Abstract
In previous experiments using bullfrog hearts, we successfully replicated both the elevation and reciprocal depression of the ST segment observed in electrocardiograms of human ischemic heart disease. In this study, we induced subepicardial burn injuries in the lateral part of the frog heart ventricle, which allowed us to mimic typical electrocardiographic changes associated with human lateral wall myocardial infarction. These changes included a marked ST segment elevation in the high lateral limb leads (I, augmented Voltage Left; aVL) and reciprocal ST segment depression in the opposite limb leads (III, augmented Voltage Foot; aVF). We surmise that the electrical disparity between injured and intact cardiomyocytes generates currents of injury, leading to the observed ST segment alterations.
Keywords: bullfrog heart, lateral wall myocardial infarction, reciprocal ST segment depression
Lateral wall myocardial infarction represents 15–20% of all cases of acute myocardial infarction [21]. Although it generally has a better prognosis than anterior wall myocardial infarction, serious complications such as ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac arrest, rupture of the free wall or papillary muscle, and severe hypotension due to left ventricular dysfunction can lead to worse outcomes [8, 18, 22]. The rapid diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is crucial for improving patient outcomes, with electrocardiography being the most effective method in this regard [25]. However, in lateral wall myocardial infarction, the characteristic elevation of the ST segment may not be easily detectable, as these changes are often subtle and noncontiguous in electrographic limb leads [6, 19, 20]. Moreover, ST segment elevation alone does not confirm acute myocardial infarction, as it can also occur in other cardiac conditions such as early repolarization, acute pericarditis, right bundle-branch block, and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy [7, 10, 13]. A “reciprocal” ST segment change refers to ST segment depression on electrocardiographic leads opposite to those showing ST segment elevation [26], a common finding in acute myocardial infarction. The presence of this reciprocal change is a distinctive feature of acute myocardial infarction, confirming its diagnosis [3, 28]. In our previous studies, we replicated both the ST segment elevation and reciprocal ST segment depression characteristic of human ischemic heart disease by inducing burn injuries on the surface or opposite side of bullfrog hearts [11, 15]. Additionally, by inducing subepicardial burn injuries on the inferior part of the frog heart ventricle, we reproduced electrocardiographic changes similar to those observed in human inferior wall myocardial infarction [12]. In the present study, we successfully replicated electrocardiographic changes similar to those observed in human lateral wall myocardial infarction by inducing burn injuries on the lateral part of the frog heart ventricle.
Fifteen adult bullfrogs, each weighing between 450 and 550 g, were purchased from Ohuchi Shōten (Saitama, Japan) for the experiments. The frogs were anesthetized using isoflurane (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA), followed by an intramuscular injection of the long-lasting anesthetic alfaxalone (10mg/kg; Meiji Animal Health Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), as previously described [2, 14, 23]. Then, silver wire needle electrodes (coated with silver chloride and soldered to the output pins) were inserted into the upper and lower limbs of the frogs under deep anesthesia (Fig. 1). These electrodes were linked to an electrocardiogram (ECG) amplifier to capture electrical signals from the limb leads (leads I, II, III, augmented Voltage Right; aVR, augmented Voltage Left; aVL, and augmented Voltage Foot; aVF), as previously described [12]. In the bipolar limb leads, such as lead I, the left-arm electrode functioned as the exploring electrode (positive pole), whereas the right-arm electrode served as the reference electrode (negative pole), detecting the potential difference between the right and left arms [4, 12, 17] (Fig. 1). Similarly, lead II measured the potential difference between the right arm and left leg, whereas lead III assessed the potential difference between the left arm and left leg (Fig. 1). The right-leg electrode served as an electronic reference to reduce unwanted noise (Fig. 1). In the augmented unipolar limb leads aVR, aVL, and aVF, the electrodes in the right arm, left arm, and left leg, respectively, served as the positive pole, whereas the negative pole was formed by averaging the readings from the electrode in the other limbs [4, 12, 17] (Fig. 1). ECG waveforms from these limb leads were then recorded using a data logger (midi LOGGER HV GL2000, GRAPHTEC Corp., Yokohama, Japan). The heart was surgically exposed to create a subepicardial injury on the lateral wall of the ventricle. As previously described [11, 12, 15], the tip of a glass capillary tube (1.5 mm in diameter) was heated to over 600°C and quickly pressed onto the lateral ventricular surface (Fig. 1). Repeating this process several times resulted in overlapping burn injuries in the subepicardial myocardium on the lateral wall of the heart. After the experiments, the bullfrogs were euthanized via alfaxalone overdose. All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Review Committee for Animal Experimentation of Miyagi University (No. 2025-01). We analyzed the experimental data by Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington, DC, USA) and reported them as means ± SD.
Fig. 1.
Detection of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals from the limb leads and induction of lateral wall burn injury in a bullfrog heart. Needle electrodes inserted into the upper and lower frog limbs were connected to an electrocardiographic amplifier, and the electrical signals were detected using a data logger. In the bipolar limb leads, such as lead I, the left arm (L) electrode serves as an exploring electrode (the positive pole) and the right arm (R) electrode as a reference electrode (the negative pole). Similarly, lead II detects the potential difference between the right arm and left leg (LF), whereas lead III detects the difference between the left arm and left leg. The right-leg (RF) electrode serves as an electronic reference to improve the rejection of unwanted noise. In the augmented unipolar limb leads augmented Voltage Right; aVR, augmented Voltage Left; aVL, and augmented Voltage Foot; aVF, the electrodes in the left arm, right arm, and left leg serve as the positive pole, whereas the negative pole formed from the average of the measurements from the other limb electrodes. To induce subepicardial burn injuries on the lateral wall of the myocardium, a heated glass capillary tube was repeatedly placed on the lateral part of the frog heart ventricle.
By placing electrodes directly on the ventricular surface of the heart (precordial leads) (Fig. 2A and 2B, top), ECG waveforms consisting of a series of QRS complexes followed by T waves, similar to those in humans, were obtained (Fig. 2A and 2B, bottom). Upon the induction of burn injuries on the lateral ventricular surface where the electrocardiographic electrode was placed (Fig. 2A, top), the ECG immediately displayed a marked elevation of the ST segments from the isoelectric line (625 ± 181 mV increase from the isoelectric line, n=6; Fig. 2A, bottom), signifying the occurrence of myocardial injury. Conversely, when the electrographic electrode was placed on the ventricular surface opposite to the side where the burn injuries were inflicted (Fig. 2B, top), the ECG showed pronounced depression of the ST segment from the isoelectric line (331 ± 171 mV decrease from the isoelectric line, n=6; Fig. 2B, bottom). The morphological patterns of the depressed ST segments mirrored those of the elevated ones (Fig. 2B, bottom right vs. Fig. 2A, bottom). This resembled the “reciprocal” ST segment changes often seen in human acute myocardial infarction [26], indicating myocardial injury on the side opposite to where the electrocardiographic electrode was placed.
Fig. 2.
Changes in precordial lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals before and after burn injuries were induced on the lateral wall of the frog heart ventricle. (A) Top: An electrocardiographic electrode was placed on the lateral wall of the ventricle where subepicardial burn injuries were induced. Bottom: ECG signals detected from the precordial lead before (left) and after (right) burn injuries were induced. (B) Top: An electrocardiographic electrode was placed on the side opposite to the lateral wall of the ventricle where the subepicardial burn injuries were induced. Bottom: ECG signals detected from the precordial lead before (left) and after (right) burn injuries were induced.
Compared with the ECG waveform amplitudes recorded from the precordial leads (Fig. 2), those obtained from the limb leads were significantly smaller (Fig. 3). Nonetheless, these waveforms were sufficient for displaying a series of distinct QRS complexes followed by T waves (Fig. 3), with the ST segments recorded along the isoelectric lines. Shortly after the burn injuries had been inflicted on the lateral part of the ventricular surface (Fig. 1), the ECG from leads I and aVL showed obvious elevations in the ST segments (I, 24.7 ± 15.3 mV increase from the isoelectric line, n=6; aVL, 24.6 ± 11.5 mV increase from the isoelectric line, n=6; Fig. 3). As we have previously shown, such changes in the ST segment suggest that myocardial injuries had been induced in the frog heart ventricle [11, 12, 15]. Moreover, the pattern of changes in these limb leads resembled those typically observed in acute lateral myocardial infarction in humans [6, 21]. Conversely, the ECG from leads III and aVF exhibited obvious depressions in the ST segments from the isoelectric lines (III, 20.2 ± 10.6 mV decrease from the isoelectric line, n=6; aVF, 15.6 ± 9.50 mV decrease from the isoelectric line, n=6; Fig. 3). These observations also mirrored the reciprocal ST segment changes often observed in human lateral wall myocardial infarction [20, 21]. Quantitative data of the ST segment changes in precordial and limb leads were summarized and shown in graphs (Fig. 4). Generally, the presence of reciprocal changes in ECG signals indicates the extent of myocardial ischemia [9] and supports the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction [3, 28]. Notably, in patients with high lateral myocardial infarction, the presence of such reciprocal ST segment depression in leads III and aVF is known as the South African flag sign [1, 20, 21], which clinically suggests occlusion of the first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending coronary artery as the culprit lesion [5, 21, 24]. Therefore, the typical ECG findings replicated in our frog heart model can assist in identifying the target vessel for revascularization, thereby facilitating the prompt initiation of coronary angioplasty.
Fig. 3.
Changes in limb lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals before and after burn injuries were induced on the lateral wall of the frog heart ventricle. ECG signals detected from the bipolar limb leads (I, II and III) and unipolar limb leads (augmented Voltage Right; aVR, augmented Voltage Left; aVL and augmented Voltage Foot; aVF) before (left) and after (right) burn injuries were induced.
Fig. 4.
ST segment changes before and after burn injuries were induced on the lateral wall of the frog heart ventricle. (A) Quantitative data of ST segment changes in precordial lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. (B) Quantitative data of ST segment changes in limb lead ECG signals. Values are means ± SEM (n=6).
In the present study, cardiac burn injury did not affect the sinus rhythm (Figs. 2 and 3). In human hearts, right coronary artery is the major source of the blood supply to the sinoatrial (SA) and atrioventricular (AV) nodes that are responsible for the heart rate and AV conduction [27]. Therefore, inferior wall myocardial infarction, which is generally caused by the occlusion of the right coronary artery, often accompanies with sinus bradycardia or AV conduction block [27]. On the other hand, since lateral wall myocardial infarction is generally caused by the occlusion of the left circumflex artery or the diagonal branch of the left anterior descending [21], it does not usually accompany with bradyarrhythmia.
In our previous studies, burn injuries reduced the protein expression of sodium/potassium (Na+/K+)-ATPase in cardiomyocytes, thereby diminishing the activity of the pump [12, 15]. Consequently, this hindered the transport of extracellular K+ ions back into the cardiomyocytes, increasing the ratio of extracellular to intracellular K+ concentrations. According to the Nernst equation [11, 15], this results in a shift in the resting membrane potential of injured cardiomyocytes toward depolarization. Such electrical difference in the resting membrane potential induced between the injured and adjacent intact cardiomyocytes would generate “currents of injury” within the myocardium [16]. Among the limb leads, I and aVL are referred to as “high lateral limb leads” because they detect electrical heart vectors directed toward the left superior part of the ventricle (Fig. 5, middle), with the electrode in the left arm acting as the positive pole. In other words, these high lateral limb leads can be described as primarily “observing” the heart from the left superior wall of the ventricle (Fig. 5, middle). From the perspectives of leads I and aVL (Fig. 5, white arrows), the currents of injury flowed away when myocardial injury was induced on the lateral wall of the ventricular surface (Fig. 5, middle). During the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle, the flow of these currents resulted in a negative deflection of the ECG vector from the isoelectric line (Fig. 5, top), which in turn caused the ST segment to appear elevated during systole. In contrast to the high lateral limb leads, leads III and aVF capture electrical heart vectors directed toward the right inferior section of the ventricle (Fig. 5, middle). These leads essentially provide an observation perspective of the heart from the right inferior part of the ventricle (Fig. 5, middle), which is almost opposite to the orientation of leads I and aVL. Consequently, when myocardial injury was induced on the lateral wall of the ventricle (Fig. 5, middle), the injury currents flowed almost directly toward the perspectives of leads III and aVF (white arrows). This resulted in a positive deflection of the ECG vector during diastole (Fig. 5, bottom), causing the ST segment to appear depressed during the systolic phase.
Fig. 5.
Mechanisms underlying reciprocal ST segment changes in the frog model of lateral wall burn injury. Leads I and aVL are expressed as if they “observe” (view) the heart from the left superior wall of the ventricle. From the perspectives of leads I and aVL (white arrow), the currents of injury flow away when myocardial injury is induced on the lateral wall of the ventricular surface. Thus, the electrocardiogram (ECG) vector negatively deflected from the isoelectric line (arrows) during diastole, making the ST segment appear elevated during the systolic phase (gray waveform). By contrast, leads III and aVF are expressed as if they observe the heart from the right inferior part of the ventricle, which is almost opposite to the direction of leads I and aVL. When myocardial injury is induced on the lateral wall of the ventricle, the currents of injury flow nearly toward the views of leads III and aVF (white arrows). This causes the ECG vector to be positively deflected during diastole (arrows), resulting in the ST segment appearing depressed during the systolic phase (gray waveform).
In conclusion, by creating subepicardial burn injuries on the lateral part of the frog heart ventricle, we were able to replicate typical electrocardiographic changes similar to those seen in human lateral wall myocardial infarction, such as a marked elevation of the ST segments in the high lateral limb leads (I, aVL) and their reciprocal depression in the opposite limb leads (III, aVF).
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a Special Research Grant from Miyagi University to IK.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alanís Naranjo JM, Rivera Hermosillo JC. 2023. South African flag sign. Oxf Med Case Rep 2023: omad104. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omad104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Azuma S, Kuwana R, Narisawa K, Kazama I. 2023. Sodium bicarbonate and salbutamol facilitate recovery from hyperkalemia-induced electrocardiogram abnormalities in bullfrog hearts. J Vet Med Sci 85: 1063–1067. doi: 10.1292/jvms.23-0292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brady WJ, Perron AD, Syverud SA, Beagle C, Riviello RJ, Ghaemmaghami CA, Ullman EA, Erling B, Ripley A, Holstege C. 2002. Reciprocal ST segment depression: impact on the electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 20: 35–38. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.30006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dower GE, Nazzal SB, Pahlm O, Haistey WK, Jr, Marriott HL, Bullington RH, Bullington D. 1990. Limb leads of the electrocardiogram: sequencing revisited. Clin Cardiol 13: 346–348. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960130508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Durant E, Singh A. 2015. Acute first diagonal artery occlusion: a characteristic pattern of ST elevation in noncontiguous leads. Am J Emerg Med 33: 1326.e3–1326.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Glancy DL, Rodriguez JF. 2008. ECG of the month. Use of reciprocal electrocardiographic leads: sinus bradycardia. High lateral acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J La State Med Soc 160: 245–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hanna EB, Glancy DL. 2015. ST-segment elevation: differential diagnosis, caveats. Cleve Clin J Med 82: 373–384. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.82a.14026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hreybe H, Saba S. 2009. Location of acute myocardial infarction and associated arrhythmias and outcome. Clin Cardiol 32: 274–277. doi: 10.1002/clc.20357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hwang JW, Yang JH, Song YB, Park TK, Lee JM, Kim JH, Jang WJ, Choi SH, Hahn JY, Choi JH, Ahn J, Carriere K, Lee SH, Gwon HC. 2019. Clinical significance of reciprocal ST-segment changes in patients with STEMI: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 72: 120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2018.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ilhan E, Gurkan U, Yilmaz HY, Guvenc TS, Canga Y, Bolca O. 2012. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy resembling acute high lateral myocardial infarction. Ann Saudi Med 32: 424–426. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2012.424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kazama I. 2016. Burn-induced subepicardial injury in frog heart: a simple model mimicking ST segment changes in ischemic heart disease. J Vet Med Sci 78: 313–316. doi: 10.1292/jvms.15-0440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kazama I, Kuwana R, Muto M, Nagano A, Fujimura R, Asada A, Tamada T, Shimoyama M. 2022. Subepicardial burn injuries in bullfrog heart induce electrocardiogram changes mimicking inferior wall myocardial infarction. J Vet Med Sci 84: 1205–1210. doi: 10.1292/jvms.22-0243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kazama I, Nakajima T. 2019. Apparent ST elevation in right bundle branch block pseudo-mimicking myocardial infarction. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 7: X19827748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kazama I, Sonobe H. 2025. Hydrogen peroxide exposure to bullfrog heart causes ST segment elevation. J Vet Med Sci 87: 763–768. doi: 10.1292/jvms.25-0127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kazama I, Takamura K, Yamada Y, Sugisaki Y, Suzuki M. 2020. Reciprocal ST segment changes reproduced in burn-induced subepicardial injury model in bullfrog heart. J Vet Med Sci 82: 143–147. doi: 10.1292/jvms.19-0597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kléber AG. 2000. ST-segment elevation in the electrocardiogram: a sign of myocardial ischemia. Cardiovasc Res 45: 111–118. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00301-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Childers R, Deal BJ, Hancock EW, van Herpen G, Kors JA, Macfarlane P, Mirvis DM, Pahlm O, Rautaharju P, Wagner GS, Josephson M, Mason JW, Okin P, Surawicz B, Wellens H. American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical CardiologyAmerican College of Cardiology FoundationHeart Rhythm Society. 2007. Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation 115: 1306–1324. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kono T, Takagi K, Negoto S, Tayama E. 2022. Anterior papillary muscle rupture due to acute myocardial microinfarction of the small high lateral branch. Case Rep Cardiol 2022: 7149724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee LC, Tan HC, Poh KK. 2008. Isolated high lateral acute myocardial infarction with superior injury current axis. Singapore Med J 49: e266–e268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Littmann L. 2016. South African flag sign: a teaching tool for easier ECG recognition of high lateral infarct. Am J Emerg Med 34: 107–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ludhwani D, Chhabra L, Goyal A, Quintanilla Rodriguez BS, Gupta N. 2025. . Lateral Wall Myocardial Infarction. StatPearls, Treasure Island. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morrow DA, Antman EM, Parsons L, de Lemos JA, Cannon CP, Giugliano RP, McCabe CH, Barron HV, Braunwald E. 2001. Application of the TIMI risk score for ST-elevation MI in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3. JAMA 286: 1356–1359. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.11.1356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nagano A, Muto M, Shida J, Kazama I. 2023. Amitriptyline intoxication in bullfrogs causes widening of QRS complexes in electrocardiogram. J Vet Med Sci 85: 175–179. doi: 10.1292/jvms.22-0494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Swarath S, Maharaj N, Hall A, Frederick JM, Seecheran R, Seecheran V, Seecheran NA. 2023. The South African flag sign: an electrocardiographic flag for all coronary territories? J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 11: 23247096231192861. doi: 10.1177/23247096231192861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasché P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S. Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. 2012. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 126: 2020–2035. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vaidya GN, Antoine S, Imam SH, Kozman H, Smulyan H, Villarreal D. 2018. Reciprocal ST-segment changes in myocardial infarction: ischemia at distance versus mirror reflection of ST-elevation. Am J Med Sci 355: 162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Warner MJ, Tivakaran VS. 2025. Inferior Myocardial Infarction. StatPearls. Disclosure: Vijai Tivakaran declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies, Ineligible Companies, Treasure Island. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yousif H, Lo E, Taha T, Stockins B, Oakley CM. 1989. The diagnostic significance of reciprocal ST segment depression in acute myocardial infarction. Q J Med 72: 849–855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





