Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Feb 23;16:7507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-39896-4

Role of friction on the formation of confined granular structures

Vinícius P S Oliveira 1,2, Danilo S Borges 1,3,, Erick M Franklin 1,, Jorge Peixinho 2
PMCID: PMC12932809  PMID: 41730971

Abstract

Metastable fluidized granular systems can spontaneously defluidize, forming glass- or crystal-like structures. We performed experiments with polymer spheres of different friction and roughness fluidized in a vertical water pipe flow. Velocity fluctuations were higher for high friction materials. Monodisperse particles form a crystal-like shell on the cylinder wall for a range of flow rates and number of particles. For polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) spheres with a friction coefficient near 0.1, structural organization was assessed through nearest-neighbor angle analysis, featuring hexagonal packing with defects. At such low friction, defects decreased, while contact chains became longer and more aligned. These findings highlight the role of surface properties in the emergence of ordered or disordered structures, offering new insights into the mechanisms governing glass- and crystal-like arrangements in fluidized particle systems.

Keywords: Fluidized beds, Liquid-solid transitions, Suspensions

Subject terms: Engineering, Materials science, Physics


Granular materials are ubiquitous on Earth, Earth’s moon, Mars, and other celestial bodies, but their behavior under different conditions is still far from being completely understood, those materials assuming characteristics of either solids, liquids, or gases1,2. Besides acquiring a better knowledge on how granular systems behave, granular materials can be studied for understanding problems at smaller scales, such as gas dynamics3, interface dynamics4 and the formation of resisting structures5,6. In the particular case of transitions from liquid-like (dense regime2) to solid-like structures, one problem of interest is how and under which conditions either glasses or crystals appear. Jammed or glass-like structures of spherical particles were often considered in numerical simulations using frictionless interactions7,8 where the focus was on the search for critical points and scaling laws. When taking into account friction, many contact models explicitly demand a friction coefficient, yet simulations are sometimes performed with an arbitrary friction coefficient. Hence, there is a lack of data of particulate systems where the friction and roughness are well characterized.

One system that can mimic the glass formation process is a solid-liquid fluidized bed (a suspension of solid particles in an ascending liquid) confined in a tube. Very-narrow fluidized beds are of interest because of the effects caused by high confinement, where the behavior of fluidized beds is different from regular (larger) ones. For usual (large) beds with a ratio of tube diameter, D, to grain diameter, d, in the range Inline graphic, voids (or bubbles) and slugs usually appear911. For narrow beds (say Inline graphic), transverse waves, blobs, and voids appear12. Yet, for very-narrow beds (Inline graphic), plugs, crystallization (defluidization), and jamming occur1316. Very-narrow fluidized beds are employed as fluidized-bed bioreactors for biological treatment of domestic wastewater. They are also used in micro fluidized beds (when Inline graphic mm), which are employed in encapsulation17,18, pyrolysis1922, gasification2325, and capture of COInline graphic26,27. The conclusions obtained for very-narrow beds cannot be extended to larger beds since the bed behavior is highly affected by confining effects.

Goldman and Swinney28,29 showed that, when defluidizing (decelerating flow), such system can reach a glass structure (although they did not measure the structure in detail) under water velocities still above that for minimum fluidization, which is the minimum cross-sectional average velocity for fluidization. In this state, they showed that the structure is roughly static, but the grains have some degree of fluctuation. Interestingly, by slightly increasing the water flow from this point, grain fluctuations stop, and the granular structure jams (absence of motion at both the bed and grain scales). In addition, they showed that the formation of this granular glass depends on the deceleration rate of the water (the water flow playing the role of temperature), and proposed that it does not depend on the properties of grains. Later, using a similar system but varying the type of grains, Cúñez and Franklin15 showed that bed solidification does not depend on the defluidization rate, but on the particle type (diameter, density, and surface roughness), in opposition to Goldman and Swinney29. In addition, Oliveira et al.30 showed that under some conditions, solidification can be intermittent, i.e., solid and fluid-like structures can alternate in the system. In the following, we investigate experimentally fluidized beds consisting of different particles to understand how changes in their solid-solid friction properties affect the bed structure.

Results

The results consist of friction and roughness measurements of the particles, tracking of the particle motion at both large scale and small fluctuations, a phase diagram for the formation of static glass- or crystal-like structures, and the associated timescales. Finally, the static structures are analyzed through angles of contact chains. Note that a dataset containing experimental data and numerical scripts for processing the data are available on an open repository.

Friction and roughness

Figure 1(a) presents the friction coefficient Inline graphic as a function of the velocity V of the moving plate for the following couples of wetted spheres and plates, respectively (a drop of water was added between the sphere and the plate): PTFE-PTFE, PTFE-PMMA, ABS-PMMA, and ABS-ABS. The range of velocities is smaller than in the fluidized bed, lower velocity of the plate inducing stick-slip instabilities, whereas larger velocities lead to larger fluctuations for the range of normal forces considered. Overall, a constant dynamic friction Inline graphic is measured and the friction level depends on the particle-plate couple of materials. The lowest value measured was Inline graphic and the highest Inline graphic. The relative variation of the friction is merely a factor 3 and can be explained by the roughness of the spheres, which is described by the arithmetic average of roughness height Inline graphic, where l is the sliding distance of the probe. Table 1 shows also the asphericity and the coefficient of wetted friction between the particle and the wall, the friction measurements being in agreement with previous works3133. We note that the coefficients for wetted friction are within the error bars of those for dry friction (see Table S1 of the Supplementary Information (SI) SI.pdf). For PTFE particles on PMMA tube, Inline graphic, so the high particle-wall friction seems to promote the crystallization of PTFE particles along the pipe wall23.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Dynamic coefficient of wet sliding friction for the following particle-plate pairs: ABS-ABS, ABS-PMMA, PTFE-PTFE and PTFE-PMMA. The coefficients are plotted as functions of the sliding velocity V. Inset, a schematic sketch of the sliding test. (b) Histograms of roughness Inline graphic of spherical particles described by a normal distribution. Insets: profilometer traces of Inline graphic as a function of distance along the surface, and images of spherical particles: PTFE and ABS.

Table 1.

Properties of the spheres: diameter, d, density, Inline graphic, asphericity, average roughness, Inline graphic, and measured wetted-dynamic sliding friction between the particle and a wall of the same material, Inline graphic and between the particle and the PMMA wall, Inline graphic

Sphere material d (mm) Inline graphic (g/cmInline graphic) Asphericity (%) Inline graphic (Inline graphicm) Inline graphic Inline graphic
ABS Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
PTFE Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic

Bed motion

In fluidized beds with Inline graphic, it has been reported that confinement leads to the formation of alternating regions with high and low particle fractions, known as plugs and voids (or bubbles), respectively13,15. The presence of force arches within plugs has been reported in previous numerical works13,14; however, it is not possible to directly identify such arches from our front-view images. The plugs, characterized by their length, Inline graphic, propagate upward with a typical celerity (velocity), C, computed as the difference of the plug position (center of mass) between consecutive frames, divided by the corresponding time interval (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Snapshots of the particle beds consisting of (a) ABS particles Inline graphic and (b) PTFE particles Inline graphic. The white stripe represents an area where data was distorted, hence it is not shown in the figure. The upward water mean velocity is Inline graphic cm/s.

Figures 3(a-d) show, respectively, the time averages of bed height, H, plug length, Inline graphic, plug celerity, C, and global volume concentration, Inline graphic, as they converge over time. The volume concentration represents the ratio between the volume of the particles and that occupied by the bed as a function of the bulk velocity of the water, U, parameterized by the number of particles N. N varies from 100 to 500 for PTFE, and these beds are compared with that of ABS with Inline graphic, extracted from Oliveira et al.30. For all beds tested, we observe that their height H increases while the plug length Inline graphic decreases with increasing U, Inline graphic reaching a plateau of approximately 1.6 to 3.6 cm. The increase of H with N is expected since the size of the system increases (more grains imply a higher bed) and, as the bed expands, the concentration decreases (reflected in the packing fraction in Fig. 3(d)). However, Inline graphic presents a more complex and non-linear behavior, depending on U and N (see also fig. S1(b) in the SI). We observe in the experiments that the bed is fluidized in an approximately homogeneous regime when water velocities are just above that for incipient motion, and, by increasing the water velocity, the bed forms smaller plugs. From a certain water velocity on, the size of plugs remains roughly stable with little variation, as we can see in Fig. 3(b). Yet, the same plug-detection algorithm detected some large variability for low velocity cases. By comparing the behaviors of PTFE and ABS particles as a function of U (when Inline graphic), we notice that H follows the same trend and presents the same values, but for Inline graphic the ABS beds have smoother variations and slightly higher values. The lower values of Inline graphic with PTFE particles are probably due to their lower coefficient of friction. For the plug celerity C, data for PTFE particles show a tendency to reach a plateau, while data do not allow us to conclude the same for the ABS particles (they keep increasing with U, and a plateau might possibly appear at high values of C).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Time averages of properties of beds consisting of N particles: (a) bed height, H, (b) plug length, Inline graphic, (c) celerity, C, and (d) global packing concentration, Inline graphic, as functions of the upwards water bulk velocity, U.

Phase diagram

Typically, fluidized beds have an upward flow that exceeds the incipient velocity, transfering momentum from the fluid to solid particles, which in their turn become suspended (see Fig. 3). The suspended particles change their respective positions along time, presenting fluctuations due to the fluid flow and/or interactions with other particles and solid walls. The flow-induced velocity fluctuations decrease with increasing the concentration of particles, and several states are observed: (i) homogeneous fluidized bed, (ii) plug fluidized bed (see Fig. 4), and, in some cases, (iii) no particle motion, which we call here the crystal/glass state. We observed that, depending on U, N and the type of particles, the bed was either fluidized, formed a static structure (that could be more or less organized, and that we call crystal- and glass-like, respectively), or was in a transient regime that was metastable, where the bed alternatively forms a static structure and refluidizes spontaneously30 (see the supplementary video, SV1.mp4, for an example of the formation of the crystal-like structure). As the crystallization/glass transition takes place, it is noticed that the particles form a circumferential layer along the wall, in part because of the lubrication forces close to the wall34 whereas the core of the flow remains fluidized for a certain duration.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a) Regime map of the time average of ensemble-averaged granular temperature Inline graphic in the Inline graphic space, showing the fluidized, crystal/glass, and metastable structures, for the PTFE particles (the regimes for the ABS particles are shown in red symbols). (b) Duration of crystal formation, Inline graphic, as a function of U, for different values of N. (c) Inline graphic as a function of N, parameterized by U.

As we will see in the following, depending on the friction coefficient of particles, the circumferential structure can be more or less organized, reaching a crystal- or glass-like structure. We qualify those structures by making use of Voronoi tessellation and the nearest neighbors’ angles.

Figure 4(a) shows a regime map of time-averaged granular temperatures computed for the ensemble of particles in the Inline graphic space. The ensemble-average granular temperature2,35 is defined by equation (1):

graphic file with name d33e864.gif 1

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic are, respectively, the horizontal and vertical velocity fluctuations of the Inline graphic particle, Inline graphic and Inline graphic being the velocities of each particle i and Inline graphic and Inline graphic the corresponding spatial averages, and M is the number of analyzed particles. The time average of the ensemble-averaged granular temperature, Inline graphic, is then computed by Eq. 2,

graphic file with name d33e912.gif 2

where T is the total duration of the experiment.

In this map, we distinguish the crystal and glass, fluidized, and metastable regimes, with the fluidized regime presenting two sub-regimes: a homogeneous and a plug fluidization. In the homogeneous sub-regime the bed expands without forming granular plugs (sometimes the bed is only broken into two large portions), and it occurs when water velocities are just above that for incipient motion. The formation of plugs, and then the plug sub-regime, takes place for higher water velocities. In general, for a number of particles Inline graphic, the fluidized regime is dominant. As the number of particles increases, from Inline graphic for ABS or Inline graphic for PTFE particles, crystal/glass and metastable states are observed in a range of U. The metastable state forms crystal- or glass-like states that are transient (they form and break spontaneously along the duration of the test), whereas the crystal- and glass-like structures are static and steady. If the bed became static in any of the five repetitions, we then marked the point as crystal/glass in the diagram. This is, for example, the case of point Inline graphic and Inline graphic cm/s for PTFE, where the bed crystallized in only one repetition. We note that each experiment lasts for 300 s, so that in the crystal- or glass-like states the bed defluidizes before the end of the 300 s and remains defluidized until the end of the experiment. In the metastable state the bed spontaneously alternates between the defluidized and fluidized states along the 300 s. In the regime map, metastable states were observed to coexist with crystal- and glass-like structures at some intermediate U.

We measured the time interval, Inline graphic, from the start of crystal- or glass-like formation until when the structure reaches its final stable state, and this is shown in fig. 4(b) as a function of U, from which we can observe that Inline graphic decreases with U (see the supplementary movie SV2.mp4). Figure 4(c) shows Inline graphic as a function of N for different values of U, and we observe that, as expected, the duration increases with the size of the bed.

In the fluidized regime, the granular temperature increases linearly with U (see Fig. 5) and in the range of tested velocities, the average temperatures are higher for the ABS than for the PTFE beds. Using fluctuation-dissipation principles, the energy dissipation from particle-particle and particle-wall interactions is then larger for ABS than for PTFE. Clearly, the vertical component of the temperature should be higher than the horizontal component36. Therefore, the ABS beds experience higher temperature gradients during defluidization in comparison with the PTFE beds, leading to the formation of glass-like structures.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Global granular temperature as a function of the bulk velocity, U, in the fluidization regime. The blue points represent PTFE experiments, Inline graphic 200, and the red crosses represent the ABS bed with Inline graphic. The dashed lines are linear fits. For ABS, the slope is 1.93 cm/s and for ABS, the slope is 1.37 cm/s.

Vonoroi tesselation

The glass- and crystal-like structures form a shell along the pipe wall in our confined system, and, therefore, the position of each particle can be mapped into a 2D cylindrical plane. We now assess the crystal and glass structures using Voronoi tessellation37 for which we consider only particle centers that are not at the border of images. We note that the images are two-dimensional, so that some distortions are expected (although assumed not affecting our results). Figures 6(a-b) show examples of Voronoi tesselation (yellow lines) computed for the ABS and PTFE beds, respectively. From that, we can observe a less regular and glass-like structure for the ABS, while the structure is more regular for the PTFE, for this reason we call the latter crystal and the former glass in this work. From the Voronoi cells, the centers and the angles between the nearest neighbors’, Inline graphic, can be calculated, and the distribution of Inline graphic is displayed in Fig. 6(c). For crystallized PTFE states, a single peak distribution is obtained and is fitted with the most probable value Inline graphic°. For ABS glass states, two peaks are present and fitted with a double Gaussian model, with Inline graphic°and Inline graphic°. For both distributions, the main peak is around Inline graphic°, which is typical of a hexagonal close-packed lattice, and the second for ABS is Inline graphic°, which is perhaps related to square packing. Such arrangements are reminiscent of two-dimensional hard-core interactions38.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(a) Snapshot of a metastable bed superposed with its Voronoi tessellation (in yellow) for ABS with Inline graphic and Inline graphic cm/s and (b) snapshot of a crystallized bed superposed with its Voronoi tesselation for PTFE with Inline graphic and Inline graphic cm/s. Cyan points represent the vertices associated with neighbors’ angles of Inline graphic°and magenta square points represent the vertices associated with neighbors’ angles of Inline graphic°. (c) Histogram of distribution of nearest neighbors’ angles Inline graphic for ABS and PTFE crystallized packings. The continuous lines are double Gaussian fits. The insert is a schematic of the nearest neighbors’ angles Inline graphic.

For PTFE, Fig. 7(a-d) present snapshots of the crystal-like structures for Inline graphic cm/s. The tessellation (also represented as yellow lines) and the nearest neighbors’ angles (represented by colored points) of the structure exhibit hexagonal packing. When varying U, one can notice that the hexagonal crystallized structure in Fig. 7(c) is discontinuous from bottom to top as indicated by the magenta points (representing Inline graphic°) and it is interesting to note that this discontinuous configuration is associated to a metastable state (see Fig. 4(a)). This evidences the fragility of the structure associated to metastability, not seen in Fig. 7(a), (b) and (d), which form persisting crystal-like structures. In all four cases, the tendency to have a single large peak (see Fig. 7(e)) indicates the formation of hexagonal structures, which are independent of U. Finally, Fig. 7(f) shows the time evolution of the ensemble-averaged granular temperatures, Inline graphic, of the same four cases, from which we observe that for Inline graphic, 8.6 and 9.9 cm/s, Inline graphic decreases and remains within values close to zero, while for the metastable case (Inline graphic cm/s), Inline graphic alternates between high and low values. Additional evidence of temperature intermittence associated to metastable states for ABS particles are observed (see fig. S2 in the SI).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Snapshots of the crystallized bed consisting of Inline graphic PTFE particles and the associated Voronoi diagrams: (a) Inline graphic cm/s, (b) Inline graphic cm/s, (c) Inline graphic cm/s and (d) Inline graphic cm/s. Cyan points represent the vertices associated with neighbors’ angles of Inline graphic°and magenta square points represent the vertices associated with neighbors’ angles of Inline graphic°. (e) Histograms of nearest neighbors’ angles for different values of U. The solid lines represent the fits of the histograms. (f) Ensemble-averaged granular temperatures Inline graphic as a function of time t for the same cases shown in panels (a)-(e).

Conclusions

In conclusion, fluidization of very-narrow beds consisting of regular particles can lead to fluidization, crystallization/glass formation, or metastable (transient fluidization) regimes, depending on the fluid velocity and number of particles. Within a given range of fluid velocities, the bed is in metastable or crystal/glass regimes, the metastable regime becoming more rare as the fluid velocity is increased, with the crystal/glass formation time decreasing also with U. Above this range of U, the bed is fluidized. The decrease in the coefficient of sliding friction of particles leads to more organized structures, which we associate with crystals, while those with higher friction coefficients are amorphous, which we associate with glasses. In addition, we show that the (granular) temperature is an important parameter, with high rates of decrease giving origin to amorphous structures, just as it happens for glasses and crystals. Besides fluidization and defluidization, our results represent new insights into the formation of crystals and glasses.

Methods

Experimental setup

Here, our strategy was to monitor how the formation of solid structures in confined solid-liquid fluidized beds depends on the properties of the solid particles, specifically the solid-solid friction coefficient, Inline graphic. For that, we carried out experiments in a water loop, consisting basically of a water reservoir, a centrifugal pump, a flowmeter, a flow straightener, and a tube of diameter Inline graphic mm, which has been used in previous works15,30. The test section is a vertical transparent tube made of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) mounted just downstream of the flow straightener (a porous media made of 6 mm particles), as depicted in Fig. 2. The fluid was tap water at room temperature, and the resulting flow had a bulk Reynolds number, Inline graphic, within 1500 and 3300 (typical of transitional pipe flow39), where Inline graphic is the density of water, U is the bulk velocity, and Inline graphic the dynamic water viscosity. Each test was repeated five times to improve statistics.

The fluidized beds consisted of either spherical particles of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). The ABS-based particles were used in a previous study30. The particles are confined, with the ratio between the tube diameter, D, and that of particles, d, within 4.2 and 4.3, and their properties are summarized in Table 1. The Stokes number based on the terminal velocity Inline graphic of a single particle, Inline graphic, is 467 and 696 for the ABS and PTFE particles, respectively, showing that they have considerable inertia with respect to the fluid and that particle-particle collisions are not negligible40. The average interstitial velocity, defined as Inline graphic, varies within 10.6 and 44.2 cm/s, where Inline graphic is the average packing fraction (global volume concentration of particles), H being the time average of the bed height and N the number of particles in the bed. The incipient velocity is defined as the bulk velocity at which particles in the bed begin to move15 (oscillations of small amplitude detected between frames). We observe that above a minimum incipient velocity, Inline graphic cm/s for PTFE and Inline graphic cm/s for ABS, the bed fluidizes, and remains indefinitely fluidized for water velocities above a higher threshold, Inline graphic cm/s. Moreover, either crystal- or glass-like formation can occur when Inline graphic, and, otherwise, structures in the form of plugs develop with particles migrating from one plug to the other.

Friction measurements

We measured the friction coefficient Inline graphic of the materials involved, where Inline graphic and Inline graphic are, respectively, the tangential (measured) and normal (imposed) forces on a sliding sphere. The dynamic sliding friction measurements were performed using a torsional rheometer Anton Paar MCR 502 with a moving top plate made of PTFE, ABS, or PMMA, and imposing the normal force Inline graphic, which can be varied from 0.1 to 5 N. A sketch of the setup is shown in the inset of Fig. 1(a). Because our system is a solid-liquid fluidized bed, we added water at the contact of the sphere with the plate. The tests were performed at room temperature and normal humidity for a duration that varied between 30 and 70 s, the water drop did not evaporate during the test. Previous works33 have also investigated PTFE spheres sliding on a substrate, and concluded that the contact of PTFE spheres on dry or liquid-immersed surfaces yield comparable friction coefficients. The bottom plate is drilled so that three spheres of PTFE or ABS are flush-mounted. The measurements consisted in applying Inline graphic and then measuring the torque T for a constant velocity V of the moving plate. These parameters are tracked during a given time, corresponding to a total sliding distance of about 9 mm. After a short transient, the measurements of Inline graphic and T stabilize. Inline graphic was computed as the ratio of the torque, T, and the distance R from the center of the top plate to that of the contact point with the spheres, Inline graphic, and, afterward, the friction factor Inline graphic was calculated and then averaged for the 20 final time steps. We used particles of ABS or PTFE and plates of ABS, PTFE or PMMA. The coefficient of friction Inline graphic is slightly dependent on V within a range comparable to the collision velocities observed in the fluidized beds. This dependence is stronger for the ABS-ABS pair, where the variation can reach approximately 30%. The ABS-ABS case appears to exhibit mixed lubrication behavior as described by the Stribeck curve, while the other cases show an almost constant Inline graphic, suggesting a regime of soft tribology over this velocity range41,42, which is commonly observed in polymer materials due to their reduced mechanical surface properties.

Roughness measurements

In addition, the roughness of the particles and plates were measured using a surface profilometer Dektak. Figure 1(b) presents the roughness dispersion of both particles. It is represented as a normal-distribution fit of the measured roughness height, Inline graphic. The surface of PTFE particles exhibits a narrower distribution of Inline graphic than that of ABS, indicating that PTFE particles are smoother.

Image analysis

The system is analyzed at both the bed and grain scales by processing sequences of images with resolutions of approximately 100 Inline graphic960 px, and acquired at 30 Hz for 300 s (more details are available in the supplementary information in Ref30.). The field of view was 25.4 Inline graphic 244 mm, so that the spatial resolution was approximately 3.9 px/mm. The positions of the particles are tracked and a Voronoi tesselation analysis is carried out in order to extract the distribution of the nearest neighbors’ angles of the particles forming the cylindrical shell with a hollow core. A narrow angle distribution is a signature of a crystal-like structure. Numerical unwrapping of the acquired images introduced distortions in the images that deteriorated the data. For this reason, no calibration for correcting the distortion due to the curvature of the wall was performed, and the particles located at a distance greater than one particle diameter d from the wall were overlooked in the Voronoi tesselation.

Supplementary Information

Author contributions

V.P.S.O. performed the experiments, wrote the image analysis code and edited the figures and the initial draft. D.S.B. contributed to methodology, investigation, writing-review and editing, and supervision. E.M.F. and J.P. contributed to conceptualization, funding acquisition, resources, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing-review and editing, and supervision.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. We acknowledge the support of FAPESP-CNRS Grant no 2024-02440-2. EMF, VPSO and DSB are grateful for the support of FAPESP (Grant Nos. 2018/14981-7, 2020/00221-0, 2022/01758-3, 2024/02440-2, 2024/13295-3).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Mendeley Data at https://doi.org/doi:10.17632/25ncx7cc42.3.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Danilo S. Borges, Email: danilo.dasilvaborges@uni-due.de

Erick M. Franklin, Email: erick.franklin@unicamp.br

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-39896-4.

References

  • 1.Duran, J. Sands, powders and grains: An introduction to the physics of granular materials (Springer, 1999).
  • 2.Andreotti, B., Forterre, Y. & Pouliquen, O. Granular flow: Between fluid and solid (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
  • 3.Leconte, M. et al. Microgravity experiments on vibrated granular gases in a dilute regime: non-classical statistics. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2006, P07012 (2006).
  • 4.Fan, F., Parteli, E. J. R. & Pöschel, T. Origin of granular capillarity revealed by particle-based simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 218001 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Majmudar, T. S. & Behringer, R. P. Contact force measurements and stress-induced anisotropy in granular materials. Nature435, 1079–1082 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bi, D., Zhang, J., Chakraborty, B. & Behringer, R. P. Jamming by shear. Nature480, 355–358 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.O’Hern, C. S., Silbert, L. E., Liu, A. J. & Nagel, S. R. Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: The epitome of disorder. Phys. Rev. E68, 011306 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mari, R., Seto, R., Morris, J. F. & Denn, M. M. Shear thickening, frictionless and frictional rheologies in non-brownian suspensions. J. Rheol.58, 1693–1724 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Geldart, D. Types of gas fluidization. Powder Technol.7, 285–292 (1973). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sundaresan, S. Instabilities in fluidized beds. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.35, 63–88 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Koralkar, N., Kottakota, G. & Bose, M. Transition criteria for fluidized beds revisited. Part. Sci. Technol.33, 393–405 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Duru, P., Nicolas, M., Hinch, J. & Guazzelli, E. Constitutive laws in liquid-fluidized beds. J. Fluid Mech.452, 371–404 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cúñez, F. D. & Franklin, E. M. Plug regime in water fluidized beds in very narrow tubes. Powder Technol.345, 234–246 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cúñez, F. D. & Franklin, E. M. Mimicking layer inversion in solid-liquid fluidized beds in narrow tubes. Powder Technol.364, 994–1008 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cúñez, F. D. & Franklin, E. M. Crystallization and jamming in narrow fluidized beds. Phys. Fluids32, 083303 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cúñez, F. D., Lima, N. C. & Franklin, E. M. Motion and clustering of bonded particles in narrow solid–liquid fluidized beds. Physics of Fluids33 (2021).
  • 17.Schreiber, R., Vogt, C., Werther, J. & Brunner, G. Fluidized bed coating at supercritical fluid conditions. The J. Supercrit. Fluids24, 137–151 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rodríguez-Rojo, S., Marienfeld, J. & Cocero, M. J. RESS process in coating applications in a high pressure fluidized bed environment: Bottom and top spray experiments. Chem. Eng. J.144, 531–539 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yu, J. et al. Biomass pyrolysis in a micro-fluidized bed reactor: characterization and kinetics. Chem. Eng. J.168, 839–847 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mao, Y. et al. Fast co-pyrolysis of biomass and lignite in a micro fluidized bed reactor analyzer. Bioresour. Technol.181, 155–162 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jia, L., Dufour, A., Le Brech, Y., Authier, O. & Mauviel, G. On-line analysis of primary tars from biomass pyrolysis by single photoionization mass spectrometry: Experiments and detailed modelling. Chem. Eng. J.313, 270–282 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gao, W. et al. Kinetic modeling of pyrolysis of three iranian waste oils in a micro-fluidized bed. Petroleum Sci. Technol.35, 183–189 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zheng, H., Dijksman, J. A. & Behringer, R. P. Shear jamming in granular experiments without basal friction. EPL107, 34005 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang, Y., Yao, M., Gao, S., Sun, G. & Xu, G. Reactivity and kinetics for steam gasification of petroleum coke blended with black liquor in a micro fluidized bed. Appl. Energy160, 820–828 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cortazar, M. et al. Experimental study and modeling of biomass char gasification kinetics in a novel thermogravimetric flow reactor. Chem. Eng. J.396, 125200 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fang, F., Li, Z.-S. & Cai, N.-S. Experiment and modeling of co capture from flue gases at high temperature in a fluidized bed reactor with ca-based sorbents. Energy & Fuels23, 207–216 (2009).
  • 27.Shen, T., Zhu, X., Yan, J. & Shen, L. Design of micro interconnected fluidized bed for oxygen carrier evaluation. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control.90, 102806 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schröter, M., Goldman, D. I. & Swinney, H. L. Stationary state volume fluctuations in a granular medium. Phys. Rev. E71, 030301 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Goldman, D. I. & Swinney, H. L. Signatures of glass formation in a fluidized bed of hard spheres. Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 145702 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oliveira, V. P. S., Borges, D. S. & Franklin, E. M. Crystallization and refluidization in very-narrow fluidized beds. Phys. Fluids35, 093306 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Farrell, G. R., Martini, K. M. & Menon, N. Loose packings of frictional spheres. Soft Matter6, 2925–2930 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Farain, K. & Bonn, D. Predicting frictional aging from bulk relaxation measurements. Nat. Commun.14, 3606 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Terwisscha-Dekker, H., Hogenelst, T., Bliem, R., Weber, B. & Bonn, D. Why teflon is so slippery while other polymers are not. Phys. Rev. E107, 024801 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Takeuchi, S. & Gu, J. Extended reynolds lubrication model for incompressible newtonian fluid. Phys. Rev. Fluids4, 114101 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cúñez, F. D. & Franklin, E. M. Miniaturized gas–solid fluidized beds. Mech. Res. Commun.131, 104146 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.van der Meer, D. & Reimann, P. Temperature anisotropy in a driven granular gas. Europhys. Lett.74, 384 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Reis, P. M., Sykes, T. & Mullin, T. Phases of granular segregation in a binary mixture. Phys. Rev. E74, 051306 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dhar, D., Rajesh, R. & Kumar, A. Phase transitions in systems of particles with only hard-core interactions. EPL143, 61001 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peixinho, J. & Mullin, T. Decay of turbulence in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 094501 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aguilar-Corona, A., Zenit, R. & Masbernat, O. Collisions in a liquid fluidized bed. Int. J. Multiph. Flow37, 695–705 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bongaerts, J., Fourtouni, K. & Stokes, J. Soft-tribology: Lubrication in a compliant pdms-pdms contact. Tribol. Int.40, 1531–1542 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rudge, R. E. D., Scholten, E. & Dijksman, J. A. Advances and challenges in soft tribology with applications to foods. Curr. Opin. Food Sci.27, 90–97 (2019). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Mendeley Data at https://doi.org/doi:10.17632/25ncx7cc42.3.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES