Skip to main content
Reports - Clinical Practice and Surgical Cases logoLink to Reports - Clinical Practice and Surgical Cases
. 2026 Feb 2;9(1):48. doi: 10.3390/reports9010048

Failure of Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Preventing Left Ventricular Thrombus Progression After Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report

Andreas Merz 1,2,3, Daniel Armando Morris 1,2,3, Henryk Dreger 1,2,3, Ingo Hilgendorf 1,2,3, Matthias Schneider-Reigbert 1,2,3,*
Editor: Gaetano Santulli
PMCID: PMC12922149  PMID: 41718298

Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: Left ventricular thrombus formation after acute coronary syndrome represents a severe complication. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of the entire ventricle is essential, as regional wall motion abnormalities predispose to thrombus development. Although vitamin K antagonists have traditionally been the cornerstone of therapy, the convenience of direct oral anticoagulants has made them increasingly popular. However, the paucity of prospective data raises concerns regarding their general interchangeability. Case Presentation: We present a case of a basal left ventricular thrombus that rapidly progressed in size despite triple antithrombotic therapy including Apixaban. Conclusions: Following ACS, regional LV dysfunction predisposes to LVT formation—even in patients with only mild to moderate systolic impairment or non-apical akinesia. Although rare, LVT may also develop in basal and mid-ventricular segments. Anticoagulant selection should remain individualized, and short-term follow-up imaging is necessary to monitor therapeutic response.

Keywords: left ventricular thrombus, direct oral anticoagulation, Vit K antagonist, DOAC

1. Introduction and Clinical Significance

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can lead to various complications, including left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the first-line imaging modality for LVT detection [1]. While apical thrombi following left anterior descending artery (LAD) infarction are by far the most common manifestation, all left ventricular (LV) regions should be carefully assessed for atypical locations, as regional wall motion abnormalities predispose to thrombus formation—even in patients with only mildly to moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) [2]. As a potentially life-threatening condition, anticoagulation must be initiated once LVT is diagnosed. However, prospective data guiding the choice of oral anticoagulant (OAC) for LVT management remain scarce [3,4,5]. Therefore, the OAC regimen should be individualized according to the patient’s clinical profile and serial imaging findings. We present a case of myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by a basal LVT that increased in size despite triple-therapy including Apixaban.

2. Case Presentation

A 63-year-old man presented to our hospital with palpitations, shortness of breath (New York Heart Association functional class III–IV), and a sensation of throat tightness that had begun three days earlier. Two weeks before admission, he had experienced severe heartburn (visual analog scale 9/10) accompanied by hyperhidrosis, nausea, and vomiting lasting for two days. His medical history included arterial hypertension and hyperlipoproteinemia. He was an active smoker with a 40 pack-year history and was not taking any regular medication.

The initial electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed sustained ventricular tachycardia. Due to hemodynamic instability, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit, where electrical cardioversion under sedation successfully restored sinus rhythm. Post-cardioversion ECG demonstrated discrete ST-segment elevation in leads II, III, and aVF, along with discordant T-wave inversion in leads I and aVL. Cardiac biomarkers were moderately elevated.

TTE showed mildly reduced LV-EF of 40–45% with hypokinesia of the basal and mid segments of the anterolateral, inferoseptal, and inferior walls, as well as the mid inferolateral segment. Coronary angiography revealed three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). The culprit lesion in the posterolateral branch of the circumflex artery (CX) was successfully dilated, and a drug-eluting stent was implanted. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg once daily and Ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily was initiated.

On day three after admission, TTE revealed a 30 × 8 mm mobile, echodense, oscillating structure attached to the basal segment of the anterolateral wall, highly suggestive of early thrombus formation (Figure 1, Supplemental Video S1). Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy with Apixaban 5 mg twice daily was initiated in addition to DAPT, and Ticagrelor was replaced with Clopidogrel.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Day 3. Transthoracic echocardiography, modified apical four-chamber view focused on the basal anterolateral wall. A 30 × 8 mm echodense, oscillating structure (arrow) is visible at the basal segment of the anterolateral wall.

Three days later, contrast-enhanced left heart echocardiography was performed. Despite DOAC in addition to DAPT, the thrombus had increased in size and now appeared as mobile masses located within the akinetic regions of the mid anterolateral, inferolateral, and apical lateral walls (Figure 2, Supplemental Video S2). Anticoagulation was switched to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA. Phenprocoumon, with a loading dose of 9 mg on day 6, 6 mg on day 7, and 3 mg on day 8) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) bridging at a dose of 1000 IU per 10 kg body weight; ASA was discontinued.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Day 6. Transthoracic echocardiography, apical three-chamber view. Panel (A): Thrombus progression despite triple-therapy, now appearing as two mobile masses (14 × 12 mm and 18 × 11 mm) attached to the mid-to-apical anterolateral wall. Panel (B): Contrast-enhanced left heart echocardiography demonstrating improved thrombus delineation.

The patient was discharged, and a short-term follow-up was scheduled two days later. TTE at that visit demonstrated a reduction in the LVT (Figure 3). The INR was 6, LMWH was stopped and the VKA dose was adjusted. A subsequent follow-up nine weeks later showed complete thrombus resolution (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Day 9. Transthoracic echocardiography, apical three-chamber view. Marked reduction in the size of the left ventricular thrombus.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Day 64. Transthoracic echocardiography, triplane view demonstrating the apical four, two-, and three-chamber view. Demonstrating complete resolution of the left ventricular thrombus.

3. Discussion

Complications of ACS include LVT formation, which is significantly associated with morbidity and mortality [6]. The incidence of LVT following MI has declined in the era of broadly accessible primary percutaneous coronary intervention [7]. Nevertheless, it remains a relatively common complication, occurring in up to 15% of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [8], particularly among those who present days or even weeks after symptom onset, as in the case presented here. Thrombus formation can be explained by Virchow’s triad: in ACS, the combination of blood stasis due to regional wall motion abnormalities and subendocardial tissue injury from ischemia both contribute to LVT development [7,9]. Among published predictors, LV dysfunction is the strongest independent factor for post-MI LVT formation, with significantly lower LV-EF observed in patients who develop LVT [6,10]. Additional risk factors include infarct size, apical asynergy, LV aneurysm, and anterior-apical scar [11,12,13,14]. While most LVTs occur apically, 11% have been reported at the septal wall and 3% at the inferolateral wall [15]. The presence of LVT closely correlates with the LV region exhibiting the greatest functional impairment [13].

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is considered the gold-standard modality for LVT assessment [2]. However, echocardiography remains the most widely used first-line diagnostic tool because of its broad availability and cost-effectiveness [6,16]. Unlike left atrial masses or thrombi in the left atrial appendage, transesophageal echocardiography provides little additional value over TTE for LVT diagnosis, as the LV apex is typically difficult to visualize [17]. TTE demonstrates a specificity of 95–98% for detecting LVT after acute MI [17,18], though its sensitivity (21–35%) can be limited by suboptimal acoustic windows, inadequate visualization of the LV apex, or small thrombus size [2,9,17]. Both specificity and sensitivity can be improved by contrast echocardiography, reaching 99% and 64%, respectively [2]. Common causes of false-positive findings include artifacts, prominent trabeculations, or a tangentially imaged LV wall [19,20].

In the presented case, corresponding to the culprit lesion in the CX artery, the entire anterolateral wall was akinetic three days after admission, and an echodense structure was visible at its basal segment. LVT prevalence in non-anterior MI has been shown to increase with extension of inferior necrosis toward the posterolateral wall [21], as observed in our patient, who demonstrated medial and apical inferolateral akinesia.

Once diagnosed, therapy should be initiated promptly, as LVT formation is associated with a 22% risk of embolic events [22]. Although treatment has traditionally centered on VKAs, DOACs have become increasingly attractive. However, existing guidelines lack randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing optimal OAC regimens and concomitant antiplatelet therapy in post-MI LVT. A recent meta-analysis including 11 studies with approximately 15,000 patients reported that DOACs were associated with higher rates of LVT resolution (p = 0.04), lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism (p < 0.01), and reduced major and bleeding events (p = 0.05) compared with VKA in patients with post-MI LVT [23]. Similar results have been published [24,25]. DOACs were found to be non-inferior to VKAs in three smaller RCTs [3,4,5]. The American Heart Association considers DOACs a reasonable alternative to VKAs [7], whereas the European Society of Cardiology recommends that either drug class may be considered for LVT treatment [1]. Given the easier handling and fewer monitoring requirements of DOACs relative to VKAs, our patient was initially treated with a DOAC.

The timing of imaging relative to ACS appears crucial, as most LVTs do not form immediately after the event. While LVTs occur earlier in patients with an initial LV-EF ≤ 40% or multivessel CAD, the highest detection rates have been reported approximately two weeks after the index event [26,27,28,29,30]. This suggests that LVTs may be missed in case of early hospital discharge and underscores the importance of follow-up imaging in high-risk patients without initial thrombus. For assessing thrombus resolution, repeat imaging at three months is recommended [6,7].

In the present case, it is likely that the patient experienced a STEMI two weeks before admission. TTE after three days of triple antithrombotic therapy revealed further LVT enlargement. Persistence or progression of LVT despite adequate OAC, as observed here, remains poorly studied. In accordance with consensus-based recommendations [7], our patient’s anticoagulation therapy was switched from DOAC to VKA. In a cohort of 159 patients undergoing serial echocardiography, complete thrombus resolution was observed in 62.3% after a median of 103 days, while recurrence or progression occurred in 14.5% [31]. A multicenter cohort study on anticoagulation strategies for LVTs included a substantial number of patients who switched therapy from DOAC to VKA or vice versa [32]. Common reasons for switching from VKA to DOAC included patient convenience, whereas cost considerations mainly prompted changes from DOAC to VKA. Sensitivity analyses for embolic events revealed no significant differences between groups. Further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanisms and optimal management of LVT persistence or progression.

The presented case highlights the importance of recognizing atypically located LVT, performing serial TTE follow-up, and recognizing the possibility of early progression despite OAC, thereby necessitating individualized anticoagulant selection.

4. Conclusions

Following ACS, regional LV dysfunction predisposes to LVT formation—even in patients with only mild to moderate systolic impairment or non-apical akinesia. Although rare, LVT may also develop in basal and mid-ventricular segments. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of all LV regions is therefore essential. Early and follow-up imaging after ACS are crucial for timely LVT detection, particularly in patients presenting late after symptom onset. The assumption of general interchangeability between VKAs and DOACs cannot be supported. Anticoagulant selection should remain individualized, and short-term follow-up imaging is necessary to monitor therapeutic response.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/reports9010048/s1, Supplementary Video S1: On day three after admission, TTE revealed a 30 × 8 mm mobile, echodense, oscillating structure attached to the basal segment of the anterolateral wall, highly suggestive of early thrombus Formation; Supplementary Video S2: Three days after the initial echo, contrast-enhanced left heart echocardiography was performed. Despite DOAC in addition to DAPT, the thrombus had increased in size and now appeared as mobile masses located within the akinetic regions of the mid anterolateral, inferolateral, and apical lateral walls.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.-R. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, D.A.M., H.D., I.H. and M.S.-R.; visualization, M.S.-R.; supervision, M.S.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval of this study were not required by the Institutional Ethics Committee of DHZC because case re-ports are not considered research. The patient’s information has been de-identified.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the pa tient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors have read and approved submission of the manuscript and have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Byrne R.A., Rossello X., Coughlan J.J., Barbato E., Berry C., Chieffo A., Claeys M.J., Dan G.-A., Dweck M.R., Galbraith M., et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2023;44:3720–3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weinsaft J.W., Kim J., Medicherla C.B., Ma C.L., Codella N.C., Kukar N., Alaref S., Kim R.J., Devereux R.B. Echocardiographic Algorithm for Post–Myocardial Infarction LV Thrombus. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2016;9:505–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alcalai R., Butnaru A., Moravsky G., Yagel O., Rashad R., Ibrahimli M., Planer D., Amir O., Elbaz-Greener G., Leibowitz D. Apixaban vs. warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus: A prospective multicentre randomized clinical trial. Eur. Heart J.-Cardiovasc. Pharmacother. 2022;8:660–667. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abdelnabi M., Saleh Y., Fareed A., Nossikof A., Wang L., Morsi M., Eshak N., Abdelkarim O., Badran H., Almaghraby A. Comparative Study of Oral Anticoagulation in Left Ventricular Thrombi (No-LVT Trial) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021;77:1590–1592. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Isa W.Y.H.W., Hwong N., Mohamed Yusof A., Yusof Z., Loong N.S., Wan-Arfah N., Naing N.N. Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Pilot Prospective Randomized Outcome Blinded Study Investigating Size Reduction or Resolution of Left Ventricular Thrombus. J. Clin. Prev. Cardiol. 2020;9:150. doi: 10.4103/JCPC.JCPC_41_20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Massussi M., Scotti A., Lip G.Y.H., Proietti R. Left ventricular thrombosis: New perspectives on an old problem. Eur. Heart J.-Cardiovasc. Pharmacother. 2021;7:158–167. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levine G.N., McEvoy J.W., Fang J.C., Ibeh C., McCarthy C.P., Misra A., Shah Z.I., Shenoy C., Spinler S.A., Vallurupalli S., et al. Management of Patients at Risk for and with Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;146:E205–E223. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McCarthy C.P., Vaduganathan M., McCarthy K.J., Januzzi J.L., Bhatt D.L., McEvoy J.W. Left Ventricular Thrombus After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Screening, Prevention, and Treatment. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:642. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Delewi R., Zijlstra F., Piek J.J. Left ventricular thrombus formation after acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2012;98:1743–1749. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chiarella F., Santoro E., Domenicucci S., Maggioni A., Vecchio C. Predischarge Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left Ventricular Thrombosis After Acute Myocardial Infarction in the GISSI-3 Study. Am. J. Cardiol. 1998;81:822–827. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shacham Y., Leshem-Rubinow E., Ben Assa E., Rogowski O., Topilsky Y., Roth A., Steinvil A. Frequency and Correlates of Early Left Ventricular Thrombus Formation Following Anterior Wall Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2013;111:667–670. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gianstefani S., Douiri A., Delithanasis I., Rogers T., Sen A., Kalra S., Charangwa L., Reiken J., Monaghan M., MacCarthy P. Incidence and Predictors of Early Left Ventricular Thrombus After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Contemporary Era of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2014;113:1111–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mollet N.R., Dymarkowski S., Volders W., Wathiong J., Herbots L., Rademakers F.E., Bogaert J. Visualization of Ventricular Thrombi with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease. Circulation. 2002;106:2873–2876. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000044389.51236.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zielinska M., Kaczmarek K., Tylkowski M. Predictors of Left Ventricular Thrombus Formation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Successful Primary Angioplasty with Stenting. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2008;335:171–176. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318142be20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jugdutt B.I., Sivaram C.A., Wortman C., Trudell C., Penner P. Prospective two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular thrombus and embolism after acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1989;13:554–564. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90592-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bulluck H., Chan M.H.H., Paradies V., Yellon R.L., Ho H.H., Chan M.Y., Chin C.W.L., Tan J.W., Hausenloy D.J. Incidence and predictors of left ventricular thrombus by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2018;20:72. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0494-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Srichai M.B., Junor C., Rodriguez L.L., Stillman A.E., Grimm R.A., Lieber M.L., Weaver J.A., Smedira N.G., White R.D. Clinical, imaging, and pathological characteristics of left ventricular thrombus: A comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echocardiography with surgical or pathological validation. Am. Heart J. 2006;152:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Visser C.A., Kan G., David G.K., Lie K.I., Durrer D. Two Dimensional Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Thrombus. Chest. 1983;83:228–232. doi: 10.1378/chest.83.2.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Asinger R.W., Mikell F.L., Sharma B., Hodges M. Observations on detecting left ventricular thrombus with two dimensional echocardiography: Emphasis on avoidance of false positive diagnoses. Am. J. Cardiol. 1981;47:145–156. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90303-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Weinsaft J.W., Kim R.J., Ross M., Krauser D., Manoushagian S., LaBounty T.M., Cham M.D., Min J.K., Healy K., Wang Y., et al. Contrast-Enhanced Anatomic Imaging as Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Tissue Characterization for Detection of Left Ventricular Thrombus. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2009;2:969–979. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pizzeti G., Belotti G., Margonato A., Carlino M., Gerosa S., Carandente O., Chierchia S.L. Thrombolytic therapy reduces the incidence of left ventricular thrombus after anterior myocardial infarction: Relationship to vessel patency and infarct size. Eur. Heart J. 1996;17:421–428. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cruz Rodriguez J.B., Okajima K., Greenberg B.H. Management of left ventricular thrombus: A narrative review. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021;9:520. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Attachaipanich T., Thanyaratsarun T., Attachaipanich S., Danpanichkul P., Kaewboot K. Efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in left ventricular thrombus in myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Med. Hagerstown Md. 2025;26:40–49. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gogos C., Anastasiou V., Papazoglou A.S., Daios S., Didagelos M., Kamperidis N., Moschovidis V., Papadopoulos S.F., Iatridi F., Sarafidis P., et al. Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Cardiol. 2024;232:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kwok C.S., Bennett S., Borovac J.A., Will M., Schwarz K., Lip G.Y.H. An evidence-based evaluation of left ventricular thrombus treatment, outcomes, and resolution: A systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Coron. Artery Dis. 2023;34:260–273. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meurin P., Brandao Carreira V., Dumaine R., Shqueir A., Milleron O., Safar B., Perna S., Smadja C., Genest M., Garot J., et al. Incidence, diagnostic methods, and evolution of left ventricular thrombus in patients with anterior myocardial infarction and low left ventricular ejection fraction: A prospective multicenter study. Am. Heart J. 2015;170:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gellen B., Biere L., Logeart D., Lairez O., Vicaut E., Furber A., Mercadier J.-J., Sirol M. Timing of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Impacts on the Detection Rate of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2017;10:1404–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Neskovic A. Predictors of left ventricular thrombus formation and disappearance after anterior wall myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 1998;19:908–916. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1998.0871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Funke Küpper A.J., Verheugt F.W.A., Peels C.H., Galema T.W., Roos J.P. Left ventricular thrombus incidence and behavior studied by serial two-dimensional echocardiography in acute anterior myocardial infarction: Left ventricular wall motion, systemic embolism and oral anticoagulation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1989;13:1514–1520. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90341-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Visser C.A., Kan G., Lie K.I., Durrer D. Left ventricular thrombus following acute myocardial infarction: A prospective serial echocardiographic study of 96 patients. Eur. Heart J. 1983;4:333–337. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lattuca B., Bouziri N., Kerneis M., Portal J.-J., Zhou J., Hauguel-Moreau M., Mameri A., Zeitouni M., Guedeney P., Hammoudi N., et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients with Left Ventricular Mural Thrombus. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020;75:1676–1685. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Robinson A.A., Trankle C.R., Eubanks G., Schumann C., Thompson P., Wallace R.L., Gottiparthi S., Ruth B., Kramer C.M., Salerno M., et al. Off-label Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared with Warfarin for Left Ventricular Thrombi. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:685. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Reports - Clinical Practice and Surgical Cases are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES