Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1992 Mar;85(3):165–168.

Meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies: a review.

D R Jones 1
PMCID: PMC1294821  PMID: 1556722

Abstract

Meta-analyses (integration of findings by quantitative analyses of results of individual studies) are already widely used in the psychological and educational sciences and in the pooling of clinical trial results. Examples of the application of such techniques to the results of observational epidemiological studies are now proliferating. In this paper meta-analysis of the results of observational epidemiological studies is reviewed. Uncritical adoption of techniques used in pooled analyses of clinical trial results may be inappropriate. Some alternative approaches, including meta-regression techniques, are discussed, and illustrated with reference to examples of meta-analyses of studies of breast cancer risk following oral contraceptive use and of patterns of post-bereavement mortality. Although substantial difficulties beset the use of meta-analysis in epidemiology, many of these problems are also implicit in the execution of traditional, narrative reviews. Foremost among these difficulties are those associated with publication bias and with making due allowance for the quality of the studies being combined. Unlike traditional narrative reviews, meta-analyses require explicit statement of the criteria for the review and hence highlight these difficulties. Nonetheless, careful and critical application of appropriate meta-analytical techniques facilitates quantitative exploration of inhomogeneities in, and (where appropriate) synthesis of study results.

Full text

PDF
165

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berlin J. A., Colditz G. A. A meta-analysis of physical activity in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Oct;132(4):612–628. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlin J. A., Laird N. M., Sacks H. S., Chalmers T. C. A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials. Stat Med. 1989 Feb;8(2):141–151. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1405–1408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fleiss J. L., Gross A. J. Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(2):127–139. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90261-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Furberg C. D., Morgan T. M. Lessons from overviews of cardiovascular trials. Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):295–306. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gelber R. D., Goldhirsch A. Interpretation of results from subset analyses within overviews of randomized clinical trials. Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):371–388. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldsmith J. R., Beeser S. Strategies for pooling data in occupational epidemiological studies. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1984 Apr;13(2 Suppl):297–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenland S. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol Rev. 1987;9:1–30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenland S., Salvan A. Bias in the one-step method for pooling study results. Stat Med. 1990 Mar;9(3):247–252. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Helsing K. J., Szklo M. Mortality after bereavement. Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Jul;114(1):41–52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jenicek M. Meta-analysis in medicine. Where we are and where we want to go. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(1):35–44. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90023-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones D. R. Heart disease mortality following widowhood: some results from the OPCS Longitudinal Study. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. J Psychosom Res. 1987;31(3):325–333. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(87)90052-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lichtenstein M. J., Mulrow C. D., Elwood P. C. Guidelines for reading case-control studies. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(9):893–903. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90190-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Longnecker M. P., Berlin J. A., Orza M. J., Chalmers T. C. A meta-analysis of alcohol consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 1988 Aug 5;260(5):652–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MANTEL N., HAENSZEL W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meinert C. L. Meta-analysis: science or religion? Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4 Suppl):257S–263S. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90064-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mellström D., Nilsson A., Odén A., Rundgren A., Svanborg A. Mortality among the widowed in Sweden. Scand J Soc Med. 1982;10(2):33–41. doi: 10.1177/140349488201000201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H., Singer J., Goldsmith C. H., Hutchison B. G., Milner R. A., Streiner D. L. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(1):91–98. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90205-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Parkes C. M., Benjamin B., Fitzgerald R. G. Broken heart: a statistical study of increased mortality among widowers. Br Med J. 1969 Mar 22;1(5646):740–743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5646.740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peto R. Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):233–244. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pocock S. J., Hughes M. D. Estimation issues in clinical trials and overviews. Stat Med. 1990 Jun;9(6):657–671. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rees W. D., Lutkins S. G. Mortality of bereavement. Br Med J. 1967 Oct 7;4(5570):13–16. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5570.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Romieu I., Hernandez-Avila M., Liang M. H. Oral contraceptives and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of a conflicting literature. Br J Rheumatol. 1989;28 (Suppl 1):13–23. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/xxviii.suppl_1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sackett D. L. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1-2):51–63. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shinton R., Beevers G. Meta-analysis of relation between cigarette smoking and stroke. BMJ. 1989 Mar 25;298(6676):789–794. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6676.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Simes R. J. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Oct;4(10):1529–1541. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.10.1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Spector T. D., Thompson S. G. The potential and limitations of meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Jun;45(2):89–92. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.2.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spitzer W. O. Meta-meta-analysis: unanswered questions about aggregating data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(2):103–107. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90258-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wong O., Raabe G. K. Critical review of cancer epidemiology in petroleum industry employees, with a quantitative meta-analysis by cancer site. Am J Ind Med. 1989;15(3):283–310. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700150305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yach D. Meta-analysis in epidemiology. S Afr Med J. 1990 Jul 21;78(2):94–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yusuf S., Peto R., Lewis J., Collins R., Sleight P. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985 Mar-Apr;27(5):335–371. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES