Simple Summary
During the periparturient period, dairy cows often experience negative energy balance, leading to elevated levels of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) in their blood. This condition predisposes them to fatty liver disease and ketosis. FOXA3, a crucial transcription factor involved in regulating liver metabolism, has an unclear role in the pathogenesis of fatty liver in dairy cows. This study aimed to elucidate the mechanism by which FOXA3 regulates hepatic lipid metabolism. We analyzed liver samples from dairy cows diagnosed with fatty liver, developed a lipid accumulation model using primary hepatocytes treated with NEFA, and employed FOXA3 overexpression technology. Our findings revealed a significant reduction in FOXA3 expression in the livers of dairy cows with fatty liver. Furthermore, NEFA were found to downregulate FOXA3 expression and promote lipid accumulation. In contrast, FOXA3 overexpression mitigated lipid accumulation by inhibiting lipogenesis-related genes, such as SREBP1, and influencing cell cycle pathways. This study elucidates the protective role of FOXA3 in the development of fatty liver in dairy cows, indicating that enhancing FOXA3 expression could be a novel strategy for the prevention and treatment of fatty liver and ketosis in dairy cows, with significant economic value.
Keywords: fatty liver, FOXA3, Ketosis, lipid accumulation, primary bovine hepatocytes
Abstract
During the periparturient period, negative energy balance (NEB) in dairy cows leads to increased concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) in the blood, which can induce fatty liver disease and ketosis. Forkhead box protein A3 (FOXA3) is a key transcription factor that regulates liver metabolism; however, its specific role in the pathogenesis of fatty liver in dairy cows remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the mechanism by which FOXA3 regulates hepatic lipid metabolism. We collected liver samples from dairy cows with fatty liver (n = 10) and from healthy cows (n = 10). Bovine primary hepatocytes were isolated from the liver tissue of calves (n = 5), followed by NEFA treatment, and we utilized FOXA3 overexpression, immunofluorescence, and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to conduct our analysis. Our results demonstrated that FOXA3 expression in the livers of cows with fatty liver was significantly lower than in healthy cows. NEFA treatment resulted in the downregulation of FOXA3 protein levels in hepatocytes, promoting triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation and the expression of lipogenesis-related genes. Conversely, FOXA3 overexpression mitigated NEFA-induced lipid accumulation, inhibited the expression of lipogenesis-related genes and proteins—particularly SREBP1—and affected cell proliferation, and the intracellular localization of FOXA3 and SREBP1. RNA-seq analysis suggested that FOXA3 may influence hepatic lipogenesis through pathways such as PI3K-Akt and the cell cycle. In summary, FOXA3 mitigates NEFA-induced hepatic lipid accumulation through a dual mechanism: regulating SREBP1 expression and inhibiting cellular proliferation. These findings highlight FOXA3′s potential as a novel target for the prevention and treatment of fatty liver disease in dairy cows.
1. Introduction
Diseases that occur around the time of calving in dairy cows significantly impact both the yield and quality of milk. During the periparturient period, particularly among high-producing dairy cows, NEB often develops due to increased energy demands from lactation and decreased dry matter intake [1]. In a prolonged state of NEB, cows initiate an intensive fat mobilization process, leading to elevated levels of NEFA in the bloodstream. Excessive NEFA are then transported to the liver, where they are metabolized through both re-esterification and incomplete β-oxidation pathways. This process ultimately results in excessive production of triacylglycerol (TAG) in the liver and the simultaneous generation of substantial amounts of ketone bodies [2,3,4], which can lead to fatty liver disease or ketosis [5,6]. Both conditions are the most common hepatic metabolic diseases observed in periparturient dairy cows and are closely linked in terms of etiology and pathogenesis, often occurring simultaneously or acting as predisposing factors for one another [7,8]. Fatty liver can be classified based on TAG content as normal (TAG < 1%), mild (1% ≤ TAG < 5%), moderate (5% ≤ TAG < 10%), or severe (TAG ≥ 10%) [6,9]. Ketosis and fatty liver can also lead to other diseases, such as mastitis and abomasal displacement, which not only reduce milk production but also severely impair the reproductive performance of dairy cows, resulting in significant economic losses for the dairy industry [6]. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the molecular biology underlying the pathogenesis of fatty liver in dairy cows to identify potential targets for its prevention and treatment.
Forkhead box protein A3 (FOXA3) is a member of the winged helix transcription factor family. While it is primarily localized in the cell nucleus, its expression patterns vary significantly among different cell types [10,11]. FOXA3 is present in various organs, including the liver, where it plays a critical role in glucose and lipoprotein metabolism, as well as liver growth [12,13,14,15]. Research in mice has demonstrated that increased FOXA3 expression reduces TAG accumulation and alleviates adiposity as well as chronic hepatic disorders [16]. Conversely, deletion of the FOXA3 gene in mice impairs hepatocyte proliferation and exacerbates liver damage, while enhanced expression of FOXA3 promotes hepatic regeneration and alleviates hepatocyte injury [16]. Furthermore, in human patients, overexpression of FOXA3 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) growth and increases the sensitivity of HCC to anticancer therapies [17]. These findings suggest that FOXA3 significantly contributes to the lipolysis, enhances liver metabolism, and improves developmental functions in the livers of non-ruminant species, positioning it as a crucial target for alleviating hepatic lipid accumulation and enhancing liver function. However, there are currently no reported studies on the role of FOXA3 in the livers of ruminant animals, such as cows.
SREBP1 is a key transcription factor regulating lipid and glucose homeostasis [18,19]. Its activation promotes lipogenesis and the development of fatty liver [20,21], while its inhibition ameliorates diet-induced hepatic steatosis [22]. Under low-sterol conditions, the SREBP1 precursor is cleaved and translocates to the nucleus, where it activates ACCα, FASN, and other lipogenic genes [18,23,24,25,26]. FOXA3 downregulates SREBP1 and ACCα expression, thereby improving hepatic steatosis in mice via the XBP1s-FOXA3-PER1/SREBP1c axis [13,27]. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that FOXA3 attenuates SREBP1-mediated lipid synthesis through as yet unidentified mechanisms.
Recent studies have established a strong link between proliferation/differentiation pathways and metabolism: the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway promotes anabolism and cell proliferation, whereas the LKB1/AMPK pathway inhibits anabolism and suppresses proliferation [28,29,30]. In mice, FOXA3 reactivates the cell cycle in quiescent hepatocytes, facilitates liver regeneration and adipocyte differentiation, and its deletion impairs hepatocyte proliferation and exacerbates liver injury [16,31,32]. These findings suggest that FOXA3 coordinates metabolism and proliferation; however, its role in bovine primary hepatocytes remains unclear. Therefore, we hypothesize that FOXA3 modulates lipid metabolism by regulating proliferative activity.
In this study, we hypothesize that FOXA3 can alleviate NEFA-induced lipid accumulation and may do so through mechanisms involving SREBP1 and the cell cycle. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the expression status of FOXA3 in cows with fatty liver and in bovine hepatocytes following NEFA treatment, as well as to confirm its function and mechanisms in lipid accumulation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Sample Collection
The Animal Welfare Ethics Committee of Jilin University approved this trial (SY202401011), which was conducted in strict accordance with applicable regulations. The dairy cows used in this experiment were selected from a large-scale intensive farm in Changchun, where all animals were uniformly fed a total mixed ration. The cows had a similar number of lactations (median = 3, range = 2–4) and days in milk (median = 6, range = 3–9 days). Initially, a preliminary screening was performed on a group of Holstein cows with similar lactation frequencies and days in milk to conduct a comprehensive routine health examination. Following this, liver tissue samples were collected according to the methods outlined in previous research [33]. Based on liver TAG content, the cows were classified as healthy (TAG < 1%, g/g of wet weight) or severe fatty liver (TAG ≥ 10%). From this classification, 10 healthy cows and 10 cows with fatty liver were selected for further study. The basic physiological parameters of the cows are detailed in earlier research [34]. Liver samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde or preserved by freezing in liquid nitrogen.
2.2. Isolation and Culture of Primary Bovine Hepatocytes
A total of 5 female Holstein calves, each one day old and weighing between 30 and 40 kg, were used in the present study. Our method for isolating primary hepatocytes employs a modified technique, with all reagents and procedures referenced from Zhu’s article [35]. Initially, five one-day-old female calves were selected for anesthesia and subsequently received an intravenous injection of heparin sodium. The caudate liver lobe was excised and perfused using Solution A and Solution B, followed by digestion of the tissue with a 0.02% collagenase IV solution. The digestion was terminated by adding 10% fetal bovine serum, after which the tissue was minced and filtered. The cell suspension was washed twice with RPMI-1640 medium (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA), then resuspended and centrifuged using 25% Percoll for cell purification. Cells with a viability greater than 90%, as determined by trypan blue staining, were considered qualified for experiments. Finally, the cells were plated into six-well plates. After 4 h of adherence, the medium was changed to growth medium, which was subsequently renewed every 24 h.
2.3. Preparation of NEFA
In this study, the preparation method for NEFA was adapted from previous research [36]. The specific steps are as follows: a 0.1 M KOH solution was used to dissolve the fatty acids, which were then thoroughly mixed at 60 °C. The pH was subsequently adjusted to 7.4 using 1 M hydrochloric acid. The resulting NEFA stock solution had a concentration of 52.7 mM and included oleic acid, palmitic acid, linoleic acid, palmitoleic acid, and stearic acid, all sourced from Sigma-Aldrich Co., Ltd. (Steinheim, Germany). After preparation, the NEFA stock solution was aliquoted and stored at −20 °C for future use. Prior to application, the solution was heated in a 70 °C water bath until clear and then combined with culture medium containing 2% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich) for hepatocyte treatment.
2.4. Cell Processing
To evaluate the effects of NEFA on the expression of FOXA3 and lipogenesis, and to determine the optimal concentration for in vitro culture, bovine primary hepatocytes were initially cultured in RPMI-1640 basic medium for 12 h. Subsequently, the medium was replaced with RPMI-1640 basic medium supplemented with 2% BSA, and the cells underwent a 12 h treatment with a gradient of NEFA concentrations (0, 0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 mM).
For FOXA3 overexpression studies, hepatocytes were treated with adenoviruses designed by Hanheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). based on the coding sequence of bovine FOXA3 (NM_001033119.2). Specifically, the bovine empty adenovirus vector (Ad-GFP) or the bovine FOXA3 overexpression adenovirus (Ad-FOXA3) was initially infected with half the volume of RPMI-1640 alkaline medium for 4 h. After this period, the remaining half of the culture medium was added to continue the infection. Following 8 h of infection, the cells were transferred to growth medium for an additional 36 h. The viral titers of Ad-GFP and Ad-FOXA3 used in this study were 3.16 × 1010 PFU/mL and 2.51 × 1010 PFU/mL, respectively.
In the FOXA3 silencing experiment, hepatocytes were transfected with either small interfering RNA (siRNA) negative control (si-Control) or siRNA targeting FOXA3 (si-FOXA3) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Medium (Gibco, NY, USA) for 6 h. The medium was then replaced with growth medium, and the cells were cultured for an additional 42 h. The siRNA sequences were designed by GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). and are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
After transfecting with Ad-FOXA3 or si-FOXA3 for 48 h, the medium was replaced with RPMI-1640 basic medium supplemented with 2% BSA. The cells were then exposed to 1.2 mM NEFA for 12 h.
2.5. TAG Content Determination
According to the instructions provided by the TAG Assay Kit (Applygen, Beijing, China), lysis buffer was initially added to the hepatocytes in six-well plates to facilitate cell lysis. A cell scraper was then employed to transfer the lysed cells into centrifuge tubes. Following this, 10 μL of the sample supernatant was mixed with 190 μL of the chromogenic solution and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. The absorbance of the resulting mixture was subsequently measured using a spectrophotometer. Finally, the protein concentration was determined using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) in accordance with the kit’s instructions. The TAG values were normalized to the protein concentration.
2.6. Oil Red O Staining
Following the manufacturer’s instructions, Oil Red O solution was prepared by dissolving 0.5 g of Oil Red O powder (Sigma-Aldrich) in 100 mL of isopropanol. This solution was then kept in a dark environment at 65 °C for 48 h and subsequently diluted with double-distilled water to achieve a final concentration of 60%. All subsequent staining procedures were conducted at room temperature and in the dark. First, the cells in each well were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The hepatocytes were then incubated in 60% isopropanol for 30 s and stained with the Oil Red O working solution for 30 min. Afterward, the hepatocytes were washed again with 60% isopropanol for 30 s and counterstained with hematoxylin. Finally, the hepatocytes were observed, and images were captured at magnifications of 40× and 20×.
2.7. Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from liver tissues and hepatocytes using RNAiso Plus reagent (Takara, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan). The OD260/OD280 ratio ranged from 1.91 to 1.98, and the 28S/18S ratio was approximately 2, indicating high purity and integrity of the RNA, which is suitable for subsequent experiments. Following the reverse transcription of 1 μg of RNA, quantitative PCR (qPCR) was conducted using SYBR Green on an ABI 7500 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), adhering to the reaction protocol outlined in the instruction manual. β-actin served as the internal reference, and the results were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The corresponding primer sequences are provided in Supplementary Table S2.
2.8. Protein Preparation and Western Blotting
Cellular proteins were extracted using a commercial kit (Mei5 Biotechnology, Beijing, China) and quantified with a BCA assay (Applygen). Protein samples (25 μg per lane) were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and electrotransferred to PVDF membranes. Following a 2 h blocking step with 5% BSA in TBST at room temperature, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against GAPDH (Proteintech), FOXA3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), SREBP-1 (Novus Biologicals LLC, Centennial, CO, USA), and ACCα (Proteintech). After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Proteintech) for 45 min at room temperature. Signal detection was performed using an ultrasensitive ECL substrate (Meilunbio, Dalian, China), and band intensities were quantified with ImageJ software (version 1.46), normalizing to GAPDH.
2.9. Immunofluorescence Staining
Hepatocytes cultured in laser confocal dishes (Sorfa Life Science, Zhejiang, China) were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and subsequently permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against FOXA3 (Santa Cruz) and SREBP1 (Novus). Following this, the cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Proteintech) for 45 min at room temperature. Finally, DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to counterstain the cell nuclei. Images were captured using an Olympus Fluoview FV1200 confocal microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
2.10. Cell Cycle Assay
The cell cycle assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was utilized in this experiment. Briefly, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 70% cold ethanol for 12 h, and subsequently stained with propidium iodide. For specific experimental conditions, including temperature, please refer to the kit’s instruction manual. Red fluorescence was detected using a flow cytometer, and light scattering was also measured. The data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 10.8.1 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
2.11. Liver Transcriptome Sequencing
Total RNA from Ad-FOXA3 (n = 2) and Ad-GFP (n = 2) was extracted using the Trizol-chloroform method (Takara), and its concentration, purity and integrity were assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The sequencing library was constructed in strict accordance with the standard protocol: mRNA with poly(A) tails was enriched using Oligo(dT)-coated magnetic beads. Following fragmentation, the mRNA was reverse-transcribed into double-stranded cDNA, which was then subjected to end repair, A-tailing, and adapter ligation, culminating in final library production through PCR amplification. After passing quality control, the library underwent PE150 sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, provided by LC-Bio Technologies Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China).
2.12. Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 and GraphPad Prism version 10.0, with normality and homoscedasticity tests conducted prior to analysis. Comparisons between two groups were performed using an independent samples t-test, while comparisons among multiple groups were conducted using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction. All experiments were repeated three times or more. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant, while a p-value of <0.01 was regarded as extremely significant.
3. Results
3.1. Hepatic FOXA3 Is Lowly Expressed Among Dairy Cows with Fatty Liver
Compared to healthy cows, liver FOXA3 expression was significantly lower in cows suffering from fatty liver disease (Figure 1A,B). Additionally, the FPKM values from RNA-seq indicated that the FOXA3 mRNA expression in cows with severe NEB was lower than that in cows with mild NEB. These findings suggest a reduced expression of FOXA3 in the livers of cows affected by both fatty liver and severe NEB (Figure 1C).
Figure 1.
Hepatic FOXA3 is lowly expressed among dairy cows with fatty liver. (A,B) Protein expression of FOXA3 in the liver of healthy cows and cows with fatty liver, and quantitative analysis of grayscale values. (C) FOXA3 mRNA expression in the liver of cows with mild NEB and cows with severe NEB; Data from GSE37544. Each experiment was repeated three times. Data were analyzed using an independent sample t-test followed by Bonferroni correction, and the results are expressed as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001.
3.2. FOXA3 Alleviates NEFA-Induced Lipid Accumulation
Compared to the control group, treatment of calf primary hepatocytes with 0, 0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 mM NEFA for 12 h resulted in a significant decrease in the protein abundance of FOXA3 (Figure 2A,B). Calf primary hepatocytes were treated with Ad-FOXA3, 1.2 mM NEFA, or a combination of both for 24 h. Oil Red O staining revealed that NEFA increased both the size and number of lipid droplets, leading to significant lipid accumulation within the cells. However, overexpression of FOXA3 effectively mitigated this lipid accumulation (Figure 2C,D). Additionally, NEFA significantly increased the TAG content in bovine hepatocytes, while FOXA3 overexpression markedly reduced TAG levels (Figure 2E). Furthermore, when primary hepatocytes from calves were treated with various concentrations of NEFA (0, 0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 mM) for the same duration, high concentrations of NEFA significantly elevated the mRNA levels of lipogenesis-related genes, including DGAT1, DGAT2, SCD, and SREBP1 (Figure 2F).
Figure 2.
FOXA3 alleviates NEFA-induced lipid accumulation. (A,B) Protein expression and grayscale value quantification of FOXA3 and β-actin in bovine primary hepatocytes treated with different concentrations of NEFA (0.6, 1.2, 2.4 mM). (C,D) Oil Red O staining images and quantitative analysis results of gray values obtained from primary bovine hepatocytes transfected with empty Ad-GFP or Ad-FOXA3 alone for 48 h, or transfected first followed by treatment with 1.2 mM NEFA for 12 h. Images were captured at an original magnification of 40× (scale bar = 20 μm). (E) The triglyceride (TAG) content measured in primary bovine hepatocytes under the following treatments: transfected with Ad-GFP or Ad-FOXA3 alone for 48 h, or transfected first followed by treatment with 1.2 mM NEFA for 12 h. (F) Changes in mRNA abundance of lipogenesis-related genes in bovine primary hepatocytes treated with different concentrations of NEFA. Each experiment was repeated three times. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction and are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
3.3. FOXA3 Suppresses the Expression of SREBP1 and Related Lipid Synthesis Genes
Following FOXA3 overexpression, the protein abundance of SREBP1 and ACCα was significantly downregulated (Figure 3A–D). Concurrently, the mRNA levels of SREBP1, fatty acid binding protein 1 (FABP1), and ACCα were also significantly reduced (Figure 3E). In contrast, silencing FOXA3 resulted in elevated mRNA levels of SREBP1, FABP1, and ACCα compared to the control group (Figure 3F). Additionally, immunofluorescence staining revealed that FOXA3 overexpression led to an increase in the overall fluorescence intensity of FOXA3 in the cells, indicating elevated expression levels (Figure 3G,H). Conversely, the overall fluorescence intensity of SREBP1 decreased, reflecting reduced expression levels of SREBP1 (Figure 3I,J).
Figure 3.
FOXA3 suppresses the expression of SREBP1 and related lipid synthesis genes. (A–D) Protein expression and grayscale value quantification results of FOXA3, SREBP1, and acetyl-CoA carboxylase alpha (ACCα) in bovine primary hepatocytes 48 h after transfection with Ad-FOXA3 or Ad-GFP. (E) Changes in mRNA abundance of FOXA3, SREBP1, ACCα, and fatty acid binding protein 1 (FABP1) in bovine primary hepatocytes after transfection with Ad-GFP or Ad-FOXA3. (F) Changes in mRNA abundance of FOXA3, SREBP1, ACCα, and FABP1 in bovine primary hepatocytes after transfection with si-Control or si-FOXA3. (G,H) Representative immunofluorescence staining images of FOXA3 and corresponding quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity obtained from primary bovine hepatocytes transfected with Ad-FOXA3 or Ad-GFP for 48 h, respectively. Original magnification 40×, scale bar = 40 μm. (I,J) Representative immunofluorescence staining images of SREBP1 and corresponding quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity obtained from primary bovine hepatocytes transfected with Ad-FOXA3 or Ad-GFP for 48 h, respectively. Original magnification 40×, scale bar = 40 μm. Blue: nuclei stained with DAPI; Red: FOXA3/SREBP1; Merge: co-localization of the indicated proteins. Each experiment was repeated three times. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test followed by Bonferroni correction and are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
3.4. FOXA3 Inhibits Cell Proliferation
Following FOXA3 overexpression, flow cytometry results indicated a significant reduction in the duration of the S phase and G2/M phase, while the G0/G1 phase was significantly prolonged, leading to a marked decrease in cell proliferation activity (Figure 4B–D). Additionally, qPCR results demonstrated that the mRNA levels of Cyclin B2 and Cyclin D2 were significantly reduced after FOXA3 overexpression.
Figure 4.
FOXA3 Inhibits Cell Proliferation. (A,B) The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined by flow cytometry at 48 h after transfection with Ad-FOXA3 or Ad-GFP. (C) Quantitative analysis results of the cell cycle. (D) Changes in mRNA abundance of cell cycle-related genes in bovine primary hepatocytes after Ad-FOXA3 or Ad-GFP transfection. Each experiment was repeated three times. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test followed by Bonferroni correction, and the results were expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.
3.5. Transcriptome Sequencing of Bovine Primary Hepatocytes with FOXA3 Overexpression
To investigate the potential mechanisms by which FOXA3 alleviates lipid accumulation, we conducted RNA-seq on primary hepatocytes from the Ad-Control and Ad-FOXA3 groups. Data analysis revealed a total of 378 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), comprising 183 upregulated and 195 downregulated genes (Supplementary Figure S1).
Using the Gene Ontology (GO) database (http://www.geneontology.org/), we performed functional annotation of all DEGs, revealing significant enrichment in three major categories (Figure 5). Specifically, the DEGs were significantly enriched in biological processes such as the positive regulation of cell population proliferation and G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways. They also showed significant enrichment in cellular components, including the nucleus and membrane, as well as in molecular functions such as protein binding and G protein-coupled receptor activity.
Figure 5.
GO enrichment analysis of DEGs. GO:0045944 positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II; GO: 0000122 negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II; GO:0007156 homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules; GO:0000978 RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding.
To further explore the potential functional pathways associated with the DEGs, we conducted KEGG pathway analysis and found significant enrichment in the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, cell cycle, and arachidonic acid metabolism signaling pathways (Figure 6). Additionally, within the pathways of cholesterol metabolism and cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of xenobiotics, we identified 3 to 7 downregulated DEGs, with no upregulated DEGs present.
Figure 6.
KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs.
3.6. Validation of Differential Genes
To verify the reliability of the RNA-seq data, we selected the differential genes NID, CACNA2D, PTGS2, TMEM45B, AFP, HK2, and MYB for qPCR validation. The results demonstrated that FOXA3 overexpression resulted in increased expression of the NID, CACNA2D, PTGS2, and TMEM45B genes, while the expression of AFP, HK2, and MYB genes decreased. The mRNA expression trends of these genes were consistent with the RNA-seq results (Figure 7A), confirming that the RNA-seq data in this study are accurate and reliable for subsequent analyses.
Figure 7.
Validation of DEGs and the regulatory mechanism of FOXA3. (A) qPCR validation results of DEGs. * p < 0.05. (B) Schematic diagram of the potential regulatory mechanisms of FOXA3 in lipid deposition of hepatocytes. Blue lines represent promotion, and orange lines represent inhibition; dashed lines indicate pathways that have not yet been clearly defined.
4. Discussion
Numerous studies have demonstrated that FOXA3 is essential for maintaining lipid and glucose balance in various tissues, including the liver [12,15,27,37]. Previous research indicates that FOXA3 expression is significantly reduced in the livers of obese or MASH mice [12]. Similarly, in human patients, FOXA3 expression is downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases [17]. These findings suggest a correlation between FOXA3 expression levels and hepatic metabolic health, with lower FOXA3 expression observed in livers exhibiting poor metabolic conditions. Our results align with this observation, as FOXA3 expression is lower in the livers of dairy cows with fatty liver disease compared to healthy cows. Additionally, the FPKM values from RNA-seq indicated that FOXA3 expression in the livers of cows experiencing severe NEB was lower than in those with mild NEB. Collectively, these experimental results demonstrate that FOXA3 plays a significant role in the progression of liver injury in both non-ruminant species and dairy cows. While a connection between FOXA3 and metabolic liver disorders exists, its precise function remains poorly understood.
Excessive exogenous NEFA induce lipid accumulation in bovine hepatocytes, increasing TAG content and elevating the abundance of lipid synthesis genes [38]. This study observed a similar phenomenon, with a marked increase in TAG levels and the number of lipid droplets in primary calf hepatocytes following exposure to 1.2 mM NEFA. Furthermore, the abundance of genes associated with lipid synthesis, including SREBP1, was significantly elevated. Notably, our study revealed a decrease in the protein and mRNA abundance of FOXA3 during lipid accumulation induced by high concentrations of exogenous NEFA, which aligns with findings from in vivo experiments on dairy cows. However, further research is necessary to elucidate the specific role of FOXA3 in mitigating lipid accumulation in the primary hepatocytes of calves and to clarify the precise regulatory mechanisms involved.
To clarify the influence of FOXA3 on NEFA-induced lipid accumulation in primary calf hepatocytes, we conducted gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments. Our results indicate that FOXA3 overexpression significantly reduced TAG levels caused by NEFA and increased the mRNA abundance of SREBP1 and ACCα. Conversely, silencing FOXA3 significantly increased the mRNA abundance of SREBP1 and FABP1. Moreover, primary calf hepatocytes with substantial lipid accumulation induced by NEFA exhibited a marked reduction in lipid droplet accumulation following FOXA3 overexpression, further supporting our findings. These trends are consistent with observations made in mice models [13]. In summary, these results suggest that FOXA3 could serve as a significant therapeutic target for reducing lipid accumulation and enhancing liver health in dairy cows.
Experimental data indicate that upregulation of SREBP1 expression is often accompanied by downregulation of FOXA3 expression. In ob/ob mice (diabetic and obese models) and db/db mice (type 2 diabetic models), SREBP1 expression is upregulated by more than two-fold, whereas hepatic FOXA3 protein and transcript abundance are reduced by over 50% [12]. Our experimental results support this observation; following FOXA3 overexpression, both the mRNA and protein expression levels of SREBP1 were significantly reduced. Immunofluorescence staining further revealed that after overexpression, the fluorescence intensity of FOXA3 increased, indicating elevated FOXA3 expression, while the fluorescence intensity of SREBP1 decreased, demonstrating reduced SREBP1 expression. These results suggest that FOXA3 may inhibit SREBP1 activation or promote its degradation. Additionally, FOXA3 may influence the subcellular localization of SREBP1 and indirectly affect its activity through specific pathways, thereby impacting lipid synthesis. A previous study has established a potential link between SREBP1 and FOXA3, indicating that FOXA3 can influence hepatic lipid synthesis and steatosis in mice via the XBP1s-FOXA3-PER1/SREBP1c axis [27]. However, there is currently no direct literature confirming that FOXA3 can regulate SREBP1 localization.
One study demonstrated that the expression levels of Cyclin B and Cyclin D are significantly associated with postpartum ketosis in dairy cows [39]. Additionally, research has shown that elevated FOXA3 expression enhances hepatocyte function while inhibiting cell cycle progression by downregulating Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), Cyclin D1, and Cyclin E1, thereby suppressing cell proliferation. Flow cytometry results from this study demonstrated an increased proportion of cells in the G1 phase, confirming the blockage of the cell cycle [40]. Therefore, FOXA3 may play a dual role in promoting liver function while inhibiting proliferation by regulating cell cycle-related factors. This conclusion is supported by immunohistochemical and transplantation experiment results [40]. Our flow cytometry results also indicated that following FOXA3 overexpression, the G1 phase was prolonged, while the S and G2 phases were shortened. qPCR results showed that the mRNA expression levels of Cyclin D1 and Cyclin B1 were significantly downregulated, suggesting a reduction in cell proliferation activity. Additionally, our other experimental results demonstrated that FOXA3 could reduce lipid accumulation in the liver and improve liver metabolism. We speculate that the decline in cell proliferation may reduce the cellular demand for lipids while enhancing lipid metabolism, thereby alleviating the phenotype of excessive lipid accumulation. Although we hypothesize that FOXA3 is actively involved in hepatic lipid synthesis and metabolism by influencing the localization and expression of SREBP1, as well as cell cycle progression, further studies are needed to clarify the precise mechanisms through which FOXA3 acts during liver development. To gain deeper insights into the potential mechanisms by which FOXA3 regulates lipid synthesis and metabolism, we performed RNA-seq on cells from both the control group and the FOXA3-overexpressing group. The sequencing results indicated that FOXA3 may exert its effects by influencing pathways such as the arachidonic acid metabolism pathway and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. The PI3K-Akt pathway is essential for regulating lipid and protein metabolism and is also associated with cell proliferation [41]. A high-fat diet has been shown to inhibit the PI3K-Akt pathway [42], while activation of this signaling pathway in the liver can alleviate systemic insulin resistance and obesity [43]. The PI3K-Akt signaling cascade directly affects glucose metabolism by phosphorylating key metabolic enzymes, and the biological effects of insulin are dependent on this pathway [44]. Furthermore, lipid metabolism is closely linked to atherosclerosis and insulin resistance. Abnormal lipid metabolism can trigger lipotoxicity, leading to inflammatory responses in tissues and organs [45]. Conversely, inflammation inhibits insulin signal transduction, ultimately inducing insulin resistance [46]. Given these associations, it can be concluded that the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway plays a crucial role in lipid metabolism. In our RNA-seq results, we found that after FOXA3 overexpression, the expression of MYB differentially expressed gene enriched in the PI3K-Akt pathway-was downregulated, while the expressions of ITGA11 and LAMA3 were upregulated. Arachidonic acid metabolism regulates hepatic glucose and lipid homeostasis through three major pathways: cyclooxygenase (COX), lipoxygenase (LOX), and cytochrome P450 (CYP450). Dysregulation of these pathways is closely associated with various metabolic diseases. Our data reveal upregulation of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2, also known as COX-2), an enzyme involved in lipid peroxidation and the generation of bioactive lipids [47]. Therefore, FOXA3 may influence hepatic lipid synthesis via the PI3K-Akt and arachidonic acid metabolism pathways; however, this hypothesis requires further experimental validation.
The KEGG enrichment results indicate that pathways related to the cell cycle and cell proliferation are significantly enriched. Disruption of the balance among CDKs, cyclins, and CDK inhibitors can adversely affect cell proliferation and division. Additionally, differential gene expression analysis reveals that under conditions of FOXA3 overexpression, the expression of key cell cycle proteins, such as CDK1 and CCNE1, which promote the transition from the G1 to S phase and from the G2 to M phase, is downregulated. These findings provide a robust molecular explanation at the transcriptomic level for the G0/G1 phase arrest induced by FOXA3, corroborated by flow cytometry analysis.
RNA-seq data indicated that the expression of TMEM45B, a gene associated with pathways related to integral membrane components, was upregulated. Studies have demonstrated that in pigs with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, squalene intake reduces lipid droplet synthesis and alleviates steatosis. The RNA-seq results showing increased expression of TMEM45B align with our findings [48]. Additionally, the downregulation of the key glycolytic gene HK2 indicates that FOXA3 may accelerate lipid oxidation by inhibiting glycolysis. Moreover, the expression of the PLIN4 gene in the PPAR signaling pathway was found to be downregulated. PLIN4 is not only a downstream target of PPARγ [49,50,51] but also a specific protein induced during adipocyte differentiation [52]. Previous studies have shown that FOXA3 is located upstream of PPARγ, suggesting that FOXA3 may downregulate the expression of PLIN4 through PPARγ [31], thereby affecting its efficiency in lipid droplet biogenesis. These findings provide a novel mechanistic perspective on how FOXA3 alleviates lipid accumulation. While the RNA-seq analysis in this study offers a wealth of candidate targets, further experimental validation is necessary to determine whether FOXA3 directly or indirectly regulates these DEGs.
5. Conclusions
This study demonstrates that cows with clinical ketosis exhibit severe hepatic lipid accumulation and reduced FOXA3 abundance; FOXA3 is downregulated by high concentrations of exogenous NEFA in bovine primary hepatocytes. Notably, overexpression of FOXA3 alleviates NEFA-induced lipid accumulation, whereas silencing FOXA3 exacerbates lipid deposition. Furthermore, FOXA3 influences lipid synthesis by affecting the expression levels and cellular localization of SREBP1, or through potential signaling pathways (Figure 7B). These findings suggest that FOXA3 overexpression could serve as a potential therapeutic strategy to mitigate hepatic lipid accumulation in cows with ketosis or fatty liver.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to all the students in our laboratory for their assistance in collecting samples.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| NEB | Negative Energy Balance |
| NEFA | Non-Esterified Fatty Acids |
| TAG | Triacylglycerol |
| FOXA3 | Forkhead Box A3 |
| HCC | Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
| SREBP1 | Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein 1 |
| BSA | Bovine Serum Albumin |
| Ad-GFP | Adenovirus-Green Fluorescent Protein |
| Ad-FOXA3 | Adenovirus-Forkhead Box A3 |
| siRNA | small interfering RNA |
| si-Control | small interfering RNA-Control |
| si-FOXA3 | small interfering RNA-FOXA3 |
| DEGs | Differentially Expressed Genes |
| CDK | Cyclin-Dependent Kinase |
| COX | Cyclooxygenase |
| LOX | Lipoxygenase |
| CYP450 | Cytochrome P450 |
| PTGS2 | Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase 2 |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci13020157/s1, Figure S1: Differentially expressed genes in different groups; Table S1: The siRNA sequence used during hepatocytes transfection; Table S2: Primer sequences used for quantitative real-time PCR.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, T.R. and H.F.; methodology, T.R. and X.D. (Xinyu Du); formal analysis, X.D. (Xinyu Du); investigation, X.D. (Xinyu Du); resources, M.L., L.L. and Y.W.; data curation, W.G. and X.D. (Xiliang Du); writing—original draft preparation, X.D. (Xinyu Du) and T.R.; writing—review and editing, Y.S., G.L. and X.L.; visualization, X.D. (Xinyu Du) and M.L.; supervision, T.R. and H.F.; project administration, X.L. and H.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Welfare Ethics Committee of Jilin University (approval number: SY202401011). The study meticulously complied with applicable regulations.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32573436, Grant No. 32273059).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Gerloff B.J. Dry Cow Management for the Prevention of Ketosis and Fatty Liver in Dairy Cows. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2000;16:283–292. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30106-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Grummer R.R. Etiology of Lipid-Related Metabolic Disorders in Periparturient Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1993;76:3882–3896. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77729-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.González F.D., Muiño R., Pereira V., Campos R., Benedito J.L. Relationship among Blood Indicators of Lipomobilization and Hepatic Function during Early Lactation in High-Yielding Dairy Cows. J. Vet. Sci. 2011;12:251–255. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.3.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ospina P.A., Nydam D.V., Stokol T., Overton T.R. Associations of Elevated Nonesterified Fatty Acids and β-Hydroxybutyrate Concentrations with Early Lactation Reproductive Performance and Milk Production in Transition Dairy Cattle in the Northeastern United States. J. Dairy Sci. 2010;93:1596–1603. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fry M.M., Yao B., Ríos C., Wong C., Mann S., McArt J.A.A., Nydam D.V., Leal Yepes F.A., Viesselmann L., Geick A., et al. Diagnostic Performance of Cytology for Assessment of Hepatic Lipid Content in Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101:1379–1387. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bobe G., Young J.W., Beitz D.C. Invited Review: Pathology, Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Fatty Liver in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004;87:3105–3124. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73446-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Panousis N., Karatzias H. Postparturient Liver Diseases of Dairy Cattle (Ketosis, Fatty Liver). II. Management Principles. J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc. 2018;51:249. doi: 10.12681/jhvms.15682. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Panousis Ν., Karatzias H. Postparturient Liver Diseases of Dairy Cattle (Ketosis, Fatty Liver). I. Etiology and Pathogenesis. J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc. 2018;51:182. doi: 10.12681/jhvms.15673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Melendez P., Whitney M., Williams F., Pinedo P., Manriquez D., Moore S.G., Lucy M.C., Pithua P., Poock S.E. Technical Note: Evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for the Diagnosis of Fatty Liver in Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2018;101:4483–4490. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Garon G., Bergeron F., Brousseau C., Robert N.M., Tremblay J.J. FOXA3 Is Expressed in Multiple Cell Lineages in the Mouse Testis and Regulates Pdgfra Expression in Leydig Cells. Endocrinology. 2017;158:1886–1897. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Motallebipour M., Ameur A., Reddy Bysani M.S., Patra K., Wallerman O., Mangion J., Barker M.A., McKernan K.J., Komorowski J., Wadelius C. Differential Binding and Co-Binding Pattern of FOXA1 and FOXA3 and Their Relation to H3K4me3 in HepG2 Cells Revealed by ChIP-Seq. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R129. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-11-r129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li Y., Xu Y., Jadhav K., Zhu Y., Yin L., Zhang Y. Hepatic Forkhead Box Protein A3 Regulates ApoA-I (Apolipoprotein A-I) Expression, Cholesterol Efflux, and Atherogenesis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019;39:1574–1587. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gopoju R., Wang J., Pan X., Hu S., Lin L., Clark A., Xu Y., Yin L., Wang X., Zhang Y. Hepatic FOXA3 Overexpression Prevents Western Diet–Induced Obesity and MASH through TGR5. J. Lipid Res. 2024;65:100527. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2024.100527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lantz K.A., Kaestner K.H. Winged-Helix Transcription Factors and Pancreatic Development. Clin. Sci. 2005;108:195–204. doi: 10.1042/CS20040309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shen W., Scearce L.M., Brestelli J.E., Sund N.J., Kaestner K.H. Foxa3 (Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3γ) Is Required for the Regulation of Hepatic GLUT2 Expression and the Maintenance of Glucose Homeostasis during a Prolonged Fast. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:42812–42817. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106344200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li G., Zhu L., Guo M., Wang D., Meng M., Zhong Y., Zhang Z., Lin Y., Liu C., Wang J., et al. Characterisation of Forkhead Box Protein A3 as a Key Transcription Factor for Hepatocyte Regeneration. JHEP Rep. 2023;5:100906. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou T., Li S., Xiang D., Liu J., Sun W., Cui X., Ning B., Li X., Cheng Z., Jiang W., et al. m6A RNA Methylation-Mediated HNF3γ Reduction Renders Hepatocellular Carcinoma Dedifferentiation and Sorafenib Resistance. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020;5:296. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00299-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Horton J.D., Goldstein J.L., Brown M.S. SREBPs: Activators of the Complete Program of Cholesterol and Fatty Acid Synthesis in the Liver. J. Clin. Investig. 2002;109:1125–1131. doi: 10.1172/JCI0215593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shimano H., Sato R. SREBP-Regulated Lipid Metabolism: Convergent Physiology—Divergent Pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017;13:710–730. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li X., Li Y., Yang W., Xiao C., Fu S., Deng Q., Ding H., Wang Z., Liu G., Li X. SREBP-1c Overexpression Induces Triglycerides Accumulation through Increasing Lipid Synthesis and Decreasing Lipid Oxidation and VLDL Assembly in Bovine Hepatocytes. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014;143:174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhu Y., Guan Y., Loor J.J., Sha X., Coleman D.N., Zhang C., Du X., Shi Z., Li X., Wang Z., et al. Fatty Acid-Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Promoted Lipid Accumulation in Calf Hepatocytes, and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Existed in the Liver of Severe Fatty Liver Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2019;102:7359–7370. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee M.R., Yang H.J., Park K.I., Ma J.Y. Lycopus lucidus Turcz. Ex Benth. Attenuates Free Fatty Acid-Induced Steatosis in HepG2 Cells and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Phytomedicine. 2019;55:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yellaturu C.R., Deng X., Cagen L.M., Wilcox H.G., Mansbach C.M., Siddiqi S.A., Park E.A., Raghow R., Elam M.B. Insulin Enhances Post-Translational Processing of Nascent SREBP-1c by Promoting Its Phosphorylation and Association with COPII Vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:7518–7532. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805746200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goldstein J.L., DeBose-Boyd R.A., Brown M.S. Protein Sensors for Membrane Sterols. Cell. 2006;124:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Düvel K., Yecies J.L., Menon S., Raman P., Lipovsky A.I., Souza A.L., Triantafellow E., Ma Q., Gorski R., Cleaver S., et al. Activation of a Metabolic Gene Regulatory Network Downstream of mTOR Complex 1. Mol. Cell. 2010;39:171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Deng X., Zhang W., O-Sullivan I., Williams J.B., Dong Q., Park E.A., Raghow R., Unterman T.G., Elam M.B. FoxO1 Inhibits Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein-1c (SREBP-1c) Gene Expression via Transcription Factors Sp1 and SREBP-1c. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:20132–20143. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.347211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu C., Zhou B., Meng M., Zhao W., Wang D., Yuan Y., Zheng Y., Qiu J., Li Y., Li G., et al. FOXA3 Induction under Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Contributes to Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. J. Hepatol. 2021;75:150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ward P.S., Thompson C.B. Metabolic Reprogramming: A Cancer Hallmark Even Warburg Did Not Anticipate. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.DeBerardinis R.J., Lum J.J., Hatzivassiliou G., Thompson C.B. The Biology of Cancer: Metabolic Reprogramming Fuels Cell Growth and Proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008;7:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mihaylova M.M., Shaw R.J. The AMPK Signalling Pathway Coordinates Cell Growth, Autophagy and Metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1016–1023. doi: 10.1038/ncb2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu L., Panel V., Ma X., Du C., Hugendubler L., Gavrilova O., Liu A., McLaughlin T., Kaestner K.H., Mueller E. The Winged Helix Transcription Factor Foxa3 Regulates Adipocyte Differentiation and Depot-Selective Fat Tissue Expansion. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013;33:3392–3399. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00244-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wangensteen K.J., Zhang S., Greenbaum L.E., Kaestner K.H. A Genetic Screen Reveals Foxa3 and TNFR1 as Key Regulators of Liver Repopulation. Genes. Dev. 2015;29:904–909. doi: 10.1101/gad.258855.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang C., Shao Q., Liu M., Wang X., Loor J.J., Jiang Q., Cuan S., Li X., Wang J., Li Y., et al. Liver Fibrosis Is a Common Pathological Change in the Liver of Dairy Cows with Fatty Liver. J. Dairy Sci. 2023;106:2700–2715. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fang Z., Li X., Wang S., Jiang Q., Loor J.J., Jiang X., Ju L., Yu H., Shen T., Chen M., et al. Overactivation of Hepatic Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Kinase Complex 1 (mTORC1) Is Associated with Low Transcriptional Activity of Transcription Factor EB and Lysosomal Dysfunction in Dairy Cows with Clinical Ketosis. J. Dairy Sci. 2022;105:4520–4533. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Low Abundance of Insulin-Induced Gene 1 Contributes to SREBP-1c Processing and Hepatic Steatosis in Dairy Cows with Severe Fatty Liver. J. Dairy Sci. 2023;106:5626–5635. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mitochondrial Membrane Protein Mitofusin 2 as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Treating Free Fatty Acid–Induced Hepatic Inflammation in Dairy Cows during Early Lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2020;103:5561–5574. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ma X., Xu L., Mueller E. Forkhead Box A3 Mediates Glucocorticoid Receptor Function in Adipose Tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:3377–3382. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601281113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dong J., Loor J.J., Zuo R., Chen X., Liang Y., Wang Y., Shu X., Sun X., Jia H., Liu G., et al. Low Abundance of Mitofusin 2 in Dairy Cows with Moderate Fatty Liver Is Associated with Alterations in Hepatic Lipid Metabolism. J. Dairy Sci. 2019;102:7536–7547. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yan Z., Huang H., Freebern E., Santos D.J.A., Dai D., Si J., Ma C., Cao J., Guo G., Liu G.E., et al. Integrating RNA-Seq with GWAS Reveals Novel Insights into the Molecular Mechanism Underpinning Ketosis in Cattle. BMC Genom. 2020;21:489. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06909-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li S., Ou C., Zhang J., Zeng M., Liang K., Peng Q., Gao Y. The Effect of FOXA3 Overexpression on Hepatocyte Differentiation and Liver Regeneration in a Fah cKO Mouse Model. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2024;19:101438. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2024.101438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huang X., Liu G., Guo J., Su Z.Q. The PI3K/AKT Pathway in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018;14:1483–1496. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.27173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ferretti R., Moura E.G., Dos Santos V.C., Caldeira E.J., Conte M., Matsumura C.Y., Pertille A., Mosqueira M. High-Fat Diet Suppresses the Positive Effect of Creatine Supplementation on Skeletal Muscle Function by Reducing Protein Expression of IGF-PI3K-AKT-mTOR Pathway. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0199728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Watt M.J., Miotto P.M., De Nardo W., Montgomery M.K. The Liver as an Endocrine Organ-Linking NAFLD and Insulin Resistance. Endocr. Rev. 2019;40:1367–1393. doi: 10.1210/er.2019-00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Santoleri D., Titchenell P.M. Resolving the Paradox of Hepatic Insulin Resistance. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;7:447–456. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Marra F., Svegliati-Baroni G. Lipotoxicity and the Gut-Liver Axis in NASH Pathogenesis. J. Hepatol. 2018;68:280–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Glass C.K., Olefsky J.M. Inflammation and Lipid Signaling in the Etiology of Insulin Resistance. Cell Metab. 2012;15:635–645. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hashemi Goradel N., Najafi M., Salehi E., Farhood B., Mortezaee K. Cyclooxygenase-2 in Cancer: A Review. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:5683–5699. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Abuobeid R., Herrera-Marcos L.V., Arnal C., Bidooki S.H., Sánchez-Marco J., Lasheras R., Surra J.C., Rodríguez-Yoldi M.J., Martínez-Beamonte R., Osada J. Differentially Expressed Genes in Response to a Squalene-Supplemented Diet Are Accurate Discriminants of Porcine Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:12552. doi: 10.3390/ijms241612552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dalen K.T., Schoonjans K., Ulven S.M., Weedon-Fekjaer M.S., Bentzen T.G., Koutnikova H., Auwerx J., Nebb H.I. Adipose Tissue Expression of the Lipid Droplet-Associating Proteins S3-12 and Perilipin Is Controlled by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma. Diabetes. 2004;53:1243–1252. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.5.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nagai S., Shimizu C., Umetsu M., Taniguchi S., Endo M., Miyoshi H., Yoshioka N., Kubo M., Koike T. Identification of a Functional Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Responsive Element within the Murine Perilipin Gene. Endocrinology. 2004;145:2346–2356. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shimizu M., Yamashita D., Yamaguchi T., Hirose F., Osumi T. Aspects of the Regulatory Mechanisms of PPAR Functions: Analysis of a Bidirectional Response Element and Regulation by Sumoylation. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2006;286:33–42. doi: 10.1007/s11010-005-9052-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Scherer P.E., Bickel P.E., Kotler M., Lodish H.F. Cloning of Cell-Specific Secreted and Surface Proteins by Subtractive Antibody Screening. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998;16:581–586. doi: 10.1038/nbt0698-581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.







