Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Feb 27;21(2):e0343794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343794

Multi-stakeholder perspectives on reproductive and adolescent healthcare schemes in tribal regions of India: A qualitative study

Rohit Raj 1,#, Jarina Begum 1,*,#, Syed Irfan Ali 1,, Manasee Panda 2,
Editor: Yogesh Kumar Jain3
PMCID: PMC12948130  PMID: 41758829

Abstract

Tribal populations, comprising 8.9% of India’s population, remain highly vulnerable to poor health outcomes due to socioeconomic deprivation, cultural barriers, and limited access to healthcare. Tribal women are disproportionately affected, facing high maternal mortality, poor reproductive health, and inadequate nutrition. Although government schemes such as Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) and Rashtriya Kishori Swasthya Karyakram (RKSK) aim to improve outcomes, utilization remains low. This study explored challenges and enablers in reproductive healthcare provision from multiple stakeholder perspectives in tribal Jharkhand. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted from December 2024 to June 2025 in two blocks of East Singhbhum district, Jharkhand. Using purposive sampling, 38 in-depth interviews were undertaken with stakeholders including tribal women, adolescent girls, Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs), Anganwadi Workers (AWWs), medical officers, and village heads. Interviews were conducted in Hindi, audio-recorded, translated, and transcribed into English. Thematic analysis was performed using Atlas.ti (version 8). Key challenges reported from the framed nine categories. Absenteeism of healthcare workers, inadequate infrastructure, cultural reliance on traditional medicine, weak governance, delayed incentive payments, financial and transport barriers, and limited awareness and use of health technology were the important themes developed. Enabling themes included supervision by higher authorities, quality service delivery, support from community leaders, and collaborations with NGOs. Significant barriers persist in delivering reproductive health schemes in tribal Jharkhand. Strengthening governance, ensuring workforce accountability, improving infrastructure, timely incentives, and implementing culturally tailored awareness interventions are essential to enhance reproductive health outcomes among tribal women and adolescents. Trial Registration: This study is registered at Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI) with CTRI No: CTRI/2024/03/063824 on March 8, 2024.

Introduction

The Tribal population of India constitutes roughly 8.9 percent of the total population in the country, is considered to be one of the most vulnerable populations concerning health [1]. The socioeconomic deprivation prevalent among tribal populations, limits the communities’ access to essential resources that could include education and healthcare services makes these challenges even more challenging [2]. The reason that healthcare schemes need to be directed towards women in the tribal areas is because of the proportionate high maternal mortality rate, poor reproductive health, and inadequate nutritional status that characterizes these communities. Tribal women suffer more from all these issues because of cultural limitations placed upon them, which prevent them from moving out of the house freely and taking their own decisions within the family. It is, therefore, crucial to provide healthcare schemes to reverse the multiple layers of disadvantage that tribal women face. However, despite numerous government schemes that have been launched to enhance maternal and reproductive health outputs-for example, the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), [3] and Rashtriya Kishori Swasthya Karyakram (RKSK), [4] there is disparity in maternal healthcare usage in the tribal region of Jharkhand as per NFHS 5 report [5].

While several studies in India have examined maternal and adolescent health among tribal populations, most have focused on service utilization, barriers, access, beneficiary awareness, or outcomes related to individual schemes in isolation [6,7]. There remains a critical gap in understanding how reproductive and adolescent health schemes function at the implementation level within tribal settings when viewed through the combined perspectives of beneficiaries, frontline health workers, health system managers, and local governance actors [6]. In particular, limited qualitative evidence exists that simultaneously captures health system, governance, cultural, and workforce-related barriers across multiple reproductive health schemes within a single tribal context.

In addition to policy implementation, the success or failure of health care schemes in tribal regions ultimately depends on the perceptions of various stakeholders concerned. The stakeholders in tribal health include: beneficiaries, or tribal women, health care providers, community leaders, and local governance bodies. All these actors play key roles in determining the effectiveness of health care schemes and in identifying barriers to health care provision. The barrier between the community and government healthcare workers are one of the challenges facing the healthcare schemes for tribal women. It becomes all the more important to understand the challenges at the level of the stakeholders who are providing healthcare schemes to tribal women in the interest of improving health outcomes. Analysing the challenges from the perspectives of the various different people involved the objective of this study is to understand the challenges and ways to overcome them from different Stakeholder’s perspectives in the provision of tribal women’s healthcare schemes.

This study fills the gap by providing a comprehensive multi-stakeholder qualitative assessment of reproductive and adolescent healthcare schemes in tribal Jharkhand, mapping challenges and enablers across key health system domains including workforce accountability, service delivery, financing, infrastructure, leadership, and community engagement.

Materials and methods

An Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), approval was taken from Manipal Tata Medical College, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. IEC No: MTMC/IEC/2023/53 dated 16th October, 2023. This was a non-invasive with minimal risk study. The researcher RR and JB went to the assigned community settings with permission from the Medical Officer In-charge (MOIC).

