Skip to main content
Gut Microbes logoLink to Gut Microbes
. 2026 Feb 21;18(1):2631834. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2026.2631834

Alcohol consumption in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): understanding the gut–liver crosstalk for clinical translation

Raquel Benedé-Ubieto a,b, Olga Estévez-Vázquez a,b,c,1, Rana Acar d,1, Hector Leal-Lassalle a, Alejandro H Gutierrez a, Ana Redondo-Urzainqui e, Salvador Iborra a,f, Vera E Odintsova g, Alexander Tyakht h, José María Herranz b,i,j,k, Zehra Firat d, Merve Basol l,m, Busra Korkmaz l, Carlos Sanz-García a, Oriol Juanola b,n,o, Esther Caparrós b,n,o, Rubén Francés b,n,o,p, Andreea Ciudin q, Juan M Pericàs b,q,r, Beatriz Gómez-Santos s,t, Patricia Aspichueta b,s,t, Nicole Treichel u, Thomas Clavel u, Johanna Reißing v, Tony Bruns v, Matthias Bartneck v,w,x, Marina S Mazariegos a,y, Justina Clarinda Wolters z, Gonzalo Jorquera aa,ab, Christian Liedtke v, Javier Vaquero b,c,ac, Rafael Bañares a,b,c,ac, Gulcin Cakan-Akdogan l,ad, Matías A Ávila b,i,ae, Ozlen Konu d,af,ag,2, Francisco Javier Cubero a,b,c,ah,2, Yulia A Nevzorova a,b,c,ah,*,2
PMCID: PMC12928667  PMID: 41723574

ABSTRACT

Objective

In the present study, we investigated the role of the gut–liver crosstalk in the pathogenesis of steatotic liver disease (SLD) induced by the compounding and deleterious effects of alcohol and metabolic risk factors, and explored the potential translational aspects of microbiome-based interventions.

Design

The effects of combined exposure to alcohol and a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet (HFHC) Western diet (WD) were tested in a dietary mouse DUAL model and compared to mice fed only with WD. Liver and gut phenotypes were evaluated via histochemistry, flow cytometry, gene expression, proteomic, and metabolomic analyses. The effects on the gut microbiota were studied in both DUAL mice and MASLD patients with a history of alcohol consumption. Antibiotic-induced microbiota depletion (AIMD) and microbiota modulation therapies (probiotics and fecal microbiota transplant (FMT)) were performed in mice. Primary human hepatocytes and HepG2 cells were used to study the underlying mechanisms. Zebrafish larvae exposed to alcohol and a HFHC diet were used as a validation model.

Results

Alcohol in combination with WD synergistically exacerbated SLD. DUAL-diet-induced disruption of the intestinal barrier led to LPS leakage into the bloodstream and subsequent TLR4-mediated hepatic inflammation. This, together with enhanced intestinal fat absorption, and impaired intrahepatic lipid oxidation – particularly due to insufficient CPT-1 activity – contributed to prominent steatohepatitis. The DUAL-induced changes in the gut microbiota showed similarities to human dysbiosis in MASLD patients who consumed alcohol, including an increase in Bacteroides and Alistipes. AIMD improved pathology, indicating a causal role of the microbiota in the pathophysiology of DUAL steatohepatitis, whilst early microbiome modulation via FMT induced mild improvements in liver and gut physiology.

Conclusions

These results indicated that the microbiota‒gut‒liver axis plays a crucial role in the progression of SLD intensified by alcohol and concurrent metabolic risk factors, thus providing a promising translational target for potential therapeutic interventions.

KEYWORDS: Gut–liver axis, steatohepatitis, CPT1, MASLD, ALD, MetALD, animal model of fibrosis

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name KGMI_A_2631834_UF0001_C.jpg

Key messages

What is already known on this topic: SLD is a multifactorial, systemic, and multi-axis disease. Increasing evidence points towards a crosstalk between the gut, including the microbiota, and the liver.

What this study adds: This study enhances our understanding of SLD of multifactorial etiology induced by metabolic risk factors and simultaneous alcohol consumption. Using the preclinical murine DUAL model and in-depth multi-omics data analysis, we unveiled, for the first time, the importance of the gut‒liver axis for disease progression. We showed that the disruption of gut barriers and increased intestinal permeability affect the balance of inflammatory mediators and lipid metabolism, particularly hepatocytic CPT-1c, and thus promote steatohepatitis. Moreover, we confirmed our data in vitro and showed a certain similarity between dysbiosis in DUAL-fed mice and MASLD patients who consumed alcohol. Furthermore, we underscore the potential of microbiome modulation as a novel therapeutic strategy. Finally, we showed that alcohol in combination with metabolic factors causes a profound aggravation of gut and liver damage.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Our results clearly show that promoting abstinence in addition to reducing the metabolic burden could be a useful and recommended regime for patients with MASLD and MetALD. Moreover, the discovery of unknown mechanisms in the gut–liver axis may open novel therapeutic avenues for the treatment of patients with SLD of “dual” etiology.

Introduction

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) has been classified as one of the most prevalent liver diseases worldwide, affecting more than 25% of the global population and representing a considerable public health burden.1 SLD serves as an overarching umbrella term comprising various etiologies of steatosis: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), as well as alcohol-related liver disease (ALD).2

Metabolic syndrome (MS) and alcohol are the leading causes of SLD. However, due to the very high prevalence of both conditions in the same individual, the overlapping of MASLD and ALD is plausible.3 Recently, the new term metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD) was selected2 to outline a group of patients with MASLD and elevated alcohol consumption (140–350 g/week for females and 210−420 g/week for males).4,5 Furthermore, the ongoing rise in the prevalence of SLD, largely attributed to MASLD, may be influenced by unreported harmful alcohol use.1

The deleterious association of alcohol consumption and MS synergistically increases the development of hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).6,7 Yet the multifactorial pathogenesis of this dangerous combination is poorly understood.1

Recent evidence showed that SLD is a systemic disease encompassing white adipose tissue (WAT) failure, hepatic and systemic insulin resistance (IR), dyslipidemia, sarcopenia and cardiovascular diseases.8,9 Moreover, it is well-known that alcohol is primarily absorbed in the stomach and small intestine before reaching the liver and similarly, lipids are also digested in the gut.10 Close connection and rigorous mutual collaboration between the gut and the liver form a functional unit called the “gut–liver axis.” Portal circulation is the anatomical link that exists between both organs. Nonetheless, the intestinal barrier limits the extent to which the intestine and liver are connected.11,12 Thus, excessive alcohol11 and high-fat high cholesterol diet (HFHC)13 could synergistically disrupt the gut–liver axis at multiple interconnected levels leading to gastrointestinal inflammation and dysbiosis, inducing gut damage and increasing intestinal permeability, which altogether increases microbial exposure and generates a proinflammatory environment in the liver.14

Identifying the crucial components of gut–liver axis that are most affected in SLD unfolds options for therapeutic intervention.11 Nevertheless, the current molecular basis to design such therapeutic trials is weak and has not been studied before for the patients with metabolic dysfunction and simultaneous chronic alcohol consumption.

Recently, we established15 a novel preclinical murine experimental model that closely mimics pathogenesis, recapitulates histological, metabolic and transcriptomic gene signature of SLD3 and resembles the compound “dual” effects of alcohol and HFHC western diet (WD). At 23 weeks, in addition to obesity, animals develop metabolic syndrome, steatohepatitis, and advanced hepatic fibrosis.15,16

Using the DUAL model, in the present study, we performed an in-depth analysis of the pathomechanisms and functional circuits of hepatic steatosis and inflammation triggered by the synergistic effect of alcohol and metabolic factors and underscored the potential benefits of gut-targeted therapeutic interventions in preventing the progression of SLD of “dual” etiology.

Methods

Animal experimentation

Mouse feeding

Animals were fed a DUAL diet (Western diet D16022301 (Research Diets, NJ, USA) and 10% alcohol in sweetened drinking water) for a short-term (10 weeks) or long-term (23 weeks) period, as previously described.15,16 DUAL-fed animals were compared to a group fed only a WD and sweetened drinking water and to a control group that received a chow diet and sterilized tap water during the entire treatment period. At the experimental end point, the mice were fasted for 12 h prior to being sacrificed by an overdose of isoflurane inhalation. All animal experiments were performed according to the Spanish laws and regulations on animal protection (PROEX125.1/20; PROEX397.2/21).

Human feces samples

Fecal samples from human subjects were obtained from Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, from 2016 to 2019. Clinical characteristics of the patient cohort are outlined in Supplementary Table 1. The research protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee for Medicines of Vall d’Hebron Hospital, PR(AG)320/2018 and PR(AG)388/2021, following the guidance on CPMP/ICH/135/95 and Real Decreto 1090/2015. All patients provided informed written consent authorizing the storage and research use of their biological samples.

Cases were identified among patients prospectively included in the cohort of steatotic liver disease at the Liver Unit – Chronic Liver Disease Group in Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. The indication for liver biopsy was based on transient elastography and clinical criteria for etiological diagnosis and disease staging. Biopsies were fixed and stained according to the usual standard procedures and analyzed by an experienced pathologist. Control measurements and samples were collected at the Outpatient clinic of the Endocrinology Department of the Vall d´Hebron University Hospital from healthy volunteers recruited via local medical teams from their networks of colleagues and acquaintances with no history of gastrointestinal disease.

Supplementary materials and methods

Please see the Supplementary Materials, Methods, and Supplementary Tables for additional details on microbiome modulation and characterization, immunofluorescence (IF) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining procedures, imaging evaluation, and proteomic and metabolic analysis.

Results

Enhanced intestinal fat absorption and altered hepatic fat metabolism in DUAL mice

In our experiments, we fed C57Bl/6Wt male mice a DUAL diet that was composed of WD and 10% alcohol in sweetened (6.75% D-glucose) drinking water for 23 weeks as previously described.15,16 The overlapping features of alcohol and WD leading to SLD were either additive or synergistic: alcohol stimulated the ingestion of WD and vice versa, showing positive feedback resulting in increased daily caloric consumption (Supplementary Figure 1A‒C). Consequently, mice displayed robustly enlarged steatotic livers following 23 weeks of DUAL feeding (Supplementary Figure 2A–F).

The accumulation of fat in the hepatic tissue is caused by an imbalance in metabolism and strongly depends on dietary fat ingestion, absorption, and fecal excretion.17,18 Metabolomic and lipidomic analysis of murine fecal fat showed that most of the metabolites were increased, especially phosphatidyl choline (PC) (Supplementary Figure 3). The low relative ratio of excreted fecal vs. dietary consumed fat was associated with a higher rate of dietary lipid absorption in the intestine (Figure 1A). Indeed, the rate of free fatty acid (FFA) absorption was increased in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of DUAL-fed mice (Figure 1B). Similarly, the expression of Cd36, a membrane protein that facilitates FFA uptake,19 was upregulated in all parts of the small intestine in DUAL animals (Figure 1C). Remarkably, feeding with only a WD for the same period resulted in lower FFA absorption and reduced ileal Cd36 expression in comparison to DUAL animals (Supplementary Figure 4A). Consistent with these results, fecal non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) levels were substantially higher in WD-fed mice relative to DUAL group, suggesting a strong positive synergistic effect of WD and alcohol on lipid absorption (Figure 1D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Intestinal fat absorption in DUAL mice. (A) Daily ratio of total fat excreted/consumed (μg fat/mg feces vs. g fat intake/day from diet) in mice (n = 2–4). (B) FFA BODIPY-C1, C12 FA in the mouse small intestine. (C) Cd36 mRNA relative expression to that of Gapdh in the mouse small intestine (n = 5–6). (D) NEFA quantification in feces (nmol NEFA/mg feces).

RNA-bulk sequencing (Figure 2A, Supplementary Figure 5A) and proteomic analysis (Supplementary Figure 5B) of murine livers showed profound alterations of the hepatic lipid metabolism-related factors, such as strong upregulation of the mRNA and protein levels of Cd36, the central regulator of free-fatty acid uptake in DUAL-fed animals (Supplementary Figure 5B, C). Interestingly, the massive FFA influx into the DUAL liver was triggered by the synergistic action of WD and EtOH, as in the mice treated with only a WD mRNA expression of Cd36 was significantly lower (Supplementary Figure 5C). Moreover, the expression of stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1 (SCD-1), the key regulator of de novo lipogenesis, was increased in the hepatic tissue of DUAL mice (Supplementary Figure 5D). SCD-1 is the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) – the main components for triglyceride (TG) and diglyceride (DG) production. Similarly, the hepatic levels of MUFA – oleic and palmitoleic acid – were increased, as well as diglyceride (DG) and TG levels in DUAL livers (Table 1; Figure 2B; Supplementary Figure 5E, F).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Alcohol in combination with a WD significantly altered hepatic lipid metabolism in mice. (A) Heatmap of the expression of genes grouped into families depending on metabolic process (intake, export, synthesis, or degradation). The expression fold change is compared to that of control animals. (B) Metabolomic study. Plots representing the levels of DG(32:0) and DG(36:2) in liver tissue samples. Data represented as relative intensity (arbitrary units). (C) Metabolomic study. Plots representing the levels of PC(36:4), PC(38:6), PC(40:4), and PC(40:8) in liver tissue samples. Data represented as relative intensity (arbitrary units) (n = 5).

Table 1.

Changes in the ratios associated with SCD1 activity. Log2 (robust fold-changes) and Student’s t-test Wilcoxon adj p-values are indicated. Log2 (robust fold-changes) in red indicates an increment of the activity in DUAL mice.

graphic file with name KGMI_A_2631834_UF0002_C.jpg

In contrast, the TG level in the serum of DUAL mice was not proportionally increased and was even lower in comparison to control animals, suggesting that the impairment in the hepatic secretion of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) (Supplementary Figure 5G). Indeed, the metabolome study showed a decrease in PC molecules rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (22:6, 20:4), which are required for VLDL particle formation (Figure 2C). PC(22:6)/PC and PC(20:4)/PE(20:4) ratios related to phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) activity and VLDL assembly were also reduced in DUAL mice (Table 2). RNA-seq confirmed a downregulation of lipid export associated pathways in DUAL mice (Figure 2A).

Table 2.

Changes in the ratios associated with PEMT activity. Log2 (fold-changes) and Student’s t-test p-values are indicated. Log2 (fold-changes) in blue denotes reduced activity in DUAL mice.

graphic file with name KGMI_A_2631834_UF0003_C.jpg

Despite the extraordinary influx of dietary FFA, intensified de novo lipogenesis and poor TG excretion, the hepatic lipid β-oxidation, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a (CPT-1a) (Supplementary Figure 5B) as well as several key regulators of lipid catabolism (e.g., Ppara, Hadh, and Acadl) (Figure 2A) were not proportionally increased and thus fostered the progression of liver steatosis in DUAL animals.15

DUAL diet-induced hepatitis as a complex interplay linked to lipotoxic species and Toll-like receptor activation

Massive lipid deposition in the liver, remarkable alteration of lipotoxic DG and free cholesterol (FC) together with ingested alcohol contribute to oxidative stress (Supplementary Table 2), liver injury (Supplementary Figure 6), and inflammation.20 Flow cytometry analysis of DUAL livers revealed significant increases in monocyte-derived macrophages (MoMFs) (F4/80+/Ly6C+/CD11b+), total T-lymphocytes (CD3+) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8+), along with an increase in the population of natural killer (NK) (NK.1.1+) cells and a reduction in the population of T helper cells (CD4+) (Supplementary Figure 7A–F). Consistently, RNA sequencing confirmed the activation of the innate immune response and the enrichment of gene sets/pathways related to Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and NF-κB activation (Figure 3A). The proteomic analysis of DUAL livers showed significant upregulation of TLRs and their corresponding downstream inflammatory-signaling nodes, such as MyD88, NF-κB, and IRAK4 (Figure 3B, Supplementary Table 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Gut‒liver axis signaling pathways in the liver of DUAL-mice. (A) Analysis of the genes associated with the greatest number of mRNAs. Peaks in negative values represent downregulation, whereas those with positive values represent upregulation. The color scale shows significance from blue to red (n = 7). (B) Proteomic analysis of the liver. A network diagram was performed using TLR4 activation found in DUAL livers as a central molecule. GO and KEGG pathways are summarized and classified by colors (n = 6). (C) Tlr2, Tlr4, and Tlr9 mRNA relative expression to Gapdh in the liver. (n = 6–7). (D) Tlr4 mRNA relative expression to Gapdh in DUAL vs. WD livers (n = 6). (E) LPS in serum (ng/mL) (n = 5–7).

The increased expression of Tlr2, 4 and 9 was further validated by qPCR analysis (Figure 3C). As the expression of Tlr4 was significantly lower in mice fed with only WD in comparison to DUAL group (Figure 3D), and we conclude that the combination of alcohol and WD appears to mutually reinforces the activation of TLRs.

TLRs are activated in response to bacterial, viral or fungal subproducts that reach the bloodstream, inducing an immune reaction towards them.21 One of the most studied TLR triggers is bacterial surface LPS produced by Gram-negative bacteria in the case of gut barrier leakiness.22 Consistently, the serum LPS level is increased in DUAL mice (Figure 3E).

Under normal conditions, LPS or bacterial byproducts are confined to the gut, but can enter the bloodstream when the intestinal barrier is compromised. Thus, we next explored the intestinal changes induced by the DUAL diet.

DUAL diet induced substantial alteration in gut morphology

DUAL-fed mice showed a significant decrease in overall gut/mouse length, primarily due to a shortened colon (Figure 4A‒C). Histological analysis showed a strong reduction in crypt depth (Figure 4D, E). Gut length reduction and villi/crypt atrophy are recognized as biological markers of intestinal injury.23 Accordingly, the pronounced intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) death observed in the colon crypts of DUAL-fed animals (Figure 4D‒F) was not adequately compensated by proliferation (Figure 4G, Supplementary Figure 8A‒C). Notably, alcohol in combination with WD significantly increased the number of morphological changes in the intestine. In contrast, the mice fed only WD did not show significant colon shortening (Figure 4A‒C). Moreover, crypt atrophy in WD-fed animals was mild (Figure 4D,E), and the underlying colonocyte damage (TUNEL staining, Figure 4D–F) was compensated by increased proliferation (Cyclin A2 expression, Supplementary Figure 8C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Intestinal alterations induced by DUAL diet. (A) Macroscopic images of the gut. (B) Gut/mouse length ratio (cm/cm) (n = 7–14). (C) Colon/mouse length ratio (cm/cm) (n = 7–14). (D) Representative H&E images of colon and TUNEL IF, respectively. The arrows point positive stained cells. (E) Colon crypt depth (μm) measurement (n = 5–6). (F) Quantification of % TUNEL-positive cells in the colon by ImageJ software (n = 3–4). (G) PCNA WB in colon and PCNA/GAPDH protein level ratio (n = 4). (H) H&E representative image of GALT in the colon. The black arrow indicates GALT structures. GALT cell type-composition characterization by CD45, CD3, and B220 IF staining in the colon. (I) Flow cytometry dot plots in the colon. The percentages in brackets in the dot plots represent the percentage of the population indicated in the graph (n = 4–14).

Multiple gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) structures were present in the colon of DUAL mice (Figure 4H) and mainly consisted of T-lymphocytes (CD45+/CD3+) and B-lymphocytes (CD45+/B220+), with a minor presence of macrophages (CD45+/F4/80+) and monocytes (CD45+/CD11b+) (Figure 4H; Supplementary Figure 9A). Subsequently, flow cytometry analysis clearly identified increased populations of T- and B-lymphocytes (Figure 4I, Supplementary Figure 9B, C), but there were no differences in T-helper cells (Figure 4I, Supplementary Figure 9D) and a significant increase in cytotoxic CD3+/CD8+ cells in the colon of DUAL mice (Figure 4I, Supplementary Figure 9E). Additionally, DUAL feeding led to a reduction in γδ-T-cells, a phenomenon associated with severe intestinal inflammation 24 (Figure 4I, Supplementary Figure 9F), and an increase in regulatory T-cells (T-reg) (CD4/FOXP3+) (Figure 4I, Supplementary Figure 9G). Finally, the significant upregulation of the proinflammatory cytokine Tnf-α was detected in the colons of DUAL-fed animals (Supplementary Figure 9H). In the group of mice fed with only WD, a 2.5-fold increase in the population of B-lymphocytes (CD19+/CD45+) was identified, while T-lymphocytes and particularly cytotoxic CD8+/CD3+ cells, were not affected (Figure 4I, Supplementary Figure 9B–E, I), γδ-T-cells remained unchanged and T-reg cells (CD4/FOXP3+) significantly increased altogether suggesting a milder intestinal inflammatory response in WD-fed animals than in comparison to DUAL animals (Figure 4I, Supplementary Figure 9F, G).

The DUAL diet weakened the intestinal barriers and increased gut permeability

In agreement with previous publications,25 WD negatively impacts the intestinal barrier by affecting mucin production and tight junctions (TJs) expression, altogether leading to increased intestinal permeability (Figure 5A,B,E,F,H). Similarly, upon DUAL feeding, IF staining of mucin-2 (MUC2) glycoprotein in the colon showed a significant decrease (Figure 5A,B). Loss and damage of the colonic mucus layer induced by DUAL diet were associated with a significant reduction in secretory IgA (sIgA), a key regulator of barrier immune homeostasis (Figure 5C,D).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Gut barrier disruption in DUAL-fed mice. (A) IF staining of MUC2 in the colon. (B) Quantification of the positive MUC2-stained area (%) by ImageJ software (n = 4–7). (C) sIgA quantification in the colon (ng/mg tissue). (D) sIgA quantification in feces (μg/100 mg stool). (E) IF staining for ZO-1 in the colon. (F) Quantification of the positive ZO-1-stained area (%) by ImageJ software (n = 3–5). (G) OCCLUDIN protein level analysis by WB and the OCCLUDIN/GAPDH ratio (n = 4). (H) FITC-dextran measurement in serum (ng/mL) (n = 4–7). (I) Albumin quantification in feces by ELISA (μg/mL) (n = 5).

In addition, a mild decrease in the number of colonic TJs: zona occludens-1 (ZO-1) and occludin, was detected in DUAL-fed animals (Figure 5E‒G).

At the same time, the expression of CD34, a transmembrane glycoprotein of the gut vascular barrier (GVB),26 was decreased in the colon (Supplementary Figure 10A, B).

Alterations in all layers of the gut barrier should lead to increased intestinal leakiness.11 Hence, a significant increase in FITC dextran in the serum (Figure 5H) and increased albumin concentration in the feces of DUAL-fed animals confirmed disrupted GVB27 and intestinal barrier dysfunction (Figure 5I).

DUAL diet triggered changes in the gut microbiota

Gut microbiome alteration is another key contributor to a dysfunctional gut‒liver axis induced by diet or alcohol.28 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed that the fecal microbiota composition was significantly different between control and DUAL mice – at the level of genera and families (PERMANOVA over Euclidean distance for clr-transformed data, p < 0.001) (Figure 6A). We compared the groups by deriving the nearest balance, which was defined as two subsets of taxa (numerator and denominator, respectively)29 The normalized ratio of relative abundances effectively differentiated the groups (Figure 6B). The microbial taxa increased in DUAL animals included those previously linked to high fat and sugar consumption30 in humans, such as Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, and Alistipes, and unclassified genera within the family Desulfovibrionaceae (Figure 6C).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

DUAL-fed mice-associated microbiome nearest balance and human SLD-associated microbiome nearest balance. (A) Mouse microbiota member taxa. (B) The normalized ratio of relative abundances between the control and DUAL animal groups. (C) Contribution of each taxon to the balance (calculated as coefficients from a linear model over clr-transformed bacterial abundances) in mice. Bars are filled according to the direction of their association. (D) SCFA heatmap representing the results from the DUAL vs. Control animals unpaired comparison. Heatmap color codes for log2 (pairwise fold-change) are indicated at the bottom of the figure (n = 5). (E) Human microbiota member taxa. (F) Distribution of the balance values for each sample compared between the control and SLD patients with alcohol consumption and simultaneous metabolic risk factors. (G) Contribution of each taxon to the balance (calculated as coefficients from a linear model over clr-transformed bacterial abundances) in humans. Bars are filled according to the direction of their association.

We also found a decrease in fecal short chain fatty acids (SCFA), specifically valerate, in DUAL mice. This has been previously linked to an increase in gut permeability, gut inflammation, and liver fibrosis (Figure 6D).31,32

Despite a small sample size, the balance analysis along with the ordination plot showed that the gut microbial communities in mice fed with only WD differed from those in the DUAL group, suggesting that the addition of alcohol to the WD led to enhanced disruption of microbial populations (Supplementary Figure 11).

Next, we investigated the potential similarities between the microbiota changes in DUAL mice and obese patients with MASLD and mild, albeit regular, alcohol consumption (Supplementary Table 3). The general difference in fecal microbiota composition between control individuals and SLD patients (genus-level PERMANOVA: p = 0.003) was further explored to determine the nearest balance, including 31 genera in the numerator and 29 in the denominator (Figure 6E,F). The topmost taxa associated with the disorder were Enterobacteriaceae, Ruminococcus gnavus-related taxa, and Flavonifractor (Figure 6G). Certain patterns mirrored those observed in DUAL mice, including an increase in Bacteroides and Alistipes.

AIMD attenuated hepatic steatosis and inflammation in DUAL-fed animals

To validate whether the phenomenon of DUAL-diet-induced liver damage is mediated by the gut microbiome, we performed antibiotic-induced microbiota depletion (AIMD) by administering a broad-spectrum antibiotic mixture via oral gavage. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed notable depletion of microbial taxa after antibiotic administration (Supplementary Figure 12A).

Serum levels of gut-derived bacterial LPS and subsequent TLR4 expression in the liver significantly decreased in DUAL animals treated with antibiotics (Figure 7A,B). These changes had remarkable consequences for liver pathology: attenuated hepatomegaly (Figure 7C), mitigated steatosis (Figure 7D, Supplementary Figure 12B) and decreased levels of hepatic TGs in DUAL-fed mice (Supplementary Figure 12C). The resolution of steatosis was not a result of diminished lipid influx into the liver, as Cd36 expression was unaltered after antibiotic treatment (Supplementary Figure 12D). However, AIMD increased CPT-1c hepatic expression levels, highlighting that upregulation of lipid oxidation may be a potential mechanism underlying the observed reduction in hepatic steatosis (Figure 7E).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

AIMD-associated gut–liver modifications in DUAL mice. (A) LPS in serum by concentrations were measured via ELISA (ng/mL) (n = 3–4). (B) Tlr4 mRNA relative expression to that of Gapdh in the liver (n = 4–6). (C) Liver/body weight ratio (%) (n = 3–5). (D) Illustrative ORO-stained liver sections. (E) CPT-1c WB in the liver; CPT-1c/HSC70 protein level ratio (n = 3).

Decreased steatosis attenuated liver damage (Supplementary Figure 12E), inflammation (Supplementary Figure 12F, G) and decreased hepatic collagen deposition in DUAL-fed mice treated with antibiotics (Supplementary Figure 12H).

To further verify these key data, we used a second more physiological model of AIMD and supplemented the drinking water with an antibiotic cocktail during the final 4 weeks of DUAL feeding. Consistently, DUAL + ABXdw significantly reduced liver weight, attenuated liver steatosis, and decreased the content of hepatic TG (Supplementary Figure 13A–D), decreased liver enzymes in the serum (Supplementary Figure 13E), attenuated inflammation (Supplementary Figure 13F) and the expression of profibrotic Collagen I in the liver (Supplementary Figure 13G).

Probiotic administration did not modify DUAL-induced steatohepatitis

Next, we subsequently investigated whether the microbiome represents a potential target for therapeutic interventions in DUAL mice and tested multi-strain probiotics as a potential therapeutic strategy.

Probiotics administration to DUAL-fed mice neither attenuated hepatomegaly nor hepatic steatosis induced by the DUAL diet (Figure 8A, Supplementary Figure 14A–C). Similarly, following probiotic administration, hepatic lipid uptake, as determined by Cd36 expression, remained unchanged, as well as the lipid oxidation, as quantified by CPT-1c (Supplementary Figure 14D, Figure 8B). Consequently, probiotic treatment had no effect on liver damage and hepatic collagen deposition in DUAL-treated mice (Figure 8C,D). Finally, Tlr4 mRNA expression, showed no variance between the groups (Supplementary Figure 14E).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Potential therapeutic role of microbiota modulation in terms of steatosis and crucial role of hepatic CPT-1. (A) Illustrative ORO-staining of the liver after probiotic treatment. (B) CPT-1c WB analysis of the liver with CPT-1c/HSC70 protein level ratio (n = 3) after probiotic treatment. (C) ALT, AST, and LDH (U/L) levels in the serum after 12 h of fasting (n = 4–5). (D) Hepatic CollagenI mRNA relative expression to Gapdh (n = 4–5). (E) ORO-stained liver sections after FMT treatment. (F) CPT-1c WB analysis of the liver and CPT-1c/HSC70 protein level ratio (n = 3) after FMT performance. (G) ALT, AST, and LDH (U/L) levels in the serum after 12 h of fasting (n = 4–5). (H) CollagenI mRNA relative expression to Gapdh in the liver (n = 3–4). (I) Relative abundance of the taxa differentiating DUAL and DUAL + FMT according to balance (n = 4). (J) ORO-stained PHH after treatment with in vitro DUAL diet + LPS. (K) CPT-1a WB and CPT-1a/HSC70 protein level ratios in DUAL in vitro + LPS-treated PHH.

FMT in DUAL-fed animals caused mild therapeutical effects on steatohepatitis

Next, we evaluated the efficacy of FMT from healthy donors via oral treatment in DUAL-fed mice.

Following FMT administration to DUAL animals, only a slight improvement in hepatomegaly (Supplementary Figure 15A) and a modest reduction in hepatic steatosis, associated with a lower hepatic TG content, were observed (Figure 8E, Supplementary Figure 15B, C). Cd36 expression remained unaltered in DUAL animals after FMT, and a non-significant increase in lipid oxidation, as indicated by CPT-1c levels, was detected (Supplementary Figure 15D, Figure 8F). Consequently, mild attenuation of liver steatosis was associated with a moderate reduction in hepatic injury and fibrosis in DUAL-fed mice after FMT (Figure 8G,H).

Although the positive changes in the hepatic phenotype were moderate and most of the parameters in the DUAL + FMT group did not reach the control levels, slight improvements in intestinal permeability and gut barriers integrity were demonstrated in the colon (Supplementary Figure 15E, F). However, the expression of Tlr-4 in the liver and LPS levels in the serum remained unchanged after FMT in DUAL animals (Supplementary Figure 15G, H).

No one-directional dynamic in the composition of the intestinal microbiota in DUAL + FMT mice was observed (Supplementary Figure 15I). However, a substantial increase in three commensal bacterial species was observed: Faecalibacterium rodentium, Dubosiella newyorkensis, and Akkermansia muciniphila (Figure 8I). These species, together with Dysosmobacter welbionis, which was also increased in DUAL + FMT mice, albeit at lower relative abundances, are associated with beneficial effects on host metabolism.33,34

LPS had a direct impact on hepatic lipid metabolism in vitro

To further validate our key findings, we applied an in vitro DUAL model to HepG2 human hepatoma cells. First, in HepG2 cells, we examined the effects of palmitic acid (PA) alone and compared it to the combination of PA plus EtOH. Our results supported the in vivo findings and clearly demonstrated that the “dual” treatment (PA + EtOH) synergistically increases the lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells (Supplementary Figure 16 A, B).

In our murine DUAL model, the presence of LPS in the serum was associated with the accumulation of fat in the liver due to inadequate CPT-1c-mediated lipid oxidation. Consistently, HepG2 cells treated with PA plus alcohol and the highest concentration of LPS, presented the greatest level of lipid accumulation (Supplementary Figure 16C, D) directly correlated with a reduction in CPT-1a-mediated lipid oxidation (Supplementary Figure 16E).

To further confirm this important finding, we tested the consequences of in vitro DUAL treatment (palmitic acid (PA) plus alcohol) in combination with LPS in primary human hepatocytes (PHH). As expected, in vitro DUAL treatment of PHHs led to the intracellular accumulation of lipids, which was greatly enhanced after LPS application in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 8J). Remarkably, DUAL + LPS-induced lipid accumulation in PHH was associated with an impairment in CPT-1a protein expression (Figure 8K).

The combined exposure to alcohol and a HFHC induced hepatic steatosis and intestinal damage in zebrafish larvae

Finally, in order to validate and compare the clinical translatability of DUAL mice, we used a second model organism – zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae.

The mouse phenotype was effectively replicated in zebrafish larvae at 9 days post fertilization (dpf), where the exposure to EtOH and a high-fat, high-cholesterol (EtOH/HFHC) diet of egg yolk led to increased hepatic lipid accumulation (Supplementary Figure 17A, B). Histopathological analysis of Alcian blue/PAS staining in zebrafish livers revealed that hepatocytes exposed to EtOH and HFHC diets displayed deformations, ballooning and fat accumulation, resembling the disruption of the hepatic parenchyma, as it occurs in mammals (Supplementary Figure 17C).

Consistently, the Alcian Blue/PAS staining of the intestine of zebrafish larvae simultaneously exposed to EtOH and a HFHC diet showed loosening of the tissue structure, flattening of the crypts and villous atrophy, which is assumed to be a result of the disbalance between IECs proliferation and death (Supplementary Figure 17C).35

Discussion

The “gut–liver axis” refers to the reciprocal and functional interaction between the gut, microbiota, and the liver. Since the gut and liver are interdependent organs, alterations in the intestinal barrier might lead to an increased portal influx of bacteria or their products into the liver, thus triggering a variety of hepatic disorders, including MASLD and ALD.12 The combination of MASLD and simultaneous alcohol consumption refers to a distinctive systemic and potentially multiaxial entity, whose pathogenesis remains elusive.5,11 In the present work, we used the preclinical murine DUAL model15 to examine the relevance of the microbiome‒gut‒liver crosstalk and explored potential therapeutic circuits.

DUAL feeding induced significant intestinal morphological alterations and augmented IECs death not balanced by compensatory proliferation. This resulted in villi atrophy, epithelial cell gap formation, and permeability changes, exacerbating epithelial shedding and inflammatory responses.36,37

Multiple GALT structures identified in DUAL colon were characterized by expanded populations of T-and B-cells and elevated proinflammatory cytokine levels, that have been reported as main inducers of local immune responses.38 Moreover, DUAL feeding led to a significant increase in cytotoxic T cells and a decrease in protective γδ-T-cells, previously linked to severe intestinal inflammation in preclinical studies.24 The corresponding low level of sIgA worsened intestinal epithelium protection from pathogenic microorganisms and further disrupted microbiota homeostasis.39 Gut damage and inflammation in DUAL mice caused a significant disruption of the mucus layer and TJs, which in combination with loss of the GVB integrity,40 increased bidirectional intestinal permeability.41

16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of stool samples unveiled microbial dysbiosis in DUAL mice and important shifts in the composition of dominant bacterial families and single species.42 Intestinal dysbiosis is a hallmark in multiple diseases, including MASLD and ALD, underscoring its importance in maintaining intestinal health and resilience.43,44 More specifically, a notable increase in Bacteroides was identified in DUAL animals, that correlated with fecal content rich in fat and sugars and is known for positive association with MASLD pathogenesis.45 This was accompanied by a decrease in Prevotella consistent with the competitive relationship between these two genera.45 As Prevotella synthesize SCFA, in particular valerate, their depletion may have been associated with the reduction in SCFA observed in DUAL mice.46,47 This may have contributed to aggravated loss of intestinal barrier integrity, mucus production, and protection against inflammation.32 Importantly, some of the changes in bacterial composition after DUAL diet resembled the patterns of dysbiosis in SLD patients, supporting the relevance of our model.

Diet-induced alterations in microbiota, together with hyperpermeable intestinal barriers facilitated portal influx of LPS to the liver, where it (i) triggered a proinflammatory cascade via activation of TLRs corresponding downstream inflammatory-signaling nodes; and (ii) promoted hepatic steatosis via inhibition of ß-oxidation.

Indeed, DUAL animals exhibited an enhanced ability to absorb fat in the intestine. Thus, following 23 weeks of DUAL feeding, we observed marked FFA influx into the liver, combined with intensified de novo lipogenesis and impaired export and ß-oxidation of lipids, which, altogether, contributed to progressive steatosis. Our in vivo and in vitro findings confirm and extend previous studies demonstrating the suppressive effect of LPS on FFA oxidation and, particularly, on its key regulator CPT1. LPS-associated decreased ß-oxidation in hepatocytes could be a by-product of the systemic coordinated host response to increase FFAs and TGs in order to provide lipid substrates for cells that play a crucial role in host defense or tissue repair.48,49

However, the inability of DUAL hepatocytes to degrade FFA by adequate ß-oxidation contributes to hepatic steatosis, triggering oxidative stress, cell death and immune cell infiltration into the liver tissue. In the liver tissue of DUAL-fed mice, we observed an increase in NK cells, MoMFs, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and a decrease in T helper cells altogether contributing to liver inflammation, injury, and fibrosis.50

Indeed, the liver's innate immune response is crucial in the pathogenesis of SLD. Immune cells in the liver recognize cell damage or pathogen invasion, subsequently initiating signaling cascades and further promoting the inflammatory response, resulting in a state of unresolved chronic inflammation.51

The dysregulation of T cell populations, with increased CD3/CD8+ T lymphocytes and reduced CD4+ T cells, mirrored human-like steatohepatitis pathogenesis and correlated with disease progression to more advanced fibrosis.50

Importantly, the depletion of bacteria by AIMD significantly reduced LPS serum levels, ameliorated lipid accumulation by increasing the levels of lipid oxidation through CPT-1c, disabled the TLR4 inflammatory cascade and, consequently, the progression of hepatic fibrosis.

Our findings suggest that targeting the imbalanced microbiota in DUAL animals largely prevents SLD development. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that bacteria symbiotically interact with the host, including metabolism regulation, maintenance of immune homeostasis, and preservation of a healthy gut barrier.52

The use of microbiome modulation is a novel therapeutic strategy for SLD. While nutritional and lifestyle interventions remain the primary recommendations for ALD and MASLD, adherence to dietary changes is often challenging.53 Thus, in this study, we modified the microbiota in DUAL mice while maintaining their diet. Initially, we explored the therapeutic potential of probiotics supplementation, a method previously suggested to alleviate liver steatosis and inflammation.54 However, our findings did not demonstrate significant clinical benefits. We speculate that certain beneficial bacteria within probiotics may struggle to colonize the DUAL gut effectively, potentially owing to the reduced levels of commensal bacteria.55

Recognizing the limitations of probiotics supplementation, we proposed an alternative approach: FMT from healthy donors. Animal studies and clinical trials have shown promising results of FMT in improving liver health, gut permeability, and metabolic syndrome.56,57 Our study revealed partial improvement in liver markers of injury after as well as enhancement of the gut phenotype after FMT in DUAL mice. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing showed a tendency toward compositional changes induced by FMT at the species level; a larger sample size would be required to evaluate the specific direction of the shift differentiating these from the DUAL animals and the controls. An increase in some bacterial commensal species, such as Faecalibacterium rodentium,Dubosiella newyorkensis, and Dysosmobacter welbionis was noted, which have been found to have hepatoprotective properties58,59 and beneficial influence on host metabolism.32 Moreover, we observed alterations in other bacterial taxa, such as Akkermansia muciniphila, known for its role in maintaining mucosal barrier integrity and overall gut homeostasis.60 Our results support the potential of FMT as a therapeutic intervention for SLD, even though its efficacy requires further investigation.

Several important findings in our study represent major novelties over prior work in the field. First, from the current literature, we know that rodents are not the easiest translational model for studying alcohol consumption, as they metabolize alcohol quickly and have a high basal metabolic rate in comparison to humans.61 The resemblance between zebrafish larvae and mice regarding the key alterations in the gut and liver not only supports our findings but also paves the way for utilizing efficient, rapid, and cost-effective models to explore the broader aspects of SLD pathophysiology.

Second, the concurrent combination of alcohol consumption with metabolic risk factors should not be considered ALD or MASLD alone. In line with previous observations,62 our study provides some insights into the reciprocal interaction between high-fat food and alcohol intake, indicating the possibility that each nutrient stimulates the intake of the other. In DUAL mice, alcohol stimulated the increased consumption of WD and vice versa. This is relevant since such vicious synergism in the DUAL model leads to a significant excess of calories in comparison to WD alone. However, as summarized in Supplemental Figure 18A, the variations observed between DUAL and WD are not only attributable to increased caloric intake. Moreover, DUAL mice have a relatively high rate of intestinal absorption of dietary lipids, leading to the massive FFA flux to the liver. In vivo and in vitro data confirmed the inability of hepatocytes to degrade lipids by adequate ß-oxidation in response to “dual” damage (EtOH in combination with high fat), which further aggravated hepatic steatosis. Moreover, in the gut, the combination of alcohol and WD has more severe negative consequences for IEC proliferation, leads to more prominent intestinal damage, inflammation and more pronounced microbiome disbalance, which together superactivates the TLR4 inflammatory cascade in the liver and reinforces the progression of hepatic inflammation/fibrosis.

Indeed, the liaison between MASLD and alcohol intake has been a matter of debate in recent years. Our findings highlight the need of encouraging abstinence in addition to lowering the metabolic burden as a beneficial and recommendable therapy for MASLD and MetALD patients. We propose that alcohol-related public health guidelines should incorporate additional public health initiatives addressing the link between alcohol, obesity, and SLD.

In summary, the use of the murine DUAL model, zebrafish larvae, cell lines, and patient cohorts provided evidence suggesting that gut–liver axis disruption plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of SLD induced by alcohol and concurrent metabolic risk factors. Gut dysbiosis is a determinant for the development of this dysfunction, and therefore, gut-based early therapeutic interventions63 could be beneficial for halting the development of MetALD.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material

Suppl_figures_with_captions_clean.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (Grant nos. PID2020-117827RB-I00, PID2020-117941RB-I00, PID2021-124425OB-I00, PID2023-150260OB-I00, and PID2023-151347OB-I00), EXOHEP2-CM (Grant no. S2022/BMD-7409), HORIZON-HLTH-2022-STAYHLTH-02 (Grant no. 101095679), CIBER EHD25PI02 MICRO-BOOST, and CRC 1382 projects A02, B07, Q02 and 403224013.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants PID2020-117827RB-I00 and PID2020-117941RB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and PID2021-124425OB-I00 PID2023- 150260OB-I00 and PID2023-151347OB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by FEDER, European Union, EXOHEP2-CM (S2022/BMD-7409), HORIZON-HLTH-2022-STAYHLTH- 02 under agreement# 101095679, CIBER EHD25PI02 MICRO-BOOST, CRC 1382 (projects A02, B07 and Q02 Grant No. 403224013). The UCM research group belongs to “Liver Pathophysiology” (Ref. 970935), “Lymphocyte immunobiology” (Ref. 920631), and “Inmunogenética e Inmunología de las mucosas” (Ref. 920361). G.J. and F.J.C. were funded by the Welcome Leap Dynamic Resilience programme (co-funded by Temasek Trust). R.B.U. and A.H. are recipients of the UCM Real Colegio Complutense (RCC) Harvard – Santander scholarships CT63/19 and CT15/23, respectively. R.B.U. and O.E.V. were granted with the fellowship ¨Aprendizaje de Nuevas Tecnologías¨ from the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH). H.L.-L. is supported by Beca FPI.

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2026.2631834.

Abbreviations

AIMD

Antibiotic-induced microbiota-depletion

ALD

Alcohol-related liver disease

ALT

Alanine aminotransferase

AST

Aspartate aminotransferase

CMF-PBS

Ca2+ and Mg+-free Phosphate buffered saline, PBS

CPT-1c

Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase-1c

DG

Diglyceride

FA

Fatty acid

FBS

Fetal bovine serum

FC

Free cholesterol

FFA

Free-fatty acid

FMT

Fecal microbiota transplant

GALT

Gut-associated lymphoid tissue

GVB

Gut vascular barrier

HADH

Hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase

HFHC

High-fat and high-cholesterol

HFD

High fat diet

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

IBD

Inflammatory bowel disease

IEC

Intestinal epithelial cell

IF

Immunofluorescence

IHC

Immunohistochemistry

IR

Insulin resistance

KC

Kupffer cells

LDH

Lactate dehydrogenase

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

MASLD

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

MetALD

Metabolic- and alcohol-associated liver disease

MoMFs

Monocyte-derived macrophages

MS

Metabolic syndrome

MUC2

Mucin-2

MUFA

Monounsaturated fatty acids

MyD88

Myeloid differentiation primary response 88

NAFLD

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

NEFA

Non-esterified fatty acid

NF-ĸB

Nuclear factor-kappa B

NK

Natural killer

ORO

Oil red O

OTUs

Operational taxonomic units

PA

Palmitic acid

PC

Phosphatidyl choline

PCA

Principal components analysis

PEMT

Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase

PHH

Primary human hepatocytes

PPARα

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha

PUFA

Polyunsaturated fatty acids

SCD-1

Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1

SCFA

Short chain fatty acid

sIgA

Secretory immunoglobulin A

SLD

Steatotic liver disease

TG

Triglyceride

TJ

Tight junction

TLR

Toll-like receptor

T-reg

Regulatory T-cells

TUNEL

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP Nick end labelling

VLDL

Very low-density lipoproteins

WAT

White adipose tissue

WB

Western blot

WD

Western diet

ZO-1

Zona occludens-1

References

  • 1.Staufer K, Stauber RE. Steatotic liver disease: metabolic dysfunction, alcohol, or both? Biomedicines. 2023;11:2108. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, Romero D, Abdelmalek MF, Anstee QM, Arab JP, et al. A multisociety delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol. 2023;79:1542–1556. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Diaz LA, Arab JP, Louvet A, Bataller R, Arrese M. The intersection between alcohol-related liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;20:764–783. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00822-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Israelsen M, Torp N, Johansen S, Thiele M, Krag A. MetALD: new opportunities to understand the role of alcohol in steatotic liver disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8:866–868. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00206-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leal-Lassalle H, Estévez-Vázquez O, Cubero FJ, Nevzorova YA. Metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD): a representation of duality. npj Gut Liver. 2025;2:1. doi: 10.1038/s44355-024-00014-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ntandja Wandji LC, Gnemmi V, Mathurin P, Louvet A. Combined alcoholic and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. JHEP Rep. 2020;2:100101. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Malnick S, Maor Y. The interplay between alcoholic liver disease, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome. Visc Med. 2020;36:198–205. doi: 10.1159/000507233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Danford CJ, Lai M. NAFLD: a multisystem disease that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019;10:328–329. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim JA, Choi KM. Sarcopenia and fatty liver disease. Hepatol Int. 2019;13:674–687. doi: 10.1007/s12072-019-09996-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hussain MM. Intestinal lipid absorption and lipoprotein formation. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2014;25:200–206. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Albillos A, de Gottardi A, Rescigno M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: pathophysiological basis for therapy. J Hepatol. 2020;72:558–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gil-Gomez A, Brescia P, Rescigno M, Romero-Gomez M. Gut-liver axis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the impact of the metagenome, end products, and the epithelial and vascular barriers. Semin Liver Dis. 2021;41:191–205. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benede-Ubieto R, Cubero FJ, Nevzorova YA. Breaking the barriers: the role of gut homeostasis in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Gut Microbes. 2024;16:2331460. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2331460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hsu CL, Schnabl B. The gut-liver axis and gut microbiota in health and liver disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21:719–733. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00904-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Benede-Ubieto R, Estevez-Vazquez O, Guo F, Chen C, Singh Y, Nakaya HI, Benedé‐Ubieto R, Estévez‐Vázquez O, Gómez del Moral M, Lamas‐Paz A, et al. An experimental DUAL model of advanced liver damage. Hepatol Commun. 2021;5:1051–1068. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nevzorova YA, Weiskirchen R, Liedtke C. Mouse models for hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis initiation. Methods Mol Biol. Vol. 26692023; p. 177–191. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3207-9_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park G, Jung S, Wellen KE, Jang C. The interaction between the gut microbiota and dietary carbohydrates in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Exp Mol Med. 2021;53:809–822. doi: 10.1038/s12276-021-00614-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wit M, Trujillo-Viera J, Strohmeyer A, Klingenspor M, Hankir M, Sumara G. When fat meets the gut-focus on intestinal lipid handling in metabolic health and disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2022;14:e14742. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhao L, Li Y, Ding Q, Li Y, Chen Y, Ruan XZ. CD36 senses dietary lipids and regulates lipids homeostasis in the intestine. Front Physiol. 2021;12:669279. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.669279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang K. Molecular mechanisms of hepatic apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e996–e996. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schwabe RF, Seki E, Brenner DA. Toll-like receptor signaling in the liver. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1886–1900. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Candelli M, Franza L, Pignataro G, Ojetti V, Covino M, Piccioni A, Gasbarrini A, Franceschi F. Interaction between lipopolysaccharide and gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:6242. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chassaing B, Aitken JD, Malleshappa M, Vijay-Kumar M. Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2014;104:1–15. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1525s104. 15 25. 25 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nielsen MM, Witherden DA, Havran WL. Gammadelta T cells in homeostasis and host defence of epithelial barrier tissues. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:733–745. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miranda CSS-OD, Vasques-Monteiro IL, Dantas-Miranda NS, Glauser JSO, Silva-Veiga FM, Souza-Mello V. Time-dependent impact of a high-fat diet on the intestinal barrier of Male mice. World J Methodol. 2024;14:89723. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i1.89723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mouries J, Brescia P, Silvestri A, Spadoni I, Sorribas M, Wiest R, Mileti E, Galbiati M, Invernizzi P, Adorini L, et al. Microbiota-driven gut vascular barrier disruption is a prerequisite for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis development. J Hepatol. 2019;71:1216–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang L, Llorente C, Hartmann P, Yang AM, Chen P, Schnabl B. Methods to determine intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation during liver disease. J Immunol Methods. 2015;421:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singh RK, Chang HW, Yan D, Lee KM, Ucmak D, Wong K, Abrouk M, Farahnik B, Nakamura M, Zhu TH, et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J Transl Med. 2017;15:73. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1175-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Odintsova VE, Klimenko NS, Tyakht AV. Approximation of a microbiome composition shift by a change in a single balance between two groups of taxa. mSystems. 2022;7:e0015522. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00155-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Beam A, Clinger E, Hao L. Effect of diet and dietary components on the composition of the gut microbiota. Nutrients. 2021;13:2795. doi: 10.3390/nu13082795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cao X, Zolnikova O, Maslennikov R, Reshetova M, Poluektova E, Bogacheva A, Zharkova M, Ivashkin V. Low short-chain-fatty-acid-producing activity of the gut microbiota is associated with hypercholesterolemia and liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic-associated (Non-Alcoholic) fatty liver disease. Gastrointestinal Disorders. 2023;5:464–473. doi: 10.3390/gidisord5040038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parada Venegas D, De la Fuente MK, Landskron G, Gonzalez MJ, Quera R, Dijkstra G, González MJ, Harmsen HJM, Faber KN, Hermoso MA. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-Mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Le Roy T, Moens de Hase E, Van Hul M, Paquot A, Pelicaen R, Regnier M, Régnier M, Depommier C, Druart C, Everard A, et al. Dysosmobacter welbionis is a newly isolated human commensal bacterium preventing diet-induced obesity and metabolic disorders in mice. Gut. 2022;71:534–543. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cani PD, Depommier C, Derrien M, Everard A, de Vos WM. Akkermansia muciniphila: paradigm for next-generation beneficial microorganisms. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19:625–637. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00631-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jansson-Knodell CL, Hujoel IA, Rubio-Tapia A, Murray JA. Not all that flattens villi is celiac disease: a review of enteropathies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93:509–517. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Subramanian S, Geng H, Tan XD. Cell death of intestinal epithelial cells in intestinal diseases. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2020;72:308–324. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Blander JM. Death in the intestinal epithelium-basic biology and implications for inflammatory bowel disease. FEBS J. 2016;283:2720–2730. doi: 10.1111/febs.13771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Morbe UM, Jorgensen PB, Fenton TM, von Burg N, Riis LB, Spencer J, Mörbe UM, Jørgensen PB, Agace WW. Human gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT); diversity, structure, and function. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14:793–802. doi: 10.1038/s41385-021-00389-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu L, Yin M, Gao J, Yu C, Lin J, Wu A, et al. Intestinal barrier function in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2023;11:452–458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Di Tommaso N, Santopaolo F, Gasbarrini A, Ponziani FR. The gut-vascular barrier as a new protagonist in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:1470. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zuo L, Kuo WT, Turner JR. Tight junctions as targets and effectors of mucosal immune homeostasis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;10:327–340. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.DeGruttola AK, Low D, Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E. Current understanding of dysbiosis in disease in human and animal models. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1137–1150. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2012;489:220–230. doi: 10.1038/nature11550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Manor O, Dai CL, Kornilov SA, Smith B, Price ND, Lovejoy JC, Gibbons SM, Magis AT. Health and disease markers correlate with gut microbiome composition across thousands of people. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5206. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18871-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Boursier J, Mueller O, Barret M, Machado M, Fizanne L, Araujo-Perez F, Araujo‐Perez F, Guy CD, Seed PC, Rawls JF, et al. The severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with gut dysbiosis and shift in the metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Hepatology. 2016;63:764–775. doi: 10.1002/hep.28356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Isenring J, Stevens MJA, Jans C, Lacroix C, Geirnaert A. Identification of valerate as carrying capacity modulator by analyzing lactiplantibacillus plantarum colonization of colonic microbiota in vitro. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:910609. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.910609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ecklu-Mensah G, Choo-Kang C, Maseng MG, Donato S, Bovet P, Viswanathan B, Bedu-Addo K, Plange-Rhule J, Oti Boateng P, Forrester TE, et al. Gut microbiota and fecal short chain fatty acids differ with adiposity and country of origin: the METS-microbiome study. Nat Commun. 2023;14:5160. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40874-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang M, Wang K, Liao X, Hu H, Chen L, Meng L, Gao W, Li Q. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase system: a new target for anti-inflammatory and anticancer therapy? Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:760581. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.760581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Feingold KR, Wang Y, Moser A, Shigenaga JK, Grunfeld C. LPS decreases fatty acid oxidation and nuclear hormone receptors in the kidney. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:2179–2187. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800233-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Huby T, Gautier EL. Immune cell-mediated features of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:429–443. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00639-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bieghs V, Trautwein C. Innate immune signaling and gut-liver interactions in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014;3:377–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Malard F, Dore J, Gaugler B, Mohty M. Introduction to host microbiome symbiosis in health and disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14:547–554. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-00365-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Anderson JW, Konz EC, Frederich RC, Wood CL. Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. AJCN. 2001;74:579–584. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.5.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhou X, Wang J, Zhou S, Liao J, Ye Z, Mao L. Efficacy of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102:e32734. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Khan I, Bai Y, Zha L, Ullah N, Ullah H, Shah SRH, Sun H, Zhang C. Mechanism of the gut microbiota colonization resistance and enteric pathogen infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:716299. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.716299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Woodhouse CA, Patel VC, Goldenberg S, Sanchez-Fueyo A, China L, O'Brien A, O’Brien A, Flach C, Douiri A, Shawcross D. PROFIT, a PROspective, randomised placebo controlled feasibility trial of faecal mIcrobiota transplantation in cirrhosis: study protocol for a single-blinded trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e023518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Craven L, Rahman A, Nair Parvathy S, Beaton M, Silverman J, Qumosani K, Hramiak I, Hegele R, Joy T, Meddings J, et al. Allogenic fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease improves abnormal small intestinal permeability: a randomized control trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:1055–1065. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ye X, Sun P, Lao S, Wen M, Zheng R, Lin Y, Gan L, Fan X, Wang P, Li Z, et al. Fgf21-Dubosiella axis mediates the protective effects of exercise against NAFLD development. Life Sci. 2023;334:122231. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhang W, Cheng W, Li J, Huang Z, Lin H, Zhang W. New aspects characterizing non-obese NAFLD by the analysis of the intestinal flora and metabolites using a mouse model. mSystems. 2024;9:e0102723. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01027-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kim S, Shin YC, Kim TY, Kim Y, Lee YS, Lee SH, O E, Kweon M. Mucin degrader akkermansia muciniphila accelerates intestinal stem cell-mediated epithelial development. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1–20. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1892441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nevzorova YA, Boyer-Diaz Z, Cubero FJ, Gracia-Sancho J. Animal models for liver disease – a practical approach for translational research. J Hepatol. 2020;73:423–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Barson JR, Karatayev O, Chang GQ, Johnson DF, Bocarsly ME, Hoebel BG, Leibowitz SF. Positive relationship between dietary fat, ethanol intake, triglycerides, and hypothalamic peptides: counteraction by lipid-lowering drugs. Alcohol. 2009;43:433–441. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2009.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Di Ciaula A, Baj J, Garruti G, Celano G, De Angelis M, Wang HH, Di Palo DM, Bonfrate L, Portincasa P. Liver steatosis, gut-liver axis, microbiome and environmental factors. A never-ending bidirectional cross-talk. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2648. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

Suppl_figures_with_captions_clean.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.


Articles from Gut Microbes are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES