Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Feb 3;16:7053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-37967-0

Assessment of saline-alkaline water quality and rice-crab co-culture improvement effects in the Songnen Plain

Zhen Sun 1,#, Tongchao Ding 1,#, Chuang Sun 2, Pengcheng Gao 1, Yan Li 1, Yiming Li 1, Yuxing Wei 1, Kai Zhou 1, Zongli Yao 1,, Qifang Lai 1,
PMCID: PMC12920752  PMID: 41634114

Abstract

The Songnen Plain in Northeast China is a global hotspot for soda saline-alkalization. This region suffers from severe water security challenges that limit agricultural productivity. Our assessment reveals severe irrigation hazards in the local saline-alkaline water. These waters show prevalent alkaline conditions with pH values ranging from 8.04 to 9.50. The dominant water type is NaHCO3, with extreme sodicity levels. Importantly, 63.3% of water samples were classified as C4S4 (EC > 2250 µS cm−1, SAR > 26), indicating extreme hazard. These samples exceeded sodium hazard thresholds by 2.3–4.8 times. Hydrochemical analysis identified silicate weathering, cation exchange, and evaporative concentration as key processes driving water quality deterioration. Importantly, rice-crab co-culture systems, particularly with juvenile crabs, effectively transform these constraints into opportunities for sustainable agriculture. The juvenile crab system achieved comprehensive improvements, reducing SAR by 41.25%, alkalinity by 1.21 mmol/L, and sodicity (%Na+ = 58.05), while increasing rice yields by 10.61% and total economic output by 84.51% compared to rice monoculture. A key finding was the consistent association between crab activity and concurrent RSC increases with sodium leaching, providing a new perspective on interpreting water quality indices in integrated systems. Our findings establish rice-juvenile crab co-culture as an effective nature-based solution that simultaneously addresses water security and agricultural productivity in soda saline-alkaline regions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-37967-0.

Keywords: Saline-alkaline water, Rice-crab co-culture, Hydrochemical assessment, Songnen plain, Sustainable agriculture

Subject terms: Ecology, Ecology, Environmental sciences

Introduction

The Songnen Plain, situated in northeastern China (121°21′-128°18′ E, 43°36′-49°26′ N), is a significant agricultural region that faces challenges due to saline-alkaline conditions, which adversely affect crop productivity. This region—one of the world’s three major chernozem regions— is a critical national base for grain production and animal husbandry1. However, this area has become a global hotspot for soda saline-alkalization. This is constrained by soil parent material, hydrological conditions, and unsustainable anthropogenic activities (e.g., overgrazing, irrigation without drainage). The majority of the region exhibits slight to moderate salinity levels, particularly in its central-western plains2. Despite implementing comprehensive remediation strategies-including hydraulic engineering, soil amendments, and cultivation of salt-tolerant crops-soil re-salinization remains a significant challenge3.

Rice cultivation in the Songnen Plain has emerged as an effective strategy for ameliorating saline-alkaline soils. It also enhances grain yield and sequesters organic carbon4. Field investigations revealed that integrated rice-crab co-culture systems increased crab yields by 20–40 kg/mu. This is equivalent to 500 kg/mu of annual excrement deposition. These systems also boosted economic returns by over 50% compared to monoculture rice systems. The rice-crab integrated co-culture system not only reduces soil salinity-alkalinity but also expands arable land. Furthermore, it enhances ecological resilience and restructures soil microbial communities through organic matter enrichment from aquaculture residues5. Nevertheless, the agricultural utilization of saline-alkaline water is severely limited by its complex hydrochemistry. This is characterized by elevated pH, alkalinity, salinity, and ionic imbalances.

Previous water quality assessments in this region primarily focused on pH, salinity, alkalinity, and major ion concentrations. Soda saline-alkaline waters typically exhibit high Na+ and HCO3/CO32− concentrations, as well as elevated pH. Silicate weathering has been identified as the dominant source of Ca2+ and Mg2+ exceeding standards6. Excessive salinity and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) exacerbate soil alkalinization, impairing crop productivity. Zhang et al.7 classified surface waters into four categories based on USDA irrigation criteria, emphasizing sodium regulation. While existing studies have extensively analyzed hydrochemical compositions, systematic evaluations of irrigation suitability for saline-alkaline water remain inadequate. Furthermore, China’s recent initiatives to develop saline-alkaline lands have accelerated integrated agri-aquaculture integration utilization, such as the rice-crab co-culture system. However, empirical data quantifying their benefits and constraints—particularly how aquaculture modulates pH, alkalinity, ionic loads, and irrigation water quality—are critically lacking.

This study addresses these gaps through a dual approach: (1) collecting saline-alkaline water samples from four representative zones to characterize current hydrochemical conditions, and (2) conducting comparative analyses between rice-crab co-culture and rice monoculture systems to quantify aquaculture-mediated water quality improvements. Specifically, we characterize the hydrochemical signatures of saline-alkaline waters via multivariate statistics and geochemical modeling, develops tailored irrigation suitability indices to the Songnen Plain, and holistically evaluates the rice-crab co-culture system’s efficacy in salinity mitigation alongside productivity. This integrated framework provides actionable strategies for sustainable saline-alkaline water use and soil conservation.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study area spans the western Songnen Plain in Jilin Province, China, encompassing Zhenlai County(Baicheng), Da’an City(Baicheng), Taobei District (Baicheng), and Ulan Aodu Township (Songyuan) (Fig. 1: Remote sensing locator map). This temperate continental monsoon climate zone experiences arid to semi-arid conditions, with a mean annual temperature of 5 °C and precipitation of 400–500 mm (predominantly summer rainfall). The region exhibits strong evaporation (1,200-1,600 mm/year), yielding an evaporation-to-precipitation ratio of 3–4:1. The flat topography (elevation: 120–200 m) features extensive wetlands, depressions, and interconnected lakes (“paozi” in local terminology). All water samples were collected from demonstration sites managed by the local Aquatic Technology Extension Station.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Sampling locations and experimental design. a Geographical distribution of the demonstration sites within the surveyed regions. This map was created using ArcGIS Pro software (version 3.4.0; Esri Inc.) based on elevation data from the Copernicus Digital Elevation Model (CDEM, ESA) available at https://dataspace.copernicus.eu; b Schematic diagram of the field sampling design for a typical integrated fishery and agriculture demonstration zone.

To capture representative saline-alkaline water conditions, we collected 30 surface water samples (depth: 0.2 m below water surface) from integrated agri-aquaculture integration utilization demonstration sites in Baicheng and Songyuan during Spring 2023. Samples were categorized by source/usage: source water (SW), aquaculture water (ASW), paddy field water (FW), and drainage canal water (FSW). The ASW samples represent water from aquaculture ponds with prior cultivation history, providing a baseline of historically influenced water quality. SW serves as the incoming background water, FW represents the core crop cultivation area, and FSW characterizes the final agricultural effluent. To further evaluate the impacts of aquaculture on salinity-alkalinity water dynamics, additional sampling campaigns were conducted at the Da’an demonstration site in Baicheng during the rice transplanting (May), mid-growth (August), and harvesting (September) stages in 2024. Saline-alkaline water samples were taken from three treatments, including rice monoculture, rice juvenile crab co-culture, and rice adult crab co-culture system, with concurrent yield measurements of rice and Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis).

Sample collection and analysis

Prior to sampling, 500 mL polyethylene bottles were triple-rinsed with deionized water. They were then followed by three successive rinses with ambient water. In-situ measurements of pH and salinity were obtained using calibrated portable meters (YSS ProDSS, YSI incorporated, American). Samples were immediately sealed, labeled, and transported to the laboratory under 4 °C refrigeration. Cations (K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+) were quantified via atomic absorption spectrometry (GBC SavantAA, GBC instruments, Australia) following Chinese National Standard GB11904. Anions, including sulfate (SO42−), were measured using barium chromate spectrophotometry (HJ342). Chloride (Cl) was measured by AgNO3 titration (GB11896). Carbonate species (CO32−/HCO3) were determined by dual-indicator titration (SL83). Total dissolved solids (TDS) were determined gravimetrically at 105 °C through evaporation residue method.

Water quality assessment

(1) Ionic balance validation.

Ion balance was used to verify the reliability of the water analysis data. The formula is as follows:

Inline graphic

where E is the relative error, and nc and na represent the milliequivalent concentrations of cations and anions, respectively.

Assuming no experimental errors, the total milliequivalent concentration of anions in the water should be very close to that of cations. Theoretically, the ratio of the total milliequivalent concentration of all cations to that of all anions should be within 90%-110%. If the value of E exceeds this range, the water analysis data is considered unreliable and requires re-collection and re-measurement.

(2) Irrigation suitability indices.

Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR).

SAR reflects the potential of sodium to cause soil dispersion and reduce soil permeability and is an important indicator for evaluating the suitability of water for agricultural irrigation8. The SAR is calculated as follows:

Inline graphic

Sodium percentage (%Na+).

Since the interaction of Na+ with soil can reduce soil permeability, calculating the percentage of Na+ is also a common method for assessing the suitability of water for agricultural irrigation9. The %Na+ is calculated as follows:

Inline graphic

Residual sodium carbonate (RSC).

When the concentration of carbonate in agricultural irrigation water is higher than that of alkaline earth metals, excess carbonate will combine with Na+ to form NaHCO3, affecting soil structure. Therefore, the relationship between the content of carbonate and alkaline earth metals can be calculated to assess the suitability of agricultural irrigation water. The concentration of excess carbonate is called residual sodium carbonate (RSC), which is an indicator reflecting the alkaline hazard of irrigation water8. The RSC is calculated as follows:

Inline graphic

Magnesium hazard (MH).

Szaboles and Darab proposed magnesium hazard to assess the suitability of agricultural irrigation water. Under normal circumstances, exchangeable Na+ in irrigated soil can cause high levels of Mg2+. When the Mg2+ content in irrigation water reaches a certain level, magnesium alkalization may occur in the soil, affecting soil structure and producing toxic effects on crops10. The MH is calculated as follows:

Inline graphic

Permeability index (PI).

PI is used to measure the permeability of the soil medium10. The permeability index (PI) is a key indicator used to evaluate the suitability of irrigation water, reflecting the influence of calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), sodium (Na+), and bicarbonate (HCO3) ion concentrations on soil permeability and drainage capacity. Lower PI values usually indicate better irrigation water quality, as they suggest that the soil structure remains conducive to water movement, which is essential for healthy crop growth. Groundwater with a PI value greater than 75% is classified as Class III, indicating that it may not be suitable for irrigation, while lower PI values indicate better suitability (MDPI). The PI is calculated as follows:

Inline graphic

where all ion concentrations are expressed in milliequivalents per liter.

Statistical analysis

The homogeneity of variances was first assessed using Levene’s test. When variances were homogeneous, standard ANOVA was applied. This was followed by Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. In cases of heterogeneous variances, Welch ANOVA and Brown–Forsythe ANOVA were used as robust corrections. For these cases, the Games–Howell method was employed for post-hoc comparisons. The significance level was set at P < 0.05 for all tests. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp, USA, https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics).

For geospatial and geochemical analysis, the Copernicus Digital Elevation Model (CDEM, ESA, https://dataspace.copernicus.eu) with a spatial resolution of 30 m was used as the data source. ArcGIS Pro software 3.4.0 (Esri Inc., USA, https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/overview) was employed for terrain visualization and analysis. It was used to generate distribution maps of terrain slope and elevation. Rivers, lakes, and sampling demonstration sites were labeled in the maps (Fig. 1a). Descriptive statistics (Mean and standard deviation) were also calculated using SPSS. Origin 2022 (OriginLab Corp, USA, https://www.originlab.com/) was utilized to create Piper diagrams, Gibbs diagrams, ionic ratio plots, and ionic concentration boxplots. These were used for water chemistry interpretation. The US Soil Salinity Laboratory (USSL) diagram was adopted to evaluate the suitability of the saline-alkaline water for irrigation reuse.

Results

Hydrochemical characteristics of saline-alkaline water types

Descriptive statistics of four saline-alkaline water types (Aquaculture Water, ASW, n = 8; Paddy Field Water, FW, n = 10; Source Water, SW, n = 8; Drainage Canal Water, FSW, n = 4) are summarized in Table 1 and Table S1. All parameters except pH and alkalinity (mmol/L) are reported in mg/L, with a cation-anion balance error of < 10% confirming data reliability. Key findings include: ASW samples exhibited moderate alkalinity (pH 8.04–9.10, mean 8.74) and high salinity (TDS 1007.10–3999.31 mg/L), with mean alkalinity (11.98 mmol/L) significantly exceeding that of SW samples (6.72 mmol/L). FSW samples demonstrated extreme alkalinity (pH 9.02–9.50) and the highest alkalinity (18.54 mmol/L), measuring 2.76, 2.28, and 1.55 times higher than SW, FW, and ASW samples, respectively. FW samples displayed the greatest alkalinity variability (1.53–24.56 mmol/L). All water types exceeded the pH threshold of 8.5 for optimal crop irrigation.

Table 1.

Mean values and significance levels of hydrochemical parameters Accoss different saline-alkaline types.

Index ASW SW FW FSW
TDS (mg/L) 2089.82ab 659.7b 1719.4ab 3358.5a
pH 8.74ab 7.98c 8.55b 9.19a
Na+ (mg/L) 616.08ab 104.95c 415.06b 1012.14a
K+ (mg/L) 3.70b 3.65b 11.85a 14.49a
Ca2+ (mg/L) 16.70 45.57 38.82 25.73
Mg2+ (mg/L) 20.75b 16.52b 51.92a 45.73a
Cl (mg/L) 475.43ab 30.66b 160.87b 873.93a
SO42− (mg/L) 228.21 48.87 545.68 257.20
CO32− (mg/L) 123.01ab 21.33c 54.20bc 148.60a
HCO3 (mg/L) 605.93ab 388.26b 440.45b 980.06a

Note: Different lowercase letters (a, b, c) within the same row denote significant differences among water types at a significance level of P < 0.05. Comparisons were conducted using One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test (for homogeneous variance) or Welch ANOVA with Games-Howell post-hoc test (for heterogeneous variance). Parameters without letters indicate no significant difference (P > 0.05).

During the sampling period in Spring 2023, although aquaculture activities for crab had not yet commenced, it is essential to acknowlege that such practices had been conducted in previous years. Consequently, the ASW samples collected during this time still reflect the hydrochemical conditions of saline-alkaline water influenced by past aquaculture. This historical context is crucial for understanding baseline conditions and the potential improvements that aquaculture could offer to saline-alkaline water quality. Furthermore, while soil return salt and alkaline were detected, this doesn’t diminish the positive effects observed from active co-culture. The significant economic benefits derived from aquaculture underscore its role in enhancing the management of saline-alkaline lands, demonstrating that the advantages of aquaculture extend beyond immediate water quality improvements to broader agricultural and economic outcomes.

Ionic Composition displayed that HCO3 and Cl were dominant anions. Na+ was the dominant cation across all types. HCO3 showed relative stability in ASW (CV = 29.62%) and SW (CV = 39.19%), while Na+ varied least in FSW (CV = 26.36%). SO42− exhibited extreme fluctuation in FW (CV = 139.69%). Prior to cultivation initiation, FW samples showed elevated SO42− release, ASW promoted Cl release, and FSW experienced marked increases in Na+, Cl, and alkalinity. To elucidate the distribution patterns of major ions in saline-alkaline water and their environmental correlations, this study conducted a comparative analysis of concentration distributions for Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Cl, HCO3, SO42−, and CO32− across different saline-alkaline water types using boxplots (Fig. 2). Cl had universally high median concentrations (150.13 mg/L). HCO3 showed remarkable stability (median 458.11 mg/L). SO42− and CO32− exhibited high variability (medians 183.93 mg/L and 59.38 mg/L). SW ion concentrations (except HCO3 and Ca2+) consistently fell below saline-alkaline water medians, with Na+ and Cl near minimum thresholds (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Boxplot comparison of major ion mass concentrations in saline-alkaline water, regional water sources, and seawater.

To elucidate the hydrochemical characteristics and potential weathering sources across saline-alkaline water types, we analyzed scatterplots of [Ca2++Mg2+] vs. [HCO3+SO42−], [Na+] vs. [Cl], [Ca2+] vs. [Mg2+], and [SO42−] vs. [Ca2+] . Reference lines in Fig. 3a-b, d represent a 1:1 equilibrium line, while Fig. 3c includes both 1:1 and 2:1 equilibrium lines. Artificial seawater (salinity 1.5) was prepared following Zhu Shuping’s ionic formulation containing eight major ions. Scatterplot analyses revealed the predominance of reverse ion exchange, carbonate/sulfate dissolution, and silicate weathering, with supplementary Na+ derived from silicate weathering and cation exchange (Na+/Cl ratio = 2.3 ± 0.4, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3b). Mg2+ exceeded Ca2+ due to preferential release of Mg and evaporative enrichment (Fig. 3c). Gypsum dissolution and silicate weathering primarily controlled Ca-SO4 relationships (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Ions scatter diagrams for different saline-alkaline water types. (a) [Ca++Mg2+] versus [HCO3+ SO42−]; (b) [Na+] versus [Cl]; (c) [Ca2+] versus [Mg2+]; (d) [SO42−] versus [Ca2+].

To examine the hydrochemical characteristics composition differences among various saline-alkaline water types (ASW, SW, FW, FSW, and Seawater 1.5), a Piper trilinear diagram was used (Fig. 4a). NaHCO3 was the dominant water type (60% of samples). SW samples plotted in Zone 1 (leaching influence), while some FW, ASW, and all FSW samples plotted in Zone 2 (anthropogenic influence). ASW and artificial seawater clustered in high-Cl, SO42−, Ca2+, and Mg2+ regions. Water type evolution followed: SW (HCO3-Na-Ca) → FW (HCO3-SO42−-Cl-Na) → ASW (HCO3-Cl-Na) → FSW (Na-Cl). Anthropogenic chloride enrichment (e.g., KCl fertilizers, disinfectants) drove final NaCl-type formation in populated areas. Gibbs ratio analysis (Fig. 4b,c) identified evaporation-crystallization (Na+/[Na++Ca2+] = 0.45-1) and rock weathering (Cl/[HCO3+Cl] = 0.01–0.99) as dominant controls, with FSW showing intense evaporation signatures.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a) The Piper diagrams of saline-alkaline water in the study area, (b,c) the Gibbs diagram for major processing saline-alkaline water chemistry.

Irrigation suitability assessment

Using the US salinity Laboratory (USSL) diagram (Fig. 5), we evaluated the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and salinity of five water types: aquaculture saline-alkaline water (ASW), source water (SW), field saline-alkaline water (FW), flowing saline-alkaline water (FSW), and artificial seawater (1.5). Only Zhenlai SW samples (C2S1: EC = 412–587 µS/cm, SAR = 3.2–5.1) were suitable for most soils. Artificial seawater (1.5) and Songyuan/Daan SW samples (C3S1: EC = 896–1345 µS/cm) required salt-tolerant crops with enhanced drainage. Critically, 63.3% of the spring 2023 samples fell into the C4S4 class (EC > 2250 µS/cm, SAR > 26), exceeding sodium hazard thresholds by 2.3-4.8 times. This prevalence of extreme-hazard water in spring alone underscores the pervasive and serious nature of salinity and sodicity challenges in the region. Our data provide a conservative yet robust quantification of the baseline hazard level, against which the efficacy of management interventions (such as rice-crab co-culture) can be measured, and upon which future studies can build to explore intra-annual variability.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

USSL classification of saline-alkaline water.

To further explore the agricultural irrigation suitability of different saline-alkaline water, this study analyzed five indicators: SAR, permeability index (PI), sodium percentage (%Na+), residual sodium carbonate (RSC), and magnesium hazard (MH) for aquaculture water (ASW), paddy field water (FW), drainage alkali channel water (FSW), and source water (SW)(Table 2). ASW samples performed poorly across all indices (SAR: 50.0% extreme hazard; PI, %Na+, and RSC: 100.0% unsuitable; MH: 87.5% high risk). FSW samples demonstrated catastrophic unsuitability (75–100% hazard rates). FW samples showed contradictory characteristics in SAR and %Na+ (50% suitability and 90% unsuitable, respectively), while other indicators were generally poor. SW samples presented partial viability (SAR/%Na+: 87.5%/50% suitable) but limitations in PI (62.5% unsuitable) and MH (100% moderate risk).

Table 2.

Evaluation results for groundwater irrigation suitability.

Index Criteria Hazard description ASW FW FSW SW
% % % %
SAR ≤ 10 Low-sodium water, suitable 0.0 50.0 0.0 87.5
10–18 Medium-sodium water, fairly suitable 37.5 10.0 0.0 12.5
18–26 High-sodium water, less suitable 12.5 40.0 25.0 0.0
> 26 Extremely high sodium water, unsuitable 50.0 0.0 75.0 0.0
PI ≤ 25 Good water quality, suitable for irrigation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
25–75 Medium water quality, marginally suitable for irrigation 0.0 20.0 0.0 37.5
≥ 75 Poor water quality, unsuitable for irrigation 100.0 80.0 100.0 62.5
Na% ≤ 20 Excellent water quality 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
20–40 Suitable water quality 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0
40–60 Restricted water quality 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.5
60–80 Unsuitable 0.0 50.0 0.0 25.0
> 80 Extremely unsuitable 100.0 40.0 100.0 12.5
RSC ≤ 1.25 Suitable for irrigation 0.0 40.0 0.0 25.0
1.25–2.50 Marginally suitable for irrigation 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.5
> 2.5 Unsuitable for irrigation 100.0 60.0 100.0 37.5
MH ≤ 30% Suitable for irrigation 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0
30–50% Moderate risk 12.5 0.0 0.0 100.0
> 50% High risk 87.5 80.0 100.0 0.0

Impact of rice-crab co-culture on saline-alkaline water

To validate the effects of rice-crab co-culture systems on saline-alkaline water chemistry, we analyzed alkalinity, pH, and total ion content (TIC) across cultivation phases (Fig. 6). During rice transplanting, Paddy monoculture (Paddy) had peak alkalinity (4.91 mmol/L), while Rice-Juvenile Crab co-culture (Paddy-JC) showed the lowest (3.37 mmol/L). During mid-planting phase, Rice-Adult Crab (Paddy-AC) reached maximum alkalinity (5.68 mmol/L), surpassing Paddy by 27.3%. At the harvesting stage, Paddy maintained the highest alkalinity (5.90 mmol/L), while Paddy-JC demonstrated optimal mitigation (20.5% lower than Paddy). pH and Total Ion Content (TIC) trends mirrored alkalinity, with Paddy consistently showing elevated values except during mid-planting. Paddy-JC consistently showed the lowest values at key stages (TIC: 0.27 vs. 2.14 mg/L in Paddy at harvest; pH: 7.61 vs. 7.6). The reduction in pH and alkalinity is agronomically significant because it mitigates the stress on crops sensitive to high pH, which can impair nutrient uptake and reduce yields.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Changes in saline-alkaline water properties of alkalinity, pH, and Total ionic concentration under different growth stages and improvement modes.

To investigate the impacts of Paddy-JC and Paddy-AC co-culture systems on soil physicochemical properties, we analyzed SAR, PI, %Na+, RSC, and MH across treatments (Fig. 7). At transplanting, the Paddy had a significantly higher SAR (17.53) than both the Paddy-JC (9.03) and Paddy-AC (15.82). At harvest, the SAR in Paddy-AC (4.02) remained lower than in Paddy (5.77) but was slightly higher than in Paddy-JC (3.39). The Paddy showed a reduced permeability (PI = 88.04) compared to Paddy-JC (68.46) and Paddy-AC (79.10) at transplanting. This degradation worsened in the monoculture by harvest (PI = 99.56), while the co-culture maintained better permeability. The Paddy-JC reduced %Na+ by 22.9% (63.63 vs. Paddy’s 82.57) at transplanting and achieved a more optimal balance (58.05, 20.2% lower than Paddy) at harvest. The Paddy-AC demonstrated superior control of RSC (1.28, 68.2% lower than Paddy). The elevated MH in Paddy-AC (51.37 vs. Paddy-JC’s 22.49) was correlated with juvenile crab growth. An elevated MH can disrupt the soil’s calcium-magnesium balance, leading to poor soil structure and potentially toxic effects on plant root systems. Moreover, rice-crab co-culture increased rice yields by 8.73–10.61% and total economic output by 68.16–84.51% compared to rice monoculture (Table 3).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Changes in saline-alkaline water properties of SAR, PI, %Na, RSC, and MH under different growth stages and improvement modes.

Table 3.

Effects of integrated rice-crab co-culture on rice yield and Eriocheir sinensis biomass output.

Yield Rice production (kg/mu) Rice total economic (RMB) Crab production (kg/mu) Crab total economic (RMB)
Paddy 424 1272 0 0
Paddy-JC 469 1407 23.5 940
Paddy-AC 461 1383 18.9 756

Discussion

Drivers of saline-alkaline hydrochemistry and irrigation hazards

Our hydrochemical analysis reveals a complex interplay of natural and anthropogenic processes governing water quality in the Songnen Plain. The prevalence of NaHCO3 water types (Fig. 4a) and elevated Na+/Cl ratios (Fig. 3b) strongly support silicate weathering and cation exchange as primary ion sources11, a regime intensified by evaporative concentration (Fig. 4b,c, FSW extremes). This signature is characteristic of soda saline-alkaline environments globally, consistent with recent characterizations in other endorheic basins1,1113. Furthermore, the observed enrichment of Mg2+ over Ca2+ (Fig. 3c) aligns with the findings of Bian et al.1, which underscores the role of evaporative concentration in the region. The evolution towards Na-Cl type in drainage water (FSW) (Fig. 4a), coupled with anomalous Cl enrichment (Fig. 4), clearly implicates significant anthropogenic inputs—such as from KCl fertilizers and disinfectants14,15—that are overriding natural weathering controls.

The predominance of C4S4 water classification in our foundational spring 2023 (Fig. 5) coupled with widespread unsuitability across irrigation indices (Table 2), confirms the prevalence of extreme sodicity and salinity risks. Elevated SAR values (> 26) indicate that irrigation with this water will promote soil particle dispersion, severely reducing water infiltration and soil aeration, which can physically constrain root development and exacerbate water stress in crops. This finding aligns with Bian et al.1 but contrasts with earlier reports of milder conditions6, underscoring the severity of the region challenge. These water quality constraints pose direct threats to ecosystem health: high SAR degrades soil structure and reduces permeability, while extreme salinity and alkalinity disrupt microbial communities (e.g., favoring Halomonadaceae) and impair C/N/P metabolic functions16. The serious irrigation hazards documented in our spring baseline provide a compelling rationale for future research to quantify the potential intensification of these risks during drier “resurgence phases.” Consequently, the direct agricultural use of most local water sources is ecologically unsustainable and necessitates prior remediation.

Despite the direct irrigation risks of spring aquaculture water (ASW) and drainage channel water (FSW), field investigations have found that farmers still reuse them. Although several studies have pointed out that such water types can enhance soil bacterial diversity, increase soil carbon reserves and fertility, regulate soil pH, improve soil structure, and reduce soil salinization and alkalinization1719, the persistent risks during saline-alkaline recurrence periods (such as evaporation concentration in the dry season) (fluctuation trends in Fig. 6) warn that sustainable management must be achieved through rice-crab symbiosis systems.

Co-culture system performance and plausible ecological linkages

The rice-crab co-culture system, particularly the Paddy-JC treatment, demonstrates a consistent correlative association with the mitigation of key saline-alkaline constraints. The superior reduction in water alkalinity, pH, TIC (Fig. 6), SAR, %Na+, and RSC (Fig. 7) in Paddy-JC, particularly during critical growth stages (transplanting, harvest), highlights its efficacy. While specific mechanistic drivers were not directly measured in this study, the observed improvements are consistent with known ecological processes reported in previous research. This improvement likely stems from multiple ecological mechanisms, including nutrient coupling, ionic regulation, and soil structuring through biological activity.

The correlative reductions in sodium-related indices (SAR, %Na+) and improvements in soil permeability (PI) align with the established concept that the presence of benthic organisms like crabs can influence soil physical properties through activities such as bioturbation20. Similarly, the nutrient data and yield increases (Table 3) are consistent with the documented role of animal excreta in providing bioavailable nutrients2124. The modulation of the ionic environment (e.g., TIC and RSC) was particularly insightful. Compared with previous studies25,26, the observed increase in RSC from negative values to a low positive value in the co-culture system is a critical finding. A positive RSC typically indicates an alkaline hazard, which can raise soil pH and induce crop micronutrient deficiencies. However, the shift from a strongly negative baseline in our study suggests a more complex biogeochemical transformation. Crab bioturbation and respiration enhance the dissolution of soil minerals, such as carbonates (e.g., CaCO3). The dissolution process consumes H+ and releases Ca2+, HCO3, and CO32− ions into the water, concurrently increasing both the RSC and the water’s alkalinity-buffering capacity. This newly released Ca2+ could then participate in ion exchange, displacing Na+ from soil colloids, which aligns with the observed reductions in SAR and %Na+. Thus, the RSC increase may not be a simple deterioration but rather a sign of an activated geochemical cycle where the release of calcium, even as it elevates RSC, simultaneously facilitates the mobilization and leaching of sodium, leading to an overall improvement in soil structure and sodicity.

It is noteworthy that Paddy-JC was associated with more favorable outcomes in over 60% of the measured ecological indices compared to Paddy-AC (Figs. 6 and 7). This correlative pattern strongly suggests that juvenile crabs induce different or more pronounced system feedbacks. The higher surface-area-to-volume ratio and potentially greater mass-specific metabolic and activity rates of juvenile crabs lead to more intense bioturbation and a greater relative excretory load per unit biomass. This heightened biological activity would intensify mineral dissolution and ion exchange processes, explaining the stronger ameliorative effects observed in Paddy-JC.

Research value, limitations and future research directions

This study provides robust, correlative evidence from a real-world agricultural setting, positioning rice-crab co-culture as a highly promising nature-based strategy for saline-alkaline land restoration in the Songnen Plain. By capturing the system’s performance under practical field conditions, our findings establish a critical baseline and a compelling reference for its efficacy, particularly for the rice-juvenile crab (Paddy-JC) system in mitigating complex environmental stressors. The consistent trends observed—simultaneous mitigation of water and soil hazards alongside enhancements in productivity and economic returns—deliver a powerful and holistic validation that aligns with global goals for sustainable intensification on marginal lands.

The observational nature of this research, which reflects the inherent complexities of large-scale agricultural studies, is a key source of its ecological relevance. While this approach places constraints on traditional statistical replication for establishing definitive causality, it successfully documents the integrated system’s performance in a manner that highly controlled experiments cannot27,28. Therefore, this work should be regarded not as a terminal finding, but as a vital and robust real-world assessment that provides both a springboard for future mechanistic investigations and a valid reference for practical application. The strong correlations we report, most notably the novel geochemical interpretation of the RSC shift, generate concrete, testable hypotheses for the research community.

Guided by these clear trends and hypotheses, future research is to build effectively upon this work. The immediate priorities include: (1) Controlled experiments to quantify crab bioturbation and excretion impacts on carbonate dissolution and ion exchange; (2) Replicated trials to statistically validate the causal relationships suggested by our correlative patterns; and (3) Investigations into the role of the soil microbiome in mediating these processes29. The validation of these proposed mechanisms will solidify the theoretical foundation for a sustainable restoration strategy for which our study provides a robust empirical benchmark. Ultimately, this research pathway will enable the precise optimization of management practices, ensuring that the full potential of this integrated agroecosystem can be realized for sustainable landscape restoration.

Conclusions

This study establishes the ecological unsustainability of direct irrigation with saline-alkaline waters from the Songnen Plain, where hydrochemical evolution—driven by evaporation and anthropogenic inputs—creates severe sodicity and salinity hazards (C4S4 classification in 63.3% of samples). In contrast, the rice-juvenile crab co-culture system (Paddy-JC) demonstrates a strong correlative link with multifaceted amelioration of these constraints. This system was consistently associated with reduced water alkalinity, pH, and TIC, alongside significant enhancements in soil health, as evidenced by a 41.2% decrease in SAR and a 20.2% reduction in %Na+ at harvest.

A key insight of this research is the reinterpretation of a critical water quality parameter. The increase in RSC from negative to a low positive value under co-culture is not viewed as a simple deterioration, but as a potential signature of an activated, beneficial geochemical cycle. We propose that this shift marks crab-driven carbonate dissolution, a process that releases calcium to displace exchangeable sodium—thus providing a unified explanation for the concurrent rise in RSC and decline in sodium-related indices. The superior performance of juvenile crabs is hypothetically linked to their heightened metabolic and bioturbation activity, which may intensify this mechanism.

Consequently, the rice-juvenile crab co-culture system emerges not merely as a palliative measure, but as a potentially transformative agroecological strategy that actively redirects local biogeochemical cycles to restore degraded land. Its implementation, supported by the future research outlined, presents a globally relevant model for achieving simultaneous ecological restoration and economic prosperity in saline-alkaline environments.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (16.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (25ZR1402585), the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund CAFS (2025XT0206) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFD2401000).

Author contributions

Z.S.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing-original draft. T.C.D.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Figures and Tables, Investigation. C. S.: Sampling, Investigation, Data curation. P.C.G. : Investigation Y.L. : Investigation. Y.M.L.: Investigation. Y.X.W.: Investigation. K.Z.: Investigation. Z.L.Y.: Methodology, Supervision, Writing-review & editing. Q.F.L.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Funding

Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (25ZR1402585); the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund CAFS (2025XT0206); National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFD2401000). We also thank our colleague Tianfei Cheng for the assistance with the preparation of Fig. 1a.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request. The data used in this study can be provided by the first author (Zhen Sun). If necessary, please contact email: sunzhen@ecsf.ac.cn.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Zhen Sun and Tongchao Ding.

Contributor Information

Zongli Yao, Email: yaozl@ecsf.ac.cn.

Qifang Lai, Email: laiqf@ecsf.ac.cn.

References

  • 1.Bian, J., Nie, S. Y., Wang, R., Wan, H. L. & Liu, C. H. Hydrochemical characteristics and quality assessment of groundwater for irrigation use in central and Eastern Songnen Plain, Northeast China. Environ. Monit. Assess.382, 1–16. 10.1007/s10661-018-6774-4 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gao, R. Z., Li, X. J., Zuo, L. J., Zou, B. & Wang, B. Unveiling soil salinity patterns in soda saline-alkali regions using Sentinel-2 and SDGSAT-1 thermal infrared data. Remote Sens. Environ.322, 114708. 10.1016/j.rse.2025.114708 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fu, J. H., Liu, Y. W., Liu, X. C., Guo, M. F. & Gao, J. Z. Screening of saline-alkali tolerant microorganisms and their promoting effects on rice growth under saline-alkali stress. J. Clean. Prod.481, 144176. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144176 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xu, S. Q., Na, M., Huang, Y. J., Zhang, J. & Zhou, J. H. Changes in microbial carbon cycling functions along rice cultivation chronosequences in saline-alkali soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem.202, 109699. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109699 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun, Z., Yao, Z. L., Gao, P. C., Zhou, K. & Li, Y. Effects of fishery utilization on the physiochemical index and microbial community composition in saline-alkaline water. ACS Omega. 9, 18872–18881. 10.1021/acsomega.3c08437 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yan, J. H., Chen, J. S. & Zhang, W. Q. Study on the groundwater quality and its influencing factor in Songyuan City, Northeast China, using integrated hydrogeochemical method. Sci. Total Environ.773 (15), 144958. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144958 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang, B., Song, X. F., Zhang, Y. H., Han, D. M. & Tang, C. Y. Hydrochemical characteristics and water quality assessment of surface water and groundwater in Songnen plain, Northeast China. Water Res.46 (8), 2737–2748. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.033 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu, B. S., Huang, L. H., Jiang, X. T., Huang, G. Z. & Yang, G. Quantitative evaluation and mechanism analysis of soil chemical factors affecting rice yield in saline-sodic paddy fields. Sci. Total Environ.929, 172584. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172584 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Singh, A. K., Tewary, B. K. & Sinha, A. Hydrochemistry and quality assessment of groundwater in part of Noida metropolitan city, Uttar Pradesh. J. Geol. Soc. India. 78, 523–540. 10.1007/s12594-011-0124-2 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arslan, H. & Colak, M. G. The assessment of groundwater quality through the water quality and nitrate pollution indexes in Northern Türkiye. Environ. Monit. Assess.195, 1257. 10.1007/s10661-023-11854-x (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ismail, A. H., Shareef, M. A., Hassan, G. & Alatar, F. M. Hydrochemistry and water quality of shallow groundwater in the Tikrit area of Salah AI Din Province, Iraq. Appl. Water Sci.13, 197. 10.1007/s13201-023-02008-y (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun, X. X., Wu, J. T., Jiang, L. J., Yao, J. N. & Chen, X. Y. Nutrient limitation and saline-alkaline stress primarily drive community and function shifts in protists inhabiting saline-sodic soils. Agr Ecosyst. Environ.396, 110009. 10.1016/j.agee.2025.110009 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.E, J. F., Yang, S. Q., Zhang, W. F., Chen, X. & Gu, Q. Y. Design and evaluation of abiological vertical shaft-subsurface ditch system for alkali spot improvement. Agr Water Manage.317, 109625. 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109625 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li, P. Y., Tian, R. & Liu, R. Solute geochemistry and multivariate analysis of water quality in the Guohua phosphorite mine, Guizhou Province, China. Expos Health. 11, 81–94. 10.1007/s12403-018-0277-y (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sharma, A. R., Bordoloi, R., Paul, A., Gyanendra, Y. & Tripathi, O. P. Water quality and geochemical facie of high-altitude lakes in Tawang, Eastern Himalaya, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut R. 31, 24492–24511. 10.1007/s11356-024-32712-4 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Luo, S. Y., Yuan, J. B., Song, Y. Y., Ren, J. S. & Qi, J. Elevated salinity decreases microbial communities complexity and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus metabolism in the Songnen plain wetlands of China. Water Res.276, 123285. 10.1016/j.watres.2025.123285 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen, L. J., Feng, Q., Li, C. S., Wei, Y. P. & Zhao, Y. Impacts of aquaculture wastewater irrigation on soil microbial functional diversity and community structure in arid regions. Sci. Rep-UK. 7, 11193. 10.1038/s41598-017-11678-z (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu, M. J., Sun, C. W., Du, Z. L. & Zhu, X. D. Impacts of aquaculture on the area and soil carbon stocks of mangrove: A machine learning study in China. Sci. Total Environ.859, 160173. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160173 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang, S. X., Rasool, G., Wang, S., Zhang, Y. W. & Guo, X. P. Biochar and chlorella increase rice yield by improving saline-alkali soil physicochemical properties and regulating bacteria under aquaculture wastewater irrigation. Chemosphere340, 139850. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139850 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bashir, M. A., Liu, J., Geng, Y. C., Wang, H. Y. & Pan, J. T. Co-culture of rice and aquatic animals: an integrated system to achieve production and environmental sustainability. J. Clean. Prod.249, 119310. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119310 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chakraborty, S. C. & Chakraborty, S. Effect of dietary protein level on excretion of ammonia in Indian major carp, Labeo rohita, fingerlings. Aquacult. Nutr.4, 47–51. 10.1046/j.1365-2095.1998.00049.x (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guo, L., Zhao, L. F., Ye, J. L., Ji, Z. J. & Tang, J. J. Using aquatic animals as partners to increase yield and maintain soil nitrogen in the paddy ecosystems. eLife 11, e73869. 10.7554/eLife.73869 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Gu, B., Zhang, X., Lam, S. K., Yu, Y. L. & van Grinsven, H. J. M. Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands. Nature613, 77–84. 10.1038/s41586-022-05481-8 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zou, Z., Chu, K., Wang, M. & Guo, S. Carbon footprint assessment and economic benefits of rice-fish/poultry co-culture in China. J. Clean. Prod.527, 146651. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146651 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ghaznavi, S., Yazdani, S., Rafiee, H., Saleh, I. & Jalilian, A. Sustainable synergies of rice–fish–duck symbiosis: a life cycle assessment in Guilan Province of Iran. Results Eng.28, 107226. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107226 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.He, Y. L., Fu, B., Fang, C., Zhang, N. N. & Zheng, M. P. Decoding the gut-microbiota-muscle nexus: multi-omics integration reveals mTOR driven flesh modulation in rice-fish co-cultured common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture612, 743090. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743090 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Extinction of experience among ecologists. Trends Ecol. Evol.40, 212–215. 10.1016/j.tree.2024.12.010 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhao, Y. G., Wang, S. J., Li, Y., Liu, J. & Zhuo, Y. Q. Long-term performance of flue gas desulfurization gypsum in a large-scale application in a saline-alkali wasteland in Northwest China. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment. Agr Ecosyst. Environ.261, 115–124. 10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.009 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hartmann, M. & Six, J. Soil structure and Microbiome functions in agroecosystems. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ.4, 4–18. 10.1038/s43017-022-00366-w (2023). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (16.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request. The data used in this study can be provided by the first author (Zhen Sun). If necessary, please contact email: sunzhen@ecsf.ac.cn.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES