There was a mistake in Tables 2–4 as published. Tables 2–4 contained a formatting/layout issue: in each table, an extra blank table appeared above the intended populated table.
Table 2.
Performance comparison of nine machine learning models for NAFLD prediction in the testing set.
| Model | AUC | ACC | SEN | PRE | F1 Score | Kappa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANN | 0.715 | 0.778 | 0.470 | 0.285 | 0.355 | 0.230 |
| DT | 0.671 | 0.673 | 0.602 | 0.221 | 0.324 | 0.165 |
| ET | 0.784 | 0.808 | 0.651 | 0.365 | 0.468 | 0.361 |
| GB | 0.762 | 0.716 | 0.699 | 0.270 | 0.389 | 0.249 |
| KNN | 0.740 | 0.648 | 0.747 | 0.233 | 0.355 | 0.196 |
| LightGBM | 0.739 | 0.759 | 0.627 | 0.297 | 0.403 | 0.276 |
| RF | 0.760 | 0.844 | 0.530 | 0.419 | 0.468 | 0.378 |
| SVM | 0.788 | 0.747 | 0.723 | 0.302 | 0.426 | 0.297 |
| XGBOOST | 0.768 | 0.723 | 0.699 | 0.276 | 0.396 | 0.258 |
Models include ANN (artificial neural network), DT (decision tree), ET (extra trees), GB (gradient boosting), KNN (k-nearest neighbors), LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine), RF (random forest), SVM (support vector machine), and XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting). Metrics: AUC, area under the curve; ACC, accuracy; SEN, sensitivity; PRE, precision.
Table 4.
Performance comparison of the ET model and logistic regression models based on TYG and its derived indices in the testing set.
| Model | AUC | ACC | SEN | PRE | F1 Score | Kappa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYG | 0.697 | 0.653 | 0.633 | 0.206 | 0.311 | 0.153 |
| TYG+TYG.BMI | 0.758 | 0.736 | 0.684 | 0.273 | 0.390 | 0.259 |
| TYG+TYG.WC | 0.767 | 0.791 | 0.658 | 0.327 | 0.437 | 0.326 |
| TYG+TYG.BMI+TYG.WC | 0.768 | 0.797 | 0.696 | 0.342 | 0.458 | 0.351 |
| TYG.BMI+TYG.WC | 0.767 | 0.786 | 0.734 | 0.333 | 0.458 | 0.348 |
| ET | 0.784 | 0.773 | 0.687 | 0.324 | 0.440 | 0.320 |
ET, extra trees; TyG, triglyceride-glucose index; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference. Metrics as in Table 2.
Table 3.
Performance comparison between the ET model and TYG-based indicators in the testing set.
| Model | AUC | ACC | SEN | PRE | F1 Score | Kappa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYG | 0.675 | 0.653 | 0.633 | 0.206 | 0.311 | 0.153 |
| TYG.BMI | 0.748 | 0.720 | 0.722 | 0.266 | 0.389 | 0.255 |
| TYG.WC | 0.760 | 0.714 | 0.823 | 0.278 | 0.415 | 0.283 |
| ET | 0.784 | 0.773 | 0.687 | 0.324 | 0.440 | 0.320 |
ET, extra trees; TyG, triglyceride-glucose index; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference. Metrics as in Table 2.
The corrected Tables 2–4 appear below.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Footnotes
Edited by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Reviewed by: Bikash Sadhukhan, Techno International New Town, India
Maria Teofila Vicente Herrero, University of Balearic Islands, Spain
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
