Abstract
Early spring sowing of maize in semi-arid, wind-eroded regions is increasingly threatened by cold snaps due to climate change.These events, often coupled with uneven soil moisture distribution,compromise seedling emergence and early development. Identifying critical temperature and moisture thresholds is essential to ensure successful germination in these vulnerable environments.A factorial experiment was conducted in a controlled environment using maize seeds (Zea mays L.) exposed to diurnal temperature cycles.Treatments included five minimum temperatures (0,2,4,6,8°C), three chilling durations (2,4,6 hours),and four soil moisture levels (60,70,80,90% field capacity). Key germination metrics,including final germination rate, weighted germination time,synchrony,delay days,and seedling dry matter at day 30,were measured and analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Pearson correlations. Temperatures below 6°C significantly delayed germination and reduced final germination rates,particularly under low moisture conditions.Moisture levels ≥80% effectively mitigated chilling effects at moderate temperatures(4 ~ 6°C).Extended chilling durations further suppressed germination.The strongest interaction was observed between minimum temperature and soil moisture.Seedling dry matter accumulation was also significantly affected by all three factors and their interactions.Soil moisture serves as a critical buffer against chilling stress during maize germination. This study provides quantitative benchmarks for temperature and moisture combinations that optimize early maize emergence under extreme spring weather, offering practical insights for precision moisture management in semi-arid agriculture.
Introduction
Over recent decades, early spring climatic variability has intensified globally, with increasing occurrences of late spring coldness, freeze–thaw cycles, and abrupt cold snaps caused by climate change [1,2].These sudden thermal fluctuations pose significant risks to early-sown maize (Zea mays L.),especially in semi-arid, wind-eroded agricultural regions such as Northeast China, where chilling injury and stand loss have become increasingly frequent [3,4]. When soil temperatures drop below 10°C after sowing, seeds may suffer from imbibitional chilling injury, delayed emergence, and asynchronous stand establishment, often resulting in yield losses of up to 20 ~ 50% [5,6].
Temperature and soil moisture are the two primary abiotic factors that regulate seed germination and early seedling growth. The hydrothermal time (HTT) model suggests that germination is jointly driven by thermal time and water potential [7,8]. While optimal maize germination generally occurs between 15 ~ 30°C, temperatures below 10°C hinder enzymatic activity and delay radicle emergence [9,10].Simultaneously, water stress—particularly when water potential drops below –0.5 MPa—restricts oxygen diffusion and impairs metabolic activation, exacerbating the risk of failed emergence [11,12]. In field conditions, cold and dry soils can prolong emergence by 1 ~ 2 weeks and reduce germination rates by 30 ~ 60% [13,14].
Previous studies have mostly explored the independent effects of low temperature or soil moisture on seed germination; however, the interactive effects under early spring variable climate remain poorly understood [15,16]. Moreover, most studies overlook chilling duration, which significantly influences membrane stability, hormone balance, and oxidative stress responses [17,18]. Most existing studies are based on constant laboratory conditions and do not capture the transient and compound stresses of early spring sowing in continental semi-arid zones.This research gap is especially prominent in semi-arid regions, where climatic unpredictability is high. Without comprehensive models integrating temperature, moisture, and chilling duration, predictive accuracy for safe sowing is limited.
Emerging evidence suggests that adequate soil moisture may buffer chilling-induced damage by maintaining cellular hydration, preserving membrane integrity, and activating antioxidant systems and hormonal pathways [19–21]. However, this buffering capacity may decline with prolonged chilling or under extreme cold and saturated conditions [22,23]. Quantifying the hydrothermal thresholds governing safe emergence under varying chilling durations is thus critical for risk reduction and precise management.
To address these gaps, this study examines the interactive effects of chilling temperature, duration, and soil moisture on maize seed germination dynamics and early biomass accumulation. We hypothesize that (1) sufficient soil moisture alleviates chilling damage under moderate conditions; (2) prolonged chilling reduces this buffering effect; and (3) hydrothermal thresholds for safe emergence can be defined. Our results will contribute to improved early-sowing strategies and provide theoretical support for climate-resilient maize production. In the Qiqihar region, early spring sowing often coincides with snowmelt and occasional rainfall, which can temporarily raise soil moisture close to or above field capacity. This climatic context provides a practical background for interpreting the laboratory-based moisture treatments applied in this study.
Materials and methods
Experimental conditions
This study was conducted in a controlled-environment growth chamber at the Qiqihar Branch of the Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The objective was to examine how low-temperature stress, duration of chilling, and soil moisture levels affect maize germination and early seedling growth. All experiments were carried out using a randomized complete block design with a full factorial arrangement of treatments.
Experimental design
Three experimental factors were considered: minimum temperature (Tmin), chilling duration, and soil moisture content. Tmin levels were set at 0°C,2°C,4°C,6°C,and 8°C, while chilling durations were 2,4,and 6 hours. A control treatment (CK) maintained a constant temperature of 20°C. Soil moisture was set at four levels:60%,70%,80%, and90% of field capacity. We did not include 100% field capacity, because preliminary trials indicated that full saturation under low temperature often created transient waterlogging and hypoxic microenvironments, which do not reflect the well-aerated soil conditions of semi-arid spring seedbeds. Thus, 60–90% FC was selected to represent a practical range from sub-optimal to near-optimal moisture conditions while avoiding artefacts caused by excessive saturation. Each treatment was replicated three times.
Plant material and substrate
The growth substrate consisted of fine sand that was autoclaved at 121 essive saturation.,d had an average particle size of 0.2e sand that was autoclaved at 121 essive saturation., which do not rH was determined to be 6.8 and the electrical conductivity 0.14 dS m21 essive saturation., which do not reflect the well-aerated soil conditions of semfe (core sampler) method, was 25% (w/w).
Temperature simulation protocol
A six-phase diurnal temperature cycle was applied to mimic early-spring day–night thermal rhythms: Phase 1 (T1) → Tmin → Phase 1 (T1) → Phase 2 (T2) → Tmax → Phase 2 (T2), where Tmax was maintained at 20°C. Phase 1 and Phase 2 temperatures were calculated as:
T1 = (Tmin + Tmax)/3, T2 = 2 × (Tmin + Tmax)/3. Each phase lasted for 4 hours, mimicking early spring day-night thermal rhythms. Photoperiod was maintained at 12 hours (6:00–18:00) with 500 μmol/m²/s light intensity.
Plant material and substrate
The maize hybrid Xianyu 696, commonly cultivated in northeastern China, was used as the experimental material. Seeds were surface sterilized prior to sowing. A well-washed and sterilized fine sand medium (passed through a 200-mesh sieve) was used as the growth substrate. Each replicate included 90 seeds sown in trays, which were placed in the climate chamber for germination.
Moisture management
Soil moisture was maintained at designated levels (60 ~ 90% field capacity) using a gravimetric method. Water was added daily based on weight difference, using the following formula:
Water added (g) = (Target moisture content − Current moisture content) × Dry soil weight.
Moisture content was monitored with a digital soil moisture meter and adjusted accordingly to minimize variation.
The experimental water used is double distilled water, with electrical conductivity (EC) of 1.2–1.5 µS/cm, total dissolved solids (TDS) of 0.5–1.2 ppm, and total organic carbon (TOC) of<5 ppb.
Germination and growth measurements
Germination was recorded daily from day 2 after sowing. A seed was considered germinated when the coleoptile broke through the sand surface. The following metrics were calculated:
Final Germination Rate (%) = (Number of emerged seeds/ Total sown seeds) × 100
Weighted Germination Time (WGT): average germination timing considering emergence distribution
Germination Synchrony: proportion of germinated seeds within peak emergence window
Germination Delay Days: days until the first seed emerged
On day 30, seedlings were harvested, and shoot dry weight was measured after oven-drying at 80°C for 72 hours.
Data analysis
All data were processed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and statistically analyzed in R software (version 4.1.0). Three-way ANOVA was used to test the effects of Tmin, duration, and moisture and their interactions. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate relationships among key germination traits.Before ANOVA, data were examined for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and homogeneity of variances (Levene’s test), and all datasets met these assumptions (p > 0.05). Significance levels were set at p < 0.05.
Results
Effects of minimum temperature (Tmin) on germination timing and rate
S1 Fig A1 illustrates the germination dynamics of maize under varying minimum temperatures (Tmin), chilling durations, and soil moisture levels.Germination was severely delayed at Tmin≤2°C,with final emergence rates below 50%,especially under 60% and 90% field capacity.In contrast, Tmin at 6°C and 8°C accelerated germination,reaching over 80% emergence within 7 ~ 10 days. The chilling duration had a compounding suppressive effect—longer exposure (4 ~ 6 hours) further delayed germination onset and reduced total emergence.Moisture demonstrated a non-linear buffering effect:70 ~ 80% field capacity yielded the most favorable germination outcomes across Tmin levels.Overly dry (60%) or saturated (90%) conditions reduced emergence under both moderate and extreme chilling.
Low-temperature duration exerted an additive suppressive effect.When Tmin was moderate (4 ~ 6°C),extending the exposure from 2 h to 6 h consistently delayed the emergence onset and reduced the final emergence percentage.This effect was most pronounced under drier(60%) and over-wet (90%) soil conditions.
Soil moisture showed a nonlinear interaction with Tmin.The 70% and 80% field capacity treatments supported the highest and fastest emergence across Tmin gradients.Both water deficit (60%) and oversaturation (90%) conditions impaired emergence,especially under extreme low Tmin.In control treatments (CK), germination curves were steep and saturated, indicating optimal conditions.
The sigmoidal germination pattern was most evident under Tmin≥6°C combined with 70 ~ 80% moisture.Under suboptimal conditions (e.g.,Tmin≤2°C),curves flattened or failed to approach saturation, indicating prolonged lag phases and reduced germination vigor.
The germination index (GI) exhibited a progressive increase over time across all treatments, with more rapid accumulation under higher Tmin and longer chilling durations (S2 Fig A2).Under favorable conditions (Tmin≥6°C and Duration = CK),GI values approached their maximum earlier (Day 5 ~ 6),whereas lower Tmin (0 ~ 4°C) and extended chilling duration (48 ~ 144 h) resulted in delayed and slower accumulation.Moisture level modulated the GI dynamics significantly:at suboptimal temperatures (e.g.,Tmin = 2°C),higher moisture (80 ~ 90%) notably accelerated the GI curve,particularly under shorter chilling durations.
Germination speed(GS),represented as daily emergence rate,displayed a typical unimodal temporal distribution(S3 Fig A3).Peak GS was achieved earlier under warm and short chilling conditions (Tmin≥6°C,Duration = 2 ~ 4 h),while cold or prolonged chilling delayed the peak and lowered the magnitude.GS curves were markedly sensitive to soil moisture levels:at Tmin = 4 ~ 6°C, higher moisture (80 ~ 90%) produced sharper and earlier peaks,whereas under 0 ~ 2°C,excessive moisture (90%) appeared to suppress GS.The interactions among Tmin,Duration,and Moisture shaped the overall germination rhythm,confirming their joint regulation on both germination rate and uniformity.
Effects of chilling duration and soil moisture on germination
Chilling duration imposed an additive inhibitory effect on germination performance. Extending exposure from 2 h to 6 h significantly increased weighted germination time and germination delay, especially under low Tmin, reflecting cumulative metabolic disruption and membrane damage consistent with elevated MDA and electrolyte leakage reported by Zhang et al. [24]. High soil moisture (80–90% FC) partially alleviated these delays at moderate temperatures (4–6°C), but its buffering capacity diminished under severe cold (≤2°C). Excessive moisture could even become detrimental, likely because saturated, cold soils restrict oxygen diffusion and impair metabolic activity. Overall, chilling duration and soil moisture interact to regulate maize germination, with adequate moisture offering protection only within a limited temperature–duration range.
Three-way interactions and mechanistic implications
Three-way interaction plots (S12–S15 Figs D1–D4) revealed critical thresholds and nonlinear dependencies.For instance,at Tmin = 4 ~ 6°C and chilling = 4 h,80% moisture ensured>85% germination, while at Tmin = 0°C, even 90% moisture failed to surpass 50% germination.The delay days and WGT demonstrated strong Tmin×Duration×Moisture interactions, suggesting hydrothermal thresholds beyond which germination physiology collapses.
These patterns imply a mechanistic cascade: chilling disrupts energy metabolism and ROS balance;duration intensifies membrane and hormonal imbalance;moisture modulates oxygen diffusion and antioxidative defenses.Only when all three conditions reach favorable ranges can physiological recovery and coordinated emergence occur.These insights support integrating hydrothermal modeling into early sowing strategies.
Three-way interactions and mechanistic implications
S16 Fig F and S1 Table present the three-way effects of Tmin,duration,and soil moisture on seedling dry matter accumulation measured at 30 days post-sowing.Tmin, duration, and moisture all had significant main effects (p < 0.001),with Tmin showing the largest effect size.Dry weight was lowest under Tmin = 0 ~ 2°C and 60% moisture,but increased significantly with warmer Tmin and higher moisture.Notably,the interaction between Tmin and moisture was significant (p = 0.005),while the three-way interaction also reached significance (p = 0.003),highlighting that dry matter production is co-regulated by hydrothermal conditions during early development.
Discussion
In recent years, to ensure grain production, the wind–sand semi-arid regions of China have gradually promoted the use of integrated water–fertilizer drip irrigation technology, effectively alleviating yield losses caused by drought. However, in these regions, the interactive effects of low temperature, chilling duration, and soil moisture on maize emergence after early-spring sowing have not been systematically investigated. This study comprehensively evaluates the three-way interaction among chilling temperature (Tmin), chilling duration, and soil moisture on maize germination performance and early seedling growth.
Interactive effects of chilling temperature, duration, and soil moisture
This study provides clear evidence that maize germination and emergence are jointly regulated by chilling temperature, exposure duration, and soil moisture. High soil moisture (≥80% field capacity) demonstrated a pronounced buffering effect under short-term moderate chilling conditions (Tmin = 4 ~ 6°C, duration ≤4 h), as reflected by higher final germination rates, reduced weighted germination time, and enhanced germination synchrony. Such buffering effects are likely linked to sustained imbibitional hydration, maintenance of plasma membrane fluidity, and reduced mechanical impedance to radicle protrusion [9,12,15]. Adequate water availability during the imbibition phase ensures rapid and uniform water uptake, minimizes mechanical strain on expanding tissues, and facilitates metabolic activation.
However, the benefits of high moisture were not universal.Under prolonged chilling (≥6 h) or extreme cold (Tmin≤2°C), the buffering effect diminished and, in some cases, reversed—resulting in aggravated chilling injury. Excessive soil water under low temperatures can exacerbate hypoxic stress, restrict aerobic respiration, and enhance the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby accelerating membrane lipid peroxidation and programmed cell death [25–27]. These findings suggest that the moisture buffering effect is highly conditional, offering protection under mild–moderate chilling and short exposure durations but losing efficacy—or even becoming detrimental—under extreme or prolonged stress conditions. This aligns with earlier studies that highlight the nonlinear, context-dependent nature of temperature–moisture interactions in seed physiology [15,26,27].Because the sterilized fine sand was nearly inert with minimal nutrient content and neutral pH, observed germination responses can be attributed primarily to the manipulated temperature and moisture conditions rather than to chemical soil factors.
Hydrothermal imbalance under high moisture and low temperature
The co-occurrence of low temperatures and excessive soil moisture frequently creates a hydrothermal imbalance that adversely affects germination performance. Consistent with this, we intentionally did not include 100% FC in our treatments, as full saturation under chilling would likely exacerbate hypoxia and confound the interpretation of moisture buffering effects.Chilling temperatures reduce enzymatic activity and slow metabolic reactivation, while excess moisture limits oxygen diffusion in the seed microenvironment, inducing localized hypoxia [28–30]. This dual constraint impairs mitochondrial respiration, delays ATP synthesis, and suppresses the biosynthesis of growth-promoting hormones such as gibberellins, ultimately causing uneven and delayed germination [31–33].
Our experimental results showed that under Tmin = 0 ~ 2°C and soil moisture ≥90%, germination synchrony dropped markedly, and weighted germination time was prolonged by 2 ~ 4days compared with optimal hydrothermal conditions. This pattern is consistent with previous reports indicating that cold, waterlogged soils generate hypoxic microsites that not only hinder germination but also predispose seedlings to early root and crown diseases, further reducing stand uniformity [34–36]. The observed reduction in synchrony has direct agronomic implications, as asynchronous emergence can increase intra-specific competition and hinder uniform crop development, leading to uneven canopy closure and reduced yield potential.
Moisture thresholds and weakening of buffering under severe cold
The buffering effect of soil moisture showed a clear decline with decreasing temperature and increasing chilling duration. When Tmin fell below 2°C and chilling duration exceeded 6 h, even high soil moisture failed to maintain critical physiological protective mechanisms, such as membrane stabilization and ROS detoxification [37–39]. This suggests the existence of a temperature–moisture–duration threshold, beyond which the benefits of high soil moisture sharply diminish.
The weakening of the buffering effect under extreme cold may be explained by several mechanisms: (i) cold-induced phase transitions in membrane lipids that reduce fluidity and permeability; (ii) inhibition of aquaporin-mediated water transport, slowing cellular rehydration; and (iii) prolonged oxidative stress causing irreversible damage to cellular macromolecules [22,40,41]. These processes ultimately disrupt metabolic homeostasis and reduce seed viability.
Identifying such thresholds is essential for developing precision sowing recommendations, especially in semi-arid, cold-prone regions where both soil moisture and temperature are highly variable in early spring. The quantitative hydrothermal interaction data generated in this study provide a valuable basis for threshold-based decision-support tools that can guide sowing time selection, irrigation scheduling, and seed treatment protocols. Incorporating these thresholds into predictive models could improve risk assessment and help farmers optimize emergence success under increasingly variable early-spring climates.
Implications for biomass accumulation and agronomic practices
Our findings demonstrate that early-stage hydrothermal stress exerts prolonged effects on maize growth and biomass accumulation, with implications that extend well beyond the emergence phase. Dry matter accumulation at the seedling stage was significantly reduced when plants were exposed to severe chilling (Tmin = 0 ~ 2°C) combined with low soil moisture (≤60% field capacity). This reduction can be attributed to restricted leaf area expansion, lower chlorophyll content, suppressed photosynthetic rate, and impaired root development, which collectively limit the plant’s capacity to intercept light and acquire nutrients [19,42,43]. At the cellular level, early hydrothermal stress may reduce mesophyll conductance, inhibit Rubisco activation, and disrupt phloem loading, thereby constraining assimilate transport to growing tissues [44].
The consequences of reduced seedling biomass often persist into subsequent growth stages. In maize, a suboptimal early biomass status can delay the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth, reduce the rate of leaf area index (LAI) development, and limit the crop’s ability to capture radiation during critical periods of kernel set [45–46]. This “carry-over effect” means that even if environmental conditions improve later in the season, yield potential may remain compromised due to reduced source capacity (photosynthate supply) and weakened sink strength (ear and kernel development) [47–49]. Additionally, stress-induced shifts in biomass allocation—such as a higher root-to-shoot ratio under early drought—may further influence water and nutrient uptake dynamics throughout the growing season [50].
Conversely, our results showed that under moderate chilling (Tmin = 4 ~ 6°C) combined with high soil moisture (≥80% field capacity), seedling biomass was comparable to the control, suggesting the occurrence of physiological acclimation or “stress memory” effects. Such acclimation may involve sustained activation of antioxidant defense systems, osmotic adjustment, and the upregulation of protective proteins that mitigate subsequent stress impacts [51–52]. This finding highlights the potential for moisture management to partially buffer against chilling injury, particularly under conditions that do not exceed the physiological tolerance limits of maize seedlings.
From an agronomic perspective, maintaining soil moisture at or above 80% field capacity during early sowing is critical for ensuring both rapid, uniform emergence and robust early biomass accumulation. Adequate early biomass not only supports strong canopy development but also enhances competitive ability against weeds, improves resource-use efficiency, and provides resilience against mid-season stress events [53–54]. Integrating chilling temperature–duration–moisture interaction thresholds into sowing calendars and irrigation scheduling could greatly enhance the resilience and yield stability of maize production systems in semi-arid, cold-prone regions. Furthermore, incorporating these thresholds into breeding programs could guide the selection of genotypes with improved early-stage cold tolerance and water-use efficiency, thereby strengthening climate-resilient maize production strategies [55–56].
A limitation of this study is the use of sterilized sand as the growth medium, which lacks the complexity of field soils in terms of organic matter, microbial communities, and water retention, potentially limiting direct extrapolation to field conditions. Nevertheless, field surveys in the Qiqihar region indicate that most maize fields are sandy with low water and nutrient retention, so our use of sand reasonably simulates local conditions. Extending the experiment to later vegetative stages (e.g., V3 or V5) was not feasible in growth pots due to restricted root space and light availability, which may not accurately reflect field growth. Future studies could assess long-term recovery at later stages to better understand the full impact of chilling and soil moisture stress on maize growth. In addition, maize fields in Qiqihar are typically large, and a single planter can sow only 7–10 km2 per day. To ensure all fields are sown within the optimal planting window, farmers often need to sow early, even under low temperature or high soil moisture conditions, to avoid delaying crop maturity. This practical constraint helps explain why early sowing under suboptimal conditions is common, providing context for interpreting the relevance of our experimental findings to field decision-making.
Conclusions
This study systematically examined the interactive effects of chilling temperature (Tmin), chilling duration, and soil moisture on maize seed germination and early seedling growth under controlled diurnal temperature regimes. The results demonstrate that both the severity and duration of chilling stress markedly suppressed germination performance, particularly when soil moisture levels were suboptimal.
Soil moisture was identified as a critical buffering factor against chilling injury. Moisture levels maintained at 80 ~ 90% of field capacity effectively alleviated the adverse impacts of chilling stress, enhancing final germination rate, accelerating emergence, and improving synchrony, especially under moderate Tmin conditions (4 ~ 6°C). In contrast, under extreme chilling (0 ~ 2°C), elevated soil moisture was insufficient to fully counteract cold damage, particularly during prolonged exposure, indicating that the buffering effect of moisture is both temperature- and duration-dependent.
The three-way interaction among Tmin, chilling duration, and soil moisture significantly influenced all germination-related parameters, including weighted germination time, emergence delay, and synchrony, as well as early-stage seedling dry matter accumulation. These findings underscore the necessity of defining hydrothermal thresholds to guide optimal sowing decisions in regions sensitive to climatic variability.
To translate our quantitative findings into actionable agronomic advice, we propose a practical guideline for sowing decisions under variable spring conditions in Table 1. These recommendations are synthesized directly from our experimental thresholds on final germination rate, synchrony, and seedling dry matter accumulation.
Table 1. Practical guidelines for maize sowing decisions based on minimum temperature (Tmin) forecasts and manageable soil moisture levels.
| Minimum Temperature (Tmin) | Chilling Duration Forecast | Recommended Soil Moisture (% Field Capacity) | Expected Emergence Outcome | Sowing Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moderate Chilling (4–6°C) | Short (≤ 4 hours) | ≥ 80% | High germination rate (>85%), good synchrony, minimal delay | Safe to sow. Optimal conditions for stand establishment. |
| Moderate Chilling (4–6°C) | Prolonged (≥ 6 hours) | ≥ 80% | Good germination rate, potential slight delay | Sow with caution. Prioritize fields where moisture can be maintained. |
| Severe Chilling (0–2°C) | Any duration | Any level | Poor germination rate (<50%), significant delay, low synchrony | Avoid sowing. High risk of stand failure. Wait for warmer conditions. |
| Fluctuating Spring Conditions (Unpredictable) | Variable | Maintain 70–80% | Variable, but risk of stand loss is reduced | Sow if irrigation is available. Moisture buffer is critical to mitigate unexpected cold snaps. |
These guidelines emphasize that soil moisture at or above 80% field capacity can create a safe sowing window under moderate cold stress. However, this buffering effect has limits and cannot overcome the physiological damage caused by severe chilling (Tmin ≤ 2°C). Farmers are advised to use short-term weather forecasts, particularly for minimum temperature and its expected duration, in conjunction with soil moisture measurements to make risk-informed sowing decisions.
From an agronomic perspective, maintaining soil moisture at or above 80% of field capacity during early sowing is recommended as an effective strategy to enhance stand establishment under “false spring” conditions. This practice may be especially beneficial in semi-arid regions increasingly affected by erratic spring temperature fluctuations.
This study provides quantitative benchmarks of hydrothermal interactions that may inform sowing strategies for early-spring maize under variable climate conditions. Future work will explore a wider range of minimum temperatures (including up to 12°C) to extend the applicability of these findings.Moreover, the findings establish a foundation for future research on the hormonal regulation of hydrothermal stress responses during germination, which will be the focus of subsequent investigations.
Supporting information
Cumulative germination (%) over time in maize seeds subjected to different minimum temperatures (Tmin: 0 ~ 8°C), chilling durations (2,4,6 h), and soil moisture levels (60%,70%,80%,90% field capacity).Each curve represents the mean of three replicates (n = 90), with error bars indicating standard deviation. The control (CK) group was maintained at 20°C for 24 h without chilling stress.
(TIFF)
Daily germination index (%) of maize under various chilling temperature, duration, and moisture combinations. Each point reflects the average value from three replicates. Lower Tmin and prolonged duration suppressed the index, while higher soil moisture (80 ~ 90%) accelerated accumulation under moderate cold stress.
(TIFF)
Temporal trends of daily germination speed (%) under varying chilling durations (2,4,6 h and CK) and soil moisture levels. Loess curves illustrate average emergence rates, with shaded areas representing 95% confidence intervals. Color indicates Tmin level.
(TIFF)
WGT values across treatments of Tmin, chilling duration, and soil moisture levels. Higher Tmin and moisture resulted in earlier average emergence timing. Error bars denote standard error (SE) of mean values across replicates.
(TIFF)
Final germination rate (%) as influenced by Tmin, chilling duration, and soil moisture content. Data are mean±SE(n = 3). Higher Tmin and moisture supported better germination under chilling exposure.
(TIFF)
Synchrony (%) of maize germination under different Tmin, chilling durations, and soil moisture levels.Synchrony is calculated as the peak emergence proportion relative to total emergence. Values represent mean ± SE.
(TIFF)
Mean number of days until first emergence under varying Tmin,duration,and soil moisture levels.Greater delays occurred at Tmin≤2°C and low moisture.Bars represent mean±SE.
(TIFF)
Final germination rate (%) of maize seeds under soil moisture levels of 60–90% field capacity and chilling durations of 2, 4, 6, and 24 h. Increased soil moisture significantly enhanced final germination rate across all chilling durations.
(TIFF)
Germination synchrony (%) of maize seeds at 60–90% field capacity subjected to chilling durations of 2, 4, 6, and 24 h. Higher soil moisture promoted more synchronized germination, particularly under prolonged chilling stress.
(TIFF)
Germination delay (days) of maize seeds under varying soil moisture conditions (60–90% field capacity) and chilling durations (2, 4, 6, and 24 h). Increasing soil moisture effectively reduced germination delay under all chilling treatments.
(TIFF)
Weighted germination time (days) of maize seeds under soil moisture levels of 60–90% field capacity and chilling durations of 2, 4, 6, and 24 h. Elevated soil moisture shortened weighted germination time, indicating improved germination performance under chilling stress.
(TIFF)
Final germination rate (%) of maize seeds across combined treatments of minimum temperature (Tmin), chilling duration, and soil moisture. Lines represent means ± SE. Correlation coefficients (R) and corresponding p values are shown in each panel to quantify the relationships among the interactive factors.
(TIFF)
Germination synchrony (%) of maize seeds under different combinations of Tmin, chilling duration, and soil moisture. Values are presented as means ± SE. The strength and significance of correlations are indicated by R and p values displayed within each panel.
(TIFF)
Germination delay (days) of maize seeds in response to the interactive effects of Tmin, chilling duration, and soil moisture. Lines denote means ± SE, with correlation analysis results (R and p values) provided in each panel.
(TIFF)
Weighted germination time (days) of maize seeds across combinations of Tmin, chilling duration, and soil moisture. Data are shown as means ± SE, and correlation coefficients (R) and p values are reported within each panel.
(TIFF)
Shoot dry weight (g plant ⁻ ¹) of maize seedlings at 30 days after sowing. Points represent individual replicates; regression lines indicate trends across moisture levels under different Tmin and chilling durations. ANOVA summary provided in S1 Table.
(TIFF)
DFn = degrees of freedom numerator; DFd = degrees of freedom denominator;F = F-value; p = p-value; ges = generalized eta squared.Bolded p-values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
(PDF)
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Gu L, Hanson PJ, Post WM, Kaiser DP, Yang B, Nemani R, et al. The 2007 Eastern US Spring Freeze: Increased cold damage in a warming world?. BioScience. 2008;58(3):253–62. doi: 10.1641/b580311 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Inouye DW. Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. Ecology. 2008;89(2):353–62. doi: 10.1890/06-2128.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xie Y, Cao Y, Xie Y. Global-scale latitudinal patterns of twelve mineral elements in leaf litter. CATENA. 2022;208:105743. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105743 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Annys S, Van Passel S, Dessein J, Adgo E, Nyssen J. From fast-track implementation to livelihood deterioration: The dam-based Ribb Irrigation and Drainage Project in Northwest Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems. 2020;184:102909. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102909 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Golz J. Mutational approaches to the study of self-incompatibility: Revisiting the pollen-part mutants. Annals of Botany. 2000;85:95–103. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1999.1060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ghadirzadeh-Khorzoghi E, Jannesar M, Jahanbakhshian-Davaran Z, Moazzam-Jazi M, Lotfi A, Tajabadi Pour A, et al. The influence of environmental conditions on sex ratio in a dioecious plant Pistacia vera L. Plant Physiol Rep. 2022;27(1):152–9. doi: 10.1007/s40502-021-00614-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gummerson RJ. The Effect of Constant Temperatures and Osmotic Potentials on the Germination of Sugar Beet. J Exp Bot. 1986;37(6):729–41. doi: 10.1093/jxb/37.6.729 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheng Z, Bradford KJ. Hydrothermal time analysis of tomato seed germination responses to priming treatments. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1999;50(330):89–99. doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.330.89 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bewley JD, Black M. Seeds. Springer US. 1994. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1002-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ellis RH, Roberts EH. Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality. Hebblethwaite PD. Seed Production. London, UK: Butterworths. 1980. 605–35. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-8632-1_41 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boesewinkel FD, Bouman F. The Seed: Structure and function. Seed Development and Germination. Routledge. 2017. p. 1–24. doi: 10.1201/9780203740071-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bradford KJ. Water relations in seed germination. Seed Development and Germination. Routledge. 2017. p. 351–96. doi: 10.1201/9780203740071-13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hol WHG, Vrieling K, Van Veen JA. Nutrients decrease pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentrations in Senecio jacobaea. New Phytologist. 2003;158(1):175–81. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00710.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ni BR, Bradford KJ. Quantitative models characterizing seed germination responses to abscisic Acid and osmoticum. Plant Physiol. 1992;98(3):1057–68. doi: 10.1104/pp.98.3.1057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matsuki S, Koike T. Comparison of leaf life span, photosynthesis and defensive traits across seven species of deciduous broad-leaf tree seedlings. Annals of Botany. 2006;97(5):813–7. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad M. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;61(3):199–223. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sung D-Y, Kaplan F, Lee K-J, Guy CL. Acquired tolerance to temperature extremes. Trends Plant Sci. 2003;8(4):179–87. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00047-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sadeghianfar P, Razmjoo J, Pessarakli M. Physiological and biochemical responses of wheat to chilling stress during seed germination. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2019;42:1647–59. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2019.1627440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009;29(1):185–212. doi: 10.1051/agro:2008021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schmitt C, Vogt C, Van Ballaer B, Brix R, Suetens A, Schmitt-Jansen M, et al. In situ cage experiments with Potamopyrgus antipodarum--a novel tool for real life exposure assessment in freshwater ecosystems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;73(7):1574–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang C, Li H, Li Y, Li Z, Mo F, Deng N, et al. Toxicity of BPNSs against Chlorella vulgaris: Oxidative damage, physical damage and self-protection mechanism. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022;174:63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(12):909–30. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Folck AJ, Bigelow CA, Jiang Y, Patton AJ. Genotypic variation in germination rate, seedling vigor, and seed phenotype of Kentucky bluegrass cultivars. Crop Science. 2023;63(5):3065–78. doi: 10.1002/csc2.21045 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hou K, Wang Y, Tao M-Q, Jahan MS, Shu S, Sun J, et al. Characterization of the CsPNG1 gene from cucumber and its function in response to salinity stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;150:140–50. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bailly C. Active oxygen species and antioxidants in seed biology. Seed Sci Res. 2004;14(2):93–107. doi: 10.1079/ssr2004159 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pötzsch F, Lux G, Lewandowska S, Schmidtke K. Sulphur demand, accumulation and fertilization of Pisum sativum L. in pure and mixed stands with Hordeum vulgare L. under field conditions. Field Crops Research. 2019;239:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.05.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zahedi SM, Hosseini MS, Abadía J, Marjani M. Melatonin foliar sprays elicit salinity stress tolerance and enhance fruit yield and quality in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;149:313–23. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Batlla D, Benech-Arnold RL. A quantitative analysis of dormancy loss dynamics inPolygonum aviculareL. seeds: Development of a thermal time model based on changes in seed population thermal parameters. Seed Sci Res. 2003;13(1):55–68. doi: 10.1079/ssr2002124 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Narsai R, Law SR, Carrie C, Xu L, Whelan J. In-depth temporal transcriptome profiling reveals a crucial developmental switch with roles for RNA processing and organelle metabolism that are essential for germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011;157(3):1342–62. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.183129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jisha KC, Vijayakumari K, Puthur JT. Seed priming for abiotic stress tolerance: An overview. Acta Physiol Plant. 2012;35(5):1381–96. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-1186-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Finch-Savage WE, Bassel GW. Seed vigour and crop establishment: Extending performance beyond adaptation. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(3):567–91. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nonogaki H, Bassel GW, Bewley JD. Germination—Still a mystery. Plant Science. 2010;179(6):574–81. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.02.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Marcos Filho J. Seed vigor testing: An overview of the past, present and future perspective. Sci agric (Piracicaba, Braz). 2015;72(4):363–74. doi: 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Milosevic T, Milosevic N. The effect of zeolite, organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil chemical properties, growth and biomass yield of apple trees. Plant Soil Environ. 2009;55(12):528–35. doi: 10.17221/107/2009-pse [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Setter TL, Waters I. Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats. Plant and Soil. 2003;253(1):1–34. doi: 10.1023/a:1024573305997 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek LACJ. Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:313–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bécard G, Kosuta S, Tamasloukht M, Séjalon-Delmas N, Roux C. Partner communication in the arbuscular mycorrhizal interaction. Can J Bot. 2004;82(8):1186–97. doi: 10.1139/b04-087 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kratsch HA, Wise RR. The ultrastructure of chilling stress. Plant Cell & Environment. 2000;23(4):337–50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00560.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zeng Y, Yu J, Cang J. Cold stress in plants: A review. Bot Rev. 2022;88:229–47. doi: 10.1007/s12229-021-09271-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu D-T, Santoni V. Plant aquaporins: Membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:595–624. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Anee TI, Fujita M. Glutathione in plants: Biosynthesis and physiological role in environmental stress tolerance. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2017;23(2):249–68. doi: 10.1007/s12298-017-0422-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hund A, Ruta N, Liedgens M. Rooting depth and water use efficiency of tropical maize inbred lines, differing in drought tolerance. Plant Soil. 2008;318(1–2):311–25. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9843-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bruce TJA, Matthes MC, Napier JA, Pickett JA. Stressful “memories” of plants: Evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Science. 2007;173(6):603–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.09.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yamori W, Hikosaka K, Way DA. Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynth Res. 2014;119(1–2):101–17. doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9874-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Andrade FH, Vega C, Uhart S, Cirilo A, Cantarero M, Valentinuz O. Kernel number determination in Maize. Crop Science. 1999;39(2):453–9. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x0039000200026x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Otegui ME, Nicolini MG, Ruiz RA, Dodds PA. Sowing date effects on grain yield components for different maize genotypes. Agronomy Journal. 1995;87(1):29–33. doi: 10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700010006x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Borrás L, Slafer GA, Otegui ME. Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research. 2004;86(2–3):131–46. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tollenaar M, Lee EA. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Research. 2002;75(2–3):161–9. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4290(02)00024-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sala RG, Westgate ME, Andrade FH. Source/sink ratio and the relationship between maximum water content, maximum volume, and final dry weight of maize kernels. Field Crops Research. 2007;101(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.09.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot. 2009;103(4):551–60. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ding Y, Fromm M, Avramova Z. Multiple exposures to drought “train” transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun. 2012;3:740. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Walter J, Nagy L, Hein R, Rascher U, Beierkuhnlein C, Willner E, et al. Do plants remember drought? Hints towards a drought-memory in grasses. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2011;71(1):34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang N, Wang F-X, Shock CC, Meng C-B, Huang Z-J, Gao L, et al. Evaluating quinoa stem lodging susceptibility by a mathematical model and the finite element method under different agronomic practices. Field Crops Research. 2021;271:108241. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108241 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.van Ittersum MK, Rabbinge R. Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations. Field Crops Research. 1997;52(3):197–208. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4290(97)00037-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Araus JL, Cairns JE. Field high-throughput phenotyping: The new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19(1):52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cooper M, Messina CD, Podlich D, Totir LR, Baumgarten A, Hausmann NJ, et al. Predicting the future of plant breeding: Complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction. Crop & Pasture Science. 2014;65(4):311–36. doi: 10.1071/cp14007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]