Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Feb 10;169(2):13. doi: 10.1007/s10533-025-01304-w

Frequent fire alters soil total phosphorus but does not affect phosphorus availability in a montane grassland

Nicola J Findlay 1,2,✉, Guy Thibaud 2, Alan D Manson 3, Paul J Gordijn 4,5, Max Rietkerk 1, Martin J Wassen 1, Mariska te Beest 1,4,6
PMCID: PMC12953321  PMID: 41782839

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is often a limiting nutrient in highly weathered soils. Fire is a major driver of nutrient redistribution and can temporarily increase the pool of plant-available P in P-limited ecosystems. Yet, the long-term effects of frequent fire on soil P in montane grasslands remain poorly understood. We investigated how fire regime influences soil P pools using data from a long-term fire experiment in the South African Drakensberg. Total soil P, moderately labile organic and inorganic P and plant-available P were measured across five prescribed fire regimes varying in frequency (annual, biennial or infrequent) and season of burn (autumn or spring). We hypothesised that frequent fire would not alter total P in the topsoil, but expected it would increase inorganic P and plant-available P. Infrequent and biennial burns had little effect on total P; however, total P was significantly higher under annual spring burns than the other treatments, particularly the infrequent burns and annual or biennial autumn burns. In contrast, plant-available P did not respond to any fire treatment. Frequent spring burns generally increased organic P relative to inorganic P, indicating a shift in the composition of soil P pools with fire frequency and season. Overall, despite changes in topsoil total and organic P, plant-available P remained constrained, reflecting a bottleneck in the P cycle likely driven by the high P-retention capacity of these acidic Andosols. These findings highlight the complex and sometimes counterintuitive effects of fire on nutrient dynamics in montane grasslands.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10533-025-01304-w.

Keywords: Fire frequency, Soil phosphorus fractions, Montane grassland soil, Plant-available phosphorus, Andosols

Introduction

Phosphorus (P) is an essential element that is often limiting to primary production and strongly influences nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems (Tiessen 2008). Unlike carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), which cycle through the atmosphere, P has no significant gaseous phase and is replenished through slow mineral weathering and biological recycling (Jahnke 1992). Consequently, disturbances that redistribute or deplete soil P pools can have long-term effects on ecosystem-scale biogeochemical processes and properties (Vitousek et al. 2010; Butler et al. 2017; Wassen et al. 2021). Among these disturbances, fire is a major driver of nutrient redistribution (Liao et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2025), with significant consequences for productivity and key ecosystem processes such as nutrient mineralisation, plant nutrient uptake and broader biogeochemical cycling. Anthropogenic climate change is projected to intensify fire regimes worldwide by increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, elevating vapour pressure deficits, and altering rainfall and temperature patterns (Ainsworth & Long 2005; Taub 2010; Zhu et al. 2016; Rao et al. 2023). These shifts are expected to increase fuel loads and flammability (Clark 1988; Leys et al. 2018), leading to more frequent and severe fires with significant implications for nutrient cycling. Understanding how fire affects soil P dynamics is therefore increasingly important for predicting ecosystem responses under global environmental change.

Grasslands warrant particular attention in this context. Covering over 40% of the Earth’s terrestrial surface, they provide essential ecosystem services, supporting global food systems and water supplies, storing substantial belowground C, and contributing disproportionately to global biodiversity (Bengtsson et al. 2019). Despite their importance, grasslands are among the biomes most threatened by land-use conversion and climate change (Hoekstra et al. 2005). Nutrient limitation, particularly co-limitation by N and P, is a feature of many grasslands (Craine et al. 2008; Fay et al. 2015). Moreover, unlike forests, where biomass accumulates over decades, grassland productivity and resilience depend on rapid nutrient cycling within shallow, dynamic soil layers. Fire can play a defining role here by maintaining open structure, promoting primary production, and influencing nutrient cycling (Bond 2008; Staver et al. 2011; McLauchlan et al. 2020). However, most research on fire effects on soil P has focused on tree-dominated ecosystems, where nutrient cycling is concentrated beneath tree canopies (Pellegrini et al. 2015; Coetsee et al. 2010). Non-woody grasslands, particularly temperate montane grasslands, remain comparatively understudied (Butler et al. 2018; Cheng et al. 2025) and it is unclear whether patterns observed in wooded systems apply to them. This highlights an important knowledge gap, especially as grassland fire regimes are projected to intensify (Sayedi et al. 2024).

Quantifying fire-induced shifts in soil P requires distinguishing among pools that differ in bioavailability. Although sequential fractionation methods are widely used to separate P fractions, their ecological interpretation remains debated (Kruse et al. 2015; Weihrauch & Opp 2018). In soils, P primarily occurs as orthophosphate ions (PO43−), which may be present in the soil solution as readily available inorganic P for plant or microbial uptake, or bound within organic matter (organic P, Po), or adsorbed to mineral surfaces (inorganic P, Pi). These forms are distributed among pools that differ in solubility and accessibility (Weihrauch & Opp 2018), ranging from readily available “solution” and “labile” P to more stable “sorbed” and “occluded” fractions (Hedley et al. 1982) (Fig. 1). Understanding how fire alters the partitioning of P among these pools is essential for predicting its effects on short-term nutrient turnover and long-term soil fertility (Merino et al. 2019).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Soil P pools and the main mobilisation processes in the soil P cycle. Red flux lines represent processes expected to be directly affected by fire – such as combustion of plant biomass, ash deposition, and post-fire erosion – while black lines indicate fluxes not expected to be directly affected by fire. Hot fires lead to more complete combustion of organic material, increasing mineral P inputs to the labile inorganic P pool in the soil. Cooler burns, in contrast, leave some plant biomass as P-containing charred organic residues, which contribute to the litter layer. Both mineral P and charred organic residues ultimately contribute to the solution P pool. The diagram is divided into two main components: the organic P pool (represented by the pale blue boxes) and the inorganic P pool (represented by the yellow boxes). The central orange box represents P dissolved in the soil solution (plant-available P), which is readily accessible for plant uptake and microbial assimilation and consists predominantly of inorganic orthophosphate ions (PO43−)

Fire can substantially modify ecosystem P dynamics, typically increasing Pi while reducing Po pools (Romanyà et al. 1994; Butler et al. 2018; Deng et al. 2024; Souza-Alonso et al. 2024). In unburned systems, Po mineralisation depends on microbial activity and the release of phosphatase enzymes from microbes and plant roots (McGill & Cole 1981; Ölinger et al. 1996). Fire-driven transformations bypass these biochemical pathways, rapidly changing nutrient availability. During combustion, most P in phytomass is retained within the system, remaining on the soil surface as Pi in ash or Po in charred residues (Cofer et al. 1997; González-Pérez et al. 2004; Hartshorn et al. 2009). Even relatively low intensity fires (~ 150 °C) can induce pyromineralisation of Po (García-Oliva et al. 2018), temporarily enhancing P bioavailability and producing a “P-rich signature” in post-fire soils (Schaller et al. 2015; Butler et al. 2018). Ash deposition can further modify soil chemistry by increasing P solubility in acidic soils through localised liming effects (Bodí et al. 2014). Fire-driven nutrient responses also depend on burn season (Findlay et al. 2022). In regions with pronounced seasonality, dry-season fires tend to be more intense, consuming more biomass and producing greater quantities of ash. However, these burns can leave bare soils exposed for months before post-fire rainfall stimulates vegetation recovery, increasing vulnerability to erosion. During this period, erosion of nutrient-rich ash can offset or even reverse nutrient gains (Resende et al. 2011; Nunes et al. 2018; Findlay et al. 2022).

In this study, we assess the effects of long-term, frequent fire on soil P fractions using the 39-year Brotherton fire experiment on a plateau in the temperate grasslands of the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg (hereafter Drakensberg) mountains, which form part of the eastern Great Escarpment in South Africa. These fire-dependent grasslands are renowned for their biodiversity and high levels of endemism. Biennial prescribed burns are implemented to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services (Everson 1985; Morris et al. 2020). Extending across elevations of 1800–2500 m above sea level, the high-organic matter soils in the region are derived primarily from weathered basalt and many display the distinctive chemical properties of acidic alu-andic soils (FAO 2014; Kögel-Knabner & Amelung 2014; Findlay et al. 2022). Given the geomorphological setting, P cycling in the topsoils of the experimental site may approach a quasi-stable equilibrium in which surface P losses, driven by strong late-winter katabatic winds (Brown & Piper 1988), are offset by inputs from ash deposition and the vertical redistribution of P from deeper soil layers (Porder et al. 2007; Siebers et al. 2021).

The central aim of this study was to determine how prescribed burning influences the distribution of soil P across ecologically relevant pools in these montane grassland soils. We hypothesised that total topsoil P would not differ significantly between frequent and infrequent fire regimes, as fire-driven inputs and internal redistribution are expected to maintain overall P stocks. In contrast, we predicted fire to alter the distribution of P forms in the topsoil: specifically, that Po would decline with repeated fire due to biomass loss, while Pi would increase owing to ash deposition and pyromineralisation. As a result of the expected increase in Pi in the topsoil, we also predicted that plant-available P would increase under frequent fire. Changes in deeper soil layers (5–15 cm) were expected to be minor, reflecting limited direct fire effects at depth.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive overview of the site and experiment is given in Findlay et al. (2022). In brief, this study was conducted at the Brotherton burning trial (Fig. 2), which lies on the Brotherton ridge in the northern section of the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Park in South Africa (28°58.2’S, 29°15.7’E; 1900 m a.s.l.). The humid temperate climate (Everson & Everson 2016) is characterised by moderate temperatures, with a long-term mean annual temperature (MAT) of 13.8 °C for the period 1949–1990 (Everson et al. 1998). Over the most recent decade (2013–2025), MAT has increased by 1.13 °C (Toucher 2024). The area receives an average of 1300 mm of annual precipitation (1949–1990; Everson et al. 1998), predominantly from summer thunderstorms with occasional winter snowfalls (Tyson et al. 1976). Precipitation over the past decade remains similar to the long-term average, with 1274 mm (2013–2025; Toucher 2024). The soils across the experiment can be classified according to USDA soil taxonomy as lithic Haplustands (Soil Survey Staff 2014); they are shallow, acidic andisols (pHKCl range between 4.08 and 4.3 in the top 15 cm) that are derived from deeply-weathered Drakensberg basaltic lavas (King 1944; Findlay et al. 2022). Under the World Reference Base (WRB), these soils correspond to alu-andic Andosols (FAO 2014). Despite their limited depth (0.3 to 0.5 m), they support a substantial accumulation of organic matter (Manson et al. 2007). Soil classification did not differ across the study area, ensuring that observed fire effects are not confounded by underlying variation in soil taxonomy. The vegetation at the site is classified as uKhahlamba Basalt Grassland (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). While the C4 grass Themeda triandra dominates, the grasslands are home to a rich diversity of montane flora, including 188 flowering species that are endemic to the Drakensberg’s montane altitudinal belt (Carbutt 2019).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Location map of the Brotherton burning trial (BBT) and b experimental plot layout showing the relative positions of selected burning treatments

Experimental design and data collection

The Brotherton burning trial is a long-term fire experiment that was initiated in 1980 to assess the impact of fire regime on species composition and fire behaviour in montane grasslands (Granger 1979, unpublished report; O’Connor et al. 2004). In this study we selected five fire treatments, each with three replications: annual burning in autumn or spring, biennial burning in autumn or spring, and fire exclusion. Since its inception, the Brotherton burning trial has experienced three unplanned fires in the winters of 2000, 2007 and 2016 (te Beest et al. 2021), which led to the classification of the fire exclusion treatment as an infrequent burn. Autumn burns are conducted in May, following the first frost, while spring burns take place in October after the first substantial rainfall.

Soil samples were taken in March 2019 at two depth intervals of 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm from the dedicated two-metre-wide sampling area that is located around the inner perimeter of each plot using a Beater auger (custom made by Hayden’s Engineering, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa). Twenty discrete samples were collected for each depth interval per plot. These were combined into a composite sample for analysis, resulting in one sample per depth interval per plot (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of a sample preparation and analysis procedure and b a representation of the P fractions measured and how they add to certain P pools. Note that the pools increase in size from left to right in part b of the figure. Ambic-extractable P is a subset of the most labile inorganic P

Phosphorus analyses

Analyses were conducted on the air-dried composite samples, which were first gently crushed to pass through a 1 mm brass sieve (Advantech Manufacturing Inc., ATM 18BS8F, New Berlin, Wisconsin, USA) (Findlay et al. 2022). Total P was determined after dry ashing overnight at 450 °C, followed by fusion with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for one hour at 350 °C in a high temperature muffle furnace (Ultra-Furn SA (Pty) Ltd., Model E15/30, Germiston, Gauteng, South Africa) (modified from Smith & Bain 1982). After dissolving in deionised water and filtering through Whatman Grade 1 qualitative filter paper (11 µm retention; Cytiva, Cat. No. 1001–150, Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom), aliquots of the filtrate were analysed for P following the Murphy & Riley (1962) molybdenum blue procedure.

Total extractable P (hereafter NaOH-extractable P) was determined following the NaOH and disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Na2EDTA) method of Bowman & Moir (1993) and analysed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES, 5800 series, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The inorganic P fraction in the extracts was quantified by measuring molybdate-reactive P, also using the method of Murphy and Riley (1962). Background colour due to organic matter was corrected for by measuring the difference in absorbance of aliquots treated with or without ascorbic acid added to the molybdate reagent (O’Halloran & Cade-Menum 2008). Organic P was calculated by subtracting inorganic P from NaOH-extractable P.

Plant-available P was determined by extracting soil samples with an Ambic solution comprising 0.25 mol L−1 ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3) + 0.01 mol L−1 ammonium fluoride (NH4F) + 0.01 mol L−1 Na2EDTA + Superfloc® N100 (0.05 g L−1), adjusted to pH 8.0 (van der Merwe et al. 1984; Manson et al. 2020). Background colour due to organic matter was corrected for as described above and the P concentration determined using the molybdenum blue procedure. To aid interpretation of the unexpected lack of response of plant-available P to fire regime, we conducted supplementary post hoc analyses of soil P retention capacity, following the methods described by Blakemore et al. (1987). Approximately 5 g of air-dried, sieved soil (1 mm) was equilibrated with 25 mL of a 1 mg P mL−1 potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) solution buffered at pH 4.6 with 0.2 mol L−1 anhydrous sodium acetate (CH3COONa) and 0.2 mol L−1 glacial acetic acid (CH3COOH) for 16 h with shaking at room temperature. After centrifugation, the phosphate remaining in solution was measured colorimetrically at an absorbance of 420 nm using a nitric vanadomolybdate reagent. Phosphorus retention was calculated as the difference between initial and final phosphate concentrations, expressed as a percentage of phosphate retained by the soil.

All analytical reagent grade chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, South Africa.

Statistical analysis

We tested for significant effects of fire regime on each soil P fraction, for each depth, using a one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Due to low sample sizes and the resulting unbalanced design across fire treatment combinations, fire frequency and fire season were combined into a single categorical factor (“fire regime”) for the purposes of analysis. Fisher’s protected Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used to compare treatment differences at a significance level of α = 0.05.

To assess whether differences in nutrient concentrations were influenced by the time elapsed since the most recent fire (TSLB), we ran supplementary ANOVA models that included TSLB as a continuous covariate. These analyses showed that TSLB did not significantly explain variation in soil P (P > 0.05), and therefore it was not retained in the final models presented in the Results.

All statistical analyses were performed using GENSTAT 18 (VSN International 2015) and figures were built with R Studio v4.3.3 (Posit team 2024) using the ggplot2 (Wickham 2016) and dplyr (Wickham et al. 2023) packages.

Results

Total soil P ranged from 687 to 1052 mg kg−1 in the top 0–5 cm of soil, and from 561 to 844 mg kg−1 in the 5–15 cm depth. Overall, total soil P decreased significantly with depth (P < 0.001, lsd0.05 = 64.4), from an average of 809 mg kg−1 in the 0–5 cm depth to 697 mg kg−1 in the 5–15 cm depth. However, no significant interaction was found between treatment and depth (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Average total soil P (± 1 SD, n = 3) in the 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm depths, determined by ashing and fusion with NaOH. Distinct letters signify significant differences between the treatments (upper and lower case representing the 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm sampling depths, respectively) determined by post hoc testing (Fisher’s protected LSD), at α = 0.05. There were significant differences in P concentration with depth (P = 0.008), hence a separate ANOVA was conducted for each sampling depth

Fire regime had a significant effect on total soil P at both the 0–5 cm (P = 0.008, lsd0.05 = 95.6) and 5–15 cm depths (P = 0.002, lsd0.05 = 73.7). Total P was highest in the annual spring burn treatment, with values of 936 mg kg−1 in the 0–5 cm depth and 800 mg kg−1 in the 5–15 cm depth. In contrast, total P was lowest in the annual autumn (736 and 590 mg kg−1) and infrequent burn treatments (789 and 664 mg kg−1). The differences between treatments were more pronounced in the 5–15 cm depth.

Significant differences in moderately labile soil P fractions, measured as NaOH-extractable P, were observed among annual burn treatments (Fig. 5). Annual spring burns resulted in higher concentrations of NaOH-extractable P compared to all other treatments, while annual autumn burns were associated with the lowest levels of NaOH-extractable P (P = 0.02, lsd0.05 = 72.48 for 0–5 cm and P = 0.003, lsd0.05 = 63.42 for 5–15 cm).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Organic and inorganic P (Po and Pi, respectively) as a fraction of NaOH-extractable soil P in the top 0–5 and 5–15 cm. The ANOVA for each fraction (NaOH-extractable P, Po and Pi) was run separately for each depth. Error bars reflect average NaOH-extractable P (± 1 SD, n = 3). Different letters represent significant treatment differences, per depth and for each fraction, determined by post hoc testing (Fisher’s protected LSD), at α = 0.05. Letters above each bar represent the comparison between treatments for NaOH-extractable soil P, while those with subscripts o and i reflect the comparison between treatments for Po and Pi, respectively

The inorganic fraction of NaOH-extractable P (Pi) was largely unaffected by fire regime, except in the 5–15 cm layer, where concentrations were significantly higher under annual spring burns (P = 0.005, LSD0.05 = 17.61). In contrast, the organic fraction (Po)—which comprised an average of 69% of NaOH-extractable P in the 0–5 cm layer and 72% in the 5–15 cm layer—differed significantly among treatments at both depths (0–5 cm: P = 0.014, lsd0.05 = 60.70; 5–15 cm: P = 0.011, lsd0.05 = 58.67). Organic P concentrations were lowest under annual autumn burns and highest under annual spring burns (Fig. 5).

A small but significant difference in the Po:Pi ratio was observed with depth, with values of 2.18 in the 0–5 cm depth and 2.62 in the 5–15 cm depth (P < 0.001, lsd0.05 = 2.160). This increase in Po:Pi with depth was not affected by fire treatment (not shown).

The proportion of total P accounted for in the NaOH-extractable P fraction ranged from 60.69% to 79.68% in the 0–5 cm and 54.55% to 72.88% in the 5–15 cm depth (not shown).

Plant-available soil P was significantly lower (P < 0.001, lsd0.05 = 0.765) in the 5–15 cm sampling depth than in the top 0–5 cm (Fig. 6). Patterns in the response of plant-available P to fire regime appear similar to those observed for NaOH-extractable P, but differences were not statistically significant at either sampling depth (P = 0.475 and P = 0.445 for 0–5 and 5–15 cm depths, respectively).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Mean plant-available soil P (± 1 SD, n = 3) for each treatment in the 0–5 and 5–15 cm sampling depths. Plant-available P declined with depth (P < 0.001, lsd0.05 = 0.765), but there were no statistically significant effects of the fire treatments at either sampling depth

Discussion

We investigated the effects of fire frequency and season on topsoil P pools (total, organic, inorganic and plant-available) in the long-term Brotherton fire experiment in the montane grasslands of the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg, South Africa. We hypothesised that frequent burning would have little effect on total soil P but would shift its distribution, resulting in lower Po and higher Pi and plant-available P. Total soil P ranged from 561 to 1053 mg kg−1. As predicted, total soil P was similar under infrequent and biennial burns; however annual spring burns unexpectedly produced higher values. Annual spring burns also showed higher Po relative to Pi, whereas seasonal differences were negligible in the biennial treatments. Despite these shifts in Po and Pi, plant-available P remained unchanged across all treatments, indicating a strong effect of fire season under high-frequency regimes on Po and Pi partitioning, but no significant impact of fire on plant-available P.

Although highly weathered, Drakensberg topsoils maintain relatively high total P compared to other subtropical, highly weathered soils, but remain within the global range of 3–4087 mg kg−1 (He et al. 2021). These elevated values reflect the nutrient-rich basaltic parent material (Carbutt & Edwards 2015) and high soil organic matter content (Findlay et al. 2022) of the site. The persistence of high total P in these highly-weathered soils suggests a legacy of P retention, possibly linked to the amorphous mineral phases typical of Andosols that stabilise P through sorption and complexation, rather than ongoing replenishment or fire-induced changes. It remains unclear whether younger Drakensberg Andosols, with less-developed sorption capacity and greater contributions from primary mineral P, would exhibit even higher total P content.

While total P often constrains the potential sizes of major P pools (Hou et al. 2018), the key effect of fire in this system lies in its redistribution of P among organic and inorganic fractions. Previous studies have reported increases in soil Pi in P-limited systems subjected to repeated fire due to pyro-mineralisation of organic P (e.g., Schaller et al. 2015; Butler et al. 2018). In contrast, Pi in our study did not differ significantly among treatments in surface soils (0–5 cm) and was only modestly higher at depth (5–15 cm) under annual spring burns, suggesting that ash deposition and pyromineralisation play limited roles in P enrichment in these montane grasslands. Instead, the higher Po concentrations observed under annual spring burns, particularly in the 5–15 cm layer (73% of NaOH-extractable P), likely reflect enhanced primary productivity (Everson & Everson 2016). At this depth, contributions from root biomass and turnover following fire may be especially important (Johnson & Matchett 2001; Wang et al. 2022; Luo et al. 2024), adding organic matter to the soil and accelerating nutrient turnover (Ojima et al. 1994; Johnson & Matchett 2001; Pathak et al. 2017). Increased root turnover may also enhance microbial demand for P, promoting immobilisation of Pi into microbial biomass (Huang et al. 2013), and further reinforcing Po accumulation, although this mechanism was not directly measured here. The elevated Po:Pi ratios observed under annual burning support this interpretation, suggesting that P accumulation is driven more by organic inputs than by direct inorganic inputs from ash. Differences in reported Po response to fire between this grassland and other grassy biomes likely reflect the distinct nature of fire regimes: fires in grasslands, particularly spring burns, typically have moderate severity, shorter durations and less complete combustion of aboveground biomass (Stavi 2019). These fires produce black ash, which retains partially combusted organic material (Pereira et al. 2014) and promote shifts toward greater Po. In contrast, prolonged burning of woody fuels in forests and savannas may ash even mineral-associated organic matter (Merino et al. 2019), potentially leading to greater Pi formation. Because organic matter is a major driver of P dynamics, patterns in Po are expected to parallel those of C and N, which are also cycled through organic inputs (He et al. 2021). Previous work at Brotherton found higher concentrations of soil organic C and N under spring burns, consistent with enhanced belowground productivity and reduced ash losses (Findlay et al. 2022), which may support the observed accumulation of Po in these plots.

Despite the high total P content, plant-available P (Ambic extraction) in this study remained low (Fig. 7). Interestingly, ongoing research suggests that grasses and forbs at this site are generally not severely P-limited (Findlay et al. 2025), and that plant species are able to maintain adequate P nutrition (at current levels of N-availability) despite low available P. This may reflect effective acquisition strategies such as high root surface area, enhanced phosphatase activity, carboxylate exudation, or associations with mycorrhizal fungi (Lambers et al. 2008); however, these mechanisms were not directly measured. The apparent disconnect between total and plant-available P points to a bottleneck in the P cycle, where increased organic P inputs do not translate to greater plant-available P. This decoupling likely arises from the combined effects of soil properties and climate on microbial activity, organic matter decomposition, and nutrient turnover. Seasonal shifts in climate can further modulate these processes, as observed by Hofstede (1995) in Colombian alpine Páramo grasslands, where wet-season decomposition was associated with increased P uptake despite lower plant-available soil P. A similar mechanism may help explain why vegetation at Brotherton maintains apparent P sufficiency during the growing season (Findlay et al. 2025), despite persistently low levels of plant-available P.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Proportional diagram showing the relative size of P pools in the top 0–5 cm of soil, averaged over all treatments. Moderately labile soil P (542.96 mg kg−1) averages 67% of the total ashed P (809.26 mg kg−1) and comprises Po (371.96 mg kg−1; 69%) and Pi (171.01 mg kg−1; 31%). Plant-available P (5.45 mg kg−1) is included as contributing to Pi because it was determined using the Murphy & Riley (1962) method, which indicates P in an orthophosphate form (Blombäck et al. 2021)

Relative to total P, however, the plant-available P remains low in these soils. Soils at Brotherton exhibit high P-retention capacity, with P-retention indices (Blakemore et al. 1987) averaging 91% in the 0–5 cm layer and 95% in the 5–15 cm soil layer (Supplementary Information Table S2), which is consistent with characteristics of Andosols (Shoji et al. 1993; Takahashi & Dahlgren 2016) and helps to explain why less than 4% of Pi is plant-available. In contrast to Butler et al. (2018), who reported that repeated burning increases Pi concentrations and Pi:Po ratios, effectively “resetting” soil P to a state characteristic of early-stage soils, Po:Pi ratios remain high with frequent spring fires at Brotherton and do not shift toward Pi dominance. Consequently, despite frequent burning, plant-available P remains constrained, reflecting both the inherent chemical properties of these Andosols and bottlenecks in microbial and mineral-mediated P cycling.

Conclusions

Using data from the 39th year of a long-term fire experiment in the montane grasslands of the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg mountains, we found that fire regime significantly influences soil P pools. Specifically, annual spring burning resulted in higher Po and, to a lesser extent, Pi relative to less frequent burns. Contrary to expectations, however, these differences did not translate into measurable changes in plant-available P. This apparent decoupling highlights a central finding: as found in other Andosols, P availability is constrained primarily by exceptionally high P-retention capacity (> 90% in both surface and subsoil layers), which limits Pi mobility and likely suppresses fire-driven increases in plant-available P. Our results also suggest seasonal modulation of fire effects, most evident in the contrast between annual spring and autumn burns, but these effects were not observed under less frequent burning, emphasizing the importance of both fire frequency and timing in shaping P cycling in montane grasslands.

Overall, while fire regime clearly influences the composition of soil P pools, the retention dynamics of alu-andic Andosols ultimately dominate P availability to plants, irrespective of fire-driven changes in inputs. These findings demonstrate the complex and sometimes counterintuitive effects of fire on nutrient dynamics in these unique montane grasslands.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the KZN Department of Agriculture & Rural Development (Project nr. SF-F 2020E). Mariska te Beest is supported by Vidi grant VI.Vidi.203.106 ‘How biodiversity and fire contribute to carbon storage in Afromontane grasslands’ from the Dutch Research Council (NWO). Max Rietkerk is supported by the European Research Council (ERC-Synergy project RESILIENCE, proposal nr. 101071417) and by the Dutch Research Council (NWO ‘Resilience in complex systems through adaptive spatial pattern formation’, project nr. OCENW.M20.169). The authors wish to thank Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife for permission to collect soil samples from the experiment site (Collection Permit OP 74/2020) and the Grasslands, Forests and Wetlands Node, South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON) for maintaining the Brotherton experiment. We thank the Analytical Services field staff from the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Agriculture and Rural Development for their assistance in the field.

Author contributions

Nicola Findlay, Max Rietkerk, Martin Wassen and Mariska te Beest contributed to the study conception and design. Paul Gordijn oversaw the implementation of treatments. Data collection was conducted by Nicola Findlay and Alan Manson. Chemical analyses were conducted by Nicola Findlay and Guy Thibaud. Data analysis was conducted by Nicola Findlay. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Nicola Findlay and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the KZN Department of Agriculture & Rural Development (Project nr. SF-F 2020E). Mariska te Beest is supported by Vidi grant VI.Vidi.203.106 ‘How biodiversity and fire contribute to carbon storage in Afromontane grasslands’ from the Dutch Research Council (NWO). Max Rietkerk is supported by the European Research Council (ERC-Synergy project RESILIENCE, proposal nr. 101071417) and by the Dutch Research Council (NWO ‘Resilience in complex systems through adaptive spatial pattern formation’, project nr. OCENW.M20.169).

Data availability

Soil phosphorus data supporting the findings of this study are not currently publicly available as they form part of the dataset for a PhD research project. All data will be archived on the South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON) Open Data Platform (ODP) upon completion of the PhD. However, data are available from the corresponding author (Nicola Findlay) upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bengtsson J, Bullock JM, Egoh B, Everson CS, Everson TM, O’Connor T, O’Farrell PJ, Smith HG, Lindborg R (2019) Grasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere 10:1–20. 10.1002/ECS2.2582 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blakemore LC, Searle PL, Daly BK. (1987). Methods for chemical analysis of soils (N.Z. Soil Bureau Scientific Report 80).
  4. Blombäck K, Bolster CH, Lindsjö A, Hesse K, Linefur H, Parvage MM (2021) Comparing measures for determination of phosphorus saturation as a method to estimate dissolved P in soil solution. Geoderma 383:114708. 10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2020.114708 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bodí MB, Martin DA, Balfour VN, Santín C, Doerr SH, Pereira P, Cerdà A, Mataix-Solera J (2014) Wildland fire ash: production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects. Earth-Sci Rev 130:103–127. 10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2013.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bond WJ (2008) What limits trees in C4 grasslands and savannas? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:641–659 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowman R, Moir J (1993) Basic EDTA as an extractant for soil organic phosphorus. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1516–1518 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown CJ, Piper SE (1988) Status of cape vultures in the natal Drakensberg and their cliff site selection. Ostrich 59:139–141 [Google Scholar]
  9. Butler OM, Lewis T, Chen C (2017) Fire alters soil labile stoichiometry and litter nutrients in Australian eucalypt forests. Int J Wildland Fire 26:783–788 [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler OM, Elser JJ, Lewis T, Mackey B, Chen C (2018) The phosphorus-rich signature of fire in the soil–plant system: a global meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 21:335–344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carbutt C (2019) The Drakensberg mountain centre: a necessary revision of southern Africa’s high-elevation centre of plant endemism. S Afr J Bot 124:508–529 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carbutt C, Edwards TJ (2015) Plant–soil interactions in lower–upper montane systems and their implications in a warming world: a case study from the Maloti-Drakensberg Park, southern Africa. Biodiversity 16:262–277 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng G, Lou J, Zhu M, Zhang X, Wang H, Tang Z, Wang W (2025) Fire differentially affects soil properties of forests and grasslands: a global meta-analysis. CATENA 255:109031 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark J (1988) Effect of climate change on fire regimes in northwestern Minnesota. Nature 334:233–235 [Google Scholar]
  15. Coetsee C, Bond WJ, February EC (2010) Frequent fire affects soil nitrogen and carbon in an African savanna by changing woody cover. Oecologia 162:1027–1034. 10.1007/s00442-009-1490-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cofer W, Koutzenogii K, Kokorin A, Ezcurra A (1997) Biomass burning emissions and the atmosphere. In: Clark J, Cachier H, Goldammer J, Stocks B (eds) Sediment records of biomass burning and global change. NATO ASI Series, vol 51. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–206 [Google Scholar]
  17. Craine JM, Morrow C, Stock WD (2008) Nutrient concentration ratios and co-limitation in South African grasslands. New Phytol 179:829–836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deng Y, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Cui X (2024) Effect of severe wildfire on soil phosphorus fractions and adsorption in a cold temperate coniferous forest after 5 years. Eur J Soil Sci 75:e13464 [Google Scholar]
  19. Everson CS, Molefe GL, Everson TM. (1998). Monitoring and modelling components of the water balance in a grassland catchment in the summer rainfall area of South Africa. Final report to the water research commission. WRC Report No: 493/1/98. Water research commission, Pretoria, South Africa. https://www.wrc.org.za/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/493-1-98.pdf
  20. Everson CS, Everson TM (2016) The long-term effects of fire regime on primary production of montane grasslands in South Africa. Afr J Range Forage Sci 33:33–41 [Google Scholar]
  21. Everson CS. (1985). Ecological effects of fire in the montane grasslands of Natal. PhD Thesis. University of Natal.
  22. FAO. (2014). World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources reports 106. In World soil resources reports No. 106. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf
  23. Fay PA, Prober SM, Harpole WS, Knops JMH, Bakker JD, Borer ET, Lind EM, MacDougall AS, Seabloom EW, Wragg PD, Adler PB, Blumenthal DM, Buckley YM, Chu C, Cleland EE, Collins SL, Davies KF, Du G, Feng X, Firn J, Gruner DS, Hagenah N, Hautier Y, Heckman RW, Jin VL, Kirkman KP, Klein J, Ladwig LM, Li Qi, McCulley RL, Melbourne BA, Mitchell CE, Moore JL, Morgan JW, Risch AC, Schütz M, Stevens CJ, Wedin DA, Yang LH (2015) Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients. Nat Plants. 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.80 [Google Scholar]
  24. Findlay N, Manson A, Cromsigt JPGM, Gordijn P, Nixon C, Rietkerk M, Thibaud G, Wassen MJ, Beest M (2022) Long-term frequent fires do not decrease topsoil carbon and nitrogen in an Afromontane grassland. Afr J Range Forage Sci. 10.2989/10220119.2021.2016966 [Google Scholar]
  25. Findlay NJ, Manson A, Thibaud G, Gordijn P, Mkhungo S, Rietkerk M, Wassen MJ, te Beest M (2025) Soil and plant nutrients are maintained—and can be enhanced—by long-term frequent fire in an Afromontane grassland. J Veg Sci 36(6):e70102. 10.1111/jvs.e70102 [Google Scholar]
  26. García-Oliva F, Merino A, Fonturbel MT, Omil B, Fernández C, Vega JA (2018) Severe wildfire hinders renewal of soil P pools by thermal mineralization of organic P in forest soil: analysis by sequential extraction and 31P NMR spectroscopy. Geoderma 309:32–40 [Google Scholar]
  27. González-Pérez JA, González-Vila FJ, Almendros G, Knicker H (2004) The effect of fire on soil organic matter - a review. Environ Int 30:855–870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hartshorn AS, Coetsee C, Chadwick OA (2009) Pyromineralization of soil phosphorus in a South African savanna. Chem Geol 267:24–31 [Google Scholar]
  29. He X, Augusto L, Goll DS, Ringeval B, Wang Y, Helfenstein J, Huang Y, Yu K, Wang Z, Yang Y, Hou E (2021) Global patterns and drivers of soil total phosphorus concentration. Earth Syst Sci Data 13:5831–5846 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hedley MJ, Stewart JWB, Chauhan BS (1982) Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:970–976 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hofstede R (1995) The effects of grazing and burning on soil and plant nutrient concentrations in Colombian paramo grasslands. Plant Soil 173:111–132 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hou E, Chen C, Luo Y, Zhou G, Kuang Y, Zhang Y, Heenan M, Lu X, Wen D (2018) Effects of climate on soil phosphorus cycle and availability in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Change Biol. 10.1111/GCB.14093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang W, Xu Z, Chen C, Zhou G, Liu J, Abdullah KM, Reverchon F, Liu X (2013) Short-term effects of prescribed burning on phosphorus availability in a suburban native forest of subtropical Australia. J Soils Sediments 13:869–876. 10.1007/S11368-013-0660-Z [Google Scholar]
  35. Jahnke RA (1992) The phosphorus cycle. International geophysics, vol 50. Academic Press Inc, Cambridge [Google Scholar]
  36. Johnson L, Matchett J (2001) Fire and grazing regulate belowground processes in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 82:3377–3389 [Google Scholar]
  37. King LC (1944) Geomorphology of the Natal Drakensberg. Trans Geol Soc S Afr 47:255–282 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kögel-Knabner I, Amelung W (2014) Dynamics, chemistry, and preservation of organic matter in soils. In: Holland HD, Turekian KK (eds) Treatise on geochemistry, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 157–215 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kruse J, Abraham M, Amelung W, Baum C, Bol R, Kühn O, Lewandowski H, Niederberger J, Oelmann Y, Rüger C, Santner J, Siebers M, Siebers N, Spohn M, Vestergren J, Vogts A, Leinweber P (2015) Innovative methods in soil phosphorus research: a review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 178:43–88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lambers H, Raven JA, Shaver GR, Smith SE (2008) Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol Evol 23(2):95–103. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Leys BA, Marlon JR, Umbanhowar C, Vannière B (2018) Global fire history of grassland biomes. Ecol Evol 8:8831–8852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liao X, Inglett PW, Inglett KS (2013) Fire effects on nitrogen cycling in native and restored calcareous wetlands. Fire Ecol. 10.4996/FIREECOLOGY.0901006 [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo C, Fang Z, Liu J, Han F, Wu Y, Bing H, Zhao P (2024) Root carbon and soil temperature may be key drivers of below-ground biomass in grassland following prescribed fires in autumn and spring. J Environ Manage 349:119337. 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.119337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Manson AD, Jewitt D, Short AD (2007) Effects of season and frequency of burning on soils and landscape functioning in a moist montane grassland. Afr J Range Forage Sci 24:9–18. 10.2989/102201107780178177 [Google Scholar]
  45. Manson AD, Bainbridge SH, Thibaud GR. (2020). Methods used for analysis of soils and plant material by Analytical Services at Cedara. KZN AGRI-REPORT No. N/A/2020/07. KZN Department of Agriculture & Rural Development. 10.13140/RG.2.2.16830.92485
  46. McGill WB, Cole CV (1981) Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267–286 [Google Scholar]
  47. McLauchlan KK, Higuera PE, Miesel J, Rogers BM, Schweitzer J, Shuman JK, Tepley AJ, Varner JM, Veblen TT, Adalsteinsson SA, Balch JK, Baker P, Batllori E, Bigio E, Brando P, Cattau M, Chipman ML, Coen J, Crandall R, Daniels L, Enright N, Gross WS, Harvey BJ, Hatten JA, Hermann S, Hewitt RE, Kobziar LN, Landesmann JB, Loranty MM, Maezumi SY, Mearns L, Moritz M, Myers JA, Pausas JG, Pellegrini AFA, Platt WJ, Roozeboom J, Safford H, Santos F, Scheller RM, Sherriff RL, Smith KG, Smith MD, Watts AC (2020) Fire as a fundamental ecological process: research advances and frontiers. J Ecol 108:2047–2069. 10.1111/1365-2745.13403 [Google Scholar]
  48. Merino A, Jiménez E, Fernández C, Fontúrbel MT, Campo J, Vega JA (2019) Soil organic matter and phosphorus dynamics after low intensity prescribed burning in forests and shrubland. J Environ Manag 234:214–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. van der Merwe A, Johnson J, Ras L. (1984). A NH4HCO3-NH4F-(NH4)2EDTA method for the determination of extractable P, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Na, Zn in soils. (Soil and Irrigation Research Institute, South Africa: Information Bulletin B2/2).
  50. Morris C, Everson CS, Everson TM, Gordijn PJ (2020) Frequent burning maintained a stable grassland over four decades in the Drakensberg, South Africa. Afr J Range Forage Sci 38:39–52. 10.2989/10220119.2020.1825120 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mucina L, Rutherford MC. (2006). The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19 December 1–30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287992846%0A
  52. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36. 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5 [Google Scholar]
  53. Nunes JP, Doerr SH, Sheridan G, Neris J, Santín C, Emelko MB, Silins U, Robichaud PR, Elliot WJ, Keizer J (2018) Assessing water contamination risk from vegetation fires: challenges, opportunities and a framework for progress. Hydrol Process 32:687–694. 10.1002/HYP.11434 [Google Scholar]
  54. O’Connor TG, Uys RG, Mills AJ (2004) Ecological effects of fire-breaks in the montane grasslands of the southern Drakensberg, South Africa. Afr J Range Forage Sci 21:1–9. 10.2989/10220110409485828 [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Halloran I, Cade-Menum B. (2008). Total and organic phosphorus. In M. Carter & E. Gregorich (Eds), Soil sampling and methods of analysis 2nd ed. Canadian Society of Soil Science, CRC Press and Taylor & Francis Group
  56. Ojima DS, Schimel DS, Parton WJ, Owensby CE (1994) Long- and short-term effects of fire on nitrogen cycling in tallgrass prairie. Biogeochemistry 24:67–84. 10.1007/BF02390180 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ölinger R, Margesin R, Kandeler E (1996) Enzymes involved in phosphorus metabolism. In: Schinner F, Öhlinger R, Kandeler E, Margesin R (eds) Methods in soil biology. Springer, Berlin, pp 208–227 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pathak K, Nath AJ, Sileshi GW, Lal R, Das AK (2017) Annual burning enhances biomass production and nutrient cycling in degraded Imperata grasslands. Land Degrad Dev 28:1763–1771 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pellegrini AFA, Hedin LO, Staver AC, Govender N (2015) Fire alters ecosystem carbon and nutrients but not plant nutrient stoichiometry or composition in tropical savanna. Ecology 96(5):1275–1285. 10.1890/14-1158.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pereira P, Úbeda X, Mataix-Solera J, Oliva M, Novara A (2014) Short-term changes in soil Munsell colour value, organic matter content and soil water repellency after a spring grassland fire in Lithuania. Solid Earth 5:209–225. 10.5194/SE-5-209-2014 [Google Scholar]
  61. Porder S, Vitousek PM, Chadwick OA, Chamberlain CP, Hilley GE (2007) Uplift, erosion, and phosphorus limitation in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecosystems 10:158–170. 10.1007/S10021-006-9011-X [Google Scholar]
  62. Posit team. (2024). Rstudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. (2023.12.1.402). Posit Software, PBC. http://www.posit.co/
  63. Rao K, Williams AP, Diffenbaugh NS, Yebra M, Bryant C, Konings AG (2023) Dry live fuels increase the likelihood of lightning-caused fires. Geophys Res Lett 50:1–10. 10.1029/2022GL100975 [Google Scholar]
  64. Resende J, Markewitz D, Klink C, da Cunha Bustamante B, Davidson E (2011) Phosphorus cycling in a small watershed in the Brazilian Cerrado: impacts of frequent burning. Biogeochemistry 105:105–118 [Google Scholar]
  65. Romanyà J, Khanna PK, Raison RJ (1994) Effects of slash burning on soil phosphorus fractions and sorption and desorption of phosphorus. For Ecol Manag 65:89–103. 10.1016/0378-1127(94)90161-9 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sayedi SS, Abbott BW, Vannière B, Leys B, Colombaroli D, Romera GG, Słowiński M, Aleman JC, Blarquez O, Feurdean A, Brown K, Aakala T, Alenius T, Allen K, Andric M, Bergeron Y, Biagioni S, Bradshaw R, Bremond L, Daniau AL (2024) Assessing changes in global fire regimes. Fire Ecol. 20:1–22. 10.1186/S42408-023-00237-938186675 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schaller J, Tischer A, Struyf E, Bremer M, Belmonte DU, Potthast K (2015) Fire enhances phosphorus availability in topsoils depending on binding properties. Ecology 96:1598–1606. 10.1890/14-1311.1 [Google Scholar]
  68. Shoji S, Dahlgren R, Nanzyo M (1993) Chapter 3 Genesis of volcanic ash soils. Developments in soil science, vol 21. Elsevier, Amsterdam [Google Scholar]
  69. Siebers N, Wang L, Funk T, von Tucher S, Merbach I, Schweitzer K, Kruse J (2021) Subsoils—a sink for excess fertilizer P but a minor contribution to P plant nutrition: evidence from long-term fertilization trials. Environ Sci Eur. 10.1186/S12302-021-00496-W [Google Scholar]
  70. Smith BFL, Bain DC (1982) A sodium hydroxide fusion method for the determination of total phosphate in soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 13:185–190 [Google Scholar]
  71. Soil Survey Staff. (2014). Keys to soil taxonomy (12th ed.). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
  72. Souza-Alonso P, Prats SA, Merino A, Guiomar N, Guijarro M, Madrigal J (2024) Fire enhances changes in phosphorus (P) dynamics determining potential post-fire soil recovery in Mediterranean woodlands. Sci Rep 14:1–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Staver AC, Archibald S, Levin S (2011) Tree cover in sub-Saharan Africa: rainfall and fire constrain forest and savanna as alternative stable states. Ecology 92:1063–1072. 10.1890/10-1684.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Stavi I (2019) Wildfires in grasslands and shrublands: a review of impacts on vegetation, soil, hydrology, and geomorphology. Water (Switzerland) 11:1042. 10.3390/W11051042 [Google Scholar]
  75. Takahashi T, Dahlgren RA (2016) Nature, properties and function of aluminum-humus complexes in volcanic soils. Geoderma 263:110–121 [Google Scholar]
  76. Taub D (2010) Effects of rising atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide on plants. Nat Educ Knowl 1:1–6 [Google Scholar]
  77. te Beest M, Kleinjan A, Tuijnman V, Findlay N, Mvelase T, le Roux E, Tedder M, Gordijn P, van Janse Rensburg S (2021) Grass functional trait responses to experimental warming and fire in Afromontane grasslands. Afr J Range Forage Sci 38:88–101 [Google Scholar]
  78. Tiessen H (2008) Phosphorus in the global environment. In: White PJ, Hammond JP (eds) The ecophysiology of plant-phosphorus interactions plant Ecop. Springer, Berlin [Google Scholar]
  79. Toucher M (2024) Hydrological year 2024 Update. Technical briefing note. South African environmental observation network, Pretoria [Google Scholar]
  80. Tyson PD, Preston-Whyte RA, Schulze RE. (1976). The Climate of the Drakensberg. Natal Town and Regional Planning Commission.
  81. Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20:5–15. 10.1890/08-0127.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. VSN International. (2015). Genstat for Windows 18th Edition. Genstat.co Uk
  83. Wang L, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Fu Q, Li T (2022) Vegetation restoration and plant roots improve soil infiltration capacity after a severe forest fire in Daxing’anling, northeast China. J Soil Water Conserv 77:135–143 [Google Scholar]
  84. Wassen MJ, Schrader J, van Dijk J, Eppinga MB (2021) Phosphorus fertilization is eradicating the niche of northern Eurasia’s threatened plant species. Nat Ecol Evol 5:67–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Weihrauch C, Opp C (2018) Ecologically relevant phosphorus pools in soils and their dynamics: the story so far. Geoderma 325:183–194 [Google Scholar]
  86. Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York [Google Scholar]
  87. Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K, Vaughan D. (2023). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. https://dplyr.tidyverse.org
  88. Zhou G, Eisenhauer N, Du Z, Lucas-Borja ME, Zhai K, Berdugo M, Duan H, Wu H, Liu S, Revillini D, Sáez-Sandino T, Chai H, Zhou X, Delgado-Baquerizo M (2025) Fire-driven disruptions of global soil biochemical relationships. Nat Commun 16:1–12. 10.1038/S41467-025-56598-Z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhu Z, Piao S, Myneni RB, Huang M, Zeng Z, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Arneth A, Cao C, Cheng L, Kato E, Koven C, Li Y, Lian X, Liu Y, Liu R, Mao J, Pan Y, Peng S, Peñuelas J, Poulter B, Pugh TAM, Stocker BD, Viovy N, Wang X, Wang Y, Xiao Z, Yang H, Zaehle S, Zeng N (2016) Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat Clim Chang 6:791–795. 10.1038/NCLIMATE3004 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Soil phosphorus data supporting the findings of this study are not currently publicly available as they form part of the dataset for a PhD research project. All data will be archived on the South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON) Open Data Platform (ODP) upon completion of the PhD. However, data are available from the corresponding author (Nicola Findlay) upon reasonable request.


Articles from Biogeochemistry are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES