Skip to main content
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials logoLink to Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
. 2026 Jan 25;25:13. doi: 10.1186/s12941-026-00849-4

Clinical patterns, species-specific correlations, and therapeutic outcomes of nocardiosis in immunocompetent individuals: a systematic analysis based on literature

Le Lu 1,#, Dongyi Wang 1,2,#, Muzi Li 1,#, Xiang Yang 3, Kailun Zhou 1, Zhiming Zhao 1, Chunli Liu 1, Wei Shang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12914931  PMID: 41582162

Abstract

Background

Nocardiosis, traditionally an opportunistic infection, lacks comprehensive characterization in immunocompetent individuals. This study aimed to describe and analyze the demographics, clinical features, and outcomes of Nocardia infections in this population based on the literature.

Methods

A systematic analysis of 530 immunocompetent Nocardia cases (2020–2024) was conducted using reports from PubMed, CNKI, and MedNexus. Demographics, exposures, clinical characteristics, laboratory, treatment, and outcome were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Patients (median age: 59 years; 69.8% male) exhibited pulmonary (46.5%), cutaneous (20.0%), or cerebral (15.7%) involvements. Risk factors included soil/dust exposure (97/530, 18.3%), trauma (44/530, 8.3%), and comorbidities (255/530, 48.1%, e.g., diabetes, bronchiectasis). Cure/improvement (82.6%) group exhibited younger age (P = 0.01) and higher prevalence of local infections (P < 0.001), while more cases of disseminated infection (P < 0.001), N. farcinica (P = 0.01), and unclassified Nocardia spp. (P = 0.02) were in the deterioration/mortality group. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (71.9%) was the primary therapy. Species-specific patterns demonstrated: N. brasiliensis preferentially linked to cutaneous infections (P < 0.001), N. farcinica to cerebral disease (P < 0.001), and N. cyriacigeorgica to pulmonary involvement (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Nocardiosis in immunocompetent hosts demonstrates distinct risk profiles, site-specific species associations, and prognostic factors. Early diagnosis, species identification, and antimicrobial therapy are critical for optimizing outcomes. This study underscores the need for heightened clinical suspicion and improved diagnostic protocols in non-immunocompromised populations.

Keywords: Nocardiosis, Immunocompetent, Clinical patterns, Species-Specific correlations

Introduction

Nocardia spp., ubiquitous environmental actinomycetes of the order Corynebacteriales/ formerly Mycobacteriales, have long been recognized as opportunistic pathogens predominantly affecting immunocompromised populations, including transplant recipients, individuals with hematological malignancies, and those with HIV/AIDS or chronic corticosteroid use [1–3]. Studies reported up to 36% of cases occurring in patients without overt immunodeficiency [4].

Nocardiosis in immunocompetent populations is poorly characterized, presenting with clinical heterogeneity such as subacute pneumonia, cutaneous nodules resembling mycobacterial infections, or disseminated lesions involving muscles, bones, and the central nervous system [5]. This often leads to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal outcomes due to nonspecific symptoms and diagnostic challenges.

Despite advances in molecular diagnostics like metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), knowledge on demographic characteristics, species-specific tropisms, and prognostic factors in immunocompetent populations remains fragmented, relying mainly on case reports or small studies. This study systematically analyzes 530 immunocompetent Nocardia cases globally to (1) describe demographic and clinical characteristics, (2) identify species-specific infection patterns and prognostic correlates, and (3) evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic practices.

Method

Data collection

A systematic and comprehensive literature search was performed across three databases (PubMed, CNKI, and MedNexus) using the Medical Subject Headings term “Nocardia”, targeting publications from January 2020 to December 2024. To ensure the inclusion of higher-quality publications in our dataset, we included individual case reports and case series from the literature that contain data on the specific elements in our study. Moreover, our search strategy imposed no language restrictions in PubMed, while also incorporating CNKI and MedNexus. Although CNKI predominantly hosts Chinese-language publications, a portion provides English abstracts or full texts. Therefore, duplicate records exist across the CNKI, MedNexus, and PubMed databases. The retrieved records were manually screened, with priority given to records from PubMed in cases of duplicate entries. After exclusion criteria were applied, relevant articles aligned with the study objectives were identified. The study intended to collect information on Nocardia infections in immunocompetent patients, excluding cases reporting on immunodeficient patients and patients on immunosuppressive therapy, non-Nocardia infected cases, non-human studies, cases without details, and articles with unavailable full-text access. In our study, inclusion was limited to cases meeting clinical diagnostic criteria for infection—specifically, those exhibiting compatible symptoms supported by corroborating those exhibiting compatible symptoms supported by corroborating microbiological evidence, and cases of colonization were excluded.

Specifically, immunodeficiency disorders included human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (specifically the idiopathic form characterized by anti-GM-CSF antibody positivity), and chronic granulomatous disease. The latter two conditions are considered immunocompromised states. Immunosuppressive therapy encompasses long-term exposure to corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents used for organ transplantation or nephrotic syndrome, and chemotherapy. Cases without details referred to some single- or multi-center retrospective or prospective studies that lack detailed clinical information, making it impossible to extract data on immunocompetent patients from them. This systematic approach ensured the inclusion of high-quality, relevant studies for further evaluation.

Data categories

We systematically collected data across 16 distinct categories to ensure comprehensive analysis. These categories encompassed: (1) publication type, (2) year of publication, (3) gender, (4) age, and (5) author’s origin country. Additionally, we documented (6) exposure history (including soil/dust ingestion, trauma, invasive therapy, and contact lens wear), (7) underlying medical condition (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tuberculosis, tumor, hypothyroidism). The dataset further included (8) clinical manifestations, (9) infection sites, (10) diagnostic methods, (11) antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), (12) Nocardia spp., (13) co-infections (bacterial, viral, fungal, and mold), (14) therapeutic drugs, and (15) outcomes. This multidimensional data collection framework enabled robust characterization of Nocardia infections in an immunocompetent host.

Definitions

To ensure consistency in data extraction, we established standardized definitions for relevant parameters. Occupational exposures (workers, farmers, stonemasons, herdsmen, horticulturists, construction workers, and bricklayers), exposure to post-rainwater accumulation, and wilderness habitation were all defined as soil and dust ingestion. Trauma included injuries from wood splinters, thorn pricks, dog bites, and falls. Invasive therapy was defined to include lung biopsy, pacemaker implantation, pericardiocentesis, and acupoint injection. Clinical presentations were systematically classified: swelling in hands, arms, upper and lower extremities were all categorized as skin swelling, while lumbar and thoracic vertebrae were grouped as vertebrae. Disseminated infection was defined as either the involvement of more than two anatomic locations or central nervous system infections. Diagnostic methods were standardized as follows: culture and mNGS of secretions, sputum, lung tissues, pleural effusion, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, cornea, pus, and brain tissues were all classified as tissue cultures and tissue mNGS. Suspected Nocardiosis was classified as unclassified Nocardia species. Outcomes were defined as follows: complete clinical and radiographic resolution, as well as reported as “recovered” or “complete recovery” were classified as cured. Cases described as “clinical status gradually improved” were grouped into the improved group. Patients who discontinued treatment or had unmentioned outcomes were categorized as lost to follow-up. These standardized definitions were implemented to facilitate statistical analysis of heterogeneous data sets.

Data encoding

For subsequent data processing using R software, the variables were coded as follows: Gender was encoded as 1 for male and 2 for female. In addition to being represented numerically, age was also dichotomized with 1 representing patients aged ≥ 65 years and 0 for those aged < 65 years. Medical history variables, including exposure history (soil and dust ingestion, trauma, invasive therapy, and contact lens wear) and underlying medical condition (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, bronchiectasis, COPD, tuberculosis, tumor, and hypothyroidism) were coded as 1 when present and 0 when absent or unspecified. Co-infections (bacterial, viral, and fungal) were designated 1 and 0 for absence. Disseminated infections are coded as 1, while non-disseminated infections are marked as 0. Laboratory parameters included binary coding for AST (1 = performed, 0 = not performed). Outcomes were categorized as 1 (cure/improvement) and 0 (deterioration/death), with NA assigned to lost follow-up cases. All unrecorded or missing data elements were systematically encoded as NA to facilitate consistent missing value handling in statistical analyses.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis and data visualization were performed using R software (version 4.2.3), which was chosen for its capabilities to perform not only statistical analyses but also visualization of geographic distributions and anatomical organs. Dichotomous variables were compared using chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, or logistic regression analysis, while continuous variables were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests, with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. The “rworldmap” package was used to visualize the global distribution of Nocardia cases, supplemented by bar charts illustrating case counts and Nocardia species proportions in different countries. Nocardia species composition was represented through pie charts. Sites of Nocardia infection were mapped using the “gganatogram” package for the visualization of anatomical organs. Rank correlations between data categories were quantified using Spearman’s correlation and presented as heatmaps. The diagnostic method was visualized through Venn diagrams combined with donut charts, since multiple diagnostic modalities may be used simultaneously in a single case. Antimicrobial patterns were displayed via the Nightingale rose chart. All visualizations were implemented through ggplot2 extensions to maintain graphical consistency, with alpha shapes employed for proportional representation of overlapping categorical data. Missing values were coded as NA. For chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests, we employed Row-wise NA Removal to handle missing data. For correlation analyses and between-group comparisons, we applied pairwise deletion to address missing values.

Result

Screening results and paper types

Following systematic literature retrieval across PubMed, CNKI, and MedNexus, 1,524 articles were initially identified. After deduplication (n = 25), 1,499 articles encompassing 6254 case reports were retained, comprising 4768 cases from PubMed, 1,305 cases from CNKI, and 181 cases from MedNexus (Fig. 1). Exclusion criteria were rigorously applied: immunodeficiency (n = 655), immunosuppressant use (n = 376), insufficient clinical data (n = 3428), non-Nocardia infections (n = 805), and non-human studies (n = 460). Among the final 530 included cases, 204 were sourced from CNKI, 41 from MedNexus, and 285 from PubMed. Notably, to ensure data integrity, a dual-reviewer process was implemented with methodological rigor: one researcher conducted full-text screening and data extraction for all included articles, while a second investigator performed independent verification through random sampling of records (n = 50).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of the selection process for Nocardia infection cases in immunocompetent patients

Demographic and clinical characteristics

The outcomes of the final obtained 530 cases included cure/improvement in 438 cases (82.6%), deterioration/death in 42 cases (7.9%), and 50 cases lost to follow-up (9.4%) (Table 1). Patients had a median age of 59 years (IQR 47–70 years; range 1–96 years), with a predominance of young and middle-aged adults (199/530, 37.5% ≥ 65 years vs. 329/530, 62.1% < 65 years). Male patients predominated (319/530, 60.2%) over females (206/530, 38.9%). Among 530 cases, Soil and dust ingestion constituted the primary risk factor (97/530, 18.3%), followed by invasive therapy (47/530, 8.9%) and trauma (44/530, 8.3%). The underlying medical condition affected 48.1% (255/530), predominantly diabetes (70/530, 13.2%), bronchiectasis (62/530, 11.7%), hypertension (60/530, 11.3%), and COPD (42/530, 7.9%). Immunocompetent patients with nocardiosis predominantly presented with non-disseminated infections occurred in 373 cases (70.40%). Concurrent infections affected 10.9% (58/530), primarily bacterial co-infections (34/530, 6.4%).

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between the cure/improvement and deterioration/death groups

Total
(n = 530)
Cure/Improvement
(n = 438/480)
Deterioration/Death
(n = 42/480)
Univariate
No. % No. % No. % P-value
Age
 Range, years 1–96 1–90 16–91 0.000
 < 65 years old 329 62.1 278 63.5 18 42.9
 ≥ 65 years old 199 37.5 159 36.3 23 54.8 0.013
 Not mentioned 2 0.4 1 0.2 1 2.4
Gender
 Male 319 60.2 257 58.7 26 61.9
 Female 206 38.9 177 40.4 15 35.7 0.601
 Not mentioned 5 0.9 4 0.9 1 2.4
Exposure
 Have a history 181 34.2 157 35.8 10 23.8
 Soil and dust ingestion 97 18.3 87 19.9 5 11.9 0.217
 Trauma 44 8.3 37 8.4 1 2.4 0.195
 Invasive therapy 47 8.9 39 8.9 4 9.5 0.893
 Contact lens wear 3 0.6 3 0.7 0 0.0 0.987
 Not mentioned 349 65.8 281 64.2 32 76.2
Underlying medical condition
 Without an underlying condition 275 51.9 229 52.3 17 40.5
 With underlying conditions 255 48.1 209 47.7 25 59.5 0.144
 Diabetes 70 13.2 59 13.5 6 14.3 0.883
 Hypertension 60 11.3 51 11.6 5 11.9 0.050
 Dyslipidemia 12 2.3 9 2.1 1 2.4 0.888
 Bronchiectasis 62 11.7 55 12.6 0 0.0 0.985
 COPD 42 7.9 32 7.3 6 14.3 0.117
 Tuberculosis 19 3.6 16 3.7 2 4.8 0.719
 Tumor 23 4.3 19 4.3 2 4.8 0.898
 Hypothyroidism 9 1.7 9 2.1 0 0.0 0.896
 Others 70 13.2 57 13.0 8 19.0
Disseminated
 Yes 157 29.6 121 27.6 23 54.8
 No 373 70.4 317 72.4 19 45.2 0.000
Nocardia spp.
 Unclassified 153 28.9 115 26.3 18 42.9 0.024
 N. farcinica 88 16.6 67 15.3 13 31.0 0.011
 N. cyriacigeorgica 61 11.5 59 13.5 1 2.4 0.070
 N. brasiliensis 54 10.2 52 11.9 0 0.0 0.896
 N. otitidiscaviarum 45 8.5 37 8.4 4 9.5 0.812
 N. asteroides 23 4.3 20 4.6 0 0.0 0.896
 N. beijingensis 12 2.3 11 2.5 0 0.0 0.984
 N. abscessus 16 3.0 14 3.2 0 0.0 0.988
 Others 84 15.8 69 15.8 6 14.3
Co-infection status
 No co-infection 472 89.1 392 89.5 37 88.1
 Co-infections 58 10.9 46 `10.5 5 11.9 0.778
 Bacterial 34 6.4 28 6.4 3 7.1 0.850
 Viral 8 1.5 6 1.4 2 4.8 0.124
 Fungal 18 3.4 12 2.7 2 4.8 0.463
 Others 3 0.6 3 0.7 0 0.0
AST
 Yes 190 35.8 157 35.8 16 38.1
 No 300 56.6 251 57.3 17 40.5 0.258
 Not mentioned 40 7.5 30 6.8 9 21.4

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, AST antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Notable prognostic associations emerged in immunocompetent Nocardia patients. Patients in the cure/improvement group were younger than those in the deterioration/death group (278/530, 63.5% in the cure/improvement group < 65 years vs. 18/42, 42.9% < 65 years in the deterioration/death group, P = 0.01), while the proportion of disseminated infection was higher in the deterioration/death group (121/438, 27.6% in the cure/improvement group vs. 23/42, 54.8% in the deterioration/death group, P < 0.001). Additionally, the proportions of unclassified Nocardia spp. (115/438, 26.3% vs. 18/42, 42.9%, P = 0.02) and N. farcinica (67/438, 15.3% vs. 13/42, 31.0%, P = 0.01) were lower in the cure/improvement group.

Infection site and clinical symptoms

Nocardiosis reported in immunocompetent individuals exhibited multi-system involvement affecting the central nervous, circulatory, respiratory, endocrine, and musculoskeletal systems (Fig. 2). The most frequently involved organs were the lungs (46.5%), followed by the skin (20.0%) and brain (15.7%), consistent with Nocardia’s primary transmission via the respiratory route and skin-to-skin contact (This referred to the patients’ skin exposure to environmental sources -such as soil, dust, or puddles- rather than to direct contact with the skin of infected individuals). Pulmonary infections predominantly manifested as cough (22.9%), phlegm (17.8%), fever (15.8%), and breathlessness (5.0%). Cutaneous infections primarily presented with fever (9.5%) and localized lesions such as skin ulcers (12.5%), swelling (9.9%), and subcutaneous mass (11.0%). Cerebral infections were characterized by fever (16.1%), headache (14.5%), consciousness (9.3%), and fatigue (6.4%). Overall, Nocardia infections in immunocompetent hosts demonstrated localized symptomatology accompanied by systemic manifestations, including fever, fatigue, and weight loss.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Anatomical distribution mapping of Nocardia infections in immunocompetent patients

Diagnostic and therapeutic modalities

Microbiological culture, particularly tissue culture, remains the primary diagnostic modality for Nocardiosis (Fig. 3A). Clinically, multi-method approaches combining tissue culture with 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequencing, time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), mNGS, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are routinely employed to facilitate the identification of Nocardia species (Fig. 3B). As not all reports documented the year of disease onset, the time scale in Fig. 3B represented the year of publication. While the figure suggests an increasing trend in mNGS testing over time, this interpretation must be viewed with caution due to the potential bias introduced by publication delay. Blood-based diagnostics demonstrated limited utility. Among 157 disseminated Nocardia cases, only 21 (13.4%) were confirmed through blood cultures or mNGS. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (381/530, 71.9%) persisted as the cornerstone therapeutic agent, supplemented by carbapenems (imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, biapenem) (167/530, 31.5%), oxazolidinones (linezolid, tedizolid) (112/530, 21.1%), aminoglycosides (94/530, 17.7%), and cephalosporins (73/530, 13.8%) in descending order of prescription frequency (Fig. 3C). In addition, surgical interventions were employed in some cases (73/530, 13.8%). Obtaining infected tissue specimens for diagnostic confirmation, such as craniotomy for brain abscesses, and percutaneous or surgical drainage for subcutaneous abscesses. Meanwhile, surgically removing abscesses accelerated infection resolution.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The diagnosis and medication characteristics of immunocompetent Nocardia infections. A Diagnostic modalities visualization was achieved through complementary the donut chart and Venn diagram. The peripheral donut chart showed the quantitative distribution of diagnostic modalities employed in the case. The Venn diagram of the central demonstrated overlapping application of diagnostic modalities. B Proportions of different diagnoses from 2020 to 2024 depicted in a stacked bar chart. C The Nightingale Rose chart visualized pharmacotherapeutic utilization frequencies, with the chromatic sector corresponding to distinct pharmacological categories and each bar denoting one specific therapeutic agent

Correlation between categories

The correlations between gender, age, exposures, underlying medical conditions, co-infection, infection sites, Nocardia species, disseminated infections, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed significant associations between outcomes and multiple variables, including age, infection sites, Nocardia species, comorbidities, and disseminated infections (Fig. 4A). Consistent with previous findings, age (P < 0.001), disseminated infections (P < 0.001), and unclassified Nocardia spp. (P < 0.05), and N. farcinica (P < 0.01) negatively correlated with the prognosis for cure/improvement, which showed a positive correlation with the underlying disease of bronchiectasis (P < 0.05). Moreover, pulmonary (P < 0.01), cerebral (P < 0.05), and hematogenous infections (P < 0.01) showed positive associations with deterioration/death outcomes. We also found that disseminated infection was positively correlated with infection site, including brain (P < 0.001), blood (P < 0.001), and N. farcinica (P < 0.001). Our analysis further revealed significant associations between Nocardia species and infection sites, exposures, and underlying conditions (Fig. 4A). More specifically, N. farcinica showed positive associations with cerebral infections (P < 0.001). N. brasiliensis demonstrated strong correlations with cutaneous (P < 0.001), while exhibiting inverse relationships with pulmonary (P < 0.001). N. cyriacigeorgica was preferentially linked to pulmonary infection (P < 0.001), yet inversely associated with cutaneous infection (P < 0.001).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Correlation analysis between categories. A The heatmap elucidated multidimensional correlations among gender, age, infection sites, Nocardia species, underlying diseases, co-infections, disseminated infections, and prognostic outcomes. B The heatmap visualized the association between therapeutic modalities, infection sites, Nocardia species, and outcomes. The correlations were measured using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Red and blue represented positive correlations and negative correlations, respectively. Color saturation denotes correlation strength. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

Antimicrobial treatment regimens were found to be significantly related to Nocardia species and infection sites (Fig. 4B). Carbapenem antibiotics demonstrated positive correlations with central nervous system (P < 0.001) and pulmonary (P < 0.001) infections but showed negative associations with cutaneous (P < 0.001) infections. Oxazolidinones were positively associated with central nervous system infections (P < 0.001).

Distribution of Nocardia species and cases

Our statistical analysis revealed distinct geographical patterns in nocardiosis reporting, with China documenting the highest number of immunocompetent Nocardia cases globally, followed by the United States and India (Fig. 5A and B). This finding may be influenced by our inclusion of the CNKI database. While CNKI broadened the language coverage of the databases in our study, it also increased the clinical cases reported from China. Stacked column chart analysis demonstrated no significant country-specific distribution patterns for Nocardia species. Among 530 total cases, species-level identification was achieved in 377 cases (71.1%), with four predominant species collectively accounting for nearly half of all characterized cases: N. farcinica (88/530, 16.6%), N. cyriacigeorgica (61/530, 11.5%), N. brasiliensis (54/530, 10.3%), and N. otitidiscaviarum (45/530, 8.5%). Notably, 153 cases (28.9%) remained unclassified, underscoring persisting diagnostic challenges in microbial characterization.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Global distribution and species of Nocardia infections among immunocompetent hosts. A Global distribution of reported Nocardia infections among immunocompetent patients (2000–2024). The lighter and darker colors represented fewer and more cases on the map. B The bar chart showed the country-specific case distribution of Nocardia infections, with China representing the highest caseload, followed by the United States and India. C Stacked bar charts demonstrated the distribution of Nocardia species across nations, while their proportional representation is illustrated through segmented column charts. D The pie chart visualization depicted the proportion of Nocardia species subtypes within 530 cases. Each color represented a species of Nocardia

Discussion

This study provides a systematic analysis of Nocardia infections in immunocompetent individuals, highlighting key demographic, clinical, and outcome insights. Pulmonary (47.4%) and cutaneous (18.2%) infections predominated, reflecting primary transmission routes—respiratory inhalation and direct skin inoculation. Notably, cerebral infections (16.6%) underscore severe CNS involvement risks, even in immunocompetent patients, necessitating heightened clinical suspicion for neurological symptoms [5]. Ocular nocardiosis, though rare (primarily affecting the cornea), is consequently prone to underdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis [6]. It is linked to invasive procedures, trauma, and contact lens use, warranting vigilance in exposed individuals. Cardiac involvement, exceptionally rare, was associated with invasive surgeries in our study.

Soil/dust exposure (56.4%) and trauma (23.8%) emerged as major risk factors, reinforcing the environmental reservoir hypothesis for Nocardia. In our analysis, trauma was critically associated with cutaneous nocardiosis in immunocompetent patients. Beyond individuals engaged in agricultural work, urban populations can also be exposed to Nocardia pathogens via aerosols originating from urban soil, dust, and water bodies. Research on Nocardia pathogens in urban seepage systems indicates that urban residents, when exposed to damp and polluted environments, can acquire infection through either direct contact or inhalation of aerosolized Nocardia pathogens [7]. Furthermore, occupational exposure to industrial textile dust without proper protective measures represents another potential exposure source [5]. Diabetes and bronchiectasis were frequent comorbidities, suggesting that chronic underlying diseases may predispose immunocompetent individuals to infection through impaired mucosal barriers or immune dysregulation. Diabetes mellitus has been described as immunocompromised in some cases [8, 9]. Although diabetes mellitus is not classified as a primary immunodeficiency disorder, the history of the disease has also been suggested to be an important susceptibility factor for Nocardia infections. Bronchiectasis was a common CT finding in pulmonary nocardiosis, with a disproportionately higher prevalence observed among immunocompetent patients compared to immunocompromised individuals with pulmonary nocardiosis [10, 11]. The role of Nocardia species isolated from the respiratory tract of bronchiectasis patients – whether as a colonizing bacterium or a true pathogen – remained controversial. Evidence suggested that Nocardia can be cultured from the sputum of some cystic fibrosis patients in the absence of clinical infection or pulmonary tissue destruction, suggesting probable colonization [12]. Notably, all patients in the Nocardia-positive case reports and series analyzed in our study demonstrated unequivocal clinical manifestations of infection, corroborated by robust clinical evidence. Interestingly, bronchiectasis history was independently associated with cure/improvement, possibly due to early detection in this cohort or the presence of specific host-pathogen interactions. This finding is consistent with the results of a retrospective study, which reported a higher survival rate among immunocompetent patients with bronchiectasis (39 out of 40 cases) [13]. Our findings also revealed an inverse correlation between bronchiectasis and disseminated infection, whereas a positive correlation was established with pulmonary infection. These were consistent with the study’s findings, in which all included Nocardia patients with bronchiectasis had pulmonary infections, but only one case presented with disseminated disease [13].

The identification of species-specific infection patterns demonstrated that N. farcinica was strongly linked to cerebral infections and worse outcomes, aligning with its known virulence and ability to invade the bloodstream. Current evidence characterizes N. farcinica as a particularly virulent and most common Nocardia species, demonstrating not only heightened dissemination capacity and resistance to antibiotics but also carrying significant mortality risks [14, 15]. A study detected the presence of virulence genes relA, icl, and mbtH, along with resistance to 11 antibiotics, including rifampicin, polymyxin-B, and penicillin G, in a clinically isolated N. farcinica sample [16]. In another retrospective analysis of 374 patients with Nocardia infections, N. farcinica was among the two most commonly isolated species, and infected patients had significantly higher 1-year mortality [17]. This species exhibits a distinct predilection for central nervous system involvement, with cerebral abscesses complicating approximately one-third of infections [14, 18]. Characteristic neurotropic manifestations include solitary multiloculated abscesses, multiple cerebral abscesses, or abscess formation concomitant with meningitis [18]. Conversely, N. brasiliensis was associated with cutaneous/lymphatic infections, as well as traumatic exposure. Our findings provided robust confirmation of previous literature regarding N. brasiliensis infections, which are primarily acquired through traumatic percutaneous inoculation, typically via environmental exposures such as thorn injuries or wood splinter penetration. In immunocompetent individuals, these infections predominantly manifest as three distinct clinical presentations: actinomycetoma, superficial cutaneous infections, and lymphocutaneous syndrome [19]. The characteristic localized disease progression and indolent clinical course of N. brasiliensis infections [20], as reported in the literature, might provide a pathophysiological basis for the lower deterioration/ mortality rate observed in our study, reflecting its tropism for superficial tissues, which has implications for targeted antimicrobial therapy and prognostic stratification. In our study, N. cyriacigeorgica (12.2% in the cure/improvement group vs. 2.4% in the deterioration/death group) emerged as another clinically significant species demonstrating comparable prognostic profiles to N. brasiliensis (11.9% in the cure/improvement group vs. 0% in the deterioration/death group) in immunocompetent hosts. However, its clinico-epidemiological profile diverged markedly, exhibiting a predilection for pulmonary involvement rather than cutaneous manifestations. Our correlation analysis in immunocompetent individuals revealed that N. cyriacigeorgica demonstrates not only associations with pulmonary nocardiosis, but also significant relationships with chronic pulmonary comorbidities—particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis. Actually, among 99 patients with pulmonary nocardiosis included in a retrospective study, N. cyriacigeorgica was also identified as the most prevalent Nocardia species [21].

While histopathological tissue cultures and blood cultures remain the gold-standard diagnostic modalities for Nocardia identification in our study, novel molecular diagnostic platforms—including PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization, MALDI-TOF MS, and mNGS are being increasingly integrated into clinical workflows [22–25]. These advanced methodologies demonstrate superior diagnostic efficiency in achieving rapid speciation and precise taxonomic classification of Nocardia isolates. Despite advances in molecular diagnostics, a significant proportion of cases (25.1%) remained unclassified, which was notably associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes, indicating the necessity for precise species-level characterization to optimize patient management strategies. Although 16S rRNA gene sequencing is the conventional method for Nocardia identification, it demonstrates limited discriminatory power for closely related species, such as the Nocardia nova complex [26]. Subsequent studies have revealed that target genes with higher sequence diversity - including hsp65, gyrB, secA1, and sodA - demonstrate superior interspecies discrimination and polymorphic resolution compared to 16 S rRNA [27–30]. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) assigns species on the basis of a concatenated sequence consisting of housekeeping genes (e.g., gyrB, 16 S rRNA, secA1, hsp65, and rpoB), enabling simultaneous and rapid comparison of multiple strains. MLSA-based species classification shows 95% concordance with identification by microscopic, biochemical, and cellular fatty acid analyses, while offering higher discriminatory power [31]. Notably, China accounted for the highest volume of mNGS-related publications (70%), which may correlate with its broader adoption in clinical practice and the subsequent higher diagnostic yield observed in species identification. The limited utility of blood cultures (only 8.57% of disseminated cases confirmed) underscores the importance of tissue sampling for definitive diagnosis. In addition to these techniques, new molecular techniques increasingly have emerged as pivotal tools for delineation of Nocardia species, such as real-time PCR-based high-resolution melting [32] and TaqMan real-time PCR assay [33]. Clinician vigilance for nocardiosis diagnosis is also critical. Even in immunocompetent patients, physicians must consider Nocardia infection when specific risk factors coexist, particularly underlying comorbidities (e.g., bronchiectasis, diabetes, or prolonged use of corticosteroid inhalers), significant environmental exposures (gardening, soil/organic dust handling, or contact with decaying plant material), or failed response to standard antibiotic therapy. Only through such clinical suspicion can targeted diagnostic measures be initiated: optimal specimen collection from relevant sites, specific laboratory testing requests, and explicit instructions for microbiological screening for Nocardia.

TMP-SMX remained the first-line therapy (71.9%), consistent with current recommendations establishing its role as the empirically supported frontline regimen for Nocardia infections [34]. Combination therapy was predominantly reserved for disseminated or severe Nocardia infections, with empirically selected companion drugs including third-generation cephalosporins (e.g., ceftriaxone), amikacin, and carbapenems (e.g., imipenem), particularly when addressing suspected multidrug-resistant strains or optimizing therapeutic penetration across infected tissues [35]. In our study, carbapenems (33.2%) and oxazolidinones (22.4%) accounted for a substantial proportion of therapeutic interventions in clinical practice. This observed preference may reflect clinicians’ concerns about resistance or the severity of infection. The association of carbapenems with CNS infections supports their role in managing life-threatening complications. Surgical intervention (13.8%) was crucial for resolving abscesses, particularly in the brain and soft tissues, underscoring the multimodal management approach required.

This systematic analysis is subject to selection bias, as data were derived from published literature rather than prospectively collected cohorts. Despite concerted efforts to include additional studies, certain case reports and series with incomplete research elements remained ineligible for inclusion. This unavoidable exclusion may introduce selection bias into our analysis. Our study remains constrained by significant language barriers: CNKI’s inclusion of Chinese publications explains China’s case overrepresentation, yet key languages (e.g., French/Spanish) remain uncovered, narrowing geographical scope despite comprehensiveness efforts. Missing data (e.g., AST results, detailed treatment regimens) may have introduced analytical limitations. Additionally, the exclusion of immunocompromised patients necessitates cautious extrapolation to broader populations. Besides, prospective studies are needed to validate risk factors and species-tropism associations.

In summary, this study enhances the understanding of Nocardia infections in immunocompetent hosts, while emphasizing the clinical need for early microbiological diagnosis, species-specific therapeutic approaches, and multidisciplinary care coordination in clinical management, which may add clinical alert to Nocardia infections in immunocompetent individuals, ultimately reducing morbidity and mortality associated with this neglected pathogen.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Liheng Zheng for his kind help on improving the quality of this work.

Author contributions

L. L designed the study, collected data and wrote the draft of the manuscript. W. D wrote the draft of manuscript, collected data and did the data analysis. L. M did data collection and data analysis. Y. X did the literature review and data collection. Z. K, Z. Z and L. C did data collection. S. W supervised and designed the study. All authors had full access to the data in the study, did the data interpretation, contributed to writing and revision of the final version of the manuscript, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Funding

Wang D was funded by the Postdoctoral Foundation of Jinling Hospital (Grant No. 49623). Yang X and Lu L were funded by the Jiangsu Province Cadre Healthcare Research Program (Grant No. BJ24026).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

AI usage statement

During the preparation of this work the author(s) used Deepseek and kimi in order to help literature review, text polishing and grammar optimization. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Le Lu, Dongyi Wang and Muzi Li have contribute equally to the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Yetmar ZA, Chesdachai S, Duffy D, Smith BH, Challener DW, Seville MT, et al. Risk factors and prophylaxis for nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: A nested Case-Control study. Clin Transplant. 2023. 10.1111/ctr.15016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Averbuch D, Greef JD, Duréault A, Wendel L, Tridello G. Nocardia infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: A multicenter international retrospective study of the infectious diseases working party of the European society for blood and marrow transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75:88–97. 10.1093/cid/ciab866/6378849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muñoz J, Mirelis B, Aragón LM, Gutiérrez N, Sánchez F, Español M, et al. Clinical and Microbiological features of nocardiosis 1997–2003. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56:545–50. 10.1099/jmm.0.46774-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Colaneri M, Lombardi A, Morea A, Monzillo V, Mariani B, Marone M. An Eight-Year experience of nocardia infection in italy: does immunosuppression matter? New Microbiol. 2025;44:111–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Arrache D, Zait H, Rodriguez-Nava V, Bergeron E, Durand T, Yahiaoui M, et al. [Cerebral and pulmonary nocardiosis to nocardia abscessus in an immunocompetent Algerian Patient]. J De Mycol Medicale. 2018;28:531–7. 10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gupta B, Thakur A, Limbu S, Malhotra C, Gupta A, Jain A. Nocardia Keratitis QJM. 2022;115:111–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vautrin F, Pujic P, Paquet C, Bergeron E, Mouniée D, Marchal T, et al. Microbial risk assessment of nocardia cyriacigeorgica in polluted Environments, case of urban rainfall water. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:384–400. 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pender M, Mehta N, Hamilton BD, Swaminathan S. Nocardia beijingensis isolated from an adrenal abscess in a diabetic host. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022. 10.1093/ofid/ofac328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balachandar A, Zhabokritsky A, Matukas LM. Disseminated nocardiosis with multisite involvement in an immunocompetent patient. Can Med Assoc J. 2020;192:E956–E. 10.1503/cmaj.200153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhong C, Huang P, Zhan Y, Yao Y, Ye J, Zhou H. (2022) Clinical features of pulmonary nocardiosis in patients with different underlying diseases: A case series Study. Infection and drug resistance. 15:1167–7410.2147/idr.s359596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Chen L-D, Li H-Y, Xie J-J, Hu M-F, Chen X-X, Cai Z-M, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome analysis of pulmonary nocardiosis in Southern china: A Two-Center retrospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barrio M, Martínez M, Prados C, Girón R, Maiz L, Martínez M. Isolation of nocardia species in patients with cystic fibrosis. Arch Bronconeumol. 2008;44:109–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Woodworth MH, Saullo JL, Lantos PM, Cox GM, Stout JE. Increasing nocardia incidence associated with bronchiectasis at a tertiary care center. Annals Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(347–54). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Kumar VA, Augustine D, Panikar D, Nandakumar A, Dinesh KR, Karim S, et al. Nocardia Farcinicabrain abscess: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and literature review. Surg Infect. 2014;15:640–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang H, Zhu Y, Cui Q, Wu W, Li G, Chen D, et al. Epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance profiles of the nocardia species in China, 2009 to 2021. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10:e0156021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nathar S, Rajmichael R, Jeyaraj Pandian C, Nagarajan H, Mathimaran A, Kingsley JD, et al. Exploring nocardia’s ecological spectrum and novel therapeutic frontiers through Whole-Genome sequencing: unraveling drug resistance and virulence factors. Arch Microbiol. 2024. 10.1007/s00203-023-03799-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yetmar ZA, Khodadadi RB, Chesdachai S, McHugh JW, Challener DW, Wengenack NL, et al. Mortality after nocardiosis: risk factors and evaluation of disseminated infection. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023. 10.1093/ofid/ofad409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beucler N, Farah K, Choucha A, Meyer M, Fuentes S, Seng P, et al. Nocardia farcinica cerebral abscess: A systematic review of treatment strategies. Neurochirurgie. 2022;68:94–101. 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mangieri NA, Guevara Nuñez D, Echavarría G, Bertona E, Castello L, Benchetrit G et al. (2021) Nocardiosis Esporotricoide Por Nocardia Brasiliensis. Revista Argentina de Microbiología. 53:43 – 7.10.1016/j.ram.2020.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Salinas-Carmona M. Nocardia brasiliensis: from microbe to human and experimental infections. Microbes Infect. 2000;2:1373–81. 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)01291-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang J, Ren H-t, Wang J, Dong A-y, Chen Y-l, Hu D-x, et al. Clinical Characteristics, susceptibility Profiles, and treatment of nocardiosis: A multicenter retrospective study in 2015–2021. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;130:136–43. 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brown-Elliott BA, Brown JM, Conville PS, Wallace RJ. Clinical and laboratory features of Thenocardiaspp. Based on current molecular taxonomy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:259–82. 10.1128/cmr.19.2.259-282.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yassin AF, Rainey FA, Mendrock U, Brzezinka H, Schaal KP. Nocardia abscessus Sp. Nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:1487–93. 10.1099/00207713-50-4-1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodríguez-Temporal D, Zvezdánova ME, Benedí P, Marín M, Blázquez‐Sánchez M, Ruiz‐Serrano MJ, et al. Identification of nocardia and Non‐Tuberculous Mycobacterium species by Maldi‐Tof Ms using the Vitek Ms coupled to Ivd and Ruo databases. Microb Biotechnol. 2022;16:778–83. 10.1111/1751-7915.14146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liang Y, Lin M, Qiu L, Chen M, Tan C, Tu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with nocardia genus detection by metagenomic next generation sequencing in a tertiary hospital from Southern China. BMC Infect Dis. 2023. 10.1186/s12879-023-08615-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xiao M, Kong F, Sorrell TC, Cao Y, Lee OC, Liu Y, et al. Identification of pathogenic nocardia species by reverse line blot hybridization targeting the 16s Rrna and 16s-23s Rrna gene spacer regions. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:503–11. 10.1128/jcm.01761-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vn R-N, Ae C, Devulder G, Flandrois J-P, Boiron P, Laurent F. Use of Pcr-Restriction enzyme pattern analysis and sequencing database for Hsp65 Gene-Based identification of nocardia species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:536–46. 10.1128/jcm.44.2.536-546.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Carrasco G, Valdezate S, Garrido N, Medina-Pascual MJ, Villalón P, Sáez-Nieto JA, et al. Gyrb analysis as a tool for identifying nocardia species and exploring their phylogeny. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:997–1001. 10.1128/jcm.03072-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kong F, Wang H, Zhang E, Sintchenko V, Xiao M, Sorrell TC, et al. Seca1 gene sequence polymorphisms for species identification of nocardia species and recognition of intraspecies genetic diversity. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3928–34. 10.1128/jcm.01113-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sánchez-Herrera K, Sandoval H, Mouniee D, Ramírez-Durán N, Bergeron E, Boiron P, et al. Molecular identification of nocardia species using the sod a gene. New Microbes New Infections. 2017;19:96–116. 10.1016/j.nmni.2017.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McTaggart LR, Richardson SE, Witkowska M, Zhang SX. Phylogeny and identification of nocardia species on the basis of multilocus sequence analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:4525–33. 10.1128/jcm.00883-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu S, Hou X, Li D, Sun L, Li M, Ji X, et al. Efficient differentiation of nocardia Farcinica, nocardia cyriacigeorgica and nocardia beijingensis by High-Resolution melting analysis using a novel locus. J Med Microbiol. 2020;69:1367–72. 10.1099/jmm.0.001205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang S, Wang P, Liu J, Yang C, Li T, Yang J, et al. Molecular detection of nocardia: development and application of a Real-Time Pcr assay in sputum and Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023;42:865–72. 10.1007/s10096-023-04619-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Restrepo A, Clark NM. Nocardia infections in solid organ transplantation: guidelines from the infectious diseases community of practice of the American society of transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2019;33:e13509. 10.1111/ctr.13509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Margalit I, Lebeaux D, Tishler O, Goldberg E, Bishara J, Yahav D et al. (2021) How do I manage nocardiosis? Clinical microbiology and infection. 27:550–810.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES