Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1990 Apr;83(4):245–248. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300414

Penetrating keratoplasty in south east London 1981-1986: epidemiological aspects and demands on medical resources.

C Claoué 1, M Falcon 1, J Shilling 1
PMCID: PMC1292612  PMID: 2342040

Abstract

We have compared penetrating keratoplasty at a teaching hospital and a district general hospital (DGH). At the teaching hospital, the pathology was similar to previous reports, but at the DGH the patients were older (P less than 0.01) and had a worse prognosis. The vision in the unoperated eye was also frequently poor. The number of postoperative outpatient visits within a hospital was unrelated to the original disease, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two centres. At the DGH, a corneal transplant patient requires the outpatient resources equivalent to three matched cataract patients. The implications for medical manpower requirements are discussed.

Full text

PDF
245

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen J., Ehlers N. Corneal transplantation using long-term cultured donor material. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986 Feb;64(1):93–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1986.tb06879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aquavella J. V., John T., Garcia E., Rao G. N. Outpatient keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Aug 15;100(2):276–280. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(85)90793-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop V. L., Robinson L. P., Wechsler A. W., Billson F. A. Corneal graft survival: a retrospective Australian study. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1986 May;14(2):133–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1986.tb00024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradley B. A. Corneal supply in the United Kingdom. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1986;105(Pt 4):397–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Heidemann D. G., Sugar A., Meyer R. F., Musch D. C. Oversized donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty. A randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1807–1811. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120041016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Menage M. J., Claoué C. M. Severe herpetic keratitis. II. The costs associated with penetrating keratoplasty. J R Soc Med. 1988 Sep;81(9):526–527. doi: 10.1177/014107688808100910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morris R. J., Kirkness C. M. Emergency presentation of corneal graft patients. Eye (Lond) 1988;2(Pt 1):71–76. doi: 10.1038/eye.1988.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sugar A., Meyer R. F., Bahn C. F. A randomized trial of pressure patching for epithelial defects after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 May;95(5):637–640. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(83)90382-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Völker-Dieben H. J. The effect of immunological and non-immunological factors on corneal graft survival. A single center study. Doc Ophthalmol. 1984 Apr 16;57(1-2):1–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00190461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES