Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1989 Jul;82(7):388–390. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200706

Evaluation of a 'DIY' test for the detection of colorectal cancer.

J J Tate 1, J Northway 1, G T Royle 1, I Taylor 1
PMCID: PMC1292199  PMID: 2585421

Abstract

A new type of faecal occult blood test, EZ-Detect, has been evaluated in 404 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of colorectal disease. The test avoids handling of stools and gives a result which patients can read themselves--factors which may increase patient compliance. In comparison with the Haemoccult test, EZ-Detect has the same sensitivity for blood in laboratory conditions. In clinical use 98% of patients expressed a preference for EZ-Detect but it detected significantly fewer patients with cancer than did Haemoccult (P = less than 0.05). In its present form, this type of test would be unsuitable for population screening for colorectal cancer even if improved compliance is achieved.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bader J. P. Screening of colorectal cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Sep;31(9 Suppl):43S–56S. doi: 10.1007/BF01295989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HOERR S. O., BLISS W. R., KAUFFMAN J. Clinical evaluation of various tests for occult blood in the feces. J Am Med Assoc. 1949 Dec 24;141(17):1213–1217. doi: 10.1001/jama.1949.02910170015004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hardcastle J. D., Farrands P. A., Balfour T. W., Chamberlain J., Amar S. S., Sheldon M. G. Controlled trial of faecal occult blood testing in the detection of colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1983 Jul 2;2(8340):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90001-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leicester R. J., Lightfoot A., Millar J., Colin-Jones D. G., Hunt R. H. Accuracy and value of the Hemoccult test in symptomatic patients. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Feb 26;286(6366):673–674. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6366.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES