There was a mistake in Figures 1–8 as published. The resolution of the figures was insufficient for clear visualization of the presented data. The corrected Figures 1–8 appears below.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, and conserved motifs of PaHK(L) genes. (A) Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the full-length sequences of 24 PaHK(L) proteins. (B) Exon–intron structure, analyzed with GSDS (yellow boxes: exons; black lines: introns). (C) Conserved motifs from PaHK(L) proteins are displayed in different colored boxes. The number below refers to the length of the protein.
Figure 8.
Heat map representation for the response patterns to drought treatment (A) and salt treatment (B) of TCS genes in petunia. Gene expression levels are presented using fold-change values transformed to Log2 format compared with control (0 h, value=0). The Log2 (fold-change values) and the color scale are shown at the right of heat map. Blue, white, and red represent low, medium, and strong expression, respectively. Asterisks denote statistical significance: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Detailed statistical analyses are provided in Supplementary Figure S6.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, and conserved motifs of PaHP genes. (A) Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the full-length sequences of 10 PaHP proteins. (B) Exon–intron structure, analyzed with GSDS (yellow boxes: exons; black lines: introns). (C) Conserved motifs from PaHP proteins are displayed in different colored boxes. The number below refers to the length of the protein.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, and conserved motifs of PaRR genes. (A) Phylogenetic tree constructed based on the full-length sequences of 40 PaRR proteins. (B) Exon–intron structure, analyzed with GSDS (yellow boxes: exons; black lines: introns). (C) Conserved motifs from PaRR proteins are displayed in different colored boxes. The number below refers to the length of the protein.
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic relationships of HK(L)s (A), HPs (B) and RRs (C) in Arabidopsis, rice, maize, tomato, and petunia. Different subfamilies are represented by different colors. Bootstrap values from 1000 replicates are shown at key nodes.
Figure 5.
Distribution (left) and number (right) of CREs identified in putative promoter regions of TCS genes in petunia. The numbers in the heatmap represent the quantity of elements.
Figure 6.
Organ-specific expression profiles of TCS genes in petunia. The relative expression level was normalized to the petunia EF1α gene and quantified using the 2−ΔCT method. Data represent mean ± SD (standard deviation) values from three biological replicates per tissue. Significant differences (letters a-d above the bars) among tissues were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 7.
Heat map representation for the response patterns to exogenous tZ (A) and ABA (B) of TCS genes in petunia. Gene expression levels are presented using fold-change values transformed to Log2 format compared with control (0 h, value=0). The Log2 (fold-change values) and the color scale are shown at the right of heat map. Blue, white, and red represent low, medium, and strong expression, respectively. Asterisks denote statistical significance: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Detailed statistical analyses are provided in Supplementary Figure S6.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Footnotes
Edited and reviewed by: Yunpeng Cao, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.