Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2026 Feb 20;6(2):e0005916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005916

We know what we need: Older adults’ and stakeholders’ perspectives on ageing, health, and wellbeing in Pakistan

Sonia Sameen 1,*, Javeria Mansoor 1, Maryam Pyar Ali Lakhdir 1,2, Muhammad Asim 1, Rose Munyoki 1, Carolyn Greig 3,4, Justine Davies 5,6, Bilal Ahmed Usmani 1,*
Editor: Julia Robinson7
PMCID: PMC12923039  PMID: 41719240

Abstract

The rapid increase in the older adult population worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Pakistan, raises critical challenges for healthcare, social support, and policy planning. Older adults in LMICs, especially in culturally diverse regions like Sindh, Pakistan, often face limited access to healthcare, economic insecurity, and social isolation. These challenges highlight the need to understand ageing in this context and explore potential solutions at multiple levels of the socio-ecological model. This qualitative descriptive study used focus group discussions (FGDs) to gather information from 24 older adults and 24 stakeholders in urban Karachi, and 26 older adults and 26 stakeholders in rural Thatta. Each FGD consisted of 4–6 participants. They were conducted using a semi-structured guide, moderated in local languages, and analyzed thematically using the socio-ecological model as a guiding framework. At the individual level, mental health concerns like loneliness, depression, and stress were prevalent, with participants emphasizing the importance of family and community support. Technological barriers were noted, particularly in urban areas where older adults expressed a desire to learn to use smartphones and social media. At the sociocultural level, participants highlighted a lack of respect, social integration, and the need for senior care homes. They noted that family support was crucial but also expressed the need for socializing opportunities and greater societal recognition. At the structural level, difficulties accessing healthcare and managing medications were major concerns. Additionally, there was a lack of awareness about existing social security programs which could be expanded to support older adults. The study emphasizes the complexity of ageing-related issues in LMICs and the importance of addressing personal, sociocultural, and structural barriers. These study findings may contribute to discussions around improving support systems for older adults in similar contexts and fostering a more inclusive approach to ageing in resource-deprived settings, like Pakistan.

Introduction

The growing number of older adults in the population necessitates greater attention to the health and well-being of this demographic. Recognizing vital needs related to ageing is essential for strategic planning to support the wellness and welfare of older adults [1]. In Pakistan, the older population was approximately 12.5 million in 2017, with projections estimating it could reach 40 million, or 8% of the population, by 2050. Globally, projections indicate that by 2050, one in six people will be 65 years or older, reflecting a significant demographic shift driven by declining fertility rates and increasing life expectancy [2,3]. Physiological changes accompanying ageing increase the risk of chronic conditions, a challenge strongly felt in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [2]. Many older adults also face various challenges, including financial instability post-retirement, often resulting in dependency on family members or caregivers [4]. These challenges, however, cannot be understood in isolation as they are shaped by the broader social determinants of health that influence how people age and the opportunities available to them.

Social determinants of health, i.e., the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age, significantly shape health outcomes. These factors include socioeconomic status, education, neighborhood, employment, social support networks, and access to healthcare. Research suggests that social determinants can impact health more significantly than healthcare or lifestyle choices, accounting for 30–55% of health outcomes [5]. Addressing these social determinants is crucial for improving health and reducing disparities [6]. Understanding how older adults and those who support them define and interpret healthy ageing, i.e., maintaining functional ability and well-being in older age, within these social contexts is therefore an important first step.

In Pakistan, distinct differences exist between life in rural and urban areas. These contextual differences not only determine access to resources but also create distinct forms of vulnerability. Poverty rates are highest in rural regions [7], and a substantial portion of the older population lives in poverty [8]. Conversely, older adults in urban centres typically have better access to nutritious food, clean water, and electricity [9]. Rural older adults often face material deprivation [10], whereas urban counterparts may experience social isolation and weakened community networks [11]. Understanding these contrasts is crucial to developing context-sensitive approaches to healthy ageing.

Most studies in Pakistan have focused on urban settings, exploring older adult needs, experiences, and challenges. Commonly reported issues include financial problems, social needs such as social interaction and religious involvement, limited employment opportunities, and loneliness [12,13]. As a LMIC, Pakistan faces disparities at both individual and sociocultural levels that influence healthy ageing [14]. These structural and contextual disparities often translate into barriers that limit older adults’ ability to age healthily and maintain autonomy [15]. Although few previous studies exist about the objective health outcomes and needs of older adults [8], those studies were quantitative and therefore do not fully capture ageing individuals’ lived experiences, perceptions, and priorities that shape well-being.

Given the strong influence of social determinants on autonomy, dignity, and quality of life [16], there remains a critical gap in understanding how older adults themselves interpret and navigate these factors within the Pakistani context. A qualitative approach is essential to explore how older adults perceive these determinants and navigate challenges related to ageing, healthcare access, and social inclusion. Collectively, this evidence not only contextualize quantitative findings but also sheds light on hidden barriers and enablers that shape well-being. Exploring what supports or resources enable older adults to remain active and engaged can reveal important facilitators of healthy ageing and inform the development of more person-centered interventions.

Neglecting older adult health and social needs can lead to increased healthcare costs and decreased quality of life for individuals and families, creating inter-generational impacts as younger family members take on care-giving roles. At the policy level, despite the introduction of national policy for older adult health in 1999, Pakistan is yet to implement it. Additionally, very few institutions in the country recognize geriatric care as a specialty with general practitioners and other specialists typically providing healthcare services to older adults [17]. These gaps highlight systemic weaknesses in Pakistan’s approach to geriatric care. Addressing these systemic gaps requires culturally grounded, context-specific solutions that reflect urban–rural disparities and promote equitable, dignified ageing through both policy and community-level action. Building on this evidence, this study aimed to understand ageing in Pakistan by examining how urban–rural differences shape older adult and stakeholder experiences, challenges, and opportunities for healthy ageing, and to inform policies that promote equitable and dignified ageing. It sought to capture perspectives from both older adults and key stakeholders to better understand how these determinants shape experiences of ageing. The study was guided by four overarching research questions: [1] how do older adults and stakeholders define healthy ageing; [2] what barriers hinder the achievement of healthy ageing; [3] what facilitators or enablers support it; and [4] what solutions or recommendations can strengthen the well-being of older adults across diverse contexts.

Methods

Study design

This qualitative descriptive study was embedded within a broader multi-method research project titled “Exploring healthy ageing trajectories and determinants in Pakistan: a mixed-methods study,” [16] which investigated the priorities and needs of the older adult population in Pakistan. The main study aimed to identify the needs and priorities of older adults and stakeholders across urban and rural locations, exploring their perspectives on ageing, key areas of importance, available services, and barriers to living well in later life. In the quantitative phase, participants ranked their health and social priorities and needs through a structured voting process. The same participants were then invited to participate in the qualitative follow-up study to explore their perspectives on barriers, proposed solutions, and recommendations for social determinants of health and well-being. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used to ensure effective reporting of the various aspects of this study. [16,18]

Study setting, population, and recruitment

Two districts in Sindh province were purposively selected for data collection: District East, Karachi, representing an urban setting, and District Thatta, representing a rural setting. Although both sites are in the same province, they exhibit notable geosocial differences. Karachi, the largest city in Pakistan and the provincial capital attracts people from across the country with various religious backgrounds for career opportunities, with an estimated population of 20 million (2023). In contrast, Thatta has a population of around 1 million, primarily Sindhi-speaking, with Muslim and Hindu communities forming the majority [19].

The study population comprised two major groups:

  • 1)

    Older adults, aged sixty years and above, were recruited with the assistance of a community mobilizer and a research coordinator. The community mobilizer, a trusted local representative familiar with the communities, reached out to potential participants through household visits, word-of-mouth communication, and coordination with local community leaders and neighborhood committees. Information about the study was shared verbally in local languages to ensure clarity and accessibility. The research coordinator maintained contact with those who expressed interest, confirmed eligibility based on inclusion criteria, and scheduled participants for workshops. Referrals among participants were also used to identify additional individuals willing to participate.

  • 2)

    Stakeholders were also invited to participate in the study, including a diverse group of individuals and organization partners known to support older adults. These included: members of senior councils, representatives from the Ministry of Local Government and Ministry of Health, Relevant NGOs and private organizations (such as HANDS (Health and Nutrition Development Society), Darul Sukoon, Edhi), local authorities, community leaders, health and social care managers and informal caregivers including family members involved in elderly care. All stakeholders were based in Karachi and Thatta and were known to have experience working with or supporting older adults. Invitations were sent via email, as well as in-person visits by the study coordinators.

The call for recruitment was advertised on September 25th, 2021, for both urban (Karachi) and rural (Thatta) study centres. Recruitment continued from September 26th, 2021, to September 30th, 2021, and workshops were organized on October 1st and 6th, 2021, in Thatta. Another study coordinator helped recruit participants from Karachi from October 7th, 2021, to October 12th, 2021. Workshops in Karachi were organized on October 13th and 14th, 2021.

Data collection

We conducted ten focus group discussions (FGDs) with older adults and stakeholders in Karachi and Thatta, holding five FGDs separately with older adults and stakeholders in each location. There were 24 older adults and 24 stakeholders in Karachi, and 26 older adults and 26 stakeholders in Thatta, with each focus group consisting of 4–6 participants. A quota sampling technique was used, with the study team recruiting a fixed number of older adults from the target populations for convenience. For details about the recruitment process, refer to the main study.

The semi-structured guide was developed using literature and expert opinion [20]. The study teams in both Karachi and Thatta undertook training on qualitative data collection procedures. The study team from Aga Khan University moderated in-person FGDs. Discussions lasted 1.5 to 2 hours in Karachi and 2 to 2.5 hours in Thatta. Separate focus groups were conducted for older adults, with gender-segregated groups in the rural site (Thatta) to respect cultural norms. Translators fluent in local languages, i.e., Sindhi, were present to ensure that all perspectives were accurately understood.

The data collection was aimed at achieving data saturation. The discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and subsequently translated into English. An overview of the data collection and analysis process is presented in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Data collection and analysis workflow for the qualitative study conducted in urban Karachi and rural Thatta, Pakistan.

Fig 1

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the Aga Khan University Departmental and Institutional Review Committee (2021-6147-17944). Access to the Thatta site was granted after obtaining permission from the local management. All participants voluntarily participated and provided written consent. No identifiable participant information was recorded, and confidentiality and privacy were maintained throughout the study.

Data analysis

Thematic deductive analysis was conducted using the socio-ecological model framework, which consists of themes at three levels, i.e., Individual, Sociocultural, and Structural [21]. At the individual level, it focuses on personal characteristics such as knowledge, attitudes, skills, and biological aspects. The sociocultural level emphasizes the role of relationships, community norms, and social networks in influencing actions. Lastly, the structural level examines the broader systemic and environmental factors, such as policies, economic systems, and organizational structures, that create the context in which individuals and communities operate. Together, these levels highlight the interconnectedness of personal, social, and structural elements in shaping societal outcomes [22].

The FGDs were guided by a semi-structured discussion guide (S1 File), which was developed around the study objectives and aligned with the three levels of the framework. The data was manually coded by one researcher using an inductive-deductive thematic approach following Braun and Clark [23]. In the initial step, the researcher first familiarized themselves with the data and identified key elements related to specific research questions. This process informed the development of preliminary codes, which were subsequently refined, consolidated, and organized into groups reflecting similar ideas aligned with the study's main research questions. Codes were grouped into broader categories and themes reflecting barriers and solutions to healthy ageing across individual, social, and structural levels. This inductive analysis was conducted to generate initial themes after which these themes were subsequently mapped deductively onto the three levels of the socio-ecological model. All analyses and data management were conducted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Patterns were compared across stakeholder groups and geographical regions to explore differences and similarities.

Researchers’ reflexivity

The research team comprised eight public health professionals, three with formal training in qualitative research and four with experience in ageing-related studies. The primary researcher (female), with a background in public health and ageing, led the study design, data analysis, and interpretation, while senior qualitative researchers (one male and two females) provided oversight and methodological guidance. Their prior work with older adults and community-based health programs may have shaped their sensitivity toward issues of ageing, care, and social connectedness.

To reduce potential bias, FGDs were conducted by trained community members fluent in local languages and familiar with local customs. Their involvement helped build trust and encouraged participants to share their views openly. The lead researcher developed the coding framework, which was first thoroughly reviewed by a male senior qualitative researcher from Pakistan with contextual knowledge, and subsequently by two female senior researchers to enhance analytical rigor.

The authors recognize that their professional backgrounds in public health and ageing research may have influenced how the data were interpreted. Regular reflexive discussions and the use of the participants’ own words helped ensure that findings accurately represented participant perspectives and strengthened the study's credibility.

Results

The mean age of older adults was 67.3 years in Karachi and 67.2 years in Thatta, while the mean age of stakeholders was 31 years in Karachi and 36 years in Thatta, respectively. This study identified perceived barriers and proposed solutions for older adults in our population, categorized into three levels: individual, sociocultural, and structural (refer to Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of key barriers and corresponding solutions to promote healthy ageing across multiple levels of influence.

Level of Framework Barriers Solutions
Individual Level • Generalized weakness leads to low motivation, increased susceptibility to diseases, and diminished willpower

• Loneliness, dependency, and fear of death affect mental and emotional well-being

• Technological barriers hinder adaptation to modern tools, though older adults express a strong desire for digital literacy.
• A sense of importance and acknowledgment enhances emotional well-being.

• Gratitude and religious practices provide emotional relief and promote well-being

• Early preparation both mentally and financially helps overcome ageing-related barriers and achieve personal goals.
Sociocultural Level • Lack of family support, both emotionally and practically, negatively impacts well-being.

• Lack of respect and empathetic listening diminishes emotional contentment.

• Limited opportunities for socialization hinder social engagement and satisfaction.
• Family support and trust enable delegation of responsibilities, promoting self-care and better nutrition.

• Spending quality time with family fosters emotional well-being and reduces frustration.

• Strengthening community networks and creating dedicated spaces for older adults enhance social engagement and support.
Structural Level • Lack of government support and insufficient pension systems undermine financial security.

• Limited access to affordable healthcare and medical supplies challenges health and well-being.

• Poor infrastructure, pollution, and lack of public facilities negatively affect health.
• Improved access to healthcare and essential medicines is vital to meet older adult needs.

• Subsidies and priority services for senior citizens are crucial for financial and social support.

• Ensuring access to basic utilities and financial stability improves quality of life.

At the individual level, major concerns included physical weakness, stress, loneliness, and technology barriers. At the sociocultural level, primary concerns were the need for family support and affection, respect and dignity, and a lack of socialization opportunities. At the structural level, concerns centered around the need for government support, limited access to health services and essential medicines, financial instability, and inadequate infrastructure and public services.

The proposed solutions at the individual level included fostering a sense of purpose, practicing gratitude, and engaging in religious practices. At the sociocultural level, recommended strategies involved encouraging family support through quality time, shared responsibilities, and joining community networks.

Individual level

This level includes barriers and proposed solutions that address individual concerns. The barriers are categorized into three sub-themes. Proposed solutions include fostering a sense of purpose, practicing gratitude, engaging in religious prayers, and preparing for early ageing.

  • A

    Barriers

Generalized weakness leads to low motivation, increased susceptibility to diseases and diminished willpower.

Older adults in urban and rural Pakistan noted that generalized weakness was a major concern. They added that this weakness, in turn, resulted in other issues like irritability, being in bed throughout the day, and low motivation to perform physical activity. An older adult from Karachi expressed his feelings as follows:

Sometimes, with age (age > 60), a person feels physically weak, and you feel like resting, nothing else I want to say. – FGD3 OK4

Rural participants also mentioned that apart from weakness, their bodies had become prone to developing certain diseases, experienced low immunity, and had a higher risk of falls. A participant said:

As people age, they experience weakness and become more susceptible to disease. Their weakness worsens gradually; they lose courage and willpower with age. – FGD3 OT1

Loneliness, dependency, and fear of death affect the mental health and emotional well-being of older adults.

The participants from Karachi and Thatta mentioned that loneliness resulted from losing their partners or siblings, and children becoming busy in their careers and personal lives. Another reason for mental health issues highlighted was a reduced sense of power due to a lack of employment and, subsequently, money. A few stakeholders also mentioned sleep disturbance in older adults, resulting in an improper routine. This becomes a challenge for the family that looks after them.

Loneliness is because of the death of a partner, or children getting busy with their jobs or personal lives. Dependency on children rises to the extent that they depend on their children at that age. Certain factors like memory loss and children support are included in dependency– FGD1 SK1.

Another stakeholder from the urban site mentioned that older adults tend to become agitated due to perceived loneliness, which happens as they feel that their children do not listen to them.

They show more anger and throw tantrums; they become hyper easily, and nobody listens to them. To make themselves noticed, they ignore others as well. So, according to me, in old age, a person gets angry more frequently, their children do not listen to them, and their children leave them in old age homes. – FGD3 SK4

Some older adults also reported distress because they were unable to visit their loved ones, primarily due to weakness. A female from the rural site said:

Whenever there is a wedding, a funeral, or I wish to go to pay my respects and condolences to someone, I cannot even go there. Relatives, dear ones, strangers, I cannot go to meet anyone. – FGD4 OT4

Many older adults mentioned that they often dwell on the loss of friends and family and experience fear regarding their deaths.

The problems and tensions have increased; relatives have left us. Our blood (relatives) left us, youthfulness left us, and slowly, everyone just left us like that. Fear of death is also there. Someone’s mother dies or someone’s father dies and we do not only have children and family ahead of us, but there is also only a ‘Hereafter’ ahead of us. Many hardworking people have departed. – FGD5 OT2

Technological barriers hinder older adults’ ability to adapt to modern tools, but they express a strong desire for digital literacy.

Older adults, particularly those from urban areas, discussed difficulties adapting to recent technologies and expressed interest in learning how to use smartphones and explore the internet. They mentioned facing both technological and educational barriers. An older adult stated:

Then technology and education-related barriers; even the children who are going to school know about it, my grandsons are doing it, they tell me how to use a computer, just show me how to do it, and they teach me. – FGD2 OK3

They also expressed a desire to use social media platforms to stay engaged. Another older adult added:

Independence in using technology is needed; then we would be able to use Facebook, play games, chat, or watch YouTube throughout the day. – FGD3 OK1

  • B

    Solutions

A sense of importance and acknowledgment enhances the emotional well-being of older adults.

Both older adults and stakeholders mentioned that older adults need to accept themselves as an essential part of the community, keep themselves busy, avoid overthinking, develop a proper sleep schedule and routine, and care for themselves.

First of all, we should forgive others. Take rest, take care of our diet, and take medicines on time. You should also make friends. – FGD3 OK3

The stakeholders reported that giving attention, time, and importance to older adults makes them feel respected and content.

The first thing is if we give importance to our elders’ opinions, they will stay happy but if we ignore them or do not give importance to their opinions, they will get hurt. It will speed up their ageing process more. – FGD2 SK4

Gratitude and religious practices provide emotional relief and promote well-being among older adults.

Both older adults and stakeholders reported that practicing gratitude and prayers helped alleviate mental health issues such as stress, anger, and loneliness. They found these self-care activities beneficial. Some participants also mentioned that reading newspapers and watching positive content on television contributed to their happiness.

Gradually, you find yourself focusing more on your faith, your grandchildren, and your own well-being, distancing yourself from the fast-paced life you once led. – FGD1 OK1

Early preparation, both mentally and financially, helps overcome ageing-related barriers and achieve personal goals.

Most older adults suggested that preparing for healthy ageing should start early, encompassing mental preparation and financial planning. This insight was more profound among older adults of Karachi. One older adult shared:

We need to mentally prepare ourselves, so that we can get it right. If we want to do something, we can—ageing is not a barrier. A person should mentally prepare for what he wants to achieve, and then it becomes possible. – FGD1 OK2

Sociocultural

This level also includes themes related to low support from family, respect and dignity, and avenues to socialize. The solutions proposed by the participants were categorized into themes such as delegation of responsibilities to family, spending time with family, and socializing.

  • A

    Barriers

Lack of family support, both emotionally and practically, significantly impacts the well-being of older adults.

Nearly all participants (stakeholders as well as older adults) from both sites emphasized that family support is a top priority for older adults. They noted that retirement and physical limitations make older adults increasingly dependent on their children to buy groceries and medicines. Additionally, older adults feel a need for emotional connection, wanting to share their feelings and life experiences with their children and grandchildren. Participants also expressed that a peaceful home environment is essential for their well-being. Some mentioned that their children only join them for dinner on holidays, and a few participants highlighted concerns about the attitudes of their children and in-laws.

If a person’s children are spoiled and uncaring, it adds further stress and worry to their mind. However, if the child is obedient, the older person can find some encouragement and support during times of illness or conflict. – FGD4 OT1

Sometimes, when a daughter-in-law joins the family, if she is kind and seeks to keep everyone together, the home becomes a peaceful place. However, if she causes conflict, it can disrupt the family's harmony. – FGD5 OK1

Stakeholders echoed these concerns, emphasizing that children must take responsibility for their older adult parents. One stakeholder stated:

Children should serve their elderly parents, particularly by ensuring they have a healthy diet. If the parents are unwell, their children should make arrangements for their treatment. They should fulfill their responsibilities and make every effort to ensure their parents remain healthy and well. – FGD4 ST1

Respect and empathetic listening contribute to older adults’ emotional well-being and contentment.

The participants, especially the stakeholders, collectively noted that showing respect to older adults enhances their mood and sense of contentment. They added that empathetic listening is crucial and complained that young people nowadays are often eager to voice their arguments first. Some stakeholders also mentioned that family members playing loud music disrupts older adults, especially during prayer times.

Limited opportunities for socialization hinder older adults’ social engagement and well-being.

The participants mentioned that very few opportunities were available for them to socialize. They said they do not have access to any community or recreational centres, especially designated for older adults. A participant from the urban site said:

There should be opportunities for socializing and a pleasant environment, with trees and greenery, so that when you look out the window, at least, you feel good. – KF1 OK1

  • B

    Solutions

Family support and trust enable older adults to delegate responsibilities, ensuring they focus on self-care and proper nutrition.

Both older adults and stakeholders suggested that supportive family dynamics, where stakeholders build trust with their older adults, help them delegate responsibilities, allowing them to focus on self-care. A few participants also mentioned that family members need to take responsibility for providing a specialized diet for older adults, considering their capacity to chew solids and their dietary requirements. One older adult reported:

You need a separate diet, but since your family members will not cook separate dishes for you, you have no other choice but to eat tea and rusk. – FGD5 OK1

Spending quality time with family fosters emotional well-being and reduces frustration in older adults.

Both stakeholder and older adult participants from urban and rural sites pointed out that spending time with family and creating peaceful, loving surroundings were essential for their emotional well-being. It also made them release their frustrations and share their life experiences. A stakeholder said:

If you sit and listen to their life stories then they will be easy-going and joyful, but if you do not then they become very cranky and annoyed. – FGD5 SK2

Strengthening community networks and creating dedicated spaces for older adults enhance social engagement and support.

The stakeholders from both sites especially emphasized that socializing and building stronger community support networks are valuable. The neighbors, local community, and volunteers are essential for strengthening community support networks.

Neighbors should take care of their old neighbors. On a community level, an NGO should be established that will serve to help old people financially. – FGD4 ST1

Moreover, establishing institutions for senior citizens and community parks to provide spaces for engagement and recreation was pointed out as a favorable solution, especially when their children are not available at home during their working hours.

The community should provide smaller clubs for senior citizens and everybody where you can sit and gossip. – FGD3 OK3

The government should establish institutions for people aged 60 years and above, where only people who have retired will pool in their ideas on the basis of their experiences so that they can also become valued citizens. – FGD4 ST1

Structural

This component involved most concerns at the state policies and governance levels. The themes related to concerns were government support, access to health services, medication support, financial stability, and infrastructure. The identified themes within the proposed solutions included the provision of medicines, senior citizen subsidies, the provision of basic facilities, and improved access to health facilities.

  • A

    Barriers

Lack of government support and insufficient pension systems affect the financial security of older adults.

Many participants, especially those from rural areas, expressed concerns about their eagerness to continue working but were unable to do so. Older adults who were still working complained that their daily wages or salaries were delayed for months, emphasizing the need for a pension system. They pointed out that although a pension system exists, it is limited to retired government employees. Given that a large proportion of the population works in the private sector or is self-employed, these individuals are not eligible to benefit from the government pension system when they grow old.

If the government cannot help them financially, then they should provide small jobs to the elderly so they can work and earn. – FGD2 SK1

Limited access to affordable healthcare and necessary medical supplies challenges the health and well-being of older adults.

All the participants raised concerns that medical services were expensive, and many older adults develop conditions like diabetes and hypertension and require a regular supply of medicines. A few participants also demanded the provision of wheelchairs and ambulances, especially for older adults.

The absence of a medical clinic in our village is a source of stress for us. There is a medical store. – FGD4 ST2

Poor infrastructure, including pollution and lack of public facilities, negatively impacts the health of older adults.

The participants, predominantly from Karachi, complained about air pollution and the lack of clean green parks and roads. Few participants from the rural site raised concerns about public toilets.

In our country, the government is not doing anything. There is too much dirt over here, which is hazardous to our health. – FGD3 OK1

  • B

    Solutions

Enhanced access to healthcare and medicines is essential for addressing the needs of older adults.

A few urban stakeholders mentioned that online services should be utilized in this regard, including online delivery of medical supplies or online mental health counselling services, e.g., Tele-clinics for older adults.

(We) need a proper healthcare system for that, from where you can buy free medicines, the government should give us free medication and free check-ups. – FGD3 OK3

Subsidies and priority services for senior citizens are crucial for financial and social support.

Many participants, particularly from Karachi, compared the senior citizen benefits, including ration cards, discounts on bus fares, and priority service while waiting in lines at pharmacies, banks, or any other public place where token system tickets are being issued with their settings. They mentioned that these services are available in our neighboring countries and proposed that such schemes should also be available to them.

We want our organization to provide us with financial aid. We do not have enough strength to make money on our own. We need external support. – FGD4 OT4

Access to basic utilities and financial stability are essential for improving the quality of life for older adults.

Most participants, especially from the rural site, demanded proper provision of facilities like electricity, gas, and water from the government, while some urban participants demanded some aid with groceries.

In terms of facilities, they are the same as those that I mentioned earlier, like the availability of electricity, water, and gas. Other than this, having a stable and good income is important. – FGD4OT1

These findings informed the development of an integrated framework illustrating urban–rural disparities and potential pathways for promoting healthy ageing in Pakistan (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Integrated Framework for Addressing Urban–Rural Disparities in Healthy Ageing in Pakistan.

Fig 2

The framework highlights distinct and shared barriers, mechanisms for change, and tailored solutions that bridge urban–rural gaps to promote equitable, inclusive, and dignified ageing.

Discussion

Through the FGDs at an urban and rural site of Sindh province in Pakistan, the study explored older adult and stakeholder priorities regarding barriers and solutions at three levels of the socio-ecological model. Healthy ageing has become a primary area of focus globally with the increasing older adult population [24]. Being a LMIC, the study’s overall concerns about urban and rural older adults were similar and were primarily directed toward providing basic amenities.

At the individual level, one of the identified themes included mental health concerns, loneliness, and stress. In community-dwelling older adults across Asia, factors such as having a spouse or partner, living with family, maintaining a large social network, frequent contact with friends and family, and receiving emotional and practical family support are all associated with fewer depressive symptoms and greater life satisfaction [25]. Some older adults in the study also reported that these reasons were associated with depression. A 2022 systematic review by Lapane et al. on older adults in congregate long-term care settings found that loneliness was prevalent among residents, even though they lived with other older adults. This loneliness was associated with increased risks of depression and suicidal tendencies [26]. A 2023 scoping review by Mazumder et al. on mental health interventions found that older adults in South Asia face significant disparities in mental health. While depression and anxiety were the most commonly reported issues, other outcomes included poor quality of life, cognitive decline, low self-esteem, and reduced physical capability. The review proposed solutions such as meditation, behavioural and educational interventions, technology-assisted approaches, and music therapy [18].

Participants also noted a technology barrier at the individual level, particularly in urban areas, where many older adults expressed an interest in learning to use smartphones and social media applications. A recent systematic review on Mobile Health (mHealth) use among older adults also found limited technological capacity in this group, highlighting that motivation and social support are essential for sustained engagement. However, none of the studies in this review focused on older adults from LMICs [27]. A Canadian study on older adult technology use similarly reported smartphones as the preferred device, but, in contrast to the study’s findings, it found that most older adults could self-learn technology [28] without relying on their children or grandchildren.

A study from the UAE explored the rights of older adults in Islam and their country and reported that Islam supports providing shelters and senior homes for older adults without successors or relatives. These homes should be constructed based on Islamic programs, services, and foundations. Neglect of older adults is considered agonizing, and it contributes to the worsening of their health and psychological problems [29]. Pakistan is also an Islamic country, and the laws and sociocultural norms are mainly based on Islamic teachings. Many older adults in the study noted that their sense of contentment increased as they practiced religion more at this stage of life. However, they also highlighted the scarcity of senior homes at the sociocultural and structural level, proposing that such facilities should be established. This finding aligns with a study from Bangladesh, which highlighted the need for senior homes and reported that financial constraints often contribute to the hardships the older adult population faces. To address this, the study suggested expanding and equitably distributing social security programs [30]. Interestingly, the participants in this study did not mention any existing social security programs.

A study by Chantakeeree et al. conducted in Thailand emphasized the importance of older adults taking personal responsibility for their health, through consistent medication adherence, healthier lifestyle choices, and cultivating spirituality to enhance emotional resilience [31]. While this focus on individual agency is important, it must be understood within the broader structural context. For instance, a study from Michigan, USA, revealed that many older adults struggled with external determinants of health, such as the affordability of healthcare, especially mental health services, concerns about access to safe water, and dissatisfaction with local infrastructure [32]. These findings note that personal responsibility, though vital, is often shaped and constrained by systemic conditions, highlighting the need for an enabling environment to support older adults in managing their health effectively. Similarly, this study also found that self-reliance was often proposed as a more sustainable solution compared to dependence on government support. In line with this, Parra et al. explored older adult views on physical activity and mindfulness, showing that mindfulness workshops enhanced self-awareness, nurtured self-compassion, and strengthened social connections. These findings align with the results of this study, where participants emphasized the importance of preparing for healthy ageing in advance [33].

Many older adults in this study, particularly from Thatta, expressed a strong desire to work despite their advanced age, motivated primarily by economic need but also by the wish to engage in meaningful activities. This finding aligns with other studies suggesting that post-retirement work is associated with enhanced emotional well-being and greater satisfaction [34]. Additionally, the World Economic Forum reports that the global retirement age is expected to rise to accommodate an ageing population and boost productivity, with several European countries already leading the way in this shift [35].

In our study, sociocultural issues were primarily associated with family support, receiving respect, and opportunities for socializing. Beaudry et al. conducted a similar study among the older adult populations in India and Sri Lanka, emphasizing that family and community support are essential for long-term care. Many older adults, especially those managing disabilities or chronic illnesses, identified insufficient support as a primary factor leading them to seek residence in long-term care facilities. Additionally, these facilities largely depended on community assistance for daily operations due to minimal support from both family members and the government [36].

A Swedish study examining solutions for sociocultural issues among older adults highlighted how social media networking complemented traditional phone conversations, encouraging participation in social activities, events, and transportation support. Participants described engaging in community-oriented activities, such as walking a neighbor's dog, joining a church, cooking for others, or providing transportation, which fostered a sense of purpose and value [37]. Similarly, social support was seen as essential in this study; however, the participants in this study predominantly relied on their children or close family rather than community or neighborhood support for these interactions.

At the structural level, access to and utilization of healthcare services and medications remain a constant concern for older adults, as highlighted in our study. A recent study from India also reported that multi-morbidity significantly increases outpatient visits, hospitalization costs, and overall healthcare utilization, with affordability being a primary barrier to accessibility [38]. While cancer-related costs were especially burdensome in that study, the older adults in our study expressed more concern over managing conditions such as osteoporosis, hypertension, and diabetes.

A study from Malaysia identified several medication-related challenges among older adults, primarily involving administration, adherence, accessibility, and polypharmacy. It found that 44% of older adults skipped medications due to perceived ineffectiveness, and 60% experienced difficulties when changes occurred in medication color, size, or shape. Additionally, 15.5% reported trouble accessing information about medications from their primary physicians, and 62.3% felt they were on an excessive number of medications. Only 52.7% were aware of possible side effects. Dissatisfaction stemmed from long waiting times, insufficient guidance, and a lack of follow-up care [39]. In this study, participants similarly noted a need for family support in administering medicines and reported long hospital waiting times that led to missed follow-up visits. However, unlike the Malaysian study, this study’s participants, both older adults and stakeholders, did not express concerns about polypharmacy, side effects, or difficulty accessing information. This difference may reflect the limited health literacy or lower awareness of polypharmacy risks among participants from low socioeconomic backgrounds in our study.

Rajwar et al., in their scoping review protocol on income support programs in South Asian nations, highlighted several government initiatives aimed at reducing income insecurity among older adults. For example, India has established schemes such as the Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme, the National Social Assistance Program, and the Senior Citizen Savings Scheme. Similarly, in Nepal, the government launched programs in 1994, including Old Age Allowances for all seniors over 60 years who are not covered by pensions and allowances for widowed, impoverished, or homeless older adult women. Bangladesh, with support from the World Bank, implemented similar programs over the past decade. Sri Lanka also has an Elderly Assistance Program, which provides cash transfers to older persons over 70 who lack income opportunities [40]. Notably, the review did not mention any comparable programs in Pakistan, although Pakistan does have pension systems and an Old Age Benefits Institution for government employees [41].

Strengths and limitations

This study provides important evidence documenting ageing experiences across urban and rural settings in Pakistan, although several limitations warrant consideration. The inclusion of one urban and one rural district offered comparative depth but limited the generalizability of findings to other geographic settings in Pakistan. Pakistan’s older population is very diverse, and perspectives across different provinces may reflect variation amongthe older population’s preferences in terms of care. Additionally, recruitment through community mobilization may have excluded home-bound or socially isolated older adults, leading to potential under-representation of some of the most vulnerable groups.

The primary analysis was undertaken by a single researcher, which may have introduced interpretive bias and lack of inter-coder reliability. To enhance analytical rigor and accuracy, a second, qualitative researcher independently reviewed the coding framework, thematic structure, and supporting quotations to validate the analysis process. This peer review process, together with framework-guided coding, an audit trail, and debriefings with senior investigators, helped strengthen the rigor of findings. Translation from Sindhi and Urdu into English may also have led to slight loss of meaning despite multiple rounds of verification and transcript checking.

Despite these limitations, the study possesses several strengths. The study brought together perspectives from both older adults and stakeholders and used the socio-ecological model to examine ageing at multiple levels. In the rural setting, gender-segregated discussions ensured cultural sensitivity and gave participants the freedom to express their concerns more openly. Collectively, these features contribute to the methodological robustness and contextual relevance of the study findings, offering valuable evidence to inform interventions and practices supporting healthy ageing in LMICs.

Conclusion

This study highlights the complexity of issues affecting ageing populations and emphasizes that these issues are not only personal but also deeply rooted in structural and sociocultural contexts. At the sociocultural level, addressing the lack of family support, respect, and avenues for socialization can be achieved by fostering community networks, promoting family time, and encouraging the delegation of responsibilities. On the individual level, physical and mental health concerns, as well as technological barriers, underscore the importance of personal preparation, gratitude, religious practices, and fostering a sense of importance. Overall, these findings emphasize the complexity of issues facing ageing populations and can be used to guide the creation of comprehensive plans and policies that support and empower healthy ageing.

Supporting information

S1 File. Study focus group discussion (FGD) guide.

(PDF)

pgph.0005916.s001.pdf (49.7KB, pdf)
S2 File. Condensed data analysis findings for older adults and stakeholders from Karachi and Thatta.

(XLSX)

pgph.0005916.s002.xlsx (21KB, xlsx)
S3 File. Thematic analysis findings for older adults and stakeholders in Karachi and Thatta.

(PDF)

pgph.0005916.s003.pdf (61.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The study team is thankful to the data collection team for their hard work.

Data Availability

All relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. Specifically, anonymized qualitative summaries, including the condensed thematic analysis (S2 File) and the anonymized themes and quotes table (S3 File), have been provided as supplementary material. The complete transcripts and full coding framework contain potentially identifying information and therefore cannot be shared publicly due to ethical restrictions imposed by the Aga Khan University Ethics Review Committee. Researchers may request access to these materials from the corresponding author or through the Aga Khan University Ethics Review Committee, subject to institutional approval. Please get in touch with the AKU ERC using this email address: erc.pakistan@aku.edu.

Funding Statement

This study is a substudy of a broader research project originally supported by the Institute of Global Innovation, University of Birmingham, UK, for which the award was received by Professor Justine Davies and Professor Carolyn Greig. The original study is available at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304474. The data used in this analysis were collected as part of that original study. The current substudy did not receive any additional or dedicated funding. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ayoubi-Mahani S, Eghbali-Babadi M, Farajzadegan Z, Keshvari M, Farokhzadian J. Active aging needs from the perspectives of older adults and geriatric experts: a qualitative study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1121761. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1121761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1. Accessed 2024 November 9. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.United Nations. Population Division: World Population Prospects. https://population.un.org/wpp/Graphs/Probabilistic/PopPerc/65plus/586. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Samuel LJ, Wright R, Granbom M, Taylor JL, Hupp C, Roberts Lavigne LC, et al. Community-dwelling older adults who are low-income and disabled weathering financial challenges. Geriatr Nurs. 2021;42(4):901–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.04.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Why we work in Pakistan? https://www.helpage.org/global-network/asia/south-asia/pakistan/. Accessed 2024 October 9. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):19–31. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pakistan-International Fund for Agricultural Development. Investing in rural people in Pakistan. https://www.ifad.org/documents/d/new-ifad.org/investing-in-rural-people-in-pakistan-pdf#:~:text=In%20Pakistan%2C%20poverty%20in%20remote,and%20policy%20and%20institutional%20constraints. Accessed 2023 October 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cassum LA, Cash K, Qidwai W, Vertejee S. Exploring the experiences of the older adults who are brought to live in shelter homes in Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1376-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.The Borgen project. Elderly poverty in Pakistan. Online: The Borgen project.; [Available from: https://borgenproject.org/elderly-poverty-in-pakistan/ [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sumil-Laanemaa M, Sakkeus L, Puur A, Leppik L. Socio-demographic risk factors related to material deprivation among older persons in Europe: A comparative analysis based on SHARE data. In: Walsh K, Scharf T, Van Regenmortel S, Wanka A, editors. Social exclusion in later life: Interdisciplinary and policy perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2021:31–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pickering J, Wister AV, O’Dea E, Chaudhury H. Social isolation and loneliness among older adults living in rural areas during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04196-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baig LA, Hasan Z, Iliyas M. Are the elderly in Pakistan getting their due share in health services? Results from a survey done in the peri-urban communities of Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2000;50(6):192–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Itrat A, Taqui AM, Qazi F, Qidwai W. Family systems: perceptions of elderly patients and their attendents presenting at a university hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007;57(2):106–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.SPRC. Determinants of Healthy Ageing for Older People in Pakistan. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cabañero-Garcia E, Martinez-Lacoba R, Pardo-Garcia I, Amo-Saus E. Barriers to health, social and long-term care access among older adults: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Equity Health. 2025;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02429-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Usmani BA, Lakhdir MPA, Sameen S, Batool S, Odland ML, Goodman-Palmer D, et al. Exploring the priorities of ageing populations in Pakistan, comparing views of older people in Karachi City and Thatta. PLoS One. 2024;19(7):e0304474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ashiq U, Asad AZ. The rising old age problem in Pakistan. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan. 2017;54(2). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mazumder H, Faizah F, Gain EP, Sharmin Eva I, Ferdouse Mou K, Saha N, et al. Effectiveness of mental health interventions for older adults in South Asia: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0287883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Online. https://www.pbs.gov.pk/census-2017-district-wise/results/091. Accessed 2023 October 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Uwizeyimana T, Uwimana A, Inkotanyi CF, Goodman-Palmer D, Ntaganira S, Kanyana L, et al. Priorities and barriers for ageing well; results from stakeholder workshops in rural and urban Rwanda. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0297299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kilanowski JF PhD Rn Aprn Cpnp Faan. Breadth of the Socio-Ecological Model. J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):295–7. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1358971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McGinnis MD, Ostrom EJE. Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Society. 2014;19(2). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Maguire M, Delahunt BJ. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. International Journal of Health Professions Education. 2017;9(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fang EF, Xie C, Schenkel JA, Wu C, Long Q, Cui H, et al. A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): Focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;64:101174. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tengku Mohd TAM, Yunus RM, Hairi F, Hairi NN, Choo WY. Social support and depression among community dwelling older adults in Asia: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e026667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lapane KL, Lim E, McPhillips E, Barooah A, Yuan Y, Dube CE. Health effects of loneliness and social isolation in older adults living in congregate long term care settings: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022;102:104728. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.van Acker J, Maenhout L, Compernolle S. Older Adults’ User Engagement With Mobile Health: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Mixed-Methods Studies. Innov Aging. 2023;7(2):igad007. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Desai S, McGrath C, McNeil H, Sveistrup H, McMurray J, Astell A. Experiential Value of Technologies: A Qualitative Study with Older Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):2235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Albrithen A, Almemari M, Briskman L. Islamic Principles and UAE Policies Regarding Protecting Senior Citizens’ Rights and Safety. Social Sciences. 2024;13(8):400. doi: 10.3390/socsci13080400 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hossain MZ, Ullah SA, Haque AMJ. Human rights of the senior citizens in Bangladesh: Political, administrative and economic challenges. 2017;5:62.
  • 31.Chantakeeree C, Sormunen M, Jullamate P, Turunen H. Understanding perspectives on health-promoting behaviours among older adults with hypertension. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2022;17(1):2103943. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2103943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Robles MC, O’Brien A, Islam N, McBride AC, Corches CL, Mansour M, et al. Exploring Social Determinants of Health in Healthy Aging Among Older Adults: A Qualitative Study. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(1):71–8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Parra DC, Wetherell JL, Van Zandt A, Brownson RC, Abhishek J, Lenze EJ. A qualitative study of older adults’ perspectives on initiating exercise and mindfulness practice. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1375-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Perez FP, Perez CA, Chumbiauca MN. Insights into the Social Determinants of Health in Older Adults. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2022;15(11):261–8. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2022.1511023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Retirement age trends around the globe. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/10/retirement-age-trends-around-globe/. 2023. Accessed 2023 October. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Beaudry LJ. Aging in South Asia: Attitudes/Beliefs of Elders in Southern India and Long-term Care of the Elderly in Southern Sri Lanka. Duke University. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Löfgren M, Larsson E, Isaksson G, Nyman A. Older adults’ experiences of maintaining social participation: Creating opportunities and striving to adapt to changing situations. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29(7):587–97. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1974550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Puri P, Pati S. Exploring the Linkages Between Non-Communicable Disease Multimorbidity, Health Care Utilization and Expenditure Among Aboriginal Older Adult Population in India. Int J Public Health. 2022;67:1604333. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Christopher CM, Blebil AQ, Bhuvan KC, Alex D, Mohamed Ibrahim MI, Ismail N, et al. Medication use problems and factors affecting older adults in primary healthcare. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023;19(12):1520–30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rajwar E, Pundir P, Parsekar SS, Venkatesh BT, Vogt T. Income support programmes for the older adults in South Asia: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e050676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nisar M, Wahab A, Siddiqui DA. Issues of non-contributing gap & management at EOBI: A case of largest pension fund of Pakistan. In: 2020. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3641448 [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005916.r001

Decision Letter 0

Helen Howard

8 Sep 2025

PGPH-D-25-01527

We Know What We Need: Older Adults’ and Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Ageing, Health, and Wellbeing in Pakistan

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Sameen,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please note that we have only been able to secure a single reviewer to assess your manuscript. We are issuing a decision on your manuscript at this point to prevent further delays in the evaluation of your manuscript. Please be aware that the editor who handles your revised manuscript might find it necessary to invite additional reviewers to assess this work once the revised manuscript is submitted. However, we will aim to proceed on the basis of this single review if possible.

Could you please carefully revise the manuscript to address all comments raised?

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 23 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Helen Howard

Staff Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. In the online submission form, you indicated that All relevant data are included within the manuscript. Additional data are selectively available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request..

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either

1. In a public repository,

2. Within the manuscript itself, or

3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons by return email and your exemption request will be escalated to the editor for approval. Your exemption request will be handled independently and will not hold up the peer review process, but will need to be resolved should your manuscript be accepted for publication. One of the Editorial team will then be in touch if there are any issues.

2. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?-->?>

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review this manuscript which analyses a very relevant topic. Overall, the manuscript is well written and understandable to an external reader. However, I have a few comments that should be considered for a revision of the submitted manuscript:

- The introduction is well written and refers to the topic at hand. However, I would suggest a redesign of some phrases to improve the flow of the "story". The transition from the first paragraph to the second (line 83-84) comes very sudden and needs a sentence that transfers the focus from the challenges mentioned to the social determinants of health. The paragraph starting from line 95 deals with the reasoning for this article and I would put this rather towards the end as it is a perfect predecessor for the aim of the article. Overall, the introduction needs a bit more structure, alignment and logical flow rather than jumping from one topic to another.

- In the methods section, you briefly mentioned the broader multi-method research project, please also indicate the name (and any Grant Agreement Number or similar ID), so that interested readers can look it up. You also mentioned in the data collection to refer to the main study. Readers cannot do that without knowing the main study.

- Regarding the recruitment of older adults, it would be beneficial to state a few details on the recruitment process. How did the community mobilizer and research coordinator contact these people (lines 143-147)?

- Please also state any software or programs used (lines 178-179)

- You referred to the studies four main research questions (line 200) without mentioning them before. Please add them where appropriate (e.g. together with the study aim at the end of the introduction)

- I would also suggest to include a legend for table 1 (below). Readers may be able to proceed the bulk of information better, if barriers and solutions are placed in columns next to each other instead of rows. It makes it easier to compare and contrast (Column 1: Level of framework, Column 2: Themes Barriers, Column 3: Themes solutions)

- The figure is very appealing, but I am wondering what the message or added value behind it should be? It only focuses on the concerns and I think the value of the paper would be increased a lot to also highlight the solutions. Please think about redesigning the figure also integrating (and emphasizing) the solutions!

- The discussion offers an appropriate reflection of the results with contemporary literature. There are two citations missing: Mazumder et al. (lines 461-466) and Michigan Study (lines 494-500).

- What I am completely missing - which in my opinion is an absolute essential part of every scientific rigorous publication - is the critical reflection of the strengths and limitations of your work. Please include this in the discussion. E.g. a limitation coming to my mind is that only one reviewer conducted the analysis/coding (as mentioned in line 195), which may affect researcher bias and interpretive rigor, amongst others. Please critically go through your work and elaborate on the strengths and limitations of your methodology as well as a reflexivity part in the discussion!

- It would also be great to provide the semi-structured guide for the focus groups as supplementary material. Even the coding process would be very interesting for readers.

Thank you once more for giving me the opportunity to review this manuscript! I hope my comments are of help and I am looking forward to reading the revised version or even the published paper.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005916.r003

Decision Letter 1

Julia Robinson

15 Jan 2026

We Know What We Need: Older Adults’ and Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Ageing, Health, and Wellbeing in Pakistan

PGPH-D-25-01527R1

Dear Dr Sameen,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'We Know What We Need: Older Adults’ and Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Ageing, Health, and Wellbeing in Pakistan' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Julia Robinson

Executive Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

publication criteria?>

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?-->?>

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Thank you for writing this paper; it was a fascinating read.

The methodology is clearly described, well conceived, with an appropriate sampling approach and robust methods for data collection and analysis.

The study explores the impressions of older adults and other stakeholders regarding what it means to grow old in Pakistan, the barriers to healthy and successful ageing, and the areas where improvement may be possible.

The authors also summarise key gaps in the literature, situate their findings within the available global evidence, and offer a balanced analysis that is strengthened by important cultural context. This cultural framing meaningfully amplifies both the voices of the participants and the setting in which the data should be interpreted.

Overall, I support publication of this paper.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Study focus group discussion (FGD) guide.

    (PDF)

    pgph.0005916.s001.pdf (49.7KB, pdf)
    S2 File. Condensed data analysis findings for older adults and stakeholders from Karachi and Thatta.

    (XLSX)

    pgph.0005916.s002.xlsx (21KB, xlsx)
    S3 File. Thematic analysis findings for older adults and stakeholders in Karachi and Thatta.

    (PDF)

    pgph.0005916.s003.pdf (61.3KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_SS_22102025.docx

    pgph.0005916.s005.docx (19.3KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. Specifically, anonymized qualitative summaries, including the condensed thematic analysis (S2 File) and the anonymized themes and quotes table (S3 File), have been provided as supplementary material. The complete transcripts and full coding framework contain potentially identifying information and therefore cannot be shared publicly due to ethical restrictions imposed by the Aga Khan University Ethics Review Committee. Researchers may request access to these materials from the corresponding author or through the Aga Khan University Ethics Review Committee, subject to institutional approval. Please get in touch with the AKU ERC using this email address: erc.pakistan@aku.edu.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES