Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medline Book to support NIHPA logoLink to Medline Book to support NIHPA
. 2025 Dec 16;(220):1. doi: 10.15620/cdc/174626

Comparing Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Population Estimates Using Different Predictive Equations: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2018.

Margaret D Carroll, Jennifer Rammon, Renee Storandt, Eric A Tolliver
PMCID: PMC12926850  PMID: 41701902

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 1972, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been calculated by the Friedewald equation, which estimates very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as triglycerides divided by 5 and is accurate only for triglycerides <400 mg/dL. The Martin equation, published in 2013 (for triglycerides <400 mg/dL), replaced 5 with a factor varying over an array of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels. This array was extended in 2021 for triglycerides 400-<800 mg/dL. In 2020, the Sampson equation, accurate for triglycerides <800 mg/dL, was developed using multiple least squares regression. This report compares LDL-C as calculated by the Friedewald, Martin, and Sampson equations in a nationally representative sample of adults with triglycerides <400 mg/dL across the distribution of clinical cut points for LDL-C (<70 mg/dL, 70-<100 mg/dL, 100-<160 mg/dL, 160-<190 mg/dL, and ≥190 mg/dL) to assess the impact of equation choice on national estimates.

METHODS

Using data on 4,461 adults in the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, classification agreement into the LDL-C categories used for clinical management across the three equations was assessed using kappa statistics for men and women overall and by demographic subgroups. A sensitivity analysis assessed classification agreement between the Martin and Sampson equations for adults with triglycerides <800 mg/dL.

RESULTS

During 2015-2018, 9.8%-10.0% of adults age 20 and older had LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL (Friedewald: 10.0%, Martin: 9.8%, Sampson: 9.8%). Less than 3% had LDL-C >190 mg/dL (Friedewald: 2.3%, Martin: 2.4%, Sampson: 2.6%). Very good agreement between the equations was seen in all subgroups (kappa >0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The three equations for LDL-C produce similar U.S. population-level percent distributions for adults age 20 and older across LDL-C categories.

Full text of this article can be found in Bookshelf.

References

  1. Ferraro RA, Sathiyakumar S, Blumenthal RS.. Understanding strengths and limitations of different methods of LDL-C estimation. American College of Cardiology. 2019.
  2. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS.. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972. Jun;18(6):499–502. PMID: 4337382. [PubMed]
  3. Sniderman AD, Blank D, Zakarian R, Bergeron J, Frohlich J.. Triglycerides and small dense LDL: The twin Achilles heels of the Friedewald formula. Clin Biochem. 2003. Oct;36(7):499–504. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(03)00117-6. PMID:14563441. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(03)00117-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Brinton EA, Toth PP, McEvoy JW, et al. Friedewald-estimated versus directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and treatment implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. Aug 20;62(8):732–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.079. Epub 2013. Mar 21. PMID:23524048. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Toth PP, Kwiterovich PO, Blumenthal RS, et al. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA. 2013. Nov 20;310(19):2061–8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280532. PMID: 24240933; PMCID: PMC4226221. 10.1001/jama.2013.280532PMC4226221 [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Sampson M, Ling C, Sun Q, Harb R, Ashmaig M, Warnick R, et al. A new equation for calculation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with normolipidemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA Cardiol. 2020. May 1;5(5):540–548. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0013. Erratum in: JAMA Cardiol. 2020. May 1;5(5):613. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0526. PMID: 32101259; PMCID:PMC7240357. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0013PMC7240357 [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Sajja A, Park J, Sathiyakumar V, Varghese B, Pallazola VA, Marvel FA, et a. Comparison of methods to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with high triglyceride levels. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. Oct 1;4(10):e2128817. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817. PMID: 34709388; PMCID: PMC8554644. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817PMC8554644 [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. 2018. AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APHA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019. Jun 25;73(24):3168–3209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.002. Epub 2018. Nov 10. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019. Jun 25;73(24):3234–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.012. PMID: 30423391. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Sathiyakumar V, Blumenthal RS, Elshazly MB.. New information on accuracy of LDL-C estimation. American College of Cardiology. 2020.
  10. Grant JK, Kaufman HW, Martin SS.. Extensive evidence supports the Martin-Hopkins equation as the LDL-C calculation of choice. Clin Chem. 2024. Feb 7;70(2):392–8. DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad199. PMID: 38101945. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad199. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Wang I, Rahman MH, Hou S, Lin HW.. Assessing the practical differences in LDL-C estimates calculated by Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, or NIH Equation 2: An observation cross-sectional study. J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023. Sep;12(3):252–266. DOI: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.252. Epub 2023. Jun 20. PMID: 37800109; PMCID:PMC10548185. 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.252PMC10548185 [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation. Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx.
  13. Chen TC, Clark J, Riddles MK, Mohadjer LK, Fakhouri THI.. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015–2018: Sample design and estimation procedures. Vital Health Stat 2. 2020. Apr;(184):1–35. PMID: 33663649. [PubMed]
  14. Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Gwira JA, Iniguez M.. Total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in adults: United States, August 2021–August 2023. NCHS Data Brief. 2024. Nov;(515):CS354900. DOI: 10.15620/cdc/165796. PMID: 39750952; PMCID: PMC11726265. 10.15620/cdc/165796PMC11726265 [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey MEC laboratory procedures manual. Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/public/2017/manuals/2017_MEC_Laboratory_Procedures_Manual.pdf.
  16. Laboratory procedure manual: total cholesterol (frozen), serum, Roche Cobas 6000 Chemistry Analyzer, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–2018. Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/public/2017/labmethods/TCHOL-J-MET-508.pdf.
  17. Laboratory procedures manual: HDL-cholesterol in serum, COBAS 6000 Chemistry analyzer. Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/public/2017/labmethods/HDL-J-MET-508.pdf.
  18. Laboratory procedure manual: Triglycerides, serum, Cobas 6000 Chemistry Analyzer. Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/public/2017/labmethods/TRIGLY-J-MET-508.pdf.
  19. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC.. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003.
  20. Landis JR, Koch GG.. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977. Mar;33(1):159–74. PMID: 843571. [PubMed]
  21. Chen TC, Clark J, Riddles MK, Mohadjer LK, Fakhouri THI.. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015−2018: Sample design and estimation procedures. Vital Health Stat 2. 2020. Apr;(184):1–35. PMID: 33663649. [PubMed]
  22. Wolter KM. Introduction to variance estimation. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2007.
  23. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT 15.1 user’s guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. 2018.
  24. RTI International. SUDAAN (Release 11.0.4) [computer software]. 2008.
  25. Parker JD, Talih M, Malec DJ, Beresovsky V, Carroll M, Gonzalez JF, et al. National Center for Health Statistics data presentation standards for proportions. Vital Health Stat 2. 2017. Aug;(175):1–22. PMID: 30248016. [PubMed]
  26. Sajja A, Li HF, Spinelli KJ, Blumenthal RS, Virani SS, Martin SS, Gluckman TJ.. Discordance between standard equations for determination of LDL cholesterol in patients with atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022. Feb 15;79(6):530–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.042. PMID: 35144744. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Samuel C, Park J, Sajja A, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR, Martin SS.. Accuracy of 23 equations for estimating LDL cholesterol in a clinical laboratory database of 5,051,467 patients. Glob Heart. 2023. Jun 19;18(1):36. DOI: 10.5334/gh.1214. PMID: 37361322; PMCID: PMC10289049. 10.5334/gh.1214PMC10289049 [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Palmer MK, Barter PJ, Lundman P, Nicholls SJ, Toth PP, Karlson BW.. Comparing a novel equation for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the Friedewald equation: A VOYAGER analysis. Clin Biochem. 2019. Feb;64:24–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.10.011. Epub 2018. Oct 24. Erratum in: Clin Biochem. 2020. Feb;76:49. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.12.006. PMID: 30365923. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed]

RESOURCES