Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 2026 Feb;32(2):250–254. doi: 10.3201/eid3202.250686

Multiplex PCR to Differentiate Monkeypox Virus Clades

Christopher T Williams 1, Alessandra Romero-Ramirez 1, Adeleye Adesola Semiu 1, Samuel Oluwafunmbi Ifabumuyi 1, Caitlin Greenland-Bews 1, Susan Gould 1, Dominic Wooding 1, Collette Allen 1, Anushri Somasundaran 1, Nicodemus Nnabuike Mkpuma 1, Dorcas Gado 1, Jolly Amoche Adole 1, Abdulakeem Eniola Amoo 1, Abisola Ajoke Adeyemi 1, Laure Bosquillon de Jarcy 1, Christine Goffinet 1, Jake Dunning 1, Malcolm G Semple 1; The International Severe Acute Respiratory1; Emerging Infection Consortium Investigators,1, Esto Bahizire 1, Afolabi Akinpelu 1, Thomas E Fletcher 1, Ana I Cubas-Atienzar 1, Cristina Leggio 1, Adeyinka Adedeji 1, Adesuyi A Omoare 1, Thomas Edwards 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12928233  PMID: 41663215

Abstract

We designed a multiplex quantitative PCR to differentiate monkeypox virus clades. For clinical samples collected in the United Kingdom and Nigeria, sensitivity was 78% (95% CI 67.67%–86.14%) and specificity 94% (95% CI 80.84%–99.30%); for samples with cycle thresholds <35, sensitivity was 98% (95% CI 91.72%–99.96%) and specificity 94% (95% CI 80.84%–99.30%).

Keywords: MPXV, monkeypox virus, mpox, viruses, PCR, diagnostics, zoonoses, United Kingdom, Nigeria


Mpox is a zoonotic viral disease caused by monkeypox virus (MPXV). There are 2 MPXV clades; clade I is historically associated with a higher disease severity and case-fatality ratio compared with clade II (1). Clade II is subdivided into IIa and IIb. Lineage B.1 emerged from IIb as the dominant MPXV lineage in 2022 (2), with marked human-to-human transmission linked to sexual activity (3,4) but lower mortality rates (5). Clade I is subdivided into Ia and Ib; Ib emerged in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2023 (6). Similar to lineage B.1, the clade Ib outbreak resulted in decreased mortality with sustained human-to-human transmission (6,7). An ≈1 kb deletion occurs in the OPG032 gene in clade Ib (6). This segment is the target of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clade I PCR (8).

Diagnosis of mpox relies on PCR testing performed on lesion swab specimens (9). Because the clinical manifestations of mpox are similar between clades, clade identification typically requires sequencing, which is time-consuming, expensive, and difficult to implement in low- and middle-income countries. We designed a multiplex quantitative PCR to differentiate monkeypox virus clades.

The Study

We used DNA extracted from cultured lineage B.1 MPXV (European Virus Archive Global, https://www.european-virus-archive.com; strain no. Slovenia_MPXV-1_2022, clade hMPXV-1, lineage B.1), and 47 clinical samples from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium clinical characterization protocol study (ethics approval no. REC 13/SC/0149). We propagated viral isolates in Vero E6 cells and extracted DNA by using the QIAamp 96 Virus QIAcube-HT Kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com) on a QIAcube-HT (QIAGEN), following manufacturer instructions. Samples collected in 2018 (n = 11) were from persons with suspected West Africa travel–associated mpox, and samples from 2022 (n = 36) were from suspected United Kingdom mpox cases. According to the reference CDC mpox PCR (10), 32 samples were MPXV-positive. We made minor adjustments to the CDC PCR by reducing the reaction volume and not performing the RNase P assay. All confirmed UK cases from 2018 were clade IIb from West Africa, whereas the UK Health Security Agency sequencing data revealed that 99% of 2022 mpox cases were lineage B.1 (11).

We also tested 54 MPXV-positive lesion samples from routine mpox diagnostic surveillance at the National Reference Laboratory (Abuja, Nigeria) of the Nigerian Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC; approval granted by the Research Governance Unit). Samples were collected in 2017 (n = 7), 2018 (n = 11), 2019 (n = 10), 2021 (n = 10), 2023 (n = 12), and 2024 (n = 4). We used 20 varicella zoster virus PCR-positive samples (PCR-negative for mpox) as negatives. We extracted DNA by using QIAmp DNA mini kits (QIAGEN), following manufacturer instructions. We retrospectively analyzed serial dilutions of DNA from stocks of clade Ia (hMpxV/DRC-INRB/22MPX0422C/2023, 2023-WHO-LS-008) and Ib (hMpxV/DRC-INRB/24MPX0203V/2024, 2024-WHO-LS-003) MPXV to determine limits of detection.

We identified clade-specific mutations by using Nextstrain (genome NC_063383.1; https://nextstrain.org/mpox/all-clades). We downloaded sequences for each clade and lineage from GenBank and aligned through ClustalW by using MEGA 11 (https://www.megasoftware.net). We manually designed the probes to contain mutations in the middle. We designed the primers by using PrimerQuest (Integrated DNA Technologies, https://eu.idtdna.com). The clade I probe targeted the F3L gene (mutation sites T46417C, G46421A, A46427C, C46435T), and the lineage B.1 probe targeted the OPG109 gene (mutation site C84587T). An assay on the OPG210 gene (mutation sites G183695A, C183696T) distinguishes clade IIb from non-IIb; clade IIb contains the F3L and OPG210 gene mutations, whereas clade IIa and clade I do not. The clade Ib assay targets the ≈1 kb deletion (Δ19,128–20,270) in the OPG032 gene (Table 1)

Table 1. Assay interpretation of multiplex PCR to differentiate monkeypox virus clades from the United Kingdom and Nigeria*.

Result Probe
Clade I (T46417C, G46421A, A46427C, C46435T) Clade Ib (Δ19,128–20,270) Non-IIb (G183695, C183696) Clade IIb (G183695A, C183696T) Lineage B.1 (C84587T)
Clade Ia Positive Negative Positive Negative Negative
Clade Ib Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative
Clade IIa Negative Negative Positive Negative Negative
Clade IIb Negative Negative Negative Positive Negative
Lineage B.1 Negative Negative Negative Positive Positive

*Values in parentheses are the sites of nucleotide mutations each probe was assigned to.

We used TaqPath-Fast mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com), primers and probes (Appendix), nuclease-free water, and 2.5 µl of DNA for quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions. To improve specificity for lineage B.1, we designed a blocker oligo identical to the B.1 probe but without the mutation and with a 5′ end phosphate instead of a fluorophore. We conducted experiments on a Quantstudio 5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by using the thermal profile 95°C for 20 seconds, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 1 second and 60°C for 10 seconds. We used a positivity cutoff cycle threshold (Ct) of 38, with thresholds set at 10% of the maximum fluorescence of the positive control. We used synthetic double-stranded DNA containing target amplicons (Twist Bioscience, https://www.twistbioscience.com) or DNA from viral stocks as positive controls.

We created standard curves of clade I, IIb, and non-IIb DNA controls in triplicate from 1 × 104 to 1 copies/µL (Figure). We quantified DNA extracted from lineage B.1 and clade Ia and Ib viral stocks from the DNA controls to make standard curves. We conducted all analysis with the finalized multiplex. We conducted 20 replicates at 10 copies/µL and 1 copy/µL for each target; all replicates at 10 copies/µL successfully amplified.

Figure.

Figure

Standard curves of each monkeypox virus PCR target for multiplex PCR to differentiate monkeypox virus clades. A) Synthetic DNA containing clade I amplicon (R2 0.997, efficiency 98.1%). B) DNA extracted from stock of clade Ia virus (clade I curve: R2 0.998, efficiency 96.4%; non-IIb curve: R2 0.992, efficiency 103.394%). C) DNA extracted from stock of clade Ib virus (clade I curve: R2 0.986, efficiency 98.858%; non-IIb curve: R2 0.996, efficiency 93.9%; Ib curve: R2 0.996, efficiency 95.067%). D) Synthetic DNA containing non-IIb amplicon (R2 0.994, efficiency 97%). E) Synthetic DNA containing IIb amplicon (R2 0.98, efficiency 109.2%). F) DNA extracted from stock of lineage B.1 virus (IIb curve: R2 0.999, efficiency 101.4%; lineage B.1 curve: R2 0.996, efficiency 96.6%). Ct, cycle threshold, R2, coefficient of determination.

In the UK evaluation, our assay had 97% (95% CI 83.78%–99.92%) sensitivity and 87% (95% CI 59.54%–98.34%) specificity compared with the CDC mpox PCR (Table 2). We tested discrepant samples by using the Sansure Monkeypox Virus Kit (Sansure-Biotech, https://www.sansureglobal.com). The 2 false positives and 1 false negative were positive according to Sansure, suggesting 2 false negative and 1 true positive result by using the CDC PCR. Our assay was 100% specific and 80% sensitive for detecting lineage B.1. The 5 false negatives had Cts > 34.

Table 2. Evaluation results of multiplex PCR to differentiate monkeypox virus clades from the United Kingdom and Nigeria*.

Reference PCR and country Result True positive True negative False positive False negative Sensitivity, % Specificity, %
CDC assay, United Kingdom
Total 31 13 2 1 97 (83.78–99.92) 87 (59.54–98.34)
Total Ct <35 31 13 2 0 100 (88.78–100.00) 87 (59.54–98.34)
Clade I 0 45 0 0 NA 100 (92.13–100.00)
IIa 0 45 0 0 NA 100 (92.13–100.00)
IIb 31 13 2 1 97 (83.78–99.92) 87 (59.54–98.34)
Lineage B.1
20
22
0
5
80 (59.30–93.17)
100 (84.56–100.00)
CDC with Sansure, United Kingdom†
Total
33
13
0
1
97 (84.67–99.93)
100 (75.29–100.00)
CDC Assay, Nigeria
Total 36 20 0 18 67 (52.53–78.91) 100 (83.16–100.00)
Total Ct <35
32
20
0
1
97 (84.24–99.92)
100 (83.16–100.00)
CDC assay; combined, United Kingdom and Nigeria Total 67 33 2 19 78 (67.67–86.14) 94 (80.84–99.30)
Total Ct <35 64 33 2 1 98 (91.72–99.96) 94 (80.84–99.30)

*Numbers in parentheses are 95% CIs. Ct, cycle threshold; NA, not applicable. †Discrepant samples were tested by using the Sansure Monkeypox virus Kit (Sansure-Biotech, https://www.sansureglobal.com).

In the NCDC evaluation, our assay showed sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 52.53%–78.91%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 83.16%–100.00%) compared with the CDC assay (Table 2). Of the available samples, 20% (n = 11) had a Ct >35; typically, Ct values from lesion swab specimens in the acute phase are lower (12), and samples with Ct >35 are predicted to have no or very little infectivity (13). In samples with Ct <35, we observed 97% sensitivity (95% CI 84.24%–99.92%) and 100% specificity (95% CI 83.16%–100.00%). All samples were confirmed to be clade IIb. One sample had a Ct of 25.59 for IIb and 36.77 for B.1; this difference discounted a true B.1 positive and was classified as a false positive, giving a 98% specificity for this target.

Conclusions

Sensitivity for our assay was high in samples with a reference qPCR Ct <35 but lower with higher Ct values, supporting assay use for reflex testing samples with a Ct <35. Clade I and IIa clinical samples were unavailable. Although the other assays compared were created on the basis of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms, the lineage B.1 assay is based on a single mutation. If this single mutation were to naturally occur in nonlineage B.1 strains, it could compromise the assay. Mutations will be monitored on Nextstrain. We assigned clinical samples to clades on the basis of date and location of collection after failed attempts to generate full genome assemblies after sequencing. Although this process is suboptimal, 99% of MPXV sequenced in the United Kingdom in 2022 by UK Health Security Agency was lineage B.1; the 2018 samples were imported cases from Nigeria, and only clade IIb is known to have circulated in Nigeria during our collection dates (4). Other assays can distinguish between clades; a qPCR that detects clade I, clade II, clade IIb, and lineage B.1 was previously published (14) but requires 2 tubes per sample and does not include clade Ib. Another assay detects clade Ib by using singleplex assays (15).

Rapid identification of MPXV clades is vital with outbreaks occurring attributed to different clades. Clade and lineage identification is necessary because of differences in disease severity and epidemiologic tracking, particularly for new outbreaks. Although sequencing is the standard diagnostic practice, PCR remains necessary when access to sequencing is limited or extra throughput is required.

Appendix

Additional information about multiplex PCR to differentiate monkeypox virus clades.

25-0686-Techapp-s1.pdf (204.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank the World Health Organization BioHub for providing monkeypox virus clade Ia and Ib.

This research was funded by The Pandemic Institute, formed of 7 founding partners: The University of Liverpool, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool City Council, Liverpool City Region Combined Authority, Liverpool University Hospital Foundation Trust, and Knowledge Quarter Liverpool. The UK Public Health Rapid Support Team is funded by UK Aid from the Department of Health and Social Care and is jointly run by the UK Health Security Agency and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. The International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium is funded from the National Institute for Health Research (award no. CO-CIN-01), the Medical Research Council (grant no. MC_PC_19059), and by Liverpool Pandemic Institute and the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool in partnership with UK Health Security Agency, in collaboration with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and the University of Oxford (award no. 200907), Wellcome Trust and Department for International Development (grant no. 215091/Z/18/Z), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant no. OPP1209135), and Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (grant no. C18616/A25153). Branches are colored by posterior support, and horizontal node bars represent 95% highest posterior density intervals of node ages. L.B.J. is supported by the Berlin Institute of Health Clinician Scientist program.

Members of the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium members: Mike Beadsworth, Ingeborg Welters, Lance Turtle, Jane Minton, Karl Ward, Elinor Moore, Elaine Hardy, Mark Nelson, David Brealey, Ashley Price, Brian Angus, Graham Cooke, and Oliver Koch.

Biography

Mr. Williams is a senior research technician at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. His main research interests involve designing and evaluating novel diagnostic methods for infectious diseases that affect low- and middle-income countries.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Williams CT, Romero-Ramirez A, Semiu AA, Ifabumuyi SO, Greenland-Bews C, Gould S, et al. Multiplex PCR to differentiate monkeypox virus clades. Emerg Infect Dis. 2026 Feb [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3202.250686

1

Members of the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium are listed at the end of this article.

2

These authors contributed equally to this article.

References

  • 1.McCollum AM, Damon IK. Human monkeypox. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:260–7. 10.1093/cid/cit703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Isidro J, Borges V, Pinto M, Sobral D, Santos JD, Nunes A, et al. Phylogenomic characterization and signs of microevolution in the 2022 multi-country outbreak of monkeypox virus. Nat Med. 2022;28:1569–72. 10.1038/s41591-022-01907-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Endo A, Murayama H, Abbott S, Ratnayake R, Pearson CAB, Edmunds WJ, et al. Heavy-tailed sexual contact networks and monkeypox epidemiology in the global outbreak, 2022. Science. 2022;378:90–4. 10.1126/science.add4507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ndodo N, Ashcroft J, Lewandowski K, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Chukwu C, Ahmad A, et al. Distinct monkeypox virus lineages co-circulating in humans before 2022. Nat Med. 2023;29:2317–24. 10.1038/s41591-023-02456-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fink DL, Callaby H, Luintel A, Beynon W, Bond H, Lim EY, et al. ; Specialist and High Consequence Infectious Diseases Centres Network for Monkeypox. Clinical features and management of individuals admitted to hospital with monkeypox and associated complications across the UK: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23:589–97. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00806-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vakaniaki EH, Kacita C, Kinganda-Lusamaki E, O’Toole Á, Wawina-Bokalanga T, Mukadi-Bamuleka D, et al. Sustained human outbreak of a new MPXV clade I lineage in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Nat Med. 2024;30:2791–5. 10.1038/s41591-024-03130-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kibungu EM, Vakaniaki EH, Kinganda-Lusamaki E, Kalonji-Mukendi T, Pukuta E, Hoff NA, et al. ; International Mpox Research Consortium. Clade I–associated mpox cases associated with sexual contact, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30:172–6. 10.3201/eid3001.231164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li Y, Zhao H, Wilkins K, Hughes C, Damon IK. Real-time PCR assays for the specific detection of monkeypox virus West African and Congo Basin strain DNA. J Virol Methods. 2010;169:223–7. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organization. Diagnostic testing for the monkeypox virus (MPXV): interim guidance, 9 November 2023. 2023. [cited 2024 Nov 14]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MPX-Laboratory-2023.1
  • 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Test procedure: monkeypox virus generic real-time PCR test. 2022. [cited 2024 May 1]. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/119661
  • 11.UK Health Security Agency. Investigation into monkeypox outbreak in England: technical briefing 8. 2024. [cited 2024 Nov 14]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/monkeypox-outbreak-technical-briefings/investigation-into-monkeypox-outbreak-in-england-technical-briefing-8#part-6genomic-surveillance.
  • 12.Edman-Wallér J, Jonsson O, Backlund G, Muradrasoli S, Sondén K. Results of PCR analysis of mpox clinical samples, Sweden, 2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:1220–2. 10.3201/eid2906.230253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Paran N, Yahalom-Ronen Y, Shifman O, Lazar S, Ben-Ami R, Yakubovsky M, et al. Monkeypox DNA levels correlate with virus infectivity in clinical samples, Israel, 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27:2200636. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.35.2200636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huo S, Chen Y, Lu R, Zhang Z, Zhang G, Zhao L, et al. Development of two multiplex real-time PCR assays for simultaneous detection and differentiation of monkeypox virus IIa, IIb, and I clades and the B.1 lineage. Biosaf Health. 2022;4:392–8. 10.1016/j.bsheal.2022.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schuele L, Masirika LM, Udahemuka JC, Siangoli FB, Mbiribindi JB, Ndishimye P, et al. ; GREATLIFE MPOX group; Collaborators. Real-time PCR assay to detect the novel Clade Ib monkeypox virus, September 2023 to May 2024. Euro Surveill. 2024;29:2400486. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.32.2400486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

Additional information about multiplex PCR to differentiate monkeypox virus clades.

25-0686-Techapp-s1.pdf (204.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES