Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Feb 12;148(7):7181–7188. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c18194

Probing Hydrogen Activation in a Dimetal Dihydride Complex by Symmetric Exchange with Parahydrogen

Julius F Matz †,‡, Lukas Kaltschnee †,‡, Sara I Mozzi §, Gonzalo G Rodriguez †,‡, Anton Römer ∥, Ricardo A Mata ∥, Ilya Kuprov ⊥,#, Franc Meyer §, Stefan Glöggler †,‡,∇,○,*
PMCID: PMC12951439  PMID: 41678325

Abstract

We report an investigation into the hydrogen exchange mechanism in a dinickel­(II) dihydride complex with C 2v symmetry. To obtain atomic level information on the low-concentration intermediate species, we use parahydrogen in combination with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Unexpectedly, despite the chemical equivalence of the two hydride sites imposed by the mirror symmetry of the model, we observe spontaneous conversion of the nuclear singlet order into in-phase longitudinal magnetization–something that normally requires sophisticated pulse sequences. The magnetization is retained upon reductive elimination of dihydrogen from the dihydride species and observed as an enhanced hydrogen NMR signal. This is explained by a chain of nuclear relaxation interference processes that do not require asymmetric intermediates; we confirm this in two ways: using analytical relaxation theory and with brute-force numerical simulations.


graphic file with name ja5c18194_0007.jpg


graphic file with name ja5c18194_0005.jpg

Introduction

Understanding fundamental chemical processes observed in nature, such as hydrogen production and nitrogen fixation, is important for the development of more efficient and selective catalysts. , This is particularly true for organometallic and enzymatic catalysis − where transient chemical species can occur in low concentrations, but may still determine reaction pathways and the selectivity of the catalytic process. Direct observation and structural characterization of these intermediates using mainstream analytical methods is difficult and limited to special cases; there are very few generally applicable tools. −

One popular technique is nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy; it is highly chemically selective and can provide structural information. − However, NMR has low sensitivity and often struggles to detect low-concentration reaction intermediates. One way to remedy this is parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP)–a method with nearly 40 years of history in the study of catalytic processes. − It belongs to the broader group of spin hyperpolarization methods and uses parahydrogen (pH2)–an easily obtainable nuclear spin isomer of molecular hydrogen. The two protons in pH2 are 100% spin-polarized relative to each other, but the total spin of two antiparallel protons is zero and the state is therefore initially NMR-silent. Chemical manipulation is therefore necessary to break the symmetry and convert that relative spin polarization into much stronger observable magnetization than what is available in conventional NMR spectroscopy.

Major work in PHIP methodology today is concentrated in biomedical applications, such as cancer imaging, , metabolomics, , as well as in the studies of catalytic processes involving hydrogen activation. − Even the mere presence of PHIP is informative: the mechanism must keep the two protons together to retain their spin correlation. ,, This was initially limited to cis-hydrogenation but was later expanded to include trans-selective and geminal hydrogenation mediated by ruthenium carbene complexes. , Those mechanistic studies later enabled hyperpolarization of fumarate and the detection of fumarase activity in cells. Since detectable magnetization is produced as soon as the pH2 symmetry is broken, the investigation of metal dihydrogen activation is possible as demonstrated by the detection of transient classical − and nonclassical metal dihydride complexes, , also by indirect detection through partially negative line (PANEL) experiments. Other applications include frustrated Lewis pair molecular tweezers that function as metal-free hydrogenation catalysts. −

Recent extensions of PHIP methodology have enabled mechanistic studies of hydrogenases under catalytic conditions, leading to the characterization of two previously elusive intermediates in the catalytic cycle of [Fe]-hydrogenases. These metalloenzymes are involved in H2 activation and production; they serve as blueprints for the development of eco-friendly catalysts. Transient diamagnetic hydrogen-bound intermediates in other metalloenzymes are now within reach, for example nitrogenases wherein metal hydrides are present in the FeMo cofactor and used to store reducing equivalents, enabling reductive binding of dinitrogen to the Fe/S active site accompanied by hydrogen release. −

In this communication, we study similar processes in dinickel dihydride complex K­[L­(NiII–H)2] (1H 2 , where L is a compartmental ligand scaffold) that may be viewed as a model of the enzymatic reactions discussed above, because it is known to undergo replacement of the two hydride ligands with concomitant reductive binding of small molecules coupled to H2 release − (see Figure ), and because its oxidation triggers even the H2-releasing reductive activation of N2. The H2/D2 exchange reaction proceeds in a pairwise synchronous fashion without H/D scrambling, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations and characterization of the proposed {LNiI} intermediate suggest that this may follow a dissociative stepwise mechanism. , In this context, parahydrogen could help confirm the proposed mechanism through NMR signal enhancement in low-concentration intermediates, and could provide evidence for the dissociative exchange pathway.

1.

1

(A) Dinickel dihydride complex K­[L­(NiII–H)2] (1H 2 ) studied within this work showing pairwise H2/D2 exchange. 1H 2 is highly sensitive toward O2 forming the peroxido complexK­[LNiII 2(O2)] (1O 2 ) irreversibly, and toward water reacting to K­[LNiII 2(H)­(OH)] (1(H)­(OH)) and ultimately to K­[LNiII 2(μ–OH)] (1OH). Oxidation of 1H 2 enables reductive binding of N2 coupled to H2 release giving K­[LNiII 2(μ1,2–N2)] (1N 2 ); a scenario resembling the reactivity of nitrogenase metalloenzyme where binding of N2 to the FeMo metal cofactor is also paired with reductive elimination of H2 (see B). , The hydride arrangement as well as binding mode of N2 in nitrogenases is still under discussion. − Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2025 American Chemical Society.

The difficulty in using PHIP to elucidate the H2 binding mechanism of 1 is that the two hydrides in 1H 2 occupy chemically equivalent sites related by mirror symmetry. Accordingly, in the absence of structural perturbations, the two nuclear spins ought to remain in the singlet state, rendering them NMR silent under standard PHIP mechanisms. ,,, However, we demonstrate here that spontaneous polarization transfer from the initial parahydrogen singlet spin order to in-phase proton longitudinal magnetization does nonetheless occur. This is unexpected, but may be explained using a nuclear spin relaxation model taking into account chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) and dipole-dipole (DD) coupling interference effects–we demonstrate this both algebraically and numerically below. This CSA―CSA and DD―CSA interference mechanism bypasses the classical requirement for asymmetric intermediates. ,

PHIP-CEST , (chemical exchange saturation transfer experiments) with 1H 2 indicates the absence of asymmetric intermediates in the exchange reaction and that dihydrogen acquires net longitudinal magnetization upon release from the complex. This provides further insight into the dynamics of the H2 exchange process at the molecular level. Our results highlight a novel pathway for the generation of longitudinal magnetization from parahydrogen in systems where the hydrogen atoms remain chemically equivalent, emphasizing the role of nuclear spin relaxation interference effects in the dynamics of parahydrogen singlet order.

Results

Studying air and moisture sensitive compounds requires manipulation under an inert atmosphere. Previous PASADENA-type experiments with 1H 2 were hampered by insufficiently inert conditions. Consequently, a new PASADENA setup that fulfills these specifications and that is easy to operate and maintain is crucial. Within this article, we present the development and construction of such a setup operating under anoxic and anhydrous conditions (see SI for further details).

PHIP experiments under inert conditions were carried out by preparing samples under an argon atmosphere in a glovebox. The sample holder was subsequently transferred into the bore of the magnet. The atmosphere of the operational section of the setup was repeatedly evacuated and backfilled with inert gas (nitrogen) to ensure the exclusion of air and moisture. After this purging process, the valves to the sample holder were opened, and the experiments were initiated. pH2 was introduced to the sample either automatically via computer-controlled magnetic valves or manually by operating the valves by hand.

Given the molecular symmetry of 1H 2 we were intrigued to observe enhancement of signals in the 1H NMR spectrum after bubbling pH2 through a sample of 1H 2 under argon (pulse sequence is depicted in SI Figure 7). In the C 2v symmetric complex 1H 2 the two hydrides occupy chemically equivalent positions related by mirror symmetry (Figure A). Only minor amounts of water decomposition products (88% 1H 2 , 12% 1(H)­(OH)) were detected before bubbling. This shows that the sample holder is gastight on the time scale of the experiment and is well suited for use with highly sensitive compounds. Even after bubbling with pH2 for 10 s the amounts of decomposition products increases only slightly (81% 1H 2 , 12% 1­(H)­(OH), 7% 1O 2 ). After bubbling with pH2 moderate enhancements of the signals at −24.1 ppm (I PHIP/I thermal = 9.2, 0.03% polarization) and 4.54 ppm are visible in the NMR spectrum of 1H 2 in THF-d 8 although the hydrogen atoms occupy chemically equivalent positions (see Figure B). The former signal is assigned to the dihydride position of 1H 2 whereas the latter signal assignment has some ambiguity that will be addressed below.

2.

2

(A) Pairwise exchange of dihydride ligands of complex 1H 2 with pH2 or thermally polarized H2 showing enhanced signals for the dihydride and for free H2. (B) Overlay of 1H-PHIP-NMR spectra of complex 1H 2 (13.4 mM) in THF-d 8 at 298 K with π/4 detection pulses before (black) and after 10 s bubbling with pH2 (magenta) showing pH2 induced enhancement of signals at 4.54 ppm and −24.1 ppm with pure in-phase magnetization. The inserts show subsections of the spectra showing sensitivity enhancements.

Notably, both signals are purelyin-phase and not antiphase as expected for PHIP experiments under PASADENA conditions. , To emphasize the absence of classical antiphase PASADENA signals in Figure we decided to use π/4 pulses for detection, even if π/2 pulses would yield the highest intensity for the in-phase PHIP signals observed. To verify that these signals originate from 1H 2 , control experiments were performed under identical conditions using some of the decomposition products. Accordingly, NMR samples of 1OH and 1O 2 were prepared independently under argon in THF-d 8 and exposed to pH2 (7 bar). After 10 s of bubbling and a 2 s settling time, π/4 flip angle 1H NMR spectra were acquired (see Figures S9 and S10). No signal enhancement was detected in either experiment, confirming that 1H 2 is essential for the PHIP effects leading to signal enhancement.

By combining PHIP techniques with the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), − herein referred to as PHIP-CEST ,, transiently formed species can be indirectly detected through their chemical exchange with more abundant species. This method was recently used to reveal H2-bound states in hydrogenase catalysis with extremely high sensitivity. Herein, we use PHIP-CEST to determine the origin of the signal at 4.54 ppm and test the hypothesis of chemical exchange between the dinickel dihydride species (−24.1 ppm) and free hydrogen. The hydride region in the NMR is tested (−25 ppm as a high-field limit) to exclude the presence of possible intermediates on the exchange reaction pathway. When applying a radio frequency (RF) spin-lock pulse on resonance with a signal of a certain species, the corresponding NMR transition is saturated, and the signal is attenuated. In CEST, saturation is transferred from one species to another if both are related by chemical exchange. In the system under study, the signal at 4.54 ppm can be attributed either to the methylene proton of the β-ketiminato ligand backbone of 1H 2 or to free H2, presumably polarized by exchange with pH2 bound transiently to the nickel complex. To provide evidence that the signal at 4.54 ppm stems from freely dissolved H2, 24 1H NMR spectra with π/4 flip-angle were acquired following the pulse sequence depicted in Figure S11. The saturation irradiation was applied for 2 s with a spin-lock amplitude of 50 Hz and central frequencies varied according to lists given in the SI. Accordingly, a reduction of the dihydrogen signal at 4.54 ppm is expected when irradiating at −24.1 ppm. By plotting the integral of these signals against the continuous wave (CW) irradiation offset, PHIP-CEST profiles are obtained (see Figure ).

3.

3

1H-PHIP-CEST profiles obtained for 1H 2 (13.4 mM) in THF-d 8. The value of the Ni–H integral at −24.1 ppm (green) or H2 integral at 4.54 ppm (orange) in a.u. is plotted vs the CW irradiation offset in ppm relative to tetramethyl silane. PHIP-CEST profiles were reproduced more than 3 times with different samples and spin-lock-frequency lists (see Figures S12–S15). NMR-invisible pH2 exchanges with the dihydride complex, leading to sensitivity enhancement of the dihydride signal at −24.1 ppm. CW irradiation at this offset leads to a sharp decrease in signal intensity at 4.54 ppm (and vice versa) indicative of polarized free H2 in solution. All PHIP-CEST spectra were acquired with π/4 flip-angle pulses as single-scan spectra at 9.4 T (400 MHz) using 2 s cw saturation after 10 s bubbling and allowing the sample to settle for 1 s according to Figure S11. Spin-lock-field amplitudes (|γH B 1|) were set to 50 Hz and spin-lock-field offsets (cw offset) were varied according to uniformly and non-uniformly distributed lists of 24 points from −25 to 7.5 ppm.

Discussion

When irradiating at the hydride position, the signal intensity at 4.54 ppm decreases dramatically and vice versa. This indicates that the signal at 4.54 ppm belongs to free hydrogen, which was released from 1H 2 by reversible reductive elimination, in accordance with the mechanism for the pairwise H2/D2 exchange. Herein, pH2 presumably exchanges with the hydride ligands in 1H 2 , is converted to oH2 (orthohydrogen) upon singlet–triplet transition, and is released in a polarized state by reductive elimination, leaving behind an unsaturated complex able to bind hydrogen again.

Sophisticated pulse sequences and chemical transformations , are normally required to convert nuclear singlet order into magnetization, but the process can also happen spontaneously through the dipole-dipole/chemical shift anisotropy (DD-CSA) interference mechanism which opens cross-relaxation channels from the longitudinal correlation component I Z S Z of the singlet state to longitudinal magnetization states I Z and S Z. This mechanism is significant when the I ± S ∓ part of the singlet disappears sufficiently fast. ,

In this instance, we have a two-proton system with a J-coupling, a dipole-dipole coupling, and two noncollinear chemical shift tensors not aligned in the spin-spin direction

H=I·ZI·B+S·ZS·B+2πJI·S+I·D·S 1

where B is the magnetic field vector (Tesla), I and S are vectors of three Cartesian projection operators for the two spins (dimensionless), Z = −γ­(1–σ) are Zeeman interaction tensors (rad/s·T), including the isotropic Zeeman interaction with a magnetogyric ratio γ and the chemical shielding σ; J is the scalar coupling constant (Hz), and D is the dipole-dipole coupling tensor (rad/s). In a strong vertical magnetic field B = [0 0 B 0]T, the isotropic part of this Hamiltonian

H0=ωIIZ+ωSSZ+2πJI·SωI,S=B0Tr(ZI,S)/3 2

is symmetric with respect to the permutation of the two spins because here ωI = ωS. The singlet state density matrix commutes with this Hamiltonian and therefore cannot evolve. However, the two Zeeman tensors Z I,S are only related by mirror symmetry–not by inversion or permutation symmetry, meaning that relaxation leakage is expected from the singlet subspace.

Automatic symbolic evaluation of Bloch-Redfield-Wangsness relaxation superoperator ,

R=−⟨∫0∞H1(0)e−iH0τH1(τ)e+iH0τdτ⟩Hρ=[H,ρ] 3

in the case of isotropic rotational diffusion (see the Mathematica script in the Supporting Information) reveals that the cross-relaxation rate from the pure singlet state to I Z + S Z is zero, but that longitudinal and transverse components of the singlet have different relaxation rates

graphic file with name ja5c18194_0008.jpg 4

Here, the invariants of 3 × 3 Cartesian interaction tensors are defined as

graphic file with name ja5c18194_0009.jpg 5

and J(ω) = τC/(1 + ω2τC 2) is the isotropic rotational diffusion autocorrelation function.

The presence of J(0) terms in R[I + S – + I – S +] means that the transverse components of the singlet disappear faster than the longitudinal components. This breaks the symmetry lockout and allows longitudinal magnetization to accumulate via DD-CSA cross-correlation with the following rate

graphic file with name ja5c18194_0010.jpg 6

This process is easily visualized (Figure ) in Spinach (see the Matlab script in the Supporting Information), where the Bloch-Redfield-Wangsness theory module is designed to account for all known and unknown Redfield type processes of all ranks automatically. ,

4.

4

Numerical simulation, using Spinach 2.9, of the dynamics of the components of the singlet state (blue and red traces) and longitudinal magnetization (green trace) for a system initially in a pure singlet state and evolving in time under the action of the Hamiltonian and the Bloch-Redfield-Wangsness relaxation superoperator assuming a rotational correlation time of 0.5 ns and magnetic field of 18.79 T. The dipole-dipole coupling tensor was obtained from the energy minimum molecular geometry (CPCM THF) obtained using PBE0-D3­(BJ)/def2-TZVP method in ORCA. Proton chemical shielding tensors were then obtained using GIAO method and def2-TZVPP basis set in the same program.

Conclusion

We have observed parahydrogen-induced NMR signal enhancements for a C 2v symmetric dinickel dihydride complex that couples the reductive activation of challenging substrates to H2 release, akin to the proposed mechanism for nitrogenase enzymes. We report an experimental setup that enables PASADENA-type PHIP experiments for sensitive compounds under inert conditions.

The unusual spontaneous interconversion of the nuclear singlet order into in-phase longitudinal magnetization, apparently without symmetry breaking, was explained by a chain of nuclear spin relaxation interference effects: first CSA-CSA cross-correlation makes longitudinal and flip-flop components of the singlet relax at different rates, and then DD-CSA cross-correlation converts longitudinal two-spin order into longitudinal magnetization. The presence of longitudinally magnetized dihydrogen was corroborated by PHIP-CEST experiments; no asymmetric intermediates were found.

Although in general, contributions of paramagnetic intermediates cannot be excluded, there is no direct evidence for such contributions, since the DD-CSA cross-correlated relaxation mechanism explains our observations. In analogy to recent PHIP experiments employing phosphorus biradicaloids, the putative {LNiI} intermediate likely also does not interfere with PHIP generation due to its singlet electronic ground state.

Our findings suggest that parahydrogen techniques can be applied to symmetric compounds, improving NMR sensitivity and facilitating the study of symmetric molecules in catalysis and materials science. Further work on this methodology will enable the investigation of hydrogen-bound intermediates in hydrogenase and possibly nitrogenase enzymes, as well as their synthetic model systems.

Supplementary Material

ja5c18194_si_001.pdf (3.4MB, pdf)
ja5c18194_si_003.nb (103.4KB, nb)
ja5c18194_si_004.xlsx (12KB, xlsx)
ja5c18194_si_006.txt (2.2KB, txt)

Acknowledgments

The research in this publication was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)510228793/SFB1633 (projects B03 and B01), the European Union’s Horizon 2023 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie (grant agreement No. 101150649). S.G. acknowledges funding by the Max Planck Society. The authors acknowledge the mechanical and electrical workshops of the Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences for their assistance.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.5c18194.

  • Experimental Methods, 1H NMR spectra of relevant compounds, additional PHIP-CEST profiles and technical drawings (PDF)

  • Mathematica script for a CSA-DD-CSA system, complete relaxation analysis (NB)

  • List of the parts used for construction of the inert Bubbling Setup (XLSX)

  • PHIP-CEST pulse programm including exemplary data (ZIP)

  • Matlab script: time-dependence of I z S z and I z + S z spin orders in a parahydrogen molecule coordinated to a nickel cage (m) (TXT)

◆.

J.F.M., L.K. and S.I.M. contributed equally to this work.

Open access funded by Max Planck Society.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Sun L., Duboc C., Shen K.. Bioinspired Molecular Electrocatalysts for H2 Production: Chemical Strategies. ACS Catal. 2022;12:9159–9170. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c02171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berggren G., Adamska A., Lambertz C., Simmons T. R., Esselborn J., Atta M., Gambarelli S., Mouesca J.-M., Reijerse E., Lubitz W., Happe T., Artero V., Fontecave M.. Biomimetic assembly and activation of [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Nature. 2013;499:66–69. doi: 10.1038/nature12239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lukoyanov D., Khadka N., Dean D. R., Raugei S., Seefeldt L. C., Hoffman B. M.. Photoinduced Reductive Elimination of H2 from the Nitrogenase Dihydride (Janus) State Involves a FeMo-cofactor-H2 Intermediate. Inorg. Chem. 2017;56:2233–2240. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ash P. A., Kendall-Price S. E. T., Vincent K. A.. Unifying Activity, Structure, and Spectroscopy of [NiFe] Hydrogenases: Combining Techniques To Clarify Mechanistic Understanding. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52:3120–3131. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Land H., Senger M., Berggren G., Stripp S. T.. Current State of [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Research: Biodiversity and Spectroscopic Investigations. ACS Catal. 2020;10:7069–7086. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01614. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmidt-Räntsch T., Verplancke H., Kehl A., Sun J., Bennati M., Holthausen M. C., Schneider S.. CC Dissociative Imination of Styrenes by a Photogenerated Metallonitrene. JACS Au. 2024;4:3421–3426. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.4c00571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haryanto A., Jung K., Lee C. W., Kim D.-W.. In situ infrared, Raman and X-ray spectroscopy for the mechanistic understanding of hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Energy Chem. 2024;90:632–651. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.10.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bols M. L., Ma J., Rammal F., Plessers D., Wu X., Navarro-Jaén S., Heyer A. J., Sels B. F., Solomon E. I., Schoonheydt R. A.. In Situ UV-Vis-NIR Absorption Spectroscopy and Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2024;124:2352–2418. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mehara J., Roithová J.. Identifying reactive intermediates by mass spectrometry. Chem. Sci. 2020;11:11960–11972. doi: 10.1039/D0SC04754F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Antonschmidt L., Dervişoğlu R., Sant V., Movellan K. T., Mey I., Riedel D., Steinem C., Becker S., Andreas L. B., Griesinger C.. Insights into the molecular mechanism of amyloid filament formation: Segmental folding of a-synuclein on lipid membranes. Sci. Adv. 2021;7:eabg2174. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg2174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Romero P. E., Piers W. E.. Direct Observation of a 14-Electron Ruthenacyclobutane Relevant to Olefin Metathesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:5032–5033. doi: 10.1021/ja042259d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. van der Eide E. F., Piers W. E.. Mechanistic insights into the ruthenium-catalysed diene ring-closing metathesis reaction. Nat. Chem. 2010;2:571–576. doi: 10.1038/nchem.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Xie L.-G., Bagutski V., Audisio D., Wolf L. M., Schmidts V., Hofmann K., Wirtz C., Thiel W., Thiele C. M., Maulide N.. Dynamic behaviour of monohaptoallylpalladium species: internal coordination as a driving force in allylic alkylation chemistry. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:5734–5739. doi: 10.1039/C5SC01867F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bowers C. R., Weitekamp D. P.. Parahydrogen and synthesis allow dramatically enhanced nuclear alignment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:5541–5542. doi: 10.1021/ja00252a049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisenschmid T. C., Kirss R. U., Deutsch P. P., Hommeltoft S. I., Eisenberg R., Bargon J., Lawler R. G., Balch A. L.. Para hydrogen induced polarization in hydrogenation reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:8089–8091. doi: 10.1021/ja00260a026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duckett S. B., Wood N. J.. Parahydrogen-based NMR methods as a mechanistic probe in inorganic chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008;252:2278–2291. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eills J., Budker D., Cavagnero S., Chekmenev E. Y., Elliott S. J., Jannin S., Lesage A., Matysik J., Meersmann T., Prisner T., Reimer J. A., Yang H., Koptyug I. V.. Spin Hyperpolarization in Modern Magnetic Resonance. Chem. Rev. 2023;123:1417–1551. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Green R. A., Adams R. W., Duckett S. B., Mewis R. E., Williamson D. C., Green G. G. R.. The theory and practice of hyperpolarization in magnetic resonance using parahydrogen. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2012;67:1–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bowers C. R., Weitekamp D. P.. Transformation of Symmetrization Order to Nuclear-Spin Magnetization by Chemical Reaction and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986;57:2645. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hövener J., Pravdivtsev A. N., Kidd B.. et al. Parahydrogen-Based Hyperpolarization for Biomedicine. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:11140–11162. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hune T., Mamone S., Schroeder H., Jagtap A. P., Sternkopf S., Stevanato G., Korchak S., Fokken C., Müller C. A., Schmidt A. B., Becker D., Glöggler S.. Metabolic Tumor Imaging with Rapidly Signal-Enhanced 1–13C-Pyruvate-d3. ChemPhysChem. 2023;24:e202200615. doi: 10.1002/cphc.202200615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fries L. M., Hune T. L. K., Sternkopf S., Mamone S., Schneider K. L., Schulz-Heddergott R., Becker D., Glöggler S.. Real-Time Metabolic Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Pancreatic and Colon Cancer Tumor-Xenografts with Parahydrogen Hyperpolarized 1–13C Pyruvate-d3. Chem. - Eur. J. 2024;30:e202400187. doi: 10.1002/chem.202400187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reimets N., Ausmees K., Vija S., Reile I.. Developing Analytical Applications for Parahydrogen Hyperpolarization: Urinary Elimination Pharmacokinetics of Nicotine. Anal. Chem. 2021;93:9480–9485. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sellies L., Reile I., Aspers R. L. E. G., Feiters M. C., Rutjes F. P. J. T., Tessari M.. Parahydrogen induced hyperpolarization provides a tool for NMR metabolomics at nanomolar concentrations. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:7235–7238. doi: 10.1039/C9CC02186H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tickner B. J., Zhivonitko V. V.. Advancing homogeneous catalysis for parahydrogen-derived hyperpolarisation and its NMR applications. Chem. Sci. 2022;13:4670–4696. doi: 10.1039/D2SC00737A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huynh M. T., Kovacs Z.. Homogeneous Catalysts for Hydrogenative PHIP Used in Biomedical Applications. Anal. Sens. 2025;5:e202400044. doi: 10.1002/anse.202400044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pravdivtsev A. N., Tickner B. J., Glöggler S., Hövener J.-B., Buntkowsky G., Duckett S. B., Bowers C. R., Zhivonitko V. V.. Unconventional Parahydrogen-Induced Hyperpolarization Effects in Chemistry and Catalysis: From Photoreactions to Enzymes. ACS Catal. 2025;15:6386–6409. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.4c07870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schleyer D., Niessen H. G., Bargon J.. In situ 1 H-PHIP-NMR studies of the stereoselective hydrogenation of alkynes to (E)-alkenes catalyzed by a homogeneous [Cp*Ru]+ catalyst. New J. Chem. 2001;25:423–426. doi: 10.1039/b007201j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Leutzsch M., Wolf L. M., Gupta P., Fuchs M., Thiel W., Farès C., Fürstner A.. Formation of Ruthenium Carbenes by gem-Hydrogen Transfer to Internal Alkynes: Implications for Alkyne trans-Hydrogenation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:12431–12436. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ripka B., Eills J., Kouřilová H., Leutzsch M., Levitt M. H., Münnemann K.. Hyperpolarized fumarate via parahydrogen. Chem. Commun. 2018;54:12246–12249. doi: 10.1039/C8CC06636A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Eills J., Cavallari E., Carrera C., Budker D., Aime S., Reineri F.. Real-Time Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Detection of Fumarase Activity Using Parahydrogen-Hyperpolarized [1–13C]­Fumarate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:20209–20214. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b10094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Duckett S. B., Newell C. L., Eisenberg R.. Observation of New Intermediates in Hydrogenation Catalyzed by Wilkinson’s Catalyst, RhCl­(PPh3)3, Using Parahydrogen-Induced Polarization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:10548–10556. doi: 10.1021/ja00102a023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Harthun A., Kadyrov R., Selke R., Bargon J.. Proof of Chiral Dihydride Complexes Including Catalyst and Substrate during the Bis­(phosphinite)­rhodium­(I)-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Dimethyl Itaconate. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997;36:1103–1105. doi: 10.1002/anie.199711031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Giernoth R., Heinrich H., Adams N. J., Deeth R. J., Bargon J., Brown J. M.. PHIP Detection of a Transient Rhodium Dihydride Intermediate in the Homogeneous Hydrogenation of Dehydroamino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:12381–12382. doi: 10.1021/ja002516o. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Reineri F., Aime S., Gobetto R., Nervi C.. Role of the reaction intermediates in determining PHIP (parahydrogen induced polarization) effect in the hydrogenation of acetylene dicarboxylic acid with the complex [Rh­(dppb)]+ (dppb: 1,4-bis­(diphenylphosphino)­butane. J. Chem. Phys. 2014;140:094307. doi: 10.1063/1.4867269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kireev N. V., Kiryutin A. S., Pavlov A. A., Yurkovskaya A. V., Musina E. I., Karasik A. A., Shubina E. S., Ivanov K. L., Belkova N. V.. Nickel­(II) Dihydrogen and Hydride Complexes as the Intermediates of H2 Heterolytic Splitting by Nickel Diazadiphosphacyclooctane Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021;2021:4265–4272. doi: 10.1002/ejic.202100489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kiryutin A. S., Sauer G., Yurkovskaya A. V., Limbach H.-H., Ivanov K. L., Buntkowsky G.. Parahydrogen Allows Ultrasensitive Indirect NMR Detection of Catalytic Hydrogen Complexes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121:9879–9888. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhivonitko V. V., Telkki V.-V., Chernichenko K., Repo T., Leskelä M., Sumerin V., Koptyug I. V.. Tweezers for Parahydrogen: A Metal-Free Probe of Nonequilibrium Nuclear Spin States of H2Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:598–601. doi: 10.1021/ja410396g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhivonitko V. V., Sorochkina V., Chernichenko K., Kótai K., Földes B., Pápai T., Telkki I., Repo V.-V., Koptyug T.. Nuclear spin hyperpolarization with ansa -aminoboranes: a metal-free perspective for parahydrogen-induced polarization. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:27784–27795. doi: 10.1039/C6CP05211H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zakharov D. O., Chernichenko K., Sorochkina K., Yang S., Telkki V.-V., Repo T., Zhivonitko V. V.. Parahydrogen-Induced Polarization in Hydrogenation Reactions Mediated by a Metal-Free Catalyst. Chem. - Eur. J. 2022;28:e202103501. doi: 10.1002/chem.202103501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kaltschnee L., Pravdivtsev A. N., Gehl M., Huang G., Stoychev G. L., Riplinger C., Keitel M., Neese F., Hövener J.-B., Auer A. A., Griesinger C., Shima S., Glöggler S.. Parahydrogen-enhanced magnetic resonance identification of intermediates in [Fe]-hydrogenase catalysis. Nat. Catal. 2024;7:1417–1429. doi: 10.1038/s41929-024-01262-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lubitz W., Ogata H., Rüdiger O., Reijerse E.. Hydrogenases. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:4081–4148. doi: 10.1021/cr4005814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Brazzolotto D., Gennari M., Queyriaux N., Simmons T. R., Pécaut J., Demeshko S., Meyer F., Orio M., Artero V., Duboc C.. Nickel-centred proton reduction catalysis in a model of [NiFe] hydrogenase. Nat. Chem. 2016;8:1054–1060. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Thorneley R. N. F., Lowe D. J.. Nitrogenase: substrate binding and activation. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1996;1:576–580. doi: 10.1007/s007750050095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Burgess B. K., Lowe D. J.. Mechanism of Molybdenum Nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 1996;96:2983–3012. doi: 10.1021/cr950055x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hoffman B. M., Lukoyanov D., Yang Z.-Y., Dean D. R., Seefeldt L. C.. Mechanism of Nitrogen Fixation by Nitrogenase: The Next Stage. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:4041–4062. doi: 10.1021/cr400641x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lukoyanov D., Khadka N., Yang Z.-Y., Dean D. R., Seefeldt L. C., Hoffman B. M.. Reductive Elimination of H2Activates Nitrogenase to Reduce the NN Triple Bond: Characterization of the E4­(4H) Janus Intermediate in Wild-Type Enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:10674–10683. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Manz D.-H., Duan P.-C., Dechert S., Demeshko S., Oswald R., John M., Mata R. A., Meyer F.. Pairwise H2/D2 Exchange and H2 Substitution at a Bimetallic Dinickel (II) Complex Featuring Two Terminal Hydrides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:16720–16731. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b08629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Duan P.-C., Manz D.-H., Dechert S., Demeshko S., Meyer F.. Reductive O2 Binding at a Dihydride Complex Leading to Redox Interconvertible μ-1,2-Peroxo and μ-1,2-Superoxo Dinickel­(II) Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:4929–4939. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b01468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ferretti E., Dechert S., Meyer F.. Reductive Binding and Ligand-Based Redox Transformations of Nitrosobenzene at a Dinickel (II) Core. Inorg. Chem. 2019;58:5154–5162. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kothe T., Kim U.-H., Dechert S., Meyer F.. Reductive Binding of Nitro Substrates at a Masked Dinickel­(I) Complex and Proton-Coupled Conversion to Reduced Nitroso Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2020;59:14207–14217. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tagliavini V., Duan P.-C., Chatterjee S., Ferretti E., Dechert S., Demeshko S., Kang L., Peredkov S., DeBeer S., Meyer F.. Cooperative Sulfur Transformations at a Dinickel Site: A Metal Bridging Sulfur Radical and Its H-Atom Abstraction Thermochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:23158–23170. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c05113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schulz, R. A. ; Römer, A. ; Werthmann, N. J. A. ; Manz, D.-H. ; Dechert, S. ; John, M. ; Mata, R. A. ; Meyer, F. . Metal-Metal Cooperative Oxidative H2O Addition Supported by Dihydrogen Bonding and Lewis Acid Interaction. 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-sxlh9.(accessed October 14, 2025). [DOI]
  54. Mozzi S. I., Manz D.-H., Ostermann N., Schulz R. A., Duan P.-C., Kothe T., Diefenbach M., Dechert S., Demeshko S., Krewald V., Siewert I., Meyer F.. Oxidatively Induced Reductive N2 Binding: A Dinickel-Bridging Bent N2 Radical Anion and Its Redox-Triggered N2 Release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:33679–33690. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c09334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Duan P.-C., Schulz R. A., Römer A., Van Kuiken B. E., Dechert S., Demeshko S., Cutsail G. E. III, DeBeer S., Mata R. A., Meyer F.. Ligand Protonation Triggers H2 Release from a Dinickel Dihydride Complex to Give a Doubly “T”-Shaped Dinickel­(I) Metallodiradical. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:1891–1896. doi: 10.1002/anie.202011494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Raugei S., Seefeldt L. C., Hoffman B. M.. Critical computational analysis illuminates the reductive-elimination mechanism that activates nitrogenase for N2 reduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2018;115:E10521–E10530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810211115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Dance I.. The activating capture of N2 at the active site of Mo-nitrogenase. Dalton Trans. 2024;53:14193–14211. doi: 10.1039/D4DT01866D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kang W., Lee C. C., Jasniewski A. J., Ribbe M. W., Hu Y.. Structural evidence for a dynamic metallocofactor during N2 reduction by Mo-nitrogenase. Science. 2020;368:1381–1385. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz6748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Peters J. W., Einsle O., Dean D. R., DeBeer S., Hoffman B. M., Holland P. L., Seefeldt L. C.. Comment on “Structural evidence for a dynamic metallocofactor during N2 reduction by Mo-nitrogenase”. Science. 2021;371:eabe5481. doi: 10.1126/science.abe5481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kang W., Lee C. C., Jasniewski A. J., Ribbe M. W., Hu Y.. Response to Comment on “Structural evidence for a dynamic metallocofactor during N2 reduction by Monitrogenase”. Science. 2021;371:eabe5856. doi: 10.1126/science.abe5856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Buljubasich L., Franzoni M. B., Spiess H. W., Münnemann K.. Level anti-crossings in ParaHydrogen Induced Polarization experiments with Cs-symmetric molecules. J. Magn. Reson. 2012;219:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Aime S., Gobetto R., Reineri F., Canet D.. Hyperpolarization transfer from parahydrogen to deuterium via carbon-13. J. Chem. Phys. 2003;119:8890–8896. doi: 10.1063/1.1615522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Aime S., Gobetto R., Canet D.. Longitudinal Nuclear Relaxation in an A2 Spin System Initially Polarized through Para-Hydrogen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:6770–6773. doi: 10.1021/ja973240w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Aime S., Dastrù W., Gobetto R., Russo A., Viale A., Canet D.. A Novel Application of para H2: the Reversible Addition/Elimination of H2 at a Ru3 Cluster Revealed by the Enhanced NMR Emission Resonance from Molecular Hydrogen. J. Phys. Chem. A. 1999;103:9702–9705. doi: 10.1021/jp992668+. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Forsén S., Hoffman R. A.. Study of Moderately Rapid Chemical Exchange Reactions by Means of Nuclear Magnetic Double Resonance. J. Chem. Phys. 1963;39:2892–2901. doi: 10.1063/1.1734121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Palmer, A. G. ; Koss, H. . Methods in Enzymology; Wand, A. J. , Ed.; Academic Press, 2019; Vol. 615, pp 177–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vallurupalli P., Bouvignies G., Kay L. E.. Studying “Invisible” Excited Protein States in Slow Exchange with a Major State Conformation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:8148–8161. doi: 10.1021/ja3001419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Knecht S., Hadjiali S., Barskiy D. A., Pines A., Sauer G., Kiryutin A. S., Ivanov K. L., Yurkovskaya A. V., Buntkowsky G.. Indirect Detection of Short-Lived Hydride Intermediates of Iridium N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes via Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123:16288–16293. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ahlquist M., Gustafsson M., Karlsson M., Thaning M., Axelsson O., Wendt O. F.. Rhodium­(I) hydrogenation in water: Kinetic studies and the detection of an intermediate using 13C­{1H} PHIP NMR spectroscopy. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2007;360:1621–1627. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2006.08.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pileio G., Carravetta M., Levitt M. H.. Storage of nuclear magnetization as long-lived singlet order in low magnetic field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:17135–17139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010570107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Warren W. S., Jenista E., Branca R. T., Chen X.. Increasing Hyperpolarized Spin Lifetimes Through True Singlet Eigenstates. Science. 2009;323:1711–1714. doi: 10.1126/science.1167693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Goldman M.. Interference effects in the relaxation of a pair of unlike spin-1/2 nuclei. J. Magn. Reson. (1969) 1984;60:437–452. doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(84)90055-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Hogben H. J., Hore P. J., Kuprov I.. Multiple decoherence-free states in multi-spin systems. J. Magn. Reson. 2011;211:217–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Kuprov I., Wagner-Rundell N., Hore P. J.. Bloch-Redfield-Wangsness theory engine implementation using symbolic processing software. J. Magn. Reson. 2007;184:196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Redfield A. G.. On the Theory of Relaxation Processes. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1957;1:19–31. doi: 10.1147/rd.11.0019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wangsness R. K., Bloch F.. The Dynamical Theory of Nuclear Induction. Phys. Rev. 1953;89:728–739. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.89.728. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Kuprov, I. Spin: from Basic Symmetries to Quantum Optimal Control; Springer, 2023; pp 223–289. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kuprov, I. Spin: from Basic Symmetries to Quantum Optimal Control; Springer, 2023; pp 73–105. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hogben H. J., Krzystyniak M., Charnock G. T. P., Hore P. J., Kuprov I.. Spinach - A software library for simulation of spin dynamics in large spin systems. J. Magn. Reson. 2011;208:179–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Neese F.. The ORCA program system. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012;2:73–78. doi: 10.1002/wcms.81. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhivonitko V. V., Konsewicz K., Bresien J., Schulz A.. Photoswitchable, metal-free parahydrogen-induced polarization enabled by a phosphorus biradicaloid. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2025;27:15835–15839. doi: 10.1039/D5CP02024G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja5c18194_si_001.pdf (3.4MB, pdf)
ja5c18194_si_003.nb (103.4KB, nb)
ja5c18194_si_004.xlsx (12KB, xlsx)
ja5c18194_si_006.txt (2.2KB, txt)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES