Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Feb 7;16:7674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-37812-4

CDMMM: a comprehensive platform of traditional Indian medicinal plant DNA barcodes and metabolite fingerprints database

Chigateri M Vinay 1, Akshay Pramod Ware 2, Kannath U Sanjay 1, Debyani Samantray 2, Reju R Krishnan 3, Keyur Raval 4, Mahendran Sekar 5, Yarappa Lakshmikanth Ramachandra 6, Bobby Paul 2, Padmalatha S Rai 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12946267  PMID: 41654607

Abstract

Herbal medicines, derived from medicinal plants, are in high demand due to global population growth and the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases; however, the use of substitutes or adulterants can compromise the quality of these medicines. DNA barcoding and metabolite fingerprinting are used to identify plants and ensure the safety of drugs. The effectiveness of authentication methods depends on the availability and coverage of the reference library. However, reference DNA barcodes and metabolite fingerprint libraries for traditional Indian medicinal plants are lacking, which hinders the authentication of herbal drugs and the elucidation of the therapeutic effects of secondary metabolites. In the present study, we developed a user-friendly ‘Comprehensive Database of Medicinal Plants, Molecular Markers, and Metabolite Fingerprinting (CDMMM)’ that provides extensive details on traditional Indian medicinal plants used in drug formulations, DNA barcode sequences, metabolites, and their therapeutic targets associated with diseases. CDMMM is an expandable data resource comprising 89 experimentally obtained DNA barcode accessions from 67 plant species, 3033 annotated plant metabolites, and 1414 therapeutic targets associated with 441 diseases from 20 plant species. The ever-expanding CDMMM resource is available at https://slsdb.manipal.edu/cdmmm/. Overall, it is a powerful platform for taxonomy, systematics, species identification, and drug discovery, promoting knowledge and addressing taxonomic uncertainties.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-37812-4.

Keywords: Database, DNA barcodes, Metabolite fingerprints, Therapeutic targets, Traditional Indian medicinal plants

Subject terms: Plant molecular biology, Databases, Pharmacokinetics, Chemical libraries, Target identification, Mass spectrometry, Metabolomics, PCR-based techniques

Introduction

Herbal medicines rely on medicinal plants to treat a variety of ailments1. The population expansion and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases impact the growth of the herbal medicine market. The global herbal medicine market was valued at USD 165.13 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 386.07 billion by 2032. However, the herbal medicine market in India was valued at USD 60.52 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow to USD 110.08 billion by 20322,3. India plays a significant role in the global pharmaceutical industry, with plant-based compounds forming the foundation for a substantial portion of its drug market. Approximately 25% of all prescription drugs worldwide, and a remarkable 70% of modern medications within India itself, originate from plant sources.4. This wealth of botanical material has propelled India to become the second-largest exporter of medicinal plants and raw materials globally5. The National Medicinal Plant Board of India listed 960 medicinal plants in trade, among which 178 plants consume more than 100 tons every year6. The demand for herbal medicines has drastically increased since the COVID-19 pandemic in India7. The increasing global demand for herbal medicines necessitates robust quality control measures to ensure their efficacy and safety, especially due to the use of substitutes and adulterants8.

Traditional methods of identification include morphological, organoleptic, microscopic, and chemical-based methods. However, these techniques lead to the misidentification of closely related species and lack sensitivity in identifying the original plant materials in herbal drugs9. With advanced sequencing technologies, DNA barcodes are more efficient at accurately authenticating medicinal plants and raw drugs than conventional authentication methods10. DNA barcodes are short DNA sequences from the genome used in taxonomic research11. Some candidate markers, such as ITS, psbA-trnH, rbcL, trnL-trnF, and matK, are widely used in plant species identification12. Several public databases, such as GenBank13 and the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD)14, serve as critical resources for genomic authentication. However, the effectiveness and accuracy of DNA barcode-based species identification depend on the coverage of the amplicon by the reference sequence and the base quality10. Some specialized databases, such as the MMDBD (Medicinal Materials DNA Barcode Database), provide a dedicated platform for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) plant DNA barcode sequences, thereby enhancing the identification and authentication of raw drugs15. However, a comprehensive digital platform of reference DNA barcode sequences for Indian medicinal plants is not available for reliable identification and authentication of raw drugs.

Medicinal plants produce various metabolites that are essential for plant physiology through signaling pathways and biochemical reactions16. Currently, several broad-spectrum metabolite databases exist for metabolome research, including MassBank17, the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB)18, Metlin19, and the Metabolomics Workbench20. Additionally, plant-specific metabolome databases, such as the plant metabolic network21, Golm metabolome database22, RefMetaPlant23, and the ReSpect database24 existed. However, even these resources face challenges in terms of their comprehensiveness and applicability to a wider range of plant species, specifically Indian medicinal plants listed in the Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia of India and their substitutes. The integration of high-performance liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry has enabled large-scale metabolite identification with increased sensitivity, resolution, and accuracy25.

Several plant secondary metabolites can serve as therapeutic agents for treating diseases26. For example, plant bioactive compounds such as Taxol and digoxin are used to treat cancer and heart disease, respectively27. Recently, various databases, such as the Bioinformatics Analysis Tool for Molecular Mechanism of TCM, Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP), TCMAnalyzer, TCM@Taiwan, and TCM-Suite databases, have provided information on therapeutic targets and diseases related to TCM plants28–32. However, the exploration of bioactive compounds from traditional Indian medicinal plants and their therapeutic targets associated with human diseases is lacking. An integrated network pharmacology approach can help elucidate the therapeutic potential of bioactive compounds in treating various human diseases33. Furthermore, an online platform to decipher the biological role of secondary metabolites that can act as lead molecules will enhance the drug discovery process and aid in the treatment of life-threatening diseases.

To address these research gaps, we developed a user-friendly expandable data resource, the CDMMM (Comprehensive Database on medicinal plants, molecular markers, and metabolite fingerprints), which provides information on traditional Indian medicinal plants. Advanced search and browsing options were provided for users to explore information on medicinal plants, DNA barcode sequences, annotated plant metabolites, and potential therapeutic targets associated with various diseases.

Results

CDMMM database contents and structure

The CDMMM is an open-access online expandable platform comprising a medicinal plant species module, a reference DNA barcode module, a plant metabolome module, and a molecular target-associated human disease module. All these data modules were integrated into an interactive CDMMM database built with a hypertext markup language (HTML), hypertext preprocessor (PHP), JavaScript, and MySQL. A schematic representation of the CDMMM database architecture is shown (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic workflow of the methodology employed in this study.

The medicinal plant species module comprises information on 67 highly traded Indian medicinal plant species and their substitutes used in drug formulations, which were collected from different geographical locations (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S1). The species page module comprises the taxonomical information of plant species obtained from the NCBI taxonomy database, vernacular names, medicinal parts used in the preparation of herbal formulations, plant descriptions, distributions, and medicinal uses for each plant species listed in the Ayurvedic pharmacopeia of India and other research journals (Supplementary Table S1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Geographical sampling sites of selected medicinal plants from Karnataka, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu states in India. The sampling map was created in QGIS v3.34 [https://qgis.org/].

The DNA barcode module provides the sequences of the barcode regions amplified from the 67 plant species. The DNA barcode sequence database consists of 76 nrITS barcodes from 54 plant species that were successfully amplified and sequenced, 8 psbA-trnH barcodes from eight plant species, 2 rbcL barcodes from two species, 2 trnL-trnF barcodes from two species, and 1 matK barcode from Syzygium cumini (Supplementary Fig. S1-S5, Supplementary Table S2). The phylogenetic relationships of the 89 universal DNA barcodes are illustrated (Fig. 3). The phylogenetic analysis revealed that species from different markers were present in the appropriate clades, with strong support (bootstrap support ≥ 70%). Currently, the DNA barcode reference library module provides the following information: i) specimen ID as the GenBank accession number, ii) specimen voucher, iii) georeferenced data, iv) universal marker used, and v) DNA barcode sequence of each sample.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic construction of DNA barcodes via universal markers with RaxML v8.0 software. The DNA barcodes with the nrITS marker are represented in the green clade, the rbcL marker is represented in yellow, the trnL-trnF marker is represented in blue, matK is represented in red, and the psbA-trnH marker is represented in pink. The outside labels were color-coded according to the DNA barcode family.

The reference plant metabolome was constructed from 20 highly traded plant species (ten authentic and ten substitutes) via mass spectral data obtained from Agilent HPLC-QTOF-MS/MS and Waters UPLC-QTOF-MSE platforms. The raw spectral data from both systems for the plant species were preprocessed and filtered into high-quality features via MS-DIAL v4.9 [https://systemsomicslab.github.io/compms/msdial/main.html]. The unique MS2 spectral features obtained in the ESI positive mode of ionization were annotated with compound spectral libraries present in MS-Finder v3.60 [https://systemsomicslab.github.io/compms/msfinder/main.html]. A total of 3033 unique annotated metabolites were obtained from 20 plant species (Supplementary Table S3). Furthermore, these annotated metabolites were classified into 14 superclasses and 181 compound classes via the ClassyFire webserver [https://classyfire.wishartlab.com/] (Fig. 4). The majority of annotated metabolites are prenol lipids, flavonoids, organooxygen compounds, carboxylic acids and derivatives, fatty acyls and steroids, and steroid derivatives. Currently, the plant reference metabolome module provides mass spectrometry data, identifiers, and compound classification data for each annotated metabolite from the corresponding plant species. The module is also cross-linked to external databases, such as HMDB [https://www.hmdb.ca/], KNApSACK [https://www.knapsackfamily.com/knapsack_core/top.php], FooDB [https://foodb.ca/], DrugBank [https://go.drugbank.com/], PubChem [https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/], PlantCyc v16.0.3 [https://pmn.plantcyc.org/cpd-search.shtml], and CoconutDB [https://coconut.naturalproducts.net/], for easy navigation and collection of related information. ADMET properties were calculated for 3,028 compounds, and five compounds were not computed via the QikProp module because of technical errors in the software or errors in the input structures. Among the 3,028 compounds, 77.67% of the pharmacokinetic properties fell within the 95% acceptable range for recognized drugs, whereas 1114 compounds presented #stars = 0 (Supplementary Fig. S6).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Classification of tentative annotated metabolites into major superclasses and classes. The inside ring represents the superclass, and the outside ring represents the classes identified via the Classyfire webserver.

Molecular human protein targets were predicted for annotated metabolites using reference metabolome libraries such as SwissTargetPrediction [https://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/], the similarity ensemble approach prediction tool, and the therapeutic target database. A total of 1414 predictive targets were obtained for 2685 tentative metabolites. These predictive targets were characterized into clinical trials (434), successful (408), literature-reported (407), patented recorded (123), preclinical (21), and 21 listed in other target categories (Supplementary Table S4). Furthermore, the analysis identified 931 predictive targets associated with 441 diseases that belong to 25 disease ICD-11 codes (Supplementary Table S5). Currently, the target-associated human disease module provides the following information: (i) target name, (ii) UniProt ID, (iii) gene name, (iv) disease name, and (v) therapeutic target database ID.

Database functionalities and web interface

The CDMMM database provides a user-friendly interface for users to retrieve relevant information via search or browsing options (Fig. 5). The search option in the CDMMM interface allows users to search three fields: i) medicinal plants (botanical names), ii) plant metabolites (compound names), and iii) therapeutic targets (human diseases). Additionally, a quick-browsing option is provided in the interface with navigation tabs named ‘Medicinal Plants’, ‘Compounds’, ‘Therapeutic targets’, and ‘BLAST’.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

The graphical user interface of the CDMMM database for searching and browsing functions.

The navigation menu ‘Medicinal Plants’ allows users to select the medicinal plants being used in drug formulation, and details of selected medicinal plants, such as taxonomy, synonyms, vernacular names, habits, habitat, morphology, distribution, and medicinal uses, are shown (Fig. 6A). The users can also access the plant–metabolite associations and DNA barcode sequence for each plant species by clicking the relevant tab options on the medicinal information page (Fig. 6C). The analytical method information of the selected plant species is listed on the ‘analytical method’ page under the plant–metabolite association tab. The ‘compounds’ page provides the annotated metabolites of reference plant metabolomes in tabular format. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic properties of each annotated metabolite are provided on the information page of the compound. The user can access the detailed information of each annotated metabolite by browsing the hyperlink provided (Fig. 6B). Users can also view the details of the targets associated with each annotated metabolite and human disease by clicking the relevant tab options on the compound’s information page (Fig. 6D and Fig. 6E). The page to browse ‘therapeutic targets’ provides a list of therapeutic targets of the reference metabolome and associated diseases in tabular format. The ‘BLAST’ option is provided to perform a similarity search of nucleotide sequences against the reference DNA barcode library in the CDMMM database. This helps users accurately identify the medicinal plants used in drug formulations. We performed several case studies to demonstrate the accurate usage and application areas of the online platform.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

CDMMM database output with selected medicinal plants (A) medicinal plant information, (B) phytocompound information, (C) DNA barcode information, (D) compound-target information, and (E) disease-associated target information.

Database utility

Case study 1: Validation of raw drugs via the CDMMM reference DNA barcode library

A total of 47 raw drugs from selected medicinal plants were collected from different marketplaces in India (Supplementary Fig. S7). DNA was isolated from 44 raw materials, and the psbA-trnH region was sequenced from three samples. These sequences are then aligned with the reference sequence data provided by the database. The analysis revealed that 24 samples shared significant sequence homology with authentic medicinal plants. However, 8 samples presented sequence homology with the substitutes/adulterants, and the remaining 15 raw drugs were not amplified/sequenced with universal markers. All the DNA barcode regions amplified and sequenced from the raw drugs were submitted to GenBank. The accession numbers of the barcode regions submitted to GenBank are listed (Supplementary Table S6). The comprehensive platform can be effectively utilized to differentiate medicinal plants from their substitutes/adulterants via sequence homology measures.

Case study 2: Network pharmacology analysis of diabetes mellitus via CDMMM therapeutic targets and a metabolome library

To explore the potential use of the CDMMM reference metabolome and therapeutic target database, we performed network analysis of diabetes mellitus. Through network pharmacology analysis, we identified potential lead compounds that can target the hub proteins of diabetes mellitus. With respect to the therapeutic target disease module, 54 potential targets were identified for diabetes mellitus. These 54 potential receptors were targeted by 1219 compounds from the CDMMM reference metabolome library (Supplementary Table S7). Using the StringAPP plugin in Cytoscape v3.10, a protein‒protein interaction network was constructed, and four candidate gene targets, namely, GCG, DPP4, GHRL, and GLP1R, were obtained on the basis of degree (Supplementary Fig. S8). A functional KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the identified hub genes was performed using EnrichR [https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=enrichR] package by utilizing KEGG_Human pathway library34–36. The analysis revealed that the neuroactive ligand‒receptor interaction, insulin secretion, and cAMP signalling pathways were enriched (Supplementary Fig. S9).

Furthermore, molecular docking analysis was performed via the Schrodinger suite 2023-3 to identify potential lead compounds against diabetes mellitus-related candidate gene targets. Molecular docking analysis revealed that the compounds (CDMMM02038, CDMMM01764, and CDMMM01482) obtained from herbs (Curucma oligantha (PL0021) and Cinnamomum tamala (PL0035)) on the basis of the entries in our database had binding affinities of − 15.2261 kcal/mol, − 12.8619 kcal/mol, and − 11.3532 kcal/mol, respectively, against the GLP1R gene target compared with other hub targets (DPP4, GCG, and GHRL). Similarly, the compounds (CDMMM02435 and CDMMM01934) obtained from herbs (Curcuma longa (PL0020) and Asparagus gonoclados (PL0040)) presented relatively high binding affinities of approximately − 13.4863 kcal/mol and − 11.27 kcal/mol, respectively, against the target DPP4 (Supplementary Table S8). By combining molecular docking and MM-GBSA analysis results, the compound Protoprimulagenin A 3-[rhamnosyl-(1- > 4)-rhamnosyl-(1- > 4)-[rhamnosyl-(1- > 2)]-glucosyl-(1- > ?)-glucuronide] (CDMMM01764) had a relatively high dock score (-12.8619 kcal/mol) and free energy binding (dG bound: − 61.52 kcal/mol) against the GLP1R target. Similarly, the compound 1-O-(E)-Caffeoyl-4,6-(S)-HHDP-beta-D-glucopyranose (CDMMM01934) had a relatively high dock score (− 11.27 kcal/mol) and free energy binding (dG Bind: − 53.39 kcal/mol) against the target DPP4. The 3D representations of the ligand‒protein complexes (Complex 1: CDMMM01764 + GLP1R and Complex 2: CDMMM01934 + DPP4) are shown (Supplementary Fig. S10A and Supplementary Fig. S10B). Similarly, the 2D representations of complex 1 and complex 2 are shown (Supplementary Fig. S10C and Supplementary Fig. S10D). Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation analysis was performed for these ligand‒protein complexes for 100 ns via the Desmond module of the Schrodinger suite 2023-3 (Schrodinger 2023-3, LLC, New York). Both protein‒ligand complexes showed stable ligand binding to the protein Cα backbone with fewer fluctuations, as shown (Supplementary Fig. S10E and Supplementary Fig. S10F).

Discussion

In the present study, 67 Indian medicinal plants and their commonly used substitutes, which are traded for the treatment of various diseases, were collected for analysis. Molecular authentication was carried out via DNA barcoding with universal markers to accurately identify the selected medicinal plants at the species level. Comparative metabolite fingerprinting analysis was performed on the top 10 authentic and substitute plant species to identify unique metabolite fingerprints and facilitate downstream network pharmacology analysis. We also developed a comprehensive database of medicinal plants, molecular markers, and metabolite fingerprints (CDMMM) to promote knowledge by sharing comprehensive information on DNA barcodes and metabolite fingerprints in taxonomy and systematics for species identification and resolving taxonomic uncertainties, and the pharmaceutical industry for identifying novel compounds with potential therapeutic properties in the drug discovery process. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive digital platform providing a database of DNA barcodes and metabolite fingerprints for Indian medicinal plants.

Several credible databases exist, such as the Indian medicinal plant database37, India Biodiversity Portal38, OSADHI39, and eFloraofIndia40, which provide information on vernacular names, taxonomic classification, synonyms, medicinal uses, plant collection sites, and herbarium images of medicinal plants from India. In our developed CDMMM database, information concerning 67 medicinal plants with respect to habit, habitat, plant part used, substitute plant used, synonyms, vernacular names, taxonomical classification, plant collection sites, morphological description and medicinal uses, images of plant species and herbarium voucher specimens of selected medicinal plants from Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Gujarat states of India were provided to enhance the traditional knowledge of medicinal plants growing in India.

Accurate species-level identification of medicinal plants is urgently needed to ensure the safety and efficacy of raw herbal drugs. The use of plant DNA barcoding has emerged as a reliable and widely accepted method for the authentication of herbal materials and the identification of medicinal plant species41,42. Among the various barcode loci evaluated, studies have consistently demonstrated that the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region has greater species-level discriminatory power than commonly used plastid markers such as rbcL and matK43,44. Several countries have made significant progress in integrating DNA barcoding into regulatory frameworks. The establishment of reference plant DNA barcode libraries for Chinese Materia Medica was successful and adopted in their pharmacopoeia45. DNA barcode testing methods have been adopted in the Korean herbal pharmacopoeia46 and the Japanese and British Pharmacopoeias47. At present, for Indian medicinal plants, the Ayurvedic pharmaocopoeia of India reference DNA barcode library (API-RDBL) was developed for 374 medicinal plants with rbcL sequences48. The BRM DNA barcode library was developed for 187 Indian medicinal plants with rbcL and ITS2 barcode sequences49. However, there is no single platform that covers common loci for the identification of all medicinal plants50. In the present study, molecular authentication of 67 medicinal plant species was performed via the ITS marker because of its relatively high variability and species-level resolution. We also developed a BLAST interface in the CDMMM database for nucleotide sequence similarity searches against reference DNA barcode sequences.

The advancement of high-throughput analytical techniques has made LC‒MS/MS-based untargeted metabolomics a common approach for metabolite identification, leveraging public spectral libraries and databases51. While comprehensive databases exist for the human metabolome, the number of dedicated databases specifically focused on plant-specialized metabolites is significantly limited52. Several databases, such as Phytochemica53, IMPAAT54, and IMPDB55, provide curated metabolite information on Indian medicinal plants on the basis of published literature sources. The use of in silico spectral annotation methods is increasing due to the limited availability of publicly available reference spectra56. Recent databases, such as RefMetPlant and PMHub 1.0, exemplify this trend by incorporating in silico prediction tools to expand plant-specific metabolome coverage and improve metabolite annotation23,57. In the present study, LC‒MS/MS-based untargeted metabolite fingerprinting was performed for 20 top-traded Indian medicinal plants, and in silico spectral annotation was performed via MS-DIAL integrated with MS-Finder software. These annotated metabolites can be useful for identifying biological targets and treating diseases.

To identify the biological ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and perform downstream network pharmacology analysis, the Watson–Suite database was integrated into the TCM-Suite platform32. In the present study, we predicted the associations between annotated plant metabolites and disease targets on the basis of information retrieved from the Therapeutic Target Database. The drug-like and ADME properties of the annotated metabolites are also provided in the CDMMM database. This information may be useful for identifying lead compounds via a network pharmacology approach in the drug discovery process.

In summary, the CDMMM database is a user-friendly, expandable, comprehensive database that provides information on the traditional medicinal plants used in drug formulations. This study generated DNA barcodes and accessions of authentic medicinal plants and their substitutes and provided an option for searching for sequence similarity. The established regional DNA barcode reference library for 67 medicinal plants can act as a platform for accurate medicinal plant identification. The developed plant reference metabolome library for the top 20 traded Indian medicinal plants and their substitutes provides an invaluable resource for plant-derived secondary metabolite-based therapy. Pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed that these metabolites have drug likeliness potential to human disease-associated targets for further identification of suitable lead‒target complexes. The CDMMM database can also aid in identifying and validating novel lead compounds for drug discovery and repurposing. The generated data and database facilitate the identification and translation of medicinal plants into therapeutic drugs. However, the CDMMM database should be further expanded to incorporate additional closely related substitute species, biosynthetic pathways associated with metabolites, and functional enrichment tools for user-defined bioactive compounds and predicted therapeutic targets. These enhancements would enable a deeper understanding of the pharmacological mechanisms of action.

Materials and methods

Selection and collection of medicinal plants

The Indian medicinal plants listed in part ‘B’ of the Ayurvedic Formulary of India for plant-based drugs were selected. The original and substitute source information for drug formulation was retrieved from Ayurvedic classical texts and other published literature from PubMed. The selected medicinal plants were collected from the states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat in India. Formal identification of the selected medicinal plants was performed with the help of renowned plant taxonomists, late Dr. K G Bhat and Dr. Radhakrishna Rao, on the basis of morphological and floral characteristics as described in the ‘Flora of Udupi’, ‘Flora of South Canara’ literature, and ‘World Flora Online’ database58,59. Permission was obtained for the collection of plant material. Herbarium voucher specimens were prepared and authenticated with the help of taxonomists. These voucher specimens were verified by the Scientific officer, Pilikula Herbarium, Pilikula Development Authority, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India which is recognized by Index Herbariorum (Acronym-PND), and herbarium voucher specimen number was assigned for the selected medicinal plants (Supplementary_material-3). The fresh roots, stem bark, seeds, and flower buds for each sample were immersed in liquid nitrogen and stored frozen for long-term preservation. The germplasm was preserved in a greenhouse at the Manipal School of Life Sciences, MAHE, for future use. Information such as plant parts, habits, habitats, synonyms, vernacular names, morphological descriptions, distributions, and therapeutic uses was retrieved from scientific journals, ayurvedic books, and credible databases60.

DNA barcoding

Fresh tissue from each plant species was pulverized with liquid nitrogen. The genomic DNA of the fresh leaf tissue was isolated via a modified CTAB protocol61. The universal nuclear internal transcribed spacer region was amplified in 54 plant species, and 13 plant species were amplified with other chloroplast markers (psbA-trnH, rbcL, matK, and trnL-trnF). PCRs were conducted in a 15 µl reaction volume. The reaction mixture consisted of 5 µl of 2X PCR master mix (Maxome Labsciences, India), 1 µl of each forward and reverse primer (10 µM), 1 µl of plant DNA template (50 ng/µl), and the remaining volume was adjusted to 15 µl with sterile deionized water. The primer information and PCR conditions for DNA amplification with different universal markers are listed (Supplementary Table S9). After amplification, the PCR products were examined via 1.2% agarose gel-based electrophoresis. The PCR products were cleaned via a HighPrep PCR Clean-up Kit (MagBio Genomics, USA). The purified products were then sequenced via an automated Genetic Analyser 3500 (Applied Biosystems, USA). The generated DNA barcodes were aligned against the NCBI nucleotide database via the MegaBLAST tool62. The highest sequence similarity was selected for the species with greater than 97% query coverage and percent identity. We submitted all the DNA barcode regions amplified in this study to the GenBank database. The phylogenetic analysis of these reference DNA barcode sequences was performed by using the muscle model in MEGA 1163 and maximum likelihood phylogeny with the GTR + g substitution model in RAxML v 8.064.

Comparative metabolite fingerprinting of authentic and substitute plants

Sample preparation: The top 10 traded authentic medicinal plants and their 10 substitute plants were ground with liquid nitrogen. Then, 100 mg of the frozen powder was weighed and mixed with 1 mL of extraction buffer solution (75% aqueous methanol and 0.1% formic acid), which had been prechilled on ice. The samples were vortexed and subsequently sonicated in a water bath maintained at ambient temperature for 15 min. The sonication was conducted at a maximum frequency of 40 kHz. Subsequently, centrifugation was performed at a rotational speed of 12,000 RPM for 15 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm sterile filter (Merck, India). The filtrate was then lyophilized, and the yield was measured. The extract was dissolved in 1 ml of 100% methanol for LC‒MS/MS analysis.

Metabolite fingerprinting via mass spectrometry techniques: LC‒MS analysis was performed for the plant species via two analytical platforms: (i) an Agilent 6520 quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry (LC‒MS) system coupled with a 1200 HPLC system, and (ii) a Waters Acquity UPLC H-Class Plus bio system coupled with a Xevo-G2XSQTOF system. The ESI ionization source was maintained on both platforms, and mobile phases consisting of 0.1% formic acid in deionized water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B) were used on both platforms for separation, employing a gradient program (Supplementary Table S10). Overall, the flow rate was maintained at 0.5 ml/min, and LC‒MS and MS‒MS analyses were performed in ESI + ionization mode with a mass range from m/z 50–1500. The ion source parameters were as follows: nitrogen gas temperature, 350 °C; nebulizer pressure, 35 psig; capillary voltage, 3 kV; and skimmer voltage, 65 V for the Agilent 6520 LC-ESI-QTOF system; capillary voltage, 3 kV; cone voltage, 40 °C; cone gas flow, 50 L/hr; and desolvation gas flow, 1000 L/hr for the Waters UPLC-HRMS-MSE system. The collision energy was ramped from 10–60 eV for data-dependent acquisition in the auto MS/MS mode on the Agilent 6520 system. Similarly, the Waters UPLC-HRMS-MSE system has data-independent acquisition with 6 eV for low collision energy systems and 20–40 eV for high collision energy systems. Lock mass correction was performed with leucine enkephalin in positive (m/z 556.2771) ionization mode. The mass spectrometry data were acquired via Agilent MassHunter B.07.00 and MassLynx v4.1 workstations for the Agilent 6520 system and Waters UPLC-HRMS-MSE systems, respectively.

Data processing and prediction-based metabolite annotation: The Agilent .d files and Waters MSE raw fragmented channel data files were converted to .mzML format via the MSConvert tool in Proteowizard [https://proteowizard.sourceforge.io/download.html]. The generated .mzML files were processed via MS-DIAL v4.9.265 with specific requirements such as soft ionization, chromatography, conventional LC/MS, profile data, and positive ion mode for data-dependent acquisition for MS/MS data and soft ionization, chromatography, SWATH-MS or the conventional all-ions method with an experimental file (Supplementary Table S11), centroid data, and positive mode for data-independent acquisition of MSE data. The data processing parameters, including mass accuracy, peak detection, deconvolution, identification, adduct ion settings, and alignment parameter settings, are described (Supplementary Table S11). The peak lists obtained from MS-DIAL v4.9.2 were exported to MS-Finder v3.6066 for metabolite annotation. The molecular formula and structure prediction were performed by matching experimental spectra with in silico predicted spectra from different natural product databases integrated in MSFINDER v3.60 (HMDB, LipidMAPS, FooDB, PlantCyc, NANPDB, COCONUT, KNApSACK, PubChem, and UNPD databases). The precursor ion mass tolerance and MS/MS fragment mass tolerance were set to 0.05 Da. Structures with MS/MS similarity scores greater than 5 were considered accurately identified. The automated chemical classification for annotated metabolites was performed via the ClassyFire web server67.

Molecular target prediction for annotated metabolites

The targets of metabolites from 20 medicinal plants (10 each authentic and substitute) were predicted via SwissTargetPrediction68 with a probability score greater than 0.1 and the similarity ensemble approach web server69 with a p value < 0.05. The disease and ICD-11 code information for each protein target were retrieved from the Therapeutic Target Databasey70. The prediction of human oral bioavailability and ADMET properties for each tentative metabolite was performed with the QikProp module in the Schrodinger suite 2023-3 (Schrodinger 2023-3, LLC, New York).

Database and web interface development

The CDMMM database was developed via LAMP, a Linux-based open-source software package that includes Apache v2.4, MySQL v5.7, and PHP v7.2. The interactive web interface was developed using HTML, bootstrap, CSS, PHP, and JavaScript to access the entries by searching for or browsing botanical names, metabolite names, and target-associated diseases. The plant–compound and compound–target interaction networks were constructed via Cytoscape.js, an open-source JavaScript-based graph library. NCBI Blast + v2.2.29 was incorporated into the CDMMM database to find the sequence homology of newly sequenced DNA barcode sequences against the 89 reference barcode sequences provided in this database.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (1MB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 2 (937.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Material 3 (1.1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Late Dr. K. G. Bhat and Dr. Radhakrishna Rao for taxonomic identification of the plant samples. Dr. Ramakrishna Marati for verification of the herbarium voucher specimens at Pilikula Herbarium, Pilikula Development Authority, Mangaluru, Government of Karnataka, India. Mr. Manjunath, Dr. Archana Kamath, Mr. Mehaboob, Mr. Prakash, and Dr. Vivek Pandi for helping in plant collection. Mr. Infant Thomas, Ms. Neeharika NV, Mr. Devija Shetty, Ms. Suchitra P Talawar, Mr. Manoj, Mr. Rajesh, Ms. Sandhya and Ms. Trithila Shetty for the technical support.

Author contributions

P.S.R. conceptualized the project. C.M.V. performed the experiments, data curation and database development, and wrote the manuscript. A.P.W. and B.P. assisted in database design and development. K.U.S. and R.K. supported in plant sample collection. D.S. performed data analysis. K.R. and M.S. assisted in mass spectrometry and in silico analysis. Y.L.R. assisted in conceptualization of the project. B.P. and P.S.R. assisted in critical reviewing and editing the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal. This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Grant No. BT/PR15963/TRM/120/83/2016), Dr. TMA Pai structured Ph.D. fellowship, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Government of India (F. No 45/01/2022/TRM/BMS).

Data availability

The DNA barcoding datasets generated in the present study have been deposited in the GenBank repository ([https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide]) under the following accession numbers : Tinospora cordifolia (MW362771, MW591542, MW547138, OM639957-OM639967); Tinospora sinensis (MW547128, MW591543, MW547139, OM639950-OM639956); Bacopa monnieri (MW547129); Centella asiatica (MW547130); Tribulus terrestris (MW591544); Pedalium murex (MW591545); Terminalia chebula (MW547132); Phyllanthus emblica (OM677795); Plumbago zeylanica (OM677463); Baliospermum solanifolium (OR073671); Terminalia arjuna (MW547131); Terminalia paniculata (OR073677); Terminalia bellirica (OM677794); Withania somnifera (MW547133); Moeroris amara (MW547135); Phyllanthus urinaria (OM677793); Aegle marmelos (OM677792); Cyperus rotundus (MW547134); Cyperus surinamensis (OM677811); Curcuma longa (MW547142); Curcuma oligantha (OR073673); Ocimum tenuiflorum (OM677459); Vitex negundo (OM677805); Piper sarmentosum (OM677813); Piper retrofractum (OM677810); Gymnema sylvestre (ON878111); Acorus calamus (MW591546); Azadirachta indica (MW547141); Myristica fragrans (OM677465); Syzygium aromaticum (OM677796); Syzygium cumini (OR096415); Pleurolobus gangeticus (MW591547); Pseudarthria viscida (OM677809); Cinnamomum verum (OM677464); Cinnamomum tamala (ON878114); Curculigo orchioides (OM677461); Bombax ceiba (MW547140); Moringa oleifera (OM677802); Asparagus racemosus (MW591548); Asparagus gonoclados (PP824660); Convolvulus prostratus (OR073672); Clitoria ternatea (OM677800); Dalbergia sissoo (PP818961); Dalbergia latifolia (OM677801); Oroxylum indicum (OM677803); Ailanthus triphysus (PP824661); Operculina turpethum (OM677804); Chrysopogon nigritanus (OM677807); Glycyrrhiza glabra (ON878112); Woodfordia fruticosa (MW591549); Zingiber officinale (OM677460); Boerhavia diffusa (OM677798); Trianthema portulacastrum (OM677799); Leptadenia reticulata (ON878117); Holostemma ada-kodiena (OM677797); Trigonella foenum-graecum (ON878116); Mesua ferrea (ON878113); Tecomella undulata (PP818960); Aphanamixis polystachya (OR073674); Acmella paniculata (OM677462); Embelia ribes (OM677815); Embelia tsjeriam-cottam (OM677806); Ipomoea mauritiana (ON911578); Elettaria cardamomum (OM677812); Symplocos racemosa (ON911579); Andrographis paniculata (ON911581); Ficus racemosa (ON878115). The physical herbarium voucher specimens of 67 medicinal plants were deposited in Pilikula Herbarium, recognized by the Index Herbarioum (Acronym: PND), Mangaluru, Government of Karnataka, India. The specimens are accessible to researchers with the herbarium voucher specimen numbers (10,416–10,482), and virtual herbarium specimens were deposited in the CDMMM database (https:/slsdb.manipal.edu/cdmmm), which is publicly available. The metabolite fingerprinting data, predicted molecular targets of annotated metabolites, molecular docking and molecular dynamics results are provided in the supplementary material.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Pandey, M. M., Rastogi, S. & Rawat, A. K. S. Indian traditional ayurvedic system of medicine and nutritional supplementation. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med.2013, 376327. 10.1155/2013/376327 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Balkrishna, A. et al. Exploring the safety, efficacy, and bioactivity of herbal medicines: Bridging traditional wisdom and modern science in healthcare. FIM3, 35–49. 10.14218/FIM.2023.00086 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Facts & Factors. 2024. India Herbal Products Market Size, Share, Growth Analysis Report, 2024–2032. FNF Research. Available from: https://www.fnfresearch.com/india-herbal-products-market.
  • 4.Shi, Y., Zhang, C. & Li, X. Traditional medicine in India. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Sci.8, S51–S55. 10.1016/j.jtcms.2020.06.007 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Singh, S. & Kumar, S. Medicinal plant sector in India: Status and sustainability. Int. J. Econ. Plants8, 081–085. 10.23910/2/2021.0414b (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kotecha, R. The journey with COVID-19: Initiatives by Ministry of AYUSH. J Ayurveda Integr Med12, 1–3. 10.1016/j.jaim.2021.03.009 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alyas, A. A., Aldewachi, H. & Aladul, M. I. Adulteration of herbal medicine and its detection methods. Pharmacogn. J.16, 248–254. 10.5530/pj.2024.16.36 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Muyumba, N. W., Mutombo, S. C., Sheridan, H., Nachtergael, A. & Duez, P. Quality control of herbal drugs and preparations: The methods of analysis, their relevance and applications. Talanta Open4, 100070. 10.1016/j.talo.2021.100070 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Unnikrishnan, R., Dev, S. A. & Jayaraj, R. Pitfalls and promises of raw drug identification techniques in the ayurvedic industry: An overview. 3 Biotech10, 497. 10.1007/s13205-020-02482-0 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen, S. L. et al. DNA barcoding in herbal medicine: Retrospective and prospective. J. Pharma. Anal.13, 431–441. 10.1016/j.jpha.2023.03.008 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rai, P. S. et al. DNA barcoding of authentic and substitute samples of herb of the family Asparagaceae and Asclepiadaceae based on the ITS2 region. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med.3, 136. 10.4103/0975-9476.100177 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Palhares, R. M. et al. Medicinal plants recommended by the world health organization: DNA barcode identification associated with chemical analyses guarantees their quality. PLoS ONE10, e0127866. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127866 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sayers, E. W. et al. GenBank 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res.52, D134–D137. 10.1093/nar/gkad903 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P. D. N. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org). Mol. Ecol. Notes.7, 355–364, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Wong, T. H. et al. Medicinal Materials DNA Barcode Database (MMDBD) version 15-one-stop solution for storage, BLAST, alignment and primer design. Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.28, 112. 10.1093/database/bay112 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shiade, S. R. G. et al. Plant metabolites and signaling pathways in response to biotic and abiotic stresses: Exploring bio stimulant applications. Plant Stress12, 100454. 10.1016/j.stress.2024.100454 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Horai, H. et al. MassBank: A public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J. Mass Spectrom.45, 703–714. 10.1002/jms.1777 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wishart, D. S. et al. HMDB 5.0: The human metabolome database for 2022. Nucleic Acids Res.50, D622–D631. 10.1093/nar/gkab1062 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guijas, C. et al. METLIN: A technology platform for identifying knowns and unknowns. Anal. Chem.90, 3156–3164. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04424 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sud, M. et al. Metabolomics workbench: An international repository for metabolomics data and metadata, metabolite standards, protocols, tutorials and training, and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res.44, D463–D470. 10.1093/nar/gkv1042 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hawkins, C. et al. Plant metabolic network 15: A resource of genome-wide metabolism databases for 126 plants and algae. J. Integr. Plant Biol.63, 1888–1905. 10.1111/jipb.13163 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kopka, J. et al. GMD@CSB.DB: The golm metabolome database. Bioinform.21, 1635–1638. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti236 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shi, H. et al. RefMetaPlant: A reference metabolome database for plants across five major phyla. Nucleic Acids Res.52, D1614–D1628. 10.1093/nar/gkad980 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sawada, Y. et al. RIKEN tandem mass spectral database (ReSpect) for phytochemicals: A plant-specific MS/MS-based data resource and database. Phytochem.82, 38–45. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.07.007 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alvarez-Rivera, G., Ballesteros-Vivas, D., Parada-Alfonso, F., Ibañez, E. & Cifuentes, A. Recent applications of high resolution mass spectrometry for the characterization of plant natural products. Trac-Trends Anal. Chem.112, 87–101. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.01.002 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Harvey, A. L., Edrada-Ebel, R. & Quinn, R. J. The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.14, 111–129. 10.1038/nrd4510 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Expósito, O. et al. Biotechnological production of taxol and related taxoids: Current state and prospects. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem.9, 109–121. 10.2174/187152009787047761 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kong, X. R. et al. BATMAN-TCM 2.0: An enhanced integrative database for known and predicted interactions between traditional Chinese medicine ingredients and target proteins. Nucleic Acids Res.52, D1110–D1120. 10.1093/nar/gkad926 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ru, J. L. et al. TCMSP: A database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines. J. Cheminform.10.1186/1758-2946-6-13 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu, Z. H. et al. TCMAnalyzer: A chemo- and bioinformatics web service for analyzing traditional Chinese medicine. J. Chem. Inf. Model.58, 550–555. 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00549 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen, C. Y. C. TCM Database@Taiwan: The world’s largest traditional chinese medicine database for drug screening. PLoS ONE6, e15939. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015939 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang, P. S. et al. TCM-Suite: A comprehensive and holistic platform for Traditional Chinese Medicine component identification and network pharmacology analysis. Imeta1, e47. 10.1002/imt2.47 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Batool, S. et al. Network pharmacology and bioinformatics approach reveals the multi-target pharmacological mechanism of Fumaria indica in the treatment of liver cancer. Pharmaceutic.15, 654. 10.3390/ph15060654 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.28, 27–30. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci.28, 1947–1951. 10.1002/pro.3715 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res51, D587–D592. 10.1093/nar/gkac963 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dadhich, M. K. et al. Contributions of the national medicinal plants board (nmpb), ministry of ayush in the medicinal plants sector-an appraisal. Int. J. Ayurveda Res.5, 62–75 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vattakaven, T. et al. India biodiversity portal: An integrated, interactive and participatory biodiversity informatics platform. Biodivers. Data J.4, e10279. 10.3897/BDJ.4.e10279 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kiewhuo, K. et al. OSADHI-An online structural and analytics based database for herbs of India. Comput. Biol. Chem.102, 107799. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2022.107799 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sharma, A., Sharma, R., Pandey, C. & Chopra, V. eFlora: Future of plant taxonomy and conservation. Ecol. Environ. Conserv.28, S147–S152. 10.53550/EEC.2022.v28i04s.021 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ha, W. Y., Wong, K. L., Ma, W. Y., Lau, Y. Y. & Chan, W. H. Enhancing testing laboratory engagement in plant DNA barcoding through a routine workflow-a case study on Chinese Materia Medica (CMM). Plants11, 1317. 10.3390/plants11101317 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Balaji, R. & Parani, M. DNA barcoding of the market samples of single-drug herbal powders reveals adulteration with taxonomically unrelated plant species. Diversity14, 495. 10.3390/d14060495 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Harris, C. M., Kim, D. Y., Jordan, C. R., Miranda, M. I. & Hellberg, R. S. DNA barcoding of herbal supplements on the US commercial market associated with the purported treatment of COVID-19. Phytochem. Anal.35, 664–677. 10.1002/pca.3320 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xiong, C. et al. Evaluation of four commonly used DNA barcoding loci for Ardisia species Identification. Front. Plant Sci.13, 860778. 10.3389/fpls.2022.860778 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Malik, S., Priya, A. & Babbar, S. B. Employing barcoding markers to authenticate selected endangered medicinal plants traded in Indian markets. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants25, 327–337. 10.1007/s12298-018-0610-8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu, J. X. et al. BOKP: A DNA barcode reference library for monitoring herbal drugs in the Korean pharmacopeia. Front. Pharmacol.8, 931. 10.3389/fphar.2017.00931 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chen, X. C. et al. Identification of crude drugs in the Japanese pharmacopoeia using a DNA barcoding system. Sci. Rep.7, 42325. 10.1038/srep42325 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vassou, S. L., Nithaniyal, S., Raju, B. & Parani, M. Creation of reference DNA barcode library and authentication of medicinal plant raw drugs used in Ayurvedic medicine. BMC Complement. Altern. Med.16, 186. 10.1186/s12906-016-1086-0 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shanmughanandhan, D., Ragupathy, S., Newmaster, S. G., Mohanasundaram, S. & Sathishkumar, R. Estimating herbal product authentication and adulteration in India using a vouchered, DNA-based biological reference material library. Drug Saf.39, 1211–1227. 10.1007/s40264-016-0459-0 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Urumarudappa, S. K. J. et al. Development of a DNA barcode library of plants in the Thai herbal pharmacopoeia and monographs for authentication of herbal products. Sci. Rep.12, 9624. 10.1038/s41598-022-13287-x (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gauglitz, J. M. et al. Enhancing untargeted metabolomics using metadata-based source annotation. Nat. Biotechnol.41, 1656–1656. 10.1038/s41587-023-02025-x (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li, Y. Y. et al. Creation of a plant metabolite spectral library for untargeted and targeted metabolomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 2249. 10.3390/ijms24032249 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pathania, S., Ramakrishnan, S. M. & Bagler, G. Phytochemica: A platform to explore phytochemicals of medicinal plants. Database2015, bav075. 10.1093/database/bav075 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vivek-Ananth, R. P., Mohanraj, K., Sahoo, A. K. & Samal, A. IMPPAT 2.0: An enhanced and expanded phytochemical atlas of Indian medicinal plants. ACS Omega8, 8827–8845. 10.1021/acsomega.3c00156 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sinha, S. et al. IMPDB: Indian medicinal phytochemical database curated for drug designing. J. Comput. Biophys. Chem.21, 709–728. 10.1142/S2737416522500302 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kang, K. B. et al. Mass spectrometry data on specialized metabolome of medicinal plants used in East Asian traditional medicine. Sci. Data9, 528. 10.1038/s41597-022-01662-2 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bhat, K. Flora of Udupi, Indian Naturalist (Regd.). Vol. 106 (2003).
  • 58.Tian, Z. et al. PMhub 1.0: a comprehensive plant metabolome database. Nucleic Acids Res.52, D1579–D1587. 10.1093/nar/gkad811 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bhat Gopalakrishna, K. Flora of South Canara. Vol. 1 (2014).
  • 60.Borsch, T. et al. World Flora Online: Placing taxonomists at the heart of a definitive and comprehensive global resource on the world’s plants. Taxon69, 1311–1341. 10.1002/tax.12373 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rani, S., Sharma, J. & Sehrawat, S. Standardization the protocol for high genomic DNA yield and quality for guava cultivars. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem.8, 77–79 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol.215, 403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. MEGA11 Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol.38, 3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinform.30, 1312–1313. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tsugawa, H. et al. MS-DIAL: data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat. Methods12, 523. 10.1038/nmeth.3393 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tsugawa, H. et al. Hydrogen Rearrangement Rules: Computational MS/MS Fragmentation and Structure Elucidation Using MS-FINDER Software. Anal. Chem.88, 7946–7958. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00770 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Feunang, Y. D. et al. ClassyFire: Automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy. J. Cheminform.8, 61. 10.1186/s13321-016-0174-y (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Daina, A., Michielin, O. & Zoete, V. SwissTargetPrediction: Updated data and new features for efficient prediction of protein targets of small molecules. Nucleic acids res.47, W357–W364. 10.1093/nar/gkz382 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang, Z. H., Liang, L., Yin, Z. & Lin, J. P. Improving chemical similarity ensemble approach in target prediction. J. Cheminform.8, 20. 10.1186/s13321-016-0130-x (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhou, Y. et al. TTD: Therapeutic target database describing target druggability information. Nucleic Acids Res.52, D1465–D1477. 10.1093/nar/gkad751 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (1MB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 2 (937.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Material 3 (1.1MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The DNA barcoding datasets generated in the present study have been deposited in the GenBank repository ([https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide]) under the following accession numbers : Tinospora cordifolia (MW362771, MW591542, MW547138, OM639957-OM639967); Tinospora sinensis (MW547128, MW591543, MW547139, OM639950-OM639956); Bacopa monnieri (MW547129); Centella asiatica (MW547130); Tribulus terrestris (MW591544); Pedalium murex (MW591545); Terminalia chebula (MW547132); Phyllanthus emblica (OM677795); Plumbago zeylanica (OM677463); Baliospermum solanifolium (OR073671); Terminalia arjuna (MW547131); Terminalia paniculata (OR073677); Terminalia bellirica (OM677794); Withania somnifera (MW547133); Moeroris amara (MW547135); Phyllanthus urinaria (OM677793); Aegle marmelos (OM677792); Cyperus rotundus (MW547134); Cyperus surinamensis (OM677811); Curcuma longa (MW547142); Curcuma oligantha (OR073673); Ocimum tenuiflorum (OM677459); Vitex negundo (OM677805); Piper sarmentosum (OM677813); Piper retrofractum (OM677810); Gymnema sylvestre (ON878111); Acorus calamus (MW591546); Azadirachta indica (MW547141); Myristica fragrans (OM677465); Syzygium aromaticum (OM677796); Syzygium cumini (OR096415); Pleurolobus gangeticus (MW591547); Pseudarthria viscida (OM677809); Cinnamomum verum (OM677464); Cinnamomum tamala (ON878114); Curculigo orchioides (OM677461); Bombax ceiba (MW547140); Moringa oleifera (OM677802); Asparagus racemosus (MW591548); Asparagus gonoclados (PP824660); Convolvulus prostratus (OR073672); Clitoria ternatea (OM677800); Dalbergia sissoo (PP818961); Dalbergia latifolia (OM677801); Oroxylum indicum (OM677803); Ailanthus triphysus (PP824661); Operculina turpethum (OM677804); Chrysopogon nigritanus (OM677807); Glycyrrhiza glabra (ON878112); Woodfordia fruticosa (MW591549); Zingiber officinale (OM677460); Boerhavia diffusa (OM677798); Trianthema portulacastrum (OM677799); Leptadenia reticulata (ON878117); Holostemma ada-kodiena (OM677797); Trigonella foenum-graecum (ON878116); Mesua ferrea (ON878113); Tecomella undulata (PP818960); Aphanamixis polystachya (OR073674); Acmella paniculata (OM677462); Embelia ribes (OM677815); Embelia tsjeriam-cottam (OM677806); Ipomoea mauritiana (ON911578); Elettaria cardamomum (OM677812); Symplocos racemosa (ON911579); Andrographis paniculata (ON911581); Ficus racemosa (ON878115). The physical herbarium voucher specimens of 67 medicinal plants were deposited in Pilikula Herbarium, recognized by the Index Herbarioum (Acronym: PND), Mangaluru, Government of Karnataka, India. The specimens are accessible to researchers with the herbarium voucher specimen numbers (10,416–10,482), and virtual herbarium specimens were deposited in the CDMMM database (https:/slsdb.manipal.edu/cdmmm), which is publicly available. The metabolite fingerprinting data, predicted molecular targets of annotated metabolites, molecular docking and molecular dynamics results are provided in the supplementary material.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES