ABSTRACT
Feral birds pose a significant concern to many authors, as they can serve as long‐distance vectors for various microorganisms that may be transmissible to animals and poultry. This study aimed to identify bacterial infections in feral pigeons (Columba livia var. domestica), their potential role in spreading bacterial pathogens to various Egyptian livestock and the zoonotic significance of this bird species. We conducted the study on 80 healthy feral pigeons, collected from a non‐urban area (Ismailia city) in Egypt during the hunting season from October 2022 to July 2023. We kept the birds in the lab for 72 h, conducting a thorough clinical examination and collecting tissue specimens from various organs of the body. The observed histological lesions were various and numerous, with variable incidences in different body organs. Bacteriological examination revealed the isolation of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Salmonellae, Shigella, Proteus, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas. We concluded that feral pigeons could significantly contribute to transmitting some bacterial pathogens to humans, poultry farms and other farm animals.
Keywords: bacterial infections, Egypt, pathology, pigeons, poultry farm
The potential role of feral pigeons in spreading bacterial pathogens to various livestock and their zoonotic significance. Bacteriological examination revealed the occurrence of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Salmonellae, Shigella, Proteus, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas. There were various histological lesions with variable incidences in different body organs.

1. Introduction
Pigeons are members of the order Columbiformes, which includes pigeons and doves. The common rock dove (Columba livia) is the ancestor of all domestic pigeon breeds, with over 800 varieties currently in existence. Pigeons (C. livia) inhabit urban, suburban and feral environments (Welle 2021). In many regions, rock doves roost and nest in natural areas but make daily flights of several kilometres to forage in cities and agricultural zones (Welle 2021).
Feral pigeons still constitute a major problem in transmitting a wide spectrum of infectious diseases to domestic animals and humans (Santos et al. 2020). The role of these birds in bacterial transmission is a concern due to their proximity to human habitats and their ability to carry and spread bacteria through their droppings, feathers and others (Dovč et al. 2016). The potential transmission of the disease not only poses a problem in the future and could lead to the emergence of infectious diseases of zoonotic importance, but their exposure to domestic animal diseases could also have severe consequences for their populations (Diab et al. 2019). Different species of feral birds have the potential to spread bacterial microorganisms to domestic birds and animals by nesting and perching close to human activities (Vasconcelos et al. 2018).
The most common bacterial pathogen was Salmonella, which can survive in an environment for an extended period. Escherichia coli can contaminate feed and water by pigeon droppings (Tanase et al. 2016; Abu El Hammed et al. 2022). Moreover, pigeons were known to carry Campylobacter, causing foodborne illness in humans (Gabriele‐Rivet et al. 2016). As a result, the threat of emerging new infectious diseases is significant (Kobuszewska and Wysok 2024). Nowadays, people are focusing on pigeons due to their significant impact on human health and agricultural production (Soufy et al. 2016). Feral birds are of major concern as they could act as long‐distance vectors for a wide range of microorganisms that are transmissible to humans and animals (El‐Shazly et al. 2016).
Pigeons can also harbour viral (Elmeligy et al. 2024; Shosha et al. 2024) and parasitic agents (Bogach et al. 2021) that are important to domestic birds, as well as to animals and humans. Furthermore, numerous factors contribute to the significance of these birds. Not only can they serve as natural reservoirs for various pathogens, which can then spread to domestic poultry, but they can also transfer infectious agents from poultry products to poultry premises (Fotouh et al. 2020; Zigo et al. 2022). Moreover, feral bird populations can also act as reservoirs of drug‐resistant bacterial pathogens or resistant genetic elements (Fotouh et al. 2024).
Feral pigeons can be challenging due to their adaptability to urban environments and large populations in some areas (Abdel‐Maguid et al. 2019; Santos et al. 2020). Combining multiple control methods tailored to the specific circumstances of each location is often the most effective approach to managing feral pigeon populations and mitigating associated risks such as disease transmission and property damage (Mahmoud et al. 2020; Santos et al. 2020). Addressing the dangers associated with feral pigeons requires a combination of prevention, control measures and public education. Implementing strategies to discourage the presence of pigeons, manage food sources, maintain clean environments and seek professional assistance for population control can help mitigate the risks and dangers posed by feral pigeon populations in urban settings (Chrobak‐Chmiel et al. 2021; Salah et al. 2025).
As there is a lack of reports about bacterial infections in feral pigeons, the present study aimed to identify various bacteria that could be found in pigeons with a trial to illustrate their potential role in transmitting to various livestock as well as their potential role in spreading some zoonotic pathogens in Egypt.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Pigeons
Eighty feral pigeons (C. livia domestica) were collected randomly from non‐urban areas in Ismailia, Egypt. The study starts from October 2022 to July 2023. The birds were live‐trapped through nets.
2.2. Study Design
Birds were transferred to the laboratory of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, New Valley University. Birds were observed for 72 h for the detection of any abnormal clinical signs. All birds were sacrificed using an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (SIGMA, catalogue no. 57‐133‐0) (50 mg/kg body weight). A necropsy examination was carried out, and organs, including the lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, small and large intestine, pancreas, bursa, brain and pectoral muscle, were dissected out of the body. Specimens from the lungs, liver and intestine were collected under aseptic conditions and kept frozen for further bacteriologic investigations (Al‐Noayme and Al‐Alhially 2021).
2.3. Bacteriological Examination
Organs used for bacteriological examination included the liver, lungs and intestines of all birds. All samples were inoculated into Trypticase soya broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 h (Elbarbary et al. 2023).
2.4. Isolation of Enterobacteriaceae
A loopful from the previously inoculated broth was cultured onto MacConkey agar and eosin methylene blue agar (EMB) (Oxoid). The inoculated plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h, and suspected colonies were picked up and examined for their morphological, cultural and biochemical characteristics (Dutta et al. 2013).
2.5. Serological Identification of E. coli
The slide agglutination method was used to perform the serological identification of E. coli isolates, as described by Abu El Hammed et al. (2022). On a glass slide, the bacterial cultures were mixed with specific antisera and gently agitated to facilitate agglutination. The identity of the isolates was confirmed by the presence of agglutination, which indicated a positive reaction (Dandrawy et al. 2025).
2.6. RapIDTM ONE (Remel) Test
It was carried out for the identification of the biochemical profile of the isolated organisms belonging to members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase‐negative, Gram‐negative non‐fermenters bacteria, according to the manufacturer's instructions.
2.7. Isolation and Identification of Salmonella spp
Pre‐enrichment in non‐selective liquid medium: Buffered peptone water (10 mL) was inoculated with the test portion (1 g) sample and then incubated at 37°C for 18 ± 2 h. Enrichment in selective liquid media: Rappaport‐Vassiliadis medium with soya (RVS 146 broth) was inoculated with 0.1 mL of pre‐enrichment broth and incubated at 41.5°C ± 1°C for 24 ± 3 h (Khairy et al. 2024). Suspected Salmonella isolates were identified serologically using slide agglutination tests in laboratories of the Ministry of Public Health in Cairo, according to Al‐Aalim (2017).
2.7.1. Plating Out and Identification
The xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (XLD agar) was incubated at 37°C ± 1°C and examined after 24 ± 3 h.
2.8. Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
A loop‐full from the previously incubated broth was inoculated on Pseudomonas CN selective supplement agar base (Oxoid) and incubated at 37°C for 24–48 h. Suspected colonies were picked up and transferred to a tryptic soy agar slant for further microscopic and biochemical identification (El‐Hawary et al. 2025). Biochemical identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa using API 20NE (analytical profile index) (Bio‐Mérieux, France) was carried out according to the manufacturer's pamphlet (Sambrook et al. 1989).
2.9. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus
The samples were incubated at 37°C in thioglycolate broth for 24 h. Then loopfuls from the thioglycolate broth were streaked on the Baird‐Parker agar medium (Oxoid). The inoculated media were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Staphylococcus aureus appeared 2–3 mm, black, shiny and convex and surrounded by clear zones (Fotouh et al. 2014).
2.10. Isolation of Proteus spp
The samples were incubated overnight at 37°C in the nutrient broth. Then loopfuls from inoculated broth were streaked on MacConkey's agar medium. The inoculated media were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. A few colourless colonies were inoculated into TSI agar, and red slant/yellow bottom, gas and H2S production were observed. Moreover, the urease test was positive (Fotouh et al. 2014).
2.11. Histopathological Findings
Formalin‐fixed specimens (liver, lungs, intestine and kidneys) were washed in tap water, dehydrated in a graded series of alcohol, cleared in xylene and finally embedded in paraffin (Abo‐Aziza et al. 2022). Paraffin blocks were serially sectioned at 4–5 µm using a microtome (MicroTech_CUT 4050, Germany) and were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as routine stains. Sections were examined using a light microscope (Leica DM500, Germany) (Elbarbary et al. 2024).
3. Results
3.1. Clinical and Post‐Mortem Examination
All birds were healthy; no abnormal lesions could be detected clinically. The observed lesions on post‐mortem examination were not specific. Generally, congestion and abnormal focal lesions were observed in the lungs and liver of some birds.
3.2. Bacteriological Examination
Bacteriological examination of the 240 samples from the liver, lung and intestine revealed that 124 were positive for bacterial isolation, with an incidence of 51.7%. Accordingly, the study analysis found that 70.2% (87 samples) tested positive for E. coli. The highest prevalence was observed in the intestine (48.7%), followed by the liver and lungs (43.7% and 16.2%, respectively). The lowest prevalence was found in the Shigella (2.5%) and Proteus (2.4%) samples, as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Incidence of isolated bacteria from different organs of the examined pigeon (n = 80).
| Examined organ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolated bacteria | Liver | Lung | Intestine | Total | ||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
| Escherichia coli | 35 | 43.7 | 13 | 16.2 | 39 | 48.7 | 87 | 70.2 |
| Klebsiella | 3 | 3.7 | 1 | 1.2 | 3 | 3.7 | 7 | 5.6 |
| Enterobacter | 2 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6.2 | 7 | 5.6 |
| Shigella | 1 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.2 | 2 | 2.5 |
| Salmonella | 3 | 3.7 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 3.7 | 8 | 6.5 |
| Pseudomonas | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 3.7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| Staphylococcus | 3 | 3.7 | 2 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| Proteus | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.2 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 2.4 |
| Positive sample | 49 | 20.4 | 22 | 9.2 | 53 | 22.1 | 124 | 51.7 |
Further analysis of the E. coli isolates revealed a diverse range of serotypes. A total of 89 E. coli isolates were recovered from various tissue specimens of pigeons, and their serotypes were determined. The results are presented in Table 2. The most common serotype identified was O78, which was isolated from the liver and accounted for 42.5% of the total isolates. The O47 serotype was the second most prevalent, isolated from the intestine and representing 26.5% of the total isolates. The O27 serotype was isolated from lungs and accounted for 17.3% of the total isolates. Other serotypes identified included O149 and O166, each accounting for 4.5% and 3.5% of the total isolates. Five isolates from the intestine (5.7%) remained untyped.
TABLE 2.
Serotyping of Escherichia coli isolated from examined tissue pigeons’ specimens and their detected numbers.
| O serotype | Types of tissues | No. of isolates | Percentage of isolation |
|---|---|---|---|
| O78 | Liver | 37 | 42.5 |
| O47 | Intestine | 23 | 26.5 |
| O27 | Lung | 15 | 17.3 |
| O149 | Liver | 4 | 4.5 |
| O166 | Lung | 3 | 3.5 |
| O untyped | Intestine | 5 | 5.7 |
| Total | — | 87 | 100 |
Moreover, the presented study found that 6.5% (eight samples) tested positive for Salmonella. Serotyping of the isolated Salmonella revealed that 62.5% was S. typhimurium (five samples), 25% was S. gallinarum (two samples), and 12.5% was S. derby (one sample). The results of the various isolated bacteria from different organs, with their incidence, are summarized in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1.

Serotyping of the isolated Salmonella spp.
3.3. Histopathological Examination
The microscopic lesions observed in the livers of pigeons infected with E. coli can vary depending on the severity of the infection and the bird's immune response. Microscopically, we can observe hepatitis, characterized by the infiltration of heterophilic cells and disruption of normal liver architecture. The inflammatory response to the infection manifests as swelling and congestion of the liver's blood vessels. In Salmonella‐infected cases, there was vacuolar degeneration (VD), and areas of necrosis within the liver tissue may be present, indicating damage (Figure 2A,B). Lymphocytic depletion was the most commonly observed lesion in the examined spleens infected with E. coli. The inflammatory process led to the detection of newly formed blood vessels (Figure 2C,D).
FIGURE 2.

Photomicrograph of pigeon's liver and spleen (H&E scale bar, 200). (A) Liver of pigeons infected with Escherichia coli showing perihepatitis (arrow) and massive heterophilic infiltration (HI) of hepatic parenchyma (HP), especially around congested central veins (CV). (B) Pigeon livers infected with Salmonellae showing severe vacuolar degeneration (VD) of HP and paracentral HI. (C) Spleen of pigeons infected with E. coli showing newly formed splenic arterioles (arrows). (D) Spleen of pigeons infected with E. coli showing lymphoid depletion (arrows).
The kidneys showed signs of interstitial nephritis, a condition where inflammatory cell infiltrate the interstitial tissue, causing inflammation. The inflammatory response to the infection resulted in congestion, blood vessel dilation and haemorrhage. The glomerulus and renal casts in convoluted tubules mostly exhibit hyalinization (Figure 3A,B). Pseudomonas‐infected pigeons’ lungs show congested vasculature and hyperplasia of the bronchiolar lining epithelium, whereas S. aureus‐infected pigeons’ lungs show massive infiltration of the bronchi, lung parenchyma and parabronchus by inflammatory cells (Figure 3C,D). As a result of the infection, there was an accumulation of fluid in the lung tissue due to increased vascular permeability.
FIGURE 3.

Photomicrograph of pigeon's kidneys and lungs (H&E scale bar, 200). (A) Kidneys of pigeons infected with Salmonellae showing interstitial nephritis (arrows). The kidneys of pigeons that had an Escherichia coli infection show hyalinization of the glomerulus (black arrow) and renal casts in the convoluted tubules (blue arrows). (C) The lungs of pigeons infected with Pseudomonas show congested vasculature (blue arrows) and hyperplasia of the bronchiolar lining epithelium (black arrow). (D) Lungs of pigeons infected with Staphylococcus showing massive infiltration of parabronchus by inflammatory cells (black arrows).
Congestion results from increased blood flow to the intestines. Salmonella infections have been known to cause enteritis, characterized by the infiltration of inflammatory cells and damage to the mucosal layer. Enterobacter infection causes damage to the intestinal mucosa, resulting in erosions and ulcers in the intestinal lining (Figure 4A,B). In response to the infection, inflammatory cells accumulate in the ovarian tissue, contributing to inflammation and tissue damage in the ovaries. Salmonella‐infected ovarian tissues show regressed follicles (Figure 4C,D).
FIGURE 4.

Photomicrograph of pigeon's intestines and ovaries. Infection of pigeons’ intestines with Salmonellae causes enteritis, which is shown by inflammatory cell infiltration (arrow) and the breakdown of intestinal glands (H&E scale bar, 200). (B) Intestine of pigeons infected with Enterobacter showing desquamation of intestinal villi (arrow) (H&E scale bar, 200). (C) Ovary of pigeons infected with Salmonellae showing regressed ovarian follicles (arrow) (H&E scale bar, 200). (D) Ovary of pigeons infected with Escherichia coli showing infiltration of ovarian interstitium by inflammatory cells (arrows) (H&E scale bar, 50).
4. Discussion
Few studies have surveyed bacterial lesions in feral pigeons in Egypt. The present study was conducted on 80 wild pigeons from Ismailia in the east of Egypt, evaluating various pathological lesions in these birds through a trial to explore their potential role in the epidemiology of certain bacterial pathogens in Egypt. Various body organs, including the lungs, kidneys, intestines, spleen, liver, heart and ovaries, were collected from each bird for histopathological and bacteriological investigation. Furthermore, during 72 h of clinical observation in the laboratory, no abnormal signs were detected in any of the collected birds, but variable histopathological lesions were observed in all of them. Regarding the bacteriological isolation, the main isolates were E. coli, Salmonella, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Proteus and Shigella.
The bacteriological examination of feral pigeons in this study revealed a significant prevalence of 51.7% (124 out of 240) of the collected samples testing positive for at least one bacterial species. This finding underscores the role of free‐living pigeons as important reservoirs and potential vectors for pathogenic bacteria that may pose threats to public health and livestock industries (Diab et al. 2019).
Furthermore, Schmidt et al. (2000) and Radimersky et al. (2010) isolated E. coli from feral pigeons, whereas Raue et al. (2005) proved the isolation of Klebsiella from pigeons. Additionally, Askar et al. (2011) and Santos et al. (2020) mentioned the isolation of Shigella from feral pigeons. As well as El‐Enbaawy et al. (2014) stated that Pseudomonas was the most common bacterium in feral pigeons. Awad‐Alla et al. (2010) isolated Enterobacter from white ibis in Egypt. The co‐existence of E. coli, Salmonella and Enterobacteriaceae in pigeons poses a significant threat to human health, as these pathogens can contaminate meat and eggs, leading to foodborne illnesses (Zaki and Hadad 2019).
E. coli, a common infectious bacterial disease, was isolated from cases of fibrinous bronchopneumonia, bronchitis and interstitial pneumonia. This result aligns with the findings of Radimersky et al. (2010) and Zaki et al. (2025), who noted that E. coli is commonly found in the gastrointestinal tract of birds and is widely disseminated in their faeces. As a result, birds are constantly exposed to contaminated faeces, water, dust and the environment (Charlton 2006; Santos et al. 2020).
In addition, E. coli has a role in decreasing immunity, which increases the virulence of the other associated pathogens as well as the ability of the body to produce fibrin in an inflammatory response; it also can cause respiratory manifestations in birds (Bradbury and Janet 2008). The isolated E. coli could contribute to hepatitis occurrence (Ewers et al. 2004). Researchers have identified over 1000 E. coli serotypes but have only linked a limited subset to avian diseases. The primary reservoir of E. coli is the poultry's intestinal tract, where it is present in high concentrations (Diab et al. 2021). Finding the O78 serogroups in the current study samples is worrying because it can be spread from animals to people and is linked to many diseases in humans, such as invasive infections, neonatal meningitis and sepsis (Rahman et al. 2020). Our study revealed that approximately 5.7% of the isolates remained untyped, highlighting the complexity of E. coli serotyping and the need for further characterization methods.
El‐Enbaawy et al. (2014) reported that Pseudomonas spp. was the most common bacterium in feral pigeons, causing respiratory infections when introduced into the tissues of susceptible birds (Durrani et al. 2020). However, Yousseff and Ahmed (2013) reported that Pseudomonas causes interstitial nephritis, deposits urea in the ureters and causes the ureter cells to desquamate. Mohamed and Shehata (2009) observed similar lesions, including interstitial nephritis, degeneration and necrosis of renal tubular epithelial lining cells, in table‐egg layers infected with Pseudomonas species. Moreover, Klebsiella species are one of the most important zoonotic microorganisms, and the infections they cause are often resistant to multiple drugs. More and more strains are making extended‐spectrum beta‐lactamases (ESBLs), which make the body resistant to many antimicrobial drugs (Beceiro et al. 2013).
Shigella, one of the most important foodborne and waterborne diseases, can spread to humans through various routes such as contaminated water from wild bird faeces (Abbaszadegan et al. 1997) or improperly cooked meat (Todd et al. 2007). Furthermore, studies have reported that Shigella can cause focal hepatitis and focal hepatic necrosis in both chicken embryos (Al‐Sadi et al. 2000) and humans, particularly laboratory workers (Stern and Gitnick 1976). The predominant lesion in the immune organs (spleen, bursa of Fabricius and caecal tonsils) was lymphocytic depletion, which could be attributed to the isolated Salmonella that causes enlargement of the lymphoid organs at the beginning of the infection, followed by lymphocytic depletion and decreased bird immunity, which is in agreement with Ranjbar et al. (2020). The observed post‐mortem lesions were variable and not specific, with no conspicuous lesion associated with a particular locality.
Collectively, these bacteriological findings demonstrate that feral pigeons can harbour a wide array of pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria, many of which have zoonotic or veterinary significance. Their free‐ranging behaviour, ability to thrive in diverse habitats and proximity to urban and agricultural environments make them potential bridge hosts for pathogen transmission between wildlife, domestic animals and humans.
The histopathological findings observed in the tissues of feral pigeons in this study provide valuable insights into the pathological impact of various bacterial pathogens and highlight the potential of these birds as reservoirs for zoonotic and economically important infections. Liver lesions in E. coli‐infected pigeons were characterized by hepatitis with infiltration of heterophilic cells and marked disruption of hepatic architecture. These findings are consistent with bacterial septicaemia, where the liver acts as a filtration organ, accumulating bacteria and initiating a robust inflammatory response. Hepatic congestion and swollen blood vessels are hallmarks of acute inflammation, often reported in systemic E. coli infections in birds and mammals. Similar histopathological changes have been described by Mehmood et al. (2021), where hepatic inflammation was attributed to circulating endotoxins and bacterial antigens in avian species.
In pigeons infected with Salmonella, VD and necrosis within hepatic tissue were evident, suggesting more severe cellular injury. These lesions reflect hepatocellular damage due to the cytotoxins produced by Salmonella spp., especially S. typhimurium. This pathogen is known for its invasive nature and its ability to induce both acute and chronic granulomatous hepatitis in birds, as previously reported in broilers by Soufy et al. (2016).
Splenic lymphoid depletion, as seen in E. coli‐infected pigeons, indicates a depressed immune status and reflects systemic involvement. Lymphoid atrophy is a common feature in chronic infections and stress‐related immunosuppression. The neovascularization observed suggests chronic inflammation and tissue remodelling. These findings align with previous studies that described depletion of splenic white pulp in bacterial infections as a response to persistent antigenic stimulation (Abu El Hammed et al. 2022).
In the kidneys, E. coli and Pseudomonas infections were associated with interstitial nephritis, congestion and hyalinization of the glomeruli. These changes reflect the systemic dissemination of bacteria and the kidneys’ role in filtering blood‐borne pathogens. Interstitial nephritis with haemorrhage is a known outcome of bacterial endotoxemia and can severely impair renal function. The presence of hyaline casts suggests tubular damage and protein leakage, consistent with findings in septicaemic birds (Fotouh et al. 2014).
The lungs exhibited pathogen‐specific lesions. P. aeruginosa infection resulted in bronchiolar epithelial hyperplasia and vascular congestion, indicative of chronic irritation and prolonged inflammation. This bacterium is known for producing biofilms and toxins that damage respiratory epithelium, contributing to tissue remodelling. Meanwhile, S. aureus caused massive infiltration of the pulmonary parenchyma and parabronchus by inflammatory cells, a hallmark of bronchopneumonia (Chrobak‐Chmiel et al. 2024). The presence of pulmonary oedema further supports a severe inflammatory reaction leading to increased vascular permeability. These findings are supported by research in avian respiratory diseases where S. aureus was found to induce severe fibrinopurulent pneumonia (Mohamed and Abdelaziz 2023).
Intestinal lesions, particularly in Salmonella‐infected pigeons, included enteritis with mucosal erosion, inflammation and vascular congestion. These pathological features are indicative of invasive enteric infection, where disruption of epithelial integrity allows for bacterial translocation and systemic spread. Enterobacter‐associated ulceration and mucosal damage underscore its role as an opportunistic pathogen in compromised hosts. These findings are consistent with studies showing that both Salmonella and Enterobacter can cause necrotizing enteritis and colitis in birds, often exacerbated by co‐infections and stress (Mahmoud et al. 2025).
Finally, the ovarian tissue in Salmonella‐infected pigeons displayed regressed follicles and inflammatory infiltration, suggesting reproductive dysfunction. S. gallinarum in particular is well‐known for its tropism for reproductive tissues in birds (Soufy et al. 2016), often leading to follicular degeneration and decreased egg production in laying hens. The inflammation observed here could result in long‐term impairment of reproductive performance if such infections persist or become widespread in feral populations that interact with poultry (Căpriță et al. 2024).
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, the present study revealed a high incidence of bacterial diseases in feral birds without obvious clinical manifestation in the affected birds, suggesting a health risk to humans and animals through direct or indirect contact.
Author Contributions
Ahmed Fotouh, Nady Khairy Elbarbary, Said Elshafae and Rania Samir Zaki: design of methodology and coordination of the overall study. Sohaila Fathi El‐Hawary: data collection and conducted the study. Eman A. Al‐Shahari, Hanan M. Alharbi, Maha A. Aljumaa, Suad Hamdan Almasoudi and Ahmed Ezzat Ahmed: data collection, data analysis and interpretation of the results. Ahmed Fotouh, Mohamed Said Diab and Manal Abdullah Mahmoud: writing up of the manuscript. Ahmed Fotouh and Nady Khairy Elbarbary: supervision. All the authors approved the final manuscript for submission.
Funding
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Research Project under grant number RGP2/223/46. The authors extend their appreciation to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2026R454), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ethics Statement
The ethical committee for animal use at Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aswan University, Egypt, approved the protocol under no. 05‐08‐2022.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors have nothing to report.
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the manuscript.
References
- Abbaszadegan, M. , Hasan M. N., Gerba C. P., and Roessle P. F.. 1997. “The Disinfection Efficacy of a Point‐of‐Use Water Treatment System Against Bacterial, Viral and Protozoan Waterborne Pathogens.” Water Research 31, no. 3: 574–582. [Google Scholar]
- Abdel‐Maguid, D. S. , Zaki R. S., Soliman S. A., Abd‐Elhafeez H. H., and Mohamed S. A.. 2019. “Fraudulence Risk Strategic Assessment of Processed Meat Products.” Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research 9, no. 3: 81–90. [Google Scholar]
- Abo‐Aziza, F. A. M. , Zaki A. A., Adel R. M., and Fotouh A.. 2022. “Amelioration of Aflatoxin Acute Hepatitis Rat Model by Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Hepatogenic Differentiation.” Veterinary World 15, no. 5: 1347–1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abu El Hammed, W. , Soufy H., EL‐Shemy A., Fotouh A., Nasr M. N., and Dessouky M. I.. 2022. “Prophylactic Effect of Oregano in Chickens Experimentally Infected With Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli O27 With Special Reference to Hematology, Serum Biochemistry, and Histopathology of Vital Organs.” Egyptian Journal of Chemistry 65, no. 6: 269–282. [Google Scholar]
- Al‐Aalim, A. M. 2017. “Isolation and Identification of Salmonella Microorganisms From Pigeons and Their Pathogenicity in Broiler Chicks.” Basrah Journal of Veterinary Research 16, no. 1: 333–347. [Google Scholar]
- Al‐Noayme, Z. A. , and Al‐Alhially A. A.. 2021. “A Cytopathological Study of the Role of Liver Impression as a Diagnostic Tool in Pigeons.” Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences 35, no. 3: 555–560. [Google Scholar]
- Al‐Sadi, H. I. , Basher H. A., and Ismail H. K.. 2000. “Bacteriologic and Pathologic Studies on Dead‐in‐Shell Chicken Embryos.” Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences 681, no. 13: no. 2: 297–307. [Google Scholar]
- Askar, Ş. , Sakarya F., and Murat Y.. 2011. “The Potential Risk in Epizootiology of Bacterial Zoonozis: Pigeon (Columba livia domestica) Feces.” Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 17: S13–S16. 10.9775/kvfd.2010.2802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Awad‐Alla, M. E. , Abdien H. M., and Dessouki A. A.. 2010. “Prevalence of Bacteria and Parasites in White Ibis in Egypt.” Veterinaria Italiana 46, no. 3: 277–286. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46382882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beceiro, A. , Tomás M., and Bou G.. 2013. “Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence: A Successful or Deleterious Association in the Bacterial World?” Clinical Microbiology Reviews 26, no. 2: 185–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bogach, M. , Paliy A., Liulin P., Bohach O., and Palii A.. 2021. “Endoparasitoses of the Eurasian Collared Dove (Streptopelia decaocto) on the Northern Black Sea Coast of Ukraine.” Biosystems Diversity 29, no. 4: 340–344. [Google Scholar]
- Bradbury, E. D. , and Janet M.. 2008. Section 2 Bacterial Diseases: Enterobacteriaceae. Poultry Diseases . 6th ed. Saunders Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- Căpriță, A. G. , Dina D. M., Măcinic M., and Daneş D.. 2024. “Analysis of Etiological, Clinical Manifestations, and Gross Lesions Associated with Young Pigeon Disease in a Pigeon Loft Outbreak.” Scientific Works Series C, Veterinary Medicine 70, no. 2: 48–54. [Google Scholar]
- Charlton, B. R. 2006. Avian Disease Manual. 6th ed. American Association of Avian Pathologists (AAAP). [Google Scholar]
- Chrobak‐Chmiel, D. , Kwiecień E., Golke A., et al. 2021. “Pigeons as Carriers of Clinically Relevant Multidrug‐Resistant Pathogens—A Clinical Case Report and Literature Review.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: 664226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chrobak‐Chmiel, D. , Marszalik A., Golke A., et al. 2024. “Virulence and Host Specificity of Staphylococci From Staphylococcus intermedius Group of Pigeon Origin With an Emphasis on Staphylococcus intermedius .” Microbial Pathogenesis 195: 106906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dandrawy, M. K. , Tufahah M. O., Hassan M. D., Manar M. A., Ahmed S. A., and Nady K. E.. 2025. “Probiotic Approaches to E. coli in Meat and Chicken Products: Prevalence, Resistance, and Virulence.” Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal 71, no. 185: 151–174. [Google Scholar]
- Diab, M. S. , Tarabees R., Elnaker Y. F., et al. 2021. “Molecular Detection, Serotyping, and Antibiotic Resistance of Shiga‐Toxigenic Escherichia coli Isolated From She‐Camels and In‐Contact Humans in Egypt.” Antibiotics 10, no. 8: 1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diab, M. S. , Zaki R. S., Ibrahim N. A., and Abd El Hafez M. S.. 2019. “Prevalence of Multidrug Resistance Non‐Typhoidal Salmonellae Isolated From Layer Farms and Humans in Egypt.” World's Veterinary Journal 9, no. 4: 280–288. [Google Scholar]
- Dovč, A. , Jereb G., Krapež U., et al. 2016. “Occurrence of Bacterial and Viral Pathogens in Common and Non‐Invasive Diagnostic Sampling From Parrots and Racing Pigeons in Slovenia.” Avian Diseases 60, no. 2: 487–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Durrani, A. Z. , Saleem M. H., Ahmad H. A., Ali M. H., Chaudhary M., and Usman M.. 2020. “Bacterial and Parasitic Profiling of Native Pigeons in District Lahore‐Pakistan.” In 17th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
- Dutta, P. , Borah M. K., Sarmah R., and Gangil R.. 2013. “Isolation, Histopathology and Antibiogram of Escherichia coli From Pigeons (Columba livia).” Veterinary World 6, no. 2: 91–94. 10.5455/vetworld.2013.91-94. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Elbarbary, N. K. , Abdelmotilib N. M., Gomaa R. A., et al. 2023. “Impact of Thawing Techniques on the Microstructure, Microbiological Analysis, and Antioxidants Activity of Lates niloticus and Mormyrus kannume Fish Fillets.” Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research 49: 530–536. [Google Scholar]
- Elbarbary, N. K. , Darwish W. S., Fotouh A., and Dandrawy M. K.. 2024. “Unveiling the Mix‐Up: Investigating Species and Unauthorized Tissues in Beef‐Based Meat Products.” BMC Veterinary Research 20, no. 1: 380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El‐Enbaawy, M. I. H. , Shalaby N. A., and Omran G. A. M.. 2014. “Risk of Feral Birds (Pigeons, Ibises, Hoopoes, and Crows) in Transmission of Multidrug‐Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Sohag Governorate.” Global Veterinaria 12, no. 5: 725–730. [Google Scholar]
- El‐Hawary, S. F. , Meawad A., Bekhit M. M., et al. 2025. “Tackling Food Spoilage Bacteria: How Pomegranate Peel Extract Can Improve Beef Safety.” Italian Journal of Food Science 37, no. 2: 228–240. [Google Scholar]
- Elmeligy, A. A. , Ghania A. A., and Fotouh A.. 2024. “Pathological and Immunohistochemical Studies of Lymphoid Leukosis in Pigeons in Egypt.” Open Veterinary Journal 14, no. 8: 1952–1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El‐Shazly, M. , Hassan A., ElJakee J., and Youssef Y.. 2016. “Studies on the Role of Feral Birds as a Source of Pathogenic Escherichia coli Infection to Chickens.” Veterinary Medical Journal (Giza) 62, no. 2: 65–71. [Google Scholar]
- Ewers, C. , Traute J., Sabine K., Hans C., Philippc L., and Wielera H.. 2004. “Molecular Epidemiology of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) Isolated From Colisepticemia in Poultry.” Veterinary Microbiology 104: 91–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fotouh, A. , Abdel‐Maguid D. S., Abdelhaseib M., Zaki R. S., and Darweish M.. 2024. “Pathological and Pharmacovigilance Monitoring as Toxicological Imputations of Azithromycin and Its Residues in Broilers.” Veterinary World 17, no. 6: 1271–1280. 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1271-1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fotouh, A. , Gab‐Allah M. S., Tantawy A. A., Soufy H., and Nasr S. M.. 2014. “Alterations of Blood Components in Broiler Chicks Experimentally Infected With Salmonella gallinarum .” Global Veterinaria 13, no. 5: 787–793. [Google Scholar]
- Fotouh, A. , Soufy H., El‐Begawey M. B., and Nasr S. M.. 2020. “Pathological, Clinicopathological and Molecular Investigations on Chickens Experimentally Infected With Avian Leucosis Virus Type J.” Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 8, no. 6: 590–600. 10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.6.590.600. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gabriele‐Rivet, V. , Fairbrother J. H., Tremblay D., Harel J., Côté N., and Arsenault J.. 2016. “Prevalence and Risk Factors for Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Coxiella burnetii, and Newcastle Disease Virus in Feral Pigeons (Columba livia) in Public Areas of Montreal, Canada.” Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 80, no. 1: 81–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khairy, E. N. , Dandrawy M. K., Hadad G., et al. 2024. “Bacterial Quality and Molecular Detection of Food Poisoning Virulence Genes Isolated From Nasser Lake Fish, Aswan, Egypt.” International Journal of Food Science 2024: 6095430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobuszewska, A. , and Wysok B.. 2024. “Pathogenic Bacteria in Feral Birds and Its Public Health Significance.” Animals 14, no. 6: 968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahmoud, M. A. , Abdel‐Kareem A. H., Abdel‐Hafez M. S., Fotouh A., Zahran I. S., and Abdel‐Rahman H. A.. 2025. “Nanoparticles Amelioration Effects on Heat Stress in Broilers.” Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal 71, no. 185: 314–343. [Google Scholar]
- Mahmoud, M. A. , Megahed G., Yousef M. S., Ali F. A. Z., Zaki R. S., and Abdelhafeez H. H.. 2020. “ Salmonella typhimurium Triggered Unilateral Epididymo‐Orchitis and Splenomegaly in a Holstein Bull in Assiut, Egypt: A Case Report.” Pathogens 9, no. 4: 314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mehmood, S. , Nashiruddullah N., and Ahmed J. A.. 2021. “Mortality in Some Domesticated Pigeons (Columba livia) From Jammu, India.” Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 45, no. 1: 158–167. [Google Scholar]
- Mohamed, H. A. , and Shehata N. M.. 2009. “Some Studies on Bacteria Induction of Renal Lesions in Chickens.” Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal 55, no. 122: 247–262. [Google Scholar]
- Mohamed, M. H. , and Abdelaziz A. M.. 2023. “Survey on the Most Common Diseases Circulating Among Pigeons in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.” Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 33, no. 5: 1220–1236. [Google Scholar]
- Radimersky, P. , Frolkova D., Janoszowska M., Dolejska P., Svec E., and Roubalova P.. 2010. “Antibiotic Resistance in Faecal Bacteria (Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp.) in Feral Pigeons.” Journal of Applied Microbiology 109, no. 5: 1687–1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, M. S. , Hakim M. L., Rima U. K., Rahman M. M., and Rumi N. A.. 2020. “Prevalence of Diseases of Pigeons and Responses to Treatment of Bacterial Disease.” Bangladesh Veterinarian 37, no. 1–2: 21–26. [Google Scholar]
- Ranjbar, V. R. , Basiri S., and Abbasi‐Kali R.. 2020. “Paratyphoid Infection Caused by Salmonella typhimurium in a Pigeon Flock (Columba livia) in Iran.” Journal of Zoonotic Diseases 4, no. 1: 43–48. [Google Scholar]
- Raue, R. , Schmidt V., Freick M., Reinhardt B., Johne R., and Kamphausen L.. 2005. “A Disease Complex Associated With Pigeon Circovirus Infection, Young Pigeon Disease Syndrome.” Avian Pathology 34, no. 5: 418–425. 10.1080/03079450500267825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salah, A. S. , Lestingi A., El‐Tarabany M. S., et al. 2025. “Effect of Spirulina Supplementation on Growth, Immunity, Antioxidant Status, and Pathomorphological Perspectives in Broilers Exposed to Dietary Aflatoxin B1.” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 34, no. 2: 100519. [Google Scholar]
- Sambrook, J. , Fritsch E. F., and Maniatis T.. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, H. M. , Tsai C. Y., Catulin G. E. M., et al. 2020. “Common Bacterial, Viral, and Parasitic Diseases in Pigeons (Columba livia): A Review of Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies.” Veterinary Microbiology 247: 108779. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, H. , Scheef J., Morabito S., Wieler L. H., Karch H., and Scheef R. A.. 2000. “New Shiga Toxin 2 Variant (Stx2f) From Escherichia coli Isolated From Pigeons.” Applied Environmental Microbiology 66, no. 3: 1205–1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shosha, E. A. E. M. , Zanaty A. M., Darwesh M. M., and Fotouh A.. 2024. “Molecular Characterization and Immunopathological Investigation of Avian Reticuloendotheliosis Virus in Breeder Flocks in Egypt.” Virology Journal 21, no. 1: 259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soufy, H. , Gab‐Allah M. S., Tantawy A. A., Fotouh A., and Nasr S. M.. 2016. “Pathogenesis of Experimental Salmonella gallinarum Infection (Fowl Typhoid) in Broiler Chicks.” Egyptian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 47, no. 2: 117–131. [Google Scholar]
- Stern, M. S. , and Gitnick G. L.. 1976. “Shigella Hepatitis, Cholestatic Hepatitis With Portal and Periportal Polymorph Nuclear Inflammatory Infiltrates.” Jama 235: 262. [Google Scholar]
- Tanase, I. O. , Ilie C., Daraban F., Pavli C., Rîmbu C. M., and Velescu E.. 2016. “Observations in a Colibacillosis Outbreak in Pigeons.” JIVA 22, no. 1: 97–103. [Google Scholar]
- Todd, E. C. , Greig J. D., Bartleson C. A., and Michaels B. S.. 2007. “Outbreaks Where Food Workers Have Been Implicated in the Spread of Foodborne Disease. Part 2. Description of Outbreaks by Size, Severity, and Settings.” Journal of Food Protection 70, no. 8: 1975–1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vasconcelos, R. H. , Teixeira R. S. D. C., Silva I. N. G. D., Lopes E. D. S., and Maciel W. C.. 2018. “Feral Pigeons (Columba livia) as Potential Reservoirs of Salmonella sp. and Escherichia coli .” Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 85: e0412017. [Google Scholar]
- Welle, K. R. 2021. “Pigeons and Doves.” In Exotic Animal Emergency and Critical Care Medicine. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Yousseff, F. M. , and Ahmed M. A.. 2013. “Bacteriological Studies on the Effect of Probiotics on Pseudomonas as a Pathogen in Quails and Their Clinicopathological Alteration.” Proc. 6th Inter Conf. Vet. Res. Div . 15–31.
- Zaki, R. S. , Elbarbary N. K., Mahmoud M. A., et al. 2025. “Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli and Ostriches: A Deep Dive Into Pathological and Microbiological Investigation.” American Journal of Veterinary Research 86, no. 2: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaki, R. S. , and Hadad G. A.. 2019. “Rate of Salmonellae and Bacillus cereus in Some Retail Cut‐Up Chicken and Poultry Meat Products.” Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research 9, no. 2: 76–80. [Google Scholar]
- Zigo, F. , Ondrašovičová S., and Farkašová Z.. 2022. “Correct Interpretation of Carrier Pigeon Diseases‐ Collibacillosis.” International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology 6, no. 1: 27–30. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the manuscript.
