Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1996 Jul;89(7):364–371. doi: 10.1177/014107689608900704

Shifting boundaries in professional care.

A Hopkins 1, J Solomon 1, J Abelson 1
PMCID: PMC1295848  PMID: 8774532

Abstract

The nature of the work undertaken by different health professionals and inter-professional boundaries are constantly shifting. The greater knowledge of users of health care, and the increasing technical and organizational complexity of modern medicine, have partly eroded the control of health professionals over the substance of their work. The definition of a field of work as lying within the province of any one profession is culturally rather than scientifically determined. It is evident that care of good quality should be delivered at the lowest possible cost. This might include delivery of care by a less trained person than heretofore, or by someone with limited but focused training. Sharing of skills is a more sensible subject for discussion than transfer of tasks. We review a number of studies which show the effectiveness of inter-professional substitution in various care settings, and also the effectiveness of substitution by those other than health professionals. The views of users of health services on inter-professional substitution need to be considered. Health professionals and others need to work together to devise innovative ways of delivering effective health care. The legal issues need clarification.

Full text

PDF
364

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buchan J. Nursing shortages. BMJ. 1996 Jan 20;312(7024):134–135. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7024.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carzoli R. P., Martinez-Cruz M., Cuevas L. L., Murphy S., Chiu T. Comparison of neonatal nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and residents in the neonatal intensive care unit. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 Dec;148(12):1271–1276. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170120033005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. David R., Enderby P., Bainton D. Treatment of acquired aphasia: speech therapists and volunteers compared. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;45(11):957–961. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.45.11.957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dowling S., Barrett S., West R. With nurse practitioners, who needs house officers? BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):309–313. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haug M. R. A re-examination of the hypothesis of physician deprofessionalization. Milbank Q. 1988;66 (Suppl 2):48–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hill J., Bird H. A., Harmer R., Wright V., Lawton C. An evaluation of the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of a nurse practitioner in a rheumatology outpatient clinic. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Mar;33(3):283–288. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.3.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lewis C. E., Resnik B. A. Nurse clinics and progressive ambulatory patient care. N Engl J Med. 1967 Dec 7;277(23):1236–1241. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196712072772305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Light D., Levine S. The changing character of the medical profession: a theoretical overview. Milbank Q. 1988;66 (Suppl 2):10–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maule W. F. Screening for colorectal cancer by nurse endoscopists. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jan 20;330(3):183–187. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199401203300307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McKinlay J. B., Arches J. Towards the proletarianization of physicians. Int J Health Serv. 1985;15(2):161–195. doi: 10.2190/JBMN-C0W6-9WFQ-Q5A6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nelson E. C., Jacobs A. R., Johnson K. G. Patients' acceptance of physician's assistants. JAMA. 1974 Apr 1;228(1):63–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sackett D. L., Spitzer W. O., Gent M., Roberts R. S. The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner: health outcomes of patients. Ann Intern Med. 1974 Feb;80(2):137–142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-80-2-137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Spitzer W. O., Sackett D. L., Sibley J. C., Roberts R. S., Gent M., Kergin D. J., Hackett B. C., Olynich A. The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner. N Engl J Med. 1974 Jan 31;290(5):251–256. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197401312900506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Studner J. M., Hirsh H. L. Nurse practitioners: functions, legal status and legislative control. Med Law. 1986;5(1):61–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van der Horst M. L. Canada's health care system provides lessons for NPs. Nurse Pract. 1992 Aug;17(8):44, 50-3, 57 passim. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199208000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES