Abstract
Chondromyxoid fibroma (CMF) is a rare benign cartilaginous neoplasm that most frequently occurs in the metaphysis of long bones in adolescents and young adults. The most common symptom is pain and/or swelling in the affected area. Radiographs typically show a well-defined, eccentric lytic lesion with sclerotic margins and scalloped or lobulated borders. Unlike other cartilaginous neoplasms, matrix calcification is uncommon. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CMF usually exhibits low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and heterogenous high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates intense homogeneous, heterogeneous or peripheral enhancement. Histologically, CMF is composed of lobules of stellate to spindle-shaped cells in a myxoid background. The periphery of the lobules is generally hypercellular, imparting a characteristic zonal architecture. Recent molecular studies have identified alteration of glutamate metabotropic receptor 1 (GRM1) gene, and GRM1 positivity by immunohistochemistry has emerged as a reliable surrogate marker for this molecular event. Curettage or en bloc resection is the treatment of choice, with a non-negligible risk for local recurrence. This review provides an updated overview of the clinical, radiological, histological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic features of CMF and discusses the differential diagnosis of this unusual neoplasm.
Keywords: Chondromyxoid fibroma, chondroblastoma, phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, GRM1, COL12A1, review
Introduction
Chondromyxoid fibroma (CMF) is a rare benign cartilaginous tumor first described by Jaffe and Lichtenstein (1) in 1948. It belongs to the chondrogenic tumor group according to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification of soft tissue and bone tumors (2). The etiology of this peculiar tumor is unknown. The morphology of CMF can overlap with a variety of mesenchymal tumors such as chondroblastoma (CB), phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT), conventional chondrosarcoma (CS) and CMF-like osteosarcoma (CMF-OS). Advances in knowledge of the histopathological and molecular features of CMF are leading to more timely and accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. This review provides valuable insights into the clinical, radiological, histological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic features of CMF. In addition, we discuss the differential diagnosis of this uncommon entity.
Clinical Features, Management and Prognosis
CMF accounts for less than 1% of all bone tumors and has a peak incidence in the second and third decades of life, with a slight male predominance (3-5). It most frequently occurs in the metaphysis of long bones, especially the proximal tibia and distal femur. The flat bones, mainly the ilium, are also relatively common sites (3). The clinical manifestations vary according to the size, location and extent of the lesion. Pain is the most common presenting symptom, and it may be noted for a considerable time (4). Local swelling may also be noted and is more common in tumors of the small bones. Limited range of motion in the adjacent joints and pathological fractures are rare. The natural history of CMF is not entirely understood; to date, there has been no evidence of potential spontaneous healing. Surgical management is the mainstay of treatment for patients with CMF. The accepted procedure is intralesional curettage and filling of the cavity with bone graft or bone cement (6-9). In general, curettage alone is not recommended due to its higher local recurrence rate (up to 80%) (6,7). Extensive curettage using a high-speed burr may be performed to reduce the local recurrence rate (10). En bloc resection, when feasible, is another treatment option (4,11,12), although it may result in loss of function of the joint. Local recurrence occurs in 9-33% of cases (3,4,6-9,13-16). The risk of local recurrence appears to be higher in younger patients (8). Radiotherapy is not indicated except for surgically inaccessible lesions (4). Distant metastasis has not been documented; however, malignant transformation has been described in the literature (3,17).
Radiological Features
Radiographs typically show a well-defined, lobulated or oval eccentric lytic lesion with geographic bone destruction, sclerotic margins and internal trabeculations (18). A nearly hemispherical ‘bite’ from the cortical margin without periosteal reaction is the characteristic feature, particularly in long bones (19). In small bones, CMF tends to be central and shows fusiform expansion of the bone. In flat bones, the lesion may become large and markedly scalloped, producing a bubbly appearance. Computed tomography (CT) reveals a well-demarcated, expansile osteolytic lesion with a sclerotic rim (18). Unlike other cartilaginous tumors, intralesional calcification is unusual, occurring in 3.3-16% of cases (5,18-20). Interestingly, the incidence of calcification is higher in patients aged over 40 years and in tumors of the flat bones (20). On Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CMF usually exhibits low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and heterogenous high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences due to the different composition of fibrous, cartilaginous and myxoid components (18). Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates intense homogeneous, heterogeneous or peripheral enhancement (18). Positron emission tomography (PET) features of CMF have been described in the literature (21-24). Integrated PET/CT images show low to moderate fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake by the lesion, with a maximum range of standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 3.2-5.9.
Less frequently, juxtacortical CMF has been documented in long and small bones (25-28). Ultrasonography may reveal a hypoechoic lesion with saucerization of the cortex and periosteal reaction (26). Radiographs and CT usually exhibit a radiolucent surface lesion with sclerotic margins and scalloping or saucerization of the underlying bone. Compared to conventional CMF, juxtacortical CMF tends to show extensive calcification (25). Like conventional CMF, MRI typically demonstrates a well-circumscribed lesion with intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences, heterogenous high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences and peripheral or heterogeneous enhancement on contrast-enhanced sequences (28).
Histological and Immunohistochemical Features
The definitive diagnosis of CMF is made based on histopathological examination. Grossly, curetted fragments appear firm or rubbery, blue-gray or semitranslucent (5). If the lesion is removed intact, it is multilobulated, well-circumscribed and sharply demarcated from the surrounding bone (4). Histologically, CMF shows a predominantly lobulated growth pattern with central hypocellularity and consists of stellate to spindle-shaped cells in a myxoid background. The cells frequently have abundant pink cytoplasm, producing an epithelioid appearance. Osteoclast-type giant cells may be seen at the periphery of the nodules. Enlarged, atypical cells, likely degenerative in nature, can occasionally be encountered. Hyaline cartilage is present in 19% of cases (3). Coarse calcification is observed in approximately one third of cases (3,20). Mitotic figures are uncommon. Immunohistochemically, the spindle cells are positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA) and muscle-specific actin (MSA) (29). Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) may be focally positive in CMF (15). Chondroid areas are variably positive for S100 (29). Recently, nuclear expression of SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) and ETS transcription factor ERG (ERG) has also been demonstrated in CMF (30,31). Most notably, CMF typically shows strong and diffuse expression of glutamate metabotropic receptor 1 (GRM1) (32,33). Toland et al. (32) suggested that GRM1 immunohistochemistry would be a useful adjunct tool for the diagnosis of CMF, especially in small biopsy specimens. Immunostaining for desmin and CD34 is typically negative (29).
Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Features
Cytogenetically, a diploid or near-diploid chromosomal complement has been observed in CMF. Chromosome 6 aberrations are prominent and have involved the following three recurrent regions: 6p23-25, 6q12-15 and 6q23-25 (34-44). Notably, an inv(6)(p25q13) has been described as the sole anomaly in a few cases (41). At the molecular level, GRM1 alterations including gene fusions and rearrangements have been identified in CMF (33,45). Torrence et al. (33) reported that GRM1 gene rearrangements could be detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in approximately 75% of cases. GRM1 gene is located on chromosome 6q24.3 and encodes a metabotropic glutamate receptor that functions by activating phospholipase C. It is recognized that GRM1 is activated through promotor swapping and gene fusion events in CMF (45). Interestingly, GRM1 expression is absent or very low in other cartilaginous tumors, strongly suggesting a key pathogenetic event in CMF (45). To date, several fusion partners of GRM1 have been detected in CMF, including BCL2 associated transcription factor 1 (BCLAF1), myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A) and PNN interacting serine and arginine rich protein (PNISR) (45,46). Moreover, recurrent rearrangements of collagen type XII alpha 1 chain (COL12A1) have been reported in a subset of CMFs (41,42,45). It has been shown that GRM1 upregulation is due to genomic rearrangements that place GRM1 under the influence of COL12A1 in some cases (45). COL12A1 gene is located on chromosome 6q13-14.1 and encodes the alpha chain of type XII collagen. This gene rearrangement has also been demonstrated in subungual exostosis with t(X;6)(q22;q13-14) (47).
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of CMF includes CB, PMT, conventional CS and CMF-OS. The corresponding clinicopathological and molecular characteristics are summarized in Table I.
Table I. Differential diagnosis of chondromyxoid fibroma.
CMF: Chondromyxoid fibroma; CB: chondroblastoma; PMT: phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor; CCS: conventional chondrosarcoma; CMF-OS: chondromyxoid fibroma-like osteosarcoma; LRR: local recurrence rate; DM: distant metastasis; ACT: atypical cartilaginous tumor; CS1/2/3: chondrosarcoma grade 1/2/3; IHC: immunohistochemistry; GRM1: glutamate metabotropic receptor 1; SOX9: SRY-box transcription factor 9; ERG: ETS transcription factor ERG; DOG1: discovered on GIST1; FGFR1: fibroblast growth factor receptor 1; SATB2: special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2; SSTR2A: somatostatin receptor 2A; FGF23: fibroblast growth factor 23; IDH: isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP(+)); COL12A1: collagen type XII alpha 1 chain; H3-3B: H3.3 histone B; FN1: fibronectin 1; FGF1: fibroblast growth factor 1; COL2A1: collagen type II alpha 1 chain.
CB is a relatively rare benign chondrogenic tumor that frequently occurs in the epiphysis of long bones, particularly the femur, proximal tibia and proximal humerus. It has a peak incidence in the second to early third decades of life, with a male predominance (48). The most common symptom is mild to significant pain. Surgery is the treatment of choice for CB and includes extensive intralesional curettage with local adjuvants and en bloc resection (49-51). Local recurrence occurs in 4.3-39.5% of cases (49-57). Notably, Xu et al. (55) reported that the local recurrence rate was 0% in the extremities after resection. Predisposing factors for local recurrence remain controversial, but younger age, larger tumor size and tumor location may increase the risk (51,55,57). Although rare, malignant transformation and distant metastasis have been documented in the literature (52,53,56,58). The most common site of distant metastasis is lung (58). Radiographs usually show a well-demarcated, round or oval lytic lesion with geographic bone destruction and thin sclerotic margins. CT may reveal a well-defined, osteolytic lesion with a thin sclerotic rim and stippled or patchy calcifications (59). Unlike CMF, intralesional calcification is frequently found in CB. On MRI, CB usually exhibits intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and variable signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Peritumoral edema or aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC)-like changes can be seen (48,60). Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates heterogeneous lobular or septal enhancement (60). Integrated PET/CT images show varying degrees of FDG uptake by the lesion, with a mean SUVmax of 7.2 (60). Histologically, CB is characterized by a sheet-like proliferation of ovoid to polygonal cells with grooved, reniform nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Pericellular lace-like or chicken-wire calcification is the hallmark of CB (48). Osteoclast-like giant cells are often distributed irregularly, and ABC-like changes are common. Mitotic activity is generally low. Recently, histologically malignant CB has been described in the literature (61,62). In contrast to conventional CB, malignant CB exhibits permeative growth and significant cytologic atypia. Several immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated that H3.3 K36M mutant antibody is a highly sensitive and specific marker for the diagnosis of CB (63-66). Additionally, SOX9, S100, cytokeratin and discovered on GIST1 (DOG1) may be focally positive in CB (30,66,67). Cytogenetic studies have shown heterogenous rearrangements of chromosomes 5, 8 or 17 (68-70), but no consistent chromosomal alterations have been found in CB. At the molecular level, point mutations of H3-3B (H3.3 histone B), located on chromosome 17q25.1, have been identified in 70-95% of CBs (71-73). The discovery of H3-3B mutations has led to more precise diagnostics of CB.
PMT is a rare soft-tissue or bone neoplasm that most frequently occurs in middle-aged adults, with no sex predominance (74). It is usually associated with tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO). Most PMT-associated TIOs are mediated through overproduction of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) (74). PMT most often affects the extremities and acral sites in the soft-tissues, whereas bone tumors commonly occur in the appendicular skeleton, cranial bones and paranasal sinuses (75). Clinical symptoms are mostly related to TIO and include muscle pain, bone pain, pathological fractures, progressive muscle weakness and gait disturbance (76). Surgery remains the definitive treatment for PMT. Following complete resection of the tumor, patients will make a dramatic recovery with disappearance of symptoms and return of laboratory values to normal. Local recurrence occurs in 14.2% of cases (77). Although histologically benign, rare cases of malignant transformation and distant metastasis have been described (78-80). There are currently no definite clinical prognostic factors in PMT. Radiographs may be useful in displaying fractures due to osteomalacia. CT usually reveals an osteolytic lesion with a narrow zone of transition and internal matrix in intraosseous PMT (81). On MRI, PMT typically exhibits intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and high signal intensity with dark foci on T2-weighted sequences (82). Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates homogeneous enhancement (81). PET/CT may be useful in identifying an occult lesion and frequently shows moderate FDG uptake by the lesion, with a mean SUVmax of 4.1 (82). Histologically, PMT is composed of bland, spindle to stellae cells in a smudgy or grungy calcified matrix. A very well-developed capillary network is typically present (74). Osteoclast-like giant cells and mature adipose tissue may be found. Mitotic activity and necrosis are usually absent. Notably, CMF-like PMT has been described (83-85), posing a great diagnostic challenge. Moreover, a small number of histologically malignant PMTs have been reported in both bone and soft-tissue (76); these lesions show high cellularity, high nuclear atypia, increased mitotic activity and tumor necrosis (86). By immunohistochemistry, PMT often expresses CD56, ERG, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) and somatostatin receptor 2A (SSTR2A) (83,87). Expression of FGF23 protein has been shown in some PMTs (86). Cytogenetic abnormalities have been reported in only two cases, with no shared alterations (88). At the molecular level, nearly half of PMTs harbor fibronectin 1 (FN1)-FGFR1 or, more rarely, FN1-fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) fusions (89,90), implicating activation of FGFR1 signaling pathway. However, fusion-negative PMTs frequently exhibit overexpression of klotho (KL) (91,92). These fusion-negative cases with high KL expression may show distinct clinicopathological features such as a predilection for skeletal or sinonasal locations and histological resemblance to cellular solitary fibrous tumor (92).
Conventional CS is the most frequent subtype of CS, accounting for approximately 83% of all cases (93). It has a peak incidence in the third to six decades of life, with no significant sex predominance (94,95). Conventional CS predominantly occurs in metaphysis of long bones (especially the proximal femur, proximal humerus and distal femur) and the flat bones (especially the ilium and ribs) (94,95). In addition to arising de novo, conventional CS can arise secondary to a benign pre-existing lesion such as osteochondroma or enchondroma. Currently, conventional CS is divided into three histological grades comprising atypical cartilaginous tumor/CS grade 1 (ACT/CS1), CS grade 2 (CS2: intermediate-grade) and CS grade 3 (CS3: high-grade) (94,95). Clinically, pain and local swelling are the most common presenting symptoms. Surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment for conventional CS and includes extensive intralesional curettage with local adjuvants for ACT in the long bones and wide en bloc resection for CS1 in the axial skeleton, CS2 and CS3 (96,97). Conventional CS does not respond to chemotherapy or radiation. Local recurrence rates are 7.5-11% for ACT/CS1, 19% for CS2 and 26% for CS3 (94,95). ACT/CS1 rarely metastasize. Metastatic rates are 10-30% for CS2 and 32-71% for CS3 (94,95). The 10-year overall survival rates are 88-95% for ACT/CS1, 58-86% for CS2 and 26-55% for CS3 (94,95). Radiographs typically reveal an ill-defined, mixed lytic and sclerotic lesion with geographic bone destruction, endosteal scalloping and ring and arc-type calcifications (98). In high-grade CSs, radiographs may reveal a larger lesion with motheaten or permeative bone destruction, cortical destruction and less matrix mineralization (99). CT is optimal to detect subtle matrix mineralization, which is demonstrated in 94% of cases (98). On MRI, conventional CS usually exhibits low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Areas of matrix mineralization show low signal intensity on all MR pulse sequences. Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates mild peripheral and septal enhancement (98). On PET/CT, conventional CS shows varying degrees of FDG uptake by the lesion (100,101). Histologically, ACT/CS1 shows a lobular growth pattern, abundant hyaline cartilage matrix with sometimes myxoid changes and low cellularity. Binucleated cells are frequently observed, but mitoses are absent (94). In CS2, cellularity is higher than ACT/CS1; additionally, extensive myxoid matrix changes may be present, mimicking CMF. Nuclear atypia and mitoses can be seen. In CS3, nuclei are larger and more hyperchromatic, and mitoses are more easily found (95). Focal spindle cell changes may be present at the periphery of lobules. Necrosis can be seen regardless of tumor grade. Immunohistochemically, isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) 1 (IDH1) expression via the R132H mutation-specific antibody can be observed in a subset of conventional CSs (102). Cytogenetically, conventional CSs are heterogeneous, with karyotypic complexity ranging from simple numerical changes to abundant numerical and structural abnormalities (103). At the molecular level, approximately 50% of conventional CSs harbor heterozygous mutations in IDH1 R132 and isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) 2 (IDH2) R172 (102). Moreover, mutations of collagen type II alpha 1 chain (COL2A1) have been reported in approximately 37% of CSs (104). Additional genomic alterations include tumor protein p53 (TP53) mutations, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) mutations and cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions in high-grade CS (104-107).
CMF-OS is an extremely rare variant of low-grade OS (108). It has a peak incidence in the third to fourth decades of life, with no significant sex predominance (109). Unlike CMF, CMF-OS more commonly occurs in the craniofacial region (109). Common presenting symptoms include pain, local swelling or mass. Surgery is the treatment of choice for CMF-OS, and wide resection is always recommended whenever feasible. CMF-OS has a high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis despite its low-grade morphology (109). The role of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the management of CMF-OS remains unknown. Radiographs and CT may show an ill-defined, expansive osteolytic lesion with incomplete trabeculations, cortical destruction and soft-tissue extension (108-110). A periosteal reaction is also frequently observed (110,111). On MRI, CMF-OS usually exhibits low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates heterogeneous enhancement (109,110,112). Histologically, CMF-OS is composed of lobules of spindle, stellate or polygonal cells with moderate nuclear pleomorphism and hyperchromasia embedded in a highly myxoid stroma (108). The most distinctive feature is the presence of direct production of osteoid by the neoplastic cells. Immunohistochemically, unlike CMF, S100 expression is absent in CMF-OS. No cytogenetic and molecular genetic alterations have been reported thus far.
Conclusion
CMF is a rare cartilaginous tumor with recurrent but no metastatic potential that primarily occurs in the long bones of adolescents and young adults. Unlike other cartilaginous tumors, intralesional calcification in CMF is unusual by imaging. En bloc resection is favored over curettage to decrease likelihood of local recurrence. CMF is histologically characterized by a lobular pattern with stellate to spindle-shaped cells in a myxoid background. GRM1 alteration is highly characteristic of CMF. The use of GRM1 immunostaining is a valuable adjunct in the diagnosis of CMF. Further investigations are required to delineate the correlation between genetic alterations and clinicopathological features.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this article.
Authors’ Contributions
JN conceived and designed the study, searched the literature and drafted the article. YS, YC and MA collected the data and reviewed the article.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disclosure
No artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including large language models or machine learning software, were used in the preparation, analysis, or presentation of this article.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
References
- 1.Jaffe HL, Lichtenstein L. Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone: a distinctive benign tumor likely to be mistaken especially for chondrosarcoma. Arch Pathol. 1948;45(4):541–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hogendoorn PCW, Bloem JL, Bridge JA. Lyon, France, IARC Press. 2020. Chondromyxoid fibroma. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours; pp. pp. 362–364. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wu CT, Inwards CY, O’Laughlin S, Rock MG, Beabout JW, Unni KK. Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone: a clinicopathologic review of 278 cases. Hum Pathol. 1998;29(5):438–446. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zillmer DA, Dorfman HD. Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone: Thirty-six cases with clinicopathologic correlation. Hum Pathol. 1989;20(10):952–964. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90267-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rahimi A, Beabout JW, Ivins JC, Dahlin DC. Chondromyxoid fibroma: A clinicopathologic study of 76 cases. Cancer. 1972;30(3):726–736. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197209)30:3<726::aid-cncr2820300321>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gherlinzoni F, Rock M, Picci P. Chondromyxoid fibroma. The experience at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. J Bone J Surg Am. 1983;65(2):198–204. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198365020-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lersundi A, Mankin HJ, Mourikis A, Hornicek FJ. Chondromyxoid fibroma: a rarely encountered and puzzling tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;439:171–175. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000174685.62379.6a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bhamra JS, Al-Khateeb H, Dhinsa BS, Gikas PD, Tirabosco R, Pollock RC, Skinner JA, Aston WJ, Saifuddin A, Briggs TW. Chondromyxoid fibroma management: a single institution experience of 22 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:283. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Karaca MO, Özyıldıran M, Alizade R, Başarır K, Yıldız HY. Chondromyxoid fibroma: A retrospective evaluation of 31 cases. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024;35(2):377–385. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ibe IK, Alder KD, Henderson SE, Yu KE, Lee FY. Excisional curettage of benign cystic lesions. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019;9(3):e24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Soni R, Kapoor C, Shah M, Turakhiya J, Golwala P. Chondromyxoid fibroma: a rare case report and review of literature. Cureus. 2016;8(9):e803. doi: 10.7759/cureus.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.HemanthaKumar G, Sathish M. Diagnosis and literature review of chondromyxoid fibroma - a pathological puzzle. J Orthop Case Rep. 2019;9(4):101–105. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2019.v09.i04.1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sharma H, Jane MJ, Reid R. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the foot and ankle: 40 years’ Scottish bone tumour registry experience. Int Orthop. 2006;30(3):205–209. doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0046-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yaghi NK, DeMonte F. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the skull base and calvarium: surgical management and literature review. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2016;77(1):e023–e034. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meredith DM, Fletcher CD, Jo VY. Chondromyxoid fibroma arising craniofacial sites: a clinicopathologic analysis of 25 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(3):392–400. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.De La Peña NM, Yekzaman BR, Patra DP, Rath TJ, Lal D, Bendok BR. Craniofacial chondromyxoid fibromas: a systematic review and analysis based on anatomic locations. World Neurosurg. 2022;162:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yadav SK, Choudhary AK, Kantiwal P, Karmakar S, Elhence P, Elhence A. Chondrosarcoma proximal tibia secondary to chondromyxoid fibroma: A rare case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025;127:110842. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.110842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cappelle S, Pans S, Sciot R. Imaging features of chondromyxoid fibroma: report of 15 cases and literature review. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1064):20160088. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Beggs IG, Stoker DJ. Chondromyxoid fibroma of bone. Clin Radiol. 1982;33(6):671–679. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(82)80400-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yamaguchi T, Dorfman HD. Radiographic and histologic patterns of calcification in chondromyxoid fibroma. Skeletal Radiol. 1998;27(10):559–564. doi: 10.1007/s002560050437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hamada K, Tomita Y, Konishi E, Fujimoto T, Jin YF, Outani H, Tamiya H, Naka N, Araki N. FDG-PET evaluation of chondromyxoid fibroma of left ilium. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34(1):15–17. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31818f464b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Makis W, Ciarallo A, Lisbona R. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the rib mimics a chondrosarcoma on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Acta Radiol. 2011;52(5):554–556. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.100526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Long KL, Absher KJ, Draus JM Jr. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the second rib. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(6):1442–1444. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oh N, Khorsandi AS, Scherl S, Wang B, Wenig BM, Manolidis S, Jacobson A. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the mastoid portion of the temporal bone: MRI and PET/CT findings and their correlation with histology. Ear Nose Throat J. 2013;92(4):201–203. doi: 10.1177/014556131309200412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baker AC, Rezeanu L, O’laughlin S, Unni K, Klein MJ, Siegal GP. Juxtacortical Chondromyxoid Fibroma of Bone: A Unique Variant: a case study of 20 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(11):1662–1668. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31806772ec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Marin C, Gallego C, Manjón P, Martinez-Tello FJ. Juxtacortical chondromyxoid fibroma: imaging findings in three cases and a review of the literature. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(11):642–649. doi: 10.1007/s002560050303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oh SJ, Chung SH. Juxtacortical chondromyxoid fibroma in the small bones: two cases with unusual location and a literature review. J Pathol Transl Med. 2022;56(3):157–160. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2021.12.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harrington KA, Hoda S, La Rocca Vieira R. Surface-type chondromyxoid fibroma in an elderly patient: a case report and literature review. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(5):823–830. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3120-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nielsen GP, Keel SB, Dickersin GR, Selig MK, Bhan AK, Rosenberg AE. Chondromyxoid fibroma: a tumor showing myofibroblastic, myochondroblastic, and chondrocytic differentiation. Mod Pathol. 1999;12(5):514–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Konishi E, Nakashima Y, Iwasa Y, Nakao R, Yanagisawa A. Immunohistochemical analysis for Sox9 reveals the cartilaginous character of chondroblastoma and chondromyxoid fibroma of the bone. Hum Pathol. 2010;41(2):208–213. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shon W, Folpe AL, Fritchie KJ. ERG expression in chondrogenic bone and soft tissue tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(2):125–129. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Toland AMS, Lam SW, Varma S, Wang A, Howitt BE, Kunder CA, Kerr DA, Szuhai K, Bovée JVMG, Charville GW. GRM1 immunohistochemistry distinguishes chondromyxoid fibroma from its histologic mimics. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46(10):1407–1414. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Torrence D, Dermawan JK, Zhang Y, Vanderbilt C, Hwang S, Mullaney K, Jungbluth A, Rao M, Gao K, Sukhadia P, Linos K, Agaram N, Hameed M. Detection of GRM1 gene rearrangements in chondromyxoidfibroma: a comparison of fluorescence in-situ hybridisation,RNA sequencing and immunohistochemical analysis. Histopathology. 2024;85(6):889–898. doi: 10.1111/his.15248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Granter SR, Renshaw AA, Kozakewich HP, Fletcher JA. The pericentromeric inversion, inv(6)(p25q13), is a novel diagnostic marker in chondromyxoid fibroma. Mod Pathol. 1998;11(11):1071–1074. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Halbert AR, Harrison WR, Hicks MJ, Davino N, Cooley LD. Cytogenetic analysis of a scapular chondromyxoid fibroma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998;104(1):52–56. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(97)00450-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sawyer JR, Swanson CM, Lukacs JL, Nicholas RW, North PE, Thomas JR. Evidence of an association between 6q13-21 chromosome aberrations and locally aggressive behavior in patients with cartilage tumors. Cancer. 1998;82(3):474–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Safar A, Nelson M, Neff JR, Maale GE, Bayani J, Squire J, Bridge JA. Recurrent anomalies of 6q25 in chondromyxoid fibroma. Hum Pathol. 2000;31(3):306–311. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(00)80243-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sjögren H, Orndal C, Tingby O, Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG, Stenman G. Cytogenetic and spectral karyotype analyses of benign and malignant cartilage tumours. Int J Oncol. 2004;24(6):1385–1391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Smith CA, Magenis RE, Himoe E, Smith C, Mansoor A. Chondromyxoid fibroma of the nasal cavity with an interstitial insertion between chromosomes 6 and 19. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;171(2):97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jhala D, Coventry S, Rao P, Yen F, Siegal GP. Juvenile juxtacortical chondromyxoid fibroma of bone: a case report. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(6):960–965. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yasuda T, Nishio J, Sumegi J, Kapels KM, Althof PA, Sawyer JR, Reith JD, Bridge JA. Aberrations of 6q13 mapped to the COL12A1 locus in chondromyxoid fibroma. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(11):1499–1506. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Romeo S, Duim RA, Bridge JA, Mertens F, de Jong D, Dal Cin P, Wijers-Koster PM, Debiec-Rychter M, Sciot R, Rosenberg AE, Szuhai K, Hogendoorn PC. Heterogeneous and complex rearrangements of chromosome arm 6q in chondromyxoid fibroma: delineation of breakpoints and analysis of candidate target genes. Am J Pathol. 2010;177(3):1365–1376. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dadfarnia T, Velagaleti GV, Carmichael KD, Eyzaguirre E, Eltorky MA, Qiu S. A t(1;9)(q10;q10) translocation with additional 6q23 and 9q22 rearrangements in a case of chondromyxoid fibroma. Cancer Genet. 2011;204(12):666–670. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu J, Ownbey RT, Boc SF, Pezanowski DM, Patel DM, Sadri S, Vincent GA, de Chadarévian JP. Pseudotetraploid clone with structural chromosomal rearrangements in a chondromyxoid fibroma: a case report. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2013;16(3):201–205. doi: 10.2350/12-01-1145-CR.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nord KH, Lilljebjörn H, Vezzi F, Nilsson J, Magnusson L, Tayebwa J, de Jong D, Bovée JV, Hogendoorn PC, Szuhai K. GRM1 is upregulated through gene fusion and promoter swapping in chondromyxoid fibroma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(5):474–477. doi: 10.1038/ng.2927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zupan A, Salapura V, Šekoranja D, Pižem J. Subcutaneous chondromyxoid fibroma with a novel PNISR::GRM1 fusion-report of a primary soft tissue tumour without connection to an underlying bone. Virchows Arch. 2023;482(5):917–921. doi: 10.1007/s00428-023-03519-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Storlazzi CT, Wozniak A, Panagopoulos I, Sciot R, Mandahl N, Mertens F, Debiec-Rychter M. Rearrangement of the COL12A1 and COL4A5 genes in subungual exostosis: molecular cytogenetic delineation of the tumor-specific translocation t(X;6)(q13-14;q22) Int J Cancer. 2006;118(8):1972–1976. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Amary F, Bloem JL, Cleven AHG, Konishi E. Lyon, France, IARC Press. 2020. Chondroblastoma. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours; pp. pp. 359–361. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Deventer N, Deventer N, Gosheger G, de Vaal M, Budny T, Laufer A, Heitkoetter B, Luebben T. Chondroblastoma: Is intralesional curettage with the use of adjuvants a sufficient way of therapy. J Bone Oncol. 2020;26:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang J, Du Z, Yang R, Tang X, Yan T, Guo W. Analysis for clinical feature and outcome of chondroblastoma after surgical treatment: A single center experience of 92 cases. J Orthop Sci. 2022;27(1):235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hirozane T, Sekita T, Kobayashi E, Mori T, Asano N, Udaka T, Tajima T, Nakagawa R, Kikuta K, Yoshiyama A, Morioka H, Watanabe I, Anazawa U, Susa M, Horiuchi K, Suzuki Y, Morii T, Nakayama R. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with chondroblastoma undergoing surgery with various adjuvant procedures: a retrospective study of 59 cases. BMC Surg. 2025;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02782-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lin PP, Thenappan A, Deavers MT, Lewis VO, Yasko AW. Treatment and prognosis of chondroblastoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:103–109. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000179591.72844.c3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ramappa AJ, Lee FY, Tang P, Carlson JR, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Chondroblastoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(8):1140–1145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Konishi E, Nakashima Y, Mano M, Tomita Y, Kubo T, Araki N, Morii E, Yoshikawa H, Haga H, Toguchida J, Ueda T, Osawa M, Hoshi M, Inoue T, Aono M, Yanagisawa A. Chondroblastoma of extra-craniofacial bones: Clinicopathological analyses of 103 cases. Pathol Int. 2017;67(10):495–502. doi: 10.1111/pin.12586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Xu H, Nugent D, Monforte HL, Binitie OT, Ding Y, Letson GD, Cheong D, Niu X. Chondroblastoma of bone in the extremities: a multicenter retrospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(11):925–931. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Laitinen MK, Stevenson JD, Evans S, Abudu A, Sumathi V, Jeys LM, Parry MC. Chondroblastoma in pelvis and extremities- a signle centre study of 177 cases. J Bone Oncol. 2019;17:100248. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2019.100248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yang D, Wang Z. Chondroblastoma in 28 cases: The risk of local recurrence increases with larger tumor size. J Orthop Sci. 2025;33(1):10225536251328099. doi: 10.1177/10225536251328099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Samargandi R, Bafail A, Le Nail LR, Berhouet J. Comprehensive insights into chondroblastoma metastasis: metastatic patterns and therapeutic approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16(12):2283. doi: 10.3390/cancers16122283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Feng X, Fang Y, Yu H, Song Z, Guo X, Yang M. Comparative analysis of X-ray, CT, and MRI images in patients with chondroblastoma in tubular and non-tubular bones. J Bone Oncol. 2025;52:100691. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Karbhari A, Vijan A, Janu AK, Gulia A, Kulkarni S, Shetty N, Gala K, Panjwani P. Retrospective study of multimodality imaging features of chondroblastoma. Indian J Orthop. 2024;58(9):1303–1309. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01214-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Papke DJ, Hung YP, Schaefer IM, Bredella MA, Charville GW, Reith JD, Fletcher CDM, Nielsen GP, Hornick JL. Clinicopathologic characterization of malignant chondroblastoma: a neoplasm with locally aggressive behavior and metastatic potential that closely mimics chondroblastoma-like osteosarcoma. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(11):2295–2306. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0604-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fritchie K, Ameline B, Andrei V, Charville G, Hornick JL, Meredith DM, John I, Michal M, Pancsa T, Kilpatrick SE, Reith J, Wang Z, Horvai A, Gross J, Sumathi V, Davis JL, Purgina B, Raymond DP, Ilaslan H, Chrisinger J, Din NU, Hung YP, Nielsen GP, Mogler C, Papke DJ, Baumhoer D. Malignant chondroblastoma: an epigenetically distinct subtype of chondroblastoma with a predilection for the skeletally mature. Mod Pathol. 2025;38(9):100790. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Amary MF, Berisha F, Mozela R, Gibbons R, Guttridge A, O’Donnell P, Baumhoer D, Tirabosco R, Flanagan AM. The H3F3 K36M mutant antibody is a sensitive and specific marker for the diagnosis of chondroblastoma. Histopathology. 2016;69(1):121–127. doi: 10.1111/his.12945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhao Q, Tang J, Luo Y, Huang J, Hu D, Zhu J, Jiang T, Zhang H, Liu Z. Chondroblastoma: clinicopathological analyses of 307 cases from a single institution in China and the diagnostic value of the H3F3 K36M mutant antibody. J Clin Pathol. 2023;76(6):367–373. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hui M, Uppin SG, Narayanan R, Kancherla NR, Kamble A, Reddy BR, Patnala C. Anti-histone H3.3K36M antibody is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemistry marker for the diagnosis of chondroblastoma. A validation based on study 136 cases comprising chondroblastoma and its mimics from single a centre in India. Int J Surg Pathol. 2023;31(4):375–386. doi: 10.1177/10668969221105614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rekhi B, Dave V, Butle A, Dutt A. Utility of immunohistochemical expression of H3.3K36M and DOG1 in the diagnosis of chondroblastomas: An experience from a tertiary cancer referral center. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2023;66:152174. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2023.152174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Akpalo H, Lange C, Zustin J. Discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumour 1 (DOG1): a useful immunohistochemical marker for diagnosing chondroblastoma. Histopathology. 2012;60(7):1099–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Swarts SJ, Neff JR, Johansson SL, Nelson M, Bridge JA. Significance of abnormalities of chromosomes 5 and 8 in chondroblastoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;349:189–193. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199804000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Romeo S, Szuhai K, Nishimori I, Ijszenga M, Wijers-Koster P, Taminiau AH, Hogendoorn PC. A balanced t(5;17) (p15;q22-23) in chondroblastoma: frequency of the re-arrangement and analysis of the candidate genes. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:393. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Carlson AP, Yonas H, Olson GT, Reichard KK, Medina-Flores R. Temporal chondroblastoma with a novel chromosomal translocation (2;5) (q33;q13) Skull Base Rep. 2011;1(1):65–70. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Behjati S, Tarpey PS, Presneau N, Scheipl S, Pillay N, Van Loo P, Wedge DC, Cooke SL, Gundem G, Davies H, Nik-Zainal S, Martin S, McLaren S, Goodie V, Robinson B, Butler A, Teague JW, Halai D, Khatri B, Myklebost O, Baumhoer D, Jundt G, Hamoudi R, Tirabosco R, Amary MF, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Flanagan AM. Distinct H3F3A and H3F3B driver mutations define chondroblastoma and giant cell tumor of bone. Nat Genet. 2013;45(12):1479–1482. doi: 10.1038/ng.2814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Cleven AH, Höcker S, Briaire-de Bruijn I, Szuhai K, Cleton-Jansen A, Bovée JV. Mutation analysis of H3F3A and H3F3B as a diagnostic tool for giant cell tumor of bone and chondroblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(11):1576–1583. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kervarrec T, Collin C, Larousserie F, Bouvier C, Aubert S, Gomez-Brouchet A, Marie B, Miquelestorena-Standley E, Le Nail LR, Avril P, Christophe Pagès J, de Pinieux G. H3F3 mutation status of giant cell tumors of the bone, chondroblastomas and their mimics: a combined high resolution melting and pyrosequencing approach. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(3):393–406. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lee JC, Folpe AL. Lyon, France, IARC Press. 2020. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours; pp. pp. 284–286. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Folpe AL. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors: A review and update. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019;36(4):260–268. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2019.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Su YJ, Lee JC. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Surg Pathol Clin. 2025;18(3):513–524. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2025.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Montanari A, Pirini MG, Lotrecchiano L, Di Prinzio L, Zavatta G. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors with or without phosphate metabolism derangements. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(8):7478–7488. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ogose A, Hotta T, Emura I, Hatano H, Inoue Y, Umezu H, Endo N. Recurrent malignant variant of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor with oncogenic osteomalacia. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30(2):99–103. doi: 10.1007/s002560000306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Oyama N, Kojima-Ishii K, Toda N, Matsuo T, Tocan V, Ohkubo K, Oba U, Koga Y, Setsu N, Yamada Y, Kohashi K, Nakashima Y, Oda Y, Ihara K, Ohga S. Malignant transformation of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor: a case report and literature review. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2020;29(2):69–75. doi: 10.1297/cpe.29.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Dwabe S, Chow W. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor with de novo liver metastases: a case report and literature review. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024;16:17588359241232092. doi: 10.1177/17588359241232092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hussein MAM, Cafarelli FP, Paparella MT, Rennie WJ, Guglielmi G. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors: radiological aspects and suggested imaging pathway. Radiol Med. 2021;126(12):1609–1618. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01412-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Broski SM, Folpe AL, Wenger DE. Imaging features of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(1):119–127. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Agaimy A, Michal M, Chiosea S, Petersson F, Hadravsky L, Kristiansen G, Horch RE, Schmolders J, Hartmann A, Haller F, Michal M. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of 22 cases expanding their morphologic and immunophenotypic spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(10):1371–1380. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Suryawanshi P, Agarwal M, Dhake R, Desai S, Rekhi B, Reddy KB, Jambhekar NA. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor with chondromyxoid fibroma-like feature: an unusual morphological appearance. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(11):1481–1485. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1159-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Koga K, Iwasaki H, Nabeshima K. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor: a chondromyxoid fibroma-like type. J Dermatol. 2023;50(11):1484–1487. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Billings SD, Bisceglia M, Bertoni F, Cho JY, Econs MJ, Inwards CY, Jan de Beur SM, Mentzel T, Montgomery E, Michal M, Miettinen M, Mills SE, Reith JD, O’Connell JX, Rosenberg AE, Rubin BP, Sweet DE, Vinh TN, Wold LE, Wehrli BM, White KE, Zaino RJ, Weiss SW. Most osteomalacia-associated mesenchymal tumors are a single histopathologic entity: an analysis of 32 cases and a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(1):1–30. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200401000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tajima S, Fukayama M. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) expression in phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(8):9422–9427. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Graham RP, Hodge JC, Folpe AL, Oliveira AM, Meyer KJ, Jenkins RB, Sim FH, Sukov WR. A cytogenetic analysis of 2 cases of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of mixed connective tissue type. Hum Pathol. 2012;43(8):1334–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lee JC, Su SY, Changou CA, Yang RS, Tsai KS, Collins MT, Orwoll ES, Lin CY, Chen SH, Shih SR, Lee CH, Oda Y, Billings SD, Li CF, Nielsen GP, Konishi E, Petersson F, Carpenter TO, Sittampalam K, Huang HY, Folpe AL. Characterization of FN1-FGFR1 and novel FN1-FGF1 fusion genes in a large series of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(11):1335–1346. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Liu X, Yin X, Li D, Li K, Zhang H, Lu J, Zhou L, Gao J, Wang J, Wu H, Liang Z. RNA Sequencing reveals novel oncogenic fusions and depicts detailed fusion transcripts of FN1-FGFR1 in phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Mod Pathol. 2023;36(10):100266. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lee CH, Su SY, Sittampalam K, Chen PC, Petersson F, Kao YC, Carpenter TO, Hsieh TH, Konishi E, Tsai JW, Billings SD, Folpe AL, Lee JC. Frequent overexpression of klotho in fusion-negative phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors with tumorigenic implications. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(5):858–870. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0416-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lee JC, Hsieh TH, Kao YC, Tsai CF, Huang HY, Shih CY, Song HL, Oda Y, Chih-Hsueh Chen P, Pan CC, Sittampalam K, Petersson F, Konishi E, Chiu WY, Chen CF, Carpenter TO, Lu TP, Chang CD, Huang SC, Folpe AL. Klotho overexpression is frequently associated with upstream rearrangements in fusion-negative phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors of bone and sinonasal tract. Mod Pathol. 2023;36(12):100336. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Giuffrida AY, Burgueno JE, Koniaris LG, Gutierrez JC, Duncan R, Scully SP. Chondrosarcoma in the United States (1973 to 2003): an analysis of 2890 cases from the SEER database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(5):1063–1072. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bovée JVMG, Bloem JL, Flanagan AM, Nielsen GP, Yoshida A. Lyon, France, IARC Press. 2020. Central atypical cartilaginous tumour/chondrosarcoma, grade 1. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours; pp. pp. 370–372. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bovée JVMG, Bloem JL, Flanagan AM, Nielsen GP, Yoshida A. Lyon, France, IARC Press. 2020. Central chondrosarcoma, grades 2 and 3. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours; pp. pp. 375–378. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn PC, Dijkstra SD, van Rijswijk CS, Krol AD, Taminiau AH, Bovée JV. The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. Oncologist. 2008;13(3):320–329. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kim JH, Lee SK. Classification of chondrosarcoma: from characteristic to challenging imaging findings. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15(6):1703. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Murphey MD, Walker EA, Wilson AJ, Kransdorf MJ, Temple HT, Gannon FH. From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of primary chondrosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23(5):1245–1278. doi: 10.1148/rg.235035134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Gazendam A, Popovic S, Parasu N, Ghert M. Chondrosarcoma: a clinical review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(7):2506. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lee FY, Yu J, Chang SS, Fawwaz R, Parisien MV. Diagnostic value and limitations of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for cartilaginous tumors of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(12):2677–2685. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200412000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Annovazzi A, Anelli V, Zoccali C, Rumi N, Persichetti A, Novello M, Sciuto R, Bertoni F, Ferraresi V, Biagini R. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of cartilaginous bone neoplasms: the added value of tumor grading. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33(11):813–821. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01392-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Amary MF, Bacsi K, Maggiani F, Damato S, Halai D, Berisha F, Pollock R, O’Donnell P, Grigoriadis A, Diss T, Eskandarpour M, Presneau N, Hogendoorn PC, Futreal A, Tirabosco R, Flanagan AM. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours. J Pathol. 2011;224(3):334–343. doi: 10.1002/path.2913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Sandberg AA, Bridge JA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: chondrosarcoma and other cartilaginous neoplasms. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;143(1):1–31. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(03)00002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Tarpey PS, Behjati S, Cooke SL, Van Loo P, Wedge DC, Pillay N, Marshall J, O’Meara S, Davies H, Nik-Zainal S, Beare D, Butler A, Gamble J, Hardy C, Hinton J, Jia MM, Jayakumar A, Jones D, Latimer C, Maddison M, Martin S, McLaren S, Menzies A, Mudie L, Raine K, Teague JW, Tubio JM, Halai D, Tirabosco R, Amary F, Campbell PJ, Stratton MR, Flanagan AM, Futreal PA. Frequent mutation of the major cartilage collagen gene COL2A1 in chondrosarcoma. Nat Genet. 2013;45(8):923–926. doi: 10.1038/ng.2668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Wagner MJ, Pimenta EM, Sweeney NW, Loggers ET, Roberts JL, Brinkman E, Chen EY, Ricciotti R, Haddox CL, Berg R, Yilma B, Stoppler MC, Chen JL, Cranmer LD. Genomic characterization of chondrosarcoma reveals potential therapeutic targets. JCO Precis Oncol. 2025;9:e2400592. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Zhang Y, Chen Y, Yang C, Seger N, Hesla AC, Tsagkozis P, Larsson O, Lin Y, Haglund F. TERT promoter mutation is an objective clinical marker for disease progression in chondrosarcoma. Mod Pathol. 2021;34(11):2020–2027. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00848-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Zhu GG, Nafa K, Agaram N, Zehir A, Benayed R, Sadowska J, Borsu L, Kelly C, Tap WD, Fabbri N, Athanasian E, Boland PJ, Healey JH, Berger MF, Ladanyi M, Hameed M. Genomic profiling identifies association of IDH1/IDH2 mutation with longer relapse-free and metastasis-free survival in high-grade chondrosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(2):419–427. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-4212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Chow LT, Lin J, Yip KM, Kumta SM, Ahuja AT, King WW, Lee JC. Chondromyxoid fibroma-like osteosarcoma: a distinct variant of low-grade osteosarcoma. Histopathology: 1996;29(5):429–436. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zhong J, Si L, Geng J, Xing Y, Hu Y, Jiao Q, Zhang H, Yao W. Chondromyxoid fibroma-like osteosarcoma: a case series and literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3063-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Boumeriem K, Bourekba I, Allali N, Chat L, El Haddad S. A case of a paediatric chondromyxoid fibroma-like osteosarcoma. BJR Case Rep. 2025;11(2):uaaf011. doi: 10.1093/bjrcr/uaaf011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Derqaoui S, Marbouh O, Madhi T, Najat L, Rouas L. Chondromyxoid fibroma-like osteosarcoma in a 13 years old girl: a report of a new case. Clin Pathol. 2021;14:2632010X211057555. doi: 10.1177/2632010X211057555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Stark M, Heinrich SD, Sivashanmugam R, Mackey D, Wasilewska E, Craver R. Pediatric chondromyxoid fibroma-like osteosarcoma. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2017;36(2):154–161. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2016.1259376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

