Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Childbirth is a transformative experience with lasting psychological and emotional effects. Evidence shows that birth experience influences maternal outcomes such as breastfeeding self-efficacy, mother–infant bonding, and postpartum depression, yet these associations in low-risk births remain insufficiently explored. This study examined how birth satisfaction relates to early postpartum maternal well-being.
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Lithuania among 218 women who experienced low-risk deliveries. Data collection occurred between September 2022 and July 2024. The present analysis is based on data collected at 6–8 weeks postpartum. Standardized instruments were used to assess birth satisfaction (BSS-R), breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSES-SF), mother–infant bonding (MIBS), and postpartum depressive symptoms (EPDS). Mann–Whitney U tests and linear regression models were applied, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
A positive birth experience was associated with stronger mother–infant bonding (less resentment, disappointment, and aggression; all p≤0.003) and higher protective emotions (p=0.025). These women also reported higher breastfeeding self-efficacy, including confidence in milk intake, latch, and managing difficulties (all p≤0.012). Negative experiences were linked to higher postpartum depressive symptoms (EPDS p=0.014), particularly anxiety and reduced enjoyment (both p≤0.008). Birth satisfaction predicted breastfeeding self-efficacy (R2=0.34; β=0.34, p<0.001, 95% CI: 0.63–1.39) and bonding (R2=0.30; β= -0.30, p<0.001, 95% CI: -0.16 – -0.07) but only weakly predicted postpartum depression (R2=0.09).
CONCLUSIONS
A positive birth experience is associated with stronger mother–infant bonding and higher breastfeeding self-efficacy. Although linked to fewer depressive symptoms, its predictive value for postpartum depression was limited, indicating the importance of additional psychosocial determinants.
ABBREVIATIONS
BSS-R: Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised, BSES-SF: Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form, MIBS: Mother-Infant Bonding Scale, EPDS: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
KEYWORDS: birth experience, breastfeeding self-efficacy, mother–infant bonding, postpartum depression, low-risk childbirth
INTRODUCTION
Childbirth is a significant event in a woman’s life, with long-lasting psychological and physical effects1. In addition to physical changes, birth is a complex experience with significant emotional and psychological components that impact postnatal recovery, mother–infant bonding, mother self-confidence, and mental health1,2. Despite its importance, the psychological impact of childbirth remains underexplored compared to its medical aspects.
The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes the importance of a positive birth experience as a core element of maternity care3. Higher maternal satisfaction, enhanced mother–infant bonding, and more effective breastfeeding are closely associated with a positive birth experience4. Conversely, negative birth experiences have been linked to increased stress, the likelihood of traumatic birth, and postpartum depression – all of which may undermine maternal–infant bonding and overall maternal well-being5-7.
While previous research has primarily focused on physiological and clinical aspects, such as pain management, the effectiveness of medical interventions, and the reduction of the risk of obstetric complications8,9, psychological aspects of childbirth often receive insufficient attention, even though they are critical. Emotional subjective experiences during childbirth significantly affect maternal–infant bonding and maternal mental health10-13.
Postnatal depression affects approximately 10–20% of mothers in the first year postpartum, affecting not only maternal well-being but also child behavioral, emotional, and cognitive development2,13. In Lithuania, the number of officially registered cases is significantly lower. In 2022, only 0.18% of births were officially recorded as postnatal depression cases, suggesting that many cases remain undiagnosed14. This discrepancy suggests potential underdiagnosis, highlighting the need for a better understanding of maternal psychological well-being in the postnatal period15.
The birth experience is shaped not only by clinical events but also by subjective factors such as a sense of control, emotional support, access to information, and the overall birth environment – all of which are crucial to determining outcomes7,16. Research suggests that mothers who feel empowered and actively involved in decision-making during childbirth are more likely to have a positive birth experience, even when medical interventions are required7,16-18.
Furthermore, early postnatal interaction between mother and infant is crucial for establishing maternal–infant bonding and initiating breastfeeding4,19. Skin-to-skin contact during breastfeeding induces the release of oxytocin and strengthens the mother–infant bonding19,20. Mothers who define their birth experiences as positive are not only more inclined to initiate breastfeeding but also to breastfeed for longer21. Maternal mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, however, may affect the success of breastfeeding22.
Despite substantial research on birth experiences, studies integrating their effects on breastfeeding self-efficacy, mother–infant bonding, and postnatal depression remain limited. Understanding how these factors interact can provide valuable insights into improving maternal care and postnatal outcomes.
This study aims to evaluate the associations between birth experience and maternal outcomes, focusing on breastfeeding self-efficacy, mother–infant bonding, and postpartum depression in low-risk deliveries.
METHODS
Study design and participants
This cross-sectional study is part of a larger research project evaluating various aspects of the postpartum period among women with low-risk childbirth23. The present analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of childbirth experience on maternal outcomes. In this study, maternal outcomes are defined as key indicators of maternal well-being, including mother–infant bonding, postpartum depressive symptoms, and breastfeeding self-efficacy.
Data collection occurred between September 2022 and July 2024 at 6–8 weeks postpartum. The study included women aged ≥18 years who were fluent in Lithuanian and experienced low-risk deliveries. Low-risk delivery was defined in accordance with the national methodology for normal childbirth24, referring to spontaneous term labor without obstetric or medical complications and with a minimal likelihood of medical interventions. Women whose deliveries transitioned from low-risk to intermediate or high-risk during labor or delivery, were excluded.
The study was conducted in two Lithuanian hospitals – a university hospital and a regional hospital – both of which provide maternity care for women with low-risk deliveries. These hospitals were selected to ensure a diverse clinical population and to reflect the maternity care settings available in Lithuania. Both hospitals manage low-risk deliveries within the framework of standard perinatal care, allowing for the examination of maternal experiences in routine childbirth settings.
Eligible participants were identified through hospital records and invited to participate by the research team during their postpartum hospital stay. A total of 218 women provided complete data at 6–8 weeks postpartum and were included in the present analysis. As this analysis was conducted within a broader research project, the sample size was predetermined based on methodological considerations for the main study; therefore, a separate sample size calculation was not performed for the present cross-sectional analysis.
Data collection
Data for the present study were collected at 6–8 weeks postpartum using an online questionnaire. Participants who agreed to take part in the study provided their contact information and received a link to the questionnaire by email. They were instructed to complete the questionnaires independently in a quiet environment to avoid external influence. All responses were submitted electronically, ensuring confidentiality and data protection.
To maintain data quality, incomplete questionnaires were excluded from the analysis. The questionnaires were designed to be user-friendly, and participants were encouraged to contact the research team with any questions or concerns.
Measurement
The data were collected using a subset of the questionnaire from a comprehensive survey developed by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM)23. Five standardized questionnaires were employed. These instruments were selected based on their validity and relevance to key aspects of the study, including birth experience, postpartum mental health, breastfeeding confidence, and mother–infant bonding. Table 1 provides an overview of the questionnaires, including their scoring systems and specific roles within this study.
Table 1.
Overview of questionnaires used in the study, Lithuania, September 2022–July 2024 (N=218)
| Questionnaire | Purpose | Items |
Scoring
range |
|---|---|---|---|
| BSES-SF | Measures breastfeeding self-efficacy | 14 | 14–70 |
| MIBS | Assesses mother–infant bonding | 8 | 0–24 |
| EPDS | Screens for postpartum depression symptoms | 10 | 0–30 |
| BSS-R | Measures satisfaction with the childbirth experience | 10 | 10–50 |
BSES-SF: Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale–Short Form. MIBS: Mother–Infant Bonding Scale. EPDS: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. BSS-R: Birth Satisfaction Scale–Revised.
The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale–Short Form (BSES-SF) was utilized to measure women’s confidence in their ability to breastfeed successfully. The scale, developed initially and psychometrically assessed by Dennis25, consists of 14 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores indicate greater confidence in breastfeeding self-efficacy25.
The Mother–Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS) was used to assess mothers’ emotional responses toward their infants during the postnatal period. Developed by Taylor et al.26, the MIBS is an 8-item self-report scale designed to screen for early bonding difficulties. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (‘not at all’) to 3 (‘very much’), with total scores ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate greater emotional difficulties in the mother–infant bond26.
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), developed by Cox et al.27, was used to screen for symptoms of postnatal depression in women after childbirth. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of postnatal depression27. The scale has been extensively validated across different populations, including Lithuania28.
The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R), a validated multi-dimensional measure developed by Hollins-Martin and Martin29, assessed women’s satisfaction with their childbirth experience. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (‘strongly disagree’) to 4 (‘strongly agree’), with total scores ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the childbirth experience29. The participants were divided into two groups based on their childbirth experience: those with a positive experience and those with a negative experience. The groups were classified according to the BSS-R scale: Negative experience (BSS-R<28 points) and Positive experience (BSS-R ≥28 points)29.
The standardized questionnaires (MIBS, BSES-SF, and BSS-R) were translated and culturally adapted from English into Lithuanian with permission from the original authors. The translation process followed the ISPOR Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, including forward translation, back translation, expert review, and iterative refinement to ensure semantic and conceptual equivalence. The adapted measures were then tested in a sample of postpartum women to assess comprehensibility, refine phrasing for clarity, and confirm cultural relevance.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of the study data was performed using SPSS/W 29.0. Descriptive statistics were applied, with results presented as frequencies (n) and percentages (%). For quantitative variables, the mean and standard deviation (SD), minimum, maximum, and median were calculated. Comparative statistics were used to test statistical hypotheses. Main study variables included birth satisfaction (BSS-R), breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSES-SF), mother–infant bonding (MIBS), postpartum depressive symptoms (EPDS), and sociodemographic characteristics (maternal age, education level, marital status, and parity). As only simple linear regression models were applied, no covariates or potential confounders were included in the analyses. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare the distributions of non-parametric variables between two independent samples. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical sociodemographic variables between groups. The relationships between birth satisfaction (BSS-R) and each maternal outcome (MIBS, BSES-SF, and EPDS) were analyzed using simple linear regression models. No multivariable regression models were applied in the present analysis. Model fit was assessed by calculating the coefficient of determination (R2), variance inflation factor (VIF), Cook’s distance, and maximum DFBeta values. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 218 women participated in the study. The mean age of participants was 31.0 ± 4.6 years. Among them, 45% (n=98) reported a positive birth experience and 55% (n=120) reported a negative birth experience. Most participants had non-university education (59.6%), were married (81.2%), and slightly more than half were multiparous (53.2%). No statistically significant differences were found between women with positive and negative birth experiences across sociodemographic characteristics, including age, education level, marital status, and parity (all p>0.05). These results are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants according to birth experience, Lithuania, 2022–2024 (N=218)
| Characteristics |
Total
n (%) |
Birth experience | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Negative
n (%) |
Positive
n (%) |
|||
| Total, n | 218 | 120 | 98 | |
| Maternal age (years), mean ± SD | 31.00 ± 4.6 | 31.41 ± 4.6 | 30.58 ± 4.6 | 0.128 |
| Education level | ||||
| Primary/secondary/vocational | 53 (24.3) | 27 (22.5) | 26 (26.5) | 0.285 |
| Higher non-university | 130 (59.6) | 77 (64.2) | 53 (54.1) | |
| Higher university | 35 (16.1) | 16 (13.3) | 19 (19.4) | |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 177 (81.2) | 95 (79.2) | 82 (83.7) | 0.698 |
| Cohabitation | 38 (17.4) | 23 (19.2) | 15 (15.3) | |
| Single/divorced | 3 (1.4) | 2 (1.6) | 1 (1.0) | |
| Parity | ||||
| Nulliparous | 102 (46.8) | 57 (47.5) | 45 (45.9) | 0.614 |
| Multiparous | 116 (53.2) | 63 (52.5) | 53 (54.1) | |
P-values for education level, marital status, and parity were calculated using the chi-squared test; maternal age was compared between groups using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Mothers with a positive birth experience reported significantly stronger maternal–infant bonding, as indicated by lower levels of resentment (p=0.003), disappointment (p<0.001), and aggressive feelings toward the infant (p=0.001), as well as higher protective emotions (p=0.025) compared to those with negative birth experiences. These results are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
Mother–infant bonding (MIBS) scores according to birth experience, Lithuania, 2022–2024 (N=218)
| MIBS statements | Birth experience | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Negative
(N=120) Mean ± SD |
Positive
(N=98) Mean ± SD |
||
| Loving | 0.07 ± 0.3 | 0.06 ± 0.4 | 0.076 |
| Resentful | 0.25 ± 0.6 | 0.10 ± 0.5 | 0.003 |
| Neutral or felt nothing | 0.13 ± 0.3 | 0.09 ± 0.3 | 0.340 |
| Joyful | 0.45 ± 0.6 | 0.35 ± 0.6 | 0.133 |
| Dislike | 0.22 ± 0.7 | 0.19 ± 0.4 | 0.218 |
| Protective | 0.29 ± 0.6 | 0.13 ± 0.4 | 0.025 |
| Disappointed | 0.27 ± 0.4 | 0.06 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| Aggressive | 0.10 ± 0.3 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.001 |
MIBS: Mother–Infant Bonding Scale; score range 0–24, higher scores indicate greater bonding difficulties. Negative birth experience: BSS-R<28. Positive birth experience: BSS-R ≥28. Statistical comparisons performed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Linear regression analysis demonstrated that birth satisfaction (BSS-R) was a significant predictor of mother–infant bonding (MIBS) (R2=0.30; β= -0.30, p<0.001, 95% CI: -0.16 – -0.07). The relationship between birth satisfaction and mother–infant bonding is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Linear regression between birth satisfaction and mother–infant bonding, Lithuania, 2022–2024 (N=218)
Breastfeeding self-efficacy was significantly higher among mothers who reported a positive birth experience. These mothers exhibited greater confidence in ensuring adequate milk intake (p<0.001), achieving proper latch (p=0.012), and managing breastfeeding challenges (p<0.001). Additionally, they reported higher confidence in handling the time demands of breastfeeding (p=0.003) and maintaining consistency in feeding (p=0.033). These results are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4.
Breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSES-SF) scores according to birth experience, Lithuania, 2022–2024 (N=218)
| BSES-SF statements | Birth experience | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Negative
(N=120) Mean ± SD |
Positive
(N=98) Mean ± SD |
||
| Determine that my baby is getting enough milk | 3.63 ± 1.0 | 4.14 ± 1.1 | <0.001 |
| Successfully cope with breastfeeding like I have with other challenging tasks | 3.47 ± 1.1 | 3.92 ± 1.2 | <0.001 |
| Breastfeed my baby without using formula as a supplement | 3.83 ± 1.5 | 4.13 ± 1.4 | 0.146 |
| Ensure that my baby is properly latched on for the whole feeding | 3.50 ± 1.4 | 3.95 ± 1.3 | 0.012 |
| Manage the breastfeeding situation to my satisfaction | 3.49 ± 1.3 | 4.17 ± 1.3 | <0.001 |
| Manage to breastfeed even if my baby is crying | 3.43 ± 1.3 | 3.91 ± 1.2 | 0.005 |
| Keep wanting to breastfeed | 3.69 ± 1.4 | 4.06 ± 1.3 | 0.037 |
| Comfortably breastfeed with my family members present | 3.57 ± 1.4 | 3.78 ± 1.3 | 0.357 |
| Be satisfied with my breastfeeding experience | 3.42 ± 1.4 | 4.10 ± 1.1 | <0.001 |
| Deal with the fact that breastfeeding can be time-consuming | 3.74 ± 1.4 | 4.23 ± 1.2 | 0.003 |
| Finish feeding my baby on one breast before switching to the other breast | 3.67 ± 1.4 | 4.00 ± 1.2 | 0.140 |
| Continue to breastfeed my baby for every feeding | 3.93 ± 1.5 | 4.30 ± 1.3 | 0.033 |
| Manage to keep up with my baby’s breastfeeding demands | 3.81 ± 1.5 | 4.27 ± 1.3 | 0.012 |
| Tell when my baby is finished breastfeeding | 3.66 ± 1.3 | 4.17 ± 1.3 | <0.001 |
| Overall | 50.83 ± 16.6 | 57.13 ±15.1 | 0.001 |
BSES-SF: Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale–Short Form; score range 14–70, higher scores indicate greater breastfeeding self-efficacy. Negative birth experience: BSS-R<28. Positive birth experience: BSS-R ≥28. Statistical comparisons performed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Birth satisfaction predicted breastfeeding self-efficacy. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that birth satisfaction (BSS-R) was a significant predictor of breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSES-SF) (R2=0.34; β=0.34, p<0.001, 95% CI: 0.63–1.39). The relationship between birth satisfaction and breastfeeding self-efficacy is illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Linear regression between birth satisfaction and breastfeeding self-efficacy, Lithuania, 2022–2024 (N=218)
Participants with negative birth experiences had significantly higher EPDS scores (7.01 ± 3.4) compared to those with positive experiences (5.74 ± 3.3; p=0.014). Symptoms of anxiety (p=0.008) and reduced enjoyment of daily activities (p<0.001) were particularly pronounced. Thoughts of self-harm were rare and did not show significant differences between the groups. These results are summarized in Table 5. Regression analysis revealed that birth experience (BSS-R) was not a significant predictor of postpartum depressive symptoms (EPDS) (R2=0.09).
Table 5.
Postpartum depressive symptoms (EPDS) according to birth experience, Lithuania, 2022–2024 (N=218)
| EPDS statements | Birth experience | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Negative
(N=120) Mean ± SD |
Positive
(N=98) Mean ± SD |
||
| I have been able to laugh and see the funny side of things | 0.20 ± 0.4 | 0.10 ± 0.3 | 0.064 |
| I have looked forward with enjoyment to things | 0.30 ± 0.5 | 0.08 ± 0.3 | <0.001 |
| I have blamed myself unnecessarily when things went wrong | 1.27 ± 0.9 | 1.19 ± 0.9 | 0.464 |
| I have been anxious or worried for no good reason | 1.83 ± 0.8 | 1.52 ± 0.9 | 0.008 |
| I have felt scared or panicky for no good reason | 1.27 ± 1.0 | 0.98 ± 0.9 | 0.066 |
| Things have been getting to me | 0.80 ± 0.7 | 0.70 ± 0.7 | 0.255 |
| I have been so unhappy that I have had difficulty sleeping | 0.22 ± 0.4 | 0.14 ± 0.4 | 0.203 |
| I have felt sad or miserable | 0.56 ± 0.6 | 0.49 ± 0.5 | 0.417 |
| I have been so unhappy that I have been crying | 0.06 ± 0.6 | 0.49 ± 0.5 | 0.490 |
| The thought of harming myself has occurred to me | 0.01 ± 0.1 | 0.04 ± 0.2 | 0.112 |
| Overall | 7.01 ± 3.4 | 5.74 ± 3.3 | 0.014 |
EPDS: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; score range 0–30, higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. Negative birth experience: BSS-R <28. Positive birth experience: BSS-R ≥28. Statistical comparisons performed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study underscore the association between birth experience and both mother–infant bonding and breastfeeding self-efficacy.
Our results showed that mothers who had a positive birth experience had a stronger emotional bond with their infant, with lower levels of negative emotions such as frustration and resentment. Protective emotions were also significantly higher, while feelings of aggression toward the baby were almost nonexistent in the positive birth experience group. These findings suggest that a positive birth experience may foster a stronger mother–infant emotional bond. It is consistent with findings from previous studies that maternal satisfaction with childbirth is associated with better emotional interactions with the infant and lower expressions of hostility30,31. Conversely, negative birth experiences can weaken the bond between mother and infant. Reviews have shown that women who rated their birth experience as negative were more likely to experience frustration, hostility, and emotional detachment32. In addition, it was observed that mothers who felt disempowered to make decisions or experienced a lack of control during childbirth were more likely to report a weaker bond with their infant33. This suggests that the objective parameters of childbirth and the mother’s subjective perception of the experience may significantly impact the early mother–infant bond.
Breastfeeding plays a crucial role in a mother’s confidence in her ability to care for her infant31,34. Our analysis revealed that a positive birth experience was a significant predictor of breastfeeding confidence, indicating that mothers who felt empowered and supported during childbirth were more confident in their ability to breastfeed successfully. This can be explained through the lens of successful experiences, which enhance a person’s confidence in their abilities31,34. The support received during childbirth, and the opportunity to be actively involved in decision-making, may strengthen the mother’s self-efficacy, which, in turn, reflects her confidence in her ability to breastfeed31,34. Our study showed that women with a positive birth experience demonstrated significantly higher confidence levels in breastfeeding across a range of dimensions. They were more confident in their ability to ensure adequate latch-on during breastfeeding, to effectively address feeding challenges, and to recognize their baby’s nutritional needs. These findings support previous research showing that a positive birth experience is associated with higher breastfeeding self-efficacy and a higher likelihood of continuing breastfeeding for longer35.
The experience of childbirth has long been considered one of the most important factors influencing a mother’s emotional state after childbirth10,18,32. The results of this study showed that women who had a negative birth experience were significantly more likely to experience increased symptoms of postnatal depression, particularly anxiety and reduced enjoyment of daily activities. These results are aligned with previous research suggesting that negative birth experiences may increase the risk of postnatal depression, particularly if women experience a lack of control, fear, or lack of emotional support during childbirth32. While these findings align with previous studies, some research suggests that the strongest risk factors for postpartum depression include psychosocial stressors, history of mental illness, and lack of social support2,32,33. The relatively low predictive value of birth satisfaction for postpartum depression in our study suggests that additional factors should be considered when assessing maternal emotional well-being in the postpartum period33. Research also shows that symptoms of postnatal depression tend to be most strongly felt in the first weeks after birth33. This may explain why, in the present study, in which depressive symptoms were assessed at 6–8 weeks, the influence of the birth experience was already less expressed.
It is also essential to consider that only women with low-risk pregnancies were included in this study. Low-risk births tend to be associated with a lower possibility of medical interventions, better postnatal physical health, and a greater sense of autonomy during childbirth, which may lead to a lower incidence of postnatal depression3,9,10,32. In contrast, women who have experienced complicated or traumatic births are more likely to have a stronger emotional impact on the birth experience and are at higher risk of developing postpartum depression symptoms33. This may explain why the impact of birth experience on depression scores was less pronounced in this study than in a previous study that included higher-risk births36.
Strengths and limitations
This study provides comprehensive evidence on the impact of birth experience on mother–infant bonding, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and symptoms of postnatal depression. The use of validated instruments, such as the BSS-R, BSES-SF, MIBS, and EPDS, ensures the reliability of the results and facilitates comparisons with other international studies. Additionally, including only low-risk mothers reduces the influence of confounding factors, such as medical interventions or birth complications, allowing for a more precise assessment of the direct impact of birth experience on the analyzed aspects. The study is part of a broader research initiative and uses the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) methodology.
However, the study has some limitations. The study was conducted in only two Lithuanian hospitals, which limits the generalizability of the results to the broader national or international population. In addition, the study relied on self-reported data, which may have introduced information bias and potential misclassification. Furthermore, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Further research using larger and more diverse samples is needed to extend these findings.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that a positive birth experience is significantly associated with stronger mother–infant bonding and higher breastfeeding self-efficacy among women with low-risk deliveries. Women with positive birth experiences also reported fewer negative emotions toward their infant and greater confidence in breastfeeding. While negative birth experiences were linked to higher postpartum depressive symptoms, particularly anxiety and reduced enjoyment of daily activities, birth satisfaction had a weaker predictive value for postpartum depression than for mother–infant bonding and breastfeeding self-efficacy. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Funding Statement
FUNDING There was no source of funding for this research.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
ETHICAL APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT
Ethical approval was obtained from Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of the Kaunas region (Approval number: P1-BE-2-24/2022; Date: 21 July 2022). Participants provided informed consent.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data supporting this research are available from the authors on reasonable request.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
REFERENCES
- 1.Olza I, Leahy-Warren P, Benyamini Y, et al. Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e020347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saharoy R, Potdukhe A, Wanjari M, Taksande AB. Postpartum depression and maternal care: exploring the complex effects on mothers and infants. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41381. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization . WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization; 2018. Accessed February 10, 2026. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513809/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roth MC, Humphreys KL, King LS, Gotlib IH, Robakis TK. Breastfeeding difficulties predict mothers’ bonding with their infants from birth to age six months. Matern Child Health J. 2021;25(5):777-785. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03036-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ahmadpour P, Faroughi F, Mirghafourvand M. The relationship of childbirth experience with postpartum depression and anxiety: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01105-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shiva L, Desai G, Satyanarayana VA, Venkataram P, Chandra PS. Negative childbirth experience and post-traumatic stress disorder - a study among postpartum women in South India. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:640014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bagherinia M, Haseli A, Bagherinia E, Mansouri N, Dolatian M, Mahmoodi Z. Prevalence of negative birth experience: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07269-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fenaroli V, Molgora S, Dodaro S, et al. The childbirth experience: obstetric and psychological predictors in Italian primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2561-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Henshall BI, Grimes HA, Davis J, East CE. What is ‘physiological birth’? A scoping review of the perspectives of women and care providers. Midwifery. 2024;132:103964. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McKelvin G, Thomson G, Downe S. The childbirth experience: a systematic review of predictors and outcomes. Women Birth. 2021;34(5):407-416. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lehnig F, Nagl M, Stepan H, Wagner B, Kersting A. Associations of postpartum mother-infant bonding with maternal childhood maltreatment and postpartum mental health: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2426-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Power C, Williams C, Brown A. Does childbirth experience affect infant behaviour? Exploring the perceptions of maternity care providers. Midwifery. 2019;78:131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Carlson K, Mughal S, Azhar Y, Siddiqui W. Perinatal depression. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Updated 2025. Accessed February 27, 2026. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519070/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Institute of Hygiene . Gimimų medicininiai duomenys 2022. Medical data of births 2022. Institute of Hygiene; 2023. Accessed February 27, 2026. https://www.hi.lt/uploads/Statistikos_leidiniai_Gimimai/gimimai_2022.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sanni SO, Adeoye IA, Bella-Awusah TT, Bello OO. Influence of postpartum depression on maternal-infant bonding and breastfeeding practices among mothers in Abeokuta, Ogun state. Discov Ment Health. 2024;4(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00104-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Leinweber J, Fontein-Kuipers Y, Karlsdottir SI, et al. Developing a woman-centered, inclusive definition of positive childbirth experiences: a discussion paper. Birth. 2023;50(2):362-383. doi: 10.1111/birt.12666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang S, Liu J, Guo N, Jiang H. The relationship between birthing related factors and maternal breastfeeding confidence in China. Women Birth. 2021;34(2):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chabbert M, Panagiotou D, Wendland J. Predictive factors of women’s subjective perception of childbirth experience: a systematic review of the literature. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;39(1):43-66. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2020.1748582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Feng X, Zhang Y. Effects of mother-infant skin-to-skin contact on mother-infant relationship and maternal psychology feelings: a qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2024;11(6):e2181. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nagel EM, Howland MA, Pando C, et al. Maternal psychological distress and lactation and breastfeeding outcomes: a narrative review. Clin Ther. 2022;44(2):215-227. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Davis AMB, Sclafani V. Birth Experiences, breastfeeding, and the mother-child relationship: evidence from a large sample of mothers. Can J Nurs Res. 2022;54(4):518-529. doi: 10.1177/08445621221089475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yuen M, Hall OJ, Masters GA, et al. The effects of breastfeeding on maternal mental health: a systematic review. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022;31(6):787-807. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lietuvos Respublikos sveikatos apsaugos ministerija . Normalus gimdymas. Metodika. SAM. July 13, 2019. Accessed February 27, 2026. https://sam.lrv.lt/uploads/sam/documents/files/Akus%CC%8Cerine%CC%87%20metodika_Normalus%20gimdymas_SAM_2019%2007%2013.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 24.International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) . Pregnancy and childbirth data collection reference guide; 2016. Updated April 10, 2017. Accessed February 27, 2026. https://ichom.org/files/medical-conditions/pregnancy-and-childbirth/pregnancy-childbirth-reference-guide.pdf
- 25.Dennis CL. The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale: psychometric assessment of the short form. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32(6):734-744. doi: 10.1177/0884217503258459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Taylor A, Atkins R, Kumar R, Adams D, Glover V. A new Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale: links with early maternal mood. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005;8(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00737-005-0074-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782-786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bunevičius A, Kusminskas L, Bunevičius R. Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Medicina. 2009;45(7):544–548. doi: 10.3390/medicina45070072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014;30(6):610-619. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Devita S, Deforges C, Bickle-Graz M, Tolsa JF, Sandoz V, Horsch A. Maternal childbirth-related posttraumatic stress symptoms, bonding, and infant development: a prospective study. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2025;43(3):718-732. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2023.2261057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tseng JF, Chen SR, Au HK, et al. Effectiveness of an integrated breastfeeding education program to improve self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding rate: a single-blind, randomised controlled study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;111:103770. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hutchens BF, Kearney J. Risk factors for postpartum depression: an umbrella review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65(1):96-108. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Batt MM, Duffy KA, Novick AM, Metcalf CA, Epperson CN. Is postpartum depression different from depression occurring outside of the perinatal period? A review of the evidence. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2020;18(2):106-119. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Çimen BÜ, Topal CΑ, Boztepe H. Relationship between breastfeeding self-efficacy, breastfeeding motivation, and self-esteem. Mediterr Nurs Midwifery. 2024;4(2):105–111. doi: 10.4274/mnm.2023.23173 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brani P, Mrvoljak-Theodoropoulou I, Pechlivani F, et al. Mothers’ breastfeeding self-efficacy after a high-risk or normal pregnancy: a greek longitudinal cohort study. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024;14(6):1803-1820. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14060119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Brubaker LH, Paul IM, Repke JT, Kjerulff KH. Early maternal-newborn contact and positive birth experience. Birth. 2019;46(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/birt.12378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting this research are available from the authors on reasonable request.