Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1993 Jan;86(1):18–20.

Ultrasonographic appearance of regenerate bone in limb lengthening.

T H Hughes 1, N Maffulli 1, J A Fixsen 1
PMCID: PMC1293816  PMID: 8423567

Abstract

The appearance of regenerate bone during the process of limb lengthening using a mono-axial device was studied using radiographs and ultrasound scanning in nine patients. The corticotomy site initially appeared as a sonolucent area. Poorly organized echogenic foci were detectable 2 weeks after the distraction was begun. After 4 weeks, these areas became aligned. At 7-8 weeks, a clear impression of a new cortical margin was seen. The formation of a medullary canal started at this point, progressing to a radiographically evident canal. Ultrasound scanning can reduce considerably exposure to ionising radiation in patients undergoing limb lengthening. Accurate measurements are possible in the early stages, and ossification can be monitored. Axial deviation can be seen but not evaluated. The maturity of the regenerate bone still has to be assessed clinically.

Full text

PDF
18

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blane C. E., Herzenberg J. E., DiPietro M. A. Radiographic imaging for Ilizarov limb lengthening in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21(2):117–120. doi: 10.1007/BF02015621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dal Monte A., Donzelli O. Tibial lengthening according to Ilizarov in congenital hypoplasia of the leg. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987 Mar-Apr;7(2):135–138. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198703000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. De Bastiani G., Aldegheri R., Renzi-Brivio L., Trivella G. Limb lengthening by callus distraction (callotasis). J Pediatr Orthop. 1987 Mar-Apr;7(2):129–134. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198703000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huppertz R., Pfeil J., Kaps H. P. Sonographische Verlaufskontrollen von Verlängerungsosteotomien. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1990 Jan-Feb;128(1):90–95. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Paley D., Chaudray M., Pirone A. M., Lentz P., Kautz D. Treatment of malunions and mal-nonunions of the femur and tibia by detailed preoperative planning and the Ilizarov techniques. Orthop Clin North Am. 1990 Oct;21(4):667–691. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paley D. Current techniques of limb lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988 Jan-Feb;8(1):73–92. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198801000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peretti G., Memeo A., Formentoni A., Di Lelio A., Marinoni E. C. Gli allungamenti degli arti inferiori: il valore dell'ecografia nella valutazione delle varie fasi del rigenerato osseo. Chir Organi Mov. 1988 Jan-Mar;73(1):53–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peretti G., Memeo A., Paronzini A., Marinoni E. C. Methods for the study of bone regeneration in lengthening of the limbs. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1989 Jun;15(2):217–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. White S. H., Kenwright J. The timing of distraction of an osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 May;72(3):356–361. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B3.2341426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Young J. W., Kostrubiak I. S., Resnik C. S., Paley D. Sonographic evaluation of bone production at the distraction site in Ilizarov limb-lengthening procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Jan;154(1):125–128. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.1.2104695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Young J. W., Kovelman H., Resnik C. S., Paley D. Radiologic assessment of bones after Ilizarov procedures. Radiology. 1990 Oct;177(1):89–93. doi: 10.1148/radiology.177.1.2399344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES