Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Sens. 2021 Apr 27;6(5):1899–1909. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.1c00253

A Bimodal Nanosensor for Probing Influenza Fusion Protein Activity Using Magnetic Relaxation

Vedant Jain [1], Tyler Shelby [1], Truptiben Patel [1], Elena Mekhedov [2], Jennifer D Petersen [2], Joshua Zimmerberg [2], Ahinsa Ranaweera [3], David P Weliky [3], Prasad Dandawate [4], Shrikant Anant [4], Shoukath Sulthana [5], Yolanda Vasquez [5], Tuhina Banerjee [1],*, Santimukul Santra [1],*
PMCID: PMC12950294  NIHMSID: NIHMS2017211  PMID: 33905237

Abstract

Viral fusion is a critical step in the entry pathway of enveloped viruses and remains a viable target for antiviral exploration. The current approaches for studying fusion mechanisms include ensemble fusion assays, high resolution cryo-TEM and single molecule fluorescence-based methods. While these methods have provided invaluable insights into the dynamic events underlying fusion processes, they come with their own limitations. These often include extensive data and image analysis, in addition to experimental time and technical requirements. This work proposes the use of spin-spin T2 relaxation technique as a sensitive bioanalytical method for the rapid quantification of interactions between viral fusion proteins and lipids, in real-time. In this study, new liposome-coated iron oxide nanosensors (LIONs) mimic as magnetic-labelled host membranes are reported to detect minute interactions occurring between the membrane and influenza’s fusion glycoprotein, hemagglutinin (HA). The influenza fusion protein’s interaction with the LION membrane is detected by measuring changes in the sensitive spin-spin T2 magnetic relaxation time using a bench-top NMR instrument. More data is gleaned from including the fluorescent dye DiI into the LION membrane. In addition, the effects of environmental factors on protein/lipid interaction that affect fusion such as pH, time of incubation, trypsin, and cholesterol were also examined. Furthermore, the efficacy and sensitivity of the spin-spin T2 relaxation assay in quantifying similar protein/lipid interactions with more native configurations of HA were demonstrated using virus-like particle (VLP). Shorter domains derived from HA were used to start a reductionist path to identify the parts of HA responsible for the NMR changes observed. Finally, the known fusion inhibitor Arbidol was employed in our spin-spin T2 relaxation-based fusion assay to demonstrate the application of LIONs in real-time monitoring of this aspect of fusion for evaluation of potential fusion inhibitors.

Keywords: magneto-liposome, influenza fusion, magnetic relaxation, nanosensor, pathogen detection

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2017211-f0001.jpg


Fusion between host cell membranes and viral envelopes is one of the most crucial steps in viral pathogenesis and allows enveloped viruses to overcome one of the largest barriers to propagation: cell entry.1 For enveloped viruses, the cell entry process is made possible by viral surface proteins that allow the virus to merge membrane barriers and facilitate escape of the viral genome from the endosome to the cytoplasm.2,3 Although there have been many successes in elucidating the mechanisms behind these crucial steps in pathogenesis, there remains much to be learned by clinicians and researchers alike, for development of novel methods to defeat some of the most pathogenic viruses that we face today: Zika, Ebola, SARS-Cov-2 and influenza. Various aspects of the fusion process have been analyzed using techniques such as electron microscopy (EM), cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET), electrophysiology, single-molecule Forster resonance energy transfer (sm-FRET) and sedimentation equilibrium analytical ultracentrifugation.4-14 However, the associate instrumentations and overall techniques are expensive and time consuming when compared with spin-spin T2 relaxation technique using a low-cost bench-top NMR instrument. We now briefly review the fundamental mechanism of the fusion process.

Influenza virus fusion in host cell membranes is facilitated by hemagglutinin, a glycoprotein with two functional peptide components, the receptor binding domain (RBD) and the fusion peptide.3 RBD is primarily responsible for binding with sialic acid molecules found on host cell membranes, initiating the process of cell entry. Once the virus is bound to the sialic acid residues, the host cell membrane endocytoses the virus. From the point-of-view of the viral genome, the next step in its path is to inject the cell cytoplasm with the viral genome as the virus does not escape the endosome, half of the weight of the virus remains in the endosomal membrane, thereby gaining access to requisite cellular machinery.15,16 This step is facilitated by the reduced pH within the endosome, which causes the conformational change allowing the previously cleaved N-terminus of the fusion peptide to interact with the endosomal membrane. Once activated, the fusion peptide initiates the process of fusion with the endosomal membrane and facilitates viral genome escape into the cytosol where it proceeds with the remainder of its infection cycle.2,17,18 Each step along this cell-entry pathway is an opportunity for medical intervention. If either binding or fusion are prevented, the viral life cycle as a whole is cut short, yet no drugs exist for these steps. These viral fusion mechanisms may provide viable opportunities for the development of novel prevention or treatment modalities, which require advancement of the tools used to analyze viral fusion. Therefore, development of specific techniques that may be adapted for the development of viral fusion inhibitors in simple and high-throughput fashion is needed.

To address this gap, we propose the use of novel liposome-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (LIONs) for the analysis of viral fusion mechanisms. This is an approach that has never before been explored, and may offer a new insight into this vital pathogenic mechanism. Furthermore, this approach offers an exciting potential for expansion as a generic platform for the rapid screening of anti-fusion drugs. With a combination of spin-spin T2 relaxation and fluorescence modalities, this platform allows for the quantifiable, real-time measurement of fusion and may be used to further characterize the environments or molecules that facilitate and inhibit it. Herein, we describe the synthesis of LIONs and demonstrate the feasibility of using LIONs for the real-time measurement of fusion, using the well-understood mechanics of influenza as a model.

Herein, we report a new method for the synthesis of LIONs, which effectively mimics a host endosomal membrane. Fluorescent dye is encapsulated in the lipid membrane, and both spin-spin T2 relaxation and fluorescence-based detection are used to monitor interactions between the LION’s lipid membrane and influenza fusion proteins. As shown in Scheme 1A, when fusion proteins are activated by reduced pH, they interact more with LION membranes. We hypothesized that as the fusion proteins cluster around the LIONs, it would replace surrounding water molecules, causing the spin-spin T2 magnetic relaxation times to rise. This T2 relaxation hypothesis was proven extensively in our previous studies,19-21 and provides the first example by which successful interaction between pathogen fusion proteins and host lipid membranes are observed. Next, the successful T2 relaxation-based fusion can be concordantly verified by using fluorescent modality (Scheme 1B). When the fusion proteins pierce the membrane surrounding the LIONs, some of the encapsulated DiI dye is able to escape into solution. Following magnetic filtration and removal of all LIONs, the presence of remaining fluorescent dye in solution confirms for the disruption of the membrane by the fusion proteins. Herein, we demonstrate the ability of LIONs to observe fusion in real-time using full-length HA, influenza virus-like particles (VLPs), full-length trimeric HA-II and other shorter domains derived from HA-II that lack the fusion peptide. Furthermore, we use this LIONs platform to study environmental effects on fusion, including pH and lipid membrane’s cholesterol composition. Lastly, the application of this platform for screening antiviral drugs in a sensitive fashion is established.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Schematic representation and quantification of fusion peptide-membrane interaction using A) spin-spin T2 relaxation and B) fluorescence properties of LIONs at various pH.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Synthesis and Characterization of Lipid-Coated Iron Oxide Nanosensors (LIONs).

Iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (IONPs) were synthesized using previously reported method and as described in the experimental section.22 Briefly, an aqueous solution of iron salts mixture was acid digested before precipitating in dilute NH4OH solution. Polyacrylic acid (PAA) was used to provide thin polymer coatings around iron oxide nanocrystals and excellent stability in aqueous environment. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) method was used for the measurement of overall size (diameter D = 42±2 nm) and surface charge (zeta potential ζ = −31±3 mV) of the synthesized IONPs, as shown in SI Figure S1A-S1B. The size of IONPs was further confirmed by TEM measurement (D = 40 nm, SI Figure S1C) and the formation of superparamagnetic nanoparticles were indicated by the spin-spin T2 relaxation study (T2 = 83 ms, SI Figure S1D). These results indicated for the formulation of highly stable, dispersed and superparamagnetic IONPs. Next, we used a modified solvent evaporation method for the synthesis of LIONs, where 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) was selected as the model lipid membrane. After evaporation of DOPC solution in chloroform, the DOPC thin film was soaked in a hydrating media, which was a mixture of HEPES buffer and IONPs solution. In this process, the IONPs were able to fuse in to the DOPC lipid layer, which naturally formed multilamellar LIONs. An extensive extrusion process was carried out in order to synthesize unilamellar LIONs. Similar protocol was used for the preparation of fluorescent-labelled LIONs (2, Scheme 1), where an optical dye, DiI (λex = 554 nm, λem = 574 nm), was selected due to its high extinction coefficients (Ɛ > 1,25,000 cm−1 M−1) and high fluorescence stability in hydrophobic environments,23,24 and mixed in the hydrating media of DOPC thin layer.

Synthesized LIONs were characterized using various spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. For the measurement of average size and surface charge, three consecutive measurements were taken from the same sample. Average size and surface charge (ζ potential) of LIONs were measured using Malvern’s Nano-ZS90 Zetasizer and were found to be 93±4 nm and −14±2 mV, respectively. The superparamagnetic property of LIONs ([Fe] = 2 mM) was confirmed by the collection of spin-spin T2 relaxation time and was found to be 120 ms. The optimal detection limit in terms of Fe concentration was found to be in the range of 2±0.5 mM. The shape and morphology of LIONs were further confirmed by the negative-stained transmission electron microscopy, and the average size was found to be 90 nm. The magneto-fluorescence properties for DiI-labelled LIONs (2, FL-LIONs, Scheme 1) were characterized by measuring fluorescence emission (λem = 588 nm) and collecting T2 relaxation time of 131 ms (Figure 1A-1F). The red shift (Δλem = 14 nm) in fluorescence emission and change in magnetic relaxation time (ΔT2 = 11 ms) are the indicative of effective DiI dye encapsulation in the lipid layer by water displacement. In order to determine the stability LIONs preparations (1 and 2) at different lower pH levels, they were incubated in HEPES buffer solutions with varying pH (pH = 5.1-7.5). Size and magnetic relaxation of LIONs (1 and 2) were measured at every 24 h intervals in order to assess for any indication of instability. We observed that the synthesized LIONs and FL-LIONs preparations are stable at various pH, as evaluated by measuring their size, T2 relaxation and fluorescence emission at various times. (SI, Figure S2-S4, Table S1) This provides a stable nanoplatform for studying viral fusion at lower pH, where LIONs can be used as host membrane with bimodal magneto-fluorescence properties. Batch to batch variability for the LIONs synthesis protocol was assessed by measuring size and T2 relaxation time at three pH levels (pH = 7.5, 6.0 and 5.1). Minimum variations were observed when the results were compared as seen in SI, Figure S5. This demonstrates that our synthetic protocol is optimized and could be reliably applied for sensing applications.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Spectroscopic and microscopic characterizations of LIONs (1) and FL-LIONs (2). A) Average diameter and B) zeta potential of LIONs (1) measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique. C) Size of LIONs was further characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Scale Bar: 100 nm. D) Magnetic property of synthesized LIONs was confirmed by performing spin-spin T2 magnetic relaxation experiments. E) The fluorescence property of DiI dye encapsulating LIONs (2) was confirmed by observing fluorescence maximum at 588 nm and F) the magnetic relaxation value was collected as T2 = 131 ms, indicative of its’ fluorescent and superparamagnetic properties.

Fusion Between LIONs and full-length HA.

The greater stability of synthesized LIONs preparations at different pH levels provide a suitable platform for studying fusion peptide-membrane interaction of pathogens. We intended to monitor the fusion interaction between LIONs and hemagglutinin protein HA in seven different pH environments (pH = 7.5, 7.0, 6.5, 6.0, 5.5, 5.3 and 5.1) using sensitive spin-spin T2 relaxation technique. The goal of this experiment is to demonstrate the real-time capability of our LIONs nanosensor to detect HA fusion peptide in lipid membrane. It is reported2 that the molecular fusion interaction is become significant at a lower pH range, however, our novel magnetic nanoplatform (LIONs) would provide a quantitative and accurate information of fusion at different pH. To prepare various pH solutions of HEPES buffer, we utilized sodium citrate solution (pH = 3.0) in an incremental manner. For each fusion experiment, the HEPES-citrate buffer of different pH was added to a mixture of 400 μL of LIONs solution (2.0 mM, pH= 7.5) and 10 μL of HA stock solution (1.3 μg/mL), and mixed. The resulting solution was incubated for about 10 seconds before collecting corresponding spin-spin T2 relaxation times for the evaluation of the interactions between LIONs and HA.

As seen from the experiment, the ΔT2 increased very sensitively as we lowered the pH values of the reaction. Importantly, the change in T2 relaxation value was more significant in pH below 5.5, and optimal fusion was detected at pH 5.1 (Figure 2A). The greater increase in ΔT2 values at lower pH levels is attributed to pH-triggered conformational change undergone in the fusion loop of the HA molecule. This sudden conformational change allows its insertion into the liposome membrane and leads to a significant displacement of neighboring bulk water protons, ultimately increasing the ΔT2 signal.25 Unpaired t-tests were performed to compare the individual data points collected from two extreme pH levels, namely 7.5 and 5.1, as well as between pH levels of 6.0 and 5.5. Statistically significant T2 elevations (P < 0.0001 or ****) were observed for both these comparisons. Next, we measured the time-dependence of the fusogenic interactions using our magnetic nanosensor platform in order to evaluate the dynamic characteristics of HA fusion. For this purpose, we selected the optimal pH (pH = 5.1) of observed maximum fusion activity between HA and LIONs. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature and T2 relaxation data were collected in each minute. As presented in Figure 2B, the ΔT2 values increased exponentially within first two minutes of the incubation. Following the second measurement, the ΔT2 values remained relatively unchanged for the rest of the incubation periods. These results indicated that the fusion event between HA and LIONs is rapid at a low pH of 5.1. Unpaired t-tests were also used to compare the individual data points collected from the first and second time points in Figure 2B. Statistically significant T2 elevations (P < 0.0001 or ****) were observed for these two points.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A) HA and LION interaction at various pH levels, showing increase in ΔT2 and HA activity as the pH decreases. B) Time dependent interaction between HA and LIONs at pH 5.1, indicating that the activity is rapid and spiked to its maximum within two minutes. C) Effect of increasing deuterium oxide on T2 relaxation signal, resulting from interaction between HA and LIONs at low pH. Increased deuterium oxide causes decrease in the T2 relaxation signal, directly corelating the collected T2 relaxation times with the fusion peptide interaction-mediated neighboring water protons displacement. D) Fluorescence study of fusion peptide interaction between HA and FL-LIONs at various pH, indicated higher rate at lower pH and further validates T2 relaxation signals indicative of fusion peptide activity on membranes. Unpaired t-tests were performed to compare the individual data points collected from two extreme pH levels, namely 7.5 and 5.1. Statistically significant T2 elevations (P < 0.0001 or ****) were observed for both these comparisons.

To further validate the spin-spin T2 relaxation signals as a result of HA fusion peptide-membrane interaction and neighboring water (H2O) proton displacement, experiments were conducted between LIONs and trimeric HA at pH 5.1 in the presence of increasing concentrations of deuterium oxide (D2O). Since, deuterium and hydrogen have different magnetic moments, it is often used for the identification of the role of water protons on magnetic relaxation signal. The results showed that with the increase in the percentage of D2O in the experimental solution, a reduced spin-spin T2 relaxation values were obtained (Figure 2C). This observation directly indicated for the important role of water proton’s displacement associated with conditions allowing HA fusion peptide liberation, which resulted in the change in T2 relaxation signal. In order to cross-validate the above observation and to further demonstrate the role of neighboring water protons displacement in the HA fusion, we took the help of fluorescence modality using LIONs platform. DiI encapsulating LIONs (2, Scheme 1) were incubated with HA at the same pH range (pH 5.0 – 7.5) for five minutes, after which the solutions were passed through magnetic column to remove the magnetic nanoparticles from solutions. The supernatant reaction mixtures of different pH were analyzed to check for the presence of any fluorescence, which would directly corelate the disruption of the LIONs’ lipid membranes for the HA fusion interaction. The amount of released DiI dye in each filtrate was analyzed using a plate reader and was then plotted in correspondence to the pH level. As shown in Figure 2D, increased fluorescence intensity was observed at lower pH levels, indicated for the HA fusion at lower pH and which resulted in DiI dye release from the lipid coatings. This experiment directly validates the change in spin-spin T2 relaxation signals due to water protons displacement caused by the HA fusion.

The magnetic relaxation and fluorescence emission data thus far indicated an interaction at pH levels below 6.0, however, it was necessary to confirm that these changes in T2 relaxation signals and fluorescent dye escapes were HA fusion peptide-membrane interaction-specific, and not due to the simple presence of HA in the solution. To achieve this, two control assays were conducted in which 1) HA was preincubated with its corresponding fusion-neutralizing antibody prior to mixing with LIONs at different pH (Figure 3A), and 2) HA was preincubated at various pH prior to the addition of LIONs (Figure 3B). In the first control assay, the lack of significant change in ΔT2 values were seen due to fusion inhibition mediated by the presence of HA neutralizing antibody. In the second experiment, the conformational changes in HA that facilitate fusion occurred rapidly as the HA was preincubated with various low pH and before introduced to the LIONs.26-28 This experiment resulted in the lack of significant ΔT2 increase as shown in Figure 3B. These results indicated that fusion interaction is mediated by one of the conformational intermediates of HA, and once it reaches to that conformational state, fusion is no longer possible. Similar control assays, including HA neutralizing antibody and various low pH preincubations, were performed in order to utilize the fluorescence modality of FL-LIONs and no significant fusion activities were observed (Figure 3C and 3D). These control assays further confirm that the changes in ΔT2 values and fluorescence emission related to dye release are due to the pH-triggered fusion-specific interactions between HA and LIONs’ lipid membranes. In conclusion, the magnetic relaxation and fluorescence experiments indicated for the significant fusogenic interactions between HA and LIONs at lower pH values with significant fusion occurring at pH of 5.1. Furthermore, these data verified our magnetic nanoplatform’s efficacy in its ability to detect and investigate fusion peptide-membrane interactions of other pathogen and to screen potential antiviral drugs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Control experiments. A) Fusion interaction between HA and LIONs at various pH, where HA is preincubated with anti-HA antibody. Results indicated for minimal change in ΔT2 due to the lack of fusion interaction. B) Fusion between LIONs and pre-incubated HA at various pH, showing no significant change in ΔT2. Fluorescence study of fusion between FL-LIONs and HA preincubated with C) HA-neutralizing antibody and D) various pH, showing minimal change in fluorescence intensity. These results indicative of the quick fusogenic conformational change in the HA before it comes in contact with LIONs.

Effects of LION’s Membrane Composition and Trypsin on HA Fusion.

The fusion between influenza and host cell membranes in biological environments is influenced by various factors including host membrane compositions, trypsin and various environmental factors. We wished to demonstrate that our platform is capable of detecting the effects of such factors on fusion. We chose to demonstrate this capability by analyzing fusion in the presence of trypsin (1%) as well as in the presence of LIONs with various degrees of membrane cholesterol composition (0%, 20%, and 40%). To observe the effects of trypsin, fusion assays between HA and LIONs were repeated in the presence of trypsin at the same pH levels used before (Figure 4A). We observed that the presence of trypsin facilitated an increase in fusogenic interactions when compared to assays lacking trypsin.29-36 Unpaired t-tests were used to compare the spin-spin T2 relaxation changes in the presence and absence of trypsin within both 5.1 and 5.3 pH groups. Statistically significant differences (P<0.0001 or ****) were observed for both of these groups.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A) Fusion interactions between HA and LIONs in the presence of trypsin (1%), showing increase in ΔT2 and thereby, fusogenic activity in presence of trypsin (1%) when compared to fusion without trypsin. B) Fusion interactions between HA and LIONs with varied cholesterol compositions (0%, 20% and 40%. Bar graph showing increase in ΔT2 value, indicative of increase in fusogenic activity, when 20% and 40% cholesterol was added to the LION’s membrane. Statistically significant difference (P<0.0001 or ****) were observed when data points for LIONs with and without trypsin and cholesterol compositions were compared at two pH 5.3 and 5.1.

It is known that cholesterol composition of host cell membranes has significant effects on membrane properties and on HA mediated fusion.37-41 To analyze the effects of cholesterol composition within the LIONs on fusion interactions, we altered the percentage composition of cholesterol in the LION’s lipid membrane. This was achieved by dissolving appropriate amount of cholesterol along with DOPC in chloroform followed by extrusion to get LIONs with varied cholesterol composition in the lipid membrane. Next, similar spin-spin T2 relaxation-based fusion assays were conducted on HA and LIONs at pH levels ranging from 7.5 to 5.1. As seen in Figure 4B, increased cholesterol concentration resulted in greater fusogenic interactions between HA and LION’s membrane. This increase is attributed to the increase in the fluidity of the LION’s lipid membrane, which in turn enhances the fusion efficiency.40,41 Ultimately, this leads to greater interaction between HA and LION membranes and therefore increases the displacement of bulk waster protons as reflected by higher T2 relaxation values. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare the T2 relaxation time changes of different LION’s membrane compositions at equivalent pH levels. Statistically significant difference (P<0.0001 or ****) were observed when data points for LIONs with 0% and 40% cholesterol compositions were compared at two pH 5.3 and 5.1.

Detection of Fusion Interactions Between Different Domains of HA2 With LIONs Using Magnetic Relaxometry.

Fusion activity is mainly catalyzed by the HA-II subunit of hemagglutinin.3 The HA-II subunit has been shown to be composed of four domains: the fusion peptide (FP), a soluble ectodomain (SE), transmembrane (TM), and intraviral domains. Previous studies have shown that each of these domains play a specific and critical role in the viral fusion process. SE and FP have been shown to play pivotal roles in fusion mechanisms at acidic pH (<5.5), whereas TM has been shown to play minimal role in fusion even at acidic pH (<5.5).42 Herein, we demonstrate that our magnetic nanoplatform was capable of detecting these mechanistic differences amongst domains using new LIONs. To conduct real-time analysis on these individual components of HA-II, we obtained the following domains experimentally and as previously reported: SHA2 (SE), FHA2 (FP+SE), and SHA2+TM (SE+TM).42

The spin-spinT2 relaxation experiments with SHA2 and FHA2 domains resulted higher ΔT2 at low pH levels (<5.5), which indicated for the maximum fusion peptide interactions between the domains and LIONs. (Figure 5A and 5B) On the other hand, SHA2+TM was expected to show lower activity even at lower pH (<5.5).42 As shown in Figure 5C, the interaction between LIONs and SHA2+TM resulted a very low fusion peptide interaction when compared with the activity of other domains and hence a smaller ΔT2 value even at low pH levels (<5.5) was yielded. Taken together these results corroborate earlier findings and show that our LIONs platform is capable of detecting interactions that might involve even the subunits of a viral glycoprotein with the host membrane. Unpaired t-tests were carried out for all three of these experiments and two pH groups namely, 7.5 and 5.1 were compared. For all three experiments, P value was <0.0001, which denoted that the difference between the group was significant.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Interactions of A) SHA2, and B) FHA2 with LIONs at various pH: Bar graph showing significant increase in ΔT2 (or increase in fusogenic activity) as the pH decreases from 7.5 to 5.1. C) Interaction between SHA2+TM and LIONs at various pH: The result showing minimal increase in ΔT2 (or increase in fusogenic activity) as the pH decreases from 7.5 to 5.1. Statistically significant change (P < 0.0001 or ****) was observed when testing was performed between 7.5 and 5.1.

Fusion of Influenza VLPs With LIONs.

Following the successful observation of fusion between LIONs, HA and HA-domains, we have designed experiments to determine if our nanoplatform could detect fusion interactions between LIONs and a more realistic viral model. To accomplish this, we used influenza viral-like particles (VLP) that contained both wild type HA and neuraminidase glycoproteins and therefore, represents structurally similar to influenza virus.43 Similar fusion experiments were performed between LIONs (2 mM) and VLPs (10 μL, 1.3 μg/mL) at different pH levels. As seen in Figure 6A, interactions between LIONs and VLPs was significantly high at low pH levels, once again demonstrating the successful replication of viral fusion in a biologically relevant environment, which can be sensitively detected using the novel magnetic nanoplatform. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare the statistical significance of the individual data points collected from two extreme pH levels (7.5 and 5.1). Statistically significant T2 elevations (P < 0.0001 or ****) were observed from this comparison. To further establish the efficacy of our system, we performed a time dependent T2 relaxation fusion experiments between VLPs and LIONs at pH 5.1. Data points were collected every minute and plotted. As shown, moderate change in T2 relaxation time observed within a minute, however, the fusion peptide interaction was found to be rapid and the maximum change in T2 change was observed within next minutes and efficiently collected using the magnetic nanoplatform (Figure 6B). These results indicated for the rapid nature of HA fusion in host and that can be quantitively assessed using our LIONs nanoplatform and spin-spin T2 relaxation technology. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare the individual data points collected from first minute and second minute. Statistically significant T2 elevations (P= 0.0003 or ***) were observed for these two points.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A) Fusion interactions between VLPs and LIONs at various pH. The results showing an increase in ΔT2 (or increase in fusogenic activity) as the pH decreases from 7.5 to 5.1. B) Time-dependent interaction between VLPs and LIONs at pH 5.1. Plot indicating that the interaction at pH 5.1 is rapid.

Effect of Arbidol on Fusion-Related Activity.

In addition to studying the effects of lipid compositions and environmental factors on the membrane interactions of HA and its parts, we wanted to determine whether our newly developed LIONs platform could reliably be used as a new generic tool for the screening of fusion inhibitors. In order to accomplish this, Arbidol (30 μM), a known fusion inhibitor, was used as an external agent to test its effects on fusion-related activities.44 Two sets of experiments were designed to check the effect, one with HA and the second with VLPs (10 μL, 1.3 μg/mL). In both cases, we expected that the anti-fusogenic effects of Arbidol would be detectable by our platform. Fusion assays were carried out at a pH level of 5.1 with and without using Arbidol. As Figure 7A indicates, the solution with Arbidol had negative affect on fusion interactions between HA and LIONs. A similar trend was observed for interactions between VLPs and LIONs (Figure 7B). These data show that Arbidol’s anti-fusion activity also prevents the interactions measured in our platform, as well as the precision of our platform in detecting this mechanism. This is an important result and indicates for the potential use of our LIONs-based magnetic relaxation technology as an effective bioanalytical method for screening new anti-viral drugs. Unpaired t-tests were carried out and statistically relevant differences (P<0.0001 or ****) were found for both the groups in both the experiments.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

A) The effect of Arbidol on fusion between HA and LIONs at pH 5.1: Bar graph showing a decrease in ΔT2 in the presence of Arbidol at pH 5.1, when compared to absence of Arbidol. B) Similar results obtained on interactions between VLPs and LIONs at pH 5.1. Results indicated for reduction in ΔT2 signal indicative of decrease in fusion peptide interaction in the presence of Arbidol at pH 5.1. Statistically significant change (P < 0.0001 or ****) was observed when testing was performed between absence and presence of Arbidol at pH 5.1.

Docking of Arbidol in the Binding Site of Hemagglutinin (HA).

To further provide a representation of this anti-fusion mechanism, we used molecular modeling to demonstrate the binding of Arbidol with HA. HA is composed of head (HA1) and stem (HA2/HA1) domains and both cHA-Ins are linked with a single disulfide bond. The proposed Arbidol binding site in the X-ray crystal structure is composed of residues Arg54–Glu57 (helix-A), Lys58–Asn60 (loop-B), Trp92–Glu103 (helix-C), from HA2 and Pro293, Phe294, and Arg307 (C-terminal loops) of HA1 and Glu90′–Ala101′ (helix-C′), K310′ (a short loop close to the HA1 C terminus), and Leu29′ (a β-HA-Irpin turn of HA2).44-46 There were no hydrogen bonds reported in the available PDB. Hence, we used Auto dock vina program to study the interaction of Arbidol in the protein cavity of HA. (Figure 8) Arbidol binds in t50he protein cavity with the binding energy of −6.0 Kcal/mol, as calculated from this computational modeling experiment. The compound stabilized itself by forming hydrogen bond with amino acid THR59 (2.3 Å) of Loop-B of the HA2 cHA-In, while smaller hydrogen bond length indicated the tight binding. Our study shows the tight binding of Arbidol in the protein cavity of HA suggesting the probable mechanism of antiviral activity.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Computational modeling experiment showing molecular interactions between Arbidol and Hemagglutinin (HA).

CONCLUSIONS

As enveloped viruses such as influenza, Zika, Ebola and Covid-19 continue to play a major role in disease throughout the world, it is important to develop novel technologies to study relevant viral pathogenesis mechanisms. The data reported herein demonstrate the successful application of our novel LIONs platform to observe viral fusion interactions using isolated viral glycoproteins, their respective domains, and more biologically relevant models such as viral-like particles (VLPs). Further, we demonstrated the ability of this model to evaluate external effects on fusion mechanism, such as lipid composition and the presence of additional molecules including trypsin and Arbidol. The successful observation of fusion interaction between HA and LIONs membranes at biologically relevant pH levels indicates that this magnetic nanoplatform may provide a new avenue to analyze viral fusion. Additional observation of fusion using VLPs instead of individual glycoprotein further strengthens the argument that LIONs may be used to mimic host cell membranes for the sake of further mechanistic discovery. This platform was also successful in detecting interactions between various domains of HA and LIONs as well as the effect of an antiviral drug Arbidol. Furthermore, the use of anti-HA antibody to prevent fusion interaction indicates that this platform may also be used to study potential fusion inhibitors. Since one of the major reasons to better understand pathogenic mechanisms is to discover methods of inhibiting them, the ability of the LIONs platform to accomplish this in addition to real-time fusion observation makes it a considerable candidate for further use in this field. In addition to these assets, LIONs may also be used to analyze the extent to which fusion is affected by stimulating or inhibiting environmental factors, such as membrane composition or enzyme presence. Our findings suggest an increase in fusion activity both in the case of increased cholesterol membrane composition as well as in the presence of the protease trypsin and decrease in fusion activity in the presence of an antiviral drug Arbidol.

In summary, this article provides evidence that the formulated novel LIONs platform may be used to analyze influenza fusion peptide-membrane interaction in a rapid and high-throughput manner using spin-spin T2 magnetic relaxation as an effective bioanalytical method. Furthermore, this nanoplatform lends itself to broad application in the study of key pathogenic mechanisms of other viruses. The ability to observe fusion in real-time, without use of any sophisticated instruments and also studying the effects of key environmental factors, all within minutes, makes this platform highly approachable and efficient. Furthermore, the high degree of customizability of this nanoplatform allows it to easily used for the study of multiple enveloped viruses, requiring little to no alteration of the LIONs synthesis.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Materials and Instruments.

1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) and ovine cholesterol (ovine wool, >98%) were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids. Recombinant influenza A Virus Hemagglutinin H1 protein (ab69741) was obtained from Abcam. Anti-HA2 monoclonal antibody was obtained from Sino Biological. Various domains of HA2 were generously provided by Dr. David Weliky from Michigan State University. Arbidol hydrochloride (>98%) and polyacrylic acid (PAA) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich. Chloroform (99.8+%) and HEPES sodium salt (99%) were obtained from Acros Organic. Ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), hydrochloric acid (HCl), ferrous chloride tetrahydrate and ferrous chloride hexahydrate (FeCl2.4H2O, FeCl3.6H2O) were purchased from Fischer scientific.

The magnetic relaxometer mq20 (0.47 T) was obtained from Bruker and used for T2 measurements. A Zetasizer-ZS90 from Malvern was used for the surface charge and size characterization of the IONPs. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) experiments were carried out using Technai T20 and JEOL-JEM 2100 electron microscopes. The extruder system was purchased from Avanti and used for LIONs synthesis. Magnetic column setup was purchased from Miltenyi Biotec. TECAN’s infinite M200 PRO high-throughput plate reader was also used.

Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs).

Iron oxide nanoparticles were prepared by forming a core of iron oxide (Fe3O4), which was then coated with a layer of polyacrylic acid. Three initial solutions were created, solution 1 consisted of polyacrylic acid (0.859 g) dissolved in water (5 mL). Solution 2 was made of NH4OH (1.8 mL from a 30% stock solution) and further diluted with 15 mL of water. The third and final solution contained a mixture of FeCl2.4H2O (0.334 g) and FeCl3.6H2O (0.622 g) dissolved in water (2 mL). Once these solutions were prepared, HCl (90 μL from 12 M stock) was added to Solution 3, and then solution 2 was immediately added to solution 3 while mixing. To this solution, the solution 1 was added and resulting mixture was vortexed for about an hour at 3000 RPM. This solution was then centrifuged to get rid of nanoparticle agglomerates and large nanoparticles. The supernatant was collected and purified using magnetic column and finally dialyzed in PBS (pH = 7.40). The iron concentration was determined by acid digestion. The nanoparticles were subjected to acid digestion using HCl acid that converts all Fe ions to iron (III). Amount of iron was estimated by creating a standard calibration curve of known concentrations of FeCl3 and the absorbance was recorded at 410 nm after digestion. These IONPs ([Fe] = 5 mM) were then characterized for their size and surface charge using dynamic light scattering (Figure S1).

Synthesis of Liposome-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (LIONs).

For synthesis of liposome-coated iron oxide nanoparticles, a solution was prepared by dissolving DOPC (100 mg) in chloroform (1 mL). Then, a dry lipid film was obtained by evaporating the chloroform solvent under low vacuum for 24 h. This layer was hydrated using a stock solution of IONPs (4 mL, 5 mM) and HEPES buffer (4 mL, pH = 7.50). The hydrated layer was mixed at room temperature (22 °C) for 3 h. The resulting solution was centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 25 mins to remove any unbound DOPC. Finally, the solution was extruded through a 100 nm polycarbonate membrane for a minimum of 21 times to decrease the polydispersity and to convert the multilamellar vesicles into unilamellar liposomes. The iron concentration [Fe] of synthesized LIONs was found to be 5.0 mM. For the preparation of LIONs with fluorescence modality (FL-LIONs), the similar protocol was followed except, 2 μL of DiI solution (5 μM in DMSO) was directly added to the hydrating solution of IONPs (4 mL, 5 mM) and HEPES buffer (4 mL; pH = 7.50). The synthesized LIONs and FL-LIONs were found to be stable in aqueous solution and characterized using DLS, magnetic relaxation and fluorescence spectroscopic techniques (SI, Figure S2-S4, Table S1).

Stability of LIONs at Different pH.

The stability of LIONs at different pH were evaluated using spin-spin T2 relaxation and dynamic light scattering techniques. The stock LIONs solution was diluted to [Fe] = 2.0 mM by adding HEPES buffer (pH 7.5). For the stability studies, 400 μL of LIONs ([Fe] = 2.0 mM) were mixed with 100 μL of HEPES buffer solutions with different pH (1X; pH: 7.5, 7.0, 6.5, 6.0, 5.5, 5.3, 5.1), and the spin-spin T2 relaxation times were collected over 72 h using a magnetic relaxometer. The HEPES buffer solutions (1X) with different pH were previously prepared by adding aliquots of 50 mM sodium citrate (pH 3.0) to HEPES buffer with a starting pH = 7.5. Similarly, the size of LIONs solutions at different pH were monitored using dynamic light scattering every 24 h for 72 h (SI, Figure S2-S4, Table S1).

Preparation of LIONs and HA Protein Stock Solutions for Fusion Protein-Membrane Interaction Assays.

To prepare for fusion assay, the concentration of synthesized LIONs solution ([Fe] = 5.0 mM) was diluted by adding HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) and the final concentration was adjusted to [Fe] = 2.0 mM, which resulted in a baseline T2 relaxation value of 100 ms. This LIONs stock solution was used for all LIONs-based fusion experiments. The stock solution of viral HA protein was prepared by adding 1 μL (1.3 μg/μL) of HA protein to 999 μL of deionized water (pH 7.5) to obtain an overall stock concentration of 1.3 μg/mL.

Spin-Spin T2 Relaxation Experiments for Fusion Interaction Assays.

For this experiment, we have incubated 400 μL of LIONs ([Fe] = 2.0 mM) with respective HEPES buffer at different pH (90 μL, pH = 7.5-5.1) and 10 μL of HA stock solution (1.3 μg/mL) in a 1.0 mL relaxometer tube for 10 seconds. Subsequently, T2 measurements were performed in a time-dependent manner (5 times in every 1-minute intervals) at room temperature (22 °C). Similar procedure was adopted to evaluate 1) the effects of cholesterol presence in LIONs composition (20% and 40%), 2) presence of 1% Trypsin, and 3) the presence of Arbidol (30 μM) in the fusion interaction process. In addition, this procedure was also applied to study the pH-dependent fusion protein-membrane interaction between LIONs with VLPs and various domains of HA2.

Fluorescence-Based Experiments for Fusion Assays.

To cross-validate spin-spin T2 relaxation-based fusion experiments, we incubated 400 μL DiI-LIONs ([Fe] = 2.0 mM) with respective HEPES buffer at different pH (90 μL, pH = 7.5-5.1) and 10 μL of HA stock solution (1.3 μg/mL) in a 1.0 mL test tube for 5 minutes. This solution was then passed through a magnetic column in order to isolate the dye. The amount of dye released at each pH was quantified based on the fluorescence intensity values obtained when excited at 575 nm in a TECAN’s infinite M200 PRO high-throughput plate reader. Similar procedure was adopted to cross validate the interaction between VLP and LIONs.

Virus-Like Particle (VLP) Preparation.

293T human embryonic kidney cells were seeded in a 10 cm diameter tissue culture dish (3x106 cells/dish) and grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in DMEM-10% FCS supplemented with L-glutamine and primocin. 24 h later, cells were transfected with the plasmids using Trans-IT LT1 (Mirus) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plasmids preparation was described in Chlanda et al.43 VLPs were produced using the following quantities: 2.5 μg pCAGGS-HA, 0.5 μg pCAGGS-NA, 3.0 μg pCAGGS-M1, and 0.25 μg of pCAGGS-M2. At 5 h post-transfection, the medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM and exogenous bacterial neuraminidase from Clostridium perfrigens (Sigma-Aldrich) was added at a final concentration of 25 mU/mL. At 48 h tosylsulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin (5 μg/mL) was directly added to the medium in the culture dish and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Trypsin was inactivated by the addition of soybean trypsin inhibitor (0.1 mg/mL); supernatant was collected and clarified at 4 °C by centrifugation at 1000 x g for 10 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was layered onto a 3 mL 30% (wt/vol) sucrose-KHE (100 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 1 mM EDTA) cushion and centrifuged at 200,000 x g for 2 h at 4 °C in a Beckman Optima centrifuge using a 50.2Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter). The pellet was re-suspended in KHE buffer and centrifuged again at 130,000 x g for 30 min at 4 °C using a TLA 100.3 rotor. The pellet was re-suspended in KHE buffer. Protein concentration was measured using Microplate BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Synthesis of Various HA2 Domains.

Similar protocol for the synthesis and characterization of various domains of HA2 was followed as previously reported.42, 47

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Imaging of VLPs and LIONs by Negative Staining.

VLPs were adhered to a freshly glow discharged, formvar and carbon coated 200-mesh copper EM grid (Electron microscopy Sciences, EMS) for one minute, by inverting the grid on a 5 μL drop of VLP suspended in KHE buffer. The EM grid with attached VLP was transferred to a filtered drop of 2% aqueous uranyl acetate negative stain solution (EMS) for one minute and then excess stain solution was gently wicked away with a piece of Whatman filter paper. VLP sample images were observed with Technai T20 electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated at 200KV, whereas, LIONs using JEOL-JEM 2100 electron microscope. (Figure 1C and SI Figure S6)

Computational and Docking Studies of HA and Arbidol using Autodock Vina Software Program.

The docking calculations were performed using Autodock vina software program.45 The crystal structure of hemagglutinin (HA) was extracted from protein data bank (PDB ID: 5T6S).44 CHA-In A and B were selected for docking and all other components were removed from PDB. Autodock vina offers high performance and accuracy for virtual screening of drug molecules and optimizing drug discovery procedure. It is free software developed at Molecular Graphics Lab at The Scripps Research Institute (http://vina.scripps.edu/). The software used a 3D-grid box generated containing all active site residues and assesses through pre-calculated grids of affinity potentials and uses multiple of algorithms to establish favorable binding poses. For the present study, we generated the 3D-grid box containing the active site residues and a grid center co-ordinate consisting of grid spacing 1.0 A° and 60X60X60 point size with default parameters of the Autodock tools. Total Kollman and Gasteiger charges were added to HA and Arbidol before performing docking. Lamarckian GA was utilized to discover the top conformations. About 10 conformations for each HA-Arbidol complex were selected for the study. Later, the most favorable conformation of HA-Arbidol complex was selected based on the scoring, hydrogen bonding and the lowest binding energy and visualized with Pymol (https://pymol.org/2/).46

Supplementary Material

ESI

Acknowledgements.

This project was supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH: 1 R03 AI132832-01) to SS and TB, and Kansas INBRE bridging grant (K-INBRE P20 GM103418) to SS. This work also supported by NIH R01 AI047153 to DPW and NSF CHE 1554924 to YV. The authors would like to thank Ms. Lisa Whitworth at OSU-Stillwater for the help with TEM experiments.

Footnotes

Supporting Information. Detailed characterization data for IONPs, spectrophotometric, spin-spin T2 relaxation and dynamic light scattering data for the batch-to-batch synthesis and stability studies of LIONs and FL-LIONs. Transmission electron microscopic data for IONPs and VLPs. “This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.”

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • (1).White J; Kartenbeck J; Helenius A Membrane fusion activity of influenza virus. The EMBO Journal 1982, 1, 217–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Steinhauer DA Role of Hemagglutinin Cleavage for the Pathogenicity of Influenza Virus. Virology 1999, 258, 1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Skehel JJ; Wiley DC Receptor Binding and Membrane Fusion in Virus Entry: The Influenza Hemagglutinin. Annual Review of Biochemistry 2000, 69, 531–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Kanaseki T; Kawasaki K; Murata M; Ikeuchi Y; Ohnishi S-I Structural Features of Membrane Fusion between Influenza Virus and Liposome as Revealed by Quick-Freezing Electron Microscopy. The Journal of Cell Biology 1997, 137, 1041–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Fujiyoshi Y; Kume N; Sakata K; Sato S Fine Structure of Influenza A Virus Observed by Electron Cryo-Microscopy. The EMBO Journal 1994, 13, 318–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Bonnafous P; Stegmann T Membrane Perturbation and Fusion Pore Formation in Influenza Hemagglutinin-Mediated Membrane Fusion. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2000, 275, 6160–6166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Böttcher C; Ludwig K; Herrmann A; Heel MV; Stark H Structure of Influenza Haemagglutinin at Neutral and at Fusogenic PH by Electron Cryo-Microscopy. FEBS Letters 1999, 463, 255–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Fernández J; Li S; Crowther R CTF Determination and Correction in Electron Cryotomography. Ultramicroscopy 2006, 106, 587–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Ge M; Freed JH Fusion Peptide from Influenza Hemagglutinin Increases Membrane Surface Order: An Electron-Spin Resonance Study. Biophysical Journal 2009, 96, 4925–4934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Harris A; Cardone G; Winkler DC; Heymann JB; Brecher M; White JM; Steven AC Influenza Virus Pleiomorphy Characterized by Cryoelectron Tomography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103, 19123–19127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Gui L; Lee KK Influenza Virus-Liposome Fusion Studies Using Fluorescence Dequenching and Cryo-Electron Tomography. Methods in Molecular Biology 2018, 1836, 261–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Chen J; Lee KH; Steinhauer DA; Stevens DJ; Skehel JJ; Wiley DC Structure of the Hemagglutinin Precursor Cleavage Site, a Determinant of Influenza Pathogenicity and the Origin of the Labile Conformation. Cell 1998, 95, 409–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Liu S-L; Zhang Z-L; Tian Z-Q; Zhao H-S; Liu H; Sun E-Z; Xiao GF; Zhang W; Wang H-Z; Pang D-W Effectively and Efficiently Dissecting the Infection of Influenza Virus by Quantum-Dot-Based Single-Particle Tracking. ACS Nano 2011, 6, 141–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Sun E-Z; Liu A-A; Zhang Z-L; Liu S-L; Tian Z-Q; Pang D-W Real-Time Dissection of Distinct Dynamin-Dependent Endocytic Routes of Influenza A Virus by Quantum Dot-Based Single-Virus Tracking. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4395–4406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Chernomordik LV; Frolov VA; Leikina E; Bronk P; Zimmerberg J The Pathway of Membrane Fusion Catalyzed by Influenza Hemagglutinin: Restriction of Lipids, Hemifusion, and Lipidic Fusion Pore Formation. The Journal of Cell Biology 1998, 140, 1369–1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Lee KK Architecture of a Nascent Viral Fusion Pore. The EMBO Journal 2010, 29, 1299–1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Korte T; Ludwig K; Booy FP; Blumenthal R; Herrmann A Conformational Intermediates and Fusion Activity of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin. Journal of Virology 1999, 73, 4567–4574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Hughson FM Enveloped Viruses: A Common Mode of Membrane Fusion? Current Biology 1997, 7, R565–R569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Shelby T; Banerjee T; Zegar I; Santra S Highly Sensitive, Engineered Magnetic Nanosensors to Investigate the Ambiguous Activity of Zika Virus and Binding Receptors. Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 7377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Shelby T; Banerjee T; Kallu J; Sulthana S; Zegar I; Santra S Novel magnetic relaxation nanosensors: an unparalleled “spin” on influenza diagnosis. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 19605–19613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Kaittanis C; Shaffer TM; Ogirala A; Santra S; Perez JM; Chiosis G; Li Y; Josephson L; Grimm J Environment-Responsive Nanophores for Therapy and Treatment Monitoring via Molecular MRI Quenching. Nature Communications 2014, 5, 3384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Santra S; Kaittanis C; Grimm J; Perez JM "Drug/Dye-Loaded, Multifunctional Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Combined Targeted Cancer Therapy and Dual Optical/MR-Imaging". Small 2009, 5, 1862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).McCarthy JR; Perez JM; Bruckner C; Weissleder R Polymeric Nanoparticle Preparation that Eradicates Tumors. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2552–2556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Packard BS; Wolf DE Fluorescence lifetimes of carbocyanine lipid analogs in phospholipid bilayers. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 5176–5181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Stegmann T; Hoekstra D; Scherphof G; Wilschut J Kinetics of PH-Dependent Fusion between Influenza Virus and Liposomes. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 3107–3113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Imai M; Sugimoto K; Okazaki K; Kida H Fusion of Influenza Virus with the Endosomal Membrane Is Inhibited by Monoclonal Antibodies to Defined Epitopes on the Hemagglutinin. Virus Research 1998, 53, 129–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Puri A; Booy FP; Doms RW; White JM; Blumenthal R Conformational Changes and Fusion Activity of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin of the H2 and H3 Subtypes: Effects of Acid Pretreatment. Journal of Virology 1990, 64, 3824–3832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Ruigrok R; Wrigley N; Calder L; Cusack S; Wharton S; Brown E; Skehel J Electron Microscopy of the Low PH Structure of Influenza Virus Haemagglutinin. The EMBO Journal 1986, 5, 41–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Kim CS; Epand RF; Leikina E; Epand RM; Chernomordik LV The Final Conformation of the Complete Ectodomain of the HA2 Subunit of Influenza Hemagglutinin Can by Itself Drive Low PH-Dependent Fusion. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2011, 286, 13226–13234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Hamilton BS; Whittaker GR; Daniel S Influenza Virus-Mediated Membrane Fusion: Determinants of Hemagglutinin Fusogenic Activity and Experimental Approaches for Assessing Virus Fusion. Viruses 2012, 4, 1144–1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Garten W; Klenk H-D Cleavage Activation of the Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin and Its Role in Pathogenesis. Monographs in Virology Avian Influenza 2008, 27, 156–167. [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Kido H; Okumura Y; Takahashi E; Pan H-Y; Wang S; Yao D; Yao M; Chida J; Yano M Role of Host Cellular Proteases in the Pathogenesis of Influenza and Influenza-Induced Multiple Organ Failure. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics 2012, 1824, 186–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Uchikoba T; Mase T; Arima K; Yonezawa H; Kaneda M Isolation and Characterization of a Trypsin-Like Protease from Trichoderma Viride. Biological Chemistry 2001, 382, 1509–1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Tashiro M; Ciborowski P; Klenk H-D; Pulverer G; Rott R Role of Staphylococcus Protease in the Development of Influenza Pneumonia. Nature 1987, 325, 536–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Tashiro M; Ciborowski P; Reinacher M; Pulverer G; Klenk H-D; Rott R Synergistic Role of Staphylococcal Proteases in the Induction of Influenza Virus Pathogenicity. Virology 1987, 157, 421–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Klenk H-D; Rott R; Orlich M; Blödorn J Activation of Influenza A Viruses by Trypsin Treatment. Virology 1975, 68, 426–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Hamilton BS; Whittaker GR; Daniel S Influenza Virus-Mediated Membrane Fusion: Determinants of Hemagglutinin Fusogenic Activity and Experimental Approaches for Assessing Virus Fusion. Viruses 2012, 4, 1144–1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Nussbaum O; Rott R; Loyter A Fusion of Influenza Virus Particles with Liposomes: Requirement for Cholesterol and Virus Receptors to Allow Fusion with and Lysis of Neutral but Not of Negatively Charged Liposomes. Journal of General Virology 1992, 73, 2831–2837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Razinkov VI; Cohen FS Sterols and Sphingolipids Strongly Affect the Growth of Fusion Pores Induced by the Hemagglutinin of Influenza Virus†. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 13462–13468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Takeda M; Leser GP; Russell CJ; Lamb RA Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Concentrates in Lipid Raft Microdomains for Efficient Viral Fusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2003, 100, 14610–14617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Biswas S; Yin S-R; Blank PS; Zimmerberg J Cholesterol Promotes Hemifusion and Pore Widening in Membrane Fusion Induced by Influenza Hemagglutinin. The Journal of General Physiology 2008, 131, 503–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Ratnayake PU; Ekanayaka EP; Komanduru SS; Weliky DP Full-Length Trimeric Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin II Membrane Fusion Protein and Shorter Constructs Lacking the Fusion Peptide or Transmembrane Domain: Hyperthermostability of the Full-Length Protein and the Soluble Ectodomain and Fusion Peptide Make Significant Contributions to Fusion of Membrane Vesicles. Protein Expression and Purification 2016, 117, 6–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Chlanda P; Mekhedov E; Waters H; Schwartz CL; Fischer ER; Ryham RJ; Cohen F,S; Blank PS; Zimmerberg J “The Hemifusion Structure Induced by Influenza Virus Haemagglutinin Is Determined by Physical Properties of the Target Membranes.” Nature Microbiology, 2016, 1, 16050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Kadam RU; Wilson IA Structural basis of influenza virus fusion inhibition by the antiviral drug Arbidol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016, 114, 206–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Trott O; Olson AJ AutoDock Vina: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Docking with a New Scoring Function, Efficient Optimization, and Multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2010, 31, 455–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Alexander N; Woetzel N; Meiler J Bcl::Cluster: A Method for Clustering Biological Molecules Coupled with Visualization in the Pymol Molecular Graphics System. IEEE International Conference on Computational Advances in Bio and Medical Sciences 2011, 2011, 13–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Ranaweera A; Ratnayake PU; Weliky DP The Stabilities of the Soluble Ectodomain and Fusion Peptide Hairpins of the Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Subunit II Protein Are Positively Correlated with Membrane Fusion, Biochemistry, 2018, 57, 5480–5493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES