Abstract
Objective:
To determine if the underlying cause of pulmonary hypoplasia results in different trajectories of lung growth by describing pulmonary function in 8- to 13-year-old children born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), early intervention congenital lung malformation (EICLM), and giant omphalocele (GO).
Study Design:
We performed spirometry and plethysmography, and echocardiograms in 81 children aged 8- to 13-years with CDH, EICLM, and GO. Clinical and demographic data were collected at the study visit and from electronic medical records. Quantitative analyses of right ventricular (RV) function were retrospectively performed.
Results:
Fifty-two children with CDH, 17 with EICLM, and 12 with GO were included in the study. Most patients (51.9%) had abnormal lung function. Those with CDH and EICLM were more likely to have an obstructive process, while subjects with GO frequently had restrictive disease. Chest wall abnormalities, patch repair, larger diaphragm defect, and intrathoracic liver position were associated with abnormal lung function in patients with CDH. Abnormal lung function tended to be associated with lower right ventricular function, although this was not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
Abnormal lung function persists into late childhood in patients with CDH, EICLM, and GO. However, specific patterns of pulmonary function abnormalities occur in each disorder. This suggests that lung growth and remodeling likely differ depending on the underlying cause of pulmonary hypoplasia.
Keywords: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, giant omphalocele, congenital lung malformation, congenital pulmonary airway malformation, bronchopulmonary sequestration, right ventricular function
Introduction
Normal lung development begins as early as 22 days gestation when a lung bud projects from the ventral foregut and divides into right and left lung buds. 1,2 A variety of aberrant processes occurring after this time can impact lung development and result in pulmonary hypoplasia.3,4 Three highly morbid5–7 causes of pulmonary hypoplasia are giant omphalocele (GO), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), and large congenital lung malformations (CLMs).
In CDH, incomplete diaphragm closure leads to the herniation of abdominal viscera into the thoracic cavity. Patients have reduced alveolar surface area and airway branching, as well as decreased pulmonary vascularization with increased pulmonary arterial smooth muscle.8 The term CLM encompasses several space-occupying thoracic lesions including congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM), bronchopulmonary sequestration (BPS), and congenital lobar overinflation (CLO). To date, no study has exclusively assessed long-term pulmonary function outcomes in children with large, space occupying CLMs requiring either fetal intervention or resection within the first 48 hours of life (early intervention CLM, EICLM). Omphalocele is characterized by the extrusion of abdominal viscera, covered by a membrane, outside of the abdominal cavity. Giant omphalocele refers to a large evisceration that contains most of the liver.9,10 In general, small omphaloceles are not associated with pulmonary hypoplasia. However, in some patients with GO, lung growth is impaired beginning in the fetal period.9,10 Although infant pulmonary function has been reported in survivors of GO9, long-term pulmonary function has not been described to date. In each of these three disorders (CDH, EICLM, GO), the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypoplasia differs, and a comparison of long-term lung function outcomes has not been performed.
Pulmonary function, as measured by forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), normally follows three trajectories across the lifespan: (1) increase in pulmonary function throughout childhood due postnatal alveolarization (during the first few years of life) and increased alveolar and airway size (2) lung function plateau during early adulthood, and (3) steady lung function decline with aging.11 Children with lung growth abnormalities that cause either a reduction in airway size or number, or a reduction in the number of alveoli, would be expected to achieve a lower peak lung function, placing them at risk for developing early-onset symptomatic lung disease, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).11–13 Therefore, identification of patients at risk for abnormal lung function during childhood is essential to allow for targeted interventions like tobacco smoke avoidance, treatment of concomitant diseases such as asthma, and reducing negative environmental and occupational exposures.11–13
In July 2004, we established an interdisciplinary program at our institution to care for children with pulmonary hypoplasia. The current study aimed to describe pulmonary function in children aged 8 to 13 years with GO, CDH, and EICLM. We hypothesized that pulmonary function abnormalities would differ between the groups, based on the underlying cause of pulmonary hypoplasia. We also aimed to describe factors associated with abnormal lung function in this cohort.
Methods
The Institutional Review Board at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia approved the current study, and all parents or legal guardians gave written or verbal informed consent for their children to be included (IRB 18–015396).
Patient population
This is a single center cross-sectional study of pulmonary function among 8- to 13-year-old children diagnosed with pulmonary hypoplasia within the first 28 days of life and followed at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Pulmonary Hypoplasia Program. For this study, research visits occurred from September 2016 to October 2018. All eligible patients were emailed a recruitment letter regarding the study. Parents of patients were then contacted by phone for enrollment. Patients were randomly selected to be contacted until the target enrollment of 100 participants was reached (convenience sample). The subset of patients who completed pulmonary function testing is included in this study.
Our program defined GO as a large abdominal evisceration covered by a membrane containing most of the liver.9,10,14 For CDH patients, the defect size was graded from A to D, from smallest to largest, by direct visualization during operation, in accordance with published consensus criteria.15 Only CLMs that required prenatal intervention or resection within the first 48 hours of life due to respiratory distress were included (EICLM). We reviewed the medical records of children who enrolled in this study and included those who performed pulmonary function testing (spirometry and/or plethysmography). Demographic and clinical data were obtained during the initial study visit and retrospectively from the electronic medical record. For this study, we documented the following chest wall abnormalities: chest wall asymmetry, pectus carinatum/excavatum, and rib flaring. In our experience, nearly all patients with GO have a narrow chest, and therefore, this was not included as a specific chest wall abnormality to compare between the cohorts.
Echocardiogram
Prospectively acquired echocardiograms were performed by a single pediatric sonographer (AF) using standard pediatric views with 3–8 MHz transducers on a Phillips IE33 machine (Phillips, Andover, MA, USA) in accordance with our echocardiography laboratory’s standard imaging protocol at the time of the study visit and digitally stored in the Syngo Dynamics system (Siemens, USA). Additional quantitative analyses of right ventricular (RV) function were retrospectively performed at the time of this sub-analysis. Two pediatric cardiac sonographers (YW and DA), blinded to clinical characteristics, obtained offline measures of RV systolic function that predict adverse outcomes in CDH and other forms of developmental lung diseases.16–20 RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) and RV free wall strain (RVFWS) measurements of systolic myocardial deformation were obtained using Tomtec software (Image Arena 4.6; Munich, Germany). Strain is reported as a negative number, with a greater absolute value indicating better systolic function.21 Absolute value of the strain measures was used in this study. RV systolic function was also assessed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion Z-scores (TAPSEZ) and RV fractional area change (RVFAC) calculated as the end-diastolic area minus the end-systolic area divided by the end-diastolic area.22–24
Pulmonary function testing
Spirometry and plethysmography were performed using a Morgan Scientific Medisoft Plethysmograph and ComPAS software. All studies followed American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) technical standards. We assigned a grade to each spirometry study according to ATS/ERS guidelines, and only included studies that received grade A or B for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC).25 Only acceptable plethysmography studies according to the ATS/ERS guidelines were included.25 Race-neutral reference equations were used, consistent with an updated American Thoracic Society statement.26 All pulmonary function testing was performed in the outpatient setting, and subjects were free from illness at the time of the study. Bronchodilator testing was not performed. In addition to reporting median PFT values, we identified abnormal pulmonary function patterns in subjects who completed valid spirometry and plethysmography, using a z-score less than or greater than 1.65 to define a particular value as abnormal for all measures, consistent with the updated ERS/ATS technical standard.27 A subject with a decreased FEV1/FVC was deemed to have an obstructive process. A decreased total lung capacity (TLC) and normal or increased FEV1/FVC was defined as a restrictive process. A mixed restrictive/obstructive disorder was defined as decreased FEV1/FVC and a low TLC. An increased residual volume (RV)/TLC accompanied by a normal FEV1/FVC and normal or increased TLC was categorized as lung overdistension. A pattern of impaired chest wall mechanics was defined as a normal FEV1/FVC, increased RV/TLC, and a low TLC. This category would include individuals with respiratory muscle weakness or an abnormally stiff chest wall. When assessing variables associated with abnormal lung function, we defined abnormal lung function as either: low FEV1/FVC, low TLC, or increased RV/TLC.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were summarized using the median (interquartile range, IQR, 25%, 75%) or mean (standard deviation) depending on the data distribution, as assessed by histograms, and categorical variables were summarized as frequencies. Continuous variables that were assumed to be non-normally distributed were compared between dichotomous lung function groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and between the diagnosis categories using the Kruskal-Wallis test. All spirometry and plethysmography result variables were normally distributed and therefore compared between the three groups using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). A Tukey HSD post-hoc analysis was used to adjust for multiple comparisons between group comparisons of these variables. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test of independence or Fisher’s exact test when the expected values in the cells were close to 5. We also used linear regression models to evaluate the association between abnormal lung function and a list of a priori chosen cardiac function variables. These models were adjusted for the potential confounding effects of biological sex, self-reported race defined as White/Non-White, age at pulmonary function testing, and use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in the neonatal period. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. All analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.
Results
Patient population
During the study period, the pulmonary hypoplasia program followed 626 patients, 189 of whom were between the ages of 8 and 13 years old. Of the 100 patients enrolled in the study, 97 attempted to perform pulmonary function testing. Fifteen subjects were excluded because of inadequate effort or reproducibility on pulmonary function testing. We also excluded one subject with pentalogy of Cantrell because he had both GO and CDH, and categorization of the main cause of his pulmonary hypoplasia could not be clinically determined. Ultimately, 81 subjects were included in the study. Fifty-two had CDH, 17 had EICLM, and 12 had GO. Four subjects had a small CLM in addition to CDH (n=3) or GO (n=1). We categorized these patients in the CDH or GO categories and not the EICLM category because the CLM did not require fetal intervention or resection within the first 48 hours of life. Of those included in the study, 64 (79%) subjects had valid spirometry and plethysmography studies, and 17 (21%) subjects had valid spirometry alone.
Patient demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in age, weight, or height at the time of pulmonary function testing between the three cohorts. The median gestational age at delivery for all subjects was 38.1 weeks, with a small but statistically significant difference between the three groups, likely attributable to a lower gestational age in the GO cohort (p = 0.02). No subjects had a tracheostomy or used any form of respiratory support at the time of pulmonary function testing. Only one subject was prescribed pulmonary hypertension (PH) medications at the time of testing. Corticosteroids and bronchodilators were prescribed to a higher percentage of subjects with CDH, although this difference was not statistically significant. Twelve (14.8%) subjects had a history of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support during their initial hospitalization after birth (10 in the CDH group, two in the EICLM group).
Table 1.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Continuous variables are expressed as median and interquartile range [Q1,Q3]. CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; EICLM, early intervention congenital lung malformation; GO, giant omphalocele; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease
| Variable | CDH (n=52) | EICLM (n=17) | GO (n=12) | Overall (n=81) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGE (yrs) | 10.3 [8.94, 12.2] | 10.3 [9.10, 11.9] | 10.8 [8.74, 11.5] | 10.4 [8.94, 11.9] | 0.941 |
| WEIGHT (kg) | 31.9 [24.1, 40.1] | 33.3 [30.5, 47.0] | 27.6 [22.6, 34.6] | 32.6 [25.4, 40.6] | 0.116 |
| HEIGHT (cm) | 138 [128, 148] | 140 [135, 148] | 134 [129, 150] | 138 [131, 149] | 0.49 |
| GESTATIONAL AGE (wks) | 38.4 [37.6, 39.1] | 37.7 [37.0, 38.4] | 37.5 [33.9, 38.2] | 38.1 [37.2, 39.0] | 0.02 |
| CHEST WALL | 0.317 | ||||
| Chest wall asymmetry | 6 (11.5%) | 1 (5.9%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (8.6%) | |
| No chest wall deformity | 35 (67.3%) | 12 (70.6%) | 12 (100%) | 59 (72.8%) | |
| Pectus carinatum | 4 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (4.9%) | |
| Pectus excavatum | 7 (13.5%) | 3 (17.6%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (12.3%) | |
| Rib flaring | 0 (0%) | 1 (5.9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.2%) | |
| SCOLIOSIS | 11 (21.2%) | 2 (11.8%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (16.0%) | 0.177 |
| MEDICATIONS at time of study | |||||
| Bronchodilators | 36 (69.2%) | 9 (52.9%) | 5 (41.7%) | 50 (61.7%) | 0.148 |
| Inhaled corticosteroids | 22 (42.3%) | 4 (23.5%) | 3 (25.0%) | 29 (35.8%) | 0.305 |
| Allergic rhinitis medications | 24 (46.2%) | 5 (29.4%) | 5 (41.7%) | 34 (42.0%) | 0.478 |
| Pulmonary vasodilators | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.2%) | > 0.99 |
| GERD medications | 8 (15.4%) | 2 (11.8%) | 1 (8.3%) | 11 (13.6%) | > 0.99 |
| Diuretics | 1 (1.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.2%) | > 0.99 |
| HISTORY OF ECMO | 10 (19.2%) | 2 (11.8%) | 0 (0%) | 12 (14.8%) | 0.27 |
Chest wall abnormalities and scoliosis were only observed in subjects with CDH and EICLM (Table 1). Nearly all subjects (91.3%) with CDH underwent open surgical repair, and 22 (42.3%) required a patch repair. The diaphragm defect was on the left in most cases (86.5%). The most common grade defect was A (57.7%). Intrathoracic liver position was seen in 22 (42.3%).
In the GO group, eight patients (66.7%) underwent Schuster staged closure, three (25%) underwent primary closure, and information about surgical technique was missing in one subject. No subjects had scoliosis or a chest wall deformity.
Fourteen (82.4%) patients with EICLM had CPAM, one (5.9%) had BPS, one (5.9%) had CLO, and one (5.9%) had persistent pulmonary interstitial emphysema.
Pulmonary function
Spirometry
Spirometry results are shown in Figure 1 and Table 2. The average FEV1/FVC was lower in subjects with CDH and EICLM compared to those with GO (ANOVA p-value 0.007, multiple comparison adjusted p-values of 0.005 and 0.052, respectively –Table S1). The FEV1 and FVC tended to be lowest in the GO group, while the trend was for FEF25–75 to be lower in CDH and EICLM subjects compared to those with GO, although these differences were not statistically significant.
Figure 1.
Box and whisker plots depicting lung function testing results (spirometry and plethysmography). Each box extends from the 25th to 75th percentile of values; the line within each box represents the median value. CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; EICLM, early intervention congenital lung malformation; GO, giant omphalocele
Table 2.
Spirometry results. Values are expressed as mean (standard deviation). pp, percent predicted; CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; EICLM, early intervention congenital lung malformation; GO, giant omphalocele; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEF25–75, forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75 percent of forced vital capacity; pp, percent predicted
| Variable | CDH (n=52) | EICLM (n=17) | GO (n=12) | Overall (n=81) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| FEV1 pp | 85.7 (18.7) | 83.3 (18.1) | 82.2 (14.0) | 84.6 (17.8) | 0.787 |
| FEV1 z-score | −1.07 (1.4) | −1.25 (1.3) | −1.35 (1.1) | −1.15 (1.3) | 0.773 |
| FVC pp | 95.9 (17.9) | 90.9 (13.9) | 84.2 (16.5) | 93.1 (17.3) | 0.088 |
| FVC z-score | −0.32 (1.4) | −0.69 (1.1) | −1.22 (1.3) | −0.53 (1.3) | 0.089 |
| FEV 1 /FVC | 78.7 (8.9) | 79.9 (8.5) | 87.4 (5.1) | 80.2 (8.8) | 0.007 |
| FEV 1 /FVC pp | 88.8 (9.9) | 90.5 (10.1) | 98.0 (6.1) | 90.5 (9.9) | 0.014 |
| FEV 1 /FVC z-score | −1.36 (1.1) | −1.13 (1.3) | −0.22 (1.0) | −1.14 (1.2) | 0.01 |
| FEF25–75 pp | 63.8 (25.2) | 64.8 (25.0) | 76.8 (18.8) | 66.0 (24.5) | 0.255 |
| FEF 25–75 | −1.56 (1.1) | −1.44 (1.1) | −1.03 (0.9) | −1.46 (1.1) | 0.31 |
Lung volumes
Plethysmography results are shown in Figure 1 and Table 3. The average FRC percent predicted (pp) and z-score differed between the three groups (p=0.024 and p=0.009, respectively). With multiple comparison testing, FRC was significantly increased in patients with CDH compared to those with GO whether described by percent predicted (p = 0.021) or by z-score (p = 0.007). FRC was not significantly different between subjects with CDH and those with EICLM (pp, p=0.472 and z-score, p=0.485). The average TLC percent predicted and z-score were different between the three groups (p=0.017 and p=0.012, respectively). In multiple comparison testing, the TLC was lower in subjects with GO compared to those with CDH (pp, p=0.013 and z-score, p=0.008) and EICLM z-score (pp, p=0.071 and z-score, p=0.049). Average RV and RV/TLC tended to be increased in those with CDH and EICLM compared to the GO group, although these differences were not statistically significant.
Table 3.
Plethysmography results. Values are expressed as mean (standard deviation). CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia. EICLM, early intervention congenital lung malformation; GO, giant omphalocele; FRC, function residual capacity; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity; pp, percent predicted.
| Variable | CDH (n=42) | EICLM (n=14) | GO (n=8) | Overall | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| FRC pp | 124 (33.0) | 113 (25.6) | 91.3 (31.1) | 118 (32.8) | 0.024 |
| FRC z-score | 0.99 (1.32) | 0.52 (1.2) | −0.603 (1.6) | 0.687 (1.4) | 0.009 |
| RV pp | 140 (59.7) | 129 (58.7) | 96.2 (38.0) | 132 (58.3) | 0.145 |
| RV z-score | 0.68 (1.0) | 0.45 (1.03) | −0.166 (0.8) | 0.523 (1.0) | 0.093 |
| TLC pp | 104 (17.7) | 102 (11.2) | 85.1 (20.4) | 101 (17.8) | 0.017 |
| TLC z-score | 0.28 (1.3) | 0.13 (0.8) | −1.20 (1.6) | 0.064 (1.3) | 0.012 |
| RV/TLC z-score | 1.11 (1.1) | 0.80 (1.0) | 0.514 (0.6) | 0.968 (1.0) | 0.257 |
| RV/TLC pp | 148 (47.2) | 135 (44.1) | 123 (26.4) | 142 (44.8) | 0.317 |
| RV/TLC | 31.6 (10.2) | 29.0 (9.5) | 26.6 (5.6) | 30.4 (9.6) | 0.334 |
We compared differences in abnormal pulmonary function patterns between groups (Figure 2). Forty-three percent of patients with CDH demonstrated an obstructive pattern, while 10% had a pattern of lung overdistension without obstruction. Similarly, an obstructive pattern was the most common abnormal pattern in EICLM subjects (36%). The only abnormal pulmonary function pattern seen in subjects with GO was a restrictive process (50%).
Figure 2.
Pulmonary function patterns of subjects who completed valid spirometry and plethysmography. CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; EICLM, early intervention congenital lung malformation; GO, giant omphalocele.
Factors associated with abnormal pulmonary function
Overall, 42 (51.9%) patients had abnormal pulmonary function, defined as either a low FEV1/FVC, low TLC, or high RV/TLC. This included 29 (55.8%) subjects with CDH, 8 (47.1%) with EICLM, and 5 (41.7%) with GO. In the CDH group, several factors were associated with abnormal lung function (Table 4), including chest wall abnormalities (p = 0.033), patch repair (p < 0.001), grade of defect (p < 0.001), and liver position (p = 0.017). There were no variables significantly associated with abnormal pulmonary function in patients with GO or EICLM, although this may have been the result of the smaller sample size in those groups.
Table 4.
Factors associated with abnormal lung function in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). GA, gestational age. Continuous variables are expressed as median and interquartile range [Q1,Q3].
| Variable | Normal Lung Function (n=23) | Abnormal Lung Function (n=29, 55.8%) | Overall (n=52) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGE (yrs) | 10.2 [9.13, 11.5] | 10.4 [8.74, 12.3] | 10.3 [8.94, 12.2] | 0.868 |
| GA at Birth (wks) | 38.7 [37.9, 39.2] | 38.3 [37.2, 39.1] | 38.4 [37.6, 39.1] | 0.231 |
| WEIGHT (kg) | 33.0 [26.5, 40.8] | 30.8 [23.4, 35.4] | 31.9 [24.1, 40.1] | 0.242 |
| HEIGHT (cm) | 139 [129, 144] | 136 [129, 150] | 138 [128, 148] | 0.761 |
| CHEST WALL ABNORMALITY | 3 (13.0%) | 14 (48.3%) | 17 (32.7%) | 0.033 |
| Chest wall asymmetry | 2 (8.7%) | 4 (13.8%) | 6 (11.5%) | |
| Pectus excavatum | 1 (4.3%) | 6 (20.7%) | 7 (13.5%) | |
| Pectus carinatum | 0 (0%) | 4 (13.8%) | 4 (7.7%) | |
| SURGICAL TECHNIQUE | ||||
| Minimally invasive | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.9%) | |
| Open | 21 (91.3%) | 29 (100%) | 50 (96.2%) | |
| Missing | 1 (4.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.9%) | |
| PATCH REPAIR | 3 (13.0%) | 19 (65.5%) | 22 (42.3%) | < 0.001 |
| CDH GRADE | < 0.001 | |||
| A | 20 (87.0%) | 10 (34.5%) | 30 (57.7%) | |
| B | 1 (4.3%) | 8 (27.6%) | 9 (17.3%) | |
| C | 0 (0%) | 7 (24.1%) | 7 (13.5%) | |
| D | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.4%) | 1 (1.9%) | |
| Missing | 2 (8.7%) | 3 (10.3%) | 5 (9.6%) | |
| LIVER POSITION | 0.017 | |||
| Down | 18 (78.3%) | 12 (41.4%) | 30 (57.7%) | |
| Up | 5 (21.7%) | 17 (58.6%) | 22 (42.3%) | |
| CDH SIDE | > 0.99 | |||
| Left | 20 (87.0%) | 25 (86.2%) | 45 (86.5%) | |
| Right | 3 (13.0%) | 4 (13.8%) | 7 (13.5%) |
Quantitative right ventricular function
Echocardiographic measures are described in Table 5. The average TAPSEZ and RVFAC were lower in those who had abnormal lung function compared to those without, although this association did not reach statistical significance. The differences in RVGLS and RVFWS are not clinically relevant.
Table 5.
Echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function associated with abnormal lung function. (a) Summary statistics and (b) Regression model adjusted for sex, race, age, and history of ECMO. TAPSEZ, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion Z-score; RVFAC, right ventricular fractional area change; RVGLS, right ventricular global longitudinal strain; RVFWS, right ventricular free wall strain; CI, confidence interval
| VARIABLE | Normal Lung Function (N=39) | Abnormal Lung Function (N=42) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| TAPSEZ | 0.19 (−0.95, 1.74) | 0.10 (−1.25, 1.64) | 0.631 |
| RVFAC | 48 (44.4, 51.8) | 45.5 (42, 49.5) | 0.146 |
| RVGLS | 25.3 (23.2, 27.6) | 26.4 (23.0, 28.5) | 0.751 |
| RVFWS | 27.2 (25.8, 29.9) | 28.0 (25.4, 31.2) | 0.747 |
| a | |||
| TAPSE-Z | RVFAC | RVGLS | RVFWS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Coefficient | −0.29 | −1.73 | 0.15 | 0.08 |
| 95% CI | [−1.35, 0.77] | [−4.42, 0.97] | [−1.42, 1.73] | [−2.07, 2.23] |
| b | ||||
Discussion
In this study, we report long-term pulmonary function outcomes in children with various causes of pulmonary hypoplasia. To our knowledge, this is the first report of pulmonary function in older children with GO and EICLM, and the first study to compare pulmonary function in children with different underlying causes of pulmonary hypoplasia. We observed pulmonary function abnormalities in most patients (51.9%) independent of the underlying diagnosis, despite their being several years removed from surgical correction of their congenital defects. Additionally, patterns of abnormal pulmonary function differed among etiologies of pulmonary hypoplasia, suggesting that subsequent lung growth differs depending on the underlying cause of pulmonary hypoplasia. An obstructive pattern was the most common abnormality in patients with CDH and EICLM, whereas restrictive lung disease was the most common abnormal pattern in those with GO.
Pulmonary hypoplasia in CDH has been hypothesized to be the result of a “dual-hit hypothesis.”28 Abnormal cellular signaling pathways during embryogenesis lead to reduced alveolar number and airway branching, pulmonary vascular disease, and abnormal left ventricular development, even before the expected closure of the diaphragm in utero. Then, failure of the diaphragm to close results in mechanical compression of the lungs by abdominal viscera, which in turn further impairs lung growth, and exacerbates the existing pulmonary hypoplasia.8,28,29 Several studies have assessed pulmonary function outcomes in individuals with CDH. Panitch et al. performed infant pulmonary function testing in 98 subjects with CDH during the first three years of life and found expiratory flows were reduced but airspace overdistension without airway obstruction was common (high RV/TLC and normal FEV0.5/FVC). The authors hypothesized that persistent pulmonary hypoplasia and overdistension of simplified alveoli, in addition to compensatory overinflation of the contralateral lung, resulted in elevated lung volumes. Further, decreased elastic recoil by alveolar simplification would contribute to reduced expiratory flows.30 In a longitudinal study of 119 subjects with CDH, Dao et al. found that the probability of developing obstructive lung disease (low FEV1/FVC) increased by 33% each year, and that by early adulthood, nearly all subjects had obstructive lung disease.31 Peetsold et al. also found that obstructive lung disease was common in 53 older children and adolescents (mean age 11.9 years) with a history of CDH who underwent pulmonary function testing.32 Our findings are similar to these previous studies of older children with CDH. It seems that airspace overdistension is the primary means of volume compensation for pulmonary hypoplasia early in life (rather than more rapid increase in alveolar number). With time, the number of alveoli increases, while the number of airways does not, leading to expiratory flow limitation and an obstructive pattern on pulmonary function testing.33
Previous studies have found the grade of defect31 and patch closure30 to be associated with worse pulmonary function in patients with CDH. Intrathoracic liver position is associated with an increased need for ECMO, increased mortality, and worse early life lung function.30,34,35 Our study confirms that early life abnormalities in lung function associated with patch closure, increased defect size, and intrathoracic liver position persist into late childhood. Every subject with a grade C or D defect had abnormal lung function, and nearly all (91%) subjects with normal lung function had a grade A or B defect. However, it is worth mentioning that a large proportion (46%) of those with grade A or B diaphragm defects had abnormal lung function in our study. Right laterality has been associated with pulmonary morbidity in several studies, likely due to the intrathoracic liver position that occurs in right sided CDH.31,36 While there was no association between laterality and abnormal lung function in our cohort, this is likely due to the small number (n=7) of subjects with right sided CDH and a lack of statistical power.
Large CLMs compress lung parenchyma, leading to incomplete lung expansion and in turn to hypoplasia.5 Both the severity of the condition and the timing of surgical intervention play important roles in subsequent lung growth. Long term pulmonary function outcomes vary in different studies,37–44 likely because of heterogeneity of these factors in the studied population. Most studies of pulmonary function in subjects with a history of CLM demonstrate either normal pulmonary function or mild obstructive lung disease.39,40,44 However, our patient population is unique in that all required either prenatal treatment or excision of the CLM within the first 48 hours of life due to respiratory distress, whereas those included in previous studies underwent resection later in life. Therefore, our patients probably had more significant pulmonary hypoplasia. This may account for the large proportion (47.1%) of patients with EICLM having abnormal lung function in our study.
In GO, several explanations for the development of pulmonary hypoplasia have been proposed. Because the liver is outside of the abdominal cavity, the lower thoracic cage forms abnormally. Additionally, decreased intraabdominal pressure leads to indrawing of the lower rib cage during inhalation, and the abnormal lateral attachment of rectus abdominis muscles to the ribs exerts a downward force on the rib cage during muscle contraction. These factors lead to caudal rib declination and a narrow chest wall, which in turn is presumed to limit lung expansion and impair lung development. Others have also described diaphragm dysfunction, which further impairs lung expansion and development in utero.45,46
A restrictive process was the most common abnormality in our subjects with GO. This is consistent with a study by Danzer et al. demonstrating that young children (mean age 19.3 months) with GO had significantly decreased TLC (69% predicted) and respiratory system compliance.9 While the larger median TLC (79.7 % predicted) in our study indicates some improvement in restriction occurred over time, the abnormality was still present in half of our GO patients. The restrictive process in these patients is probably related to a narrow chest wall,46 which impairs lung expansion, resulting in a low TLC. Other factors may have also contributed to the restrictive pattern. Danzer et al. found that respiratory system compliance (Crs) was low in young children with GO, likely reflecting a parenchymal abnormality.9 Because we did not measure Crs, it is unclear if this played a role in the restrictive physiology seen in our older patients. Diaphragm dysfunction in older children with GO has not been formally studied, although if present, it would also contribute to a reduced TLC.
Akinkuotu et al. found that lung volumes on pre-natal MRI (a surrogate for pulmonary hypoplasia) differed between neonates with CDH, CLM, and omphalocele. When the authors controlled for differences in prenatal lung volume, those with CDH still had a longer duration of intubation and a higher incidence of PH.47 These findings indicate that disease-specific factors aside from the degree of lung hypoplasia influence pulmonary outcomes. However, subjects in that study differed from our population in that all patients with omphaloceles (even small ones) and milder CLM were included, limiting comparisons with our results.
Children with pulmonary hypoplasia are at risk for developing PH.48 PH during infancy is associated with mortality49 and abnormal pulmonary function30,31,50 in patients with CDH. However, in those who survive, echocardiographic measures of PH often resolve during the first few years of life.51 In CLM, PH during infancy has been described in case reports and small case series.52–54 PH is also common in GO and is associated with worse pulmonary outcomes and mortality during infancy.14 The increased RV afterload caused by PH leads to RV dysfunction.8,55 Qualitative assessment of RV systolic function is reader-dependent and limits vigorous longitudinal follow-up.56 However, quantitative measures of RV dysfunction are associated with important clinical outcomes in infants with developmental lung disease, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia,20 GO57, and CDH.18 Additionally, these non-invasive echocardiographic measures correlated with pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance measured by cardiac catheterization in a cohort of infants with CDH.16 However, long-term RV function in survivors of CDH and other forms of pulmonary hypoplasia has not been well-described. In one small study of seven survivors of CDH, quantitative measures of RV function were abnormal in early childhood (mean age at time of study, 6.2 years) compared with healthy controls.58 We found a non-statistically significant association between TAPSEZ and RVFAC and abnormal lung function in a larger cohort of older children with pulmonary hypoplasia. In infants with pulmonary hypoplasia, abnormal development of pulmonary vasculature and ongoing lung disease both contribute to the development of pulmonary hypertension and subsequent RV systolic dysfunction.8 Therefore, it is not surprising that subjects with abnormal lung function were more likely to have signs of RV dysfunction on echocardiogram. Ultimately, larger, long-term studies assessing RV function in pulmonary hypoplasia survivors are needed.
Our study has several limitations. We did not perform bronchodilator testing, which would have provided insight into the long-term management of these patients. Studies of younger children with GO and CDH have found a substantial portion to be bronchodilator responsive (46% in GO, 22.5% in CDH).9,30 Peetsold et al. reported a 23.7% rate of bronchodilator responsiveness in older children and adolescents with a history of CDH.32 In a longitudinal study of pulmonary function in survivors of CDH, Dao et al. noted that most subjects with obstructive lung disease did not have a positive bronchodilator response, although they did not provide further details.31 The sample size of our subjects was small within each disease category. Furthermore, selection bias may have been present if parents of children with more severe underlying disease would have been more likely to agree to participate in this research study. On the other hand, children with more severe underlying disease may have been unable to perform pulmonary function testing because of intellectual or developmental disability. The somewhat wide age range (8 to 13 years) was necessary to maximize enrollment. However, it is certainly possible that differences even within this age range related to puberty (lung and thorax size, respiratory muscle strength, bronchial smooth muscle tone) may have impacted pulmonary function.59–62 Data regarding several factors associated with abnormal pulmonary function (e.g., tobacco smoke exposure,63 asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD]) were incomplete. The fact that there was no association between inhaled corticosteroid or GERD medication use and abnormal lung function, however, suggests that these conditions did not impact our pulmonary function results. Finally, our definition of abnormal lung function did not include more subtle abnormalities in pulmonary function test results such as isolated reduction in FEV1, which can be pathologic.64
In summary, more than half of survivors of CDH, GO, and EICLM have abnormal lung function during older childhood, but patterns of lung function abnormalities differ by underlying etiology of pulmonary hypoplasia. Patients with CDH and EICLM are more likely to have obstructive lung disease, while those with GO most commonly have restrictive lung disease. Our findings suggest that the lung grows differently, depending on the initial cause of hypoplasia. As low lung function during childhood is associated with an increased risk for pulmonary morbidity in adulthood,33 these patients stand to benefit from longitudinal care by a pulmonologist to monitor pulmonary function and identify modifiable risk factors for further lung function decline.
Supplementary Material
Funding Statement:
AIG is supported by NHLBI/NIH T32-HL160493.
Footnotes
Financial Disclosure: The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Potential Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
References
- 1.Lauria MR, Gonik B, Romero R. Pulmonary hypoplasia: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and antenatal prediction. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(3):466–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sherer DM, Davis JM, Woods JR Jr. Pulmonary hypoplasia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1990;45(11):792–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reid LM. Lung growth in health and disease. Br J Dis Chest. 1984;78(2):113–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cotten CM. Pulmonary hypoplasia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22(4):250–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pederiva F, Rothenberg SS, Hall N, Ijsselstijn H, Wong KKY, von der Thusen J, et al. Congenital lung malformations. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023;9(1):60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gupta VS, Harting MT, Lally PA, Miller CC, Hirschl RB, Davis CF, et al. Mortality in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Multicenter Registry Study of Over 5000 Patients Over 25 Years. Ann Surg. 2023;277(3):520–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ghattaura H, Ross A, Aldeiri B, Mutanen A, Saxena A. Managing giant omphalocele: A systematic review of surgical techniques and outcomes. Acta Paediatr. 2024;113(11):2459–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zani A, Chung WK, Deprest J, Harting MT, Jancelewicz T, Kunisaki SM, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Danzer E, Hedrick HL, Rintoul NE, Siegle J, Adzick NS, Panitch HB. Assessment of early pulmonary function abnormalities in giant omphalocele survivors. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(10):1811–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Danzer E, Edgar JC, Eppley E, Goldshore MA, Chotzoglou E, Herkert LM, et al. Predicting neonatal outcomes in infants with giant omphalocele using prenatal magnetic resonance imaging calculated observed-to-expected fetal lung volumes. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41(11):1439–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Agusti A, Faner R. Lung function trajectories in health and disease. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(4):358–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Melen E, Faner R, Allinson JP, Bui D, Bush A, Custovic A, et al. Lung-function trajectories: relevance and implementation in clinical practice. Lancet. 2024;403(10435):1494–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang IA, Jenkins CR, Salvi SS. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in never-smokers: risk factors, pathogenesis, and implications for prevention and treatment. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(5):497–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Partridge EA, Hanna BD, Panitch HB, Rintoul NE, Peranteau WH, Flake AW, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in giant omphalocele infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(12):1767–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lally KP, Lasky RE, Lally PA, Bagolan P, Davis CF, Frenckner BP, et al. Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia--an international consensus. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(12):2408–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Avitabile CM, Flohr S, Mathew L, Wang Y, Ash D, Frank DB, et al. Quantitative Measures of Right Ventricular Size and Function by Echocardiogram Correlate with Cardiac Catheterization Hemodynamics in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. J Pediatr. 2023;261:113564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Avitabile CM, Flohr S, Mathew L, Wang Y, Ash D, Gebb JS, et al. Echocardiographic Changes in Infants with Severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia After Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion (FETO). Pediatr Cardiol. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Avitabile CM, Wang Y, Ash D, Flohr SJ, Mathew L, Rintoul N, et al. Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Who Die After Repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2025;60(1):162002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Avitabile CM, Wang Y, Zhang X, Griffis H, Saavedra S, Adams S, et al. Right Ventricular Strain, Brain Natriuretic Peptide, and Mortality in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17(11):1431–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Altit G, Bhombal S, Feinstein J, Hopper RK, Tacy TA. Diminished right ventricular function at diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension is associated with mortality in bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pulm Circ. 2019;9(3):2045894019878598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Levy PT, Sanchez Mejia AA, Machefsky A, Fowler S, Holland MR, Singh GK. Normal ranges of right ventricular systolic and diastolic strain measures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(5):549–60, e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koestenberger M, Friedberg MK, Nestaas E, Michel-Behnke I, Hansmann G. Transthoracic echocardiography in the evaluation of pediatric pulmonary hypertension and ventricular dysfunction. Pulm Circ. 2016;6(1):15–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Koestenberger M, Nagel B, Ravekes W, Urlesberger B, Raith W, Avian A, et al. Systolic right ventricular function in preterm and term neonates: reference values of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in 258 patients and calculation of Z-score values. Neonatology. 2011;100(1):85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Koestenberger M, Ravekes W, Everett AD, Stueger HP, Heinzl B, Gamillscheg A, et al. Right ventricular function in infants, children and adolescents: reference values of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in 640 healthy patients and calculation of z score values. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(6):715–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, et al. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(8):e70–e88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bhakta NR, Bime C, Kaminsky DA, McCormack MC, Thakur N, Stanojevic S, et al. Race and Ethnicity in Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation: An Official American Thoracic Society Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;207(8):978–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stanojevic S, Kaminsky DA, Miller MR, Thompson B, Aliverti A, Barjaktarevic I, et al. ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2022;60(1). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Keijzer R, Liu J, Deimling J, Tibboel D, Post M. Dual-hit hypothesis explains pulmonary hypoplasia in the nitrofen model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(4):1299–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ameis D, Khoshgoo N, Keijzer R. Abnormal lung development in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2017;26(3):123–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Panitch HB, Weiner DJ, Feng R, Perez MR, Healy F, McDonough JM, et al. Lung function over the first 3 years of life in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(9):896–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dao DT, Hayden LP, Buchmiller TL, Kharasch VS, Kamran A, Smithers CJ, et al. Longitudinal Analysis of Pulmonary Function in Survivors of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. J Pediatr. 2020;216:158–64 e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Peetsold MG, Heij HA, Nagelkerke AF, Ijsselstijn H, Tibboel D, Quanjer PH, et al. Pulmonary function and exercise capacity in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(5):1140–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McGinn EA, Mandell EW, Smith BJ, Duke JW, Bush A, Abman SH. Dysanapsis as a Determinant of Lung Function in Development and Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;208(9):956–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Albanese CT, Lopoo J, Goldstein RB, Filly RA, Feldstein VA, Calen PW, et al. Fetal liver position and perinatal outcome for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18(11):1138–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hedrick HL, Danzer E, Merchant AM, Bebbington MW, Zhao H, Flake AW, et al. Liver position and lung-to-head ratio for prediction of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and survival in isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(4):422 e1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Partridge EA, Peranteau WH, Herkert L, Rendon N, Smith H, Rintoul NE, et al. Right- versus left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a comparative outcomes analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(6):900–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Farolfi A, Ghezzi M, Calcaterra V, Riccipetitoni G, Pelizzo G, Costanzo S, et al. Congenital Lung Malformations: Clinical and Functional Respiratory Outcomes after Surgery. Children (Basel). 2022;9(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Barikbin P, Roehr CC, Wilitzki S, Kalache K, Degenhardt P, Buhrer C, et al. Postnatal lung function in congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(4):1164–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lau CT, Wong KKY. Long-term pulmonary function after lobectomy for congenital pulmonary airway malformation: is thoracoscopic approach really better than open? J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(12):2383–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lau CT, Wong KKY, Tam P. Medium Term Pulmonary Function Test After Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation: A Comparative Study with Normal Control. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(5):595–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nakajima C, Kijimoto C, Yokoyama Y, Miyakawa T, Tsuchiya Y, Kuroda T, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of pulmonary function after lobectomy in childhood - factors affecting lung growth. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13(5–6):341–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Komori K, Kamagata S, Hirobe S, Toma M, Okumura K, Muto M, et al. Radionuclide imaging study of long-term pulmonary function after lobectomy in children with congenital cystic lung disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(11):2096–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Keijzer R, Chiu PP, Ratjen F, Langer JC. Pulmonary function after early vs late lobectomy during childhood: a preliminary study. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(5):893–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.McBride JT, Wohl ME, Strieder DJ, Jackson AC, Morton JR, Zwerdling RG, et al. Lung growth and airway function after lobectomy in infancy for congenital lobar emphysema. J Clin Invest. 1980;66(5):962–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Panitch HB. Pulmonary complications of abdominal wall defects. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015;16(1):11–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hershenson MB, Brouillette RT, Klemka L, Raffensperger JD, Poznanski AK, Hunt CE. Respiratory insufficiency in newborns with abdominal wall defects. J Pediatr Surg. 1985;20(4):348–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Akinkuotu AC, Sheikh F, Cass DL, Zamora IJ, Lee TC, Cassady CI, et al. Are all pulmonary hypoplasias the same? A comparison of pulmonary outcomes in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele and congenital lung malformation. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(1):55–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kovacs G, Bartolome S, Denton CP, Gatzoulis MA, Gu S, Khanna D, et al. Definition, classification and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2024;64(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dillon PW, Cilley RE, Mauger D, Zachary C, Meier A. The relationship of pulmonary artery pressure and survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(3):307–12; discussion −12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Healy F, Lin W, Feng R, Hanna BD, Hedrick H, Panitch HB. An association between pulmonary hypertension and impaired lung function in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(7):672–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wong M, Reyes J, Lapidus-Krol E, Chiang M, Humpl T, Al-Faraj M, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients: Prognostic markers and long-term outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(5):918–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Atkinson JB, Ford EG, Kitagawa H, Lally KP, Humphries B. Persistent pulmonary hypertension complicating cystic adenomatoid malformation in neonates. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(1):54–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Banerjea MC, Wirbelauer J, Adam P, Trusen A, Marx A, Speer C. Bilateral cystic adenomatoid lung malformation type III--a rare differential diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in neonates. J Perinat Med. 2002;30(5):429–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ben-Ishay O, Nicksa GA, Wilson JM, Buchmiller TL. Management of giant congenital pulmonary airway malformations requiring pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(4):1073–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Patel N, Lally PA, Kipfmueller F, Massolo AC, Luco M, Van Meurs KP, et al. Ventricular Dysfunction Is a Critical Determinant of Mortality in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(12):1522–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Varghese NP, Austin ED, Galambos C, Mullen MP, Yung D, Guillerman RP, et al. An interdisciplinary consensus approach to pulmonary hypertension in developmental lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2024;64(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dal Col AK, Bhombal S, Tacy TA, Hintz SR, Feinstein J, Altit G. Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Ventricular Function and Pulmonary Pressure in the Neonatal Omphalocele Population. Am J Perinatol. 2021;38(S 01):e109–e15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Egan MJ, Husain N, Stines JR, Moiduddin N, Stein MA, Nelin LD, et al. Mid-term differences in right ventricular function in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia compared with controls. World J Pediatr. 2012;8(4):350–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.DeBoer MD, Phillips BR, Mauger DT, Zein J, Erzurum SC, Fitzpatrick AM, et al. Effects of endogenous sex hormones on lung function and symptom control in adolescents with asthma. BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1):58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mahmoud O, Granell R, Tilling K, Minelli C, Garcia-Aymerich J, Holloway JW, et al. Association of Height Growth in Puberty with Lung Function. A Longitudinal Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(12):1539–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Neve V, Girard F, Flahault A, Boule M. Lung and thorax development during adolescence: relationship with pubertal status. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(5):1292–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Verma R, Chiang J, Qian H, Amin R. Maximal Static Respiratory and Sniff Pressures in Healthy Children. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(4):478–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Corbo GM, Agabiti N, Forastiere F, Dell’Orco V, Pistelli R, Kriebel D, et al. Lung function in children and adolescents with occasional exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(3 Pt 1):695–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wyatt ML, Sokolow AG, Brown RF, Kaslow JA, Tolle JJ, Weiner DJ, et al. Prevalence, stability, and clinical significance of an isolated low FEV(1) spirometry pattern in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024;59(6):1747–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


