Simple Summary
Bovine babesiosis is a tick-borne parasitic disease that impairs the health and productivity of Holstein calves. This study investigated the link between immune- and antioxidant-related gene expression and blood and serum biochemical changes in naturally infected calves. Infected animals showed increased expression of immune genes and decreased expression of antioxidant genes, reflecting strong inflammatory responses and increased oxidative stress. These molecular changes coincided with hematological disturbances and altered biochemical markers of liver and kidney function, metabolism, mineral balance, and antioxidant status in the calves. The results highlight a close relationship between gene expression dynamics and blood-based indicators during B. bovis infection and suggest that combining immune and antioxidant genes with hematobiochemical biomarkers can serve as effective tools for disease detection, monitoring, and control in livestock.
Keywords: Babesia spp., calves, diagnostic indicators, gene expression profiling, inflammatory response, PCR amplification
Abstract
Bovine babesiosis is a widespread tick-borne parasitic disease that compromises calf health and productivity, causing substantial economic losses. This study evaluated the potential of molecular and hematobiochemical biomarkers for the detection of babesiosis in Holstein calves by analyzing the expression dynamics of selected immune and antioxidant genes and their association with blood-based indicators. Blood samples were collected from 243 fattening calves, classified as healthy (n = 180) or naturally infected (n = 63). Transcriptional levels of immune-related genes (IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1) and antioxidant genes (SOD3, CAT, GPX, and GST) were measured alongside hematological, biochemical, immunological, and oxidative stress assessments. Infected calves exhibited significant upregulation (p < 0.05) of immune and pro-inflammatory genes, indicating strong immune activation, while antioxidant gene expression was markedly downregulated, reflecting impaired redox balance. These molecular changes were accompanied by hematobiochemical alterations, including elevated liver and kidney markers, serum lipids, inflammatory mediators, and oxidative stress indices. Conversely, reductions were observed in glucose, serum proteins, thyroid hormones, essential minerals, total antioxidant capacity, and endogenous antioxidant enzymes. The coordinated assessment of immune and antioxidant gene expression with hematobiochemical profiles provides a robust biomarker-based approach for the early detection and monitoring of bovine babesiosis. These integrated molecular and blood-based indicators may support effective diagnosis, disease management, and control strategies in livestock production systems.
1. Introduction
Bovine babesiosis is a worldwide disease caused by an intraerythrocytic protozoan, “Babesia”, belonging to the genus Babesia [1,2]. It primarily affects cattle but also infects a variety of domestic and wild animals, leading to increases in the morbidity and mortality rate in cattle [3,4]. Babesia is the second most prevalent parasite in mammalian bloodstreams after trypanosomes [5]. The OIE lists it as an emerging disease under the “B” category of diseases [6]. The presence of external parasites in the dairy industry results in financial losses due to their detrimental effects on animal health and productivity [7,8]. These effects include depriving cattle of necessary nutrients, decreasing feed intake and efficiency, increasing stress levels in animals, causing skin damage, and serving as carriers of various diseases [9]. Certain Babesia species are zoonotic and impact human health [10]. Human babesiosis occurs primarily through the bite of infected ixodid ticks, particularly Ixodes spp., although transmission via blood transfusion and, rarely, organ transplantation has also been reported [11]. The disease is globally distributed, with increasing incidence documented in North America, Europe, Asia, and parts of Africa, reflecting expanding tick habitats, climate change, and closer interactions between wildlife, livestock, and humans [12]. From a One Health perspective, domestic animals and wildlife serve as important reservoirs for zoonotic Babesia species, underscoring the need for integrated surveillance and control strategies that link animal health, vector ecology, and human health [13]. It is a significant disease in the Middle East since it can occasionally manifest acutely with significant clinical changes in animal productivity [14]. Babesia bigemina, Babesia divergens, and Babesia bovis are the most frequent species that infect cattle [15]. B. bovis and B. bigemina are the causative agents of the disease in Egypt [16,17]. The protozoon is spread from one animal to another (transovarial transmission) by cattle ticks. Rhipicephalus microplus and Rhipicephalus annulatus are responsible for the transmission of B. bovis and B. bigemina among cattle [6].
Babesia species induce acute disease mainly through two mechanisms: hemolysis and circulatory disruption [18]. The clinical manifestations of this disease include anorexia, weight loss, ruminal atony, dyspnea, depression, fever, anemia, hemoglobinuria, jaundice, diarrhea, abortion, and decreased milk production [19,20]. The side effects include unconsciousness, seizures, tremors, and muscle atrophy [21]. Neurological symptoms include circling, aggressiveness, nystagmus, hyperesthesia, convulsions and paralysis [18].
Hematobiochemical assessments offer valuable insights into an animal’s nutritional status, health, and physiological well-being. Therefore, these parameters serve as useful indicators for broadly evaluating an animal’s general health condition [22]. Alterations in blood parameters beyond the normal reference ranges can be detected, providing valuable information for differential diagnosis and offering insights into the severity of tissue damage and levels of infection [23].
Numerous physiological processes, including oocyte maturation, fertilization, embryo growth during pregnancy, parturition, and the start of premature labor, are associated with oxidative stress [24]. Cytokines play a major role in the induction and regulation of the immune inflammatory response [25]. By regulating cell growth, maturation, activation, proliferation, and differentiation, cytokines exert a substantial influence on the type, magnitude, and duration of immune responses [26].
Modern molecular genetic techniques are used as complementary tools for disease management and to enhance overall animal health [27]. Researchers have successfully identified genetic markers, particularly single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), associated with disease susceptibility and resistance in cattle [28,29,30]. This indicates the presence of variation in the adaptive capacity or resilience of the host genome in response to disease [31]. Antioxidants, SNPs, immune systems, and altered gene expression linked to bovine babesiosis are areas of ongoing research. The current study aimed to assess gene expression, SNPs, and hematobiochemical, immunological, and oxidative changes associated with bovine babesiosis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Livestock Management Conditions
The study was conducted in the New Valley Governorate, situated in Egypt’s western desert. This region forms a large depression bordered by the Nile, Sudan, and Libya (Figure 1). It spans approximately 440,098 km2 and lies between the coordinates 24°32′44″ N and 27°10′24″ E. The New Valley Governorate of Egypt, with Kharga Oasis as its administrative center, is characterized by a hyper-arid desert climate, high temperatures, and minimal annual rainfall, resulting in severe water scarcity and reliance on groundwater for livestock production. Livestock are predominantly managed under extensive grazing systems, with cattle, sheep, and goats freely grazing on desert pastures and oasis vegetation, while feed supplementation and veterinary services remain limited and irregular. These management practices, together with environmental stressors such as heat stress, nutritional deficiencies, and water depletion, increase livestock vulnerability to infectious diseases. The presence of irrigated agricultural areas, animal shelters, and traditional husbandry practices creates favorable microhabitats for ixodid ticks, particularly Rhipicephalus and Hyalomma species, which are well adapted to arid conditions. These ticks serve as the primary vectors of bovine babesiosis caused mainly by Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina, which are enzootically maintained in local cattle populations. Epidemiological evidence from the region indicates high tick infestation rates and increased Babesia transmission during warmer months, highlighting the endemic nature of bovine babesiosis and the importance of understanding local tick ecology for effective disease surveillance and control.
Figure 1.
Geographical location of New Valley Governorate within Egypt.
2.2. Animals and Study Design
The current study comprised 243 fattening calves between December 2023 and May 2024, with an average age of 3 ± 0.3 years (1.5–5 years) and an average body weight of 317 ± 18.3 kg (215–400 kg). Calves were categorized based on their health status. The control group (G1) comprised 180 clinically healthy animals. The inclusion criteria for this group were no previous or current tick exposure, absence of any clinical abnormalities, and negative Babesia results confirmed by blood smear examination and PCR testing. Group 2 comprised 63 calves diagnosed with babesiosis. The enrollment criteria included observable tick infestation, the presence of clinical signs such as anorexia, weight loss, ruminal atony, dyspnea, depression, fever, anemia, pale or icteric mucous membranes, hemoglobinuria, and jaundice, along with laboratory confirmation of intra-erythrocytic Babesia stages via Giemsa-stained blood smears and Babesia-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Positive samples with PCR were introduced to confirm the dominant strain of Babesia subspecies present in the study area through gene sequencing and phylogenetic analyses and recorded in the GeneBank database.
The calves were fed a basic diet designed for beef cattle and kept in partially shaded quarters [32]. The initial diet comprised 40% wheat straw and 60% concentrate. Free water was provided along with a diet twice a day, in the morning and evening. In accordance with the Egyptian Authority Program, the animals were routinely vaccinated and dewormed. A thorough clinical examination was performed on each calf, and clinical symptoms were noted. All cases included in this study were free from bacterial, viral, helminth, and protozoan parasites, as animals were subjected to clinical examination to eliminate bacterial and viral infected cases as much as possible [33], and all suspicious cases were denied from the study. Fecal samples were obtained directly from the rectum, packed in clean plastic containers, numbered, and transferred to the laboratory for parasitological examination to eliminate cases with helminth or protozoal parasites. The Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation of Egypt and the Animal and Poultry Health Department at the Desert Research Center (IACUC-APPD-DRC-# 25 8 51 #) instructed that the study adhere to all relevant national regulations and institutional guidelines for the use and care of animals. The protocols followed the All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and the International Animal Ethics Committee standards (8th Edition, 2011; Record No.: 13799; Legacy ID: 8247) and were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee.
2.3. Blood Sampling
First, 10 mL of blood was collected from each calf using jugular venipuncture. The samples were divided into plain tubes without anticoagulant and EDTA-containing tubes for serum and whole-blood analyses, respectively. All samples were placed on crushed ice and immediately transported to the laboratory for processing. EDTA-treated whole blood was used for complete blood count (CBC) analysis and for RNA extraction. Blood collected in plain tubes was allowed to clot overnight at room temperature and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min. The separated serum was aliquoted, stored at −20 °C, and subsequently used for biochemical assays of oxidative and energy stress biomarkers.
2.4. Parasitological Examination
From each blood sample, two thin smears were made, allowed to air-dry, and fixed in absolute methanol for 5 min. The slides were then stained with 10% Giemsa for one hour. Microscopic examination was performed using a light microscope with an oil-immersion objective (×1000), following the procedure described in [34]. Identification of the parasites was based on the morphological features detailed in [35].
2.5. PCR Identification and Genotyping of Babesia
Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Only samples that tested positive or negative by blood smear evaluation were further analyzed using a PCR assay to verify the presence of Babesia. Amplification targeted the 18S rRNA gene using species-specific primers: forward (GTCTTGTAATTGGAATGATGGTGAC) and reverse (ATGCCCCCAACCGTTCCTATTA), which produced a 340 bp fragment as described by [36]. PCR amplification was performed in a final reaction volume of 25 µL containing 12.5 µL of commercial Master Mix (Bio-Basic, Alverca do Ribatejo, Portugal), 10 pmol of each primer, approximately 25 ng of genomic DNA, and sterile distilled water. Reactions were carried out using an automated thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The thermal profile consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30–40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 40 s, and extension at 72 °C for 40 s, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min.
PCR products were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized using a gel documentation system (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA). The presence of a 340 bp band was considered indicative of Babesia species infection. Purified amplicons were subsequently sequenced using an Applied Biosystems 3130 automated DNA sequencer (ABI, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Sequencing reactions were prepared with BigDye Terminator v3.1 (2 µL), primer (1 µL), and variable volumes of template DNA (1–10 µL) depending on the band quality and DNA concentration, with the final reaction volume adjusted to 20 µL using deionized or PCR-grade water. The obtained sequences were analyzed using BLAST (BLASTn version 2.12.0+ (National Center for Biotechnology Information, NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA) to determine sequence identity and were compared with reference sequences deposited in GenBank [37] and then compared with those of closely related species preserved in the GenBank database. A phylogenetic tree was created using the neighbor-joining model in MEGA Version 6.0 software [38].
2.6. RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, qRT-PCR, and Polymorphism Detection
Total RNA was isolated from EDTA-treated blood samples using Trizol reagent (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The RNA concentration and quality were assessed with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer Quawell, CA, USA. cDNA synthesis was performed using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher, Cat. No. EP0441, London, UK). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was carried out with SYBR Green Master Mix (SensiFAST, Bioline, SensiFast™ SYBR, Bioline, Cat. No. Bio-98002, London, UK) to evaluate the expression of immune-related genes (IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1) and antioxidant genes (SOD3, CAT, GPX, and GST), with GAPDH used as the internal control. Primer details are provided in Table 1, and relative gene expression was calculated using the 2–ΔΔCt method [39].
Table 1.
Sequences of forward and reverse primers used for real-time PCR analysis of the immune- and antioxidant-related genes investigated in this study.
| Investigated Marker | Primer | Product Size (bp) | Annealing Temperature (°C) | GenBank Isolate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT | F: 5′-TCTGTTGAAGATGCAGCAAGAC-3′ R: 5′-GCCGTCACGCTGGTAGTTGGCCA-3′ |
435 | 60 | NM_001035386.2 |
| GAPDH | F: 5′-AGGTCGGAGTGAACGGATTC-3′ R: 5′-GATGTTGGCAGGATCTCGCT-3′ |
242 | 58 | NM_001034034.2 |
| GPX | F: 5′-GAGAACGTAGCATCGCTCTGAG-3′ R: 5′-CACACCGTCTGGGCCCACCAGGA-3′ |
396 | 58 | NM_174076.3 |
| GST | F: 5′-TCCAATGCCATCCTGCGGCACCT-3′ R: 5′-CTGTTTCCCATTGCCGTTGATGG- 3′ |
435 | 58 | NM_177516.1 |
| IL-2 | F: 5′-TACAAGATACAACTCTTGTCT-3′ R: 5′-TCATATTCACATGTGAATCTTGT-3′ |
386 | 58 | NM_180997.2 |
| IL-6 | F: 5′-ACAAGCGCCTTCACTCCATTCG-3 R: 5′-AGACTGCATCTTCTCCAGCAGG-3′ |
516 | 60 | EU276071.1 |
| MCP-1 | F: 5′-ATGAAGGTCTCCGCTGCCCTCCT-3′ R: 5′-AGGCTTTGGAGTTTGGTTTTTC-3′ |
297 | 60 | NM_174006.2 |
| SOD3 | F: 5′-GTGCTGCCGTCGGCCACGCTG-3′ R: 5′-GACGGCTTTACACTCGCTCTCGC-3′ |
528 | 58 | NM_001082610.2 |
| TNFα | F: 5′-AGCATGATCCGGGATGTGGAGC-3′ R: 5′-GACTCCTCCCTGGTAGATGGGT-3′ |
588 | 60 | AF348421.1 |
Catalase (CAT), Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH); Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX), Glutathione S-Transferase (GST), Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1), Superoxide Dismutase 3 (SOD3), and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α). A: Adenine, T: Thymine, C: Cytosine, G: Guanine.
PCR amplicons were purified using a commercial purification kit (Jena Bioscience, Jena, Germany), quantified using a NanoDrop Q5000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and subsequently sequenced on an ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Forward and reverse reads were assembled and aligned using Chromas 1.45, and sequence identity was confirmed using BLAST analysis [37]. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected by comparing the obtained sequences with the corresponding GenBank reference entries. Amino acid alignments and comparative analyses were performed using MEGA6 software version 6 [40].
2.7. Biochemical Analysis
Serum biochemical parameters were measured using commercial diagnostic kits following the manufacturers’ standard protocols. Total protein, albumin, glucose, cholesterol, and creatinine concentrations were determined using kits from Gamma Trade Company (Mohandessin, Giza, Egypt), while calcium levels were assessed using Bio-Diagnostic reagents (Giza, Egypt). Sodium, potassium, triglycerides, urea, AST, ALT, LDH, and GGT were quantified using Spectrum kits, (Obour City, Cairo Governorate, Egypt) on an automated chemistry analyzer (Apple 302, Cupertino, CA, USA). Total bilirubin was evaluated using N.S. BIO-TEC kits, (Camp Shizar, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt), and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) was measured using a MyBioSource kit (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA). Globulin concentrations were calculated by subtracting albumin from total protein. Trace minerals were analyzed using the following kits: copper (SIGMA-ALDRICH, St. Louis, MI, USA), zinc (Abnova, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan), and iron (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Oxidative and antioxidant markers—including malondialdehyde (MDA; Biodiagnostic, CAT No: MD2529), nitric oxide (NO; CAT No: NO2533), superoxide dismutase (SOD; CAT No: SD2520), total antioxidant capacity (TAC; CAT No: TA2513), reduced glutathione (GSH; CAT No: GR2511), and catalase (CAT; Biodiagnostic, Dokki, Giza Governorate, Egypt)—were also quantified. Cytokines were measured using ELISA kits as follows: IL-2 (RayBiotech, Catalog #: ELB-IL2-1), IL-6 and IL-10 (Boster Biological Technology, Pleasanton, CA, USA. CAT No: EK0412 and EK0418, respectively), and TNF-α and IFN-γ (Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego, CA, USA). Serum amyloid A (SAA) was assayed using IBL International (Toronto, ON, Canada) ELISA kits, while C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined using a RayBiotech kit (Catalog #: ABIN6954219). MCP-1 (Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and T4 ELISA Kit (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA, Catalog #: MBS454447, MBS8819985), respectively.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23. Independent-samples t-tests were applied to compare the mean values of measured variables between infected and control groups, with results expressed as mean ± SD. The chi-square test was used to examine differences in the frequencies of each gene SNP between infected and healthy calves, evaluating the distribution of identified SNPs across the groups. The observed genotype frequencies were subjected to a chi-square (χ2) test to assess Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and to characterize genotype distribution in the study population [41,42]. Furthermore, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) was conducted to assess whether the average SNP values of the genes could distinguish between infected and healthy animals. The mean scores of the eight genes served as predictor variables, while health status (infected vs. healthy) was used as the grouping variable. A significance level of p = 0.05 was applied for all tests.
3. Results
3.1. Clinical Examination
Clinical evaluation of the 243 examined calves showed that 180 animals (74.07%) were clinically healthy. These calves displayed normal physiological parameters, including body temperature, pulse, and respiratory rate, and exhibited bright, clear eyes without discharge, a moist muzzle, and no evidence of internal or external parasitism. They demonstrated normal posture, appetite, and behavior, with no signs of diarrhea, lameness, or abnormal lung sounds upon auscultation. Additionally, they had no current or prior history of tick infestation and showed no clinical indicators suggestive of babesiosis. Conversely, 63 calves (25.93%) presented with clinical abnormalities. These included anorexia, weight loss, ruminal atony, dyspnea, depression, fever (≥39.5 °C), anemia, pale or icteric mucous membranes, hemoglobinuria, and jaundice, along with a documented history of previous tick exposure. Microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood smears confirmed the presence of Babesia, characterized by the typical intraerythrocytic, double pear-shaped (pyriform) forms. Analysis of the study population revealed that there was no significant association between the age of the animals and their body condition scores (p > 0.05). Both younger and older animals displayed a wide range of body conditions, indicating that age was not a determining factor for nutritional status in this population. These findings suggest that other factors, such as feeding practices, environmental stressors, and management conditions, are likely more influential in affecting the body condition of livestock in the New Valley Governorate.
3.2. Detection and Genotyping of Babesia
The PCR-based assay confirmed the results of clinical and blood film examinations. However, DNA amplified for Babesia species was detected in 63 calves, producing bands with sizes of 340 bp, while 180 had no infections, as shown in Figure 2 (original image is shown in Figure S1). The results also showed that the fragments generated by PCR had the same sequence as B. bigemina with a typical identity of 100% after gene sequencing analysis. No genetic diversity, different SNPs, divergence, or genetic distances between them have been determined so far. The submitted strain had the same sequence as other preserved B. bigemina strains in GenBank. The sequence was recorded under accession number PP892245 B. bigemina BFNV-DRC in the GenBank database.
Figure 2.
Representative 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis showing positive amplification of the 18S rRNA gene of Babesia spp. Positive samples are shown in lanes 2, 10, 17, 21, 27, and 28. Lane P represents the positive control, lane N the negative control, and lanes L contain the molecular size marker (Fermentas, Darmstadt, Germany). All remaining lanes show negative results.
3.3. Hematological Profile
When comparing calves infected with B. bigemina to healthy control animals, a substantial (p < 0.05) decrease in the mean RBCs, Hb, PCV%, MCHC, WBCs, lymphocyte, and neutrophil counts was noted, along with an increase in MCV (Table 2).
Table 2.
Comparison of hematological parameters between apparently healthy (n = 180) and Babesia-infected (n = 63) calves in the New Valley Governorate, Egypt.
| Parameters | Healthy Calves | Infected Calves | p Values | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBCs | 6.3 ± 0.6 | 4.2 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | ×106/µL |
| Hb | 11.9 ± 1.5 | 8.1 ± 1.01 * | 0.001 | g/dL |
| PCV | 32.1 ± 0.5 | 22 ± 0.3 * | 0.001 | % |
| MCV | 32.1 ± 0.05 | 36.4 ± 0.2 * | 0.1 | fL |
| MCH | 22.1 ± 1.9 | 19.1 ± 0.88 | 0.09 | pg |
| MCHC | 36.4 ± 0.2 | 31 ± 0.08 | 0.07 | % |
| WBCs | 18.11 ± 3.32 | 11.22 ± 1.4 * | 0.001 | ×103/µL |
| Neutrophils | 8.99 ± 0.29 | 4.02 ± 0.08 * | 0.004 | ×103/µL |
| Lymphocyte | 2.11 ± 0.55 | 4.1 ± 0.08 * | 0.03 | ×103/µL |
RBCs, erythrocytes count; Hb, hemoglobin; PCV, packed cell volume; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; WBCs, total leukocytes count. Significant differences between the two groups are indicated by *: p < 0.05.
3.4. Patterns for Transcript Levels of Immune and Antioxidant Indicators
Figure 3 illustrates the transcript patterns of the evaluated immune and antioxidant markers. Calves infected with Babesia exhibited significantly higher expression levels of IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 than healthy calves. In contrast, the expression of the antioxidant genes SOD3, CAT, GPX, and GST was notably lower in the infected group. Among the infected calves, TNF-α showed the highest mRNA expression (2.34 ± 0.24), whereas CAT showed the lowest (0.51 ± 0.08). In healthy calves, GPX demonstrated the highest mRNA level (1.58 ± 0.12), whereas IL-2 had the lowest (0.45 ± 0.09).
Figure 3.
Differential expression of immune-related genes (IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1) and antioxidant genes (SOD3, CAT, GPX, and GST) in Babesia-affected calves. Data are presented as mean ± SE. An asterisk (*) indicates statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
3.5. Genetic Polymorphisms of Immune and Antioxidant Genes
The PCR-amplified DNA fragments for IL-2 (480 bp), IL-6 (400 bp), TNF-α (359 bp), MCP-1 (399 bp), SOD3 (343 bp), CAT (423 bp), GPX (461 bp), and GST (419 bp) showed sequence variations between healthy calves and Babesia-infected calves. Comparison with reference sequences from GenBank confirmed all detected SNPs in the immune and antioxidant genes.
The exonic changes identified in these genes, summarized in Table 3, resulted in coding sequence alterations in infected calves compared to those in healthy calves. Sequencing analysis identified 14 SNPs, including eight synonymous and six non-synonymous variants. Significant differences in SNP frequencies were observed between the infected and healthy calves (p < 0.005). Chi-square tests demonstrated that the distribution of these SNPs across all genes differed significantly between the two groups, with the overall chi-square value indicating substantial variation between resistant and infected animals (p < 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Distribution and statistical analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in immune (IL-2, IL-6, TNFα, MCP-1) and antioxidant-related genes (SOD3, CAT, GPX, GST) of apparently healthy (n = 180) and Babesia-infected (n = 63) calves in the New Valley Governorate, Egypt, including mutation type and amino acid changes.
| Gene | SNPs | Healthy n = 180 |
Infected n = 63 |
Total n = 243 |
ChiSquare Value X2 | p-Value | Type of Mutation | Amino Acid Number and Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-2 | C330T | -/180 | 34/63 | 34/243 | 112.9 | 0.001 | Synonymous | I |
| IL-6 | G224A | -/180 | 17/63 | 17/243 | 52.2 | 0.001 | Non-synonymous | S to N |
| TNFα | G328A | -/180 | 28/63 | 28/343 | 90.4 | 0.001 | Non-synonymous | V to M |
| G488A | 57/180 | -/63 | 57/243 | 26 | 0.001 | Non-synonymous | R to K | |
| MCP-1 | A93G | -/180 | 24/63 | 24/243 | 76 | 0.001 | Synonymous | Q |
| T180C | 84/180 | -/63 | 84/243 | 44.9 | 0.001 | Synonymous | P | |
| A205G | 67/180 | -/63 | 67/243 | 32.3 | 0.001 | Non-synonymous | I to V | |
| T270C | -/180 | 46/63 | 46/243 | 162.1 | 0.001 | Synonymous | L | |
| SOD3 | A137G | 93/180 | -/63 | 93/243 | 52.7 | 0.001 | Non-synonymous | N to S |
| CAT | T45C | 129/180 | -/63 | 129/243 | 96.2 | 0.001 | Synonymous | Y |
| T333C | 107/180 | -/63 | 107/243 | 66.9 | 0.001 | Synonymous | F | |
| GPX | T152C | -/180 | 34/63 | 34/243 | 112.9 | 0.001 | Non-synonymous | L to P |
| GST | G147A | 123/180 | -/63 | 123/243 | 87.1 | 0.001 | Synonymous | A |
| C396G | -/180 | 25/63 | 25/243 | 79.6 | 0.001 | Synonymous | P |
Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1); Superoxide Dismutase 3 (SOD3), Catalase (CAT), Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX), and Glutathione S-Transferase (GST). A: Adenine, T: Thymine, C: Cytosine, G: Guanine.
The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed for each SNP locus independently in both the healthy control and Babesia-infected groups. The chi-square (χ2) analysis demonstrated that genotype frequencies at all examined loci conformed to genetic equilibrium in both populations, as the calculated χ2 values were lower than the corresponding tabulated χ2 values (Table 4).
Table 4.
The observed genotype frequencies for each gene locus subjected to a chi-square (χ2) test to assess Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and to characterize genotype distribution in healthy (n = 180) and Babesia-infected (n = 63) calves.
| Gene | SNPs | Number | Genotyping Frequency | Allele Frequency | Chi-Square Calculated (X2) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy | Infected | |||||||
| IL-2 | C330T | CC | CT | TT | C | T | 0.017 | |
| Observed | 209/0.86 | 34/0.14 | 0.63 | 0.37 | ||||
| Expected | 96.47 | 113.24 | 33.29 | |||||
| IL-6 | G224A | GG | GA | AA | G | A | 0.00000063 | |
| Observed | 226/0.93 | 17/0.07 | 0.74 | 0.26 | ||||
| Expected | 133.65 | 92.34 | 17.01 | |||||
| TNFα | G328A | GG | GA | AA | G | A | 0.0003 | |
| Observed | 215/0.88 | 28/0.12 | 0.66 | 0.34 | ||||
| Expected | 105.85 | 109.06 | 28.09 | |||||
| G448A | GG | GA | AA | G | A | 0.1219 | ||
| Observed | 57/0.23 | 186/0.77 | 0.12 | 0.88 | ||||
| Expected | 3.40 | 51.27 | 188.08 | |||||
| MCP-1 | A93G | AA | AG | GG | A | G | 0.2284 | |
| Observed | 219/0.90 | 24/0.10 | 0.70 | 0.30 | ||||
| Expected | 119.07 | 102.06 | 21.87 | |||||
| T180C | TT | TC | CC | T | C | 0.0034 | ||
| Observed | 84/0.35 | 159/0.65 | 0.19 | 0.81 | ||||
| Expected | 8.77 | 74.80 | 159.43 | |||||
| A205G | AA | AG | GG | A | G | 0.0038 | ||
| Observed | 67/0.28 | 176/0.72 | 0.15 | 0.85 | ||||
| Expected | 5.47 | 61.97 | 175.57 | |||||
| T270C | TT | TC | CC | T | C | 0.0288 | ||
| Observed | 197/0.81 | 46/0.19 | 0.56 | 0.44 | ||||
| Expected | 76.20 | 119.75 | 47.04 | |||||
| SOD3 | A137G | AA | AG | GG | A | G | 0.0481 | |
| Observed | 93/0.38 | 150/0.62 | 0.21 | 0.79 | ||||
| Expected | 10.72 | 80.63 | 151.66 | |||||
| CAT | T45C | TT | TC | CC | T | C | 0.0444 | |
| Observed | 129/0.53 | 114/0.47 | 0.32 | 0.68 | ||||
| Expected | 24.88 | 105.75 | 112.36 | |||||
| T333C | TT | TC | CC | T | C | 0.0079 | ||
| Observed | 107/0.44 | 136/0.56 | 0.25 | 0.75 | ||||
| Expected | 15.19 | 91.13 | 136.69 | |||||
| GPX | T152C | TT | TC | CC | T | C | 0.017 | |
| Observed | 209/0.86 | 34/0.14 | 0.63 | 0.37 | ||||
| Expected | 96.47 | 113.24 | 33.29 | |||||
| GST | G147A | GG | GA | AA | G | A | 0.0142 | |
| Observed | 123/0.51 | 120/0.49 | 0.30 | 0.70 | ||||
| Expected | 21.87 | 102.06 | 119.07 | |||||
| C396G | CC | CG | GG | C | G | 0.00061 | ||
| Observed | 218/0.90 | 25/0.10 | 0.68 | 0.32 | ||||
| Expected | 112.36 | 105.75 | 24.88 | |||||
Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1); Superoxide Dismutase 3 (SOD3), Catalase (CAT), Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX), and Glutathione S-Transferase (GST). A: Adenine, T: Thymine, C: Cytosine, G: Guanine.
Table 5 presents the discriminant analysis results, illustrating the association between gene variants and calves’ health status. The model successfully classified all calves as either healthy or infected, demonstrating that the SNP markers included have strong discriminatory power and may be valuable as potential genetic indicators of susceptibility to B. bovis infection.
Table 5.
Predicted group membership of calves based on diagnostic parameters: Classification of apparently healthy (n = 180) and diseased (n = 63) animals in the New Valley Governorate, Egypt.
| Predicted Group Membership | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy | Diseases | |||
| Count | Healthy | 180 | 0 | 180 |
| Diseased | 0 | 63 | 63 | |
| % | Healthy | 100 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
| Diseased | 0.0 | 100 | 100.0 | |
3.6. Biochemical Profile
The biochemical results showed that serum levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, urea, creatinine, total bilirubin, K, and serum activity of AST, ALT, GGT, and LDH were considerably higher (p < 0.05) in diseased calves than in non-infected ones, while serum levels of glucose, total protein albumin, globulin, T4, cTnI, calcium, sodium, copper, zinc, and iron were significantly lower (Table 6).
Table 6.
Serum biochemical profiles of apparently healthy (n = 180) and Babesia-infected (n = 63) calves in the New Valley Governorate, Egypt.
| Parameters | Healthy Calves | Babesia Infected Calves | p Values | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | 68.8 ± 0.8 | 48 ± 0.5 * | 0.006 | mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 89.6 ± 0.8 | 124 ± 1.5 * | 0.001 | mg/dL |
| Triglyceride | 55.6 ± 0.8 | 82.6 ± 1.7 * | 0.008 | mg/dL |
| Total protein | 6 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 0.1 * | 0.001 | g/dL |
| Albumen | 4.4 ± 0.05 | 3.8 ± 0.08 * | 0.001 | g/dL |
| Globulin | 1.3 ± 0.08 | 0.8 ± 0.05 * | 0.001 | g/dL |
| Urea | 23 ± 0.5 | 31 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.7 ± 0.01 * | 0.001 | mg/dL |
| Total billirubin | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 3.5 ± 1.5 * | 0.001 | mg/dL |
| Thyroxine | 215 ± 7.6 | 165 ± 5.7 * | 0.001 | ng/mL |
| AST | 54 ± 0.5 | 78 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | U/L |
| ALT | 30 ± 0.5 | 54 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | U/L |
| GGT | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 14.9 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | U/L |
| LDH | 102.3 ± 3.9 | 220.3 ± 15.7 * | 0.001 | U/L |
| cTnI | 0.2 ± 0.04 | 1.3 ± 0.05 * | 0.001 | ng/mL |
| Calcium | 9.6 ± 0.1 | 7.4 ± 0.2 * | 0.001 | mg/dL |
| Sodium | 149.8 ± 1.2 | 131 ± 1.1 * | 0.001 | mmol/L |
| Potassium | 5.3 ± 0.08 | 3.5 ± 0.05 * | 0.001 | mmol/L |
| Copper | 1810 ± 7.9 | 14.1 ± 0.08 * | 0.001 | nmol/L |
| Zinc | 79.9 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 0.05 * | 0.001 | nmol/L |
| Iron | 165 ± 0.5 | 130 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | nmol/L |
AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, Alanine transaminase; GGT, Gamma-glutamyl transferase; LDH, Lactate Dehydrogenase; cTnI, Cardiac troponin I. Significant differences between the two groups are indicated by *: p < 0.05.
3.7. Antioxidants and Immunological Profile
When comparing infected calves to healthy calves, the oxidative stress biomarkers MDA (1.50 ± 0.008 mg/dL) and NO (6.4 ± 0.1 µmol/L) exhibited a significant (p < 0.05) increase, while TAC (62.4 ± 0.6 mg/dL), GSH (16.7 ± 0.7 mg/dL), SOD (25 ± 0.5 U/mL), and CAT (25 ± 0.5 U/mL) revealed a significant (p < 0.05) decrease (Table 6). Serum concentrations of TNF-α (150.7 ± 2.6 pg/mL), IFN-γ (118 ± 2 pg/mL), IL2 (167.6 ± 4.7 pg/mL), IL6 (90 ± 38 pg/mL), IL10 (119 ± 1.1 pg/mL), MCP-1 (125 ± 0.5 pg/mL), SAA (8 ± 0.08 mg/L), and CRP (9.6 ± 0.4 g/L) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in infected calves (PG) than in the healthy group (Table 7).
Table 7.
Comparison of antioxidant and immune-related profiles between apparently healthy (n = 180) and Babesia-infected (n = 63) calves in the New Valley Governorate, Egypt.
| Parameters | Healthy Calves | Babesia Infected Calves | p Values | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSH | 28.3 ± 0.4 | 16.7 ± 0.7 * | 0.001 | mg/dL |
| CAT | 42.6 ± 0.8 | 25 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | U/mL |
| SOD | 64.3 ± 1.4 | 25 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | U/mL |
| TAC | 102 ± 1.0 | 62.4 ± 0.6 * | 0.001 | mg/dL |
| MDA | 0.81 ± 0.008 | 1.50 ± 0.008 * | 0.001 | mg/dL |
| NO | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.1 * | 0.001 | µmol/L |
| IL2 | 58 ± 1.1 | 167.6 ± 4.7 * | 0.001 | pg/mL |
| IL 6 | 38.2 ± 1.5 | 90 ± 38 * | 0.001 | pg/mL |
| IL 10 | 60 ± 1.1 | 119 ± 1.1 * | 0.001 | pg/mL |
| TNFα | 49 ± 1 | 150.7 ± 2.6 * | 0.001 | pg/mL |
| IFNᵧ | 30 ± 0.5 | 118 ± 2 * | 0.001 | pg/mL |
| MCP-1 | 40.2 ± 0.4 | 125 ± 0.5 * | 0.001 | pg/mL |
| SAA | 3.7 ± 0.05 | 8 ± 0.08 * | 0.001 | mg/L |
| CRP | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 9.6 ± 0.4 * | 0.001 | mg/L |
GSH, glutathione reduced; CAT, Catalase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; MDA, malondialdehyde; NO, Nitric oxide; IL2, interleukin 2; IL6, interleukin 6; IL10, interleukin 10; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; INFγ, interferon gamma; MCP-1, Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; CRP, C-reactive protein. Significant differences between the two groups are indicated by *: p < 0.05.
4. Discussion
Bovine babesiosis is a major endemic disease in Egypt, where its acute form severely reduces productivity and causes substantial economic loss [43,44]. Globally, approximately 1.2 billion cattle in regions, including Asia, Australia, Africa, South and Central America, and the United States, are at risk [45]. Developing effective vaccines against Babesia spp. remains challenging because of the limited understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease and the lack of well-defined immunological correlates of protection.
4.1. Clinical Findings
The sudden onset of pyrexia observed in this study may result from the effects of toxic metabolites produced during Babesia metabolism on thermoregulation [33]. Additionally, hemolysis of red blood cells leads to anemia and anemic hypoxia, triggering increased heart and respiratory rates as a compensatory response to tissue oxygen deficiency [33]. Severe hemolysis can also cause hemoglobinemia and hemoglobinuria in infected animals [46]. Overall, the clinical signs observed here align with previous reports of babesiosis [47,48,49].
4.2. Parasitological Findings
The present study found a Babesia infection rate of 25.93% in the study area, which varies compared with previous reports in Egypt using different detection methods. Infection rates were 18.43% in camels on the northwest coast [50] and 2.81% in southeastern Egypt [51], 51.28% in cattle and 22.47% in buffaloes in El-Qalubia [51], and 10% in Beheira and Faiyum Governorates [52]. In the middle Delta, prevalence was 12.6%, compared with lower rates in the west Delta and Upper Egypt (5.3% and 3.97%) [52]. Internationally, B. bigemina was detected in 92.6% of calves and 84% of cows in Brazil [53], 11.1% in Tunisia [54], and nested PCR studies reported 18.8% in Pakistan [55], 78.5% in Portugal [56], 29% in Brazil [57], and 26.7% in the Philippines [58].
In the present study, B. bigemina was the predominant Babesia species in calves, whereas previous studies in Egypt reported B. bovis as dominant in the northwest coast [50], southeast Egypt [51], and South Sinai [59]. The prevalence of B. bigemina in our study may reflect local regulations restricting animal imports from other governorates to prevent disease introduction. The strain identified was 100% identical to other B. bigemina sequences in GenBank, including EF458190 from buffaloes in South Africa [60], HQ264114 from white-tailed deer in the USA [61], JQ437261 from cattle, and EF458194 from buffaloes in Australia [62], as well as MN227676 previously isolated from cattle in Assiut, Egypt [44], indicating a widespread global distribution.
4.3. Hematological Profile
In this study, Babesia bigemina-infected calves exhibited macrocytic hypochromic anemia, evidenced by significant reductions in mean RBC count, hematocrit (HCT%), hemoglobin concentration, and MCHC, along with an increase in MCV. These findings are consistent with previous reports [20,49,63]. The anemia may result from multiple pathogenic mechanisms, including the production of anti-erythrocyte antibodies that target both infected and uninfected red blood cells [64], mechanical damage caused by binary fission of intra-erythrocytic trophozoites, and increased erythrophagocytosis by activated macrophages [65]. Furthermore, the observed macrocytic hypochromic pattern likely reflects a compensatory response to hemolysis, characterized by the extensive release of immature reticulocytes from the bone marrow and accelerated erythropoiesis [66].
In the present study, Babesia-infected calves exhibited leukopenia, as reflected in the leucogram. This reduction in white blood cell counts may be partially explained by the interaction between platelets and activated endothelial cells, which promotes “secondary capture” of leukocytes and contributes to their decreased circulation [67]. Neutropenia, in particular, may result from multiple mechanisms, including splenic sequestration, increased adherence of neutrophils to the endothelium, direct damage to hematopoietic precursor cells, or a combination of these factors [68]. Such neutropenia is commonly observed during acute infections [69]. Lymphopenia in infected calves may also be associated with stress-induced immunosuppression [70], while overall leukopenia may further reflect the sequestration of both neutrophils and lymphocytes in the spleen [71]. Collectively, these findings highlight the multifactorial nature of leukocyte depletion during acute Babesia infection.
4.4. Genetic Polymorphisms Between Healthy and Babesiosia Affected Cows
The idea implies that chromosomal polymorphisms affect the expression levels of mRNA for their respective genes, serving as a heritable endophenotype [72]. This approach also backed up the notion that integrating information on gene expression and chromosomal abnormalities could improve our comprehension of the genetics underpinning disease onset [73].
The mRNA expression profiles of immune-related genes (IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1) and antioxidant genes (SOD3, CAT, GPX, and GST) were evaluated to assess differences in immune and antioxidant status between healthy calves and those infected with Babesia. Infected calves exhibited markedly higher expression of the immune genes, while the antioxidant genes were expressed at lower levels compared to healthy calves.
These findings are consistent with previous studies showing that Babesia infection in calves induces early upregulation of type 1 cytokines such as IL-12 and IFN γ [74,75]. The observed SNP differences may also influence host susceptibility, supporting prior reports that host genetic variation shapes immune responses during babesiosis [76]. Our observations of increased IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 expression align with previous findings in bovine babesiosis [74,76] and canine models [77], suggesting that these cytokines are central mediators of leukocyte recruitment and parasite clearance. The oxidative stress induced by ROS and NO may further amplify tissue inflammation, as reported in calves and small ruminants during Babesia infection [16,77]. The downregulation of SOD3, CAT, GPX, and GST in infected calves mirrors earlier studies demonstrating reduced antioxidant enzyme activity during babesiosis in calves and sheep [16]. This suggests that oxidative stress contributes to disease pathophysiology and may influence clinical severity.
In this study, we investigated the immune-related genes (IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1) and antioxidant genes (SOD3, CAT, GPX, and GST) in calves both infected and uninfected with Babesia using PCR-based DNA sequencing. The analysis revealed distinct SNP profiles between the two groups. Compared to reference sequences from GenBank, the polymorphisms identified here provide novel insights into the genetic variation in these markers. The role of SNPs in immune and antioxidant genes in influencing susceptibility to babesiosis in calves has not been previously explored. Our study, using Bos taurus gene sequences published in PubMed, is the first to demonstrate a link between these genetic variations and the host response to babesiosis.
All analyzed SNP loci in both Babesia-infected and healthy calves conformed to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, indicating genetic stability of the studied populations and reliability of genotype data. This equilibrium supports the validity of the observed polymorphisms and suggests that the identified variations in immune and antioxidant genes reflect true biological diversity rather than sampling or technical bias, reinforcing their potential role in host response to babesiosis [42,78].
Importantly, this research represents the first application of combined gene expression profiling and RT-PCR DNA sequencing of immune and antioxidant genes to assess host genetic responses in dairy calves, whereas similar candidate gene strategies have previously been employed to study trypanosomiasis in dromedary camels [79]. In camels infected with trypanosomiasis, significant upregulation was observed in the genes TLR2, TLR5, IL-17, MARCHF3, RASGRP1, EPS15L1, PPIE, ASB16, CMPK2, LPCAT1, FPGT, GPHN, TNNI3K, DIO3, Keap1, and OXSR1, while the genes Nrf2, PRDX6, and NDUFS5 were notably downregulated. PCR-based DNA sequencing was conducted to identify nucleotide polymorphisms across immune genes (TLR2, TLR5, IL-17, MARCHF3, RASGRP1, EPS15L1), metabolic genes (PPIE, ASB16, CMPK2, LPCAT1, FPGT, GPHN, TNNI3K, DIO3), and antioxidant genes (Nrf2, Keap1, PRDX6, NDUFS5, OXSR1) in order to compare genetic variations between healthy camels and those affected by trypanosomiasis.
4.5. Biochemical Profile
In our study, Babesia-infected calves exhibited significantly lower serum glucose levels compared to healthy controls. This hypoglycemia may result from multiple factors, including increased glucose utilization by the parasites, hepatic dysfunction associated with Babesia infection, and reduced feed intake due to anorexia and refusal to graze [80]. These findings are consistent with previous reports documenting decreased blood glucose in infected cattle [81]. Conversely, serum triglycerides and cholesterol levels were significantly elevated in infected calves. Similar observations have been reported in other studies [82], and the increase in triglycerides may reflect enhanced hepatic synthesis or impaired clearance from the circulation. Furthermore, elevated triglyceride levels during the acute phase of infection may represent a component of the host’s metabolic and immune response to Babesia [83].
In the present study, serum levels of total protein, albumin, and globulin were significantly reduced in Babesia-infected calves. This decline may result from impaired liver function caused by the parasite’s direct and indirect effects, as well as from digestive disturbances such as diarrhea, reduced feed intake, and fever [16]. Specifically, decreased albumin levels may arise from reduced hepatic synthesis, leakage from damaged red blood cells, or urinary losses [84]. These findings are in agreement with previous studies reporting hypoproteinemia and hypoalbuminemia in Babesia-infected cattle [20]. Additionally, research indicates that crossbred cattle under improved management practices may have less prior exposure to vectors and limited immunity, rendering them more susceptible to clinical infection when exposed [85].
In our study, Babesia-infected calves exhibited significant elevations in liver and renal enzymes, including AST, ALT, GGT, LDH, urea, and creatinine, indicating hepatic and renal dysfunction. The increase in AST and ALT levels may result from damage to hepatocytes, skeletal muscle, or red blood cells caused by the toxic metabolites of Babesia sp. [86]. Similarly, elevated BUN and creatinine levels likely reflect renal impairment, potentially due to glomerulonephritis induced by the parasitic infection [87]. The observed rise in total bilirubin in infected calves may be attributed to a combination of hemolytic crisis and hepatic injury [88]. Overall, these findings corroborate previous reports demonstrating liver and kidney involvement in babesiosis, confirming the systemic impact of the infection on affected calves [48,81,89,90,91].
In the present study, Babesia-infected calves exhibited a significant decrease in serum thyroxine (T4) levels. This reduction may be attributed to increased metabolic demand, as T4 is converted to the more metabolically active triiodothyronine (T3), resulting in lower circulating T4 concentrations [92]. These findings align with previous reports, which also documented decreased T4 levels in calves under similar infectious or metabolic stress conditions [93].
In this study, Babesia-infected calves exhibited significantly higher serum potassium levels and lower concentrations of calcium, sodium, zinc, copper, and iron compared to healthy controls. These alterations are consistent with previous reports [49,81,94] and may be attributed, in part, to degeneration and necrosis of renal convoluted tubules caused by the parasite [16]. The reduction in calcium levels could also result from decreased dietary intake or disruption of thyroid function induced by irritation from external parasites [95]. Cu and Zn help the body’s antioxidant system by avoiding damage from radicals [96]. While the precise mechanism by which zinc protects against redox-active substances remains unclear, copper has been demonstrated to play a protective role in bovine babesiosis [43]. For instance, Cu–Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) catalyzes the conversion of O2 to H2O2, acting as both an antioxidant and pro-oxidant to reduce free radical-induced cellular damage [97,98,99]. These findings highlight the interplay between mineral imbalances and oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of Babesia infection.
4.6. Antioxidant Profile
Compared with healthy animals, infected calves exhibited significantly elevated levels of oxidative stress markers (NO and MDA) along with significantly reduced antioxidant parameters (GSH, SOD, CAT, and TAC). These results are consistent with previous studies [77,91].
Parasitic infections activate inflammatory cells that play a crucial role in host defense. This activation induces pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), which regulate oxidant-generating enzymes [100,101]. In bovine babesiosis caused by Babesia bigemina, infected erythrocytes stimulate macrophage activation, leading to increased inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and nitric oxide production. The resulting release of reactive nitrogen intermediates enhances oxidative stress, promotes lipid peroxidation, and increases malondialdehyde (MDA) levels [101]. Elevated inflammatory cytokine production promotes the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, including hydrogen peroxide, nitric oxide, superoxide anion, and hydroxyl radicals, which can damage proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and DNA [100]. In the present study, MDA and NO levels were significantly higher in diseased cattle, consistent with findings in Anaplasma marginale-infected calves [102]. This increase is closely associated with infection severity, oxidative stress, and depletion of antioxidant defenses, further supporting previous reports of elevated MDA and NO levels in bovine anaplasmosis [103]. Infected calves showed significantly decreased levels of GSH, CAT, SOD, and TAC. The reduction in GSH may be attributed to its increased utilization in neutralizing reactive oxygen species or enhanced glutathione peroxidase activity during Anaplasma marginale infection [104]. Similarly, the decline in TAC likely reflects the depletion of antioxidant defenses under infection-induced oxidative stress, as these enzymes function as key free radical scavengers [101].
4.7. Immunological Profile
In the present study, babesiosis induced cytokine production to initiate an immune response. The presence and proliferation of Babesia bigemina stimulated immune cells to release pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to tissue damage [105]. Compared with controls, infected calves exhibited significantly elevated serum levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, MCP-1, SAA, CRP, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-10, indicating activation of both innate and adaptive immune responses.
In the Babesia-infected group, serum CRP and SAA levels were significantly elevated, suggesting an IL-6-mediated inflammatory response in babesiosis. Consistent with this, low circulating CRP has been proposed as an in vivo marker of inhibited IL-6 activity due to increased free anti-IL-6 receptor antibodies [106]. IL-10, a key regulatory cytokine, was significantly elevated in Babesia-infected calves. Elevated IL-10 levels have been associated with excessive inflammatory responses and poor prognosis, likely due to infection-induced immunosuppression, particularly when the IL-10/TNF-α ratio is increased [107,108].
MCP-1 levels were significantly elevated in Babesia-infected calves, with higher concentrations associated with poor prognosis, highlighting its role in regulating the host immune response [109]. MCP-1 has shown the strongest association with organ dysfunction and mortality in sepsis compared with other cytokines and is markedly elevated in critically ill dogs, immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, myxomatous mitral valve disease, and various cancers, where it also serves as a prognostic marker [110,111,112,113]. Consistent with previous studies [79,114], our findings support the prognostic significance of MCP-1.
5. Conclusions
According to the results shown here, bovine babesiosis is associated with notable immunological and antioxidant alterations, particularly in blood levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL2, IL6, IL10, MCP-1, SAA, CRP, MDA, NO, TAC, GSH, SOD, and CAT. Our findings highlight that variations in nucleotide sequences and gene expression patterns of the studied immune and antioxidant genes play a crucial role as risk factors and are closely associated with calves’ susceptibility to Babesia infection. These results indicate that there is genetic diversity among animals and present new genetic markers and prospective candidate genes for detecting Babesia infection in calves. These indicators offer potential opportunities to prevent the disease through selective breeding programs and could be utilized as reliable stand-ins for babesiosis in calves.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, for the support of this research through the Annual Funding track [Project Number KFU260719]. The authors also acknowledge Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2026R458), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci13020176/s1, Figure S1: The original figure before formatting with data.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, A.A.E. and A.I.A.; methodology, formal analysis, and investigation, S.M.B., A.L.E.-N., M.T.R. and W.A.O.; software, validation, and visualization, H.A.A., M.M., R.Y.E. and F.A.S.; resources, funding acquisition, H.A.A., M.M. and F.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Desert Research Center, Egypt (approval code: IACUC-APPD-DRC# 25 8 51#).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported through the Annual Funding Track by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Project Number KFU260719]. This research was also funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2026R458), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Tana-Hernández L., Navarrete-Arroyo K., Ron-Román J., Reyna-Bello A., Chávez-Larrea M.A. PCR-diagnosis of Anaplasma marginale in cattle populations of Ecuador and its molecular identification through sequencing of ribosomal 16S fragments. BMC Vet. Res. 2017;13:392. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1311-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alvarez J.A., Rojas C., Figueroa J.V. Diagnostic tools for the identification of Babesia sp. in persistently infected cattle. Pathogens. 2019;8:143. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8030143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sharma A., Singla L.D., Batth B.K., Kaur P. Clinicopatho-biochemical alterations associated with subclinical babesiosis in dairy animals. J. Arthropod Borne Dis. 2016;10:258. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guswanto A., Allamanda P., Mariamah E.S., Sodirun S., Wibowo P.E., Indrayani L., Nugroho R.H., Wirata I.K., Jannah N., Dias L.P., et al. Molecular and serological detection of bovine babesiosis in Indonesia. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:550. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2502-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.El-Hamed A., Hala A., Salem S.M., Ibrahim H.N. Haemato-biochemical Alterations in Cattle Suffering from Anaemia and their effect on quality of some meat. Egypt. J. Chem. Environ. Health. 2016;2:232–249. doi: 10.21608/ejceh.2016.248058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Afonso C., Miller P., Grund C., Koch G., Peeters B., Selleck P., Srinivas G. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. World Organization for Animal Health (OIE); Paris, France: 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wiszniewska-Łaszczych A., Wysok B., Wojtacka J., Sołtysiuk M. Effect of mixed invasions of Hypoderma bovis and Ostertagia ostertagi in cattle on milk yield and contents in polish dairy farms. Animals. 2021;11:464. doi: 10.3390/ani11020464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vouraki S., Gelasakis A.I., Papanikolopoulou V., Papadopoulos E., Arsenos G. Association of hard ticks (Ixodidae) infestation with milk production and udder health of extensively reared dairy goats. Animals. 2022;12:354. doi: 10.3390/ani12030354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalayou S., Ten Bosch Q., Villinger J., Koenraadt C.J., Masiga D. Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting cattle in coastal Kenya harbor a diverse array of tick-borne pathogens. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2024;15:102266. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Talkhan O.F.A., Radwan M.E.I., Ali M.A. Cattle babesiosis and associated biochemical alteration in Kalubyia Governorate. Nat. Sci. 2010;12:24–27. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Asquith M., Prior S., Brüning-Richardson A. Human Babesiosis: The Past, Present, and Future. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2025;27:e309. doi: 10.1017/erm.2025.10016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Karshima S.N., Karshima M.N., Ahmed M.I. Global meta-analysis on Babesia infections in human population: Prevalence, distribution and species diversity. Pathog. Glob. Health. 2022;116:220–235. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1989185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vada R., Zanet S., Trisciuoglio A., Varzandi A.R., Calcagno A., Ferroglio E. A one-health approach to surveillance of tick-borne pathogens across different host groups. BMC Vet. Res. 2025;21:553. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04983-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mahmmod Y. Natural Babesia bovis infection in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and crossbred cattle under field conditions in Egypt: A preliminary study. J. Arthropod Borne Dis. 2013;8:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adham F., Abd-El-Samie E., Gabre R., Hussein H.E. Detection of tick blood parasites in Egypt using PCR assay I—Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina. Parasitol. Res. 2009;105:721–730. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1443-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Salem N.Y., Yehia S.G., Farag H.S., Elkhiat M.A. Clinical, hemato-biochemical alterations and oxidant–antioxidant biomarkers in Babesia-infected calves. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2016;4:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2016.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hassan M.I., Gabr H.S., Abdel-Shafy S., Hammad K.M., Mokhtar M.M. Molecular detection of Borrelia sp. in ornithodoros savignyi and Rhipicephalus annulatus by FlaB gene and babesia bigemina in R. annulatus by 18S rRNA gene. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 2017;47:403–414. doi: 10.21608/jesp.2017.77795. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mohammed E., Elshahawy I. The current prevalence of bovine babesiosis and theileriosis infection in Egypt. Clin. Med. Images Int. J. 2017;1:00004. doi: 10.15406/jbmoa.2018.06.00224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saied M.M. Studies of naturally infected babesiosis and its effect on some hematological and biochemical parameters in cattle in Qena, Egypt. Dairy Vet. Sci. J. 2017;4:555640. doi: 10.19080/JDVS.2017.04.555640. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Barman U., Das A., Deka A., Hazorika M., Arif S., Lahkar D., Borpujari D. Haemato-biochemical alterations and therapeutic study on babesiosis in cattle of lower Brahmaputra valley region. Pharma Innov. 2021;10:1091–1094. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bal M.S., Mahajan V., Filia G., Kaur P., Singh A. Diagnosis and management of bovine babesiosis outbreaks in cattle in Punjab state. Vet. World. 2016;9:1370. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.1370-1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ashmawy N.A. Blood metabolic profile and certain hormones concentrations in Egyptian buffalo during different physiological states. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2015;10:271–280. doi: 10.3923/ajava.2015.271.280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Salem N.Y., Yehia S.G., Farag H., Soliman S. Evaluation of hepcidin level and clinico-pathological modifications in canine parvovirus enteritis. Int. J. Vet. Sci. 2018;7:93–96. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Agarwal A., Gupta S., Sharma R.K. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2005;3:28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-3-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Khalid A., Na Y., Jinyou Z., Khudhair N., Guixue Z. Responses of Chicken Sertoli Cells and Fibroblasts after Transfection with Plasmids pEGFP-N3-HNP-1. Pak. Vet. J. 2015;35:504–509. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Iliev P., Georgieva T. Acute phase biomarkers of diseases in small ruminants: An overview. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 2019;22:1–12. doi: 10.15547/10.15547/bjvm.1051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Berry D.P., Bermingham M.L., Good M., More S.J. Genetics of animal health and disease in cattle. Ir. Vet. J. 2011;64:5. doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-64-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pierce C.F., Brown V.R., Olsen S.C., Boggiatto P., Pedersen K., Miller R.S., Speidel S.E., Smyser T.J. Loci associated with antibody response in feral swine (Sus scrofa) infected with Brucella suis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:554674. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.554674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang L., Nie M.-Y., Liu F., Chen J., Wei L.-J., Hua Q. Multiple gene integration to promote erythritol production on glycerol in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021;43:1277–1287. doi: 10.1007/s10529-021-03113-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sallam A.M., Abou-Souliman I., Reyer H., Wimmers K., Rabee A.E. New insights into the genetic predisposition of brucellosis and its effect on the gut and vaginal microbiota in goats. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:20086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46997-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schutta C.J. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A & M University; College Station, TX, USA: 2006. Bovine SLC11A1: Genomic Sequence Variation and Functional Analysis in Cattle Naturally Resistant and Susceptible to Bovine Brucellosis; p. 80. [Google Scholar]
- 32.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 8th ed. National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Constable P.D., Hinchcliff K.W., Done S.H., Grünberg W. Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs and Goats. 11th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Saleem M., Tariq A., Shazad A., Mahfooz S. Clinical, epidemiological and therapeutic studies on bovine tropical theileriosis in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci. 2014;28:87–93. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2014.116957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mohamed G., Ebied M. Epidemiological studies on bovine babesiosis and theileriosis in Qalubia governorate. Bharati Vidyapeeth Med. J. 2014;27:36–48. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Salem N., Farag H. Clinical, hematologic, and molecular findings in naturally occurring Babesia canis vogeli in Egyptian dogs. Vet. Med. Int. 2014;2014:270345. doi: 10.1155/2014/270345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pfaffl M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Pearson Education India; New Delhi, India: 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Abramovs N., Brass A., Tassabehji M. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the large scale genomic sequencing era. Front. Genet. 2020;11:210. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Omar A.O., Sadat M., Emam F.A. Determination of oxidative stress markers associated with Babesia Bigemina. Afr. J. Biotechnol. Res. 2015;3:150–155. [Google Scholar]
- 44.AL-Hosary A.A. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Diagnosis of Bovine Babesiosis (Babesia bovis infection) in Egypt: LAMP assay for diagnosis of bovine babesiosis. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2017;7:71–74. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Terkawi M.A., Thekisoe O.M.M., Katsande C., Latif A.A., Mans B.J., Matthee O., Mkize N., Mabogoane N., Marais F., Yokoyama N., et al. Serological survey of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in cattle in South Africa. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;182:337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Foreyt W.J. Veterinary Parasitology Reference Manual. 6th ed. John Wiley & Sons; Ames, IA, USA: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yusuf A., Dambo A., Luka S., Bringa A. Haemoparasitic Infection and Haematological Parameters of Cattle slaughtered at Four Abattoirs in Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. Niger. J. Parasitol. 2022;43:58–66. doi: 10.4314/njpar.v43i1.9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Saini K., Khinchi R., Sharma S., Gaurav A., Solanki S. Evaluation of Haemato-biochemical Alterations, Antioxidant status and Oxidative stress in Babesia Infected Cattle. J. Anim. Res. 2022;12:871–877. doi: 10.30954/2277-940X.06.2022.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Elbarbary N.B. Biochemical studies on the impact of external and blood parasites on milk production and its components in dairy cattle. Egypt. Vet. Med. Soc. Parasitol. J. (EVMSPJ) 2024;20:1–13. doi: 10.21608/evmspj.2024.346046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.El-Naga T.R.A., Barghash S. Blood parasites in camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Northern West Coast of Egypt. J. Bacteriol. Parasitol. 2016;7:258. [Google Scholar]
- 51.El-Sayed S.A.E.-S., El-Adl M.A., Ali M.O., Al-Araby M., Omar M.A., El-Beskawy M., Sorour S.S., Rizk M.A., Elgioushy M. Molecular detection and identification of Babesia bovis and Trypanosoma spp. in one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius) breeds in Egypt. Vet. World. 2021;14:625. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.625-633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ibrahim H.M., Adjou Moumouni P.F., Mohammed-Geba K., Sheir S.K., Hashem I.S., Cao S., Terkawi M.A., Kamyingkird K., Nishikawa Y., Suzuki H., et al. Molecular and serological prevalence of Babesia bigemina and Babesia bovis in cattle and water buffalos under small-scale dairy farming in Beheira and Faiyum Provinces, Egypt. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;198:187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Oliveira-Sequeira T., Oliveira M.d.S., Araujo J., Jr., Amarante A. PCR-based detection of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in their natural host Boophilus microplus and cattle. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005;35:105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.M’ghirbi Y., Hurtado A., Brandika J., Khlif K., Ketata Z., Bouattour A. A molecular survey of Theileria and Babesia parasites in cattle, with a note on the distribution of ticks in Tunisia. Parasitol. Res. 2008;103:435–442. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0995-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chaudhry Z.I., Suleman M., Younus M., Aslim A. Molecular detection of Babesia bigemina and Babesia bovis in crossbred carrier cattle through PCR. Pak. J. Zool. 2010;42:201–206. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Silva M.G., Henriques G., Sanchez C., Marques P.X., Suarez C.E., Oliva A. First survey for Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina infection in cattle from Central and Southern regions of Portugal using serological and DNA detection methods. Vet. Parasitol. 2009;166:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Costa-Júnior L.M., Rabelo É.M.L., Martins Filho O.A., Ribeiro M.F.B. Comparison of different direct diagnostic methods to identify Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in animals vaccinated with live attenuated parasites. Vet. Parasitol. 2006;139:231–236. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yu L., Terkawi M.A., Cruz-Flores M.J., Claveria F.G., Aboge G.O., Yamagishi J., Goo Y.K., Cao S., Masatani T., Nishikawa Y., et al. Epidemiological survey of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina infections of cattle in Philippines. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2013;75:995–998. doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Barghash S.M. Molecular prevalence and phylogeny of some tick-borne parasites in ruminants in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Eur. J. Biomed. Pharm. Sci. 2022;9:15–25. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gray J., Zintl A., Hildebrandt A., Hunfeld K.-P., Weiss L. Zoonotic babesiosis: Overview of the disease and novel aspects of pathogen identity. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2010;1:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Holman P.J., Carroll J.E., Pugh R., Davis D.S. Molecular detection of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from Tom Green County in central Texas. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;177:298–304. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dawood K.E., Morgan J.A., Busfield F., Srivastava M., Fletcher T.I., Sambono J., Jackson L.A., Venus B., Philbey A.W., Lew-Tabor A.E. Observation of a novel Babesia spp. in eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in Australia. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2013;2:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hashem M., Neamat-Allah A.N., Gheith M.A. A study on bovine babesiosis and treatment with reference to hematobiochemical and molecular diagnosis. Slov. Vet. Res. 2018;55:165–173. doi: 10.26873/SVR-643-2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Góes T., Góes V., Ribeiro M., Gontijo C. Bovine babesiosis: Anti-erythrocyte antibodies purification from the sera of naturally infected cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2007;116:215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Court R., Jackson L., Lee R. Elevated anti-parasitic activity in peripheral blood monocytes and neutrophils of cattle infected with Babesia bovis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2001;31:29–37. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00144-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tvedten H. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2022. Classification and laboratory evaluation of anemia; pp. 198–208. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mine S., Fujisaki T., Suematsu M., Tanaka Y. Activated platelets and endothelial cell interaction with neutrophils under flow conditions. Intern. Med. 2001;40:1085–1092. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.40.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Akel T., Mobarakai N. Hematologic manifestations of babesiosis. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2017;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12941-017-0179-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Latimer K.S. Duncan and Prasse’s Veterinary Laboratory Medicine: Clinical Pathology. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons; Ames, IA, USA: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zahid I., Latif M., Baloch K. Incidence and treatment of theileriasis and babesiasis. Pak. Vet. J. 2005;25:137. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Máthé A., Vörös K., Papp L., Reiczigel J. Clinical manifestations of canine babesiosis in Hungary (63 cases) Acta Vet. Hung. 2006;54:367–385. doi: 10.1556/avet.54.2006.3.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Jansen R.C., Nap J.-P. Genetical genomics: The added value from segregation. Trends Genet. 2001;17:388–391. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02310-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fairfax B.P., Knight J.C. Genetics of gene expression in immunity to infection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2014;30:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Goff W., Johnson W., Horn R., Barrington G., Knowles D. The innate immune response in calves to Boophilus microplus tick transmitted Babesia bovis involves type-1 cytokine induction and NK-like cells in the spleen. Parasite Immunol. 2003;25:185–188. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.2003.00625.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Goff W., Johnson W., Tuo W., Valdez R., Parish S., Barrington G., Davis W. Age-related innate immune response in calves to Babesia bovis involves IL-12 induction and IL-10 modulation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002;969:164–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04371.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Attia M.M., Khalifa M.M. Virulence of Babesia bigemina in infected cattle (Bos taurus): Molecular and immunological studies. Res. Vet. Sci. 2023;156:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Mohammed S.H., Kurra H.M., Rushdi M., Abdu El-Ella G.A. Antioxidants and lipid peroxides in anemic cattle infected by blood parasites. Assiut Vet. Med. J. 2025;71:108–121. doi: 10.21608/avmj.2025.335105.1465. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wigginton J.E., Cutler D.J., Abecasis G.R. A note on exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;76:887–893. doi: 10.1086/429864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Elsayed A.A., Barghash S.M., El-Kattan A.M., Wassif I.M., Osman W.A., Ateya A.I. Analysis of potential genes, immunological and antioxidant profiles associated with trypanosomiasis susceptibility in dromedary camels. Vet. Parasitol. 2024;331:110264. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Youssef S.Y., Yasien S., Mousa W.M.A., Nasr S.M., El-Kelesh E.A.M., Mahran K.M., Abd-El-Rahman A.H. Vector identification and clinical, hematological, biochemical, and parasitological characteristics of camel (Camelus dromedarius) theileriosis in Egypt. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2015;47:649–656. doi: 10.1007/s11250-015-0771-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Al-Hakak Z.M. Some of Biochemical Tests for Blood Serum and Some of Hematological Variants of the Blood for Iraqi Camels Infected with Blood Parasites. Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 2022;12:39–45. doi: 10.25258/ijddt.12.1.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Singh R., Barden A., Mori T., Beilin L. Advanced glycation end-products: A review. Diabetologia. 2001;44:129–146. doi: 10.1007/s001250051591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Carpentier Y.A., Scruel O. Changes in the concentration and composition of plasma lipoproteins during the acute phase response. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2002;5:153–158. doi: 10.1097/00075197-200203000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hofmann-Lehmann R., Meli M.L., Wengi N., Lutz H., Deplazes P., Reusch C.E., Lutz H. Concurrent infections with vector-borne pathogens associated with fatal hemolytic anemia in a cattle herd in Switzerland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:3775–3780. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3775-3780.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ananda K., D’Souza P.E., Puttalakshmamma G. Prevalence of Haemoprotozoan diseases in crossbred cattle in Banglore north. Vet. World. 2009;2:15. doi: 10.5455/vetworld.2009.15-16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Alsaad K. Clinical, hematological and biochemical studies of anaplasmosis in Arabian one-humped camels (Camelus dromedaries) J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2009;8:2106–2109. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Daher E.F., da Silva G.B., Trivedi M., Fayad T., Srisawat N., Nair S., Siriyasatien P., de Lacerda M.V.G., Baptista M.A.S.F., Vankalakunti M., et al. Kidney complications of parasitic diseases. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022;18:396–406. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00558-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Yeruham I., Avidar Y., Aroch I., Hadani A. Intra-uterine infection with Babesia bovis in a 2-day-old calf. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B. 2003;50:60–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2003.00597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Al-Obaidi Q., Hasan S., Alsaad K. Clinical, haematological and blood biochemical parameters in Arabian one-humped camels (Camelus dromedarius) with Babesia caballi infection. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 2021;24:422–433. doi: 10.15547/bjvm.2293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ghimire R., Shrestha A., Rimal S., Singh D.K. Haemato-biochemical alterations associated with babesiosis in cattle. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2022;36:128–130. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Alsulami M. Histopathological and biochemical analysis of selected organs of cattle infected with bovine babesiosis. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2025;23:2211–2231. doi: 10.15666/aeer/2302_22112231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Todini L. Thyroid hormones in small ruminants: Effects of endogenous, environmental and nutritional factors. Animal. 2007;1:997–1008. doi: 10.1017/S1751731107000262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hussain M., Ali H., Roohi N., Naeem M. Assessment of lipid and thyroid biomarkers in cattles infected with babesiosis in Lahore, Pakistan. Pure Appl. Biol. 2021;10:311–317. doi: 10.19045/bspab.2021.100033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Abdalsalam N.A. Study on some hemato-biochemical changes associated with Babesia Bovine in cattle of El-Wisata-Libya. Al-Mukhtar J. Sci. 2019;34:271–278. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Al-Shammari M., Alanazi I.O., Alzahrani M., Alotaibi S., Alkahtani N., Alaqil A., Al-Olayan E. Effects of Tick Infestation on Milk Yield, Blood Biochemistry, Hematology, and the Overall Health of Dairy Cows. Pathogens. 2025;14:883. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14090883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Nazifi S., Razavi S., Kianiamin P., Rakhshandehroo E. Evaluation of erythrocyte antioxidant mechanisms: Antioxidant enzymes, lipid peroxidation, and serum trace elements associated with progressive anemia in ovine malignant theileriosis. Parasitol. Res. 2011;109:275–281. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2248-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Powell S.R. The antioxidant properties of zinc. J. Nutr. 2000;130:1447S–1454S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.5.1447s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Razavi S., Nazifi S., Rakhshandehroo E., Firoozi P., Farsandaj M. Erythrocyte antioxidant systems, lipid peroxidation and circulating lipid profiles in cattle naturally infected with Theileria annulata. Rev. Med. Vet. 2012;163:18–24. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Osredkar J., Sustar N. Copper and zinc, biological role and significance of copper/zinc imbalance. J. Clin. Toxicol. 2011;3:0495. doi: 10.4172/2161-0495.S3-001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kucukkurt I., Cigerci I.H., Kozan E., Aytekin I., Eryavuz A., Fidan A.F. The effects of babesiosis on oxidative stress and DNA damage in Anatolian black goats naturally infected with Babesia ovis. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2014;9:90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Esmaeilnejad B., Tavassoli M., Samiei A., Hajipour N., Imani-Baran A., Farhang-Pajuh F. Evaluation of oxidative stress and antioxidant status, serum trace mineral levels and cholinesterases activity in cattle infected with Anaplasma marginale. Microb. Pathog. 2018;123:402–409. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.De U.K., Dey S., Banerjee P.S., Sahoo M. Correlations among Anaplasma marginale parasitemia and markers of oxidative stress in crossbred calves. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012;44:385–388. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9938-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ergoenuel S., Așkar T. The investigation of heat shock protein (HSP 27), malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO) and interleukin (IL-6, IL-10) levels in cattle with anaplasmosis. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2009;15:575–579. [Google Scholar]
- 104.El-Ashker M., Salama M., El-Sebaei M., Risha E., Abdelhamid F., El-Diasty M., El-Fadle E. Significance of clinical variables and selected biochemical markers in predicting the outcome of bovine anaplasmosis. Vet. Med.-Czech. 2015;60:301–308. [Google Scholar]
- 105.El-Bahr S., El-Deeb W. Trypanosoma evansi in naturally infected dromedary camels: Lipid profile, oxidative stress parameters, acute phase proteins and proinflammatory cytokines. Parasitol. 2016;143:518–522. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016000123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Nishimoto N., Terao K., Mima T., Nakahara H., Takagi N., Kakehi T. Mechanisms and pathologic significances in increase in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble IL-6 receptor after administration of an anti–IL-6 receptor antibody, tocilizumab, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Castleman disease. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2008;112:3959–3964. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-155846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Gogos C.A., Drosou E., Bassaris H.P., Skoutelis A. Pro-versus anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in patients with severe sepsis: A marker for prognosis and future therapeutic options. J. Infect. Dis. 2000;181:176–180. doi: 10.1086/315214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tripathy A.S., Vishwakarma S., Trimbake D., Gurav Y.K., Potdar V.A., Mokashi N.D., Patsute S.D., Kaushal H., Choudhary M.L., Tilekar B.N., et al. Pro-inflammatory CXCL-10, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6: Biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Arch. Virol. 2021;166:3301–3310. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05247-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Goff W.L., Johnson W.C., Parish S.M., Barrington G.M., Tuo W., Valdez R.A. The age-related immunity in cattle to Babesia bovis infection involves the rapid induction of interleukin-12, interferon-γ and inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression in the spleen. Parasite Immunol. 2001;23:463–471. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.2001.00402.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Duffy A.L., Olea-Popelka F.J., Eucher J., Rice D.M., Dow S.W. Serum concentrations of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in healthy and critically ill dogs. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2010;39:302–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2010.00228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Kjelgaard-Hansen M., Goggs R., Wiinberg B., Chan D. Use of serum concentrations of interleukin-18 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 as prognostic indicators in primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2011;25:76–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Zois N.E., Moesgaard S.G., Kjelgaard-Hansen M., Rasmussen C.E., Falk T., Fossing C., Häggström J., Pedersen H.D., Olsen L.H. Circulating cytokine concentrations in dogs with different degrees of myxomatous mitral valve disease. Vet. J. 2012;192:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Nielsen L.N., Kjelgaard-Hansen M., Kristensen A.T. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and other inflammatory parameters in Bernese Mountain dogs with disseminated histiocytic sarcoma. Vet. J. 2013;198:424–428. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Bastos R.G., Laughery J.M., Ozubek S., Alzan H.F., Taus N.S., Ueti M.W., Suarez C.E. Identification of novel immune correlates of protection against acute bovine babesiosis by superinfecting cattle with in vitro culture attenuated and virulent Babesia bovis strains. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:1045608. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1045608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.



