Abstract
Background
Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) pose major public health challenges. The World Health Organization reports that sexually transmitted infections (STIs) alone lead to approximately 374 million new cases annually worldwide, averaging about one million per day. Blood-borne infections also considerably contribute to the global health burden. In Canada, the 2018 Pan-Canadian Framework aims to mitigate the effects of STBBIs through collaborative initiatives. Saskatchewan has experienced rising incidence rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and congenital syphilis.
Methods
We examined the epidemiology of STBBIs in the Regina area of Saskatchewan from 2019 to 2024 using data from the provincial public health surveillance system, Panorama. The analysis focused on reported case numbers and demographic characteristics. Poisson regression models assessed associations between demographic factors and diagnoses. Sex was recorded as biological sex (male or female) in the surveillance system; gender identity was not collected. The study was part of a Quality Improvement initiative using de-identified data and did not require formal ethical review.
Results
Between 2019 and 2024, there were 11,739 reported cases of sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs), including chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. Syphilis cases increased significantly, while chlamydia and gonorrhea cases declined. Females had higher rates of chlamydia, while males showed elevated rates of gonorrhea, syphilis, and blood-borne viruses (BBVs). Risk factors included inconsistent condom use, multiple sexual partners (20% reported more than two partners in three months), and substance use (7.1% used injectable drugs, and 6.8% used non-injectable substances). Street involvement and a history of STBBIs were also significant predictors for these infections.
Conclusion
STBBIs remain a significant public health issue in Regina, with syphilis rates rising sharply from 2019 to 2022. Overall, cases increased, primarily driven by syphilis and BBVs. Public health responses include dedicated STI clinics and harm-reduction programs for BBVs, but challenges persist.
Keywords: Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections, Syphilis, Saskatchewan
Background
Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) are a global health concern. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) alone account for approximately one million new infections acquired daily worldwide, primarily chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and trichomoniasis [1]. Blood-borne infections such as HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C also contribute substantially to the overall burden. Most STBBIs are treatable and can be managed to prevent complications or long-term health consequences that significantly influence global sexual and reproductive health [1].
STBBIs are transmitted in the context of other social and health challenges; unless these underlying issues are addressed, the likelihood of recurring exposure and infection is high, requiring a multidisciplinary approach to care [2]. Risk factors that increase the transmission of STBBIs include unprotected sexual contact with multiple partners, previous history of STBBIs, sexual assault, alcohol use, sex work, having a partner who has had concurrent sexual contacts or a history of an STBBI, recreational drug use, and intravenous drug use [3].
Recognizing the burden posed by STBBIs, the Pan-Canadian Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections Framework for Action was published in 2018 and describes national strategic initiatives to reduce the impact of STBBIs in Canada [4]. The document also outlined strategic objectives and guiding principles to address STBBIs in Canada and achieve global STBBI targets by 2030 [4]. To achieve these goals, primary care and public health professionals must collaborate to decrease the number of STBBIs in Canada, increase access to diagnostic procedures and medical care, and reduce the stigma and discrimination that lead to STBBI vulnerability [4].
Assessing the impact of STBBI prevention and control programs entails gathering and analyzing information on the incidence and prevalence of infection, identifying the populations most affected and their locations, and identifying behavioural risk factors contributing to STBBI acquisition and transmission [5]. Research shows that STBBI rates continue to rise globally, including in Europe, America, and across Canada; Saskatchewan has the second-highest rate of infectious syphilis in Canada after Manitoba, and infection rates have rapidly increased since 2010 [6–9].
Publicly available data indicate that the most frequently reported STBBIs in Saskatchewan are chlamydia and gonorrhea, but the rise in the prevalence of syphilis is a cause for concern. Syphilis is caused by the spirochaete bacterium Treponema pallidum and is usually transmitted through sexual contact with an actively infected partner [10]. Syphilis can also be acquired congenitally (in utero or during birth canal passage) or by blood-borne transmission [11]. With significantly increasing syphilis rates in Saskatchewan, we have seen an increasing proportion of late infection, and congenital syphilis has seen a resurgence in the last five years [12]. The majority (86%) of confirmed early congenital syphilis cases in 2020 were reported in Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. In 2019, Saskatchewan saw its first cases of congenital syphilis since 2011 [13, 14]. Since then, the province has had 185 cases of congenital syphilis per 100,000 live births in 2021.
Although data on the provincial burden of STBBIs in Saskatchewan are available, there is a paucity of information on the epidemiological breakdown of STBBIs in smaller geographic areas across the province. This deficiency led the Regina Public Health Communicable Disease Program to conduct a study on the impact of STBBIs in our community. The primary objective was to analyze the epidemiology of STBBIs in the Regina area of Saskatchewan from 2019 to 2024.
Materials and methods
This retrospective cohort study analyzed the epidemiology of STBBIs in the Regina area of Saskatchewan, Canada, from 2019 to 2024. The sample size was determined by the total number of reported cases of the selected STBBIs in the Regina area between 2019 and 2024. No additional sampling technique was necessary, as the entire population of reported cases during this period was included in the analysis.
Study population
The study included all individuals residing in the Regina area who were diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C during the study period. Individuals diagnosed with STBBIs outside the Regina area, those without complete demographic or clinical data, or those for whom data on sex, age, or risk factors were missing, were excluded from the analysis.
Data collection
Data were extracted from the Panorama system, the provincial electronic public health surveillance system, using the MicroStrategy application [15]. Variables included age, biological sex (male or female, as recorded in the database), residence location, and risk factors such as sexual behaviour and substance use. Sexual behaviour was categorized based on the number of partners in the past three months: 0–1 versus ≥ 2 partners, consistent condom use versus inconsistent/no use and history of STBBIs, yes versus no. Substance use was categorized as injectable or non-injectable based on client-reported history in the case investigation forms.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 and Microsoft Excel 2016. Descriptive statistics were initially employed to summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. To calculate rates for various STBBIs, the numerator was the number of reported cases for each STBBI, while the denominator was the total population covered under the Saskatchewan eHealth program on June 3 of the previous year, providing a measure of the region’s at-risk population. These rates were expressed as cases per 100,000 population.
Additionally, Poisson regression models were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for each STBBI, with 95% confidence intervals, to evaluate the relationship between specific demographic or risk factors and the incidence of STBBI diagnoses over time. This analysis facilitated the identification of trends and the assessment of potential associations between risk factors and STBBI incidence.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This study was part of a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative and, as such, did not undergo formal ethical review by a Research Ethics Board (REB). The project adhered to local institutional guidelines for QI activities, which do not require full ethical approval when using de-identified, routinely collected public health data. Since the study utilized only aggregate, anonymized data from the Panorama system, individual consent to participate was not required. The data were analyzed in compliance with established protocols to ensure participant confidentiality and data security.
Results
Between 2019 and 2024, a total of 11,739 STBBI cases were reported within the Regina area. The most notable increase was observed in syphilis cases, with rates escalating from 22.3 per 100,000 population in 2019 to 189.5 per 100,000 in 2024. Although the incidence rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea remained elevated, they experienced a slight decline over the same period, as illustrated in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Overall disease counts and disease-specific rates of confirmed STBBI cases, 2019–2024, Regina, Saskatchewan
Overall, females accounted for a slightly larger proportion of reported STBBI cases due to higher rates of chlamydia, while males represented a greater proportion of cases for most other infections (Table 1). The Regina area has an estimated population of approximately 290,000, with Saskatchewan’s total population around 1.3 million. The population distribution is relatively balanced, but younger age groups (20–40 years) represent a larger proportion of STBBI diagnoses.
Table 1.
Characteristics of individuals diagnosed with STBBIs in the Regina area, 2019–2024
| Female | Male | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of cases (%) | 6637 (56.6) | 5096 (43.4) |
| STBBI cases by disease type | ||
| Chlamydia Infection | 3902 (63.2) | 2275 (36.8) |
| Gonococcal Infection | 1298 (53.9) | 1109 (46.1) |
| HIV | 150 (48.9) | 157 (51.1) |
| Hepatitis B | 106 (41.2) | 151 (58.8) |
| Hepatitis C | 230 (38.3) | 371 (61.7) |
| Syphilis | 942 (48.2) | 1013 (51.8) |
| STBBI cases and rates per 100,000 by Regina area residents | ||
| Regina 1 (North) | 1408 (771.4) | 898 (487.0) |
| Regina 2 (East) | 870 (482.4) | 632 (327.8) |
| Regina 3 (South) | 1146 (603.5) | 851 (443.8) |
| Regina 4 (Central) | 2575 (1434.0) | 1524 (827.7) |
| Regina NA | 638 (284.6) | 1191 (565.5) |
Geospatial analysis indicated that more than one-third of cases had residential addresses in Regina Central, which represents slightly less than one-fifth of the city’s population. Regina North, comprising approximately 30% of the city’s population, accounted for 20% of the cases.
The average age of individuals diagnosed with STBBIs was 28.3 years. Patients diagnosed with chlamydia were generally younger, with an average age of 25.2 years, whereas those diagnosed with HIV and hepatitis B exhibited higher mean ages of 48 and 40.4 years, respectively. A comprehensive analysis of age distributions by infection type is available in Appendix 1, which includes the univariate analysis of age by disease.
Risk factor analysis indicated that inconsistent or no use of condoms and multiple sexual partners were prevalent among STI cases. Approximately 24% of individuals reported having more than two sexual partners in the past three months. “Sex without protective barriers” primarily refers to the use of condoms (both male and female) and other barrier methods such as dental dams. Table 2 presents the additional risk factors identified among cases. Further details on the distribution of risk factors across specific diseases (chlamydia, gonorrhea, HIV, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and syphilis) are provided in Appendix 2.
Table 2.
Risk factor profile of STBBI cases in Regina, 2019–2024
| Frequency | |
|---|---|
| STI-related risk factors | |
| Sex without protective barriers | 2820 (27.8) |
| Sex with two or more partners in the last three months | 2481 (24.4) |
| Sex with an anonymous partner | 1720 (16.9) |
| Cases meeting partners online | 757 (7.5) |
| Sex with a known case | 622 (6.1) |
| BBV-related risk factors | |
| Cases with a history of non-injectable substance use | 1163 (11.4) |
| Cases with a history of injectable substance use | 211 (2.1) |
| Cases who are street-involved | 387 (3.8) |
The analysis revealed a substantial increase in syphilis incidence across all stages of the disease. When categories were merged into the four principal stages, primary syphilis (Primary) accounted for 31.3% of cases, secondary syphilis (Secondary) for 16.4%, latent syphilis (Early latent, Late latent, and Latent syphilis of unknown duration) for 50.4%, and tertiary syphilis (Tertiary other than neurosyphilis, Neurosyphilis and syphilitic stillbirth accounted for 1.9%. Additionally, seven cases of congenital syphilis were documented. An increasing proportion of cases has been categorized as “unknown duration,” highlighting the difficulties in obtaining complete staging information.
Potential predictors of STBBIs included street involvement, a history of previous STBBI, and having more than two sexual partners in the three months preceding diagnosis. After adjustment for confounding factors, individuals who were street-involved demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of STBBIs (IRR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.17–1.18). A prior history of STBBI was also correlated with an increased incidence (IRR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07–1.08). Male sex was associated with a reduced incidence of STBBIs (IRR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.94–0.94), as illustrated in Table 3.
Table 3.
Poisson regression analysis of STBBI risk factors in Regina, 2019–2024
| Parameter | Incidence rate ratio | 95% CI | Pr > ChiSq |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cases who are street-involved | 1.17 | 1.17 to 1.18 | P < 0.001 |
| Cases with a previous STBBI | 1.08 | 1.07 to 1.08 | P < 0.001 |
| Sex with two or more partners in the last three months | 1.01 | 1.01 to 1.01 | P < 0.001 |
| Male sex | 0.94 | 0.94 to 0.94 | P < 0.001 |
Discussion
The rising prevalence of STBBIs observed in Regina, Saskatchewan, mirrors a broader resurgence of these infections at both the national and international levels. Throughout Canada, the incidence rates of syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia have consistently increased with particularly notable surges in infectious and congenital syphilis [16]. The current analysis indicates an almost eightfold escalation in syphilis cases in Regina from 2019 to 2024, exceeding the overall provincial trend reported in Saskatchewan and corresponding with national growth patterns. Comparable increases have been documented in Saskatchewan (n = 1,913), Alberta (n = 2,380), and Manitoba (n = 1,487) in 2023, suggesting that local transmission dynamics reflect a broader re-emergence of STBBIs across Western Canada [16].
The higher rates of infection among younger adults (ages 20–40 years) in this study align with national age distributions reported by the Public Health Agency of Canada and findings from studies in other high-income settings where younger populations show elevated risk behaviours such as limited condom use and multiple partners [17]. The observed sex distribution, with higher chlamydia incidence among females but greater syphilis and HIV among males, mirrors Canadian surveillance data and global epidemiological trends [1]. The protective association seen with male sex (IRR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.94–0.94) may reflect gendered patterns in healthcare-seeking behaviour and testing rather than biological differences, as routine screening programs more often target sexually active women [18].
Our results also identified street involvement, previous STBBI diagnosis, and multiple sexual partners as independent predictors of infection, consistent with findings from both national studies and global surveillance reports [17]. The Canadian Public Health Association has identified unstable housing, substance use, and transactional sex as key determinants of risk in urban centers [19]. Similarly, studies have reported that individuals experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity have two to three times higher odds of acquiring STIs compared with the general population [20–23]. These consistent patterns highlight the structural and social determinants of STBBI vulnerability, reinforcing the need for interventions that extend beyond biomedical treatment to address social inequities.
In response to these challenges, the introduction of Street Outreach and Intervention Worker (SOIW) programs in Regina aligns with evidence-based harm reduction and outreach models used in other Canadian contexts. The Edmonton initiative showed measurable increases in testing and linkage to care among high-risk and hard-to-reach populations [24]. Similarly, mobile testing and peer-supported outreach interventions have been effective in increasing testing among low-resource settings and priority populations globally [25]. These study findings suggest that Regina’s adoption of a similar model effectively complements traditional clinic-based care, especially for populations disproportionately affected by STBBIs.
The overlap between the COVID-19 pandemic and the rise in syphilis cases requires careful consideration. Around the world, many jurisdictions reported disruptions to sexual health services during the pandemic due to resource reallocation and clinic closures [26]. The temporary drop in chlamydia and gonorrhea cases seen in our results may partly result from reduced screening opportunities rather than an actual decrease in transmission. Post-pandemic monitoring has shown quick rebounds in case numbers once regular services resumed [16, 27]. These trends highlight the importance of maintaining access to services and adopting innovative care models such as telehealth, self-testing, and community-based testing to ensure continued progress in STBBI prevention and treatment.
Despite robust surveillance methods, several limitations should be recognized. Our analysis was based on reported and tested cases; therefore, undiagnosed infections likely remain underrepresented. Additionally, behavioural data were self-reported, introducing potential reporting bias. Nonetheless, this study provides valuable local evidence to inform targeted interventions in Regina and similar urban centers. Overall, the findings highlight the intersection of biomedical, social, and structural determinants driving STBBI transmission. The growing burden of syphilis and persistent disparities across geographical and demographic subgroups underscore the need for continued public health investment in outreach, education, and testing infrastructure. Sustained cross-sectoral collaboration, supported by community engagement and integrated care pathways, remains essential for reversing these upward trends and achieving provincial and national STBBI reduction targets.
Conclusion
STBBIs continue to be a significant public health issue in Regina, with a notably rapid increase in syphilis cases from 2019 to 2024. This health concern shows uneven distribution, characterized by higher rates among younger adults and in specific geographic areas. Social and structural factors, including street involvement, inadequate housing, and participation in sexual risk behaviours, influence its prevalence.
The findings underscore the importance of targeted, community-focused strategies, including specialized STBBI clinics and outreach programs such as Street Outreach and Intervention Workers, to improve testing, linkage to care, and ongoing support for priority populations. Continuous efforts in surveillance, integrated service delivery, and multisectoral collaboration will be essential in preventing further increases in STBBIs and in meeting provincial and national goals for STBBI prevention and control.
Abbreviations
- BBV
Blood-borne viruses
- IRR
Incidence Risk Ratio
- QI
Quality Improvement
- REB
Research Ethics Board
- SOIW
Street Outreach and Intervention Worker
- STTBI
Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections
Appendix 1
Table 4.
Univariate analysis of age by disease
| Chlamydia | Gonorrhea | HIV | Hepatitis B | Hepatitis C | Syphilis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | 4583 | 1847 | 230 | 170 | 476 | 1255 |
| Mean | 25.3 | 28.5 | 35.3 | 40.4 | 38.3 | 32.2 |
| Std. deviation | 8.0 | 9.1 | 11.2 | 12.7 | 13.0 | 10.9 |
| Mean | 25.3 | 28.5 | 35.3 | 40.4 | 38.3 | 32.2 |
| Median | 23 | 27 | 34 | 40 | 37 | 31 |
| Mode | 20 | 26 | 32 | 42 | 43 | 33 |
| Range | 68 | 72 | 76 | 72 | 75 | 86 |
Appendix 2
Table 5.
Risk factor counts by individual STBBI diseases
| Chlamydia | Gonococcal | Hepatitis B | Hepatitis C | HIV | Syphilis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STI-related risk factors | ||||||
| Sex without protective barriers | 943 | 283 | 6 | 1588 | ||
| Sex with two or more partners in the last three months | 1200 | 553 | 2 | 46 | 3 | 677 |
| Sex with an anonymous partner | 634 | 404 | 1 | 67 | 614 | |
| Cases meeting partners online | 346 | 168 | 13 | 230 | ||
| Sex with a known case | 136 | 43 | 5 | 60 | 21 | 357 |
| BBV-related risk factors | ||||||
| Cases with a history of non-injectable substance use | 5 | 2 | 1 | 86 | 13 | 1056 |
| Cases with a history of injectable substance use | 99 | 112 | ||||
| Cases who are street-involved | 11 | 10 | 1 | 23 | 342 | |
Authors’ contributions
PM, HB, and OM conceived the idea for the manuscript and led the analysis and writing. MT, AS, and OM were involved in pulling, cleaning, and analyzing the Panorama data. PM, HB, OM, MH, CB, MT, AS, MS and TD were involved in various aspects of STBBI public health programming in the Regina area. They were also involved in drafting and revising the final version of the manuscript. All authors participated in preparing the final draft of the manuscript, revising it, and critically evaluating its intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any funding.
Data availability
Aggregated data used during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was part of a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative and, as such, did not undergo formal ethical review by a Research Ethics Board (REB).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Factsheets. 2023. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis).
- 2.Saskatchewan Ministry of Health. Saskatchewan’s HIV Strategy 2010–2014, Saskatchewan’s HIV Strategy. Regina. 2010. Available from: https://skhiv.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/SKHIV-Strategy-2010-2014.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2025.
- 3.Garcia MR, Leslie SW, Wray AA. In: StatPearls, editor. Sexually transmitted infections. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center Creighton University School of Medicine: StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560808/. [PubMed]
- 4.Public Health Agency of Canada. A Pan-Canadian Framework for Action: Reducing the Health Impact of Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections in Canada by 2030. Ottawa, ON; 2018. Available from: https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/aspc-phac/HP40-214-2018-eng.pdf.
- 5.Kroeger K, Torrone E, Nelson R. Assessment: a core function for implementing effective interventions in sexually transmitted disease control programs. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(2):S3-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Public Health Agency of Canada. Report on sexually transmitted infection surveillance in Canada. 2019. 2021. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/report-sexually-transmitted-infection-surveillance-canada-2019.html.
- 7.Du M, Yan W, Jing W, Qin C, Liu Q, Liu M et al. Increasing incidence rates of sexually transmitted infections from 2010 to 2019: an analysis of temporal trends by geographical regions and age groups from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):1–16. Available from: 10.1186/s12879-022-07544-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Geretti AM, Mardh O, De Vries HJC, Winter A, McSorley J, Seguy N, et al. Sexual transmission of infections across europe: appraising the present, scoping the future. Sex Transm Infect. 2022;98(6):451–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pollock ED, Clay PA, Kreisel KM, Spicknall IH. Estimated incidence and prevalence of gonorrhea in the united States, 2006–2019. Sex Transm Dis. 2023;50(4):188–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peeling RW, Mabey D, Kamb ML, Chen XS, Radolf JD, Benzaken AS. Syphilis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3(1):17073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stoltey JE, Cohen SE. Syphilis transmission: a review of the current evidence. Sex Health. 2015;12(2):103–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control. Syphilis in Canada, Technical Report on Epidemiological Trends, Determinants and Interventions., Public Health Agency of Canada. 2020. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/services/health/publications/diseases-conditions/syphilis-epidemiological-report.html.
- 13.Aho J, Lybeck C, Tetteh A, Issa C, Kouyoumdjian F, Wong J, et al. Rising syphilis rates in Canada, 2011–2020. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2022;47(2–3):52–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Choudhri Y, Miller J, Sandhu J, Leon A, Aho J. Infectious and congenital syphilis in Canada, 2010–2015. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018;44(2):43–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.eHealthSaskatchewan P. Panorama. 2022. Available from: https://www.ehealthsask.ca/services/panorama. Cited 5 Jul 2022.
- 16.Public Health Agency of Canada. Infectious syphilis and congenital syphilis in Canada. Ottawa: PHAC. 2023. Available from: https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2025/aspc-phac/HP37-48-2023-eng.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2025.
- 17.Tao X, Ghanem KG, Page KR, Gilliams E, Tuddenham S. Risk factors predictive of sexually transmitted infection diagnosis in young compared to older patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Int J STD AIDS. 2020;31(2):142–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sonnenberg P, Clifton S, Beddows S, Field N, Soldan K, Tanton C, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and uptake of interventions for sexually transmitted infections in britain: findings from the National surveys of sexual attitudes and lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet. 2013;382(9907):1795–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Canadian Public Health Association. Framework for a Public Health Approach to Substance Use. The Voice of Public Health. 2024. Available from: https://www.cpha.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/policy/positionstatements/2024-PHASU-PolicyStatement-e.pdf. Accessed 01 Jan 2025.
- 20.Beijer U, Wolf A, Fazel S. Prevalence of tuberculosis, hepatitis C virus, and HIV in homeless people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(11):859–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Clemenzi-Allen AA, Hartogensis W, Cohen SE, Gandhi M, Geng E, Christopoulos K. Evaluating the impact of housing status on gonorrhea and chlamydia screening in an HIV primary care setting. Sex Transm Dis. 2019;46(3):153–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Davis A, Goddard-Eckrich D, Dasgupta A, El-Bassel N. Risk factors associated with sexually transmitted infections among women under community supervision in New York City. Int J STD AIDS. 2018;29(8):766–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Waddell CJ, Saldana CS, Schoonveld MM, Meehan AA, Lin CK, Butler JC, et al. Infectious diseases among people experiencing homelessness: a systematic review of the literature in the United States and Canada, 2003–2022. Public Health Reports®. 2024;139(5):532–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Niruban J, Meyer G, Parker P, Gratrix J, Smyczek P. P320 incentive testing and treatment for STBBI in hard to reach populations in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Poster presentations. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2019: A1711–171.
- 25.Sundararajan R, Ponticiello M, Nansera D, Jeremiah K, Muyindike W. Interventions to increase HIV testing uptake in global settings. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022;19(3):184–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ryu H, Blaque E, Stewart M, Anand P, Gómez-Ramírez O, MacKinnon KR, et al. Disruptions of sexually transmitted and blood borne infections testing services during the COVID-19 pandemic: accounts of service providers in Ontario, Canada. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, et al. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(4):1–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Aggregated data used during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

