Abstract
Organoid technology has transformed experimental virology by offering physiologically relevant 3D human models that bridge the gap between conventional 2D cell cultures and complex in vivo systems. Derived from pluripotent or adult stem cells, organoids self-organize into multicellular structures that recapitulate native tissue architecture and function, enabling more accurate modeling of host–virus interactions and disease mechanisms. This review outlines the evolution and application of organoid-based systems across neural, intestinal, hepatic, pulmonary, and renal tissues for studying a broad range of human viruses that remain a public health burden. These models can reproduce viral tropism, immune signaling, and host variability, offering new molecular insights into infection dynamics. Integration with single-cell transcriptomics, CRISPR editing, and antiviral screening has expanded the translational utility of organoids, establishing them as a powerful platform for antiviral discovery, vaccine testing, and precision medicine.
Keywords: organoids, viral pathogenesis, host–virus interactions, human stem cell-derived models, emerging and re-emerging viruses, antiviral drug discovery, translational virology, 3d cell culture models
1. Introduction
Viral diseases have been plaguing humankind for thousands of years, and their frequency and impact have grown exponentially in recent decades owing to factors such as rapid evolution of viruses, ecological disturbances, rapid urbanization, and human migration [1,2,3]. In addition to these factors, the effects of climate change are becoming increasingly obvious with every passing year, especially as it disrupts the ecological system and blurs the lines separating species. Projections show that by 2070, due to the drastic shift in global temperatures, thousands of species will converge on biodiversity hotspots and regions of dense human population, which exponentially increase the chances of cross-species viral transmission and the risk of pandemic [4,5,6]. In these recent years alone, we have witnessed the resurgence of viral threats like Zika, Ebola, MERS-CoV, Dengue, and Chikungunya [7,8]. Simultaneously, novel viral entities, such as the Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome virus (SFTS), have raised concern for humans [9]. These changing dynamics in viral evolution and the increasing susceptibility of the human population underscore an urgent need for scalable, physiologically sound models to study host–virus interactions.
Understanding how these emerging and re-emerging viruses transmit and cause specific diseases has been the primary focus of biomedical research in recent years, especially following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2019 [10,11]. Understanding viral transmission patterns and the molecular mechanisms driving pathogenesis is critical for predicting outbreaks and developing a vaccine. Despite significant advances, effective antiviral options remain limited for many viruses, including oncogenic pathogens, where persistent infection and tissue-specific disease progression remain poorly modeled in conventional systems, underscoring the need for adjunct and host-directed therapeutic strategies alongside conventional approaches [12,13,14,15,16]. Current virology models, such as immortalized cell lines and animal systems, are constrained by their inability to accurately mimic human physiological conditions, including tissue architecture, cellular heterogeneity, and authentic viral replication dynamics [17,18]. Consequently, there has been a growing demand for improved human-relevant experimental platforms.
In recent years, organoids have emerged as a promising solution to this challenge. Organoids provide powerful platforms for studying viral infections in settings that closely resemble human physiology [19]. These models have been successfully applied to investigate many human viruses, yielding critical molecular insights into viral replication and host responses that were previously inaccessible [20,21]. Organoids are rapidly becoming an indispensable tool in virology, enabling more accurate disease modeling, improved antiviral testing, and potential applications in personalized medicine that were scarcely conceivable a decade ago.
2. What Are Organoids?
An organoid is a three-dimensional (3D), self-organized tissue construct generated in vitro from stem cells, which may be pluripotent, fetal, or adult in origin, and that captures the key cytoarchitectural, functional, and biological features defining an organ [22,23,24]. Key hallmarks of an organoid include their ability to organize into complex tissue architecture, differentiate, and mimic the properties of a typical organ, making them a middle ground between 2D cell cultures and relevant in vivo systems [25,26,27,28]. The cells used for organoid generation can be derived from various sources, such as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or tissue-derived cells (TDCs), including normal stem or progenitor cells, differentiated cells, or even cancerous cells [29,30,31]. Organoids are broadly classified into two origins: pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), including ESCs, which offer high developmental flexibility and recapitulate early organogenesis, and adult stem cells (ASCs), which generate tissues restricted to specific lineages [32,33,34,35]. However, PSC-derived organoids typically require longer culture periods, and the resulting structures often resemble early fetal developmental stages [34,36,37,38].
Early studies showed that dissociated cells can self-organize, beginning with Wilson’s 1907 sponge experiments and Barth and Holtfreter’s findings that embryonic ectodermal cells could reaggregate and differentiate in simple culture conditions [39,40,41]. By the late 20th century, key stem-cell breakthroughs, most notably the derivation of mouse ESCs (1981) and human ESCs (1998), showed that pluripotent cells could be stably maintained in vitro with full self-renewal and differentiation potential [42,43]. About 25 years later, Takahashi and Yamanaka (2006) showed that introducing four factors-Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4-could reprogram fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), opening a new era in stem cell biology [44]. Building on these advances, Eiraku et al. (2008) showed that mouse and human ESCs grown in 3D suspension could self-organize into polarized cortical tissues that recapitulate early corticogenesis [45].
The modern era of organoid research began in 2009 with the landmark study by Sato et al., which demonstrated that a single Lgr5+ intestinal stem cell could generate a complete crypt-villus architecture in vitro [31]. These “mini-guts” exhibited long-term self-renewal, formed functional crypt-villus structures, and did not require a mesenchymal niche, establishing the first robust adult epithelial organoid system. This breakthrough, driven by Wnt activation and BMP inhibition, catalyzed the development of organoid models across multiple organ systems and firmly positioned them as physiologically relevant alternatives to traditional 2D cultures [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. The evolutionary timeline of organoid technology, from foundational discoveries to its application in virology, is schematically presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Timeline of Organoid Development and Applications in Virology. Chronological overview of key milestones in organoid research, from early demonstrations of cellular self-organization (1907–1944) to the advent of stem cell and iPSC technologies (1981–2006), establishment of pluripotent and adult stem cell-derived organoids (2008–2009), and their expansion to multiple organs (2010–2015) [31,39,41,44,45,47,50]. The timeline also highlights the integration of organoid systems into virology, enabling studies of viral pathogenesis, host–virus interactions, and antiviral testing (2018–2025).
3. Organoids in Virology
The application of organoid technology in virology has followed a trajectory distinct from its original use in developmental biology and cancer research. While early organoid studies primarily focused on cell fate specification, tissue morphogenesis, and oncogenic transformation, virologists rapidly recognized the value of these systems as physiologically relevant human models for studying host–virus interactions and viral pathogenesis.
Organoid models have enabled detailed interrogation of viral replication cycles, cell-type-specific tropism, immune evasion strategies, and tissue-level responses that are not achievable with conventional 2D cell cultures or many animal models. By preserving key features of native tissue architecture, cellular heterogeneity, and epithelial polarity, organoids provide experimental contexts that more accurately reflect human infection dynamics. As a result, organoid-based systems have become indispensable tools for investigating viral pathogenesis, congenital infection, and antiviral responses in human-relevant tissues where traditional models have proven insufficient. The following sections review organoid-based virology studies across distinct organ systems, organized by tissue context and viral tropism, and summarize key experimental insights enabled by these platforms.
3.1. Brain Organoids for Neurotropic Viruses
Brain organoids are three-dimensional (3D), self-organizing structures generated from pluripotent stem cells that recapitulate key features of human brain development, including tissue architecture, regional patterning, and neuronal differentiation [18,54].
Neurotropic viruses preferentially infect neurons and glial cells, thereby targeting both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Infection of these cell types can initiate a range of neurological pathologies, in some cases leading to severe or fatal outcomes [55,56]. Studying neurotropic viruses remains challenging due to several constraints, such as limited access to developing brain tissue, virus-specific cellular tropism, and the inability of conventional 2D cultures or animal models to capture the complexity of human neurodevelopment and neural cytoarchitecture [57,58,59].
3.1.1. Zika Virus (ZIKV)
Zika virus (ZIKV) is an enveloped, positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) virus belonging to the family Flaviviridae. ZIKV is highly neurotropic, and its replication cycle involves direct infection of neural progenitor cells, astrocytes, and radial glial cells [60,61,62,63,64]. The ZIKV outbreak of 2015–2016 was a turning point in establishing organoids as an essential tool for developing virology models, especially for congenital microcephaly. ZIKV infection of brain organoids modeling early fetal brain development preferentially targeted neural progenitor cells (NPCs), leading to cell death, neurogenesis impairment, growth suppression, and reduced organoid size, closely recapitulating microcephaly associated phenotypes [65,66,67]. This disruption of neurogenesis was associated with Toll-like Receptor 3 (TLR3) signaling [65]. Forebrain-specific organoids developed using a miniaturized bioreactor system demonstrate that ZIKV preferentially infects neural progenitor populations, thereby impairing their proliferation and survival [68]. The neuroprotective effect of Betulinic Acid was shown to suppress ZIKV-induced cell death by activating the Akt signaling pathway in NPCs and organoids [69]. ZIKV also demonstrated unexpected therapeutic potential, exhibiting oncolytic activity in Glioblastoma (GBM) stem cells via the SOX2-integrin αvβ5 axis [70]. However, the mechanism of viral entry remains unknown, as gene knockout of the previously reported receptor Axl did not protect NPCs and brain organoids from ZIKV infection [71].
3.1.2. Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1
Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1) is a double-stranded DNA virus belonging to the family Orthoherpesviridae and exhibits marked neurotropism. Following primary infection and lytic cycle in mucosal epithelial cells, HSV-1 can establish latency in the sensory neurons of the trigeminal ganglia [72,73,74,75]. Using hiPSC-derived 2D neuronal cultures and brain organoids, latent HSV-1 infection has been modeled in systems that recapitulate in vivo tissue architecture and exhibit restricted viral reactivation. In parallel, separate studies demonstrated that HSV-1 infection of brain organoids induces pathological features resembling neurodevelopmental disorders, including impaired neuronal differentiation, disrupted cortical layering, aberrant microglial activation, and inflammation [76,77]. HSV-1 infection was associated with the accumulation of Aβ42, a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), in hiPSC-derived brain organoids, whereas this phenotype was not observed in 2D cultures [78]. In another line of approach, brain organoids developed by seeding human-induced neural stem cells (hiNSCs) into a silk porous scaffold and infected with HSV-1 similarly exhibited Alzheimer’s disease-like features, including Aβ accumulation, upregulation of PSEN1/PSEN2, reactive gliosis, neuronal loss, and neuroinflammation, consistent with findings observed in hESC-derived HSV-1-infected brain organoids [74]. Further, HSV-1 infection has been found to disrupt neuroepithelial integrity and to evade type I interferon responses via ICP34.5-mediated mechanisms, leading to altered transcriptional patterns [79].
Another study using hiPSC-derived organoids and single-cell RNA sequencing to understand HSV-1 infection dynamics showed significant enrichment of TNF signaling, which was suppressed following treatment with acyclovir in combination with necrostatin-1 or bardoxolone methyl (CDDO-Me), correlating with attenuation of HSV-1-associated neuropathological features [80]. The CRISPR-Cas9 tool was employed to target ICP0 or ICP27, resulting in a significant reduction in latent infection in brain organoids [81].
3.1.3. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a +ssRNA virus belonging to the family Coronaviridae and was the causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic [82,83]. Although SARS-CoV-2 primarily targets the respiratory system, it has also been implicated in neurological manifestations, including stroke, anosmia, encephalopathy, and cognitive impairment [84,85,86]. Experimental studies using iPSC-derived brain organoids demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 can infect neuronal cells and reduce neural progenitor cell (NPC) proliferation in neurospheres, with infection occurring predominantly in cortical neural cells expressing TUJ-1 and NESTIN+ NPCs [87]. Supporting these findings, another study reported preferential infection of more mature cortical neurons expressing TUJ1, tau, MAP2, and S100β, with limited involvement of Iba-1+ microglia, indicative of organoid maturation; neurodegeneration was evident within 2 days post-infection (dpi) [88]. Investigations using choroid plexus organoids (CPOs) that express ACE2 and TMPRSS2 revealed heightened susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, accompanied by pronounced cytopathic effects (CPE) [89]. Complementary studies employing choroid plexus-CSF organoids that secrete cerebrospinal fluid confirmed similar vulnerability, collectively highlighting the choroid plexus as a critical site of SARS-CoV-2-associated neuropathology [90].
Further advances in cortical organoid systems incorporating pericyte-like cells (PLCs) and endothelial components identified vascular structures as sites supporting viral replication, with subsequent viral spread to astrocytes and activation of type I interferon signaling. Mechanistic analyses revealed that SARS-CoV-2 entry into astrocytes can occur via ACE2-independent pathways, involving neuropilin-1 (NRP1) and two-pore segment channel 1 (TPCN1), potentially explaining the variable viral tropism observed across organoid models at different maturation stages [91,92]. Altered astrocyte responses were also observed, including disruption of neurotransmitter homeostasis, metabolic stress, and altered transcriptional dynamics associated with astrogliosis, inflammation, and cell survival [93,94]. A study investigating SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) using organoid models demonstrated that viral tropism evolved with genetic changes; Omicron sublineages BA.2 and BA.5 exhibited enhanced replication efficiency and increased cytotoxicity compared with earlier strains, including the Delta variant, underscoring the role of viral evolution in neuropathology [95,96]. Beyond mechanistic investigations, brain organoids have also been used for antiviral evaluation, in which treatment with remdesivir and sofosbuvir suppressed viral replication and preserved neural cell viability [97].
3.1.4. Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV)
Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a dsDNA virus belonging to the family Orthoherpesviridae and causes congenital birth defects, such as sensorineural hearing loss and microcephaly [98,99]. The advent of brain organoid platforms enabled detailed investigation of HCMV-induced microcephaly, revealing that, similar to other neurotropic viruses, HCMV infection results in severe disruption of cortical architecture and neural development. Infection of brain organoids led to marked loss of structural integrity, necrosis, vacuolation, and atypical neuronal differentiation, hallmarks of congenital brain dysfunction [100,101]. Subsequent studies using iPSC-derived brain organoids identified TBR2+ neural progenitor cells (NPCs) within the subventricular zone as primary viral targets, linking their infection to impaired organoid growth and aberrant neural activity [102]. Transcriptomic analyses in hiPSC-derived brain organoids further demonstrated that HCMV infection downregulates key transcription factors, including FEZF2, EMX1, and FOXG1, thereby disrupting telencephalic and cortical fate specification, even in cells exhibiting minimal viral protein expression. These findings suggest that widespread developmental dysregulation may be driven by viral proteins or paracrine signaling, independent of productive viral replication [103]. Additionally, studies using 3D cortical organoids showed that mitochondrial respiration-mediated disruption of tissue architecture and neuronal differentiation is exacerbated by nitric oxide, despite its antiviral properties [104]. Similarly, iPSC-derived cerebral organoids revealed that HCMV-associated downregulation of Nidogen-1 (NID1), a basement membrane protein essential for neuronal tube-like structure formation, contributes to early rosette abnormalities. These findings indicate that viral modulation of host scaffolding proteins plays a critical role in severe neurodevelopmental defects [105,106]. Beyond developmental pathology, HCMV has also been implicated in cancer progression and neurodegeneration using cancer tissue-derived glioblastoma organoids (GBOs), where EphA2 was identified as a viral entry receptor [107]. A potential link between Alzheimer’s disease and HCMV infection was reported in 2024 using brain organoid models, demonstrating that amyloid and tau pathology were driven by CD83+ microglia associated with HCMV and IgG4 signatures [108]. Collectively, these organoid-based studies establish HCMV as a potent regulator of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative processes, influencing cortical architecture, signaling networks, progenitor dynamics, and even adult neural homeostasis.
3.1.5. Dengue Virus (DENV)
Neuropathogenesis of DENV was investigated using co-cultures of iPSC-derived brain organoids and microglia, revealing that microglia play a critical role in mounting inflammatory responses, with elevated expression of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and CCL2 [109]. In parallel, the antiviral potential of the oxoaporphine alkaloid hernandonine against DENV-2 was demonstrated, showing that it targets cholesterol-rich lipid rafts during early stages of infections [110].
3.1.6. Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV)
Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV) is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) virus belonging to the family Flaviviridae and causes central nervous system infection [111]. JEV infection was established in hESC-derived cortical organoids, demonstrating that NPC-rich organoids younger than four weeks exhibited impaired interferon signaling and heightened susceptibility in a stage-dependent manner, whereas organoids older than eight weeks mounted RIG-I, IFN-β, and STAT1 responses. Developmental impairment was characterized by preferential infection of outer radial glial cells and induction of a microcephaly like phenotype [112].
3.1.7. Measles Virus (MeV)
Measles Virus (MeV) is a negative-sense single-stranded RNA (−ssRNA) virus belonging to the family Paramyxoviridae and causes severe pneumonia and encephalitis [113,114]. Hyperfusogenic MeV variants carrying mutations in the fusion (F) protein were investigated using brain organoids. Specifically, the L454W substitution promoted receptor-independent cell fusion and enhanced CNS propagation, recapitulating fatal measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE). This mutation was identified as a key molecular determinant of MeV neurotropism and antiviral resistance [115].
3.1.8. La Crosse Virus (LACV)
La Crosse Virus (LACV), a negative-sense RNA orthobunyavirus associated with pediatric encephalitis, has also been modeled using brain organoids [116,117]. LACV-infected organoids exhibited pronounced apoptosis in differentiated neurons, which correlated with reduced type I interferon responses compared with neural progenitor cells; neuronal viability was restored following treatment with recombinant interferon. In a complementary study using iPSC-derived brain organoids, a compound was identified that inhibited viral replication by blocking virion trafficking, demonstrating the utility of brain organoids for antiviral drug discovery [118,119].
3.1.9. JC Polyomavirus (JCpyV)
JC Polyomavirus (JCpyV), the causative agent of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in immunocompromised individuals, has also been investigated using brain organoids [120,121]. Productive infection was achieved by inoculating iPSC-derived 3D brain organoids containing neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes with the MAD4 strain of JCPyV, resulting in PML-like pathological features [122].
Across neurotropic viruses, brain organoid studies consistently reveal convergence on neural progenitor vulnerability, disruption of cortical organization, and dysregulated inflammatory signaling, while also highlighting virus-specific differences in cell-type tropism, immune evasion strategies, and long-term neuropathological outcomes. These findings underscore both shared and distinct mechanisms of viral neurotropism. Crucially, brain organoids have succeeded where conventional 2D cultures fall short by recapitulating complex neurodevelopmental phenotypes. For instance, although 2D systems can support viral replication, they cannot model the structural ‘microcephaly-like’ reduction in tissue size observed in ZIKV infection or the complex spatial accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ42) plaques characteristic of HSV-1 infection. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the 3D cytoarchitecture of organoids is essential for uncovering virus-induced neuropathological mechanisms. A summary of neurotropic virus studies using brain organoids is provided in Table 1.
Table 1.
Brain Organoids for Neurotropic Viruses. Summary of neurotropic virus studies using human brain organoids derived from pluripotent stem cells. The table highlights how organoid models have enabled the recapitulation of viral tropism, pathogenesis, and host–virus interactions relevant to the central nervous system (CNS). For each virus, the genome type, organoid model employed, principal neuropathological findings, and key studies are provided. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that brain organoids serve as physiologically relevant models to study viral replication, neurodevelopmental disruption, immune responses, and therapeutic interventions in human-relevant neural contexts.
| Virus | Genome Type/ Family |
Organoid System Used | Key Findings/Neuropathological Outcomes | Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zika Virus (ZIKV) | +ssRNA/Flaviviridae | iPSC- or ESC-derived brain and forebrain organoids | Preferential infection of NPCs; apoptosis and impaired neurogenesis; organoid growth reduction (microcephaly-like phenotype); TLR3 involvement; neuroprotection by betulinic acid; oncolytic activity in GBM stem cells | [65,66,67,68,69,70,71] |
| Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 (HSV-1) | dsDNA/Orthoherpesviridae | hiPSC- and hESC-derived brain organoids; hiNSC scaffold models | Acute and latent infection; disrupted neuronal differentiation and cortical layering; microglial activation; Aβ42 accumulation (AD-like pathology); impaired IFN signaling (ICP34.5-dependent); latency reduced by CRISPR targeting ICP0/ICP27 | [74,76,77,78,79,80,81,123] |
| SARS-CoV-2 | +ssRNA/Coronaviridae | Cortical, choroid plexus, CSF, and vascularized brain organoids | Infection of NPCs and cortical neurons; neuronal loss and reduced proliferation; high susceptibility of choroid plexus with CPE; spread via vascular/pericyte routes; ACE2-dependent and -independent entry (NRP1, TPCN1); variant-dependent neurotoxicity; antiviral sensitivity | [86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97] |
| Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) | dsDNA/Orthoherpesviridae | Brain, cerebral, cortical, and glioblastoma organoids | Severe cortical disorganization; reduced organoid size; necrosis and vacuolation; targeting of TBR2+ NPCs; transcriptional dysregulation (FEZF2, EMX1, FOXG1); mitochondrial dysfunction; EphA2-mediated entry in GBOs; AD-associated microglial signatures | [100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108] |
| Dengue Virus (DENV) | +ssRNA/Flaviviridae | iPSC-derived brain organoids with microglia | Robust neuroinflammatory response driven by microglia (IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, CCL2); lipid-raft–dependent infection; inhibition by hernandonine | [109,110] |
| Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV) | +ssRNA/Flaviviridae | hESC-derived cortical organoids | Developmental stage-dependent susceptibility; impaired IFN signaling in early organoids; activation of RIG-I/IFN-β/STAT1 in mature organoids; preferential infection of outer radial glia; microcephaly-like defects | [112] |
| Measles Virus (MeV) | −ssRNA/Paramyxoviridae | Brain organoids | Hyperfusogenic F-protein mutation (L454W) drives receptor-independent cell fusion and CNS spread; recapitulates measles inclusion body encephalitis | [115] |
3.2. Intestinal Organoids for the Study of Enteric Viruses
Intestinal organoids, also known as enteroids or mini-guts, are 3D epithelial structures generated either from Lgr5+ adult stem cells or differentiated from human pluripotent stem cells [31,124]. These systems accurately mimic the intestinal epithelium, forming crypt-villus domains that comprise all major cell types, including enterocytes, goblet cells, Paneth cells, and enteroendocrine cells [125]. Their development marked a major advance in enteric virology, especially for previously “unculturable” pathogens like human norovirus (HuNoV), which could not be propagated in transformed cell lines [126]. These intestinal organoids preserve native apical-basolateral polarity, enabling physiologically relevant studies of viral entry, egress, and directional spread [127]. Studies using these models have identified key host determinants of infection, such as histo-blood group antigens and bile acids, that influence viral attachment and replication [128]. In addition, intestinal organoids permit detailed analysis of epithelial-specific innate immune responses, including interferon-mediated restriction of viral replication [129]. By overcoming long-standing culture barriers for major enteric viruses, intestinal organoids have become essential tools for dissecting viral pathogenesis and evaluating antiviral therapeutics [130].
3.2.1. Human Norovirus
Human Norovirus (HuNoV), a positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) enteric virus belonging to the family of Caliciviridae, was notoriously difficult to culture using conventional cell culture systems until the introduction of organoid models, particularly enteroids [131]. The development of Human Intestinal Organoids (HIOs: PSC-derived and containing both epithelial and mesenchymal components) and Human Intestinal Enteroids (HIEs: tissue-derived and composed exclusively of epithelial cells) enabled successful HuNoV replication and provided a platform for antiviral testing [130,132]. Early organoid-based HuNoV studies in 2017 demonstrated that PSC-derived HIOs expressed relevant intestinal glycans and bound virus-like particles (VLPs) in a histo-blood group antigen (HBGA)-dependent manner, establishing a physiologically relevant in vitro model [133]. Building on this, tissue-derived HIEs differentiated into a 2D monolayer supported consistent viral replication across multiple HuNoV genotypes isolated from clinical samples [132,134]. For certain genotypes, such as GII.3, replication required specific culture conditions, including donor origin, intestinal segment, differentiation state, and bile acid supplementation [135].
Subsequent studies using HIEs revealed that mature enterocytes are the primary targets of HuNoV infection, rather than progenitor cells, and that susceptibility is strongly dependent on secretor status. Enteroids expressing fucosyltransferase 2 (FUT2+) were permissive to HuNoV infection, whereas FUT2− enteroids were resistant; CRISPR-mediated knock-in of FUT2 restored susceptibility [128,132,136]. Mechanistic investigations further demonstrated that innate immune responses, particularly type III interferons and downstream interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), play a central role in restricting viral replication. Disruption of JAK/STAT or MAVS/STAT1 signaling pathways increased HIE susceptibility, whereas interferon treatment suppressed replication in a genotype-dependent manner, with GII.4 strains exhibiting reduced sensitivity compared with GI and GII.3 genotypes [137,138,139]. Hydrophobic bile acids, such as glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GDCA), were identified as critical cofactors enhancing viral attachment and entry via sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) in the GII.3 genotype. Inhibition of S1PR2 correspondingly inhibited the viral replication in enteroids [135]. These advances have facilitated the application of molecular assays, including qRT-PCR to detect replicative intermediates, and the generation of stable HIE lines for reproducible interrogation of host determinants such as FUT2, STAT1, and MAVS [140,141]. Beyond mechanistic studies, these organoid systems have enabled preclinical antiviral evaluation. Nitazoxanide and its active metabolite tizoxanide suppressed HuNoV replication by activating IRF-1 and inducing ISGs, and acted synergistically with ribavirin, while BTP2, a CRAC channel inhibitor, reduced HuNoV and Tulane Virus replication by disrupting calcium-dependent steps of infection [142,143]. Notably, immunoglobulin-based interventions guided by HIE assays have successfully cleared chronic HuNoV infection in immunodeficient patients [144].
3.2.2. Rotavirus
Rotavirus (RV) is a dsRNA virus belonging to the Reoviridae family and was historically the leading cause of severe diarrheal disease in children and immunocompromised individuals prior to widespread vaccine implementation. It remains a major global health burden, particularly in unvaccinated populations. RV primarily infects mature enterocytes of the small intestine [145,146,147,148,149]. Early organoid-based studies demonstrated productive RV infection, accompanied by cytopathic effects and induction of antiviral responses [150]. Mechanistic investigations using organoids in parallel with Caco-2 cells revealed that basal type I and type III interferon signaling suppresses RV replication, whereas inhibition of STAT1, STAT2, and IRF9 significantly increased viral replication. Exogenous treatment with IFN-α, IFN-β, or IFN-λ effectively reduced viral replication, supporting a central role for interferon-inducible interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in epithelial defense [151]. Consistent with this study, treatment of RV-infected HIOs with IL-22 enhanced epithelial proliferation and tissue repair, rather than directly inducing ISGs. This suggested a distinct yet complementary role of IFN-λ and IL-22 in conserving epithelial integrity during RV infection [152]. Further studies using HIOs infected with laboratory strains and primary RV isolates revealed a dependence on host metabolic pathways. Pharmacological inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) using brequinar or leflunomide, thereby blocking pyrimidine biosynthesis, significantly suppressed RV replication by limiting nucleotide availability [94]. Similarly, inhibition of guanosine synthesis with mycophenolic acid (MPA) resulted in approximately 99% reduction in viral RNA production. Additionally, the antidiabetic drug metformin hydrochloride suppressed RV replication in HIOs, Caco-2 cells, and murine models [153]. Transcriptomic analyses of HIEs infected with HuNoV, RV, and astrovirus identified a shared antiviral milieu characterized by type I interferon responses, ISG induction, and virus-specific signaling pathways [154]. It was also shown that lentiviral transduction of HIOs to express GCaMP6s enabled real-time visualization of calcium signaling dynamics during RV replication, further illustrating the versatility of organoid platforms for mechanistic virology studies [155].
3.2.3. SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 primarily infects the nasal epithelial lining and the respiratory tract, but viral tropism is also evident in the GI tract, as demonstrated by detection of viral RNA in feces and intestinal tissues [156,157]. The gut has been implicated as a key secondary site of infection, supported by reports of diarrhea and fecal shedding during COVID-19 [158,159]. Using ASC-derived HIEs and hPSC-derived intestinal organoids, it was demonstrated that enterocytes are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, with these models exhibiting productive viral replication and cytopathic effects [160,161]. Organoid models derived from bat species and HIOs further provided insights into cross-species susceptibility and helped elucidate viral tropism and host-range barriers [162,163,164]. These organoid models have enabled investigation of multiple stages of the viral replication cycle, demonstrating the requirement of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) for viral attachment and entry. They also revealed that infectivity and receptor usage are influenced by spike protein variation, with mutations such as R403/T403 modulating ACE2-dependent infection in lung and intestinal organoids. Additional studies showed that ACE2 expression is regulated by the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and identified the lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) as a critical entry mediator [165,166,167].
CRISPR-edited organoid models demonstrated that Omicron and other coronavirus variants continue to utilize TMPRSS2 for entry, providing mechanistic insight into altered transmissibility and tropism among VOCs [168,169]. Several studies using HIOs have extended beyond viral entry mechanisms. One investigation identified heat shock protein 90-beta (Hsp90β) as essential for stabilization of the coronavirus nucleoprotein; inhibition with 17-AAG suppressed replication of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2, highlighting Hsp90 as a potential antiviral target [170]. More recently, HIOs have been applied in translational contexts to explore prophylactic and therapeutic strategies. For example, an α-dystroglycan recombinant fragment inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication, while MK-2206 (an Akt inhibitor) enhanced autophagy flux, limiting viral entry and preserving epithelial barrier integrity. Furthermore, intestinal organoids incorporating macrophages, termed macrophage-augmented organoids (MaugOs), were developed to study viral replication and evaluate immunomodulatory interventions against SARS-CoV-2 [171,172,173]. Finally, ESCs-derived HIOs were used to assess gut immune protection, demonstrating that serum from vaccinated individuals or those with prior exposure neutralized the WA01 strain, whereas reduced efficacy was observed against the Delta and Omicron variants [174]. The same organoid model was also employed to investigate TGEV-induced inflammation via the RIG-I/NF-κB/HIF-1α/glycolysis axis [175]. Moreover, HIF-1α was associated with enhanced viral replication and concomitant suppression of type I and type III interferon responses, suggesting that HIF-1α is a potential antiviral target [176].
3.2.4. Enterovirus
Enterovirus A71 and other Picornaviruses, such as coxsackievirus B2 and poliovirus type 3, have been studied using HIOs. These organoid models demonstrated susceptibility to viral replication, while EV-D68 did not replicate productively [177]. Fetal human colon-derived organoids were also employed to study the replication kinetics of EV-A71, Coxsackievirus B3, and Echovirus 6, revealing approximately 10-fold higher viral replication than in 2D cultures. Further analyses identified goblet cells as the primary sites of viral replication [178]. Mechanistic studies using organoids showed that EV-A71 replication kinetics were strain dependent, with glutamine at position 145 of VP1 serving as a critical determinant of infectivity [179]. EV-A71 was released from enterocytes in a non-lytic manner following replication, involving the exosome pathway [180]. Differentiated HIOs were also used to investigate the role of the upstream open reading frame (uORF) protein in echovirus 7 and poliovirus 1. Knockout of the uORF protein resulted in attenuation during late stages of viral replication, indicating that this protein is essential for efficient viral shedding [181]. In another study, the Rock inhibitor GSK269962A suppressed EV-A71 replication, identifying Rock1 as a crucial and novel host factor for viral propagation [182].
Additional studies demonstrated that several vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors exhibit potent antiviral activity, implicating VEGFR2 as another host factor required for EV-A71 replication, potentially mediated through the TSAd–Src–PI3K–Akt signaling pathway [183]. Leveraging HIOs, combination therapy with pleconaril, rupintrivir, and remdesivir was evaluated against multiple enteroviruses, including echovirus 1, echovirus 6, echovirus 11, coxsackievirus B5, and enterovirus A71, showing marked antiviral efficacy [184]. Beyond human organoids, mouse intestinal organoids demonstrated that EV-A71 replication induces store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) via activation of the STIM/Orai1 complex, with viral replication occurring in an SOCE-dependent manner, thereby facilitating efficient viral propagation [185]. In a related investigation, “apical-out” porcine intestinal organoids were used to study senecavirus infection, revealing initial infection of enterocytes followed by sequential spread to other cell types, induction of stress granules, and activation of innate immune responses [186].
3.2.5. Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus (TGEV)
Transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), a positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) virus of the Coronaviridae family, played a pivotal role in the development and use of PIOs [187]. Apical-out PIO models were employed to assess viral infectivity and host immune responses, demonstrating robust TGEV replication accompanied by upregulation of IFN-α, IFN-λ1, and inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α and IL-6 [188]. In one study, PIOs were used to investigate epithelial regeneration during TGEV infection, revealing activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and increased expression of intestinal stem cell (ISC) self-renewal markers following viral challenge [189]. By optimizing HIO growth conditions, a long-term PIO culture system was established, enabling sustained experimental modeling and continuous release of TGEV progeny [190]. To examine virus-mucus-epithelium interactions, a mucus layer was generated in PIOs using an air-liquid interface (ALI) configuration. Subsequent TGEV infection demonstrated reduced viral infectivity, with mucin 2 (MUC2) exhibiting antiviral activity and sialic acid contributing to viral inhibition [191]. Thapsigargin (TG), an ER stress inducer and an oral antiviral drug candidate, was reported to inhibit TGEV replication in a study using PIOs infected with TGEV [192]. Furthermore, PIOs were generated from Wuzhishan miniature pigs (WZS) exhibited susceptibility to TGEV, and transcriptomic analyses revealed induction of antiviral and inflammatory responses [193].
3.2.6. Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV)
Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is another member of the family Coronaviridae [194]. Organoid-based studies on PEDV have primarily focused on host factors and therapeutic interventions. PIOs infected with PEDV supported sustained viral replication and progeny release. Additionally, RNA-seq analysis revealed activation of antiviral signaling pathways and immune responses [190]. Differentiated porcine enteroid monolayer cultures (PEMCs) in Matrigel were used to assess differences in PEDV susceptibility across intestinal segments. The results showed that all segments were susceptible to PEDV, with jejunum-derived PEMCs exhibiting significantly higher viral replication [195]. Furthermore, PIOs derived from the small intestine were used as a platform to validate genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screening to identify key host factors involved in PEDV infection, leading to the identification of IFITM1 as a host factor associated with enhanced PEDV entry [196].
In addition, intestinal barrier integrity during PEDV infection was investigated using intestinal organoids, highlighting the role of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). Knockdown of lncRNA446 increased PEDV replication, and disruption of tight junctions was observed, as lncRNA446 regulates tight junction integrity by preventing Alix ubiquitination [197]. Milk small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) were found to suppress PEDV infection in PIOs; further investigation revealed that cargo miRNAs, miR-let-7e and miR-let-27b, exert antiviral functions [198]. The coexistence of Trichinella spiralis and PEDV was modeled in PIOs, demonstrating that T. spiralis excretory/secretory antigens (TsES) enhanced PEDV-induced inflammation and damaged the mucosal barrier in organoids, despite TsES contributing to PEDV replication [199].
3.2.7. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV)
In 2017, the human gastrointestinal tract was hypothesized to serve as an alternative route of MERS-CoV infection, which was subsequently investigated using HIOs. These organoids were found to be susceptible to MERS-CoV, as evidenced by robust viral replication [200]. In addition, intestinal organoids derived from Rousettus aegyptiacus were established to mechanistically explore bat adaptability to zoonotic viruses. This model was challenged with MERS-CoV and Marburg virus, revealing heightened expression of immune effectors, including IFN-ε, interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), and type III interferon IFN-λ. Notably, this response exhibited self-amplification, conferring a strong antiviral state in a virus-independent manner [201].
3.2.8. Human Astrovirus (HAstV)
Human astrovirus (HAstV) is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) virus belonging to the family Astroviridae [202]. To validate findings from genome-wide CRISPR–Cas9 screening, intestinal organoids (IOs) were used to identify the cellular receptor for HAstV. Deletion of the Fc gamma receptor and transporter (FCGRT) and β2-microglobulin (B2M), which together encode the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), rendered IOs resistant to HAstV infection, thereby establishing FcRn as the functional receptor for HAstV [203]. Furthermore, scRNA-seq analysis of HAstV-infected HIOs was performed to unravel immune dynamics across individual cell populations. The results demonstrated that HAstV can infect all major intestinal cell types and induces specialized antiviral transcriptional reprogramming, with distinct basal gene expression patterns observed across different cell populations [204].
3.2.9. Mammalian Reovirus (MRV)
Mini-gut organoids were used to delineate the roles of Type I and Type III Interferons (IFNs) in protecting the human gut against mammalian reovirus (MRV) infection. Upon viral challenge, human intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) secreted only type III IFN into the supernatant, and the antiviral activity mediated by type III IFNs was strongly dependent on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. These findings suggest that Type III IFN constitutes a spatially restricted frontline antiviral response in the human gut [205]. Separately, porcine intestinal organoids (PIOs) were established and infected with mammalian orthoreovirus Type 3 (MRV3). Infected PIOs exhibited delayed proliferation, structural disruption, and altered gene expression associated with intestinal epithelial function and antiviral responses [206].
3.2.10. Avian Influenza Virus (AIV)
Mouse intestinal organoids containing crypts and villi were generated from ISCs and used to investigate interactions with H9N2 avian influenza virus. The study demonstrated that H9N2 viral genes were detectable, with peak levels observed at 48 h post-infection (hpi). Infection caused significant intestinal damage, including impaired intestinal stem cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as loss of Paneth cells [207]. In parallel, chicken intestinal organoid (CIO) systems were employed to examine replication dynamics and innate immune responses to low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses (LPAIVs), including the endemic H6N1 strain and the Eurasian H9N2 strain. The results showed that apical-out organoids, mimicking natural exposure, elicited robust interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) responses that effectively controlled H6N1 replication, whereas “basal-out” organoids exhibited weaker upstream interferon responses during H9N2 infection [208].
3.2.11. Other Enteric Viruses
For other enteric viruses, several studies have employed organoid models to define host range and pathogenicity. PIOs were used to investigate the cross-species transmission potential of Human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43), where viral inoculation demonstrated high susceptibility, infectious virus production, and widespread cellular death [209]. Bovine enteroids established from bovine ileum served as an in vitro replication system for Bovine Coronavirus (BCoV) and were found to be permissive to infection, with BCoV inducing downregulation of immune-related genes, including CXCL-3, MMP13, and TNF-α [210]. Chicken intestinal organoid monolayers were used to study the attenuated response to porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) infection in chickens, where abortive PDCoV infection activated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, enhancing intestinal stem cell (ISC) self-renewal and accelerating epithelial regeneration, thereby contributing to resistance against PDCoV infection [211]. Rabbit intestinal organoids (RIOs) were also propagated and challenged with Rabbit calicivirus Australia-1; however, despite testing multiple inoculation conditions, no viral replication was observed [212].
Comparative analysis across enteric viruses using intestinal organoids demonstrates both shared requirements, such as mature enterocyte infection and interferon-mediated restriction, and virus-specific dependencies on host genetics, bile acids, metabolic pathways, and immune modulation. These findings illustrate how epithelial context shapes divergent replication and pathogenesis strategies. The introduction of intestinal organoids has fundamentally transformed experimental access to enteric virus biology, most notably for human norovirus. In contrast to immortalized cell lines, which lack key epithelial differentiation states, stem cell-derived enteroids recapitulate host genetic determinants, including histo-blood group antigens and FUT2 expression, that govern viral susceptibility. This physiological fidelity enabled sustained HuNoV replication in vitro for the first time, overcoming a long-standing barrier in the field and directly linking patient-derived observations with mechanistic investigation. Key findings from enteric virus studies using organoid models are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Summary of enteric virus studies using intestinal organoids. Intestinal organoids, including human intestinal organoids (HIOs), human intestinal enteroids (HIEs), porcine intestinal organoids (PIOs), and organoids from other species, serve as physiologically relevant models for studying enteric viruses. These organoids allow detailed insights into viral tropism, replication kinetics, host–pathogen interactions, antiviral responses, and therapeutic interventions. Studies also leveraged organoids for mechanistic analysis, CRISPR-based identification of host factors, and preclinical antiviral testing.
| Virus | Genome Type /Family | Organoid System Used | Key Findings/Neuropathological Outcomes | Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Norovirus (HuNoV) | Caliciviridae, +ssRNA | HIOs, HIEs | Sustained replication in enteroids; mature enterocyte tropism; FUT2-dependent susceptibility; platform for antiviral testing | [130,132,134,135,137] |
| Rotavirus (RV) | Reoviridae, dsRNA | HIOs | Productive infection with CPE; replication restricted by interferons; epithelial repair responses observed | [150,151,152,159] |
| SARS-CoV-2 | Coronaviridae, +ssRNA | HIEs, HIOs, macrophage-augmented organoids | Enterocyte infection and GI tropism; ACE2/TMPRSS2-dependent entry; variant-specific infectivity; antiviral evaluation | [94,160,161,165,168,173] |
| Enterovirus (EV-A71, CVB2, PV3, EV-D68, EV7) | Picornaviridae, +ssRNA | HIOs, fetal colon organoids, porcine IOs | Efficient replication; goblet cell tropism; non-lytic viral release; identification of host factors | [177,178,181,182,183,185] |
| Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus (TGEV) | Coronaviridae, +ssRNA | Porcine IOs (PIOs) | Robust replication; induction of antiviral and inflammatory responses; modulation of epithelial renewal | [188,189,190,191,192] |
| Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) | Coronaviridae, +ssRNA | PIOs, PEMCs | Sustained replication; segment-specific susceptibility; host factors regulate entry and barrier integrity | [194,195,196,197,198,199] |
| Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) | Coronaviridae, +ssRNA | HIOs, bat-derived IOs | Productive intestinal infection; strong type III interferon response | [200,201] |
| Human Astrovirus (HAstV) | Astroviridae, +ssRNA | HIOs | FcRn identified as entry receptor; broad epithelial cell infection | [203,204] |
| Mammalian Reovirus (MRV) | Reoviridae, dsRNA | HIOs, PIOs | Type III interferon–mediated epithelial antiviral defense | [205,206] |
| Avian Influenza Virus (AIV) H9N2, H6N1 | Orthomyxoviridae, −ssRNA |
Mouse IOs, Chicken IOs | Apical infection recapitulates natural exposure; epithelial damage and ISG induction | [207,208] |
| Other enteric viruses (HCoV-OC43, BCoV, PDCoV, RCV-A1) | Coronaviridae /Caliciviridae | PIOs, bovine enteroids, chicken IOs, rabbit IOs | Host range and species-specific susceptibility assessed | [209,210,211,212] |
3.3. Liver Organoids for Hepatotropic Viruses
Often referred to as mini-livers, liver organoids (LOs) are 3D structures that recapitulate the cytoarchitecture and key functional properties of the human liver. Like other organoid systems, they are generated using two main approaches: expansion of adult stem cells or differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. These organoids exhibit hepatocyte-like functions and are permissive to infection by multiple hepatotropic viruses, enabling productive viral replication and providing physiologically relevant platforms for dissecting viral life cycles and host responses.
3.3.1. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Hepatitis D Virus (HDV)
Liver organoids have emerged as physiologically relevant platforms for modeling chronic hepatitis virus infections, particularly HBV and its satellite virus HDV, which depends on HBV surface antigens for entry and propagation. hIPSC-derived LOs comprising endodermal, mesenchymal, and endothelial lineages have been successfully used to establish HBV infection in 3D microwell systems, where viral challenge induced hepatic dysfunction and dysregulation of liver-specific gene expression programs [213]. Complementary studies using patient-derived LOs further enabled investigation of HBV-driven hepatocarcinogenesis, providing ex vivo platforms for personalized therapeutic assessment [214,215,216]. In one model, LOs generated from healthy donors were infected with recombinant HBV or patient-derived serum, leading to the formation of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and the production of infectious virions. Transcriptomic profiling of infected organoids revealed early cancer-associated gene signatures that clustered with hepatocellular carcinoma cohorts, linking HBV replication directly to oncogenic transcriptional reprogramming [217]. These platforms have also facilitated antiviral evaluation, including orally administered agents targeting cellular inhibitors of apoptosis, which selectively eliminated infected hepatocytes and promoted clearance of episomal HBV genome [218]. Subsequent methodological refinements further optimized recombinant HBV infection efficiency in human LOs, improving experimental reproducibility and scalability [219,220].
Beyond hepatocyte-derived organoids, intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ICOs) have been explored as personalized infection models using HepAD38-derived and plasma-derived HBV. ICOs supported productive HBV replication with pronounced donor-dependent variation in viral dynamics and host transcriptional responses. Notably, HBV infection failed to induce ISGs, despite preserved responsiveness to exogenous interferon, highlighting intrinsic viral immune evasion mechanisms [221]. Additional studies demonstrated that HBV transcription disrupts hepatocyte developmental programs by activating DNA repair pathways and enhancing glycolytic metabolism, molecular features closely associated with hepatocellular carcinoma progression [222]. Within this HBV-dependent framework, HDV pathogenesis has also been interrogated using organoid-based approaches. Ubiquitinated small hepatitis D antigen (Ub-S-HDAg) was shown to promote dendritic cell maturation and CD8+ T cell activation via JAK/STAT signaling, correlating with enhanced antiviral immunity and reduced viral load. These findings highlight how HDV modulates host immune pathways within HBV-infected hepatic environments, underscoring the utility of liver organoids for dissecting complex viral co-infections and immune interactions [223].
3.3.2. Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)
Liver organoids have also been used to investigate polarity-dependent mechanisms of viral entry and host immune responses to hepatitis C virus (HCV). Studies examining interactions between host cell receptors and HCV-like particles (HCV-VLPs) in polarized LOs versus conventional 2D cultures demonstrated that productive receptor engagement occurred exclusively in polarized organoids, underscoring the importance of epithelial architecture for HCV entry [224,225]. Complementary single-particle imaging in 3D polarized hepatoma models further revealed that HCV entry is a multistep process: the virus initially engages scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SR-B1) and CD81 at the basolateral membrane via actin-driven movement, followed by accumulation at tight junctions and subsequent internalization through clathrin-mediated endocytosis [226]. Multicellular LOs incorporating Kupffer-like cells have also been used to model HCV-associated liver disease progression, in which infection was linked to lipid accumulation and enhanced lipogenic gene signatures in host cells, recapitulating key metabolic features of HCV pathogenesis [227]. Beyond innate responses, ASC-derived Los, when integrated with microfluidic platforms, enabled co-culture with HLA-matched CD8+ T cells. Upon stimulation with HCV NS3 peptides and patient-derived CD8+ cells, this system facilitated targeted immune-mediated injury of infected LOs, providing a physiologically relevant platform for studying adaptive immune responses during HCV infection [228].
3.3.3. Hepatitis E Virus (HEV)
Fetal and adult LOs containing hepatocyte and cholangiocyte populations have been shown to support the complete HEV replication cycle and viral shedding when cultured as polarized monolayers. Using these systems, drug screening approaches identified brequinar and homoharringtonine as effective inhibitors of HEV replication [229]. Early innate immune responses were also observed, with HEV RNA triggering IRF3- and IRF7-dependent interferon signaling in primary LOs generated from hepatocyte-like cells cultured on inverted colloidal crystal scaffolds.
Beyond mechanistic investigations, liver organoids have emerged as robust platforms for antiviral discovery against HEV. Drug repurposing and targeted screening strategies using human liver organoids identified multiple host-directed inhibitors, including niclosamide, brequinar, homoharringtonine, vidofludimus calcium, and pyrazofurin, which suppress HEV replication by modulating NF-κB signaling and pyrimidine biosynthesis pathways. Notably, these studies demonstrated antiviral efficacy against HEV variants associated with ribavirin treatment failure, underscoring the translational relevance of organoid-based platforms for identifying therapeutic options for chronic and drug-resistant HEV infections. Collectively, these findings establish liver organoids as a powerful system for modeling HEV replication dynamics and innate antiviral responses in a human-relevant hepatic context.
3.3.4. Dengue Virus (DENV)
hPSC-derived LOs have been employed to investigate dengue virus infection and associated hepatic pathology. These models were susceptible to DENV-2 infection, exhibiting extensive cell death and structural disruption that resembles severe dengue pathology. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that proliferating hepatocyte-like cells constituted the predominant infected population and demonstrated pronounced mitochondrial injury accompanied by alterations in cellular composition. Subsequent drug screening studies identified oxyresveratrol (ORES) and omaveloxolone (RTA403) as antiviral compounds in this system. Both agents activated the NRF2 pathway, reduced oxidative stress, and preserved mitochondrial function [188].
3.3.5. Liver Organoids to Study Oncolytic Viruses
LOs are increasingly being utilized to investigate oncolytic viruses (OVs) and their therapeutic potential in HCC. However, oncolytic adenoviruses (OAs) face significant challenges, including rapid hepatic clearance and low liver tropism of commonly used vectors such as Ad5 [230,231]. In contrast, third-generation oncolytic HSV-1 (T-01) has demonstrated enhanced T cell-mediated antitumor efficacy against HCC in organoid-based models [232]. Similarly, coxsackievirus A21 (V937), in combination with IFN-γ and PD-1 blockade, promoted immune activation and oncolysis in HCC organoids co-cultured with PBMC [233]. Beyond human tumor models, lagoviruses, including RHDV1, RHDV2, and RHDVa-K5, have been evaluated in hepatobiliary organoids derived from European rabbits and brown hares. These studies demonstrated that inhibition of interferon signaling increased viral susceptibility, further underscoring the utility of liver organoids for dissecting host antiviral responses and oncolytic virus biology [234,235].
3.3.6. Non-Canonical Hepatotropic Viruses and Liver Involvement
Beyond classical hepatitis viruses, liver organoids have enabled investigation of additional liver-tropic and systemically disseminating viruses that contribute to hepatic pathology. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived liver organoids were shown to be highly permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection, exhibiting productive viral replication and robust induction of inflammatory and chemokine signaling pathways, consistent with liver injury observed in severe COVID-19 patients [236]. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of infected liver organoids further revealed extensive cytokine signaling and bystander inflammatory responses, implicating IL-6-mediated pathways in virus-associated hepatic immune activation [237]. Complementary studies using liver organoid-derived intrahepatic bile duct cells demonstrated efficient SARS-CoV-2 replication in cholangiocytes, supporting direct cytopathic effects as a contributing mechanism underlying COVID-19-associated liver dysfunction [238].
In addition to coronaviruses, liver organoids have been applied to dissect host dependency factors for acute hepatotropic viruses. A genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen validated in human liver organoids identified UFMylation machinery and TRAMP-like complexes as essential host factors required for hepatitis A virus translation, establishing liver organoids as powerful platforms for uncovering host-directed antiviral targets [239]. Furthermore, drug repurposing screens conducted in liver organoid models identified host-targeting inhibitors that suppress viral replication by blocking pyrimidine biosynthesis, including compounds effective against treatment-refractory hepatitis virus strains, reinforcing the translational relevance of organoid-based antiviral discovery pipelines [240,241]. Collectively, these studies highlight the versatility of liver organoids in modeling diverse hepatotropic and liver-tropic viral infections, enabling mechanistic dissection of viral replication, host signaling pathways, and antiviral intervention strategies within a physiologically relevant human hepatic context [242].
Across hepatotropic and oncolytic viruses, liver organoid models reveal recurring patterns of polarity-dependent epithelial entry into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, accompanied by innate immune activation, while also enabling direct comparison of strain-dependent differences in replication efficiency, tissue damage, and antiviral sensitivity under physiologically relevant exposure conditions. Liver organoids provide an experimental context that more closely reflects hepatic physiology than hepatoma cell lines, particularly by preserving epithelial polarity and metabolic activity that shape viral infection outcomes. This is especially evident in hepatitis C Virus studies, where receptor engagement at polarized membranes, such as interactions involving SR-B1 and CD81, can be resolved with clarity not achievable in non-polarized 2D cultures. In parallel, the capacity of liver organoids to sustain covalently closed circular DNA during hepatitis B virus infection enables direct interrogation of viral persistence and chronicity-associated molecular signatures that are typically lost in conventional in vitro models. Table 3 summarizes the application of liver organoids in studying hepatotropic and oncolytic viruses.
Table 3.
Summary of hepatotropic virus studies using liver organoids. Liver organoids (LOs), derived from adult stem cells (ASCs) or pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), serve as physiologically relevant models to study hepatotropic virus replication, host–pathogen interactions, antiviral immunity, and therapeutic interventions. These models replicate polarization-dependent entry, viral replication kinetics, immune responses, and disease-relevant pathology, and allow ex vivo testing of antiviral drugs and oncolytic virus efficacy.
| Virus | Genome Type/Family | Organoid System Used | Key Findings/Neuropathological Outcomes | Representative Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) | Hepadnaviridae, dsDNA | PSC-derived LOs, patient-derived LOs, Intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ICOs) | Productive infection with cccDNA formation; hepatic dysfunction and oncogenic signatures; platform for antiviral and host-targeted drug testing | [213,214,217,218,219,220,221,222] |
| Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) | Flaviviridae, +ssRNA | PSC- and ASC-derived LOs, multicellular LOs with Kupffer-like cells | Polarization-dependent viral entry; lipid metabolic dysregulation; enables study of adaptive immune interactions | [224,225,226,227,228] |
| Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) | Hepeviridae, +ssRNA | Fetal/adult LOs, polarized monolayers | Complete replication and viral shedding; interferon-mediated antiviral responses; drug screening feasible | [229] |
| Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) | Deltaviridae, −ssRNA satellite virus | Primary hepatocyte-like LOs | Immune activation via JAK/STAT signaling; reduction in viral burden | [223] |
| Dengue Virus (DENV) | Flaviviridae, +ssRNA | hPSC-derived LOs | Hepatocyte infection with mitochondrial injury; oxidative stress–linked pathology; antiviral compound screening | [243] |
| Oncolytic Viruses (OVs) | Adenoviridae, Herpesviridae, Caliciviridae | Human LOs, hepatobiliary organoids | Evaluation of oncolytic efficacy and immune activation; modulation of antiviral immunity alters therapeutic outcome | [230,231,232,233,234,235] |
| Non-canonical hepatotropic and liver-tropic viruses (DENV, SARS-CoV-2) | Flaviviridae /Coronaviridae, +ssRNA | hPSC-derived liver organoids; adult hepatocyte and cholangiocyte organoids | Productive hepatocyte and cholangiocyte infection; mitochondrial injury, oxidative stress, and inflammatory cytokine induction; IL-6–associated bystander responses; direct cytopathic effects contribute to virus-associated liver injury | [236,237,238] |
3.4. Lung Organoids for the Study of Respiratory Viruses
Lung organoids, also known as airway organoids (AOs) or alveolar organoids (ALOs), are 3D self-organizing structures that recapitulate the cellular composition and cytoarchitecture of the human respiratory tract [244]. A key strength of lung organoid models is their ability to support viral infection via the apical epithelial surface, thereby closely mimicking natural respiratory exposure. This enables physiologically relevant assessment of viral tropism, cytopathic effects, disruption of epithelial barrier, and innate immune responses [245,246,247].
3.4.1. SARS-CoV-2
Lung organoids have been instrumental in elucidating SARS-CoV-2 tropism, pathogenesis, and therapeutic responses. hESC-derived airway and alveolar organoids supported productive viral replication, with infection predominantly targeting ciliated cells, club cells, and alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells along the proximal-distal lung axis. RNA-seq analysis further revealed robust immune activation accompanied by suppression of metabolic and lipid pathways [248]. Similarly, ASC-derived lung organoid comprising both proximal and distal epithelial populations recapitulated transcriptomic signatures observed in COVID-19 patients. In these models, proximal airway cells sustained viral proliferation, while hyperinflammatory responses were associated with AT2 differentiation [249].
Airway organoids have also been used for antiviral screening, identifying several candidate therapeutics. Remdesivir significantly reduced viral load [248], polyclonal antibodies prevented tissue injury and viral progression, whereas atorvastatin inhibited viral attachment and entry [250]. In addition, viral replication was suppressed in a dose-dependent manner following treatment with immunosuppressive agents, including mycophenolic acid, 6-thioguanine, tofacitinib, and filgotinib [251]. Nasal organoids cultured at an air-liquid interface further captured hallmark pathological features of infection, including ciliary loss and mucus overproduction [252].
3.4.2. Influenza Virus
Human airway organoids derived from lung stem cells have provided physiologically relevant platforms for investigating influenza A virus (IAV) tropism and replication. These systems recapitulate key features of ex vivo bronchus cultures, enabling assessment of viral replication dynamics and cell-type specificity for pandemic H1N1pdm and avian influenza strains, including H7N9, H5N1, and H5N6. H1N1pdm and H7N9 exhibited significantly higher replication efficiency compared with H5N1 and preferentially infected ciliated and goblet cells [253]. Evaluation of emerging strains using differentiated airway organoids in 3D and air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures further demonstrated that human-infective H7N9/Ah replicated more efficiently than the human-adapted H7N2 strain [21]. Prolonged H5N1 infection induced fibrotic remodeling in human airway organoids, characterized by increased expression of α-SMA, collagen, and fibronectin [254]. Swine IAV virulence has also been assessed using epithelial cultures derived from porcine airway organoids under ALI conditions. The H3N2 strain caused greater epithelial barrier disruption and tight junction damage compared with H1N2 or H1N1, illustrating the utility of organoid models for comparative virulence screening among influenza strains [255].
Comparative analyses across multiple studies demonstrated that viral replication kinetics, cell-type tropism, and cytokine induction profiles observed in airway organoids closely mirror those seen in ex vivo human bronchial explants, validating organoids as physiologically relevant alternatives for studying both seasonal and zoonotic influenza viruses. While H1N1pdm and H7N9 replicate efficiently in ciliated and mucus-secreting epithelial cells, highly pathogenic H5N1 induces disproportionately strong inflammatory responses despite lower replication efficiency, highlighting strain-specific differences linked to pathogenic potential [253]. Differentiated airway organoids have also proven reliable for predicting human infectivity of emerging influenza viruses, with human-adapted strains replicating more robustly than poorly human-infective avian or swine isolates [21].
Beyond viral replication, airway organoids have enabled identification of host regulatory factors, such as airway serine proteases and their endogenous inhibitors, which govern hemagglutinin activation and viral spread, processes that are difficult to resolve in conventional monolayer cultures [256]. Together, these findings underscore the capacity of airway organoids to capture polarity-dependent infection, interferon compartmentalization, and strain-specific virulence within a single human-relevant experimental platform.
3.4.3. Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (HRSV)
Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (HRSV) or simply Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a negative-sense single-stranded RNA (−ssRNA) virus belonging to the family Pneumoviridae and is a leading cause of pediatric respiratory infection [257]. Lung organoids modeling first-trimester fetal lung development were injected with recombinant RSV-A2, resulting in dose- and time-dependent viral propagation, increased CC10 expression in a dose-dependent manner, and the disruption of the F-actin cytoskeleton [258]. Maturity-dependent susceptibility was demonstrated by comparing immature fetal lung organoids with mature induced airway organoids, revealing that mature airway epithelial cells restricted RSV replication more effectively by mounting stronger innate immune responses than their immature counterparts [259]. Mechanistic studies using differentiated human airway organoids identified insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) as a key mediator of RSV entry, whereby IGF1R activation triggered signaling cascades that recruited the co-receptor nucleolin to the cell surface via protein kinase C zeta (PKCζ) [260]. An apical-out airway organoid model was further developed to expose CX3CR1+ ciliated cells, enabling direct viral access to physiologically relevant target populations. This configuration proved effective for high-throughput neutralization assays, accurately capturing the activity of both F- and G-specific antibodies, and provides a robust platform for investigating protective immune responses to RSV [246].
3.4.4. Parainfluenza Virus (PIV) and Seasonal Coronaviruses
Human airway organoids (hAOs) have been effectively used to model infection dynamics and drug responses for seasonal coronaviruses, including 229E, OC43, and NL63. These viruses exhibited more than 10-fold higher replication at 33 °C than at 37 °C, consistent with their preference for the cooler upper airway environment [261]. Treatment with molnupiravir and remdesivir significantly reduced viral replication in a dose-dependent manner. For human parainfluenza viruses (HPIVs), organoid-derived bronchial and tracheal air-liquid interface cultures proved critical for maintaining the genetic integrity and phenotypic characteristics of all four HPIV types, preventing the adaptive mutations commonly observed in conventional cell lines [262].
3.4.5. Adenovirus
hESC-derived airway and alveolar organoids have been used to compare HAdV-3 with the more virulent HAdV-55, demonstrating that HAdV-55 replicates more efficiently and exhibits broader tropism toward alveolar stem cells and airway epithelial populations [263]. These models have also been used for antiviral evaluation, in which cidofovir demonstrated efficacy against HAdV infection [263].
Across respiratory viruses, lung organoid models reveal recurring patterns of apical epithelial entry, tropism toward ciliated and secretory cells, and innate immune activation, while enabling direct comparison of strain-dependent differences in replication efficiency, tissue damage, and antiviral sensitivity under physiologically relevant exposure conditions. Lung organoid systems provide a level of epithelial complexity that is difficult to maintain in conventional airway monolayers, preserving ciliated, secretory, and alveolar populations over extended culture periods. This has allowed respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and influenza to be examined within a spatial framework that reflect the proximal-distal organization of the human airway. Moreover, apical-out configurations and air-liquid interface cultures reproduce physiological exposure conditions, enabling interrogation of mucociliary clearance, epithelial barrier disruption, and localized immune responses that are poorly modeled under submerged 2D systems. A summary of respiratory viruses investigated using lung organoid models is presented in Table 4.
Table 4.
Summary of lung organoid models for the study of respiratory viruses. This table summarizes the different respiratory viruses studied using lung organoids, including airway organoids (AOs) and alveolar organoids (ALOs). For each virus, the virus family, the specific organoid model used, and key findings, including viral tropism, pathogenesis, immune responses, and antiviral testing, are highlighted. References are provided for further details on the methodologies and experimental outcomes. The table emphasizes how lung organoids recapitulate the cellular diversity of the respiratory tract and serve as platforms for mechanistic studies and preclinical antiviral evaluation.
| Virus | Genome Type/Family | Organoid System Used | Key Findings/Neuropathological Outcomes | Representative Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 | Coronaviridae, +ssRNA | hESC- and ASC-derived airway/ alveolar organoids | Infection of ciliated and alveolar epithelial cells; strong inflammatory responses; epithelial damage recapitulating COVID-19 pathology; platform for antiviral evaluation | [248,249,250,251,252] |
| Influenza Virus (IAV) | Orthomyxoviridae, −ssRNA | Airway organoids, ALI | Strain-specific epithelial tropism and replication efficiency; airway damage and remodeling reflect virulence differences | [250,251,252,253] |
| Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (HRSV) | Pneumoviridae, −ssRNA |
Fetal and induced airway organoids, apical-out organoids | Maturity-dependent infection of airway epithelium; cytoskeletal disruption; enables neutralization and entry studies | [255,256,257,258] |
| Parainfluenza Virus (PIV) | Paramyxoviridae, −ssRNA |
Airway organoids, bronchial/tracheal ALI cultures | Productive infection with preserved viral characteristics; supports antiviral testing and temperature-dependent replication studies | [261,262] |
3.5. Kidney Organoids
Kidney Organoids are self-assembled 3D structures that mimic the complex architecture and cellular diversity of the native human kidney. These models generate multiple nephron segments along with endothelial and stromal components, providing physiologically relevant platforms for renal biology and disease modeling [264,265]. Similarly to other organoid systems, kidney organoids bridge critical gaps between animal models and conventional 2D cultures by enabling direct investigation of human-specific host–pathogen interactions in infectious disease contexts [266,267]. Recent studies have demonstrated that kidney organoids support productive viral infection and exhibit robust virus-induced renal pathology [268]. Consequently, kidney organoids serve as complementary and translationally relevant models for investigating viral kidney involvement and evaluating antiviral strategies in human-specific settings [269,270].
3.5.1. SARS-CoV-2
In addition to the lungs, brain, and gastrointestinal tract, SARS-CoV-2 also infects renal tissue, facilitated by expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in proximal tubular epithelial cells. Kidney organoids (KOs) recapitulate this susceptibility, supporting productive viral replication, apoptosis, and morphological alterations. Transcriptomic analyses of SARS-CoV-2-infected KOs revealed upregulation of interferon signaling pathways that mirrored urinary proteomic signatures observed in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Preclinical therapeutic studies using KOs demonstrated that viral infection could be blocked by novel spike-binding peptides and neutralized by a long-acting soluble ACE2 variant (ACE2 1-618-ABD) [271,272]. Further investigations showed that combinatorial treatment with remdesivir and soluble ACE2 significantly enhanced the therapeutic window against SARS-CoV-2 infection [273].
3.5.2. Mpox Virus (MPXV)
Mpox Virus is a dsDNA virus belonging to the family Poxviridae [274,275]. Kidney organoid studies demonstrated susceptibility to MPXV infection, with organoids responding favorably to antiviral treatment, further highlighting their utility for modeling viral renal involvement and therapeutic evaluation [276].
Although still limited in number, kidney organoid studies across diverse viral families demonstrate a shared capacity to model proximal tubule tropism, interferon-driven responses, and virus-induced renal injury, supporting their emerging role in elucidating mechanisms of viral nephropathology and therapeutic intervention. Kidney organoid platforms capture nephron-level cellular diversity largely absent from conventional renal cell lines, enabling the resolution of virus–host interactions at the segment-specific level. Using these systems, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been localized predominantly to ACE2- and TMPRSS2-expressing proximal tubular cells, producing injury patterns that parallel urinary proteomic signatures reported in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The ability of kidney organoids to reproduce clinically relevant features of viral nephropathy in an ex vivo setting underscores their added value over traditional in vitro approaches. Table 5 summarizes the viral infection studies conducted using kidney organoid models.
Table 5.
Summary of kidney organoid models for viral infection studies. The table presents an overview of viruses studied in human kidney organoids (KOs), detailing the virus family, organoid type, and key findings on viral tropism, replication, cytopathic effects, immune response, and therapeutic interventions. The table highlights the use of kidney organoids in modeling proximal tubule infection, elucidating antiviral signaling pathways, and validating antiviral therapies. References provide additional experimental context and outcomes for each virus.
| Virus | Genome Type/Family | Organoid System Used | Key Findings/Neuropathological Outcomes | Representative Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 | Coronaviridae, +ssRNA | iPSC-derived kidney organoids (KOs) | Infects proximal tubules via ACE2/TMPRSS2; productive replication, apoptosis, cell morphology changes; upregulates IFN pathways; therapeutic testing: spike binder peptides, soluble ACE2 1-618-ABD, remdesivir combination therapy | [271,272,273] |
| Mpox Virus (MPXV) | Poxviridae, dsDNA | iPSC-derived kidney organoids | Susceptible to infection; antiviral responsiveness demonstrated | [272,273,274] |
4. Assembloids: Multicellular and Multi-Organoid Platforms for Studying Viral Pathogenesis
Assembloids represent an advanced evolution of organoid technology, generated through the controlled integration of multiple region-specific organoids or distinct cellular compartments to model inter-tissue communication, circuit formation, and complex host–pathogen interactions. Unlike single-organoid systems, assembloids enable investigation of viral pathogenesis within a spatially and functionally interconnected human tissue context, allowing assessment of viral spread, cell-to-cell transmission, bystander effects, and circuit-level dysfunction that cannot be resolved in isolated cultures.
Recent virology-focused studies have demonstrated the unique utility of assembloids in modeling human-restricted neurotropic viral infections. Human spinal cord-muscle and brain-peripheral tissue assembloids have been used to model poliovirus, EV-D68, and EV-A71 infection, revealing virus-specific differences in cellular tropism, kinetics of neuronal injury, and mechanisms leading to functional paralysis despite shared clinical outcomes. These systems captured convergent loss of neuromuscular activity driven by divergent viral strategies, an insight not achievable in monolayer cultures or single neural organoids [277]. Assembloids have further enabled circuit-level interrogation of viral neuropathogenesis, demonstrating that viral infection can disrupt neuronal connectivity and network synchrony independent of overt cytolysis. By preserving functional synaptic integration across regions, assembloids permit direct assessment of how viruses perturb information flow, neurotransmission, and emergent network behavior, critical dimensions of neurovirology that are poorly modeled in conventional systems [278,279]. Beyond neurotropic viruses, assembloid platforms incorporating immune-epithelial interfaces have been applied to study infection-induced inflammatory responses, including macrophage-epithelium interactions and paracrine signaling cascades that amplify tissue damage. These models reveal how immune components modulate viral permissiveness, persistence, and host injury, phenomena obscured in immune-deficient organoid systems [280].
From a technological perspective, advances in regionally patterned and inter-regional assembloids have improved reproducibility, cellular maturation, and functional complexity, enabling long-range projections, polarized signaling, and directional migration of infected cells. Such features are particularly relevant for studying viral dissemination across tissue boundaries, including CNS entry routes, axonal transport, and secondary organ involvement [281]. Importantly, assembloids are increasingly integrated with microfluidic platforms, vascularized components, and organ-on-chip technologies, further enhancing their relevance for modeling viral transmission dynamics, endothelial infection, and barrier-crossing events. These hybrid systems offer precise control over nutrient gradients, oxygenation, and flow, facilitating studies of viral access routes and systemic spread under near-physiological conditions [282,283].
Looking forward, assembloid-based virology holds substantial promise for addressing unresolved questions in viral pathogenesis, including multi-organ crosstalk, immune-mediated bystander injury, persistent infection, and post-viral sequelae. The incorporation of patient-derived cells, immune components, and vascular networks positions assembloids as powerful platforms for translational antiviral discovery and precision virology, complementing and, in some contexts, surpassing traditional organoid, air-liquid interface, and animal models [284,285]. Furthermore, continued integration of assembloids with advanced microfluidic and organ-on-chip systems is expected to expand experimental capabilities by enabling controlled interrogation of viral dissemination and barrier traversal under physiologically relevant flow conditions, thereby broadening the scope of human-relevant virology models [286].
5. Organ-on-Chip Applications in Virology
Organ-on-Chip (OoC) is emerging as an advanced, human-relevant alternative platform that narrows the gap between 2D culture and animal models to study viral infections and host responses [27,287,288,289]. Due to the incorporation of dynamic fluid flow, physiological mechanical cues, and tissue architecture, OoC models enable detailed investigation of viral replication stages, viral tropism, drug evaluation, and immune signaling [290,291,292,293]. For the study of respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and influenza, respiratory OoC systems platforms were widely used. These studies revealed compartment-specific antiviral responses and differential interferon and chemokine signaling across airway and alveolar regions [291,293,294]
Integration of multiple tissue compartments in the OoC systems has further enhanced the modeling of systemic and indirect antiviral effects, as evidenced by lung-brain and multi-organ microphysiological platforms that captured inflammation-driven endothelial injury and extrapulmonary pathology following respiratory infection [291,292]. Placental OoC models have also been used to study enteric viruses and organ-specific viral infections [295]. Collectively, these studies lay the foundation for establishing organ-on-chip technologies as a next-generation, adaptable tool for understanding viral pathogenesis, evaluating antivirals, and advancing translational virology.
6. What Organoids Have Taught Us About Viruses: Conceptual Insights from Organoid-Based Virology
Although organoid-based virology studies are often organized by organ system or virus family, synthesis across these models reveals several unifying biological principles that transcend individual pathogens. Rather than serving merely as permissive infection systems, organoids function as hypothesis-generating platforms that uncover how tissue architecture, cellular differentiation, and local immune programs converge to shape viral pathogenesis. One of the most consistent insights emerging from organoid studies is the central role of epithelial polarity in governing viral entry, replication, and egress. In intestinal, airway, and hepatic organoids, polarized tissue organization dictates receptor accessibility and the spatial directionality of infection. This has been exemplified by norovirus dependence on apical histo-blood group antigens, apical entry of SARS-CoV-2 via ACE2, and basolateral interactions of hepatotropic viruses. Such polarity-dependent processes are poorly captured in conventional 2D cultures, underscoring a fundamental advantage of 3D organoid systems in resolving physiologically relevant infection routes.
A second unifying theme is the strong influence of cellular differentiation state on viral permissiveness and disease outcome. Across brain, intestinal, lung, and liver organoids, progenitor or less differentiated cell populations frequently exhibit heightened susceptibility to infection, whereas mature cells tend to mount more effective intrinsic antiviral responses. This principle is evident in the targeting of neural progenitor cells by the Zika virus, the preferential infection of differentiated enterocytes by rotavirus and norovirus, and the SARS-CoV-2 tropism for differentiated airway and alveolar epithelial cells. Organoids uniquely enable the coexistence of multiple developmental states within a single system, allowing differentiation-dependent viral dynamics to be dissected in ways not feasible in traditional models. Comparative analyses further clarify the contexts in which organoids offer distinct advantages over alternative platforms such as air-liquid interface cultures or short-term ex vivo tissues. While ALI systems remain well-suited for studying acute respiratory infection and mucociliary function, organoids are particularly powerful when experimental questions involve 3D architecture, multicellular interactions, viral latency, chronic infection, or long-term tissue remodeling. Importantly, organoid models have also revealed that innate immune responses are highly tissue- and cell-type specific rather than uniformly antiviral. Dominance of type III interferon responses in intestinal epithelia, attenuated interferon signaling during hepatotropic virus infection, and context-dependent inflammatory responses in neural organoids challenge immune paradigms derived from immortalized cell lines. These findings emphasize the necessity of studying antiviral immunity within appropriate tissue environments and caution against extrapolating universal immune mechanisms across organs.
Collectively, these conceptual insights position organoid-based virology as a critical bridge between reductionist cell culture systems and in vivo studies. By capturing physiologically relevant architecture, differentiation, and immune context, organoids advance the field beyond descriptive infection models toward mechanistic frameworks with direct implications for antiviral discovery, vaccine design, and prediction of tissue-specific disease outcomes.
7. Future Perspectives of Organoids in Virology
Organoid systems are increasingly evolving from purely descriptive infection models into platforms that allow more integrative analysis of virus–host interactions. An important future direction is to enhance system-level complexity by combining organoids with microfluidic and organ-on-chip approaches. Such integration enables dynamic perfusion, controlled mechanical stimulation, and limited inter-organ communication, which together improve tissue maturation and permit more physiologically relevant modeling of viral dissemination, systemic infection, and organ–organ crosstalk. The incorporation of immune components into organoid systems, including co-culture with innate and adaptive immune cells, autologous immune reconstruction, or the development of engineered immune niches, is expected to improve the capacity of these models to interrogate antiviral immunity, immune evasion strategies, and virus-induced immunopathology. Such immune-augmented organoids may be particularly informative for examining vaccine responses, post-infectious inflammatory processes, and immune-mediated tissue damage.
Future applications of organoid platforms are also likely to extend toward personalized and longitudinal infection modeling. Patient-derived organoids offer an opportunity to investigate how host-specific factors, such as genetic background, age, comorbidities, and prior immune exposure, influence viral susceptibility, disease progression, and therapeutic response over time. In parallel, incorporation of spatial organization, biomechanical cues, and extracellular matrix dynamics may further refine how viral entry, replication, and host signaling pathways are represented in vitro. Finally, the continued integration of organoid systems with single-cell multi-omic approaches, CRISPR-based genetic perturbation strategies, and scalable high-throughput screening platforms is expected to accelerate the identification of host factors and therapeutic targets. Collectively, these advances support the use of organoids as increasingly predictive preclinical models that connect mechanistic insights in virology with antiviral development, vaccine evaluation, and preparedness for future emerging and re-emerging viral threats.
8. Limitations and Challenges of Organoid Systems in Virology
Even though organoid technology has revolutionized virology by enabling detailed analysis of host–virus interactions, host factor modulation, and immune responses, several limitations continue to constrain full translational implementation.
A major challenge across organoid platforms is limited structural maturity and incomplete cellular diversity, restricting faithful recapitulation of in vivo organ function. Numerous PSC-derived organoids exhibit immature phenotypes, compromising architectural fidelity and physiological performance [296,297]. Furthermore, most organoids lack vascular perfusion and native stromal microenvironments, resulting in suboptimal oxygen and nutrient delivery and limiting long-term maintenance [298,299]. Recent methodological advances are beginning to address these limitations. For example, Sun et al. (2022) developed a vascularized human brain organoid model with improved functional maturation [300]. Another key constraint is limited incorporation. Most organoid systems lack resident or circulating immune cells, hindering comprehensive investigation of antiviral immunity and immune-mediated pathology [301]. Although co-culture strategies have improved immunological relevance, these systems remain simplified relative to native tissues. Donor-to-donor variability represents an additional challenge, particularly for adult stem cell-derived organoids. Genetic background, epigenetic state, and tissue origin influence viral susceptibility and host responses, complicating standardization. At the same time, this variability reflects clinically relevant heterogeneity and may be leveraged to investigate host-specific determinants of infection and therapeutic response.
Finally, technical limitations related to batch variability, protocol complexity, and reliance on extracellular matrices such as Matrigel continue to impede scalability and reproducibility [302,303,304]. Standardized culture conditions, synthetic matrices, and automation will be essential for broader clinical and translational deployment.
9. Conclusions
The rapid integration of organoid technology into virology research has provided an unprecedented, human-centric platform for unraveling the complexities of viral pathogenesis and accelerating therapeutic discovery. As demonstrated across numerous studies, these 3D models faithfully recapitulate critical disease hallmarks that conventional 2D cultures and non-human animal models often fail to capture.
The versatility of organoids is evident in two major fields. In neurovirology, brain organoids enabled direct visualization of ZIKV targeting neural progenitor cells, establishing a mechanistic link to microcephaly [68,305]. Incorporation of microglia further permitted modeling of DENV- and HIV-1-induced neuroinflammation [109,306]. In enteric virology, intestinal organoids overcame longstanding barriers to HuNoV cultivation, enabling analysis of FUT2-dependent host susceptibility [128,130,132]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, respiratory and intestinal organoids rapidly defined SARS-CoV-2 epithelial tropism and revealed altered infectivity profiles of emerging variants such as Omicron [160,169,307,308].
Looking forward, integration with microfluidic and organ-on-chip platforms is expected to enhance vascularization, inter-organ communication, and modeling of systemic infection. Parallel incorporation of adaptive immune components will deepen understanding of antiviral immunity and immune-mediated pathology. Together, these advances organize organoids as standardized preclinical platforms that can accelerate antiviral development, vaccine evaluation, and preparedness for future infectious disease threats. Such systems also enable systematic interrogation of host dysregulated pathways, including oxidative stress responses, as adjunct therapeutic targets [309,310].
Abbreviations
2D: Two-Dimensional; 3D, Three-Dimensional; ACE2, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; AD, Alzheimer’s Disease; ALI, Air-Liquid Interface; AMPK, AMP-Activated Protein Kinase; ASC, Adult Stem Cell; AT2, Alveolar Type II Cell; AXL, AXL Receptor Tyrosine Kinase; BBD, Box–Behnken Design; BCA, Bicinchoninic Acid; BMP, Bone Morphogenetic Protein; CNS, Central Nervous System; CPE, Cytopathic Effect; CRISPR, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats; CSF, Cerebrospinal Fluid; DAB, 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine; DENV, Dengue Virus; dsDNA, Double-Stranded DNA; dsRNA, Double-Stranded RNA; EGFR, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor; ESC, Embryonic Stem Cell; FXR, Farnesoid X Receptor; GBM, Glioblastoma Multiforme; GI, Gastrointestinal; GROMACS, GROningen MAchine for Chemical Simulations; HBGA, Histo-Blood Group Antigen; HBV, Hepatitis B Virus; HCMV, Human Cytomegalovirus; HCV, Hepatitis C Virus; HEK293T, Human Embryonic Kidney 293T Cells; HEV, Hepatitis E Virus; HIE, Human Intestinal Enteroid; HIO, Human Intestinal Organoid; HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; HRSV, Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus; HSV-1, Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1; HuNoV, Human Norovirus; IAV, Influenza A Virus; IFN, Interferon; IgG, Immunoglobulin G; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; iPSC, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell; ISC, Intestinal Stem Cell; ISG, Interferon-Stimulated Gene; IVT, In vitro Transcription; JAK, Janus Kinase; JEV, Japanese Encephalitis Virus; KO, Knockout; LACV, La Crosse Virus; LDLR, Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor; LO, Liver Organoid; MAPK, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase; MAVS, Mitochondrial Antiviral-Signaling Protein; MD, Molecular Dynamics; MeV, Measles Virus; miRNA, MicroRNA; MPXV, Mpox Virus; MRV, Mammalian Reovirus; MSN, Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle; NPC, Neural Progenitor Cell; NRP1, Neuropilin-1; PAMP, Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern; PBMC, Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction; PEDV, Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus; PEI, Polyethylenimine; PIO, Porcine Intestinal Organoid; PSC, Pluripotent Stem Cell; qRT-PCR, Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA-seq, RNA Sequencing; RV, Rotavirus; SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; scRNA-seq, Single-Cell RNA Sequencing; SFTS, Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome; SOCE, Store-Operated Calcium Entry; STAT, Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription; TLR, Toll-Like Receptor; TMPRSS2, Transmembrane Serine Protease 2; uORF, Upstream Open Reading Frame; VLP, Virus-Like Particle; VOC, Variant of Concern; Wnt, Wingless/Integrated Signaling Pathway; ZIKV, Zika Virus; +ssRNA, Positive-Sense Single-Stranded RNA; −ssRNA, Negative-Sense Single-Stranded RNA.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.S.S., P.B. and A.M.; literature survey and data curation, N.S.S.; methodology (review framework and thematic organization), N.S.S.; formal analysis and synthesis, N.S.S.; investigation, N.S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.S.; writing—review and editing, P.B. and A.M.; visualization and graphical abstract preparation, N.S.S.; supervision, A.M. and P.B.; project administration, A.M. and P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Cupertino M., Resende M., Mayer N., Carvalho L., Siqueira-Batista R. Emerging and Re-Emerging Human Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review of the Role of Wild Animals with a Focus on Public Health Impact. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2020;13:99. doi: 10.4103/1995-7645.277535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harrus S., Baneth G. Drivers for the Emergence and Re-Emergence of Vector-Borne Protozoal and Bacterial Diseases. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005;35:1309–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Piret J., Boivin G. Pandemics Throughout History. Front. Microbiol. 2021;11:631736. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.631736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carlson C.J., Albery G.F., Merow C., Trisos C.H., Zipfel C.M., Eskew E.A., Olival K.J., Ross N., Bansal S. Climate Change Increases Cross-Species Viral Transmission Risk. Nature. 2022;607:555–562. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04788-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoberg E.P., Brooks D.R. Evolution in action: Climate Change, Biodiversity Dynamics and Emerging Infectious Disease. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015;370:20130553. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morales-Castilla I., Pappalardo P., Farrell M.J., Aguirre A.A., Huang S., Gehman A.-L.M., Dallas T., Gravel D., Davies T.J. Forecasting Parasite Sharing Under Climate Change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2021;376:20200360. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chung Y.-S., Lam C.-Y., Tan P.-H., Tsang H.-F., Wong S.-C.C. Comprehensive Review of COVID-19: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Advancement in Diagnostic and Detection Techniques, and Post-Pandemic Treatment Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:8155. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Woolhouse M.E.J., Howey R., Gaunt E., Reilly L., Chase-Topping M., Savill N. Temporal Trends in the Discovery of Human Viruses. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2008;275:2111–2115. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kobayashi N. Impact of Emerging, Re-Emerging and Zoonotic Viral Infectious Diseases, in a Virologist’s Perspective. Open Virol. J. 2018;12:131–133. doi: 10.2174/1874357901812010131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cook N.L., Lauer M.S. Biomedical Research COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs. NAM Perspect. 2021;2021:202107e. doi: 10.31478/202107e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Louten J. Essential Human Virology. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2016. Emerging and Reemerging Viral Diseases; pp. 291–310. [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Wit E., Van Doremalen N., Falzarano D., Munster V.J. SARS and MERS: Recent Insights into Emerging Coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:523–534. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morens D.M., Fauci A.S. Emerging infectious diseases: Threats to Human Health and Global Stability. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003467. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mukherjee A., Nayak M.K., Dutta S., Panda S., Satpathi B.R., Chawla-Sarkar M. Genetic Characterization of Circulating 2015 A(H1N1)pdm09 Influenza Viruses from Eastern India. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0168464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khan I., Harshithkumar R., More A., Mukherjee A. Human Papilloma Virus: An Unraveled Enigma of Universal Burden of Malignancies. Pathogens. 2023;12:564. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12040564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dass D., Dhotre K., Chakraborty M., Nath A., Banerjee A., Bagchi P., Mukherjee A. miRNAs in Herpesvirus Infection: Powerful Regulators in Small Packages. Viruses. 2023;15:429. doi: 10.3390/v15020429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clevers H. Modeling Development and Disease with Organoids. Cell. 2016;165:1586–1597. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lancaster M.A., Knoblich J.A. Organogenesis in a Dish: Modeling Development and Disease Using Organoid Technologies. Science. 2014;345:1247125. doi: 10.1126/science.1247125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schutgens F., Clevers H. Human Organoids: Tools for Understanding Biology and Treating Diseases. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2020;15:211–234. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sachs N., Papaspyropoulos A., Zomer-van Ommen D.D., Heo I., Böttinger L., Klay D., Weeber F., Huelsz-Prince G., Iakobachvili N., Amatngalim G.D., et al. Long-Term Expanding Human Airway Organoids for Disease Modeling. EMBO J. 2019;38:e100300. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhou J., Li C., Sachs N., Chiu M.C., Wong B.H.-Y., Chu H., Poon V.K.-M., Wang D., Zhao X., Wen L., et al. Differentiated Human Airway Organoids to Assess Infectivity of Emerging Influenza Virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:6822–6827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806308115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lou Y.-R., Leung A.W. Next Generation Organoids for Biomedical Research and Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018;36:132–149. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sinha A., Maibam M., Jain R., Aggarwal K., Sahu A.K., Gupta P., Paul S., Bisht B., Paul M.K. Organoid: Biomedical Application, Biobanking, and Pathways to Translation. Heliyon. 2025;11:e43028. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e43028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao Z., Chen X., Dowbaj A.M., Sljukic A., Bratlie K., Lin L., Fong E.L.S., Balachander G.M., Chen Z., Soragni A., et al. Organoids. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 2022;2:94. doi: 10.1038/s43586-022-00174-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hsiung N., Ju Y., Yang K., Yang P., Zeng W., Zhao H., Zou P., Ye J., Yi K., Wang X. Organoid-Based Tissue Engineering for Advanced Tissue Repair and Reconstruction. Mater. Today Bio. 2025;33:102093. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lewis A., Keshara R., Kim Y.H., Grapin-Botton A. Self-Organization of Organoids from Endoderm-Derived Cells. J. Mol. Med. 2021;99:449–462. doi: 10.1007/s00109-020-02010-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang X.-Y., Wu S., Wang D., Chu C., Hong Y., Tao M., Hu H., Xu M., Guo X., Liu Y. Human Organoids in Basic Research and Clinical Applications. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:168. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01024-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang S., Hu H., Kung H., Zou R., Dai Y., Hu Y., Wang T., Lv T., Yu J., Li F. Organoids: The Current Status and Biomedical Applications. MedComm. 2023;4:e274. doi: 10.1002/mco2.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Karthaus W.R., Iaquinta P.J., Drost J., Gracanin A., van Boxtel R., Wongvipat J., Dowling C.M., Gao D., Begthel H., Sachs N., et al. Identification of Multipotent Luminal Progenitor Cells in Human Prostate Organoid Cultures. Cell. 2014;159:163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Murrow L.M., Weber R.J., Gartner Z.J. Dissecting the Stem Cell Niche with Organoid Models: An Engineering-Based Approach. Development. 2017;144:998–1007. doi: 10.1242/dev.140905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sato T., Vries R.G., Snippert H.J., Van De Wetering M., Barker N., Stange D.E., Van Es J.H., Abo A., Kujala P., Peters P.J., et al. Single Lgr5 Stem Cells Build Crypt-Villus Structures in Vitro without a Mesenchymal Niche. Nature. 2009;459:262–265. doi: 10.1038/nature07935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Drost J., Clevers H. Translational Applications of Adult Stem Cell-Derived Organoids. Development. 2017;144:968–975. doi: 10.1242/dev.140566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hautefort I., Poletti M., Papp D., Korcsmaros T. Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Organoid-Based Models (and Never Dared to Ask) Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;14:311–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li Y., Xu C., Ma T. In Vitro Organogenesis from Pluripotent Stem Cells. Organogenesis. 2014;10:159–163. doi: 10.4161/org.28918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McCauley H.A., Wells J.M. Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Organoids: Using Principles of Developmental Biology to Grow Human Tissues in a Dish. Development. 2017;144:958–962. doi: 10.1242/dev.140731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Arjmand B., Rabbani Z., Soveyzi F., Tayanloo-Beik A., Rezaei-Tavirani M., Biglar M., Adibi H., Larijani B. Advancement of Organoid Technology in Regenerative Medicine. Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. 2023;9:83–96. doi: 10.1007/s40883-022-00271-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang X., Liu N., Zhang H., Yin Z., Zha Z.-G. From Cells to Organs: Progress and Potential in Cartilaginous Organoids Research. J. Transl. Med. 2023;21:926. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04591-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Werschler N., Quintard C., Nguyen S., Penninger J. Engineering next Generation Vascularized Organoids. Atherosclerosis. 2024;398:118529. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.118529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Holtfreter J. Neural Differentiation of Ectoderm through Exposure to Saline Solution. J. Exp. Zool. 1944;95:307–343. doi: 10.1002/jez.1400950303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weiss P., Taylor A.C. Reconstitution of Complete Organs from Single-Cell Suspensions of Chick Embryos in Advanced Stages of Differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1960;46:1177–1185. doi: 10.1073/pnas.46.9.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wilson H.V. A New Method by Which Sponges May Be Artificially Reared. Science. 1907;25:912–915. doi: 10.1126/science.25.649.912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Evans M.J., Kaufman M.H. Establishment in Culture of Pluripotential Cells from Mouse Embryos. Nature. 1981;292:154–156. doi: 10.1038/292154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thomson J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Shapiro S.S., Waknitz M.A., Swiergiel J.J., Marshall V.S., Jones J.M. Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts. Science. 1998;282:1145–1147. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Eiraku M., Watanabe K., Matsuo-Takasaki M., Kawada M., Yonemura S., Matsumura M., Wataya T., Nishiyama A., Muguruma K., Sasai Y. Self-Organized Formation of Polarized Cortical Tissues from ESCs and Its Active Manipulation by Extrinsic Signals. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3:519–532. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Barker N., Huch M., Kujala P., van de Wetering M., Snippert H.J., van Es J.H., Sato T., Stange D.E., Begthel H., van den Born M., et al. Lgr5+ve Stem Cells Drive Self-Renewal in the Stomach and Build Long-Lived Gastric Units In Vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Boj S.F., Hwang C.-I., Baker L.A., Chio I.I.C., Engle D.D., Corbo V., Jager M., Ponz-Sarvise M., Tiriac H., Spector M.S., et al. Organoid Models of Human and Mouse Ductal Pancreatic Cancer. Cell. 2015;160:324–338. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Huch M., Dorrell C., Boj S.F., van Es J.H., Li V.S.W., van de Wetering M., Sato T., Hamer K., Sasaki N., Finegold M.J., et al. In Vitro Expansion of Single Lgr5+ Liver Stem Cells Induced by Wnt-Driven Regeneration. Nature. 2013;494:247–250. doi: 10.1038/nature11826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lamers M.M., Van Der Vaart J., Knoops K., Riesebosch S., Breugem T.I., Mykytyn A.Z., Beumer J., Schipper D., Bezstarosti K., Koopman C.D., et al. An Organoid-derived Bronchioalveolar Model for SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Alveolar Type II-Like Cells. EMBO J. 2021;40:e105912. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lancaster M.A., Renner M., Martin C.-A., Wenzel D., Bicknell L.S., Hurles M.E., Homfray T., Penninger J.M., Jackson A.P., Knoblich J.A. Cerebral Organoids Model Human Brain Development and Microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501:373–379. doi: 10.1038/nature12517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Salahudeen A.A., Choi S.S., Rustagi A., Zhu J., van Unen V., de la O S.M., Flynn R.A., Margalef-Català M., Santos A.J.M., Ju J., et al. Progenitor Identification and SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Distal Lung Organoids. Nature. 2020;588:670–675. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-3014-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Taguchi A., Kaku Y., Ohmori T., Sharmin S., Ogawa M., Sasaki H., Nishinakamura R. Redefining the in Vivo Origin of Metanephric Nephron Progenitors Enables Generation of Complex Kidney Structures from Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14:53–67. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Turco M.Y., Gardner L., Kay R.G., Hamilton R.S., Prater M., Hollinshead M.S., McWhinnie A., Esposito L., Fernando R., Skelton H., et al. Trophoblast Organoids as a Model for Maternal–Fetal Interactions during Human Placentation. Nature. 2018;564:263–267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0753-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gordon A., Yoon S.-J., Tran S.S., Makinson C.D., Park J.Y., Andersen J., Valencia A.M., Horvath S., Xiao X., Huguenard J.R., et al. Long-Term Maturation of Human Cortical Organoids Matches Key Early Postnatal Transitions. Nat. Neurosci. 2021;24:331–342. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00802-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Capendale P.E., Wolthers K.C., Pajkrt D. What is a Neurotropic Virus: Discrepancies in Terminology between Clinical and Basic Science. Med. 2023;4:660–663. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2023.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Koyuncu O.O., Hogue I.B., Enquist L.W. Virus Infections in the Nervous System. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:379–393. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lalande A., Mathieu C. Ex Vivo Study of Neuroinvasive and Neurotropic Viruses: What Is Current and What Is Next. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2025;49:fuaf024. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuaf024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.LaNoce E., Dumeng-Rodriguez J., Christian K.M. Using 2D and 3D Pluripotent Stem Cell Models to Study Neurotropic Viruses. Front. Virol. 2022;2:869657. doi: 10.3389/fviro.2022.869657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang Y., Xing X., Long B., Cao Y., Hu S., Li X., Yu Y., Tian D., Sui B., Luo Z., et al. A Spatial and Cellular Distribution of Neurotropic Virus Infection in the Mouse Brain Revealed by fMOST and Single Cell RNA-Seq. bioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.03.26.436691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baronti C., Piorkowski G., Charrel R.N., Boubis L., Leparc-Goffart I., De Lamballerie X. Complete Coding Sequence of Zika Virus from a French Polynesia Outbreak in 2013. Genome Announc. 2014;2:e00500-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00500-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Elliott K.C., Mattapallil J.J. Zika Virus—A Reemerging Neurotropic Arbovirus Associated with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Neuropathogenesis. Pathogens. 2024;13:177. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13020177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Giraldo M.I., Gonzalez-Orozco M., Rajsbaum R. Pathogenesis of Zika Virus Infection. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2023;18:181–203. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-031521-034739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Komarasamy T.V., Adnan N.A.A., James W., Balasubramaniam V.R.M.T. Zika Virus Neuropathogenesis: The Different Brain Cells, Host Factors and Mechanisms Involved. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:773191. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.773191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kuno G., Chang G.-J.J. Biological Transmission of Arboviruses: Reexamination of and New Insights into Components, Mechanisms, and Unique Traits as Well as Their Evolutionary Trends. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005;18:608–637. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.4.608-637.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dang J., Tiwari S.K., Lichinchi G., Qin Y., Patil V.S., Eroshkin A.M., Rana T.M. Zika Virus Depletes Neural Progenitors in Human Cerebral Organoids through Activation of the Innate Immune Receptor TLR3. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19:258–265. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Garcez P.P., Loiola E.C., Madeiro Da Costa R., Higa L.M., Trindade P., Delvecchio R., Nascimento J.M., Brindeiro R., Tanuri A., Rehen S.K. Zika Virus Impairs Growth in Human Neurospheres and Brain Organoids. Science. 2016;352:816–818. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Salick M.R., Wells M.F., Eggan K., Kaykas A. Modelling Zika Virus Infection of the Developing Human Brain In Vitro Using Stem Cell Derived Cerebral Organoids. J. Vis. Exp. 2017;127:56404. doi: 10.3791/56404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Qian X., Nguyen H.N., Song M.M., Hadiono C., Ogden S.C., Hammack C., Yao B., Hamersky G.R., Jacob F., Zhong C., et al. Brain-Region-Specific Organoids Using Mini-Bioreactors for Modeling ZIKV Exposure. Cell. 2016;165:1238–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Cavalcante B.R.R., Aragão-França L.S., Sampaio G.L.A., Nonaka C.K.V., Oliveira M.S., Campos G.S., Sardi S.I., Dias B.R.S., Menezes J.P.B., Rocha V.P.C., et al. Betulinic Acid Exerts Cytoprotective Activity on Zika Virus-Infected Neural Progenitor Cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:558324. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.558324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhu Z., Mesci P., Bernatchez J.A., Gimple R.C., Wang X., Schafer S.T., Wettersten H.I., Beck S., Clark A.E., Wu Q., et al. Zika Virus Targets Glioblastoma Stem Cells through a SOX2-Integrin Avβ5 Axis. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26:187–204.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wells M.F., Salick M.R., Wiskow O., Ho D.J., Worringer K.A., Ihry R.J., Kommineni S., Bilican B., Klim J.R., Hill E.J., et al. Genetic Ablation of AXL Does Not Protect Human Neural Progenitor Cells and Cerebral Organoids from Zika Virus Infection. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19:703–708. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bello-Morales R., Andreu S., López-Guerrero J.A. The Role of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection in Demyelination of the Central Nervous System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5026. doi: 10.3390/ijms21145026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Held K., Derfuss T. Control of HSV-1 Latency in Human Trigeminal Ganglia—Current Overview. J. Neurovirol. 2011;17:518–527. doi: 10.1007/s13365-011-0063-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Qiao H., Zhao W., Guo M., Zhu L., Chen T., Wang J., Xu X., Zhang Z., Wu Y., Chen P. Cerebral Organoids for Modeling of HSV-1-Induced-Amyloid β Associated Neuropathology and Phenotypic Rescue. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:5981. doi: 10.3390/ijms23115981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Walker P.J., Siddell S.G., Lefkowitz E.J., Mushegian A.R., Adriaenssens E.M., Alfenas-Zerbini P., Dempsey D.M., Dutilh B.E., García M.L., Curtis Hendrickson R., et al. Recent Changes to Virus Taxonomy Ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2022) Arch. Virol. 2022;167:2429–2440. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05516-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.D’Aiuto L., Bloom D.C., Naciri J.N., Smith A., Edwards T.G., McClain L., Callio J.A., Jessup M., Wood J., Chowdari K., et al. Modeling Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infections in Human Central Nervous System Neuronal Cells Using Two- and Three-Dimensional Cultures Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. J. Virol. 2019;93:e00111-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00111-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Qiao H., Guo M., Shang J., Zhao W., Wang Z., Liu N., Li B., Zhou Y., Wu Y., Chen P. Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection Leads to Neurodevelopmental Disorder-Associated Neuropathological Changes. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008899. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Abrahamson E.E., Zheng W., Muralidaran V., Ikonomovic M.D., Bloom D.C., Nimgaonkar V.L., D’Aiuto L. Modeling Aβ42 Accumulation in Response to Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infection: 2D or 3D? J. Virol. 2021;95:e02219-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02219-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Krenn V., Bosone C., Burkard T.R., Spanier J., Kalinke U., Calistri A., Salata C., Rilo Christoff R., Pestana Garcez P., Mirazimi A., et al. Organoid Modeling of Zika and Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infections Reveals Virus-Specific Responses Leading to Microcephaly. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:1362–1379.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Rybak-Wolf A., Wyler E., Pentimalli T.M., Legnini I., Oliveras Martinez A., Glažar P., Loewa A., Kim S.J., Kaufer B.B., Woehler A., et al. Modelling Viral Encephalitis Caused by Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infection in Cerebral Organoids. Nat. Microbiol. 2023;8:1252–1266. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01405-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bellizzi A., Çakır S., Donadoni M., Sariyer R., Liao S., Liu H., Ruan G.-X., Gordon J., Khalili K., Sariyer I.K. Suppression of HSV-1 Infection and Viral Reactivation by CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing in 2D and 3D Culture Models. Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids. 2024;35:102282. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Fox D. What You Need to Know about the Novel Coronavirus. Nature. 2020:d41586-020-00209-y. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00209-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Khan S., Siddique R., Bai Q., Shabana, Liu Y., Xue M., Nabi G., Liu J. Coronaviruses Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Causative Agent, Mental Health Concerns, and Potential Management Options. J. Infect. Public Health. 2020;13:1840–1844. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lou J.J., Movassaghi M., Gordy D., Olson M.G., Zhang T., Khurana M.S., Chen Z., Perez-Rosendahl M., Thammachantha S., Singer E.J., et al. Neuropathology of COVID-19 (Neuro-COVID): Clinicopathological Update. Free Neuropathol. 2021;2:2. doi: 10.17879/freeneuropathology-2021-2993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Matschke J., Lütgehetmann M., Hagel C., Sperhake J.P., Schröder A.S., Edler C., Mushumba H., Fitzek A., Allweiss L., Dandri M., et al. Neuropathology of Patients with COVID-19 in Germany: A Post-Mortem Case Series. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:919–929. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30308-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Song W.-J., Hui C.K.M., Hull J.H., Birring S.S., McGarvey L., Mazzone S.B., Chung K.F. Confronting COVID-19-Associated Cough and the Post-COVID Syndrome: Role of Viral Neurotropism, Neuroinflammation, and Neuroimmune Responses. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021;9:533–544. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00125-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhang B.-Z., Chu H., Han S., Shuai H., Deng J., Hu Y., Gong H., Lee A.C.-Y., Zou Z., Yau T., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infects Human Neural Progenitor Cells and Brain Organoids. Cell Res. 2020;30:928–931. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0390-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ramani A., Müller L., Ostermann P.N., Gabriel E., Abida-Islam P., Müller-Schiffmann A., Mariappan A., Goureau O., Gruell H., Walker A., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Targets Neurons of 3D Human Brain Organoids. EMBO J. 2020;39:e106230. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020106230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Jacob F., Pather S.R., Huang W.-K., Zhang F., Wong S.Z.H., Zhou H., Cubitt B., Fan W., Chen C.Z., Xu M., et al. Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Cells and Brain Organoids Reveal SARS-CoV-2 Neurotropism Predominates in Choroid Plexus Epithelium. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:937–950.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pellegrini L., Albecka A., Mallery D.L., Kellner M.J., Paul D., Carter A.P., James L.C., Lancaster M.A. SARS-CoV-2 Infects the Brain Choroid Plexus and Disrupts the Blood-CSF Barrier in Human Brain Organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:951–961.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kong W., Montano M., Corley M.J., Helmy E., Kobayashi H., Kinisu M., Suryawanshi R., Luo X., Royer L.A., Roan N.R., et al. Neuropilin-1 Mediates SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Astrocytes in Brain Organoids, Inducing Inflammation Leading to Dysfunction and Death of Neurons. mBio. 2022;13:e0230822. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02308-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wang L., Sievert D., Clark A.E., Lee S., Federman H., Gastfriend B.D., Shusta E.V., Palecek S.P., Carlin A.F., Gleeson J.G. A Human Three-Dimensional Neural-Perivascular ‘Assembloid’ Promotes Astrocytic Development and Enables Modeling of SARS-CoV-2 Neuropathology. Nat. Med. 2021;27:1600–1606. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01443-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Andrews M.G., Mukhtar T., Eze U.C., Simoneau C.R., Ross J., Parikshak N., Wang S., Zhou L., Koontz M., Velmeshev D., et al. Tropism of SARS-CoV-2 for Human Cortical Astrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2122236119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122236119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Colinet M., Chiver I., Bonafina A., Masset G., Almansa D., Di Valentin E., Twizere J.-C., Nguyen L., Espuny-Camacho I. SARS-CoV2 Infection Triggers Inflammatory Conditions and Astrogliosis-Related Gene Expression in Long-Term Human Cortical Organoids. Stem Cells. 2025;43:sxaf010. doi: 10.1093/stmcls/sxaf010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hou Y., Li C., Yoon C., Leung O.W., You S., Cui X., Chan J.F.-W., Pei D., Cheung H.H., Chu H. Enhanced Replication of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 in Human Forebrain and Midbrain Organoids. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:381. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01241-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Stewart R., Yan K., Ellis S.A., Bishop C.R., Dumenil T., Tang B., Nguyen W., Larcher T., Parry R., Sng J.D.J., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 and XBB Variants Have Increased Neurotropic Potential Over BA.1 in K18-hACE2 Mice and Human Brain Organoids. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1320856. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1320856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Mesci P., de Souza J.S., Martin-Sancho L., Macia A., Saleh A., Yin X., Snethlage C., Adams J.W., Avansini S.H., Herai R.H., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infects Human Brain Organoids Causing Cell Death and Loss of Synapses That Can Be Rescued by Treatment with Sofosbuvir. PLoS Biol. 2022;20:e3001845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Joseph A., Mahida N., Clark G., Irving W., Soo S. Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. Paediatr. Child Health. 2018;28:277–281. doi: 10.1016/j.paed.2018.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Zuhair M., Smit G.S.A., Wallis G., Jabbar F., Smith C., Devleesschauwer B., Griffiths P. Estimation of the Worldwide Seroprevalence of Cytomegalovirus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Rev. Med. Virol. 2019;29:e2034. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Brown R.M., Rana P.S.J.B., Jaeger H.K., O’Dowd J.M., Balemba O.B., Fortunato E.A. Human Cytomegalovirus Compromises Development of Cerebral Organoids. J. Virol. 2019;93:e00957-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00957-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sison S.L., O’Brien B.S., Johnson A.J., Seminary E.R., Terhune S.S., Ebert A.D. Human Cytomegalovirus Disruption of Calcium Signaling in Neural Progenitor Cells and Organoids. J. Virol. 2019;93:e00954-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00954-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Sun G., Chiuppesi F., Chen X., Wang C., Tian E., Nguyen J., Kha M., Trinh D., Zhang H., Marchetto M.C., et al. Modeling Human Cytomegalovirus-Induced Microcephaly in Human iPSC-Derived Brain Organoids. Cell Rep. Med. 2020;1:100002. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.O’Brien B.S., Mokry R.L., Schumacher M.L., Pulakanti K., Rao S., Terhune S.S., Ebert A.D. Downregulation of Neurodevelopmental Gene Expression in iPSC-Derived Cerebral Organoids upon Infection by Human Cytomegalovirus. iScience. 2022;25:104098. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Mokry R.L., O’Brien B.S., Adelman J.W., Rosas S., Schumacher M.L., Ebert A.D., Terhune S.S. Nitric Oxide Attenuates Human Cytomegalovirus Infection yet Disrupts Neural Cell Differentiation and Tissue Organization. J. Virol. 2022;96:e0012622. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00126-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ijezie E.C., O’Dowd J.M., Kuan M.I., Faeth A.R., Fortunato E.A. HCMV Infection Reduces Nidogen-1 Expression, Contributing to Impaired Neural Rosette Development in Brain Organoids. J. Virol. 2023;97:e0171822. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01718-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Lee J., Son S., Ko Y., Lim H., Lee M., Kang M., Kim H., Lee K., Shin I. Nidogen-1 Suppresses Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Glycolysis via Integrin B1-Mediated HIF-1α Downregulation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:10633. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84880-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Dong X.-D., Li Y., Li Y., Sun C., Liu S.-X., Duan H., Cui R., Zhong Q., Mou Y.-G., Wen L., et al. EphA2 is a Functional Entry Receptor for HCMV Infection of Glioblastoma Cells. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19:e1011304. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Readhead B.P., Mastroeni D.F., Wang Q., Sierra M.A., de Ávila C., Jimoh T.O., Haure-Mirande J.-V., Atanasoff K.E., Nolz J., Suazo C., et al. Alzheimer’s Disease-Associated CD83(+) Microglia Are Linked with Increased Immunoglobulin G4 and Human Cytomegalovirus in the Gut, Vagal Nerve, and Brain. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2025;21:e14401. doi: 10.1002/alz.14401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Abreu C.M., Gama L., Krasemann S., Chesnut M., Odwin-Dacosta S., Hogberg H.T., Hartung T., Pamies D. Microglia Increase Inflammatory Responses in iPSC-Derived Human BrainSpheres. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2766. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Liao Y.-C., Yeh C.-C., Chueh Y.-F., Huang M.-S., Wu J.-S., Wen Y.-X., Chang Y.-T., Lai Y.-R., Chen J.-J., Chang T.-H. Effects of the Oxoaporphine Alkaloid Hernandonine on Dengue Virus. Evidence for Its Mechanisms of Action. Phytomedicine. 2024;134:155986. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Yun S.-I., Lee Y.-M. Japanese Encephalitis: The Virus and Vaccines. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2014;10:263–279. doi: 10.4161/hv.26902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Zhang B., He Y., Xu Y., Mo F., Mi T., Shen Q.S., Li C., Li Y., Liu J., Wu Y., et al. Differential Antiviral Immunity to Japanese Encephalitis Virus in Developing Cortical Organoids. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:719. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0763-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Davaro R.E. Measles Virus. In: Fraire A.E., Woda B.A., Welsh R.M., Kradin R.L., editors. Viruses and the Lung. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2014. pp. 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Rima B., Balkema-Buschmann A., Dundon W.G., Duprex P., Easton A., Fouchier R., Kurath G., Lamb R., Lee B., Rota P., et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Paramyxoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2019;100:1593–1594. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Mathieu C., Bovier F.T., Ferren M., Lieberman N.A.P., Predella C., Lalande A., Peddu V., Lin M.J., Addetia A., Patel A., et al. Molecular Features of the Measles Virus Viral Fusion Complex That Favor Infection and Spread in the Brain. mBio. 2021;12:e0079921. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00799-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lumkong L., Alatrash R., Sridhar S., Tonto P.B., Herrera B.B. Development of an RT-RPA Assay for La Crosse Virus Detection Provides Insights Into Age-Dependent Neuroinvasion in Mice. Virol. J. 2025;22:95. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02720-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Bennett R.S., Cress C.M., Ward J.M., Firestone C.-Y., Murphy B.R., Whitehead S.S. La Crosse Virus Infectivity, Pathogenesis, and Immunogenicity in Mice and Monkeys. Virol. J. 2008;5:25. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-5-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ojha D., Winkler C.W., Leung J.M., Woods T.A., Chen C.Z., Nair V., Taylor K., Yeh C.D., Tawa G.J., Larson C.L., et al. Rottlerin Inhibits La Crosse Virus-Induced Encephalitis in Mice and Blocks Release of Replicating Virus from the Golgi Body in Neurons. Nat. Microbiol. 2021;6:1398–1409. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00968-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Winkler C.W., Woods T.A., Groveman B.R., Carmody A.B., Speranza E.E., Martens C.A., Best S.M., Haigh C.L., Peterson K.E. Neuronal Maturation Reduces the Type I IFN Response to Orthobunyavirus Infection and Leads to Increased Apoptosis of Human Neurons. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019;16:229. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1614-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Saribas A.S., Ozdemir A., Lam C., Safak M. JC Virus-Induced Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy. Future Virol. 2010;5:313–323. doi: 10.2217/fvl.10.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Seppälä H., Virtanen E., Saarela M., Laine P., Paulín L., Mannonen L., Auvinen P., Auvinen E. Single-Molecule Sequencing Revealing the Presence of Distinct JC Polyomavirus Populations in Patients with Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy. J. Infect. Dis. 2017;215:889–895. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Barreras P., Pamies D., Monaco M.C., Muñoz L.S., Zhong X., Major E.O., Hogberg H.T., Hartung T., Pardo C.A. A Human-Derived 3D Brain Organoid Model to Study JC Virus Infection. J. Neurovirol. 2022;28:17–26. doi: 10.1007/s13365-022-01062-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Cairns D.M., Rouleau N., Parker R.N., Walsh K.G., Gehrke L., Kaplan D.L. A 3D Human Brain–like Tissue Model of Herpes-induced Alzheimer’s Disease. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaay8828. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay8828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Spence J.R., Mayhew C.N., Rankin S.A., Kuhar M.F., Vallance J.E., Tolle K., Hoskins E.E., Kalinichenko V.V., Wells S.I., Zorn A.M., et al. Directed Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells into Intestinal Tissue In Vitro. Nature. 2011;470:105–109. doi: 10.1038/nature09691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Wells J.M., Spence J.R. How to Make an Intestine. Dev. Camb. Engl. 2014;141:752–760. doi: 10.1242/dev.097386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Ettayebi K., Crawford S.E., Murakami K., Broughman J.R., Karandikar U., Tenge V.R., Neill F.H., Blutt S.E., Zeng X.-L., Qu L., et al. Replication of Human Noroviruses in Stem Cell-Derived Human Enteroids. Science. 2016;353:1387–1393. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Co J.Y., Margalef-Català M., Li X., Mah A.T., Kuo C.J., Monack D.M., Amieva M.R. Controlling Epithelial Polarity: A Human Enteroid Model for Host-Pathogen Interactions. Cell Rep. 2019;26:2509–2520.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Haga K., Ettayebi K., Tenge V.R., Karandikar U.C., Lewis M.A., Lin S.-C., Neill F.H., Ayyar B.V., Zeng X.-L., Larson G., et al. Genetic Manipulation of Human Intestinal Enteroids Demonstrates the Necessity of a Functional Fucosyltransferase 2 Gene for Secretor-Dependent Human Norovirus Infection. mBio. 2020;11:e00251-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00251-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Saxena K., Blutt S.E., Ettayebi K., Zeng X.-L., Broughman J.R., Crawford S.E., Karandikar U.C., Sastri N.P., Conner M.E., Opekun A.R., et al. Human Intestinal Enteroids: A New Model To Study Human Rotavirus Infection, Host Restriction, and Pathophysiology. J. Virol. 2016;90:43–56. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01930-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Estes M.K., Ettayebi K., Tenge V.R., Murakami K., Karandikar U., Lin S.-C., Ayyar B.V., Cortes-Penfield N.W., Haga K., Neill F.H., et al. Human Norovirus Cultivation in Nontransformed Stem Cell-Derived Human Intestinal Enteroid Cultures: Success and Challenges. Viruses. 2019;11:638. doi: 10.3390/v11070638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Vinjé J., Estes M.K., Esteves P., Green K.Y., Katayama K., Knowles N.J., L’Homme Y., Martella V., Vennema H., White P.A., et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Caliciviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2019;100:1469–1470. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Ettayebi K., Kaur G., Patil K., Dave J., Ayyar B.V., Tenge V.R., Neill F.H., Zeng X.-L., Speer A.L., Di Rienzi S.C., et al. Insights into Human Norovirus Cultivation in Human Intestinal Enteroids. mSphere. 2024;9:e0044824. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00448-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Zhang D., Tan M., Zhong W., Xia M., Huang P., Jiang X. Human Intestinal Organoids Express Histo-Blood Group Antigens, Bind Norovirus VLPs, and Support Limited Norovirus Replication. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:12621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12736-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ettayebi K., Tenge V.R., Cortes-Penfield N.W., Crawford S.E., Neill F.H., Zeng X.-L., Yu X., Ayyar B.V., Burrin D., Ramani S., et al. New Insights and Enhanced Human Norovirus Cultivation in Human Intestinal Enteroids. mSphere. 2021;6:e01136-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01136-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Tenge V., Ayyar B.V., Ettayebi K., Crawford S.E., Hayes N.M., Shen Y.-T., Neill F.H., Atmar R.L., Estes M.K. Bile Acid-Sensitive Human Norovirus Strains Are Susceptible to Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 2 Inhibition. J. Virol. 2024;98:e0202023. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02020-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Tenge V.R., Hu L., Prasad B.V.V., Larson G., Atmar R.L., Estes M.K., Ramani S. Glycan Recognition in Human Norovirus Infections. Viruses. 2021;13:2066. doi: 10.3390/v13102066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Hosmillo M., Chaudhry Y., Nayak K., Sorgeloos F., Koo B.-K., Merenda A., Lillestol R., Drumright L., Zilbauer M., Goodfellow I. Norovirus Replication in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells Is Restricted by the Interferon-Induced JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway and RNA Polymerase II-Mediated Transcriptional Responses. mBio. 2020;11:e00215-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00215-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Lin S.-C., Qu L., Ettayebi K., Crawford S.E., Blutt S.E., Robertson M.J., Zeng X.-L., Tenge V.R., Ayyar B.V., Karandikar U.C., et al. Human Norovirus Exhibits Strain-Specific Sensitivity to Host Interferon Pathways in Human Intestinal Enteroids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:23782–23793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010834117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Nolan L.S., Baldridge M.T. Advances in Understanding Interferon-Mediated Immune Responses to Enteric Viruses in Intestinal Organoids. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:943334. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.943334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.König K.M.K., Jahun A.S., Nayak K., Drumright L.N., Zibauer M., Goodfellow I., Hosmillo M. Design, Development, and Validation of a Strand-Specific RT-qPCR Assay for GI and GII Human Noroviruses. Wellcome Open Res. 2021;6:245. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17078.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Lin S.-C., Haga K., Zeng X.-L., Estes M.K. Generation of CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genetic Knockout Human Intestinal Tissue-Derived Enteroid Lines by Lentivirus Transduction and Single-Cell Cloning. Nat. Protoc. 2022;17:1004–1027. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00669-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Dang W., Xu L., Ma B., Chen S., Yin Y., Chang K.-O., Peppelenbosch M.P., Pan Q. Nitazoxanide Inhibits Human Norovirus Replication and Synergizes with Ribavirin by Activation of Cellular Antiviral Response. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e00707-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00707-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Scribano F.J., Gebert J.T., Engevik K.A., Hayes N.M., Villanueva J., Pham S., Kaundal S., Dave J.J., Prasad B.V.V., Estes M.K., et al. BTP2 Restricts Tulane Virus and Human Norovirus Replication Independent of Store-Operated Calcium Entry. J. Virol. 2025;99:e0044425. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00444-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.van Kampen J.J.A., Dalm V.A.S.H., Fraaij P.L.A., Oude Munnink B.B., Schapendonk C.M.E., Izquierdo-Lara R.W., Villabruna N., Ettayebi K., Estes M.K., Koopmans M.P.G., et al. Clinical and In Vitro Evidence Favoring Immunoglobulin Treatment of a Chronic Norovirus Infection in a Patient with Common Variable Immunodeficiency. J. Infect. Dis. 2022;226:1781–1789. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Greenberg H.B., Estes M.K. Rotaviruses: From Pathogenesis to Vaccination. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1939–1951. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Zafari E., Soleimanjahi H., Mohammadi A., Teimoori A., Mahravani H. Molecular and Biological Characterization of the Human-Bovine Rotavirus-Based Reassortant Rotavirus. Microb. Pathog. 2018;121:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Mukherjee A., Chawla-Sarkar M. Rotavirus Infection: A Perspective on Epidemiology, Genomic Diversity and Vaccine Strategies. Indian J. Virol. 2011;22:11–23. doi: 10.1007/s13337-011-0039-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Mullick S., Mukherjee A., Ghosh S., Pazhani G.P., Sur D., Manna B., Nataro J.P., Levine M.M., Ramamurthy T., Chawla-Sarkar M. Community Based Case-Control Study of Rotavirus Gastroenteritis among Young Children during 2008–2010 Reveals Vast Genetic Diversity and Increased Prevalence of G9 Strains in Kolkata. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e112970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Crawford S.E., Ramani S., Tate J.E., Parashar U.D., Svensson L., Hagbom M., Franco M.A., Greenberg H.B., O’Ryan M., Kang G., et al. Rotavirus Infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:17083. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Suzuki H. Rotavirus Replication: Gaps of Knowledge on Virus Entry and Morphogenesis. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2019;248:285–296. doi: 10.1620/tjem.248.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Hakim M.S., Chen S., Ding S., Yin Y., Ikram A., Ma X.-X., Wang W., Peppelenbosch M.P., Pan Q. Basal Interferon Signaling and Therapeutic Use of Interferons in Controlling Rotavirus Infection in Human Intestinal Cells and Organoids. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:8341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26784-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Guo C., Sharma A.K., Guzmán J., Herrmann C., Boulant S., Stanifer M.L. Interleukin-22 Promotes Cell Proliferation to Combat Virus Infection in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2024;44:438–452. doi: 10.1089/jir.2024.0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Zhang R., Feng C., Luo D., Zhao R., Kannan P.R., Yin Y., Iqbal M.Z., Hu Y., Kong X. Metformin Hydrochloride Significantly Inhibits Rotavirus Infection in Caco2 Cell Line, Intestinal Organoids, and Mice. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16:1279. doi: 10.3390/ph16091279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Cieza R.J., Golob J.L., Colacino J.A., Wobus C.E. Comparative Analysis of Public RNA-Sequencing Data from Human Intestinal Enteroid (HIEs) Infected with Enteric RNA Viruses Identifies Universal and Virus-Specific Epithelial Responses. Viruses. 2021;13:1059. doi: 10.3390/v13061059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Gebert J.T., Scribano F.J., Engevik K.A., Hyser J.M. Live Calcium Imaging of Virus-Infected Human Intestinal Organoid Monolayers Using Genetically Encoded Calcium Indicators. J. Vis. Exp. 2024;203:66132. doi: 10.3791/66132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Chee J., Chern B., Loh W.S., Mullol J., Wang D.Y. Pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Nasal Respiratory and Olfactory Epithelia and Its Clinical Impact. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2023;23:121–131. doi: 10.1007/s11882-022-01059-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Guimarães Sousa S., Kleiton de Sousa A., Maria Carvalho Pereira C., Sofia Miranda Loiola Araújo A., de Aguiar Magalhães D., Vieira de Brito T., Barbosa A.L.D.R. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Causes Intestinal Cell Damage: Role of Interferon’s Imbalance. Cytokine. 2022;152:155826. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2022.155826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Friedel D.M., Cappell M.S. Diarrhea and Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2023;52:59–75. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2022.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Zhang F., Lau R.I., Liu Q., Su Q., Chan F.K.L., Ng S.C. Gut Microbiota in COVID-19: Key Microbial Changes, Potential Mechanisms and Clinical Applications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023;20:323–337. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00698-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Lamers M.M., Beumer J., van der Vaart J., Knoops K., Puschhof J., Breugem T.I., Ravelli R.B.G., Paul van Schayck J., Mykytyn A.Z., Duimel H.Q., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Productively Infects Human Gut Enterocytes. Science. 2020;369:50–54. doi: 10.1126/science.abc1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Zhou J., Li C., Liu X., Chiu M.C., Zhao X., Wang D., Wei Y., Lee A., Zhang A.J., Chu H., et al. Infection of Bat and Human Intestinal Organoids by SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1077–1083. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0912-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Elbadawy M., Kato Y., Saito N., Hayashi K., Abugomaa A., Kobayashi M., Yoshida T., Shibutani M., Kaneda M., Yamawaki H., et al. Establishment of Intestinal Organoid from Rousettus Leschenaultii and the Susceptibility to Bat-Associated Viruses, SARS-CoV-2 and Pteropine Orthoreovirus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:10763. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Hashimi M., Sebrell T.A., Hedges J.F., Snyder D., Lyon K.N., Byrum S.D., Mackintosh S.G., Crowley D., Cherne M.D., Skwarchuk D., et al. Antiviral responses in a Jamaican fruit bat intestinal organoid model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:6882. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42610-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Liu X., Li C., Wan Z., Chiu M.C., Huang J., Yu Y., Zhu L., Cai J.-P., Rong L., Song Y.-Q., et al. Analogous Comparison Unravels Heightened Antiviral Defense and Boosted Viral Infection upon Immunosuppression in Bat Organoids. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:392. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01247-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.An Y., Wang C., Wang Z., Kong F., Liu H., Jiang M., Liu T., Zhang S., Du K., Yin L., et al. Tight Junction Protein LSR Is a Host Defense Factor against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Small Intestine. EMBO J. 2024;43:6124–6151. doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00281-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Brevini T., Maes M., Webb G.J., John B.V., Fuchs C.D., Buescher G., Wang L., Griffiths C., Brown M.L., Scott W.E., et al. FXR Inhibition May Protect from SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Reducing ACE2. Nature. 2023;615:134–142. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05594-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Zech F., Schniertshauer D., Jung C., Herrmann A., Cordsmeier A., Xie Q., Nchioua R., Prelli Bozzo C., Volcic M., Koepke L., et al. Spike Residue 403 Affects Binding of Coronavirus Spikes to Human ACE2. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:6855. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27180-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Beumer J., Geurts M.H., Lamers M.M., Puschhof J., Zhang J., van der Vaart J., Mykytyn A.Z., Breugem T.I., Riesebosch S., Schipper D., et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 Genetically Engineered Organoid Biobank Reveals Essential Host Factors for Coronaviruses. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5498. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25729-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Mykytyn A.Z., Breugem T.I., Geurts M.H., Beumer J., Schipper D., van Acker R., van den Doel P.B., van Royen M.E., Zhang J., Clevers H., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Entry Is Type II Transmembrane Serine Protease-Mediated in Human Airway and Intestinal Organoid Models. J. Virol. 2023;97:e0085123. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00851-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Li C., Chu H., Liu X., Chiu M.C., Zhao X., Wang D., Wei Y., Hou Y., Shuai H., Cai J., et al. Human Coronavirus Dependency on Host Heat Shock Protein 90 Reveals an Antiviral Target. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020;9:2663–2672. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1850183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Bigotti M.G., Klein K., Gan E.S., Anastasina M., Andersson S., Vapalahti O., Katajisto P., Erdmann M., Davidson A.D., Butcher S.J., et al. The α-Dystroglycan N-Terminus Is a Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Agent against SARS-CoV-2 and Enveloped Viruses. Antivir. Res. 2024;224:105837. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2024.105837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Rader A.G., Cloherty A.P.M., Patel K.S., Almandawi D.D.A., Perez-Vargas J., Wildenberg M.E., Muncan V., Schreurs R.R.C.E., Jean F., Ribeiro C.M.S. Autophagy-Enhancing Strategies to Promote Intestinal Viral Resistance and Mucosal Barrier Function in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Autophagy Rep. 2025;4:2514232. doi: 10.1080/27694127.2025.2514232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Xu G., Zhou J., Liu K., Wang Y., Tsikari T., Qin F., van den Hil F., Boor P.P.C., Ayada I., de Vries A.C., et al. Macrophage-Augmented Intestinal Organoids Model Virus-Host Interactions in Enteric Viral Diseases and Facilitate Therapeutic Development. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:4475. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59639-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Cherne M.D., Snyder D., Sidar B., Blackwell K., Jenkins B., Huang S., Sebrell T.A., Hedges J.F., Spence J.R., Chang C.B., et al. Strain- and Vaccine-Specific Effects of Serum Antibodies in the Protection of Intestinal SARS-CoV-2 Infection. medRxiv. 2025 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(25)01320-4. medRxiv:2025.03.24.25324570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Zhang Y., Yang N., Li Y., Tan C., Cai Y., Rui X., Liu Y., Fu Y., Liu G. Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus Induces Inflammatory Responses via RIG-I/NF-κB/HIF-1α/Glycolysis Axis in Intestinal Organoids and in Vivo. J. Virol. 2024;98:e0046124. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00461-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Zhang Y., Rui X., Li Y., Zhang Y., Cai Y., Tan C., Yang N., Liu Y., Fu Y., Liu G. Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α Facilitates Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus Replication by Inhibiting Type I and Type III Interferon Production. Vet. Microbiol. 2024;292:110055. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Tsang J.O.-L., Zhou J., Zhao X., Li C., Zou Z., Yin F., Yuan S., Yeung M.-L., Chu H., Chan J.F.-W. Development of Three-Dimensional Human Intestinal Organoids as a Physiologically Relevant Model for Characterizing the Viral Replication Kinetics and Antiviral Susceptibility of Enteroviruses. Biomedicines. 2021;9:88. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9010088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Li C., Chen Y., Zhou X., Lin J., Luo Z. A Human Intestinal Organoid Derived from Fetal Human Colon Cells Model for Studying Enteroviral Pathogenesis. Virulence. 2025;16:2542455. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2025.2542455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.van der Sanden S.M.G., Sachs N., Koekkoek S.M., Koen G., Pajkrt D., Clevers H., Wolthers K.C. Enterovirus 71 Infection of Human Airway Organoids Reveals VP1-145 as a Viral Infectivity Determinant. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018;7:84. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0077-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Huang H.-I., Lin J.-Y., Chiang H.-C., Huang P.-N., Lin Q.-D., Shih S.-R. Exosomes Facilitate Transmission of Enterovirus A71 From Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;222:456–469. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Lulla V., Dinan A.M., Hosmillo M., Chaudhry Y., Sherry L., Irigoyen N., Nayak K.M., Stonehouse N.J., Zilbauer M., Goodfellow I., et al. An Upstream Protein-Coding Region in Enteroviruses Modulates Virus Infection in Gut Epithelial Cells. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:280–292. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0297-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Zhao X., Li C., Chiu M.C., Qiao R., Jiang S., Wang P., Zhou J. Rock1 Is a Novel Host Dependency Factor of Human Enterovirus A71: Implication as a Drug Target. J. Med. Virol. 2022;94:5415–5424. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Zhao X., Qiao R., Hao M., Xu L., Wang D., Lu Y., Li J., Wu J., Li Y., Cheng T., et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 as a Potential Host Target for the Inhibition of Enterovirus Replication. J. Virol. 2024;98:e0112924. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01129-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Ianevski A., Frøysa I.T., Lysvand H., Calitz C., Smura T., Schjelderup Nilsen H.-J., Høyer E., Afset J.E., Sridhar A., Wolthers K.C., et al. The Combination of Pleconaril, Rupintrivir, and Remdesivir Efficiently Inhibits Enterovirus Infections In Vitro, Delaying the Development of Drug-Resistant Virus Variants. Antivir. Res. 2024;224:105842. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2024.105842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Hsu B.-Y., Tsai Y.-H., Weng T.-C., Kung S.-H. Activation of Store-Operated Calcium Entry and Mitochondrial Respiration by Enterovirus 71 is Essential for Efficient Virus Replication. mBio. 2025;16:e0371724. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03717-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Wang Y., Wei Z., Li J., Wang X., Jiang Y., Cui W., Shan Z., Tang L. Senecavirus a Can Replicate in Apical-out Porcine Intestinal Organoids and Induce Stress Granules and Innate Immune Response. Virulence. 2025;16:2548623. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2025.2548623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Olech M., Antas M. Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus (TGEV) and Porcine Respiratory Coronavirus (PRCV): Epidemiology and Molecular Characteristics-An Updated Overview. Viruses. 2025;17:493. doi: 10.3390/v17040493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Li Y., Yang N., Chen J., Huang X., Zhang N., Yang S., Liu G., Liu G. Next-Generation Porcine Intestinal Organoids: An Apical-Out Organoid Model for Swine Enteric Virus Infection and Immune Response Investigations. J. Virol. 2020;94:e01006-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01006-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Yang N., Zhang Y., Fu Y., Li Y., Yang S., Chen J., Liu G. Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus Infection Promotes the Self-Renewal of Porcine Intestinal Stem Cells via Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. J. Virol. 2022;96:e0096222. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00962-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Zhang M., Lv L., Cai H., Li Y., Gao F., Yu L., Jiang Y., Tong W., Li L., Li G., et al. Long-Term Expansion of Porcine Intestinal Organoids Serves as an In Vitro Model for Swine Enteric Coronavirus Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:865336. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.865336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Yang N., Li Y., Cai Y., Liu Y., Zhang Y., Fu Y., Tan C., Willems L., Liu G. A Mucus Layer Derived from Porcine Intestinal Organoid Air-Liquid Interface Monolayer Attenuates Swine Enteric Coronavirus Infection by Antiviral Activity of Muc2. BMC Biol. 2024;22:297. doi: 10.1186/s12915-024-02094-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Li Y., Liu Y., Zhang Y., Tan C., Cai Y., Zhang Y., Chen J., Fu Y., Liu G. In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Thapsigargin as an Antiviral Agent against Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus. Vet. Res. 2024;55:97. doi: 10.1186/s13567-024-01359-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Liu Y., Yang N., Tan C., Zhang Y., Gao S., Cai Y., Zhang Y., Fu Y., Liu G., Li Y. Wuzhishan Miniature Pig-Derived Intestinal 2D Monolayer Organoids to Investigate the Enteric Coronavirus Infection. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024;11:1457719. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1457719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Zhang Y., Chen Y., Zhou J., Wang X., Ma L., Li J., Yang L., Yuan H., Pang D., Ouyang H. Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus: An Updated Overview of Virus Epidemiology, Virulence Variation Patterns and Virus-Host Interactions. Viruses. 2022;14:2434. doi: 10.3390/v14112434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Yen L., Nelli R.K., Twu N.-C., Mora-Díaz J.C., Castillo G., Sitthicharoenchai P., Giménez-Lirola L.G. Development and Characterization of Segment-Specific Enteroids from the Pig Small Intestine in Matrigel and Transwell Inserts: Insights into Susceptibility to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus. Front. Immunol. 2024;15:1451154. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1451154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Lv L., Luo H., Yi J., Zhang K., Li Y., Tong W., Jiang Y., Zhou Y., Tong G., Liu C. IFITM Proteins Are Key Entry Factors for Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Coronavirus. J. Virol. 2025;99:e0202824. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02028-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Qin W., Qi X., Xie Y., Wang H., Wu S., Sun M.-A., Bao W. LncRNA446 Regulates Tight Junctions by Inhibiting the Ubiquitinated Degradation of Alix after Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection. J. Virol. 2023;97:e0188422. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01884-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Liang J.Q., Xie M.-Y., Hou L.-J., Wang H.-L., Luo J.-Y., Sun J.-J., Xi Q.-Y., Jiang Q.-Y., Chen T., Zhang Y.-L. miRNAs Derived from Milk Small Extracellular Vesicles Inhibit Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection. Antivir. Res. 2023;212:105579. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2023.105579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Liu Y., Tan J., Zhang N., Qu Z., Li W., Wu Y., Yin H., Liu G., Fu B. Trichinella Spiralis Excretory/Secretory Antigens Ameliorate Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus-Induced Mucosal Damage in Porcine Intestinal Oganoids by Alleviating Inflammation and Promoting Tight Junction. Int. J. Parasitol. 2025;55:183–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2024.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Zhou J., Li C., Zhao G., Chu H., Wang D., Yan H.H.-N., Poon V.K.-M., Wen L., Wong B.H.-Y., Zhao X., et al. Human Intestinal Tract Serves as an Alternative Infection Route for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. Sci. Adv. 2017;3:eaao4966. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao4966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Kellner M.J., Monteil V.M., Zelger P., Pei G., Jiao J., Onji M., Nayak K., Zilbauer M., Balkema-Buschmann A., Dorhoi A., et al. Bat Organoids Reveal Antiviral Responses at Epithelial Surfaces. Nat. Immunol. 2025;26:934–946. doi: 10.1038/s41590-025-02155-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Wu L., Teng Z., Lin Q., Liu J., Wu H., Kuang X., Cui X., Wang W., Cui X., Yuan Z., et al. Epidemiology and Genetic Characterization of Classical Human Astrovirus Infection in Shanghai, 2015–2016. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:570541. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.570541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Haga K., Tokui T., Miyamoto K., Takai-Todaka R., Kudo S., Ishikawa A., Ishiyama R., Kato A., Yokoyama M., Katayama K., et al. Neonatal Fc Receptor Is a Functional Receptor for Classical Human Astrovirus. Genes Cells. 2024;29:983–1001. doi: 10.1111/gtc.13160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Triana S., Stanifer M.L., Metz-Zumaran C., Shahraz M., Mukenhirn M., Kee C., Serger C., Koschny R., Ordoñez-Rueda D., Paulsen M., et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Immune Response of Intestinal Cell Types to Viral Infection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2021;17:e9833. doi: 10.15252/msb.20209833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Pervolaraki K., Stanifer M.L., Münchau S., Renn L.A., Albrecht D., Kurzhals S., Senís E., Grimm D., Schröder-Braunstein J., Rabin R.L., et al. Type I and Type III Interferons Display Different Dependency on Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases to Mount an Antiviral State in the Human Gut. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:459. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Lee S.-A., Lee H.J., Gu N.-Y., Park Y.-R., Kim E.-J., Kang S.-J., Hyun B.-H., Yang D.-K. Evaluation of Porcine Intestinal Organoids as an In Vitro Model for Mammalian Orthoreovirus 3 Infection. J. Vet. Sci. 2023;24:e53. doi: 10.4142/jvs.23017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Huang L., Hou Q., Ye L., Yang Q., Yu Q. Crosstalk between H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus and Crypt-Derived Intestinal Organoids. Vet. Res. 2017;48:71. doi: 10.1186/s13567-017-0478-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Shin D.-L., Tsai Y.-B., Hsu S.-H., Liang C.-C., Wu N.-H. Chicken Intestinal Organoids Reveal Polarity-Dependent Replication Dynamics and Immune Responses of Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses. Poult. Sci. 2025;104:104921. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Xu G., Qiao Z., Schraauwen R., Avan A., Peppelenbosch M.P., Bijvelds M.J.C., Jiang S., Li P. Evidence for Cross-Species Transmission of Human Coronavirus OC43 through Bioinformatics and Modeling Infections in Porcine Intestinal Organoids. Vet. Microbiol. 2024;293:110101. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Shakya R., Jiménez-Meléndez A., Robertson L.J., Myrmel M. Bovine Enteroids as an In Vitro Model for Infection with Bovine Coronavirus. Viruses. 2023;15:635. doi: 10.3390/v15030635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Zhang S., Cao Y., Huang Y., Zhang X., Mou C., Qin T., Chen Z., Bao W. Abortive PDCoV Infection Triggers Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway Activation, Enhancing Intestinal Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Promoting Chicken Resistance. J. Virol. 2025;99:e0013725. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00137-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Kardia E., Frese M., Smertina E., Strive T., Zeng X.-L., Estes M., Hall R.N. Culture and Differentiation of Rabbit Intestinal Organoids and Organoid-Derived Cell Monolayers. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:5401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84774-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Nie Y.-Z., Zheng Y.-W., Miyakawa K., Murata S., Zhang R.-R., Sekine K., Ueno Y., Takebe T., Wakita T., Ryo A., et al. Recapitulation of Hepatitis B Virus-Host Interactions in Liver Organoids from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. eBioMedicine. 2018;35:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Rao S., Hossain T., Mahmoudi T. 3D Human Liver Organoids: An In Vitro Platform to Investigate HBV Infection, Replication and Liver Tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett. 2021;506:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Sharma S., Rawal P., Kaur S., Puria R. Liver Organoids as a Primary Human Model to Study HBV-Mediated Hepatocellular Carcinoma. A Review. Exp. Cell Res. 2023;428:113618. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Torresi J., Tran B.M., Christiansen D., Earnest-Silveira L., Schwab R.H.M., Vincan E. HBV-Related Hepatocarcinogenesis: The Role of Signalling Pathways and Innovative Ex Vivo Research Models. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:707. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5916-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.De Crignis E., Hossain T., Romal S., Carofiglio F., Moulos P., Khalid M.M., Rao S., Bazrafshan A., Verstegen M.M., Pourfarzad F., et al. Application of Human Liver Organoids as a Patient-Derived Primary Model for HBV Infection and Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. eLife. 2021;10:e60747. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Clark M.P., Huynh T., Rao S., Mackiewicz L., Mason H., Romal S., Stutz M.D., Ahn S.H., Earnest L., Sozzi V., et al. Clinical Stage Drugs Targeting Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins Purge Episomal Hepatitis B Viral Genome in Preclinical Models. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:641. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03924-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Hossain T., Romal S., Mahmoudi T. Production of Recombinant Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Detection of HBV in Infected Human Liver Organoids. Bio-Protocol. 2022;12:e4392. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Romal S., Hossain T., Mahmoudi T. Generation, Maintenance and HBV Infection of Human Liver Organoids. Bio-Protocol. 2022;12:e4358. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Lim C.K., Romeo O., Tran B.M., Flanagan D.J., Kirby E.N., McCartney E.M., Tse E., Vincan E., Beard M.R. Assessment of Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Interhost Cellular Responses Using Intrahepatic Cholangiocyte Organoids. J. Med. Virol. 2023;95:e29232. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Zhou L., Liu C.-H., Lv D., Sample K.M., Rojas Á., Zhang Y., Qiu H., He L., Zheng L., Chen L., et al. Halting Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Identifying Intercellular Crosstalk in HBV-Driven Disease. Cell Rep. 2025;44:115457. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Shen L., Tian L., Guo Q., He R., Zhang Y., Ma S., Hu W., Chen J., Ng S.S., Chen J., et al. Ubiquitinated Hepatitis D Antigen-Induced CD8+ T-Cell Responses Inhibit HDV Replication in HDV-Infected Liver Organoids. Antivir. Res. 2025;243:106266. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2025.106266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Collett S., Torresi J., Silveira L.E., Truong V.K., Christiansen D., Tran B.M., Vincan E., Ramsland P.A., Elbourne A. Investigating Virus-Host Cell Interactions: Comparative Binding Forces between Hepatitis C Virus-Like Particles and Host Cell Receptors in 2D and 3D Cell Culture Models. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;592:371–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.So C.-W., Randall G. Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems for Studying Hepatitis C Virus. Viruses. 2021;13:211. doi: 10.3390/v13020211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Baktash Y., Madhav A., Coller K.E., Randall G. Single Particle Imaging of Polarized Hepatoma Organoids upon Hepatitis C Virus Infection Reveals an Ordered and Sequential Entry Process. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:382–394.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Lee J., Gil D., Park H., Lee Y., Mun S.J., Shin Y., Jo E., Windisch M.P., Kim J.-H., Son M.J. A Multicellular Liver Organoid Model for Investigating Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Progression. Hepatology. 2024;80:186–201. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Natarajan V., Simoneau C.R., Erickson A.L., Meyers N.L., Baron J.L., Cooper S., McDevitt T.C., Ott M. Modelling T-Cell Immunity against Hepatitis C Virus with Liver Organoids in a Microfluidic Coculture System. Open Biol. 2022;12:210320. doi: 10.1098/rsob.210320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Li P., Li Y., Wang Y., Liu J., Lavrijsen M., Li Y., Zhang R., Verstegen M.M.A., Wang Y., Li T.-C., et al. Recapitulating Hepatitis E Virus-Host Interactions and Facilitating Antiviral Drug Discovery in Human Liver-Derived Organoids. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabj5908. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj5908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.King C.R., Dodge M.J., MacNeil K.M., Tessier T.M., Mymryk J.S., Mehle A. Expanding the Adenovirus Toolbox: Reporter Viruses for Studying the Dynamics of Human Adenovirus Replication. J. Virol. 2024;98:e0020724. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00207-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Sallard E., Schulte L., van den Boom A., Klimovitskii A., Knierer J., Hagedorn C., Knocks M., Zhang W., Kreppel F., Ehrhardt A., et al. Development of Oncolytic and Gene Therapy Vectors Based on Adenovirus Serotype 4 as an Alternative to Adenovirus Serotype 5. J. Gene Med. 2024;26:e3576. doi: 10.1002/jgm.3576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Nakatake R., Kaibori M., Nakamura Y., Tanaka Y., Matushima H., Okumura T., Murakami T., Ino Y., Todo T., Kon M. Third-Generation Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus Inhibits the Growth of Liver Tumors in Mice. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:600–610. doi: 10.1111/cas.13492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Tran T.Q., Grein J., Selman M., Annamalai L., Yearley J.H., Blumenschein W.M., Sadekova S., Chackerian A.A., Phan U., Wong J.C. Oncolytic Virus V937 in Combination with PD-1 Blockade Therapy to Target Immunologically Quiescent Liver and Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Ther. Oncol. 2024;32:200807. doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Kardia E., Fakhri O., Pavy M., Mason H., Huang N., Smertina E., Jenckel M., Peng N.Y.G., Estes M.K., Strive T., et al. Hepatobiliary Organoids Derived from Leporids Support the Replication of Hepatotropic Lagoviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2023;104:001874. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Smertina E., Pavy M., Peng N.Y.G., Fahri O., Jenckel M., Strive T., Frese M., Smith I.L. Inhibition of Interferon Signaling Improves Rabbit Calicivirus Replication in Biliary Organoid Cultures. J. Virol. 2025;99:e0057425. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00574-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Yang L., Han Y., Nilsson-Payant B.E., Gupta V., Wang P., Duan X., Tang X., Zhu J., Zhao Z., Jaffré F., et al. A Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Platform to Study SARS-CoV-2 Tropism and Model Virus Infection in Human Cells and Organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:125–136.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Richards A., Friesen M., Khalil A., Barrasa M.I., Gehrke L., Jaenisch R. SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Liver Organoids Reveals Potential Mechanisms of Liver Pathology. iScience. 2022;25:105146. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Lui V.C.-H., Hui K.P.-Y., Babu R.O., Yue H., Chung P.H.-Y., Tam P.K.-H., Chan M.C.-W., Wong K.K.-Y. Human Liver Organoid Derived Intra-Hepatic Bile Duct Cells Support SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Replication. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:5375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09306-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Kulsuptrakul J., Wang R., Meyers N.L., Ott M., Puschnik A.S. A Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen Identifies UFMylation and TRAMP-like Complexes as Host Factors Required for Hepatitis A Virus Infection. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108859. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Guo H., Liu D., Liu K., Hou Y., Li C., Li Q., Ding X., Verstegen M.M.A., Zhang J., Wang L., et al. Drug Repurposing Screen Identifies Vidofludimus Calcium and Pyrazofurin as Novel Chemical Entities for the Development of Hepatitis E Interventions. Virol. Sin. 2024;39:123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.virs.2023.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Li Y., Li P., He Q., Zhang R., Li Y., Kamar N., Peppelenbosch M.P., de Man R.A., Wang L., Pan Q. Niclosamide Inhibits Hepatitis E Virus through Suppression of NF-kappaB Signalling. Antivir. Res. 2022;197:105228. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2021.105228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Liu Y., Sheng J.-Y., Yang C.-F., Ding J., Chan Y.-S. A Decade of Liver Organoids: Advances in Disease Modeling. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2023;29:643–669. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Li M.-Q., Xu Y.-P., Li K., Zhou C., Fan X.-X., Wang H., Shi P.-D., Li R.-T., Wang Z.-X., Cao T.-S., et al. Recapitulating Dengue Virus Infection with Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Liver Organoids for Antiviral Screening. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:8069. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63323-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Cunniff B., Druso J.E., Van Der Velden J.L. Lung Organoids: Advances in Generation and 3D-Visualization. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2021;155:301–308. doi: 10.1007/s00418-020-01955-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Edwards C.E., Tata A., Baric R.S. Human Lung Organoids as a Model for Respiratory Virus Replication and Countermeasure Performance in Human Hosts. Transl. Res. 2022;250:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2022.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.van Dijk L.L.A., Rijsbergen L.C., Rubio B.T., Schmitz K.S., Gommers L., Comvalius A.D., Havelaar A., van Amerongen G., Schepp R., Lamers M.M., et al. Virus Neutralization Assays for Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Using Airway Organoids. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2024;81:267. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05307-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Joo H., Min S., Cho S.-W. Advanced Lung Organoids for Respiratory System and Pulmonary Disease Modeling. J. Tissue Eng. 2024;15:20417314241232502. doi: 10.1177/20417314241232502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Pei R., Feng J., Zhang Y., Sun H., Li L., Yang X., He J., Xiao S., Xiong J., Lin Y., et al. Host Metabolism Dysregulation and Cell Tropism Identification in Human Airway and Alveolar Organoids upon SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Protein Cell. 2021;12:717–733. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00811-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Tindle C., Fuller M., Fonseca A., Taheri S., Ibeawuchi S.-R., Beutler N., Katkar G., Claire A., Castillo V., Hernandez M., et al. Adult Stem Cell-Derived Complete Lung Organoid Models Emulate Lung Disease in COVID-19. bioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2020.10.17.344002. bioRxiv:2020.10.17.344002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Duarte R.R.R., Copertino D.C., Iñiguez L.P., Marston J.L., Bram Y., Han Y., Schwartz R.E., Chen S., Nixon D.F., Powell T.R. Identifying FDA-Approved Drugs with Multimodal Properties against COVID-19 Using a Data-Driven Approach and a Lung Organoid Model of SARS-CoV-2 entry. Mol. Med. 2021;27:105. doi: 10.1186/s10020-021-00356-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Xiang J.S., Mueller J.R., Luo E.-C., Yee B.A., Schafer D., Schmok J.C., Tan F.E., Rothamel K., McVicar R.N., Kwong E.M., et al. Discovery and Functional Interrogation of SARS-CoV-2 Protein-RNA Interactions. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.02.21.481223. bioRxiv:2022.02.21.481223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Rajan A., Weaver A.M., Aloisio G.M., Jelinski J., Johnson H.L., Venable S.F., McBride T., Aideyan L., Piedra F.-A., Ye X., et al. The Human Nose Organoid Respiratory Virus Model: An Ex Vivo Human Challenge Model To Study Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Pathogenesis and Evaluate Therapeutics. mBio. 2021;13:e0351121. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03511-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Hui K.P.Y., Ching R.H.H., Chan S.K.H., Nicholls J.M., Sachs N., Clevers H., Peiris J.S.M., Chan M.C.W. Tropism, Replication Competence, and Innate Immune Responses of Influenza Virus: An Analysis of Human Airway Organoids and Ex-Vivo Bronchus Cultures. Lancet Respir. Med. 2018;6:846–854. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30236-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Rothan H., Mostafa A., Bayoumi M., Ye C., Barre R.S., Allué-Guardia A., Nogales A., Torrelles J.B., Martinez-Sobrido L. Emerging Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Triggers Fibrotic Remodeling in Human Airway Organoids. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2025;14:2532684. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2025.2532684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Gerhards N.M., Vrieling M., Dresken R., Nguyen-van Oort S., Bordes L., Wells J.M., de Swart R.L. Porcine Airway Organoid-Derived Well-Differentiated Epithelial Cultures as a Tool for the Characterization of Swine Influenza a Virus Strains. Viruses. 2024;16:1777. doi: 10.3390/v16111777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Wang D., Li C., Chiu M.C., Yu Y., Liu X., Zhao X., Huang J., Cheng Z., Yuan S., Poon V., et al. SPINK6 Inhibits Human Airway Serine Proteases and Restricts Influenza Virus Activation. EMBO Mol. Med. 2022;14:e14485. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Wong H., Sjaarda C.P., Rand B., Roberts D., Tozer K., Fattouh R., Kozak R., Sheth P.M. The Molecular Epidemiology of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Ontario, Canada from 2022–2024 Using a Custom Whole Genome Sequencing Assay and Analytics Package. J. Clin. Virol. 2025;176:105759. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Harford T.J., Rezaee F., Dye B.R., Fan J., Spence J.R., Piedimonte G. RSV-Induced Changes in a 3-Dimensional Organoid Model of Human Fetal Lungs. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0265094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Luo J., Yang W., Hu Y., Lu D., Chen L., Liu H. Differential Characteristics of Human Airway Organoids at Different Stages of Differentiation After Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection. J. Sichuan Univ. (Med. Sci. Ed.) 2025;56:411–418. doi: 10.12182/20250360508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Griffiths C.D., Bilawchuk L.M., McDonough J.E., Jamieson K.C., Elawar F., Cen Y., Duan W., Lin C., Song H., Casanova J.-L., et al. IGF1R is an Entry Receptor for Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Nature. 2020;583:615–619. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2369-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Li P., Wang Y., Lamers M.M., Lavrijsen M., Iriondo C., de Vries A.C., Rottier R.J., Peppelenbosch M.P., Haagmans B.L., Pan Q. Recapitulating Infection, Thermal Sensitivity and Antiviral Treatment of Seasonal Coronaviruses in Human Airway Organoids. eBioMedicine. 2022;81:104132. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Kim H.-J., Park S., Jeong S., Kim J., Cho Y.-J. Lung Organoid on a Chip: A New Ensemble Model for Preclinical Studies. Int. J. Stem Cells. 2024;17:30–37. doi: 10.15283/ijsc23090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Zhao S., Wu X., Tan Z., Ren Y., Li L., Ou J., Lin Y., Song H., Feng L., Seto D., et al. Generation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Lung Organoids for Modeling Infection and Replication Differences between Human Adenovirus Types 3 and 55 and Evaluating Potential Antiviral Drugs. J. Virol. 2023;97:e0020923. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00209-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Schutgens F., Rookmaaker M.B., Margaritis T., Rios A., Ammerlaan C., Jansen J., Gijzen L., Vormann M., Vonk A., Viveen M., et al. Tubuloids Derived from Human Adult Kidney and Urine for Personalized Disease Modeling. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:303–313. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0048-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Juliar B.A., Stanaway I.B., Sano F., Fu H., Smith K.D., Akilesh S., Scales S.J., El Saghir J., Bhatraju P.K., Liu E., et al. Interferon-γ Induces Combined Pyroptotic Angiopathy and APOL1 Expression in Human Kidney Disease. Cell Rep. 2024;43:114310. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Murray B.O., Flores C., Williams C., Flusberg D.A., Marr E.E., Kwiatkowska K.M., Charest J.L., Isenberg B.C., Rohn J.L. Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: A Mystery in Search of Better Model Systems. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11:691210. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.691210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Nishinakamura R. Human Kidney Organoids: Progress and Remaining Challenges. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019;15:613–624. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0176-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Jansen J., Reimer K.C., Nagai J.S., Varghese F.S., Overheul G.J., de Beer M., Roverts R., Daviran D., Fermin L.A.S., Willemsen B., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infects the Human Kidney and Drives Fibrosis in Kidney Organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29:217–231.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Bouffi C., Wikenheiser-Brokamp K.A., Chaturvedi P., Sundaram N., Goddard G.R., Wunderlich M., Brown N.E., Staab J.F., Latanich R., Zachos N.C., et al. In Vivo Development of Immune Tissue in Human Intestinal Organoids Transplanted into Humanized Mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023;41:824–831. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01558-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Nakanoh H., Tsuji K., Fukushima K., Uchida N., Haraguchi S., Kitamura S., Wada J. Kidney Organoids: Current Advances and Applications. Life. 2025;15:1680. doi: 10.3390/life15111680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Helms L., Marchiano S., Stanaway I.B., Hsiang T.-Y., Juliar B.A., Saini S., Zhao Y.T., Khanna A., Menon R., Alakwaa F., et al. Cross-Validation of SARS-CoV-2 Responses in Kidney Organoids and Clinical Populations. JCI Insight. 2021;6:e154882. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.154882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Wysocki J., Ye M., Hassler L., Gupta A.K., Wang Y., Nicoleascu V., Randall G., Wertheim J.A., Batlle D. A Novel Soluble ACE2 Variant with Prolonged Duration of Action Neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Kidney Organoids. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021;32:795–803. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020101537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Monteil V., Dyczynski M., Lauschke V.M., Kwon H., Wirnsberger G., Youhanna S., Zhang H., Slutsky A.S., Hurtado Del Pozo C., Horn M., et al. Human Soluble ACE2 Improves the Effect of Remdesivir in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. EMBO Mol. Med. 2021;13:e13426. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202013426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Lu J., Xing H., Wang C., Tang M., Wu C., Ye F., Yin L., Yang Y., Tan W., Shen L. Mpox (Formerly Monkeypox): Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023;8:458. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01675-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Sagdat K., Batyrkhan A., Kanayeva D. Exploring Monkeypox Virus Proteins and Rapid Detection Techniques. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024;14:1414224. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1414224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Li P., Du Z., Lamers M.M., Incitti R., Tejeda-Mora H., Li S., Schraauwen R., van den Bosch T.P.P., de Vries A.C., Alam I.S., et al. Mpox Virus Infects and Injures Human Kidney Organoids, but Responding to Antiviral Treatment. Cell Discov. 2023;9:34. doi: 10.1038/s41421-023-00545-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Peters C.E., Andersen J., Li M.-Y., Varanese L., Thete M.V., Yoon S.-J., Pio T., Thom N., Chen X., Qiao W., et al. Human Assembloid Model of Emergent Neurotropic Enteroviruses. bioRxiv. 2025 doi: 10.1101/2025.11.18.689148. bioRxiv:2025.11.18.689148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Kim E., Kim Y., Hong S., Kim I., Lee J., Yoo J.-Y., Kim J., Yoo K., Lee H., Kim J.-H., et al. Single Rosette-Based Generation of Uniform Cortical Assembloids Recapitulating Cellular Interactions between Neurons and Glial Cells. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:11362. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-66440-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Nishimura M., Adachi S., Kodera T., Sato A.Y., Takeuchi R.F., Osakada F. Thalamus-Cortex Interactions Drive Cell Type-Specific Cortical Development in Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Assembloids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2025;122:e2506573122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2506573122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Parab A.R., Salazar A.M., Bark S.J., Divenko M., Putluri V., Lieu D.J., Singh A.S., Putluri N., Mysorekar I.U. A Scalable Organoid Model of Urothelial Aging for Metabolic Interrogation, Infection Modeling, and Reversal of Age-Associated Changes. Aging Cell. 2026;25:e70391. doi: 10.1111/acel.70391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Sherman E., Qiu K., Roberts R., Shichman L., Li S., Sun H., Ide L., Tucker A., Lee S., Gniadzik W., et al. Modeling Alzheimer’s Disease with APOE4 Neuron-Glial Brain Assembloids Reveals IGFBPs as Therapeutic Targets. bioRxiv. 2025 doi: 10.1101/2025.10.17.683162. bioRxiv:2025.10.17.683162. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Lombardozzi G., Szebényi K., Giorgi C., Topi S., d’Angelo M., Castelli V., Cimini A. Next-Gen Stroke Models: The Promise of Assembloids and Organ-on-a-Chip Systems. Cells. 2025;14:1986. doi: 10.3390/cells14241986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Halkoluoto A., Dhungana H., Keuters M.H. Advances in three-dimensional modeling of ischemic injury. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2026:271678X251409022. doi: 10.1177/0271678X251409022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Liu J., Shi Y., Shen X., Zhang W., Wang X., Wang K. Evolving from Organoid to Assembloid with Enhanced Cellular Interactions. Cell Organoid. 2025;1:9410010. doi: 10.26599/CO.2025.9410010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Sun X., Kofman S., Ogbolu V.C., Karch C.M., Ibric L., Qiang L. Vascularized Brain Assembloids with Enhanced Cellular Complexity Provide Insights Into the Cellular Deficits of Tauopathy. Stem Cells. 2024;42:107–115. doi: 10.1093/stmcls/sxad086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Walocha R., Kim M., Wong-Ng J., Gobaa S., Sauvonnet N. Organoids and Organ-on-Chip Technology for Investigating Host-Microorganism Interactions. Microbes Infect. 2024;26:105319. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Alonso-Roman R., Mosig A.S., Figge M.T., Papenfort K., Eggeling C., Schacher F.H., Hube B., Gresnigt M.S. Organ-on-Chip Models for Infectious Disease Research. Nat. Microbiol. 2024;9:891–904. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01645-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Feaugas T., Sauvonnet N. Organ-on-Chip to Investigate Host-Pathogens Interactions. Cell. Microbiol. 2021;23:e13336. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Shahabipour F., Satta S., Mahmoodi M., Sun A., de Barros N.R., Li S., Hsiai T., Ashammakhi N. Engineering Organ-on-a-Chip Systems to Model Viral Infections. Biofabrication. 2023;15:022001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac6538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Tan J., Guo Q., Tian L., Pei Z., Li D., Wu M., Zhang J., Gao X. Biomimetic Lung-on-a-Chip to Model Virus Infection and Drug Evaluation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023;180:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Wang P., Wang Y., Qin J. Multi-Organ Microphysiological System: A New Paradigm for COVID-19 Research. Organs-on-a-Chip. 2023;5:100029. doi: 10.1016/j.ooc.2023.100029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Wang P., Jin L., Zhang M., Wu Y., Duan Z., Guo Y., Wang C., Guo Y., Chen W., Liao Z., et al. Blood-Brain Barrier Injury and Neuroinflammation Induced by SARS-CoV-2 in a Lung-Brain Microphysiological System. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2024;8:1053–1068. doi: 10.1038/s41551-023-01054-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Yadav S., Fujimoto K., Takenaga T., Takahashi S., Muramoto Y., Mikawa R., Noda T., Gotoh S., Yokokawa R. Isogenic Induced-Pluripotent-Stem-Cell-Derived Airway- and Alveolus-on-Chip Models Reveal Specific Innate Immune Responses. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2025;9:2028–2042. doi: 10.1038/s41551-025-01444-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Goyal G., Prabhala P., Mahajan G., Bausk B., Gilboa T., Xie L., Zhai Y., Lazarovits R., Mansour A., Kim M.S., et al. Ectopic Lymphoid Follicle Formation and Human Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Responses Recapitulated in an Organ-on-a-Chip. Adv. Sci. 2022;9:e2103241. doi: 10.1002/advs.202103241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Arumugasaamy N., Rock K.D., Kuo C.-Y., Bale T.L., Fisher J.P. Microphysiological Systems of the Placental Barrier. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020;161–162:161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Andrews M.G., Kriegstein A.R. Challenges of Organoid Research. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2022;45:23–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-111020-090812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Liu K., Chen X., Fan Z., Ren F., Liu J., Hu B. From Organoids to Organoids-on-a-Chip: Current Applications and Challenges in Biomedical Research. Chin. Med. J. 2025;138:792–807. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Abilez O.J. Developing Advanced Organoids: Challenges, Progress, and Outlook. BioTechniques. 2024;76:575–580. doi: 10.1080/07366205.2024.2442825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Fan X., Hou K., Liu G., Shi R., Wang W., Liang G. Strategies to Overcome the Limitations of Current Organoid Technology—Engineered Organoids. J. Tissue Eng. 2025;16:20417314251319475. doi: 10.1177/20417314251319475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Sun X.-Y., Ju X.-C., Li Y., Zeng P.-M., Wu J., Zhou Y.-Y., Shen L.-B., Dong J., Chen Y.-J., Luo Z.-G. Generation of Vascularized Brain Organoids to Study Neurovascular Interactions. eLife. 2022;11:e76707. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Bogoslowski A., An M., Penninger J.M. Incorporating Immune Cells into Organoid Models: Essential for Studying Human Disease. Organoids. 2023;2:140–155. doi: 10.3390/organoids2030011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Aisenbrey E.A., Murphy W.L. Synthetic Alternatives to Matrigel. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020;5:539–551. doi: 10.1038/s41578-020-0199-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Roberto de Barros N., Wang C., Maity S., Peirsman A., Nasiri R., Herland A., Ermis M., Kawakita S., Gregatti Carvalho B., Hosseinzadeh Kouchehbaghi N., et al. Engineered Organoids for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2023;203:115142. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.115142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Zou R.-Q., Dai Y.-S., Liu F., Yang S.-Q., Hu H.-J., Li F.-Y. Hepatobiliary Organoid Research: The Progress and Applications. Front. Pharmacol. 2025;16:1473863. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1473863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Gabriel E., Ramani A., Karow U., Gottardo M., Natarajan K., Gooi L.M., Goranci-Buzhala G., Krut O., Peters F., Nikolic M., et al. Recent Zika Virus Isolates Induce Premature Differentiation of Neural Progenitors in Human Brain Organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20:397–406.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Gumbs S.B.H., Berdenis van Berlekom A., Kübler R., Schipper P.J., Gharu L., Boks M.P., Ormel P.R., Wensing A.M.J., de Witte L.D., Nijhuis M. Characterization of HIV-1 Infection in Microglia-Containing Human Cerebral Organoids. Viruses. 2022;14:829. doi: 10.3390/v14040829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Mithal A., Hume A.J., Lindstrom-Vautrin J., Villacorta-Martin C., Olejnik J., Bullitt E., Hinds A., Mühlberger E., Mostoslavsky G. Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Intestinal Organoids Model SARS-CoV-2 Infection Revealing a Common Epithelial Inflammatory Response. Stem Cell Rep. 2021;16:940–953. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.02.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Vidović D., Carlon M.S., da Cunha M.F., Dekkers J.F., Hollenhorst M.I., Bijvelds M.J.C., Ramalho A.S., Van den Haute C., Ferrante M., Baekelandt V., et al. rAAV-CFTRΔR Rescues the Cystic Fibrosis Phenotype in Human Intestinal Organoids and Cystic Fibrosis Mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016;193:288–298. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-0914OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Mao Y.-Q., Jahanshahi S., Malty R., Van Ommen D.A.J., Wan Y., Morey T.M., Chuang S.H.W., Pavlova V., Ahmed C., Dahal S., et al. Targeting Protein Homeostasis with Small Molecules as a Strategy for the Development of Pan-Coronavirus Antiviral Therapies. Commun. Biol. 2024;7:1460. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07143-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Xu M., Lee E.M., Wen Z., Cheng Y., Huang W.-K., Qian X., Tcw J., Kouznetsova J., Ogden S.C., Hammack C., et al. Identification of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Zika Virus Infection and Induced Neural Cell Death via a Drug Repurposing Screen. Nat. Med. 2016;22:1101–1107. doi: 10.1038/nm.4184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

