Skip to main content
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2026 Feb 12;13:1682564. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1682564

Case Report: Pediatric nephrology—expanding the genotypic spectrum of COQ2-related nephropathy with a novel splice site variant in CoQ10-responsive SRNS

Yu-Ren Huang 1,2,3, Abhijeet Pal 4, Anne Chun-Hui Tsai 3,5,*
PMCID: PMC12935614  PMID: 41767521

Abstract

Coenzyme Q10, also known as CoQ10, CoQ, and ubiquinone is an essential component of the mitochondrial electron-transport chain and functions as an energy transfer molecule as well as a redox carrier and is a lipid-soluble antioxidant. Biallelic pathogenic variants in one of the 10 genes encoding proteins involved in its synthesis, establishes the diagnosis of primary CoQ10 deficiency. COQ2, or parahydroxybenzoate-polyprenyltransferase (EC 2.5.1.39), catalyzes one of the final reactions in the biosynthesis of CoQ, the prenylation of parahydroxybenzoate with an all-trans polyprenyl group. COQ2 related CoQ10 deficiency can present with multiple system atrophy, cardiomyopathy and steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Multiple papers have suggested CoQ supplement can treat SRNS. We report a 9-year-old girl presenting with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, whose renal biopsy revealed focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. She showed only a partial response to combined therapy with tacrolimus, lisinopril, and losartan. Whole exome sequencing identified two compound heterozygous variants in the COQ2 gene (NM_015697.7): a known pathogenic variant, c.683A>G, inherited from her father, and a novel splice-site variant, c.692+3A>G, inherited from her mother and currently classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Notably, previously reported patients carrying the c.683A>G variant typically present with early-onset, severe disease. In contrast, our patient’s relatively late onset and isolated nephropathy suggests that the novel variant may be pathogenic but associated with a milder phenotype. Prompt genetic diagnosis enabled early initiation of high-dose CoQ10 supplementation (ubiquinone, 30 mg/kg/day), which led to marked clinical improvement and may have prevented further renal function deterioration or the development of other systemic manifestations.

Keywords: COQ2, nephrotic syndrome, ubiquinone, genetics, case report

Introduction

Coenzyme Q10, also known as CoQ10, CoQ, and ubiquinone is an essential component of the mitochondrial electron-transport chain (ETC), a process that generates energy in the form of ATP (1, 2). It functions as both an energy transfer molecule and a redox carrier, and also acts as a lipid-soluble antioxidant (3). After its synthesis, CoQ is transported to the inner mitochondrial membrane, where it facilitates electron transfer between Complex II and Complex III of the ETC. Additionally, CoQ serves as an antioxidant within both intra-mitochondrial and extra-mitochondrial membranes, and plays a role in the regeneration of other antioxidants, including vitamins C and E (4).

The isoprenoid tail length of coenzyme Q varies by organism: humans essentially produce CoQ10, with only trace/uncertain CoQ9 likely attributable to diet or microbiota (5–7); rodents (e.g., mice) produce both CoQ9 and CoQ10, with CoQ9 predominant (8); E. coli produce CoQ8 (9), and S. cerevisiae produce CoQ6 (10). CoQ biosynthesis is governed by multiple genes, including COQ2, COQ4, COQ5, COQ6, COQ7, COQ8A (ADCK3), COQ8B (ADCK4), COQ9, PDSS1, and PDSS2 (11, 12).

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) deficiency can affect various organs, particularly those with high energy demands such as the brain, skeletal muscle, heart, eyes, and kidneys. Clinically, it presents with at least five major phenotypes: encephalomyopathy, severe infantile multisystemic disease, nephropathy, cerebellar ataxia with cerebellar atrophy, and isolated myopathy (13). Nephropathy typically manifests as steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) and progressive renal dysfunction. Isolated myopathy, though less common, is an increasingly recognized presentation, often associated with secondary CoQ10 deficiency due to pathogenic variants in genes such as ETFDH, ETFA, and ETFB. These patients commonly exhibit proximal muscle weakness, elevated serum creatine kinase, and mitochondrial abnormalities on muscle biopsy, and they often respond favorably to CoQ10 and riboflavin supplementation (14–16). In contrast, primary CoQ10 biosynthetic gene defects (e.g., COQ2, COQ4, COQ6) more commonly result in multisystem involvement, though rare cases with muscle-predominant symptoms have also been reported (17).

Nephrotic syndrome is one of the most common glomerular diseases in pediatric populations. Approximately 10%–15% of affected individuals exhibit steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), defined as persistent proteinuria unresponsive to corticosteroid therapy within 4–6 weeks (18). About 50% of SRNS patients respond to intensified immunosuppressive therapy, while the remainder develop multidrug resistance, progressing to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ultimately to kidney failure (19). Notably, genetic mutations account for approximately 30% of childhood-onset SRNS cases and 10%–15% of adult-onset cases (19). Among these, pathogenic variants in the COQ2 gene have been identified as a cause of CoQ10 deficiency-associated SRNS.

We present a case of SRNS caused by COQ2 related CoQ10 deficiency, in which the patient showed clinical improvement following treatment with CoQ10 supplementation (ubiquinone).

Case report

A 9-year-old girl was initially evaluated by nephrology services due to a 3-day history of periorbital swelling and generalized body edema. Her past medical history was notable for alopecia areata and asthma. Initial evaluation revealed periorbital edema and 2+ pitting edema in the lower extremities. Laboratory findings showed a BUN of 8 mg/dL, serum creatinine 0.41 mg/dL, and hypoalbuminemia with a serum albumin level of 1.6 g/dL. Urinalysis demonstrated 3+ proteinuria, and the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) was markedly elevated at 18.3 mg/mg.

Based on a presumptive diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome, high-dose oral prednisone (60 mg daily). However, due to persistent edema and inadequate outpatient response, she was admitted for albumin and furosemide (Lasix) infusions. She was discharged on furosemide 40 mg twice daily and prednisone.

After 8 weeks of high-dose corticosteroid therapy, she showed no clinical improvement, with persistent edema and ongoing 3+ proteinuria, meeting criteria for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).

She was readmitted for further management, including inpatient diuresis and a kidney biopsy. During this hospitalization, two doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2) were administered to attempt induction of remission while awaiting biopsy results.

Renal biopsy revealed focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Tacrolimus therapy was subsequently initiated and titrated to standard therapeutic levels of 5–10 ng/mL, and prednisone was tapered off due to lack of response. She was also started on dual proteinuria therapy with losartan 50 mg and lisinopril 20 mg to reduce proteinuria.

While on tacrolimus, lisinopril and losartan a partial response was observed, with UPCR declining from 18 mg/mg at presentation to approximately 12 mg/mg and then 10 mg/mg; however, complete remission was not achieved. Given the limited response to immunosuppressive therapy, she was referred to genetics for evaluation of a possible monogenic etiology.

Trio whole exome sequencing (WES) identified two compound heterozygous variants in the COQ2 gene (NM_015697.7): c.683A>G (p.Asn228Ser) of paternal origin, and c.692+3A>G (splice site variant) of maternal origin. The clinical features in conjunction with the molecular findings were consistent with the diagnosis of primary CoQ10 deficiency.

Based on this diagnosis, high-dose ubiquinone (oxidized CoQ10, administered orally in a commercially available oil-based softgel formulation) was initiated at approximately 30 mg/kg/day and later increased to 40–42 mg/kg/day, corresponding to a total daily dose of about 2,000 mg. Tacrolimus was discontinued, as immunosuppressive agents are generally ineffective once a genetic cause of nephrotic syndrome is identified. Clinical improvement was evident within 2 months of CoQ10 initiation, with increased diuresis and resolution of edema and proteinuria. UPCR declined to 4.6 mg/mg within 4 months and to 1.3 mg/mg by 6 months, accompanied by normalization of serum albumin from 2.9 to 4.4 g/dL over the same period.

She remained on ubiquinone 30–40 mg/kg/day (approximately 2,000 mg/day) and lisinopril 20 mg daily. Her proteinuria stabilized (most recently UPCR 2.3), and she continued to grow and develop normally without edema. Although she demonstrated clinical improvement and a marked reduction in proteinuria, kidney function markers suggested ongoing chronic kidney disease progression. Cystatin C measured 1.95 mg/L shortly before initiation of ubiquinone supplementation and continued to rise during follow-up. Her serum creatinine stabilized between 0.89 and 0.97 mg/dL, corresponding to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 57.7 mL/min/1.73 m2. Long-term follow-up over several years showed gradual progression of chronic kidney disease to stage 3a, consistent with irreversible renal damage secondary to longstanding CoQ10 deficiency.

Over time, her creatinine increased modestly, reaching 1.1–1.35 mg/dL. Lisinopril was later switched to losartan. Intermittent hyperkalemia (6.2 mmol/L), thought to be related to lisinopril therapy and underlying renal insufficiency, prompted the addition of the potassium binder, patiromer. Notably, her alopecia areata also improved after initiation of CoQ10 supplementation (ubiquinone). Physical examination at last follow-up showed no edema and normal neurological examination.

Relevant biochemical and pathological results are summarized in the Tables 1, 2 and Figures 1a,b.

Table 1.

Renal function test.

During admission Referral to genetic clinic Start ubiquinol supplement 3 months after supplement 1 year after supplement 27 months after supplement
BUN (7–17 mg/dL) 20 18 9 16 28 25
Creatinine (0.18–0.66 mg/dL) 0.87 0.69 0.89 0.73 0.89 0.98
Albumin (3.8–5.2 g/dL) 2.3 2.4 2.9 3.2 4.4 4.2

Table 2.

Urine protein and creatinine.

Referral to genetic clinic Start ubiquinol supplement 6 months after supplement 1 year after supplement 27 months after supplement
Urine protein random (mg/dL) 760 773 70 44 91
Urine creatinine random (mg/dL) 61 89 53 49 63.4
Urine protein/creatine ratio (mg/mg) 12.5 8.7 1.3 0.9 1.4

Figure 1.

Two microscopy images show kidney tissue stained for examination. The first image (a) displays elongated sections of tubules with marked areas in circles indicating significant features. The second image (b) shows a magnified view of glomerular structures with a central circle highlighting cellular and structural details. Both images use pink and purple staining to differentiate cellular components and structures.

Renal biopsy: (a) Light microscope showed mild interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy. The overall cortical tubular loss is estimated to be ~20%. (b) Under the light microscope with PAS stain, 5 of the 40 glomeruli contained in the specimen are completely sclerotic, 17 of which are involved by segmental sclerosis. A minority of mesangial regions are mildly hypercellular.

Kidney biopsy done at the time of the presentation showed some chronic changes including global sclerosis in ~10% of glomeruli, segmental sclerosis in an additional ~40% of glomeruli, and mild interstitial fibrosis (~20%). There was no significant endocapillary hypercellularity. Necrotizing lesions and cellular crescents were not seen. There were no acute glomerular proliferative changes or signs of glomerulonephritis. Under the electron microscope, extensive podocyte foot process effacement was seen which was suggestive of a primary podocytopathy. Some podocytes appeared to have an increased mitochondrial density, and a minor subset of podocyte mitochondria appeared swollen with diminished cristae. Increased mitochondrial density, extensive podocyte foot process effacement and FSGS have all been reported in patients with pathogenic variants COQ2 (20).

Whole exome sequencing

Whole exome sequencing (WES) showed two compound heterozygous variants in the COQ2 gene (NM_015697.7): c.683A>G (p.Asn228Ser) and c.692+3A>G. Homozygous or compound heterozygous pathogenic variants in the COQ2 gene have been associated with primary coenzyme Q10 deficiency-1 (COQ10D1; OMIM 607426), a rare autosomal recessive disorder involving multiple systems, which can include neurologic manifestations, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), retinopathy or optic atrophy, and sensorineural hearing loss. Early treatment with high-dose oral CoQ10 supplementation can limit disease progression and reverse some manifestations (21).

The c.683A>G variant in exon 3 of the COQ2 gene leads to a missense substitution of asparagine with serine at position 228 (p.Asn228Ser), a highly conserved amino acid. This variant was inherited from her dad. This variant has been described in multiple COQ10D1 patients with early onset SRNS as the major feature (22–26). Functional studies revealed this variant was associated with low levels of CoQ10 and reduced activities of complexes I, II, and IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (22). It is observed in the population (gnomAD) with a relatively low frequency of 0.011%, indicating it is unlikely benign. The University of Oklahoma lab interpreted this variant as likely pathogenic.

The c.692+3A>G variant is located at intron 3 of the COQ2 gene. This variant was inherited from her mom. This variant has not been reported in the literature, nor has it been documented in the population database (gnomAD). The consequence of this change is not predictable without further functional studies; however, in silico analysis predicts this variant probably results in abnormal splicing. The University of Oklahoma lab classified this variant as uncertain significance.

Discussion

Our patient was found to have two compound heterozygous variants in the COQ2 gene: c.683A>G (p.Asn228Ser), inherited from her father, and c.692+3A>G, a novel splice site variant inherited from her mother. The c.683A>G variant is classified as likely pathogenic, while the c.692+3A>G variant, although currently classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), has not been previously reported in the literature. In silico analysis using SpliceAI predicts this novel variant likely results in donor site loss (score: 0.85), indicating a potential impact on splicing. Given the patient’s clinical phenotype and the bioinformatic prediction, we suspect this novel variant is likely disease-causing.

In cases of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), renal biopsy and genetic testing are recommended components of the diagnostic workup. While awaiting genetic results, clinical guidelines recommend initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB (e.g., lisinopril or losartan), a calcineurin inhibitor (e.g., tacrolimus or cyclosporine), and a tapering off the corticosteroids (18).

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is the most common renal pathology associated with CoQ10 deficiency in SRNS, reported in 69% of patients with COQ2 pathogenic variants (25 of 36 cases) (27). FSGS is classified into five histological variants: collapsing (COL), tip (TIP), cellular (CEL), perihilar (PH), and not otherwise specified (NOS) (28). These morphological features reflect podocyte injury and subsequent repair mechanisms (29). In our patient’s renal biopsy, the absence of endocapillary hypercellularity and perihilar hyalinosis supported classification as FSGS-NOS. Electron microscopy revealed podocyte abnormalities (30), including increased mitochondrial density and occasional mitochondrial swelling with loss of cristae, indicating mitochondrial and podocyte injury. Proteinuria is a hallmark of podocyte dysfunction and an early marker of kidney injury (29).

Notably, most cases of COQ2-related nephrotic syndrome reported in the literature (Supplementary Table 1) present before the age of 2 years (22, 30–34), whereas our patient had disease onset at age 9. This late-onset phenotype suggests a milder effect of the novel c.692+3A>G splice site variant on CoQ biosynthesis. Previous studies have demonstrated a genotype–phenotype correlation in COQ2-related disease, with severe phenotypes associated with biallelic loss-of-function variants and milder cases retaining partial CoQ production (35). Splice site mutations may result in exon 3 skipping or retention, as suggested in Figure 2. Moreover, the presence of a splice site variant also raises the possibility of future antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapy.

Figure 2.

Diagram of COQ2 gene mutations associated with various conditions. It shows seven exons, potential mitochondrial leader sequences, binding sites, and membrane-spanning domains. Mutations are color-coded: Parkinsonism (brown), multi-systemic involvement (red), MSA (orange), optic neuropathy (teal), lissencephaly (blue), and SRNS (purple). Each mutation is labeled with its specific genetic change.

Location of COQ2 variants reported in previous literature. The figure shows which exon each variant is located.

There is a known association between the degree of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (36). Our patient’s biopsy showed some degree of chronic tubulointerstitial damage, which likely contributes to her persistently elevated creatinine and mildly reduced GFR despite treatment.

Pathogenic variants in COQ2 are associated with a broad and heterogeneous spectrum of systemic manifestations. Neurological features may include fatal neonatal encephalopathy (31), infantile-onset neurodegenerative disease, and late-onset multiple system atrophy (MSA)-like syndromes characterized by autonomic dysfunction, parkinsonism, cerebellar ataxia (37), and pyramidal signs (38). In addition to steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), affected individuals may present with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (39, 40), optic atrophy or retinopathy (33, 41), and sensorineural hearing loss. Although most COQ2-related disorders result from biallelic pathogenic variants, certain heterozygous variants have been implicated in adult-onset MSA (37, 42). The clinical spectrum ranges from isolated nephrotic syndrome in infancy (22, 32), to early-onset multisystem disease with rapid deterioration (31), or slowly progressive adult-onset neurodegeneration (38). Notably, a recent case described a pediatric patient with isolated SRNS due to a homozygous COQ2 variant who achieved complete remission following oral CoQ10 supplementation (43), emphasizing the importance of early genetic diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.

CoQ10 supplementation is the mainstay of treatment and should be initiated as early as possible to limit disease progression and potentially reverse manifestations (20, 30). However, severe renal or neurologic damage is often irreversible. Therefore, early genetic diagnosis is critical in children with SRNS. CoQ10 supplementation may be used in combination with ACE inhibitors in patients with persistent proteinuria (21). The protective effects of CoQ10 supplementation are believed to involve modulation of apoptotic genes (e.g., caspase-3, p53), antioxidant enzymes (e.g., PON1), and key signaling pathways such as Nrf2/HO-1 (44).

The random urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) is a method of detecting and estimating the quantitative assessment of proteinuria (45). In our patient, the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) improved significantly from 8.7 mg/mg to 1.3 mg/mg with normalization of serum albumin levels within 6 months of CoQ10 supplementation, indicating a positive renal response. However, long-term prognosis remains uncertain, particularly regarding neurological outcomes. In a previous report, four patients with homozygous c.437G>A (p.Ser146Asn) variants and neonatal CoQ deficiency experienced only temporary improvement in nephrotic syndrome, later developing severe neurological deterioration despite early CoQ10 therapy (46). Notably, the formulation used in our patient was ubiquinone, the oxidized form of CoQ10. While several small human studies have suggested that ubiquinol, the reduced form, may achieve higher systemic CoQ10 concentrations than ubiquinone (47–49), these findings are limited and strongly influenced by the formulation matrix and solubilization methods. In particular, oil-based or softgel CoQ10 preparations are recommended to enhance absorption and bioavailability, as tablets are associated with poorer intestinal uptake (12, 50). Many of these lipid-based formulations incorporate Vitamin E to enhance the bioavailability of the lipophilic CoQ10. Although ubiquinol has been proposed to exert enhanced antioxidant or neuroprotective effects (51), conclusive clinical evidence is still lacking. Given the necessary high-dose supplementation regimen for primary CoQ10 deficiency, the inclusion of supplemental Vitamin E requires close monitoring of both the patient’s total daily intake and serum Vitamin E levels. Exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (UL) of 1,000 mg/day (1,500 IU/day) could lead to hypervitaminosis E, potentially resulting in adverse effects, most significantly an increased risk of hemorrhage.

The c.683A>G and c.692+3A>G variants identified in our patient join a growing list of COQ2 pathogenic variants associated with isolated nephrotic syndrome, including c.701delT (23), c.973A>G (32, 52), c.1058A>G (32), and c.1169G>C (34). Given the known genotype–phenotype correlation (35), long-term outcomes following CoQ10 supplementation may depend on the extent of residual CoQ biosynthetic function. In our case, the patient showed sustained clinical improvement with high-dose CoQ10 supplementation (ubiquinone), which may have prevented further renal function deterioration and delayed or mitigated the onset of other systemic manifestations. Continued follow-up remains crucial to monitor renal function over time and to detect any emerging neurological or extrarenal involvement.

Acknowledgments

We would like to show our gratitude to the patient depicted in this study and her family. We thank all the excellent pediatric services of Oklahoma Children’s Health and lab services of OU Health.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Rajendra Bhimma, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Reviewed by: Guillermo Lopez Lluch, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Spain

Roberto Chimenz, University of Messina, Italy

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

Y-RH: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AP: Writing – review & editing. AT: Supervision, Project administration, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2026.1682564/full#supplementary-material

Table_1.xlsx (10.2KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Forsgren M, Attersand A, Lake S, Grünler J, Swiezewska E, Dallner G, et al. Isolation and functional expression of human COQ2, a gene encoding a polyprenyl transferase involved in the synthesis of CoQ. Biochem J. (2004) 382:519–26. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040261, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alcázar-Fabra M, Navas P, Brea-Calvo G. Coenzyme Q biosynthesis and its role in the respiratory chain structure. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2016) 1857:1073–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.03.010, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hargreaves IP. Ubiquinone: cholesterol’s reclusive cousin. Ann Clin Biochem. (2003) 40:207–18. doi: 10.1258/000456303321610493, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodick T, Seibels D, Jeganathan R, Huggins K, Ren G, Mathews S. Potential role of coenzyme Q10 in health and disease conditions. Nutr Diet Suppl. (2018) 10:1–11. doi: 10.2147/NDS.S112119 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Turunen M, Olsson J, Dallner G. Metabolism and function of coenzyme Q. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. (2004) 1660:171–99. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.11.012, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yubero D, Montero R, Artuch R, Land JM, Heales SJR, Hargreaves IP. Biochemical diagnosis of coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Mol Syndromol. (2014) 5:147–55. doi: 10.1159/000362390, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.González-García P, Barriocanal-Casado E, Díaz-Casado ME, López-Herrador S, Hidalgo-Gutiérrez A, López LC. Animal models of coenzyme Q deficiency: mechanistic and translational learnings. Antioxidants. (2021) 10:1687. doi: 10.3390/antiox10111687, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.García-Corzo L, Luna-Sánchez M, Doerrier C, García JA, Guarás A, Acín-Pérez R, et al. Dysfunctional Coq9 protein causes predominant encephalomyopathy associated with CoQ deficiency. Hum Mol Genet. (2013) 22:1233–48. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds530, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tsui HS, Clarke CF. Ubiquinone biosynthetic complexes in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Cell Chem Biol. (2019) 26:465–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.04.005, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.González-Mariscal I, Martín-Montalvo A, Ojeda-González C, Rodríguez-Eguren A, Gutiérrez-Ríos P, Navas P, et al. Balanced CoQ6 biosynthesis is required for lifespan and mitophagy in yeast. Microb Cell. (2017) 4:38–51. doi: 10.15698/mic2017.02.556, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fernández-del-Río L, Clarke CF. Coenzyme Q biosynthesis: an update on the origins of the Benzenoid ring and discovery of new ring precursors. Meta. (2021) 11:385. doi: 10.3390/metabo11060385, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Desbats MA, Lunardi G, Doimo M, Trevisson E, Salviati L. Genetic bases and clinical manifestations of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. (2015) 38:145–56. doi: 10.1007/s10545-014-9749-9, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Emmanuele V, López L, Berardo A, Naini A, Tadesse S, Wen B, et al. Heterogeneity of coenzyme Q10 deficiency: patient study and literature review. Arch Neurol. (2012) 69:978–83. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gempel K, Topaloglu H, Talim B, Schneiderat P, Schoser BGH, Hans VH, et al. The myopathic form of coenzyme Q10 deficiency is caused by mutations in the electron-transferring-flavoprotein dehydrogenase (ETFDH) gene. Brain J Neurol. (2007) 130:2037–44. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm054, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lalani SR, Vladutiu GD, Plunkett K, Lotze TE, Adesina AM, Scaglia F. Isolated mitochondrial myopathy associated with muscle coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Arch Neurol. (2005) 62:317–20. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.2.317, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Horvath R, Schneiderat P, Schoser BGH, Gempel K, Neuen-Jacob E, Plöger H, et al. Coenzyme Q10 deficiency and isolated myopathy. Neurology. (2006) 66:253–5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000194241.35115.7c, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wahedi A, Sudhakar S, Lam A, Ciancio JIR, Mills P, Gissen P, et al. Clinical features, biochemistry, imaging, and treatment response in a single-center cohort with coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis disorders. Neurol Genet. (2024) 10:e200209. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200209, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Trautmann A, Vivarelli M, Samuel S, Gipson D, Sinha A, Schaefer F, et al. IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. (2020) 35:1529–61. doi: 10.1007/s00467-020-04519-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lipska-Ziętkiewicz BS. Genetic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome overview In: Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews®. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle; (2021) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Starr MC, Chang IJ, Finn LS, Sun A, Larson AA, Goebel J, et al. COQ2 nephropathy: a treatable cause of nephrotic syndrome in children. Pediatr Nephrol. (2018) 33:1257–61. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-3937-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Salviati L, Trevisson E, Doimo M, Navas P. Primary coenzyme Q10 deficiency In: Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews®. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Diomedi-Camassei F, Di Giandomenico S, Santorelli FM, Caridi G, Piemonte F, Montini G, et al. COQ2 nephropathy: a newly described inherited mitochondriopathy with primary renal involvement. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2007) 18:2773–80. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080833, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McCarthy HJ, Bierzynska A, Wherlock M, Ognjanovic M, Kerecuk L, Hegde S, et al. Simultaneous sequencing of 24 genes associated with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2013) 8:637–48. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07200712, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bezdíčka M, Štolbová Š, Seeman T, Cinek O, Malina M, Šimánková N, et al. Genetic diagnosis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in a longitudinal collection of Czech and Slovak patients: a high proportion of causative variants in NUP93. Pediatr Nephrol. (2018) 33:1347–63. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-3950-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Warejko JK, Tan W, Daga A, Schapiro D, Lawson JA, Shril S, et al. Whole exome sequencing of patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2018) 13:53–62. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04120417, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schapiro D, Daga A, Lawson JA, Majmundar AJ, Lovric S, Tan W, et al. Panel sequencing distinguishes monogenic forms of nephritis from nephrosis in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2019) 34:474–85. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy050, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Drovandi S, Lipska-Ziętkiewicz BS, Ozaltin F, Emma F, Gulhan B, Boyer O, et al. Oral coenzyme Q10 supplementation leads to better preservation of kidney function in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome due to primary coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Kidney Int. (2022) 102:604–12. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.04.029, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.D’Agati VD, Fogo AB, Bruijn JA, Jennette JC. Pathologic classification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a working proposal. Am J Kidney Dis. (2004) 43:368–82. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.10.024, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nagata M. Podocyte injury and its consequences. Kidney Int. (2016) 89:1221–30. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.01.012, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Montini G, Malaventura C, Salviati L. Early coenzyme Q10 supplementation in primary coenzyme Q10 deficiency. N Engl J Med. (2008) 358:2849–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0800582, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jakobs BS, van den Heuvel LP, Smeets RJP, de Vries MC, Hien S, Schaible T, et al. A novel mutation in COQ2 leading to fatal infantile multisystem disease. J Neurol Sci. (2013) 326:24–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.01.004, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li M, Yue Z, Lin H, Wang H, Chen H, Sun L. COQ2 mutation associated isolated nephropathy in two siblings from a Chinese pedigree. Ren Fail. (2021) 43:97–101. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1864402, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Quinzii C, Naini A, Salviati L, Trevisson E, Navas P, Dimauro S, et al. A mutation in para-hydroxybenzoate-polyprenyl transferase (COQ2) causes primary coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Am J Hum Genet. (2006) 78:345–9. doi: 10.1086/500092, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gigante M, Diella S, Santangelo L, Trevisson E, Acosta MJ, Amatruda M, et al. Further phenotypic heterogeneity of CoQ10 deficiency associated with steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome and novel COQ2 and COQ6 variants. Clin Genet. (2017) 92:224–6. doi: 10.1111/cge.12960, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Desbats MA, Morbidoni V, Silic-Benussi M, Doimo M, Ciminale V, Cassina M, et al. The COQ2 genotype predicts the severity of coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Hum Mol Genet. (2016) 25:4256–65. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw257, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schelling JR. Tubular atrophy in the pathogenesis of chronic kidney disease progression. Pediatr Nephrol. (2016) 31:693–706. doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3169-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ogaki K, Fujioka S, Heckman MG, Rayaprolu S, Soto-Ortolaza AI, Labbé C, et al. Analysis of COQ2 gene in multiple system atrophy. Mol Neurodegener. (2014) 9:44. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-9-44, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.The Multiple-System Atrophy Research Collaboration. Mutations in COQ2 in familial and sporadic multiple-system atrophy. N Engl J Med. (2013) 369:233–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212115, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Scalais E, Chafai R, Van Coster R, Bindl L, Nuttin C, Panagiotaraki C, et al. Early myoclonic epilepsy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and subsequently a nephrotic syndrome in a patient with CoQ10 deficiency caused by mutations in para-hydroxybenzoate-polyprenyl transferase (COQ2). Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2013) 17:625–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.05.013, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dinwiddie DL, Smith LD, Miller NA, Atherton AM, Farrow EG, Strenk ME, et al. Diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders by concomitant next-generation sequencing of the exome and mitochondrial genome. Genomics. (2013) 102:148–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.04.013, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stallworth JY, Blair DR, Slavotinek A, Moore AT, Duncan JL, de Alba Campomanes AG. Retinopathy and optic atrophy in a case of COQ2-related primary coenzyme Q10 deficiency. Ophthalmic Genet. (2022) 44:486–90. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2022.2141792, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Porto KJ, Hirano M, Mitsui J, Chikada A, Matsukawa T, Ishiura H, et al. COQ2 V393A confers high risk susceptibility for multiple system atrophy in east Asian population. J Neurol Sci. (2021) 429:117623. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117623, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alwazzan S, Alnwaihi O, John N, Matsa LS, Alshaya HO. Novel coenzyme Q2 (CoQ2) mutation in a pediatric patient with primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome due to coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) deficiency. Cureus. (2024) 16:e75669. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75669, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao S, Wu W, Liao J, Zhang X, Shen M, Li X, et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying the renal protective effects of coenzyme Q10 in acute kidney injury. Cell Mol Biol Lett. (2022) 27:57. doi: 10.1186/s11658-022-00361-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kamińska J, Dymicka-Piekarska V, Tomaszewska J, Matowicka-Karna J, Koper-Lenkiewicz OM. Diagnostic utility of protein to creatinine ratio (P/C ratio) in spot urine sample within routine clinical practice. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. (2020) 57:345–64. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2020.1723487, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Eroglu FK, Ozaltin F, Gönç N, Nalçacıoğlu H, Özçakar ZB, Yalnızoğlu D, et al. Response to early coenzyme Q10 supplementation is not sustained in CoQ10 deficiency caused by CoQ2 mutation. Pediatr Neurol. (2018) 88:71–4. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2018.07.008, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hosoe K, Kitano M, Kishida H, Kubo H, Fujii K, Kitahara M. Study on safety and bioavailability of ubiquinol (Kaneka QH) after single and 4-week multiple oral administration to healthy volunteers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. (2007) 47:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.07.001, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Langsjoen PH, Langsjoen AM. Comparison study of plasma coenzyme Q10 levels in healthy subjects supplemented with ubiquinol versus ubiquinone. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. (2014) 3:13–7. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.73, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.López-Lluch G, Del Pozo-Cruz J, Sánchez-Cuesta A, Cortés-Rodríguez AB, Navas P. Bioavailability of coenzyme Q10 supplements depends on carrier lipids and solubilization. Nutrition. (2019) 57:133–40. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.05.020, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bhagavan HN, Chopra RK. Plasma coenzyme Q10 response to oral ingestion of coenzyme Q10 formulations. Mitochondrion. (2007) 7 Suppl:S78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2007.03.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bagheri S, Haddadi R, Saki S, Kourosh-Arami M, Rashno M, Mojaver A, et al. Neuroprotective effects of coenzyme Q10 on neurological diseases: a review article. Front Neurosci. (2023) 17:1188839. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1188839, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ni H-F, Yang Y, Li C-Q, Zhou T-Z, Liu B-C, Wang B. Myeloid bodies caused by COQ2 mutation: a case of concurrent COQ2 nephropathy and IgA nephropathy. Clin Kidney J. (2021) 14:1697–700. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab043, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table_1.xlsx (10.2KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES