Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1993 Jun;86(6):324–327. doi: 10.1177/014107689308600607

Coronary care follow-up study: acute care required immediately following thrombolytic therapy.

C Ellicott 1, D B Shaw 1, B J Kirby 1, T Bailey 1
PMCID: PMC1294480  PMID: 8315624

Abstract

We carried out a prospective survey of the outcome of patients with 'suspected myocardial infarction', in order to determine where they should be nursed. The delay between onset, admission, transfer to the CCU, the sequelae and side-effects of thrombolytic therapy were noted and were documented prospectively. Of 217 admissions to CCU with a history of chest pain and suspected acute myocardial infarction during a four-month period (mean age was 62.8 years range 31 to 86 years) 202 fulfilled the criteria for suspected myocardial infarction. Streptokinase was given in 129 and alteplase in one patient. The delay between onset of pain and admission was < 4 h in 73, 4 to 12 h in 30 and > 12 h in 23. Elderly patients were just as likely as younger ones to receive thrombolytic therapy (Chi 2 = 3.6; P = 0.6). An eventual diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was made in 133 of whom 100 received streptokinase. Dysrhythmia or shock was encountered in one-third of those given streptokinase and a quarter of the remainder. Reactions to streptokinase were recorded in 32 mainly hypotension or bradycardia alone or in combination. Forty-five per cent experienced either cardiac complications or drug reactions or both. During one month there were 57 admissions, 50 of whom arrived by ambulance. The mean delay between call out and arrival in the A&E department was 55 min. We concluded patients who are given thrombolytic therapy need close supervision and they should be nursed in a CCU or its equivalent.

Full text

PDF
324

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gibler W. B., Kereiakes D. J., Dean E. N., Martin L., Anderson L., Abbottsmith C. W., Blanton J., Blanton D., Morris J. A., Jr, Gibler C. D. Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a north-south perspective. The Cincinnati Heart Project and the Nashville Prehospital TPA Trial. Am Heart J. 1991 Jan;121(1 Pt 1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90948-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grines C. L., DeMaria A. N. Optimal utilization of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: concepts and controversies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Jul;16(1):223–231. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90482-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kay C. Management of myocardial infarction in the community: a new RCGP study. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Mar;41(344):89–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lew A. S., Hod H., Cercek B., Shah P. K., Ganz W. Mortality and morbidity rates of patients older and younger than 75 years with acute myocardial infarction treated with intravenous streptokinase. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Jan 1;59(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(87)80059-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liddell R., Grant J., Rawles J. The management of suspected myocardial infarction by Scottish general practitioners with access to community hospital beds. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Aug;40(337):318–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Muller D. W., Topol E. J. Selection of patients with acute myocardial infarction for thrombolytic therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):949–960. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rawles J. M., Haites N. E. Patient and general practitioner delays in acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Mar 26;296(6626):882–884. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6626.882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Simoons M. L., Vos J., Tijssen J. G., Vermeer F., Verheugt F. W., Krauss X. H., Cats V. M. Long-term benefit of early thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: 5 year follow-up of a trial conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Dec;14(7):1609–1615. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wilcox R. G. Thrombolysis and the general practitioner. 2. Useful after careful evaluation of patients. BMJ. 1990 Mar 31;300(6728):869–870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6728.869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES