Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1990 Jul;83(7):436–438. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300709

Day-case surgery: enhanced recovery with flumazenil.

B R Birch 1, K M Anson 1, E Clifford 1, R A Miller 1
PMCID: PMC1292732  PMID: 2118572

Abstract

In an open, randomized, parallel group study of 84 adult patients undergoing elective day-case urological surgery the specific benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil was shown to reverse effectively subjective postoperative sedation due to midazolam and enabled 83% of patients to recover and be ready for potential discharge within 15 min of surgery (control group 24% p less than 0.001). The significantly shorter recovery time has benefits in terms of increased patient cooperation and reduced demands on postoperative nursing care. The implications of these findings for day-case surgery are discussed.

Full text

PDF
436

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hunkeler W., Möhler H., Pieri L., Polc P., Bonetti E. P., Cumin R., Schaffner R., Haefely W. Selective antagonists of benzodiazepines. Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):514–516. doi: 10.1038/290514a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jensen S., Kirkegaard L., Anderson B. N. Randomized clinical investigation of Ro 15-1788, a benzodiazepine antagonist, in reversing the central effects of flunitrazepam. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1987 Mar;4(2):113–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jullien Y., Holzer J., Passeron D., du Cailar J. La prémédication par voie intra-musculaire. Comparaison midazolam-diazépam. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1982;1(1):23–27. doi: 10.1016/S0750-7658(82)80072-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McAteer E. J., Dixon J., Whitwam J. G. Intramuscular midazolam. A comparison of midazolam with papaveretum and hyoscine for intramuscular premedication. Anaesthesia. 1984 Dec;39(12):1177–1182. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb06427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramsay M. A. A survey of pre-operative fear. Anaesthesia. 1972 Oct;27(4):396–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1972.tb08244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rassam S., Thomas H. F. Local anaesthesia for cataract surgery. Lancet. 1989 Jan 14;1(8629):110–111. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91475-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reinhart K., Dallinger-Stiller G., Dennhardt R., Heinemeyer G., Eyrich K. Comparison of midazolam, diazepam and placebo i.m. as premedication for regional anaesthesia. A randomized double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 1985 Mar;57(3):294–299. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.3.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rodrigo M. R., Clark R. N. A study of intravenous sedation with diazepam and midazolam for dentistry in Hong Kong Chinese. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1986 Nov;14(4):404–411. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8601400413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rodrigo M. R., Rosenquist J. B. The effect of Ro15-1788 (Anexate) on conscious sedation produced with midazolam. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1987 May;15(2):185–192. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8701500212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vinik H. R., Reves J. G., Wright D. Premedication with intramuscular midazolam: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study. Anesth Analg. 1982 Nov;61(11):933–937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES