Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1994 Sep;87(9):523–525.

A comparison of the attitudes shown by general practitioners, hospital doctors and medical students towards alternative medicine.

M R Perkin 1, R M Pearcy 1, J S Fraser 1
PMCID: PMC1294769  PMID: 7932459

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare and contrast the views of general practitioners (GPs), hospital doctors and medical students to alternative medicine. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 100 GPs and 100 hospital doctors in the South West Thames Regional Health Authority (SWTRHA). A convenience sample of 237 pre-clinical medical students at St George's Hospital Medical School was also given a questionnaire. Eighty-seven GPs and 81 hospital doctors replied. Five therapies were investigated: acupuncture; chiropractice; homeopathy; naturopathy; and osteopathy. All respondents were asked about their attitude towards and knowledge of these therapies. Doctors were asked how often they referred patients for such treatment and whether they practised it themselves. GPs and hospital doctors had similar levels of knowledge of the therapies. Medical students were the least informed but the most enthusiastic respondents. Seventy per cent of hospital doctors and 93% of GPs had, on at least one occasion, suggested a referral for alternative treatment. GPs were making these referrals more frequently and earlier. Twelve per cent of hospital doctors and 20% of GPs were practising alternative medicine. The majority of the respondents felt that alternative medicine should be available on the National Health Service (NHS) and that medical students should receive some tuition about alternative therapies. A considerable proportion of those doctors referring patients to alternative practitioners were ignorant of their official qualifications.

Full text

PDF
523

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson E., Anderson P. General practitioners and alternative medicine. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Feb;37(295):52–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ernst E. From alternative to complementary: changing the view on the fringe. 1993 Sep 15-Oct 5Br J Hosp Med. 50(6):299–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Himmel W., Schulte M., Kochen M. M. Complementary medicine: are patients' expectations being met by their general practitioners? Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Jun;43(371):232–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kleijnen J., Knipschild P., ter Riet G. Clinical trials of homoeopathy. BMJ. 1991 Feb 9;302(6772):316–323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6772.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knipschild P. Trials and errors. BMJ. 1993 Jun 26;306(6894):1706–1707. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6894.1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lowry S. Curriculum design. BMJ. 1992 Dec 5;305(6866):1409–1411. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maxwell R. J. The Osteopaths Bill. BMJ. 1993 Jun 12;306(6892):1556–1557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6892.1556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Meade T. W., Dyer S., Browne W., Townsend J., Frank A. O. Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment. BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1431–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pietroni P. C. Beyond the boundaries: relationship between general practice and complementary medicine. BMJ. 1992 Sep 5;305(6853):564–566. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6853.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reilly D. T. Young doctors' views on alternative medicine. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jul 30;287(6388):337–339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6388.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wharton R., Lewith G. Complementary medicine and the general practitioner. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 7;292(6534):1498–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6534.1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES