Abstract
Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation (PAAD) without odontoid fracture is exceptionally rare. We report the first documented case entirely asymptomatic at presentation. A 78-year-old woman, evaluated after a motor vehicle collision, presented with no neck pain, neurological deficits, or loss of consciousness. Computed tomography scan revealed PAAD without odontoid fracture. Closed reduction was successfully performed, followed by posterior C1–C2 fixation with the Goel technique, extended to C3 due to C2–C3 instability. Postoperative imaging confirmed complete reduction, and the patient remained neurologically intact at 6-month follow-up. This case highlights the potential for silent presentation and the need for individualized management.
Keywords: Asymptomatic, case report, closed reduction, Goel technique, posterior atlantoaxial dislocation
INTRODUCTION
Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation (PAAD) without an associated odontoid fracture is an exceptionally rare injury, first described by Haralson and Boyd in 1969.[1] Since then, only isolated cases have been described in the literature. Although a large proportion of patients with PAAD in the absence of odontoid fracture have been reported as neurologically intact,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] all previously published cases exhibited at least neck pain or loss of consciousness. To our knowledge, no report has documented a patient with traumatic PAAD who was entirely asymptomatic, without neurological deficits, cervical pain, or alteration of consciousness at the time of presentation. This raises important questions regarding the anatomical or biomechanical factors that may protect certain individuals from neurological compromise despite significant atlantoaxial displacement. Proposed explanations include congenital or age-related variations in spinal canal diameter, craniovertebral morphology, and the buffering effect of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) surrounding the spinal cord.[2,3,9,17] In this report, we describe the first documented case of completely asymptomatic traumatic PAAD without associated odontoid fracture, and we provide a review of previously published cases, discussing potential protective anatomical factors and implications for diagnosis and management.
CASE REPORT
A 78-year-old woman presented to our emergency department following a low-energy frontal motor vehicle collision. She was alert and hemodynamically stable at admission, reporting no neck pain, sensory disturbances, or motor weakness. Physical examination revealed no tenderness or deformity in the neck area, and neurological assessment was unremarkable. Her Glasgow Coma Scale was 15/15 at presentation. Given the dynamics of trauma, the patient underwent an urgent computed tomography (CT) scan. Unexpectedly, imaging revealed a PAAD [Figure 1].
Figure 1.

Posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without odontoid fracture – Three-dimensional reconstruction of the computed tomography scan; (a) Frontal view; (b) Sagittal view; (c) Axial view; (d) Mid-sagittal section
No fracture of the odontoid process, posterior arch, or lateral masses of C1 was detected. The facet joints appeared intact with preserved cortical margins. Measurements of the sagittal canal diameter and craniovertebral angles were performed on mid-sagittal and axial planes using PACS workstation tools. The foramen magnum diameter measured 37.5 mm at the CT mid-sagittal cut, while the C1 diameter measured 31.5 mm. The spinal canal diameter was 16.9 mm at C2 level. The posterior translation of C1 relative to C2 measured 16 mm on the axial plane [Figure 2].
Figure 2.

Computed tomography (CT) scan of the posterior atlantoaxial dislocation (PAAD); (a) Sagittal CT scan showing the PAAD; (b) Sagittal CT scan with measurement of the foramen magnum, C1 diameter and spinal canal diameter; (c) Axial view of the CT scan showing the entity of the dislocation and distance from the anterior facet of the odontoid process to the articular surface of the atlas
A closed manual reduction was performed under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic guidance. Gentle traction and extension maneuvers achieved successful correction of the posterior displacement. Subsequently, posterior C1–C2 stabilization using the Goel technique was performed. Due to mild C2–C3 instability, the screw fixation was extended to C3. Final intra-operative radiograph and postoperative CT scan confirmed complete reduction and stabilization of the dislocation, correct screw placement, and restoration of the normal relationship between the anterior arch of C1 and the odontoid process [Figure 3]. Postoperatively, the patient was hospitalized in the ICU without complications and was discharged on postoperative day 25, after complete rehabilitation of all trauma-related injuries, including rib fractures. At 6-month follow-up, the patient remained neurologically intact and demonstrated stable fixation of the atlantoaxial complex on imaging.
Figure 3.

Postoperative imaging after reduction and stabilization of the posterior atlantoaxial dislocation (PAAD); (a) Intra-operative fluoroscopy after screw fixation; (b) Sagittal computed tomography scan showing reduction of the PAAD; (c) Sagittal scan showing the C1–C3 screw fixation
This work was conducted as a single-patient case report in accordance with the CARE guidelines.[18] Written informed patient consent for participation and publication was obtained, and institutional review board approval was deemed unnecessary according to institutional policy for anonymized descriptive study.
DISCUSSION
We conducted a literature search of previously published studies using the keyword “posterior atlantoaxial dislocation” in PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE. Our review identified 16 reported cases of PAAD without odontoid fracture in patients presenting without neurological deficits. However, none of the published cases described a completely asymptomatic patient. All reported patients exhibited neck pain and/or loss of consciousness at presentation [Table 1]. In contrast, our patient presented without neurological symptoms, neck pain, or loss of consciousness, suggesting that individual anatomical or physiological factors may contribute to preserved neurological function in selected cases.
Table 1.
Summary of cases from literature review presenting with posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without odontoid fracture and without neurological deficit
| Study | Country | Sex | Age (years) | Trauma cause | Loss of consciousness | Neck pain | Closed reduction attempt (day) | Intervention | Follow-up (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haralson and Boyd (1969)[1] | USA | Male | 30 | MVA | Yes | NA | Success (6) | Posterior wiring | 18 |
| Patzakis et al. (1974)[4] | USA | Male | 37 | MVA | Yes | NA | Success (1) | - | 36 |
| Jamshidi et al. (1983)[5] | USA | Male | 22 | MVA | Yes | Yes | Success (2) | Posterior wiring | NA |
| Wong et al. (1991)[6] | USA | Male | 23 | MVA | Yes | Yes | Success (1) | Posterior wiring | 84 |
| Fujimura et al. (1997)[7] | Japan | Male | 54 | MVA | No | Yes | Success (1) | - | NA |
| Neumann et al. (2003)[8] | Germany | Male | 22 | MVA | Yes | NA | Success (1) | - | 24 |
| Jiang et al. (2010)[9] | China | Male | 48 | MVA | Yes | Yes | Failed (2) | Anterior trans-articular screws | 21 |
| Zhen et al. (2011)[10] | China | Male | 44 | EQ | Yes | Yes | Failed (9) | Posterior wiring | NA |
| Jagannatha et al. (2013)[11] | India | Male | 32 | MVA | Yes | Yes | Success (1) | Posterior C1–C2 screws | 12 |
| Hu et al. (2015)[12] | China | Male | 50 | HOT | Yes | Yes | Failed (1) | Posterior C1–C2 screws | 15 |
| Yu et al. (2015)[13] | China | Male | 43 | FFH | Yes | No | Failed (24) | Anterior trans-articular screws and posterior C1–C2 screws | 12 |
| Ning et al. (2019)[14] | China | Male | 52 | MVA | No | Yes | Not attempted | Posterior C1–C2 screws | 6 |
| Peterson et al. (2020)[15] | USA | Male | 39 | MVA | Yes | NA | Success (1) | Occipito-cervical (C5) fusion | NA |
| Sumethvanich et al. (2021)[16] | Thailand | Female | 40 | MVA | Yes | Yes | Success (1) | Posterior C1–C2 screws | 12 |
| Ibrahim et al. (2024)[2] | Egypt | Male | 21 | MVA | Yes | Yes | Success (1) | Posterior C1–C2 screws | 36 |
| Yan et al. (2025)[3] | China | Male | 43 | MVA | Yes | Yes | Failed (1) | Posterior C1–C2 screws | NA |
| Our case (2025) | Italy | Female | 78 | MVA | No | No | Success (1) | Posterior C1–C3 screws | 6 |
MVA - Motor vehicle accident; EQ - Earthquake; FFH - Fall from height; HOT - Heavy object trauma; NA - Not available
Possible mechanisms of asymptomatic presentation
Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how significant C1–C2 displacement may occur without producing neurological injury. One commonly cited concept is Steel’s “rule of thirds,” which states that at the level of the atlas, approximately one-third of the spinal canal is occupied by the odontoid process, one-third by the spinal cord, and the remaining third by CSF.[2,9,17] In this model, a sufficiently generous posterior CSF space could act as a protective buffer during posterior translation of C1, reducing the likelihood of direct cord compression. An alternative explanation involves individual anatomical variations. Patients with a congenitally wide spinal canal or an enlarged craniovertebral junction may tolerate a greater degree of atlantoaxial displacement before neurological structures become compromised. A further consideration relates to the biomechanics of trauma. Low rotational force or favorable motion vectors may allow joint displacement without significant cord compression.
However, these hypotheses remain speculative and are difficult to be demonstrated in large cohorts due to the exceptional rarity of this type of injury.
Management considerations
Management of PAAD without odontoid fracture remains challenging due to the potential for catastrophic neurological injury and not standardized due to the rarity of the condition.[2,3] Closed reduction remains the first-line approach whenever feasible, but surgical stabilization is needed to prevent redislocation.[2,3,19,20] The Goel technique is widely recognized for its biomechanical strength and versatility.[19,20] In our patient, the stabilization was extended to C3 to address mild C2–C3 instability, reflecting the need to individualize fixation strategies based on individual clinical and anatomical features.[15,20] This extended approach is not commonly reported in the management of PAAD without odontoid fracture, but this case may reflect the need for individualized management for each case.
CONCLUSION
This is the first known case of traumatic PAAD without odontoid fracture, completely asymptomatic at presentation. Our case highlights that such severe injury may be present without any symptoms and underscores the importance of careful trauma evaluation. Individualized surgical planning may be required, depending on clinical findings and anatomical variations.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Nil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Haralson RH, 3rd, Boyd HB. Posterior dislocation of the atlas on the axis without fracture. Report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:561–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ibrahim MF, Abdelgawaad AS, El-Morshidy EM, Hatem A, El-Meshtawy M, El-Sharkawi M. Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without an associated fracture: A PRISMA-compliant case-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Spine J. 2024;18:889–902. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yan T, Qi D, Ni H, Xie B, Chang J, Zhang L, et al. Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation based on imaging of the anterior arch-odontoid process-transverse ligament complex: A retrospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2025;43:98–107. doi: 10.3171/2025.2.SPINE24876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Patzakis MJ, Knopf A, Elfering M, Hoffer M, Harvey JP., Jr Posterior dislocation of the atlas on the axis; a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1260–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jamshidi S, Dennis MW, Azzam C, Karim N. Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without neurological deficit: Case report. Neurosurgery. 1983;12:211–3. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198302000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wong DA, Mack RP, Craigmile TK. Traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture of the odontoid. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:587–9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199105000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fujimura Y, Nakamura M, Kobayashi K. Posterior dislocation of the atlas on the axis without fracture: A case report. J Orthop Surg. 1997;5:81–4. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Neumann U, Urbanski H, Riedel K. Posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture of the odontoid. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1343–6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jiang LS, Shen L, Wang W, Wu H, Dai LY. Posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture and neurologic deficit: A case report and the review of literature. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(Suppl 2):S118–23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1150-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhen P, Lan X, Yang LW. Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without associated fracture and neurological deficit. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:681–5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1228-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jagannatha AT, Srikantha U, Murthy PR, Varma RG, Chakravarthy H, Hegde AS. Unique paradoxical atlantoaxial dislocation with C1-C2 facet diastases and isolated ligamentous injury to the craniovertebral junction without neurological deficits: A case report. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2013;4:90–3. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.128542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hu D, Yang X, Wang J. Traumatic posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture of odontoid process: A case report and systematic analysis of 19 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:e342–5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu HM, Malhotra K, Butler JS, Wu SQ. Anterior and posterior fixation for delayed treatment of posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2015212436. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-212436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ning S, Yang S, Ding W, Ma T, Wu Z. Posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture or neurological symptoms treated by transoral-posterior approach surgery: A case report and literature review. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:37–40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5823-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peterson R, Burkhardt E, Sin A. Traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation without neurologic deficit. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:188–90. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sumethvanich S, Sookpattee C, Wangjiraphan N. Pure traumatic posterior dislocation of the atlantoaxial joint without associated odontoid fracture and neurological deficit: A case report, reduction technique and literature review. Lampang Med J. 2021;42:39–47. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martin MD, Bruner HJ, Maiman DJ. Anatomic and biomechanical considerations of the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:2–6. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365830.10052.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2013201554. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994;129:47–53. doi: 10.1007/BF01400872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Park J, Scheer JK, Lim TJ, Deviren V, Ames CP. Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:639–46. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.SPINE10446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
