Abstract
Aim
Traditional induction modules for resident doctors starting ENT rotations are passive, offering limited interaction. We developed an interactive, speech-driven AI avatar induction module for managing epistaxis and evaluated its impact on trainees’ confidence and satisfaction. We aim to determine whether participant engagement and satisfaction is higher with interactive AI avatars.
Method
A prospective single-group study recruited twelve resident doctors, who completed baseline surveys rating their self-confidence and satisfaction with prior induction methods. Following a 10-minute interactive avatar-led epistaxis tutorial and structured viva, post-module surveys reassessed confidence and measured satisfaction with the interactive experience. Differences between pre- and post-course survey data were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with p < 0.05 deemed significant.
Results
All participants completed pre- and post-course satisfaction surveys. In the participant group, 58.3% had no prior ENT experience, and 50% had no AI experience. Self-confidence scores did not improve significantly. However, there was a significant increase in engagement (median increase of 1.0 on the 5-point scale; p < 0.001) and general satisfaction with the induction module (median increase of 2.5; p = 0.007).
Conclusions
An AI avatar-delivered induction course substantially increased resident doctors’ self-reported engagement and was well received. Furthermore, AI based induction models are no difference in delivering content compared to traditional induction methods. AI avatar tutors show promise as scalable tools in surgical education, but further refinement—especially in assessment, feedback, and objective performance measures—is warranted to optimise effectiveness.
