Skip to main content
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2026 Feb 13;14:e180522. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.14.e180522

New records and ecological insights of Spondylus limbatus (Bivalvia, Spondylidae) from the Panamic Province

Julio A Cotom-Nimatuj 1,, Jesús Emilio Michel-Morfín 2, Giovanni Bassey-Fallas 3, Johanna Segovia 4,5, Ashley E Sharpe 6, Osmar Sandino 7, Pedro Jiménez-Prado 8, Antonio Jaramillo-Arango 9, Valentín Mogollón-Ávila 10, Luis Gómez-Gastelum 11, Rodrigo Esparza-López 12, Richard Lunniss 13, Philippe Béarez 1
PMCID: PMC12924048  PMID: 41728020

Abstract

Background

Although Spondylus limbatus is a fishery resource in several Latin American countries and has been widely reported throughout the Panamic Province, gaps remain in the knowledge of its distribution and ecology. This bivalve has been exploited since pre-Hispanic times, although the specific harvesting grounds are still uncertain. To contribute to malacological issues of both archaeological and contemporary interest, we established a reference collection that will serve as a basis for future studies, particularly geochemical analyses. Sampling consisted of recovering approximately four individuals per locality, obtained mainly from local food consumption, while recording information on their provenance and collection environment, amongst other data. In total, 180 individuals were recovered from shallow waters at 72 localities distributed across eight countries of the region. Collection sites included open coasts, gulf and bays that may comprise islands and shoals.

New information

This work documents new localities in areas where previous information was scarce or absent, such Jalisco in Mexico and El Salvador, Nicaragua and Panama, thereby significantly expanding current knowledge of the distribution of this species.

Keywords: Mollusca , Spondylidae , distribution records, reference collection, rocky reef habitats, thorny oyster, Tropical Eastern Pacific

Introduction

Four species of the genus Spondylus (Bivalvia, Spondylidae) are distributed throughout the Panamic Province, ranging from the Pacific coast of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico, to northern Peru, including some oceanic islands, such as Isla del Coco (Skoglund and Mulliner 1996, Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012, Lodeiros et al. 2016). Amongst them, Spondylus limbatus is noteworthy because, after its larval stage, it attaches most of its right valve to hard substrates, such as rocks and shells, in rocky and coral reef habitats of warm waters, from the lower intertidal zone down to depths of 55 m (Lamprell 1987, Soria et al. 2012, Lodeiros et al. 2016). Genetic and spatial analyses suggest that its larvae may disperse, depending on factors such as tidal regime and the absence of natural barriers, over distances exceeding ~ 100 km from the fertilisation site (Soria et al. 2012). It is also the largest Panamic species, with shells reaching up to 25 cm in length, characterised by a wide internal margin with purple to orange hues, a large adductor muscle and short spines when present (Skoglund and Mulliner 1996, Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012, Lodeiros et al. 2016).

Although several studies have been conducted on this species, primarily in the Baja California Peninsula (Cudney-Bueno and Rowell 2008, Soria et al. 2012, Villalejo-Fuerte et al. 2023) and in Ecuador (Fabara 2008, Mackensen and Brey 2013, Loor et al. 2016), its distribution and ecology in other parts of the Province remain poorly understood. This is partly because the species is most often mentioned in general faunal lists rather than in targeted ecological studies. While multiple localities document its wide distribution, its pattern is not uniform (Carter 2022). Consequently, its presence may be underestimated, with additional localities not yet reported in scientific literature, but well known to fishers who collect the species both for subsistence and local trade, given its fishery value (Poutiers 1995, Barraza 2006, Villalejo-Fuerte et al. 2020, INCOPESCA 2023).

Beyond its current use, Spondylus limbatus, together with Spondylus crassisquama, was employed by various pre-Hispanic cultures as ritual offerings or for the manufacture of ornaments (Hocqhenghem 2010, Solís del Vecchio and Herrera Villalobos 2015, Jaramillo Arango 2017, Castillo Velasco and Velázquez Castro 2020, Eeckhout et al. 2023). This raises questions regarding the original collection sites, since much of the archaeological evidence comes from contexts located far from the species’ natural distribution (Murra 1982, Marcos 1986, Temple Sánchez-Garavito and Velázquez Castro 2003, Carter 2022). However, geochemical studies that could test these hypotheses have not yet been conducted for this species, unlike other taxa in different cultural regions (Mouchi et al. 2018, Mouchi et al. 2020).

In this context, the present article aims to report the results of Spondylus limbatus collections and the establishment of a dry reference collection that provides new data on the distribution and ecology of the species. This collection is also intended for future geochemical research. Ultimately, it has the potential to contribute to archaeomalacological studies and, in the long term, to serve as a historical record of the current environmental conditions of this fishery resource in the Tropical Eastern Pacific Ocean.

Materials and methods

Selection of sampling sites

Shells of Spondylus limbatus were collected from multiple localities, distributed along the Panamic Province between 2022 and 2023. The selection of these localities was based on three criteria: (1) sites reported in literature; (2) areas with evidence of pre-Hispanic exploitation (Temple Sánchez-Garavito and Velázquez Castro 2003); and (3) new sites suggested by local fishers, where no previous records of this species existed. A distance of 150–200 km was established between sampling localities, considering the potential geochemical and molecular differences in shells. This interval was proposed considering the potential dispersal distances of larvae and/or the presence of geomorphological features (e.g. open coasts, gulfs or bays) that may lead to environmental and ecosystem changes, potentially influencing the geochemical signatures to be recorded in the future within the exoskeleton of this mollusc. It should be noted that no collections were conducted within protected areas.

Sampling strategy

To minimise impacts on Spondylus populations beyond local exploitation, the sampling strategy was limited to collecting only post-consumption discards, with an average of four specimens per locality. When possible, amongst the available shells, individuals showing variation in size, shape and colour were selected from the samples provided by fishers. Importantly, no direct extractions were performed for this study and no live animals were handled; therefore, no ethical approval was required. The collection was supplemented with specimens gathered by other researchers between 1994 and 2024, who donated them for this study. Only specimens with clear and precise information regarding collection locality, date, depth and other relevant data were included. When the collection site was not clearly known, the fisher was asked to indicate the approximate capture point on a map and those coordinates were assigned as the specimen’s locality of origin. Except for three localities, no beach-collected material was included. The fishers authorised the use of the information related to the sample collection of this research.

Specimen database and species identification

The provenance information of all specimens was recorded in a database. Each individual was photographed, measured (umbo-to-ventral margin height, anteroposterior length and thickness), using an electronic digital caliper with a precision of ± 0.1 mm and weighed using a digital balance with a precision of ± 1 g. Each specimen was assigned a preliminary unique code, even in cases where two valves formed a pair. Once incorporated into the Malacology Collections of the Zooteca (Zoothèque) at the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), each specimen will be assigned a definitive catalogue number. Species identification was carried out, based on morphological characteristics, compared with the descriptions available in Keen (1971), Skoglund and Mulliner (1996), Coan and Valentich-Scott (2012) and Lodeiros et al. (2016). This phase was conducted at the BioArchéologie, Interactions Sociétés Environnements laboratory (UMR7209 – BioArch) of the MNHN in Paris, France. In doubtful cases, specimens were compared with Spondylus reference material preserved in the malacology section of the MNHN.

Data resources

At present, access to the MNHN databases remains temporarily unavailable due to a recent cyberattack affecting the institution's informatics infrastructure. Consequently, it has not yet been possible to deposit the dataset in public repositories such as GBIF. The data will be uploaded once access is restored.

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author, as they form part of the first author’s ongoing doctoral dissertation.

Taxon treatments

Spondylus limbatus

G. B. Sowerby II, 1847

DB8150FF-5C1A-5389-875D-26C16345A99C

https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=207886

Description

According to Keen (1971), Poutiers (1995), Coan and Valentich-Scott (2012) and Lodeiros et al. (2016), Spondylus limbatus shows considerable variability in shell shape, ranging from irregularly rounded to distorted. It has an exterior surface with strong radial ribs bearing short, spathate or pointed spines (when preserved), which may decrease in size and eventually disappear; the right valve likewise exhibits concentric foliations around the attachment area, which can be rather extensive. Hinge teeth are robust and thick, brown in the left valve and white in the right valve. The adductor muscle scar varies from shallow to deep, with a ventral callus. Colourations, most evident along the broad inner margin, range from purple to orange hues. Marginal crenulations are fine and numerous. The shell can reach up to 25 cm in length.

Diagnosis

The hinge teeth are generally more robust, large and brown and the adductor muscle scar is deeply impressed; the spines also differ in shape and arrangement and, when the specimen retains the right valve, it may exhibit a broad attachment area (Lodeiros et al. 2016), which distinguishes it from related species. Additionally, the sculpture pattern of the ventral margin consists of fine and numerous crenulations. Dark and intense purple hues are characteristic of Spondylus limbatus, whereas orange and reddish tones may cause confusion with S. crassisquama; therefore, several morphological characters should be considered for reliable macroscopic identification.

Notes

Spondylus calcifer P. P. Carpenter, 1857 is one of the unaccepted synonyms of this species (MolluscaBase 2025).

Analysis

Collected samples and localities of origin

The complete Spondylus collection from the Tropical Eastern Pacific Ocean consists of 240 specimens originating from 79 localities distributed across the Panamic Province between 28°N and 4°S. Of these, 180 individuals correspond to Spondylus limbatus, the most abundant species not only in terms of the number of specimens, but also in the number of localities where it was documented (n = 72/79; Tables 1, 2; Figs 1, 2). Amongst them are two individuals from Playa Corotú (Panama) and one from Bajo Seco de Súa (Ecuador), whose morphological characteristics are ambiguous, but appear to be closer to this species; therefore, they were classified as Spondylus cf. limbatus. It should also be noted that, amongst the 180 inventoried specimens of S. limbatus, 15 correspond to longitudinal shell sections of 15 different individuals from three Panamanian islands (Archipelago de Coiba, Isla Villa and Isla Mogo Mogo), which had previously been cut for geochemical study (Owen 2012, Carter and France 2013).

Table 1.

Localities of origin of Spondylus limbatus samples and number of specimens collected (Figs 1, 2). * New locality record.

Country State/Dept./Province: Localities[number of specimens collected per locality] n = total country %
Mexico
(Fig. 2a, b)
Baja California Sur: 1. *Morro San Lucas1, 2. Isla La Liebre2, 3. Isla El Coyote3, 4. Isla Danzante1, 5. *Isla Ballena1, 6. *La Playa de San José del Cabo3
Sonora: 7. *Isla El Venado1, 8. Shangri-la3
Sinaloa: 9. Las Labradas1
Jalisco: 10. *Mismaloya1, 11. *Boca de Tomatlán1, 12. *Playa Cucharas1, 13. *Tehuamixtle4, 14. *Hakuna Matata1, 15. *Campo Acosta3, 16. *El Palmito4
Colima: 17. *Palo Alto3, 18. Punta de las Hadas2
Michoacán: 19. *Maruata Viejo3
Guerrero: 20. *El Yunque4, 21. Punta Bruja4
Oaxaca: 22. Playa Huatulco4, 23. Playa Chahué3
56 31.1
El Salvador
(Fig. 2c)
Sonsonate: 24. *Acajutla3
La Libertad: 25. *La Perla1, 26. *El Majahual4, 27. *San Blas5
La Unión: 28. *Las Tunas1, 29. *Isla Meanguerita1
15 8.3
Nicaragua
(Fig. 2c, d)
León: 30. *Las Peñitas1
Rivas: 31. *Playa Santana1, 32. *Playa Manzanillo1, 33. *Isla La Vieja2, 34. *Playa Blanca1, 35. *Bahía de Nacascolo1, 36. San Juan del Sur1, 37. *Islote de Playa Hermosa2, 38. *Isla Las Palomas1, 39. Bajo de Bahía La Flor1, 40. *Isla Cocineras3, 41. *El Ostional2
17 9.4
Costa Rica
(Fig. 2d, e)
Guanacaste: 42. Cuajiniquil4, 43. Bahía Culebra2, 44. Ocotal1, 45. *Las Mucuras3
Puntarenas: 46. *Manzanillo3, 47. Isla Tortuga3, 48. *Punta Leona4, 49. Bahía Herradura1, 50. *Isla Ballena1, 51. Islote La Viuda4, 52. Punta Curupacha4
30 16.7
Panama
(Fig. 2e)
Chiriquí: 53. *Playa Corotú2, 54. *Isla Bolaños2, 55. *Isla San José6
Veraguas: 56. Isla Granito de Oro (Archipiélago de Coiba)5, 57. *Isla Canales de Tierra4
Los Santos: 58. *El Calabacito4, 59. *El Ciruelo2, 60. Playa El Arenal1, 61. Isla Villa5
Panamá Oeste: 62. *San Carlos1
Panamá: 63. Isla Taboga3, 64. *Isla Taboguilla4, 65. Isla Mogo Mogo5
44 24.5
Colombia
(Fig. 2e)
Chocó: 66. Bahía Solano3 3 1.7
Ecuador
(Fig. 2f)
Esmeraldas: Súa (67. Bajo Seco1; 68. *Barco Hundido1)
Manabí: 69. Bajo El Copé1, 70. El Ostional de Salango6
El Oro: 71. Isla Santa Clara4
13 7.2
Peru
(Fig. 2f)
Tumbes: 72. Punta Sal2 2 1.1
Total number of specimens in the Reference Collection 180 100%

Table 2.

Distribution of sampled localities by general and specific environment.

General environment Specific environment Country and Locality
Open Coast Bay Mexico: 10. Mismaloya, 11. Boca de Tomatlán, 16. El Palmito, 18. Punta de las Hadas, 19. Maruata Viejo, 22. Playa Huatulco, 23. Playa Chahué
Nicaragua: 32. Playa Manzanillo, 34. Playa Blanca, 35. Bahía de Nacascolo, 36. San Juan del Sur, 41. El Ostional
Costa Rica: 45. Las Múcuras, 49. Bahía Herradura
Colombia: 66. Bahía Solano
Littoral Continental Mexico: 6. La Playa de San José del Cabo, 12. Playa Cucharas, 13. Tehuamixtle, 14. Hakuna Matata, 15. Campo Acosta, 17. Palo Alto, 20. El Yunque
El Salvador: 24. Acajutla, 25. La Perla, 26. El Majahual, 27. San Blas, 28. Las Tunas
Nicaragua: 30. Las Peñitas, 31. Playa Santana
Costa Rica: 46. Manzanillo, 48. Punta Leona
Panama: 58. El Calabacito, 59. El Ciruelo, 62. San Carlos
Ecuador: 70. El Ostional de Salango
Littoral Insular Nicaragua: 33. Isla La Vieja, 37. Islote de Playa Hermosa, 38. Isla de las Palomas, 40. Isla Cocineras
Costa Rica: 50. Isla Ballena
Panama: 61. Isla Villa
Shoal Nicaragua: 39. Bajo de Bahía La Flor
Ecuador: 67. Bajo Seco de Súa, 69. Bajo El Copé
Peru: 72. Punta Sal
Shipwreck Ecuador: 68. Barco Hundido de Súa
Open Embayment Bay Costa Rica: 42. Cuajiniquil, 43. Bahía Culebra, 44. Ocotal
Littoral Insular Panama: 54. Isla Bolaños, 55. Isla San José, 56. Isla Granito de Oro (Archipiélago de Coiba), 57. Isla Canales de Tierra, 63. Isla Taboga, 64. Isla Taboguilla, 65. Isla Mogo Mogo (Archipiélago de las Perlas)
Semi-Enclosed Embayment Littoral Continental Mexico: 1. Morro San Lucas, 8. Sangri-La, 21. Punta Bruja
Costa Rica: 52. Punta Curupacha
Littoral Insular Mexico: 2. Isla La Liebre, 3. Isla Coyote, 4. Isla Danzante, 5. Isla Ballena, 7. Isla El Venado
El Salvador: 29. Isla Meanguerita
Costa Rica: 47. Isla Tortuga, 51. Islote La Viuda
Ecuador: 71. Isla Santa Clara
Unknown Mexico: 9. Las Labradas
Panama: 53. Playa Corotú, 60. Playa El Arenal

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Geographical distribution of sampling localities of specimens from the Panamic Province. Maps were created in QGIS using the ESRI Ocean Basemap. Yellow dots indicate sampling localities.

Sampling localities of Panamic Province specimens. Maps were created in QGIS using the ESRI Ocean Basemap. Yellow dots indicate sampling localities (Table 1):

Figure 2a.

Figure 2a.

Gulf of California;

Figure 2b.

Figure 2b.

Central Mexico;

Figure 2c.

Figure 2c.

El Salvador-northwestern Nicaragua;

Figure 2d.

Figure 2d.

South-western Nicaragua-Costa Rica;

Figure 2e.

Figure 2e.

Southern Costa Rica-northwestern Colombia;

Figure 2f.

Figure 2f.

Ecuador and northern Peru. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.14.e180522.figure2f

Regarding the localities, these are distributed across eight of the nine countries comprising the Panamic Province. Although fieldwork was carried out along the Guatemalan Pacific, local communities (mainly fishers and researchers) reported never having observed this species, despite the presence of small and scattered rocky outcrops along the coast. In the case of Honduras, it was not possible to establish collaborations; therefore, fieldwork could not be conducted along the Honduran coast of the Gulf of Fonseca.

In approximately 95% (n = 69/72) of the localities of origin, it was possible to characterise the general environment, which proved to be highly heterogeneous (Table 2; Fig. 3A). Environments were classified a priori as open coasts (n = 46; 63.89%), open embayment (n = 10; 13.89%) and semi-enclosed embayment (n = 13; 18.06%), which, in turn, comprise different habitat types on a smaller scale (Table 2; Fig. 3B). In addition, three localities (4.17%; Las Labradas in Mexico, Playa Corotú and El Arenal in Panama) with a total of four beach-collected samples were considered uncertain regarding the original habitat of the individuals; therefore, these were assigned to the category Unknown (Table 2; Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Frequency and proportional distribution of localities by general and specific environments: (A) Distribution of localities by general environment; (B) Proportional distribution of localities by general and specific environment.

Open coast

Open coastal environments exhibited the greatest diversity of habitat types and localities with Spondylus limbatus (n = 46/72; Table 2; Fig. 3B). Open coasts are characterised by predominant exposure to the waters of the Tropical Eastern Pacific Ocean, although, in certain cases, they may also receive continental inputs. These open coasts were subdivided into littoral continental, littoral insular, bays, shallow rocky outcrops (bajos) and artificial reefs, from which the largest number of samples was obtained (n = 106/180).

Within the collection, 55 individuals originate from localities near littoral continental habitats (n = 20/72), sometimes relatively close to other environments, such as bays or capes, but without being located inside them. Examples include Campo Acosta in Mexico, Acajutla and Las Tunas in El Salvador and El Ostional de Salango in Ecuador. In addition, specimens collected at La Playita de San José del Cabo (Baja California Sur, Mexico) were reported by fishers to have been captured in the breakwater basin constructed as a jetty. Fourteen specimens were also collected from six localities situated around islands (insular shorelines), such as Isla Cocineras (also known as Roca El Roble) in Nicaragua and Isla Villa in Panama.

Furthermore, 31 specimens derive from 15 localities located within open bays, i.e. areas with wide entrances, whether large in scale — such as Bahía Banderas, which includes localities like Boca de Tomatlán or Mismaloya and Bahía de Huatulco, which includes Playa Huatulco and Playa Chahué in Mexico — or smaller in scale, such as Bahía Herradura in Costa Rica or Bahía Solano in Colombia. In addition, five specimens were collected from four shallow rocky outcrops (bajos) which may occur offshore, as in the case of Bajo El Copé (ca. 33 km) and Bajo Seco de Súa (ca. 24 km) in Ecuador or near the littoral continental, as in the outcrop associated with Bahía La Flor in Nicaragua. Finally, sunken vessels (either shipwrecks or intentionally submerged) have been colonised by various organisms, forming artificial reefs. The collection includes one locality of this type: a shipwreck off the coast of Súa, Ecuador.

Open embayment

These environments (mainly gulfs) are characterised by wide entrances and strong exchanges with oceanic currents, providing conditions similar to those of localities directly influenced by the open sea. However, they differ in that their interiors may include other geographic features, such as bays, capes, coves or islands, where current intensity may decrease, resulting in calmer water conditions. At least 36 individuals were collected from 10 localities situated within open gulfs (Table 2; Fig. 3B). Examples include specimens obtained along the shores of Bahía Cuajiniquil in the Gulf of Santa Elena and Bahía Culebra in the Gulf of Papagayo, both in Costa Rica. Notably, 29 individuals were collected around islands such as Granito de Oro (between this Island and Isla Ranchería) in the Archipiélago de Coiba, as well as Bolaños and San José in the Gulf of Chiriquí and Taboga and Mogo Mogo, the latter located within the Archipiélago of Las Perlas in the Gulf of Panama.

Semi-enclosed embayment

These environments (gulfs and bays) are characterised by relatively narrow entrances, which limit the inflow of oceanic waters compared to open embayments, resulting in less intense wave action and almost always receiving continental water inputs. Thirteen localities of this type yielded 34 individuals. As in open embayments, the samples originated from both littoral continental (3 localities, 10 shells) and insular littoral zones (9 localities, 20 shells; Table 2; Fig. 3B). Notable collection sites include Bahía Concepción in the Gulf of California, which is characterised by very calm waters and where specimens were collected around Coyote and La Liebre islands. On the continental littoral of the same Gulf, examples include Morro San Lucas and Shangri-La. A comparable semi-enclosed environment occurs at Bahía de Acapulco, where four specimens were obtained from rocky nearshore habitats at Punta Bruja (Table 2; Fig. 3B).

In addition, one specimen was obtained from Isla Meanguerita in the Gulf of Fonseca, El Salvador, while, in the Gulf of Dulce, Costa Rica, specimens were collected from Islote La Viuda and rocky outcrops off Punta Curupacha. Two localities are situated at the entrance of semi-enclosed gulfs, likely representing transitional waters between oceanic and gulf conditions: Isla Tortuga in the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica and Isla Santa Clara in the Gulf of Guayaquil, Ecuador. In the latter, continental inputs are considerable, given that several rivers, including the Guayas River — the largest in Ecuador — discharges into this Gulf. However, the Island is located in the transition zone toward the open sea.

Ecology

Amongst the 163 specimens with realiable depth data, most were collected in shallow nearshore waters of the intertidal zone, at depths ranging from approximately 2 m to 20 m (Fig. 4A), with a possible exception at 32 m offshore at El Palmito, Mexico. However, approximately 80% of the specimens (n = 144) were collected shallower than 12 m depth, regardless of general environment. Since these depths were estimated, based on fishermen reports, the data may vary somewhat from the actual conditions and should, therefore, be interpreted with caution. Most individuals were attached to rocky substrates (Fig. 4B), which included large boulders, slab-like rocks, cobbles and pebbles. Within these habitats, four individuals were found attached to other shells, as previously reported in literature. Three of them were using shells of Spondylus sp. as substrate. In one case (at Las Múcuras, Costa Rica), a double set was observed with both specimens alive, one shell cemented on to the other and the lower one was attached to rock.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Depth patterns and habitat attachment of Spondylus limbatus specimens: (A) Specimens' collected depths by general environment; (B) Specimen attached to rock substrate, Acajutla, El Salvador (Photograph by A. Trejo, used with permission).

Fishermen reported three specimens that were “free” amongst cobbles and pebbles on the seafloor (at Isla La Liebre, Mexico and Las Múcuras, Costa Rica) or on a shallow rocky outcrop (Bajo Seco de Súa, Ecuador). However, the right valve exhibited a small imprint, suggesting that these individuals had detached from the substrate to which they were originally attached. It should be emphasised that, although the collection localities include rocky areas, either along continental or insular littoral zones, these may, for example, alternate with other habitats such as sandy bottoms in shallow outcrops. In addition, certain localities also include coral reefs, such as Bahía Culebra in the Gulf of Papagayo or Islote La Viuda in the Gulf of Dulce, both in Costa Rica (Cortés and Jiménez 2003, Alvarado et al. 2006).

Shell margin colour

Based on the colour of the internal shell margin (Figs 5, 6), purple hues were predominant across all documented environments, with a recurrence of approximately 67% (n = 121/180). These shells are the most abundant not only in the collection, but also in the natural environment, according to fishers’ reports. A smaller proportion of specimens exhibited orange hues (n = 50; 27.8%), while reddish-brown tones were scarce (n = 9; 5%). These colours may be either uniform or non-uniform along the entire internal margin (including the edge), in some cases displaying spots of varying shades of the predominant colour or even other colours, including yellow (Fig. 6B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Distribution of predominant internal shell margin colours in Spondylus limbatus specimens from the reference collection.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Variation in colouration along the inner margin of Spondylus limbatus: (A) orange specimen, Islote de Playa Hermosa (ID S044); (B) purple specimen (internal and external views), Cuajiniquil (ID S153); (C) reddish-brown specimen, El Ciruelo (ID S214).

Shell height

Regarding height, although all individuals in the collection were measured, only 174 retained the left valve (Fig. 7A). Since this valve is the most abundant, morphometric estimates were performed on it. The dataset showed a normal distribution according to the Shapiro–Wilk test (W = 0.9869; p = 0.1051). The set was divided into three size classes, with specimens larger than 130 mm being the most abundant in the collection (Fig. 7B). Height values ranged from 48.8 mm in a specimen from El Ocotal (Costa Rica) to 222.3 mm in a specimen from Bajo El Copé (Ecuador), with a mean of 136.0 mm, an estimated modal value of 127.8 mm and a standard deviation of 27.2 mm (Fig. 7A).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Frequency and size distribution of left valves in the collection: (A) Frequency distribution of left valve height in Spondylus limbatus specimens; (B) Size-class distribution of left valve specimens in the reference collection.

Capture Methods

Specimens were collected manually by free diving, compressor-assisted diving and SCUBA diving. In the case of free diving, maximum reported depths ranged between 12 and 13 m at Boca de Tomatlán (Mexico), El Majahual and San Blas (El Salvador) and Islote de Playa Hermosa (Nicaragua). With compressor-assisted diving, greater depths were reached, including 32 m at El Palmito (Mexico).

Since Spondylus limbatus attached to hard substrates, divers usually extracted only the left valve (Fig. 8A), cutting the adductor muscle with a knife when the bivalve was partially open, while leaving the right valve in situ. This process risked fracturing the hinge teeth of the right valve, which sometimes remained attached to the left valve. Occasionally, whole individuals were removed with a chisel and hammer (~ 1 kg) from rocky shores or collected when found “free” or attached to smaller rocks or shells.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Some ways in which Spondylus limbatus is extracted and brought to the surface: (A) Left valves obtained through free diving (Isla San José, Panama); (B) Adductor muscle harvested only (El Palmito, Mexico).

In some cases, during compressor-assisted diving, only the adductor muscle was harvested (Fig. 8B), with both valves left on the seafloor. Although uncommon, given that Spondylus limbatus has short spines or may lose them in adulthood, specimens collected at Súa (Ecuador) were trapped in fishing nets at depths of 11 and 14 m, at the sites known as Barco Hundido and Bajo Seco, respectively.

Use and exploitation

The consumption of this mollusc constitutes a dietary supplement for coastal communities, but it does not represent a primary resource such as fish. Generally, only the adductor muscle is consumed (Fig. 9A) and, in rare cases, the mantle, while the rest of the organism, including the shells, is discarded in refuse dumps. Only in Mulegé (Baja California Sur, Mexico) did fishers report that, after consumption, the shells are returned to the sea on the same day of capture so that epibionts (sometimes including juvenile Spondylus individuals) may continue to grow. However, it was also observed that shells are sometimes used as ornaments — for example, as soap dishes, ashtrays or even embedded in architecture (Fig. 9B) — or as raw material for the manufacture of jewelry.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Examples of documented current uses of Spondylus limbatus: (A) In some cases, the adductor muscle of S. limbatus and other mollusc species, such as Pinctada mazatlanica, is consumed with only lemon juice (Huatulco, Mexico); (B1) Wall decorated with various mollusc species (Tehuamixtle, Mexico); (B2-B4) Details of adults S. limbatus specimens embedded in the wall.

Discussion

New data records

The reference collection comprised 240 specimens of Spondylidae, of which 180 were identified as Spondylus limbatus. This modern dataset provides valuable information on the distribution, ecology and other aspects of a species considered of interest to fisheries in the region (Barraza 2006, Holguín Quiñones 2006, Farías-Tafolla et al. 2022, INCOPESCA 2023). Specimens originated from 72 localities in eight countries, thereby complementing the existing distributional records (Skoglund and Mulliner 1996, Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012, Lodeiros et al. 2016, Carter 2022).

The collections confirmed the persistence of populations previously reported in literature, such as Bahía Concepción (e.g. Isla Coyote) in Mexico (Skoglund and Mulliner 1996), Bahía Solano in Colombia (Bernard et al. 1991) and El Ostional in Salango, Ecuador (Aguilar et al. 2013). In addition, approximately 40 new localities were documented (Table 1; Figs 1, 2), filling important gaps in regions where S. limbatus had been poorly recorded, such as Jalisco and Colima in Mexico (Holguín Quiñones 2006, Landa-Jaime et al. 2013, Ríos Jara et al. 2017), El Salvador (Barraza 2006, Barraza 2018, Barraza 2021), Nicaragua (López de la Fuente and Urcuyo Ramos 2008) and Panama (Skoglund and Mulliner 1996, Carter and France 2013, Carter 2022), amongst others. These findings significantly expand the known distribution of the species, which had previously been fragmentary and suggested a locally scarce presence. A notable case is the locality popularly known as Barco Hundido in Súa (0°59'55"N, 79°44'41"W), a shipwreck situated approximately 14 km west of a site previously reported as “El Barco” (Aguilar et al. 2013). This finding highlights the need for more detailed exploration and documentation of shipwrecks that have become artificial reefs.

Taken together, this reference collection demonstrates that, beyond the well-known concentration and exploitation areas in Baja California Sur, Acapulco and Ecuador (Marcos and Norton 1981, Cudney-Bueno and Rowell 2008, Mackensen 2013, Carter 2022), other regions, such as the coasts of Jalisco and Colima in Mexico, western El Salvador and the south-western Nicaragua–Panama corridor, may also represent additional concentration zones for the species. This is supported by the fact that these areas’ geographic and environmental conditions are favourable for the development of benthic species such as Spondylus (Alvarado et al. 2006, Ríos Jara et al. 2016, Ríos Jara et al. 2017). In addition, although population density estimates are still lacking, the records suggest that the distribution and abundance of S. limbatus in the region has been under-documented and may have been underestimated.

Habitat and ecology

The results confirm that Spondylus limbatus occurs on rocky and/or coral formations — such as those documented in Bahía Culebra in the Gulf of Papagayo and Islote La Viuda in the Gulf of Dulce, Costa Rica (Cortés and Jiménez 2003, Alvarado et al. 2006) — in shallow waters, as previously reported for this and other species of the family Spondylidae (Keen 1971, Skoglund and Mulliner 1996, Cudney-Bueno and Rowell 2008, Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012, Lodeiros et al. 2016). This habitat is essential, as it provides hard substrates, such as rocks, cobbles and shells, which are required for the settlement and development of the species. Such environments are typically found along open coasts and in embayments — both open and semi-enclosed — such as gulfs and bays.

A particularly relevant finding was the presence of S. limbatus individuals attached to the shells of dead conspecifics. This observation validates local fishers’ reports of returning shells to the sea after consumption, thereby promoting the continued growth of organisms attached to the outer surface of the valves, potentially including juvenile Spondylus. This interpretation is consistent with the aquaculture study of Lodeiros et al. (2016), who reported that, after reproduction, larvae settle on hard substrates, such as other shells, which may explain the benefit of this practice. Although no studies have quantified the frequency of juveniles attached to conspecific shells, this practice of returning shells could, to some extent, help mitigate the decline of populations that continue to be exploited for their adductor muscle (Holguín Quiñones 2006, Lodeiros et al. 2016).

Although fishers in some localities reported a few apparently “free-living” individuals, the presence of small attachment scars on the right valve suggests that these specimens had become detached, either naturally or through anthropogenic disturbance, from the substrates to which they had originally been fixed.

Exploitation and Sustainability Considerations

Spondylus limbatus is classified as a fisheries resource in many countries, including El Salvador (Barraza 2006), Nicaragua (Instituto Nicaragüense de la Pesca y Acuicultura 2019) and Costa Rica (INCOPESCA 2023), where its local commercial exploitation is permitted under different legislative frameworks. In Mexico and Ecuador, the species is subject to permanent fishing bans, with some exceptions (Subsecretaría de Recursos Pesqueros, Ecuador 2009, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales 2010).

The present study did not aim to quantitatively assess the impact or sustainability of exploitation, which would require specific studies of population density and fishing effort. Available studies in the region are scarce and largely restricted to Baja California Sur (Mexico) and a few localities along the Ecuadorian coast (Mackensen et al. 2011, Aguilar et al. 2013, Villalejo-Fuerte et al. 2020), where reported population density indices are low. This limitation hinders the evaluation of exploitation levels across much of the species’ range. Such data gaps may partly reflect a broader tendency for conservation and research efforts to focus on oyster species of higher economic value, such as Pinctada mazatlanica in Panama (Galtsoff 1950, Cipriani et al. 2008, Spalding and Mellado 2018), leaving Spondylus comparatively understudied. Nevertheless, testimonies from fishers in Jalisco (Mexico), El Salvador and Ecuador suggest that the species was more abundant in shallow waters (< 5–10 m) prior to the 1990s, which may indicate a local decline.

In this context, potential conservation measures could include restricting exploitation to periods outside the reproductive season, limiting harvests to adult individuals (> 90 mm shell height; Villalejo-Fuerte et al. 2020, Villalejo-Fuerte et al. 2023), given that juvenile extraction has been observed in some localities (e.g. Acapulco and Bahía de Huatulco, Mexico) and returning shells to the sea immediately after consumption. However, the effectiveness of such measures would depend on the implementation of targeted studies and management actions across the species range.

Potential environmental constraints

The apparent absence of Spondylus limbatus along the Guatemalan coast and adjacent areas, as identified by Carter (2022) from a bibliographic review, is likely related to biogeographic factors. Local inhabitants in this region did not recognise the presence of S. limbatus, reinforcing this observation. Unlike other areas characterised by gulfs, bays with cliffs or rocky formations, the Guatemalan coast is predominantly a broad, rectilinear plain with volcanic black-sand beaches (Fonseca E. and Arrivillaga 2003, Boix Morán et al. 2011, SEGEPLAN 2011, Dávila Pérez et al. 2014). This coastal plain is interrupted by river mouths, sandbars, estuaries, channels and coastal lagoons (Melendreras Wilkin 2008, Estrada et al. 2024). The seafloor consists mainly of sand and clayey silt, with little relief or structural complexity (Melendreras Wilkin 2008). These characteristics make the occurrence and exploitation of species, such as S. limbatus, unlikely in this region. Although some isolated corals occur on hard substrates (Fonseca E. and Arrivillaga 2003), as well as artificial structures, such as the docks at Puerto Quetzal (Portuaria Quetzal 2017) or artificial reefs deployed in recent years (CONAP & MARN 2009, Morales Díaz 2015), no reliable records of S. limbatus have been confirmed to date, despite a mention by Pérez Ramírez (2006).

A similar apparent absence was noted in gulf or bay environments strongly influenced by freshwater input, such as Bahía San Miguel in Panama, where the Tuira River discharges and the Gulf of Guayaquil in Ecuador, influenced by the Guayas River. These results reinforce the ecological association of S. limbatus with hard-substrate habitats removed from the direct influence of substantial fluvial discharge.

Depth

Specimens were collected at depths ranging from 2 m to 32 m, although most were obtained at less than 12 m, corroborating previous observations by Aguilar et al. (2013) and Carter (2022). In the present study, the relative abundance at these shallow depths may be partly explained by the fact that many specimens were collected through free diving, a technique limited in both depth and bottom time. Collecting individuals at greater depths generally requires the use of alternative diving methods. Population density studies in the Gulf of California have similarly reported considerable abundance of S. limbatus at approximately 10 m depth (Villalejo-Fuerte et al. 2020). On the other hand, Spondylus living at shallow depths (< 2 m) may have been preferentially harvested and have, therefore, become rare in infralittoral waters.

Height and colour variation

The analysis of shell height in 174 specimens with preserved left valves showed a range between 48.8 mm and 222.3 mm (mean = 136 mm; mode = 127.8 mm), which overall exceeds the values reported for the Gulf of California by Villalejo-Fuerte et al. (2023), who documented sizes between 8.2 and 167 mm (mean = 126 mm). Nearly all individuals measured more than 90 mm in height (Fig. 7), indicating that they correspond to adult specimens (Cudney-Bueno and Rowell 2008, Mackensen and Brey 2013). However, because of the challenges in establishing parameters related to asymptotic shell height for this species (Villalejo-Fuerte et al. 2023), it remains difficult to reliably correlate shell size with individual age. Nevertheless, these results provide a regional overview of the sizes currently exploited, which are also closely linked to resource availability.

With respect to colouration, the predominance of purple hues is characteristic of this species and consistent with previous reports (Keen 1971, Skoglund and Mulliner 1996, Coan and Valentich-Scott 2012, Villalejo-Fuerte et al. 2015). However, orange-coloured individuals were also recorded in several localities, occurring in the same environments and under the same conditions as purple- and reddish-toned shells (Fig. 6). In some cases, specimens exhibited one orange valve and one purple valve or even a single valve displaying both hues simultaneously. The factors underlying this chromatic variation remain unknown and represent a promising avenue for future research.

Implications

One of the potential biases of this study lies in the sampling strategy, as an average of only four specimens was recovered per locality. Due to the small number of shells collected and the selection method, this sample does not provide an exhaustive representation of the diversity that may exist at each site, particularly in those where only a single specimen was obtained (e.g. Isla Meanguerita in El Salvador or Ocotal in Costa Rica). Nevertheless, the broad variety of localities and environments represented by the 180 Spondylus limbatus specimens included in the reference collection offers a useful regional overview of the species. It should also be considered that, in each locality, larger individuals or specimens with morphological and chromatic variations different from those documented here may occur.

In addition, ethnohistorical sources have suggested possible pre-Hispanic harvesting zones along the Guerrero coast, Mexico (Temple Sánchez-Garavito and Velázquez Castro 2003). However, only samples from El Yunque, a shoal south of Zihuatanejo and from Acapulco (Punta Bruja) — the latter previously documented (Gutiérrez Zavala and Cabera Mancilla 2012, Castro-Mondragón et al. 2016) — were recovered. This limits the extent to which the present collection can be used to verify such hypotheses in future studies.

Despite these limitations, the collection has relevance not only for archaeomalacological research, but also for improving our understanding of the distribution and ecology of the species, as previously discussed. Moreover, it provides a means to document the environmental conditions in which these individuals lived and opens the possibility of establishing future geochemical datasets that may be applied in other lines of research. In this sense, the collection offers opportunities for interdisciplinary studies on marine bivalves of the family Spondylidae, including those related to conservation and the sustainable management of this fishery resource — provided that ongoing over-exploitation does not cause irreversible damage to its populations.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Spondylus limbatus

Acknowledgements

This research would not have been possible without the invaluable support of fishers is each of the localities between Mexico and northern Peru. It also benefitted from the collaboration of many colleagues and institutions, including: Fondation Aublet the Groupement de Recherche Océan et Mers (GDR OMER) of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the project “MAYACOSTA: Exchanges and transfers of prestige goods between the Maya and Costa Rican areas between 300 BC and AD 700” (ANR-22-CE27-0023-01) (France), Blanca Ramírez and Carmen Esqueda (CUCBA-UDG, Mexico), Victor Landa (UDG, Mexico), Aureliano Valencia, Máximo Jiménez, Félix Rodríguez and the late Richard Cooke (STRI, Panama), Alexandra Bellayer-Roille, Nathalie Wetzel, Romain Hecker and Eva Sahores (Embassy of France in Costa Rica), Chloé Andrieu, Dominique Michelet, Philippe Nondédéo and Grégory Pereira (ArchAm, CNRS/Université Paris 1 – Panthéon-Sorbonne, France), Matthieu Ménager (Avignon Université, France), Adrián Velázquez and Norma Valentín (INAH, Mexico), Raziel Acevedo (UCR-Sede de Guanacaste, Costa Rica), Silvia Salgado (UCR, Costa Rica), Gustavo Induni (SINAC, Costa Rica), Alejandra Trejo (UFG, El Salvador), Marlon Escamilla (UTEC, El Salvador), Edouard Kraffe de Laubarède (LEMAR-UBO, France) and Rodrigo Fajardo (Colombia), FLECHO (Colombia), as well as the researchers who donated specimens to complete the collection: Federico García (CICIMAR-IPN, Mexico), Benjamin Carter (Muhlenberg College, USA), Óscar González (UNAN Sede León, Nicaragua) and Jesús Gibrán De La Torre (INAH Sinaloa, Mexico).

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the Groupement de Recherche Océan et Mers (GDR OMER) of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), The Martine Aublet Fondation, the BioArch Laboratory, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche to the project “MAYACOSTA: Exchanges and transfers of prestige goods between the Maya and Costa Rican areas between BC 300 and AD 700 (ANR-22-CE27-0023-01), France; the Embassy of France in Costa Rica; the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama; and the University of Costa Rica, Guanacaste Campus.

References

  1. Aguilar F., Mendívez W., Revelo W. Distribución y abundancia de la concha Spondylus (Spondylus calcifer y S. princeps) en las Provincias de Esmeraldas, Manabí, Santa Elena y El Oro. Boletín Científico y Técnico. 2013;23(1):73–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarado Juan José, Fernández Cindy, Nielsen Vanessa. In: Informe Técnico Ambientes Marino Costeros de Costa Rica. Comisión Interdisciplinaria Marino Costera de la Zona Económica Exclusiva de Costa Rica. Nielsen Muñoz V, Quesada Alpízar M. A, editors. CIMAR, Conservation International, TNC; San José: 2006. Arrecifes y Comunidades Coralinas.51–67. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barraza Enrique. Buceo responsable en El Salvador. https://www.lamjol.info/index.php/RyR/article/view/6208. Realidad y Reflexión. 2018;18(47):13–20. doi: 10.5377/ryr.v0i47.6208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barraza José Enrique. Identificación de Moluscos Marinos Comestibles en El Salvador. Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales; San Salvador: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barraza José Enrique. Moluscos acuáticos de áreas rocosas en El Salvador. Instituto de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de la Universidad Francisco Gavidia; San Salvador: 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernard F. R., MacKinnell Stewart M., Jamieson G. S. Distribution and zoogeography of the Bivalvia of the eastern Pacific Ocean. Minister of Supply and Services Canada; Ottawa: 1991. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boix Morán Juana Lorena, Rinze Turton Vivian Michelle, García Julio, Montiel Alva, Ortiz Carlos Humberto. Centro de Estudios del Mar y Acuicultura, Dirección General de Investigación, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala; 2011. Elementos para contribuir a la gestión integrada de zonas costeras del Pacífico de Guatemala. I - Área de trabajo: humedal Las Lisas, Chiquimulilla, departamento de Santa Rosa. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carter B., France C. A. M. Can oxygen and carbon isotopes be used to source Spondylus? 2013. Poster presented at the Institute of Andean Studies 53rd Annual Meeting, Berkeley, January 11.
  9. Carter Benjamin. In: Waves of influence: Pacific maritime networks connecting Mexico, Central America, and northwestern South America. Beekman CS, McEwan C, editors. Dumbarton Oaks Pre-Columbian symposia and colloquia. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection; Washington, D.C.: 2022. Spondylus as a driver of interregional exchange: Mapping recent ecological research on Spondylus to inform pre-Columbian extraction and use.419–458. [Google Scholar]
  10. Castillo Velasco Elva Adriana, Velázquez Castro Adrián. Origen y circulación de las conchas de moluscos. Arqueología Mexicana. 2020;27(161):24–31. [Google Scholar]
  11. Castro-Mondragón Himmer, Flores Garza Rafael, Valdez González Arcadio, Flores Rodríguez Pedro, García Ibáñez Sergio, Rosas Acevedo José Luis. Diversity, most important species and size composition of mollusks in coastal fisheries in Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico. http://www.actauniversitaria.ugto.mx/index.php/acta/article/view/1025. Acta Universitaria, Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal. 2016;26(6):24–34. doi: 10.15174/au.2016.1025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cipriani Roberto, Guzman Hector M., Lopez Melina. Harvest History and Current Densities of the Pearl Oyster Pinctada Mazatlanica (Bivalvia: Pteriidae) in Las Perlas and Coiba Archipelagos, Panama. Journal of Shellfish Research. 2008;27(4):691–700. doi: 10.2983/0730-8000(2008)27[691:HHACDO]2.0.CO;2. english. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Coan Eugene V., Valentich-Scott Paul H. Bivalve seashells of tropical West America: marine bivalve mollusks from Baja California to Northern Perú. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History; Santa Barbara: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. MARN CONAP &. Biodiversidad marina de Guatemala: análisis de vacíos y estrategias para su conservación. Consejo Nacional de Áreas Protegidas, Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, The Nature Conservancy; Guatemala City: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cortés Jorge, Jiménez Carlos. In: Latin American Coral Reefs. Cortés J, editor. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2003. Corals and coral reefs of the Pacific of Costa Rica: history, research and status.361–385. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cudney-Bueno Richard, Rowell Kirsten. Establishing a Baseline for Management of the Rock Scallop, Spondylus calcifer (Carpenter 1857): Growth and Reproduction in the Upper Gulf of California, Mexico. http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2983/0730-8000%282008%2927%5B625%3AEABFMO%5D2.0.CO%3B2. Journal of Shellfish Research. 2008;27(4):625–632. doi: 10.2983/0730-8000(2008)27[625:EABFMO]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dávila Pérez Celia Vanessa, López Roulet Airam Andrea, García Vettorazzi Manolo José. Dirección General de Investigación, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala,; 2014. Utilidad de la biodiversidad como indicador de sostenibilidad para la evaluación de la calidad ambiental de la Costa Este del Pacífico de Guatemala. Informe Final. [Google Scholar]
  18. Eeckhout Peter, Ledesma Carmela Alarcón, Dávila Milton Luján. In: Underwater and coastal archaeology in Latin America. Elkin D, Delaere C, editors. University Press of Florida; Gainesville: 2023. A Spondylus Workshop within a Ritual Building at Pachacamac on the Central Coast of Peru (ca. AD 1470–1533)110–125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Estrada Javier, Sharpe Ashley, Mendoza Víctor, Chinchilla Oswaldo. El Paleoambiente de la Planicie Costera del Pacífico de Guatemala: Una Reconstrucción Desde las Investigaciones en Montana, Escuintla. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5becd5662714e530f22454e9/t/663d3a5b718b39704b08c6ae/1715288690443/TheMayanist5%282%29.pdf The Mayanist. 2024;5(2):41–62. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fabara Mónica. Proyecto Spondylus, Fundación Machalilla; 2008. Alternativas de manejo para la concha Spondylus calcifer. Puerto López, Manabí. Unpublished report, Machalilla. [Google Scholar]
  21. Farías-Tafolla Beatriz, Arias-Zumbado Fausto, Chaves-Zamora Isaac, Alvarado-Ruiz Carlos, Espinoza Mario. Dinámica espacio-temporal de la pesquería artesanal en el Golfo de Santa Elena, Pacífico Norte de Costa Rica (2010-2019) Revista de Biología Tropical. 2022;70:557–575. doi: 10.15517/rev.biol.trop.2022.49114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fonseca E. Ana C., Arrivillaga Alejandro. In: Latin American Coral Reefs. Cortés J, editor. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2003. Coral reefs of Guatemala.159–169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Galtsoff Paul Simon. The Pearl-Oyster Resources of Panama. Special Scientific Report - Fisheries, No. 28. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service; Washington, D. C.: 1950. 53. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gutiérrez Zavala Rosa María, Cabera Mancilla Esteban. La pesca ribereña de Guerrero. Instituto Nacional de Pesca; México, D.F.: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hocqhenghem Anne Marie. In: Producción de Bienes de Prestigio Ornamentales y Votivos de la América Antigua. Melgar Tísoc E, Solís Ciriaco R, editors. Syllaba Press; Deale: 2010. El Spondylus princeps y la Edad de Bronce en los Andes Centrales: Las Rutas de Intercambios.34–49 [Google Scholar]
  26. Holguín Quiñones Óscar Efraín. In: Los recursos pesqueros y acuícolas de Jalisco, Colima y Michoacán. Jiménez Quiroz M. del C., Espino Barr E., editors. SAGARPA, Instituto Nacional de la Pesca, Centro Regional de Investigación Pesquera de Manzanillo; Manzanillo: 2006. Moluscos bentónicos de interés económico y potencial de las costas de Michoacán, Colima y Jalisco, México.121–131. [Google Scholar]
  27. INCOPESCA . Instituto Costarricense de Pesca y Acuicultura; 2023. Acuerdo de Junta Directiva INCOPESCA - AJDIP/057-2023. [Google Scholar]
  28. Acuicultura Instituto Nicaragüense de la Pesca y. Resolución Ejecutiva PA N°. 006-2019 - Clasificación de los Recursos Pesqueros de Nicaragua de acuerdo al estado de su aprovechamiento. http://legislacion.asamblea.gob.ni/Normaweb.nsf/(All)/A99CE64A965E2BDF062583EC0063F282?OpenDocument. [2026-01-16T00:02:56+00:00]. http://legislacion.asamblea.gob.ni/Normaweb.nsf/(All)/A99CE64A965E2BDF062583EC0063F282?OpenDocument
  29. Jaramillo Arango Antonio. Comunión e interexistencia. El Spondylus spp. En la costa norte del Perú durante el Intermedio Tardío (800-1450 d.C) Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología. 2017;28 doi: 10.7440/antipoda28.2017.04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Keen A. Myra. Sea Shells of Tropical West America. Marine Mollusks from Baja California to Peru. Second Edition. Stanford University Press; Stanford, California: 1971. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lamprell Kevin. Spondylus: Spiny oyster shells of the world. Brill; Leiden: 1987. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Landa-Jaime Victor, Michel-Morfín Jesus Emilio, Arciniega-Flores Judit Alicia De Jesus, Castillo-Vargasmachuca Sergio, Saucedo-Lozano Mirella. Moluscos asociados al arrecife coralino de Tenacatita, Jalisco, en el Pacífico central mexicano. http://10.1.20.9/index.php/bio/article/view/921 Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2013;84(4):1121–1136. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lodeiros César, Soria Gaspar, Valentich-Scott Paul, Munguía-Vega Adrián, Cabrera Jonathan Santana, Cudney-Bueno Richard, Loor Alfredo, Márquez Adrian, Sonnenholzner Stanislaus. Spondylids of Eastern Pacific Ocean. http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.2983/035.035.0203. Journal of Shellfish Research. 2016;35(2):279–293. doi: 10.2983/035.035.0203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Loor Alfredo, Ortega Daniel, Lodeiros César, Sonnenholzner Stanislaus. Early life cycle and effects of microalgal diets on larval development of the spiny rock-scallop, Spondylus limbatus (Sowerby II, 1847) https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0044848615301319. Aquaculture. 2016;450:328–334. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.08.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. López de la Fuente Adolfo, Urcuyo Ramos Janina. Moluscos de Nicaragua, I - Bivalvos. MARENA - ARAUCARIA - AECID. Ministerio del Ambiente y los Recursos Naturales; Managua: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mackensen Annika K., Brey Thomas, Sonnenholzner Stanislaus. The Fate of Spondylus Stocks (Bivalvia: Spondylidae) in Ecuador: Is Recovery Likely? Journal of Shellfish Research. 2011;30(1):115–121. doi: 10.2983/035.030.0117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mackensen Annika K. Towards sustainable artisanal fisheries for the common pool resource Spondylus (Bivalvia, Spondylidae) in Ecuador. PhD thesis. Faculty 2 (Biology & Chemistry) Bremen University; Bremen: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mackensen Annika K., Brey Thomas. In: Towards sustainable artisanal fisheries for the common pool resource Spondylus (Bivalvia, Spondylidae) in Ecuador [PhD thesis]. Faculty 2 (Biology & Chemistry) Mackensen A. K., editor. Bremen University; Bremen: 2013. Towards individual growth models for Spondylus limbatus G. B. Sowerby II, 1847 and S. crassisquama Lamarck, 1819.36–44 [Google Scholar]
  39. Marcos Jorge G., Norton Presley. Interpretación sobre la Arqueología de la Isla de la Plata. Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana. 1981;1(1):136–154. [Google Scholar]
  40. Marcos Jorge. In: Arqueología de la Costa Ecuatoriana. Nuevos Enfoques. Marcos J, editor. Biblioteca Ecuatoriana de Arqueología, ESPOL/Corporación Editora Nacional; Guayaquil: 1986. Intercambio a larga distancia en América: El caso del Spondylus.197–206 [Google Scholar]
  41. Melendreras Wilkin Paulo Steven. El hombre y el mar en el Puerto de Iztapa, Escuintla: una mirada antropológica a la pesca artesanal (2006-2008). Bachelor’s dissertation. Área de Antropología, Escuela de Historia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala; Guatemala City: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  42. MolluscaBase, editor. MolluscaBase. Spondylus limbatus G. B. Sowerby II, 1847. https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=207886. [2025-09-15T00:02:56+00:00]. https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=207886
  43. Morales Díaz María Olga del Carmen. Implicaciones socioeconómicas y ambientales del uso de arrecifes artificiales en la Costa Sur de Guatemala. Bachelor’s dissertation. Escuela de Estudios de Postgrado, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala; Guatemala City: 2015. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mouchi Vincent, Briard Justine, Gaillot Stéphane, Argant Thierry, Forest Vianney, Emmanuel Laurent. Reconstructing environments of collection sites from archaeological bivalve shells: Case study from oysters (Lyon, France) https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352409X17307010. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2018;21:1225–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.10.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Mouchi Vincent, Godbillot Camille, Forest Vianney, Ulianov Alexey, Lartaud Franck, De Rafélis Marc, Emmanuel Laurent, Verrecchia Eric P. Rare earth elements in oyster shells: provenance discrimination and potential vital effects. https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2205/2020/ Biogeosciences. 2020;17(8):2205–2217. doi: 10.5194/bg-17-2205-2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Murra John V. In: Primer Simposio de Correlaciones Antropológicas Andino-Mesoamericano (25-31 de julio de 1971) Marcos J. G., Norton P, editors. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL); Guayaquil: 1982. El tráfico de mullu en la costa del Pacífico.265–274 [Google Scholar]
  47. Owen Bruce. University of California, Berkeley; 2012. Institute of Andean Studies 53rd Annual Meeting (January 11-12, 2013), Preliminary Program. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pérez Ramírez Sara Carlota. Centro de Estudios del Mar y Acuicultura, Dirección General de Investigación, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. Guatemala City; 2006. Ejercicio Profesional Supervisado desarrollado en el municipio del Puerto San José e Iztapa en la aldea Buena Vista del departamento de Escuintla. Informe Final. [Google Scholar]
  49. Quetzal Portuaria. Empresa Portuaria Quetzal, Quiénes somos. 2017. https://www.puertoquetzal.gob.gt/quienes-somos/ https://www.puertoquetzal.gob.gt/quienes-somos/ Accessed online 30 July 2025.
  50. Poutiers Jean - Maurice. In: Guía FAO para la identificación de especies para los fines de la pesca. Pacífico Centro-Oriental. Fischer W., Krupp F., Schneider W., Sommer C., Carpenter K. E., Niem V. H., editors. I - Plantas e Invertebrados. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación; Rome: 1995. Bivalvos (Acephala, Lamellibranchia, Pelecypoda)99–222. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ríos Jara Eduardo, Hermosillo-González Alicia, Galván-Villa Cristian Moisés. In: La biodiversidad en Colima. Estudio de Estado. Cruz Angón Andrea, Ortega Huerta Miguel A., Melgarejo Erika Daniela, Perdomo Velázquez Héctor, Contreras Ana Victoria., editors. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; Mexico City: 2016. Moluscos marinos (Mollusca)279—287. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ríos Jara Eduardo, Juárez Carrillo Eduardo, Galván Villa Cristian Moisés. In: La biodiversidad en Jalisco. Estudio de Estado. Volumen II. Cruz Angón Andrea, Ondorica Hermosillo Antonio, Valero Padilla Jessica, Melgarejo Erika Daniela., editors. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Territorial; Mexico City: 2017. Invertebrados Marinos.251–269. [Google Scholar]
  53. Naturales Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010. Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. https://www.dof.gob.mx/normasOficiales/4254/semarnat/semarnat.htm. [2026-01-15T00:02:56+00:00]. https://www.dof.gob.mx/normasOficiales/4254/semarnat/semarnat.htm
  54. SEGEPLAN . Dirección de Ordenamiento Territorial, Secretaría de Planificación y Programación de la Presidencia (SEGEPLAN). Guatemala City; 2011. Plan de Desarrollo Integral del Litoral del Pacífico. [Google Scholar]
  55. Skoglund Carol, Mulliner David K. The genus Spondylus (Bivalvia: Spondylidae) of the Panamic Province. The Festivus. 1996;XXVIII(9):93–107. [Google Scholar]
  56. Solís del Vecchio Felipe, Herrera Villalobos Anayensi. Herramientas y adornos de concha en el sitio Jícaro: un acercamiento a la reconstrucción de cadenas operativas, Bahía de Culebra, noroeste de Costa Rica. Vínculos. 2015;35(2012):67–106. [Google Scholar]
  57. Soria G, Munguía-Vega A, Marinone S. G., Moreno-Báez M., Martínez-Tovar I., Cudney-Bueno R. Linking bio-oceanography and population genetics to assess larval connectivity. http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v463/p159-175/ Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2012;463:159–175. doi: 10.3354/meps09866. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Spalding Ana K., Mellado María Eugenia. In: Coastal Heritage and Cultural Resilience. Price Lisa L., Narchi Nemer E., editors. Springer International Publishing; Cham: 2018. From the Discovery of the Mar Del Sur to the Creation of Unlikely Connections Between Panama and the United States.39–61. english. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Subsecretaría de Recursos Pesqueros Ecuador. Acuerdo Ministerial No. 136. https://esilecstorage.s3.amazonaws.com/biblioteca_silec/REGOFPDF/2009/8BCFF406BF0DEA0C7D4CB277D3640D91922189FE.pdf. [2026-01-16T00:02:56+00:00]. https://esilecstorage.s3.amazonaws.com/biblioteca_silec/REGOFPDF/2009/8BCFF406BF0DEA0C7D4CB277D3640D91922189FE.pdf
  60. Temple Sánchez-Garavito John Joseph, Velázquez Castro Adrián. In: Estudios Etnobiológicos, pasado y presente de México. Montúfar López A, editor. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia; Mexico City: 2003. El tapachtli entre los antiguos nahuas.15–23 [Google Scholar]
  61. Villalejo-Fuerte Marcial, Arellano Martínez Marcial, Ceballos Vázquez Bertha Patricia, González Castro Diana, Berovides Álvarez Vicente, Tripp-Quezada Arturo, Tripp-Valdez Arturo. Spondylus calcifer Carpenter, 1857: antecedentes de la especie. Amici Molluscarum. 2015;23(1-2):39–42. [Google Scholar]
  62. Villalejo-Fuerte Marcial, Borges Souza José, Arellano-Martínez Marcial, Tripp-Quezada Arturo, Fernández Aguirre Enmaylin, Berovides-Álvarez Vicente, Velez-Arellano Nurenskaya, Cabrera Jerez Amhed R. The density of the bivalve Spondylus limbatus in Agua Verde-Tembabiche Gulf of California, Mexico. http://lajar.ucv.cl/index.php/rlajar/article/view/vol48-issue1-fulltext-2141. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research. 2020;48(1):162–166. doi: 10.3856/vol48-issue1-fulltext-2141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Villalejo-Fuerte Marcial, Ruiz Domínguez Marcelino, Cota Hernández Gladys Guadalupe, Melo Barrera Felipe Neri, Vélez-Arellano Nurenskaya, Arellano-Martínez Marcial, Tripp-Quezada Arturo. Parameters of the Spondylus limbatus GB Sowerby II, 1847, population in the Central-West Gulf of California, Mexico. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07924259.2023.2172363. Invertebrate Reproduction & Development. 2023;67(1-2):26–36. doi: 10.1080/07924259.2023.2172363. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Spondylus limbatus

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES