Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Feb 26;21(2):e0342776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342776

Multilevel determinants of illness since birth among infants aged 5–9 weeks in Ethiopia: Evidence from the 6-week follow-up of the PMA-ethiopia longitudinal survey (2021–2023)

Amare Mebrat Delie 1,*, Mickiale Hailu 2, Molla Getie Mehari 3, Gizachew Kassahun Bizuneh 4, Berihun Agegn Mengistie 5, Tesfaye Shumet Mekonnen 6
Editor: Orvalho Augusto7
PMCID: PMC12944765  PMID: 41746924

Abstract

Background

Infant illness in the early weeks of life remains a major public health concern in Ethiopia, contributing to neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality. Identifying individual- and community-level determinants is critical to guide targeted interventions.

Objective

To assess multilevel determinants of illness since birth among infants aged 5–9 weeks in Ethiopia using data from the PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal Survey (2021–2023).

Methods

We analyzed data from 1,960 infants and mothers enrolled in Cohort 2 of the PMA Ethiopia longitudinal survey, conducted across Addis Ababa, Amhara, Oromia, and SNNP regions. A multistage stratified cluster design with sampling weights ensured national representativeness. The outcome was any maternal-reported infant illness since birth. Multilevel binary logistic regression accounted for clustering within mothers and enumeration areas. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported, and model fit was compared using AIC and BIC.

Results

Overall, 34.42% (95% CI: 30.23–38.87) of infants experienced illness since birth, while 65.58% (95% CI: 61.13–69.77) remained illness-free. Female infants had lower odds of illness than male infants (AOR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.35–0.82). Infants born to mothers who experienced pregnancy complications had higher odds of illness (AOR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.11–3.20), as did infants of mothers with postpartum complications (AOR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.27–4.27). Infants from households owning insecticide-treated bed nets also had higher odds of illness (AOR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.10–2.96).

Conclusion

About one-third of Ethiopian infants experienced illness within 5–9 weeks of life. Female infants were less vulnerable, whereas maternal complications during pregnancy and postpartum markedly increased illness risk. The association with bed net ownership warrants further investigation. Strengthening maternal health services and targeted interventions may reduce early infant morbidity.

Background

Infant and child mortality are widely recognized as critical indicators of a nation’s socioeconomic development and overall quality of life [1]. In response to the global burden of preventable child deaths, Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2 targets a reduction in neonatal mortality to at least 12 per 1,000 live births and under-five mortality to no more than 25 per 1,000 live births by 2030 [2]. Achieving these targets requires ongoing efforts to systematically document, analyze, and monitor maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes, ensuring that progress is tracked and interventions are effectively guided.

Globally, infectious diseases such as diarrhea, malaria, and pneumonia remain leading causes of morbidity and mortality among children under five, particularly in low- and middle-income countries [3]. Acute respiratory infections alone account for approximately 1.3 million child deaths annually, representing 20% of under-five mortality, while diarrhea contributes to 370,000 deaths, or roughly 9% of the total [46]. Pneumonia accounts about 14% of lives in this age group, with an incidence of 1,400 cases per 100,000 children per year [6]. Fever is a common symptom across these illnesses and is often the primary reason for healthcare visits among children in low-resource settings, including Ethiopia [79]. It commonly indicates underlying infections such as malaria, acute respiratory infections (ARIs), or gastrointestinal diseases [10]. In Ethiopia, children typically experience between two and nine episodes of fever annually [11].

Childhood illness continues to be a significant public health challenge in Ethiopia. As reported in the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS), 7.0% of children under five exhibited symptoms of acute respiratory infections (ARIs), 13.0% had diarrhea, and 14.0% experienced fever in the two weeks preceding the survey [1]. Alarmingly, the 2021 EDHS reported an increase in ARI symptoms to 21.7%, with diarrhea and fever affecting 12.1% and 14.8% of children, respectively [12]. These findings underscore a persistent and, in some cases, worsening burden of early childhood illnesses [13]. Another previous study revealed a range of early neonatal morbidities, with jaundice requiring phototherapy (32%), respiratory distress (19.1%), and cyanotic episodes (15.7%) among the most frequently reported, followed by conditions such as hypoglycemia, temperature instability, and feeding intolerance [14]. The likelihood of developing complications was found to be over 13 times higher in specific subgroups, underscoring the significance of both modifiable factors such as antenatal steroid use, administration of magnesium sulfate, and mode of delivery and non-modifiable factors like maternal age, parity, twin gestation, and infant gender [15].

While prior studies and national surveys have documented the burden of common childhood illnesses such as fever, diarrhea, and acute respiratory infections in Ethiopia, these studies are predominantly cross-sectional and rely on retrospective caregiver reports [14,1618]. As a result, they are limited in their ability to capture the early postnatal period, assess temporal patterns of illness, and identify multilevel determinants that operate at both individual and community levels particularly in rural settings. Moreover, existing evidence in Ethiopia largely focuses on under-five children as a broad age group, with limited attention to early infancy, a critical developmental window characterized by heightened vulnerability to illness and mortality. Robust longitudinal data examining illness prevalence and risk factors among infants in the first weeks of life are especially scarce [16,17,19,20].

To address this gap, the present study utilizes nationally representative longitudinal data from the PMA-Ethiopia project (2021–2023) to estimate the prevalence of any illness among infants aged 5–9 weeks and to identify individual- and community-level risk factors. By leveraging a multilevel analytic approach, this study aims to provide critical insights that can inform targeted interventions, optimize resource allocation, and ultimately contribute to the national and global efforts to improve early childhood health outcomes.

Methods

Data source

This study is based on secondary data from the six-week follow-up survey of Cohort 2 of the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Ethiopia longitudinal study, conducted between 2021 and 2023. PMA Ethiopia is a five-year collaborative initiative involving Addis Ababa University, Johns Hopkins University, and the Ethiopian Ministry of Health, aimed at generating high-quality data to inform reproductive, maternal, and newborn health (RMNH) policies and programs.

The longitudinal study tracks women from pregnancy through one year postpartum, with data collected at multiple intervals. It is carried out in four major agrarian regions in Amhara, Oromia, Tigray, and the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region (SNNPR) along with the urban hub of Addis Ababa. While the first cohort (2019–2021) included the Afar region, Cohort 2, which is the focus of this study, did not [21].

Sampling technique

The study employed a two-stage stratified cluster sampling design, with 162 enumeration areas selected from the Central Statistical Agency’s master sampling frame using probability proportional to size, stratified by region and urban-rural residence. Within each enumeration areas, a household census identified women aged 15–49 who were either pregnant or up to 9 weeks postpartum. Eligible women were recruited and participated in baseline interviews. A total of 2,297 women provided informed consent to participate in the six-week follow-up survey. PMA Ethiopia categorizes households in two ways: those identified through household screening as containing a currently pregnant or postpartum woman (0–9 weeks) and those selected for cross-sectional interviews where a panel-eligible woman was later identified. Based on reproductive status at baseline, women were grouped into four categories: currently pregnant, 0–4 weeks postpartum, 5–9 weeks postpartum, and ineligible or non-consenting women [21]. Importantly, 273 women who were already 5–9 weeks postpartum at the time of the baseline interview completed both baseline and six-week follow-up interviews concurrently. These cases are flagged using the “cohort type” variable and represent a unique subgroup for whom complete information on delivery, neonatal care, birth outcomes, and postnatal care is available. Although household rosters captured data on all members, only panel-eligible women completed the full female questionnaire. Longitudinal variables were formatted in a wide structure, with repeated events assigned numerical indices to ensure efficient tracking and integration across successive survey rounds [21]. The study population was all early infants aged 5–9 weeks in Ethiopia, assessed through interviews with their mothers participating in the PMA Ethiopia Longitudinal Panel Survey.

Data collection procedures and data quality assurance

Baseline data were collected between October 2021 and January 2022 using standardized, mobile-assisted personal interviews conducted on smartphones or tablets via the Open Data Kit platform. The baseline survey captured sociodemographic characteristics and key indicators across the maternal and newborn health continuum, as well as selected sexual and reproductive health measures. Follow-up interviews were conducted at 6 weeks, 6 months, and one year postpartum. All interviews were administered face-to-face by trained female resident enumerators in local languages. Enumerators received comprehensive training on ethical research conduct, digital data collection tools, and survey procedures [22]. The six-week postpartum follow-up took place between November 2021 and November 2022, collecting comprehensive information on antenatal care, delivery, immediate postpartum, and neonatal care. Baseline interviews captured sociodemographic and household characteristics to enable linkage with the follow-up data [21].

Trained female enumerators conducted face-to-face interviews in local languages after undergoing comprehensive training on ethical conduct, digital data tools, and survey procedures. To ensure high data quality, the survey implemented rigorous protocols including real-time field supervision, standardized training, random spot-checks, and back-checking of key responses. The use of automated skip logic and built-in consistency checks within the ODK platform helped minimize data entry errors. Only panel-eligible women completed the full female questionnaire, and data were structured in wide format to facilitate longitudinal analysis. Sampling weights were applied to correct for design effects and non-response, ensuring nationally representative and reliable estimates [21].

Data extraction procedure

A total of 2,297 women participated in the baseline interview and gave their consent to be followed up at six weeks. Of these, 2,024 women (1,796 currently pregnant and 228 in the early postpartum period) were eligible for follow-up. Among them, 1,799 completed the six-week interview, while 225 were lost to follow-up due to reasons such as relocation, refusal, or ineligibility. Additionally, 273 women who were already 5–9 weeks postpartum at baseline completed the six-week interview concurrently. All 2,072 women who took part in the follow-up interviews delivered live-born infants. From these, 1,660 postpartum women (with 1,685 infants including 25 twin births) and the 273 postpartum women (with 275 infants including 2 twin births) were assessed for any infant illness since birth. In total, 1,960 infants were included in the final analysis [21] (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Data extraction procedure for assessing multilevel determinants of illness since birth in Ethiopia: evidence from Cohort 2 of the longitudinal survey (2021–2023).

Fig 1

Variables

Dependent Variable.

Presence of any illness since birth, defined as a binary outcome (ill/not ill).

Independent Variables.

Individual level factors

Sociodemographic variables: The sociodemographic characteristics considered in the study include maternal age, the gender of the newborn, religion, marital status, and the household wealth index, the number of live births (parity), household food insecurity status were assessed in this study.

Maternal and pregnancy-related factors: The number of antenatal care visit and timing of first antenatal care visits, whether the mother experienced intimate partner violence. Additional variables included pregnancy reaction of mother, pregnancy reaction of partner or husband, pregnancy type (singleton vs twin), the extent of respectful maternity care received, and whether the mother received birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) counseling, occurrence of pregnancy complication, presence of delivery complications, the place of deliver, cesarean section delivery, the presence of skilled birth attendance, and the occurrence of post-delivery complications, whether the baby was wrapped immediately after birth, appropriate cord care (substances used, instruments used), and early or delayed bathing practices, initiation of breast feeding within 1 hour birth, baby placed naked on mother’s chest immediately after birth tetanus immunization during pregnancy, ANC iron supplementation given during her pregnancy, ANC deworming supplementation received during pregnancy were included as maternal and pregnancy related factors.

Community Level factors: Community-level factors included the place of residence, region, community’s education status, and community’s poverty status.

Operational definition.

Illness: Refers to any health condition reported by the mother that affected the infant from birth up to six weeks of age. This includes, but is not limited to, symptoms such as vomiting, unconsciousness, sore throat, umbilical redness or pus, poor feeding, absence of urine or stool, failure to cry or breathe, lethargy, skin rash or lesions, jaundice, hypothermia, fever, fast breathing, red or pus-filled eyes, difficulty breathing, diarrhea, cold or cough, convulsions, or chest indrawing. An infant is classified as “ill” if they exhibit any one of these symptoms. Not Ill: Infants who did not show any of the above symptoms or conditions during the first six weeks of life are classified as “not ill.”

Wealth quintile: Household wealth status was measured using the wealth quintile variable provided by the PMA-Ethiopia project. PMA constructs this variable using an asset-based wealth index derived through principal component analysis (PCA) of household ownership of durable assets, housing characteristics, and access to water and sanitation facilities. The resulting wealth score is ranked at the national level and divided into five quintiles such as poorest, poorer, middle, richer, and richest and each representing 20% of households. This study used the PMA-constructed wealth quintile variable as provided in the dataset [22].

Household food insecurity status: Household food insecurity was assessed using nine questions and follow-up items on the frequency of food insufficiency and related psychological responses over the past 30 days [23,24].

Delivery Complications: All participants were asked whether they encountered any issues during childbirth. Reported complications included heavy bleeding, prolonged rupture or leakage of membranes without the onset of labor for over 24 hours, premature membrane rupture before nine months of gestation, abnormal fetal position or presentation, labor lasting more than 12 hours, and episodes of convulsions or seizures. Affirmative response to any complication was categorized into a variable for “any complication.” All complications were self-reported and were not confirmed via record review or formal diagnosis.

Birth preparedness discussion and complication readiness: women with ANC who received counseling on each birth preparedness topic, including place of delivery, delivery by a skilled birth attendant, arrangement of delivery transport, where to go when experiencing pregnancy danger signs, severe headaches with blurred vision, high blood pressure, edema, convulsions, and bleeding before delivery as a danger sign [21].

Community poverty and community education level: Community-level indicators of poverty and education were derived by aggregating individual-level characteristics within each community. These indicators were categorized into “high” or “low” based on the proportion of relevant attributes observed in each community cluster. Specifically, community poverty was classified as high if the proportion of households in the lowest two wealth quintiles (lowest and lower) within a cluster exceeded the median value across all clusters; otherwise, it was considered low. Likewise, the community literacy level was categorized as high if the percentage of women with a minimum of primary education including primary, secondary, technical, vocational, or higher education, which was equal to or greater than the median value within the cluster; it was considered low if it was below the median. This median-based dichotomization accounted for the uneven distribution of poverty and literacy across communities and was also applied to create community-level variables related to the presence of any illness since birth.

Data management and analysis

The dataset, which is publicly accessible through the PMA website, was downloaded in Stata format and analyzed using Stata version 17. Data preparation involved extracting the study variables and extracting our study population, labeling variables, recoding categorical responses, generating composite indicators, and addressing missing values. The dataset was restructured to reflect its multilevel hierarchy: infants (level 1) nested within mothers (level 2), who were further nested within enumeration areas (EAs) (level 3). The outcome variable, infant illness, was defined as a binary variable indicating whether the infant experienced any reported symptoms since birth. The independent variables were grouped into two categories: individual-level factors and community-level determinants. Given the complex, stratified multistage sampling design of the PMA survey, all analyses incorporated sampling weights, cluster identifiers, and strata to ensure representativeness and adjust for design effects and nonresponse [25].

To account for the hierarchical nature of the data, multilevel binary logistic regression was employed. Initially, bivariable analyses were performed, and variables with a p-value < 0.25 were selected for inclusion in the multivariable model. After determining the key variables influencing the outcome, four models were developed sequentially: Model 0 (the null model) assessed the initial variation across clusters; Model 1 included individual-level factors; Model 2 introduced community-level variables; and Model 3 integrated predictors from both individual and community levels. Multicollinearity was assessed using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), with variables exceeding a VIF of 10 either removed or conceptually merged. Model fit was evaluated using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), with lower values indicating better fit [26]. The degree of clustering was assessed through the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Median Odds Ratio (MOR) [27], while the Proportional Change in Variance (PCV) [28] quantified variance explained by predictors across models. Fixed-effect estimates were reported as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05. Results were presented in well-structured texts, tables and Figs, progressing from descriptive summaries to inferential multilevel analyses, with interpretation highlighting both statistical and public health relevance in the context of maternal and child health in Ethiopia.

Model formulation for multilevel binary logistic regression analysis

Logistic regression uses the logit transformation to convert the non-linear relationship between predictor X and the probability of outcome Y into a linear form. This is achieved by using odds and logarithms, with the logit function representing the S-shaped curve. Generalized linear models refer to a class of models that uses a relation function to make an estimation. The logit link function is used in binary logistic regression [2931]. Let Xijk= (X1ijk, X2ijk …, Xnijk) represent the vector of k predictor variables for the ith individual in jth postpartum mother in kth enumeration area, where i = 1, 2…,…ith infant; j = 1,2,3, 4…jth postpartum mother; k = 1,2,3, 4…kth enumeration area)

The probability of any illness since birth in ith infant in jth postpartum mother, in the kth enumeration area and with their predictors Xijk is given by:

pij= prob (yijk=1|Xijk)=exijkβ1+exijkβ=eβ0+  x1ijkβ1 +x2ijkβ2 +,,+xnijkβn1+eβ0+  x1ijkβ1 +x2ijkβ2 +,,+xnijkβn

Where β = (β₀, β₁, β₂, …, β) ′ represents a denotes a vector consisting of unknown parameters from the population.

Yijk={ 1,  if the ith infant in jth postpartum mother in the kth enumeration area  had any types of illnes since birth     0,     if the ith infant in jth postpartum mother in the kth enumeration area  had no any types of illnes since birth    

The logit transformation of pijk  is expressed as a linear function of the explanatory variables.

logit (pijk)=ln[pijk1pijk]=Xijk,β=β0+  x1ijkβ1+x2ijkβ2+,,xnijkβn

Measures of clustering and between-level heterogeneity

  • (1) Intraclass correlation coefficient

This study used a three-level binary logistic regression model, where the levels are: Level 1: infants’ level (outcome: illness since birth), Level 2: Postpartum mother (mother-level clustering), and Level 3: Enumeration Area ID (community-level clustering),

Level 1 residual variance (for logistic models): For logistic models, the individual-level residual variance is fixed at σ2residual=π233.29 [32]. The following formulas outline how to compute the ICC at both the postpartum mother level and the enumeration area level, as well as the combined clustering effect.

  • i. ICC at the Postpartum Mother Level

ICC for postpartum clustering level=σ2postpartum levelσ2enumeration area+σ2postpartum women level+σ2residual

This measures the proportion of total variance in infant illness attributable to differences between postpartum women within the same enumeration area

  • ii. ICC at the Enumeration Area (EA) Level

ICC for enumeration area=σ2enumeration areaσ2enumeration area+σ2postpartum women level+σ2residual

It indicates the variation in any illness since birth due to differences between enumeration areas. It tells proportion of the residual variance in the likelihood of infants illness that is attributable by the differences between in enumeration areas [32,33].

  • iii. Combined Clustering Effect (EA + Postpartum women level)

ICC Combined=σ2enumeration area+σ2postpartum women levelσ2enumeration area+σ2postpartum women level+σ2residual

This indicates the overall explained variation by clustering effect of both postpartum mother level and enumeration area level. The remainder was attributed to unexplained residual variation at the individual level, as modeled by the logistic distribution. It tells the residual variance is attributable to differences between individuals (postpartum mother level ID) within the same Enumeration area cluster.

  • (2) Median odds ratio

The median odd ratio (MOR) quantifies the unexplained cluster-level (random effects) heterogeneity on the odds ratio scale and represents the median increase in the odds of the outcome when comparing two randomly selected individuals from different clusters (postpartum mother or enumeration area), attributable solely to clustering. The MOR translates the random effects (variances) into the odds ratio scale. the MOR quantifies how much cluster-level differences contribute to the likelihood of the outcome, offering a more intuitive interpretation of random effects than raw variance estimates [27,34].

To compute the Median Odds Ratio in a three-level binary logistic regression model, where the levels are: Level 1: infant level (outcome: illness since birth), Level 2: Postpartum mother ID (mother-level clustering), and Level 3: Enumeration Area ID (community-level clustering), For a given level (say level j), the MOR is calculated as:

MORjth=e(2*σj2*ϕ1(0.75))

Where; σj2== estimated variance at level jth cluster (Enumeration Area or Mother)

ϕ1(0.75)= 0.6745 = estimated variance at level jth cluster (the clusters considered in this study were Enumeration Area or postpartum Mother level)

  • i. MOR at enumeration area

MORjth enumeration area=e(2*σjth enumeration area2*ϕ1(0.75))

This indicates the median increase in odds of an illness for two infants from different enumeration areas purely due to differences between EAs.

  • ii. MOR at postpartum mother level

MORjth postpartum mother=e(2*σjth  postpartum mother level2*ϕ1(0.75))

MOR at postpartum mother level tells by how much the median increase in odds of illness since birth for two infants from different postpartum mothers purely due to differences between postpartum mothers. This shows a substantial variation at the mother level.

  • iii. The Overall Median Odds Ratio (MOR combined)

This tells you the median odds ratio between two individuals from different enumeration area and different postpartum mothers, purely due to random effects at both levels. It tells due to unmeasured differences at both the enumeration area and postpartum mother level. The median odds of illness between two randomly selected individuals from different postpartum mothers in different enumeration area level can computed as follows:

Overall MOR=e(2*(σjth enumeration area2+σjth postpartum mother2)*ϕ1(0.75))
  • (3) Proportion Change in Variance

The Proportional Change in Variance (PCV) quantifies the proportion of variance at a specific level that is explained after additional predictors are included in the model [28].

PCV=Variance at null modelVariance  of adjacent modelvariance at null model
  • i. Proportional change in variance at enumeration area level

PCV at enumeration area level=Variance at null modelVariance at adjacent modelvariance at null model

This reflects the reduction in unexplained variation at the enumeration area level after accounting for additional covariates in the model.

  • ii. Proportion changes in variance at postpartum mother level

PCV at postpartum mother level=Variance at null modelVariance at adjacent modelvariance at null model

It measures the extent to which added predictors reduce the unexplained variance between postpartum women.

  • iii. Proportional change in variance combined (both at enumeration area + at postpartum mother level)

PCC Combined=(σ2 enumeration area null model+σ2postpartum women level at null model)(σ2enumeration area of adjacent model+σ2postpartumwomen level)σ2enumeration area null model+σ2postpartum women level of the null model

This combined PCV quantifies the overall proportion of variation explained by predictors at both the enumeration area and postpartum mother levels, highlighting the impact of model adjustments on reducing unexplained heterogeneity.

Ethical considerations and approval

This dataset can be accessed freely via their official platform (https://www.pmadata.org/dataset). All analyses adhered to ethical standards and protocols approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) governing the original PMA data collection, in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The dataset contained no personal identifiers, and strict confidentiality measures were applied to protect the privacy of respondents, households, and sampled communities. Since this study is based on secondary data analysis of publicly available anonymized data, further ethical approval and participant consent were not required. Additional details regarding data ethics and protection measures can be accessed through the PMA-Ethiopia website.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents

This study included a total of 1,960 women from the Ethiopia PMA Cohort 2 longitudinal survey (2021–2023). This summary presents the sociodemographic characteristics of infants’ mother based on weighted percentages. The majority of respondents were aged 25–29 years (29.1%), followed by those aged 20–24 years (24.5%). Most participants resided in rural areas (75.4%) and were currently married or living with a partner (97.5%). In terms of educational attainment, nearly one-third (31.2%) of mothers had never attended school, while 46.4% had completed primary education. A small proportion (4.8%) attained higher education. Regarding religious affiliation, Muslim (36.0%) and Orthodox Christian (33.1%) faiths were the most commonly reported. Regionally, over half (52.4%) of the participants were from Oromia, with others from SNNPR (21.9%), Amhara (21.1%), and Addis Ababa (4.7%). Newborns were almost equally distributed by sex, with 50.2% male and 49.8% female. Household food security was a challenge, with 31.0% experiencing moderate food insecurity and 13.7% facing severe food insecurity. The wealth distribution was fairly even across quintiles, ranging from 19.3% (poorest) to 20.3% (richest). The majority of mothers (80.5%) had given birth previously (multiparous), whereas 11.7% were first-time mothers (nulliparous). At the community level, 71.9% lived in areas with high educational status, and 95.4% were from communities with low poverty levels (Table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic-economic related characteristics of respondents for the assessments of multilevel determinants of illness since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Variables Categories Unweighted Weighted
Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
Age of the mother in years 15-19 191 9.74 234 11.94
20-24 472 24.08 480 24.53
25-29 607 30.97 570 29.12
30-34 385 19.64 377 19.27
35-49 305 15.56 296 15.13
Residence Urban 822 41.94 482 24.65
Rural 1138 58.06 1,475 75.35
Gender of newborn Male 994 50.71 983 50.21
Female 966 49.29 974 49.79
Religion Orthodox 761 38.83 647 33.05
Protestant 611 31.17 570 29.13
Moslem/Muslim 564 28.78 704 35.99
Others (No religion/ non-believer or catholic 24 1.22 36 1.83
Marital status Currently married/living with man 1,908 97.35 1,908 97.49
Divorced/separated/not currently/single 52 2.65 49 2.51
Region Amhara 425 21.68 412 21.05
Oromia 701 35.77 1,026 52.40
SNNPR 560 28.57 428 21.88
Addis 274 13.98 91 4.67
School Never attended 528 26.94 610 31.16
Primary 861 43.93 909 46.44
Secondary 334 17.04 285 14.54
Technical & vocational 83 4.23 59 3.02
Higher 154 7.86 95 4.84
Household Food Insecurity Access category Food secure 921 47.06 897 45.92
Mildly Food Insecure Access 189 9.66 183 9.39
Moderately Food Insecure Access 583 29.79 606 31.03
Severely Food Insecure Access 264 13.49 267 13.66
Wealth quintile Poorest 393 15.46 378 19.31
Poor 310 15.82 400 20.43
Medium 314 16.02 386 19.73
Rich 381 19.44 396 20.24
Richest 652 33.27 397 20.29
Numbers of live birth Null para 240 13.09 214 11.72
Multi-para [1–4] 1290 70.34 69 80.48
Grand multipara (>= 5) 304 16.58 357 19.52
Community education status Low education 462 23.57 551 28.13
High education 1,498 76.43 1,406 71.87
Community poverty status Low poverty 1,893 96.58 1, 867 95.38
High poverty 67 3.42 90 4.62

Maternal and newborn care related characteristics of respondents

This analysis summarizes maternal and newborn care practices among infants’ mothers, based on nationally representative weighted data. A substantial proportion of mothers (27.8%) did not receive any antenatal care (ANC), while 39.8% attended 1–3 visits, and 32.5% had four or more. In terms of the timing of ANC initiation, 34.0% began within the first four months of pregnancy, 38.3% initiated between five and nine months, and 27.8% received no ANC at all. Regarding health education and preventive measures during pregnancy, 62.1% of mothers reported not discussing nutrition or diet during ANC visits. Although 76.3% received a tetanus injection, only 15.9% consumed multivitamins containing iron, and the same percentage took medication for intestinal worm infections. In terms of service quality, 79.5% of mothers had their weight measured as part of ANC, while 20.5% did not. Almost all pregnancies (97.1%) were singletons, with twin pregnancies accounting for only 2.9%. Emotional reactions to pregnancy varied, with 41.3% of mothers feeling very happy and 32.6% somewhat happy, whereas 5.4% reported being very unhappy. Partners generally responded more positively, with 49.8% being very happy and just 1.5% expressing strong dissatisfaction. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy was reported by 10.7% of mothers. Notably, just 6.5% of mothers were adequately prepared for childbirth and possible complications, highlighting a critical gap in birth preparedness (Table 2).

Table 2. Maternal and newborn care related characteristics of respondents for the assessments of multilevel determinants of illness since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Variables Categories Unweighted Weighted
Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
Number of ANC visit No ANC visit 526 33.98 543 27.75
1-3 666 39.18 778 39.76
>=4 768 26.84 636 32.50
First ANC visit 0-4 months 751 38.32 665 33.98
5-9 months 683 34.85 749 38.28
No ANC visit 526 26.84 543 27.75
Discussed nutrition or diet during ANC No 935 58.55 989 62.13
Yes 662 41.45 603 37.87
Given tetanus injection during this pregnancy No 377 23.61 377 23.66
Yes 1,220 76.39 1,215 76.34
Consumed multi vitamins that contains iron during this pregnancy No 1657 84.54 1,645 84.08
Yes 303 15.46 311 15.92
Consumed any drug for Intestinal worms during this pregnancy No 1,657 84.54 1,645 84.08
Yes 303 15.46 311 15.92
Weight taken as part of ANC No 260 16.28 326 20.48
Yes 1,337 83.72 1, 266 79.52
Number of children in this pregnancy Single 1904 97.14 1901 97.11
Twin 56 2.86 56 2.89
Pregnancy reaction Very happy 863 44.14 807 41.33
Sort of happy 620 31.71 636 32.58
Mixed happy & unhappy 181 9.26 189 9.65
Sort of unhappy 189 9.67 216 11.07
Very unhappy 102 5.22 105 5.38
Partner pregnancy reaction Very happy 863 44.14 935 49.78
Sort of happy 620 31.71 721 38.36
Mixed happy & unhappy 181 9.26 112 5.94
Sort of unhappy 189 9.67 83 4.42
Very unhappy 102 5.22 28 1.51
Intimate partner violence No violence 1,504 89.47 1504 89.30
Violence 177 10.53 180 10.70
Birth preparedness & complication readiness Yes 125 92.17 104 6.50
No 1472 7.83 1488 93.50
Place of delivery Home 574 29.29 742 37.92
Governmental 1,310 66.84 1172 59.87
Private 44 2.24 23 1.16
Other 9 0.46 10 0.52
NGO/faith-based health facility 23 1.17 10 0.52
Health facility delivery Home 574 29.29 742 37.91
Health facility 1,386 70.71 1,215 62.09
Skilled delivery Not skilled 577 29.45 749 38.28
Skilled 1,382 70.55 1,207 61.72
Delivered by cesarian section No 1,775 90.56 1,846 94.34
Yes 185 9.44 111 5.66
Complication during pregnancy No complication occurred 1,117 57.37 1096 56.46
Complication occurred 830 42.63 845 43.54
Any Delivery complication No 1,289 65.80 1302 66.57
Yes 670 34.20 657 33.43
Post delivery complication Not post-delivery complication 1,403 71.88 1,384 71.02
At least have one post-delivery complication 549 28.13 28.98 28.98
Respectful maternity care Not received respectful maternity care 1,303 94.83 1,147 95.37
Received respectful maternity care 71 5.17 56 4.63
Baby wrapped after birth No 91 4.65 89 4.53
Yes 1,868 95.35 1, 867 95.47
Baby placed naked on mother’s chest immediately No 839 42.83 923 47.20
Yes 1,120 57.17 1,032 52.80
Applied substances cord care Inappropriate 395 21.27 450 24.25
Appropriate 1,462 78.73 1,405 75.75
Bathing time since birth Early bathing 694 35.72 794 41.03
Delayed bathing 1,249 64.28 1,141 58.97
Initiation of breast feeding Greater than 1hour 1,623 84.40 1,622 84.54
Within 1 hour 300 15.60 296 15.46

In terms of delivery settings, 37.9% of births occurred at home, while 59.9% took place in government health facilities. A small proportion delivered in private (1.2%) or NGO/faith-based facilities (0.5%). Overall, 62.1% of deliveries occurred in health facilities. Skilled attendants assisted 61.7% of mothers during delivery, whereas 38.3% were assisted by unskilled personnel. Cesarean sections were performed in 5.7% of births. Maternal health complications were common: 43.5% experienced complication during pregnancy, 33.4% encountered complications during delivery, and 29.0% reported postnatal complications. Despite these risks, respectful maternity care was notably low, only 4.6% of mothers received such care, while the majority (95.4%) did not (Table 2).

Immediate newborn care practices showed mixed adherence to recommended standards. Most newborns (95.5%) were wrapped immediately after birth, but only 52.8% experienced skin-to-skin contact with their mothers. In 75.8% of cases, appropriate substances were used for cord care, while the remaining 24.3% involved the application of unsuitable materials. Delayed bathing, a protective newborn practice, was observed in 59.0% of cases. However, early initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of birth occurred in just 15.5% of cases, indicating a significant gap in optimal neonatal care practices (Table 2).

Environmental health and sanitation related characteristics of respondents

The findings reveal environmental health and sanitation related characteristics among the study population. A significant proportion of households (78.2%) did not have access to insecticide-treated bed nets. About 84.1% of households using unimproved toilet facilities and only 15.9% accessing improved toilet facilities. Cooking fuel uses further reflected environmental risks, as 86.4% relied on moderately polluting fuels and 6.5% on highly polluting ones, while just 7.1% used clean fuels. Although 72.6% of households had access to improved drinking water sources, 27.4% still relied on unimproved water sources (Table 3).

Table 3. Environmental health and sanitation related characteristics of respondents for the assessments of multilevel determinants of illness since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Variables Categories Unweighted Weighted
Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
Household has an insecticide treated bed net No 1,507 76.89 1,530 78.16
Yes 453 23.11 427 21.84
Types of toilets Improved 508 25.92 311 15.87
Unimproved 1,452 74.08 1,646 84.13
Cooking-fuel type Clean fuel 292 14.90 138 7.07
Moderately polluting fuel 1,568 80.00 1,691 86.43
Highly polluting fuel 100 5.10 127 6.50
Sources of drinking Improved 1,571 80.15 1, 421 72.64
Unimproved 389 19.85 535 27.36

weighted prevalence of infant illness in the first six weeks of life

Based on weighted data from 1,960 infants aged 5–9weeks, about 34.42% (95% CI: 30.23, 38.87) of infants experienced at least one illness episode since illness. In contrast, 65.58% (95% CI: 61.13, 69.77) of infants remained illness-free during this early infancy period.

The proportion illness on sociodemographic characteristics of respondents

The proportion of infants who experienced at least one illness since birth showed notable variation across maternal sociodemographic characteristics. Infants born to younger mothers aged 15–19 years had a relatively lower illness rate (33.2%) compared to those born to mothers aged 25–29 years (38.8%), while the lowest rate was observed among those aged 35–49 (30.3%). Rural infants experienced slightly higher illness prevalence (34.6%) than their urban counterparts (33.9%). Gender differences were evident, with male infants showing a higher illness rate (38.3%) compared to females (30.5%). Infants of currently married mothers had a slightly lower illness burden (34.3%) than those of unmarried or separated women (38.7%). Regional disparities were considerable, with Oromia reporting the lowest illness rate (30.3%) and Amhara (39.8%) and SNNPR (38.7%) the highest. Based on maternal education status, as infants of mothers with primary education had a lower illness rate (31.9%) than those whose mothers had no formal education (37.4%). Similarly, infant illness declined with increasing household wealth, from 43.2% in the poorest quintile to 29.3% in middle-income households. Regarding household food insecurity status, severely food-insecure households reported the highest infant illness (40.8%) compared to food-secure ones (31.3%). Moreover, multiparous mothers (1–4 births) having infants with lower illness rates (33.7%) than grand multiparas (36.8%) and nulliparas (37.4%). At the community level, higher maternal education (32.6%) and lower poverty (34.2%) had lower prevalence of illness compared to low education (39.1%) and high poverty settings (39.5%) (Table 4).

Table 4. The proportion of illness since birth across different categories of sociodemographic characteristics of respondents for the assessments of multilevel determinants of illness since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Serial
number
Variables Categories At least one illness
Frequency Percentage
Age category 15-19 78 33.16
20-24 150 31.33
25-29 221 38.76
30-34 135 35.81
35-49 90 30.34
Residence Urban 163 33.89
Rural 510 34.60
Gender of newborn Male 377 38.33
Female 297 30.48
Religion Orthodox 230 35.59
Protestant 205 35.91
Moslem/Muslim 230 32.66
Others (No religion/ non-believer/catholic 9 24.38
Marital status Currently married/living with man 655 34.32
Divorced/separated/not currently/single 19 38.65
Region Amhara 164 39.81
Oromia 310 30.25
SNNPR 166 38.73
Addis 34 36.84
School Never attended 228 37.42
Primary 290 31.88
Secondary 100 35.09
Technical & vocational 23 38.20
Higher 33 35.18
Household Food Insecurity Access category Food secure 281 31.28
Mildly Food Insecure Access 62 34.03
Moderately Food Insecure Access 222 36.57
Severely Food Insecure Access 109 40.76
Wealth quintile Poorest 163 43.18
Poor 145 36.21
Medium 113 29.27
Rich 131 33.04
Richest 122 30.69
Numbers of live birth Null para 80 37.38
Multi-para [1–4] 424 33.73
Grand multipara (>= 5) 131 36.82
Community education status Low education 215 39.10
High education 458 32.60
Community poverty status Low poverty 638 34.18
High poverty 35.7 39.50

The proportion illness on maternal and newborn care related characteristics of respondents

The proportion of infant illness since birth varied across maternal and newborn care related characteristics. Infants whose mothers had no antenatal care (ANC) visits experienced higher illness rates (37.4%) compared to those with 1–3 visits (34.4%) or four or more visits (32.0%). Early initiation of ANC (0–4 months) was slightly associated with lower illness (35.1%) than late initiation (38.3%). Tetanus vaccination during pregnancy showed a lower illness proportion (32.8%) among vaccinated mothers versus 37.8% among unvaccinated. Similar patterns were seen for weight measurement during ANC (32.9% vs. 37.8%). Infants from twin pregnancies experienced markedly higher illness (47.4%) compared to singletons (34.0%). Infants of mothers who were “very unhappy” or “sort of unhappy” for her pregnancy had higher illness rates (42.9% and 39.8%, respectively) compared to those who were “very happy” (33.9%). Likewise, negative partner reactions were associated with higher infant illness, particularly among “sort of unhappy” (48.7%) and “very unhappy” (40.5%) partners. Infants whose mothers experienced intimate partner violence had a higher illness rate (36.5%) than those who did not (33.4%). This study also found that infants of mother who received birth preparedness and complication readiness during her ANC had a notably lower illness rate (25.5%) than those infants’ mother who did not received birth preparedness and complication readiness service (34.6%). While place and type of delivery showed minimal variation, cesarean delivery was linked to higher infant illness (40.2%) versus their counterparts (34.3%). Illness was also more frequent among infants born from their mothers who had pregnancy complications (44.2%), delivery complications (42.1%), and postnatal complications (44.9%), compared to those without complications. Lastly, receipt of respectful maternity care did not show substantial differences in infant illness, with similar rates observed between recipients (35.2%) and non-recipients (34.2%) (Table 5).

Table 5. The proportion of illness since birth across different categories of maternal and newborn care related characteristics of respondents for the assessments of multilevel determinants of illness since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Variables Categories At least one illness
Frequency Percentage
Number of ANC visit No ANC visit 203 37.39
1-3 267 34.38
>=4 203 31.95
First ANC visit 0-4 months 233 35.08
5-9 months 340 62.61
No ANC visit 674 34.42
Discussed nutrition or diet during ANC No 327 33.11
Yes 213 35.35 |
Given tetanus injection during this pregnancy No 142 37.77
Yes 398 32.78
Consumed multi vitamins that contains iron during this pregnancy No 187 35.14
Yes 487 34.16
Consumed any drug for Intestinal worms during this pregnancy No 558 33.89
Yes 116 37.26
Weight taken as part of ANC No 123 37.81
Yes 417 32.97
Number of children in this pregnancy Single 647 34.04
twin 27 47.40
Pregnancy reaction Very happy 274 33.95
Sort of happy 200 31.39
Mixed happy & unhappy 69 36.50
Sort of unhappy 86 39.75
Very unhappy 45 42.91
Partner pregnancy reaction Very happy 313 33.51
Sort of happy 243 33.79
Mixed happy & unhappy 37 32.86
Sort of unhappy 40 48.65
Very unhappy 34 40.45
Intimate partner violence No violence 503 33.44
Violence 66 36.50
Birth preparedness & complication readiness No 514 34.55
Yes 26 25.49
Place of delivery Home 255 34.41
governmental 14 60.19
Private 9 39.81
Other 5 50
NGO/faith-based health facility 4 39.88
Health facility delivery Home 255 34.41
Health facility 1283 65.58
Skilled delivery Not skilled 258 34.49
Skilled 415 34.41
Delivered by cesarian section No 65.92 629
Yes 45 40.18
Complication during pregnancy No complication occurred 294 26.81
Complication occurred 373 44.16
Any Delivery complication No 399 30.61
Yes 275 42.10
Post delivery complication Not post-delivery complication 418 30.20
At least have one post-delivery complication 253 44.85
Respectful maternity care Not received respectful maternity care 392 34.17
Received respectful maternity care 20 35.23

The proportion illness on environmental health and sanitation related characteristics of respondents

Infants from households without insecticide-treated bed nets had a lower illness rate (32.4%) than those with nets (41.7%). Use of unimproved toilets was associated with a slightly higher illness rate (34.8%) compared to improved toilets (32.2%). Households using highly polluting cooking fuels had the highest infant illness (41.7%), followed by moderately polluting fuels (34.0%), while clean fuel use was linked to lower illness (32.5%). Notably, infants in households with unimproved drinking water sources experienced significantly more illness (44.1%) than those with improved sources (30.8%), highlighting the impact of poor sanitation and unsafe water on early childhood health (Table 6).

Table 6. The proportion of illness since birth across different categories environmental health and sanitation related characteristics of respondents for the assessments of multilevel determinants of illness since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Variables Categories At least one illness
Frequency Percentage
Household has an insecticide treated bed net No 496 32.39
Yes 178 41.69
Types of toilets Improved 100 32.22
Unimproved 574 34.84
Cooking-fuel type Clean fuel 45 32.53
Moderately polluting fuel 376 34.03
Highly polluting fuel 53 41.67
Sources of drinking Improved 438 30.81
Unimproved 236 44.08

Random effect analysis

The null model, without covariates, showed substantial clustering of infant illness at both the enumeration area (EA) and postpartum mother levels, with variances of 3.20 and 8.16 respectively, and a combined intra-cluster correlation (ICC) of 77.5%. The median odds ratios (MOR) indicated strong heterogeneity, particularly at the mother level (MOR = 15.3) and overall (MOR = 24.9). Model 1, which included individual level predictors, substantially reduced variance at both EA (to 1.09) and mother levels (to 2.35), lowering combined clustering (ICC) to 51.1%. This model explained about 69.7% of the total variance (PCV), indicating improved fit, supported by lower AIC and BIC values. Model 2, incorporating community level predictor, showed higher variances similar to the null model (EA variance 2.98, mother variance 8.18), with clustering effects close to the null model (combined ICC 77.2%) and minimal variance reduction (PCV around 1.7%), suggesting limited explanatory power of these variables alone. Model 3, the full model with all covariates, again reduced variance and clustering substantially (EA variance 1.03, mother variance 2.52, combined ICC 52.0%), with PCV around 69%, similar to Model 1. Median odds ratios reflected reduced heterogeneity (MOR around 2.6 for EA and 4.5 for mother level).

Overall, the analysis indicates that a large portion of variation in infant illness is explained by individual- and community-level factors, with significant clustering at both enumeration area and maternal levels. Sociodemographic and maternal characteristics substantially reduce unexplained variance, whereas community level factors alone contribute less. The final full model (Model 3) was identified as the optimal model based on a comprehensive evaluation of model fit indices and variance components. Considering key metrics such as AIC, BIC, deviance, proportional change in variance (PCV), intra-cluster correlations (ICCs), and median odds ratios (MORs), Model 3 demonstrated superior performance. It had the lowest AIC (1258.30) and deviance (591.15), the highest PCV (68.69%), the lowest combined ICC (51.95%), and a reduced MOR (6.04). These results indicate that Model 3 offers the best fit, explains the greatest amount of variance, and effectively minimizes unexplained heterogeneity compared to the null model and other candidate models (Table 7).

Table 7. Random effect analysis and model fit statistics for the assessments of multilevel determinants of illness since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Parameter Null model Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Random Effects Variance (95% CI)
Enumeration area level variance 3.196(95%CI: 1.409, 7.249) 1.088 (95% CI:.485, 2.444) 2.980(95% CI: 1.313, 6.767) 1.032(95%CI:.453, 2.351)
Postpartum mother level variance within enumeration area 8.161(95%CI:3.194, 20.854) 2.353 (95% CI:.615, 9.001) 8.182(95% CI: 3.250, 20.597) 2.524(95% CI:.686, 9.293)
Total cluster level variance 11.357(95%CI: 4.603, 28.103) 3.441(95% CI: 1.100, 11.445) 11.162(95% CI: 4.563, 27.363) 3.556(95%CI: 1.139,11.644)
Intracluster Correlation Coefficient (ICC, %)
ICC at enumeration area level (%) 21.82% (95% CI: 16.18, 28.75) 16.17% (95% CI: 10.05, 24.98) 20.62% (95%:15.28, 27.24) 15.08% (95%CI:9.26, 23.59)
ICC at postpartum mother level (%) 55.72% (95% CI:23.26, 81.64) 34.96% (95%, 12.32, 67.24) 56.62% (95% CI: 34.15, 76.66) 36.87(95%CI: 13.68, 68.26)
Combined Clustering Effect (EA + Postpartum mother level) (%) 77.54% (95% CI: 58.72, 89.34) 51.13% (95% CI: 25.45, 76.22) 77.24% (95%CI:58.48, 89.10) 51.95% (95% CI: 26.19, 76.71)
Median Odds Ratio (MOR, 95% CI)
MOR at enumeration area level 5.50 (95%CI:3.10, 13.04) 2.71(95% CI: 1.94, 4.44) 5.19(95%:2.98, 11.96) 2.64(95% CI: 1.90, 4.32)
MOR at postpartum mother level 15.26(95% CI: 5.50, 77.95) 4.32(95% CI: 2.11, 17.49) 15.31(95%CI: 5.58, 75.87) 4.55(95% CI:2.20, 18.32)
Overall MOR (EA + Postpartum women level) 24.89(95% CI: 7.74, 157.08) 5.87(95% CI: 2.72, 25.20) 24.21(95% CI:7.67, 146.90) 6.04(95%: 2.77, 25.92)
Proportional Change in Variance (PCV, %)
PCV at enumeration area level Reference 65.95% (95%CI: 65.62, 66.28) 6.75% (95%: 6.85 to 6.65) 67.71% (95%CI:67.84, 67.57)
PCV at postpartum mother level Reference 71.17% (95%CI: (80.73, 56.84) −0.25% (95%CI:
−1.75, 1.23)
69.07% (95%CI: 78.54, 55.44) `
Overall PCV Reference 69.70% (95% CI: 76.12,59.27) 1.72% (95% CI:0.88, 2.63) 68.69% (95% CI:75.26, 58.57)
Model Fit Indices
AIC 2258.929 1259.45 2258.72 1258.30
BIC 2275.671 1435.77 2292.21 1449.74
Deviance
(−2loglikelihood)
1126.4645 594.73 1123.36 591.15

Note that: AIC = Akaike Information Criterion, BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion, CI = Confidence Interval, ICC = Intracluster Correlation Coefficient, MOR = Median Odds Ratio, PCV = Proportional Change in Variance

Bivariable analysis and multivariable analysis of predictors and presence of any illness since birth

Based on the bivariable analysis, variables with a p-value ≤ 0.25 that were included in the final multivariable multilevel binary logistic regression model comprised maternal age, gender of the newborn, religion, and region; wealth quintile; number of antenatal care visits; receiving tetanus injection during pregnancy; consuming medication for intestinal worms during ANC; and having weight measured as part of ANC. Additionally, factors such as the number of fetuses in the current pregnancy, the mother’s emotional response to the pregnancy, the partner’s reaction, birth preparedness and complication readiness, cesarean delivery, and the presence of complications during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period were all taken into account. Furthermore, initiation of breastfeeding within one hour, household use of insecticide-treated bed nets, cooking fuel type, and sources of drinking water were also included in the final model (Table 8).

Table 8. Bivariable analysis of each independent variable with presence of any illness since birth for the assessments of multilevel determinants of illness of infants since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Predicator variables Categories Crude odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval P value
Age of mother in years 15-19 Reference
20-24 1.11(95%: 0.48, 2.54) 0.81
25-29 1.85(95%: 0.80, 4.27) 0.15
30-34 1.21(95%: 0.49, 3.01) 0.68
35-49 0.83(95%: 0.32,2.13 0) 0.70
Residence Urban Reference
Rural 0.94(95%:0.46, 1.95) 0.88
Gender of newborn Male Reference
Female 0.41(95%: 0.25, 0.65) <0.001
Religion Orthodox Reference
Protestant 0.84(95%: 0.46, 1.54) 0.57
Moslem/Muslim 0.86(95%: 0.41, 1.83) 0.70
Others (No religion/ non-believer or catholic 0.35(95%: 0.05, 2.23) 0.26
Marital status Currently married/living with man Reference
Divorced/separated/not currently/single 1.38(95%: 0.34, 5.70) 0.65
Region Amhara Reference
Oromia 0.34(95%: 0.13, 0.88) 0.03
SNNPR 0.76(95%: 0.26, 2.23) 0.62
Addis Ababa 0.78(95%: 0.28, 2.21) 0.64
Educational status Never attended Reference
Primary 0.82(95%: 0.48, 1.43) 0.49
Secondary 1.17(95%: 0.57, 2.38) 0.67
Technical & vocational 1.19(95%: 0.44, 3.22) 0.73
Higher 0.98(95%: 0.41, 2.32) 0.97
Household Food Insecurity Access category Food secure Reference
Mildly Food Insecure Access 1.12(95%:0.50, 2.50) 0.79
Moderately Food Insecure Access 1.38(95%:0.72, 2.65) 0.33
Severely Food Insecure Access 1.72(95%: 0.79, 3.77) 0.17
Wealth quintile Poorest Reference
Poor 0.72(95%: 0.31, 1.69) 0.45
Medium 0.41(95%: 0.16, 1.05) 0.06
Rich 0.46(95%:0.17,1.27) 0.14
Richest 0.34(95%: 0.12, 0.98) 0.05
Numbers of live birth Null para Reference
Multi-para [1–4] 0.82(95%: 0.42, 1.62) 0.57
Grand multipara (>= 5) 1.10(95%:0.48, 2.55) 0.82
Community education status Low education Reference
High education 0.87(95%: 0.42, 1.81) 0.71
Community poverty status Low poverty Reference
High poverty 1.16(95%: 0.18, 7.58) 0.87
Number of ANC visit No ANC visit Reference
1-3 0.94(95%: 0.53, 1.68) 0.84
>=4 0.70(95%: 0.38, 1.31) 0.27
First ANC visit 0-4 months Reference
5-9 months 0.97(95%:0.53, 1.78) 0.59
No ANC visit 1.18(95%:0.65, 2.15) 0.92
Discussed nutrition or diet during ANC No Reference
Yes 1.10(95%: 0.63, 1.93) 0.73
Given tetanus injection during this pregnancy No Reference
Yes 0.59(95%: 0.33, 1.06) 0.08
Consumed multi vitamins that contains iron during this pregnancy No Reference
Yes 0.95(95%: 0.54, 1.66) 0.86
Consumed any drug for Intestinal worms during this pregnancy No Reference
Yes 1.47(95%: 0.75, 2.86) 0.26
Respectful maternity care Received Reference
Not received 0.92(95%: 0.39, 2.14) 0.84
Weight taken as part of ANC No Reference
Yes 0.67(95%: 0.35, 1.29) 0.23
Number of children in this pregnancy Single Reference
Twin 4.27(95%: 0.93, 19.49) 0.06
Pregnancy reaction Very happy Reference
Sort of happy 0.64(95%: 0.37, 1.14) 0.13
Mixed happy & unhappy 1.49(95%: 0.63, 3.50) 0.36
Sort of unhappy 1.41(95%: 0.60, 3.32) 0.43
Very unhappy 2.97(95%: 1.01, 8.72) 0.05
Partner pregnancy reaction Very happy Reference
Sort of happy 1.01(95%: 0.61, 1.66) 0.98
Mixed happy & unhappy 1.22(95%: 0.44, 3.38) 0.71
Sort of unhappy 3.65(95%:1.06, 12.56) 0.04
Very unhappy 0.98(95%: 0.22, 4.33) 0.98
Intimate partner violence No Reference
Yes 1.23(95%: 0.50, 3.04) 0.65
Birth preparedness & complication readiness No Reference
Yes 0.37(95%: 0.13, 1.02) 0.05
Health facility delivery Home Reference
Health facility 1.12(95%: 0.63, 1.99) 0.69
Skilled delivery Not skilled Reference
Skilled 1.12(95%: 0.63, 1.96) 0.71
Delivered by cesarian section No Reference
Yes 1.65(95%: 0.99, 2.76) 0.06
Complication during pregnancy No complication occurred Reference
Complication occurred 4.47(95%: 2.18, 9.19) <0.001
Any Delivery complication No Reference
Yes 2.38(95%: 1.33, 4.25) <0.001
Post delivery complication No post-delivery complication Reference
At least have one post-delivery complication 3.72(95%: 1.85,7.48) <0.001
Baby wrapped after birth No Reference
Yes 0.73(95%:0.24, 2.21) 0.57
Baby placed naked on mother’s chest immediately No Reference
Yes 0.76(95%: 0.47, 1.23) 0.27
Applied substances cord care Inappropriate Reference
Appropriate 1.20(95%: 0.71, 2.05) 0.49
Bathing time since birth Early bathing Reference
Delayed bathing 0.83(95%: 0.50, 1.38) 0.47
Initiation of breast feeding Greater than 1hour Reference
Within 1 hour 1.63(95%: 0.91, 2.92) 0.10
HH has an insecticide treated bed net No Reference
Yes 1.86(95%: 1.06,3.26) 0.03
Types of toilets Improved Reference
Unimproved 1.27(95%: 0.66, 2.44) 0.47
Cooking-fuel type used by household Clean fuel Reference
Moderately polluting fuel 1.51(95%: 0.65, 3.52) 0.34
Highly polluting fuel 2.76(95%: 0.66, 11.49) 0.16
Sources of drinking Improved Reference
Unimproved 2.03(95%: 0.98, 4.20) 0.06

Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis

In the final multivariable multilevel binary logistic regression model, several factors were significantly associated with infant illness since birth. Female infants were 47% less likely to experience illness compared to male infants (AOR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.82), suggesting a protective effect of female gender against early-life illnesses. Infants born to mothers who had complications during pregnancy had 89% higher odds of illness (AOR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.20), indicating that maternal health complications during pregnancy substantially increase the risk of infant illness. Moreover, maternal post-delivery complications were associated with more than a twofold increase in the odds of infant illness (AOR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.27, 4.27), highlighting the critical impact of postpartum maternal health on infant outcomes. Surprisingly, infants from households owning insecticide-treated bed nets showed 81% higher odds of illness (AOR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.96), which may reflect underlying confounding factors such as higher exposure to disease vectors in these households or increased reporting in such settings. Other variables including region, birth preparedness, cesarean delivery, and source of drinking water were not statistically significant in the adjusted model, indicating their limited independent effect on infant illness after controlling for other factors. These findings emphasize the importance of maternal health before and after delivery and gender differences in infant vulnerability, while also suggesting a need to further explore environmental and behavioral factors influencing illness risk (Table 9).

Table 9. Multivariable analysis of each predictor variable with absence or presence of any illness since birth for the assessments of multilevel determinants of any illness since birth in Ethiopia: Evidence on Cohort 2 PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal survey (2021-2023).

Predictors Categories Null model
(with no predictors)
Model 1:
(Only individual level
Predictors)
Model 2
(only community level predictor)
Model 3
(Both individual and community level predictors)
Age category 15-19 Reference
20-24 1.12(0.53, 2.34) 1.09(0.51, 2.33)
25-29 1.43(0.63, 3.21) 1.36(0.59, 3.10)
30-34 0.75(0.34, 1.63) 0.69(0.31, 1.53)
35-49 0.44(0.16, 1.22) 0.40(0.14, 1.13)
Gender of newborn Male Reference
Female 0.55(0.36, 0.83) *** 0.53(0.35, 0.82) ***
Region Amhara Reference
Oromia 0.34(0.13, 0.88) 0.62(0.30, 1.28)
SNNPR 0.76(0.26, 2.23) 0.90(0.38, 2.09)
Addis Ababa 0.78(0.28, 2.21) 2.73(0.90, 8.22)
Household Food Insecurity Access category Food secure Reference
Mildly Food Insecure Access 0.89(0.43, 1.85) 0.86(0.42, 1.80)
Moderately Food Insecure Access 1.10(0.59, 2.08) 1.05(0.56, 2.00)
Severely Food Insecure Access 1.59(0.80, 3.13) 1.54(0.78, 3.05)
Wealth quintile Poorest
Poor 1.43(0.55, 3.72) 1.37(0.52, 3.58)
Medium 0.74(0.29, 1.88) 0.72(0.28, 1.87)
Rich 1.13(0.49, 2.61) 1.14(0.48, 2.68)
Richest 0.66(0.27, 1.58) 0.59(0.24, 1.44)
Given tetanus injection during this pregnancy No Reference
Yes 0.80(0.48, 1.31) 0.79
Weight taken as part of ANC No Reference
Yes 0.99 (0.48, 2.04) 0.91(0.44, 1.92)
Number of children in this pregnancy Single Reference
Twin 2.79(0.70, 11.07) 2.94(0.72, 12.03)
Pregnancy reaction Very happy Reference
Sort of happy 0.60(0.33, 1.11) 0.60(0.32, 1.13)
Mixed happy & unhappy 1.14(0.45, 2.87) 1.17(0.45, 3.00)
Sort of unhappy 0.66(0.23, 1.91) 0.67(0.23, 1.97)
Very unhappy 1.16(0.30, 4.55) 1.26(0.32, 5.03)
Partner or husband pregnancy reaction Very happy Reference
Sort of happy 1.40 (0.78, 2.48) 1.38(0.77, 2.48)
Mixed happy & unhappy 1.34(0.49, 3.64) 1.38(0.50, 3.83)
Sort of unhappy 2.43(0.56, 10.59) 2.42(0.56, 10.55)
Very unhappy 0.67(0.17, 2.59) 0.64(0.16, 2.53)
Birth preparedness & complication readiness No Reference
Yes 0.53(0.22, 1.27) 0.49(0.20, 1.20)
Delivered by cesarian section No Reference
Yes 1.54(0.79, 3.02) 1.45(0.73, 2.88)
Complication during pregnancy No complication occurred Reference
occurred complication 1.86(1.11, 3.10) * 1.89(1.11, 3.20) *
Any Delivery complication No Reference
Yes 1.28(0.82, 1.99) 1.30 (0.82, 2.04)
Post delivery complication Not any delivery complication Reference
At least have one post-delivery complication 2.32(1.28, 4.21) * 2.33(1.27, 4.27) *
Household has an insecticide treated bed net No Reference
Yes 1.72(1.07, 2.77) * 1.81(1.10, 2.96) *
Cooking-fuel type used by household Clean fuel Reference
Moderately polluting fuel 0.94(0.43, 2.04) 1.40(0.60, 3.27)
Highly polluting fuel 1.66(0.43, 6.41) 2.35(0.57, 9.73)
Sources of drinking Improved Reference
Unimproved 1.19(0.57, 2.47) 1.18(0.56, 2.48)
Fixed effect intercept 0.23(0.11, 0.46) *** 0.30(0.07, 1.27) 0.37(0.16, 0.83) * 0.28(0.06, 1.37)

Note that: *=P value<0.05, **= P value<0.01, ***= indicates P value <0.001.

Discussion

In this study, which utilized weighted data from 1,960 infants aged 5–9 weeks, approximately one in three (34.42%; 95% CI: 30.23–38.87) had experienced at least one episode of illness since birth. This notably high prevalence highlights a substantial burden of early-life morbidity during a critical window when infants are particularly susceptible due to immature immune systems, increased exposure to environmental pathogens, and potential gaps in maternal and newborn care services.

The prevalence found in our study (34.42%) exceeds the 27.8% reported in an earlier study from Northwest Ethiopia [16]. This discrepancy may reflect regional or temporal variations in disease burden, differences in health service utilization, or methodological factors such as differences in sample age, data collection period, illness definition, or weighting approaches. Furthermore, it may suggest a possible increase in early infant morbidity over time, warranting closer monitoring and targeted public health interventions. Comparatively, data from the 2021 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) show that among children under five, 21.7% had symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI), 12.1% had diarrhea, and 14.8% had fever in the two weeks preceding the survey [3]. While the EDHS Figs refer to slightly older children and a shorter recall period, they still point to a persistently high burden of infectious illnesses among young children in Ethiopia. Our findings, focusing on a younger cohort, emphasize that health vulnerabilities may begin much earlier in infancy. The elevated illness burden observed in this study underscores the pressing need for strengthened postnatal care, early identification of risk factors, and improved maternal health services. These efforts are crucial for addressing preventable infant morbidity and mortality and for accelerating progress toward Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2, which aims to reduce neonatal mortality to 12 or fewer deaths per 1,000 live births by 2030 [2,35]. Without targeted intervention strategies, Ethiopia may struggle to meet this global benchmark.

Further comparisons with other studies also provide important context. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in Ethiopia reported a pooled prevalence of neonatal sepsis at 45% [36], which is higher than the illness prevalence found in our study. Similarly, a hospital-based study in Shashemene, Ethiopia, reported a strikingly high prevalence of neonatal sepsis at 77.9% [37], likely due to the clinical setting and higher-risk population being studied. On the other hand, our prevalence was higher than that reported in a study using EDHS data, which found the prevalence of ARI among under-five children to be 8.4% [38], again underscoring the increased susceptibility in early infancy.

Additional studies have reported varying rates of neonatal conditions: a study in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia found the prevalence of neonatal jaundice among admitted neonates to be 38.8% [39], while a similar study in Dhaka, Bangladesh reported an even higher rate of 69.35% [40]. In contrast, the prevalence of perinatal asphyxia among newborns delivered at Saad Abuelela Maternity Hospital in Sudan was found to be relatively lower at 11.3% [41]. Collectively, these findings indicate that early infancy remains a period of high vulnerability, with varying prevalence of specific neonatal illnesses across regions and settings. The relatively high burden identified in our study highlights the urgent need for strengthened postnatal care, early screening for neonatal illnesses, and improved maternal health services. Such interventions are critical for reducing preventable morbidity and mortality and achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2, which targets reducing neonatal mortality to 12 or fewer deaths per 1,000 live births by 2030 [2,35]. Without sustained and targeted public health efforts, Ethiopia may face significant challenges in meeting this global benchmark.

A significant gender disparity was observed in this study, with female infants exhibiting 47% lower odds of illness compared to males (AOR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.35–0.82). This finding is biologically plausible and consistent with global evidence suggesting that male infants are more vulnerable to early-life illnesses due to several physiological and developmental factors. Biologically, female neonates tend to have more robust immune responses than males, influenced by hormonal and genetic differences. Estrogen enhances both innate and adaptive immunity, while testosterone can have immunosuppressive effects [42]. Furthermore, male infants are at a developmental disadvantage, with slower lung maturation and higher susceptibility to respiratory conditions, sepsis, and other infections [43,44]. These biological distinctions are evident in observed epidemiological trends. Studies have consistently shown higher rates of neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality among males. For example, a large-scale meta-analysis by Mondal et al. (2014) [45] confirmed that male newborns face significantly higher risks of infections and related complications. Similarly, evidence from Ethiopia also indicates that male infants have increased odds of neonatal death and illness (Tura et al., 2014) [46]. The Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) supports this trend, with slightly higher reported prevalence of common childhood illnesses such as acute respiratory infections, fever, and diarrhea among male children under five, although not always statistically significant. Overall, the observed gender difference in illness prevalence in this study likely reflects inherent biological vulnerabilities in male infants rather than differences in care-seeking or health service access. This underscores the need for heightened clinical vigilance and targeted interventions to reduce preventable illness in this higher-risk group. On the contrary, another study conducted in Burundi revealed that the proportion of under-five hospitalizations that were neonatal was higher among girls than they were among boys: early neonatal infection, prematurity, fetal acute and lung disease [47].

This study found that infants born to mothers who experienced pregnancy-related complications had 89% higher odds of illness (AOR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.11–3.20), highlighting the substantial influence of maternal health during pregnancy on early neonatal outcomes. Pregnancy-related complications such as hypertensive disorders, antepartum hemorrhage, infections, and gestational diabetes can adversely affect fetal development and compromise neonatal immune function. These conditions are often associated with preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, and low birth weight, all of which are well-established risk factors for early-life illness and mortality [48,49]. Maternal complications can also impair placental function, leading to reduced nutrient and oxygen transfer to the fetus, thereby affecting the infant’s ability to mount an adequate immune response postnatally [50]. Furthermore, the intergenerational link between maternal and infant health has been emphasized in global health frameworks, such as the WHO’s continuum of care model, which advocates for integrated maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) interventions to improve survival and well-being across the life course [51].

Similarly, mothers who experienced postpartum complications had more than twice the odds of having an ill infant compared to those without such complications (AOR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.27–4.27), highlighting the critical role of postpartum care in safeguarding early neonatal health. This finding underscores the critical importance of timely and comprehensive postpartum care in promoting early neonatal health. The possible justification for this finding might be due to Postpartum complications such as postpartum infections (e.g., endometritis), hemorrhage, severe anemia, and sepsis, can impair a mother’s physical ability to provide adequate newborn care, including breastfeeding, hygiene, and timely health-seeking. Disrupted maternal care routines in the immediate postpartum period increase the infant’s vulnerability to infectious diseases [52]. Additionally, postpartum illness is a known barrier to exclusive breastfeeding, which is crucial for enhancing infant immunity and protecting against early-life infections [53]. A plausible explanation for the increased risk of infant illness among mothers with postpartum complications is the limited utilization of early postnatal care in settings like Ethiopia. With only 17% of mothers receiving a check-up within the first 48 hours after delivery (EDHS 2016), contributing to missed opportunities for managing complications that affect both mother and child [54].

An unexpected finding was the significantly higher odds of illness among infants residing in households that owned insecticide-treated bed nets (AOR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.10–2.96). While this appears paradoxical, it likely reflects several confounding factors. Households owning ITNs often reside in malaria-endemic or high-risk environments that are also burdened by poor sanitation, limited healthcare access, and high child morbidity. Moreover, net ownership does not ensure proper or consistent use, infants may be excluded from coverage due to sleeping arrangements, cultural practices, or worn-out nets. Pulford et al. (2011) highlighted substantial gaps between ITN ownership and actual use, especially for infants [55]. Additionally, households with ITNs may be more health-aware and thus more likely to recognize and report illness, introducing potential reporting bias [54]. These findings suggest that ITN ownership may serve as a proxy for environmental risk and health awareness rather than a direct cause of increased infant illness, warranting further investigation into actual usage patterns and contextual exposures.

Strength and limitation of study

This study’s strength lies in its use of weighted, nationally representative data from 1,960 infants aged 5–9 weeks, which enhances the generalizability of the findings to the broader Ethiopian population. Moreover, the analysis appropriately accounted for the complex, hierarchical structure of the data, recognizing that multiple infants may be clustered within the same mother, and mothers themselves are nested within enumeration areas, by applying advanced statistical techniques. This multilevel approach improves the precision and validity of the estimated associations by adjusting for intra-cluster correlation and reducing potential bias. However, reliance on maternal recall to report the presence or absence of infant illness may introduce recall or reporting bias. Additionally, survivor bias cannot be ruled out, as the study includes only infants who survived to at least five weeks of age, potentially underestimating the true burden of early-life illness.

Conclusion

This study revealed that over one-third of infants aged 5–9 weeks experienced at least one illness episode since birth, underscoring a substantial burden of early-life morbidity. Female infants had significantly lower odds of illness, suggesting a potential biological advantage in early immunity. In contrast, experiencing complications during pregnancy and the postpartum period was associated with higher odds of infant illness since birth, emphasizing the crucial need for integrated maternal care throughout pregnancy, delivery, and the postnatal period. The unexpected association between insecticide-treated bed net ownership and higher infant illness may point to contextual confounders such as greater disease exposure or differential reporting patterns. These findings call for targeted maternal health interventions and further investigation into household-level environmental and behavioral factors influencing neonatal health.

Based on the study findings, we recommend strengthening maternal health services across the continuum of care by improving the early identification and management of pregnancy-related complications, and providing comprehensive postpartum follow-up. Given the increased vulnerability of male infants to early-life illness, integrating neonatal risk screening into routine care is essential. The unexpected association between insecticide-treated bed net ownership and infant illness highlights the need for further research into environmental and behavioral factors influencing newborn health. Additionally, enhancing community education on maternal and newborn care, proper ITN use, hygiene, and early illness recognition can empower caregivers and improve outcomes. These insights should guide policymakers to design context-specific, gender-sensitive interventions that address both clinical and environmental determinants of neonatal morbidity.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Ethiopia project for granting access to the data utilized in this study.

Abbreviations

AIC

Akaike’s Information Criterion

ANC

Ante Natal Care Visit

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

COR

Crude Odds Ratio

BIC

Bayesian Information Criterion

CI

Confidence Interval

ICC

Intraclass Correlation Coefficient

IPV

Intimate Partner Violence

MOR

Median Odds Ratio

PCV

Proportional Change in Variance

PMA

Performance Monitoring Action

Data Availability

The data underlying this study are third-party data from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA)-Ethiopia Longitudinal Survey (2021–2023). The datasets are openly available and were accessed from the PMA website (https://www.pmadata.org/data/available-datasets), which provides free, public access to PMA datasets through the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Data Repository. No registration or special access privileges were required. All interested researchers can access the same data to replicate the findings of this study.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Csace I. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Howden-Chapman P, Siri J, Chisholm E, Chapman R, Doll CN, Capon A. SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote wellbeing for all at all ages. A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation. Paris, France: International Council for Science. 2017:81–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geldsetzer P, Williams TC, Kirolos A, Mitchell S, Ratcliffe LA, Kohli-Lynch MK, et al. The recognition of and care seeking behaviour for childhood illness in developing countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization P. Child mortality (under 5 years). 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Unicef W. Ending preventable child deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea by 2025: the integrated global action plan for pneumonia and diarrhoea (GAPPD). Geneva: WHO & UNICEF. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.UNICEF W. Diarrhoea remains a leading killer of young children, despite the availability of a simple treatment solution. UNICEF. 2016. https://www.unicef.org/reports/diarrhoea-remains-leading-killer-young-children [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2151–61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prasad N, Sharples KJ, Murdoch DR, Crump JA. Community prevalence of fever and relationship with malaria among infants and children in low-resource areas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(1):178–80. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sands R, Shanmugavadivel D, Stephenson T, Wood D. Medical problems presenting to paediatric emergency departments: 10 years on. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(5):379–82. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.106229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Teferi M, Desta M, Yeshitela B, Beyene T, Cruz Espinoza LM, Im J, et al. Acute Febrile Illness Among Children in Butajira, South-Central Ethiopia During the Typhoid Fever Surveillance in Africa Program. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Suppl 6):S483–91. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu L, Hill K, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Cousens S. Levels and causes of mortality under age five years. Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. 2016;11:71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia], ICFI. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2021. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ICF International. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chilot D, Diress M, Yismaw Gela Y, Sinamaw D, Simegn W, Andualem AA, et al. Geographical variation of common childhood illness and its associated factors among under-five children in Ethiopia: spatial and multilevel analysis. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):868. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27728-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morag I, Okrent AL, Strauss T, Staretz-Chacham O, Kuint J, Simchen MJ, et al. Early neonatal morbidities and associated modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors in a cohort of infants born at 34-35 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(8):876–82. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.938043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Morag I, L OA, Tzipora S, S-C O, Jacob K, SM J. Early neonatal morbidities and associated modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors in a cohort of infants born at 34–35 weeks of gestation. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2015;28(8):876–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Delele TG, Biks GA, Abebe SM, Kebede ZT. Prevalence of common symptoms of neonatal illness in Northwest Ethiopia: A repeated measure cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Takele K, Zewotir T, Ndanguza D. Risk factors of morbidity among children under age five in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7273-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chilot D, Belay DG, Shitu K, Mulat B, Alem AZ, Geberu DM. Prevalence and associated factors of common childhood illnesses in sub-Saharan Africa from 2010 to 2020: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(11):e065257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Demoze L, Dessie A, Azanaw J, Yitageasu G, Asrat K, Gizaw Z. Comorbidity of diarrhea and respiratory infection symptoms, and associated factors among under-five children in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Ital J Pediatr. 2025;51(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13052-025-01866-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lindtjørn B, Alemu T, Bjorvatn B. Child health in arid areas of Ethiopia: longitudinal study of the morbidity in infectious diseases. Scand J Infect Dis. 1992;24(3):369–77. doi: 10.3109/00365549209061345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.for AAUSoPHaTWHGIfPaRHaTJHBSoPHPM.
  • 22.Zimmerman L, Desta S, Yihdego M, Rogers A, Amogne A, Karp C, et al. Protocol for PMA-Ethiopia: A new data source for cross-sectional and longitudinal data of reproductive, maternal, and newborn health. Gates Open Res. 2020;4:126. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13161.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shone M, Demissie T, Yohannes B, Yohannis M. Household food insecurity and associated factors in West Abaya district, Southern Ethiopia, 2015. Agriculture & Food Security. 2017;6:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Coates J, Swindale A, Bilinsky P. Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: indicator guide: version 3. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Heeringa SG, West BT, Heeringa SG, Berglund PA. Applied survey data analysis: chapman and hall/CRC; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vrieze SI. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychol Methods. 2012;17(2):228–43. doi: 10.1037/a0027127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Larsen K, Merlo J. Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(1):81–8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(4):290–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Snijders TA, Bosker R. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling. Using Stata. 2 ed. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lenz ST. Categorical data analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hox J, Moerbeek M, Van de Schoot R. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu S, Crespi CM, Wong WK. Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(5):869–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Larsen K, Petersen JH, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Endahl L. Interpreting parameters in the logistic regression model with random effects. Biometrics. 2000;56(3):909–14. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00909.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hug L, Alexander M, You D, Alkema L, UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(6):e710–20. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30163-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Assemie MA, Alene M, Yismaw L, Ketema DB, Lamore Y, Petrucka P, et al. Prevalence of Neonatal Sepsis in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Pediatr. 2020;2020:6468492. doi: 10.1155/2020/6468492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Getabelew A, Aman M, Fantaye E, Yeheyis T. Prevalence of Neonatal Sepsis and Associated Factors among Neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Selected Governmental Hospitals in Shashemene Town, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, 2017. Int J Pediatr. 2018;2018:7801272. doi: 10.1155/2018/7801272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Merera A, Asena T, Senbeta M. Bayesian multilevel analysis of determinants of acute respiratory infection in children under the age of five years in Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03187-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zelelew AM, Tafere TZ, Jemberie SM, Belay GM. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Jaundice Among Neonates Admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units at Public Specialized Hospitals in Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia. Glob Pediatr Health. 2024;11. doi: 10.1177/2333794X241286739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nyma Z, Rahman M, Hasan SMM, Roby NU, Khanam F, Alam ME, et al. Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Sepsis among Neonates Admitted into Neonatal Intensive Care Units of Public Hospitals in Dhaka. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7461. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alfaifi J, Ahmed MA, Almutairi GS, Alhumaidi NH, AlHabardi N, Adam I. Prevalence of perinatal asphyxia and its associated factors among live birth in Khartoum, Sudan: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2025;25(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05499-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(10):626–38. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Koke C, Kanesaki T, Grosshans J, Schwarz US, Dunlop CM. A computational model of nuclear self-organisation in syncytial embryos. J Theor Biol. 2014;359:92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fischer J, Jung N, Robinson N, Lehmann C. Sex differences in immune responses to infectious diseases. Infection. 2015;43(4):399–403. doi: 10.1007/s15010-015-0791-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mondal D, Galloway TS, Bailey TC, Mathews F. Elevated risk of stillbirth in males: systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 30 million births. BMC Med. 2014;12:220. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0220-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tura G, Fantahun M, Worku A. The effect of health facility delivery on neonatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Moise IK. Causes of Morbidity and Mortality among Neonates and Children in Post-Conflict Burundi: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study. Children (Basel). 2018;5(9):125. doi: 10.3390/children5090125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee ACC, Waiswa P, et al. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):189–205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3027–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kerber KJ, de Graft-Johnson JE, Bhutta ZA, Okong P, Starrs A, Lawn JE. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1358–69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lassi ZS, Das JK, Salam RA, Bhutta ZA. Evidence from community level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings. Reprod Health. 2014;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.CSAo E. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pulford J, Hetzel MW, Bryant M, Siba PM, Mueller I. Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature. Malar J. 2011;10:83. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jianhong Zhou

14 Nov 2025

Dear Dr. Delie,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please note that we have only been able to secure a single reviewer to assess your manuscript. We are issuing a decision on your manuscript at this point to prevent further delays in the evaluation of your manuscript. Please be aware that the editor who handles your revised manuscript might find it necessary to invite additional reviewers to assess this work once the revised manuscript is submitted. However, we will aim to proceed on the basis of this single review if possible.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 28 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jianhong Zhou

Staff Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf .

2. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

3. Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

5. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Thank you for your good work. Now I have attached the comment below.

In Abstract: The results section mentioned the uniformity, some of the sentences used percentages and some of areas use times; is better to maintain the uniformity.

/line 54-56 include the citation.

The research gap or statement of the problem was not identified properly.

Section dependent variable line 122 needs to be paraphrased and clearly mention how to make the category the variable. Again, the author used multiple diseases; if the infant suffered more than one, then how to categorize? As per my suggestion, make the dependent variable a categorical format, with lines for diseases, single, double, and multi-disease.

Need to remove the repetition; there is no difference in the dependent section and the operational definition. Need to be merged.

Riders want to know how to make the wealth quintile (poor….richest). Which variables are the authors taken? Again why author take the same variable in the community poverty status?

In Table 9 few variables are significant, although the author used a 0.25 level of significance instead of 0.05.

The table sentence structure are not uniform.

The author needs to be present sampling design, how to collect the sample, because the author used different region in this study

The author mentioned in the results section that intimate partner violence had higher rates of child, but not mention in the discussion section what are reasons for that.

The author used so many tables, it is better to use the important table in body of the manuscript.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr. UJJWAL DAS

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Feb 26;21(2):e0342776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342776.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


6 Jan 2026

We really appreciate the reviewer comments and constructive feedbacks which help us to improve the quality of our manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0342776.s001.docx (25.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Orvalho Augusto

28 Jan 2026

Multilevel Determinants of Illness Since Birth Among Infants Aged 5-9 weeks in Ethiopia: Evidence from the 6-Week Follow-Up of the PMA-Ethiopia Longitudinal Survey (2021–2023).

PONE-D-25-51736R1

Dear Dr. Delie,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Orvalho Augusto, MD, MPH, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

This report has new important data. The authors here use an update survey to report the prevalence of any illness during the second month of life in Ethiopia. For health services provision planning such information is relevant. Differently from many other surveys here the authors leverage a unique longitudinal survey to obtain recent illness events (as they collect information at the age of 2 months). However, this report does not cover what were those illnesses and how frequent they were. Indeed such reporting would take more space.

Few issues to resolve:

1. Why is the whole manuscript in a landscape?

2. There are 2 “figures 1”. Please correct this.

3. Figure 1 - The one showing how the flowchart of the sample - misses the number of neonatal deaths. Is it true that no live birth died before the 5th week of life?

4. Figure 1 - the pie chart - should be removed. It is a misuse of space. This proportion is well covered in the table.

5. There is a “data management and analysis” subsection, then an “Ethical considerations and approval”, and then a subsection specifying the multilevel model. Please, put the specification of the model within the “data management and analysis”.

6. Be careful with the model specification.

• Use an equation editor to avoid terrible symbols. For example: line 214 includes prob(1/ X…). The “/” should be replaced with “|”.

• Title on line 219, I would suggest changing from “random-effect parameters” to something that expresses “interpretation” or “heterogeneity”. We need something more appellative.

• Please avoid using the 2nd person. Eg: line 241 “it tells you how much…” or line 272 “when you add predictors to your model”.

7. Table 3, 4 and 5 - we do not need the “no illness” columns. Ok?

- And why table 3 has a “serial number” column?

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: The revised manuscript is accepted for production from my side. Just need a minor revision. Athor shold provide the better quality of imgage, it is not visible clearly. And the second methodological need to be shortened, only improtant equation shold be presented, and the remaining must be shifted to suplemantaly file.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Orvalho Augusto

PONE-D-25-51736R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Delie,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Orvalho Augusto

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0342776.s001.docx (25.2KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data underlying this study are third-party data from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA)-Ethiopia Longitudinal Survey (2021–2023). The datasets are openly available and were accessed from the PMA website (https://www.pmadata.org/data/available-datasets), which provides free, public access to PMA datasets through the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Data Repository. No registration or special access privileges were required. All interested researchers can access the same data to replicate the findings of this study.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES