Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2024 Nov 28;386(6725):1010–1018. doi: 10.1126/science.adp3025

A Tetramer of BCL11A is Required for Stable Protein Production and Fetal Hemoglobin Silencing

Ge Zheng 1,, Maolu Yin 1,, Stuti Mehta 1,, I-Te Chu 1, Stacy Wang 3, Alia AlShaye 1, Kirstin Drainville 1, Altantsetseg Buyanbat 1, Frédérique Bienfait 1, Karin Tenglin 1, Qian Zhu 3, Stuart H Orkin 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC12924673  NIHMSID: NIHMS2140889  PMID: 39607926

Abstract

Down-regulation of BCL11A protein reverses the fetal (HbF, α2γ2) to adult (HbA, α2β2) hemoglobin switch and is exploited in gene-based therapy for hemoglobin disorders. Due to reliance on ex vivo cell manipulation and marrow transplant, such therapies cannot lessen disease burden. To develop novel small molecule approaches, we interrogated the state of BCL11A protein in erythroid cells. We report that tetramer formation mediated by a single zinc-finger (ZnF0) is required for production of steady-state protein. Beyond its role in protein stability, the tetramer state is necessary for γ-globin gene repression, as an engineered monomer fails to engage a critical corepressor complex. These aspects of BCL11A protein production identify tetramer formation as a vulnerability for HbF silencing, and provide opportunities for drug discovery.

One-Sentence Summary:

The surprising structure of protein BCL11A provides insights into ways to develop novel drugs to treat sickle cell disease.


During ontogeny, the principal hemoglobin in red blood cells changes from fetal (HbF, α2γ2) to adult hemoglobin (HbA, α2β2), paralleling a progressive cellular switch from fetal liver to bone marrow erythropoiesis (1). This developmental transition begins in mid-gestation and is completed during the first few months after birth. As the major hemoglobin disorders, Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) and β-thalassemia, are caused by mutations in the adult β-globin gene, affected individuals are typically spared symptoms in the neonatal period, as first described for children with SCD 75 years ago (2). Recognition that the clinical severity of SCD and β-thalassemia is ameliorated by increased levels of HbF, either due to common genetic variation (3, 4) or rare mutations in the Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin (HFPH) syndrome (5, 6), has fueled decades long interest in the fetal-to-adult hemoglobin switch. Clinical observations have provided a compelling rationale for reactivation of HbF expression as therapy for the hemoglobinopathies. The barrier to accomplishing this goal was lack of knowledge regarding mechanisms underlying the process. Research over the past 15 years has provided an increasingly detailed view of how HbF silencing is controlled and may be targeted for therapeutic benefit.

At the molecular level, the fetal-to-adult switch reflects a switch in transcription from duplicated γ-globin genes to the downstream β-globin gene in the β-globin locus on chromosome 11. The repressor protein BCL11A, an adult stage factor, is the principal physiological regulator of the switch (1, 7). BCL11A acts directly at the γ-globin gene promoter by binding at a canonical DNA-recognition sequence, (8, 9) and displacing a ubiquitous transcriptional activator (NF-Y) (10). Engagement of the Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase (NuRD) complex by BCL11A is believed to contribute to repression at the locus (7, 11). Shut-off of γ-globin gene transcription liberates a strong upstream enhancer, the locus control region (LCR), to loop to and activate transcription of the β-globin gene (12, 13). A second, stage-independent repressor protein, ZBTB7A (LRF) also acts to silence the γ-globin genes by binding a site further upstream in their promoters (8, 14).

Several findings positioned BCL11A as a genetic target for therapeutic manipulation. Down-regulation of its expression in adult CD34+ cell derived-erythroid precursor cells (HSPCs) leads to increased HbF levels, demonstrating that γ-globin silencing is reversible and dependent on BCL11A (7). Indeed, subsequent observations have revealed that the level of BCL11A dictates the level of HbF at the adult stage. Modest decreases in BCL11A expression resulting from common genetic variants in an essential erythroid-specific enhancer within the gene itself (15), first identified through genome-wide association studies (3) (4), are associated with small, but consistent increases in HbF levels (~1-3%) in the population. In individuals with neurodevelopmental deficits due to a rare BCL11A haploinsufficiency syndrome, HbF levels are are much higher (~15% on average) (16). Within HSPCs, the extent of increased HbF expression strongly correlates with the reduction in BCL11A expression (17). In effect, BCL11A serves as a rheostat for HbF. Besides this dose-sensitivity, marked down-regulation of BCL11A alone is sufficient to reactivate HbF expression to generally accepted therapeutic levels (~30% total Hb/red cell), as first revealed by genetic rescue of engineered SCD mice (18). The discovery that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disruption of a single GATA1-binding in the BCL11A erythroid enhancer greatly impairs BCL11A expression (19, 20) has been translated in trials of patients with SCD and β-thalassemia with transformative clinical outcomes (21), culminating recently in regulatory approval of the first gene editing therapy, Casgevy. A striking feature of both rescue of engineered SCD mice and success of Casgevy is the tolerance of red cell differentiation and production to low levels of BCL11A. This relative insensitivity likely reflects the remarkably few primary gene targets for BCL11A in erythroid cells, as revealed by nascent transcript analysis following acute protein depletion (22).

Besides providing a transformative therapy for patients, the success of gene editing (21), taken together with a trial of shRNA-mediated down-regulation of BCL11A in patients with SCD (23), establishes BCL11A as a clinically validated therapeutic target for HbF reactivation. As currently practiced, genetic therapies cannot be delivered to large numbers of patients due to cost and intensive care required. Unless methods for in vivo delivery of gene-based therapies become efficient enough to modify a substantial fraction of host hematopoietic stem cells, small molecule drugs will be required to reduce overall disease burden. While modulating epigenetic pathways has been pursued as a route to therapeutics (2429), the direct involvement of BCL11A in γ-globin repression and its validation in the clinical setting provide a compelling rationale for targeting the protein itself.

In the course of studying structure-function relationships, we have uncovered novel aspects regarding how BCL11A protein is processed and functions in erythroid cells. Steady-state BCL11A protein requires formation of a tetramer, which is mediated by a single zinc-finger (ZnF0) near its N-terminus. Apart from its role in protein stability, the tetramer state itself is critical for γ-globin repression. Our findings present unforeseen opportunities for therapeutic targeting of BCL11A.

Results

ZnF0 mediates multimeric interactions and is required for steady-state protein expression

BCL11A contains 7 ZnF domains, numbered from 0 to 6 (Fig. 1A). ZnF0 is a C2HC ZnF, whereas ZnFs 1-6 are of the more common C2H2 class. A canonical peptide sequence at the BCL11A N-terminus binds RBBP4, a subunit of the NuRD complex (3032). C-terminal ZnF4-6 recognize and bind the sequence TGACCA in the γ-globin promoters (9). As predicted by PONDR (prediction of disordered regions)(33) and AlphaFold 3(34), BCL11A is largely disordered, except for its ZnFs (fig. S1A, B). In erythroid cells, the protein appears stable with a half-life of ~20 hr (22).

Fig. 1. ZnF0-mediated multimeric interaction is required for BCL11A steady-state protein level.

Fig. 1.

(A) Schematic of BCL11A constructs lacking individual zinc fingers or zinc finger clusters. Constructs were expressed with Myc or GFP epitope tags, and transfected into HEK293T cells for reciprocal immunoprecipitations. (B) Anti-Myc and anti-GFP immunoprecipitates (IPs) were Western blotted with indicated antibodies in HEK293T cells co-transfected with indicated plasmids. Myc- or GFP-tagged BCL11A lacking ZnF0 failed to multimerize with each other. (C) The total cell lysates (INPUT), anti-Myc and anti-GFP immunoprecipitates (IPs) were blotted with the indicated antibodies in HEK293T cells co-transfected with the indicated plasmids. ZnF0 alone was sufficient to mediate multimer formation. (D) HUDEP-2 cells with biallelic, in-frame excision of ZnF0 lacked steady-state protein level of BCL11A, as detected by Western Blotting. BCL11A knock-out (KO) clone was included as a control. (E) The percentage of γ-globin mRNA to total non-α-globin mRNAs was determined by RT-qPCR analysis in wild-type (WT), KO, and two independent ΔZnF0 clones on day 7 of differentiation. Error bars = S.D.

To characterize full-length (FL) BCL11A (also termed BCL11A-XL), we generated recombinant protein in the baculovirus expression system. Under denaturing conditions, BCL11A migrated just above the 100kDa marker (fig. S1C). By native gel electrophoresis and size-exclusion chromatography, FL protein behaved as a much larger species, consistent with a multimer state (fig. S1D, E). Study of patients with pathogenic missense mutations previously suggested that BCL11A self-interacts, and possibly physically associates with BCL11B when they are coexpressed (35, 36). To map self-interaction domains in a systematic fashion, we co-expressed domain-deleted Myc- and GFP-tagged BCL11A cDNA constructs in HEK293T cells, and performed reciprocal immunoprecipitation (Fig. 1A, B). These experiments indicated that ZnF0 serves as the principal domain mediating interactions (Fig. 1B). Moreover, co-expression of tagged ZnF0 constructs revealed its self-association (Fig. 1C). ZnF23 and ZnF4-6 failed to self-associate (fig. S2A). Additional experiments showed that FL BCL11A physically associated with a shorter isoform (BCL11A-L), and BCL11B, which has one amino acid difference in ZnF0 from that of BCL11A (fig. S2B, C, D).

To study hemoglobin switching in a relevant cellular context, we, and others, utilize HUDEP-2 cells, an immortalized CD34+-derived progenitor cell line that undergoes erythroid differentiation characterized by an adult-stage phenotype (high β-globin and low γ-globin) (37). As these cells can be genetically manipulated and cloned, they provide a tractable system in which to test functional requirements of specific domains in a rigorous and reproducible manner (10, 19, 38). Our experiments leverage an efficient CRISPR/Cas9 editing protocol that yields bi-allelically edited cells for analysis (39). Accordingly, transcription of the endogenous BCL11A loci is unperturbed upon deletion of discrete coding sequences. Independent HUDEP-2 clones lacking ZnF0 (ΔZnF0 cells) phenocopied knockout cells with respect to deficiency of steady-state protein and marked HbF reactivation (Fig. 1D, E, fig. S3A). BCL11A RNA transcripts appeared modestly increased, consistent with a degree of negative feedback repression at the BCL11A gene (22) (fig. S3B). We conclude that ZnF0 is required to maintain the steady-state level of BCL11A protein in erythroid cells.

Tetramerization is required to maintain steady-state BCL11A protein level

Upon preparation of recombinant protein, we were surprised to observe that, even at low concentrations, ZnF0 formed a stable tetramer, as assessed by equilibrium sedimentation centrifugation (Fig. 2A), native gel electrophoresis, and dynamic light scattering (fig. S4A, B). The structure of crystallized ZnF0, as determined by X-ray diffraction at 1.8A resolution, revealed a symmetric tetramer with a hydrophobic core (Fig. 2B). At the interface where diagonal monomers meet, Leu57, Ile60, Leu61 engage in hydrophobic interactions (Fig. 2B). Gly58 forms a hydrogen bond with a water molecule, which serves effectively as a bridge to stabilize the β-sheets (Fig. 2B). In addition to these hydrophobic interactions, the formation of intermolecular anti-parallel β-sheets is facilitated by a network of hydrogen bonds between pairs of residue backbones across strands, including Leu45, Leu46, and Thr47 (Fig. 2C). Within a ZnF0 monomer, the hydrophobic residues Leu57, Ile60, Leu61, Phe63, and Ile64 constitute a core crucial for tetramer assembly (Fig. 2D). Structures predicted by AlphaFold 3 were similar with minor differences (fig. S4D, E). To estimate stability of the ZnF0 tetramer, we calculated the dissociation constant (KD) using free binding energy considerations from Proteins, Interfaces, Structures and Assemblies (PDBePISA service, https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/pisa/). The estimated KD from tetramer to monomer is 4.81x10−18 M.

Fig. 2. Tetramerization of BCL11A is required for steady-state protein level.

Fig. 2.

(A) c(s) distribution and 2-D shape and size distribution plot of ZnF0 protein by analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) analysis. The major peak at an S-value of 2S corresponds to ~19kDa, the molecular weight of a tetramer of ZnF0 protein. (B) Crystal structure of the ZnF0 tetramer. Each subunit in the tetramer is shown with a different color. Interactions between diagonally positioned monomers are labeled. (C) Interacting residues on intermolecular β-Sheets are shown. (D) Hydrophobic core residues within a monomer are highlighted. (E) Anti-Myc immunoprecipitates (IPs) were blotted with the indicated antibodies in HEK293T cells co-transfected with the indicated plasmids. 5A: five sites mutated to alanines (L46A/L57A/I60A/L61A/F63A). (F) I60 and L61 in ZnF0 of BCL11A were replaced with alanines by CRISPR/Cas9 editing in HUDEP-2 cells. BCL11A levels in independent WT, KO or I60A/L61A clones were analyzed by Western blotting. After CRISPR/Cas9 editing, two clones with BCL11A unmodified (WT) and two clones with BCL11A premature termination (KO) were included as controls. I60A/L61A mutations led to loss of steady-state BCL11A protein. (G) The percentage of γ-globin mRNA to total non-α-globin mRNAs was determined by RT-qPCR analysis on day 7 of differentiation. AA = I60A/L61A. Error bars = S.D.

Guided by the structure, we mapped residues critical for ZnF0 assembly by transfection of cDNA constructs in HEK293T cells (Fig. 2E). Alanine replacement of five hydrophobic residues at the tetramer interface ablated self-interaction (Fig. 2E). The alanine mutants disrupt the ZnF0 tetrameric structure, a finding consistent with the AlphaFold 3 prediction. Replacement of different combinations of residues identified isoleucine 60 (I60), a contact residue in the structure, as critical for tetramer assembly (Fig. 2E). To ascertain its role in stabilization of BCL11A in an erythroid cell context, we engineered HUDEP-2 cells with alanine replacements at I60 and the neighboring residue L61 (Fig. 2F). Independent I60A/L61A clones exhibited markedly reduced steady-state BCL11A protein (Fig. 2F) accompanied by derepression of the γ-globin gene (Fig. 2G, fig. S4F). BCL11A RNA transcript levels in the I60A/L61A clones were modestly increased (fig. S4G). The level of BCL11A I60A/L61A protein was deficient throughout the course of erythroid differentitaton (fig. S4H). AlphaFold 3 predicts that the I60A/L61A mutations do not alter the integrity of the ZnF structure (fig. S4I). Taken together, these findings strongly suggest the tetramer state of ZnF0 per se, rather than the mere presence of ZnF0, as required for production of steady-state BCL11A protein. On the other hand, reported pathogenic missense mutations in ZnF0 (35, 36) involve residues that directly coordinate zinc ions or neighboring residues. These pathogenic mutations also fail to form a stable tetramer, as assessed by immunoprecipitation or native gel electrophoresis (fig. S4J, K).

Tetramerization shields BCL11A from degradation

If the native state of BCL11A is a tetramer, what is the fate of BCL11A protein expressed by ΔZnF0? Treatment of ΔZnF0 cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 was accompanied by partial restoration of steady-state protein levels with time (fig. S5A), suggesting that ΔZnF0 protein was actively degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. We hypothesized that a degron sequence elsewhere in ΔZnF0 protein was exposed in monomeric BCL11A and obscured in the tetramer. In contrast to findings in ΔZnF0 cells, biallelic excision of ZnF1 led to a marked increase in steady-state protein (Fig. 3A), providing evidence that ZnF1 serves a destabilizing role. BCL11A RNA transcripts in ΔZnF1 cells were not significantly changed (fig. S5B). In ΔZnF1 cells, γ-globin expression was similar to, or perhaps somewhat hyperrepressed, as compared to wild-type cells (Fig. 3B, fig. S5C). Thus, protein lacking ZnF1 retained strong repressor activity. We noted that ZnF1 contains a central stretch of hydrophobic residues (FTSAWFLL) reminiscent of known degrons (Fig. 3A) (40, 41). We, therefore, tested if degron activity was transferable to a heterologous protein. Fusion of ZnF1 with well-folded proteins, such Myc or maltose-binding protein (MBP), reduced protein levels in transfected HEK293T cells (Fig. 3C). The level of ZnF1 expression was restored by addition of the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 (Fig. 3D). Structure prediction of ZnF1 with N- and C-terminal extensions (extZnF1) by AlphaFold 3 suggested that extZnF1 froms a dimer with the hydrophobic stretch buried at the interface (Fig. 3E). Consistent with dimer formation, co-expression of Myc- and GFP-tagged extZnF1 constructs and immunoprecipitation in HEK293T revealed self-association (Fig. 3F). To examine its properties directly, we expressed recombinant extZnF1. We observed that, unlike ZnF23 or ZnF4-6, extZnF1 formed a stable dimer at low concentration, as assessed by equilibrium sedimentation centrifugation (Fig. 3G) and SEC-MALS (fig. S5D).

Fig. 3. Tetramerization of BCL11A facilitates dimerization of ZnF1 and shields a degron.

Fig. 3.

(A) BCL11A ZnF1 domain contains a putative degron sequence highlighted in red. Right: HUDEP-2 cells with biallelic excision of ZnF1 showed an elevated BCL11A level, as detected by Western Blotting. BCL11A KO clone was included as a control. (B) RT-qPCR analysis revealed the percentage of γ-globin mRNA to total non-α-globin mRNAs in the indicated HUDEP-2 cells on day 7 of differentiation. The ΔZnF1 cells displayed a lower percentage of γ-globin in comparison to the WT cells. Error bars = S.D. (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids and cell lysates were blotted with the indicated antibodies. ZnF1 conferred instability on heterologous proteins, Myc and MBP. (D) The lysates of HEK293T transfected with ZnF1 in fusion with Flag-HA tag were blotted with anti-Flag antibody. Ectopic expressed Flag-HA-ZnF1 was stabilized by the addition of the proteasome inhibitor MG-132. (E) Predicted dimer structure of extZnF1 by AlphaFold 3. (F) Anti-Myc immunoprecipitates (IPs) were blotted with the indicated antibodies in HEK293T cells co-transfected with the indicated plasmids. (G) c(s) distribution and 2-D shape and size distribution plot of extZnF1 protein by analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) analysis. The major peak at an S-value of 1.50S corresponds to ~11kDa, the molecular weight of a dimer of extZnF1 protein.

Combined deletion of ZnF0 and ZnF1 creates a monomeric BCL11A protein

To account for the contrasting findings upon deletion of ZnF0 or ZnF1, we propose a model for steady-state BCL11A protein production (Fig. 4A). As first translated, monomeric BCL11A is susceptible to proteasomal degradation due to the presence of an exposed degron in ZnF1. Tetramerization of BCL11A driven by ZnF0 facilitates dimerization of ZnF1, thereby shielding its internal degron (4143). Multimeric BCL11A is thereby rendered resistant to proteasomal degradation, consistent with its very long half-life in cells (22).

Fig. 4. BCL11A lacking ZnF0 and ZnF1 is a stable monomer.

Fig. 4.

(A) A model depicts ZnF0-mediated BCL11A self-tetramerization as essential for production of stready-state protein. BCL11A monomer is unstable as the putative degron in ZnF1 is exposed, thereby rendering protein susceptible to proteasomal degradation. Tetramerization of ZnF0 facilitates dimerization of ZnF1, which masks the ZnF1 degron. The model posits that assembly of the ZnF0 tetramer protects BCL11A from proteasomal degradation. (B) HUDEP-2 cells were engineered with discrete, in-frame deletion of both ZnF0 and ZnF1 (ΔZnF01), or engineered with replacement of I60 and L61 to alanines together with deletion of ZnF1 (AA/ΔZnF1) within full-length BCL11A. The steady-state protein levels of BCL11A ΔZnF01 and AA/ΔZnF1 were assessed by Western blotting. ΔZnF0, ΔZnF1, I60A/L61A clones were included as controls. (C) Nuclear extractions from the indicated HUDEP-2 cells were incubated with 2.5% Trimton X-100 and 5% 1,6-hexanediol for 30 min to disrupt interactions mediated by regions other than ZnF0 and ZnF1 in BCL11A, and then subjected to native-PAGE and blotted with anti-BCL11A antibody. The arrows indicate the expected positions of WT and mutant BCL11A proteins. BCL11A ΔZnF0 and I60A/L61A were below detection, despite MG-132 treatment of cells.

If ZnF1 harbors the sole strong degron in BCL11A, expression of protein discretely lacking both ZnF0 and ZnF1 should be stable, despite an inability to assume a tetramer state. We first confirmed that removal of both ZnF0 and ZnF1 abolished multimer assembly in HEK293T cells co-transfected with Myc- and GFP-tagged versions of BCL11A (fig. S6A). Native BCL11A protein lacking ZnF0 and ZnF1 migrated at the size of a monomer by native gel electrophoresis (fig. S6B). A similar result was observed with a combination of tetrameric deficient mutation(s) and removal of ZnF1 (fig. S6A, B). We next engineered HUDEP-2 cells with biallelic deletions of both ZnF0 and ZnF1 (ΔZnF01), as well as cells with I60A/L61A in the context of ZnF1 deletion (AA/ΔZnF1) (Fig. 4B). Independent ΔZnF01 and AA/ΔZnF1 clones exhibited elevated levels of steady-state protein (Fig. 4B). Notably, the elevated protein level in the tetramerization-deficient mutant AA/ΔZnF1 further supports the conclusion that the lack of stable BCL11A protein reflects the failure of tetramer assembly rather than a consequence of an unfolded protein response. Compared to WT BCL11A, both ΔZnF01 and AA/ΔZnF1 proteins behave as a monomer in native gels (Fig. 4C). As with other domain-deletion mutants, BCL11A RNA transcript levels were unaffected (fig. S6C). The half-life of ΔZnF01 BCL11A was somewhat reduced as compared with wild-type BCL11A (fig. S6D, E). Production of monomeric forms of stable BCL11A in cells harboring ΔZnF01 or AA/ΔZnF1 alleles is consistent with, and supports, the proposed model (Fig. 4A).

Precise genetic modification of HUDEP2 cells has been critical in dissecting the structure-function relationships of BCL11A described here. Given the intrinsic property of ZnF0 to self-assembly as a tetramer, it seemed likely that BCL11A protein behaves similarly in all cells in which BCL11A is expressed. To assess the state of endogenous BCL11A in short-lived, primary CD34+ HSPCs, we expressed constructs containing ZnF0+ZnF1 (cDNA spanning both ZnFs, ZnF01) and observed that ZnF01 increased the level of steady-state protein, consistent with assembly into newly synthesized multimeric protein (fig. S7A). Furthermore, expression of ZnF01 linked to an Fc-domain attenuated this increase due to degradation of ZnF01 or the assembled complex by TRIM-away (44) (fig. S7A). By native gel electrophoresis, endogenous BCL11A in primary CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor (HSPC) cells and immortal B-lymphoid cells of the Jeko1 line (45) behaved as a high molecular weight species similar to that in HUDEP-2 cells (fig. S7B, C) These findings strongly suggest that the multimeric state of BCL11A is similar in all cells, as it driven by the intrinsic property of ZnF0 to form a tetramer.

Tetramerization of BCL11A is critical for γ-globin repression

ΔZnF01 and AA/ΔZnF1 cells afford the opportunity to assess the contribution of tetramer formation and multivalency to γ-globin repression, independent of the role of ZnF0 in production of steady-state protein. To test the function of engineered monomeric BCL11A, we examined globin levels on days 0 and 7 of differentiation (Fig. 5A, B). Despite elevated steady-state protein, cells expressing ΔZnF01 or AA/ΔZnF1 BCL11A exhibited a defect in HbF silencing, principally upon differentiation at which time globin expression is robust. The levels of both γ-globin RNA and HbF protein were substantially elevated as compared with wild-type and ΔZnF1 cells (Fig. 5B, fig. S8A, B). Consistent with these findings, chromosome accessibility at the γ-globin promoters was increased in differentiated ΔZnF01 cells, as assessed by ATAC-Seq analysis (Fig. 5C) (46). These results demonstrate that monomeric ΔZnF01 BCL11A is defective for HbF silencing. Thus, tetramerization of BCL11A is critical for proper γ-globin repression.

Fig. 5. Engineered monomeric BCL11A is defective in γ-globin repression.

Fig. 5.

(A) RT-qPCR analysis showed the percentage of γ-globin mRNA to total non-α-globin mRNAs in undifferentiated HUDEP-2 cells. Error bars = S.D. (B) Similar analysis on day 7 of differentiation. Error bars = S.D. (C) Chromosome accessibility at the β-globin locus in the indicated HUDEP-2 cells was assessed by ATAC-Seq, on days 0 and 7 of differentiation. For each sample, three biological replicates were performed and the signals were combined to generate tracks. γ-globin promoter regions are highlighted in pink. (D) WT and ΔZnF01 HUDEP-2 cells transduced with lentivirus carrying ZBTB7A shRNA were subjected to BCL11A CUT&RUN analysis. BCL11A occupancy at the γ-globin promoters are highlighted in pink. (E) Venn diagrams of genome-wide colocalization of BCL11A peaks that contain TGRCCR or TGACCA motif in WT and ΔZnF01 HUDEP-2 cells. The total numbers of each motif in the genome are shown.

Monomeric BCL11A exhibits defects in chromatin occupancy and NuRD complex engagement

In seeking to uncover how monomeric ΔZnF01 BCL11A differs from tetramer BCL11A in repression, we first assessed occupancy at the γ-globin promoter. Despite its location at the C-terminus of BCL11A, we sought to exclude the possibility that the ZnF4-6 DNA-binding domain might be occluded. We performed BCL11A CUT&RUN (47) in wild-type and ΔZnF01 HUDEP-2 cells. In wild-type cells, the γ-globin locus is very highly repressed, and virtually inaccessible, as assessed by ATAC (Fig. 5C) (46). To render the locus more accessible and permit BCL11A antibody penetration, we performed CUT&RUN in cells depleted of ZBTB7A/LRF. As shown in Fig. 5D, occupancy at the γ-globin promoters appeared similar between ΔZnF01 and wild-type cells. Hence, we infer that monomeric ΔZnF01 BCL11A is competent to bind to its target site in the γ-globin promoters. Consistent with a defect in repression, however, ΔZnF01 protein failed to fully evict NF-Y at the locus (fig. S8C). To assess chromatin occupancy more broadly, we enumerated CUT&RUN peaks genome-wide at both consensus (TGRCCR) and cognate (TGACCA) BCL11A binding motifs. We observed extensive and highly significant overlap of peaks between WT and ΔZnF01 (Fig. 5E). Despite the increased level of ΔZnF01 protein, however, the number of peaks was modestly reduced, suggesting that the monomer may be less able to occupy, or be retained, at target sites. Genome-wide analysis also showed that ΔZnF01 exhibited a weakened motif footprint compared to WT (data not shown). Taken together, these findings indicate that engineered monomeric BCL11A occupies chromatin at its target sites, and therefore retains DNA-binding capacity, but aspects of its function may be attenuated relative to normal BCL11A protein in chromatin.

A canonical N-terminal peptide sequence of BCL11A engages the NuRD complex through interaction with RBBP4 (30, 32). Prior genetic analysis established a functional role for specific NuRD subunits in HbF silencing (31). To assess BCL11A-dependent NuRD engagement, we removed the NuRD-binding sequence in HUDEP-2 cells by biallelic gene editing (Fig. 6A). As anticipated, ΔN BCL11A-expressing cells failed to interact with the NuRD complex, as assessed by immunoprecipitation for the MTA2 subunit (Fig. 6B). Despite expression of BCL11A protein (fig. S8A), HbF repression was impaired in differentiated cells (Fig. 6 C, D, fig. S9B, C, D). In undifferentiated cells, which express globin transcripts at a low level, the fraction of γ-globin transcripts was not significantly increased compared with wild-type cells. In agreement with these observations, accessibility at the γ-globin promoters was increased only upon differentiation (Fig. 6E). Thus, consistent with prior inferences, we validated that BCL11A-dependent NuRD engagement is required for proper HbF silencing.

Fig. 6. Monomeric BCL11A is defective for stable NuRD engagement.

Fig. 6.

(A) A schematic of biallelic excision of the N-terminal NuRD-binding domain in BCL11A in HUDEP-2 cells by CRISPR/Cas9 editing. (B) Total cell lysates (INPUT), and anti-BCL11A immunoprecipitates (IPs) were blotted with the indicated antibodies in WT, KO and ΔN HUDEP-2 cells. (C) RT-qPCR analysis showed the percentage of γ-globin mRNA to total non-α-globin mRNAs in the indicated undifferentiated HUDEP-2 cells. Error bars = S.D. (D) Similar analysis on day 7 of differentiation. Error bars = S.D. (E) Chromosome accessibility at the β-globin locus in the indicated HUDEP-2 cells was assessed by ATAC-Seq, on days 0, 4 and 7 of differentiation. Two replicates of day 0 and 4 samples, three replicates of day 7 samples were performed and the signals were combined to generate tracks. γ-globin promoter regions are highlighted in pink. (F) Total cell lysates (INPUT), anti-IgG and anti-BCL11A immunoprecipitates (IPs) were blotted with the indicated antibodies in WT and engineered ΔZnF0, I60A/L61A, ΔZnF1, ΔZnF01 and AA/ΔZnF1 HUDEP-2 cells. (G) A model depicting the role of the BCL11A tetramer in repression. In WT adult stage erythroid cells, the BCL11A tetramer stably engages the NuRD complex in a concerted fashion and prevents NF-Y binding by steric hindrance to repress γ-globin expression. However, although capable of binding the TGACCA motif at the γ-globin promoters, BCL11A monomer fails to stably engage NuRD and due to its overall smaller size is unable to displace NF-Y. Both features may contribute to a defect in repression.

The similar phenotypes of ΔZnF01 and AA/ΔZnF1 with ΔN BCL11A-expressing cells led us to examine engagement of the NuRD complex in cells expressing monomeric BCL11A. As shown in Fig. 6F, interaction of ΔZnF01 or AA/ΔZnF1 with NuRD was markedly impaired, as revealed by coimmunoprecipitation for CHD4 and MTA2. In chromatin analyses, we observed occupancy of MTA2 at the HBB and HBD loci, which was attentuated, as expected, in ΔN cells (fig. S9E). Occupancy of MTA2 appeared similarly reduced in ΔZnF01 cells (fig. S9F). The severe deficit in NuRD complex engagement of monomeric protein in cells, despite the presence of a single NuRD-binding motif, further underscores the critical role of the tetramer in BCL11A function. We infer that monomeric BCL11A is defective in repression at the γ-globin locus, in part due to a deficit in NuRD complex engagement.

Discussion

Our principal finding that ZnF0-mediated tetramerization of BCL11A is necessary for both production of steady-state protein and proper HbF silencing provides new perspectives on the native state of BCL11A and its function, as well as on opportunities for possible therapeutic intervention.

Transcription factors are often found in dimers or higher order complexes. Most commonly such multimers establish a high-affinity binding domain, as illustrated by dimeric bHLH factors (48) or tetrameric p53 protein (49). Whereas ZnFs are typically viewed as DNA-binding domains, they also participate in protein-protein interactions, such as in GATA (50) and Ikaros factors (51). To our knowledge, however, BCL11A protein presents a unique example in which multivalency is established by a ZnF that forms a stable tetramer within an otherwise largely unstructured protein. In effect, tetramerization is “hard-wired” in BCL11A, as well as its close paralog BCL11B, and therefore likely characterizes the protein in all cells in which it is expressed. Our findings in primary CD34+ HPSCs and a B-cell line support this inference (fig. S7C). While we have found that tetramer formation is critical, the nature of protein complexes of BCL11A is likely more complex, as suggested by its behavior in native gels (see Fig. 4C, fig. S4K, S6B, S7B, C). For example, dimer formation driven by ZnF1 may bring together BCL11A polypeptides of different tetramers, thereby generating a lattice of protein. Other studies will be required to address these possibilities.

Tetramerization via ZnF0 serves a critical function in stabilization of BCL11A protein by preventing proteasomal degradation of monomers through shielding a degron located in ZnF1 (41). The intrinsic property of recombinant ZnF1 to form dimers suggests that ZnF0 tetramerization promotes ZnF1 dimerization, perhaps during protein translation. Further studies are needed to define the structure of ZnF1 dimers, identify the E3 ubiquitin ligase(s) that act on the degron, and establish how events are coordinated as nascent peptides are synthesized. Expression of stable monomeric ΔZnF01 indicates that no other strong degrons reside elsewhere in BCL11A. Taken together, the pathway of stabilization we describe for BCL11A protein likely accounts for its long half-life in cells.

Besides its role in controlling protein stability, tetramerization confers additional properties to BCL11A that affect chromatin occupancy and co-repressor engagement. Engineered monomeric BCL11A occupies chromatin at target sites, but seems to do so less well than wild-type protein (Fig. 5E). The precise basis for this apparent deficit is unclear. Current methods do not allow for quantitative assessment of relative affinities of multimeric protein complexes for DNA. It is tempting to speculate that the observed differences in genome-wide chromatin occupancy may reflect the striking deficit in engagement of the NuRD complex by monomeric ΔZnF01. Taken together, our findings indicate that the tetramer state is required to ensure assembly of a repressive environment at the promoter. Cryo-EM studies and stoichiometry experiments indicate that each NuRD complex bears 4 RBBP4 subunits (32), which remarkably corresponds, either by chance or evolutionary design, to the 4 NuRD-binding sequences on a BCL11A tetramer. Concerted engagement of NuRD by the tetramer may anchor NuRD complexes more stably than a monomer within large protein complexes at the γ-globin promoters. Previously, we presented evidence that BCL11A or unrelated proteins (such as dCas9) act as a steric barrier to NF-Y binding at the proximal CCAAT motif in the γ-globin promoters (10). Weaker eviction of NF-Y by ΔZnF01 due its overall smaller size may also contribute to impaired repression. We propose an updated model for repression at the γ-globin promoter in which tetrameric BCL11A cooperatively engages the NuRD complex in a stable fashion (Fig. 6G). The extent to which transcription factor multivalency, as described here, is a special feature evolved for repression is unknown. Although γ-globin repression is reversed by removal of BCL11A (or ZBTB7A), the γ-globin loci are remarkably inaccessible (as assessed by ATAC) in adult-type erythroid precursors. We speculate that the multivalent state of BCL11A contributes to occlusion of the locus.

BCL1A is a modular protein, comprised of 7 ZnFs, a NuRD binding sequence, and large disordered regions. As such, the protein lacks structured domains for identification of small molecule ligands that serve as starting points for therapeutic development of inhibitors or protein degraders. Whether more tractable protein targets for HbF reactivation remain to be identified is uncertain. Given that BCL11A acts proximally in γ-globin repression (9, 10) and has been validated clinically as a target (21, 23), efforts targeted to the protein offer the best prospect for mechanism-based therapy. Our findings regarding the expression and assembly of BCL11A protein identify vulnerabilities that present unforeseen opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Tetramer formation mediated by ZnF0 constitutes a vulnerability for HbF repression. Agents that prevent or disrupt tetramerization would lead to down-regulation of BCL11A protein, and relieve HbF silencing. Similarly, agents that perturb dimerization of ZnF1 would also promote proteasomal degradation of BCL11A. Of special note, however, the tetramer structure of ZnF0 provides a stable domain in an otherwise largely disordered protein. Though assembled from a ZnF, the overall structure of the tetramer is distinct from that of ZnF domains. Discovery of ligands that bind the tetramer surface may represent a starting point for small molecules to down-modulate BCL11A protein in a therapeutic context.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material
Data_s6.zip
Data_s7.zip
Data_s8.zip
Data_s5.zip
Data_s4.zip
Data_s3.zip
Data_s2.zip
Data_s1.zip

Supplementary Materials – separate file on supplementary template

Acknowledgments:

We thank Drs. Jiyoung Hong and Victoria Hargreaves for contributions to initial characterization of BCL11A protein, and Dan Finley and Angela Koehler for helpful discussion. We also thank Mark Rackham (Isomorphic Labs) for advice on structural predictions of the ZnF1 dimer. We thank the Molecular Biology Core Facility at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and the Center for Macromolecular Interactions at Harvard Medical School. Computational analyses were conducted on the O2 High Performance Computer Cluster, supported by the Research Computing Group at Harvard Medical School. AUC analyses were performed at the Johnson Foundation Biophysics and Structural Biology Core at the Perelman School of Medicine with the support an NIH High-End Instrumentation Grant (S10-OD018483). SHO is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Funding:

Research support was provided by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Footnotes

Competing interests: Authors declare that they have no competing interests

Data and materials availability:

The crystallographic structure for ZnF0 (PDB 9B4P) has been deposited to the publicly accessible database Protein Data Bank available at https://www.rcsb.org/structure.

References

  • 1.Orkin SH, Molecular Medicine: Found in Translation. Med (N Y) 2, 122–136 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Watson J, The significance of the paucity of sickle cells in newborn Negro infants. Am J Med Sci 215, 419–423 (1948). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Menzel S et al. , A QTL influencing F cell production maps to a gene encoding a zinc-finger protein on chromosome 2p15. Nat Genet 39, 1197–1199 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Uda M et al. , Genome-wide association study shows BCL11A associated with persistent fetal hemoglobin and amelioration of the phenotype of beta-thalassemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 1620–1625 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Collins FS et al. , A point mutation in the A gamma-globin gene promoter in Greek hereditary persistence of fetal haemoglobin. Nature 313, 325–326 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gelinas R, Endlich B, Pfeiffer C, Yagi M, Stamatoyannopoulos G, G to A substitution in the distal CCAAT box of the A gamma-globin gene in Greek hereditary persistence of fetal haemoglobin. Nature 313, 323–325 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sankaran VG et al. , Human fetal hemoglobin expression is regulated by the developmental stage-specific repressor BCL11A. Science 322, 1839–1842 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martyn GE et al. , Natural regulatory mutations elevate the fetal globin gene via disruption of BCL11A or ZBTB7A binding. Nat Genet 50, 498–503 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu N et al. , Direct Promoter Repression by BCL11A Controls the Fetal to Adult Hemoglobin Switch. Cell 173, 430–442 e417 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu N et al. , Transcription factor competition at the gamma-globin promoters controls hemoglobin switching. Nat Genet 53, 511–520 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu X et al. , Disruption of the MBD2-NuRD complex but not MBD3-NuRD induces high level HbF expression in human adult erythroid cells. Haematologica 104, 2361–2371 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grosveld F, van Assendelft GB, Greaves DR, Kollias G, Position-independent, high-level expression of the human beta-globin gene in transgenic mice. Cell 51, 975–985 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Deng W et al. , Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell 149, 1233–1244 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Masuda T et al. , Transcription factors LRF and BCL11A independently repress expression of fetal hemoglobin. Science 351, 285–289 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bauer DE et al. , An erythroid enhancer of BCL11A subject to genetic variation determines fetal hemoglobin level. Science 342, 253–257 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Basak A et al. , BCL11A deletions result in fetal hemoglobin persistence and neurodevelopmental alterations. J Clin Invest 125, 2363–2368 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brendel C et al. , Lineage-specific BCL11A knockdown circumvents toxicities and reverses sickle phenotype. J Clin Invest 126, 3868–3878 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu J et al. , Correction of sickle cell disease in adult mice by interference with fetal hemoglobin silencing. Science 334, 993–996 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Canver MC et al. , BCL11A enhancer dissection by Cas9-mediated in situ saturating mutagenesis. Nature 527, 192–197 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vierstra J et al. , Functional footprinting of regulatory DNA. Nat Methods 12, 927–930 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Frangoul H et al. , CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and beta-Thalassemia. N Engl J Med 384, 252–260 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mehta S et al. , Temporal resolution of gene derepression and proteome changes upon PROTAC-mdeiated degradation of BCL11A protein in erythroid cells. Cell Chem Biol 29, 1273–1287 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Esrick EB et al. , Post-Transcriptional Genetic Silencing of BCL11A to Treat Sickle Cell Disease. N Engl J Med 384, 205–215 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rivers A, Jagadeeswaran R, Lavelle D, Potential role of LSD1 inhibitors in the treatment of sickle cell disease: a review of preclinical animal model data. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 315, R840–R847 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cui S et al. , The LSD1 inhibitor RN-1 induces fetal hemoglobin synthesis and reduces disease pathology in sickle cell mice. Blood 126, 386–396 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Molokie R et al. , Oral tetrahydrouridine and decitabine for non-cytotoxic epigenetic gene regulation in sickle cell disease: A randomized phase 1 study. PLoS Med 14, e1002382 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Renneville A et al. , EHMT1 and EHMT2 inhibition induces fetal hemoglobin expression. Blood 126, 1930–1939 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ting PY et al. , A molecular glue degrader of the WIZ transcription factor for fetal hemoglobin induction. Science 385, 91–99 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bradner JE et al. , Chemical genetic strategy identifies histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and HDAC2 as therapeutic targets in sickle cell disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 12617–12622 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lejon S et al. , Insights into association of the NuRD complex with FOG-1 from the crystal structure of an RbAp48.FOG-1 complex. J Biol Chem 286, 1196–1203 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sher F et al. , Rational targeting of a NuRD subcomplex guided by comprehensive in situ mutagenesis. Nat Genet 51, 1149–1159 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arvindekar S et al. , Molecular architecture of nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase sub-complexes by integrative structure determination. Protein Sci 31, e4387 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xue B, Dunbrack RL, Williams RW, Dunker AK, Uversky VN, PONDR-FIT: a meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids. Biochim Biophys Acta 1804, 996–1010 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abramson J et al. , Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grabarczyk P et al. , The N-Terminal CCHC Zinc Finger Motif Mediates Homodimerization of Transcription Factor BCL11B. Mol Cell Biol 38, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shen Y et al. , Pathogenic BCL11A variants provide insights into the mechanisms of human fetal hemoglobin silencing. PLoS Genet 17, e1009835 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kurita R et al. , Establishment of immortalized human erythroid progenitor cell lines able to produce enucleated red blood cells. PLoS One 8, e59890 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang P et al. , HIC2 controls developmental hemoglobin switching by repressing BCL11A transcription. Nat Genet 54, 1417–1426 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mehta S, Byanbat A, Orkin SH, Nabet B, High-efficiency knock-in of degradable tags (dTAG) at endogenous loci in cell lines. . Methods in Enzymology 681, 1–22 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kussie PH et al. , Structure of the MDM2 oncoprotein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain. Science 274, 948–953 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guharoy M, Lazar T, Macossay-Castillo M, Tompa P, Degron masking outlines degronons, co-degrading functional modules in the proteome. Commun Biol 5, 445 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Johnson PR, Swanson R, Rakhilina L, Hochstrasser M, Degradation signal masking by heterodimerization of MATalpha2 and MATa1 blocks their mutual destruction by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cell 94, 217–227 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hattori T, Ohoka N, Inoue Y, Hayashi H, Onozaki K, C/EBP family transcription factors are degraded by the proteasome but stabilized by forming dimer. Oncogene 22, 1273–1280 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Clift D, So C, McEwan WA, James LC, Schuh M, Acute and rapid degradation of endogenous proteins by Trim-Away. Nat Protoc 13, 2149–2175 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jeon HJ, Kim CW, Yoshino T, Akagi T, Establishment and characterization of a mantle cell lymphoma cell line. Br J Haematol 102, 1323–1326 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ, ATAC-seq: A Method for Assaying Chromatin Accessibility Genome-Wide. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 109, 21 29 21–21 29 29 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Skene PJ, Henikoff S, An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites. Elife 6, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vinson CR, Sigler PB, McKnight SL, Scissors-grip model for DNA recognition by a family of leucine zipper proteins. Science 246, 911–916 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gencel-Augusto J et al. , Dimeric p53 Mutant Elicits Unique Tumor-Suppressive Activities through an Altered Metabolic Program. Cancer Discov 13, 1230–1249 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bresnick EH, Katsumura KR, Lee HY, Johnson KD, Perkins AS, Master regulatory GATA transcription factors: mechanistic principles and emerging links to hematologic malignancies. Nucleic Acids Res 40, 5819–5831 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Molnar A, Georgopoulos K, The Ikaros gene encodes a family of functionally diverse zinc finger DNA-binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol 14, 8292–8303 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material
Data_s6.zip
Data_s7.zip
Data_s8.zip
Data_s5.zip
Data_s4.zip
Data_s3.zip
Data_s2.zip
Data_s1.zip

Data Availability Statement

The crystallographic structure for ZnF0 (PDB 9B4P) has been deposited to the publicly accessible database Protein Data Bank available at https://www.rcsb.org/structure.

RESOURCES