Abstract
Tumor immune escape is a major challenge in cancer treatment, and targeted immune escape therapy has become a key strategy for cancer treatment. As an important deubiquitinating enzyme, ubiquitin-specific protease 10 (USP10) participates in the process of tumor development by adjusting the balance between ubiquitination and deubiquitination of substrate proteins. Recently, USP10 has been shown to be closely related to tumor immune escape, where it serves to reduce the immunogenicity of tumor cells by stabilizing immune checkpoints and promotes tumor immune escape. In this review, we focus on the structural and functional characteristics of USP10 and elaborate on the biological function of USP10 in the occurrence and development of tumors, as well as its role in immune escape, including the regulation of immune checkpoints and the effect on immune cells in the immune microenvironment. It is possible to improve the efficacy of traditional cancer therapies by appropriately regulating the expression of USP10. The aim of this review is to provide a reference for further understanding the mechanism of tumor immune escape and the development of new tumor treatment methods.
Keywords: tumors, inhibitors, immune checkpoint blockade, therapy, targets
Background
Ubiquitination is a reversible process in which deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) specifically hydrolyze small ubiquitin molecules from target proteins or precursor proteins by hydrolyzing peptide bonds, isopeptide bonds, or ester bonds at the carboxy-terminal of ubiquitin to protect target proteins from ubiquitin–proteasome degradation.1,2 Ubiquitin-specific proteases are the largest subfamily of DUBs, comprising approximately 56 members; these enzymes are characterized by a catalytic core that is associated with ubiquitin binding (Figure 1).3,4 USPs are involved in various intracellular life activities and are also closely related to human diseases, such as tumors and inflammation.5,6 USP10, a member of the USP family, is a cysteine protease that is widely distributed in human tissues and has enormous significance in diverse cellular processes and various human diseases. 7 Studies have shown that USP10 acts as an anti-stress molecule in oxidative stress, viral infection, heat shock, and other stressful environments.8,9 In terms of metabolism, USP10 regulates lipid formation, lactic acid production, and glycolysis gene expression. 10
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of the domain architectures of human USPs. The red arrow points to the specific structural composition of USP10
Tumor immune escape is a process by which tumor cells evade the recognition and attack of the immune system through a variety of mechanisms, which enables tumors to continue to grow and metastasize in the body. The mechanism of tumor immune escape is complex, involving changes in the characteristics of tumor cells, immunosuppression of the tumor microenvironment, and dysfunction of the host immune system. 11 Among the many molecular mechanisms that affect tumor immune escape, the role of DUBs has gradually attracted attention.12,13 As an important member of the DUB family, USP10 plays a key role in the process of tumor immune escape by deubiquitinating substrate proteins to regulate their stability, localization, and function.14,15 An in-depth study of the mechanism of USP10 in tumor immune escape is crucial to elucidate the pathogenesis of tumors and develop new treatment strategies.
Biological Function of USP10
USP10, also known as UBPO, is located on chromosome 16q24.1 and contains 18 exons. 16 It comprises 798 amino acids with a relative molecular weight of 93 kDa. 17 Figure 1 shows the molecular structure of USP10 (red arrow). USP10 mainly consists of an Ataxin-2 C domain and a USP domain. 7 Ataxin-2 is a polyglutamine protein involved in biological processes such as RNA metabolism and cytoskeletal recombination. 18 The USP domain has a modified catalytic site on it and participates in the deubiquitination of various proteins. 19 USP10 is mainly located in the cytoplasm. It deubiquitinates various proteins in the cytoplasm, thereby regulating cell proliferation, cell cycle, cell apoptosis, autophagy, DNA damage repair, and other important physiological processes (Table 1). 57 Based on its unique structural characteristics, the active pocket and amino acid segment of the catalytic domain of USP have become key targets for the design of small molecular inhibitors.
Table 1.
Role and Biological Function of USP10 in Various Types of Cancer
| Role of USP10 | Mechanism | Types | REF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proliferation and metastasis | Suppression of USP10 accelerated the degradation of HDAC7 and weakened NSCLC growth | Non–small cell lung cancer | 20 |
| Proliferation and metastasis | USP10 inhibited YAP1 ubiquitination and degradation to promote Cyr61 expression, which induced immune escape and promoted the growth and metastasis of PAAD | Pancreatic adenocarcinoma | 21 |
| Proliferation, migration, and invasion | Loss of USP10 could restore the G3BP1-induced proliferation, migration, and invasion of ovarian cancer cells | Ovarian cancer | 22 |
| Proliferation and migration | USP10 could induce PCNA deubiquitination to promote hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and migration | Hepatocellular carcinoma | 23 |
| Proliferation, migration, and cell cycle | USP10 was involved in vascular remodeling by directly promoting VSMC proliferation and migration via stabilization of Skp2 protein expression | Vascular smooth muscle cell | 24 |
| Proliferation | USP10 activated PTEN by preventing its K63-linked polyubiquitination mediated by TRIM25 and suppressed the Akt/mammalian target of the rapamycin signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting NSCLC proliferation | Non–small cell lung cancer | 25 |
| Proliferation and metastasis | NLRP7 deubiquitination by USP10 promotes tumor progression and tumor-associated macrophage polarization in colorectal cancer | Colorectal cancer | 26 |
| Proliferation | USP10 promoted the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma by deubiquitinating and stabilizing YAP/TAZ | Hepatocellular carcinoma | 27 |
| Metastasis | USP10 promoted hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through deubiquitinating and stabilizing Smad4 protein | Hepatocellular carcinoma | 28 |
| Proliferation and cell cycle | Inhibition of USP10 suppressed the proliferation of chronic myeloid leukemia cells, which depended on the SKP2 status | Chronic myeloid leukemia | 29 |
| Proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis | Spautin-1(USP10 inhibitor) inhibited prostate cancer progression by inhibiting the EGFR pathway | Prostate cancer | 30 |
| Proliferation | TRAF4 promoted fibroblast proliferation in keloids by destabilizing p53 via interacting with USP10 | Fibroblast | 31 |
| Proliferation | USP10 regulated MSI2 stability via deubiquitination and promoted tumor proliferation in colon cancer | Colon cancer | 32 |
| Proliferation, migration, and apoptosis | USP10 promoted proliferation and migration and inhibited the apoptosis of endometrial stromal cells in endometriosis by activating the Raf-1/MEK/ERK pathway | Endometrial stromal | 33 |
| Proliferation | Oncogene-induced senescence mediated by c-Myc requires USP10-dependent deubiquitination and stabilization of p14ARF | Foreskin fibroblasts, fetal lung | 34 |
| Proliferation | USP10 promoted cell survival and growth, dependent on G3BP2-mediated signaling | Prostate cancer | 35 |
| Proliferation | USP10 inhibited lung cancer cell growth and invasion by upregulating PTEN | Lung cancer | 36 |
| Proliferation and cell cycle | USP10 antagonized c-Myc transcriptional activation through sirtuin-6 (SIRT6) stabilization to suppress tumor formation | Colon cancer | 37 |
| Proliferation and cell cycle | USP10 was closely connected with RBM15 alterations, and cell cycles were regulated by it | Pancreatic adenocarcinoma | 38 |
| Cell cycle | USP10 directly interacted with EIF4G1, while acting as a negative regulator for EIF4G1-mediated functions | Lung cancer | 39 |
| Apoptosis and cell cycle | Suppression of the USP10/CCND1 axis induced glioblastoma cell apoptosis | Glioblastoma | 40 |
| Apoptosis and fibrosis | FSTL1 treatment ameliorated cardiac dysfunction in MI with co-existent T2DM, possibly through the inhibition of myocardial fibrosis and apoptosis by upregulating USP10/Notch1 signaling | Myocardium | 41 |
| Apoptosis | USP10 inhibited the dopamine-induced reactive oxygen species−dependent apoptosis of neuronal cells by stimulating the antioxidant Nrf2 activity | Parkinson’s disease | 42 |
| Apoptosis | USP10 abated LPS-induced renal tubular epithelial cell injury and apoptosis | Renal tubular epithelial | 43 |
| Apoptosis | FoxO4 negatively modulated USP10 transcription to aggravate the apoptosis via blocking the Hippo/YAP pathway | Cardiomyocyte | 44 |
| Apoptosis | USP10 inhibitor (Wu-5) enhanced acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell death via inhibiting FLT3 and AMPK pathways | Acute myeloid leukemia | 45 |
| Apoptosis | USP10 suppressed inflammation and apoptosis through the inhibition of TAK1 signaling | Cerebral ischemia | 46 |
| Apoptosis | CNYP granule promoted apoptosis and inhibited inflammation in endometrial stromal cells by inhibiting USP10 | Endometriosis | 47 |
| Apoptosis | USP10 inhibited apoptosis of long-term hematopoietic stem cells | Hematopoietic stem cells | 48 |
| Apoptosis | USP10 inhibited stress-induced ROS production and apoptosis in HTLV-1-infected T cells | Leukemia | 8 |
| Autophagy | USP10 promoted autophagy-related pathways and molecules and increased the synthesis of autophagosomes in NASH | Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis | 49 |
| Autophagy | USP10 predicted the prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma | Osteosarcoma | 50 |
| Autophagy | USP10 deubiquitinated LC3B to increase LC3B levels and autophagic activity | Human cell | 51 |
| Autophagy | The mammalian ortholog of yeast ATG6 (Beclin1) controlled the p53 levels by regulating the deubiquitination activity of USP10 | Human cell | 17 |
| DNA damage repair | DnaK bound to USP10, reducing p53 stability and anticancer functions | Various types of cancer | 52,53 |
| DNA damage | USP10 deubiquitinated and stabilized MutS Homolog 2 to regulate cellular sensitivity to DNA damage | Lung cancer | 54 |
| DNA damage | USP10 led to persistent recruitment of mono-ubiquitinated PCNA and polymerase-η to nuclear foci, causing an increase in mutation frequency | HeLa cells | 55 |
| DNA damage | USP10 regulated p53 localization and stability by deubiquitinating p53 | Clear cell carcinomas | 56 |
The Role of USP10 in Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis
As an important tumor suppressor protein, p53 inhibits cell proliferation and tumor formation by promoting cell apoptosis.58,59 In normal cells, p53 is ubiquitinated by interaction with the E3 ligase murine double minute 2 in the nucleus, then exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and finally degraded by the proteasome, thereby promoting apoptosis.56,60–62 Continuous degradation keeps the p53 protein at a low level.
Studies have shown that USP10 deubiquitinates and stabilizes p53 in the cytoplasm, enhances the function of p53, and enables p53 to re-enter the nucleus. 63 In the case of DNA damage and ataxia-telangiectasia mutant (ATM) activation, USP10 is phosphorylated and accumulates in the nucleus. 56 Moreover, USP10 knockout has been shown to inhibit colon cancer cell apoptosis by promoting wild-type p53 degradation. 56 In addition, previous research has shown that USP10 knockout in HCT116 cells with wild-type p53 increased their proliferation, but USP10 knockout in HCT116 cells with p53 double deletion had no effect on their proliferation. 56 USP10 has been found to promote cell proliferation in p53 mutant cells, but the specific molecular mechanism remains unclear. 64 Another study revealed that USP10 regulated Musashi-2 (MSI2) stability via deubiquitination and promoted tumor proliferation in colon cancer. 32 These results demonstrate that USP10 stabilized the protein level of p53 in cells by deubiquitination of p53, thus enhancing the anticancer effect of wild-type p53 on cells and achieving the effect of inhibiting cell proliferation and apoptosis (Figure 2A). 56 Currently, studies on the effect of USP10 on tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis mostly focus on the p53 protein pathway, which may also be related to the tumor suppressor effect of the p53 protein itself.
Figure 2.
The biological function of USP10. Some mechanistic pathways of USP10 in proliferation and apoptosis (A), cell cycle (B), autophagy (C), and DNA damage repair (D) pathways
The Role of USP10 in Cell Cycle
As a member of the histone deacetylase family, sirtuin-6 (SIRT6) is a tumor suppressor protein encoded by genes localized to telomeres in human cells. SIRT6 controls cellular senescence and telomere structure by deacetylating histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9). 65 Through proteomic analysis of SIRT6, some scholars found that USP10 deubiquitinated and stabilized SIRT6. 66 In addition, the overexpression of USP10 or SIRT6 significantly reduced the G2/M and S phases and increased the G0/G1 phase of HCT116 colon cancer cells; the overexpression of USP10 and SIRT6 had a more significant effect on the cell cycle. 67 The knockout of USP10 or SIRT6 promoted cell cycle progression by increasing S and G2/M phases, and the effect of the knockout of USP10 and SIRT6 was more obvious. 67 The aforementioned information suggested that USP10 and SIRT6 synergistically regulated the cell cycle of colon cancer cells. 67 Because SIRT6 performed its anticancer function by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of c-Myc, it regulated tumor cell cycle progression by regulating the expression levels of some key genes.34,68 Subsequent experiments found that the overexpression of SIRT6 or p53 partially restored the interference of USP10 on the cell cycle, while the co-expression of p53 and SIRT6 completely restored the interference. Therefore, the researchers concluded that USP10 inhibited the cell cycle process by enhancing the SIRT6-and p53-mediated inhibition of c-Myc. 37
A recent study showed that USP10 interacted with CCND1 and prevented the polymerization of its K48- but not K63-connections in glioblastoma U251 and HS683 cells, thereby increasing the stability of CCND1. 40 In line with the effect of USP10 on CCND1, the USP10 knockdown of CCND1 resulted in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase and induced GBM cell apoptosis (Figure 2B). 40 Despite its role as a double-edged sword in tumors, USP10 is widely recognized as an oncogene in several settings, driving the malignant progression of tumors by driving cell cycle progression.
The Role of USP10 in Autophagy
Autophagy is a basic metabolic mechanism that degrades unnecessary or abnormal cellular components through lysosomes, before recycling through autophagy. 69 Vacuolar sorting protein 34 (Vps34) is an essential component of the PI3 kinase (PI3K) family and the only known PI3K class. Vps34 exists in mammalian cells in the form of complexes, including Vps complex 1 and Vps complex, and plays a central role in autophagosome formation and maturation.70,71 Both complexes share a core component, Beclin1, which is an essential molecule in the formation of autophagosomes and can mediate the localization of other autophagic proteins to phagophores.72–74 USP10 and USP13 regulate Vps34 complex–mediated autophagy through Beclin1 deubiquitination. 75 However, some experiments have proven that Beclin1 interacts directly with USP13 and only indirectly or instantaneously with USP10. 75 Moreover, downregulation of the Vps34 complex or Beclin1 reduced endogenous levels of USP10 and USP13. 75 Further experiments revealed that USP13 deubiquitinated USP10, suggesting that Beclin1 and Vps34 also regulate USP10 activity by interacting with USP13, thus affecting autophagy. 75 Furthermore, researchers have found that USP10 alleviated hepatic steatosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in an autophagy-dependent manner (Figure 2C). 49 In general, USP10 interferes with the autophagy process of tumor cells mainly by regulating the autophagy initiation complex, stabilizing key proteins of autophagy nucleation, and interfering with autophagosome–lysosome fusion, thereby affecting the progression of tumor cells.
The Role of USP10 in DNA Damage Repair
The external environment and internal factors often lead to DNA molecular damage. After damage, certain mechanisms can restore DNA structure and function or improve the survival rate of damaged cells. 76 In normal cells, USP10 is mostly located in the cytoplasm, where it deubiquitinates p53, which allows p53 to re-enter the nucleus. 77 However, after DNA damage, USP10 is phosphorylated by activated ATM and transferred from the cytoplasm to accumulate in the nucleus, thereby stabilizing p53 in the nucleus. 56 Therefore, USP10 is a necessary factor for p53 to participate in DNA damage repair. 56 Moreover, USP10 interacts with MutS and deubiquitinates and stabilizes MutS homologous 2 to regulate cell sensitivity to DNA damage (Figure 2D). 54 The genomic instability caused by DNA damage repair defects promotes the development of cancer and causes adverse outcomes such as tumor drug resistance. USP10 mediates tumor DNA damage repair through ubiquitination regulation and promotes tumor chemotherapy resistance, which provides a new idea for targeted tumor therapy.
USP10 and Tumor Immune Escape Mechanism
USP10 in Cancer Types
As a specific deubiquitination enzyme, USP10 plays a vital role in cell life activities, with its role in cancer attracting increasing attention in recent years. USP10 is involved in the occurrence and progression of various cancer types and is a potential molecular marker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction (Figure 3). Next, we summarize the specific role and mechanistic pathway of USP10 in some cancers.
Figure 3.
Role and function of USP10 in various cancers
In addition, USP10 inhibits hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and inflammation through SIRT6. 66 In the context of DNA damage, USP10 inhibits the activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and the production of inflammatory cytokines. 78 In addition, as a DUB, USP10 has a crucial role in the development and progression of tumors. For example, USP10 inhibits the growth of cancer cells and tumor development by inhibiting the ubiquitination and protein degradation of p53 and SIRT6.37,56 USP10 regulates the stability of KLF transcription factor 4 (KLF4) and suppresses lung tumorigenesis. 79 The association of USP10 with GTPase-activating protein (SH3 domain)-binding protein 2 inhibits p53 signaling and contributes to poor outcome in prostate cancer. 75 USP10 regulates MSI2 stability via deubiquitination and promotes tumor proliferation in colon cancer. 32 Herein, we evaluated USP10 expression in patients with different types of cancer according to the UALCAN Cancer Database. As shown in Figure 4A, esophageal carcinoma (ESCA) and liver hepatocellular carcinoma showed the highest and lowest USP10 expression, respectively. Furthermore, most cancerous tissues exhibit higher expression levels of USP10 than normal tissues. Among them, cholangiocarcinoma, ESCA, GBM, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma differ significantly from normal tissues (P < .05), suggesting that USP10 may be involved in the development of these tumors and that its inhibition may show better efficacy. The expression level of USP10 in DLBC, LAML, and PCPG cells is lower than that in normal tissues, which might be associated with the tumor-suppressor function of USP10 in these tumor types. For these tumors, up-regulating the expression of USP10 may lead to a better prognosis. (Figure 4B). Based on the GEPIA database Survival Analysis, USP10 expression in breast cancer (BRCA) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) shows an inverse proportional relationship with the overall survival rate. In contrast, in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), USP10 expression is directly proportional to the overall survival rate, and these differences are statistically significant (P < .05) (Figure 4C). Whether USP10 plays a pro- or anti-tumor role is related to its expression level and downstream substrates in different tumors, which needs to be personalized designed in the treatment of tumors.
Figure 4.
The relationship of USP10 with tumors by bioinformatics. (A) The expression level of USP10 in different cancer types. (B) Comparison of USP10 expression between tumor and normal tissues. Blue columns stand for normal tissues. Red columns stand for cancerous tissues. (C) The relationship between USP10 and the overall survival rate of several types of tumors; BRCA, breast cancer; HNSC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; KIRC, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; The data is sourced from the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) database
Immune Checkpoint Proteins and USP10
Immune checkpoint proteins play a critical role in tumor immune escape, and USP10 has been found to regulate the expression and stability of multiple immune checkpoint proteins.
Regulation of PD-L1
In tumor cells, USP10 can interact with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to inhibit its degradation through deubiquitination, thereby upregulating its expression level. In prostate cancer studies, NDR1 hinders the ubiquitination and degradation of PD-L1 by increasing the interaction between USP10 and PD-L1, resulting in the abundant expression of PD-L1 on the surface of tumor cells (Figure 5). After binding to the programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) on the surface of T cells, PD-L1 inhibits the activation and proliferation of T cells and promotes immune escape of prostate cancer cells. 14 In a study on esophageal cancer (EC), FOXP4-AS1 was found to stabilize PD-L1 through USP10, reduce PD-L1 ubiquitination, and promote immune escape of EC cells by hindering the function of CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). 15 USP10 mainly maintains the protein stability of PD-L1 through deubiquitination, ultimately promoting tumor immune escape and influencing the response to immunotherapy. However, the specific molecular mechanism still needs to be further clarified, providing a theoretical basis for improving the efficacy of immunotherapy.
Figure 5.
The mutual regulatory relationship between USP10 and PD-1/PD-L1
Regulation of B7-H4
B7-H4, a coinhibitory B7 family ligand, is a key immune checkpoint that inhibits CD8 T cell activity. B7-H4 mRNA can be detected in multiple normal tissues, but protein levels are barely detectable in normal tissues; the inconsistency between B7-H4 mRNA and protein levels suggests that B7-H4 undergoes post-transcriptional modification. Studies have shown that B7-H4 can be glycosylated or ubiquitinated. 80 Zeng et al discovered that in triple-negative breast cancer, USP10 acts as a critical DUB to suppress tumor immunogenicity by inhibiting autocrine motor factor receptor-mediated B7-H4 stabilization, which in turn mediates tumor immune escape by stabilizing protein expression. Inhibition of USP10 expression can reduce the stability of B7-H4, increase tumor immunogenicity, and enhance the ability of immune cells to recognize and kill tumor cells. 81 Currently, there are relatively few studies on USP10 and B7-H4. The immunotherapy for cold tumors based on these two factors has only been verified in breast cancer research. Further studies are needed to explore how they can overcome immune suppression and treat drug resistance.
Effect of USP10 on Immune Cell Function in the Tumor Microenvironment
The tumor microenvironment is a complex ecosystem of non-malignant components surrounding a tumor cell, including immune cells, stromal cells, and the factors produced and released by them. 82 Their functional status is crucial for tumor immune escape, and USP10 plays a regulatory role in it.
Effects on T Cell Function
T cells are involved in coordinating multiple aspects of adaptive immunity throughout life, including immune responses, homeostasis, and the establishment and maintenance of memory. 83 USP10 indirectly affects the function of T cells through the expression of immune checkpoint proteins. USP10 can stabilize immune checkpoint proteins such as PD-L1, prevent their degradation, and promote the exhaustion of CD8 + CTLs while reducing their killing activity against tumor cells. 15 USP10 may also directly affect T cell differentiation and function through other pathways. Indeed, in some tumor models, aberrant expression of USP10 has been found to lead to an imbalance in T cell subsets, an increase in the proportion of regulatory T cells, and a decrease in the proportion of effector T cells with antitumor activity, thereby promoting tumor immune escape.
Effect on Macrophage Function
Macrophages are the main type of immune cells and play a crucial role in the tumor microenvironment. Macrophages mainly polarize into either the classically activated “M1” type, which promotes antitumor immune responses, or the selectively activated “M2” phenotype, which leads to immunosuppression and tumor development. 84 The expression level of USP10 has been shown to correlate with the immunosuppressive M2 polarization of macrophages. Studies in colorectal cancer (CRC) have revealed that USP10 can interact with NLRP7 and catalyze its deubiquitination in CRC cells, which stabilizes NLRP7 and increases its protein level. NLRP3 promotes the secretion of CCL2 by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway, which further promotes the polarization of M2-like tumor macrophages. 26 In addition, several studies have shown that USP10 inhibits YAP1 ubiquitination and degradation, enhances Cyr61 expression, and enhances M2 macrophage polarization in the tumor microenvironment, leading to immune escape and malignant development of pancreatic cancer cells. Knockdown of USP10 has been shown to increase the ubiquitination and degradation of YAP1 in pancreatic cancer cells, increase the proportion of M1-polarized macrophages, and decrease the proportion of M2-polarized macrophages. 84 USP10, in different tumors or diseases, exerts its deubiquitination-stabilizing protein function by acting on different protein substrates. USP10 promotes the transformation of macrophages into M2-like cells and plays various roles, including facilitating tumor progression and alleviating disease.
Effect on Other Immune Cell Function
USP10 has also been discovered to exert an influence on other immune cells. For example, USP10 transcriptionally upregulates PD-L1 and galectin-9 (Gal-9) by deubiquitinating YAP1, desensitizing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. 85 The high expression of USP10 is also positively associated with neutrophils, dendritic cells, macrophages, etc. 86 Currently, research on the impact of USP10 the functions of immune cells primarily focus on T cells and macrophages. Further in-depth studies on the effects of USP10 on other immune cells are needed to enhance the theoretical credibility.
The Current Status of Tumor Treatment Targeting USP10
In view of the key role of USP10 in tumor immune escape, targeting USP10 has become a popular research direction in tumor treatment. USP10 is overexpressed in various tumors and is closely related to a poor prognosis. Functionally, USP10, as an oncogene, can increase the proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells both in vivo and in vitro. 87 Some small-molecule inhibitors targeting USP10 have been developed. These inhibitors can specifically inhibit the deubiquitination enzyme activity of USP10 and block its regulatory effect on substrate proteins. USP10 is overexpressed in osteosarcoma and significantly induces autophagy, cell proliferation, and invasion by enhancing ULK1 expression. Treatment with the USP10 inhibitor Spautin-1 inhibits the proliferation of osteosarcoma cells and increases their sensitivity to the chemotherapy drug cisplatin. Studies in an animal xenograft tumor model also revealed that using Spautin-1 to inhibit USP10 can slow tumor growth. 88 However, many USP10 inhibitors are still in the research stage and need further optimization and improvement in terms of drug specificity, efficacy, and safety.
Therapeutic Potential of USP10 Inhibitors
It is currently understood that USP10 promotes the growth and progression of some tumors. 89 USP10 can be used as a novel drug target for tumor therapy because it is involved in regulating tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and migration. As a result, some studies have been performed on USP10 inhibitors (Table 2). 29 The small-molecule inhibitors of USP10 reported in recent years are summarized as follows:
Table 2.
Summary of Inhibitors Targeting USP10
| Inhibitor | IC50 (μM) | Formula/weight | Structure | Mechanism | REF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spautin-1 | 0.6-0.7 | C15H11F2N3 271.26 |
|
Spautin-1 is a specific and potent autophagy inhibitor that inhibits USP10 and USP13 | 90 |
| HBX19818 | 28.1 | C25H28ClN3O 421.96 |
|
An inhibitor of deubiquitinase USP10 leads to the dual degradation of spleen tyrosine kinase and FLT3 | 91 |
| Wu-5 | 3.7-8.3 | C15H13NO7S 351.33 |
|
Wu-5 targets USP10 to inhibit downstream FLT3 signaling pathways | 45 |
| LY-2 | 10.87 ± 1.07 | C28H26ClN3O3 488.17 |
|
LY-2 inhibits the proteasomal degradation of YAP and p53 mediated by USP10 | 92 |
| F806 | C28H38N2O6 498.61 |
|
Targeting the USP10-ANLN axis | 93 | |
| Curcumin | C21H20O6 368.38 |
|
Curcumin promotes the expansion of mitochondria by targeting USP10 | 94 | |
| Quercetin | C15H10O7 302.24 |
|
Quercetin suppresses USP10 activity to abrogate T-bet upregulation | 95 |
Spautin-1
Specific and potent autophagy interactivator-1 (spautin-1) is the most commonly used small-molecule inhibitor of USP10, which has a strong inhibitory effect on autophagy. Previous research has shown that spautin-1 regulates osteoclast formation by inhibiting autophagy induced by receptor activator for NF-kB and 1α,25-(OH)2D3. 96 Furthermore, spautin-1 has been shown to alleviate acute pancreatitis in animal models established using the combination of frog skin peptide and lipopolysaccharide by inhibiting pancreatic cell autophagy. 97 In tumors, spautin-1 enhances the sensitivity of osteosarcoma and chronic myeloid leukemia to chemotherapeutic agents by inhibiting autophagy. Spautin-1 also decreases cell survival and colony formation in osteosarcoma cells.98,99 Most importantly, spautin-1 inhibits autophagy by interacting with USP10 and USP13 through the inhibition of Beclin-1 protein expression levels. Spautin-1 suppresses melanoma growth via ROS-mediated DNA damage and exhibits synergy with cisplatin.100,101 Currently, there have been no reports on the efficacy of spautin-1 in vivo animal studies; thus, spautin-1 is still in preclinical development.
HBX19818
HBX19818 is another USP10 inhibitor. Originally thought to be an inhibitor of USP7, HBX19818 targets USP7 and reduces UV-induced phosphorylation of Chk1 and the levels of the checkpoint mediator Claspin. 102 Later, Yang et al found that HBX19818 leads to the dual degradation of spleen tyrosine kinase and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), resulting in the death of acute myeloid leukemia cells. 103
Wu-5
Wu-5 is a little-known USP10 inhibitor. The kinase FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) is known to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in AML. 104 Wu-5 has been found to induce synergistic cell death in FLT3-ITD-positive cells by reducing FLT3 and AMP-activated protein kinase proteins. 45 However, further in-depth research is still needed to explore the specific efficacy and clinical outcomes of Wu-5 in the treatment of human cancers.
LY-2
Dong et al developed the small molecular inhibitor LY-2 via structural optimization of the previously identified USP10 inhibitor D2. By substituting the 1,2,4-oxadiazole moiety with an amide bond linkage, LY-2 exhibited substantially enhanced binding affinity for USP10 compared to its lead compound D2. Comprehensive structure-activity relationship (SAR) analyses further validated its potential as a promising therapeutic candidate. Additionally, LY-2 is the first USP10 inhibitor to achieve nanomolar binding affinity. In liver cancer, LY-2 effectively inhibits the proteasomal degradation of downstream proteins YAP and p53 mediated by USP10, thereby leading to the subsequent downregulation of CDK4 in the p53 signaling pathway. 92 However, LY-2 has currently only been validated at the cellular level, and its activity in vivo animal models as well as clinical settings remains to be further confirmed.
F806
F806 is a natural macrolide compound isolated from the Chinese actinomycete strain FIM-04-806. It selectively targets the deubiquitinase USP10 and suppresses its catalytic activity, which disrupts the homeostasis of the USP10-Cdh1-ANLN complex, thereby exerting a potent inhibitory effect on cell cycle progression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cells. 93 In addition, F806 has been shown to induce ESCC cell apoptosis through blocking the activation of integrin β1. 105 Furthermore, it exerts anti-ESCC activity by facilitating the internalization of glucose transporter 1 and its subsequent degradation within autolysosomes. 93
Other Inhibitors
Notably, several natural products and their derivatives also exert regulatory effects on USP10 activity. For example, curcumin induces mitochondrial expansion in breast cancer cells through targeting USP10. Specifically, silencing or inhibiting USP10 expression effectively abrogates curcumin-induced upregulation of polyubiquitinated proteins and CHOP, attenuates curcumin-mediated activation of ERK and JNK signaling pathways, and diminishes mitochondrial peroxide production, ultimately mitigating curcumin induced breast cancer cell death in a marked manner. 94 Quercetin also exerts a distinct inhibitory effect on USP10. In the context of asthma, USP10 interacts with the transcription factor T-bet and sustains its structural stability via deubiquitination, thereby protecting T-bet from proteasomal degradation. As a key regulator of adaptive immunity, T-bet orchestrates Th1 immune responses by upregulating the expression of Th1-signature cytokines. Importantly, quercetin suppresses USP10 activity to abrogate T-bet upregulation, consequently mitigating asthmatic inflammation. Collectively, quercetin has been proven to be a potential anti-inflammatory drug in autoimmune diseases. 95 However, currently the inhibitors of USP10 are only used in preclinical experiments, and there is still a long way to go before they can make a substantive contribution to human diseases.
To date, no new USP10 inhibitors have been reported. With the development of high-throughput proteomics technology, it is possible to screen specific substrates and specific deubiquitination sites of USP10 through various research methods and develop new specific inhibitors, providing new drugs for targeted therapy of tumors.
Conclusion and Prospect
As a member of the ubiquitin-specific protease family, USP10 affects the degradation and stability of substrate proteins by removing the substrate ubiquitin and participates in the whole process of tumor development, 93 including regulating immune checkpoint proteins, regulating the infiltration of specific immune cell subsets, and affecting cell migration and invasion. Thus, USP10 can be used as a potential marker for tumor prognosis. Currently, research on USP10 in tumor immune escape has made some progress, but there remain many problems to be solved. In terms of basic research, it is still necessary to further clarify whether USP10 affects tumor immunity and progression through other pathways, and whether there are other unknown substrate proteins. In terms of clinical application, how to safely and effectively transfer USP10 targeted therapy strategies to cancer treatment remains a major challenge. In the future, it will be important to elucidate the mechanism of USP10 in tumors and conduct more clinical trials to evaluate its efficacy and safety in various tumors and patient populations. Furthermore, future research should explore the potential of a combined treatment approach involving USP10 modulation alongside chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. The ultimate goal is to create personalized treatment plans that consider the patient’s specific gene mutations and the unique characteristics of their immune microenvironment.
The Future Direction of Combination Therapy With USP10 Inhibitors
USP10 participates in crucial processes by regulating the stability of substrate proteins, including tumor proliferation, apoptosis, and microenvironment remodeling. Nevertheless, owing to its tumor-type-dependent bidirectionality, the monotherapy of USP10 inhibitors is restricted. Consequently, combination therapy has emerged as the core approach to overcome the bottleneck of USP10 monotherapy and enhance the anti-tumor efficacy. The following focuses on exploring the mechanism and development prospects of the combined application of USP10 inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy drugs. Research on the relationship between USP10 and immune checkpoint inhibitors has mainly focused on PD-L1 and B7-H4, and the specific mechanism have been comprehensively elaborated in the preceding content.14,81 The mechanisms underlying the combined application of USP10 inhibitors and chemotherapeutic drugs primarily encompass the following aspects. USP10 promotes tumor resistance to chemotherapy by facilitating DNA damage repair. Inhibiting USP10 can enhance the efficacy of oxaliplatin in the chemotherapy of colorectal cancer.100,101 USP10 can promote the migration and cisplatin resistance of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) through deubiquitination and stabilization of integrin β1/YAP. Deficiency of USP10 can significantly suppress the migratory ability and chemoresistance of ESCC cells. 106 In the treatment of thyroid cancer, USP10 plays a unique role. Overexpression of USP10 suppresses the invasion, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics of doxorubicin-resistant (FTC133-DOX) cells, promotes cell apoptosis, and enhances the chemosensitivity of FTC133 cells to DOX treatment. 107 Targeting USP10 can also generate a synergistic effect with anti-tumor drugs by amplifying the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy and optimizing the response to chemotherapy, thus overcoming drug resistance in tumors. In the future, more efforts should be made to focus on issues such as precise tumor classification and in-depth exploration of mechanisms, so as to promote the combination of USP10 inhibitors in clinical tumor treatment.
Potential Immunomodulatory Function of USP10: Potential Perspectives
Effective immunotherapy currently includes immune checkpoint blocking, chimeric antigen receptor-T cell, and natural killer cell therapy; however, patients with tumors still have low survival rates because most are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to non-specific symptoms and a lack of biomarkers, especially in the early stage of the disease. Thus, finding a valid target for tumors remains an urgent issue. 108 USP10 affects oncogenic and tumor-suppressor signals, tumor immunogenicity, and immune cells and is involved in pro-tumor responses. Thus, USP10 inhibitors have important implications for the development and application of both epigenetic therapies and cancer immunotherapies, and combinations thereof.
Challenges in USP10 Inhibitors Development for Tumors Therapy
There are currently only a few available USP10 inhibitors, and none of them have entered clinical studies. In addition, USP10 inhibitors in combination with other compounds may be an effective way to treat tumors. However, there is a lack of compound combination therapy and exploration of combination mechanisms. Of course, it is also critical to improve the subtype selectivity of compounds.
In this paper, we have discussed the biological function of USP10 and its key role in tumor progression. Many detailed molecular mechanisms of USP10 in the context of tumorigenesis and development remain unclear. We have also summarized the current knowledge of USP10 inhibitors in treating tumors. USP10 has attracted attention in research on epigenetic regulation of tumor development because of its involvement in the whole progression of many tumors. With the advances in methods such as structural biology and computer-aided drug design, we hope that this review will encourage and accelerate advances in the continuing search for novel USP10 inhibitors for tumor therapy. Additionally, the application of USP10 as a target for tumor diagnosis and targeted therapy in clinical practice is expected in the future.
Acknowledgments
We thank LetPub (https://www.letpub.com.cn/) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Appendix.
Abbreviations
- PD-1
Programmed Death Receptor 1
- PD-L1
Programmed Death Ligand 1
- DUBs
Deubiquitinating Enzymes
- USP
Ubiquitin-Specific Protease
- MDM2
Murine Double Minute 2
- ATM
Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutant
- PI3K
PI3 Kinase
- SIRT6
Sirtuin-6
- MSI2
Musashi-2
- ESCA
Esophageal Carcinoma
- LIHC
Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- CHOL
Cholangiocarcinoma
- GBM
Glioblastoma Multiforme
- PAAD
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- BRCA
Breast Carcinoma
- HNSC
Head Neck Squamous Carcinoma
- CRC
Colorectal Cancer.
Footnotes
Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Henan Provincial Medical Science and Technology, Joint Construction Project (No LHGJ20220423).
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iD
Xiaojing Li https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2013-9171
Ethical Considerations
This manuscript is a review article and does not involve a research protocol requiring approval by the relevant institutional review board or ethics committee.
References
- 1.Wang R, Xu X, Wang GL, Ning Y. Ubiquitination of susceptibility proteins modulates rice broad-spectrum resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2022;27(4):322-324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pan K, Fu J, Xu W. Role of ubiquitin-specific peptidase 47 in cancers and other diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:726632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clague MJ, Barsukov I, Coulson JM, Liu H, Rigden DJ, Urbe S. Deubiquitylases from genes to organism. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(3):1289-1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fraile JM, Quesada V, Rodriguez D, Freije JM, Lopez-Otin C. Deubiquitinases in cancer: new functions and therapeutic options. Oncogene. 2012;31(19):2373-2388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Young MJ, Hsu KC, Lin TE, Chang WC, Hung JJ. The role of ubiquitin-specific peptidases in cancer progression. J Biomed Sci. 2019;26(1):42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen S, Liu Y, Zhou H. Advances in the development ubiquitin-specific peptidase (USP) inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bhattacharya U, Neizer-Ashun F, Mukherjee P, Bhattacharya R. When the chains do not break: the role of USP10 in physiology and pathology. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(12):1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takahashi M, Higuchi M, Makokha GN, et al. HTLV-1 tax oncoprotein stimulates ROS production and apoptosis in T cells by interacting with USP10. Blood. 2013;122(5):715-725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takahashi M, Higuchi M, Matsuki H, et al. Stress granules inhibit apoptosis by reducing reactive oxygen species production. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(4):815-829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Deng M, Yang X, Qin B, et al. Deubiquitination and activation of AMPK by USP10. Mol Cell. 2016;61(4):614-624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu Q, You L, Nepovimova E, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors: master regulators of hypoxic tumor immune escape. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gao K, Shi Q, Gu Y, et al. SPOP mutations promote tumor immune escape in endometrial cancer via the IRF1-PD-L1 axis. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30(2):475-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kuang Z, Liu X, Zhang N, et al. USP2 promotes tumor immune evasion via deubiquitination and stabilization of PD-L1. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30(10):2249-2264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fu M, Li J, Xuan Z, et al. NDR1 mediates PD-L1 deubiquitination to promote prostate cancer immune escape via USP10. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;22(1):429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shen GY, Zhang Y, Huang RZ, et al. FOXP4-AS1 promotes CD8(+) T cell exhaustion and esophageal cancer immune escape through USP10-stabilized PD-L1. Immunol Res. 2024;72(4):766-775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zeng Z, Wu HX, Zhan N, et al. Prognostic significance of USP10 as a tumor-associated marker in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(4):3845-3853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Soncini C, Berdo I, Draetta G. Ras-GAP SH3 domain binding protein (G3BP) is a modulator of USP10, a novel human ubiquitin specific protease. Oncogene. 2001;20(29):3869-3879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carmo-Silva S, Nobrega C, Pereira de Almeida L, Cavadas C. Unraveling the role of Ataxin-2 in metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2017;28(4):309-318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zong Z, Zhang Z, Wu L, Zhang L, Zhou F. The functional deubiquitinating enzymes in control of innate antiviral immunity. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8(2):2002484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guo K, Ma Z, Zhang Y, et al. HDAC7 promotes NSCLC proliferation and metastasis via stabilization by deubiquitinase USP10 and activation of beta-catenin-FGF18 pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022;41(1):91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu X, Chen B, Chen J, Su Z, Sun S. Deubiquitinase USP10 maintains Cyr61 expression via YAP1 to augment immune escape and metastasis of PAAD. Cancer Sci. 2022;113(5):1868-1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li M, Tang Y, Zuo X, Meng S, Yi P. Loss of Ras GTPase-activating protein SH3 domain-binding protein 1 (G3BP1) inhibits the progression of ovarian cancer in coordination with ubiquitin-specific protease 10 (USP10). Bioengineered. 2022;13(1):721-734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shen C, Li J, Zhang Q, et al. LncRNA GASAL1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by up-regulating USP10-stabilized PCNA. Exp Cell Res. 2021;415:112973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xia X, Liu X, Chai R, et al. USP10 exacerbates neointima formation by stabilizing Skp2 protein in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2021;297(5):101258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.He Y, Jiang S, Mao C, et al. The deubiquitinase USP10 restores PTEN activity and inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation. J Biol Chem. 2021;297(3):101088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li B, Qi ZP, He DL, et al. NLRP7 deubiquitination by USP10 promotes tumor progression and tumor-associated macrophage polarization in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhu H, Yan F, Yuan T, et al. USP10 promotes proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma by deubiquitinating and stabilizing YAP/TAZ. Cancer Res. 2020;80(11):2204-2216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yuan T, Chen Z, Yan F, et al. Deubiquitinating enzyme USP10 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through deubiquitinating and stabilizing Smad4 protein. Mol Oncol. 2020;14(1):197-210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liao Y, Liu N, Xia X, et al. USP10 modulates the SKP2/Bcr-Abl axis via stabilizing SKP2 in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cell Discov. 2019;5:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liao Y, Guo Z, Xia X, et al. Inhibition of EGFR signaling with Spautin-1 represents a novel therapeutics for prostate cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Deng CC, Zhu DH, Chen YJ, et al. TRAF4 promotes fibroblast proliferation in keloids by destabilizing p53 via interacting with the deubiquitinase USP10. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(9):1925-1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ouyang SW, Liu TT, Liu XS, et al. USP10 regulates Musashi-2 stability via deubiquitination and promotes tumour proliferation in colon cancer. FEBS Lett. 2019;593(4):406-413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen Q, Hang Y, Zhang T, Tan L, Li S, Jin Y. USP10 promotes proliferation and migration and inhibits apoptosis of endometrial stromal cells in endometriosis through activating the Raf-1/MEK/ERK pathway. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2018;315(6):C863-C872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ko A, Han SY, Choi CH, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence mediated by c-Myc requires USP10 dependent deubiquitination and stabilization of p14ARF. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(6):1050-1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Takayama KI, Suzuki T, Fujimura T, Takahashi S, Inoue S. Association of USP10 with G3BP2 inhibits p53 signaling and contributes to poor outcome in prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2018;16(5):846-856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sun J, Li T, Zhao Y, et al. USP10 inhibits lung cancer cell growth and invasion by upregulating PTEN. Mol Cell Biochem. 2018;441(1-2):1-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lin Z, Yang H, Tan C, et al. USP10 antagonizes c-Myc transcriptional activation through SIRT6 stabilization to suppress tumor formation. Cell Rep. 2013;5(6):1639-1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhao Z, Ju Q, Ji J, Li Y, Zhao Y. N6-Methyladenosine methylation regulator RBM15 is a potential prognostic biomarker and promotes cell proliferation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:842833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cao Y, Wei M, Li B, et al. Functional role of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 (EIF4G1) in NSCLC. Oncotarget. 2016;7(17):24242-24251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sun T, Xu YJ, Jiang SY, et al. Suppression of the USP10/CCND1 axis induces glioblastoma cell apoptosis. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021;42(8):1338-1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lu L, Ma J, Liu Y, et al. FSTL1-USP10-Notch1 signaling axis protects against cardiac dysfunction through inhibition of myocardial fibrosis in diabetic mice. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:757068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sango J, Kakihana T, Takahashi M, et al. USP10 inhibits the dopamine-induced reactive oxygen species-dependent apoptosis of neuronal cells by stimulating the antioxidant Nrf2 activity. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(1):101448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gao F, Qian M, Liu G, Ao W, Dai D, Yin C. USP10 alleviates sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by regulating Sirt6-mediated Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway. J Inflamm. 2021;18(1):25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huang J, Liu Y, Wang M, Wang R, Ling H, Yang Y. FoxO4 negatively modulates USP10 transcription to aggravate the apoptosis and oxidative stress of hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced cardiomyocytes by regulating the Hippo/YAP pathway. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2021;53(5):541-551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yu M, Fang ZX, Wang WW, et al. Wu-5, a novel USP10 inhibitor, enhances crenolanib-induced FLT3-ITD-positive AML cell death via inhibiting FLT3 and AMPK pathways. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021;42(4):604-612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang L, Wu D, Xu Z. USP10 protects against cerebral ischemia injury by suppressing inflammation and apoptosis through the inhibition of TAK1 signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;516(4):1272-1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li S, Zhu Y, Zhang T, Hang Y, Chen Q, Jin Y. Cai’s Neiyi prescription promotes apoptosis and inhibits inflammation in endometrial stromal cells with endometriosis through inhibiting USP10. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2019;66(2):231-239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Higuchi M, Kawamura H, Matsuki H, et al. USP10 is an essential deubiquitinase for hematopoiesis and inhibits apoptosis of long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;7(6):1116-1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xin SL, Yu YY. Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10 ameliorates hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis model by restoring autophagic activity. Dig Liver Dis. 2022;54(8):1021-1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Qi W, Yan Q, Lv M, Song D, Wang X, Tian K. Prognostic signature of osteosarcoma based on 14 autophagy-related genes. Pathol Oncol Res. 2021;27:1609782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jia R, Bonifacino JS. The ubiquitin isopeptidase USP10 deubiquitinates LC3B to increase LC3B levels and autophagic activity. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Benedetti F, Cocchi F, Latinovic OS, et al. Role of mycoplasma chaperone DnaK in cellular transformation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(4):1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zella D, Curreli S, Benedetti F, et al. Mycoplasma promotes malignant transformation in vivo, and its DnaK, a bacterial chaperone protein, has broad oncogenic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(51):E12005-E12014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang M, Hu C, Tong D, et al. Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10 (USP10) deubiquitinates and stabilizes MutS homolog 2 (MSH2) to regulate cellular sensitivity to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(20):10783-10791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Park JM, Yang SW, Yu KR, et al. Modification of PCNA by ISG15 plays a crucial role in termination of error-prone translesion DNA synthesis. Mol Cell. 2014;54(4):626-638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yuan J, Luo K, Zhang L, Cheville JC, Lou Z. USP10 regulates p53 localization and stability by deubiquitinating p53. Cell. 2010;140(3):384-396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bomberger JM, Barnaby RL, Stanton BA. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP10 regulates the post-endocytic sorting of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in airway epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(28):18778-18789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hafner A, Bulyk ML, Jambhekar A, Lahav G. The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(4):199-210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nikolaev AY, Li M, Puskas N, Qin J, Gu W. Parc: a cytoplasmic anchor for p53. Cell. 2003;112(1):29-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tollini LA, Jin A, Park J, Zhang Y. Regulation of p53 by Mdm2 E3 ligase function is dispensable in embryogenesis and development, but essential in response to DNA damage. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(2):235-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gabut M, Bourdelais F, Durand S. Ribosome and translational control in stem cells. Cells. 2020;9(2):497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ayroldi E, Petrillo MG, Bastianelli A, et al. L-GILZ binds p53 and MDM2 and suppresses tumor growth through p53 activation in human cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(1):118-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Luise C, Capra M, Donzelli M, et al. An atlas of altered expression of deubiquitinating enzymes in human cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e15891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jochemsen AG, Shiloh Y. USP10: friend and foe. Cell. 2010;140(3):308-310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Michishita E, McCord RA, Berber E, et al. SIRT6 is a histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylase that modulates telomeric chromatin. Nature. 2008;452(7186):492-496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Luo P, Qin C, Zhu L, et al. Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10 (USP10) inhibits hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and inflammation through Sirt6. Hepatology. 2018;68(5):1786-1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sebastian C, Zwaans BM, Silberman DM, et al. The histone deacetylase SIRT6 is a tumor suppressor that controls cancer metabolism. Cell. 2012;151(6):1185-1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kelly K, Cochran BH, Stiles CD, Leder P. Cell-specific regulation of the c-myc gene by lymphocyte mitogens and platelet-derived growth factor. Cell. 1983;35(3 Pt 2):603-610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kobayashi S. Choose delicately and reuse adequately: the newly revealed process of autophagy. Biol Pharm Bull. 2015;38(8):1098-1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Birgisdottir AB, Mouilleron S, Bhujabal Z, et al. Members of the autophagy class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex I interact with GABARAP and GABARAPL1 via LIR motifs. Autophagy. 2019;15(8):1333-1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Workman P, van Montfort RL. Unveiling the secrets of the ancestral PI3 kinase Vps34. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(5):421-423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Itakura E, Kishi C, Inoue K, Mizushima N. Beclin 1 forms two distinct phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complexes with mammalian Atg14 and UVRAG. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(12):5360-5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Liang C, Feng P, Ku B, et al. Autophagic and tumour suppressor activity of a novel Beclin1-binding protein UVRAG. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(7):688-699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Matsunaga K, Saitoh T, Tabata K, et al. Two Beclin 1-binding proteins, Atg14L and Rubicon, reciprocally regulate autophagy at different stages. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(4):385-396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Liu J, Xia H, Kim M, et al. Beclin1 controls the levels of p53 by regulating the deubiquitination activity of USP10 and USP13. Cell. 2011;147(1):223-234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Friedberg EC. DNA damage and repair. Nature. 2003;421(6921):436-440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhang J, Cao M, Dong J, et al. ABRO1 suppresses tumourigenesis and regulates the DNA damage response by stabilizing p53. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Niu J, Shi Y, Xue J, et al. USP10 inhibits genotoxic NF-kappaB activation by MCPIP1-facilitated deubiquitination of NEMO. EMBO J. 2013;32(24):3206-3219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wang X, Xia S, Li H, et al. The deubiquitinase USP10 regulates KLF4 stability and suppresses lung tumorigenesis. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(6):1747-1764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lu Y, Sun Y, Zhang J, et al. The deubiquitinase USP2a promotes tumor immunosuppression by stabilizing immune checkpoint B7-H4 in lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR-activating mutants. Cancer Lett. 2024;596:217020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zeng L, Zhu Y, Cui X, et al. Tuning immune-cold tumor by suppressing USP10/B7-H4 proteolytic axis reinvigorates therapeutic efficacy of ADCs. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(40):e2400757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Xiao Y, Yu D. Tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;221:107753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kumar BV, Connors TJ, Farber DL. Human T cell development, localization, and function throughout life. Immunity. 2018;48(2):202-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liu X, Chen B, Chen J, Su Z, Sun S. Deubiquitinase ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10 maintains cysteine rich angiogenic inducer 61 expression via Yes1 associated transcriptional regulator to augment immune escape and metastasis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2022;113(5):1868-1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hsu SK, Chou CK, Lin IL, Chang WT, Kuo IY, Chiu CC. Deubiquitinating enzymes: potential regulators of the tumor microenvironment and implications for immune evasion. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;22(1):259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gao D, Zhang Z, Xu R, et al. The prognostic value and immune infiltration of USP10 in pan-cancer: a potential therapeutic target. Front Oncol. 2022;12:829705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Shi Y, Ding J, Ling X, Xu D, Shen Y, Qin X. USP10 stabilizes BAZ1A to drive tumor stemness via an epigenetic mechanism in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2025;16(1):270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Feng Z, Ou Y, Deng X, et al. Deubiquitinase USP10 promotes osteosarcoma autophagy and progression through regulating GSK3beta-ULK1 axis. Cell Biosci. 2024;14(1):111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Han GH, Chay DB, Yi JM, Cho H, Chung JY, Kim JH. Loss of both USP10 and p14ARF protein expression is an independent prognostic biomarker for poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2019;16(6):553-562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pesce E, Sondo E, Ferrera L, et al. The autophagy inhibitor Spautin-1 antagonizes rescue of mutant CFTR through an autophagy-independent and USP13-Mediated mechanism. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Cremer A, Stegmaier K. Targeting DUBs to degrade oncogenic proteins. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(8):1121-1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lu Y, Wang W, Yuan C, et al. Discovery of a ubiquitin-specific protease 10 inhibitor with high binding affinity promoting cell apoptosis via down-regulated CDK4 for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Bioorg Chem. 2025;163:108775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Cao YF, Xie L, Tong BB, et al. Targeting USP10 induces degradation of oncogenic ANLN in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30(2):527-543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kim JY, Lee DM, Woo HG, et al. RNAi screening-based identification of USP10 as a novel regulator of paraptosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Pan L, Chen Z, Wang L, et al. Deubiquitination and stabilization of T-bet by USP10. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;449(3):289-294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ji L, Gao J, Kong R, Gao Y, Ji X, Zhao D. Autophagy exerts pivotal roles in regulatory effects of 1alpha,25-(OH)2D3 on the osteoclastogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;511(4):869-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Xiao J, Feng X, Huang XY, et al. Spautin-1 ameliorates acute pancreatitis via inhibiting impaired autophagy and alleviating calcium overload. Mol Med. 2016;22:643-652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Schott CR, Ludwig L, Mutsaers AJ, Foster RA, Wood GA. The autophagy inhibitor spautin-1, either alone or combined with doxorubicin, decreases cell survival and colony formation in canine appendicular osteosarcoma cells. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Shao S, Li S, Qin Y, et al. Spautin-1, a novel autophagy inhibitor, enhances imatinib-induced apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J Oncol. 2014;44(5):1661-1668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lin P, Lin C, Teng Z, et al. USP10-mediated Ku70/80 stabilization inhibits PANoptosis and promotes chemoresistance in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2025;44(44):4239-4253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Liu X, Zhang S, An Y, Xu B, Yan G, Sun M. USP10/XAB2/ANXA2 axis promotes DNA damage repair to enhance chemoresistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2025;44(1):94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Reverdy C, Conrath S, Lopez R, et al. Discovery of specific inhibitors of human USP7/HAUSP deubiquitinating enzyme. Chem Biol. 2012;19(4):467-477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Yang J, Meng C, Weisberg E, et al. Inhibition of the deubiquitinase USP10 induces degradation of SYK. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(8):1175-1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Bjelosevic S, Gruber E, Newbold A, et al. Serine biosynthesis is a metabolic vulnerability in FLT3-ITD-Driven acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(6):1582-1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Li LY, Jiang H, Xie YM, et al. Macrolide analog F806 suppresses esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by blocking beta1 integrin activation. Oncotarget. 2015;6(18):15940-15952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Hou S, Zhao T, Deng B, et al. USP10 promotes migration and cisplatin resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Med Oncol. 2023;41(1):33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Sun J, Xiang Q, Ding D, Yan N. USP10 suppresses ABCG2-induced malignant characteristics of doxorubicin-resistant thyroid cancer by inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2023;55(6):457-466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Zheng YC, Kang HQ, Wang B, et al. Curriculum vitae of HDAC6 in solid tumors. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;230:123219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