In-depth interviews were conducted by RR and JB. Whereas transcripts preparation and the analysis by derivation of codes and themes were conducted by all the authors (RR, JB, MP, & SIA). RR a male Ph.D. research scholar with experience of total three years in conducting in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, also completed a four-credit course on the qualitative research methods conducted by Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. Whereas JB, and MP female professors and SIA a male professor cum head at the department of community medicine have the expertise in qualitative research methods.

All the researchers established a relationship with participants by visiting the village and obtaining permission at the grassroots level from the gatekeepers such as village heads, healthcare workers, leader from the tribal community, and medical officers. Study participants were informed about the study, its benefits, its role in a doctoral project, and the assurance of confidentiality. No bias was reported in the interviewer’s conduct.

This study was based on the qualitative descriptive design using the purposive sampling technique. A face-to-face, in-depth interviews were conducted over a time period of six months, from 2nd December, 2024–2nd June, 2025 in the two blocks from East Singhbhum district, from one of the Indian state Jharkhand. All the in-depth interviews were done at participants home or in the working places such as community hospitals, and village head offices, without any presence of non-participants beside them. Study population included the stakeholders from the receiver’s side such as tribal women in the reproductive age (15–49 years), adolescent girl (10–19 years). From the provider’s side stakeholders were Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA), Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANM), Sahhiya Sathi (ASHA-Supervisor), Aanganwadi Workers (AWW), Aanganwadi-helper, Medical Officers (MO), Gram Pradhan/Village head (GP), and Gram Mukhiya/Panchayat head (GM). The reproductive age women and adolescent girls were from the tribal communities such as Santhal, Ho, Munda, and Kharia tribes. The reporting of this qualitative study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist, which has been provided as a Supplementary file S1 Table, COREQ checklist. The protocol of this study is published in the same PlosOne journal [8].

Data collection

A semi-structured interview guide was designed by RR and JB based on the study objectives and a review of relevant literature. Any discrepancies, ambiguities, or conceptual doubts in the guide were discussed and resolved through consultation with SIA and MP to ensure the contextual relevance. Prior to the main data collection, the interview guide was pilot tested in the field among ten participants, including healthcare workers, tribal women of reproductive age, and adolescent girls, who were not included in the final analysis. The pilot interviews were conducted in settings similar to the actual study sites to assess the clarity, sequencing, cultural appropriateness, and comprehensibility of the questions. Feedback from the pilot testing was used to refine question wording, simplify language, and adjust probing techniques, after which the final version of the interview guide was used for data collection.

Interviewer’s guide covered the ice breaking questions as an opening question, Body of the interviewer’s guide were the questions related to the key strengths of the current healthcare schemes, government commitments, trainings, and capacity buildings. Major weaknesses such as Lack of infrastructure or accessibility issues hinderance in the implementation of these healthcare programs. Opportunities such as community-based empowerments, and challenges faced in the provision of healthcare schemes, followed by the closing questions suggestions or feedback if any.

A total of eight reproductive healthcare schemes were included in the study. These healthcare schemes were Rashtriya Kishori Swasthya Karyakram (RKSK), POSHAN Abhiyan, Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), Janani Sishu Suraksha Karyakaram (JSSK), Anaemia Mukt Bharat (AMB), Pradhan Mantri Matri Vandana Yojana (PMMVY), Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan (PMSMA), and Family Planning Schemes under National Health Mission (NHM) including: ASHA Scheme and Enhanced Compensatory Scheme (ECS).

In-depth interviews were done through audio recordings in Hindi language followed by the field notes. A Participatory Information Sheet (PIS) were explained to the participants. Written Consent with signatures were taken through Informed Consent (IC) forms, in case of minors below the age 18 years assent were taken from their parents/guardians in written. For illiterate participants thumb impression were taken with the signatures of witness in the Informed consent form. In depth interviews were conducted from the twelve villages, under two blocks Potka and Golmuri cum Jugsalai blocks from the East Singhbhum district in Jharkhand, India. Interviews were concluded upon achieving data saturation. This was assessed using a group-wise approach across stakeholder categories, as well as overall thematic saturation. Interviews were continued within each stakeholder group until no new codes or themes emerged, and cross-group comparisons were used to confirm saturation at the overall study level.

Each in-depth interview lasted 10–15 minutes. Although in-depth interviews were conducted using a focused interview guide, the duration of interviews was relatively short. This was primarily due to field-level challenges, including limited participant cooperation in some tribal settings, where respondents tended to provide brief or minimal responses, and time constraints among healthcare providers who were engaged in routine service delivery. These contextual factors may have restricted the depth of probing for certain themes, and future studies may benefit from longer interviews, repeat interactions, or alternative participatory methods to facilitate richer data collection in similar settings.

Transcripts, were developed by translating the Hindi verbatims into English. The developed transcripts were rechecked with the translators inform of language validation. These translators were the school teachers from a private school with expertise in Hindi and English subjects. Also, some transcripts were also returned to the study participants such as medical officers and ANMs, who are literate and well versed with English readings to check the accuracy of the transcripts.

Data analysis

Data were analysed using thematic analysis following a mixed inductive-deductive approach. Initial codes were generated inductively from the interview transcripts to allow themes to emerge directly from the data. Subsequently, deductive elements were guided by predefined health system domains relevant to reproductive and adolescent health schemes for category section.

All the real names, age, and designation of study participants were coded to maintain the anonymity of the participants. Coding was conducted independently by multiple researchers (RR and JB) using Atlas.ti (version 8). The preliminary codebook was then reviewed and refined through iterative discussions with SIA and MP to resolve discrepancies, enhance conceptual clarity, and ensure consistency across transcripts. Detailed code book is available in the Supplementary file S2 Table, Codebook of the themes and sub themes developed. Final themes were agreed upon through consensus among all authors. Categories such as healthcare Scheme utilization challenges, healthcare Information, healthcare financing, collaborations, healthcare service delivery, healthcare Infrastructure, healthcare accessibility, healthcare workforce, leadership and governance were framed. Based on the categories, themes were developed. Some themes reported were also had cross cutting characteristics which were common under different categories framed.

Results

There were total 38 study participants interviewed till the data saturation. Data saturation was measured based on the repetition of the same quotes from the different study participants. Characteristics of the study participants including types of stakeholders and the interviews reported till the data saturation are mentioned in the Table 1: Different stakeholder’s interviews till the data saturation.

Table 1. Different stakeholder’s interviews till the data saturation.

S. No. Stakeholders No of Study Participants Total interview reported till the data saturation (n)
1. Village Heads including Gram Panchayat and Gram Pradhan 4 4
2. Medical Officers 4 4
3. Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) and their supervisor 6 6
4. Auxiliary Nurse Midwifery (ANM) 5 5
5. Aanganwadi Workers (AWW) & their helpers 5 5
6. Tribal women in the reproductive age (15–49 years) 8 8
7. Tribal adolescent girls (10–19 years) 6 6

The detailed verbatims of the themes developed are mentioned in the Supplementary file S3 Table, Verbatim’s reported from the in-depth interviews. All the themes developed have been discussed under the broad headings of the nine framed categories. These are mentioned as follows.

  • 1. Challenges fac\ed in the provision of reproductive healthcare schemes:

The themes derived under this category are presented in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Themes developed under the category “Challenges faced in the provision of reproductive healthcare schemes.

Fig 1

Fig 1 illustrates the thematic framework of key challenges in providing reproductive healthcare schemes, highlighting system, socio-cultural, infrastructural, workforce, governance, and beneficiary-level barriers identified through qualitative analysis.Providing reproductive healthcare schemes such as JSY, JSSK, PMMVY, PMSMA, AMB, Poshan Abhiyan, RKSK, and ECS, in tribal areas faces numerous challenges across thirteen themes. Key issues include frequent absenteeism of healthcare workers, such as ASHA workers and doctors, who are often only available during emergencies, leaving routine care neglected. Cultural barriers persist, with a preference for traditional home deliveries assisted by Dai Ma due to religious beliefs like Sarna Dharam. Traditional medicine is favoured over allopathic care due to concerns about side effects. Delayed incentive payments for both beneficiaries and healthcare workers breed frustration and mistrust. Other barriers include low awareness of healthcare schemes, inadequate government support, poor infrastructure, language barriers, funding issues, and difficulties with health technology and transportation.

Quotes:

Respondent: “Language problem is there, we know Hindi but tribal people have their language I am unable to understand sometimes what they are saying.” (Female, 32, Medical Officer)

Respondent: “Some of them still prefer local food and medicines. There are some natural herbs we used to take. Because after taking native herbs we will not feel any discomfort.” (Female, 33, Tribal Women)

  • 2. Collaborations

The category collaborations emphasize on the emergence of two themes, i.e., local leader support and non-governmental organisations collaborations. Leaders such as the Mukhiya play a crucial role in community awareness, though formal healthcare inspections are often missing. NGOs, such as the N Plus Foundation (coded name), contribute to reproductive and adolescent health. However, inconsistent NGO engagement, especially post-COVID-19, has disrupted healthcare continuity, raising concerns about long-term sustainability.

Quote:

Mukhiya ji and N plus foundation (Coded name) is working with us and help us when we are in need help towards health care.“(Female, 25, Health Worker)

  • 3. Health Accessibility

Under the category health accessibility, reported themes, such as healthcare schemes, service quality, traditional medicine, technological barriers, and transport challenges. Despite improvements from schemes like JSY, many struggle to access full benefits. Disparities in service quality, like inconsistent medicine supply, hinder access. Delays and poor infrastructure diminish service effectiveness. Also study participants were not fully awared with the names of the schemes. They were aware of the schemes that provide only cash benefits. Furthermore, limited awareness and use of telemedicine and mobile health technologies highlight a significant gap in leveraging technology to enhance healthcare access in tribal regions.

Quote:

Respondent: “Government is doing good. There are schemes such as Janani yojana cash benefit of rs 1400. I am not knowing the full name one is Vandana yojana 5000 cash benefit all these things are there. But still tribal people are not aware of the incentives provided under the scheme.” (Female, 35, Tribal Women)

  • 4. Health Service Delivery

Healthcare workers, especially ASHAs and AWWs, are crucial in delivering services by supporting pregnant women, distributing supplies, and promoting health schemes. However, their efforts are hampered by irregular outreach and supply delays from CHCs. Though cultural barriers are being tackled, additional support is essential. Cash incentives boost engagement, but delayed payments reduce their impact. A major challenge is inadequate government support, especially financial aid, forcing workers to use personal funds for supplies. Key themes in health service delivery include lack of government support, IEC-based training, trust-building with tribal communities, tailored IEC methods, support for ASHA/ANM/AWW, and technological barriers.

Quotes:

Respondent: “We used to go to Anganwadi centre it is nearby. Infrastructure is nice.” (Female, 26, Tribal Women)

Respondent: “I would suggest if you will do any awareness sessions, please provide some banners & posters with more pictures in it. It will help the tribal women to grab the content.” (Female, 38, Village Leader)

  • 5. Healthcare Workforce

Various themes were reported such as, supervision, government support, availability of healthcare workers, ASHA/ANM/AWW support, lack of government support, and absenteeism of healthcare workers. The study revealed a shortage of healthcare workers, particularly ANMs and doctors, leading to inadequate service coverage. Absenteeism and irregular engagement of healthcare professionals further strain the system. Many respondents emphasized the need for more staff to ensure regular healthcare delivery especially in emergencies. Despite some improvements in government support, critical gaps in infrastructure and financial assistance persist, limiting the effectiveness of healthcare programs.

Quotes: “Now facilities are there from the government side related to schemes, such as iron tablets and all, also Kishori yojana is running.” (Female, 24, Tribal Women)

  • 6. Health Information

Key themes included the need for frequent awareness, awareness strategies, school-based programs, and knowledge of reproductive health schemes. A significant barrier to healthcare delivery was the lack of awareness among tribal communities about existing schemes. While some knew about incentives like those under JSY, many were unaware of the full benefits. Cultural preferences for traditional practices further hindered the adoption of modern healthcare. Visual aids, such as posters and street plays, were seen as effective for raising awareness but were inconsistently used.

Quote:

“Absence of awareness about the available healthcare schemes can result in poor health outcomes within the tribal women. Awareness will be generated, not at one time, two times or three times. We have to motivate them frequently, then only awareness will generate.” (Female, 38, Village leader)

  • 7. Healthcare Financing

Healthcare financing issues are significant, with respondents highlighting delays in receiving cash incentives from various schemes. Incomplete documentation and payment discrepancies further erode trust. Healthcare workers also experience delays in their incentives, impacting motivation and timely service delivery. Key themes identified include cash incentives, funding issues, delayed payments, and insufficient government support.

Quote:

“We don’t receive our cash incentives on time. Higher authorities say fund problem is there.”

(Female, 38, Village Leader)

  • 8. Healthcare Infrastructure

The themes identified include infrastructure adequacy, service quality, lack of facilities, and technology challenges for healthcare workers. This section explores their perspectives on infrastructure in tribal areas. While some noted improvements, such as well-equipped Anganwadi centres, others pointed out persistent gaps, like the absence of fans and the need for new buildings. Primary Health Centre’s (PHCs) often lack essential utilities like electricity and water, while Community Health Centre’s (CHCs), though better equipped, suffer from construction delays. Poor infrastructure continues to hinder healthcare delivery and reduce participation in programs, despite some progress in recent years.

Quote:

“We used to go to Anganwadi centre it is nearby. Infrastructure is nice. But there is no facility of fans. They give medicines & edibles.” (Female, 26, Tribal Women)

  • 9. Leadership and governance

Under the category leadership and governance, it emphasizes the roles of family, government, and local leaders in shaping healthcare practices among tribal women. Key themes included family support, maintaining records, government support, leader support, lack of government support, and supervision. Mothers-in-law can both encourage modern healthcare or reinforce traditional practices. Government support has enhanced infrastructure and healthcare access, yet service delivery remains inconsistent. Local leaders, like the Mukhiya and NGO’s, are essential in awareness efforts, though their impact varies. Regular supervision and record inspections are vital, but gaps in accountability and inconsistent oversight by authorities affect healthcare quality and efficiency.

Quote:

“Medical officer sir, Sahiya Sathi, and block trainer used to come frequently to check and inspect the record that we have maintained in the register.” (Female, 21, Health Worker)

Discussion

This study offers an in-depth examination of the systemic barriers affecting the delivery of reproductive healthcare schemes in tribal areas, interpreted through the lens of established health systems and healthcare access frameworks, particularly the WHO Health System Building Blocks and the dimensions of access-availability, accessibility, acceptability, and affordability [9]. Framing the findings within these conceptual models enables a shift from descriptive reporting to a more explanatory understanding of how interlinked system failures shape reproductive health outcomes in marginalized tribal population.

Healthcare workforce and service delivery

One of the most critical issues identified is the lack of healthcare personnel, particularly doctors and ASHA workers, in tribal areas. Another is absenteeism, especially when there is no emergency, creates a significant gap in the regular delivery of healthcare services. This problem is compounded by the lack of mechanisms for monitoring and accountability, which are essential to address absenteeism and ensure that healthcare services are delivered consistently. As noted in another studies, absenteeism in rural healthcare systems directly impacts service delivery and erodes community trust [1012]. This issue needs to be addressed through the development of robust monitoring systems to hold healthcare workers accountable and ensure that services are provided regularly.

Cultural and community engagements

Cultural barriers pose a significant challenge to healthcare delivery in tribal areas. For instance, many women prefer home deliveries assisted by traditional birth attendants (Dhai-Maa) rather than institutional deliveries. This preference is rooted in religious and cultural beliefs, particularly those associated with Sarna Dharam, and a general mistrust of allopathic medicines due to concerns about side effects. A similar study emphasize that cultural beliefs surrounding childbirth and traditional medicine are common barriers to healthcare acceptance in tribal regions [13]. Another major issue identified in the study is the delay in incentive payments, both to healthcare beneficiaries and workers. These delays contribute to a sense of frustration and mistrust in the healthcare system.

Financial incentives and healthcare financing

Timely financial incentives are essential for the success of healthcare programs, as they motivate both healthcare workers and community members to actively participate in healthcare initiatives. One of the study researchers stressed the importance of timely and adequate financial incentives in encouraging participation and ensuring the success of health programs [14]. Significant progress has been made in improving healthcare access, with many respondents aware of schemes like JSY and utilizing cash benefits that boosted demand for healthcare services. Similarly, some studies highlighted that the MAMATA scheme not only stimulated demand but also empowered beneficiaries, promoting a sense of independence. Additionally, disparities in healthcare quality, particularly the inconsistent supply of medicines, hinder access to healthcare services [15,16].

Infrastructure and health information

Lack of government support, inadequate grievance redressal systems, and poor infrastructure further exacerbate the challenges faced in delivering healthcare services. In particular, the study found that many Anganwadi centres in tribal areas are poorly equipped, limiting healthcare access for women and adolescents. These structural and logistical issues must be addressed to enhance the delivery of healthcare services. Studies also mentioned the problems confronted in tribal areas are not only shortfall of medical staff but inadequate number of health centres and its poor accessibility highlights the success of health schemes in remote areas depends heavily on the availability of robust infrastructure. Collaborations with local leaders and NGOs are key enablers in healthcare delivery in tribal areas. Village head and other local leaders also plays a crucial role in raising awareness about health schemes & programs [17,18].

Our study also highlights a lack of awareness and implementation of telemedicine and mobile health technologies, which could potentially bridge geographical barriers. However, the success of these technologies depends on effective training, available infrastructure, and community acceptance. One of the study, emphasize that harnessing the community-based digital solutions driven by developments in science and technology, or digital health, may be the critical next step to facilitate equitable access to education and health care among indigenous people [19].

The scarcity of healthcare workers, particularly ANMs and doctors, is another major challenge in tribal regions. This scarcity, combined with absenteeism, reduces the effectiveness of healthcare schemes and limits service coverage. Despite some improvements in government support, significant gaps remain in terms of financial assistance and infrastructural development. Some studies, argue that healthcare delivery in remote areas will continue to be inadequate without sufficient human resources. There is a need for sufficient doctors and nurses in government health facilities were overwhelmed by high demand due to a shortage of human resources in the tribal areas [6,18].

Leadership governance and policy implementation

Gaps in government support, weak grievance redressal mechanisms, utilization of maternal and new born services with poor policy implementation further exacerbate challenges which was reported in this study. Other studies also discussed about the disparities in the utilization of maternal healthcare needs which hampers the policy implementation [20,21]. Similarly, another study done in Odisha also found that, the utilization of maternity and newborn care services was low within the community, with a significant gap between the guidelines outlined by programs like Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness (IMNCI) and their actual implementation [22].

Effective leadership and governance are essential to ensure coordinated service delivery, adequate staffing, and infrastructure development [6,16]. Without strengthening these elements, health programs in remote tribal areas may continue to fall short of intended outcomes.

Overall, the study underscores that challenges in tribal healthcare are multifactorial and interconnected across health system domains. Addressing workforce shortages, absenteeism, cultural barriers, financial disincentives, infrastructure deficits, and governance gaps is essential for improving reproductive health outcomes. Applying a health systems framework allows these findings to be understood not merely as isolated observations but as systemic issues requiring integrated and multi-level intervention.

Limitations of the study

The study has several limitations. Although in-depth interviews were conducted using a focused guide, the duration was relatively short (10–15 minutes) due to field constraints. Participants, particularly from tribal communities, often provided brief responses, and healthcare workers faced time limitations, which may have restricted the depth of information obtained. Additionally, the findings may be influenced by subjective bias inherent in participants’ responses and the researchers’ interpretations. Finally, the results are context-specific and may not be generalizable to broader populations beyond the study setting.

Recommendation

  • Strengthen workforce accountability: by addressing absenteeism through regular supervision, incentives, and community-based monitoring systems.

  • Enhance infrastructure with urgent construction and renovation of Anganwadi Center’s and PHCs, along with ensuring water, electricity, and transport facilities.

  • Ensure timely disbursement of incentives to both beneficiaries and healthcare workers to maintain trust and motivation.

  • Promote culturally sensitive IEC strategies through visual tools, street plays, and tribal language-based materials tailored to local needs.

  • Build trust through community leaders and NGOs by formalizing partnerships to sustain awareness and outreach efforts.

  • Implement continuous training for ASHA, ANM, and AWW on digital tools and reproductive health schemes.

  • Address language and cultural barriers via local translators and by integrating traditional beliefs with modern healthcare promotion.

Conclusion

The study reveals persistent challenges in the awareness and utilization of reproductive health schemes among tribal populations. From the provider side, healthcare workers such as ASHAs, ANMs, AWWs, medical officers, and village heads face major barriers including staff absenteeism, weak government support, and inadequate infrastructure. Nevertheless, supervision by higher authorities and the delivery of quality services were recognized as positive factors that can be strengthened to improve service provision. From the receiver side, adolescent girls and women of reproductive age exhibit low levels of reproductive health knowledge, with cultural barriers, reliance on traditional medicine, financial difficulties, transport challenges, and limited interest in scheme utilization acting as key obstacles. Importantly, stakeholders emphasized the urgent need for frequent, school-based awareness campaigns, community-oriented programs, and culturally sensitive IEC strategies to bridge these gaps. Addressing both provider- and receiver-side challenges through stronger governance, better resource allocation, and sustained awareness interventions will be critical to improving reproductive health outcomes in tribal areas.

Supporting information

S1 Table. COREQ checklist.

(PDF)

pone.0343794.s001.pdf (437.2KB, pdf)
S2 Table. Codebook of the themes and sub themes developed.

(DOCX)

pone.0343794.s002.docx (24.9KB, docx)
S3 Table. Verbatim’s reported from the in-depth interviews.

(DOCX)

pone.0343794.s003.docx (30.9KB, docx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Government of India. Press Information Bureau. https://pib.gov.in/FeaturesDeatils.aspx?NoteId=151222&ModuleId=2®=3&lang=1
  • 2.Ministry of Tribal Affairs. Achievements during last four years i.e. 2014-15 to 2017-18. Government of India. https://archive.pib.gov.in/4yearsofnda/Comprehensive-Materials/Tribal%20Affairs.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ministry of Health & Family Welfare G of I. Janani Suraksha Yojana: National Health Mission. https://nhm.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=3&lid=309&sublinkid=841
  • 4.National Health Mission. Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karyakram (RKSK):: National Health Mission. https://nhm.gov.in/index4.php?lang=1&level=0&linkid=152&lid=173
  • 5.Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS 5) 2019-21, Compendium of Fact Sheets India and 14 States/UTs (Phase-11). 2021.
  • 6.Boro B, Saikia N. A qualitative study of the barriers to utilizing healthcare services among the tribal population in Assam. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Madankar M, Kakade N, Basa L, Sabri B. Exploring Maternal and Child Health Among Tribal Communities in India: A Life Course Perspective. Glob J Health Sci. 2024;16(2):31–47. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v16n2p31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Raj R, Begum J, Ali SI, Panda M, R VL. Development & validation of a health awareness booklet: “Reproductive health schemes for tribal women of Jharkhand” a study protocol. PLoS One. 2025;20(5):e0322777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ferrinho P, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Ferrinho R, Fronteira I. Building-blocks to develop one health systems. One Health. 2023;17:100624. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kerketta P, Maniyara K, Palle E, Kodali PB. Exploring health worker absenteeism at public healthcare facilities in Chhattisgarh, India. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024;25:e44. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rao KD, Bhatnagar A, Berman P. So many, yet few: Human resources for health in India. Hum Resour Health. 2012;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-10-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sharma R, Webster P, Bhattacharyya S. Factors affecting the performance of community health workers in India: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:25352. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.25352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cáceres ÁL, Ramesh RM, Newmai P, Kikon R, Deckert A. Perceptions, health seeking behavior and utilization of maternal and newborn health services among an indigenous tribal community in Northeast India-a community-based mixed methods study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1139334. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1139334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kumar DS, Jain DP, Garg DU. Impact, Challenges, Opportunities: A Literature Review of the Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana in addressing Maternal, Child Health and Nutrition in India. eatp. 2024. doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i3.6077 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ali SI, Begum J, Panda M. Impact of conditional cash transfer scheme (MAMATA) on the prevalent MCH care practices in rural areas of Ganjam district, Orissa: a descriptive study. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(8):3537. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20183094 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ali SI, Begum J, Panda M. Utilization of maternal and child health services under MAMATA scheme in rural areas of Ganjam district, Orissa. Int J Health Sci Res. 2018;8(3):90–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yadav R, Devidas RD. Review of tribal population of Jharkhand: exploring origins, factors, and implications. 2021;18.
  • 18.Nandi P. Health status and availability of health service in Jharkhand. AMOGHVARTA. 2024;03(03):235–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nath SC, Choudhury RD, Nath D. Innovative Approaches to Enhance Education and Healthcare in Tribal Regions Through Science & Technology. A Basic Handbook of Science, Technology and Innovation for Inclusive Development [Volume: 1]. International Academic Publishing House (IAPH). 2024. 144–54. doi: 10.52756/bhstiid.2024.e01.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tripathi P, Chakrabarty M, Singh A, Let S. Geographic disparities and determinants of full utilization of the continuum of maternal and newborn healthcare services in rural India. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):3378. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20714-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Singh S, Rajak R. Barriers in utilization and provisioning of obstetric care services (OCS) in India: a mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06189-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Begum J, Ali SI, Tripathy RM. Evaluation of Antenatal to Neonatal Continuum Care Services Affecting Neonatal Health in a Tertiary Health-Care Setup. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(3):213–8. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.183588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yogesh Jain

13 Jan 2026

Dear Dr. Begum,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Kindly address the comments provided by reviewer 2.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 27 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yogesh Kumar Jain, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

[The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.].

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: Manipal Tata Medical College.

1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If this adherence statement is not accurate and there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

4. We note that this data set consists of interview transcripts. Can you please confirm that all participants gave consent for interview transcript to be published?

If they DID provide consent for these transcripts to be published, please also confirm that the transcripts do not contain any potentially identifying information (or let us know if the participants consented to having their personal details published and made publicly available). We consider the following details to be identifying information:

- Names, nicknames, and initials

- Age more specific than round numbers

- GPS coordinates, physical addresses, IP addresses, email addresses

- Information in small sample sizes (e.g. 40 students from X class in X year at X university)

- Specific dates (e.g. visit dates, interview dates)

- ID numbers

Or, if the participants DID NOT provide consent for these transcripts to be published:

- Provide a de-identified version of the data or excerpts of interview responses

- Provide information regarding how these transcripts can be accessed by researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data, including:

a) the grounds for restriction

b) the name of the ethics committee, Institutional Review Board, or third-party organization that is imposing sharing restrictions on the data

c) a non-author, institutional point of contact that is able to field data access queries, in the interest of maintaining long-term data accessibility.

d) Any relevant data set names, URLs, DOIs, etc. that an independent researcher would need in order to request your minimal data set.

For further information on sharing data that contains sensitive participant information, please see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-human-research-participant-data-and-other-sensitive-data

If there are ethical, legal, or third-party restrictions upon your dataset, you must provide all of the following details (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-acceptable-data-access-restrictions):

1. A complete description of the dataset

2. The nature of the restrictions upon the data (ethical, legal, or owned by a third party) and the reasoning behind them

3. The full name of the body imposing the restrictions upon your dataset (ethics committee, institution, data access committee, etc.)

4. If the data are owned by a third party, confirmation of whether the authors received any special privileges in accessing the data that other researchers would not have

5. Direct, non-author contact information (preferably email) for the body imposing the restrictions upon the data, to which data access requests can be sent

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Reviewer #1: The study is a well planned qualitative study addressing a crucial region specific lacuna. The leading questions and interviews have given answers to the questions raised .The study results can be noted and followed up by the stakeholders for addressing the lacuna

Reviewer #2: Regarding the contribution of the study, the added value compared to previous studies in Indian populations is not clearly seen. It is suggested to include 1 or 2 paragraphs on which specific gap this study fills. This is in order for the reader to understand why the results matter for policies and programs.

Regarding the design, the analytical approach is not specified. It is suggested to state “qualitative descriptive design”, or “interpretive descriptive approach”, or “case study design”, or whatever was actually done. The use of a standard reference such as COREQ as a checklist should be added, and it should also be mentioned who designed the interview guides and how the pilot was carried out.

Regarding saturation, the process should be detailed, clarifying whether saturation was sought by group or in a general/global way. This is important to provide credibility to the study.

Regarding the depth of the interviews, a duration of 10 to 15 minutes is reported. It is suggested to be more modest and use “semi-structured interviews” unless the guides were very focused and field notes were collected. Otherwise, this should be included as a limitation.

Regarding the qualitative analysis procedure, it is not specified whether it was inductive, deductive, or mixed, nor the number of coders.

Regarding the discussion, it should be developed using relevant conceptual frameworks such as the health system, accessibility, etc. The same findings are repeated many times but with little theoretical depth.

In the ethics section, there are elements written in the future tense; the description should be unified in the past tense

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Feb 27;21(2):e0343794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343794.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


15 Jan 2026

Reviewer #1:

The study is a well-planned qualitative study addressing a crucial region-specific lacuna. The leading questions and interviews have given answers to the questions raised. The study results can be noted and followed up by the stakeholders for addressing the lacunae.

Answer: We sincerely thank Reviewer 1 for their positive and encouraging feedback, and we appreciate the recognition of the study’s methodological rigor, region-specific relevance, and potential utility for stakeholders in addressing identified lacunae.

Reviewer #2:

1. Regarding the contribution of the study, the added value compared to previous studies in Indian populations is not clearly seen. It is suggested to include 1 or 2 paragraphs on which specific gap this study fills. This is in order for the reader to understand why the results matter for policies and programs.

• We thank the reviewer for this important suggestion. To clearly articulate the study’s added value, we have revised the Introduction sections by adding two dedicated paragraphs that explicitly highlight the specific gap addressed by this study.

2. Regarding the design, the analytical approach is not specified. It is suggested to state “qualitative descriptive design”, or “interpretive descriptive approach”, or “case study design”, or whatever was actually done. The use of a standard reference such as COREQ as a checklist should be added, and it should also be mentioned who designed the interview guides and how the pilot was carried out.

• We thank the reviewer for this constructive suggestion. We have now clearly specified the study as a qualitative descriptive design in the Materials and Methods section to enhance methodological clarity.

• Additionally, we have stated that the study reporting follows the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist, which has been added to the Methods section and included as a supplementary file.

• We have also clarified that the semi-structured interview guides were self-developed by the research team, informed by existing literature and study objectives, and that these guides were pilot tested among ten stakeholders to assess clarity, relevance, and cultural appropriateness before final data collection.

3. Regarding saturation, the process should be detailed, clarifying whether saturation was sought by group or in a general/global way. This is important to provide credibility to the study.

• We thank the reviewer for highlighting this important methodological aspect. We have now elaborated on the data saturation process in the Methods section, clarifying that saturation was assessed using a group-wise approach across stakeholder categories, as well as overall thematic saturation. Interviews were continued within each stakeholder group until no new codes or themes emerged, and cross-group comparisons were used to confirm saturation at the overall study level. These revisions have been incorporated to enhance transparency and methodological rigor.

4. Regarding the depth of the interviews, a duration of 10 to 15 minutes is reported. It is suggested to be more modest and use “semi-structured interviews” unless the guides were very focused and field notes were collected. Otherwise, this should be included as a limitation.

• We thank the reviewer for this important clarification. The study employed in-depth interviews using a focused interview guide; however, we acknowledge that the interview duration was relatively short (10–15 minutes) due to contextual field constraints. Many participants, particularly from tribal communities, provided brief or one-word responses, and several healthcare workers reported time constraints related to service delivery responsibilities, which limited prolonged engagement. We have now explicitly acknowledged this as a study limitation in the manuscript to ensure transparency and appropriate interpretation of the depth of findings.

5. Regarding the qualitative analysis procedure, it is not specified whether it was inductive, deductive, or mixed, nor the number of coders.

• We thank the reviewer for this important methodological clarification. We have now specified that the thematic analysis followed a mixed inductive-deductive approach. Initial coding was conducted inductively from the data, while deductive elements were guided by predefined health system domains relevant to reproductive and adolescent health schemes for category section. We have also clarified that multiple coders were involved in the analysis, with independent coding followed by team discussions to resolve discrepancies and refine the codebook. These details have been added to the Data analysis section to enhance transparency and rigor.

6. Regarding the discussion, it should be developed using relevant conceptual frameworks such as the health system, accessibility, etc. The same findings are repeated many times but with little theoretical depth.

• We have updated the discussion under the sub headings based on WHO building blocks of health system. To add the evidence we have tried to incorporate more depth with references to the discussion part.

7. In the ethics section, there are elements written in the future tense; the description should be unified in the past tense.

• Corrected.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewers response.docx

pone.0343794.s005.docx (23.4KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Yogesh Jain

11 Feb 2026

Multi-stakeholder perspectives on reproductive and adolescent healthcare schemes in tribal regions of India: A qualitative study.

PONE-D-25-44960R1

Dear Dr. Begum,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Yogesh Kumar Jain, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #2: I have reviewed the R1 version of the manuscript and can confirm that it addresses all previously noted observations, responding to each point appropriately and comprehensively. I would also like to highlight that the manuscript demonstrates additional improvements, particularly in the restructured discussion using relevant conceptual frameworks and in the clearer explanation of the analytical approach, which substantially strengthens both methodological rigor and overall coherence.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Yogesh Jain

PONE-D-25-44960R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Begum,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yogesh Kumar Jain

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. COREQ checklist.

    (PDF)

    pone.0343794.s001.pdf (437.2KB, pdf)
    S2 Table. Codebook of the themes and sub themes developed.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0343794.s002.docx (24.9KB, docx)
    S3 Table. Verbatim’s reported from the in-depth interviews.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0343794.s003.docx (30.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewers response.docx

    pone.0343794.s005.docx (23.4KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES