Skip to main content
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research logoLink to Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
. 2026 Feb 20;21:149. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06511-7

Correction: Association of dietary patterns with osteoporosis risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Bing Tan 1, HongWei Su 2, LanYa Wei 3, Min Liang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12922302  PMID: 41721412

Correction to: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2025) 20:551 10.1186/s13018-025-05896-9

In this article [1], few of the entries in Tables 1, 3 and 5 were incorrect. The corrected tables are given below and the changes have been highlighted in bold typeface.

Table 1.

General characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis on dietary patterns and osteoporosis

Author, year Country Study design Sample size (case) Population characteristics Dietary pattern Diet assessmentmethod Osteoprosisdefinition
method
Compare Odd ratio
(95%CI)
Adjustied confounding
factors
Study quality
Liu et al. 2025 [27]  US  Cross-sectional study  7290(243)  Average age 50.6 years adults  DII 24-h dietary recall interviews  DXA scan:BMD T score ≤ − 2.5  Q4 vs Q1  1.88 (1.41–2.52)  Age, race, sex, education level, marital status, ratio of family income to poverty level, smoking, BMI, Calcium, ALT, AST, uric acid, ALP, BUN, phosphorus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia  16
 Moham-adisima et al. 2024 [28]  Iran  Cross-sectional study 232 (108)   Postmenopaus-al women  DII  168-item FFQ  DXA scan:BMD T score ≤ − 2.5  DII (categoricl)  4.04 (1.79,9.10)  Age,BMI, post-menopausal years, parity, education, total energy intake, physical activity  18
 Zheng et al. 2024 [29]  China  Cross-Sectional Study  788 (130)  55–65 years adults hPDI  12-item FFQ  DXA scan:BMDT score ≤ − 2.5  Q5 vs Q1 1.83 (0.81, 4.10)  Age,sex,WHR, physical exercise, smoking status, alcohol consumption, tea consumption, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, history of dyslipidemia  17
PDI 1.45 (0.63, 3.32)
uPDI 2.91 (1.27, 6.64)
Zheng et al. 2024 [30]  UK  cohort study  202,063 (4841)  Average age56 years adults hPDI 24-h dietary questionnaire  DXA scan:BMDT score ≤ − 2.5  Q5 vs Q1 1.16 (1.05, 1.28)  Age, sex, ethnicity, BMI, Townsend deprivation index, education, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, energy intake, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, history of hip or spine fracture  9 
uPDI

1.15

(1.05, 1.26)

Meng et al. 2023 [31] US Cross-sectional study 526 (133) Average age 63.25 years adults DII 45-item FFQ DXA scan:BMD T score ≤ − 2.5 Q4 vs Q3 2.09 (1.05,4.23) Age, gender, race, BMI group, smoking, steroids use, calcium intake, phosphorus intake, serum calcium, serum phosphorus, total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, albumin, estrogen, anti-osteoporosis drugs, physical activity 18
Li et al. 2023 [32] US

Cross-

sectional study

10,312 (-) Median age 50.0 years adults DII 24-h dietary recalls

DXA scan:

BMD T score ≤ − 2.5

T3 vs T1 1.94 (1.02,3.69)

Age, gender, race/ethnicity,

smoker, BMI, eGFR, UACR, serum C-reactive protein, WBC count, NLR, serum calcium, arthritis, aspirin use, calcitonin use, biphosphonate use, DMARDs use, calcium intake, estrogen use

19
Shen et al. 2023 [33] China

Cross-

sectional study

839 (194) Aged 50 years and older adults DASH

65-item

FFQ

DXA scan:

BMD T score ≤ − 2.5

Scores

Men

0.96

(0.91, 1.02)

Age, BMI, height, hypertension, diabetes, age at menarche and menopause for women, smoking status, alcohol use, calcium supplement intake, vitamin D supplement intake, total energy intake, physical activity 17

Women

0.96

(0.91, 1.02)

Zheng et al. 2023 [34] US Cross-sectional study 16,085 (1073)  ≥ 20 years adults hPDI NHANES 24-h recall interviews

DXA scan:

BMD

T score ≤ − 2.5

Q5 vs Q1

1.08

(0.73, 1.60)

Age, sex, ethnicity, education, marital status, PIR, BMI, smoking status, physical exercise, hypertension, T2DM, CKD, cancer, history of fracture 16
PDI

1.01

(0.68, 1.51)

uPDI

1.48

(1.04, 2.11)

Hu et al. 2023 [35] China Cross-sectional study 9613 (1848) Adults over 60 years hPDI Simplifed FFQ

DXA scan:

BMD

T score ≤ − 2.5

Q4 vs Q1

0.64

(0.56, 0.74)

Age, gender, BMI, SMI, educational level, income, physical activity level, history of smoking, history of drinking, disease history 15
PDI

0.80

(0.69, 0.93)

uPDI

1.42

(1.23, 1.65)

Tayyem et al. 2023 [36] Jordan Case–control study 200 (100) Postmenopausal women Unhealthy/Western Arabic FFQ NR Q4 vs Q1 1.36(0.52,3.56) Age, BMI, physical activity level, total energy intake, number of pregnancies and lactation, health problems, smoking, education level, marital status, history of osteoporosis 7
Zhao et al. 2022 [37] US Cross-sectional study 2103 (196) Aged ≥ 50 years adults DII 24-h dietary recalls

DXA scan:

BMD

T score ≤ − 2.5

Q4 vs Q1

Men

0.82 (0.16, 4.23)

Age, race, BMI, martial status, smoking status, calcium 15

Women

6.14(2.55, 14.78)

Zhao et al. 2021 [38] China Cross-sectional study 476 (104) Middle-aged and aged people Aquatic food Simplified FFQ

DXA scan:

BMD

T score ≤ − 2.5

Q4 vs Q1

0.74

(0.43, 1.26)

Gender, age, smoking 17
Shahriar-pour et al. 2020 [39] Iran Cross-sectional study 151 (70) Postmenopausal women DASH 168-item FFQ DXA scan: BMD T score ≤ − 2.5 T3 vs T1

Lumbar spine 0.28 (0.09, 0.88)

Femoral neck 1.21(0.21, 7.00)

Age, BMI, physical activity, age at menarche, age at menopause, parity, duration of lactation, energy intake, sunlight exposure, smoking, supplement intake, education 16
Noel et al. 2020 [40] US Cross-sectional study 751 (-) 59.9 ± 7.6 years adults DASH Semi-quantitative FFQ DXA scan: BMD T score ≤ − 2.5 Scores Men 0.71 (0.40, 1.29) Age, BMI, height, smoking status, season of bone mineral density measurement, osteoporosis medication use, calcium intake, serum vitamin D status 16
Women 0.54 (0.39, 0.75)
Ilesanmi-Oyelere et al. 2020 [41] New Zealand Cross-sectional study 125 (65) Postmenopausal Women Dessert, cheese, red meat 108-item FFQ DXA scan: BMD T score ≤ − 2.5 NR 0.71 (0.44, 1.14) Age, BMI, activity energy expenditure 17
Oily fish, sports drink, and seafood-rich 0.86 (0.46, 1.60)
Na et al. 2019 [42] Korea Cross-sectional clinical study 2778 (1040) Postmenopausal Women DII 24-h dietary recalls DXA scan: BMD T score ≤ − 2.5 T3 vs T1 1.27 (1.00,1.62)

Age, BMI, vitamiD household income, smoking habits, physical activity, calcium

intake, postmenopausal Period

female-hormone use

19
Kim et al. 2018 [43] Korea cohort study 159,846 (2572) 40–79 years adults DII 106-item FFQ NR Q5vs Q1 1.33 (1.12,1.58) Age, BMI, smoke, calcium intake, alcohol consumption, physical activity, energy intake 8
Denova-Gutiérrez et al. 2016 [44] Mexico Cross-sectional study 6915 (-) Adults aged 20–80 years Prudent dietary pattern 116-item FFQ DXA scan: BMD T score ≤ − 2.5 Q5 vs Q1 0.83 (0.63, 1.07) Age, gender, BMI, height, multivitamin use,smoking status, physical activity, energy intake, estrogen use, age of menarche, parity, menopause 18
Westernized dietary pattern

1.74

(1.10, 2.76)

Shin et al. 2013 [45] Korea Cross-sectional study 3735 (1959) Postmenopausal Women Dairy and fruit Standardised questionnaire and a 24-h recall method

DXA scan:

BMD

T score ≤ − 2.5

Q5 vs Q1

Femoral neck

0.80

(0.54, 1.19);

Lumbar spine

0.47

(0.34, 0.65)

Age, BMI,energy intake, parathyroid hormone serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, smoking, alcohol intake, moderate physical activity, supplement use,oral contraceptive use 15
Meat, alcohol and sugar

Femoral neck

0.89

(0.60, 1.31);

Lumbar spine

0.78

(0.57, 1.07)

Park et al. 2012 [46] Korea Cohort study 1464 (429) Postmenopausal women Dairy 103-item FFQ

Ultrasound bone densitometer, speed of sound (m/s) BMD:

T score

 ≤ −2.5

Q5 vs Q1

Radius

0.63 (0.42, 0.93);

Tibia

0.56 (0.35, 0.90)

Age, residual area, exercise, passive smoking 9
Western

Radius

1.46 (1.02, 2.10);

Tibia

1.46 (0.91, 2.33)

DII Dietary Inflammatory Index, FFQ food frenquency questionnaire, DASH dietary approaches to stop hypertension, BMD bone mineral density, BMI body mass index, PDI plant-based diet index, hPDI healthy plant-based diet index, uPDI unhealthy plant-based diet index, NHANEX National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, CKD, chronickidney disease, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, UACR urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, BUN blood urea nitrogen, WBC white blood cell, NLR neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, DMARDs disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, PIR poverty income ratio, WHR Waist-to-Hip Ratio, SMI skeletalmuscle mass index, NR not reported, CI confidence interval, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALP alkaline phosphatase

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of dietary pattern and osteoporosis risk by diet assessment method

Dietary patterns Diet assessment method Number of studies Pooled Hazard ratio (95% CI) Heterogeneity
P value I2 (%) P valuea Model
hPDI 24-h dietary recall 2 1.16 (1.05, 1.27) 0.003 0.00 0.729 Random
FFQ 2 1.00 (0.36, 2.77) 1.000 84.0 0.012 Random
PDI FFQ 2 0.93 (0.56, 1.55) 0.781 47.5 0.167 Random
uPDI FFQ 2 1.80 (0.93, 3.50) 0.081 64.3 0.090 Random
24-h dietary recall 2 1.23 (0.99, 1.53) 0.063 45.4 0.176 Random
Western/Unhealthy FFQ 4 1.25 (0.84, 1.88) 0.272 64.9 0.036 Random
Prudent/Healthy FFQ 2 0.71 (0.52, 0.98) 0.036 59.6 0.115 Random

PDI plant-based diet index, hPDI healthy plant-based diet index, uPDI unhealthy plant-based diet index, FFQ food frenquency questionnaire, CI confidence interval

aP value for heterogeneity within each subgroup

Table 5.

The trim-and-fill analysis of PDI and the risk of osteoporosis

Pooled 95% CI Asymptotic No. of Heterogeneity
Method Est Lower Upper z_value p_value studies Q_value p_value
Meta-analysis Fixed −0.179 −0.317 −0.041 −2.544 0.011 3 2.884 0.236
Random −0.117 −0.358 0.124 −0.951 0.342

Filled

Meta-analysis

Fixed −0.223 −0.352 −0.094 −3.398 0.001 5 6.558 0.161
Random −0.223 −0.456 0.010 −1.878 0.060

PDI plant-based diet index, CI confidence interval

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reference

  • 1.Tan B, Su H, Wei L, et al. Association of dietary patterns with osteoporosis risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1):551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES