Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1989 Apr;82(4):210–214. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200410

Thirty years of electronic intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: discussion paper.

H M Jenkins 1
PMCID: PMC1292086  PMID: 2654395

Full text

PDF
210

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amato J. C. Fetal monitoring in a community hospital. A statistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Sep;50(3):269–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Banta H. D., Thacker S. B. Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1979 Aug;34(8):627–642. doi: 10.1097/00006254-197908000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beard R. W., Filshie G. M., Knight C. A., Roberts G. M. The significance of the changes in the continuous fetal heart rate in the first stage of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1971 Oct;78(10):865–881. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1971.tb00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crawford J. W., Carter N. W., Lovell K. M., Henry M. J. The use of computers in fetal monitoring. Int J Biomed Comput. 1974 Oct;5(4):249–263. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(74)90019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edington P. T., Sibanda J., Beard R. W. Influence on clinical practice of routine intra-partum fetal monitoring. Br Med J. 1975 Aug 9;3(5979):341–343. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5979.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gillmer M. D., Combe D. Intrapartum fetal monitoring practice in the United Kingdom. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979 Oct;86(10):753–758. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10689.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodlin R. C. History of fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Feb 1;133(3):323–352. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90688-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HON E. H. THE CLASSIFICATION OF FETAL HEART RATE. I. A WORKING CLASSIFICATION. Obstet Gynecol. 1963 Aug;22:137–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HON E. H. The electronic evaluation of the fetal heart rate; preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1958 Jun;75(6):1215–1230. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(58)90707-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hon E. H., Zannini D., Quilligan E. J. The neontal value of fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Jun 15;122(4):508–519. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33545-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jenkins H. M., Symonds E. M., Kirk D. L., Smith P. R. Can fetal electrocardiography improve the prediction of intrapartum fetal acidosis? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jan;93(1):6–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07804.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnstone F. D., Campbell D. M., Hughes G. J. Has continuous intrapartum monitoring made any impact on fetal outcome? Lancet. 1978 Jun 17;1(8077):1298–1300. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)91280-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kelso I. M., Parsons R. J., Lawrence G. F., Arora S. S., Edmonds D. K., Cooke I. D. An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul 1;131(5):526–532. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90114-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LEE S. T., HON E. H. THE FETAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM. IV. UNUSUAL VARIATIONS IN THE QRS COMPLEX DURING LABOR. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1965 Aug 15;92:1140–1148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leveno K. J., Cunningham F. G., Nelson S., Roark M., Williams M. L., Guzick D., Dowling S., Rosenfeld C. R., Buckley A. A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34,995 pregnancies. N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 4;315(10):615–619. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609043151004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu D. T., Thomas G., Blackwell R. J. Progression in response patterns of fetal heart rate throughout labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975 Dec;82(12):943–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Low J. A., Pancham S. R., Worthington D., Boston R. W. The incidence of fetal asphyxia in six hundred high-risk monitored pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Feb 15;121(4):456–459. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90074-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Low J. A., Pancham S. R., Worthington D. Fetal heart deceleration patterns in relation to asphyxia and weight-gestational age percentile of the fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jan;47(1):14–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. MacDonald D., Grant A., Sheridan-Pereira M., Boylan P., Chalmers I. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jul 1;152(5):524–539. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90619-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mueller-Heubach E., MacDonald H. M., Joret D., Portman M. A., Edelstone D. I., Caritis S. N. Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Aug 1;137(7):758–763. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90881-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Odendall H. Fetal heart rate patterns in patients with intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Aug;48(2):187–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Paul R. H., Hon E. H. A clinical fetal monitor. Obstet Gynecol. 1970 Feb;35(2):161–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Prentice A., Lind T. Fetal heart rate monitoring during labour--too frequent intervention, too little benefit? Lancet. 1987 Dec 12;2(8572):1375–1377. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91266-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rosén K. G., Kjellmer I. Changes in the fetal heart rate and ECG during hypoxia. Acta Physiol Scand. 1975 Jan;93(1):59–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1975.tb05790.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saldana L. R., Schulman H., Yang W. H. Electronic fetal monitoring during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Jun;47(6):706–710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shenker L., Post R. C., Seiler J. S. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Aug;46(2):185–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Simmons S. C., Lieberman B. The combined use of cardiotocography and fetal blood sampling in monitoring the fetus in labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972 Sep;79(9):816–820. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb12927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sykes G. S., Molloy P. M., Johnson P., Stirrat G. M., Turnbull A. C. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Oct 1;287(6397):943–945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6397.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Symonds E. M. On-line processing of the fetal electrocardiogram. A new direction for fetal monitoring. J Reprod Med. 1987 Jul;32(7):509–512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tejani N., Mann L. I., Bhakthavathsalan A. Correlation of fetal heart rate patterns and fetal pH with neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Oct;48(4):460–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thacker S. B. The efficacy of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):24–30. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90197-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tutera G., Newman R. L. Fetal monitoring: its effect on the perinatal mortality and cesarean section rates and its complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Jul 15;122(6):750–754. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90582-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wood C. A comparison of two controlled trials concerning the efficacy of fetal intensive care. J Perinat Med. 1978;6(3):149–153. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1978.6.3.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van den Berg P., Schmidt S., Gesche J., Saling E. Fetal distress and the condition of the newborn using cardiotocography and fetal blood analysis during labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Jan;94(1):72–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES