ABSTRACT
Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) is increasingly prevalent in newborn piglets with diarrhea. With the development of research on the virus and the feasibility of PDCoV cross-species transmission, the biosafety and the development of pig industry have been greatly affected. In this study, a PDCoV strain CH/LNFX/2022 was isolated from diarrheal newborn piglets at a farm in China. A genome-wide based phylogenetic analysis suggests that 97.5% to 99.2% homology existed in the whole genomes of other strains. Five amino acid mutations are seen for the first time in the S protein. By constructing 3D models, it was found that the S1-NTD/CTD and S2-HR-C regions produced structural alterations. Protein functional analysis showed that the structural changes of the three regions changed the epitope of S protein, the O-GalNAc glycosylation site and the 3C-like protease cleavage site. In addition, oral administration of 107 TCID50 CH/LNFX/2022 to newborn piglets successfully reproduced obvious clinical signs of piglets, such as diarrhea and dehydration. Meanwhile, PDCoV antigen was detected by immunofluorescence in the small intestine, and microscopic lesions and intestinal mucosal barrier destruction were detected by histological observation and scanning electron microscopy. Our study confirmed that porcine coronavirus strains increased pathogenicity through evolution, damaged the intestinal barrier of newborn piglets, and caused diarrhea in pigs. This study provided the candidate strains and theoretical basis for establishing the prevention and control system of vaccine and diagnostic methods for piglet diarrhea.
KEYWORDS: Porcine deltacoronavirus, CH/LNFX/2022, evolutionary analysis, neutralizing epitope mutations, validation of regression
Introduction
Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) was first reported in 2012 in Hong Kong, China [1]. Until now, it has been widely prevalent in American regions such as the United States, Mexico, Canada and in Asia such as China, Japan, Korea, Thailand [2–5]. As a pathogen causing acute diarrhea and vomiting in pigs, it has caused significant economic losses to the global swine industry since its discovery [4,6,7]. PDCoV, which has a positive sense single stranded RNA genome of 25.4 kb in length, is a member of the genus Deltacoronavirus in the Coronaviridae family [8,9]. The genome, in turn, consists of: 5’UTR, open reading frame 1a/b (ORF1a/b), spike (S), envelopments (E), membrane (M), nonstructural protein 6 (NS6), nucleocapsid (N), nonstructural protein 7 (NS7), and 3’UTR [10].
The S protein is the most variable protein in PDCoV, with only 96.0%–100% amino acid sequence divergence between the American and Asian strains [11]. The S protein is placed on the envelope surface and plays an important role in viral recognition and adsorption to host cells [12]. The S protein of PDCoV includes two regions, S1 and S2, with the S1 domain including the NTD and CTD, containing neutralizing antibody epitopes, where the RBD located at the CTD is responsible for receptor recognition [13,14]. S2 is relatively conserved and mediates membrane fusion, including CH-N, FP, HR-N, CH-C, and HR-C [15].
PDCoV is infectious to pigs of different ages, especially newborn piglets with the same clinical manifestations as swine epidemic diarrhea virus and swine infectious gastroenteritis virus [16,17]. The co-infection of PDCoV and PEDV cannot be ignored, the proportion of PDCoV and PEDV co-infection has increased in recent years compared with other common piglet epidemics, and studies have shown that this is more severe and difficult to treat than infection alone [18]. The latest studies show that PDCoV infects calves and poultry while utilizing APN as a receptor to enter human cells, implying that the transmissibility of PDCoV makes it a potential high-risk novel coronavirus pathogen and that vaccine development and diagnostic methods for its establishment have important public health implications [19–22].
In this study, the highly pathogenic PDCoV strain CH/LNFX/2022 showed changes in the protein helical structure at S1-NTD, S2-HR-C, and S1/2 junctions compared with other epidemic strains, and changed the epitopes of existing epidemic strains, which affected the progress of 6-helix bundle (6HB) and viral membrane fusion. In addition, regression experiments confirmed that diarrhea in newborn piglets was caused by disruption of the intestinal mucosal barrier by highly pathogenic CH/LNFX/2022. Together, these results further complement the spread and evolution of PDCoV and provide new insights for vaccine development and diagnostic approaches.
Materials and methods
Collection of specimens and identification of pathogens
Piglets were collected from a diarrhoeal pig farm of Liaoning Province, China, in 2022 with clinical symptoms of vomiting, watery diarrhoea and death from dehydration. Nucleic acid extraction and reverse transcription were performed using Trizol™ (15596018CN, Thermo) and PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (RR036Q Takara) on collected small intestinal tissues from diarrhea pigs. The real-time PCR method was consistent with previous work [23]. The N gene plasmid was used as a positive control to calibrate viral copy number and was kept by the laboratory.
Cell culture and diarrhea virus adaptive isolation
Ten percent fetal bovine serum (SH30088.03, Hyclone) was added in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM, SH30081.01, Hyclone) for in vitro experiments. Small intestinal lesions with positive PCR results were ground and mixed 1 g: 10 mL using DMEM containing 100 U/mL penicillin streptomycin (SV30010, Hyclone). The filtered liquid was labeled with P0 (0.22 μm, BS-PES-22, Biosharp), and Swine Testis (ST) cells cultured to 80% confluence in T75 cell flasks (708003, NEST) were infected as adsorbate. After incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 h, freeze–thaw was repeated at low temperature. The freeze–thaw solution was collected, and the filtered P1 passage virus labeled solution was used to observe the cytopathic effect and virulence study (n = 3) after P10.
Construction of recombinant plasmids for N
Specific N gene primers (Comate Bioscience, China) were designed based on the published sequence of CH/LNFX/2022 (ON968724.1). N-F/R PCR was used and the PCR products were recovered (DP219, TIANGEN) and connected to T-Vector pMD19 (Simple, 3271, Takara) according to manufacturer’s as well as plasmids from individual colony cultures. Sanger sequencing was performed after extraction (Comate Bioscience, China), and the sequencing results were consistent with the database (Supplementary Fig. S1). The resulting plasmids were diluted 102 to 107 times, and a standard curve was established by real-time PCR, which was used as a reference for subsequent absolute quantification of virus replication.
Detection of TCID50 after virus passaging
ST cells (2 × 106/mL) were infected with PDCoV, subjected to 10 serial dilutions of PDCoV, and incubated for 2 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. After washing twice with sterile PBS, DMEM plus 2% fetal bovine serum was added to the cell plates (200 μL per well) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h before TCID50 was determined using the Reed–Muench method (n = 8).
Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA)
ST cells cultured to 80% confluence in 6-well plates (3736, Corning) were infected with PDCoV CH/LNFX/2022 for 24 h. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, perforated with 0.2% TritonX-100 (P0096, Beyotime) after three washes with PBS for 10 min, washed again three times with PBS, and incubated at BSA (SRE0096, Sigma) 37°C for 20 min. After washing, anti-PDCoV monoclonal antibody incubation was used (SD-4-5, Medgene Labs). After washing three times and added Alexa fluor 488 (A0428, Beyotime) conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. After being protected from light treatment, cells were washed and observed (Leica, Germany). Tissue sections were subjected to color development in the same manner, except for incubation with Alexa fluor 594 conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (A-11005, Thermo) (n = 3).
whole genome sequencing of pathogenic samples
Library preparation and sequencing at the MAGIGENE Technology Co., LTD (MAGIGENE, China).
Sequence analysis
The respective protein amino acid sequences of CH/LNFX/2022 and the reference strains (Supplementary Table 1) were aligned using DNAMAN (v6.0). MEGA6 software was used to build phylogenetic trees genome-wide and for each gene, and the neighbor joining (NJ) method set the guide value to 1000 repeats. ITOL has been involved in the esthetic process of strain phylogenetic trees. The MegAlign (v7.1.0.44) program was used to analyze the nucleotide homology of the genome and individual genes of the reference strain and CH/LNFX/2022, and the results were used for analysis by Origin generation Heatmap (v2021).
Protein 3D structure model and function prediction
Individual protein tertiary structures were homology modeled by Phyre2 and SWISS-MODEL. DNAMAN alignment results predicted amino acid helix trends and FirstGlance in JMOL verified the position of amino acid mutations. Using NetCorona-1.0 to predict the location of coronavirus 3C-like protease cleavage proteases in proteins, and using NetNGlyc-1.0 to predict O-GalNAc (mucin type) glycosylation sites in mammalian proteins. Transmembrane functional changes of S protein from CH/LNFX/2022 were predicted by TMHMM (v2.0).
Animal experiments
The experiment was carried out after the newborn piglets were fed adaptively with artificial milk replacement for 48 h. In vivo infection of PDCoV (n = 10) was described in animal experiments according to the National Guidelines for the management and use of Laboratory Animals (CNAS-CL06: 2018) and ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments), and approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Northeast Agricultural University (NEAUEC20230383). Fourteen 1-day-old male newborn Large White pigs weighing 1.2 ± 0.1 kg from Qinggang farm were used in the experiment. The experimental animals were in field condition with their mothers, healthy and unvaccinated. Animals were randomly divided into infection (H.P.I) groups (n = 10) and control (Mock) groups (n = 4) using a computer-based random order generator at the Laboratory Animal Center of Northeast Agricultural University. The two groups of animals were assigned to two separate rooms with the same experimental conditions, and the piglets were raised freely in pens. Artificial milk substitutes were fed every 4 h for 48 h of adaptation. The 1 mL of PDCoV mixed milk (TCID50 ≈ 107) was orally infected on the third day, and the same volume of sterile PBS buffer was used to mock infection of newborn pigs. Each piglet was treated as an experimental unit and included in the study as a Mock group uninfected or an H.P.I group infected. Otherwise, they are excluded. All 14 experimental units in this study met the criteria and were included in the study. In addition, the investigators who performed randomization (the fourth author) and the investigators who analyzed the data (the second author) were unaware of the group assignment, but the rearing investigators (the first and fifth authors) were aware of the group assignments due to the distinct clinical features.
Histological analysis
After the jejunum and colon were isolated and fixed in tissue fixative solution for more than 24 h, they were dehydrated, embedded, and sectioned. Hematoxylin and eosin were used for staining, and H&E staining of the colon was performed after deparaffinization. IFA analysis of jejunum was performed using specific PDCoV N protein antibody staining (n = 3).
Electron microscopy
PDCoV through 3000 × g differential centrifugation 10 min, then in 4°C, 30 min 12,000 × g differential centrifugation for clarification. After passing through a 0.22 μm filter, viral particles in the supernatant were centrifuged at 140,000 × g for 3 h and then re-suspended in 500 μL phosphate buffer (PBS) and overlaid on a discontinuous (15% −40%) sucrose density gradient. After ultracentrugation at 140,000 × g for 2 h, a 2 mL fraction was collected, and sucrose was removed by additional ultracentrugation. Virus particles were dispersed in 100 μL PBS and negative stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (pH 7.0) for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (n = 3). After the jejunum was isolated and fixed at 4°C in glutaraldehyde for more than 1.5 h, it was rinsed two to three times with PBS. Dehydration was performed using sequentially 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100% ethanol, with 100% ethanol twice for 10 min each. Replacement was performed using 50% and 100% tert-butyl alcohol sequentially, with 100% tert-butyl alcohol twice for 15 min each. The samples were dried at −20°C and glued to the sample stage. After coating, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation was performed (n = 3).
Analysis of recombination
Use RDP included seven procedures, such as Chimaera BootScan, 3seq, GENECONV, MaxChi, and SiScan. This study shows that the recombinant results hold in all seven procedures (p <0.05).
Statistical analysis
The software GraphPad Prism (version 8.3) was used for statistical comparison, where the Student's t-test was used to analyze the data (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). Fluorescence imaging was quantitatively analyzed using ImageJ (version 1.8), and a difference coefficient P less than or equal to 0.5 was considered statistically significant in the Heatmap. Data that were not significant or not statistically significant were not labeled.
Results
Isolation and cell adaptation culture of CH/LNFX/2022
Diarrhea, dehydrated lethal piglets appeared in 2022 in Liaoning Province farm of China, and the RT-PCR and RT-qPCR results indicated that PDCoV was positive, while other pathogens with similar symptoms were negative (Figure 1a and Supplementary Table 2). The small intestine and its contents were homogenized and an adsorbate was made to infect ST cells, and the harvested viral fluids were labeled as P1 and serially passaged until P10 for subsequent studies. After 24 h of infection of ST cells at P10, IFA showed purposeful fluorescence using a monoclonal antibody against the PDCoV-N protein, which was absent in the negative control, and green fluorescence increased as the infection coefficient rose (Figure 1b). The fluorescence quantification results clearly showed the good adaptability (****, p < 0.0001) of PDCoV on ST cells (Figure 1c). Transmission electron microscope results showed that there were virus particles with the same size and shape, and there were crown-shaped protrusions outside the cell membrane (Figure 1d). These results confirmed the existence of PDCoV.
Figure 1.

PDCoV isolation and culture. (a) Assays for PCV2, PDCoV, TGEV, PRRSV, PRV, PEDV, BVDV were performed sequentially. (b) PDCoV P10 infected ST cells, and the MOI = 0, 0.5, 1, and 24 h later for immunofluorescence detection (n = 3). (c) PDCoV-N protein green fluorescence was quantified using the DAPI fluorescence value as a standard (n = 3, ****, p < 0.0001). (d) The supernatant of infected tenth passage lysates was collected for TEM (n = 3).
Although we saw a single virion in the TEM field, we performed next-generation sequencing on P10 to ensure viral purity and for further analysis. The sequencing results showed that the sequencing depth was neat, and the full length of the fragment was 25,506 bp after splicing, which was consistent with the PDCoV genome length, by database alignment, and the sequencing strain was found to be the closest to SCNC201705 (MK572803.1) (Figure 2a, b and c). To better investigate viral replication, we constructed N-gene recombinant plasmids targeting conserved sequences of PDCoV and plotted a standard curve (Figure 2d). A comparative examination of the P1 and P10 generations of PDCoV revealed that the tenth generation of virions replicated at a higher rate than the first generation, and the cell infectivity titer was also higher than that of the first generation (Figure 2e).
Figure 2.

Sequencing and cellular adaptation of PDCoV (a) genome sequencing depth results. (b) Sequencing fragmentation assembly results. (c) Assembly results were aligned to the database. (d) N recombinant plasmids were prepared to generate a standard curve (n = 3). (e) Virus copy numbers of virus fluid from the adsorbent fluid of the disease and from the tenth generation of culture were compared (n = 3), and virus infectivity was compared between the first and tenth generation viruses (n = 8) (** p < 0.01).
Whole genome sequence characterization of CH/LNFX/2022
The isolate named CH/LNFX/2022 was submitted to GenBank under the accession number ON968724.1 after the complete genome sequence was deduced on the Illumina platform. A total of 25,506 nucleotides were detected for this strain, including ORF1a (nt 572–11441), ORF1b (nt 11,441–19368), S (nt 19,350–22829), E (nt 22,823–23074), M (nt 23,067–23720), NSP6 (nt 23,720–24004), N (nt 24,025–25053) and NSP7 (nt 24,119–24721). Full gene phylogenetic analysis showed that PDCoV is currently mainly concentrated in the Americas and endemic in Asia, but the American strains are more closely related to Asian strains and belong to the GI subtype, whereas the endemic strains in Southeast Asia are more distantly related and belong to the GII subtype (Figure 3a). The isolate CH/LNFX/2022 marked by yellow Pentagram belonged to the GI subtype and was close to other isolates in China, and the results of further S gene evolution analysis were consistent with it (Figure 3b). The whole genome of CH/LNFX/2022 shared 97.5%–99.2% identity with other strains and was most similar to SCNC201705 by analysis of PDCoV homology, while Southeast Asian strains showed 97.5% nucleotide homology (Supplementary Fig. S2). The genomic homology normalized heatmap showed significant differences compared to the genomes of the other strains, and this result was repeated for the S gene (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Figure 3.

The whole genome and S protein sequences of the CH/LNFX/2022 strain were analyzed for genetic evolution. The legend of A and B is the same. (a) The CH/LNFX/2022 and 50 PDCoV strains were subjected to evolutionary analysis and divided into two subtypes, GI and GII, with three lineages of strains from China/America, Japan, and Korea/Southeast asia. (b) S protein is the same as above.
The 5-aa mutation alters the spatial conformation of the S protein of PDCoV
Amino acid alignments and analyses of two randomly selected Chinese strains, Japanese strains, American strains, and Southeast Asian strains were performed using DNAMAN. It showed 5-aa mutations on the S protein, A – V (aa 137) with the NTD structure, D – H (aa 1076) and I – V (aa 1101) located in the HR-C domain, S-L (aa 505), and T-I (aa 559) at the S1/2 junction (Figure 4a). Interestingly, we found the presence of partial amino acid specific conservation except for the E protein within strains from various regions, and these symptoms were the basis for the appraisal of PDCoV subtypes. Examples are GI/GII group SEQ/SDQ (aa 158–160) and Chinese/American or Japanese/Southeast Asian strains ITPRI/LTTRI/LTSRV (aa 666–670) in the S protein, GI/GII group NSD/NND (aa 180–182) in the M protein, PVE/PAE (aa 42–44) in the N protein, Chinese strains/other regional strains KLH/KRH (aa 17–19) in the NS6 protein and Chinese/American or Japanese/Southeast Asian strains RPN/RPS/KPN (aa 153–155) in the NS7 protein (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Two strains per region were randomly picked for alignment. (a) S protein to contrast. (b) M protein to contrast. (c) N protein to contrast. (d) NS6 protein to contrast. (e) E protein to contrast. (f) NS7 protein to contrast. The red box represents the unique evolutionary characteristics of CH/HLJJS/2022, and the blue box represents the characteristics of each lineage.
Prediction of spatial helix trends of CH/LNFX/2022 and other strains’ proteins using DNAMAN. The A-V mutations located in the NTD domain shifted the strains down by COIL and up by STRAND (Supplementary Fig. S4A). S-L and T-I mutations located at the S1/2 junction raise the maximum likelihood HELIX and STRAND scores, respectively, while suppressing the second likelihood COIL (Supplementary Fig. S4B). D-H and I-V mutations located in the HR-C domain suppressed the maximum scored coil, facilitating the second scored (Supplementary Fig. S4C). To more intuitively embody the mutational impact, we quantified the predicted outcomes, embodied using line charts (Supplementary Fig. S4D). Modeling of the spatial structure of each protein from isolates and other strains showed in contrast no significant changes in the structure of the proteins except for the S protein (Figure 5a and Supplementary Fig. S5). To accurately identify a range of changes caused by the 5-aa mutation, we focused on the simulation scope of the mutation to identify potential changes at the mutation site. It was shown that 5-aa in the S protein altered the tertiary structure of the NTD, S1/2, and HR-C domains, with deflection of two helices of S1/2 by S-L and T-I, NTD, and HR-C protein protrusions by D-H and A-V (Figure 5b, c and d).
Figure 5.

Detailed alignment of the S protein model to the reference strain. (a) S protein modeling results for CH/LNFX/2022. (b) The S protein 100-150AA range was modeled and the protein tertiary structure has a specific bulge at A – V (aa 137). (c) The S protein 500-570AA range was modeled and the protein tertiary structure has a specific bulge at S-L (aa 505) and T-I (aa 559). (d) The S protein 1050-1100AA range was modeled and the protein tertiary structure has a specific bulge at D – H (aa 1076).
5-aa altered S protein antigenic epitopes and function
After sequence specificity and structure specificity of the S protein, four representative strains were randomly selected for protein function alignment according to region. Alignments to CH/LNFX/2022 and other lineages represent strain neutralizing epitopes via DNASTAR. A – V (aa 137), T-I (aa 559), and D – H (aa 1076) located at the NTD, S1/2, and HR-C showed differences from currently circulating PDCoV epitopes (Figure 6a). Interestingly, the remaining mutations, which did not alter the antigenic epitope, increased O-GalNAc glycosylation sites, implying that the highly glycosylated S protein can accelerate the glycosylation process and block the glycol-shield of antibody neutralizing viruses, equally unfavorable for vaccines and neutralizing antibodies to work (Figure 6b). Coronavirus 3C-like protease cleaves S protein as an important link in host invasion by coronaviruses. To explore whether mutations at the S1/2 junction of isolates affect this function, we predicted the cleavage site of S protein by Netcorona-1.0. A mutation of CH/LNFX/2022 at T-I (aa 559) that eliminates only one of the two cleavage sites was found by alignment of isolates and other prevalent strains (Figure 6c). In accordance with expectation, mutations located in the caudal HR-C domain did not alter the transmembrane function of the S protein (Figure 6d).
Figure 6.

Protein function prediction. (a) Primary epitope comparative analyses of five regionally representative strains and CH/LNFX/2022 strain revealed 3-aa mutations out finding specific changes. (b) O-GalNAc (mucin type) glycosylation sites in mammalian proteins were predicted using netnglyc-1.0. (c) Prediction of the position of the coronavirus 3C like protease cleaving protease in the protein using netcorona-1.0. (d) TMHMM (v2.0) was used to predict the transmembrane functional changes of S protein.
Diarrhea in CH/LNFX/2022 newborn piglets
To determine the histopathological changes in piglets infected with the PDCoV CH/LNFX/2022 strain, all piglets were adaptively fed with artificial milk substitute for 48 h, and the infected group was given PDCoV orally (TCID50 ≈ 106), and the mock-infected group was given PBS orally, and tested 72 h after infection (Figure 7a). Overall results were similar in four piglets treated orally with CH/LNFX/2022, with watery feces at 48 h of infection, dehydration, and marked emaciation at 72 h, while normal in the simulated infection group (Figure 7b). The results of colon staining showed that compared with the mock infection group, the submucosa layer was significantly reduced (pink, **, p < 0.01), and fistulas were formed in some areas after CH/LNFX/2022 infection. In addition, muscular layer (orange, **, p < 0.01), serosal layer (blue, ***, p < 0.001), and U-shaped recess (green, *, p < 0.05) length were significantly reduced (Figure 7c). The immunofluorescence results of the jejunum of the piglets confirmed the establishment of the animal model. The infection group showed specific PDCoV fluorescence (red), while the mock infection group showed negative results (Figure 7d). The SEM results showed that the jejunal mucosa of newborn piglets infected with CH/LNFX/2022 developed a large area of ulceration, while the mock infection group was smooth and flat (Figure 7e), which corresponded to the results in Figure 7c.
Figure 7.

Pathological analysis of newborn piglets infected with highly pathogenic CH/LNFX/2022. (a) Newborn piglets were orally infected with PDCoV (n = 10) after 48 h artificial milk replacement, and the mock infection group was treated with PBS instead (n = 4). (b) Watery diarrhea occurred 24 h after infection and was normal in the mock infection group. (c) Colonic staining results were quantified using the mock infection group as a control (n = 3, *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). (d) The animal model of infection was established by immunofluorescence of the jejunum (n = 3). (e) Results of scanning electron microscopy of the colon (n = 3).
Discussion
Piglet diarrhea is a common epidemic disease in the swine industry, and the causes of piglet diarrhea are complex and diverse, but viral diarrhea can cause the most serious harm [24,25]. PDCoV is an emerging coronavirus, and swine infection is followed by symptoms such as vomiting, diarrhea, and lethality from dehydration [26]. In 2012, PDCoV was initially reported in Hong Kong, China, and in 2014, PDCoV became endemic from the United States and spread to several countries worldwide, including China, Japan, Korea, Thailand, and Canada, Mexico, and other countries and regions located in the Americas [27]. Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent and control pathogen transmission, but the commercialized PDCoV vaccine has not yet emerged and genomic diversity has caused great economic losses to the global swine industry [28,29].
So far, PDCoV has evolved into three lineages in China, America/Japan/Korea, and South-East Asia [30,31]. Since 2014, the Chinese lineage has been the main branch of PDCoV evolutionary transmission, and at the same time, it is of great significance to keep abreast of its epidemic trends and evolution as a reference lineage for existing vaccine development [32]. The S protein is the PDCoV major virulence associated glycoprotein and consists of a binding subunit S1 and a membrane fusion subunit S2, where S1 includes both NTD and CTD domains, has neutralizing epitopes that can stimulate the induction of neutralizing antibodies, and its RBD located at the CTD has a highly similar binding region to that on APNs of humans and pigs, which is the structural basis for PDCoV infection of humans and pigs [33]. At the same time, studies have shown that amino acid mutation and loss of S protein can affect the pathogenicity of the strain, and these results indicate that S protein plays an important role in influencing the virulence of coronavirus. In the present study, we show for the first time that S protein generates simultaneous 5-aa mutations at aa 137, aa 505, aa 559, aa 1076, and aa 1101, resulting in altered protein structure and function in the CH/LNFX/2022 NTD, S1/2, and HR-C regions (Figure 5 and 6). Meanwhile, we speculate that the A – V (aa 137), T-I (aa 559), and D – H (aa 1076) antigenic epitope alterations of CH/LNFX/2022 negatively impact the development of existing vaccines [34,35].
S2 includes the intrinsic membrane fusion peptide FP, peptide repeat HR, transmembrane adjacent region JMD, transmembrane domain TMD, and cytosolic region CD [36]. Upon binding of the RBD to the receptor, the S2 subunit changes conformation by insertion of the FP into the host cell membrane, with the HR arrangement bound into a 6HB that composes the fusion core leading to fusion of the virus with the cell membrane [37,38]. But it was discovered from the recent PDCoV epidemic that its glycosylation sites S-L (aa 505) and T-I (aa 559) for defense against vaccines and neutralizing antibodies have increased (Figure 6b). It is thought-provoking that three mutations in the 5-aa mutation alter the antigenic epitope and the remaining two increase a glycosylation site, which may be a unique evolutionary mechanism of immune evasion by PDCoV. Meanwhile, our study also found that T-I (aa 559) weakens a coronavirus 3C-like protease cleavage site, making the only two changed into one (Figure 6c). The gain of its glycosylation site and the disappearance of the coronavirus cleavage site may present difficulties for the in-depth study of PDCoV.
Adaptation of a strain to susceptible cells is an important link for strain isolation and identification. In this study, we detected the virus replication of CH/LNFX/2022 in ST cell culture P10 and P0 in tissue grinding solution (Figure 2e). The titer of P1 and P10 is not meaningful as P0 detection titer of tissue grinding solution. The ileum is more sensitive to enteric coronaviruses such as PDCoV and PEDV than the colon, and the lesions are mainly concentrated in the small intestine [39,40]. In this study, the immunofluorescence detection of PDCoV in the jejunum was used as the “lower limit” of the experiment to measure the success of the animal infection model. However, the morphological and ultrastructural observations of the colon, corresponding to the theme of the present study, on the basis of jejunal lesions were the validation of the highly pathogenic strain as the experimental “upper limit” (Supplementary Fig. S6). This is different from the previous general belief that there is no significant change in the colon after PDCoV infection [41–43]. This could be a unique change from the 5-aa mutation.
Genome recombination of different strains is an effective way to escape immune pressure, and cross-species recombination is particularly important. For example, the emergence of PDCoV HKU15 is the recombination between HKU17 and HKU11 in avian genus [44,45]. To further investigate the recombination relationship of CH/LNFX/2022, HUK11, HUK13, HUK16, HUK17, HUK19, HUK20, and HUK21 from different avian species were added as reference sequences, together with PDCoV reference sequences (Supplementary Table S3). The results show that CH/LNFX/2022 is a recombination of major parent CHN-HB-2014, CHN-SC2015, and minor parent Swine/Vietnam/Binh21/2015, HNZK-02. This indicates that the cross-species recombination of PDCoV may be nearing an end (Supplementary Fig. S7).
Coronaviruses have caused three major epidemics since 2003, including SARS-CoV-2, and in four genera of the family Coronaviridae, human infection is limited to alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruse [46]. In 2021, however, it was shown that PDCoV strains were identified in plasma samples from three Haiti children, the first human-related coronaviruses to infect outside the population, particularly in settings where close human to animal contact is possible [47]. Further studies revealed that the RBD of PDCoV is distinct from PEDV and has a highly similar binding region to human APN, providing a structural basis for infecting humans [48]. The latest study shows that the S protein of wild bird D-type coronavirus can invade cells of the corresponding species genus via chicken or swine APN mediated invasion, respectively, revealing the possibility of expanding the infected population by PDCoV [49]. Therefore, the detection of amino acid changes in the S protein can help to grasp its antigenic, pathogenic, and neutralizing epitope changes and has important public health implications for the development of vaccines and the establishment of assays [23].
Conclusions
In this study, we analyzed the molecular characteristics and regression infection of CH/LNFX/2022 strain isolated from newborn piglets with diarrhea in China in 2022. The highly pathogenic CH/LNFX/2022 strain changed the three-domain epitope, added NTD and HR-C glycosylation sites, and reduced S1/2 coronavirus 3C-like protease cleavage sites. It also reduced the thickness of the small intestinal mucosa and disrupted the mucosal barrier. All the facts suggest that PDCoV is on a more complex path with important public health implications. Our results provide new insights into the establishment of high standard vaccines and diagnostics.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Thank Key Laboratory of the Provincial of Heilongjiang for Common Animal Disease Prevention and Treatment, Heilongjiang Key Laboratory for Laboratory Animals and Comparative Medicine for their support and help in this study and MAGIGENE Technology Co., LTD for their support and help in this study.
Funding Statement
Key Research and Development Program of Heilongjiang Province (No. GZ20210178); China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (No. CARS-35); Distinguished Professor of Longjiang Scholars Support Project (No. T201908).
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Author’s contributions
X. Y. had a major role in the conception, designed of the trial, managed the main trial and drafted the final manuscript. W.-H. L. authored and performed the statistical analyses. Y.-Q. Z. authored the cost-effectiveness analyses and W.-T. Q. performed the analysis. B.-Y. Z. was involved in animal experiments. X. Y. also contributed to the study design, statistical analyses, and the interpretation of the findings. J.-L. L. and H.-X. L. provided expertise to the study design and delivery. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability statement
The CH/LNFX/2022 and other DCoV sequences used in this study are available in GenBank of the National Center for Biotechnological Information. The accession numbers of all sequences are showed in Supplementary Table 1 and Table 3.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Northeast Agricultural University (NEAUEC20230383). All procedures were in accordance with the requirements of the National Guidelines for the Management and Use of Experimental Animals (CNAS-CL06: 2018). The ARRIVE guidelines were followed in this study.
Supplemental data
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2024.2446742
References
- [1].Woo PC, Lau SK, Lam CS, et al. Discovery of seven novel mammalian and avian coronaviruses in the genus deltacoronavirus supports bat coronaviruses as the gene source of alphacoronavirus and betacoronavirus and avian coronaviruses as the gene source of gammacoronavirus and deltacoronavirus. J Virol Apr. 2012;86:3995–14. Epub 2012/01/27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Ajayi T, Dara R, Misener M, et al. Herd-level prevalence and incidence of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV) and porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) in swine herds in Ontario, Canada. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018. Oct;65(5):1197–1207. Epub 2018/04/03. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Perez-Rivera C, Ramirez-Mendoza H, Mendoza-Elvira S, et al. First report and phylogenetic analysis of porcine deltacoronavirus in Mexico. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019. Jul;66:1436–1441. Epub 2019/04/04. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Wang L, Byrum B, Zhang Y.. Detection and genetic characterization of deltacoronavirus in pigs, Ohio, USA, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014. Jul;20(7):1227–1230. Epub 2014/06/26. doi: 10.3201/eid2007.140296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Zhang Y, Cheng Y, Xing G, et al. Detection and spike gene characterization in porcine deltacoronavirus in China during 2016–2018. Infection, Genetics Evolution. 2019. Sep;73:151–158. Epub 2019/04/27. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.04.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Hu H, Jung K, Vlasova AN, et al. Isolation and characterization of porcine deltacoronavirus from pigs with diarrhea in the United States. J Clin Microbiol May. 2015;53(5):1537–1548. Epub 2015/03/06.doi: 10.1128/JCM.00031-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Song D, Zhou X, Peng Q, et al. Newly emerged porcine deltacoronavirus associated with diarrhoea in Swine in China: identification, prevalence and full-length genome sequence analysis. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015. Dec;62:575–580. Epub 2015/08/08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Lee S, Lee C. Functional characterization and proteomic analysis of the nucleocapsid protein of porcine deltacoronavirus. Virus Res. 2015. Oct 2;208:136–145. Epub 2015/06/24. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.06.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Phan MVT, Ngo Tri T, Hong Anh P, et al. Identification and characterization of coronaviridae genomes from Vietnamese bats and rats based on conserved protein domains. Virus Evol. 2018. Jul;4:vey2. Epub 2018/12/21. doi: 10.1093/ve/vey035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Zhang J. Porcine deltacoronavirus: overview of infection dynamics, diagnostic methods, prevalence and genetic evolution. Virus Res. 2016. Dec 2;226:71–84. Epub 2016/06/09. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.05.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Zhang J, Chen J, Shi D, et al. Porcine deltacoronavirus enters cells via two pathways: a protease-mediated one at the cell surface and another facilitated by cathepsins in the endosome. J Biol Chem. 2019. Jun 21;294(25):9830–9843. Epub 2019/05/10. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Chiou HY, Huang YL, Deng MC, et al. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Spike (S) gene of the new variants of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus in Taiwan. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017. Feb;64(1):157–166. Epub 2015/04/24. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Duan C, Wang J, Liu Y, et al. Antiviral effects of ergosterol peroxide in a pig model of porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) infection involves modulation of apoptosis and tight junction in the small intestine. Vet Res. 2021. Jun 14;52(1):86. Epub 2021/06/16. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00955-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Shang J, Zheng Y, Yang Y, et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of porcine deltacoronavirus spike protein in the prefusion state. J Virol. Feb 15;92. Epub 2017/10/27.2018;92(4). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01556-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Ji W, Peng Q, Fang X, et al. Structures of a deltacoronavirus spike protein bound to porcine and human receptors. Nat Commun. 2022. Mar 18;13:1467. Epub 2022/03/20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Yao X, Qiao WT, Zhang YQ, et al. A new PEDV strain CH/HLJJS/2022 can challenge current detection methods and vaccines. Virol J. 2023. Jan 20;20(1):13. Epub 2023/01/21. doi: 10.1186/s12985-023-01961-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Zhou X, Zhou L, Zhang P, et al. A strain of porcine deltacoronavirus: genomic characterization, pathogenicity and its full-length cDNA infectious clone. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021. Jul;68(4):2130–2146. Epub 2020/10/05. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Shu X, Han F, Hu Y, et al. Co-infection of porcine deltacoronavirus and porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus alters gut microbiota diversity and composition in the colon of piglets. Virus Res. 2022. Dec;322:198954. Epub 2022/10/06. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2022.198954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Boley PA, Alhamo MA, Lossie G, et al. Porcine deltacoronavirus infection and transmission in poultry, United States1. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(2):255–265. Epub 2020/01/22. doi: 10.3201/eid2602.190346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Jung K, Hu H, Saif LJ. Calves are susceptible to infection with the newly emerged porcine deltacoronavirus, but not with the swine enteric alphacoronavirus, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Arch Virol. 2017. Aug;162(8):2357–2362. Epub 2017/04/05. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3351-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Li W, Hulswit RJG, Kenney SP, et al. Broad receptor engagement of an emerging global coronavirus may potentiate its diverse cross-species transmissibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018. May 29;115(22):E5135–E5143. Epub 2018/05/16. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802879115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Liang Q, Zhang H, Li B, et al. Susceptibility of chickens to porcine deltacoronavirus infection. Viruses. 2019. Jun 21;11(6):573. Epub 2019/06/27. 573. doi: 10.3390/v11060573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Yao X, Zhu Y, Qiao WT, et al. Based on the results of PEDV phylogenetic analysis of the most recent isolates in China, the occurrence of further mutations in the antigenic site S1° and COE of the S protein which is the target protein of the vaccine. Transboundary Emerg Dis. 2023. [2023 Feb 22];2023:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2023/1227110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Fu X, Fang B, Liu Y, et al. Newly emerged porcine enteric alphacoronavirus in southern China: identification, origin and evolutionary history analysis. Infect Genet Evol. 2018. Aug;62:179–187. Epub 2018/04/29. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.04.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Zhou P, Fan H, Lan T, et al. Fatal swine acute diarrhoea syndrome caused by an HKU2-related coronavirus of bat origin. Nat Apr. 2018;556(7700):255–258. Epub 2018/04/06. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0010-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Wang Q, Vlasova AN, Kenney SP, et al. Emerging and re-emerging coronaviruses in pigs. Curr Opin Virol Feb. 2019;34:39–49. Epub 2019/01/18. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Tang P, Cui E, Song Y, et al. Porcine deltacoronavirus and its prevalence in China: a review of epidemiology, evolution, and vaccine development. Arch Virol. 2021. Nov;166:2975–2988. Epub 2021/09/16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Chattha KS, Roth JA, Saif LJ. Strategies for design and application of enteric viral vaccines. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2015;3(1):375–395. Epub 2014/11/12. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Zhou L, Sun Y, Lan T, et al. Retrospective detection and phylogenetic analysis of swine acute diarrhoea syndrome coronavirus in pigs in southern China. Transbound Emerg Dis Mar. 2019;66:687–695. Epub 2018/09/02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Janetanakit T, Lumyai M, Bunpapong N, et al. Porcine deltacoronavirus, Thailand, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis Apr. 2016;22(4):757–759. Epub 2016/03/18. doi: 10.3201/eid2204.151852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Lorsirigool A, Saeng-Chuto K, Madapong A, et al. The genetic diversity and complete genome analysis of two novel porcine deltacoronavirus isolates in Thailand in 2015. Virus Genes Apr. 2017;53:240–248. Epub 2016/12/23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Dong N, Fang L, Yang H, et al. Isolation, genomic characterization, and pathogenicity of a Chinese porcine deltacoronavirus strain CHN-HN-2014. Vet Microbiol. 2016. Nov 30;196:98–106. Epub 2016/12/13. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.10.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Ji W, Peng Q, Fang X, et al. Author correction: structures of a deltacoronavirus spike protein bound to porcine and human receptors. Nat Commun. 2023. Jul 20;14:4379. Epub 2023/07/21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Jia Y, Cao JS, Wei ZY. Bioinformatics analysis of spike proteins of porcine enteric coronaviruses. Biomed Res Int. 2021. Jul 2;6689471:11. doi: 10.1155/2021/6689471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Liu Y, Wang B, Liang QZ, et al. Roles of two Major domains of the porcine deltacoronavirus S1 subunit in receptor binding and neutralization. J Virol. 2021. Dec;95(24). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01118-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nat Mar. 2020;579(7798):265–269. Epub 2020/02/06. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].da Hora AS. Coronavirus: a veterinary perspective. Nat Apr. 2020;580:321. Epub 2020/04/15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Tortorici MA, Walls AC, Joshi A, et al. Structure, receptor recognition, and antigenicity of the human coronavirus CCoV-HuPn-2018 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2022. Jun 23;185(13):2279–2291.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Chen Y, Li P, Zhen R, et al. Effects of niacin on intestinal epithelial barrier, intestinal immunity, and microbial community in weaned piglets challenged by PDCoV. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022. Oct;111:109054. Epub 2022/08/04. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Zhang K, Lin S, Li J, et al. Modulation of innate antiviral immune response by porcine enteric coronavirus. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:845137. Epub 2022/03/04. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.845137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Kikuti M, Picasso-Risso C, Corzo CA. Porcine deltacoronavirus occurrence in the United States Breeding Herds since its emergence in 2014. Viruses. 2024. Mar 13;16(3):445. Epub 2024/03/28. doi: 10.3390/v16030445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Shi Y, Li B, Cheng J, et al. Microbial community and metabolome analysis of the porcine intestinal damage Model induced by the IPEC-J2 cell culture-adapted porcine Deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) infection. Microorganisms. 2024. Apr 27;12(5):874. Epub 2024/05/25. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12050874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Wang L, Hayes J, Sarver C, et al. Porcine deltacoronavirus: histological lesions and genetic characterization. Arch Virol. 2016. Jan;161:171–175. Epub 2015/10/18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Duraes-Carvalho R, Caserta LC, Barnabe AC, et al. Coronaviruses detected in Brazilian wild Birds reveal Close evolutionary relationships with beta- and deltacoronaviruses isolated from mammals. J Mol Evol. 2015. Aug;81(1–2):21–23. Epub 2015/08/08. doi: 10.1007/s00239-015-9693-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Lau SKP, Wong EYM, Tsang CC, et al. Discovery and sequence analysis of four Deltacoronaviruses from birds in the Middle East reveal interspecies jumping with recombination as a potential mechanism for avian-to-avian and avian-to-mammalian transmission. J Virol. 2018. Aug 1;92(15). Epub 2018/05/18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00265-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Andeweg SP, Vennema H, Veldhuijzen I, et al. Elevated risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 beta, gamma, and delta variants compared with alpha variant in vaccinated individuals. Sci Transl Med. Feb 22;2023;15:eabn4338. Epub 2022/07/22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Lednicky JA, Tagliamonte MS, White SK, et al. Independent infections of porcine deltacoronavirus among Haitian children. Nature. 2021. Dec;600(7887):133–137. Epub 2021/11/19. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04111-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Bahoussi AN, Wang PH, Shah PT, et al. Evolutionary plasticity of zoonotic porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV): genetic characteristics and geographic distribution. BMC Vet Res. 2022. Dec 22;18(1):444. Epub 2022/12/23. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03554-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Liang QZ, Wang B, Ji CM, et al. Chicken or porcine aminopeptidase N mediates cellular entry of pseudoviruses carrying spike glycoprotein from the avian Deltacoronaviruses HKU11, HKU13, and HKU17. J Virol. 2023. Feb 28;97(2):e0194722. Epub 2023/01/20. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01947-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The CH/LNFX/2022 and other DCoV sequences used in this study are available in GenBank of the National Center for Biotechnological Information. The accession numbers of all sequences are showed in Supplementary Table 1 and Table 3.
