Skip to main content
European Heart Journal. Case Reports logoLink to European Heart Journal. Case Reports
. 2026 Jan 24;10(2):ytag045. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytag045

Two young athletes with Tetralogy of Fallot—stress echocardiography in therapeutic decision-making: a case report

Melina Winkler 1, Nuno Duarte 2, A Graham Stuart 3, Guido E Pieles 4,5,✉,2
Editors: Danny van de Sande, Takeshi Kitai, Nicolo Sisti
PMCID: PMC12924162  PMID: 41728223

Abstract

Background

The surveillance of athletes with congenital heart disease remains challenging despite recent recommendations. Stress echocardiography as a diagnostic tool is not yet part of the routine follow-up but has emerged as an innovative approach to assess cardiac reserve and exercise capacity. It can unmask cardiac exercise pathophysiology and hence inform decision making for repeat interventions in athletes with complex congenital heart disease.

Case summary

This case report describes two athletes with Tetralogy of Fallot who, despite similar conditions, exhibit different cardiovascular risks. Their above average exercise capacity masks early cardiac deterioration, underscoring the limitations of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in assessing myocardial function. Stress echocardiography revealed severe biventricular dyssynchrony in one athlete, playing a major role in decision-making to perform a pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). Post transcatheter PVR, improved left ventricular–right ventricular synchrony was seen at rest and during exercise stress echocardiography.

Conclusion

In athletes with congenital heart disease (CHD), disease worsening might be masked by above-normal exercise capacity, and detailed assessment, including cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise echocardiography, might be needed to detect underlying pathophysiology and hence guide the therapeutic approach. Two-strain during exercise echocardiography can be used to quantify cardiac function but also decipher interventricular dyssynchrony in CHD.

Keywords: Congenital heart disease, Adolescent athlete, Stress echocardiography, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, Sports cardiology, Interventricular dyssynchrony, Case report


Learning points.

  • In athletes with congenital heart disease, disease progression may be masked by above-normal exercise capacity.

  • A comprehensive evaluation, including cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise echocardiography, may be required to uncover underlying pathophysiology and guide management.

  • Strain analysis during exercise echocardiography can further quantify ventricular function and identify interventricular dyssynchrony in congenital heart disease

Topic: Issue Section 55: Case Report > Sports and heart disease

Introduction

Advances in the diagnosis and long-term survival of congenital heart disease (CHD) have enabled an increasing number of patients to maintain a more active lifestyle and participate in sports. Unlike the sedentary majority, there is an emerging patient subpopulation of young CHD patients training at an elite level. These athletes, however, require thorough diagnostic evaluation to prevent disease complications or cardiac adverse events associated with sports.1

In this case report, two athletes with Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) are presented detailing innovative diagnostic workup following the recent recommendations for athletes over the age of 16 years with CHD.1–3 Compared to previous guidelines, which primarily focus on anatomical lesions, the new recommendations emphasize a more functional approach to assessing an athlete’s heart with CHD including comprehensive assessment during exercise. Although the underlying anatomical lesion is important, a functional approach allows for more personalized decision-making tailored to the patient. The following case report highlights the benefits of exercise stress echocardiography in young athletes with repaired CHD.

Summary figure

graphic file with name ytag045il2.jpg

Case presentation

Two 16-year-old male athletes with TOF and matching characteristics and disease phenotype underwent a routine diagnostic workup. One of the athletes was a UK county-level footballer, while the other qualified for a US sports college scholarship in tennis.

The routine assessment comprised electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiography at rest, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and simultaneous stress ECG on an ergometer, as well as a 24-h Holter ECG and additional quantitative exercise stress echocardiography (Table 1). On echocardiography, the footballer had an enlarged RV in the apical four-chamber view and the tennis player showed both an enlarged right atrium and RV. LV function was measured within the normal range in both athletes (Supplementary material online, Videos S1–S4). The CMR confirmed the pressure and volume overload of the footballer’s heart, with a pulmonary regurgitation (PR) that was quantified as mild to moderate. Compared to the footballer’s heart, the tennis player had significantly less RV pressure and volume overload. In CPET, the footballer had a peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) above average, although he showed signs of chronotropic insufficiency. The tennis player performed even better. Both results showed good fitness levels especially considering their underlying heart condition.4 The stress and Holter ECG showed no arrhythmia, there were only occasionally some monomorphic ventricular extrasystole (VES) originating from the RV outflow tract (RVOT) in the footballer. The QRS complex (QRS) duration was moderately prolonged in the footballer, whereas the tennis player only showed a partial right branch bundle block (Table 1).

Table 1.

Diagnostic workup of the two athletes

Baseline characteristics
Footballer Tennis player
Age (years) 16 16
Weight (kg) 62 71.7
Height (cm) 179 177.5
BMI (kg/m2) 19 22
Cardiac diagnosis TOF, repair (1 year), PVR + MPA plasty [5 years], RVOT patch/supravalvular stenosis (15 years) TOF, right Blalock Tausig Shunt (1 year), total correction (2 years)
Clinic presentation Athletic body habitus Athletic body habitus
Systolic murmur 2/6 2/6 systolic murmur
No medication No medication
Past medical history No syncope, above average subjective exercise tolerance, but decreasing over last 6 months, no family history of SCD No syncope, above average subjective exercise tolerance, no family history of SCD
Family history
ECG
SR with RBBB SR with partial RBBB
 HR at rest (bpm) 65 62
 Resting ECG QRS duration (ms) 160 110
 QRS axis (degrees) +97 +90
Normal intervals, RVH Normal intervals, no LVH/RVH
24-h Holter ECG
SR, monomorphic VES <1% SR, monomorphic VES <1%
CPET
 VO2max (mL/kg/min) 40.2 47
 VO2/HR (mL/beat) 16 16
 AT/VO2 max (%) 56 61
 VE/VO2 28 31
 HR max. (bpm) 156 187
 RER 1.09 1.1
Cardiac MR
 LV-EF (%) 50; 57–77 62; 57–77
 LV-EDV (mL/m2) 103; 68–112 100; 68–112
 LV-ESV (mL/m2) 51;16–44 38; 16–44
 RV-EF (%) 34; 47–67 64; 47–67
 RV-EDV (mL/m2) 177; 74–134 116; 74–134
 RV-ESV (mL/m2) 119; 26–62 42; 26–62
 PR (%) 32 17
No gadolinium delayed enhancement No gadolinium delayed enhancement
Echocardiography at rest
 IVSd (mm) 8 9
 LVIDd (mm) 55 47
 LVIDs (mm) 35 35
 FS (%) 36 30
 MAPSE 10.5 17
 RVOT vel. (m/s) 4.3 2.9
 RVSP (mmHg) 72 35
 TAPSE 12.5 11
 RVOT peak gradient (mmHg) 37 34
 RVSP (mmHg) 75
Stress echocardiography—resting strain
 LV peak systolic longitudinal strain (%) −15 19.9
 LV peak systolic circumferential strain (%) −18 −24.7
 RV peak systolic longitudinal strain (%) −18 −15
Stress echocardiography
 HR max. (bpm) 203 184
 LV peak systolic circumferential strain (%; at 100 W/rec. 2 min) −21.5/−23 −28/−26
 LV peak systolic longitudinal strain (%; at 100 W/rec. 2 min) −19/−20
 RV peak systolic longitudinal strain (%; at 100 W/rec. 2 min) −11.5/−14 −23.4/−20
Exercise ECG
No ischaemic or repolarization ST changes, normal shortening of QT interval, max HR 203 bpm, reduced frequency of VES, no VT, or SVT; frequent monomorphic ventricular ectopics No ischaemic or repolarization ST changes, normal shortening of QT interval, max HR 203 bpm, no ectopics, or arrhythmic activity

All investigations were performed contemporaneously within 3 months in both athletes.

ECG, electrocardiogram; EDV, end diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESV, end systolic volume; FS, fractional shortening; HR, heart rate; IVDd, intraventricular septal diameter diastolic; IVSd, intraventricular septal diameter systolic; LV, left ventricle/left ventricular; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; MAPSE, mitral annular plane systolic excursion; MPA, main pulmonary artery; PR pulmonary regurgitation; PVR, pulmonary valve replacement; RBBB, right bundle branch block; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; RV, right ventricle/right ventricular; RVH, right ventricular hypertrophy; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; SCD, sudden cardiac death; SP, systolic pressure; SR, sinus rhythm; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TOF, Tetralogy of Fallot; VES, ventricular extrasystole.

To assess exercise-related symptoms, cardiac function, RV pressure, and myocardial reserve, both athletes underwent stress echocardiography on a semi-supine (45°) cycle ergometer. The protocol included 3-min stages with 50-W increments for steady-state echocardiographic data acquisition as prescribed previously in adolescent athletes.5–7 Focused 2D strain echocardiography was performed at rest, during unloaded pedalling, at 50 W, 100 W, and 2 min into recovery. The gas exchange threshold was expressed as a percentage of VO₂peak. Myocardial reserve was defined as the difference in mean peak systolic strain between baseline and each stage. Metabolic parameters were analysed concurrently during simultaneous CPET. Only images with frame rates between 60 and 100 frames per second were included to ensure adequate temporal resolution for strain analysis at higher heart rates. A minimum of three cardiac cycles were recorded per stage to include at least one expiratory cycle, visually confirmed for optimal image quality prior to strain analysis. In this protocol, imaging was performed according to workload rather than target heart rate, in line with previously published methodology by Pieles et al.6,7 Myocardial strain is known to be heart rate-dependent during exercise, consistent with findings by Cifra et al.8 in a healthy paediatric cohort and Forsey et al.9 in children with congenital heart disease.8,9 This approach accounts for the observed differences in heart rate during image acquisition.

At a workload of 100 W, the footballer’s RV exhibited significant pressure and volume overload, accompanied by severe LV–RV dyssynchrony as measured by 2D strain (Table 1, Supplementary material online, Videos S5, S6, S9 and S10). The mild RV impairment observed at rest worsened during exercise, with RV longitudinal strain decreasing from −18% at rest to −11.5% at 50 W, showing a decompensating RV, that also showed significant dilation. Notably, ventricular–ventricular interaction led also to a consecutive decline in LV function, with LV circumferential strain decreasing to −21.5%, falling below published reference values during exercise,6,8 showing a poor LV myocardial reserve. Although the tennis player displayed increased RV diameters at rest, he demonstrated good myocardial reserve with synchronized biventricular function and near-normal strain values at 100 W (Table 1, Figure 1, Supplementary material online, Video S7, S8 and S10). Considering the severe dyssynchrony during exercise resulting from a pressure-loaded RV as a cause of biventricular dysfunction, resulting in increasing exercise symptoms, the footballer underwent transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). Post catheter intervention, both RV longitudinal and LV circumferential strain patterns showed significant improvement, leading to a more synchronized biventricular response to exercise as early as 4 months after the PVR (Figure 13, Supplementary material online, Videos S11 and S12).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Exercise stress echocardiogram at 100 W, left footballer, and right tennis player.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Stress echocardiogram performed at 100 W 4 months after pulmonary valve replacement in footballer.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Stress echocardiogram performed at 50 W before and 4 months after pulmonary valve replacement in footballer.

Discussion

Sports participation in patients with CHD remains an evolving and complex topic. Therapeutic decision-making for athletes with CHD poses significant challenges, given the wide spectrum of haemodynamic consequences and prognostic outcomes associated with different congenital defects, even in individuals with the same diagnosis. This case report aims to highlight the role that exercise echocardiography can play in individual diagnosis and decision-making.

Exercise assessment is at the core of the most recent European Association of Preventive Cardiology and Assoociation for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology recommendations on the assessment of athletes with CHD and while CPET is the current gold standard for risk stratification and assessment of exercise capacity, it has inherent limitations.1 CPET primarily evaluates oxygen delivery, driven largely by increased cardiac output, but does not directly assess myocardial function in response to exercise stress. Consequently, it provides limited insight into cardiac reserve and relies on indirect inferences.7 Furthermore, as our case highlights, an above-average and normal exercise capacity due to athletic training measured during CPET may indeed conceal early signs of cardiac deterioration, as both athletes’ VO2peak were above the 80th centile for TOF patients.4 Combining CPET with stress echocardiography can overcome this limitation, as shown here, and may reveal myocardial exercise pathology, as the cause of symptoms and help implement aetiology-based therapy.6–10

PVR is performed to mitigate the adverse effects of chronic RV volume and pressure overload, yet the decision on when to intervene is complex and the optimal timing of PVR in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic TOF patients remains uncertain.11 Following interventional PVR in the football player, both RV longitudinal strain and global LV strain during exercise showed significant improvement. This can be attributed to the relief of the RVOT obstruction, which improved the previously significant RV–LV dyssynchrony, which not only impaired RV function but also adversely affected LV performance via interventricular dyssynchrony,12 as shown by the specific RV and LV strain pattern in this case. In TOF patients, interventricular dyssynchrony—reflected in the RV–LV delay due to the consequences of chronic RV pressure loading—is associated with prolonged QRS duration, reduced RV–EF, and consequently, diminished VO₂peak.13 Establishing this precise pathophysiology in our case using exercise echocardiography led to timely intervention by catheter PVR and follow-up exercise echocardiography confirmed improvement in RV and LV function and synchrony (Figure 3).

In summary, in athletes with CHD, disease worsening might be masked by above-normal exercise capacity and detailed assessment including CPET and exercise echocardiography might be needed to detect underlying pathophysiology and hence guide the therapeutic approach. Two-strain during exercise echocardiography can be used to quantify cardiac function but also decipher interventricular dyssynchrony in CHD.14

Lead author biography

graphic file with name ytag045il1.jpg

Dr. M. Winkler is a senior resident in paediatric cardiology at the Medical University of Graz, Austria. Her clinical interests include congenital heart disease, with a particular focus on sports cardiology.

Supplementary Material

ytag045_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank both athletes and the Bristol Heart Institute.

Contributor Information

Melina Winkler, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/II, 8036 Graz, Austria.

Nuno Duarte, Bristol Congenital Heart Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8BJ, UK.

A Graham Stuart, Bristol Congenital Heart Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8BJ, UK.

Guido E Pieles, Department of Athlete Screening and Sports Cardiology, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Sport City Street, Doha, Qatar; Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, University College London, 170 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7HA, UK.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal – Case Reports online.

Author contributions

Melina Winkler (Conceptualization, Writing—original draft), Nuno Duarte (Writing—review and editing), A. Graham Stuart (Writing—review and editing), Guido E. Pieles (Conceptualization, Writing—original draft)

Consent: The authors confirm that written consent for submission and publication of this case report including image(s) and associated text has been obtained from the patients in line with COPE guidance.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Open Access funding was provided by the Qatar National Library.

Data availability

All available data relevant to this case report have been included within the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Budts  W, Pieles  GE, Roos-Hesselink  JW, De La Garza  MS, D’Ascenzi  F, Giannakoulas  G, et al.  Recommendations for participation in competitive sport in adolescent and adult athletes with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD): position statement of the Sports Cardiology & Exercise Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Adult Congenital Heart Disease and the Sports Cardiology, Physical Activity and Prevention Working Group of the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J  2020;41:4191–4199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Baumgartner  H, de Backer  J, Babu-Narayan  SV, Budts  W, Chessa  M, Diller  GP, et al.  ESC guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J  2021;42:563–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kim  JH, Baggish  AL, Levine  BD, Ackerman  MJ, Day  SM, Dineen  EH, et al.  Clinical considerations for competitive sports participation for athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol  2025;85:1059–1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Diller  GP, Dimopoulos  K, Okonko  D, Li  W, Babu-Narayan  SV, Broberg  CS, et al.  Exercise intolerance in adult congenital heart disease: comparative severity, correlates, and prognostic implication. Circulation  2005;112:828–835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pieles  GE, Oberhoffer  R. The assessment of the paediatric athlete. J Cardiovasc Transl Res  2020;13:306–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pieles  GE, Gowing  L, Ryding  D, Perry  D, McNally  SR, Stuart  AG, et al.  Characterisation of LV myocardial exercise function by 2-D strain deformation imaging in elite adolescent footballers. Eur J Appl Physiol  2021;121:239–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pieles  GE, Gowing  L, Forsey  J, Ramanujam  P, Miller  F, Stuart  AG, et al.  The relationship between biventricular myocardial performance and metabolic parameters during incremental exercise and recovery in healthy adolescents. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol  2015;309:H2067–H2076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cifra  B, Mertens  L, Mirkhani  M, Slorach  C, Hui  W, Manlhiot  C, et al.  Systolic and diastolic myocardial response to exercise in a healthy pediatric cohort. J Am Soc Echocardiogr  2016;29:648–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Forsey  J, Friedberg  MK, Mertens  L. Speckle tracking echocardiography in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Echocardiography  2013;30:447–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bhatt  SM, Wang  Y, Elci  OU, Goldmuntz  E, McBride  M, Paridon  S, et al.  Right ventricular contractile reserve is impaired in children and adolescents with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: an exercise strain imaging study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr  2019;32:135–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Leonardi  B, Cifra  B. The role of cardiopulmonary testing to risk stratify tetralogy of Fallot patients. CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis  2023;2:314–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Friedberg  MK, Mertens  L. Echocardiographic assessment of ventricular synchrony in congenital and acquired heart disease in children. Echocardiography  2013;30:460–471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bitterman  Y, Hui  W, Fan  CPS, Kiss  A, Mertens  L, Wald  RM, et al.  Electromechanical dyssynchrony is associated with right ventricular remodeling and dysfunction independently of pulmonary regurgitation late after tetralogy of Fallot repair. J Am Soc Echocardiogr  2023;36:1315–1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Dorobantu  DM, Amir  NH, Wadey  CA, Sharma  C, Stuart  AG, Williams  CA, et al.  The role of speckle-tracking echocardiography in predicting mortality and morbidity in patients with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr  2024;37:216–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ytag045_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

All available data relevant to this case report have been included within the manuscript.


Articles from European Heart Journal. Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES