Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2026 Feb 10;123(7):e2514518123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2514518123

A systems approach identifies MERTK as a therapeutic vulnerability in ZFTA-RELA-driven ependymomas

Marina Chan a, Songli Zhu a, Zachary R Russell a, Sonali Arora a, Aleena K S Arakaki a, Joel M Vaz a, Deby Kumasaka a, Frank Szulzewsky a,b,c, Antony Michealraj d, Eric C Holland a,1, Taranjit S Gujral a,1
PMCID: PMC12912970  PMID: 41665993

Significance

ZFTA-RELA (Zinc Finger Translocation Associated – RELA Proto-Oncogene) fusion-positive ependymomas are lethal pediatric brain tumors lacking targeted therapies. By integrating large-scale human tumor transcriptomics, a genetically engineered mouse model, and machine-learning-guided functional screening, we identify MERTK (MER Tyrosine Kinase) as a fusion-driven dependency and therapeutic vulnerability. MERTK inhibition disrupts oncogenic programs and suppresses tumor growth in vivo, highlighting a promising therapeutic strategy and demonstrating a scalable framework for uncovering actionable targets in rare, treatment-refractory cancers.

Keywords: ependymomas, ZFTA-RELA fusion, Kinome regularization, MERTK, targeted therapy

Abstract

Ependymomas (EPN) are rare central nervous system tumors that account for approximately 10% of intracranial tumors in children and 4% in adults. Despite their clinical and molecular heterogeneity, spanning supratentorial, posterior fossa, and spinal subtypes, treatment remains limited to surgery and radiotherapy, with chemotherapy offering minimal benefit. Here, we performed transcriptomic analysis of 370 human ependymoma samples and identified two distinct molecular subgroups: EPN-E1 and EPN-E2. The EPN-E1 cluster is enriched for supratentorial tumors harboring ZFTA-RELA fusions (ZFTA-RELAfus), which occur in over 70% of cases and are associated with poor prognosis. To identify targeted therapies for this aggressive subtype, we validated a ZFTA-RELAfus mouse model that recapitulates the human EPN-E1 transcriptome and used it for target discovery. Through Kinome Regularization, a machine learning-driven polypharmacology approach, we identified MERTK as a critical regulator of tumor cell viability. Genetic depletion or pharmacologic inhibition of Mertk reduced cell growth ex vivo, and treatment with a clinical-grade MERTK inhibitor significantly suppressed tumor proliferation in vivo. Both human EPN-E1 tumors and ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumors exhibited elevated expression of MERTK and its ligand GAS6, and MERTK inhibition led to suppression of pro-survival signaling pathways including MEK/ERK (Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase) and PI3K/AKT (Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Protein Kinase B). Notably, over 80% of genes upregulated in ZFTA-RELAfus tumors were downregulated following MERTK inhibition, indicating a strong dependency on this pathway for tumor maintenance. These findings define a signaling vulnerability in ZFTA-RELA-driven ependymomas and support the clinical development of MERTK-targeted therapies for patients with the high-risk EPN-E1 subtype.


Ependymomas are rare cancers that account for approximately 10% of intracranial tumors in children and 4% of brain and spinal cord tumors in adults (1). They arise throughout the central nervous system and include supratentorial, posterior fossa, and spinal subtypes, each representing clinically and molecularly distinct entities. Treatment remains largely limited to surgery and radiation, with chemotherapy offering limited benefit, primarily in select pediatric cases (2, 3). Recent genomic studies have uncovered recurrent chromosomal translocations in supratentorial ependymomas, most notably ZFTA-RELA fusions, which occur in over 70% of cases and are associated with poor outcomes (3, 4). Despite growing insights into the molecular landscape of these tumors, there are currently no therapies that directly target the fusion proteins. This highlights a broader challenge in rare cancers, where limited patient numbers and a lack of tailored models hinder therapeutic discovery. To uncover actionable vulnerabilities and accelerate treatment development for rare subtypes like ZFTA-RELAfus ependymomas, it is essential to 1) comprehensively profile a large number of human tumors to identify robust, subtype-specific molecular signatures, 2) develop physiologically relevant mouse models that accurately reflect human disease, and 3) leverage these models to dissect key signaling pathways and uncover therapeutic targets unique to each molecular subtype.

To address this unmet need, we first performed consensus clustering on RNA-seq data from 370 ependymoma tumor samples across five independent studies to define molecular subtypes that could guide model development and therapeutic discovery. This analysis revealed two distinct subgroups: EPN-E1 and EPN-E2. EPN-E1 was composed predominantly of supratentorial tumors with a high frequency of ZFTA-RELAfus, while EPN-E2 was enriched for posterior fossa and myxopapillary tumors. Differential gene expression analysis revealed marked transcriptional differences between the two groups, underscoring their biological distinctiveness. To model the rare and aggressive ZFTA-RELAfus subtype, we leveraged a previously established RCAS/tv-a system to express ZFTA-RELAfus in nestin-positive neural cells in mice. The resulting tumors closely mirrored the human EPN-E1 subtype both histologically and transcriptionally, validating this model as a relevant preclinical platform for investigating disease mechanisms and identifying subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities.

To uncover key signaling pathways driving tumor growth in the ZFTA-RELAfus ependymoma subtype (EPN-E1), we leveraged our human aligned-mouse model system and applied Kinome Regularization (KiR), a machine learning-based, systems polypharmacology approach we previously developed to identify kinases essential for specific phenotypes. Using this method in the ZFTA-RELA-driven mouse model, we identified MERTK as a critical kinase uniquely required for the survival and proliferation of ZFTA-RELAfus ependymoma cells. Genetic knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of Mertk significantly impaired cell growth in vitro and reduced viability in tumor slices. Treatment with a clinical-grade MERTK inhibitor also reduced tumor growth and proliferation in vivo. Consistent with these findings, both MERTK and its ligand Gas6 were significantly upregulated in ZFTA-RELAfus human tumors compared to other ependymoma subtypes. Mechanistically, ZFTA-RELAfus expression was required for maintaining Mertk and Gas6 expression, and inhibiting this axis suppressed pro-survival pathways, including MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT. These results suggest that ZFTA-RELAfus reprograms signaling dependencies, creating a vulnerability to MERTK inhibition. Our findings elucidate the molecular drivers of this aggressive ependymoma subtype and support the development of MERTK-targeted therapies for clinical translation.

Results

Molecular Subgrouping of Ependymoma Uncovers Distinct Transcriptomic and Gene Fusion Profiles.

To define molecular subtypes of human ependymoma and better understand their biological diversity, we analyzed bulk RNA-seq data from 370 tumor samples collected across five independent studies from North America and Europe (59) (SI Appendix, Table S1). These samples included 134 supratentorial, 135 posterior fossa, 77 ependymoma (NOS), 11 anaplastic, 9 myxopapillary, and 4 spinal ependymomas. Raw sequencing reads were aligned to the human genome (hg38), and gene counts were generated for all protein-coding genes. Batch effects were corrected using ComBatSeq (R package sva), and data were normalized using variance stabilizing transformation (VST). Consensus clustering of the normalized expression data revealed two distinct molecular subgroups: EPN-E1 and EPN-E2 (Fig. 1A). EPN-E1 is predominantly composed of supratentorial ependymomas (ST-EPNs), accounting for 77% (97/126) of the samples, followed by 11% (14/126) ependymoma NOS, 5.55% (7/126) PF-EPNs, 3.96% (5/126) Anaplastic EPNs and 2.38% (3/126) spinal EPNs. The EPN-E2 is primarily dominated by PF-EPNs (52.47% ,127/242) followed by 15.28% (37/242) ST-EPNs (25%, 62/242) ependymoma NOS samples, 3.71% (9/242) myxopapillary EPNs and 2.47% (6/242) Anaplastic EPNs (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). Notably, all myxopapillary tumors were exclusive to the EPN-E2 cluster, while spinal and anaplastic tumors were distributed across both groups. Although some diagnostic labels may not align with the 2021 WHO classification, we retained the original annotations for consistency and transparency.

Fig. 1.

A, ependymoma subtypes; B, fusion distribution; C, differential expression; D, Z F T A-R E L A mouse model; E, volcano plot; F, dotplot.

Transcriptomic subtyping of human ependymoma and cross-species alignment with a ZFTA-RELAfus mouse model. (A) Human ependymoma subtyping. Consensus clustering of bulk RNA-seq data from 370 human ependymoma tumors reveals two distinct molecular subgroups, EPN-E1 and EPN-E2. (B) Barplot showing the distribution of gene fusions across both clusters; EPN-E1 is predominantly composed of ZFTA-RELAfus tumors. (C) Differential expression analysis between EPN-E1 and EPN-E2 identifies 3,786 upregulated and 3,970 downregulated genes in EPN-E1. (D) Development of the ZFTA-RELAfus mouse model. A schematic depicting the introduction of the ZFTA-RELAfus construct in DAF-1 cells, the resulting tumor development in mice, and histological sections of the mouse brain with ZFTA-RELAfus tumor. Right, schematic showing number of up and down-regulated genes in ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumor compared to naïve brain. (E) Volcano plot showing the up-regulated genes (pink) and down-regulated genes (green) in E1 human samples, compared to E2 ependymoma human samples. Up-regulated and downregulated genes in ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumor compared to naïve brain are shown in red and blue respectively. (F) Dotplot showing pathways up-regulated in ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumors compared to Naïve brain, and up-regulated pathways in E1 and E2 human ependymoma samples.

Next, we examined the molecular features associated with each cluster. Analysis of gene fusion profiles revealed that the EPN-E1 group was predominantly composed of supratentorial ependymomas, with 75% of cases harboring ZFTA-RELAfus (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the EPN-E2 cluster showed greater molecular heterogeneity and lacked a dominant fusion event. Differential gene expression analysis between the two clusters identified 3,786 genes upregulated and 3,970 genes downregulated in EPN-E1 relative to EPN-E2 (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Table S2 A and B), highlighting distinct transcriptional programs associated with each subgroup.

A ZFTA-RELA-Driven Mouse Model Faithfully Mirrors the Human EPN-E1 Subtype.

Previous studies, including our own, have demonstrated that the expression of the ZFTA-RELAfus in nestin-expressing brain cells is sufficient to induce EPN in mice (4, 10, 11). To model this, we utilized the RCAS/tva system for postnatal cell-type-specific gene transfer (10). Specifically, an RCAS retroviral vector encoding the ZFTA-RELAfus was used to infect nestin-expressing cells in Nestin-tva mice. This was achieved through intracranial injection of DF1 chicken fibroblasts, transfected to produce the vector. Tumor development occurred within 70 to 120 d, and affected mice were identified based on clinical signs (e.g., weight loss, poor grooming) and MRI-confirmed intracranial tumors. Tumors were harvested and processed for transcriptomic profiling (Fig. 1D). Differential gene expression analysis between ZFTA-RELAfus tumors and naïve brain tissue revealed 3,401 upregulated and 3,997 downregulated genes, confirming that the model recapitulates broad transcriptional reprogramming.

To evaluate its relevance to human disease, we compared the differentially expressed genes from the mouse model to those distinguishing the EPN-E1 and EPN-E2 human subtypes. Genes upregulated in the ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumors closely aligned with those enriched in the human EPN-E1 cluster, whereas downregulated genes mirrored those suppressed in EPN-E1 or elevated in EPN-E2 (Fig. 1E). These patterns were supported by highly significant overlaps in both upregulated (P = 3.0 × 1017) and downregulated (P = 9.6 × 1048) gene sets (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). Pathway enrichment analysis further showed that biological pathways activated in the mouse model were also specifically enriched in EPN-E1 human tumors, but not in EPN-E2 (Fig. 1F). These findings suggest that the ZFTA-RELAfus mouse model is a faithful representation of the EPN-E1 subtype and highlight the central role of ZFTA-RELA in driving tumor development.

Kinome Regularization Identifies Key Kinase Dependencies in ZFTA-RELAfus Ependymoma.

To identify kinases critical for the growth of ZFTA-RELAfus ependymoma cells, we applied our systems polypharmacology approach, Kinome Regularization (KiR), to cancer cells derived from a ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumor line (referred to as ZR1) (Fig. 2A). KiR leverages the polypharmacology of kinase inhibitors, most of which target multiple kinases, to deconvolute kinase dependencies using machine learning. This approach has been successfully applied across diverse biological contexts, including identifying kinases that regulate cell migration (1214), prostate cancer cell growth (15), SARS-CoV-2-induced cytokine release in monocytes (16), liver-stage malaria (17), herpes virus (18), and cytokine secretion (19), demonstrating its broad utility in uncovering key signaling drivers. Here, we screened a computationally selected training set of 37 kinase inhibitors that together cover over 90% of the human kinome (13, 15). Each inhibitor was tested across eight concentrations in ZR1 cells, and drug effects were quantified using a real-time imaging-based growth assay. Staurosporine (STS), a broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor, was included as a positive control (SI Appendix, Table S2). The screen generated 73,728 microscopy images, which were analyzed to quantify drug-induced changes in cell viability.

Fig. 2.

A, experimental strategy; B, Ki R regression plot; C, experimental validation; D, time course cell growth curves.

KiR screening identified “key” kinases in ZFTA-RELAfus ependymoma. (A) A schematic of our experimental strategy for predicting kinases important for the growth of ZFTA-RELAfus -expressing mouse ependymoma cells. A set of computationally chosen kinase inhibitors were evaluated for their effect on the growth of ZFTA-RELAfus -expressing cells. Each compound was tested at eight different concentrations. The effect on cell growth was assessed through a real-time growth assay. (B) KiR regularized regression plot for predicting response to kinase inhibitors in ZR1 cells. The horizontal axis represents the logarithm of the penalty hyperparameter λ, while the vertical axis shows the mean squared error from LOOCV (mean ± SD, n = 36 folds). The dotted red line indicates the lowest error and the selected value of λ for the final model. (Right), The KiR modeling identified 12 most “informative kinases” out of over 300 kinases that influence the proliferation of ZR1. (C) Experimental validation of KiR-predicted kinases showed that knockdown of 9 out of 12 kinases resulted in a statistically significant decrease in cell growth compared to the scrambled siRNA-transfected control. Red bars indicate the knockdown of kinases that significantly decreased cell viability. ANOVA, ** indicate P < 0.001, * indicate P < 0.05. (D) Time course cell growth curves of ZFTA-RELAfus ZR1 cells transfected with scrambled siRNA control or siRNAs targeting various kinases: Acvr1 and Acvr1b (Top row Left), Ptk6 (Top row Middle), Fgfr1 and Mertk (Top row Right), Epha1 and Epha6 (Bottom row Left), Irak1 (Bottom row Middle), and Pim3 (Bottom row Right). Cell confluence was assessed as the percentage of the total image area occupied by cells.

These responses were used as input for an elastic net-regularized multiple linear regression model, with the residual activities of 298 kinases serving as explanatory variables. Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), comparing predicted vs. observed growth responses. The optimized model achieved over 90% predictive accuracy. From the best-performing models, we identified 12 kinases most strongly associated with ZR1 cell growth, including several receptor tyrosine kinases such as MERTK, members of the FGFR family, c-Kit, PTK6, and EPHA1 (Fig. 2B), highlighting potential therapeutic targets in ZFTA-RELA-driven ependymoma.

Validation of Kinase Dependencies in ZFTA-RELA-Driven Ependymoma.

To validate the accuracy of our KiR predictions, we performed siRNA-mediated knockdown of the 12 kinases identified as top candidates and assessed their impact on the viability of ZR1 cells. Quantitative PCR confirmed at least a 50% reduction in expression for each targeted kinase compared to nontargeting controls (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and Table S3). Consistent with these results, immunoblotting demonstrated reduced protein levels following siRNA treatment, and immunofluorescence imaging verified efficient depletion of Epha1 in si-Epha1-treated cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Knockdown of 9 out of the 12 kinases resulted in a statistically significant decrease in ZR1 cell viability, with Mertk knockdown causing more than a twofold reduction, highlighting it as a particularly strong candidate (Fig. 2C).

To further assess functional impact, we used live-cell imaging to monitor growth following knockdown of Mertk, Fgfr1, Epha1, Epha6, Ptk6, Acvr1, Acvr1b, Pim3, and Irak1. Depletion of Mertk, Epha1/6, Ptk6, Acvr1/b, Pim3, and Irak1 significantly impaired cell growth compared to both untransfected and siRNA control conditions (Fig. 2D). While FGFR1 and FGFR3 have previously been implicated in ST-EPN (20), our identification of IRAK1, known to regulate NF-κB signaling, a hallmark of ZFTA-RELAfus tumors, further supports the accuracy of the KiR approach. Notably, Mertk had not been previously associated with ependymoma, pointing to a potentially actionable vulnerability.

We next asked whether any of these KiR-predicted kinases are aberrantly expressed in human ZFTA-RELAfus tumors. Transcriptomic comparisons between ZFTA-RELAfus tumors, low-grade supratentorial tumors, and YAP-fusion-driven ependymomas revealed significant upregulation of MERTK, ACVR1B, PIM3 in the ZFTA-RELAfus group (Fig. 3A). FGFR1 and EPHB4 were upregulated in both ZFTA-RELAfus and YAP-fus tumors. Consistently, analysis of RNA-seq data from 370 ependymoma samples revealed significantly higher expression of MERTK, FGFR1, PIM3, and EPHB4 in the EPN-E1 subtype compared to EPN-E2, reinforcing their selective enrichment in ZFTA-RELAfus-driven tumors (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Violin plots of M E R T K, F G F R 1, P I M 3, E P H B 4, A C V R 1 B, and GAS6 expression in ependymoma tumors and single-cell R N A-seq data.

Elevated expression of MERTK and other kinases in ZFTA-RELAfus ependymomas across bulk and single-cell datasets. (A) Violin plots showing the relative expression of MERTK, FGFR1, PIM3, EPHB4, and ACVR1B in human ependymoma tumors, comparing ZFTA-RELAfus, YAPfus, and low-grade supratentorial tumors. MERTK, FGFR1, and EPHB4 are significantly upregulated in ZFTA-RELAfus tumors. Significance was determined by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test; ****P < 0.0001, **P < 0.01, ns = not significant. (B) Expression of the same kinases and Gas6 in EPN-E1 vs. EPN-E2 molecular subgroups shows selective enrichment in the EPN-E1 cluster, which is dominated by ZFTA-RELAfus tumors. Significance was determined by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test; ****P < 0.0001, ns = not significant. (C) Single-cell RNA-seq analysis of a ZFTA-RELAfus tumor. Left: UMAP plot identifying major cell populations. Middle: MERTK expression mapped across all cells, indicating expression in a subset of tumor cells. Right: Violin plot confirming MERTK expression in ZFTA-RELAfus cancer cells, supporting a tumor-intrinsic role for MERTK in this subtype.

MERTK is well known to be expressed in myeloid cells within the tumor microenvironment, where it promotes M2-like polarization and immunosuppression (21). However, its specific role in tumor cells remains less well-defined. While bulk RNA-seq data suggested elevated MERTK expression in ZFTA-RELAfus ependymomas, this does not distinguish between tumor and nontumor cell types. To clarify this, we analyzed a previously published single-cell RNA-seq dataset from ZFTA-RELAfus supratentorial ependymoma patients (3), comprising >28,000 cells (Fig. 3C). Our analysis confirmed that MERTK is highly expressed in microglia, as expected, but also revealed clear expression in tumor cells, supporting a potential cell-intrinsic role for MERTK in ZFTA-RELAfus- driven ependymoma (Fig. 3C). Supporting these transcriptomic findings, we also observed elevated Mertk protein levels in ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumors compared to naïve brain tissue (Fig. 4A). Together, these data validate the functional significance of several KiR-predicted kinases and highlight MERTK as a biologically relevant target in ZFTA-RELA-driven ependymoma.

Fig. 4.

Immunostaining, binding sites, and protein expression of Mertk and Gas6 in mouse ependymoma cells. Bar graphs and western blots are included.

ZFTA-RELAfus drives the expression of Mertk and Gas6. (A) Representative images showing protein expression of Mertk in ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumor and naïve brain detected via immunostaining. (B) ZFTA-RELAfus binding sites were identified in the promoter regions of Mertk and Gas6 in mouse EPN cells. Anti-HA was used to pull down the ZFTA-RELAfus, while IgG was used as a negative control. (C) Knockdown of ZFTA-RELAfus caused downregulation of Mertk, Gas6, and cyclin D1 (Ccnd1). The effect of siRNAs targeting ZFTA-RELAfus on Mertk, Gas6, and Ccnd1 was assessed using quantitative PCR, with data normalized to GAPDH expression. Bars represent the mean of three replicate samples, and error bars indicate the SEM. Unpaired, two-tailed, t test, *** indicate P < 0.0001, ** indicate P < 0.01. Right, Western blots showing the effect of siRNAs targeting RELA on the protein expression of ZFTA-RELAfus, as measured by immunoblotting with anti-HA, Mertk, and CyclinD1 antibodies. β-actin serves as a loading control. (D) siRNAs targeting ZFTA-RELAfus inhibits the phosphorylation of several pro-growth and survival signaling proteins. Bars represent the mean of two replicates and error bars represent SEM. Unpaired t test, ** indicate P < 0.01, * indicate P < 0.05.

ZFTA-RELAfus Directly Activates Autocrine MERTK Signaling to Promote Oncogenic Pathways.

Previously, it was shown that in addition to activating the NFκB pathway, ZFTA-RELAfus drives a neoplastic transcriptional program by binding to thousands of unique sites across the genome, activating pathways enriched in MAPK and focal adhesion networks (22, 23). We investigated whether ZFTA-RELAfus could directly activate MERTK signaling. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq analysis from two recent EPN studies revealed prominent binding sites for ZFTA-RELAfus in the promoter regions of both Mertk and its cognate ligand, Gas6, in mouse EPN cells (Fig. 4B). Consistent with these findings, our ChIP-qPCR analysis confirmed significant enrichment of the Mertk promoter in HA antibody pulldown compared to IgG control, validating that ZFTA-RELA directly binds and transcriptionally regulates Mertk (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). Further, we observed elevated levels of Gas6 in E1 EPN subcluster compared to E2 subcluster (Fig. 3B), suggesting that ZFTA-RELAfus could prime the activation of autocrine Gas6-Mertk signaling in cancer cells. To validate this, we knocked down ZFTA-RELAfus in ZR1 cells and assessed changes in Mertk expression. Our data showed that the knockdown of ZFTA-RELAfus led to a significant decrease in the mRNA expression of Mertk, Gas6, and Ccnd1 (cyclin D1, a known ZFTA-RELAfus downstream target gene) (Fig. 4C). Western blot analysis confirmed reduced protein levels of Mertk and CyclinD1 following ZFTA-RELAfus depletion (Fig. 4C). Importantly, reexpression of ZFTA-RELAfus in ZR1 cells not only rescued this effect but increased Mertk transcript levels even above baseline, further confirming that Mertk is transcriptionally regulated by the ZFTA-RELA fusion (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). Furthermore, knockdown of ZFTA-RELAfus resulted in decreased phosphorylation of several pro-growth and survival signaling proteins, including Akt, S6 ribosomal protein, eIF4G, and Mek-Erk (Fig. 4D). These findings suggest that ZFTA-RELAfus not only activates the NFκB pathway but also promotes Mertk signaling by directly binding to its promoter region, highlighting a dual mechanism by which ZFTA-RELAfus drives ependymoma progression.

Previous studies have shown that Mertk regulates intracellular pro-survival and antiapoptotic signaling pathways in cancer cells and skews macrophage polarization toward a pro-tumor M2-like phenotype in the tumor microenvironment (21, 24, 25). To investigate the contribution of Mertk activation in ZFTA-RELAfus -expressing cancer cells, we stimulated ZR1 cells with Gas6 and observed a robust increase of the phosphorylation of Erk1/2, Akt, and S6 ribosomal protein within 5 min, indicating that Gas6-Mertk signaling is functional and intact in ZFTA-RELAfus cancer cells (Fig. 5A). Given that Gas6 can also activate other members of the TAM receptor family, including Axl and Tyro3, we sought to confirm that the activation of the MAPK and AKT pathways in response to Gas6 is specifically due to Mertk. We treated ZR1 cells with the Mertk inhibitor MRX2843 prior to Gas6 stimulation (Fig. 5B). Our data showed that Mertk inhibition significantly blocked the activation of several downstream pathways, including Mek/Erk and Akt/S6 (Fig. 5B), suggesting that the Mertk receptor is a key driver of Gas6-mediated signaling in ZFTA-RELAfus cells.

Fig. 5.

A multi-part figure shows Gas6 stimulation and M E R T K inhibitor treatment. Line graphs and a heat map show protein phosphorylation changes.

Gas6-Mertk signaling drives pro-growth signaling cascade in ZFTA-RELAfus EPN cells. (A) Gas6 stimulation caused activation of several growth factor signaling proteins in a time-dependent manner. Plots showing changes in the phosphorylation of Erk1/2, Akt (pan), S6, and Creb in ZFTA-RELAfus EPN cells treated with Gas6. Right, representative western blot images Phosphorylation changes were measured by western blot. (B) MRX2843 treatment (1 h) inhibits several growth factors signaling proteins in a time-dependent manner. A heatmap showing changes in the phosphorylation levels of Akt (pan), S6 ribosomal protein, Mek1/2, Erk1/2, cPLA2, Creb, p38, Sek1, and Mlc2 in ZFTA-RELAfus EPN cells treated with the Mertk inhibitor, MRX-2843, at various concentrations (from 0.1 to 10 µM).

MERTK Inhibition Suppresses Tumor Growth and Oncogenic Pathways in ZFTA-RELAfus EPN.

Having established that MERTK signaling is active and contributes to pro-survival pathways in ZFTA-RELAfus ependymoma cells, we next evaluated the therapeutic potential of MRX-2843, a clinical-grade MERTK inhibitor capable of crossing the blood–brain barrier (26, 27). In 2D cultures of ZR1 cells, MRX-2843 significantly reduced cell viability, with an EC50 of ~200 nM (Fig. 6A). This effect was consistent across four patient-derived ZFTA-RELAfus cell lines, while minimal sensitivity was observed in ZFTA-MAMLfus cells, indicating subtype-specific vulnerability (Fig. 6B). MRX-2843 also reduced viability of ZFTA-RELAfus tumor slices ex vivo in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6C). To assess potential clinical combinations, MRX-2843 was tested alongside temozolomide. No additive or synergistic effects were observed with temozolomide, consistent with the intrinsic chemoresistance of this tumor type (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). In addition, MRX-2843 inhibited ZR1 cell migration in a dose-dependent fashion, with an EC50 of approximately 1.3 µM (SI Appendix, Fig. S6), about fivefold higher than the EC50 for cell growth (~200 nM), suggesting that MERTK primarily regulates tumor proliferation but may also contribute to cell motility.

Fig. 6.

M E R T K inhibition suppresses tumor growth in Z F T A-R E L Afus ependymoma. It includes line graphs, bar graphs, and heat maps.

MERTK inhibition suppresses tumor growth in ZFTA-RELAfus ependymoma. (A) ZFTA-RELAfus mouse tumor-derived cells (ZR1) exhibit strong sensitivity to the MERTK inhibitor MRX-2843 in 2D culture, with an EC50 of ~200 nM. (B) MRX-2843 selectively inhibits viability in four patient-derived ZFTA-RELAfus cell lines, but not in a ZFTA-MAMLfus control line, indicating subtype-specific sensitivity. (C) Ex vivo treatment of ZFTA-RELAfus tumor slices with MRX-2843 results in a dose-dependent reduction in tissue viability. STS was used as a positive control. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by Student’s t test. (D) MRX-2843 significantly reduces tumor growth in mice bearing subcutaneous ZR1 flank tumors over a 21-d treatment period, n = 5 (vehicle), n = 4 (MRX-2843). (E) Short-term (5-d) MRX-2843 treatment in mice with orthotopic ZR1 tumors reduces proliferation, as indicated by decreased Ki67 staining in HA-positive tumor cells. Right, representative immunofluorescence images showing Ki67, HA, and Hoechst staining on ZFTA-RELAfus tumors, captured at 20× magnification with a scale bar of 50 µm. (F) Heatmap showing changes in the expression of ZFTA-RELAfus EPN marker genes in response to short-term MRX-2843 treatment in mice. Data are normalized vehicle-treated nontumor tissue.

In vivo, MRX-2843 treatment significantly reduced tumor growth in mice bearing subcutaneous ZR1 flank tumors (Fig. 6D). These studies were conducted in NSG immunocompromised mice, indicating that the observed antitumor effects are not confounded by inhibition of MERTK in myeloid cells but instead reflect direct targeting of the cancer cells. Mice were treated once daily for 21 d, and MRX-2843 led to a clear reduction in tumor volume compared to vehicle-treated controls, with no significant weight loss or signs of toxicity, indicating good tolerability (Fig. 6D). Given that the immunocompetent mouse model of ZFTA-RELAfus ependymoma exhibits high variability in tumor growth, making it challenging to perform long-term drug efficacy studies, we focused on evaluating early pharmacodynamic effects. Mice harboring intracranial ZR1 tumors were treated with MRX-2843 for 5 d, followed by assessment of tumor proliferation via Ki67 staining. This short-term treatment led to a marked reduction in proliferative HA+ tumor cells compared to vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 6E), suggesting that MERTK inhibition suppresses tumor cell proliferation in the native brain microenvironment. Molecular analysis of MRX-2843-treated ZFTA-RELAfus tumors compared to vehicle-treated controls revealed a substantial downregulation of key fusion marker genes and tumor-associated pathways. Specifically, treatment with MRX-2843 led to the complete suppression of the Ccnd1, which is critical for cell cycle progression in EPN (28). In addition, genes involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, such as various collagens, Lumican (Lum), and Integrin β1 (Itgb1), were significantly downregulated, indicating a disruption in tumor structural integrity and invasive potential (Fig. 6F). Furthermore, inflammatory signaling genes, particularly Lif, known to contribute to tumor progression and immune evasion (29), were also markedly reduced following MRX-2843 treatment. Together, these data suggest that Mertk plays an important role in the growth of ZFTA-RELAfus cells and tumors by disrupting multiple essential regulators of ependymoma progression, including ECM remodeling and immune evasion genes.

To gain a comprehensive understanding of the pathways and processes affected by Mertk inhibition in ZFTA-RELAfus EPN tumors, we conducted unbiased transcriptomic profiling. Short-term treatment (5 d) with MRX-2843 resulted in significant gene expression changes, with 3,868 genes downregulated and 3,514 genes upregulated compared to vehicle-treated tumors (Fig. 7A). Notably, there was substantial overlap between genes upregulated in ZFTA-RELAfus tumors and those downregulated following MRX-2843 treatment, indicating that Mertk inhibition directly disrupts tumor-promoting pathways (Fig. 7B). Mertk inhibition also decreased Zfta expression, a downstream target of the ZFTA-RELAfus, suggesting a feed-forward loop that promotes tumor progression (Fig. 7C). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of significantly downregulated genes following Mertk inhibitor treatment revealed significant enrichment in pathways related to ECM organization, and cytokine signaling, while the upregulated genes were enriched in pathways associated with neuronal systems and GPCR signaling (Fig. 7D). Finally, PROGENy pathway analysis (30) comparing naïve brain tissue and ZFTA-RELAfus tumors revealed significant enrichment of pro-oncogenic pathways, including WNT, JAK-STAT, and NF-κB signaling (Fig. 7E). Notably, all these pathways were markedly downregulated in Mertk inhibitor-treated ZFTA-RELAfus tumors. Collectively, these findings highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting MERTK with MRX-2843 in ZFTA-RELAfus-driven ependymomas, demonstrating a substantial impact on tumor growth, viability, and the suppression of critical oncogenic pathways.

Fig. 7.

A) Volcano plot, B) Venn diagram, C) Bar graph, D) Reactome, and E) Heat map showing PROGENy pathways.

Mertk inhibition suppresses oncogenic programs and alters transcriptional networks in ZFTA-RELAfus ependymomas. (A) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes in ZFTA-RELAfus tumors compared to naïve brain tissue. A total of 3,868 genes were significantly downregulated (red) and 3,514 genes were significantly upregulated (blue). (B) Venn diagram illustrating the overlap between genes upregulated in ZFTA-RELAfus tumors vs. naïve brain tissue (green) and genes downregulated in Mertk inhibitor-treated ZFTA-RELAfus tumors (orange). A total of 2,936 genes were commonly altered, indicating that MERTK inhibition disrupts tumor-promoting pathways. (C) Mertk inhibition decreased the expression of both Zfta and Rela in ZFTA-RELAfus tumors. (D) GO analysis significantly downregulated (Left) and upregulated (Right) pathways after Mertk inhibition. Pathways are ranked based on significance (P value) and gene count, with colors indicating statistical significance. (E) A heatmap depicting PROGENy pathway analysis showing significant enrichment of pro-oncogenic pathways (WNT, JAK-STAT, and NF-κB) in ZFTA-RELAfus tumors, all of which are markedly downregulated after MERTK inhibition.

Discussion

Broadly, targeting specific pathways in cancer is challenging due to the presence of multiple concurrent and redundant drivers, especially in primary cancers of the central nervous system, where the blood–brain barrier further limits treatment options. However, some tumors driven by single events essential for tumor survival, such as chromosomal translocations or rearrangements resulting in gene fusions, can be effectively targeted by drugs aimed at these genetic aberrations. For example, the BCR-ABL fusion in chronic myeloid leukemia and the corresponding success of imatinib provide robust and sustained therapeutic targets (31). Similarly, the ZFTA-RELAfus is a singular event that drives ependymomas and thus could be targeted by agents that directly inhibit the fusion protein. However, directly targeting the ZFTA-RELAfus protein, a constitutively active transcription factor, is challenging. Therefore, targeting proteins downstream of the RELA fusion oncoprotein that are essential for tumor transformation represents an attractive alternative. Kinase inhibitors, with more than 80 kinases clinically approved, represent one of the major classes of anticancer drugs (32). Identifying kinases downstream of the ZFTA-RELAfus could accelerate clinical translation and offer a promising strategy for targeted therapy.

In this study, we identified two molecular subtypes of ependymoma, EPN-E1 and EPN-E2, each distinguished by unique gene fusions, kinase expression patterns, and pathway activity. The EPN-E1 cluster, which includes the majority of ZFTA-RELAfus supratentorial tumors, represents a clinically aggressive subtype with limited treatment options. Our comparative transcriptomic analysis revealed that the ZFTA-RELAfus mouse model recapitulates the gene expression signature of the human EPN-E1 subtype with high fidelity (Fig. 1). This strong concordance establishes the ZFTA-RELAfus model as a biologically relevant and translationally valuable system for uncovering subtype-specific therapeutic targets and advancing drug development for patients with high-risk EPN-E1 tumors.

We utilized ZFTA-RELAfus mouse model and applied a systems pharmacology-based approach to identify druggable kinases downstream of ZFTA-RELAfus in ST-EPN, offering promising opportunities for developing effective treatments for these aggressive tumors. We identified several kinases, including Mertk, Epha1/6, Fgfr1, Ptk6, and Acvr1, as critical for the growth and survival of ZFTA-RELAfus driven ependymoma cells in culture. Specifically, we observed strong inhibition of ZFTA-RELAfus-driven cell growth in response to the depletion of Mertk, Ptk6, Epha1, and Acvr1 (Fig. 2). Among the identified dependencies, we extensively validated the role of Mertk using cultured mouse and patient-derived cells, tumor tissue slices, and an in vivo model (Fig. 6). Notably, the inhibition of Mertk in tumors led to a significant decrease in the expression of ECM components, such as collagens and integrins (Figs. 6 and 7). Both Acvr1, a member of the TGF-beta family, and Eph receptors are known to regulate ECM components in the tumor microenvironment (3335). Furthermore, recurrent ACVR1 mutations have been observed in posterior fossa ependymomas (36). We then conducted kinase-selectivity profiling of MRX-2843, revealing potent activity not only against MERTK but also against closely related AXL and other oncogenic kinases, including c-KIT, FLT3, and FGFR1 (SI Appendix, Table S4). The inhibition of FGFR1, previously implicated in ZFTA-RELA ependymoma and confirmed independently in our screen, suggests that the antitumor activity of MRX-2843 may arise from combined targeting of MERTK and FGFR1. Thus, it is conceivable that the kinases identified in our screening approach could work together to regulate key biological processes in ependymoma progression. Therefore, an approach that involves targeting a combination of these kinases could be explored for more effective treatments.

Mertk, a member of the TAM family of receptor tyrosine kinases, is aberrantly expressed in several cancers, including central nervous system tumors such as astrocytoma (37) and glioblastoma (38). Mertk signaling contributes to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by inducing an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile, and modulating the functions of macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, natural killer cells, and T cells (39). Consistently, our data show that short-term inhibition of Mertk in tumors led to a significant decrease in the immunosuppressive cytokine Lif. Notably, Mertk inhibition also reduced Zfta expression, which is also a downstream target of the ZFTA-RELAfus, suggesting the presence of a feed-forward loop that amplifies tumor progression (Fig. 7C). This feed forward loop cannot occur in the mouse model as the ZFTA-RELA fusion gene is driven by the RCAS LTR promoter rather than the ZFTA promoter as in the human case. Disrupting this loop through Mertk inhibition could completely abrogate tumor growth in human ZFTA-RELAfus ependymomas. Furthermore, the substantial overlap (>80%) between genes upregulated in ZFTA-RELAfus tumors and those downregulated after MRX-2843 treatment (Fig. 7B) supports that Mertk inhibition directly disrupts tumor-promoting pathways. Therefore, targeting Mertk in ZFTA-RELAfus EPN could serve a dual purpose: directly eliminating cancer cells and transforming the microenvironment to support antitumor activity. Collectively, these findings highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting Mertk with MRX-2843 to suppress tumor growth and block key oncogenic pathways in ZFTA-RELAfus-driven ependymomas. Previous studies have shown that MRX-2843 achieves brain penetration and preclinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability (26, 27). A systemic therapeutic window has been reported, as it inhibited colony formation in AML samples while sparing normal cord blood cells (40), though its neurodevelopmental safety window remains undefined. Current clinical trials focus primarily on adults (NCT04872478, NCT04762199); therefore, extending its evaluation to pediatric ependymoma patients will require careful dose optimization and prospective monitoring to ensure both safety and therapeutic benefit.

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that the ZFTA-RELAfus mouse model effectively replicates human ependymoma subtype. By combining this model with a systems pharmacology-based approach, we identified Mertk as a critical kinase involved in the progression of ZFTA-RELAfus -driven ependymomas. The significant impact of Mertk inhibition on tumor proliferation in preclinical models suggests that targeting this kinase could be an effective therapeutic strategy for patients with RELA fusion-driven ependymomas. These findings pave the way for further clinical evaluation of Mertk inhibitors, offering hope for improved treatments for this challenging and aggressive cancer type.

Materials and Methods

Human Bulk RNASeq Analysis Collection of Publicly Available RNA Sequencing Data.

Raw RNA sequencing data for ependymoma samples were retrieved from various public data repositories, as detailed in SI Appendix, Table S1. The RNA sequencing reads were then aligned to the Gencode GRCh38.primary_assembly reference genome using STAR (41) (v2.7.7a). Gene-level quantification was conducted with HTSeq (42) (v0.11.0) using Gencode (43) V39 primary assembly annotations. The raw gene counts from all datasets were subsequently aggregated and batch effects were corrected using the ComBat-seq function from the R package “sva” (44). Normalized gene expression values were calculated and expressed as VST from “DESeq2” (45) package. consensusClusteringPlus (46) was used to cluster the samples.

Gene fusions were identified using the Arriba (47) tool (v2.1.0) and STAR-Fusion (48) on RNA-Seq reads aligned via STAR’s two-pass method. Fusion analysis was restricted to high-confidence fusions found by both Arriba and STAR-Fusion using only protein-coding genes. All figures were made in R, using ggplot2 (49).

Mouse Modeling of ZFTA-RELAfus Using RCAS/tva.

The RCAS/TV-A system was employed for mouse studies (50). RCAS vector ZFTA-RELAfus-HA was transfected into DF-1 cells. Neonatal mice of the Ntva, Ink4a/Arf, aged between 3 and 5 d, received an intercranial injection of 100,000 cells. Tumor formation was confirmed by weight loss, poor grooming leading to MRI imaging at approximately 2 to 3 mo of age. For CR1 (1 × 106 cells) cell injections, cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of 6 to 8-wk-old male NSG mice in a suspension of 33% (v/v) Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix (Corning, Corning, NY). Tumor sizes were measured with calipers three times a week, and volumes were calculated using the standard formula (1/2 × L × W2). Tumors were weighed at the experimental endpoint to assess the treatment effect. For CR1 tumors, once the tumor size reached approximately 100 mm3, mice were randomized into vehicle and MRX2843 groups. MRX2843 was administered at a dose of 50 mg/kg or the equivalent volume of vehicle control, daily by oral gavage for 2 wk using 20-gauge × 38 mm plastic feeding tubes (Instech Laboratories, Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA).

Mouse ZFTA-RELAfus Cells and Reagents.

The mouse ependymoma cell line ZR1 was established from a ZFTA-RELAfus tumor by dissociating the tumors and culturing the cells short-term. The presence of the ZFTA-RELAfus fusion in the ZR1 cells was confirmed through immunofluorescence staining using an HA antibody. The cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Kinase inhibitors were purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX), or Cayman Chemical Inc. (Ann Arbor, MI). MRX-2843 for animal studies was obtained from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ). Kollisolv PEG E 400, and pharmaceutical grade DMSO were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Normal saline was obtained from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). Sodium sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin was acquired from AK Scientific (Union City, CA). Mertk antibody (cat ab95925) was purchased from Abcam.

Preparation of Tissue Slices.

Organotypic tumor slices were prepared from mouse ependymoma tumors as described previously (51). Fresh tumor tissues were shaped into a 6 mm diameter cylinder using biopsy punches (Integra Miltex, York, PA). The cores of the tumor were sliced at 250 μm thickness using a Leica VT1200 S vibrating blade microtome (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The tissue cores were mounted using cyanoacrylate glue and submerged in ice-cold HBSS during slicing. The slicing parameters included a blade angle of 18°, a speed of 0.15 mm/s (with a range of 0.10 to 0.28) mm/s, and vibration amplitude of 2.0 mm. Slices were cultured on air–liquid interface using cell culture inserts in slice culture medium containing Williams’ Medium supplemented with 12 mM nicotinamide, 150 nM ascorbic acid, 2.25 mg/mL sodium bicarbonate, 20 mM HEPES, 50 mg/mL glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% (v/v) ITS+Premix, 20 ng/mL EGF, 40 IU/mL penicillin, and 40 μg/mL streptomycin.

Viability Measurements of Tissue Slices and Drug Screening.

Tissue slices were incubated with Realtime-Glo MT Cell Viability reagents (Promega, Madison, WI), with 50 μL medium on top. Two days from preparation, drugs were added to the tissue slices at final concentration at 0.5 µM, 1.0 µM, or 5.0 µM. The slices were incubated for at least 2 h to overnight with agitation at 100 to 150 rpm on an orbital shaker in a cell incubator, followed by a static incubation. Bioluminescence from tissue slices was measured using a BioTek Synergy H4 Hybrid microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). Viability was calculated by the ratio of the signal at day 5 to the signals from the same tissue before treatment, then normalized to the value of vehicle control slices to be 100%.

Kinetic In Vitro Cell Growth Assay.

ZR1 cells were seeded at 5,000 cells in 96-well plates. Real-time cell growth was monitored using the IncuCyte Live-Cell Imaging System (Essen BioScience, Ann Arbor, MI), which captures time-lapse phase-contrast images to quantify confluence as a measure of cell proliferation in response to kinase inhibitors. Images were acquired every 2 to 4 h, and changes in cell confluence was analyzed using the IncuCyte Cell Analyzer software. Inhibitor effects were normalized to control wells when the latter reached approximately 70% confluence. To evaluate the effect of Mertk inhibitor, MRX-2843, 5,000 cells were seeded in 96-well plates, and cell viability was measured at 72 to 96 h using CellTiter-Glo 2.0 reagents (Promega, Madison, WI) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) Transfection.

All siRNAs were obtained from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO). siRNA’s transfections in 6-well plates for mRNA expression profiling and in 96-well plates for monitoring changes in cell growth were carried out using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer instructions. To assess the contribution of KiR-predicted kinases to the regulation of ZR1 cell growth, cells were transfected with siRNAs targeting individual kinases or a scrambled control. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were seeded into 96-well plates, and real-time cell growth was monitored using the IncuCyte Live-Cell Imaging System as described above. In parallel, changes in metabolic activity, used as a proxy for cell proliferation in response to siRNA treatment, were measured using the CellTiter-Glo 2.0 assay.

RNA Extraction and Quantitative PCR.

Total cellular RNA was isolated using a GenCatch Total RNA Mini Prep Kit (Epoch Life Science, Missouri City, TX). mRNA expression changes were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Briefly, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed into first-strand cDNA using an RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The resultant cDNA was subjected to qPCR using gene-specific primers (BioRad, Hercules, CA) and GAPDH (housekeeping control). The qPCR reaction was performed using a BioRad CFX384 thermocycler with an initial denaturation step of 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 60 s at 58 °C. The mRNA levels of genes encoding cytokine expression were normalized relative to the mean levels of the housekeeping gene and compared using the 2−ΔΔCt method as described previously (52).

Western Blotting.

Monolayer cells were washed twice with PBS and suspended in 2% SDS lysis buffer. The remaining debris was removed by centrifuge filtration. Protein concentration was measured using a Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, #23225) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. After denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min in reduced condition, 10 to 20 µg of proteins per lane were separated with 4 to 12% Bis-Tris gradient gels in MES SDS running buffer using the XCell SureLock Mini-Cell Electrophoresis System. The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane by a BioRad wet/tank blotting system. The membrane was then blocked with Licor Intercept (PBS) blocking buffer (LICOR, #927-70001) for 1 h at ambient temperature, followed by primary antibody at 1:1,000 in the blocking buffer at 4 °C for overnight. Primary antibodies used were as follow: β-actin (Sigma, A1978), HA-tag (Cell Signaling Technology, CST#3724), phospho-Akt (Cell Signaling Technology, CST#4058), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk 1/2) (Cell Signaling Technology, CST#4376), phospho-S6 Ribosomal protein (Cell Signaling Technology, CST#2211), and phospho-CREB (Cell Signaling Technology, CST#9198). Following PBS washes, the membrane was incubated with IRDye 800CW goat anti-Mouse IgG secondary antibody (LICOR # 926-32210) or IRDye 680RD goat anti-Rabbit IgG secondary antibody (LICOR #926-68071) at 1:5,000 for 1 h at room temperature. Signal detection was performed using the Odyssey imaging system, and the band intensities were quantified with the Odyssey imaging analysis software. Signal intensities of each protein band were normalized to that of β-actin.

Reverse-Phase Protein Array.

Molecular measurements using Reverse-phase protein arrays (RPPA) were carried out as described previously (53, 54). Briefly, mouse ependymoma ZR1 cells treated with various concentration of MRX-2843 or expressing control or si-RELA (si-FUS) were washed twice in PBS, and cell lysates were prepared in 2% SDS lysis buffer as described previously (54). Whole cell lysates were printed onto 16-pad nitrocellulose coated slides (Grace Biolabs, GBL505116) using an Aushon 2470 microarrayer (Aushon BioSystems), with each sample printed in triplicate and slides were stored at −20 °C until processing. For in vivo samples, ependymoma tumors were surgically extracted from mice brain and cryopreserved until use. Small pieces of the tumors were homogenized and lysed in 2% SDS lysis buffer using a bead ruptor 12 homogenizer (Omni International 19-050A). These samples were processed similarly as to the cell lysate. The tumor lysates were adjusted to 2 mg/mL protein concentration and printed onto nitrocellulose pads attached to slide glass, with 2 depositions with single spot/sample. RPPA slides were washed with 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0) for 2 to 4 d to remove excessive SDS residue, followed by three washes with PBS for 10 min each. Subsequently, the slides were blocked with Licor Intercept (PBS) blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. After blocking, arrays were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The next day, arrays were washed thrice with PBS and then incubated with IRDye labeled secondary antibodies in the blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Following incubation, slides were scanned using a Licor Odyssey CLX Scanner (LICOR). Total signal intensity from each spot was quantified using Array-Pro analyzer software package (Media Cybernetics). The measurement of a specific protein from an individual sample was normalized to its total β-actin (Sigma, A1978). All antibodies used in the RPPA were previously validated by western blotting to ensure specificity and reliability (55, 56).

Drug Treatment of EPN Bearing Mice.

Mice with confirmed tumors by MRI were randomly assigned to receive either a vehicle or 50 mg/kg of MRX-2843. Treatment was administered once daily via oral gavage for either 3 or 5 consecutive days. Mice were euthanized 1 h after the final treatment, and the whole brains were harvested for further analysis.

RNASeq Sequencing and Analysis.

Total RNA was extracted from naïve brain tissue and ZFTA-RELAfus rumors using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN). RNA was quantified and assessed for quality using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). Library prep and RNA sequencing was performed and analyzed at Novogene using a standing workflow with sample quality control (assessed through Library QC) and polyA enrichment. Sequencing was then performed using 150 bp paired-end reads on the Illumina PE150 platform. Raw counts for samples were obtained by aligning sequencing reads to the mm10_assembly reference genome using the STAR aligner (v2.7.7a) (41). The aligned files were then indexed with SAMtools (v1.19.2), and gene expression levels were quantified using featureCounts. All raw counts were normalized using log transformed TPM (Transcripts Per Million) values. Differential gene expression analysis was performed between ZFTA-RELAfus vs. Naïve brain mouse tumors, using the R/Bioconductor package DESeq2 (45) (v 1.44.0and a statistical cutoff of FDR < 0.05 and FC > 1.5 was applied to obtain differentially regulated genes. Raw data files have been deposited to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GEO: GSE291213 (57). GO and Reactome Pathway enrichment analysis was done using R Bioconductor Packages enrichR (58) (v 3.2) and dot plots were made using R Bioconductor package ggplot2. Heatmaps were made using R package pheatmap (59) (v 1.0.12). Previously published RNAseq analysis. Analysis of RNA-seq microarray expression data were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE64415). CEL files were processed using the affy package (60) in R, with raw data read via the ReadAffy() function and normalized using the Robust Multiarray Average (RMA) method. Gene expression values were mapped using the hgu133plus2 chip annotation. scRNA-seq 10X expression data were obtained from GSE141460. The data were analyzed using the Seurat R package (61) (v4.4.0). For each patient sample, cells were filtered to include only those with a total feature count greater than half and less than twice the mean feature count, and with less than 5% mitochondrial (MT) gene content. Normalization was performed using the NormalizeData() function with a scaling factor of 10,000, followed by identification of the top 2,000 highly variable genes using the “vst” method. The data were then scaled and subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction. Clustering was conducted using the first 19 principal components, employing the Louvain algorithm on a shared nearest neighbor (SNN) graph with a resolution parameter of 0.5. Patient samples were subsequently integrated using Harmony (62) to produce a unified dataset. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction was performed using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) for visualization. Marker gene expression was visualized using Seurat functions [FeaturePlot() and VlnPlot()]. All plots were generated using the ggplot2 package (v3.4.4).

ChIP-qPCR.

ChIP assays were performed using the SimpleChIP Plus Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Cell Signaling Technology, CST#9005) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, approximately 4 × 106 of ZR1 cells per immunoprecipitation (IP) were crosslinked, quenched, and subjected to enzymatic digestion to generate chromatin fragments and ~7.5 µg of digested, cross-linked chromatin was used for each IP. Chromatin was incubated overnight at 4 °C with CST ChIP-grade HA-Tag antibody (CST#3724), while normal rabbit IgG (CST, included in kit, 1 µg/IP) served as a negative control. Immune complexes were captured using magnetic beads and sequentially washed using the low-salt, high-salt, LiCl, and TE buffers provided in the kit. Chromatin was eluted, crosslinks were reversed, and DNA was purified using the kit’s elution and spin-column components. Input DNA (2% of total chromatin) was processed in parallel. Purified DNA was analyzed by qPCR using Mertk, and RELA primers, and enrichment was calculated as percent input of the total input chromatin.

Immunohistochemistry.

Harvested brain samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin phosphate for 48 h, followed by coronal slicing and processing into paraffin-mounted blocks. Sections of 5 μm thickness were cut and mounted onto charged slides for staining. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were performed for tumor verification. Subsequently, DAB antibody staining using a Ventana system was conducted. Stains targeting HA and Ki67 were applied to evaluate proliferation effects on tumor cells with MRX-2843 treatment.

Immunofluorescence.

Immunofluorescent (IF) staining was performed to colocalize HA and Ki67 using Alexa 488 and Cy3, respectively, while Hoechst stain was used for visualizing cell nuclei. This enabled the assessment of the percentage of ZFTA-RELAfus positive cells also positive for Ki67. QuPath software was utilized for IF stain analysis. Each tumor was divided into five 0.5 mm × 0.6 mm sections at 20× magnification, covering the majority of the tumor. Positive counts for ZFTA-RELAfus positive cells were organized into positive and negative counts based on costaining for Ki67. Minimum intensity thresholds were applied before overlaying ZFTA-RELAfus positive cells with Ki67 positive cells to ensure accurate identification of all positive cells. Positive counts in each section were then expressed as a percentage of all ZFTA-RELAfus positive cells and compared across treatment groups.

Supplementary Material

Appendix 01 (PDF)

pnas.2514518123.sapp.pdf (748.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Author contributions

M.C., S.A, A.K.S.A., E.C.H., and T.S.G. conceived and designed research; M.C., S.Z., Z.R.R., A.K.S.A., D.K., A.M., and T.S.G. performed research; S.A., F.S., and A.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.C., S.Z., Z.R.R., S.A., A.K.S.A., J.M.V., A.M., E.C.H., and T.S.G. analyzed data; and M.C., S.Z., S.A., E.C.H., and T.S.G. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Contributor Information

Eric C. Holland, Email: eholland@fredhutch.org.

Taranjit S. Gujral, Email: tgujral@fredhutch.org.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

RNAseq data have been deposited in GEO (GSE291213) (57). All other data are included in the manuscript and/or SI Appendix.

Supporting Information

References

  • 1.Ruda R., Gilbert M., Soffietti R., Ependymomas of the adult: Molecular biology and treatment. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 21, 754–761 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pajtler K. W., et al. , The current consensus on the clinical management of intracranial ependymoma and its distinct molecular variants. Acta Neuropathol. 133, 5–12 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pajtler K. W., et al. , Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell 27, 728–743 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parker M., et al. , C11orf95–RELA fusions drive oncogenic NF-κB signalling in ependymoma. Nature 506, 451–455 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Capper D., et al. , DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature 555, 469–474 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mack S. C., et al. , Therapeutic targeting of ependymoma as informed by oncogenic enhancer profiling. Nature 553, 101–105 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parker M., et al. , C11orf95-RELA fusions drive oncogenic NF-κB signalling in ependymoma. Nature 506, 451–455 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shapiro J. A., et al. , An open pediatric brain tumor atlas. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2022). Accessed 26 June 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Zheng T., et al. , Cross-species genomics reveals oncogenic dependencies in ZFTA/C11orf95 fusion-positive supratentorial ependymomas. Cancer Discov. 11, 2230–2247 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ozawa T., et al. , C11orf95-RELA fusion drives aberrant gene expression through the unique epigenetic regulation for ependymoma formation. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 9, 1–21 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ozawa T., et al. , A de novo mouse model of C11orf95-RELA fusion-driven ependymoma identifies driver functions in addition to NF-κB. Cell Rep. 23, 3787–3797 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gujral T. S., et al. , A noncanonical Frizzled2 pathway regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis. Cell 159, 844–856 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gujral T. S., Peshkin L., Kirschner M. W., Exploiting polypharmacology for drug target deconvolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 5048–5053 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bello T., et al. , KiRNet: Kinase-centered network propagation of pharmacological screen results. Cell Rep. Methods 1, 100007 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bello T., et al. , Computational modeling identifies multitargeted kinase inhibitors as effective therapies for metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2103623118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chan M., et al. , Machine learning identifies molecular regulators and therapeutics for targeting SARS-CoV2-induced cytokine release. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10426 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arang N., et al. , Identifying host regulators and inhibitors of liver stage malaria infection using kinase activity profiles. Nat. Commun. 8, 1232 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Olson A. T., et al. , Polypharmacology-based kinome screen identifies new regulators of KSHV reactivation. PLoS Pathog. 19, e1011169 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chan M., Kang Y., Osborne S., Zager M., Gujral T., A kinase to cytokine explorer to identify molecular regulators and potential therapeutic opportunities. Elife 12 (2024): RP91472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Lötsch D., et al. , Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors to combat aggressive ependymoma. Acta Neuropathol. 142, 339–360 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cummings C. T., DeRyckere D., Earp H. S., Graham D. K., Molecular pathways: MERTK signaling in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 5275–5280 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Arabzade A., et al. , ZFTA-RELA dictates oncogenic transcriptional programs to drive aggressive supratentorial ependymoma. Cancer Discov. 11, 2200–2215 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kupp R., et al. , ZFTA-translocations constitute ependymoma chromatin remodeling and transcription factors. Cancer Discov. 11, 2216–2229 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tworkoski K. A., et al. , MERTK controls melanoma cell migration and survival and differentially regulates cell behavior relative to AXL. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 26, 527–541 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Davra V., et al. , Axl and Mertk receptors cooperate to promote breast cancer progression by combined oncogenic signaling and evasion of host antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 81, 698–712 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Su Y.-T., et al. , MerTK inhibition decreases immune suppressive glioblastoma-associated macrophages and neoangiogenesis in glioblastoma microenvironment. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2, vdaa065 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu J., et al. , MerTK as a therapeutic target in glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncol. 20, 92–102 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liang M.-L., et al. , Significance of cyclin D1 overexpression in progression and radio-resistance of pediatric ependymomas. Oncotarget 9, 2527 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hallett R. M., et al. , Therapeutic targeting of LIF overcomes macrophage-mediated immunosuppression of the local tumor microenvironment. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 791–804 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schubert M., et al. , Perturbation-response genes reveal signaling footprints in cancer gene expression. Nat. Commun. 9, 20 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wong S., Witte O. N., The BCR-ABL story: Bench to bedside and back. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 22, 247–306 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Roskoski R. Jr., Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors: A 2024 update. Pharmacol. Res. 200, 107059 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nagar G., et al. , Multi-omics therapeutic perspective on ACVR1 gene: From genetic alterations to potential targeting. Brief. Funct. Genomics 22, 123–142 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fattet L., et al. , Matrix rigidity controls epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity and tumor metastasis via a mechanoresponsive EPHA2/LYN complex. Dev. Cell 54, 302–316.e307 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu Y., et al. , The functions of EphA1 receptor tyrosine kinase in several tumors. Curr. Med. Chem. 30, 2340–2353 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pratt D., et al. , Recurrent ACVR1 mutations in posterior fossa ependymoma. Acta Neuropathol. 144, 373–376 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Keating A. K., et al. , Inhibition of Mer and Axl receptor tyrosine kinases in astrocytoma cells leads to increased apoptosis and improved chemosensitivity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9, 1298–1307 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Y., et al. , Mer receptor tyrosine kinase promotes invasion and survival in glioblastoma multiforme. Oncogene 32, 872–882 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Huelse J. M., Fridlyand D. M., Earp S., DeRyckere D., Graham D. K., MERTK in cancer therapy: Targeting the receptor tyrosine kinase in tumor cells and the immune system. Pharmacol. Ther. 213, 107577 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Minson K. A., et al. , The MERTK/FLT3 inhibitor MRX-2843 overcomes resistance-conferring FLT3 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. JCI Insight 1, e85630 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dobin A., et al. , STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anders S., Pyl P. T., Huber W., HTSeq–A python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Frankish A., et al. , GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D766–D773 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Leek J. T., Johnson W. E., Parker H. S., Jaffe A. E., Storey J. D., The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 882–883 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Love M. I., Huber W., Anders S., Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wilkerson M. D., Hayes D. N., ConsensusClusterPlus: A class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics 26, 1572–1573 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Uhrig S., et al. , Accurate and efficient detection of gene fusions from RNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 31, 448–460 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haas B. J., et al. , Accuracy assessment of fusion transcript detection via read-mapping and de novo fusion transcript assembly-based methods. Genome Biol. 20, 213 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wickham H., ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag New York, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kanvinde P. P., et al. , Leveraging the replication-competent avian-like sarcoma virus/tumor virus receptor-A system for modeling human gliomas. Glia 69, 2059–2076 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sivakumar R., et al. , Organotypic tumor slice cultures provide a versatile platform for immuno-oncology and drug discovery. Oncoimmunology 8, e1670019 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gujral T. S., MacBeath G., A system-wide investigation of the dynamics of Wnt signaling reveals novel phases of transcriptional regulation. PLoS One 5, e10024 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gujral T. S., et al. , Profiling phospho-signaling networks in breast cancer using reverse-phase protein arrays. Oncogene 32, 3470–3476 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gujral T. S., Kirschner M. W., Hippo pathway mediates resistance to cytotoxic drugs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E3729–E3738 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gujral T. S., et al. , Profiling phospho-signaling networks in breast cancer using reverse phase protein arrays. Oncogene 32, 3470 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Luckert K., et al. , A dual array-based approach to assess the abundance and posttranslational modification state of signaling proteins. Sci. Signal. 5, pl1 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chan M., et al. , Systems pharmacology screening reveals targetable kinases in supratentorial ependymomas (GSE291213). Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE291213. Deposited 5 March 2025.
  • 58.Chen E. Y., et al. , Enrichr: Interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 128 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kolde R., Pheatmap: pretty heatmaps. R package version 1 (2), 726 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gautier L., Cope L., Bolstad B. M., Irizarry R. A., Affy—Analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics 20, 307–315 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Butler A., Hoffman P., Smibert P., Papalexi E., Satija R., Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Korsunsky I., et al. , Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 01 (PDF)

pnas.2514518123.sapp.pdf (748.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

RNAseq data have been deposited in GEO (GSE291213) (57). All other data are included in the manuscript and/or SI Appendix.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES