Abstract
The human body contains trillions of cells, classified into specific cell types, with diverse morphologies and functions. In addition, cells of the same type can assume different states within an individual’s body during their lifetime. Understanding the complexities of the proteome in the context of a human organism and its many potential states is a necessary requirement to understanding human biology, but these complexities can neither be predicted from the genome, nor have they been systematically measurable with available technologies. Recent advances in proteomic technology and computational sciences now provide opportunities to investigate the intricate biology of the human body at unprecedented resolution and scale. Here we introduce a big-science endeavour called π-HuB (proteomic navigator of the human body). The aim of the π-HuB project is to (1) generate and harness multimodality proteomic datasets to enhance our understanding of human biology; (2) facilitate disease risk assessment and diagnosis; (3) uncover new drug targets; (4) optimize appropriate therapeutic strategies; and (5) enable intelligent healthcare, thereby ushering in a new era of proteomics-driven phronesis medicine. This ambitious mission will be implemented by an international collaborative force of multidisciplinary research teams worldwide across academic, industrial and government sectors.
The Human Genome Project (HGP) has provided a comprehensive map of the human genome and identified the species’ approximately 20,300 protein-coding genes1,2. This demonstrates the power of data-driven, large-scale coordinated ‘omics’ projects in transforming biomedical research, giving rise to genomics-driven precision medicine. The human body contains approximately 37 trillion cells of distinctive types, with diverse morphologies and functions, organized in tissues and organs, all of which share essentially the same genome. Moreover, during an individual’s lifetime, tissues/organs and cells within their bodies have often undergone extensive or reversible/irreversible changes in response to changing conditions. Experience over the (approximately) 24 years since the publication of the human genome sequence has shown that the observed cellular and organismic complexities cannot be predicted from genomic information alone.
Human biology, with all its intricate complexities, is profoundly interconnected with the vast expanse that is often termed the protein ‘universe’ or, more scientifically, the proteome (the complete set of proteins expressed by a genome in any cell or tissue at a specific point in time)3. Serving as the fundamental functional elements of cellular mechanisms, proteins are involved in essentially any biological process within an organism. Their significance extends beyond normal physiology: proteins have been crucially implicated as major contributors to the onset and progression of various diseases. They emerge as central figures in the field of therapeutics, being the primary molecular targets for a large majority of drugs. Hence, far beyond the static view provided by genomics, proteomics provides information about the dynamic aspects of the human body and its adaption to changing conditions. Following the HGP era, research based on the human proteome is one of the most exciting, yet challenging, topics in life sciences and medicine4,5.
In 2001, coinciding with the publication of the human genome sequence, a group of proteomics researchers founded the International Human Proteome Organization (HUPO)6. In September 2010, HUPO took the first step towards an international collaborative effort, termed the Human Proteome Project (HPP), with its aim of finding high-quality evidence for the expression of all human protein-coding genes using mass spectrometry, and making them routinely and reliably measurable. Since then, HUPO has stimulated and coordinated many workshops to work within the HPP. Ten years later, in 2020, the HUPO HPP project teams described the first high-stringency HPP proteome map, covering 90.4% of the canonical human proteome and paralleling similar decadal progress made by the HGP7. By 2023, detection of 18,397 (93%) of the predicted 19,750 canonical proteins encoded in the human genome had been achieved8, and a compendium of validated reference spectra for the highly specific targeted mass spectrometric measurement of over 99% of the annotated human proteins had been generated9. Since the formation of HUPO, there has been an expansion of biology/disease-centric initiatives under the HPP umbrella. These aim to spatially measure and interpret human proteome data under a range of physiological and pathological conditions, including protein abundance, post-translational modifications (PTMs), interaction partners and localization.
The first proteomics project dedicated to a human organ (the Human Liver Proteome Project) was actually launched several years previously in China in 2003, as a forerunner of the HPP10–12. This led to the characterization of liver protein expression profiles and protein–protein interactions (PPIs) in this metabolic organ13, as well as the discovery of a major functional role of acetylation in metabolic regulation14,15. Subsequently, the proteomes of other tissues or organs (for example, brain16, heart17, stomach18, skin19 and immune cells20) have been characterized, creating an initial version of the organ/tissue-based human proteome map21,22. Meanwhile, an increasing number of disease-related organ/tissue proteomes have been analysed, as exemplified by the Chinese Human Proteome Project23, the National Cancer Institute’s Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium in the USA24, the Tumor Profiler Project in Switzerland25, the Human Protein Atlas in Sweden26,27 and ProCan in Australia28. Moreover, recent advances in non-mass spectrometry-based approaches provide versatile opportunities for biomarker discovery in body fluids, which is thought to reflect a person’s health or disease status29–31. All these efforts are providing a significant boost in advancing the field towards an era previously termed proteomics-driven precision medicine32. Despite notable technological and computational advances, we are only just beginning exploration of the complexities of the human proteome, and exploitation of its full potential for biomedical breakthroughs has yet to be fully harnessed (Box 1).
Box 1. Complexities of the human proteome.
First, for a human being at any time, there is immense molecular diversity of proteins in the human proteome at multiple scales, including their level of expression and degradation, their functional state as indicated by PTMs, PPIs and shapes and their cellular and subcellular location. Collectively, proteins and their attributes shape approximately 37 trillion cells in the human body with a wide range of morphology and function. Second, for any human society, the genomic diversity of the human population leads to a larger diversity of proteomes in that population, because each person will have a special private proteome and therefore a special private functional state. Third, during the human lifetime, an individual’s proteome is highly dynamic and can be affected by disparate external and internal factors, including somatic mutations, the human microbiome (which can be defined as the microbial ecosystems that reside in various habitats of the body—for example, the human gut), the type of lifestyle (for example, diet, food, nutritional supplements, physical activity and drugs), the occurrence of somatic mutations and the state of the external environment, all of which are intimately related to human health and diseases.
In 2020, the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology funded a collaboration of around 40 proteomics research teams worldwide to envision future HPP-related projects. Since then, several multidisciplinary working groups have been established and numerous on-site meetings and webinars organized, which have been communicated with government and private funding bodies. These activities have allowed us to propose a ‘big-science’ project called the proteomic navigator of the human body (π-HuB). The project is now forming a consortium of Chinese and international scientists to generate megaproteomic datasets from all major human tissues/organs and cell types, and to subject the data to integrative analysis at an unprecedented scale. The aim is to build an intelligent computational engine, called the π-HuB navigator, which will integrate multimodality proteomic datasets to enhance our understanding of human biology, to facilitate disease risk assessment and diagnosis, to uncover new drug targets, to optimize appropriate therapeutic strategies and to enable intelligent healthcare.
Three central goals of the π-HuB project
The π-HuB project has the overriding mission to support, with an investment of billions of Ren Min Bi (currency of the People’s Republic of China), the international and interdisciplinary collaboration of scientists for a period of three decades towards three specific goals (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 |. Overall goals of the π-HuB project.

The schematic depicts the development and integration of major technological strategies for achieving the scientific milestones for each goal. The π-HuB project will start with the extensive measurement of human samples and the generation of data across digital proteomic anatomy spaces and individuals’ state spaces in their lifetime. Then, it will incorporate the advantages of the latest advances in data and computational sciences to uncover the composing principles of the human body, to generate a digitized model called Meta Homo Sapiens and to build a global positioning system for the human body and its states.
Discover principles of the human body
The π-HuB project will first dissect the human body into a hierarchy of digital proteomic anatomy spaces. By harnessing rapidly evolving techniques such as single-cell and spatial proteomics33,34, the project will digitize, and continually refine, the complete quantitative proteomic and cellular composition of the human body, including cell composition of all major tissues/organs, protein composition of individual cell types and single cells, and proteome-centric molecular networks within cells (for example, PTMs and PPIs). Taking advantage of recent advances in multimodal data fusion/integration technology—in particular, the rapid development of deep-learning or foundational models—the high-resolution, anatomy-based proteomic data will provide an unprecedented opportunity to decode the essential molecular/cellular building principles of cells/tissues/organs, and to uncover the critical molecular/cellular mechanisms of biological processes—that is, to demonstrate causal relations from a protein network to a phenotype.
Develop the Meta Homo Sapiens model
The π-HuB project will conduct in-depth investigations into the dynamics of the human proteome throughout an individual’s lifespan, exploring at a population level how the human proteome adapts in response to various factors impacting health outcomes. The entire human body state space will thus be transformed into multiple subspaces that are further dissected through various dimensions. Specifically, the aims are to (1) trace proteome-centric trajectories during major prenatal and postnatal stages, (2) profile longitudinal dynamic changes in complex proteomes during the development and progression of representatives of complex diseases and (3) determine the effects of non-genetic factors (for example, symbiotic microbiomes, lifestyles and different environments) on the human proteome. These state-contextual proteomic data will be integrated with other human omics data from complementary efforts (for example, HuBMAP35, Human Cell Atlas36, Human Tumor Atlas Network37 and LifeTime Initiative38), and projected into a digitized model called Meta Homo Sapiens. Building such a model will be facilitated by composing principles of the human body; it will be formulated using a three-dimensional anatomical hierarchy that records digital features of organs, tissues, body fluids and cells at each level, and it consists of time-sequential frames, with each containing proteomic data measured and augmented within a unit period to represent the human body state at a given timestamp.
Build the π-HuB navigator
The goal of the π-HuB project is to instantiate proteomics-driven phronesis medicine, which is a concept similar to the practical wisdom (phrónesis, from ancient Greek) that is relevant to practical action in a particular situation. Unlike traditional and current paradigms of medicine, phronesis medicine aims to develop the ability to provide temporally precise control of the human body state to prevent disease. This ability should include accurate, efficient monitoring, diagnosis and treatment capabilities and highly robust decision-making capabilities for disease prediction, early warning, prevention, control and healthcare. It will provide temporally precise control of the human body state to prevent disease, by establishing a medical model of popularization and normalization of monitoring, diagnosis and treatment decisions and health management. Undertaken with a very keen eye towards realizing this goal, we aim to develop the π-HuB navigator that will be a virtual state space instrument, created by the convergence of physiological phenotypes and proteomic-oriented, spatiotemporal biochemical/biophysical information in cells, body fluids, tissues and organs. It can transfer the prototype Meta Homo Sapiens model from primary body conditions to different secondary states to obtain realistic models. This will be followed by the creation of a state space covering all key states of the human body, by simulating body dynamics with each model for specific periods and thereby tackling the most beneficial approaches to prediction of outcomes based on non-invasive proteomic snapshots and longitudinal proteomic measurements. Ultimately, causal inference will be used to identify underlying triggers that induce transitions between adjacent key states. Each state space can be regarded as a topological navigation map in which each node is the key state defined by the corresponding biomarkers, and each edge between two nodes records the triggers to transform fr om one state to the other. Thus, building such a navigator will grant an opportunity to track trajectories of wellness and health, to define factors important in disease risk assessment and early diagnosis and to drive the development of new therapeutic interventions and intelligent healthcare approaches for redirection of unhealthy transitions towards a long and prosperous life.
Pillars for building the π-HuB navigator
To achieve the above goals, the project is being supported by six key pillars (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 |. Key pillars for implementation of the π-HuB project.

To achieve the π-HuB project goals, the project is being supported by six pillars, for which the key components are listed. HT, high throughput.
Human biospecimens
Human biospecimens are the fundamental component of the π-HuB project. To achieve the objectives outlined above, samples for π-HuB can be grouped into the following categories. (1) Anatomy-based samples will consist of freshly prepared organs, tissues and live human samples, obtained following the highest ethical standards, from postmortem examinations. (2) Twin cohorts will allow calculation of the genetic component of observed variability in a population and benefit on controlling confounding factors in aetiological studies on complex diseases. (3) Population-based cohorts will be cross-sectional collections of high-quality biospecimens from a large number of individuals from diverse geographical regions of the world with different lifestyles and subjected to different environments. (4) Longitudinal cohort studies will apply non- or less invasive approaches, with relatively high sampling frequency, to sample healthy individuals or patients with defined exposures who have health or therapeutic implications or outcomes.
In practice, the π-HuB project will first use samples from existing state-of-the-art biobanks around the world, and is open to working closely with other resources being built. All samples in this project will be required to be well and consistently annotated with clinical and demographic information obtained from multiple sources, such as questionnaires, physical measurements, biochemical tests, medical imaging data, records of genetic variants implicated in disease susceptibility, and wearable device-based records, among others. Furthermore, annotations should be performed by using agreed metadata standards that are key for data accessibility and interoperability, and for artificial intelligence-based data integration across bioinformatic resources39.
Innovations in measurement technology
Considering that the project aims to profile the human proteome at unprecedented resolution and scale and that it has an intended time horizon of 30 years, the advancement of measurement technologies is crucial to its success (Box 2). For example, there is a pressing need to identify and measure minute amounts of proteins from single cells. In recent years, we have witnessed tremendous progress in the development of mass spectrometry-based, single-cell proteomic (SCP) technologies40. However, a real-world, large-scale application of existing technologies for profiling millions to billions of human cells is still very far from being state of the art. Whereas current mass spectrometry-based SCP technologies are able to measure up to around 4,500 proteins per single cell41, limited sample throughput due to the absence of multiplexing strategies remains a major shortcoming of SCP analyses. In this regard, the project will start by profiling a cell type-resolved human proteome atlas (see below) and, in parallel π-HuB, will coordinate and support an international community effort to accelerate and benchmark mass spectrometry-based SCP technologies across different platforms and laboratories. Once we can achieve a relatively high analytical performance for SCP across π-HuB data collection centres (for example, over 3,000 proteins per cell at a throughput of roughly 1,000 cells per day), the project will then launch an initiative to collect SCP data from human samples. Meanwhile, we will closely track new concepts and technologies for single-molecule protein sequencing that have substantial potential to enable broad sequence coverage in single-cell profiling42.
Box 2. Key technologies for the π-HuB project.
SCP: π-HuB will fully benchmark state-of-the-art SCP methods (for example, nanoPOTS74, SCoPE-MS75 and scPiMS76) and determine the appropriate time to launch a large-scale initiative to collect SCP data from human samples. To further increase the throughput of SCP analysis, it is also important to encourage engineering-level innovations for fully integrated/automated nanogram-level sample preparation technologies77 and single-molecule protein-sequencing technologies42.
Spatial proteomics: π-HuB will initially apply deep visual proteomics technology78 or its derivatives to spatially profile proteomes across different cell types. Nonetheless, new concepts and technologies for spatial proteomics are warranted by integration of artificial intelligence-based tissue imaging navigation, high-throughput and pixel-format sampling, multimodal data acquisition and integration34.
Plasma proteome profiling: π-HuB will apply mass spectrometry- or affinity-based technologies for plasma proteome profiling, which have been demonstrated to simultaneously analyse thousands of proteins in many thousands of plasma samples with high throughput79,80.
Functional proteomics: π-HuB will focus on new chemical biological and biophysical approaches for targeting and enriching native functional states of the human proteome. For example, recent technological advances have enabled the direct detection of subcellular localization, dynamic changes and interactions of proteins in vivo60,61,81,82.
AutoML: π-HuB aims to automate the end-to-end process of applying machine learning to the analysis and interpretation of large-scale proteomics data83,84, which involves tailoring the selection and optimization of machine learning models, facilitating non-expert access to complex multimodal data analysis and addressing challenges on the study of proteomics such as protein identification, quantification and biomarker discovery, early disease diagnosis, optimal therapeutic interventions and the dynamics of biological processes.
XAI: π-HuB will develop XAI methods that provide clear and understandable explanations of their findings in proteomics analysis85 and that, in particular, can validate artificial intelligence-driven hypotheses in proteomics, ensuring that artificial intelligence conclusions are scientifically sound and interpretable, enhancing trust and collaboration between computational scientists and experimental biologists by providing transparent decision-making processes. Furthermore, XAI can bridge the gap between artificial intelligence models and practical applications (for example, predictions of disease risk at the individual level and the effect of drugs or drug combinations on the state of cells).
LLM: π-HuB will build advanced artificial intelligence models trained on extensive biomedical literature, to understand and generate language specific to the proteomics field45, which are expected to analyse and synthesize vast amounts of biomedical text, extract insights from unstructured data sources such as research papers relevant to proteomics and assist in identifying patterns, potential therapeutic targets and new connections within the complex human proteomics data.
In addition, the π-HuB project will also develop, integrate and apply robust technologies for the generation of multidimensional proteomic data indicating the functional states of the proteome. These technologies are exemplified by PTMs, structural states, localization and interactions, and the context-specific interdependencies of these attributes. To facilitate this, the π-HuB project will develop a specific technology scouting division separate from its own technology hub, seeking to identify and fund emerging technologies.
Because technologies will be evolving rapidly, data acquired in the early stage of this project may become superseded by those collected at a later stage. However, these early data will be invaluable for the development and benchmarking of data analysis and integration tools, for providing training opportunities for researchers in the field, for demonstrating data and sample interoperability procedures within the consortium and for supporting pilot studies. Moreover, we reasoned that, like HGP, the project will also proceed in stages at which ‘drafts’ of the high-fidelity human proteome atlases will become available at regular intervals, which will be further iterated to more accurate and complete versions using newer technologies.
Computational technology innovations
Beyond data collection, our ambition also extends to developing methods and tools for data integration, analysis and interpretation (Box 2). Data-driven modelling approaches, such as automated machine learning (autoML), have proved powerful in approximating many virtual and real-world systems43. However, transforming a biological ‘black box’ into a digital system does not typically provide us with any intellectual knowledge or insight that would enable it to be trusted in clinical practice. Therefore, the π-HuB project will push the boundaries in biomedicine by unveiling the molecular reconstruction of the human body. Inspired by success in mathematical intuition guidance and hypothesis proposal44, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods, large language models (LLMs)45 and other yet-to-be-conceived approaches will be exploited to interpret a fit-for-purpose deep-learning model of the human body with escalating resolutions, from molecular to cellular to organ and systems levels, enabling the discovery of knowledge about biological events and the establishment of construction theories46. In this context, it will be key to attract artificial intelligence practitioners to the proteomics field. With this new knowledge, several ‘white box’ prototype Meta Homo Sapiens models will be constructed to serve as the critical preliminary conditions on which π-HuB will build the foundation model of the system. We believe that the π-HuB project is ideally positioned to meet data science challenges, because of the availability of proteomic datasets acquired by the project consortium that are unique in terms of the size, consistency of collection, annotation and processing, and their coverage of multiple layers of the proteome.
Big-science infrastructure
Because very large numbers of human samples (for example, sorted single cells from human organs and biospecimens from clinical cohorts) will be analysed in the π-HuB project, ultrahigh-throughput facilities for data manufacture, collection and processing will be required. Ideally, such facilities require expertise and streamlined, reproducible pipelines to process human samples, profile proteome-centric molecular data in samples and store, transfer, process and interpret those data. Therefore, the π-HuB project will be establishing national facilities/centres as the big-science infrastructure for the collection and processing of multilayer proteomic data. Minimally, during the first stage of the π-HuB project, such an infrastructure should be able to process 1,000–2,000 samples per day and generate 1 TB of mass spectrometry raw data per day (as of today, although this amount is expected to increase in parallel with developments in technology and instrumentation). In China, only a few existing programs possess such analytical capacities, including automation workstations for ‘one-stop’ sample preparation, more than 40 cutting-edge, high-resolution mass spectrometers and a high-performance computing system called ‘Tianhe-II’23. In addition, many other big-science infrastructures and National Laboratories across China have pledged support for the π-HuB project, bringing to the project state-of-the-art single-cell technologies, multimode trans-scale biomedical imaging technologies and a cloud-based, high-performance artificial intelligence computing system. Furthermore, the π-HuB project is partnering with existing infrastructures from research entities attached to universities or other institutions worldwide, such as the Netherlands Proteomics Centre and ProCan in Australia.
Open resources
The π-HuB project will emphasize highly efficient, international, open resources, including standards, samples and their annotations, data and key analysis tools. Like other large community resources with a broad utility, the project will require an open sharing framework to ensure transparent global collaboration between researchers, funding agencies and stakeholders. Within this framework, π-HuB will maximize the importance of reusing collected human samples and reanalysing previously generated data to maximize the benefits from scientific advances, while minimizing risks to participant privacy and acknowledging the contributions of researchers. For example, all π-HuB-generated (non-sensitive) raw data will be directly available to the international scientific community through several well-established data portals implementing the findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) data principles, such as those established by the ProteomeXchange Consortium, including PRIDE and iProX47,48. In addition, bioinformatics infrastructure will be developed to integrate proteomics atlases into UniProt, the most popular protein knowledgebase in the world, so that information will be available to the whole life science community. Moreover, the project will enable clinicians and patients to freely enquire about medical intervention strategies by developing a web-based Meta Homo Sapiens computational framework based on π-HuB molecular and spatial data.
International research teams
The sixth pillar is ‘people’, including researchers, software engineers, clinicians, pathologists, project managers, administrators, financial staff, lawyers, commercial entities and others. Implementation of the π-HuB project requires synergy between a plethora of people globally to work collaboratively under the guidance of a decision-making body, and also clear governance and accountability guidelines. Specifically, the π-HuB project will be steered and governed by an executive committee and overseen by an advisory board. In addition, capacity building and cultural interchange will benefit international researchers in regard to both the exchange of ideas and results and research and intellectual culture. To foster this, π-HuB will establish several scholarship/fellowship programmes to promote these exchanges, through which it will attract additional early-career scientists to participate in this visionary international project.
Challenges
Ethics
Within the framework of the π-HuB project, several measures are proposed to mitigate the identified ethical and regulatory challenges in proteomic research49. Especially with regard to human samples, it is essential for the project to establish a common, flexible and generally accepted framework with respect to ethics approval criteria, patient/donor consent, sample annotation ontology material transfer agreements and non-disclosure agreements that can be accepted by governments from different geographical regions. In addition, the risk of reidentifying individuals through their proteomic features demands meticulous assessment and management. To safeguard the ethical integrity and foster societal acceptance of the π-HuB project, we will establish a specialized ethics committee whose primary role will be to oversee every facet of the project, encompassing biospecimen collection, analysis, data management and information dissemination. Adopting this proactive stance towards ethical and regulatory compliance will not only enhance the scientific credibility of the π-HuB project but also strengthen public trust and participation.
Big data
π-HuB will work closely with existing international data centres, such as the ProteomeXchange consortium, for the sake of consistency of data standards and management rules widely adopted in the field of proteomics. Nonetheless, a fit-for-purpose data centre specifically designed for the π-HuB project is needed. First, new upgrades will be required to store and manage more metadata (for example, clinical information) that can meet the data management requirements of the project. Second, it should support multiomics and multimodel data management and applications. Last but not least, it needs to be easily accessible for researchers worldwide. This will be achieved by the establishment of subcentres in different countries that can meet the legal constraints of each country50, while meeting the requirements of the π-HuB project by using data management system software and technical support from the headquarters centre.
Data generation and integration
The massive amount of data from different modalities will be collected across the international teams. Thus, it is necessary to ensure that data generated across different teams are comparable and integrable. The π-HuB Consortium will first ensure that all human samples are processed using standard operating procedures (SOPs) with respect to collection, annotation, handling, storage and tracking. In addition, to ensure that each data collection team can produce high-quality and unified proteome-centric datasets, the π-HuB project will adopt the HUPO Proteome Standards Initiative51 principles to standardize both state-of-the-art mass spectrometry-based and non-mass spectrometry-based approaches in terms of sample preparation, methodological settings, data acquisition, processing and error control, and develop the SOPs for each step. Given the anticipated rapidity of methodological development, the consortium will also develop and share standards, test samples and benchmarking data to help each research centre update SOPs for new techniques.
Furthermore, new computational methods and machine learning models with strong generalization ability52 are needed to further develop proteomic data analysis (for example, quality control53, data cleansing, normalization54 and missing-value imputation), and to specifically address questions that can benefit from multimodal and intercentre/laboratory measurement. As such, we will develop a centralized, cloud-based, interactive platform for data sharing and analysis that will host standardized tools and pipelines for data processing, integration and interpretation. Lastly, the consortium will provide comprehensive training and support to all consortium members to ensure familiarity and compliance with the SOPs and computational tools. These efforts will develop approaches to support the mobilization of π-HuB data, support the discovery of new insights by providing new algorithms and develop new models for unification of multiomics layers.
Modelling
The π-HuB navigator will build on the computationally driven Meta Homo Sapiens model of the human proteome, which is an extremely complex task. In our initial plan, this model will consist of three basic modules (Fig. 3): (1) a state identifier to encode different states of the human body in state space through proteome-centric measurements, followed by integration of phenotypic information of the human body through a multimodality LLM; (2) a lineage tracer to quantify transition probability between each pair of states under different physiological/pathological/therapeutic conditions—for example, between each pair of states that can be estimated by Monte Carlo methods55; and (3) a path planner to search for the optimal treatment trajectory by balancing various objectives, such as efficacy, against financial costs and individual compliance.
Fig. 3 |. Basic modules of the π-HuB navigator.

A state identifier generates key states of the human body based on massive hierarchical measurements from large cohorts. This is followed by a dynamic, model-based lineage tracer to detect potential transitions between states under all available treatments. Given the established state space, a path planner can search for a treatment trajectory while considering various objectives and constraints.
Democratizing proteomics
Compared with genomics and its related sequencing technologies, the power of proteomics is far from being fully appreciated by the public and, in fact, by many clinicians. Thus, building the interface of the π-HuB project for clinicians and the public is a major aim, in addition to the research goals of the project, to raise public awareness and participation. Such advocacy is needed as a driving force in both sample procurement and addressing the most impactful and pressing needs in disease-focused research. The π-HuB Consortium will also provide training and education of clinicians, pathologists and patients to interpret and use proteomics data, and push proteomics-driven discoveries towards both clinics and healthcare. In particular, the tools hosted in this interface will assist researchers and clinicians in understanding the biological pathways of specific state changes, guiding daily research and clinical practice.
Major outcomes π-HuB phase 1
To enable π-HuB to become a broadly applicable project, it is necessary to maximize relevance to the community by setting deliverables and expected outcomes as a series of staged programmes undertaken within a relatively short time frame. During the initiation and development stage (2024–2033, herein referred to as ‘phase 1’), we will build an international cooperative network to lay the technical foundation of this project by promoting methodological advances, benchmarking state-of-the-art technologies for standardization, building the computational infrastructures for data integration and modelling and so on. Meanwhile, it is also important for the project, in a relatively short-term frame, to achieve major outcomes as follows (Table 1).
Table 1 |.
Major outcomes of π-HuB phase 1
| Expected outcomes | Principles of cell type-based tissue organization | Proteomics-driven lifestyle guidelines | Proteomics-driven precision medicine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biospecimen inputs | All major organs from postmortem of healthy donors | Biobanks of natural populaiton | Large-scale international multicentre patient cohorts |
| Key measurements | Protein expression, subcellular localization, PTMs and PPIs in each cell type | Protein expression and PTMs in body fluids or other non-invasive human samples | Protein expression, PTMs and PPIs in diseased tissues and/or body fluids |
| Major deliverables | (1) A cell type-resolved, multidimensional human proteome atlas (2) New molecular/cellular mechanisms of biological processes |
(1) A resource of human proteome traits associated with lifetime states (2) A proteomic health score |
(1) A resource of human proteome traits associated with major diseases (2) New biomarkers and therapeutic targets |
Principles of cell type organization
The π-HuB project will eventually support studies that generate single-cell-resolution atlases of all major human organs and tissues from people who identify as emanating from different ancestral populations/origins. However, during phase 1, we will initially build reference cell type proteome atlases for all major organs using a combination of state-of-the-art flow sorting56 and parallel mass spectrometry acquisition platforms57. Moreover, rapidly evolving spatial proteomics technologies will provide additional insights into secreted proteins in the surrounding microenvironment and subcellular localization of the proteome at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels. In this regard, multiple cutting-edge and synergistic approaches will be implemented, including mass spectrometry-based, multiplex immunoaffinity-based and super-resolution-imaging-based methods58,59. In addition, the emerging proximity labelling and in vivo crosslinking approaches will enable the profiling of protein subcellular localization, protein complexes and PPIs in diverse human cell types60,61. These analyses will provide versatile opportunities to uncover new molecular/cellular mechanisms of biological processes in shaping diverse cell types and cell states within each organ. Together, we envision that these cell type-resolved, multidimensional proteome atlases, in combination with cutting-edge computational and bioinformatic approaches, will be able to uncover the building principles of cell type organization of major tissues/organs.
Proteomics-driven lifestyle guidelines
During phase 1, we will focus on the most dominant factors that shape/remodel the proteome of healthy individuals. Specifically, we will accumulate a large number of biofluid proteomes from large-scale natural populations, aiming to (1) map quantitative trait loci for circulating/tissue proteins and protein allelic variants associated with genetic variants implicated in disease susceptibility, allowing us to construct disease-causing pathways; (2) trace the proteomic trajectory over the human lifespan by quantifying dynamic changes in the biofluid proteomes of five major prenatal cycles (gametogenesis, fertilization, embryonic development, fetal development and delivery) and five major postnatal cycles (adolescence, puberty, gestation, menopause and old age); (3) analyse the effects of four major dietary nutrition patterns (Western, Japanese, Mediterranean and subsistence)62 on the human biofluid proteome; (4) map the proteomes of populations in six major ecological environments classified by the Köppen–Geiger map (hot, warm, cold, arid, polar and highland)63 and analyse the trajectory of the human biofluid proteome during acclimatization and adaptation; (5) map interactions of the human gut and skin proteome with representative microbiomes from internal and external environments, and construct the adaptation trajectory of the human proteome in response to microbiomes; and (6) map the responses of the human proteome to various clinical intervention strategies such as medication, diet and exercise. Together, these analyses will generate a resource of human proteome traits associated with the lifetime states as indicated above. Such a resource will provide opportunities to develop a proteomic health score through a neural network or LLMs, thereby formulating proteomics-driven lifestyle guidelines.
Generalization of proteomics-driven precision medicine
In the past decade, there has been growing evidence that proteomic approaches can facilitate the mechanistic understanding of diseases, as well as facilitate biomarker discovery and optimize therapy development. In particular, proteomics alone has been able to identify potential biomarkers, or potential therapeutic targets, for many tumour types32,64–67 and a variety of other diseases68–73. Despite these advances, most proteomic findings in the context of human diseases have yet to be validated, and treatment suggestions arising from the data have yet to be approved. For example, most potential biomarkers identified by proteomic studies are generated from small-scale, retrospective studies lacking the basis for the subsequent generalization of using such biomarkers in a wider population. The π-HuB Consortium, consisting of multi-interdisciplinary researchers and clinicians, provides an unprecedented opportunity to reimagine biomarker discovery through a proteomic approach. We therefore reason that, under the umbrella of π-HuB, it will be more feasible to organize large-scale, international, multicentre cohort studies for the validation of new biomarkers for early and companion diagnosis of major diseases. As such, we plan to map the proteomes of ten major organs and corresponding biofluids at different pathophysiological stages, focusing on between three and five representative diseases for each related organ. Such analyses, together with the aforementioned tissue proteome atlases with cell type resolution and biofluid proteome atlases with life-oriented adaptive proteome atlases, will allow the construction of proteomic evolutionary trajectories mapping the occurrence and development of these diseases, and the pathways associated with specific life stages and survival conditions. Furthermore, the π-HuB project will actively collaborate with clinicians, policymakers and industrial partners to catalyse the discovery of new protein-based biomarkers and drug targets that can be applied in clinics to diagnose disease and drug development, driving a paradigm shift towards proteomics-driven precision medicine.
Outlook
Since its inception in 2020, the π-HuB Consortium has grown to become an international collaborative force of more than 100 members, mobilizing scientists worldwide across academic, industrial and government sectors in the protein and health sciences. The π-HuB project will probably foster further global collaboration and discussion by integrating the results from a worldwide community of multidisciplinary scientists to better understand human biology, and to advance medicine from disease trajectory predictions to new treatment options. We anticipate that the π-HuB project will make a major contribution to biomedical research in the coming decades, facilitating disease prevention and diagnosis, accelerating drug discovery and, ultimately, ushering in an era of proteomics-driven phronesis medicine.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (grant no. 2020YFE0202200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 32088101), National Institutes of Health grants P30ES017885-11-S1 and U24CA271037 (G.S.O.) and the Big-Science Infrastructure of Phronesis Medicine, of which the pilot phase is funded by Guangzhou Development District.
Footnotes
Competing interests R.A. holds shares of Biognosys AG, which operates in the field covered by the article. D.F. is co-founder of MedBiome Inc., a precision nutrition company. K.G. is a shareholder of CYBO, LucasLand, and FlyWorks. T.G. is the founder of Westlake Omics Inc. M.M. is an indirect investor in EvoSep. R.T. is a founder of BayOmics. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
The π-HuB Consortium:
Ruedi Aebersold, Mark S. Baker, Xiuwu Bian, Xiaochen Bo, Daniel W. Chan, Cheng Chang, Luonan Chen, Chris Soon Heng Tan, Xiangmei Chen, Yu-Ju Chen, Heping Cheng, Ben C. Collins, Fernando Corrales, Jürgen Cox, Weinan E, Jennifer E. Van Eyk, Jia Fan, Pouya Faridi, Daniel Figeys, George Fu Gao, Mingxia Gao, Qiang Gao, Wen Gao, Yushun Gao, Zu-Hua Gao, Keisuke Goda, Wilson Wen Bin Goh, Dongfeng Gu, Changjiang Guo, Tiannan Guo, Xuejiang Guo, Fuchu He, Jie He, Jun He, Qing-Yu He, Yuezhong He, Albert J. R. Heck, Henning Hermjakob, Jinlin Hou, Canhua Huang, Tony Hunter, Chenxi Jia, Narayanan Gopalakrishna Iyer, Ying Jiang, Connie R. Jimenez, Lokesh Joshi, Neil L. Kelleher, Bernhard Kuster, Chaoying Li, Dong Li, Ming Li, Yan Li, Yanchang Li, Yang Li, Qingsong Lin, Cui Hua Liu, Fan Liu, Guang-Hui Liu, Siqi Liu, Xiaonan Liu, Ya Liu, Yansheng Liu, Zhihua Liu, Zhongyang Liu, Teck Yew Low, Ben Lu, Haojie Lu, Matthias Mann, Anming Meng, Robert L. Moritz, Edouard Nice, Yongzhan Nie, Guang Ning, Mariko Okada, Gilbert S. Omenn, Christopher M. Overall, Giuseppe Palmisano, Yaojin Peng, Charles Pineau, Terence Chuen Wai Poon, Anthony W. Purcell, Guojun Qian, Jie Qiao, Hongqiang Qin, Yu Rao, Zihe Rao, Roger R. Reddel, Xianwen Ren, Yan Ren, Phillip J. Robinson, Paola Roncada, Chris Sander, Jiahao Sha, Feng Shen, Lin Shen, Erwei Song, Sanjeeva Srivastava, Shicheng Su, Aihua Sun, Siu Kwan Sze, Minjia Tan, Ben Zhong Tang, Chao Tang, Liujun Tang, Sheng-Ce Tao, Ruijun Tian, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Chanjuan Wang, Chen Wang, Jian Wang, Tong Wang, Xiaowen Wang, Xinxing Wang, Yan Wang, Liming Wei, Tobias Weiss, Mathias Wilhelm, Robert Winkler, Bernd Wollscheid, Catherine C. L. Wong, Limsoon Wong, Linhai Xie, Wei Xie, Xiaoliang Sunney Xie, Li Xu, Ping Xu, Tao Xu, Tianhao Xu, Liying Yan, Huanming Yang, Jianjun Yang, Jing Yang, Xiao Yang, John Yates, Mingliang Ye, Wantao Ying, Xiaobo Yu, Yaxiang Yuan, Qingcun Zeng, Qiwei Zhai, Qimin Zhan, Bing Zhang, Hui Zhang, Lihua Zhang, Lingqiang Zhang, Pingwen Zhang, Xiaofei Zhang, Xu Zhang, Ying Zhang, Yukui Zhang, Yu Zi Zheng, Nan-Shan Zhong, Qing Zhong, Feng Zhou, Yi Zhu, Yunping Zhu, and Zemin Zhang
References
- 1.Venter JC et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lander ES et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aebersold R & Mann M Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature 537, 347–355 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abbott A And now for the proteome. Nature 409, 747 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fields S Proteomics. Proteomics in genomeland. Science 291, 1221–1224 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.The proteome isn’t genome II. Nature 410, 725 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adhikari S et al. A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome. Nat. Commun 11, 5301 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Omenn GS et al. The 2022 Report on the Human Proteome from the HUPO Human Proteome Project. J. Proteome Res 22, 1024–1042 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kusebauch U et al. Human SRMAtlas: a resource of targeted assays to quantify the complete human proteome. Cell 166, 766–778 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cyranoski D China takes centre stage for liver proteome. Nature 425, 441 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jia H & Louet S China pushes liver proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol 22, 136 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.He F Human liver proteome project: plan, progress, and perspectives. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1841–1848 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang J et al. Toward an understanding of the protein interaction network of the human liver. Mol. Syst. Biol 7, 536 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang Q et al. Acetylation of metabolic enzymes coordinates carbon source utilization and metabolic flux. Science 327, 1004–1007 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhao S et al. Regulation of cellular metabolism by protein lysine acetylation. Science 327, 1000–1004 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sharma K et al. Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome. Nat. Neurosci 18, 1819–1831 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Doll S et al. Region and cell-type resolved quantitative proteomic map of the human heart. Nat. Commun 8, 1469 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ni X et al. A region-resolved mucosa proteome of the human stomach. Nat. Commun 10, 39 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dyring-Andersen B et al. Spatially and cell-type resolved quantitative proteomic atlas of healthy human skin. Nat. Commun 11, 5587 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rieckmann JC et al. Social network architecture of human immune cells unveiled by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Immunol 18, 583–593 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wilhelm M et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature 509, 582–587 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This paper, together with Kim et al. (2014), shows the initial version of the tissue/organ-centric human proteome by applying mass spectrometry-based approaches.
- 22.Kim MS et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 509, 575–581 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cyranoski D China pushes for the proteome. Nature 467, 380 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rodriguez H, Zenklusen JC, Staudt LM, Doroshow JH & Lowy DR The next horizon in precision oncology: proteogenomics to inform cancer diagnosis and treatment. Cell 184, 1661–1670 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Irmisch A et al. The Tumor Profiler Study: integrated, multi-omic, functional tumor profiling for clinical decision support. Cancer Cell 39, 288–293 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Uhlén M et al. A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1920–1932 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Uhlén M et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tully B et al. Addressing the challenges of high-throughput cancer tissue proteomics for clinical application: ProCan. Proteomics 19, e1900109 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eldjarn GH et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xu Y et al. An atlas of genetic scores to predict multi-omic traits. Nature 616, 123–131 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sun BB et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature 558, 73–79 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jiang Y et al. Proteomics identifies new therapeutic targets of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature 567, 257–261 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study showcases the concept of proteomics-driven precision medicine.
- 33.Kelly RT Single-cell proteomics: progress and prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 19, 1739–1748 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mund A, Brunner AD & Mann M Unbiased spatial proteomics with single-cell resolution in tissues. Mol. Cell 82, 2335–2349 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A review summarizing state-of-the-art spatial proteomics for human samples.
- 35.Hu BC The human body at cellular resolution: the NIH Human Biomolecular Atlas Program. Nature 574, 187–192 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Elmentaite R, Dominguez Conde C, Yang L & Teichmann SA Single-cell atlases: shared and tissue-specific cell types across human organs. Nat. Rev. Genet 23, 395–410 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rozenblatt-Rosen O et al. The Human Tumor Atlas Network: charting tumor transitions across space and time at single-cell resolution. Cell 181, 236–249 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rajewsky N et al. LifeTime and improving European healthcare through cell-based interceptive medicine. Nature 587, 377–386 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mann M, Kumar C, Zeng WF & Strauss MT Artificial intelligence for proteomics and biomarker discovery. Cell Syst. 12, 759–770 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Perkel JM Single-cell proteomics takes centre stage. Nature 597, 580–582 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Guzman UH et al. Ultra-fast label-free quantification and comprehensive proteome coverage with narrow-window data-independent acquisition. Nat. Biotechnol 10.1038/s41587-023-02099-7 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.MacCoss MJ et al. Sampling the proteome by emerging single-molecule and mass spectrometry methods. Nat. Methods 20, 339–346 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A review summarizing next-generation proteomics technologies.
- 43.Bi K et al. Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3D neural networks. Nature 619, 533–538 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Davies A et al. Advancing mathematics by guiding human intuition with AI. Nature 600, 70–74 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thirunavukarasu AJ et al. Large language models in medicine. Nat. Med 29, 1930–1940 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kang M, Ko E & Mersha TB A roadmap for multi-omics data integration using deep learning. Brief. Bioinform 23, bbab454 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen T et al. iProX in 2021: connecting proteomics data sharing with big data. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D1522–D1527 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Deutsch EW et al. The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1539–D1548 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fierro-Monti I, Wright JC, Choudhary JS & Vizcaino JA Identifying individuals using proteomics: are we there yet? Front. Mol. Biosci 9, 1062031 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bandeira N, Deutsch EW, Kohlbacher O, Martens L & Vizcaino JA Data management of sensitive human proteomics data: current practices, recommendations, and perspectives for the future. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 20, 100071 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Deutsch EW et al. Proteomics standards initiative at twenty years: current activities and future work. J. Proteome Res 22, 287–301 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A perspective paper summarizing the 20-year-long community effort for the proteomics community with respect to data formats, quality control and annotation.
- 52.Sharifi-Noghabi H, Harjandi PA, Zolotareva O, Collins CC & Ester M Out-of-distribution generalization from labelled and unlabelled gene expression data for drug response prediction. Nat. Mach. Intell 3, 962–972 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Olivella R et al. QCloud2: an improved cloud-based quality-control system for mass-spectrometry-based proteomics laboratories. J. Proteome Res 20, 2010–2013 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chawade A, Alexandersson E & Levander F Normalyzer: a tool for rapid evaluation of normalization methods for omics data sets. J. Proteome Res 13, 3114–3120 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.James F Monte Carlo theory and practice. Rep. Prog. Phys 43, 1145 (1980). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shapiro E, Biezuner T & Linnarsson S Single-cell sequencing-based technologies will revolutionize whole-organism science. Nat. Rev. Genet 14, 618–630 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Goncalves E et al. Pan-cancer proteomic map of 949 human cell lines. Cancer Cell 40, 835–849 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Qiao C et al. Evaluation and development of deep neural networks for image super-resolution in optical microscopy. Nat. Methods 18, 194–202 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Qiao C et al. Rationalized deep learning super-resolution microscopy for sustained live imaging of rapid subcellular processes. Nat. Biotechnol 41, 367–377 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Liu Z et al. Bioorthogonal photocatalytic proximity labeling in primary living samples. Nat. Commun 15, 2712 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang Z et al. Progress, challenges and opportunities of NMR and XL-MS for cellular structural biology. JACS Au 4, 369–383 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Scarmeas N, Anastasiou CA & Yannakoulia M Nutrition and prevention of cognitive impairment. Lancet Neurol. 17, 1006–1015 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B & Rubel F World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z 15, 259–263 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 64.Harel M et al. Proteomics of melanoma response to immunotherapy reveals mitochondrial dependence. Cell 179, 236–250 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xu JY et al. Integrative proteomic characterization of human lung adenocarcinoma. Cell 182, 245–261 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shi Y et al. Targeting LIF-mediated paracrine interaction for pancreatic cancer therapy and monitoring. Nature 569, 131–135 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Eckert MA et al. Proteomics reveals NNMT as a master metabolic regulator of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nature 569, 723–728 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Shen B et al. Proteomic and metabolomic characterization of COVID-19 patient sera. Cell 182, 59–72 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nie X et al. Multi-organ proteomic landscape of COVID-19 autopsies. Cell 184, 775–791 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Niu L et al. Noninvasive proteomic biomarkers for alcohol-related liver disease. Nat. Med 28, 1277–1287 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Virreira Winter S et al. Urinary proteome profiling for stratifying patients with familial Parkinson’s disease. EMBO Mol. Med 13, e13257 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wigger L et al. Multi-omics profiling of living human pancreatic islet donors reveals heterogeneous beta cell trajectories towards type 2 diabetes. Nat. Metab 3, 1017–1031 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Johnson ECB et al. Large-scale deep multi-layer analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease-related changes not observed at the RNA level. Nat. Neurosci 25, 213–225 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhu Y et al. Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10–100 mammalian cells. Nat. Commun 9, 882 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Petelski AA et al. Multiplexed single-cell proteomics using SCoPE2. Nat. Protoc 16, 5398–5425 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Su P et al. Single cell analysis of proteoforms. J. Proteome Res 24, 1883–1893 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Chen W et al. Simple and integrated spintip-based technology applied for deep proteome profiling. Anal. Chem 88, 4864–4871 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mund A et al. Deep visual proteomics defines single-cell identity and heterogeneity. Nat. Biotechnol 40, 1231–1240 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Geyer PE et al. Plasma proteome profiling to assess human health and disease. Cell Syst. 2, 185–195 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Deutsch EW et al. Advances and utility of the human plasma proteome. J. Proteome Res 20, 5241–5263 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Buljan M et al. A computational framework for the inference of protein complex remodeling from whole-proteome measurements. Nat. Methods 20, 1523–1529 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mackmull MT et al. Global, in situ analysis of the structural proteome in individuals with Parkinson’s disease to identify a new class of biomarker. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 29, 978–989 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tsamardinos I et al. Just Add Data: automated predictive modeling for knowledge discovery and feature selection. NPJ Precis. Oncol 6, 38 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bai Y et al. AutoDC: an automatic machine learning framework for disease classification. Bioinformatics 38, 3415–3421 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Elmarakeby HA et al. Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery. Nature 598, 348–352 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
