Abstract
Candida parapsilosis is one of the most common species associated with candidemia infections globally. Recently, the emergence of fluconazole-resistant (FLU-R) C. parapsilosis has become a significant global public health concern. In this study, we investigated the genomic epidemiology and potential mechanisms of antifungal resistance among 51 hospital isolates in Qatar, of which 18 were FLU-R. Whole-genome SNP analysis revealed the presence of five major genetic clusters and evidence for cross-hospital transmission within clusters I, II and III. Cluster I had 21 isolates, including all 18 FLU-R isolates collected from 2015 to 2021. These 18 FLU-R isolates had no missense variants known to be associated with azole resistance in loci such as ERG11, ERG6 and TAC1; however, all FLU-R isolates had increased copy numbers of ERG11, ranging from 3 to 7 copies. In addition, most FLU-R isolates (n=16) had increased CDR1B copies (2–8 copies). These FLU-R isolates also had higher expression of ERG11 and CDR1B than sensitive strains. A genome-wide association study revealed 16 variants in several loci of unknown function that may be linked to resistance to FLU and 5-flucytosine. All cluster I isolates had unique missense mutations in EFG1 and UME6 that may play important roles in morphogenesis and biofilm formation. Our findings indicate these cluster I isolates may have evolved a greater propensity to persist within hospitals for prolonged periods and cause clonal transmission than isolates in other genetic clusters susceptible to fluconazole.
Keywords: azole resistance, candidemia, copy number variation, gene expression, nosocomial, molecular, Middle East
Impact Statement.
Candida parapsilosis is a WHO priority fungal pathogen, accounting for an increasing proportion of invasive Candida infection worldwide. Many of these invasive infections are caused by azole-resistant strains in clinical settings. However, its genomic diversity, antifungal resistance mechanisms and dynamics remain poorly understood globally. In this work, we investigated the genetic relationships and molecular mechanisms associated with 51 Qatari C. parapsilosis isolates using the whole-genome sequencing approach. Our data revealed the presence of five major genetic clusters and identified the persistence and transmission of fluconazole-resistant (FLU-R) C. parapsilosis isolates in various hospitals. Yet, these FLU-R isolates did not have the Y132F mutation in the Erg11 protein, which is commonly associated with FLU-R. Instead, all FLU-R C. parapsilosis isolates had increased copy number of ERG11, and most FLU-R isolates had increased CDR1B copies, indicating that copy number variation plays an important role in conferring fluconazole resistance via increased gene expression. Our data highlights the need to understand the epidemiology of invasive C. parapsilosis and antifungal resistance mechanisms and to inform infection control strategy.
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequencing reads are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the BioProject accession number PRJNA997443. BioSample and SRA accession numbers are listed in Table S1. Codes for CNV analysis are available in https://github.com/tequilasunrise0/Candida-CNV-analysis.
Introduction
Candida parapsilosis is a common cause of infections in humans and is reported to be the second to fourth most prevalent Candida species causing invasive candidemia in various geographical regions [1,2]. For instance, C. parapsilosis is the second major cause of candidemia in Japan [3], Spain [4,5] and Iran [6]. Since the early 2000s, the clinical prominence and incidence of C. parapsilosis and other non-albicans Candida species have increased significantly and have become an emerging public health concern [7]. It colonizes the human skin and mucosal membranes as a commensal micro-organism, wherein the hands of healthcare professionals are recognized as a major vector for C. parapsilosis nosocomial acquisition [2]. Therefore, immunocompromised individuals including patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection and cancer, neonates with prolonged stays at neonatal intensive care units (ICUs) and surgical patients, especially those undergoing gastrointestinal procedures, are at high risk for C. parapsilosis infection [7,8]. In 2022, C. parapsilosis was listed as a ‘High Priority’ fungal pathogen by the WHO [9].
C. parapsilosis is diploid with an estimated haploid genome size of 13.1 Mb. Compared with Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis, it has a relatively low level of heterozygosity with an average of one SNP per 15,553 bases within individual strains [8,10, 11]. C. parapsilosis has not been reported to mate and is assumed to reproduce predominantly asexually due to its pseudogenization of the MTLa locus and the lack of MATα idiomorph among the analysed strains [11,12].
Although this species had been considered susceptible to most antifungals, recent reports have indicated increasing resistance to fluconazole in C. parapsilosis globally, particularly in isolates associated with invasive infections [1,6, 13]. Although resistance rates vary broadly by country and region, some studies have reported fluconazole-resistant (FLU-R) C. parapsilosis rates as high as 80% [5,14, 15]. This problem is compounded by the reduced susceptibility of this species to echinocandins with increased minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to these agents [3,16]. Azole resistance in Candida species may arise from changes to the target gene ERG11 that codes for a key enzyme in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway targeted by azoles, or gain-of-function mutations in transcription factors MRR1 and TAC1, leading to the up-regulation of the major facilitator efflux superfamily (Mdr1) or ATP-binding cassette transporter (Cdr1 and Cdr2), which can act as azole efflux pumps [1,10, 17]. In C. parapsilosis, aside from mutations in the above genes, mutations in other genes such as ERG3 and ERG6 have also been linked to azole resistance [17,24]. Indeed, nosocomial outbreaks caused by C. parapsilosis, particularly FLU-R clones, have emerged in many countries such as South Korea, Brazil, Turkey, France, India, Germany, Austria, China, the UK and Italy [1,5, 16, 22,31]. Among these investigations, isolates/clones harbouring mutations in the Erg11 enzyme such as the Y132F mutation were prevalent; 30 and 50% FLU-R isolates carrying the Erg11 Y132F mutation were reported in South Korea and China, respectively [24,27].
Patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are known to be susceptible to acquiring secondary fungal infections such as candidemia, and outbreaks of COVID-19-associated candidemia due to Candidozyma auris (formerly Candida auris), Nakaseomyces glabratus, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis have been reported in many countries, including Qatar [18,32,37]. The application of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has allowed for a more detailed understanding of population structure, evolution and geographic dissemination of these Candida pathogens. However, the biology and epidemiology of C. parapsilosis have not been as extensively explored as those of C. auris and N. glabratus. Because C. parapsilosis poses an increasing clinical challenge in the management of fungal infections in vulnerable patient populations, understanding the origin, transmission, genetic relationships among isolates and molecular mechanisms underlying their drug resistance will aid in the development of new diagnostic tools and effective antifungal therapies. In this investigation, we used the WGS approach to study the genetic relationships of the Qatari C. parapsilosis isolates and to determine the possible pattern of transmission, particularly those associated with COVID-19 patients. Also, we characterized the molecular mechanisms, such as variants and copy number variation (CNV), as well as the expression of selected genes, that could be associated with differences in susceptibility to fluconazole. In addition, we studied the genomic relatedness between Qatari isolates and those from other parts of the world.
Methods
Sample collection, identification and antifungal susceptibility testing
This study was based on the retrospective collection of C. parapsilosis stored in Hamad Medical Corporation and Sidra Medicine (SM) between January 2015 and December 2022. The collection includes strains that were isolated from patients from six different hospitals in Qatar, including Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Hazm Mebaireek Hospital (HMGH), Heart Hospital (HH), Rhumailah Long Term Facility (RH), SM and National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR) between 2015 and 2022. During the COVID-19 pandemic, HMGH was one of the facilities dedicated to caring for patients with severe lower respiratory tract infections, particularly those who required critical care. Isolates were recovered mainly from blood and sterile body fluids like pleural fluid and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Isolates were cultured on Chromogenic Candida agar (CHROMagar, France) at 37 °C for 5–7 days following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Species identities were confirmed using MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The isolates were maintained on Sabouraud dextrose agar at 4 °C before DNA extraction.
MICs of each isolate for amphotericin B (Amb), fluconazole (Flu), itraconazole (Ita), voriconazole (Vor), posaconazole (Pos), flucytosine (Fc), anidulafungin (And), caspofungin (Casp) and micafungin (Mica) were measured using either Sensititre™ YeastOne (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA), Vitek2 (bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, MO) or Etest (bioMérieux, Inc.) at various hospital sites. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes (CLSI) breakpoints were used to interpret MICs for Flu, And, Casp and Mica [38]. In addition, CLSI epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) were used for Amb, Ita and Pos to separate WT from non-WT isolates. There is no CLSI breakpoint or ECV for Fc. Quality control strains, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. albicans ATCC 90028, were tested using the same antifungal susceptibility testing methods and MICs interpreted following the CLSI guidelines (CLSI M27M44S).
Epidemiological data such as date of patient admission were reviewed to determine if these isolates were from hospital-acquired infection (HAI) or community-acquired infection based on the Qatar National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definition. HAI was defined if the date of the event of the NHSN site-specific infection criterion occurred on or after the third calendar day of admission to an inpatient location where the day of admission was calendar day 1. If the infection was identified within 2 days before admission or the day of admission to an inpatient location (calendar day 1) or the calendar day 2 after admission, the infection was considered present on admission.
Whole-genome sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from each isolate using MasterPure Yeast DNA purification kit (Lucigen Corporation, WI, USA) and quantified using Qubit 2 fluorometer (ThermoFisher, MA, USA). Genomic DNA libraries were constructed with Nextera XT library preparation kit or DNA preparation kit (Illumina Inc., USA), and the libraries were sequenced on Illumina NextSeq for 300 cycles (150 bp paired-end) at the Integrated Genomics Services Department, SM.
Mapping, variant callings and bioinformatics analysis
Raw read qualities were assessed by Fastqc v0.11.9 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The sequence reads were trimmed by Trimmomatic v0.39 [39] to remove the adapters and low-quality reads. To determine the genetic relationships among isolates, we analysed the SNPs using two approaches. Firstly, the trimmed and filtered reads of each strain were mapped to the reference genome CDC317 (ASM18276v2) of C. parapsilosis using BWA v0.7.17 [40]. Alignments were then converted to BAM format and sorted by chromosomes using SAMtools v1.13 [41,42]. Meanwhile, duplicated reads were labelled using Picard v2.26.3 (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Next, genomic variants for individual strains were identified using GATK v4.2.5 HaplotypeCaller in GVCF mode [43]. GVCF files were merged and genotyped using CombineGVCFs and GenotypeGVCFs, respectively. Afterwards, SNPs and INDELS were extracted from the merged GVCF file using SelectVariants and filtered using VariantFiltration with the following hard filters, QD <2.0, FS >60.0, SOR >3.0, MQ <40.0, MQRankSum <−12.5 and ReadPosRankSum <−8.0. Annotation was conducted using SnpEff v5.0 [44]. Variants from a panel of 53 genes previously known to be associated with antifungal resistance and stress adaptations (Table S5, available in the online Supplementary Material) were screened from each VCF file [2,8, 45, 46].
To construct the phylogenetic tree, SNP loci were concatenated into sequences using vcf2phylip v2.0 (https://github.com/edgardomortiz/vcf2phylip), with CDC317 as the reference. IQ-TREE [47] was used to perform the phylogenetic analysis among isolates based on the concatenated SNPs data and to help define phylogenetic clusters. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using iTOL [48]. Pairwise genetic distances between isolates were calculated based on the SNP alignment as well as analysed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests [49] (stats package, R v4.2.0) across three comparisons: COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19 samples, cluster I vs. non-cluster I samples and COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19 samples within cluster I. Benjamini–Hochberg correction was applied for multiple testing, and effect sizes were computed using the effsize package in R [50].
To determine and confirm the mating type of the isolates for all C. parapsilosis isolates, quality trimmed reads were assembled using SPAdes v3.15.5 [51] and then assessed using Quast v5.0.2 [52]. The presence or absence of MATα in our isolates was screened using blastn search against the reference genome assembly.
To assess the potential genetic relatedness of the Qatari isolates to the global collections, we compared the Qatari genomes with 228 publicly available C. parapsilosis genomes from various countries [23,53], including China (74 isolates), USA (128 isolates), Turkey (7 isolates), Germany (3 isolates), S. Korea (3 isolates) and various other countries.
Genome-wide association study
In order to uncover novel mutations/variants associated with antifungal resistance in our Qatari population of C. parapsilosis, genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses were conducted to assess the associations between drug susceptibility against nine antifungal drugs and SNPs using both Fixed and random model Circulating Probability Unification (FarmCPU) in GAPIT [54] and Bayesian-information and Linkage-disequilibrium Iteratively Nested Keyway (BLINK) [55]. The nine antifungal drugs were voriconazole (Vor), posaconazole (Pos), itraconazole (Ita), fluconazole (Flu), flucytosine (Fc), caspofungin (Casp), amphotericin B (Amb), anidulafungin (And) and micafungin (Mica).
FarmCPU and BLINK were chosen here because these methods were very efficient and can effectively control for population structure and relatedness among individuals. Specifically, FarmCPU uses a fixed effect model and a random effect model (REM). The fixed effect model is used to assess individual markers while accounting for the influence of pseudo-quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs), which are significant markers identified in previous iterations. QTNs are evaluated and adjusted for confounding factors through the REM. The process iteratively refines the list of associated markers to identify the most robust associations. Instead of using REM for population structure correction, BLINK uses a Bayesian statistical framework to select the best model and avoid overfitting. Additionally, BLINK uses linkage disequilibrium (LD) information to select a set of pseudo-QTNs that are not in LD, allowing BLINK to focus on the most informative SNPs [55].
CNV estimation
CNV was characterized for all isolates to investigate its potential association with antifungal resistance, focusing particularly on genes associated with azole resistance. Two approaches were utilized to estimate CNV. Firstly, sequencing depth was assessed using the SAMtools depth module, based on the alignment data in SAM files [41,56]. The CNV for each gene was calculated as the average sequencing depth across the corresponding genomic segment within each gene divided by the average depth of the corresponding chromosome/scaffold. Additional CNV regions across the contigs were predicted using a sliding window approach, where each window spanned 500 bp with no overlap between adjacent windows. The boundaries of CNVs were confirmed by visual inspection in the Integrative Genome Viewer [57]. The association between CNVs of selected loci and MICs was assessed by Kruskal–Wallis test using R 4.0.0.
In addition, CNVpytor v1.3.1 was used to call regions with CNVs [58]. By analysing the sorted.bam files, CNVpytor called regions with CNVs using a read-depth-based approach. The bin size was set to 100 to 1,000 bp. CNV results have been merged over the 51 samples and low-quality calls were filtered. The following filter was used to select reliable CNVs: calls with more than half not uniquely mapped reads, non-confident calls (P≥0.0001), calls with more than 50% Ns in the reference genome, calls smaller than 20,000 bp and calls close to gaps in the reference genome (<50,000 bp) were all excluded.
Genetic diversity and loss of heterozygosity analysis
Genome-wide nucleotide diversity (π) and Tajima’s D (TD) were estimated from 10 kb windows across the genome using jydu/vcftools haploid mode [59] to compare the cluster I and non-cluster I isolates.
In general, heterozygosity in diploid fungi such as C. parapsilosis could be lost during both sexual and asexual reproduction. During sexual reproduction, meiotic recombination followed by mating among close relatives would cause reduction in heterozygosity. During asexual reproduction, mitotic recombination between homologous chromosomes or gene conversion would also lead to loss of heterozygosity. However, since only one single mating type has been reported in diploid C. parapsilosis among natural isolates, loss of heterozygosity through sexual reproduction is unlikely.
To illustrate the heterozygosity pattern, scaffolds were divided into non-overlapping 5,000 bp windows. And the number of heterozygous SNP loci was calculated in each window and visualized using different intensities of blue colour. The heatmap was generated using Python v3.11.4 matplotlib v3.7.1 [60].
Expression of ERG11 and CDR1b between resistant and sensitive isolates
We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to assess the gene expression of ERG11 and CDR1b between FLU-R and FLU-S C. parapsilosis isolates. Briefly, C. parapsilosis samples were inoculated into 5 ml of yeast peptone dextrose broth and incubated at 30 °C at 150 r.p.m. Total RNA was extracted from the cell pellets using Quick-RNA Fungal/Bacterial Miniprep kit (Zymo), following the manufacturer’s instructions. An in-column DNase 1 treatment was included to remove residual genomic DNA. cDNA was synthesized from 2 µg of total RNA using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (ThermoFisher), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The relative expression levels of ERG11 and CDR1b were quantified using SYBR Green-based qPCR through the comparative ΔΔCt method, with ACT1 as the reference. Gene-specific primers for the target genes and the reference gene were listed in the supplementary text. All statistical analyses and visualizations, including boxplots with significance markers, were generated using R v4.4.2.
Results
Epidemiology, antifungal susceptibilities and phylogenetic structure
A total of 51 C. parapsilosis strains between 2015 and 2022 were studied. Forty-six were isolated from blood and five from other body fluids such as CSF (Table S1). Fifteen strains were collected from COVID-19 patients during the pandemic between 2020 and 2022. Detailed information on all isolates is summarized in Table S1. A total of 25,371 genome-wide SNPs (0.2% at the genome level) were identified in the dataset, including heterozygous sites within individual strains represented by the IUPAC degenerate nucleotide codes. Overall, most isolates can be divided into 5 major clusters, with 21 belonging to cluster I, 7 to cluster II, 6 to cluster III, 5 to cluster IV and 3 in cluster V, while the remaining 9 isolates were quite distinct from each other and from the 5 clusters (Fig. 1). Based on the homozygous SNPs, the variations within clusters I, II and IV were smaller than those in clusters III and V, and the average number of SNP difference between isolates within individual clusters was 38.1, 77.4, 369.4, 118.1 and 936.3, respectively, for clusters I, II, III, IV and V (Tables 1 and S2). Since a relatively large number of isolates (41%, 21/51) belonged to cluster 1, we further compared the genetic diversity between cluster I and non-cluster I where Tajima’s D (TD) for cluster I and non-cluster I were −0.94 vs. −0.86 (−1.05 for all isolates) (Table S3). The negative values in both groups are consistent with recent clonal population expansion.
Fig. 1. Genetic relationships among Qatari C. parapsilosis isolates inferred from whole-genome SNPs using CDC317 as the reference genome. IQ-TREE was performed on an alignment of 25,371 SNPs. The bootstrap values were indicated, and five major genetic clusters (I, II, III, IV and V) are marked with different colours. The tree was overlaid with years of isolation, hospital, countries, COVID-19 status and fluconazole and voriconazole resistance, as well the estimated copy number of four loci: ERG11, CDR1B, ARR3 and RTA3 (in which, over ten isolates had increased copies).
Table 1. Average homozygous SNP difference (and SNP difference in range) among C. parapsilosis isolates within and between the five phylogenetic clusters.
| Cluster | I | II | III | IV | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 38.1 (20–64) | 981.2 (959–1007) | 1,881.7 (1,819–1,938) | 1,913 (1,893–1,943) | 3,054.9 (2,999–3,152) |
| II | 77.4 (20–125) | 1,845.5 (1,777–1,903) | 1,861.4 (1,840–1,894) | 3,040.4 (2,977–3,148) | |
| III | 369.4 (121–520) | 1,588.2 (1,529–1,640) | 2,878.1 (2,785–3,008) | ||
| IV | 118.1 (43–153) | 2,780.4 (2,709–2,886) | |||
| V | 936.3 (901–981) |
There was no obvious pattern of temporal clustering or clustering based on country of origins for patients, as isolates from patients originated in different countries and years were broadly distributed across the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). The molecular epidemiological data suggest the following. First, clones and clonal clusters persisted within hospitals. Specifically, cluster I isolates were detected in HGH between 2015 and 2021, and isolates belonging to different genetic clusters were detected in HGH as well. Second, closely related isolates within several clonal clusters were shared among hospitals and among unrelated individuals. For example, closely related isolates of both clusters II and IV were found in two hospitals, HGH and HMGH, and from both unrelated COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. In addition, 15 COVID-19-related isolates did not concentrate in one cluster but were distributed in three main clusters (I, II and VI), while one isolate (cvcan6) was genetically different from those in the three clusters, and even though most isolates were from HGH and HMGH (Fig. 1).
The SNP data revealed evidence for nosocomial transmission of C. parapsilosis within and between the hospitals in Qatar. Among others, there were several clusters of COVID-19-associated isolates (Fig. S1a, b), particularly within cluster I (Fig. S1c). For example, the average SNP difference (including heterozygous sites) among COVID-19 isolates in cluster I was 546.6 (350–670), while the difference among non-COVID-19 isolates was 1,553.7 (367–3,087) (Table S2). Except for isolates CPARA12 and CPARA20, all other C. parapsilosis isolates were considered HAI. Many patients were transferred between wards, ICUs and hospitals. After reviewing the patient epidemiological information, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemics (2020–2021), we identified several putative hospital transmission events/chains among isolates in clusters I, III and IV within HGH and HMGH (Table S4).
Antifungal susceptibility data were available for all 51 isolates (Table S1). Eighteen (35%) isolates were resistant to fluconazole, 5 (10%) isolates were fluconazole susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) and the remaining 28 were susceptible to fluconazole. All 51 isolates were susceptible to echinocandins. In addition, 8 FLU-R isolates were cross-resistant to voriconazole (MIC ≥1 µg ml−1). With respect to antifungal drugs without CLSI breakpoints, such as Amb, Ita and Pos, we found 0, 8 and 15 isolates with their MICs greater than or equal to their ECVs. The remaining samples were sensitive to all antifungal drugs.
All 18 FLU-R isolates between 2015 and 2021 belonged to cluster I, and the prevalence of FLU-R within this cluster was high (85.7%, 18 out of 21). In addition, two other isolates (cvcan33 and CPARA33) in this cluster were SDD (4 µg ml−1), while isolate CPARA2 had low MICs (2 µg ml−1). All the non-cluster I isolates were susceptible to fluconazole, except two SDD isolates (CPARA17 and CPARA21). Among the 18 patients infected by FLU-R isolates, 15 were in the ICU, 14 received echinocandin treatment (And or Casp) and 4 received Flu. Among patients with FLU-R isolates, 9 had microbiological cure, while 12 did not survive.
To investigate the genetic relationships between Qatari isolates and the global collections, we retrieved the raw sequence reads from 228 global isolates in the NCBI. The phylogenetic tree demonstrated that the Qatari isolates were diverse and intermixed with isolates from other countries. Four of the five major clusters (except cluster V) had no closer relatives from other parts of the world than among themselves, suggesting that this cluster might be unique to Qatar/Middle East (Fig. S2).
Mechanisms of azole resistance and adaptation
To explore the possible mechanism of fluconazole resistance, we looked for SNPs and structural variants in a panel of genes/loci (Table S5) that had previously shown to be associated with antifungal resistance and adaptations [2,8]. Those included genes coding for lanosterol 14-α-demethylase (Erg11), a major facilitator superfamily transporter (Mdr1), ABC transporters (Cdr1, Cdr2) and transcription factors (Mrr1, Tac1) thought to control the transcription of ERG11 (CPAR2_303740), CDR1 (CPAR2_405290), MDR1 (CPAR2_301760), CDR2 (CPAR2_401370) and MDR1B (CPAR2_603010) genes [2]. However, there were no missense variants and stop codons in these loci that demonstrated apparent association with reduced fluconazole susceptibilities (Fig. S3, Table S6). All isolates carried the WT amino acid at 132Y of Erg11, whose missense mutation 132F has been associated with frequent fluconazole resistance in C. parapsilosis. However, the R398I mutation at Erg11 was detected in six fluconazole-sensitive isolates (cvcan7, cvcan31, cvcan39, CPARA30, CPARA1 and CPARA20). Other common mutations in Erg11 such as K143R reported in several studies were not detected among these Qatari isolates. None of the isolates carried any mutations in known hotspot regions of FKS1 (CPAR2_106400), consistent with their sensitivity to echinocandins.
Apart from antifungal resistance, we also detected mutations in candidate loci that may be associated with host infection and adaptations in specific cluster [2,8, 46] (Fig. S3, Table S5). For example, we detected a missense mutation (I280T) in Efg1 (CPAR2_701620) in all cluster I isolates. Mutation (T46K) in Ume6 (CPAR2_803820) was also detected in 21 cluster I isolates, including both FLU-S and FLU-R strains (Fig. S3). EFG1 and UME6 play important roles in morphogenesis and biofilm formation in C. parapsilosis [61,62].
Since no previously published missense and nonsense mutations/variants were detected in loci known to be associated with antifungal resistance [such as ERG3 (CPAR2_105550), ERG6 (CPAR2_405010) or ERG11 and MDR1] in our Qatari population, we performed GWAS to identify potential novel SNPs associated with variations in nine antifungal susceptibilities. Given the small sample size in this study, the findings were interpreted with caution. GWAS analyses identified 16 SNPs associated with reduced susceptibility to two (FLU and Fc) of the nine drugs (Tables 2 and S7). Out of 14 putative SNPs/indels associated with FLU-R, a stop codon (Gly1649*) was detected in the product of CPAR2_806430, which is known to be involved in mitotic division septum assembly. Also, a missense mutation was identified in CPAR2_203680, a gene known to play a role in actin cortical patch organization, endocytosis and endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Similarly, a missense mutation was found in CPAR2_102380 that has predicted nucleic acid binding activity (Fig. S4). In addition, one synonymous mutation (c.1470G>A, p.Ser490Ser) was detected in Als3 (CPAR2_404770), a putative adhesin (Fig. S4). Ten additional mutations were detected in the upstream of seven different ORFs (Tables 2 and S7). For Fc, a missense mutation (p.Ile74Val) was found to be significantly associated with susceptibility differences in Als3 (CPAR2_404770), the putative adhesin-encoding gene.
Table 2. Details of SNPs identified through GWAS.
| Drug | SNP position | P value | Variant type | HGVS.c | HGVS.p | Gene_id | Gene | Annotation (from Candida Genome Database) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flu | SNW_023503277.1_30338 | 4.10E−28 | Upstream | c.-3357C>A | CPAR2_600100 | Orthologues have mRNA binding activity, role in telomere maintenance and cytoplasm, nucleus localization | ||
| SNW_023503278.1_1560502 | 6.02E−29 | Synonymous | c.327C>T | p.Ile109Ile | CPAR2_107350 | |||
| SNW_023503278.1_550010 | 8.18E−22 | Missense | c.227A>G | p.Gln76Arg | CPAR2_102380 | Has domain(s) with predicted nucleic acid binding activity | ||
| SNW_023503280.1_1483690 | 6.91E−09 | Stop_gained | c.4945G>T | p.Gly1649* | CPAR2_806430 | Orthologues have role in mitotic division septum assembly, protein localization to bud neck and cell division site, cytoplasm, division septum localization | ||
| SNW_023503281.1_1627857 | 6.91E−09 | Upstream | c.-340T>G | CPAR2_207600 | ||||
| SNW_023503281.1_1698421 | 2.55E−08 | Upstream | c.-4837G>T | CPAR2_207880 | Orthologues have protein tag activity and role in mitotic recombination-dependent replication fork processing, protein sumoylation, stalled replication fork localization to nuclear periphery, telomere maintenance | |||
| SNW_023503281.1_1698432 | 2.55E−08 | Upstream | c.-4848C>A | CPAR2_207880 | Orthologues have protein tag activity and role in mitotic recombination-dependent replication fork processing, protein sumoylation, stalled replication fork localization to nuclear periphery, telomere maintenance | |||
| SNW_023503281.1_2374745 | 6.91E−09 | Upstream | c.-92A>C | CPAR2_211150 | Orthologues have RNA polymerase I activity and role in nucleolar large rRNA transcription by RNA polymerase I, transcription by RNA polymerase I, transcription elongation by RNA polymerase I | |||
| SNW_023503281.1_2374752 | 6.91E−09 | Upstream | c.-99A>C | CPAR2_211150 | Orthologues have RNA polymerase I activity and role in nucleolar large rRNA transcription by RNA polymerase I, transcription by RNA polymerase I, transcription elongation by RNA polymerase I | |||
| SNW_023503281.1_2637591 | 3.10E−30 | Upstream | c.-247A>T | CPAR2_212210 | ALD5 | Putative aldehyde dehydrogenase | ||
| SNW_023503281.1_748745 | 6.91E−09 | Missense | c.2065A>C | p.Ser689Arg | CPAR2_203680 | Orthologues have ubiquitin binding activity and role in actin cortical patch organization, endocytosis, endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response, positive regulation of cytokinesis, regulation of protein localization | ||
| SNW_023503283.1_1070076 | 5.50E−08 | Synonymous | c.1470G>A | p.Ser490Ser | CPAR2_404770 | ALS3 | Putative adhesin | |
| SNW_023503283.1_511022 | 2.35E−08 | Upstream | c.-4448A>C | CPAR2_402290 | Orthologues have gamma-glutamylcyclotransferase activity and role in glutathione catabolic process | |||
| SNW_023503284.1_252223 | 2.00E−15 | Upstream | c.-4222G>A | CPAR2_701130 | Has domain(s) with predicted phospholipase activity and role in phospholipid catabolic process | |||
| Fc | SNW_023503283.1_1068884 | 2.95E−27 | Missense | c.278T>A | p.Val93Asp | CPAR2_404770 | ALS3 | Putative adhesin |
| SNW_023503283.1_342413 | 5.26E−15 | Synonymous | c.861G>T | p.Gly287Gly | CPAR2_401550 | Has domain(s) with predicted hydrolase activity, metallocarboxypeptidase activity and role in nitrogen compound metabolic process |
CNVs are important mechanisms of genomic and phenotypic variations and can provide rapid adaptation to stressful environments and conditions [63]. In recent years, CNV has been reported as associated with FLU-R in C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis [64,67]. Therefore, we performed CNV analysis for the panel loci known to be associated with FLU-R in the genomes of all 51 isolates. First, the ‘samtools depth’ module estimation approach indicated that all FLU-R isolates of cluster I carried more than two copies of ERG11 (CNV >2) per haploid genome (Fig. 1), while sensitive isolates carried a normal copy number (CNV=1 or below) of ERG11 per haploid genome (Fig. 1). Using Integrated Genomic Viewer (IGV), the entire ORFs of ERG11, as well as the upstream gene THR1 and downstream gene HMS1 (2,814 bp; 868,152–870,965 bp), showed increased copy numbers among all the isolates having elevated ERG11 copies (Fig. S5). All the isolates had the same CNV breakpoints. Apart from ERG11, CNV differences were also detected in CDR1B, ARR3, RTA3, GZF3, ERG28, LIP1 and LIP2 (Fig. 1, Table S8). More importantly, an increased CDR1B copy number (CNV=2–8) was detected in 30 out of 51 isolates, including all cluster I isolates (Fig. 1). Among the 30 isolates with elevated CDR1B copies, 16 were FLU-R. The entire coding sequence (4,448 bp; 1,031,203–1,035,650 bp) of CDR1B has been amplified among these 30 isolates (Fig. S5). Also, increased ARR3 (4,389 bp; 280,091–284,479 bp, including upstream ORF CPAR2_601040) copy number was detected in all cluster I isolates, plus 12 additional FLU-S isolates outside of this cluster (Fig. 1; Table S8). In contrast, while RTA3 CNV was not observed in cluster I isolates, they were found in clusters II, III and V isolates (Fig. 1). The Kruskal–Wallis test indicated that increased ERG11 and CDR1B copies were strongly and positively correlated (P<0.001) with Flu MICs (Fig. 2a, b), while elevated ARR3 copies were also positively but less strongly associated with Flu MICs (P<0.05) (Fig. 2c). RTA3 copy number showed negative statistical association with Flu MIC (P<0.05) (Fig. 2d). For the remaining four genes showing CNV (GZF3, ERG28, LIP1 and LIP2), the number of isolates with increased gene copies was all small (<7 isolates) and the estimated CNVs ranged between 2 and 3 (Table S8), and their increased copy numbers did not appear to correlate with Flu resistance.
Fig. 2. Correlation between estimated copy numbers of four loci and fluconazole (Flu) MICs in Qatari C. parapsilosis isolates. (a) ERG11 (P<0.000001), (b) CDR1B (P=0.0002), (c) ARR3 (P=0.011) and (d) RTA3 (P=0.09). The association was assessed by Kruskal–Wallis test using R 4.0.0.
Aside from the ‘samtools depth’ module estimation approach, CNV was explored using CNVpytor v1.3.1 [58] with bin size set as 100 bp. The CNV results have been merged over the 51 samples, and low-quality calls were filtered, such as calls with more than half not uniquely mapped reads, non-confident calls (P≥0.0001), calls with more than 50% Ns in the reference genome, calls smaller than 1,000 bp and calls close to gaps in the reference genome (<18,000 bp). Our analyses identified several genomic regions ranging from 2,900 to 214,000 bp that might have undergone duplications and deletions (Table S9). For instance, for the isolates with high MICs to FLU in cluster I, an increased copy number of chromosome NW_023503279.1 : 868101-873500 ranging from 4 to 12 copies was observed. These regions contained some genes known to be associated with drug resistance such as ERG11, and their duplications may represent traits of adaptations, consistent with results from the first approach. However, the increased copy number in several other regions, e.g. NW_023503282.1:24801-46400 ranging from 3 to 6 copies, was present in both antifungal-resistant and -sensitive isolates. Their adaptive significance remains unknown.
The genome-wide heterozygosity patterns for all 51 isolates are shown in Fig. 3. The 51 isolates differed in their amounts of heterozygous loci, ranging from 2,060 to 16,575. None of the 51 isolates was completely homozygous. Among the five clusters, the average overall heterozygosity was highest in cluster V (2,429), followed by clusters III (1,970), IV (1,622), I (1,435) and II (1,402). Interestingly, while all 8 chromosomes in all 51 strains contained heterozygous loci, there were differences in the frequency of heterozygosity within and among the chromosomes. For example, chromosome NW_023503284.1 had the highest overall heterozygosity, with an average of 255 heterozygous loci present in this 957,321 bp scaffold (0.24 per kb). NW_023503280.1 and NW_023503277.1 had similarly low heterozygosity, at 0.07 per kb. Various heterozygosity frequencies were also observed among different strains for each chromosome. The heterozygous loci ranged from 16 to 117 in NW_023503277.1 across strains. Large chromosomal regions with limited or no heterozygous loci were likely the results of recent loss of heterozygosity events. Such regions are found in all isolates on all chromosomes (Fig. 3). For FLU-R isolates, while several chromosomal regions such as those highlighted on chromosomes 1 (NW_023503281) and 3 (NW_023503283) had limited heterozygosity, such low heterozygosity was also found in several FLU-sensitive isolates. Thus, the loss of heterozygosity alone cannot account for differences in fluconazole susceptibilities.
Fig. 3. Loss of heterozygosity pattern of 51 C. parapsilosis strains across 8 genome scaffolds. Each block illustrates the heterozygous level for a scaffold which was divided into non-overlapping 5,000 bp windows. The intensity of the blue colour represents the number of heterozygous loci for each window.
Higher expression of ERG11 and CDR1b in FLU-R C. parapsilosis
The expression levels of ERG11 and CDR1b were compared between FLU-R (n=8) and FLU-S (n=4) isolates using RT-qPCR. Notably, ERG11 expression was significantly higher among the FLU-R strains compared to the sensitive ones (P<0.05) (Fig. 4). Similarly, the expression of CDR1b was greater in FLU-R isolates than FLU-S isolates, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.073) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Gene expression levels of ERG11 and CDR1b in representative FLU-R and FLU-S C. parapsilosis isolates assessed by qPCR using ACT1 as the reference. Gene expression levels were displayed using bar charts, with individual data points overlaid as dot plots. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean for each group. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. * denotes P<0.05.
Discussion
In this study, the proportion of clinical isolates of C. parapsilosis resistant to fluconazole was high. All FLU-R isolates in cluster I may have survived and persisted outside the human hosts and on inanimate surfaces for a long period of time, which may be similar to the behaviour of C. auris. The persistence of FLU-R isolates spanning a range of time has been reported in various countries [68,69]. For instance, FLU-R C. parapsilosis (FLU-R Cp) has been recovered over a period of 3–7 years [27]. Our result here is consistent with previous reports and suggests the ability of FLU-R Cp to persist long term in Qatar hospitals.
The observed rate of FLU-R Cp in this Qatari population (36%) is comparable to those reported in several recent studies of C. parapsilosis in other geographic regions [5,14, 15, 70]. For example, ~30% of C. parapsilosis isolates from the female reproductive tract in Hainan Province, China, were resistant to fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole [70]. Greater popularity of fluconazole in candidemia treatment due to lower cost compared to echinocandins could be the driving force in the elevated frequency of FLU-R Cp [1]. However, only 4 of the 18 patients with FLU-R Cp were ever treated with fluconazole (or any azole drug). Similarly, none of the patients with triazole-resistant C. parapsilosis reported earlier from Hainan had triazole antifungal treatment prior to sampling and diagnosis [70]. The results suggest that most triazole-resistant C. parapsilosis strains in Qatar and other places were not driven by triazole selection within individual patients during drug treatment but instead were acquired from environmental or other sources. Indeed, there is increasing evidence indicating triazole fungicide applications in agriculture and food industry as a major driver for the emergence and spread of triazole-resistant fungal pathogens in humans [71,72].
Ninety-six per cent of Cp isolates analysed here were recovered from HAIs, of which 15 were isolated from COVID-19 patients, who had stayed in COVID-19-designated ICUs during the pandemic in Qatar. Although these COVID-19-related isolates did not cluster into one clonal group but were distributed in at least three major clusters, the pattern was similar to that found for the Qatari N. glabratus [33], in which COVID-19-related isolates were distributed in four different genetic clusters. In contrast, COVID-19-associated C. auris had a higher level of clonality among Qatari isolates [34]. Smaller genetic variation among isolates from COVID-19 patients compared to related isolates in the cluster I indicated that a portion of the COVID-19-associated isolates may have come from a recent common ancestor. The pandemics could have driven the expansion of certain clones due to nosocomial transmission. Medical teams and staff caring for the patients in different wards/units may be the cause of HAIs. Also, hospital environmental niches, such as bedside carts, bed rails, infusion pumps and cardiac monitors, have been proposed as the source of FLU-R Cp [14]. Multiple genomic epidemiological investigations on C. parapsilosis have been performed in various countries, and nosocomial transmission has been reported in Canada [31] and Turkey [23]. Notably, our data indicated the isolates from different hospitals grouped together in the same phylogenetic cluster, particularly those from COVID-19 patients in clusters II and IV. This demonstrates the value of WGS analysis to detect and characterize phylogenetic clusters and outbreaks and shows the importance of monitoring local antifungal resistance trends in invasive fungal infections.
The spread and persistence of drug-resistant C. parapsilosis strains in clinical settings could lead to the failure of antifungal treatment. While FLU-R Cp was common in Qatar, all the Qatari isolates were sensitive to echinocandins, suggesting that a shift in treatment strategies from the commonly recommended to a new one is needed in Qatar. Echinocandin with amphotericin B is an alternative option for FLU-R isolates. Among oral antifungals, posaconazole, isavuconazonium sulphate and voriconazole remain potential options for FLU-R Cp infections [73,74]. However, the efficacy of alternative azoles in the current setting has not been well established, and most experts advocate for the use of a different antifungal class [73,74]. Therefore, prevention strategies should consider appropriate control measures against both exogenous and endogenous infection reservoirs [1].
In our study, none of the FLU-R isolates in Qatar carried the known mutations that result in reduced drug binding at the Erg11 such as Y132F and K143R [5,8, 26]. Similarly, other mutations associated with loci that confer resistance or regulate or activate the drug efflux such as Mrr1 (A854V), Tac1 (L518F, G650E), Erg3 (G111R) and Upc2 (Q371H) [8,19, 20] were also not detected. The lack of signature mutations in azole target loci and ergosterol synthesis pathway genes indicated that these isolates have developed other mechanisms to confer fluconazole resistance.
CNV represents one of the molecular mechanisms to confer fluconazole resistance. In this study, ERG11 CNV was discovered in all 18 FLU-R isolates in cluster I, amid one fluconazole-sensitive isolate. Also, we have detected CNV in ERG11 in four FLU-R Cp isolates in South Korea, which also had no reported mutation in ERG11, TAC1 and MRR1 [75], using the same samtools suite (data not shown). Previously, CNV in ERG11 has been reported in C. parapsilosis in two studies [64,65]. Genomic analysis from a Chinese team revealed 21 azole-resistant C. parapsilosis isolates had either whole-chromosomal aneuploidy or chromosomal segmental duplication of 2.3–12.1 kb [65]. In contrast, a study conducted in the USA found two South African isolates exhibiting CNV among 35 FLU-R isolates; the entire ORF was amplified in the first one, while only the promoter region was amplified in the second [64]. Based on the RT-qPCR findings, the greater expression of ERG11, associated with greater copy numbers, could lead to increased fluconazole resistance in clinical settings. Apart from ERG11, we also detected CNV in CDR1B, RTA3 and ARR3, which have been reported to be associated with increased azole MICs or other selective pressures in C. parapsilosis [76,79]. Specifically, increased expression of CDR1B, which encodes an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, has been reported in FLU-R Cp isolates in a previous study [64] and in this study, though not statistically significant. Although the association between Flu MICs and copy numbers of CDR1B as well as RTA3 was statistically significant in our study, increased amplification of these two genes was unlikely to be sufficient to cause fluconazole resistance. This is because several FLU-S isolates also had elevated CNV at these two genes. Bergin et al. also argued that higher CDR1B copy numbers did not correlate well with higher MIC, and Nanopore sequencing data suggested that CDR1B (CPAR2_304370) in the original C. parapsilosis CDC317 genome assembly could contain two nearly identical genes in tandem. RTA3 encodes a putative phosphatidylcholine floppase, and its increased copy number was reported to be associated with miltefosine resistance, but not fluconazole, among clinical C. parapsilosis isolates [77]. The increased CNV of ARR3 did not appear to be associated with increased fluconazole resistance in the current investigation. Selmecki argued that the increased amplification of these two genes plays important roles in physiological adaptation in C. parapsilosis [78].
CNV in ERG11 has been implicated as a resistance mechanism to fluconazole in various Candida species [8], such as C. tropicalis [66], and other fungal species like Malassezia pachydermatis [80] and Trichophyton indotineae (as homologues of CYP51) [81]. Indeed, CNV is one of the major molecular mechanisms linked to antifungal resistance and adaptations. CNV and segmental aneuploidy in C. albicans have been associated with decreased susceptibility or increased tolerance and resistance to antifungal drugs in clinical isolates and in laboratory evolution experiments [82,84].
GWAS detected several putative variants that could be associated with resistance to Flu and Fc. These variants are in genes of unknown functions at present. Specifically, one missense and a silent mutation in ALS3 (one of the 16 members in the gene family) could be linked to resistance to Fc and Flu, respectively. Cell surface Als (agglutinin-like sequence) proteins can activate cell–cell adhesion that helps micro-organisms to bind to host cells and regulate the adhesion of biofilms [85]. Measuring the level of ALS3 expression may be required to elucidate its role on antifungal resistance.
Efg1 and Ume6 are regulators of filamentation, morphogenesis, biofilm formation and white-opaque switching processes in Candida [62,86,89]. In C. parapsilosis, Efg1 regulates biofilm formation and a phenotypic switch [61,62]. Elevated azole resistance conferred by C. parapsilosis in biofilms has been considered a growing clinical problem [1,90, 91]. All strains of cluster I possessed unique mutations in EFG1 and UME6 as compared to samples of other clusters and unrelated isolates. It is possible that C. parapsilosis isolates with greater biofilm formation ability could be more likely to spread across the hospital environment. However, it is also possible that these genetic variabilities may represent natural neutral polymorphisms with no or limited functional implications.
CNV and loss of heterozygsity (LOH) events may involve large numbers of genes, and the co-occurrence or stepwise acquisition of these mechanisms may result in azole resistance in yeast adaptation [84]. Azole-resistant strains of C. parapsilosis appeared to exhibit reduced genetic diversity, LOH, and were enriched in a single genetic cluster in our Qatari sample of C. parapsilosis. Through LOH, drug-susceptible alleles may be lost and while those conferring drug resistance could be doubled through gene conversion such as mitotic crossing over to replace the drug-susceptible alleles. The doubling of drug-resistant alleles could help elevate MIC and, along with a further increase in copy numbers through whole or partial chromosomal duplications, may result in strains with very high MIC. Such phenomena have been observed in C. albicans and Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly Candida krusei) [82,83, 92].
There are several limitations to this study. First, we were unable to perform a molecular genetic experiment to verify the role of CNV detected in conferring resistance to a susceptible isolate. Second, the sample size (n=51) was not large; however, the data contributed to the understanding of C. parapsilosis in the Middle East region. Third, we have MIC data based on in vitro measurement in more than one platform. It is not clear whether this may have translated to treatment failure in clinical settings. Despite these shortcomings, our study revealed the presence, persistence and potential transmission of FLU-R Cp in Qatari hospital settings. Our findings extended and supported the data of Bergin et al. that increased copy numbers of ERG11 and CDR1B could result in increased fluconazole resistance [64]. Additional screening of C. parapsilosis samples from healthcare workers, indwelling devices and environmental surfaces within clinical environments will improve understanding of their nosocomial transmission pattern and help prevent the spread of FLU-R Cp [93]. In addition, extensive environmental sampling such as fruits, especially stored ones, that are known to harbour C. parapsilosis should be conducted to investigate the potential source(s) of the FLU-R Cp strains in Qatar [72,94].
Supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Guishuang Wang and Li Liu (Research Department, Sidra Medicine), Rhanty Nabor and Lamya Dalil (Department of Pathology, Sidra Medicine, Qatar), Dr Emad Ibrahim and Dr Saad Taj-Aldeen (HMC, Qatar) and laboratory staff and healthcare workers and staff in Hamad General Hospitals for their dedicated work. We are grateful to Will Hsiao and Jun Duan (Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada), as well as Eric Lim and Kaushal Krishna Kaslikar (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore), for technical support in computer and bioinformatics analysis. Also, the work was supported in part through computational resources (Sockeye) and services provided by Advanced Research Computing at the University of British Columbia, Canada. In addition, this research was enabled by support provided by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada (alliancecan.ca) and the general-purpose cluster (Cedar).
Abbreviations
- BLINK
Bayesian-information and Linkage-disequilibrium Iteratively Nested Keyway
- CLSI
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes
- CNV
copy number variation
- COVID-19
coronavirus disease 2019
- CSF
cerebrospinal fluid
- ECVs
epidemiological cutoff values
- FarmCPU
Fixed and random model Circulating Probability Unification
- FLU-R
fluconazole-resistant
- FLU-R Cp
FLU-R Candida parapsilosis
- GWAS
genome-wide association study
- HAI
hospital-acquired infection
- HGH
Hamad General Hospital
- HMGH
Hazm Mebaireek Hospital
- ICUs
intensive care units
- LD
linkage disequilibrium
- MIC
minimum inhibitory concentration
- NHSN
National Healthcare Safety Network
- QTNs
quantitative trait nucleotides
- REM
random effect model
- SDD
susceptible dose-dependent
- SM
Sidra Medicine
- TD
Tajima’s D
- WGS
whole-genome sequencing
Footnotes
Funding: This study was funded by the Sidra Medicine Internal Research Grant (SDR_200052 to A.P.- L. and C.K.-M.T.), the Medical Research Centre at Hamad Medical Corporation (MRC-01019420 to F.B.A.) and the Global Science Initiative at McMaster University (2020–3 to J.X.).
Ethical statement: The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee (IRB #2019-0009). This was a retrospective, non-interventional study and only required a collection of previously generated data; informed consent was not required.
Author contributions: Conceptualization: F.B.A. and C.T. Methodology: F.B.A., H.S., A.P.-L. and C.T. Investigation: Z.Z., Y.W., F.B.A., H.S., H.E., B.S., K.A.I., R.Z., S.S., K.W., J.X. and C.T. Resources: B.L., M.A.-M., A.A.S., A.P.-L. and J.X. Formal analysis: Z.Z., Y.W., H.E., B.S., R.Z., K.W., J.X. and C.T. Writing, review and editing: all authors. Supervision: M.A.-M., A.P.-L. and C.T. Funding acquisition: A.A.S., F.B.A., A.P.-L., J.X. and C.T. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Contributor Information
Zhu Zhang, Email: zhangzhu001110@gmail.com.
Yue Wang, Email: wangy660@mcmaster.ca.
Fatma Ben Abid, Email: fabid@hamad.qa.
Husam Salah, Email: HMohamed2@hamad.qa.
Khalil Al Ismail, Email: KIsmail4@hamad.qa.
Haneen Eldos, Email: hia4003@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Bincy Samuel, Email: bgs4001@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Ruwen Zhou, Email: ruwen001@e.ntu.edu.sg.
Sathyavathi Sundararaju, Email: sathyasundararaju@gmail.com.
Mohammed Suleimen, Email: MSuleiman@sidra.org.
Kun Wang, Email: kwang@sidra.org.
Bernett Lee, Email: bernett.lee@ntu.edu.sg.
Muna Al Maslamani, Email: MALMASLAMANI@hamad.qa.
Ali A. Sultan, Email: als2026@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Andres Perez-Lopez, Email: aperezlopez@sidra.org.
Jianping Xu, Email: jpxu@mcmaster.ca.
Clement K.M. Tsui, Email: ctsui@mail.ubc.ca; clement.km.tsui@nhghealth.com.sg.
References
- 1.Daneshnia F, de Almeida Júnior JN, Ilkit M, Lombardi L, Perry AM, et al. Worldwide emergence of fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis: current framework and future research roadmap. Lancet Microbe . 2023;4:e470–e480. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00067-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tóth R, Nosek J, Mora-Montes HM, Gabaldon T, Bliss JM, et al. Candida parapsilosis: from genes to the bedside. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32:00111–00118. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khalifa HO, Watanabe A, Kamei K. Antifungal resistance and genotyping of clinical candida parapsilosis complex in Japan. J Fungi. 10:4. doi: 10.3390/jof10010004. n.d. Epub ahead of print 20 December 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Díaz-García J, Mesquida A, Sánchez-Carrillo C, Reigadas E, Muñoz P, et al. Monitoring the epidemiology and antifungal resistance of yeasts causing fungemia in a tertiary care hospital in Madrid, Spain: any relevant changes in the last 13 Years? Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2021;65:e01827-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01827-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mesquida A, Alcoceba E, Padilla E, Ramírez A, Merino P, et al. Fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis genotypes from hospitals located in five Spanish cities and one in Italy: description of azole-resistance profiles associated with the Y132F ERG11p substitution. Mycoses. 2024;67:e13706. doi: 10.1111/myc.13706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arastehfar A, Daneshnia F, Najafzadeh MJ, Hagen F, Mahmoudi S, et al. Evaluation of molecular epidemiology, clinical characteristics, antifungal susceptibility profiles, and molecular mechanisms of antifungal resistance of Iranian Candida parapsilosis species complex blood isolates. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:206. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pappas PG, Lionakis MS, Arendrup MC, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Kullberg BJ. Invasive candidiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18026. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gabaldón T. Threats from the Candida parapsilosis complex: the surge of multidrug resistance and a hotbed for new emerging pathogens. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2024;88:e0002923. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00029-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Asogan M, Kim HY, Kidd S, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Govender NP, et al. Candida parapsilosis: a systematic review to inform the world health organization fungal priority pathogens list. Med Mycol . 2024;62:myad131. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myad131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schikora-Tamarit MÀ, Gabaldón T. Using genomics to understand the mechanisms of virulence and drug resistance in fungal pathogens. Biochem Soc Trans. 2022;50:1259–1268. doi: 10.1042/BST20211123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Butler G, Rasmussen MD, Lin MF, Santos MAS, Sakthikumar S, et al. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature. 2009;459:657–662. doi: 10.1038/nature08064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sai S, Holland LM, McGee CF, Lynch DB, Butler G. Evolution of mating within the Candida parapsilosis species group. Eukaryot Cell . 2011;10:578–587. doi: 10.1128/EC.00276-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Souza ACR, Fuchs BB, Pinhati HMS, Siqueira RA, Hagen F, et al. Candida parapsilosis resistance to fluconazole: molecular mechanisms and in vivo impact in infected Galleria mellonella larvae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:6581–6587. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01177-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thomaz DY, de Almeida JN, Jr, Sejas ONE, Del Negro GMB, Carvalho GOMH, et al. Environmental clonal spread of azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis with Erg11-Y132F mutation causing a large candidemia outbreak in a brazilian cancer referral center. J Fungi (Basel) 2021;7:259. doi: 10.3390/jof7040259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Magobo RE, Lockhart SR, Govender NP. Fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis strains with a Y132F substitution in the ERG11 gene causing invasive infections in a neonatal unit, South Africa. Mycoses. 2020;63:471–477. doi: 10.1111/myc.13070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Diab-Elschahawi M, Forstner C, Hagen F, Meis JF, Lassnig AM, et al. Microsatellite genotyping clarified conspicuous accumulation of Candida parapsilosis at a cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3422–3426. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01179-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arastehfar A, Daneshnia F, Hilmioğlu-Polat S, Fang W, Yaşar M, et al. First report of candidemia clonal outbreak caused by emerging fluconazole-resistant candida parapsilosis isolates harboring Y132F and/or Y132F+K143R in Turkey. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2020;64 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01001-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Daneshnia F, de Almeida Júnior JN, Arastehfar A, Lombardi L, Shor E, et al. Determinants of fluconazole resistance and echinocandin tolerance in C. parapsilosis isolates causing a large clonal candidemia outbreak among COVID-19 patients in a Brazilian ICU. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022;11:2264–2274. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2117093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Doorley LA, Rybak JM, Berkow EL, Zhang Q, Morschhäuser J, et al. Candida parapsilosis Mdr1B and Cdr1B Are Drivers of Mrr1-mediated clinical fluconazole resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66:e0028922. doi: 10.1128/aac.00289-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hartuis S, Ourliac-Garnier I, Robert E, Albassier M, Duchesne L, et al. Precise genome editing underlines the distinct contributions of mutations in ERG11, ERG3, MRR1, and TAC1 genes to antifungal resistance in candida parapsilosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024;68:e0002224. doi: 10.1128/aac.00022-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Doorley LA, Barker KS, Zhang Q, Rybak JM, Rogers PD. Mutations in TAC1 and ERG11 are major drivers of triazole antifungal resistance in clinical isolates of Candida parapsilosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29:1602. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brassington PJT, Klefisch F-R, Graf B, Pfüller R, Kurzai O, et al. Genomic reconstruction of an azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis outbreak and the creation of a multi-locus sequence typing scheme: a retrospective observational and genomic epidemiology study. Lancet Microbe . 2025;6:100949. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Arastehfar A, Hilmioğlu-Polat S, Daneshnia F, Pan W, Hafez A, et al. Clonal candidemia outbreak by Candida parapsilosis carrying Y132F in Turkey: evolution of a persisting challenge. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:676177. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.676177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ning Y-T, Sun T-S, Dai R-C, Luo Z-Y, Yu S-Y, et al. Emergence of multiple fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto clones with persistence and transmission in China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024;79:128–133. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thomaz DY, de Almeida JN, Jr, Lima GME, Nunes M de O, Camargo CH, et al. An Azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis outbreak: clonal persistence in the intensive care unit of a Brazilian teaching hospital. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2997. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Corzo-Leon DE, Peacock M, Rodriguez-Zulueta P, Salazar-Tamayo GJ, MacCallum DM. General hospital outbreak of invasive candidiasis due to azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis associated with an Erg11 Y132F mutation. Med Mycol. 2021;59:664–671. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaa098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Choi YJ, Kim Y-J, Yong D, Byun J-H, Kim TS, et al. Fluconazole-Resistant Candida parapsilosis bloodstream isolates with Y132F Mutation in ERG11 Gene, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1768–1770. doi: 10.3201/eid2409.180625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Singh A, Singh PK, de Groot T, Kumar A, Mathur P, et al. Emergence of clonal fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates in a multicentre laboratory-based surveillance study in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:1260–1268. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ergon MC, Gürbüz ED, Arslan N, Alp S, Dereli MD, et al. Investigation of clonal relationship in hospital-associated Candida parapsilosis isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025;44:311–322. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04998-2. Epub ahead of print 29 November 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abdolrasouli A, Curtis CM, Spruijtenburg B, Flores A, Brown MN, et al. Cluster of clonal fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis harbouring Y132F mutation in ERG11 gene in a neonatal ICU in the UK. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2025;80:887–890. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McTaggart LR, Eshaghi A, Hota S, Poutanen SM, Johnstone J, et al. First Canadian report of transmission of fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis within two hospital networks confirmed by genomic analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2024;62:e0116123. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01161-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Omrani AS, Koleri J, Ben Abid F, Daghfel J, Odaippurath T, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for COVID-19-associated Candidemia. Med Mycol. 2021;59:1262–1266. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myab056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang Y, Xu J, Ben Abid F, Salah H, Sundararaju S, et al. Population genomic analyses reveal high diversity, recombination and nosocomial transmission among Candida glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabrata) isolates causing invasive infections. Microb Genom. 2024;10:001179. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ben Abid F, Salah H, Sundararaju S, Dalil L, Abdelwahab AH, et al. Molecular characterization of Candida auris outbreak isolates in Qatar from patients with COVID-19 reveals the emergence of isolates resistant to three classes of antifungal drugs. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29:1083. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.04.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ramos-Martínez A, Pintos-Pascual I, Guinea J, Gutiérrez-Villanueva A, Gutiérrez-Abreu E, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical profile of candidemia and the incidence of fungemia due to fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis. JoF. 2022;8:451. doi: 10.3390/jof8050451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hoenigl M, Seidel D, Sprute R, Cunha C, Oliverio M, et al. COVID-19-associated fungal infections. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7:1127–1140. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01172-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Siopi M, Georgiou P-C, Paranos P, Beredaki M-I, Tarpatzi A, et al. Increase in candidemia cases and emergence of fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis and C. auris isolates in a tertiary care academic hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, Greece, 2020 to 2023. Eurosurveillance. 2024;29 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.29.2300661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.CLSI . Fourth International Supplement; CLSI Document M27-4. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10:giab008. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly. 2012;6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Skrzypek MS, Binkley J, Binkley G, Miyasato SR, Simison M, et al. The Candida Genome Database (CGD): incorporation of assembly 22, systematic identifiers and visualization of high throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D592–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yadav A, Jain P, Jain K, Wang Y, Singh A, et al. Genomic analyses of a fungemia outbreak caused by lodderomyces elongisporus in a neonatal intensive care unit in Delhi, India. mBio. 2023;14:e0063623. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00636-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Statist. 1947;18:50–60. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177730491. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Torchiano M. Effsize - a package for efficient effect size computation. Zenodo. 2016 doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.196082. Epub ahead of print 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhai B, Liao C, Jaggavarapu S, Tang Y, Rolling T, et al. Antifungal heteroresistance causes prophylaxis failure and facilitates breakthrough Candida parapsilosis infections. Nat Med. 2024;30:3163–3172. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03183-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang J, Zhang Z. GAPIT Version 3: boosting power and accuracy for genomic association and prediction. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2021;19:629–640. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Huang M, Liu X, Zhou Y, Summers RM, Zhang Z. BLINK: a package for the next level of genome-wide association studies with both individuals and markers in the millions. Gigascience. 2019;8:giy154. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Todd RT, Selmecki A. Copy number variation and allele ratio analysis in Candida albicans using whole genome sequencing data. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2658:105–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3155-3_8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Suvakov M, Panda A, Diesh C, Holmes I, Abyzov A. CNVpytor: a tool for copy number variation detection and analysis from read depth and allele imbalance in whole-genome sequencing. Gigascience. 2021;10:giab074. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2156–2158. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hunter JD. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9:90–95. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Connolly LA, Riccombeni A, Grózer Z, Holland LM, Lynch DB, et al. The APSES transcription factor Efg1 is a global regulator that controls morphogenesis and biofilm formation in Candida parapsilosis. Mol Microbiol. 2013;90:36–53. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Holland LM, Schröder MS, Turner SA, Taff H, Andes D, et al. Comparative phenotypic analysis of the major fungal pathogens Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004365. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jay A, Jordan DF, Gerstein A, Landry CR. The role of gene copy number variation in antimicrobial resistance in human fungal pathogens. npj Antimicrob Resist . 2025;3:1. doi: 10.1038/s44259-024-00072-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bergin S, Doorley LA, Rybak JM, Wolfe KH, Butler G, et al. Analysis of clinical Candida parapsilosis isolates reveals copy number variation in key fluconazole resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024;68:e0161923. doi: 10.1128/aac.01619-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ning Y, Dai R, Zhang L, Xu Y, Xiao M. Copy number variants of ERG11: mechanism of azole resistance in Candida parapsilosis. Lancet Microbe . 2024;5:e10. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00294-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fan X, Dai R-C, Zhang S, Geng Y-Y, Kang M, et al. Tandem gene duplications contributed to high-level azole resistance in a rapidly expanding Candida tropicalis population. Nat Commun. 2023;14:8369. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43380-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhou X, Hilk A, Solis NV, Scott N, Beach A, et al. Single-cell detection of copy number changes reveals dynamic mechanisms of adaptation to antifungals in Candida albicans. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9:2923–2938. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01795-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tóth R, Cabral V, Thuer E, Bohner F, Németh T, et al. Investigation of Candida parapsilosis virulence regulatory factors during host-pathogen interaction. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19453-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fekkar A, Blaize M, Bouglé A, Normand A-C, Raoelina A, et al. Hospital outbreak of fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis: arguments for clonal transmission and long-term persistence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2021;65 doi: 10.1128/AAC.02036-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meng Q, Wang H, Xiao W, Mai W, Liu Y, et al. Prevalence, drug resistance and genetic diversity of Candida glabrata in the reproductive tract of pregnant women in Hainan and comparison with global multilocus sequence data. Mycology. 2025;16:1400–1417. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2025.2461725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Fisher MC, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Berman J, Bicanic T, Bignell EM, et al. Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20:557–571. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00720-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Xu J. Assessing global fungal threats to humans. mLife. 2022;1:223–240. doi: 10.1002/mlf2.12036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Cornely OA, Hoenigl M, Lass-Flörl C, Chen SC-A, Kontoyiannis DP, et al. Defining breakthrough invasive fungal infection-position paper of the mycoses study group education and research consortium and the European confederation of medical mycology. Mycoses. 2019;62:716–729. doi: 10.1111/myc.12960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:e1–50. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kim TY, Huh HJ, Lee GY, Choi MJ, Yu H-J, et al. Evolution of fluconazole resistance mechanisms and clonal types of Candida parapsilosis isolates from a tertiary care hospital in South Korea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66:e0088922. doi: 10.1128/aac.00889-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.West PT, Peters SL, Olm MR, Yu FB, Gause H, et al. Genetic and behavioral adaptation of Candida parapsilosis to the microbiome of hospitalized infants revealed by in situ genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics. Microbiome. 2021;9:142. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01085-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bergin SA, Zhao F, Ryan AP, Müller CA, Nieduszynski CA, et al. Systematic analysis of copy number variations in the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis identifies a gene amplification in RTA3 that is associated with drug resistance. mBio. 2022;13:e0177722. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01777-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Selmecki A. Recurrent copy number variations in the human fungal pathogen Candida parapsilosis. mBio. 2023;14:e0071323. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00713-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Papuc A-M, Veríssimo C, Simões H, Toscano C, Gomes JP, et al. Phenotypic and genomic characterization of azole resistance in Portuguese Candida parapsilosis isolates. Front Fungal Biol . 2025;6:1713961. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2025.1713961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kim M, Cho Y-J, Park M, Choi Y, Hwang SY, et al. Genomic tandem quadruplication is associated with ketoconazole resistance in Malassezia pachydermatis. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;28:1937–1945. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1810.10019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yamada T, Maeda M, Nagai H, Salamin K, Chang Y-T, et al. Two different types of tandem sequences mediate the overexpression of TinCYP51B in azole-resistant Trichophyton indotineae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023;67:e0093323. doi: 10.1128/aac.00933-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Vande Zande P, Zhou X, Selmecki A. The dynamic fungal genome: polyploidy, aneuploidy and copy number variation in response to stress. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2023;77:341–361. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-041320-112443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Todd RT, Soisangwan N, Peters S, Kemp B, Crooks T, et al. Antifungal drug concentration impacts the spectrum of adaptive mutations in Candida albicans. Mol Biol Evol. 2023;40:msad009. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Vande Zande P, Gautier C, Kawar N, Maufrais C, Metzner K, et al. Step-wise evolution of azole resistance through copy number variation followed by KSR1 loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20:e1012497. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Klotz SA, Gaur NK, De Armond R, Sheppard D, Khardori N, et al. Candida albicans Als proteins mediate aggregation with bacteria and yeasts. Med Mycol. 2007;45:363–370. doi: 10.1080/13693780701299333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Glazier VE. EFG1, everyone’s favorite gene in Candida albicans: a comprehensive literature review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:855229. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.855229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.La Bella AA, Andersen MJ, Gervais NC, Molina JJ, Molesan A, et al. The catheterized bladder environment promotes Efg1- and Als1-dependent Candida albicans infection. Sci Adv. 2023;9:eade7689. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade7689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Banerjee M, Lazzell AL, Romo JA, Lopez-Ribot JL, Kadosh D. Filamentation is associated with reduced pathogenicity of multiple non-albicans Candida species. mSphere. 2019;4:e00656-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00656-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Louvet M, Li J, Brandalise D, Bachmann D, Sala de Oyanguren F, et al. Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in Candida auris. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12:e0153124. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01531-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Silva S, Negri M, Henriques M, Oliveira R, Williams DW, et al. Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36:288–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kuhn DM, Mikherjee PK, Clark TA, Pujol C, Chandra J, et al. Candida parapsilosis characterization in an outbreak setting. Emerg Infect Dis . 2004;10:1074–1081. doi: 10.3201/eid1006.030873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Jain K, Wang Y, Jain P, Kalita B, Shivarathri R, et al. Genomic analyses reveal high diversity and rapid evolution of Pichia kudriavzevii within a neonatal intensive care unit in Delhi, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025;69:e0170924. doi: 10.1128/aac.01709-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wang Y, Han L, Gong J, Liu L, Miao B, et al. Research advances and public health strategies in China on WHO priority fungal pathogens. Mycology. 2025;16:1437–1477. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2025.2561612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yadav A, Jain K, Wang Y, Pawar K, Kaur H, et al. Candida auris on apples: diversity and clinical significance. mBio. 2022;13:e0051822. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00518-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequencing reads are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the BioProject accession number PRJNA997443. BioSample and SRA accession numbers are listed in Table S1. Codes for CNV analysis are available in https://github.com/tequilasunrise0/Candida-CNV-analysis.




