Abstract
The ever-rising burden of stroke is a major problem for developing nations with inadequate resources, such as India. Current strategies largely focus on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases (NCDs); however, there is a growing need to shift toward predictive approaches that enable timely lifestyle modification and risk reduction. Ayurveda’s concept of Prakriti, the distinctive body constitution or psychosomatic temperament of an individual, offers a novel framework for understanding disease predisposition.
This scoping review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of studies that have examined the classification of Prakriti among stroke patients. Online search engines were used to conduct a literature search using both Sanskrit and English keywords, employing Boolean operators to combine relevant terms. Full-text articles on stroke, hemiplegia, or Pakshaghata were retrieved, screened, and included based on the presence of Prakriti analysis.
A total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 13 randomized controlled or quasi-experimental studies, 12 case studies or case reports, and 2 cross-sectional studies. Across these studies, Vata-dominant Prakriti (Vataja, Vata-Pittaja, or Vata-Kaphaja) was reported in 24 out of 27 studies, either independently or in combination with another Dosha. Only three studies reported a predominance of other constitutions.
This scoping review highlights a notable gap in existing stroke research, wherein Prakriti assessment is frequently overlooked. Integrating Prakriti-based profiling into predictive medicine may enhance individualized stroke risk assessment and contribute to more personalized preventive strategies.
Keywords: ayurveda, body constitution, hemiplegia, prakriti, risk prediction, stroke
Introduction and background
Stroke, also known as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), occurs due to the interruption of blood supply to the brain and is broadly classified into ischemic and hemorrhagic types [1]. Stroke remains a major global public health challenge, ranking as the second leading cause of death and third leading cause of disability worldwide. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2019, stroke accounted for approximately 6.55 million deaths and 143 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) globally, with 12.2 million incident cases and 101 million prevalent cases [2]. The global burden of stroke has increased substantially over the past three decades, with stroke-related deaths and DALYs rising by 43% and 32%, respectively, between 1990 and 2019 [2]. Notably, 86%-89% of stroke-related deaths and DALYs occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where stroke mortality is 3.6 times higher than in high-income countries [3].
In India, the burden of stroke has shown a steady upward trend, with stroke ranking as the third leading cause of death and sixth leading cause of disability. In 2021, stroke accounted for 6.58% of total deaths and 3.67% of total DALYs, with crude incidence rates ranging from 108 to 172 per 100,000 population per year [4-6]. Stroke-related deaths in India increased by approximately 25% between 1990 and 2021 [7].
Importantly, stroke is no longer confined to older populations. Globally, individuals below 70 years of age accounted for nearly 63% of stroke cases, and it is estimated that one in four individuals will experience a stroke during their lifetime [8]. In India, strokes occur at a younger mean age, nearly 15 years earlier than in high-income countries, with 10%-15% of all strokes occurring among younger adults, contributing to a substantial socioeconomic burden [9-12].
In the GBD Study, 19 risk factors were shown to contribute to stroke-related DALYs. The leading external predisposing factors associated with stroke-related death and disability include high systolic blood pressure, elevated body mass index, high fasting plasma glucose, ambient particulate matter pollution, and tobacco use [2]. Additional contributors include high total cholesterol levels, reduced glomerular filtration rate, unhealthy dietary patterns, and low physical activity [8]. These factors largely represent modifiable behavioral, metabolic, and environmental exposures that influence stroke risk across populations. Despite advancing healthcare with an increasing Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Service Coverage Index from 29.66 in 2000 to 63.66 in 2021, a steadily rising trend of stroke burden across different geographical regions in India has highlighted the urgent need for enhanced stroke prediction and prevention strategies [7]. Given the multifactorial nature of stroke and its substantial burden of premature morbidity and disability, early identification of individuals at increased risk is essential. Conventional preventive strategies often focus on risk factor modification after clinical manifestation, potentially overlooking individuals with underlying biological susceptibility. This highlights the need for predictive approaches that can identify risk at an earlier stage, enabling timely preventive interventions and personalized lifestyle modification.
Predictive medicine is defined as “a branch of medicine that aims to identify patients at risk of developing a disease, thereby enabling either prevention or early treatment of that disease,” and has gained increasing relevance in the context of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as stroke [13]. Ayurveda, the traditional Indian System of Medicine developed over 5000 years ago, has predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine ingrained in its roots [14]. It presents the concept of Prakriti, a foundational principle of Ayurveda that describes the distinctive body constitution or psychosomatic temperament of an individual.
Ayurvedic principles state that every individual is said to have three Dosha, namely, "Vata Dosha," "Pitta Dosha," and "Kapha Dosha." The predominance of one or more of these three Dosha (biofunctional principles) determines an individual’s Prakriti [15,16]. Hence, Prakriti represents the biological constitution of an individual with unique physical, physiological, and psychological characteristics. It is determined at the time of conception and remains constant throughout a person’s lifetime [14].
Ayurvedic classical texts describe two principal types of Prakriti-Sharirika (Deha) Prakriti, which pertains to the physical constitution, and Manasika Prakriti, which relates to psychological attributes. The present review focuses exclusively on Sharirika (Deha) Prakriti, which is classified into seven types based on the dominance of the three Dosha (biofunctional principles): (1) Vataja Prakriti, (2) Pittaja Prakriti, (3) Kaphaja Prakriti, (4) Vata-Pittaja Prakriti, (5) Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti, (6) Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti, and (7) Sama (Tridoshaja) Prakriti [16].
Individuals belonging to each type of Prakriti are susceptible to certain diseases arising from the vitiation of their respective Dosha (biofunctional principles) without any contribution from other Dosha, which are referred to as "Nanatmaja Vikara" [14]. For instance, Vata Prakriti individuals are prone to 80 diseases born out of the Vata Dosha vitiation alone, referred to as "Vataja Nanatmaja Vikara." Hemiparesis and hemiplegia, common clinical manifestations of stroke, correlate with the disease Pakshaghata/Pakshavadha described in Ayurveda and are listed among the 80 Vataja Nanatmaja Vikara [17]. According to the proponents of Ayurveda, its pathogenesis involves Vata Dosha getting lodged in one half of the body, resulting in weakness and a loss of motor and sensory function in that half [18].
Prakriti's role in Ayurgenomics, a tailored methodology in P4 medicine (predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory), has been gaining traction recently [16,19]. The concept of Prakriti parallels the principles of epigenetics, as both frameworks integrate genotypic predispositions with phenotypic expression to explain inter-individual variability in health and disease. Despite this conceptual alignment, limited research has explored Prakriti in the context of stroke, one of the leading causes of disability and mortality worldwide. Understanding the distribution of Prakriti among stroke patients could provide valuable insights into individual susceptibility, thereby informing predictive and preventive healthcare strategies. Hence, this scoping review seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of existing studies that have examined the classification of Prakriti among stroke patients, contributing to the growing evidence base that supports Ayurveda’s role in predictive, personalized, and integrative medicine.
Review
Methods
The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was utilized to guide the reporting of this review [20].
Eligibility Criteria
Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they focused on patients with stroke, hemiplegia, or Pakshaghata and reported an analysis of the Prakriti of the participants. Both interventional and observational designs were considered, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, cross-sectional studies, and case studies. Studies without Prakriti assessment, as well as review articles and abstracts without full-text availability, were excluded.
Information Sources
A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple open-access databases and search engines to ensure wide coverage of published literature. The following sources were systematically explored: PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and the AYUSH Research Portal.
Search Strategy
A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies examining the association between Prakriti (Ayurvedic constitutional types) and stroke. The search was performed across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and AYUSH Research Portal, from database inception to 2025.
The core search strategy included terms related to Ayurveda and constitutional phenotypes (“Prakriti,” “Deha Prakriti”), combined using Boolean operators with cardiovascular outcomes (“stroke”).
The search was limited to articles published in English. Reference lists of included articles and relevant reviews were also manually screened to identify additional eligible studies.
Data Selection and Extraction
All retrieved records were initially screened for eligibility based on titles and abstracts. Potentially relevant articles were then evaluated in full text against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. For each included study, a structured data extraction form was prepared to capture relevant details such as study design, year of publication, sample size, distribution of Prakriti among participants, etc. The extracted data were systematically tabulated (Table 1).
Table 1. Data from included articles.
| Search engine | Author (year) | Study design | Diagnosis | Sample size and population | Prakriti analysis |
| AYUSH Research Portal | Naphade et al. (2011) [21] | Single-blind study (RCT) | Thromboembolic infarction | 30 patients aged 30-70 years | 14 (46.66%), Vataja Prakriti |
| 10 (33.33%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |||||
| AYUSH Research Portal | Desai et al. (1988) [22] | Comparative study (RCT) | Based on clinical symptoms | 12 patients | 8 (66.66%), Dvandvaja Prakriti with the dominance of Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti |
| AYUSH Research Portal | Masatkar (2018) [23] | Open randomized study (RCT) | Ischemic stroke | 20 patients aged 40-70 years | 10 (50%), Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti |
| 7 (35%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |||||
| 3 (15%), Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti | |||||
| AYUSH Research Portal | Rajalaxmi et al. (2014) [24] | RCT | Ischemic stroke | 50 patients aged 16-70 years | 31 (62%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti |
| AYUSH Research Portal | Pillai et al. (1980) [25] | RCT | Based on clinical symptoms | 112 patients aged more than 10 years | 51 (45.53%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti |
| 46 (41.07%), Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti | |||||
| 15 (13.40%), Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti | |||||
| AYUSH Research Portal | Namboodiri et al. (1980) [26] | RCT | Internal capsule artery thrombosis, 94 | 109 patients aged more than 10 years | 77 (70.64%), Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti |
| Internal capsule embolism, 4 | 30 (27.52%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | ||||
| Intracranial hemorrhage, 7 | 2 (1.84%), Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti | ||||
| Others, 4 | |||||
| AYUSH Research Portal | Dhiman JK et al. (2018) [27] | Case report | Ischemic stroke | 54-year-old male | Vata-Pittaja Prakriti |
| Google Scholar | Rao et al. (2021) [28] | Case report | Ischemic stroke | 60-year-old male | Kapha-Vataja Prakriti |
| Google Scholar | Shukla et al. (2024) [29] | Case report | H/O CVA/stroke | 60-year-old male | Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti |
| Google Scholar | Sindhu et al. (2024) [30] | Case report | H/O ischemic stroke | 50-year-old male | Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti |
| Google Scholar | Febin et al. (2019) [31] | Case report | H/O stroke | 68-year-old male | Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti |
| Google Scholar | Acharya et al. (2022) [32] | RCT | Vascular stroke | 30 patients | 13 (43.33%), Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti |
| 11 (36.67%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |||||
| Google Scholar | Kaushish et al. (2023) [33] | RCT | Ischemic stroke | 20 patients aged 18-70 years | 10 (50%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti |
| 7 (36%), Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti | |||||
| 3 (14%), Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti | |||||
| Google Scholar | Kambale et al. (2016) [34] | Cross-sectional study | Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke | 60 patients | 27 (45%), Pitta-Vataja Prakriti |
| 19 (31%), Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti | |||||
| 10 (16 %), Kapha-Vataja Prakriti | |||||
| 4 (6%), Kapha-Pittaja Prakriti | |||||
| Google Scholar | Sukanya et al. (2024) [35] | Cross-sectional study | Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke | 96 patients aged 40-70 years | 51 (53.1%), Kapha-predominant Prakriti |
| 26 (27.1%), Vata-predominant Prakriti | |||||
| 19 (19.8%), Pitta-predominant Prakriti | |||||
| Google Scholar | Mural et al. (2024) [36] | Case study | Ischemic stroke | 48-year-old female | Kapha-Vataja Prakriti |
| Krishna et al. (2022) [37] | Case study | Ischemic stroke | 53-year-old male | Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |
| Roopa et al. (2022) [38] | Case study | Infarct and intraventricular hemorrhage | 61-year-old male | Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti | |
| Menon et al. (2022) [39] | Case report | CVA of thrombotic origin | 52-year-old female | Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |
| Jaju et al. (2022) [40] | Case report | Ischemic stroke | 68-year-old female | Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti | |
| Bhagyashree et al. (2023) [41] | Case report | Ischemic stroke | 52-year-old male | Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti | |
| Rohidas et al. (2022) [42] | Case report | Infarct | 36-year-old male | Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |
| Singh et al. (2020) [43] | RCT | Based on clinical symptoms | 30 patients aged 30-70 years | 15 (50%), Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti | |
| 9 (30%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |||||
| 6 (20%), Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti | |||||
| Patil (2017) [44] | RCT | Based on clinical symptoms | 60 patients aged 30-70 years | 53 (88.3%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |
| 6 (10%), Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti | |||||
| Sharma et al. (2013) [45] | RCT | Based on clinical symptoms | 60 patients aged 30-70 years | 26 (43.42%), Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti | |
| Chauhan et al. (2018) [46] | Quasi-experimental | CVA of thrombotic origin | 26 patients aged 30-75 years | 11 (42.3%), Vata-Pittaja Prakriti | |
| PubMed | Sankaran et al. (2019) [47] | RCT | Ischemic stroke | 25 cases | 10 (40%), Vata-predominant Prakriti |
| 8 (32%), Pitta-predominant Prakriti | |||||
| 7 (28%), Kapha-predominant Prakriti |
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistical methods, including frequency and percentage, were employed to analyze the distribution of Prakriti types across the studies. The findings were then synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of Prakriti distribution among stroke patients.
Results
In Ayurveda, stroke (Pakshaghata) is primarily caused by vitiation of Vata Dosha, sometimes in combination with Pitta or Kapha. It is classified as Kevala Vataja Pakshaghata, Pittanubandhi Pakshaghata, and Kaphanubandhi Pakshaghata.
For ease of comprehension and accurate interpretation of Ayurvedic terminology presented in this review, readers are encouraged to refer to the Glossary, which provides standardized English translations and brief descriptions of key Sanskrit terms (Table 2).
Table 2. Glossary of Sanskrit terms.
| Sanskrit terminology | Brief description |
| Dosha [48] | The vital governing principles regulating physiological and psychological functions in the body. Their balance ensures health, while an imbalance leads to disease. |
| Vata Dosha [48] | One of the three regulatory functional factors (Dosha). The biofunctional principle governing all sensory perceptions, motor activities, and higher mental activities. |
| Pitta Dosha [48] | One of the three regulatory functional factors (Dosha). The biofunctional principle governing all digestive and metabolic activities. |
| Kapha Dosha [48] | One of the three regulatory functional factors (Dosha). The biofunctional principle governing structural integrity, stability, cohesion, unctuousness, and immunity. |
| Prakriti [49] | Prakriti, derived from the Sanskrit word meaning "nature" or "constitution," represents an individual's natural state, determined by their genetic makeup. |
| Vataja Prakriti [49] | The body constitution resulting from dominance of Vata Dosha. |
| Pittaja Prakriti [49] | The body constitution resulting from dominance of Pitta Dosha. |
| Kaphaja Prakriti [49] | The body constitution resulting from dominance of Kapha Dosha. |
| Vata-Pittaja Prakriti [49] | The body constitution resulting from dominance of Vata and Pitta Dosha. |
| Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti [49] | The body constitution resulting from dominance of Vata and Kapha Dosha. |
| Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti [49] | The body constitution resulting from dominance of Pitta and Kapha Dosha. |
| Sama Prakriti [49] | The body constitution resulting from an equal proportion of Vata, Pitta, and Kapha Dosha. |
| Pakshaghata [50] | Hemiplegia/stroke resulting in weakness and a loss of motor and sensory function in one-half of the body. |
| Kevala Vataja Pakshaghata [51] | Hemiplegia caused by the vitiation of Vata Dosha alone. |
| Pittanubandhi Pakshaghata [51] | Hemiplegia caused by the vitiation of Vata and Pitta Dosha. |
| Kaphanubandhi Pakshaghata [51] | Hemiplegia caused by the vitiation of Vata and Kapha Dosha. |
Study Selection
A total of 148 articles were retrieved from various databases, out of which 58 duplicates were removed. The remaining 90 full-text articles were assessed for Prakriti analysis in stroke patients. Of these, 63 were excluded as they did not report Prakriti assessment. Finally, 27 articles were included in the review (Figure 1).
Figure 1. PRISMA-ScR flow diagram of the literature search.
PRISMA-ScR: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
The characteristics of the selected studies are provided in Table 3.
Table 3. Characteristics of the selected articles.
| Characteristics | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) | |
| Study design | RCT and quasi-experimental study | 13 | 48.2 |
| Case studies and reports | 12 | 44.4 | |
| Observational cross-sectional studies | 2 | 7.4 | |
| Year of publication | 1980-1990 | 3 | 11.1 |
| 1991-2000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2001-2010 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2011-2020 | 11 | 40.7 | |
| 2021-2025 | 13 | 48.2 | |
| Search engine | 10 | 37.1 | |
| Google Scholar | 9 | 33.3 | |
| AYUSH Research Portal | 7 | 25.9 | |
| PubMed | 1 | 3.7 | |
Prakriti Distribution among Stroke Patients
For the purpose of uniformity in data synthesis, similar Prakriti categories reported under varying nomenclature were grouped together. Specifically, Kapha-Vataja and Vata-Kaphaja were combined as Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti, while Pitta-Vataja and Vata-Pittaja were grouped as Vata-Pittaja Prakriti, since both pairs represent the same dual Dosha dominance with Vata as the primary component. This standardization ensured consistency and comparability in the interpretation of Prakriti distribution across studies.
The distribution of Prakriti types among stroke patients varied across study designs. In the 13 RCTs and quasi-experimental studies reviewed, Vata-Kaphaja and Vata-Pittaja Prakriti were reported in five studies each, while Vataja Prakriti was reported in two. In seven case studies and reports, Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti was observed in patients, followed by Vata-Pittaja Prakriti in four. Among observational studies, one reported Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti in 47% of patients, while another found Kaphaja Prakriti in 53.1% of cases (Table 4).
Table 4. Distribution of Prakriti among stroke patients according to the study design.
| Study design | Predominant Prakriti type | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| RCT and quasi-experimental study (13) | Vata-Kaphaja | 5 | 38.5 |
| Vata-Pittaja | 5 | 38.5 | |
| Vataja | 2 | 15.4 | |
| Pitta-Kaphaja | 1 | 7.7 | |
| Case studies and reports (12) | Vata-Kaphaja | 7 | 58.4 |
| Vata-Pittaja | 4 | 33.3 | |
| Pitta-Kaphaja | 1 | 8.3 | |
| Observational cross-sectional studies (2) | Vata-Kaphaja | 1 | 50 |
| Kaphaja | 1 | 50 |
An overall analysis of the included studies revealed that Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti was the most frequently reported type among stroke patients (48.2%), followed by Vata-Pittaja Prakriti (33.3%) (Table 5).
Table 5. Overall distribution of Prakriti among stroke patients in the included studies.
| Predominant Prakriti type | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Vata-Kaphaja | 13 | 48.2 |
| Vata-Pittaja | 9 | 33.3 |
| Vataja | 2 | 7.4 |
| Pitta-Kaphaja | 2 | 7.4 |
| Kaphaja | 1 | 3.7 |
Individuals with Vata-Kaphaja Prakriti were found to be equally affected by Kevala Vataja Pakshaghata (stroke arising solely from Vata vitiation) and Kaphanubandhi Pakshaghata (stroke arising from both Vata and Kapha Dosha vitiation). Those with Vata-Pittaja Prakriti were predominantly afflicted by Kevala Vataja Pakshaghata (stroke arising solely from Vata vitiation), with a smaller proportion experiencing Kaphanubandhi and Pittanubandhi Pakshaghata (stroke involving the vitiation of Vata with Kapha or Pitta, respectively). Individuals of Vataja Prakriti exclusively presented with Kevala Vataja Pakshaghata (stroke arising solely from Vata vitiation). Participants with Pitta-Kaphaja Prakriti showed an equal distribution between Pittanubandhi and Kaphanubandhi Pakshaghata (stroke involving the vitiation of Vata with Pitta or Kapha, respectively). Interestingly, one study reporting a predominance of Kaphaja Prakriti individuals observed only Kevala Vataja Pakshaghata (stroke arising solely from Vata vitiation) cases. However, one study did not specify the subtype of Pakshaghata among its participants (Table 6).
Table 6. Distribution of Prakriti according to Pakshaghata (stroke) types.
| Predominant Prakriti type | Pakshaghata (stroke) types | ||
| Kevala Vataja (stroke due to Vata Dosha vitiation alone), n (%) | Kaphanubandhi (stroke due to Vata and Kapha Dosha vitiation), n (%) | Pittanubandhi (stroke due to Vata and Pitta Dosha vitiation), n (%) | |
| Vata-Kaphaja | 6 (50) | 6 (50) | 0 (0) |
| Vata-Pittaja | 6 (66.7) | 2 (22.2) | 1 (11.1) |
| Vataja | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Pitta-Kaphaja | 0 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) |
| Kaphaja | 1 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Discussion
The present review sought to examine the distribution of Prakriti among stroke patients and identified a consistent trend. In most included studies, patients exhibited a predominance of Vata Dosha, either independently or in combination with other Dosha. This recurring pattern aligns with the Ayurvedic understanding that derangement of Vata is the principal factor in the pathogenesis of Pakshaghata (hemiplegia/stroke).
Variations in Prakriti distribution across studies may be influenced by several factors. Dual-dosha categories such as Vata-Pittaja or Vata-Kaphaja reflect differences in primary and secondary Dosha dominance, which could result in variability depending on how authors classified Prakriti. Other contributors include population heterogeneity, stroke subtype differences (ischemic vs hemorrhagic), age, gender, and regional or ethnic factors.
Globally, stroke remains a major public health challenge, with more than 80% of the projected 15 million new cases by 2050 expected to occur in low- and middle-income nations [52]. Developing countries such as India face a disproportionate burden due to limited healthcare infrastructure, high out-of-pocket expenditure, and restricted access to rehabilitation services, resulting in high stroke-related morbidity and mortality [18,53]. While public health efforts emphasize prevention, a shift toward prediction and early risk stratification is needed to facilitate lifestyle modifications and reduce disease incidence.
Current predictive tools such as the Framingham Stroke Risk Score are widely used, but they have limitations in the Indian context, as they do not incorporate ethnic, lifestyle, and constitution-specific factors [54]. Ayurveda provides an indigenous and time-tested approach through the concept of Prakriti, which classifies individuals based on their unique constitutional makeup derived from the three Dosha (biofunctional principles). Unlike conventional risk tools that rely primarily on measurable biomedical parameters, Prakriti assessment is holistic, integrating physical attributes (such as body frame and musculature), physiological tendencies (such as metabolism and digestion), psychological inclinations, and even innate disease susceptibility. Because the same Dosha (biofunctional principles) that define Prakriti are also responsible for disease causation, Prakriti evaluation offers a unique pathway for early identification of at-risk individuals, prediction of disease patterns, preventive strategies, and personalized therapeutic interventions [14,20].
The findings of this review support this premise: individuals with Vata-dominant Prakriti, particularly Vataja, Vata-Pittaja, and Vata-Kaphaja types, appear more vulnerable to stroke. This potential association emphasizes the relevance of Prakriti-based profiling as a potential predictive marker in stroke research and preventive medicine. However, a key research gap persists. Although Prakriti analysis shows clinical relevance, its use in stroke-related research remains limited by the absence of standardized, validated, and reproducible diagnostic methods. Current approaches vary widely across studies and often depend on subjective physician assessment, which limits comparability and reliability. Addressing this diagnostic heterogeneity through standardized Prakriti assessment tools is essential for meaningful integration into stroke research and personalized risk stratification. Beyond its potential association with stroke risk, Prakriti analysis may also help in differentiating stroke subtypes and tailoring therapeutic strategies.
Ayurvedic texts describe individuals with Vata-dominant Prakriti, particularly Vataja, Vata-Pittaja, and Vata-Kaphaja types, may be at higher risk of developing stroke if they do not adhere to a healthy lifestyle, including a balanced diet, regular physical activity, and stress management. Classical Ayurvedic texts describe distinct clinical patterns of Pakshaghata (hemiplegia) depending on the Dosha predominance: Vataja cases often manifest with sudden onset, dryness, emaciation, and marked motor deficits; Vata-Pittaja types may exhibit burning sensations, irritability, or inflammatory features; whereas Vata-Kaphaja strokes tend to present with heaviness, sluggish recovery, and excess secretions. This nuanced differentiation aligns with the heterogeneity observed in modern stroke pathology, where ischemic versus hemorrhagic strokes and small-vessel versus large-vessel subtypes differ in risk factors, clinical course, and recovery potential. Recognizing such constitution-based variations could therefore enhance both diagnosis and prognosis.
In addition to subtype differentiation, Prakriti analysis may hold prognostic value in predicting stroke recovery and long-term outcomes. Classical Ayurvedic principles suggest that individuals with Vata-dominant constitutions are more prone to residual deficits and slower functional recovery due to the inherent mobility and instability of Vata. In contrast, Kapha dominance, though associated with sluggish disease onset, may support steadier recovery once balance is restored, whereas Pitta influence could manifest as rapid changes, both deterioration and improvement, depending on the clinical course. These insights parallel modern findings that genetic, metabolic, and inflammatory profiles influence post-stroke neuroplasticity, rehabilitation potential, and risk of recurrence. Thus, integrating Prakriti profiling with conventional prognostic indicators may provide a more nuanced understanding of individual recovery trajectories, enabling personalized rehabilitation plans and improving long-term quality of life in stroke survivors.
From a therapeutic standpoint, Ayurveda’s principle of Prakriti-anusara cikitsa (constitution-based treatment) bears strong parallels with the modern concept of precision medicine. Just as pharmacogenomics and biomarker-driven models are increasingly applied to predict stroke outcomes and optimize drug response, Prakriti profiling offers a holistic, time-tested approach to individualizing management. It enables tailored interventions ranging from Panchakarma (detoxification) procedures to dietary and lifestyle modifications and drug selection, based on an individual’s constitution and disease expression. Integrating Prakriti insights with contemporary biomedical tools could therefore enrich predictive models, refine subtype differentiation, and advance truly personalized and integrative stroke care.
A few limitations warrant consideration. First, this review was restricted to freely accessible articles, and subscription-based studies may have provided additional insights; thus, the evidence base may be narrower than desired. Second, the subjective nature of Prakriti assessment introduces variability, as diagnostic interpretation often depends on the assessor’s training and methodology. This limits reproducibility and comparability across studies. Addressing this issue through the development of a validated, standardized, and objective Prakriti assessment tool is a critical step toward integrating Ayurvedic constitution-based prediction into mainstream stroke research.
The present review reinforces the Ayurvedic understanding of Vata predominance in stroke while highlighting the potential of Prakriti analysis to contribute to predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. Future research should focus on refining assessment methods, conducting large-scale prospective studies, and integrating Prakriti-based risk profiling with conventional biomedical markers to develop robust, culturally relevant predictive models for stroke in the Indian population and beyond.
Conclusions
The integration of Prakriti-based profiling into predictive medicine holds considerable promise. Unlike conventional risk scores, which are often derived from population averages and may overlook inter-individual and ethnic variations, Prakriti analysis provides a personalized lens by examining an individual’s physical, physiological, and psychological constitution. Such an approach could refine disease risk prediction and guide tailored lifestyle modifications, preventive strategies, and constitution-specific therapeutic interventions. Only a limited number (27) of studies were ultimately included to assess the relationship between Prakriti and stroke. Such a small evidence base may not provide sufficiently robust or generalizable conclusions.
For future research, we recommend conducting prospective cohort studies to evaluate the predictive validity of Prakriti in stroke, developing standardized and validated Prakriti assessment tools to ensure reproducibility, and integrating Prakriti profiling with biomedical and genetic markers to create robust, multidimensional risk models. Additionally, studies exploring the role of lifestyle interventions tailored to specific Prakriti types could provide practical strategies for stroke prevention. Ultimately, bridging Ayurvedic insights with modern biomedical research may enable a comprehensive, person-centered predictive model for stroke and other non-communicable diseases, enhancing preventive healthcare both in India and globally.
Funding Statement
This work is part of research funded by the Scientific Knowledge for Ageing and Neurological Ailments (SKAN) Research Trust.
Disclosures
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: This work is part of research funded by the Scientific Knowledge for Ageing and Neurological Ailments (SKAN) Research Trust.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Prasan Shankar, Shravanthi S, Sanketh V. Sharma, Amritha Sindhu, Arun Bhanu K, Harikrishnan M, Subrahmanya Kumar Kukkupuni, Chethala N. Vishnuprasad, Komal Prasad Chandrachari , Yogesh Shouche, Lavanya Garady
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Prasan Shankar, Shravanthi S, Sanketh V. Sharma, Amritha Sindhu, Arun Bhanu K, Harikrishnan M, Subrahmanya Kumar Kukkupuni, Chethala N. Vishnuprasad, Komal Prasad Chandrachari , Yogesh Shouche, Lavanya Garady
Supervision: Prasan Shankar, Sanketh V. Sharma, Subrahmanya Kumar Kukkupuni, Chethala N. Vishnuprasad
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Shravanthi S
Drafting of the manuscript: Shravanthi S
References
- 1.Stroke. Things you should know: your risk and how to be prepared. [ Dec; 2024 ]. 2019. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/searo/ncd/ncd-flip-charts/7.-stroke-24-04-19.pdf https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/searo/ncd/ncd-flip-charts/7.-stroke-24-04-19.pdf
- 2.Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:795–820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World stroke day. [ Dec; 2024 ]. 2021. https://www.who.int/southeastasia/news/detail/28-10-2021-world-stroke-day https://www.who.int/southeastasia/news/detail/28-10-2021-world-stroke-day
- 4.Stroke incidence and mortality. [ Dec; 2024 ]. 2021. https://ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/pbsrbook/resources/Factsheet.pdf https://ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/pbsrbook/resources/Factsheet.pdf
- 5.VizHub - GBD Compare. [ Dec; 2024 ]. 2021. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/
- 6.Stroke in India: a systematic review of the incidence, prevalence, and case fatality. Jones SP, Baqai K, Clegg A, et al. Int J Stroke. 2021;17:132–140. doi: 10.1177/17474930211027834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Analyzing stroke burden and risk factors in India using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Behera DK, Rahut DB, Mishra S. Sci Rep. 2024;14:22640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72551-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. [ Dec; 2024 ]. 2022. https://www.world-stroke.org/assets/downloads/WSO_Global_Stroke_Fact_Sheet.pdf https://www.world-stroke.org/assets/downloads/WSO_Global_Stroke_Fact_Sheet.pdf
- 9.A contemporary review of epidemiology, risk factors, etiology, and outcomes of premature stroke. Potter TB, Tannous J, Vahidy FS. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2022;24:939–948. doi: 10.1007/s11883-022-01067-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stroke in young. An Indian perspective. Prasad K, Singhal KK. Neurol India. 2010;58:343–350. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.65531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stroke epidemiology among young persons in India. Every step counts. Gorthi SP, Garg D. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022;25:1–2. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_935_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stroke in young in India. Tripathi M, Vibha D. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4061/2011/368629. Stroke Res Treat. 2010;2011:368629. doi: 10.4061/2011/368629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Predictive medicine. Latest research and reviews. [ Jan; 2025 ]. 2025. https://www.nature.com/subjects/predictive-medicine https://www.nature.com/subjects/predictive-medicine
- 14.Predictive, preventive and personalized medicine: leads from Ayurvedic concept of Prakriti (human constitution) Sharma R, Prajapati PK. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40495-020-00244-3 Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2020;6:441–450. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Monier-Williams Sanskrit-English Dictionary. [ Jan; 2025 ]. 1899. https://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/MWScan/2020/web/webtc1/index.php https://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/MWScan/2020/web/webtc1/index.php
- 16.Ayurgenomics and modern medicine. Wallace RK. Medicina (Kaunas) 2020;56:661. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Critical appraisal of Doshavaha Srotas. Byadgi PS. Ayu. 2012;33:337–342. doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.108819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.A conceptual review on insights of Pakshaghat (hemiplegia) in Ayurveda. Alisha Alisha, Sandrepogu J, Kuraakula C. https://ayushdhara.in/index.php/ayushdhara/article/view/1661 Ayushdhara. 2025;12:264–274. [Google Scholar]
- 19.An Ayurgenomics approach: Prakriti-based drug discovery and development for personalized care. Huang Z, Chavda VP, Bezbaruah R, Uversky VN, P S, Patel AB, Chen ZS. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:866827. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.866827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.A clinical study to assess the efficacy of Malla-Sindur for the management of Pakshaghata (hemiplegia) Naphade A, Bhuyan G, Murthy PS. https://ayushportal.nic.in/pdf/24443.pdf J Res Ayurvedic Sci. 2011;32:67–78. [Google Scholar]
- 22.A comparative study on the effect of Brhat Vata Cintamani with gold and without gold on the patients of Paksaghata. Desai K, Singh G, Vyas SN. https://ayushportal.nic.in/pdf/18527.pdf Ayu. 1988;9:15–19. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clinical effect of Shirodhara in Pakshaghat with special reference to cerebral ischemic stroke. Masatkar PR. https://ijrap.net/admin/php/uploads/2089_pdf.pdf Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2018;9:17–20. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Clinical study on the efficacy of Rasayana in the management of Margavaranajanya Pakshaghata (ischaemic stroke) Rajalaxmi MG, Acharya GS. https://jahm.co.in/index.php/jahm/article/view/214/197 J Ayurveda and Hol Med. 2014;2:16–21. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Effect of Pancakarma treatment with Masadiyoga on Paksavadha. Pillai SM, Vijayan NP, Amma KC, Santhakumari K, Bhattathiri PP, Bhaskaran KP. https://ayushportal.nic.in/pdf/3235.pdf J Res Ayurveda Siddha. 1980;1:301–328. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Management of Pakshavadha - a clinical study of 109 cases. Namboodiri PK, Amma KC, Vijayan NP, Shantakumari K, Vijayakumar D. https://ayushportal.nic.in/pdf/3276.pdf J Res Ayurveda Siddha. 1980;1:489–506. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Management of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) through Ayurveda. Dhiman JK, Prasanth D, Kumar MA, Bhatted SK. https://journals.lww.com/jacr/fulltext/2018/01020/management_of_cerebrovascular_accident__cva_.5.aspx J Ayurveda Case Rep. 2018;1:22–29. [Google Scholar]
- 28.An Ayurvedic approach in the management of watershed stroke - a case report. Rao VG, Jayaraj R, Sangolli AA. https://www.jaims.in/jaims/article/view/1518/1585 J Ayurveda Integr Med Sci. 2021;6:277–283. [Google Scholar]
- 29.The Ayurvedic management of spastic paralysis w.s.r. Pakshaghata: a case report. Shukla RK, Sharma S, Lodhi S, Nagpal S, Sharma V. https://files01.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/622336784.pdf J Ayurveda Integr Med Sci. 2024;9:211–221. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Efficacy of Shirodhara and Nasya Karma in the management of post-stroke dystonia. Sindhu B, Madikonda PK, Bura J. https://journals.lww.com/jacr/fulltext/2024/07030/efficacy_of_shirodhara_and_nasya_karma_in_the.8.aspx J Ayurveda Case Rep. 2024;7:159–163. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Post stroke depression with somatic symptoms - a case report. Febin H, Jithesh M. https://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.9_Issue.5_May2019/65.pdf Int J Health Sci Res. 2019;9:433–438. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Treatment of hemiplegia with Varahi Kanda - an open label single arm clinical study to investigate the effect of Varahi Kanda Rasayana in Margavaranaja Pakshaghata/vascular stroke. Acharya A, Acharya GS, Shailesh Y, Kamath ST. https://wjpr.net/abstract_file/19832 World J Pharm Res. 2012;11:846–855. [Google Scholar]
- 33.The efficacy of Yogendra Rasa in Pakshaghata. Kaushish S, Shinde DL, Pawar VB. https://bepls.com/oct_2023/2.pdf Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci. 2023;12:6–16. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Observational study on etiological factor of Pakshvadha with reference to cerebrovascular accident. Kambale MR, Chawre SV, Tumram AC, Kankadande P, Kodwani GH. https://www.jbsoweb.com/admin/php/uploads/250_pdf.pdf J Biol Sci Opin. 2016;4:1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Distribution of different Deha Prakriti among stroke patients - a cross-sectional survey. Sukanya S, Ajitha K, Pradeep K. https://keralajournalofayurveda.org/index.php/kja/article/view/350 Kerala J Ayurveda. 2024;3:56–59. [Google Scholar]
- 36.A case study on Pakshaghata - a successful story. Mural P, Prashanth AS, Kulkarni M. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381539586_A_Case_Study_on_Pakshaghata_-_A_Successful_Story J Ayurveda Integr Med Sci. 2024;9:254–260. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ischemic stroke of brain management approach through Ayurveda - a single case study. Krishna S, Rajashekhar CV, Nayan J. https://ijapr.in/index.php/ijapr/article/view/2391 Int J Ayurveda Pharma Res. 2022;10:54–63. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Management of Pakshagata with Pancha Karma Chikitsa (haemorrhagic stroke) case study. Roopa L, Hugar VM, Kulkarni V. https://ijprajournal.com/issue_dcp/Management%20of%20Pakshagata%20with%20Pancha%20Karma%20Chikitsa%20(Haemorrhagic%20Stroke)%20Case%20Study.pdf Int J Pharm Res Appl. 2022;7:353–358. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ayurvedic management of Pakshaghata with special reference to hemiplegia in terms of CVA of thrombotic origin - a single case report. Menon NM, Adiga M, Rajashekhar CV. https://www.wjpls.org/admin/assets/article_issue/81072022/1659161296.pdf World J Pharm Life Sci. 2022;8:187–198. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ayurvedic management of Dakshin Pakshaghata (hemiplegia) - a case report. Jaju SB, Dipankar DG, Pote AR, Wagh PS. https://iamj.in/posts/2022/images/upload/1021_1026.pdf Int Ayurvedic Med J. 2022;1:1021–1026. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Success story of Pakshagata. Bhagyashree K, Megha B, Desai AS. https://ayushdhara.in/index.php/ayushdhara/article/view/1453 Ayushdhara. 2023;10:173–177. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Role of Panchakarma in acute Pakshaghata - a case report. Rohidas TC, Desai AS, Laxmanrao SS. https://internationaljournal.org.in/journal/index.php/ijayush/article/view/683 Int J Ayush. 2022;11:23–36. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Evaluate the efficacy of Shashtik-Shali Pinda Sweda and Abhyanga in management of Pakshaghata along with Virechana w.s.r. to hemiplegia. Singh N, Dubey S. https://ijapr.in/index.php/ijapr/article/view/1506 Int J Ayurveda Pharma Res. 2020;8:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Critical study of Pakshavadha (hemiplegia) in Bruhat Trayee and its principles of management. Patil PH. http://www.iamj.in/posts/images/upload/600_609.pdf Int Ayurvedic Med J. 2017;1:600–609. [Google Scholar]
- 45.The comparative study of Virechana Karma and Basti Karma in the management of Pakshaghata w.s.r to C.V.A. Sharma BN, Sharma RS. https://iamj.in/posts/2013/images/upload/191_201.pdf Int Ayurvedic Med J. 2013;1:190–201. [Google Scholar]
- 46.A comparative clinical study on Ayurveda protocol and allopathic protocol in the management of Pakshaghata (cerebrovascular accident due to thrombus) Chauhan V, Joshi DP, Singh R. https://www.iamj.in/posts/images/upload/1216_1222.pdf Int Ayurvedic Med J. 2018;2:1216–1222. [Google Scholar]
- 47.A prospective study on the effects of Ayurvedic massage in post-stroke patients. Sankaran R, Kamath R, Nambiar V, Kumar A. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2019;10:126–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2018.02.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fundamental principles. [ Dec; 2025 ]. 2025. https://ayush.delhi.gov.in/ayush/fundamental-principles https://ayush.delhi.gov.in/ayush/fundamental-principles
- 49.A critical analysis on the concept of Prakriti and its clinical utility in human beings. Patel MA, Dr. Patki PM, Kala K, Parjapati T, Bhuva AN. https://internationaljournal.org.in/journal/index.php/ijayush/article/view/1108 Int J Ayush. 2024;7:123–134. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Guidelines for prevention and management of stroke. [ Jan; 2025 ]. 2022. https://www.nhmmizoram.org/upload/Fin%20-%20Stroke%20guidelines_0-1.pdf https://www.nhmmizoram.org/upload/Fin%20-%20Stroke%20guidelines_0-1.pdf
- 51.An individualized treatment protocol development in the management of Pakshaghata (acute stage of ischemic stroke: a review. Ashwini Sori, Ravishankar Pervaje, B S Prasad. https://ijrap.net/admin/php/uploads/1921_pdf.pdf Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2017;8:10–13. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Prevalence, contributing factors, and economic implications of strokes among older adults: a study of North-East India. Kalita J, Bharadwaz MP, Aditi A. Sci Rep. 2023;13:16880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43977-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.NP-NCD Operational Guidelines. [ Jan; 2025 ]. 2023. https://www.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/NP-NCD%20Operational%20Guidelines_0.pdf https://www.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/NP-NCD%20Operational%20Guidelines_0.pdf
- 54.Cardiovascular risk prediction in India: comparison of the original and recalibrated Framingham prognostic models in urban populations. Gupta P, Prieto-Merino D, Ajay VS, et al. https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/4-71/v2. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:71. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15137.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

