Skip to main content
Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI logoLink to Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
. 2026 Feb 16;16(4):633. doi: 10.3390/ani16040633

Oral Administration of Lactobacillus amylovorus Alleviates Diarrhea by Restoring Gut Microbiota and SCFAs in Neonatal Goats

Mudathir Y Abdulrahman 1,, Nasir A Ibrahim 2,*, Mohamed Osman Abdalrahem Essa 3,4,, Saber Y Adam 1, Raza Mohai Ud Din 1, Rifat Ullah Jan 1, Nosiba S Basher 2, Mokhtar Rejili 2, Shaaban S Elnesr 5, Ahmed A Saleh 1,6, Hosameldeen Mohamed Husien 1,3, Mengzhi Wang 1,7,*
Editors: Huazhe Si, Shengru Wu, Ning Liu
PMCID: PMC12937376  PMID: 41751094

Simple Summary

In newborn goats, diarrheic kid syndrome is a complex illness marked by systemic dysfunction and abnormalities in metabolism. Our study shows a clear connection between dysbiosis and abnormal blood biochemistry, providing new insights into the involvement of gut and gastric dysbiosis in diarrhea etiology. These findings demonstrate the significant influence of Lactobacillus amylovorus treatment on the gut microbial composition and point to its potential for regulating gut health.

Keywords: Lactobacillus amylovorus, diarrhea, gut microbiota, neonatal goats, SCFAs

Abstract

Diarrhea in kids is a significant health and economic concern for small-scale ruminant farms. This study aims to investigate the properties of Lactobacillus amylovorus as a treatment for kids with diarrhea and its effect on the composition of the gut microbiota. A total of 20 neonatal goats (approximately 2 months old) were divided into three groups: healthy control (HC, n = 4), diarrhea (D, n = 8), and diarrhea treated with probiotic (DT, n = 8). We tracked gut microbial profiles, fecal consistency, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and clinical symptoms. Probiotic-treated kids recovered fully from diarrhea within two weeks, while their untreated counterparts showed signs of clinical deterioration and gradual emaciation. Kids with diarrhea had lower microbial richness, according to alpha diversity analysis, and this was only partially restored after probiotic treatment. The kids with diarrhea had the lowest Shannon, ACE, Simpson, Dominance, Pielou-e, and Chao1 indices compared to the HC group, while the administration of Lactobacillus amylovorus significantly (p < 0.05) restored their normal enrichment in the DT group compared to the D group. The healthy group had a higher abundance of Verrucomicrobiota, while Firmicutes and Bacteroidota predominated in all groups. Bacteroides and Akkermansia predominated in the healthy and treated groups. At the genus level, analysis showed elevated levels of Escherichia-Shigella and UCG-005 in kids with diarrhea. In addition, the concentration of each SCFA in the D group was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the HC group. This study provides novel evidence that Lactobacillus amylovorus administration not only alleviates diarrhea but also uniquely restores the production of key SCFAs—including butyrate, acetate, and propionate—in neonatal goats, a finding not previously reported in this species. The concurrent recovery of microbial diversity and SCFA profiles highlights the dual mechanistic potential of Lactobacillus amylovorus as a gut microbiota modulator and metabolic therapeutic in young ruminants. These results lend credence to its potential as a probiotic treatment for small ruminant enteric diseases.

1. Introduction

The gut microbiota plays a critical role in immunity, digestion, and health maintenance. It enhances immune cell production, hormone balance, and nutritional absorption, and also contributes to the development of physiological systems, such as the brain and the immune system [1]. Moreover, the gut microbiota supports the productivity and functionality of the immune system, shaping the host’s immunity and promoting a balanced and tolerant response to innocuous antigens [2,3]. Additionally, the growth and organ development of kids, especially in the early stages of life, are promoted by the gut microbiota. The GM can also influence hormone balance, nutrient absorption in the GIT, and the development of vital physiological systems [4]. Diarrhea is one of the most significant causes of decreased production rates in livestock animals, particularly in neonates with vulnerable gut microbiota. Specifically, diarrhea leads to a decline in the beneficial bacteria that produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which provide many benefits to animal health. Thus, there may be inevitable correlations between ruminant diarrhea and alterations in the GM. The precise relationships, evolving traits, and underlying mechanisms are nevertheless unidentified. While the trajectory of gut microbiome maturation with age is well-characterized in healthy kids, less is known about how this developmental process interacts with and is modulated by acute diarrheal infection. Therefore, our study design explicitly controls for and analyzes age as a critical factor to disentangle its effects from those of the disease state. Furthermore, recent research on age-related disturbances in ruminant intestinal microecology stability is limited. Previous studies have shown that diarrhea can harm all species, especially lambs, pigs, and chickens with vulnerable gut microbiota [1,5,6]. Besides increased mortality rates, Wang et al. [1] found various alterations in the intestinal microbiota of diarrheal goats. Probiotics have been defined by the International Scientific Association for Prebiotics and Probiotics (ISAPP) as live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when consumed in sufficient quantities [7]. In addition, microbes produce digestive enzymes that assist hosts in the digestion of nutritional particles that host enzymes are not able to break down completely [8]. Furthermore, probiotic development in the animal gut can decrease the amount of undigested carbohydrates, reducing the risk of diarrhea brought on by disruption of the osmotic gradient [9]. The most popular probiotics that can be used in the treatment of a variety of illnesses are Lactobacillus sp., Bifidobacterium sp., and Enterococcus sp. [10]. A strain of Lactobacillus salivarius was previously found to treat intestinal damage in mice brought on by E. coli [11]. Previous research has confirmed that berberine helps treat colitis and inflammatory bowel diseases [12] and has antibacterial and antidiarrheal functions [13]. Lactobacillus amylovorus has a strong resistance to surviving in the animal digestive system, and its clinical use can lead to an increase in the diversity of the gut microbiota in floppy lambs, help regulate the structure of their gut microbiota, suppress the growth rate of pathogenic microbes, and enhance the growth of probiotics. This suggests that administration of Lactobacillus amylovorus to diarrheal lambs can help treat diarrheic kid syndrome, and its impact in inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microbes may reduce the use of antibiotics [14].

Metagenomics analysis has, in recent decades, given a great deal of insight into the taxonomic diversity and functions of gut microbiomes. Nevertheless, additional details of microbiomes may yield knowledge on gut microbial communities and their use in animal husbandry. Some studies have demonstrated that ruminants have the capacity to adapt to new diets and have provided an understanding of how the intestinal microbiome interacts with and supports the well-being of animals [15]. Moreover, microbial communities may play a tremendous role in the digestion and uptake of nutrients; therefore, the effects of direct-fed microbes on the rumen microbiota should be established [16]. We hypothesize that oral administration of Lactobacillus amylovorus will alleviate diarrhea in neonatal goats by restoring gut microbial homeostasis and increasing the concentration of beneficial SCFAs. This study investigates the therapeutic properties of Lactobacillus amylovorus and its effect on the gut microbiota composition, blood biochemistry, and SCFA profiles in diarrheic kids. To assess the impact of Lactobacillus amylovorus on diarrheic kids, we employed metagenomic sequencing to characterize specific taxonomic shifts and functional changes in the gut microbiome, moving beyond general diversity metrics to identify key responsive taxa.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The Animal Ethics Care and Use Committee of Yangzhou University provided ethical approval for all the animal experiments (approval date: April 2024, approval code: SCXK [Su] 2021-0013). Most importantly, the highest standards of animal welfare were upheld during the animal experiments. The study was developed with strict supervision and scrutiny to prevent any harm to the animals and to enhance humane treatment in all aspects of the research process.

2.2. Animal Grouping and Treatment

In total, 20 kids (approximately 2 months old, weighing 10–15 kg body weight) were randomly selected from a goat farm in Taizhou City, Jiangsu Province. The selection criteria were as follows: healthy kids displaying no clinical signs of disease, with normal appetites, activity levels, and fecal consistency.

In addition, diarrheic kids were identified by the presence of loose or watery feces for at least 2 days in a row, accompanied by decreased activity or loss of appetite. All kids were kept in a controlled house with sufficient ventilation, bedding, free access to clean water, and a standard diet (Table 1). The kids were randomly divided into three groups as shown below:

Table 1.

Composition of ingredients of goat feed.

Ingredients % Nutrition Composition (Per kg)
Corn 50 Crude protein 10%, metabolizable energy 3.3%, starch 65%
Pea skin 20 Fiber 40%, fat 2%, ash 3%
Silage 15 Dry matter 35%, crude protein 9%, calcium 0.3%, phosphorus 0.3%
Alfalfa meal 15
Soybean meal 50 Amino acid (lysine 3.3%, methionine 0.6%, threonine 1.8%, tryptophan 0.6%
Sunflower meal 50 Crude protein 32%, sulfur 0.3%, magnisum 0.3%)
Iodizal salt 10 NaCl 97%, KI 20%, KIO3 30%
Wild hay powder 50 Fiber 3%, protin 1.2%
Additives 1 Vitamins (A, D, E), trace minerals (Zn, Se)
Bran 320 ME, 4%, fat 4%

HC: healthy control group (n = 4), D: diarrhea group (n = 8), and DT: diarrhea + probiotic treatment group (n = 8).

Kids were orally fed with the Lactobacillus amylovorus suspension at a dose of 5 mL/10 kg of body weight daily. The dosage was adjusted for individual body weight. Blood samples were collected from n = 4 to 8 kids per group for analysis.

The suspension was prepared at a concentration of 1 × 109 CFU/mL. In addition, rectal samples were taken to determine their microbiota at baseline.

2.3. Blood Biochemical Analysis

Kids with diarrhea exhibited common symptoms, such as an unsteady gait and limb weakness. The blood samples of 2–3 mL were drawn from the kids’ jugular vein using non-anticoagulant vacuum tubes. The blood samples were left to clot at room temperature (for 30 min) and centrifuged at 3000 rpm in order to extract the serum. The serum was then placed into 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes.

2.4. Biochemical Index Measurement

An automated biochemical analyzer (Beckman Coulter International Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to measure 13 biochemical indices, including total protein, albumin, globulin, urea, calcium, creatinine, triglycerides, glucose, total cholesterol, and alkaline phosphatase.

2.5. Gut Microbiota Analysis

Fecal samples were collected from a subset of animals to ensure high-quality sampling and reliable data. The selection criteria aimed to guarantee representative samples in both groups, consistent with the inclusion criteria stipulated in Section 2.2.1 [17]. The criteria for the selection process were as follows: (1) Health Status: Only healthy kids without any clinical manifestations of a disease were selected for the healthy control group (as stated in Section 2.2). (2) Consistency between Groups: The kids were selected in such a way that they satisfied the inclusion criteria of each group. In the healthy control group, the healthy + Lactobacillus amylovorus treatment group, and the diarrhea + Lactobacillus amylovorus group, the proportion of the neonates was balanced. (3) Non-Risk to Future Collection of Samples: Once a kid had been chosen in a collection, it continued to be in the same collection throughout the study, which ensured uniformity in the sampling procedure. Sterile cotton swabs were used to collect fresh rectal samples of the selected kids (after one kid was selected, no change was possible in further rectal swab collection).

The DNA extraction method used by Li et al. [18] was followed, with 30 ng of extracted DNA used for PCR. Common primers targeting the V3/V4 regions are sensitive to marine archaea and intestinal bacteria, respectively, and are frequently employed for microbial investigation [19,20]. For this reason, PCR was performed using primers 341F (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and 806R5 (GGACTACHVGGGTATCTAAT). Using the QuantiFluor™-ST fluorescence quantification system (Promega, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA), the concentration of DNA extracted from 2% gel sugar extraction using the GENEWIZ kit (Guangzhou Genedenovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) was ascertained. Construction of the PE amplicon library was carried out using the Illumina MiSeq platform in Shanghai, China.

2.6. Determination of SCFAs Content

The fecal samples of kids were subjected to liquid chromatography to identify the relative concentrations of the SCFAs, including propionic acid, isovaleric acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, acetic acid, and isobutyric acid after the provision of EcN. Moreover, approximately 50 mg of fresh feces was mixed with 0.5 mL of water, and ultrasonic agitation was performed for 10 min to facilitate preferential extraction. As per the general protocol, centrifugation was performed for 5 min at 4 °C at 12,000 revolutions per minute (rpm). Next, 50 μL of the supernatant was taken and combined with 50 μL of isotopically labeled internal standard (5 μg/mL). Additionally, 50 μL each of 3-nitrophenylhydrazine (3-NPH) solution (250 mM, prepared in 50% methanol/water solution) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) solution (150 mM, prepared in 75% methanol/water solution with 7.5% pyridine) were also added. Then, the mixture was shaken and left at 30 °C for 30 min. Next, 50 μL of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) methanol solution (2 mg/mL) and 250 μL of 75% methanol/water solution were added. The centrifuge tube was subsequently subjected to low-temperature centrifugation for 5 min at 12,000 rpm at 40 °C. After that, 100 μL of the supernatant was collected and placed in an injection vial for detection via mass spectrophotometry. A Waters UPLC BEH C8 column (100 mm × 2.5 mm × 1.7 mm) was used.

2.7. Determination of Antioxidant Content

The neonate’s feces were evaluated to measure levels of antioxidant stress markers and related enzymes. We measured the following parameters: malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase activity (CAT), and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). All analyses were performed using a PU 8720 UV/VIS scanning spectrophotometer. Commercial kits from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China, were used for each parameter, and all experimental procedures were conducted according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

In order to refine sequences and build an abundance table of amplicon sequence variants, the raw data of kids were analyzed through Cutadapt and QIIME2 (QIIME 2 2020.6) software [21,22]. ASVs were annotated by blasting against the SILVA database (V138). The Shannon, Simpson, ACE, and Chao1 indices, along with Good’s coverage, were computed in order to assess alpha diversity and investigate the richness and diversity of microflora in the samples [23]. To assess beta diversity, the gut microbiota structure of different kids’ groups was compared using principal component analysis [24], principal coordinates analysis [25], and non-metric multidimensional scaling [26]. Using repeated LEfSe, significantly different microbial species were identified among the groups [27].

The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For parameters meeting assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the effects of treatment, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for specific group comparisons. For non-normally distributed data (including alpha diversity indices and some microbial abundance data), the Kruskal–Wallis test was used, followed by Dunn’s post hoc test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Probiotic Effects of Lactobacillus amylovorus on Kids’ Health

In the diarrhea group, eight kids received Lactobacillus amylovorus orally. All of them stopped having diarrhea after 5 days. In the untreated diarrhea group (D), kids that did not recover spontaneously exhibited progressive emaciation, with fur around the anus filled with feces, weakness of the legs, and a sunken rib cage; they were also frequently lying around the enclosure.

3.2. Effects of Lactobacillus amylovorus on Blood Biochemical Parameters

To evaluate the systemic physiological impact of Lactobacillus amylovorus supplementation on neonatal goats with diarrhea, we analyzed a comprehensive panel of blood biochemical parameters (Table 2). The results revealed significant alterations in several key markers associated with metabolic and inflammatory status. Alkaline phosphatase activity was significantly elevated across all experimental groups compared to the normal range, with the DT group showing the highest levels (p < 0.001). This elevation is consistent with the physiological stress response in diarrheic animals. Total protein and albumin levels, which are critical indicators of nutritional status and liver function, were significantly reduced in the D group compared to the HC group (p < 0.01). Notably, Lactobacillus amylovorus treatment restored these parameters to levels comparable to those of the healthy controls, indicating improved protein metabolism and nutritional recovery.

Table 2.

Blood biochemical parameters.

Item Normal Range Experiment Groups p-Value
HC D DT
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) 93 ≈ 38 265.75 ± 58.66 a 181.5 ± 32.85 a 407.36 ± 36.65 a,b <0.001
Total protein (g/L) 52 ≈ 82 68.50 ± 7.51 a 61.70 ± 6.65 a 68.30 ± 2.92 a 0.123
Albumin (g/L) 25 ≈ 45 35.24 ± 2.71 a 26.25 ± 2.42 b 36.80 ± 2.50 a <0.01
Globulin (g/L) 25 ≈ 45 43.05 ± 9.83 a 35.47 ± 7.22 b 41.50 ± 8.90 a,b <0.05
Albumin:globulin ratio 0.6 ≈ 1.2 0.82± 0.21 a 0.74 ± 0.17 a 0.89 ± 0.19 a 0.234
Urea (mmol/L) 3.6 ≈ 7.1 8.76 ± 2.15 a 11.45 ± 1.39 b 9.10 ± 1.50 a <0.05
Creatine (μmol/L) 62 ≈ 106 59.75 ± 3.62 a 60.47 ± 5.44 a 58.20 ± 4.10 a 0.234
Glucose (mmol/L) 2.8 ≈ 5.0 5.38 ± 0.36 a 5.77 ± 0.73 a 5.60 ± 0.5 a 0.345
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 1.3 ≈ 3.9 2.22 ± 0.34 a 2.20 ± 0.30 a 2.35 ± 0.28 a 0.567
Triglyceride (mmol/L) 0.1 ≈ 0.3 0.28 ± 0.06 a 0.26 ± 0.05 a 0.29 ± 0.04 a 0.456
Calcium (mmol/L) 2.2 ≈ 2.8 2.45 ±0.21 a 2.33 ± 0.18 a 2.51 ± 0.15 a 0.112

Different superscript letters (a, b) within a row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

The globulin fraction, which reflects immune function and inflammatory status, also showed significant changes. The D group exhibited lower globulin levels compared to the HC group (p < 0.05), suggesting impaired immune response during diarrhea. The DT group showed intermediate values, indicating partial restoration of globulin levels following probiotic intervention. Urea levels, a marker of protein catabolism and renal function, were elevated in the D group compared to the HC group (p < 0.05), potentially reflecting increased protein breakdown or dehydration. The DT group showed a trend toward normalization, though this did not reach statistical significance compared to the D group.

Other parameters, including glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and calcium, showed no significant differences among the three groups, indicating that these metabolic pathways were less affected by diarrhea or the probiotic treatment under the current experimental conditions.

In summary, the blood biochemical analysis demonstrates that neonatal diarrhea significantly impairs protein metabolism and immune function, as evidenced by reduced albumin, total protein, and globulin levels. Oral administration of Lactobacillus amylovorus effectively restored these parameters toward normal levels, suggesting that this probiotic strain contributes to the alleviation of diarrhea by improving nutritional status and supporting immune function in neonatal goats.

3.3. Sequence Analysis

The Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform generated 1,078,215 paired-end reads, with an average of 53,911 per sample. All samples yielded 995.723 high-quality readings after quality control processing and the removal of unqualified data; the average number of reads per sample ranged from 98.232 to 10.373 (Supplementary File S1, Table S1). In taxonomic assignment, a total of 8519 OTUs were identified from all samples, and 271 common OTUs were discovered, accounting for approximately 4.39% of the total OTUs, according to the DEBLUR algorithm. In particular, the FA, KA, and LA included 3469, 3052, and 1998 OTUs, respectively, while the common OTUs totaled 1397 (Figure 1A,B and Supplementary File S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Analysis of gut microbial community features among healthy control (HC), diarrhea (D), and diarrhea-treated (DT) kids. (A,B) Venn diagrams showing the number of unique and shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) between groups.

To determine the difference between the diversity of the intestinal microbes in the three groups, alpha and beta indices were assessed using high-quality sequences to analyze variations in the intestinal microbial communities. The alpha diversity of the gut microbiota was calculated through the diversity indices (Simpson) and community abundance (Chao1, Shannon, Dominance, Pielou-e, and ACE). The kids displaying diarrhea had the lowest Shannon, ACE, Simpson, Dominance, Pielou-e, and Chao1 indices compared to the HC group, while the administration of Lactobacillus amylovorus significantly (p < 0.05) restored these indices in the DT compared to the D group (Figure 2A–F). In addition, the beta diversity analysis revealed that the samples in the DT, D, and HC groups were grouped together (Figure 3A and B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Alpha diversity indices: Shannon (A), ACE (B), Simpson (C), Dominance (D), Pielou’s evenness (E), and Chao1 (F). Significant differences between groups are indicated with brackets and asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Comparisons shown are between the HC and D groups and between the D and DT groups.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A,B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots illustrating beta diversity based on Bray–Curtis distances.

3.4. Bacterial Community Composition at Different Taxonomic Levels

Microbial taxonomic assignment in the DT, D, and HC groups was used to determine the dominant phyla and genera (Figure 4). Firmicutes (54.23%, 47.60%, and 44.58%) and Bacteroidota (55.64%, 43.08%, and 40.24%) were the most prevalent phyla in all three groups, making up around 97% of the taxonomic groupings found (Figure 4A). In contrast, the phylum Verrucomicrobiota in the D group was less abundant (34.67%), differing from the other groups. Other phyla, such as Proteobacteria, Halobacterota, Patescibacteria, Actinobacteriota, Euryrchaeota, Spirochaetota, and Desulfobacterota, were represented with a lower abundance (Table S2). At the genus level, the most common bacteria in the HC and D groups were Bacteroides (55.09%) and Akkermansia (51.69%), which collectively accounted for 87% and 93% of the total bacterial composition, respectively (Figure 4B). Bacteroides was reduced in the DT group.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relative abundance of the top 10 most prevalent gut microbial taxa at both phylum and genus levels among the three groups. Panels (A) and (B) depict the relative abundance of gut microbiota in each sample at the phylum and genus levels, respectively. The abundance of the top four genera in the small goat fecal microbiota of each group: (C) Akkermansia, (D) Bacteroides, (E) Rikenellaceae-RC9-gut-group, and (F) UCG 005. Significant differences between groups are indicated with brackets and asterisks (*** p < 0.001, ## p < 0.01). Comparisons shown are between the HC and D groups and between the D and DT groups.

Furthermore, the most common bacteria genera in the D and DT groups were Escherichia and Shigella (33.90% and 27.75%), while UCG-005 (23.35%) was found to be higher in the DT group and lower in the other two groups. Other genera were present at lower levels across all groups (Table S3). The relative richness of these microorganisms is also demonstrated in a heatmap generated via clustering analysis (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Heatmap of the relative abundance of bacterial communities at the genus level in each sample. Each colored block in the heatmap represents the relative abundance of a specific bacterial genus within that sample.

3.5. LEfSe Analysis

Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe), in combination with linear discriminant analysis (LDA), was performed at different levels of classification to compare differences in intestinal microbiota among the four groups. The findings showed that the HC, D, and DT groups contained four, six, and six distinct bacterial taxa, respectively (Figure 6A,B). The addition of Lactobacillus bacteria to the DT group clearly had a significant impact on the composition of microbes at every level, from phylum to genus. Cambacterium, UCG_007, Hydroganoerobacterium, and Serlenomonadalus bacterium_marscilla-P2399 were found in high abundance in the HC group. The Clostridium innocuum group, Burkholderiaceae, Ralstonia, Pelomonas, and Comamonadaceae were more abundant in the D group, while the relative abundance of UCG005, Hafniaceae, Hanfnia_Obesnmbacterium, Atopobium, UCG_004, and Lachnosdpiraceae NK4A1346_group was considerably higher in the FA group.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

LEfSe analysis for notable alterations in the differential fecal microbiota in all groups. (A,B) in the three groups, the biomarker bacterial species were identified by LEfSe analysis (LDA score > 4).

3.6. Lactobacillus amylovorus Increases Content of SCFAs

The composition of butyric acid, isobutyric acid, hexanoic acid, isovaleric acid, acetic acid, caproic acid, propanoic acid, and pentanoic acid was identified, and the profiles are indicated in Figure 5. Each of the SCFAs in the D group was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the HC group of kids. Lactobacillus amylovorus administration in the diarrhea group significantly increased the levels of butyric acid, isobutyric acid, hexanoic acid, isovaleric acid, acetic acid, caproic acid, propanoic acid, and pentanoic acid (p < 0.05) compared to the D group (Figure 7A–H).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Concentrations of SCFAs in fecal samples from HC, D, and DT kids. (A) Butyrate; (B) Isovalerate; (C) Caproate; (D) Isobutyrate; (E) Acetate; (F) Valerate; (G) Propionate; (H) Heptanoate. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Significant differences between specific groups are indicated with brackets and asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test). For each SCFA, comparisons were made between the HC and D groups and between the D and DT groups.

3.7. Effects of Lactobacillus amylovorus on Antioxidant Enzymes and Oxidative Stress

The contents of MDA, SOD and CAT were determined, and the results are shown in Figure 8. The result showed significant differences between the diarrheal group (D) and the control group (HC). Diarrhea increased oxidative stress when compared with the control (HC) and treated group (DT), but there was no significant difference between the treated group (DT) and the control group (HC), indicating that Lactobacillus amylovorus decreased the oxidative stress (Figure 8A). Additionally, the antioxidant activities of SOD and CAT were significantly higher in the Lactobacillus amylovorus-treated group (DT) compared to the diarrheal group (D), but there was no significant difference between the Lactobacillus amylovorus-treated group (DT) and the control group (HC) (Figure 8B–D). Furthermore, ATP production was significantly higher in the Lactobacillus amylovorus-treated group (DT) compared to the (D) group. However, there was no significant difference in the Lactobacillus amylovorus-treated group (DT) compared to the control group (HC) (Figure 8C).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Effect of Lactobacillus amylovorus on oxidative stress and antioxidant parameters in goat kids. (A) MDA, (B) CAT, (C) ATP, (D) SOD. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Significant differences between specific groups are indicated with brackets and asterisks (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test). For each parameter, statistical comparisons were performed between the HC and D groups and between the D and DT groups.

3.8. Correlation Network Analysis of Microbiota–Host Interactions

To elucidate the potential mechanistic links between gut microbiota remodeling and host physiological recovery, we performed a comprehensive correlation analysis between the relative abundances of dominant microbial taxa and key phenotypic parameters (Figure 9). The network revealed multiple significant associations that provide insight into how Lactobacillus amylovorus-induced microbial shifts may contribute to diarrhea alleviation.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Correlation network between gut microbiota and host phenotypic parameters. Network analysis showing significant Spearman correlations between dominant microbial taxa (nodes in purple) and key host phenotypic variables (nodes in orange). Red edges represent negative correlations, while green edges represent positive correlations. The size of each node is proportional to the number of connections (degree). Microbial taxa are labeled at the phylum level (e.g., Firmicutes, Bacteroidota) or genus level, where specified. Phenotypic variables include blood biochemical parameters (e.g., alkaline phosphatase and globulin), antioxidant markers (SOD1, CAT, and MDA), and metabolic compounds (e.g., acetic acid). The network illustrates potential mechanistic links between microbiota remodeling and host physiological recovery following Lactobacillus amylovorus administration.

Beneficial microbial taxa showed strong positive correlations with favorable metabolic and antioxidant markers. The phylum Firmicutes, which was enriched in the DT group, exhibited positive associations with acetic acid (a major short-chain fatty acid) and key antioxidant enzymes, including SOD1 and CAT. Conversely, Firmicutes showed a negative correlation with MDA, a marker of oxidative stress. This correlation pattern suggests that the restoration of Firmicutes abundance following probiotic treatment may contribute to enhanced SCFA production and improved antioxidant capacity, thereby mitigating oxidative damage associated with diarrhea. Conversely, certain microbial taxa were associated with adverse metabolic profiles. The phylum Bacteroidota showed positive correlations with triglyceride levels and negative associations with total cholesterol, indicating potential involvement in lipid metabolism dysregulation during diarrhea. Additionally, several microbial nodes exhibited connections with alkaline phosphatase and globulin, both of which were significantly altered in diarrheic animals, suggesting that microbiota–host interactions may influence inflammatory and metabolic stress responses.

The network structure revealed complex interrelationships between microbial communities and host physiology. Multiple microbial taxa were interconnected with several phenotypic parameters, indicating that the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus amylovorus are likely mediated through coordinated changes in the gut ecosystem rather than isolated microbial shifts. The presence of hub nodes (e.g., Firmicutes and Bacteroidota) with multiple connections underscores their central role in modulating host metabolism and redox homeostasis.

In summary, the correlation network analysis provides direct evidence linking specific microbial taxa to host metabolic and antioxidant parameters. These associations support the hypothesis that Lactobacillus amylovorus alleviates diarrhea by restoring a microbial community that promotes SCFA production, enhances antioxidant defense, and modulates metabolic homeostasis in neonatal goats.

4. Discussion

In newborn goats, diarrheic kid syndrome is a complex illness marked by systemic dysfunction and abnormalities in metabolism. Our study shows a clear connection between dysbiosis and abnormal blood biochemistry, providing new insights into the involvement of gut and gastric dysbiosis in diarrhea etiology. A complex interdependence between the increase in pathogenic bacteria, the depletion of probiotics, and metabolic disturbances is revealed by the metagenomic sequencing and blood biochemical analyses. Goats with the DT group had significantly higher levels of albumin, phosphate, and alkaline phosphatase, according to blood biochemical tests. The substantial increase in alkaline phosphatase suggests that acidosis is specifically linked to the excess proliferation of Escherichia coli, which ferments undigested lactose to generate excessive lactic acid and releases toxins like Staphylococcus aureus α-hemolysin and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide that worsen symptoms [28,29,30,31].

Few studies on the variations of the GM in goats of different ages and health statuses have been published, despite the fact that studies on the mammalian intestinal microbiota have so far addressed a wide range of topics, including metabolism, physiology, and immunology [32]. In this study, gut microbial diversity and composition were analyzed in fecal samples of control, healthy, and diarrheal kids. A significant difference in bacterial communities was found between healthy kids treated with Lactobacillus amylovorus and diarrheal kids. While the complete depth of microbial diversity is shown by promising studies, inter-individual variations continue to pose a challenge. Metagenomic analysis and larger cohorts may improve the study’s generalizability and yield useful information. Numerous factors, including infectious agents, weaning, and management, have been identified in previous research as potential causes of diarrhea in cows. The majority of these parameters, as well as dietary, physiological, and environmental stressors [33,34], have been connected to abnormalities of normal intestinal flora because they are crucial for the intestinal function of animals. Microbiome analysis has been employed in several recent studies to determine the gut microbiota of diarrheic animals, with a particular focus on lambs [35], commercial piglets [36], early-weaned Tibetan piglets [37,38], neonatal dairy calves [39,40], and suckling goats [1]. Han et al. demonstrated that diarrhea may be mechanistically related to gut microbial dysbiosis [6]. In the current study, the microbial composition of samples from different groups showed significant variations, indicating that despite these differences, there was minimal overall variation in gut microbial community structure. The administered dose of Lactobacillus modulates the microbial state of equilibrium, which lowers alpha diversity in the DT group. The HC group’s partial recovery of diversity measures, however, points to a modulatory effect that might enhance some taxa without significantly changing the overall microbial architecture.

At the phylum level, probiotic intervention dramatically changes the gut microbiota, with Firmicutes and Bacteroidota predominating the bacterial population, suggesting possible connections between probiotic intervention and diarrhea. This is consistent with previous studies that identified Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Pseudomonadota as the dominating phyla in the intestine of Hainan black goats. Fascinatingly, Hainan black goats have a greater intestinal content of Bacteroidota (apart from the ileum) than Yimeng black goats [18,41]. However, a disturbance in the microbial balance was indicated by the lower levels of Bacteroidota in the diarrhea-infected (D) group and higher levels in the control group (HC). In contrast to the DT and HC groups, the D group had a greater Verrucomicrobiota, which may indicate gut inflammation or mucosal injury. Lower amounts of less prevalent phyla, like Proteobacteria, were found. The key novel finding of our study is the specific microbial restructuring induced by L. amylovorus. Treatment significantly reduced the abundance of potentially pathogenic genera that were elevated in diarrheic kids, such as Escherichia-Shigella, while promoting the recovery of beneficial genera like Akkermansia, which is crucial for mucin degradation and barrier integrity. Furthermore, the treated group (DT) exhibited a distinct increase in UCG-005, a genus whose role in goat kid health warrants further investigation but may be linked to the observed metabolic recovery. These targeted shifts were directly correlated with the restoration of SCFA profiles.

The presence of dominating genera has a significant impact on gut health; the most prevalent genera are Bacteroides and Akkermansia, which indicate a balanced microbiota. This result is in line with a recent study that revealed that, in neonates with diarrhea, Bacteroides continued to be the most common genus and tended to grow as a typical GM component in ruminant guts [1]. Furthermore, the genus Escherichia-Shigella exhibited a significant enrichment in both the DT and HC groups, with the D group displaying especially high enrichment (33.90%).

According to the latest research, the colon has a higher relative abundance of Bacteroides. The Christensenellaceae R-7 group demonstrated the ability to produce acetate and butyric acid from carbohydrates [42]. Studies indicate that a lack of Christensenellaceae may contribute to obesity [43]. Despite being a normal part of the flora, Escherichia coli strains are often linked to infection, diarrhea, and inflammation of the gut due to their increased abundance and pathogenic variants. According to the most recent research, the main genus groups in the stomach of black goats are Eubacterium parthenogenesis, Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Bacteroides, Paeniclostridium, and Ruminococcaceae_UCG-005. Prevotella-1. The composition of the gut microbiota in goats changes as they age [44,45,46,47]. Although the genus UCG-005 is associated with disease in the D group, it is unknown how it affects host physiology. Future research should look into how probiotics affect the composition and functionality of microorganisms over the long term.

Key bacterial biomarkers enriched in each experimental group were identified by the LEfSe technique in conjunction with LDA scoring. This revealed distinct microbial signatures that were altered by the probiotic intervention and the disease state. Taxa including Cambacterium, UCG_007, Hydrogenoanaerobacterium, and Selenomonadales bacterium_marscilla-P2399 were found to be more abundant in the control group (HC). These taxa are typically linked to a healthy, balanced intestinal environment. The idea that a stable microbiota is made up of specialized and varied taxa that support gut health by producing short-chain fatty acids, maintaining mucosal integrity, and being metabolically versatile is supported by their prevalence in the DT group. Lactobacillus amylovorus may affect microbial reorganization by boosting commensals or changing the intestinal environment, possibly facilitating gut repair or competitive exclusion of pathogens, as seen by the considerable enrichment in certain taxa displayed by the Lactobacillus-treated group.

Our study’s complex microbial connections provide important new information about the gut microbiota’s possible functional interactions and competitive dynamics. A common ecological niche or mutualistic relationship may be indicated by the positive correlation seen between Akkermansia and genera like UCG_099, UCG_005, Complobacter, and Escherichia/Shigella. Researchers have also found that adding Lactobacillus to a mouse’s diet every day can help prevent non-alcoholic fatty liver by improving gut health and lowering swelling in mice [48]. Adding Lactobacillus to a host’s diet also increased digestive enzyme activity and antioxidant capacity, which is good for the host [49,50]. A bacterium that breaks down mucin, Akkermansia, is frequently regarded as advantageous for preserving metabolic health and the integrity of the intestinal barrier. Lactobacillus supplements, on the other hand, greatly decreased the abundance of Paenibacillus, Aerococcus, Comamonas, and Corynebacterium in the ileum of mice with E. coli infection. Paenibacillus infections are very uncommon, but they can sometimes lead to meningitis [51]. Its favorable association with Escherichia/Shigella, which contains recognized pathogens, however, points to a complicated and context-dependent role that is impacted by the host’s diet or immunological condition. The co-occurrence of UCG and Campylobacter species could be an indication of a cooperative metabolic network that facilitates substrate utilization and mucosal colonization.

In goat kids with diarrhea, these multifaceted functions of SCFAs are critical for modulating the gut environment, host immunity, and pathogen interactions [52]. SCFAs, primarily acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are absorbed by intestinal epithelial cells, providing a vital energy source for the ruminant gut [53,54]. Butyrate is a major energy source for colonocytes and is critical for maintaining intestinal barrier function. Research indicates that SCFAs modulate gene expression related to SCFA transporters and inflammatory responses in goat jejunum epithelial cells, suggesting their direct involvement in maintaining gut homeostasis [54]. SCFAs are products of microbial fermentation, and their levels are intrinsically linked to the composition and metabolic activity of the gut microbiome [55]. In diarrheal conditions, the metabolic activity of the intestinal microflora can influence the severity and duration of illness. Early weaning and milk substitutes in goat kids have an impact on the gut microbiome, metabolomics, and antibodies, affecting the presentation of diarrhea [56]. SCFAs can inhibit the growth and virulence of pathogenic bacteria. They interfere with the replication and virulence of pathogens, such as E. coli, by modifying the production of pathogenic factors like toxins and by decreasing the gut pH, which creates an unfavorable environment for many harmful bacteria [57]. This resistance against enteric pathogens is vital in preventing and treating diarrheal diseases. SCFAs contribute to strengthening the intestinal epithelial barrier. They promote mucin production and enhance tight junctions between epithelial cells, which are essential for maintaining gut integrity and reducing the passage of pathogens from the gut into the bloodstream [58].

The localized acidity of the gut due to the generation of lactic acid is a fundamental mechanism behind the advantages of Lactobacillus amylovorus. Acid-sensitive pathogens (like Escherichia-Shigella) are directly inhibited by this output [59], and it may benefit acid-tolerant commensals that are associated with health, including certain Lachnospiraceae and Akkermansia [60,61]. Crucially, lactic acid’s dissociated form has the ability to damage bacterial membranes on its own, offering an antibacterial action that goes beyond a reduction in pH [62]. The observed microbial reorganization and recovery of SCFA profiles can be explained by this selective ecological pressure.

A compromised intestinal barrier is a common feature of diarrheal conditions, and SCFA-mediated reinforcement can aid recovery. The recovery of SCFA concentrations—particularly butyrate and acetate—in the DT group provides a direct functional link between the observed microbial shifts and clinical improvement. Butyrate serves as the primary energy source for colonocytes, promoting epithelial repair, while acetate contributes to systemic energy metabolism. The restoration of these key metabolites aligns with the normalization of blood biochemical parameters, such as albumin and total protein, and the resolution of diarrhea, demonstrating a coherent mechanism of action from probiotic administration to microbial modulation, metabolic output, and systemic host recovery.

There are some serious limitations to this investigation. The first limitation is the modest and unbalanced sample size, particularly the small healthy control group (n = 4). While the results show clear trends, this imbalance may affect the statistical power of some comparisons, such as alpha diversity indices, and limit the generalizability of the findings. Future studies with larger, balanced cohorts are warranted to confirm these observations. Reproducibility problems like false positives and false negatives may be exacerbated when studying goat kids. Second, fecal samples were collected rather than gut samples to study the gut microbiota of kids who had diarrhea. Conversely, feces could be valuable sample sources for studying diseases and biomarkers in humans and animals, which can provide reliable host data.

5. Conclusions

These results demonstrate the significant influence of Lactobacillus amylovorus treatment on the gut microbial composition and point to its potential for regulating gut health. The effects of Lactobacillus amylovorus are likely mediated not only through direct host interactions but also through its metabolic activity (i.e., acid production), which restructures the gut microbial ecosystem to favor a healthier, SCFA-producing community. These findings support the potential of this probiotic as a beneficial intervention for the management of enteric diseases in small ruminants, contributing to improved animal health and enhanced economic sustainability on small-scale farms.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani16040633/s1, Table S1: Relative abundance of the top 10 most prevalent gut microbial taxa at phylum; Table S2: Relative abundance of the top 10 most prevalent gut microbial taxa at genus; Table S3: The sequence information of each sample.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Y.A. and M.O.A.E.; Data curation, M.Y.A. and M.O.A.E.; Formal analysis, M.Y.A. and M.O.A.E.; Funding acquisition, N.A.I.; Investigation, M.Y.A. and M.O.A.E.; Methodology, M.Y.A. and M.O.A.E.; Project administration, M.W.; Software, M.Y.A. and M.O.A.E.; Supervision, N.A.I. and M.W.; Writing—original draft, M.Y.A. and M.O.A.E.; Writing—review and editing, N.A.I., S.Y.A., R.M.U.D., R.U.J., N.S.B., M.R., S.S.E., A.A.S. and H.M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Yangzhou University, China (approval date: April 2024, approval code: SCXK [Su] 2021-0013).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors. The 16S rRNA gene sequences analyzed in this study are provided in Supplementary File S1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2602).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Wang Y., Zhang H., Zhu L., Xu Y., Liu N., Sun X., Hu L., Huang H., Wei K., Zhu R. Dynamic Distribution of Gut Microbiota in Goats at Different Ages and Health States. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2509. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Choden T., Cohen N.A. The gut microbiome and the immune system. Explor. Med. 2022;3:219–233. doi: 10.37349/emed.2022.00087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Peng X., Ed-Dra A., Song Y., Elbediwi M., Nambiar R.B., Zhou X., Yue M. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus alleviates intestinal inflammation and promotes microbiota-mediated protection against Salmonella fatal infections. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:973224. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.973224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Du Y., Gao Y., Hu M., Hou J., Yang L., Wang X., Du W., Liu J., Xu Q. Colonization and development of the gut microbiome in calves. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023;14:46. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00856-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gryaznova M.V., Dvoretskaya Y.D., Syromyatnikov M.Y., Shabunin S.V., Parshin P.A., Mikhaylov E.V., Strelnikov N.A., Popov V.N. Changes in the Microbiome Profile in Different Parts of the Intestine in Piglets with Diarrhea. Animals. 2022;12:320. doi: 10.3390/ani12030320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Han Z., Li K., Shahzad M., Zhang H., Luo H., Qiu G., Lan Y., Wang X., Mehmood K., Li J. Analysis of the intestinal microbial community in healthy and diarrheal perinatal yaks by high-throughput sequencing. Microb. Pathog. 2017;111:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G.R., Merenstein D.J., Pot B., Morelli L., Canani R.B., Flint H.J., Salminen S., et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee J.J., Choe J., Kang J., Cho J.H., Park S., Perez-Maldonado R., Cho J.Y., Park I.H., Kim H.B., Song M. Dietary protease improves growth rate and protein digestibility of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2020;62:313–320. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.3.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rivière A., Selak M., Lantin D., Leroy F., De Vuyst L. Bifidobacteria and Butyrate-Producing Colon Bacteria: Importance and Strategies for Their Stimulation in the Human Gut. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:979. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kiousi D.E., Karapetsas A., Karolidou K., Panayiotidis M.I., Pappa A., Galanis A. Probiotics in Extraintestinal Diseases: Current Trends and New Directions. Nutrients. 2019;11:788. doi: 10.3390/nu11040788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wei Z., He Z., Wang T., Wang X., Wang T., Long M. Lactobacillus salivarius WZ1 Inhibits the Inflammatory Injury of Mouse Jejunum Caused by Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 by Regulating the TLR4/NF-κB/MyD88 Inflammatory Pathway and Gut Microbiota. Microorganisms. 2023;11:657. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11030657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mariani M., Perez-Vega R., Wirtz J. AI in marketing, consumer research and psychology: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Psychol. Mark. 2021;39:755–776. doi: 10.1002/mar.21619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li L., Chang L., Zhang X., Ning Z., Mayne J., Ye Y., Stintzi A., Liu J., Figeys D. Berberine and its structural analogs have differing effects on functional profiles of individual gut microbiomes. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:1348–1361. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1755413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jakava-Viljanen M., Murros A., Palva A., Bjorkroth K.J. Lactobacillus sobrius Konstantinov et al. 2006 is a later synonym of Lactobacillus amylovorus Nakamura 1981. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008;58:910–913. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65432-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Luton P.E., Wayne J.M., Sharp R.J., Riley P.W. The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology. 2002;148:3521–3530. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-11-3521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Henderson G., Cox F., Ganesh S., Jonker A., Young W., Janssen P.H. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:14567. doi: 10.1038/srep14567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cheng C., Du J., Tao J., Cheng D. Growth Characteristics of Sheep-Derived Bacteroides fragilis and Preliminary Research on Effects in Mice and Lambs. Microorganisms. 2025;13:87. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li A., Yang Y., Zhang Y., Lv S., Jin T., Li K., Han Z., Li Y. Microbiome analysis reveals the alterations in gut microbiota in different intestinal segments of Yimeng black goats. Microb. Pathog. 2021;155:104900. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martínez-Porchas M., Villalpando-Canchola E., Vargas-Albores F. Significant loss of sensitivity and specificity in the taxonomic classification occurs when short 16S rRNA gene sequences are used. Heliyon. 2016;2:e00170. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fadeev E., Cardozo-Mino M.G., Rapp J.Z., Bienhold C., Salter I., Salman-Carvalho V., Molari M., Tegetmeyer H.E., Buttigieg P.L., Boetius A. Comparison of Two 16S rRNA Primers (V3–V4 and V4–V5) for Studies of Arctic Microbial Communities. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:637526. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.637526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dubois B., Debode F., Hautier L., Hulin J., Martin G.S., Delvaux A., Janssen E., Mingeot D. A detailed workflow to develop QIIME2-formatted reference databases for taxonomic analysis of DNA metabarcoding data. BMC Genom. Data. 2022;23:53. doi: 10.1186/s12863-022-01067-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dong Y., Xu R., Chen X., Yang C., Jiang F., Shen Y., Li Q., Fang F., Li Y., Shen X. Characterization of gut microbiota in adults with coronary atherosclerosis. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15245. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li B., Du P., Du Y., Zhao D., Cai Y., Yang Q., Guo Z. Luteolin alleviates inflammation and modulates gut microbiota in ulcerative colitis rats. Life Sci. 2021;269:119008. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.119008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li L., Wang F., Liu Y., Gu F. Intestinal microbiota dysbiosis in children with recurrent respiratory tract infections. Microb. Pathog. 2019;136:103709. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hu S., He C., Li Y., Yu Z., Chen Y., Wang Y., Ni D. Changes of fungal community and non-volatile metabolites during pile-fermentation of dark green tea. Food Res. Int. 2021;147:110472. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim B.G., Kang N., Kim S.Y., Kim D.H., Kim H., Kwon O.J., Huh H.J., Lee N.Y., Jhun B.W. The lung microbiota in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0285143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.MahmoudianDehkordi S., Arnold M., Nho K., Ahmad S., Jia W., Xie G., Louie G., Kueider-Paisley A., Moseley M.A., Thompson J.W., et al. Altered bile acid profile associates with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease-An emerging role for gut microbiome. Alzheimer’s Dement. J. Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2019;15:76–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Han B., Han X., Ren M., You Y., Zhan J., Huang W. Antimicrobial Effects of Novel H2O2-Ag+ Complex on Membrane Damage to Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Salmonella typhimurium. J. Food Prot. 2022;85:104–111. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Castro-Valenzuela B.E., Franco-Molina M.A., Zárate-Triviño D.G., Villarreal-Treviño L., Kawas J.R., García-Coronado P.L., Sobrevilla-Hernández G., Rodríguez-Padilla C. Antibacterial efficacy of novel bismuth-silver nanoparticles synthesis on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli infection models. Front. Microbiol. 2024;15:1376669. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1376669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang L., Liu L., Liu Y., Wang F., Zhou X. Antimicrobial performance of novel glutathione-conjugated silver nanoclusters (GSH@AgNCs) against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by membrane-damage and biofilm-inhibition mechanisms. Food Res. Int. 2022;160:111680. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Muehler D., Brandl E., Hiller K.A., Cieplik F., Maisch T. Membrane damage as mechanism of photodynamic inactivation using Methylene blue and TMPyP in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2022;21:209–220. doi: 10.1007/s43630-021-00158-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zeng Y., Zeng D., Zhang Y., Ni X., Tang Y., Zhu H., Wang H., Yin Z., Pan K., Jing B. Characterization of the cellulolytic bacteria communities along the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese Mongolian sheep by using PCR-DGGE and real-time PCR analysis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;31:1103–1113. doi: 10.1007/s11274-015-1860-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Scharnböck B., Roch F.F., Richter V., Funke C., Firth C.L., Obritzhauser W., Baumgartner W., Käsbohrer A., Pinior B. A meta-analysis of bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) prevalences in the global cattle population. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:14420. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32831-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mu Y.Y., Qi W.P., Zhang T., Zhang J.Y., Mei S.J., Mao S.Y. Changes in rumen fermentation and bacterial community in lactating dairy cows with subacute rumen acidosis following rumen content transplantation. J. Dairy Sci. 2021;104:10780–10795. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kong L.C., Wang B., Wang Y.M., Hu R.G., Atiewin A., Gao D., Gao Y.H., Ma H.X. Characterization of bacterial community changes and antibiotic resistance genes in lamb manure of different incidence. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:10101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46604-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sun J., Du L., Li X., Zhong H., Ding Y., Liu Z., Ge L. Identification of the core bacteria in rectums of diarrheic and non-diarrheic piglets. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:18675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55328-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kong Q., Zhang W., An M., Kulyar M.F., Shang Z., Tan Z., Xu Y., Li J., Liu S. Characterization of Bacterial Microbiota Composition in Healthy and Diarrheal Early-Weaned Tibetan Piglets. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9:799862. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.799862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Qi M., Cao Z., Shang P., Zhang H., Hussain R., Mehmood K., Chang Z., Wu Q., Dong H. Comparative analysis of fecal microbiota composition diversity in Tibetan piglets suffering from diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) Microb. Pathog. 2021;158:105106. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim E.T., Lee S.J., Kim T.Y., Lee H.G., Atikur R.M., Gu B.H., Kim D.H., Park B.Y., Son J.K., Kim M.H. Dynamic Changes in Fecal Microbial Communities of Neonatal Dairy Calves by Aging and Diarrhea. Animals. 2021;11:1113. doi: 10.3390/ani11041113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cendron F., Niero G., Carlino G., Penasa M., Cassandro M. Characterizing the fecal bacteria and archaea community of heifers and lactating cows through 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing. J. Appl. Genet. 2020;61:593–605. doi: 10.1007/s13353-020-00575-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zeng Y., Zeng D., Ni X., Zhu H., Jian P., Zhou Y., Xu S., Lin Y., Li Y., Yin Z., et al. Microbial community compositions in the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese Mongolian sheep using Illumina MiSeq sequencing revealed high microbial diversity. AMB Express. 2017;7:75. doi: 10.1186/s13568-017-0378-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen R., Li Z., Feng J., Zhao L., Yu J. Effects of digestate recirculation ratios on biogas production and methane yield of continuous dry anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2020;316:123963. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Waters J.L., Ley R.E. The human gut bacteria Christensenellaceae are widespread, heritable, and associated with health. BMC Biol. 2019;17:83. doi: 10.1186/s12915-019-0699-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Szczepanski H.E., Flannigan K.L., Mainoli B., Alston L., Baruta G.M., Lee J.W., Venu V.K.P., Shearer J., Dufour A., Hirota S.A. NR4A1 modulates intestinal smooth muscle cell phenotype and dampens inflammation-associated intestinal remodeling. FASEB J. 2022;36:e22609. doi: 10.1096/fj.202101817RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li L., Li K., Bian Z., Chen Z., Li B., Cui K., Wang F. Association between body weight and distal gut microbes in Hainan black goats at weaning age. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:951473. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.951473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li B., Zhang K., Li C., Wang X., Chen Y., Yang Y. Characterization and Comparison of Microbiota in the Gastrointestinal Tracts of the Goat (Capra hircus) During Preweaning Development. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2125. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li A., Yang Y., Qin S., Lv S., Jin T., Li K., Han Z., Li Y. Microbiome analysis reveals gut microbiota alteration of early-weaned Yimeng black goats with the effect of milk replacer and age. Microb. Cell Factories. 2021;20:78. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01568-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang Z., Zhou H., Guan M., Zhou X., Liang X., Lv Y., Bai L., Zhang J., Gong P., Liu T., et al. Lactobacillus casei YRL577 combined with plant extracts reduce markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2021;125:1081–1091. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520003013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wu J., Zhang W., Li C. Recent Advances in Genetic and Epigenetic Modulation of Animal Exposure to High Temperature. Front. Genet. 2020;11:653. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang H., Wang Q., Liu H., Kong B., Chen Q. In vitro growth performance, antioxidant activity and cell surface physiological characteristics of Pediococcus pentosaceus R1 and Lactobacillus fermentum R6 stressed at different NaCl concentrations. Food Funct. 2020;11:6376–6386. doi: 10.1039/C9FO02309G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hunt B., Rogers C., Blais R.M., Adachi K., Sathyavagiswaran L. Paenibacillus Sepsis and Meningitis in a Premature Infant: A Case Report. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2021;42:96–98. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liu M., Lu Y., Xue G., Han L., Jia H., Wang Z., Zhang J., Liu P., Yang C., Zhou Y. Role of short-chain fatty acids in host physiology. Anim. Models Exp. Med. 2024;7:641–652. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhan K., Jiang M., Gong X., Zhao G. Effect of short-chain fatty acids on the expression of genes involved in short-chain fatty acid transporters and inflammatory response in goat jejunum epithelial cells. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.—Anim. 2018;54:311–320. doi: 10.1007/s11626-017-0226-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hsu C.-Y., Khachatryan L.G., Younis N.K., Mustafa M.A., Ahmad N., Athab Z.H., Polyanskaya A.V., Kasanave E.V., Mirzaei R., Karampoor S. Microbiota-derived short chain fatty acids in pediatric health and diseases: From gut development to neuroprotection. Front. Microbiol. 2024;15:1456793. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1456793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vorobiova N.V., Usachova O.V., Silina Y.A., Furyk O.O. The influence of the metabolic activity of the intestinal microflora on the severity and duration of rotavirus diarrhea in early-aged children. Pathologia. 2023;20:63–68. doi: 10.14739/2310-1237.2023.1.272745. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhong T., Wang C., Wang X., Freitas-de-Melo A., Zeng B., Zhao Q., Zhan S., Wang L., Cao J., Dai D., et al. Early Weaning and Milk Substitutes Affect the Gut Microbiome, Metabolomics, and Antibody Profile in Goat Kids Suffering from Diarrhea. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:904475. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.904475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhan Z., Tang H., Zhang Y., Huang X., Xu M. Potential of gut-derived short-chain fatty acids to control enteric pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:976406. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.976406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cifuentes M.P., Chapman J.A., Stewart C.J. Gut microbiome derived short chain fatty acids: Promising strategies in necrotising enterocolitis. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2024;6:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Alakomi H.-L., Skytta E., Saarela M., Mattila-Sandholm T., Latva-Kala K., Helander I. Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66:2001–2005. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2001-2005.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sorbara M.T., Pamer E.G. Microbiome-based therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022;20:365–380. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00667-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cani P.D., de Vos W.M. Next-generation beneficial microbes: The case of Akkermansia muciniphila. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1765. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen X., Bai H., Mo W., Zheng X., Chen H., Yin Y., Liao Y., Chen Z., Shi Q., Zuo Z. Lactic Acid Bacteria Bacteriocins: Safe and Effective Antimicrobial Agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:4124. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors. The 16S rRNA gene sequences analyzed in this study are provided in Supplementary File S1.


Articles from Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES