ABSTRACT
Background
Enterococcus thailandicus was initially isolated from food in Thailand, and a single clinical case involving an intra-abdominal abscess was reported. No reports on the bacteremia or whole-genome sequencing of clinically isolated E. thailandicus have been published.
Case Summary
A 50-year-old woman with intestinal Crohn’s disease was admitted because of bloody stools. She had been treated twice previously for a perianal abscess. She developed a fever on day 15 of hospitalization. Both blood and urine cultures were polymicrobial and included E. thailandicus, which was susceptible to penicillins. She was treated for the perianal abscess and pyelonephritis with intravenous penicillins combined with beta-lactamase inhibitors for 2 weeks, followed by oral amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for 4 weeks. The identities of the isolates in the blood and urine cultures were confirmed using whole-genome analysis. No antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence genes, or plasmid replicons were identified in these isolates. Phylogenetic analysis of the clinical isolates and 21 E. thailandicus isolates in public databases indicated a relatively close lineage to that obtained from pig stool samples in Japan. No antimicrobial resistance genes conferring resistance to penicillins were identified in any of the E. thailandicus genomes.
Conclusion
Phylogenetic analysis suggested that infection with E. thailandicus in this patient may have originated in Japan. The prognosis after treatment with penicillins was favorable.
KEYWORDS: phylogenetic analysis, bacteremia, Enterococcus thailandicus
INTRODUCTION
Enterococcus thailandicus was isolated from food in Thailand (1). It is a senior subjective synonym of Enterococcus sanguinicola, of which two clinical isolates were recovered from human blood in 2004 and proposed as a new species in October 2008 (2, 3). However, E. thailandicus was isolated in July 2008, and it was demonstrated that E. sanguinicola and E. thailandicus represent the same species, based on the identity of their 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequences in 2011 (4). The clinical courses of the patients from whom E. sanguinicola was isolated were not described.
Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA and rpoA genes revealed that E. thailandicus is relatively close to Enterococcus durans, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus hirae (1). The first clinical report of an intra-abdominal abscess caused by E. thailandicus was recently documented (5). However, no other reports of bloodstream infections caused by E. thailandicus, or genomic analyses of clinical isolates have been published. Herein, we present a case of E. thailandicus bacteremia and describe microbiological features using whole-genome sequencing (WGS).
CASE PRESENTATION
A 50-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with bloody stools. She had a history of intestinal Crohn’s disease and was treated with ustekinumab and an elemental diet (ELENTAL︎) until admission. She had been treated with flomoxef for perianal abscesses 6 and 8 years prior to this admission. Although the abscess cavity persisted, no clinical deterioration was observed in the absence of antimicrobial treatment. The patient was a full-time homemaker. She had not traveled abroad in the past 10 years and had no regular contact with animals. Fasting, initiation of infliximab at 5 mg/kg, and argon plasma coagulation via small bowel endoscopy resolved the bloody stools by hospital day 7.
On hospital day 15, she developed fever, stomach irritation, and diarrhea. Physical examination revealed no tenderness in the stomach or costovertebral angle. Blood tests revealed a white blood cell count of 6,510 cells/µL (reference range [RR]: 3,300–8,600), a C-reactive protein level of 4.1 mg/L (RR: ≤1.4), and a procalcitonin level of 0.02 µg/L (RR: <0.05). Urinalysis performed the day after the initiation of piperacillin-tazobactam at 4.5 g every 8 hours revealed one to four leukocytes per high-power field and a bacterial count of 30.3/µL. Computed tomography (CT) imaging showed reduced perianal abscess compared with the CT findings on admission, with no abnormalities in the urinary tract. Two sets of blood cultures and urine culture were subsequently obtained, and she was administered piperacillin-tazobactam.
On the following day, both sets of blood cultures (BD BACTEC; Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey, USA) became positive. Gram-negative bacilli were identified in one set, whereas gram-positive cocci were identified in the other. Escherichia coli, E. thailandicus, Enterococcus avium, and Enterococcus gallinarum were identified using a Bruker MALDI Biotyper︎ (Bruker, Billerica, USA; Reference Library v.6.0.0). The confidence score of E. thailandicus for MALDI identification was 2.02. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using MicroScan WalkAway (Beckmann-Coulter, Germany) showed susceptibility of E. thailandicus and E. coli to penicillins (Table 1). Urine cultures revealed the presence of E. thailandicus, E. coli, and Corynebacterium amycolatum. As a stool culture was not obtained, the carriage of E. thailandicus was unknown. Considering her abdominal symptoms, fever, and isolation of the same bacteria from both blood and urine cultures, the patient was diagnosed with a perianal abscess and pyelonephritis. Based on the antimicrobial susceptibility testing, she received piperacillin-tazobactam for 8 days and ampicillin-sulbactam at 3 g every 8 hours for 6 days. At discharge, she was prescribed amoxicillin-clavulanic acid at 375 mg/125 mg every 8 hours for the perianal abscess. At a 1-month follow-up, she remained well without relapse.
TABLE 1.
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests of the isolates Enterococcus thailandicus KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934a
| Antimicrobial agent | KUN2022-1874 | KUN2022-1934 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC (μg/mL) | Interpretation | MIC (μg/mL) | Interpretation | |
| Penicillin | 4 | S | 4 | S |
| Ampicillin | ≤2 | S | ≤2 | S |
| Levofloxacin | 2 | 2 | S | |
| Minocycline | >8 | R | >8 | R |
| Vancomycin | ≤0.5 | S | ≤0.5 | S |
| Daptomycin | 1 | S | 1 | S |
| Linezolid | 2 | S | 2 | S |
| Rifampicin | >2 | R | >2 | R |
MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; R, resistant; S, susceptible. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using MicroScan WalkAway. Interpretations were decided according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M100 ED35.
Microbiological and genomic characteristics of the clinical isolates
Colonies of E. thailandicus appeared white, small, and non-hemolytic (Fig. 1). Using API︎20 STREP (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), biochemical characterization of the two clinical isolates—KUN2022-1874 from blood culture and KUN2022-1934 from urine culture—revealed identical profiles (Table 2). Both isolates were positive for PYRase activity, LAPase activity, and hydrolysis of esculin and arginine. Acid production was observed from D-ribose, D-mannitol, D-lactose, and D-trehalose.
Fig 1.
Colonies of enterococci. Clinical isolates of Enterococcus thailandicus KUN2022-1874, Enterococcus avium, and Enterococcus gallinurum from blood culture were incubated on Columbia blood agar at 35℃ for 24 hours. Colonies of E. thailandicus appear white, small, and non-hemolytic, allowing differentiation from other enterococci.
TABLE 2.
Reaction of the isolates Enterococcus thailandicus KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934 in API︎20 STREPa
| Isolate | ATCC 35667 E. faecium |
KUN2022-1874 E. thailandicus |
KUN2022-1934 E. thailandicus |
|---|---|---|---|
| VP | + | + | + |
| HIP | + | − | − |
| ESC | + | + | + |
| PYRA | + | + | + |
| αGAL | − | − | − |
| βGUR | − | − | − |
| βGAL | + | − | − |
| PAL | − | − | − |
| LAP | − | + | + |
| ADH | + | + | + |
| RIB | + | + | + |
| ARA | + | − | − |
| MAN | + | + | + |
| SOR | − | − | − |
| LAC | + | + | + |
| TRE | + | + | + |
| INU | − | − | − |
| RAF | − | − | − |
| AMD | + | − | − |
| GLYG | − | − | − |
ADH, L-arginine; AMD, starch; ARA, L-arabinose; αGAL, 6-bromo-2-naphthyl-αD-galactopyranoside; βGAL, 2-naphthyl-ßD-galactopyranoside; βGUR, naphthol ASBI-glucuronic acid; ESC, esculin ferric citrate; GLYG, glycogen; HIP, hippuric acid; INU, inulin; LAC, D-lactose; LAP, L-leucine-ß-naphthylamide; MAN, D-mannitol; PAL, 2-naphthyl phosphate; PYRA, pyroglutamic acid-ß-naphthylamide; RIB, D-ribose; RAF, D-raffinose; SOR, D-sorbitol; TRE, D-trehalose; VP, sodium pyruvate.
Genomic DNA from the two isolates was extracted using MagNA Pure 96 system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Libraries of KUN2022-1974 and KUN2022-1934 were prepared using an Illumina DNA Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 1000 instrument (151 and 300 bp paired-end reads, respectively). Reads were assembled using SPAdes v.3.15.5. Evaluation using QUAST v.5.0.2 and bamcov v.0.1.1 showed that the draft genome of KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934 had a total length of 2,630,973 and 2,461,271 bp with 36.69% and 36.72% guanine-cytosine content and consisted of 97 and 37 contigs with an average coverage of 150× and 74.7×, respectively (Table 3) (6, 7). Using the OrthoANIu algorithm, a markedly average nucleotide identity (99.4%) and coverage (70.3%) between the KUN2022-1874 and reference sequence (accession number CP023074.1) confirmed its identification as E. thailandicus (8). Furthermore, variant calling with Snippy v.4.6.0 identified two nucleotide variants between KUN2022-1873 and KUN2022-1934, supporting that the two isolates were nearly identical (9). Virulence genes, such as cyl and hyl, were not identified using VirulenceFinder v.3.0.0 (10, 11). BLASTP analysis using six penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) from E. faecium (accession number CP038996.1) revealed that all of the PBPs were identified in KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934. The identity of PBP4 in KUN2022-1874 was 73.2% compared to that of E. faecium. No antimicrobial resistance genes and replicon sequences were detected using ResFinder v.4.2.3 and PlasmidFinder v.2.1.6 (11–14)
TABLE 3.
Assembly statistics of the isolates Enterococcus thailandicus KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934
| Statistic | KUN2022-1874 | KUN2022-1934 |
|---|---|---|
| Total length (bp) | 2,630,973 | 2,461,271 |
| N50 (bp) | 105,219 | 377,306 |
| N75 (bp) | 55,490 | 149,910 |
| L50 | 9 | 3 |
| L75 | 17 | 6 |
| No. of N’s per 100 kbp | 0 | 0 |
| No. of contigs | 97 | 37 |
| Largest contig (bp) | 245,394 | 723,332 |
| GC% | 36.69 | 36.72 |
Phylogenetic analysis of E. thailandicus isolates
Phylogenetic analysis of 21 WGS data sets of E. thailandicus registered in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) in August 2023 and the two clinical isolates was conducted using Snippy, Gubbins v.3.3.1, and IQ-TREE v.2.3.0 (Fig. 2 and Table 4) (9, 15, 16). E. thailandicus has been isolated from samples in East Asia, Australia, Canada, and Italy. Of the reported isolates, eight (38.0%) and seven (33.3%) isolates were obtained from human and animals, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934 clustered on the same branch as K5Epox and cldu-2 and were closely related to K5Epox, which was isolated from the pig stool samples in Japan (17). BLASTP analysis revealed that all isolates from NCBI harbored six PBPs . Genes conferring resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol were identified in seven isolates. Plasmid replicon sequences were identified in 15 of the 21 isolates (71.4%) (11, 12).
Fig 2.
Phylogenetic tree of Enterococcus thailandicus. A total of 21 data sets of Enterococcus thailandicus from the NCBI database, Enterococcus durans (CP022930.1), Enterococcus faecium (CP038996.1), Enterococcus hirae (CP023011.2), and the clinical isolates KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934 were included in the phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using the Interactive Tree Of Life web server (17). Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) which were detected in more than two strains were presented. Locus tags of pbp genes were pbp1A, E6A31_06625; pbp1B, E6A31_09430; pbp2, E6A31_03785; pbp2A, E6A31_12780; pbp2B, E6A31_04730; and pbp4, E6A31_07265.
TABLE 4.
Details of 21 E. thailandicus strains registered in NCBI
| Strain | Host | Isolation source | Country | Collection yr | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F0711D46 | Bos taurus | Feces | Canada | 2005 | GCF_001652875.1 |
| LM52 | Environment | –b | Italy | 2012 | GCF_001495195.1 |
| a523 | Environment | Raw sewer | Canada | 2013 | GCF_002290025.1 |
| AF57-1LNA | Homo sapiens | Fecal material | China | 2014 | GCF_027681785.1 |
| AF101-07 | Homo sapiens | Fecal material | China | 2014 | GCF_027687245.1 |
| AM102-15 | Homo sapiens | Fecal material | China | 2014 | GCF_027660045.1 |
| AM102-50 | Homo sapiens | Fecal material | China | 2014 | GCF_027659885.1 |
| AM102-105 | Homo sapiens | Fecal material | China | 2014 | GCF_027660215.1 |
| OF20-15LBA | Homo sapiens | Fecal material | China | 2014 | GCF_027693865.1 |
| OF20-18ACA | Homo sapiens | Fecal material | China | 2014 | GCF_027693845.1 |
| TM115-221 | Homo sapiens | Fecal material | China | 2014 | GCF_027678665.1 |
| EC16A | Gallus gallus | – | Australia | 2016 | GCF_027859335.1 |
| EG03 | Gallus gallus | – | Australia | 2016 | GCF_027859305.1 |
| EG15B | Gallus gallus | – | Australia | 2016 | GCF_027859295.1 |
| EG22B | Gallus gallus | – | Australia | 2016 | GCF_027859355.1 |
| DSM21767 | Environment | Fermented sausage | Thailand | 2016 | GCF_001886265.1 |
| cldu-2 | Environment | Dust from chicken farm | China | 2019 | GCF_030179535.1 |
| NBRC101867 | Environment | Mum (fermented sausage) | Thailand | 2019a | GCF_007989705.1 |
| K2F | Sus scrofa | Excrement | Japan | 2021 | GCF_030270205.1 |
| K5Epox | Sus scrofa | Excrement | Japan | 2021 | GCF_030270265.1 |
| Colony540 | Environment | Food | Thailand | 2021a | GCF_019265385.1 |
The year of registration in the NCBI database as collection year was not indicated.
–, data not available.
DISCUSSION
In this report, we present a case of E. thailandicus bacteremia in a 50-year-old woman and describe the microbiological features of its clinical isolates using WGS. Polymicrobial bloodstream infections are most commonly associated with intra-abdominal infections; however, urinary tract infections are also reported in approximately 11% of patients (18). In this case, the isolates from the blood and urine cultures were nearly identical, and pyelonephritis was also determined as the cause of bacteremia. Similarly, E. thailandicus has previously been isolated from a polymicrobial intra-abdominal infection (5). Enterococci are known to facilitate polymicrobial infections, suggesting that E. thailandicus may be associated with such infections (19).
E. thailandicus FP48-3 and TC1 and E. sanguinicola BAA-781 and CCUG 47884 hydrolyzed esculin and produced acid from ribose and mannitol (1, 2, 4, 20). However, TC1, BAA-781, and CCUG 47884 produced acid from trehalose, while FP48-3 did not, indicating that the profiles of our clinical isolates matched those of TC1, ATCC BAA-781, and CCUG 47884. As the whole-genome sequences of E. sanguinicola are not available in the NCBI database, we were unable to perform a comparative genomic analysis with our isolates. Because our clinical isolates were confirmed to be E. thailandicus using average nucleotide identity, we consider this to be the first documented clinical case of E. thailandicus bacteremia.
Subsequent isolations of E. thailandicus have been reported in sewage and animals (21, 22). Although isolates from human stool samples have been reported via metagenome analysis, they have not been characterized (23). Because the current clinical isolates were closely related to the strain in Japan, and the patient had no history of international travel, the infection likely occurred in Japan.
In enterococci, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, clindamycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are not effective clinically. Penicillin resistance in E. faecium has been linked to the pbp4(5) gene (24). A clinical isolate formerly identified as E. sanguinicola, reported in 2004 (ATCC BAA-781), carried the vanA gene, which confers resistance to vancomycin (2). In contrast, E. thailandicus isolates from animals were typically susceptible to penicillins (13, 20, 25). Notably, the strain K5Epox, closely related to our clinical isolates, was non-susceptible to linezolid due to the presence of the poxtA gene (26). The clinical isolate of E. thailandicus from intra-abdominal infection was susceptible to ampicillin, vancomycin, and linezolid, and the patient was treated with meropenem, levofloxacin, and vancomycin (5). No reports of penicillin-resistant E. thaliandicus have been published since 2005. Therefore, the low identity of PBP4(5) in E. faecium and other antimicrobial resistance genes may support the use of penicillins for the empirical therapy.
In conclusion, infections caused by E. thailandicus may be treated effectively with penicillins. Additional clinical reports and genomic analyses are essential to clarify its microbiological characteristics and reinforce clinical management.
Contributor Information
Yusuke Tsuda, Email: tsuda_yusuke@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Carey-Ann D. Burnham, Pattern Bioscience, Austin, Texas, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
Raw read sequences of KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934 were registered in the NCBI SRA under accession numbers DRX665332 and DRX764865, respectively.
ETHICS APPROVAL
Patient consent was obtained for the publication of this case report.
REFERENCES
- 1. Tanasupawat S, Sukontasing S, Lee JS. 2008. Enterococcus thailandicus sp. nov., isolated from fermented sausage ('mum’) in Thailand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1630–1634. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65535-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Carvalho M da GS, Steigerwalt AG, Morey RE, Shewmaker PL, Falsen E, Facklam RR, Teixeira LM. 2008. Designation of the provisional new Enterococcus species CDC PNS-E2 as Enterococcus sanguinicola sp. nov., isolated from human blood, and identification of a strain previously named Enterococcus CDC PNS-E1 as Enterococcus italicus Fortina, Ricci, Mora, and Manachini 2004. J Clin Microbiol 46:3473–3476. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00603-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Carvalho M da GS, Steigerwalt AG, Morey RE, Shewmaker PL, Teixeira LM, Facklam RR. 2004. Characterization of three new enterococcal species, Enterococcus sp. nov. CDC PNS-E1, Enterococcus sp. nov. CDC PNS-E2, and Enterococcus sp. nov. CDC PNS-E3, isolated from human clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 42:1192–1198. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1192-1198.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Shewmaker PL, Steigerwalt AG, Nicholson AC, Carvalho M da GS, Facklam RR, Whitney AM, Teixeira LM. 2011. Reevaluation of the taxonomic status of recently described species of Enterococcus: evidence that E. thailandicus is a senior subjective synonym of “E. sanguinicola” and confirmation of E. caccae as a species distinct from E. silesiacus. J Clin Microbiol 49:2676–2679. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00399-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mbouche P, Blairon L, Cupaiolo R, Zaouak Y, Hainaux B, Beukinga I, Tré-Hardy M. 2023. Enterococcus thailandicus, an unusual pathogen in humans encountered in an intra-abdominal infection. New Microbes New Infect 53:101137. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2023.101137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Florian B. 2018. Bamcov. https://github.com/fbreitwieser/bamcov.
- 8. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. 2017. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Seemann T. 2015. Snippy: fast bacterial variant calling from NGS reads. https://github.com/tseemann/snippy.
- 10. Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dungan RS, Bjorneberg DL. 2021. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli and enterococcal isolates from irrigation return flows in a high-desert watershed. Front Microbiol 12:660697. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.660697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zankari E, Allesøe R, Joensen KG, Cavaco LM, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. 2017. PointFinder: a novel web tool for WGS-based detection of antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations in bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2764–2768. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Croucher NJ, Page AJ, Connor TR, Delaney AJ, Keane JA, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Harris SR. 2015. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res 43:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Fukushima S, Hagiya H, Fujita K, Kamiyama S, Yamada H, Kishida M, Otsuka F. 2022. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of polymicrobial bacteremia: a retrospective, multicenter study. Infection 50:1233–1242. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01799-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Xu W, Fang Y, Zhu K. 2024. Enterococci facilitate polymicrobial infections. Trends Microbiol 32:162–177. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2023.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wu X, Wu B, Li Y, Jin X, Wang X. 2021. Identification and safety assessment of Enterococcus thailandicus TC1 isolated from healthy pigs. PLoS One 16:e0254081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Beukers Alicia G., Zaheer R, Goji N, Cook SR, Amoako KK, Chaves AV, Ward MP, McAllister TA. 2016. Draft genome sequence of an Enterococcus thailandicus strain isolated from bovine feces . Genome Announc 4. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00576-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ybazeta G, Douglas L, Graham J, Fraleigh NL, Murad Y, Perez J, Diaz-Mitoma F, Tilbe K, Nokhbeh R. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Enterococcus thailandicus strain a523 isolated from urban raw sewage. Genome Announc 5:47. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01298-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lin X, Hu T, Chen J, Liang H, Zhou J, Wu Z, Ye C, Jin X, Xu X, Zhang W, Jing X, Yang T, Wang J, Yang H, Kristiansen K, Xiao L, Zou Y. 2023. The genomic landscape of reference genomes of cultivated human gut bacteria. Nat Commun 14:1663. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37396-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Grayson ML, Eliopoulos GM, Wennersten CB, Ruoff KL, De Girolami PC, Ferraro MJ, Moellering RC Jr. 1991. Increasing resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics among clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium: a 22-year review at one institution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:2180–2184. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.11.2180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Beukers A.G, Zaheer R, Goji N, Amoako KK, Chaves AV, Ward MP, McAllister TA. 2017. Comparative genomics of Enterococcus spp. isolated from bovine feces. BMC Microbiol 17:52. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0962-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fukuda A, Nakajima C, Suzuki Y, Usui M. 2024. Transferable linezolid resistance genes (optrA and poxtA) in enterococci derived from livestock compost at Japanese farms. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 36:336–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw read sequences of KUN2022-1874 and KUN2022-1934 were registered in the NCBI SRA under accession numbers DRX665332 and DRX764865, respectively.


